Everything Everywhere Daily: History, Science, Geography & More - Calendar Reform
Episode Date: April 25, 2025Our calendar and system of keeping time are rather unique. It isn’t nice and tidy like the metric system. It is a collection of odd time units, leap years, and rotating calendars. As such, man...y people throughout history have thought that they could do better. So they have made proposals for changing our calendar, some of which would be very different from the one we are used to. Learn more about proposed calendar reforms on this episode of Everything Everywhere Daily. Sponsors Mint Mobile Cut your wireless bill to 15 bucks a month at mintmobile.com/eed Quince Go to quince.com/daily for 365-day returns, plus free shipping on your order! Stitch Fix Go to stitchfix.com/everywhere to have a stylist help you look your best Tourist Office of Spain Plan your next adventure at Spain.info Stash Go to get.stash.com/EVERYTHING to see how you can receive $25 towards your first stock purchase and to view important disclosures. Subscribe to the podcast! https://everything-everywhere.com/everything-everywhere-daily-podcast/ -------------------------------- Executive Producer: Charles Daniel Associate Producers: Austin Oetken & Cameron Kieffer Become a supporter on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/everythingeverywhere Update your podcast app at newpodcastapps.com Discord Server: https://discord.gg/UkRUJFh Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/everythingeverywhere/ Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/everythingeverywheredaily Twitter: https://twitter.com/everywheretrip Website: https://everything-everywhere.com/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Our calendar and system of keeping time are rather unique.
It isn't nice and tidy like the metric system.
It's a collection of odd units, sleep years, and rotating calendars.
As such, many people throughout history have thought that they could do better.
So they've made proposals for changing our calendar,
some of which would be very different from what we are used to.
Learn more about proposed calendar reforms on this episode of Everything Everywhere Daily.
What if your perceptions about the past were wrong?
throughline is a podcast that takes you back in time to uncover the parts of the story that may have gone unnoticed.
It effectively turned day into night.
And how it shaped the world now.
Time travel with us every week on the ThruLine podcast from NPR.
If you've been listening to this podcast long enough, you know that I frequently say that something will be the subject of a future episode.
This is such an episode.
I've done many episodes covering the origins of the calendar and timekeeping.
It's a rather convoluted mess that has been passed down to us over time from a variety of ancient cultures.
It's why we have 24 hours in a day, but 60 minutes in an hour, seven days in a week and 365 days in a year.
It's a rather awkward system, but it works and everybody knows how it works.
Our calendar and our system of keeping time are sort of a protocol for society and civilization.
That being said, many people have come up with ideas for improving the calendar.
So let's start this discussion with some of the problems with the current calendar.
The Gregorian calendar, while widely accepted, has been long criticized for its irregularities and inefficiencies.
One major issue is the uneven distribution of days across months.
Some months have 30 days and others have 31, and February has 29 or 28 days depending on leap years,
making the calendar inconsistent and difficult to memorize or predict without constant reference.
This irregularity complicates accounting, scheduling, and planning,
especially in business and administrative contexts where predictable periods are desirable.
Another significant problem is that the Gregorian calendar does not align cleanly with the seven-day week.
Each year, dates fall on different weekdays,
which creates inefficiencies for industries that rely on fixed schedules or comparisons across year.
years. There's no standardization of which dates fall on which days of the week. For example,
last year Christmas was on a Wednesday, and this year it'll be on a Thursday, and the year after
that, it'll be on a Friday. The leap year system, while an effective approximation for aligning
the calendar with the solar year, is also a source of confusion. Its rules are not intuitive,
requiring exceptions for centuries not divisible by 400. This adds a layer of complexity to what is
otherwise a straightforward progression of days. Religious observances further complicate matters.
Many holidays such as Easter are movable feasts tied to lunar cycles rather than the solar calendar,
resulting in shifting dates that vary from year to year. This inconsistency has made it difficult
to standardize international holiday calendars or school years, especially in multicultural societies.
Moreover, the Gregorian calendar divides the year into quarters of unequal length,
which is inconvenient for economic reporting and quarterly assessment in businesses.
This lack of symmetry has led to calls for calendars with uniform quarters in months,
which could simplify accounting and reduced errors in date-based calculations.
