Every Town - Murder On The Mountain? He Left Her Alone In The Dark To Die

Episode Date: March 27, 2026

Today we’re going on a scary and cold trek together to try and find out if this story is simply another tragedy that occurred on the peak, or if the person who made back alive, knows more than what ...they’ve told. Let’s head on over Austria now, this is Left Alone in the Dark: Fatal Decisions on the Mountain 🗣 20% Off at FASTGROWINGTREES.COM/EVERYTOWN 👀 Watch This Episode On Youtube: https://youtu.be/kLrurWxdlXU 👁 Check out our movie AN ANGRY BOY: https://www.anangryboy.com 💀 MERCH: https://scary-mysteries-merch.dashery.com 💀 Scary Mysteries SECRET VAULT: https://www.patreon.com/c/scarymysteries/collections   🎧 Our Other Podcast Scary Mysteries: ⁠https://open.spotify.com/show/3ZooEZMoZ421WdsOVJhVkT⁠ 👁 Instagram: ⁠https://www.instagram.com/andrew.fitzg⁠ 👁 TikTok: ⁠https://www.tiktok.com/@andrewfitzgerald⁠ 👁 Facebook: ⁠https://www.facebook.com/scarymysteriesofficial⁠ 👁 X: ⁠https://x.com/ScaryMysteries1⁠  🗣 Business Inquiries, questions and comments hit us up at ⁠scarymysteries1@gmail.com⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 Are you ready to dive into the unknown? Join me, Peyton Moreland, on Into the Dark, the true crime podcast from Ono Media with a hint of horror and mystery. Each week, I dive into a different case, breaking down the facts and pondering the age-old question, why do people do what they do? Now, sometimes the answer isn't so clear, and that's why I'll also explore conspiracy theories, hauntings, and all things spooky. From the Green River Killer to the Mothman incident, we will unravel all of the questions that keep us up at night. So don't miss out.
Starting point is 00:00:36 Subscribe now on your favorite podcast platform. New episodes drop every Wednesday. Into the dark, where true crime meets the eerie unknown. Every now and then someone would die. Risk. True stories. No holding back. He comes up behind me and whispers right in my ear.
Starting point is 00:00:57 Noobie knows where you will. Some of these stories will make you laugh till you're crying. And then I realize I'm unconscious. Some will stick with you for life. They catch my mom poisoning my sister. My brother, he died at the hands of my mother. I said, Mike, don't make me shoot you, please. But he did.
Starting point is 00:01:19 People say risk makes them feel less alone and more alive. During my time in prison, I discovered a podcast called Risk. That podcast saved my life. many times. Live your authentic truth. Because you never know who may come to your funeral and turn that bitch out.
Starting point is 00:01:39 Risk. The show where people tell true stories they never thought they dare to share wherever you get your podcasts. Every town has a dark side. Grosglockner Mountain stands just under 12,500 feet above sea level. It's the highest point in Austria
Starting point is 00:02:09 and by nearly every measure one of the most unforgiving places in the entire Alps. The name translates loosely to Great Bell, a nod to the curve of its summit ridge when you see it from far below in the valleys. And from a distance, it looks beautiful, almost sculpted. Up close, though, there's nothing gentle about it. The Gros Glockner sits deep inside the Ho-ho Terrain Range,
Starting point is 00:02:35 and in winter it becomes something close to a frozen hellscape. Wind speeds near the top routinely hit hurricane force. And temperatures with wind chill can drop to around minus 4, even minus 13 degrees Fahrenheit in the dead of night. The upper ridge lines are narrow, exposed, and technical, demanding not just strong legs and lungs, but the kind of alpine experience you only get from years of cold and dangerous hours on routes just like this one. And it's in this setting. At one day in January of 2025, a couple decided to try and touch the top of Grosklachner together,
Starting point is 00:03:15 but only one of them came back down alive. The other was found the following morning frozen to death. And what really went down out there is up for debate and something you'll need to decide for yourself. Hey guys, it's Andrew, and thanks for tuning in to every town where today. We're going on a scary and cold trek together, to try and find out if this story is simply another tragedy that occurred on this peak, or if the person who made it back alive knows more than what they've told.
