Everything Everywhere Daily: History, Science, Geography & More - Hosting the Olympics
Episode Date: January 8, 2025In July 2017, the International Olympic Committee did something unprecedented. It awarded not one, but two cities Olympic games at the same time. The 2024 games to Paris and the 2028 games to Los Ange...les. However, this decision wasn’t a stroke of genius. It was an act of desperation. That is because no one really wants to host an Olympics anymore. Learn more about the economics and politics of hosting the Olympic games and how it has radically changed over time on this episode of Everything Everywhere Daily. Sponsors Mint Mobile Cut your wireless bill to 15 bucks a month at mintmobile.com/eed MasterClass Get up to 50% off at MASTERCLASS.COM/EVERYWHERE Quince Go to quince.com/daily for 365-day returns, plus free shipping on your order! ButcherBox New users that sign up for ButcherBox will receive 2 lbs of grass-fed ground beef in every box for the lifetime of their subscription + $20 off your first box when you use code daily at checkout! Subscribe to the podcast! https://everything-everywhere.com/everything-everywhere-daily-podcast/ -------------------------------- Executive Producer: Charles Daniel Associate Producers: Ben Long & Cameron Kieffer Become a supporter on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/everythingeverywhere Update your podcast app at newpodcastapps.com Discord Server: https://discord.gg/UkRUJFh Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/everythingeverywhere/ Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/everythingeverywheredaily Twitter: https://twitter.com/everywheretrip Website: https://everything-everywhere.com/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
In July 2017, the International Olympic Committee did something unprecedented.
It awarded not one, but two cities, Olympic Games at the same time.
The 2024 games went to Paris and the 28 games went to Los Angeles.
However, this decision was not a stroke of genius.
It was an act of desperation.
And that's because no one really wants to host an Olympics anymore.
Learn more about the economics and politics of hosting the Olympic Games and how it's radically
changed over time on this episode of Everything Everywhere Daily.
What if your perceptions about the past were wrong?
ThruLine is a podcast that takes you back in time to uncover the parts of the story that may
have gone unnoticed.
It effectively turned day into night.
And how it shaped the world now.
Time travel with us every week on the ThruLine podcast from NPR.
In a previous episode, I discussed the founding and
growth of the modern Olympic Games. To summarize, the decision to revive the Olympics was spearheaded
by Pierre de Courtaire, a French educator and historian who sought to promote international peace
and the values of physical education. Inspired by the ideals of the ancient Greek Olympics,
Corbettand believed that a modern Olympic Games could foster cultural exchange and camaraderie amongst
nations. At the 1894, Congress in Paris, he proposed the idea to reestablish the Olympics,
and this led to the formation of the International Olympic Committee, or IOC.
In this episode, I'm not going to discuss the athletics or the competitors,
but rather the cities that have hosted the Olympics and the process that has gone into it.
Due to time constraints, I'm only going to focus on the summer games,
simply because they're much larger than the winter games,
and better illustrate the problem of hosting the Olympics.
The reason why I want to focus on this process is because this is at the heart of what is
made the Olympics a multi-billion-dollar business. For the first modern Olympics, the decision was obvious.
The IOC voted unanimously in 1894 to host the Games in Greece, the home of the ancient Olympic Games.
The only major construction was the Panathenaic Stadium, a historic venue reconstructed with marble,
which hosted many of the competitions. It was built in the exact same location as an ancient
stadium, which was built in the 4th century BC. This was, in the big scheme of things, a very low-budget
affair, with only 241 athletes, 65% of which were from Greece. It was basically a high school
track meet. The 1900 Olympics was likewise an easy choice. Pierre de Cobertan initially wanted
the first Olympics to be held alongside the 1900 World's Fair in Paris. But the IOC didn't want to wait
for six years and opted for the 1896 games in Athens and then awarded the 1900 games to Paris.
Again, it wasn't a major affair as it was able to piggyback in the infrastructure for the World's Fair.
And the same was true for the 1904 Olympics, which was held alongside the 1904 World's Fair in St. Louis.
If you haven't heard it yet, here I'll reference you to my episode on the 1904 Olympic Marathon, the worst event ever held in Olympic history.
Chicago initially was awarded the 1904 Olympics, but the organizers of the St. Louis World's Fair threatened to host their own athletic competition, which would compete with the Olympics.
By the 1908 games, the Olympics had now become a thing.
As such, more cities wanted to host the games, and there was no longer a perceived need to host
the games alongside a World's Fair.
Four cities submitted bids to host the 1908 Games, Rome, London, Berlin, and Milan.
The first Olympics were the truly competitive bidding process.
The games were awarded to Rome, but after an eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 1906, which
destroyed much of the city of Naples, Italy needed the money for reconstruction efforts.
So the games were then awarded to London, and they managed to rapidly construct white
City Stadium in time for the games, which could seat 93,000 people. It was eventually torn down in
1984. The Olympics were now a very desirable thing that cities wanted to host. It was something
that offered international prestige to the host city. Immediately after the 1908 games, Sweden made a big
push for Stockholm to be the next host. They had two members on the IOC, and they got all the relevant
parties in Sweden on board immediately, including the governing bodies for athletics and gymnastics,
as well as the King of Sweden.
