Everything Everywhere Daily: History, Science, Geography & More - The 1956 Suez Crisis (Encore)
Episode Date: August 17, 2025In 1956, one of the most important geopolitical events of the post-war period took place in Egypt. The Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser nationalized the Suez Canal, one of the most important w...aterways in the world. In response, a coalition of several countries tried to take it back. However, it didn’t go as planned, and it signaled a major reshuffling of the geopolitical order. Learn more about the Suez Crisis and how it shaped the second half of the 20th century on this episode of Everything Everywhere Daily. Sponsors Newspapers.com Get 20% off your subscription to Newspapers.com Quince Go to quince.com/daily for 365-day returns, plus free shipping on your order! Mint Mobile Get your 3-month Unlimited wireless plan for just 15 bucks a month at mintmobile.com/eed Jerry Compare quotes and coverages side-by-side from up to 50 top insurers at jerry.ai/daily. Subscribe to the podcast! https://everything-everywhere.com/everything-everywhere-daily-podcast/ -------------------------------- Executive Producer: Charles Daniel Associate Producers: Austin Oetken & Cameron Kieffer Become a supporter on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/everythingeverywhere Discord Server: https://discord.gg/UkRUJFh Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/everythingeverywhere/ Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/everythingeverywheredaily Twitter: https://twitter.com/everywheretrip Website: https://everything-everywhere.com/ Disce aliquid novi cotidie Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
The following is an encore presentation of Everything Everywhere Daily.
In 1956, one of the most important geopolitical events of the post-war period took place in Egypt.
The Egyptian president, Gamal Abdul-Nasar, nationalized the Suez Canal, one of the most important waterways in the world.
In response, a coalition of several countries tried to take it back.
However, it didn't go as planned, and it signaled a major reshuffling of the geopolitical order.
Learn more about the Suez Crisis.
and how it shaped the second after the 20th century on this episode of Everything Everywhere Daily.
Did you ever hear about the selfie that solved a murder or the jury that used a Ouija board to speak to a victim?
If that made you pause, you need to listen to Morning Cup of Murder.
I'm Karina Beamer-Surfer, and every single day on Morning Cup of Murder,
I tell one chilling true crime story tied to that exact day in history.
With over 2,500 episodes to binge, you'll never run out of dark,
stories to start your morning with. Go listen to Morning Cup of Murder wherever you get your
podcasts. And remember, stay safe. What I'll be referring to as the Suez Crisis is known by
other names in other countries. It is also referred to as the Second Arab-Israeli war,
the war of tripartite aggression in the Arab world, and the Sinai War in Israel. Although it didn't
rank anywhere near the top of the major conflicts of the 20th century in terms of casualties,
it played an outsized role in shaping the post-war geopolitical order, the effects of which can still
be felt today. In a previous episode, I covered the history of the Suez Canal. The idea of a canal
connecting the Mediterranean and Red Seas was an idea that went back almost 4,000 years. It wasn't
until the 19th century, however, that a canal was built by a French company that received a 99-year
lease from Muhammad Ali Pasha, the then ruler of Egypt. After more than a decade of work, the canal opened
in 1869. The British initially objected to the canal's construction because they control the routes
around Africa, but once it opened, they purchased 44% ownership in the canal, and it became a vital
link between India and Britain. In 1882, the British were invited by the then leader of Egypt to
put down an uprising, and they took control of the canal. The British continued. The British continued,
continued to control the canal through the First and Second World Wars, considering it to be vital to
defending the British Empire. However, after World War II, the world changed. India became independent,
and almost every other British colony started down the road towards independence. France, too,
saw many of its colonies move towards independence, most significantly Algeria, which began a war
for independence in 1954. Britain and France were perhaps the two greatest global powers
before the Second World War, if for no other reason than their extensive empires.
Also relevant to this story was the creation of the state of Israel in 1947, as well as the backlash
against Israel by neighboring Arab states and the subsequent rise of pan-Arabism.
And of course, all of this needs to be placed in the context of the biggest geopolitical development
in the post-war world, the start of the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union.
with that, the story of the Suez Crisis actually begins in 1952.