Starting point is 00:03:49 So let's head on over to Austria now. This is left alone in the dark, fatal decision on the mountain. By the time she was 33, Kirsten Gertner had built a life around the mountains. To grown up in Salzburg, Austria, where the peaks are always sitting on the horizon, and over the years she'd chase them on countless tours and hikes. Her mom described her as energetic, always moving, always planning the next outing, and happiest when she was outside. So Kirsten wasn't exactly a novice out there.
Starting point is 00:04:33 She knew the type of terrain and understood the risks, and she loved that world anyway. But she definitely wasn't an expert climber by any means. And the man she was with that day was 36, six-year-old Thomas Plamberger from Innsbruck, and he moved through that same world, but in a very different way. Thomas was a professional chef by trade, but in the mountains he carried himself less like a weekend hiker and more like a specialist. He'd already climbed Grosklaugner four times, and three of those in winter conditions. And friends would say he was confident up high,
Starting point is 00:05:12 maybe a little too confident, and someone who set big objectives and usually found a way to make them happen. And for about a year before January of 2025, Kirsten and Thomas had been a couple both on and off the trail. Together they'd done several tours, but they were smaller objective, single-day outings, easier routes where the technical demand sat comfortably within Kirsten's experience. Tackling Grosk, Glockner, and winter was something else entirely,
Starting point is 00:05:42 and both of them understood that. In the weeks before the climb, Kirsten sent Thomas a message that would later end up in court files. In it, she admitted in her own words that she completely lacked experience when it came to winter alpine climbing. That line will become one of the most haunting pieces of evidence in this case, because Kirsten knew that and Thomas knew that, and they still went anyway. On January 18, 2025, the two of them set off for Grosklaugner.
Starting point is 00:06:24 It was cold, but for a winter ascent, the conditions weren't unreasonable. They had their gear dialed in, ropes, crampens, headlamps. The plan was simple enough. Reach the summit and be back down the same day. But almost immediately they made the first choice the prosecutors would later call the start of a cascade of errors. And they left about two hours later than they should have. In winter alpine climbing, timing isn't a suggestion. It's mad.
Starting point is 00:06:55 What time you start, what time you reach the top, and how much daylight is left. aren't just scheduled details. They're what decide whether you get off that mountain alive. It's literally a life or death equation. If you start late, you're automatically pushing the most dangerous decisions into the dark, into the coldest hours when you're already exhausted and the weather is almost always getting worse and not better. By early afternoon, they'd reached a spot on the Stoolgrat Ridge, and climbers casually call it the breakfast spot. It's about 3,000 feet below the summit. It was around 2.30 p.m. Even with the late start, this was their out. If they turned around there, they could have made it back down before dark. The window was narrow,
Starting point is 00:07:47 but it still existed. Alpine experts who later went through the case would point to this moment as the last realistic chance to abort safely, the last real exit ramp, so to speak. and they were already tired, and the terrain ahead was steeper and more exposed, and the afternoon light it was slipping away. And Thomas later said Kirsten showed no signs of struggling there that she seemed fine, that they talked it over and agreed together to keep on going, so that's what they did. They pushed on past the breakfast spot, and the sun kept dropping, and along with it, the temperature. The wind, which had been annoying but manageable, lowered down,
Starting point is 00:08:31 down, grew sharper and more aggressive as they gained elevation. The Stoolgrat Ridge only gets more exposed the higher you climb. And so what had started as a cold but doable winter day was turning into something far more serious. By the time night fully settled in, they were high on the mountain, wrapped in a darkness that feels very different from anything at ground level. No city glow, no safety net, just black sky, snow, wind, and gravity. And there's a way. There's a way. webcam on this mountain that recorded that night. In the footage, you can see two small points of light, two headlamps, moving upward from around 6 p.m., inching their way higher. You can literally track their progress. And then much later, in the early hours of the morning, something changes.