They presented a budget, a $415,000 Kronar or $115,250 not adjusted for inflation.
The 1912 games were awarded to Stockholm, and immediately the 1916 games were awarded to Berlin.
While the Berlin Games never took place because of the First World War, they were already
concerns about the mounting cost of hosting the Olympics.
In 1920, the games were awarded to Antwerp, without any real computer.
bid as a gesture of solidarity and recognition of Belgium's suffering during the war.
In 1924, all the pent-up demand from the war and the uncompetitive bids resulted in six
different cities submitting bids, Paris, Amsterdam, Barcelona, Los Angeles, Prague, and Rome.
The games were once again awarded to Paris, and the cost of the games had now increased to
over $10 million, adjusted for inflation.
However, the condition included the stipulation that Amsterdam get it in 19,
1828. Los Angeles won the games in 1932 because no one else submitted a bid, something that
would repeat itself in the future. In 1936, however, things had changed. 14 cities announced
their intention to host the games, and in the end, it came down to Berlin and Barcelona, and it
was awarded to Berlin. The budget for the 1936 Olympics was approximately $30 million,
dollars, equivalent to around $600 million today when adjusted for inflation.
The German government under Adolf Hitler heavily financed the games, viewing them as an
opportunity to showcase Nazi Germany's power, efficiency, and cultural superiority to the world.
There was a 12-year hiatus on the summer games.
They were supposed to be held in Tokyo in 1940 and London in 1944.
They ended up being held in London in 1948, but they became known as the austerity games
because of the economic problems that every country faced after the war.
There were no new venues built, and athletes were housed in the community rather than an Olympic
village.
In 1952, everyone assumed that the Games would return to the United States.
They came out of the war relatively unscathed, and the economy was great.
Five American cities ended up splitting the vote, and the games were awarded to Helsinki Finland.
Helsinki's budget was roughly $14.5 million, equivalent to about $160 million today.
still not as expensive as the Games 18 years earlier in Berlin.
However, something then happened that changed everything.
Television.
The 1956 Winter Olympics in Cortita-Dempenseo, Italy,
was the first games where television rights were sold.
It wasn't a lot of money, and it was only limited to some European markets,
but it was a start.
At the 1956 summer games in Melbourne, TV rights were sold,
but given that it had to be watched live and Australia wasn't a good location,
for live television viewing in Europe or North America, the TV rights were small.
Satellites still didn't exist, and you couldn't get live television footage to the other side
of the world yet.
The Melbourne Games had a budget of about $50 million in inflation-adjusted dollars.
Rome on the games in 1960.
The budget for the games ballooned to about $150 million inflation-adjusted dollars,
over-tripled the previous games, and CBS paid $394,000 for the American television rights.
1964 marked a major change.
The Olympics were now becoming big business,
and people all over the world were paying far more attention than they ever did
because you could now watch it on television.
The 1964 Tokyo Games cost approximately $3 billion in inflation-adjusted dollars,
which was more than every other previous Olympics combined.
It included not just venues,
but also the construction of infrastructure projects such as Japan's first bullet train.
The 1968 games in Mexico City weren't as expensive at around $1.4 billion inflation-adjusted dollars,
but the television revenues were now starting to explode.
The IOC made $9.8 million in Mexico City, with the majority of this revenue coming from U.S. broadcasters.
In 1972, just four years later, in Munich, satellite TV was now firmly established, as was
color television. People could watch games live from anywhere in the world.
And once again, television rights set new movies.
records.
1972 was also the first Olympics where the IOC sold a large number of corporate sponsorships.
They had over 200 companies participating.
However, the IOC lacked a centralized system for managing sponsorships leading to inconsistencies,
but it showed the potential for another huge source of revenue.
With the audience from the Olympics growing and revenue from TV and sponsorships climbing,
the IOC was now making greater and greater demands from host cities.
The IOC was now out to put on a good show and please their sponsors, who provided all the revenue,
and the host cities were the ones that had to provide it.
This all came to a head with the 1976 Olympics in Montreal.
The games cost Montreal about $7 billion U.S. dollars when adjusted for inflation.
To pay for the games, Montreal incurred a debt of over a billion Canadian dollars,
which took them 30 years to pay off, and it was finally paid off,
in 2006 through a special tobacco tax.
Residents faced decades of higher taxes, and the games became a symbol of government mismanagement
and inefficiency.
Public skepticism about hosting large-scale international events like the Olympics grew in other
countries.
However, the TV rights for the 1976 games hit $25 million.
After Montreal, hardly anyone wanted to host an Olympics anymore because they felt the cost
had now exceeded the benefits.
Only two cities bid for the 1980 games, Moscow and Los Angeles.
The games were given to Moscow, which it used more as propaganda than anything else.
It cost an estimated $4.5 billion for Moscow when adjusted for inflation.
Even though the United States and other Western nations ended up boycotting the games, NBC spent $87 million on the TV rights just for the U.S. market.
