Everyday AI Podcast – An AI and ChatGPT Podcast - EP 133: How AI Will Change Financial Risk Management
Episode Date: October 30, 2023What effect will AI have on financial risk management? How will financial institutions change and what impact will it have on consumers? Sandeep Maira, Founder & CTO of Raven Risk Intelligence, jo...ins us to discuss the future of financial risk management with AI and how it'll affect us all.Newsletter: Sign up for our free daily newsletterMore on this Episode: Episode PageJoin the discussion: Ask Sandeep and Jordan questions about AI and financial riskUpcoming Episodes: Check out the upcoming Everyday AI Livestream lineupWebsite: YourEverydayAI.comEmail The Show: info@youreverydayai.comConnect with Jordan on LinkedInTimestamps:[00:01:35] Daily AI news[00:04:20] About Sandeep and Raven Risk Intelligence[00:08:15] How AI changes financial risk management[00:15:30] Challenges of adding GenAI to financial risk[00:25:15] The impact AI has on consumers[00:28:00] Final takeawayTopics Covered in This Episode:1. Current State of Financial Risk Management2. AI and Financial Risk Management3. Challenges and Opportunities in AI Implementation4. The Future of AI in Risk ManagementKeywords:film industry, creative individuals, break in, reach large audiences, internet, job opportunities, SEO, keywords, productivity, tools, advantage, open capabilities, language models, data sets, credit, access to credit, minority populations, traditional credit history, financial risk management, financial institutions, consumers, commercial credit lending, credit analysts, borrower, business strategy, management strength, competitive threats, automate, creditworthiness, dynamic information, unstructured data, narrow approach, tabular format models, real-time events, economy, human judgment, decision-making, large language models, reinforcement learning, inaccurate model outputs, human oversight, regulated finance, machine learning, human inputs, consumer credit, explainability, deep neural networks, traceability, success of AI implementation, turnover, tedious tasks, actors' jobs, interconnectivity, risk analytics, Raven Risk Intelligence, collapse of Silicon Valley Bank, structured data, macroeconomic indicators, automated tools, unstructured data, risk management techniques, ChatGPT updates, knowledge cutoff date, all tools mode, photos, PDFs, DALL E imagesSend Everyday AI and Jordan a text message. (We can't reply back unless you leave contact info) Start Here ▶️Not sure where to start when it comes to AI? Start with our Start Here Series. You can listen to the first drop -- Episode 691 -- or get free access to our Inner Cricle community and all episodes: StartHereSeries.com Also, here's a link to the entire series on a Spotify playlist.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This is the Everyday AI Show, the everyday podcast where we simplify AI and bring its power to your fingertips.
Listen daily for practical advice to boost your career, business, and everyday life.
Meet Firefly AI Assistant, now live and Adobe Firefly, the all-in-one creative AI studio.
Just describe what you want to create and the assistant handles the rest,
orchestrating multi-step workflows across Photoshop, Premiere Express, and more in one conversational interface.
You direct the outcome.
The assistant accelerates execution.
How will AI change financial risk management?
You know, and how are financial institutions going to be impacted with the rise of AI?
And what does that ultimately mean for us, the consumer?
All right.
That's what we're going to be going into today and more on everyday AI.
Welcome.
My name's Jordan.
And this is your daily podcast, free newsletter, live stream.
helping everyday people like you and me make sense of what's going on in the world of AI and how we can
actually use it to grow our companies and grow our careers. So we're going to be diving into
what's happening in the world with financial risk management and how AI is impacting all of this.
It's super interesting because, you know, AI has been used very widely for many decades in the
financial institution, but recent kind of updates and features, I guess, in generative
AI are going to be impacting financial institutions as well. So very excited to get into that.
But before we do, let's go over the AI news. And as a reminder, if you're joining this live,
like we have here, Dr. Harvey Castro, joining this live. Christy Slack joining this live. Thank you.