Starting point is 00:09:23 Now, you see just a single light moving in a different direction, not toward the summit anymore, but down, toward the other side of the mountain. Just one light. and the other is gone. Sometime around 8.50 that night, the pair stopped making progress. They were roughly 150 feet from the summit. And Kirsten had made it almost the entire way, but wouldn't go any further. At that altitude and those temperatures with the wind chill pushing things down, exhaustion isn't just being tired, it's a serious problem.
Starting point is 00:10:01 And Thomas would later say her downturn felt sudden and unexpected. An expert who reviewed the case described her collapse as consistent with a mix of extreme physical fatigue and the early stages of hypothermia, possibly made worse by the fact that she'd recently been sick with a viral infection. Her body, already fighting something off, simply ran out of reserves. Earlier in the climb, a rope had snagged and cost them about an hour and a half of precious time. And that delay stacked on top of their already laid start meant that by the time Kirsten's condition crashed, they had been moving and freezing darkness for hours. They had no warm food, no hot drinks.
Starting point is 00:10:44 According to prosecutors, nothing more substantial to eat than a bag of gummy bears and a thermos of tea. Two partners, badly underprepared, now caught high on the mountain as the weather turned harder against them. And now, this is the point where the story splits. From here on out, there are two versions of what happened. We'll get back to the story in just a second. but first a quick thanks to today's sponsor, Fast Growing Trees. Fast Growing Trees is America's largest and most trusted online nursery, with thousands of trees and plants and over 2 million happy customers.
Starting point is 00:11:27 They've got fruit trees, privacy trees, flowering trees, shrubs and houseplants, all grown with care and guaranteed to arrive healthy. It's like your local nursery, but anywhere you live, with more plants than you'll find anywhere else, and they actually help you pick options that work for your climate, space, and lifestyle. They sent me an awesome snake plant that's easy to take care of and is thriving in my living room right now as we speak. So skip those weekend trips to the Garden Center
Starting point is 00:11:58 and get expert grown plants backed by their alive and thrive guarantee at fastgrowingtrees.com. Right now they have great deals on spring planting essentials up to half off on select plants. and listeners to our show get 20% off their first purchase when using the code every town at checkout. That's an additional 20% off better plants and better growing at fastgrowingtrees.com using the code every town at checkout. Fastgrowingtrees.com code every town. Now's the perfect time to plant. Let's grow together and use every town to save today. Offer is valid for a limited time, terms and conditions apply. And Thomas's version is that as he lay beside Kirsten in the dark and the cold, she told him to go.
Starting point is 00:12:50 She told him to save himself. He says the decision to separate was mutual. They both understood he needed to descend to raise the alarm if she was going to have any chance of making it through. And she was clear and coherent when she told him to leave. In his telling, he didn't really have a choice. Staying, he says, would have meant two deaths instead of one. But the other version, which comes from prosecutors, told a very different story about those same hours on the ridge. And their version, Kirsten wasn't a calm, clear-headed partner making a tough call.
Starting point is 00:13:26 He was already disoriented, slipping into hypothermia, and in no condition to make a rational decision about anything. And then there's the detail that really undercuts the idea that Thomas left to get help in the best possible way. And when he left his partner, he didn't cover her up. He didn't place her in a bivisack or a sleeping bag or something that might have protected her from the wind and cold. And he left her lying there in the wind and the cold with none of the emergency equipment they'd brought for an emergency. The judge would later say that if Plamburger had used that gear, if he'd simply sheltered her properly, Kirsten would almost certainly have survived until morning. When Thomas began his dissent, the webcam.
Starting point is 00:14:15 picks up his single headlamp moving down the mountain around 2.30 a.m. He'd first contacted police by phone at about 12.30 a.m., telling them they needed assistance, but describing the situation as under control and not life-threatening. The officer he reached reportedly told him that no rescue was possible in the dark and advised them to keep moving if they could. Investigators later allege that at some point, Thomas put his phone on silent and missed multiple calls from rescue services trying to reach him. He failed to call promptly.