When it came time to select a city for the 1984 games, the IOCs, the IOCs,
had a major problem. The 1968 games in Mexico City had political controversies, the
1972 games in Munich had a terrorist attack, and the 76 games in Montreal were a financial
disaster. When the choice was made in 1978 for the host of the 84 games, literally only one
city offered to do it, Los Angeles. And they agreed to do it only if they didn't have to build
anything. L.A. still had the Coliseum from the 1932 Olympics, plus many stadiums for professional
and college sports teams across the region.
They didn't need an Olympic village because athletes could just stay at dormitories on college campuses.
The LA Games put Peter Eubroth in charge and he totally changed how the Olympics were run.
For the first time in history, the Los Angeles Olympics actually made a profit of a quarter billion dollars.
The U.S. TV rights alone were $225 million.
The success of the L.A. games gave the Olympics a big boost.
Instead of being a money-losing affair like they were in Montreal, the IOC held out the promise that they could now be a money-making affair.
The 1988 Olympics were awarded to Seoul South Korea before the L.A. Games took place, but they still end up spending $10 billion inflation-adjusted dollars on the games.
The 1992 games were the first ones awarded after 1984, and interest once again increased.
Six cities were finalists, and the games were awarded to Barcelona.
Barcelona spent about $19 billion adjusted for inflation in what is considered to be one of the best run Olympics in history.
The 1996 Olympics in Atlanta was unique for being privately funded, which didn't leave the city with any long-term burden,
and all of the major construction projects were designed to be repurposed from the get-go.
Likewise, the 2000 Olympics in Sydney had a budget of about $10 billion, and it was considered to be an economic success.
Once again after a run of successful games, the IOC kept upping the requirements for the host cities.
In 2004, this came to a head again in Athens.
The estimated cost of the games was originally projected at around $4.6 billion U.S. dollars adjusted for inflation,
but the final expenses ballooned somewhere between $11 to $15 billion,
contributing to Greece's financial challenges in the years following.
Many of the facilities that were built were underused.
or completely abandoned after the games, leading to ongoing maintenance costs without generating
significant revenue. It was Montreal all over again. Beijing hosted in 2008, and it cost them
$60 billion, making it the most expensive Olympic Games ever. Just like with Athens, many of the new
venues went unused after the games. London pulled off a slightly more affordable but still expensive
games in 2012 with the budget of $17 billion. In 2014,
NBC signed a deal with the IOC to get exclusive TV rights to all Olympic Games from
2022 to 2032 in the United States for $7.65 billion.
The 2016 Rio-Dajunero Olympics faced significant financial problems, both during and after
the games. The original bid estimate was around $8.8 billion, but the final expenditures
reached $13.2 billion, an increase of nearly 50%. Like with Athens, they ended up with venues that
were never used again after they were built.
The budget for the 2020 Tokyo Olympics was approximately $15.4 billion, although some estimates
suggest the total cost could have been as high as $20 billion when including all related expenses.
The out-of-control budgets and the increased demands by the IOC for hosts began leading to
a backlash from citizens in the cities that submitted bids.
Many cities ended up withdrawing their bids after uprisings by voters who didn't want to pay to host
the Olympics. In 2017, when the time came to award the 2024 Olympic Games, the IOC had a huge
problem. There were only two cities interested in hosting, and there was literally no one who had
even shown interest in hosting the games in 2008. The Olympics had become a boondoggle, often doing
more harm than good in the cities that hosted the games. Moreover, many economic studies have
shown that the supposed benefits of hosting the Olympics simply didn't exist.
To avoid the embarrassment of not having anyone interested in hosting the 2028 games,
they awarded the games to Los Angeles at the same time as the 2024 games were awarded to Paris.
For the third time, Los Angeles would host an Olympics when no one else wanted to do it.
Also, once again, they're hosting it under the stipulation that they don't have to build anything new.
In 2021, the IOC awarded the 2032 Olympics to Brisbane, Australia, which was the long,
longest advanced period that they have ever named a host city. And once again, Brisbane was the
only city that wanted it. Likewise, the 2034 Winter Olympics was awarded to Salt Lake City, which was a
previous host and the only city that wanted it. We might very well be reaching a day when no
major city in the world wants to host the Olympics anymore. One solution, which was actually
proposed back in 1896 would be to create a permanent Olympic venue, a single Olympic city,
somewhere in the world, that would host the games every four years, just like Mount Olympus once
did. And if not that, then three or four cities around the world could just rotate the Olympics
between them without having to build new venues and infrastructure every single time,
maybe adding a new city to the mix once every 20 years. Whatever the solution, if the IOC doesn't do
something. There might come a time when there's a scheduled Olympics, and there's nobody around
to host it. The executive producer of Everything Everywhere Daily is Charles Daniel. The associate
producers are Benji Long and Cameron Kiever. I want to give a big shout out to everyone who supports
the show over on Patreon, including the show's producers. Your support helps me put out a show every
single day. And also, Patreon is currently the only place where Everything Everywhere Daily
merchandise is available to the top tier of supporters. If you'd like to do that,
talk to other listeners of the show and members of the completionist club, you can join the
Everything Everywhere Daily Facebook group or Discord server. Links to everything are in the show notes.
