Everything Everywhere Daily: History, Science, Geography & More - The Peace of Westphalia (Encore)

Episode Date: November 10, 2022

In 1648, Europe saw the end of two of the most horrific wars that had ever been seen on the continent up until that point.  The treaties which ended these conflicts established an international order... which overturned the system which had existed for centuries and established a new order which, in many respects, still exists today.  Learn more about the Peace of Westphalia and how its legacy can still be felt 350 years later, on this episode of Everything Everywhere Daily. Subscribe to the podcast!  https://link.chtbl.com/EverythingEverywhere?sid=ShowNotes -------------------------------- Executive Producer: Darcy Adams Associate Producers: Peter Bennett & Thor Thomsen   Become a supporter on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/everythingeverywhere Update your podcast app at newpodcastapps.com Discord Server: https://discord.gg/UkRUJFh Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/everythingeverywhere/ Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/EverythingEverywhere Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/everythingeverywheredaily Twitter: https://twitter.com/everywheretrip Website: https://everything-everywhere.com/everything-everywhere-daily-podcast/ Everything Everywhere is an Airwave Media podcast. Please contact sales@advertisecast.com to advertise on Everything Everywhere. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 The following is an encore presentation of Everything Everywhere Daily. In 1648, Europe saw the end of two of the most horrific wars that had ever been seen on the continent up until that point. The treaties which ended these conflicts established an international order, which overturned the system that had existed for centuries, and established a new order, which, in many respects, still exist today. Learn more about the peace of Westphalia and how its legacy can still be felt 350 years later on this episode of Everything Everywhere Daily. if your perceptions about the past were wrong. ThruLine is a podcast that takes you back in time to uncover the parts of the story that may have gone unnoticed. It effectively turned day into night and how it shaped the world now.
Starting point is 00:01:03 Time travel with us every week on the ThruLine podcast from NPR. To understand how the peace of Westphalia came about, we first have to understand the wars which necessitated the peace. If you aren't a student of medieval European history, many of the wars can get really confusing. There were tons of kingdoms, principalities, and duchies, many of which no longer exist anymore. And there were tons of kings, often with the same few names, Henry Louis Charles, and the wars were often named based on how long they went. There was the seven-year war, the nine-year-s war, the 30-year-s war, the 80-year-s war, the 100-year-s war, and the 100-year-year-war, just to name a few of them. The two particular wars in question were the 30-year-s war and the 80-year-s war.
Starting point is 00:01:47 The 80-year-war is also known as the War of Dutch independence. The modern-day countries of Netherlands, Belgium, and Luxembourg fought against the Habsburg-Spanish monarchy which controlled the region. This war was a combination of a distant monarch who was far away in Spain and one of religion. Spain was a staunchly Catholic country, and various Protestant denominations had taken hold in the lowland countries. Over the years, the war took probably about 200,000 lives on both sides. The other war which was ravaging the continent,
Starting point is 00:02:16 and which was much more devastating was the 30-year-s war. If you aren't familiar with the 30-year-s war, it was probably the most costly war in Europe before the 20th century, even surpassing the Napoleonic Wars of the 19th century. This two involved the Habsburgs and the Holy Roman Empire, but it also involved an alliance of kingdoms and realms which spanned from Hungary to Sweden to the Netherlands and France. Pretty much all of Germany was involved on one side of the conflict or the other. The main issue here was religion, with various rulers declaring themselves and all of their subjects, either Catholic or Protestant. It is estimated that as many as 8 million people might have died in the conflict,
Starting point is 00:02:53 with 30% of the entire population of Germany having perished. Both of these conflicts are worthy of their own episodes, and I have them both on my big list for future shows. Suffice it to say that they were very long wars that killed a lot of people at a time when the population of Europe wasn't that large, and it had a whole lot to do with religion, but not totally to do with religion. I'm massively oversimplifying it, but that's the elevator pitch version of the wars. By the time 1648 rolled around, everyone was exhausted and just wanted to put an end to the fighting.