Get your questions in. What do you want to know about how AI will change the financial risk
management sector? All right. Let's get going. Go over AI news. We're actually just going over
two pieces today because they're bigger pieces. But as always, there's more news. Go to Your
Everyday AI.com. Sign up for the pre-daily newsletter. All right. So the White House has released
the U.S. government's first ever executive order on AI. So President Biden unveiled a new
executive order on artificial intelligence that aims to address safety concerns, protection of
civil rights, and support for workers in the industry. So this new executive order involves
creating new standards, protecting consumer privacy,
promoting innovation and competition and also collaborating with international partners.
This executive order is the first binding action ever taken by the U.S. government on artificial
intelligence and includes regulations for large companies to share safety tests with the government before release.
That's an important part. We'll see if that happens.
Also, this prioritizes the development of AI standards for testing and watermarking,
as well as guidelines for agencies using commercially available data.
So pretty big announcement.
Again, we covered this last week when the news came out, but this executive order was just
released and we're going to have a lot more on this one in the newsletter today.
All right.
Our second piece of AI news and the last one for today.
Some new chat GPT updates.
All right.
So nothing official yet from parent company Open AI.
But if you've paid attention at all over the last two or three days over the weekend to
the internet to social media, you'll see that chat.
CatGPT is already starting to unveil some pretty big updates.
So many users are now sharing these new updates, and probably two or three of the bigger ones
are a reported, updated knowledge cutoff date of September 2023.
So this has already changed once.
It went from September 2021 until January 2022 for GPT4, the paid model.
But apparently now it's being rolled out the knowledge cutoff.
office all the way up to 2023, as well as kind of the other big feature or the big announcement here
is the all tools mode, which is essentially being able to upload photos, PDFs, receive dolly,
images, all inside one mode.
So without having to flip back and forth between multiple modes.
So really getting the first taste of multimodal in one single chat versus having to, you know,
go into multiple different modes.
All right.
A lot more on that later in the week.
We're actually going to have a dedicated show on new chat GBT updates and the future of chat GPD with the developer conference coming up this week.
All right, but you didn't hear, you didn't tune in to hear about chat GBT.
And you can, again, always go to your everyday AI.com.
For more on that, you are here to learn about how AI will change financial risk management.
So I'm very excited to have today on our show.
And please, please help me welcome.
We have.
There we go.
We got him on the screen now.
Sandit, Myra, the founder and CTO of Raven Risk Intelligence.
Sande, thank you for joining us.
Thank you so much for having me, really, really honored to be on the show.
Yeah, absolutely.
Let's start high level real quick.
Just tell everyone a little about yourself and about what you're doing at Raven Risk Intelligence.
Yeah, so I'll keep the part about myself pretty brief.
You know, my backgrounds and computer science.
I actually took an AI class at Cornell 30 years ago.
It's kind of remarkable when you think about what's happened, you know,
recently versus the last 30 years.
And one side anecdote was in that class.
I took out the textbook from the class.
I still have it a few days ago.
And it said there's a small section of neural networks,
which is what LLMs are based on and chat GPDs based on.
And it said, you know, like it's not showing much promise yet,
but the people, the neural network researchers,
think that with enough computational capacity and data,
it's going to emulate human decisioning.
And it said, only time will tell.
Actually, send the textbook.
Only time will tell what actually happens.
So anyway, so basically, I think there was a long AI winter.
I mean, in the meantime, while I had an interest in AI, more broadly had an interest in
analytics.
I worked with a lot of financial firms and, you know, applying essentially, I would say,
algorithmic techniques for financial risk management in particular and some trading, you know,
systems.
So I've worked at JPMorgan, City Group, B&Y Mellon.
and more recently founded earlier this year, an AI venture called Raven Risk Intelligence.
And I'm happy to talk a little bit about the objectives of the venture, Jordan, if you want me to go there next.
Yeah, yeah, let's just go high level.
Let's just talk about a little bit about what it is so everyone can understand.
So yeah, just tell us a little bit about that.
Okay.
So essentially, and I think very broadly, the three thesis is twofold.
So one of them is, you know, and the ventures actually in commercial and corporate companies.
credit lending, not the consumer credit space.