At the time, Egypt was a monarchy ruled by King Farouk.
Farouk was one of the last kings of Egypt in the Muhammad Ali dynasty, which began in 1805.
Farouk and several of the other monarchs before him used the British to help secure their rule.
Egypt was never technically a colony of Britain per se, rather it had been a protectorate since 1882, when the British took over
control of the canal. The close ties to the British, the presence of British troops, and the
British control of the canal didn't sit well with the Egyptian nationalists who wanted Egypt for
Egyptians. And this all came to a head on July 23rd, 1952 when a group of Egyptian military
officers who called themselves the Free Officers Movement overthrew King Farouk in a bloodless coup d'etat.
Farouc abdicated the throne and was sent into exile, and his infant son, Ahmed
Fwad was placed on the throne with the free officer movement serving as regents.
This situation was short-lived, however, as Egypt was declared a republic in 1953.
This new government instituted a wide range of programs, including land reform and a crackdown
on political activities by groups on both the right and the left, including the Communist
Party and the Muslim Brotherhood. A new constitution was announced in January of 1956, and on June
23rd, Gamal Abdul Naser, one of the leaders of the 1952 revolution, was elected as president of
Egypt. And just 10 days earlier, the last British troops left Egypt under a previous agreement.
Nassar was truly a revolutionary leader. He had big plans for Egypt, and at the core was his
desire to build a dam on the Nile River. A dam would not only control the annual flooding on the
river, but also provided an enormous source of electricity which was necessary to.
modernize Egypt. To build his dam, however, he needed money. Nassar's foreign policy was to pit the
United States and the Soviet Union against each other. For example, in 1955 when he was serving
as prime minister, he first went to the United States for weapons, and when they didn't give him
the terms that he found acceptable, he went to the Soviets. So when he needed money for the dam,
he turned again to the Americans and the British. In an effort to gain favor with Egypt, in December
of 1955, the Americans promised $56 million and the UK $14 million to construct the dam.
However, the U.S. and the U.K. soon became irritated at Nassar's attempts to play both sides
of the Cold War. In particular, Nassar recognized communist China. Furthermore, many other
Arab countries that sided with the West in the Cold War were angered that they weren't
rewarded as well as Egypt was who wasn't siding with the West. So in July 19th, the United States and
the United Kingdom announced that they would be pulling their funding for the dam, citing concerns
that Egypt wasn't capable of building the project. The removal of funding forced Nassar's hand,
and on July 26th, he announced his decision to nationalize the Suez Canal, taking control
away from the British. Payments from ships using the canal would be used to build his dam.
This infuriated both the British and the French governments, both of whom owned an interest
in the canal operation. They wanted to control the canal not just to access their colonies, but to
protect the flow of oil from the Middle East. The British and the French were accustomed to getting
their way for the last couple centuries in this part of the world, so they immediately began plotting
to take back the canal and remove Nassar. The world seemed to support Egypt on the matter. In early
October, the United Nations voted on a resolution supporting Egypt's right to the canal.
privately after the UN vote, Nassar assumed that the chance of an invasion had now dropped down to about 10%.
The worst he figured was now over.
Except that it wasn't.
Britain and France found another country that had an axe to grind against Egypt.
Israel.
Israel fought a war with Egypt when it was founded, and Egypt had been blocking ships from reaching Israel via the Red Sea.
Egypt could do this through its position along the Red Sea on the Sinai Peninsula.
Israel didn't care so much about the canal per se. Rather, they were concerned about the Sinai Peninsula,
which happened to be separated from the rest of Egypt by the Suez Canal.
