Everything Everywhere Daily: History, Science, Geography & More - The 2025 Nobel Prizes
Episode Date: October 14, 2025Every year, the Nobel Prize committee awards the Nobel Prize in accordance with the will of Alfred Nobel. Save for the years where there have been world wars, the prize has been given annually sinc...e 1901. The 2025 prizes have just been announced, and each recipient has made a unique contribution for which they have been recognized. Learn more about the 2025 Nobel Prize recipients and the work that they were recognized for on this episode of Everything Everywhere Daily. Sponsors Quince Go to quince.com/daily for 365-day returns, plus free shipping on your order! Mint Mobile Get your 3-month Unlimited wireless plan for just 15 bucks a month at mintmobile.com/eed Stash Go to get.stash.com/EVERYTHING to see how you can receive $25 towards your first stock purchase. Newspaper.com Go to Newspapers.com to get a gift subscription for the family historian in your life! Subscribe to the podcast! https://everything-everywhere.com/everything-everywhere-daily-podcast/ -------------------------------- Executive Producer: Charles Daniel Associate Producers: Austin Oetken & Cameron Kieffer Become a supporter on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/everythingeverywhere Discord Server: https://discord.gg/UkRUJFh Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/everythingeverywhere/ Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/everythingeverywheredaily Twitter: https://twitter.com/everywheretrip Website: https://everything-everywhere.com/ Disce aliquid novi cotidie Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Every year the Nobel Prize Committee awards the Nobel Prize in accordance with the will of Alfred
Nobel.
Save for the years where there have been World Wars, the prize has been given annually since
2001.
The 2025 prizes have just been announced, and each recipient has made a unique contribution
for which they have been recognized.
Learn more about the 2025 Nobel Prize recipients and the work that they were recognized
for on this episode of Everything Everywhere Daily.
Did you ever hear about the selfie that solved a murder or the judge?
jury that used a Ouija board to speak to a victim. If that made you pause, you need to listen
to Morning Cup of Murder. I'm Karina Bimus Durfer, and every single day on Morning Cup of Murder,
I tell one chilling true crime story tied to that exact day in history. With over 2,500
episodes to binge, you'll never run out of dark stories to start your morning with. Go listen to
Morning Cup of Murder wherever you get your podcasts. And remember, stay safe.
are awarded every year, and each recipient has a unique story behind their recognition.
I figured this would be a good annual tradition for the podcast to review the recipients each year
and to provide a summary of the work they did to receive their prize.
In many cases, especially in the Science Awards, their work is often not understood by most people.
So I figured I would take that job upon myself.
So let's start with the oddball award in the Nobel Prizes, the Prize for Literature.
The winner of the 2025 Nobel Prize for Literature is the Hungarian writer Laslo Krasnahorkei.
The reason why the Literature Prize is such an oddball is that the Nobel Committee has to recognize work that's done all over the world.
In the case of literature, that's difficult because there are so many different languages that authors write in.
Almost every year, no one has heard of the winner in literature because unless you happen to speak that language, you've probably never heard of them.
The Nobel Committee recognized Krasnahorkeye for, quote,
his compelling and visionary uvra that in the midst of apocalyptic terror reaffirms the power of art.
Kresnahorquois is often described as the kind of epic writer in a central European tradition going back through writers like Franz Kafka,
whose style was marked by what critics call absurdism and grotesque excess.
His novels frequently follow characters in decaying, marginal communities, or in circumstances of collapse or disorder.
Perhaps his best-known work is Santantango, written in 1985, which explores a collapsing rural
community in Hungary, portraying disintegration, deceit, despair, and the presence of human connection.
That novel became a landmark in Hungarian literature and was also adapted into a film.
The book was also awarded the International Booker Prize in 2015 for its translation into English.
By all accounts, he's a great writer, but not that many people speak Hungarian, so he isn't that
well known outside of Hungary.
The winner of the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize is Maria Corina Machado of Venezuela.
Maria Carina Machado received the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize for leading a broad,
largely nonviolent movement to restore democratic rights in Venezuela after years of repression
under President Nicholas Maduro.