And the commercial credit space, there's a lot of manual effort done by, you know, large teams of
credit analysts to try to gather information about the borrower, you know, and also the economy.
So it includes things like, you know, finding out about the business strategy of the company,
the strength of the management, you know, any competitive threats to the company.
And then from a more macroeconomic standpoint, it would be, you know, things that might be happening
in the economy and so forth.
Today, basically, most of the automated information that they get tends to be pretty static.
They have to actually kind of scour essentially unstructured data sources like the ones that I'm just mentioning to come up with a view
and whether this is actually a good credit or not.
So our first goal is to help automate that, which will lead to actually increased ability to process more loans.
and frankly, be able to give more loans to more companies by taking into account a broader set of inputs rather than just, you know, is the company profitable today or not?
And that actually, frankly, I think will enable a lot of smaller borrowers to get loans more easily.
And the second part of it is, you know, what we're calling predictive risk analyses, broadly speaking, which is, you know, how are things going to perform over, you know, like a wider period of time, but using fairly advanced analytics and machine learning analytics.
to draw correlations between, you know, different things that are happening in the, in the
industry and in the economy.
I love it.
And Cindy, maybe help us also, you know, for those of us that don't follow the financial sector very closely.
You know, let's just talk, you know, briefly about, you know, financial risk and risk management
and kind of historically, you know, where it's been recently and how you see it changing now with
advancements in generative AI, you know, and like it, like you talked about, you know,
I love that you mentioned the textbook from, from 30 years ago and, you know, kind of the AI
winter. But now we're getting to the point where, you know, AI is really helping in that
decision-making process. So like, what does that mean broadly for the financial risk management
industry? Yes, I think, you know, like very, I think broadly speaking, you know, some of the
things that I think you, so let me just back up a little bit. The way that, you know, at risk management
works today. And even actually, you know, actually.
the more advanced risk management techniques, you know, tends to be taking into account what
we call structured data. And that data is, you know, things that are tabular in format, like, you know,
rows and columns. So things, you know, simple stuff, frankly. Like, you know, what is the revenue
of the company, you know, what essentially, they do take into account some macroeconomic indicators,
like, you know, what is the GDP growth in the economy, et cetera. You know, and I think, and that's the,
that has been the cutting edge, actually, unbelievably. Like, that's the limit, essentially.
of what their automated sort of tools and risk management can do today.
And then they take those what I call structured and the industrial called structured
risk factor, structured input, sorry, and then, you know, put them into models that
attempts to make decisions about or outlooks of risk for a given, let's say, company or sector.
You know, now the problem with that, which is kind of alluding to earlier, is that it's
actually relatively narrow.
It doesn't take into account things that are, you know, let's call it unstructured, which
information pieces that might, you know, happen that are not, you know, tabular in format, frankly.
So an example could be that, you know, there's a war that breaks out somewhere, you know,
like maybe in Taiwan or wherever. And, you know, these models actually can't really take that
into account at all. You know, it's human judgment that then tries to figure out, oh, well,
what exposure does this company have to Taiwan? And, you know, and that can be, A, very manual,
and B, not very comprehensive, leading to, frankly, inaccuracies. So I think the objective
is that, you know, with the event of machine learning, you could take these events that happen
and basically in real time, which is pretty amazing. And then, you know, correlate that with
impacts to, you know, to the economy and to even individual companies. Yeah. And just real quick.
And maybe, Sandy, if you can even help, help me better understand this because I'm always trying to
learn as well. So with unstructured, or sorry, with structured data, that's been used in the,
you know, financial industry and for risk management for decades, right?
So that's where, you know, machine learning and AI gets all of these data points and they can
categorize them, right?
And they can say, yes, this pattern of data over the course of, you know, hundreds of thousands
or millions of data points, we can make decisions based on this structured data.
Whereas unstructured data, it's a little harder for AI models to be able to understand that
and to be able to translate that to risk because it could be things that require more
interpretation or more interconnectivity that may be hard for traditional AI models.
to perform those tasks.
But that's maybe where now with large language models
where you can start to make use of some of this unstructured data
and tie it to risk management or to assess risk.