Starting point is 00:14:51 He failed to make clear calls. He didn't respond to return calls from rescue services. Earlier that night, around 11 p.m., a rescue helicopter had actually flown near their position. Thomas didn't try to signal it. He would later say that at that point, they were not yet in serious difficulty. And by the time, he finally finally was. connected with Mountain Rescue, made it clear how bad things really were. It was close to 3.30 in the morning. A helicopter attempt went out around 7.10 a.m., but the winds were too strong.
Starting point is 00:15:27 They had to abort and send ground teams up instead. And those rescuers climbed on foot toward the ridge when they finally reached Kirsten Gertner. At around 10 a.m., he was already dead. At the moment Kirsten was found, this is when the investigation really began. Police pulled everything they could get their hands on. Phone records, GPS tracks from their sports watches, timestamps from the mountain webcams, photos from that day. Eleven months of painstaking reconstruction. When they put it all together, it looked very, very bad.
Starting point is 00:16:19 On paper, the mistakes started stacking up so much it almost felt intentional. There was the late start, the decision not to turn back at the breakfast spot. The snagged rope, it cost them 90 crucial minutes. The delay in clearly alerting rescue services. The failure to use the emergency blanket. The mischance to signal the helicopter. Then there were the questions about gear and preparation. Kirsten arrived in soft ski boots instead of the rigid alpine boots the terrain demanded,
Starting point is 00:16:52 bringing a splitboard, and great for riding down powder but completely wrong for steep, icy mixed climbing. And on top of all that, they carried almost no food. And most people wouldn't even step foot on a golf course without a beef jerky stick or granola bar. And these two had gummy bears. Nine distinct errors by the prosecution's count. Any one of them in isolation might have been written off as a bad call made under stress. Taken together, though, they argued. It wasn't just poor judgment anymore.
Starting point is 00:17:25 It was a pattern of negligence so extreme that it crossed over in her. criminal behavior. The trial opened in Innsbruck in February of 26. It was presided over by Judge Norbert Hoffer, and in this case, who he is outside the courtroom actually mattered. Hoffer is an experienced climber himself and serves as an emergency mountaineer rescuer. Mejino, in a very practical way, what the ridge feels like in winter, and what options you really have up there, and what a responsible seasoned mountaineer is expected to do when things start to go wrong. Well, Thomas pleaded not guilty, he told the court he loved Kirsten, that he was devastated by her death and that every decision on the mountain had always been made together. The defense's argument was that the pair were equal partners and they'd planned the trip together, had a similar skill level, and thus, you know, one wasn't any more responsible for the other.
Starting point is 00:18:26 He said he'd never seen himself as a leader or guide, just as her partner. And his telling, the situation deteriorated faster than anyone could have predicted. The weather caught them off guard and he did everything he could to save at least one of them. Now, here's the part that's probably going to surprise a lot of you. Well, there were some surprises in the trial which was presided by a judge. One of them was that the deceased climbers' mother testified saying her daughter's boyfriend shouldn't be blamed for the death. She was angry that the media kept painting her daughter as some naive girl who'd been dragged up a mountain she couldn't handle.
Starting point is 00:19:20 In her eyes, that was an insult. And Kirsten was strong, stubborn when she wanted to be, and made her own decisions. She wasn't a tag-along. It wasn't like she followed her boyfriend up there blindly with no idea what was happening. Gertrude and Kirsten's father even had a letter read aloud in court. In it, they stated clearly that their daughter had asked. acted of her own free will, and that they did not blame Thomas for her death. But then came the moment that shifted the whole mood in that courtroom. Late in the trial, a surprise witness
Starting point is 00:19:55 took the stand, a woman named Andrea B., one of Thomas's ex-girlfriends. And they dated briefly in 2023, and during that time had also gone on mountain tours together. Andrea described one particular outing, a nighttime descent on Grosklochner. And she had a remarkably similar story to tell about how he'd done the same thing to her on the same mountain about two years before. So they'd brought on a trip to the same peak in the summer, and they had an argument, and he left her on the mountain, and she'd had to find her way down alone. She said Thomas thought she was moving too slowly and went on ahead, disappearing into the dark. At some point, her headlamp failed.