So with that, let's go through some of the proposed calendars that would replace the Gregorian calendar.
And the first is the International Fixed Calendar,
which was proposed by the British accountant Moses B. Cotsworth,
1902. It divides the year into 13 months, each containing exactly 28 days, which results in
months that are precisely four weeks long. This uniformity ensures that every month begins on the
same day of the week and that the dates always fall on the same weekdays year after year.
The 13th month, which is often called soul under this calendar, is inserted between June and July
on the Gregorian calendar.
Since 13 months of 28 days adds up to 364 days, and because the solar year is approximately
365.24 days, the calendar includes an extra day at the end of the year called year day.
This day falls outside the weekly cycle and is not assigned a weekday, so it's not a
Monday, a Tuesday, a Wednesday, etc. In leap years, a second extra day called leap day
is added after June 28th, and it too stands outside the seven-day week structure.
These additions allow the calendars to stay aligned with the solar year while maintaining the
regularity of its 28-day months.
Because the weekly cycle is uninterrupted within each month, but paused for the extra day
at the end of the year or in the middle of the year, the calendar offers a consistency and
symmetry that's not found in the Gregorian calendar.
The next proposed calendar is the World Calendar.
The idea of the World Calendar was first proposed by Elizabeth Achilles in the early 1930s
through the World Calendar Association. She promoted the system as a way to simplify and harmonize
global timekeeping, especially for business and government. It even gained some support initially
from the League of Nations. The World Calendar divides the year into equal quarters,
ensuring that dates always fall on the same weekdays every year. It retains the traditional
12-month structure, but adjusts the number of days in each month to create four identical quarters.
Each quarter consists of three months. The first month has 31 days, followed by two months of 30 days,
making each quarter exactly 91 days, or 13 weeks. This allows for a consistent calendar where
January 1st always falls on a Sunday, and every date has a fixed weekday. To reconcile this
orderly structure with the 365-day solar year,
The World Calendar introduces a single day at the end of the year called World Day,
very similar to the International Fixed Calendar.
The day is also not assigned a weekday and falls between December 30th and January 1st.
In leap years, a second extra leap day is added after June 30th, also outside the normal week cycle.
By placing these days outside the seven-day structure, just like the International Fixed calendar,
it maintains an unchanging relationship between dates and weekdays throughout the rest of the year.
Another proposal is the Hank Henry permanent calendar.
The calendar was developed in the 2010s by Richard Henry, a professor of physics and astronomy,
and Stephen Hank, an economist, both of whom are at Johns Hopkins University.
The calendar divides the year into 12 months and retains the traditional names of those months,
but adjusts the number of days in the months to ensure consistency.
Specifically, March, June, September, and December each have 31 days, while all other
months have 30 days. This results in a year of exactly 364 days, which is evenly divisible by
seven, allowing each date to permanently align with the same day of the week. To account for the
difference between the solar year, the Hank Henry calendar introduces a leap week rather than a
leap day, that is added every five or six years, bringing the calendar back in sync with the Earth's orbit.
This leap week known as Extra is inserted at the end of December during designated years.
Because the system eliminates the irregularities of month length and varying weekday alignments,
it too claims to simplify scheduling, accounting, and timekeeping on a global scale.
Yet another proposed calendar is the Symmetry 454 calendar.
The Symmetry 454 calendar was proposed in the early 2000s by Irv Bromberg,
a calendar reform advocate and mathematician with the University of Toronto.
Bromberg's goal was to create a calendar that offered advantages of perpetual scheduling and consistent date-week-day alignment
without violating the weekly rhythm of other proposed calendars.
Its name comes from the distinctive pattern and imposes on each quarter.
Every quarter consists of three months arranged in a four-five-four-week pattern,
meaning that the first and third months of the quarter have four weeks,
and the middle month has five weeks.
Each quarter thus contains exactly 91 days,
which totals 364 days in a standard year,
like all the other proposed calendars.
This symmetry ensures that every month starts on a Monday and ends on a Sunday,
and every date always falls on the same weekday year after year.