Is that kind of a good overview?
And then if so, how do you think large language models
might be able to help pull this all together?
Yeah, well, first I think that's an incredibly perceptive observation, frankly,
I was worried.
I was worried.
I wouldn't say that you don't know a lot about how to use.
and risk, you probably actually know quite a lot.
Because I think, you know, you've connected a lot of the dots, actually,
which is what these models, you know, obviously are doing in terms of trying to figure out
what, you know, the impact is to risk.
So, yes, I mean, I think, you know, the, you're correct, firstly, that structured data
and having models, even some machine learning models actually draw correlations on structured
data has been around for, you know, some years.
and they've done a pretty good job, actually.
So, for example, in fraud detection, you know, whether it's credit card fraud or, you know, even a trading fraud, you know, these models have been around for a few years where they look at different patterns of behavior of, let's say, consumer borrowing.
So let's say that, you know, you go basically abroad somewhere that you haven't been before.
You know, you've noticed quite often that the credit card company will, you know, call you up or even block your card from usage.
because they're noticing, you know, essentially an anomaly in your, you know, in your, in your,
in your credit behavior.
So that's been around for a few years.
But I think what is new, though, is to, you know, use essentially this for other use cases and do it at a much larger scale.
And so an example is, you know, Silicon Valley Bank actually might be a good example.
So in Silicon Valley Bank, you know, what happened was at the, you know, the Fed raise interest rates very rapidly.
The bank essentially had what's called the liquidity.
So that's called market risk.
You know, rates are considered to be like market events.
That led to what is called liquidity risk issues,
which is that, you know, the bank didn't have enough money, cash on hand,
you know, to actually satisfy all its depositors.
Because banks take depositors, money, and loan the amount.
They're just not just sitting in the bank because they have to own interest for the bank
so that they can pass that interest onto the depositors.
So they had what's called a liquidity risk issue.
And because of that, you know,
they had what was called a credit event, which is the bank essentially, for practical purposes,
defaulted, right, which is essentially meaning that they could not satisfy, you know,
their creditors who actually their depositors are their creditors in this case.
So that, you know, I think that interconnectivity would have been much more easily apparent
with the use of proper training of AI models and how different risks are interconnected to each other.
And I think what happened at Silicon Valley Bank would have been almost completely predictable with the better use of this interconnected AI models that I think you're talking about.
And large language models in particular, just to double down on that part a little bit, are actually really good at that.
So they basically, you know, I know they call large language models, but underneath the covers, what they're doing is looking at, you know, connectivity and correlations between different things and then figuring out essentially, you know, what to so-called generate.
And that's why it's called generative AI.
But you can use that not only just for pure language,
but you can actually use it for drawing, you know,
correlations and patterns essentially between all kinds of data sets that was not achievable before.
So I think those large language models can be very,
and those techniques, I guess, the modeling techniques that are used in LLMs
can be very useful for, you know, risk analytics as well.
Yeah, and hey, as a reminder, if you're just joining us live midway through,
we have Sandeep Myra, the final,
Iraa, the founder and CTO of Raven Risk, Intelligence.
And if you have questions, please get them in now so we can give Sandeep a chance to answer your questions.
And Samiva, I'm so glad you brought up, you know, this Silicon Valley Bank kind of collapse.
Because I think that's maybe one of the most relatable for many people in terms of financial risk.
because we saw, unfortunately, things go down an unfortunate path for many involved.
And I think some of the initial response to that is people said, hey, you know, with all of this data,
with all of this, you know, artificial intelligence and machine learning, how did this happen?
And you kind of started to, you know, help us solve that.
It's, you know, kind of different, I guess, models or different sets of data that maybe weren't
talking to each other.
So, you know, with even generative AI, I guess, that could potentially help solve this in the future,
what are still those obstacles to overcome until we can have, you know, generative AI, you know,
help kind of, you know, quote unquote, connect all these different, you know, pieces of data or these different models together.
What do we still have to do?
And then maybe even what are the risks of doing that?
Yeah, no, that's a great question.