Starting point is 00:20:40 and suddenly she was alone on the mountain, in the dark, crying and screaming for him, and he was nowhere to be found. That, she said, was the last time she ever climbed with him. She added that whenever she showed fear on their climbs, Thomas didn't comfort her, he just grew impatient. The defense denied her version of events, but the prosecution seized on it. To them, this wasn't just a story about character. It was a pattern.
Starting point is 00:21:10 They argued that Plamberger was not a man who made one catastrophic mistake under impossible pressure. He was someone who, when a woman on a mountain couldn't keep up, had a habit of moving on of pushing ahead and not looking back. Whether that's a fair reading is something you can argue about. Andrea survived. Kirsten did not. The situations weren't identical, and the stakes on that winter night with Kirsten were far higher. But the fact remained. The same man on the same mountain had already been accused once of leaving a partner alone in the dark.
Starting point is 00:21:48 For the prosecution, that was very hard to file under bad luck and tragic coincidence. So, what did the court decide? Guilty of grossly negligent manslaughter. And Thomas was given a five-month suspended sentence and a fine of 9,400 euros. No prison time. In delivering the verdict, the judge told him that Kirsten had trusted him completely, and she had literally placed her life in his hands and that if he had acted differently, she would almost certainly still be alive.
Starting point is 00:22:24 If he'd wrapped her in the emergency gear, if he communicated clearly with rescuers, if he had signaled that helicopter. The judge said Thomas's mountaineering skills were galaxies away from Kirsten's. He wasn't just the more experienced partner, in every practical sense, He was responsible for her. Man, didn't take that responsibility seriously, clearly. But what really makes this case so hard to file away neatly as either tragic accident or crime is the fog around those final hardest questions.
Starting point is 00:23:01 Was Kirsten really clear-headed when she told Thomas to go? Or was she already slipping into hypothermia? Confused, disoriented, and saying things she couldn't fully understand? And did Thomas honestly believe the situation was still manageable when he called police and said they were fine? Or deep down was something else pushing those choices? Ego, denial, and fear of admitting how bad it had gotten. What was actually running through his mind when he stepped past that Bivik's sack without opening it? When he watched that helicopter, sweep across the sky and didn't raise his arm, when he walked down the far side of that mountain in the small hours of the morning, while his girlfriend
Starting point is 00:23:45 friend laying the dark above him. How concerned was he? But we're never going to fully know. Heck, he might not even really know. That's the problem with stories like this. They don't unfold in front of cameras or crowds. And they happen in blackness and minus temperatures. In thin air, when bodies are drained and brains are running on fumes. And Plamberger says he was overwhelmed, acting on instinct and making the only choices he thought he had. The prosecution says those choices weren't random at all, that they fit a pattern of negligence and at a basic level, a man who chose himself. Kirsten Gertner was 33 years old, and she loved the mountains, and she trusted the person beside her, and she got within 150 feet of the highest summit
Starting point is 00:24:48 in her country before her body finally hit its limit. The person she trusted most of the person, in that moment made a series of decisions that a judge would later say sealed her fate. Was it murder? Was it a tragic accident? It was something in between, something in the gray space, between love and carelessness, between bad luck and bad judgment, between a man overwhelmed and a man who should have known better. And Kirsten Gertner, who wrote in a message days before she died that she lacked experience in winter tours, who knew the stakes and trusted the person with her to manage them, paid for that gray space for their life. And so that's it for today's episode of Everytown.
Starting point is 00:25:38 Thanks for tuning in. If you want more dark, true crime content, we'll look around as we've got a whole lot of strange stories we get into. You all stay safe out there in this wild and crazy world. Remember to come on back here next week for another episode of Everytown filled with strange and mysterious stories. Because you never know. Maybe your town will be next.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.