Starting point is 00:03:24 Given the animosity which had built up, there were actually two different treaties that were signed and negotiated in two different cities, because the sides couldn't agree on a single location to hold the talks. One city was the Catholic city of Munster, and the other was the Lutheran city of Aznebrook. They're about 50 kilometers away from each other, and they are both located in the region of Westphalia in northwestern. Germany, not far from the modern border with the Netherlands. Both cities were considered neutral territory for the duration of the negotiations. The talks involved 109 delegates from all the various warring parties, and it took five years to hammer out. In the end, three separate treaties were signed. The first was the Peace of Munster, which ended the 80-year-s war between Spain and the now-recognized
Starting point is 00:04:05 and independent Dutch Republic. This was signed on January 30, 1648. The other two treaties were both signed on October 24, 1648. These were the Treaty of Munster between the Holy Roman Empire, France, and the Dutch Republic, and the second was the Treaty of Osnabrook, which ended the 30-year's war. The primary signatories of this treaty were the Holy Roman Empire in Sweden, with some other smaller allied states. Many leading intellectuals of the time, such as Gottfried Leibniz, Jean-Jean-Rousseau, Emmanuel Kant, and Friedrich Schiller, felt that the peace of Westphalia, which is the term used to collectively describe all three agreements, was a first step towards universal peace. However, this episode really isn't about anything I just described.
Starting point is 00:04:46 The history of the wars and the signing of the treaty is really just a background for the real topic of this episode. Westphalian sovereignty. If you haven't come across this phrase before, I wouldn't worry too much about it. It's usually only used by political scientists or diplomats. It basically describes the current legal international order with nation states. In fact, many have gone so far as to say the peace of Westphalia basically created the modern notion of the nation-state. To explain what that means, let me describe the state of affairs before the peace of Westphalia and how the treaties changed that. Prior to Westphalia, sovereignty was a
Starting point is 00:05:22 very messy subject. There were overlapping rights to land based on hereditary rule. The idea of sovereignty was, for the most part, based on individuals who claimed the right to rule from God. A great example would be England and France. England was a kingdom with a king, and France was a kingdom with a king. In a certain way at the international level, France and England were of equal status. However, the king of England was also the Duke of Normandy, and the Duke of Normandy was also a vassal, in theory, to the king of France. So, how could the king be both an equal and yet a vassal? And there were all sorts of these conflicting claims of sovereignty and loyalty all over Europe. A lord might owe allegiance to two different kings, or a king may have to pay taxes to another king
Starting point is 00:06:06 for some bit of land that they inherited a century ago because of some marriage. But who really held sovereignty over a region? Was it a far-away emperor, or some other ruler who actually lived there and managed the affairs of his land? Did sovereignty and power lie in the larger, more abstract ruler, or in the more particular local ruler? This all came to a head during the Protestant Reformation, when some rulers became Protestant and made their subjects join them. On top of all of this, there was the supernational institution
Starting point is 00:06:36 of the Catholic Church. The Pope claimed the right to appoint, or at least approve, monarchs anywhere in Christendom. The peace of Westphalia basically did away with all of that. It established the idea that there are countries with borders, and how each country is run or administered within those borders is up to that country. No other country, emperor, or pope, could dictate what that country did. It also established that all countries were, at least in an international legal sense, equal. It didn't matter if a country was run by a king, a prince, a duke, or if it was even a republic. A country was a country. A ruler could do whatever they wanted within their borders, and they had no say in what someone else did within their borders. There were still kings and
Starting point is 00:07:21 emperors and princes to be sure, but now it just made everyone's space on the map its own thing. Of course, some people violently objected to the peace of Westphalia, in particular Pope Innocent the 10th, who issued a papal bull on the subject. called Zello Domus Dei. In it, he said it was, quote, null, void, invalid, iniquitous, unjust, damnable, reprobate, and nane, empty of meaning, and effect for all time. End quote. I guess he really didn't like it. Pretty much everyone in Europe just ignored the Papal Bull, and it marked the start of the decline of the papacy as a political force. If the idea of Westphalian sovereignty sounds like