So, you know, so firstly, I think, you know, these models can.
are only as good as the data and how the data is essentially presented to them.
And so, you know, they're not magic. I mean, they basically might seem like magic, but the reality
is that all even chat GPT is doing is it's taking all the data on the internet and, you know,
trying to do its best essentially to come up with what makes sense from an outward perspective.
But not everything is on the internet. So particularly, I think, in some of the, you know,
business domains like in commercial credit lending, you know, a lot of the, you know, a lot of
essentially the inputs actually come from human inputs that are not codified on the internet.
You know, so for example, like you might have something that is somewhat subjective about,
you know, essentially, let's say that, you know, there's going to be a change in the business
strategy of the company as an example. And then quite often there's a subjective decision made by
the bank about, you know, does that business strategy lead to potential risk the company or not?
And, you know, and how big is that risk? You know, like, and I think so the, these large language
models are not yet at the stage where they can quantify things that are, and even come up with
correlations for things that are not, you know, readily present in the data. And so human, what's
called human reinforcement learning. There's actually a couple of terms for it. One is called
long, long, wind a term. I mean, these guys come up always in the space with very,
long acronyms and unobsture terms, but it's called reinforcement learning with human feedback,
R-L-H-F.
And that actually is actually a pretty hot area of even research, ironically, is to actually get
humans to at least partially train the more obscure and more critical parts, essentially,
of these models, because the impact of these models and business decision can be pretty severe.
So somebody could be denied alone, for example, and, you know, could actually mess up their
business if the models present data that is you know outputs that are not not
completely accurate so that's one thing so that's I think one thing that I think is
you know like a challenge but I think there's some ways like I said it's an
active space is to not to take these automated models and LLMs and chat GPT
like models but then in you know apply some human oversight and inputs onto that
onto the modeling process the second one is you know that in finance and
particularly in regulated finance like banks,
they tend to be very highly regulated.
And so the regulators are very nervous about using machine learning, frankly, in general,
for decisioning purposes.
They started to get somewhat more comfortable about using machine learning for using structured data,
particularly for things even like consumer credit.
But they're not yet there in terms of using unstructured data and machine learning to come up with decisioning.
I think we all know about, you know, many of us know about hallucinations.
So these models are not completely accurate.
You know, quite often, frankly, if you're there,
ask very specific questions, you know, they can,
some of the data is inaccurate, which is frankly not acceptable in the finance space.
I think the regulators are very nervous about that and probably rightly so.
So I think one of the things that, you know,
I think is going to be a challenge is actually,
A, getting the models to be more accurate than they are today.
So moving them from a consumer space to an enterprise decisioning space.
And then getting, you know, once that happens,
then getting the regulators comfortable,
which is not always easy with hopefully improvements
in the decision recommendations from these models.
And then a related point to that actually is something called explainability,
is that the regulators and even the firms themselves,
you know, don't like black boxes.
So they want to know essentially some idea of how the models came up with these outputs and recommendations based upon the inputs.
So they want some traceability between the inputs and the outputs.
And unfortunately today, deep neural networks like chat GPT are not able to do that.
I mean, the models are so large that it's not easy to actually trace how chat GPT came up with the outputs based upon, you know, billions of points of input from the internet.
So that's going to be another, frankly, challenging area as well.
Adobe just introduced an entirely new way to create, bringing the power and precision of its
creative suite into one conversational experience.
Meet Firefly AI Assistant, now live in the Adobe Firefly app, the All In One Creative
AI Studio.
Powered by Adobe's creative agent, Firefly AI Assistant lets you start with your vision, just
describe what you want, and shape the outcome as it takes form with the Assistant.
The assistant orchestrates multi-step workflows, drawing on 60-plus pro-grade tools across Adobe Creative Cloud apps,
including Photoshop, Illustrator, Premiere, Lightroom Express, and more to help bring your ideas to life.
You can also get started with creative skills, a growing library of pre-built workflows for common creative tasks,
like batch editing photos, creating mood boards, portrait retouching, and creating social variations.