To align with the solar calendar,
this calendar also adds a leap week at the end of December,
approximately every five to six years.
This extra week, known as Leap Week, keeps the calendar in sync with the Earth's orbit
without breaking the seven-day weekly cycle.
I should also give a mention to the French Revolutionary Calendar, which I covered on a previous episode.
It restructured the year into 12 months of 30 days each, with names inspired by nature and agriculture,
such as Broomer and Thermidor.
Each month was divided into three 10-day weeks called decades,
and the remaining five or six days of the year were designated festival days, not part of any week.
So what are the problems with all of these proposals?
Each of these systems puts an emphasis on trying to put the same day each year on the same day of the week.
For example, January 1st would always be on a Sunday or Monday depending on the calendar.
And the only way that can achieve this is by inserting days into the calendar that are either not part of any week or weeks that are not part of any month.
month. In our current calendar, every day is accounted for. Every date on the calendar has a day of the
week and is a part of a month. One of the biggest objections to the extra day proposals comes from
religious groups. And by religious groups, I mean Christians, Muslims, and Jews, and probably a whole
bunch of other ones. Friday is the Jumua in Islam, which is a community day of prayer. Saturday is the
Sabbath in Judaism, and Sunday is the Lord's Day in Christianity.
If you toss in a day that isn't part of any week, are the days of the week that follow really those days?
Would Sunday be Sunday if there was an extra day thrown in since the last one?
The proposals to insert occasional leap weeks attempt to solve this problem, but they just create another problem.
Instead of a floating random day, you now have a floating random week that is not part of any month.
Personally, I think all of these ideas are bad.
While I can see the appeal in having months or quarters that are the same size or having the same dates each year fall in the same day of the week, I don't really think that these are big problems.
The current system works, even if it doesn't appeal to our more obsessive-compulsive natures, trying to make everything neat and tidy.
However, there's a much more important reason why I think all of these proposals are a bad idea.
idea. It would make the concerns over Y2K look like a walk in the park. Unlike Y2K, which was a simple
concern over how computers would handle a number, this would be a total replacement of the entire
calendar system, which is hard-coded into pretty much every computer in the world. Everything would have
to be rewritten, and everyone on Earth would have to adapt to a new system. The cost of changing such
an ingrained system is simply not worth whatever the potential benefits would be of a new calendar.
So is there a calendar reform that I would support? Actually, yes. It's an incredibly simple change
that require changing almost nothing and hardly anybody would even notice. Yet it would solve
one very annoying problem. It's called the Holocene calendar. All it does is add 10,000 to the current year.
So instead of the year 2025, it would be the year 12,025.
Everything else is the same.
In fact, for all practical purposes, we could keep saying it's the year 2025.
So what is the point of this?
Well, it completely eliminates the annoying BC timing, where 2,025 years ago, you have to start
counting backwards.
It's a system that would mostly be used by historians, archaeologists, and scientists.
10,000 years is just a nice round number that puts the start of the calendar at a point
well before anything in recorded human history.
So under this calendar, the year one would be the year 10,001.
The pyramids would have been built sometime around the year 7441.
The city of Jericho, believed to be the oldest city in the world, was founded approximately
9,600 BC, which would be around the year 401.
Our calendar isn't something that can be changed on a number.
a whim. When the Gregorian calendar was adopted in 1582, it faced an enormous amount of resistance,
and that was 450 years ago, and all it did was change a few days. The interconnectedness of the
modern world has made it exponentially harder to change the calendar. Reforming the calendar doesn't really
solve any problems so much as they just shift the problems to something else. We live in a world
where days, months, and years do not evenly divide into each other.
And as such, no matter what calendar we use, something has to be fudge to make it work.
So we might as well just stick with the one we got.
The executive producer of Everything Everywhere Daily is Charles Daniel.
The associate producers are Austin Oakden and Cameron Kiefer.
I want to thank everyone who supports the show over on Patreon.
Your support helps make this podcast possible.
I'd also like to thank all the members of the Everything Everywhere community
who are active on the Facebook group and the Discord server.
If you like to join in the discussion, there are links to both in the show notes.
And as always, if you leave a review or send me a boostagram, you two can have it read on the show.