Moreover, Egypt had signed a major arms deal for Soviet weapons, which Israel thought was going
to be used for another invasion. With their interests aligned, Britain, France, and Israel
made a secret agreement to invade Egypt and seize control of the Suez Canal. They became known
as the tripartite alliance. The plan was that Israel would enter the Sinai Peninsula first,
and then Britain and France would deploy troops to keep Egypt and Israel apart, supposedly,
but in reality they would use it to seize control of the canal. The invasion began on October 29,
1956 at approximately 3 p.m. The Israeli forces attacked Egyptian positions, and the Israelis
quickly took over their objectives in the Sinai, taking the Egyptians by surprise. While the invasion
was taking place, British and French forces were assembled in Malta, Cyprus, and in ships on
the Mediterranean. Nassar's response to the invasion was primarily to try and protect the canal. He ordered
tanks to fall back to the canal, which many of his generals disagreed with. They were concerned that
the Egyptian tanks would be stranded on the other side of the canal where they couldn't be
supported from the rest of Egypt. On October 31st, France and Britain began bombing Egyptian positions
along the canal and sent in troops.
Nassar's response was something that they didn't expect.
There were 40 ships in the canal at the time of the invasion,
and Nasser ordered all of them to be sunk, rendering the canal useless.
The Egyptian forces performed horribly.
They suffered large losses compared to the tripartite alliance.
Thousands of Egyptian shoulders were killed and thousands more captured,
compared to only 22 British and 10 French fatalities and 172.
Israeli. While Egypt didn't perform well militarily, they did have one thing going for them. Diplomacy.
The international reaction to the Sinai invasion was almost unanimously against the tripartite
alliance. One of the biggest condemnations against the invasion came from the United States.
The Americans were looking at the bigger picture and weren't as concerned about who was controlling
the canal. They were looking at the geopolitical situation around the world vis-a-vis the Soviet
Union. The Americans didn't want to condone the aggression of Western powers because they were concerned
that it would drive other Arab states into the arms of the Soviets. In addition to the reaction from
Arab states, the Soviets had recently entered Hungary to put down a revolution. The American vice
president at the time, Richard Nixon later said, quote, we couldn't on one hand complain about the
Soviets intervening in Hungary and on the other hand approve of the British and French picking that
particular time to intervene against Nasser."
Across the Muslim world, there were protests and condemnations of the attack.
One of the only countries supporting the attack was Iraq, and their support resulted in Syria
closing a pipeline from Iraq to the Mediterranean.
Saudi Arabia issued a total oil embargo on both France and Britain.
The Soviets likewise condemned the attack, however, they went further and threatened to send
forces to Egypt to fight the British and the French.
On November 1st, the United Nations began debating a resolution that was passed by the General Assembly
by a margin of 64 countries in favor and only five opposed.
Australia, New Zealand, Britain, France, and Israel.
Nassar also reached out to President Eisenhower to provide diplomatic assistance, something that he
did not ask of Nikita Khrushchev.
The United States began to put heavy pressure on Britain and France to withdraw their forces.
Eisenhower didn't want something that the United States didn't even care.
about to be the thing that sparked World War III. On November 7th, the United Nations approved
the formation of the United Nations Emergency Force, the first UN peacekeeping force in history.
With increasing international and domestic outrage, and with the canal out of commission
anyhow due to the sinking of the ships, Britain and France withdrew all of their soldiers
by the end of December. The Israelis kept troops in Sinai till 1957 when they were replaced by
UN peacekeeping troops. Ultimately, they got the one thing out of this that they really wanted,
lifting the blockade on the Red Sea. Nassar, despite the abysmal performance of the Egyptian
military, came out of the entire affair smelling like a rose. He wound up with full control of the
Suez Canal and his stature rose in the Arab world, which now looked upon him as their natural
leader. But the biggest thing that came out of the entire Suez crisis was that Britain and France
were no longer seen to be the great powers that they used to be.
The entire affair was a disaster for them,
and they achieved none of the objectives that they set out to achieve.
They showed that they were no longer the great powers that they used to be
and were now subordinate to the United States and the Soviet Union in the Cold War.
The executive producer of Everything Everywhere Daily is Charles Daniel.
The associate producers are Austin Otkin and Cameron Kiefer.
My big thanks go to everyone who supports the show over on
Patreon, your support helps make this podcast possible. And I also want to remind everyone about
the community groups on Facebook and Discord. That's where everything happens that's outside the
podcast. And links to those are available in the show notes. As always, if you leave a review on any
major podcast app or in the above community groups, you too can have it read in the show.