Every step the assistant takes is visible, so you can refine,
redirect or take over at any time.
You stay in the driver's seat as the creative director.
Adobe Firefly AI assistant now in public beta.
See it today at firefly.adobie.com.
You know, so as AI can help in all of these areas,
and I'm sure that's where the financial risk management,
you know, experts are starting to spend their time in.
where do humans kind of fall into this future equation, right?
Like, is their job going to change?
Are their responsibilities going to change?
And like I said, is this maybe a good thing or a bad thing?
And what are even the risk of that as leaders working in this space are maybe using
and leveraging more AI?
what do we have to keep an eye on to make sure that this is successful in terms of, you know,
risk management and handing these things off because it sounds like AI can really help in some
these areas and to, you know, help connect some of these disjointed, you know,
verticals where we have all this different data that exists.
But then, you know, how does that change then, you know, what ultimate responsibilities,
you know, lie on us, us humans?
Yeah.
So basically, you know, firstly, I think in terms of,
the, you know, things related. I think people are nervous, you know, certainly. And I think,
frankly, the more people use chat, GBT, in some cases, the more nervous they get because they
see, you know, how powerful it is, right? So people, you know, for good reason, you know,
worried about their jobs. I even get questions from people about, you know, what feels their
their kids to study in, you know, that will be less adversely impacted by AI, you know,
So there's a lot of, I would say, valid actually, questions and concerns about, you know, the impact to, you know, to social impact, but also, you know, impact to the workforce.
You know, my view is somewhat more, somewhat fairly positive, but at least in the long run.
So, you know, I think in the long run, things that are more tedious will be taken away and, you know, essentially with machine learning and AI can automate those tasks.
But there are things that, you know, I think are harder actually for machines to be.
responsible for that humans actually could play a bigger role.
So as an example, is even in this risk space, you know,
and the productivity that I was talking about, you know,
I was talking to somebody very senior at a big bank and risk.
And he was saying that, you know, he's found that their credit risk analysts
actually find this gathering of information and then trying to summarize it to come up with
some, you know, outlooks is very tedious.
And actually the turnover he's found in that, in that, you know,
in that part of his team is actually pretty high.
So I think essentially, you know, it will remove some of the more tedious tasks and enable humans to focus things, frankly, that are more interesting and more value at.
So I think that things that we can do in the future that we don't even know yet, you know.
I mean, an example could be in the media space that, you know, people are very worried about AI basically generating movies automatically and taking away actors jobs.
Now, in the short to medium term, that's a valid concern.
But in the longer term, if you think about it, somebody who's very creative, you know, could essentially as one person, potentially in the, let's say, you know, eventually in the future, create a full and movie on their own, you know, which today is very difficult for creative people, frankly, to break into, you know, getting large audiences. It's not an easy task. I do think that there's opportunities for leverage here. If you think about it, just one last point on that, it's not completely dissimilar to the internet, you know, where essentially people were very worried that the internet would take away, you know,
lots of jobs, particularly in some sectors like retail, you know, on Amazon with the advent of
Amazon and so forth. But I think if you look at, you know, another way, there were many jobs
created related to the internet that, you know, in many ways offset, more than offset, the job
losses in other sectors. You know, one thing, one thing AI, as a super aside, one thing AI can't
help is me charging my mouse battery. So apologies. I do see, I do see some great comments coming in,
but my mouse actually died, so I can't bring them up.
I'm sorry.
But maybe, Sandeep, you know, as we look, as we look forward to the future of risk management.
So one thing I maybe want to get your thoughts on is how this ultimately impacts consumers, right?
Because I think, you know, if we're looking like what's actually very tangible to consumers, you know, one thing that we probably worry about is, you know, risk and fraud.
how might we, the average bank consumer, you know, we have our savings accounts, our 401ks, our IRAs, our IRAs, credit cards, all those things.
How might we be impacted by all of these changes that we're kind of talking about?
And even as it comes to risk, you know, are consumers ultimately more at risk in the long run or maybe are we less?