The Nobel Committee's press release described her as a brave committed champion who kept
the flame of democracy alive by insisting on free elections, accountable government,
and the right of Venezuelans to choose their leaders. It highlights her decision to remain in
the country despite threats, legal disqualifications from the 2024 presidential race, and an active
arrest warrant, framing her struggle as a push for a just and peaceful transition from dictatorship
to democracy. Peace prizes tend to fall into one of three buckets. The first are diplomats or
politicians who bring about a peace or some end to hostilities. This is how Henry Kissinger,
Anwar Sadat, Yasser Arafat, and Theodore Roosevelt were awarded their peace prizes.
However, there aren't a lot of opportunities to give these sort of prizes away.
The second bucket is General do-gooderers.
They're usually involved in some international organization, are a global organization,
or just generally promote something that is considered good.
This is how Mother Teresa, the Dalai Lama, Jimmy Carter, and the International Red Cross
were all awarded prizes.
The final category includes people who are fighting against.
an authoritarian country, and the Nobel Committee selects them to send a message.
Recent recipients from China, Russia, and Iran all fall into this category, as does Maria
Karina Machado.
This is the Nobel Committee sending a message to Nicholas Maduro in Venezuela.
The 2025 Swedish Central Bank Prize in Economic Sciences in the memory of Alfred Nobel,
not one of the original Nobel Prizes, was awarded the three recipients.
Yoel Moquille of Northwestern University,
Philippe Egyon of the London School of Economics,
and Peter Howitt of Brown University.
Collectively, they were awarded for showing,
from different angles,
how invention and the spread of new ideas
power long-term growth and rising standards of living.
The committee split the prize into two parts.
Mokiel received one half for explaining the historical conditions
that allow science and practical know-how
to reinforce each other and keep progress going.
He used evidence from events like the Industrial Revolution to argue that growth is not automatic.
It depends on a culture that tolerates new ideas, open exchange of knowledge, and institutions
that do not punish change. In short, he identified the preconditions that make continuous
technical advancement possible rather than rare.
Egyon and Howitt shared the other half for building a formal theory of what Joseph Schumpeter
called creative destruction. In their model researchers and firms invest in new tech
technologies that replace older ones. That replacement raises productivity and incomes over time,
yet also creates disruption that policy must manage. Their work shows why competition, entry of new
firms, and incentive for research and development matter, and why policies that block rivals or
protect outdated production methods can slow economic growth. The model helps explain real-world
patterns, like why countries that invest in education in research, keep markets open to newcomers,
and regulate monopolies carefully, can tend to grow faster in the long run.
The 2025 Nobel Prize for Medicine or Physiology was awarded to Mary Bruchnow and Fred Ramsdahl
of the Seltek Corporation and Shimon Sakaguchi of Osaka University.
Their work had to do with bettering our understanding of the human immune system.
Our immune system has a big job. It has to fight off infections without damaging our own tissues.
If that balance fails, the immune system.
might attack the body itself, leading to autoimmune diseases, like type 1 diabetes,
lupus, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and so on. Before this work, scientists knew that
some immune cells are eliminated early in life through a process called central tolerance,
which removes immune cells that strongly target the body's own proteins. But that did not fully
explain why many people never develop autoimmunity and how the immune system restrains itself
later in the body's tissues.
The concept of peripheral tolerance is that even after immune cells mature, there must be
checks that prevent them from attacking the body.
Sakaguchi was the first proposed and experimentally show that a special class of immune
cells act like internal peacekeepers in the body.
In the mid-1990s, he found that in mice, when certain subsets of T-cells were missing
or removed, the mice developed autoimmune disease.
but if he gave those mice the missing cells from healthy animals, the disease went away.
That led him to postulate the existence of regulatory T cells, which suppress or restrain
other immune cells from attacking the body.
Later, Bruncow and Ramsdell made a key advance by identifying the genetic control behind those
regulatory T cells.
In mice with a lethal autoimmune disorder known as scurphy, Brun cow and Ramsdale found a mutation
in an X-chromazone gene encoding a protein,
they at first called scurfin and later named Foxp3.
So why is this important?
Well, it brings us a step closer to understanding autoimmune diseases
and how possibly to cure them.
The 2025 Nobel Prize in Chemistry
was awarded to Susumu Kittagawa of Kyoto University,
Richard Robson of the University of Melbourne,
and Omar Yagi of the University of California, Berkeley.