Starting point is 00:07:58 common sense, and just the way the world works, it wasn't necessarily at the time. The idea of Westphalian sovereignty wasn't created out of some philosophical treaties. It was really just a reflection of the reality on the ground. The idea of Westphalian sovereignty also isn't explicitly listed in any of the treaties. It's just the system that resulted from the peace of Westphalia. The idea wasn't fully formed after the signing of the treaties, but it grew and evolved over time. It didn't stop countries from going to war, but it did change the nature of those conflicts and the nature of how states interacted with each other. Probably the biggest exception to Westphalian sovereignty was the colonial system, where colonies were not legally equal to their colonizing country. But even then, if you look at almost every colony,
Starting point is 00:08:42 which was established by a European power, the way they were administered was very different from how vassal states were run before Westphalia. Colonies, whether they were British, French, Spanish, or Dutch, were all centrally administered or run by an appointed governor, and usually weren't set up with local dukes, princes, and barons. In fact, the entire history of the entire history, history of decolonization, when looking at it through the lens of Westphalian sovereignty, was simply former colonies trying to achieve legal and diplomatic equality with their former overloads in a Westphalian framework. Likewise, as countries outside of Europe modernized, they too organized their international relations in Westphalian terms because it just worked,
Starting point is 00:09:21 and there really wasn't anything else in place for international relations between countries so far away. There's probably no greater expression of Westphalian sovereignty than the Charter of the United Nations, which explicitly states that all members are equal, and that, quote, nothing shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state, unquote, unless, of course, you're talking about the Security Council, in which case some countries are more equal than others. If you think back on the history of the world over the last 120 years, there have been many horrendous things that have happened. The biggest have almost always stemmed from some country invading some other sovereign
Starting point is 00:09:58 country. Civil wars and conflicts within countries don't usually receive the same level of world attention unless some other power tries to intervene. Since the end of World War II, open warfare between sovereign countries has become much rare than it was beforehand. Many thinkers on the subject have claimed that we've either gone past Westphalian sovereignty or that we should. To be sure, there are institutions like the UN and the International Criminal Court and other multinational organizations, but they're all voluntary. Other than trying to physically, or financially coerce another country, there really isn't a whole lot that can be done. So, when you're watching the news or hear a story about relations between countries,
Starting point is 00:10:37 realize that the system of international relations all stems from a system that was developed in 1648 to stop one of the worst wars in history at that time. Everything Everywhere Daily is an Airwave Media podcast. The associate producers are Thorpe Thompson and Peter Bennett. I have some more boostograms to share with you. Remember, A Boostagram is sending me Satoshi's via a modern podcasting app that you can find at new podcast apps.com. Dave Jones sent me 500 sats for my episode on the Keel Mutiny. He wrote, I love World War I history. If you don't understand World War I, you can never understand World War II. And it's not covered nearly enough. Thank you for this episode. Well, thanks, Dave.
Starting point is 00:11:20 I think, especially Americans, the first World War really gets overlooked. Yet it was just as important for shaping how the 20th century unfolded as the Second World War. And as you said, there are clear lines linking the two together. New listener, Dreb Scott, sent me a massive 11,111 sats for my episode on Roman naming conventions. He wrote, enjoyed this. Found you from your boostagram to the podcasting 2.0 podcast. I've subscribed and will definitely be hitting up your back catalog. He then sent another boost of 3,22 sats from the episode on Joseph Bonaparte, the King of New Jersey. He added, I am really enjoying this podcast. Well, thanks, Treb.
Starting point is 00:11:59 In addition to asking my listeners to send in boostagrams, I also support the podcast I enjoy listening to as well. And if any of you are curious how you can send me a boostogram, just do a search on podcasting Boostagram, and you can easily find information on how to do it. There are currently almost 5,000 podcasts set up to receive boostagrams from listeners. And also, remember, if you leave a review or send me a boostagram,
Starting point is 00:12:21 you two can have it read on the show.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.