No, I think actually in risk, it's a net, and frankly, a net positive because, you know, like, I think one of the issues in the consumer space today is that people who don't have what's called our traditional credit history find it hard to get, you know, credit, including credit cards and loans.
And, you know, I think by taking essentially what we're calling on structured data sets, like, for example, let's say that somebody doesn't have a long credit history, but they've got a, you know, a good history of paying their regular bills on time, like the utility bills, et cetera, right?
and they've been, you know, so I think those kinds of data sets that haven't been used today
could provide essentially better, you know, like I would call outlooks in terms of what the
consumer's ability or, you know, ability to pay back essentially their credit looks like.
So I think it actually will expand, in fact, access to credit for consumers who have had a harder
time, you know, getting credit today.
And frankly, that includes, you know, minority populations.
or people who, you know, who through no fault of their own have had, let's say, rough time, right?
But inherently, you know, they probably can be a good credit going forward.
So I actually think it's a net positive.
On the commercial space, the impact is probably less directly visible.
But another way to look at it is that, you know, if companies get easier access to credit to,
you know, that essentially helps these business owners.
You know, some of them are small business owners as well, not just large corporations.
And then, you know, that ultimately helps the economy by ensuring that the economy is more productive and reduces prices for consumers.
So you don't want an economy where the access to credit by both large and small businesses is appropriately allocated because that ultimately drives, you know, what benefit and prices that consumers pay, you know, on the street.
So, Cindy, we covered, we covered an awful lot here.
You know, we talked about, you know, historical use cases for AI and machine learning over many decades, right?
Like even going back to, you know, a course you took some 30 years ago.
And then we kind of got caught up to current day.
And, you know, some of the challenges and also some of the opportunities that are associated with, you know, financial risk management in the new age of generative AI.
But maybe maybe what's that one point that you would really want to.
stick with people, right? So whether they're in the financial industry or if it's just everyday
person, what's kind of that one big takeaway that you would want us all to hopefully understand
so that we can better understand kind of where financial risk management is going now,
now that we have access to better, more powerful and more connected AI systems.
Yeah, I think the general point that I have, and maybe it's not just specific to financial
risk management, and it's maybe somewhat obvious perhaps, but is that that,
that I think that everybody should stay current with the tools that are out there like Chad GPT.
There's another way to think about it is that if you're not using those tools,
then your counterpart may be using their tools and improving their productivity.
So, like, you know, you want to be a little bit careful from your own, I would say,
career perspective as an example, that you're staying current with what the openly available capabilities are
for like, you know, large language models as an example.
Because you don't want to be put out of disadvantage, right?
You want to, you know, my strong recommendation is to stay current with what's happening
with at least the widely available tools so that, you know, you can use them, obviously
we're allowed, you know, to improve essentially both your personal life as well as maybe
a productivity at work.
So that's, that I think, what I would say to, you know, most people.
Sound, sound advice.
Sadi, thank you so much for joining the every day.
AI show. We very much appreciate your insights.
Thank you so much for having me.
Really appreciate it, Jordan.
All right.
And hey, there was a lot there.
Don't worry if you missed a little bit.
Go to Your EverydayAI.com.
Sign up for that free daily newsletter.
We'll not only be, hey, a lot more AI news,
but just more insights and more depth into what Sandeep was talking about.
Thank you for joining us.
And we hope to see you back for another edition of Everyday AI.
Thanks, y'all.
Meet Firefly AI Assistant, now live in Adobe Fire.
Firefly, the Allman One Creative AI Studio.
Just describe what you want to create in your own words and the assistant handles the rest,
orchestrating multi-step workflows across Adobe Creative Cloud apps,
including Photoshop, Premiere Express, and more in one conversational interface.
You direct the outcome while the assistant accelerates execution.
Stand control with the ability to step in and refine at any time.
See it today at firefly.adobie.com.
And that's a wrap for today's edition of Everyday AI.
for joining us. If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe and leave us a rating. It helps keep us
going. For a little more AI magic, visit your everyday AI.com and sign up to our daily newsletter so you
don't get left behind. Go break some barriers and we'll see you next time.