The three laureates,
developed and refined a new type of molecular architecture called metal organic frameworks,
often abbreviated as MOFs. These are crystalline materials built by combining metallic atoms
and organic molecules in a repeating lattice-like pattern. What is special is that these frameworks
contain internal cavities or empty pores through which other molecules, like gases or water vapors,
can flow, enter, exit, or even be stored. The outer shape of the material makes it. The outer shape of the material
may look solid, but inside, it's a huge internal surface area filled with space.
The idea is that by picking which metal and which organic linker molecules to use, you can
control the size, shape, and chemical properties of those pores so the MOFs can selectively
trap or release certain molecules.
In that sense, an MOF is like a highly customized sponge or network of tunnels at the molecular
scale.
So why is this important?
Because MOFs have huge internal surface areas and controllable pores, they can interact with many
molecules in ways that conventional solids cannot.
They could potentially capture CO2 molecules, particulate pollutants, or even water directly from
the atmosphere.
They can also potentially be used as catalysts in chemical reactions.
The final prize I'll be covering, which was actually the one awarded first, is the prize
for physics. The 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to John Clark of the University of California
Berkeley, Michael Devereate of Yale University, and John Martinez of the University of California, Santa Barbara.
The prize committee said the award was given for, quote, the discovery of macroscopic quantum
mechanical tunneling and energy quantization in an electric circuit. Okay, so what does that mean?
particles at the quantum level behave very differently from things that we're used to dealing with
at the macroscopic level.
In particular, in quantum physics, a particle sometimes tunnels through a barrier that it shouldn't
be able to cross in classical physics.
What Clark, Devereate, and Martinez showed is that under the right conditions, this behavior
can manifest at scales larger than the quantum level.
The setting for their experiments was a superconducting circuit.
If you recall from a previous episode on the subject, a superconductor is a material that, when
cooled to extremely low temperatures, allows electric current to flow without any resistance.
In their design, they used a special element called a Josephson Junction, which is two superconductors
separated by a very thin insulating barrier.
Normally, current can't flow through an insulator, but in quantum mechanics, tuddling can
occur.
The experimenters took a superconducting circuit, then measured how it behaved under different electrical biases and under microwaves.
The circuit was small but big enough to be seen in a microscope and still much larger than the quantum level.
They observed two major things.
First, the circuit sometimes jumped from one side to the other by tunneling through the barrier,
something that should be impossible in classical physics.
Second, when they applied microwaves of certain frequencies, the circuit absorbed energy only in
discrete amounts, showing quantized energy levels. And if you remember back to my episode on the
ultraviolet catastrophe, discrete amounts of energy means it can be at one level or another,
but nothing in between. So, why is this important? First, they bridge the gap between the
quantum world and the larger macroscopic world. Before these experiments,
many physicists assume that quantum effects like tunneling or discrete energy levels would be
unobservable in large systems because of all the noise and interaction. Their work proved that,
at least in carefully engineered systems, it was possible to preserve quantum behavior
even at scales large enough to be used in devices. Second, their experiments laid foundational
groundwork for quantum technologies, especially quantum computing, quantum sensors, and quantum
cryptography. The circuits they studied are closely related to superconducting qubits used in many
of today's quantum computer designs. In third, this work helps to improve ultra-sensitive
measurement devices. The ability to observe quantum effects in circuits helps build sensors
that can detect extremely weak signals or changes because quantum systems can be extremely
sensitive. This has implications in fields like magnetic resonance imaging or MRI, precision
measurement devices and possibly new kinds of detectors.
There's often been controversies in the awarding of Nobel Prizes.
However, I think the 2025 selections are pretty good.
Some of the awards, especially in the sciences, might actually have a role to play in shaping
our future in the years to come.
The executive producer of Everything Everywhere Daily is Charles Daniel.
The associate producers are Austin Otkin and Cameron Kiefer.
My big thanks go to everyone who supports the show over on Patreon.
your support helps make this podcast possible.
And I also want to remind everyone about the community groups on Facebook and Discord.
That's where everything happens that's outside the podcast.
And links to those are available in the show notes.
As always, if you leave a review on any major podcast app or in the above community groups,
you two can have it read in the show.
