Everything Everywhere Daily: History, Science, Geography & More - The Tyranny of the Rocket Equation (Encore)
Episode Date: November 29, 2024In 1897, the visionary Russian rocket scientist Konstantin Tsiolkovsky discovered an equation that governed how rockets worked. His equation, which was independently discovered by several other rock...et scientists, immutably governs how we can send rockets into space. The variables in his equation have determined everything surrounding spaceflight and rocketry since its inception and will for the foreseeable future. Learn more about the Tyranny of the Rocket Equation on this episode of Everything Everywhere Daily. Sponsors Sign up at butcherbox.com/daily and use code daily to get chicken breast, salmon or ground beef FREE in every order for a year plus $20 off your first order! Subscribe to the podcast! https://everything-everywhere.com/everything-everywhere-daily-podcast/ -------------------------------- Executive Producer: Charles Daniel Associate Producers: Ben Long & Cameron Kieffer Become a supporter on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/everythingeverywhere Update your podcast app at newpodcastapps.com Discord Server: https://discord.gg/UkRUJFh Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/everythingeverywhere/ Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/everythingeverywheredaily Twitter: https://twitter.com/everywheretrip Website: https://everything-everywhere.com/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
The following is an encore presentation of Everything Everywhere Daily.
In 1897, the visionary Russian rocket scientist Constantine Sealkovsky
discovered an equation that governed how rockets worked.
His equation, which was independently discovered by several other rocket scientists,
immutably governs how we can send rockets into space.
The variables in his equation have determined everything surrounding spaceflight and
rocketry since its inception and will for the foreseeable future.
Learn more about the tier.
any of the rocket equation on this episode of Everything Everywhere Daily.
What if your perceptions about the past were wrong?
ThruLine is a podcast that takes you back in time to uncover the parts of the story that may
have gone unnoticed.
It effectively turned day into night.
And how it shaped the world now.
Time travel with us every week on the ThruLine podcast from NPR.
Rockets have been around in some form for centuries.
If you remember back to my episode on gunpowder, the Chinese were using rockets and warfare
and for fireworks for about a thousand years.
While rockets were a known thing, they left scientists baffled as to how they worked.
They weren't being pushed like a sailboat, and they weren't using friction with the ground
like walking or a horse pulling a wagon.
The late 19th and early 20th century saw several people around the world independently tackle
the problem.
The first person recognized to have solved the physics behind rockets and therefore would
get credit as the first rocket scientist is Constantine Sealkovsky.
Sealcovsky realized that rockets worked because Newton's third law stipulated that for every action,
there is an equal and opposite reaction. Rockets moved forward because they were expelling something
else from behind. The principle by which rockets moved was demonstrated by Sealcoffsky with a simple
thought experiment. Suppose that you were in a boat in the middle of a pond. The boat had no sail or no
oars to paddle. You are basically stuck in the middle of a pond with no way to move. However, on the boat,
you did have a pile of heavy rocks. You could get yourself to shore by throwing the rocks off the back
of the boat, not dropping them into the water, but throwing them horizontally. This would give the
boat momentum, which, in theory, could get your boat to the shore. This is the same principle behind a rocket.
Instead of rocks, however, you are expelling molecules of gas at very high speeds.
Sealkovsky created an equation that explained everything, which is today known as the
Sealkovsky equation or more generally as the rocket equation.
Without getting into the math too much, the equation is as follows.
Delta V, or the change in the rocket speed, equals the exhaust velocity of the rocket engines
times the natural logarithm of the final mass of the rocket over the initial mass of the rocket.
Seulkovsky recorded the date of his discovery of the equation as May 10, 1897.
Other people such as the English mathematician William Moore, the American rocket pioneer Robert Goddard,
and the German physicist Hermann Oberth independently discovered the rocket equation as well.
And just as an aside, Constantine Seulcovsky, the man who helped usher in the modern world of spaceflight,
lived for most of his life in a log cabin.
Now, you might look at the equation and not think much of it.
but it has several profound implications.
Implications that govern everything to do with rockets and spaceflight.
One has to do with mass.
Suppose you wanted to put a 100 kilogram object into orbit.
You would need a certain amount of fuel to do this.
However, the fuel you use also has mass,
and that mass would need fuel to launch it,
and that fuel would need fuel to launch it,
and so on and so on.
The amount of fuel isn't infinite, but it does mean that you need an enormous amount of fuel to launch something even quite small because you're launching the fuel as well as the payload.
And that's why rockets are so big and why there are no small rockets.
There are no shoulder-mounted or backyard rockets that could conceivably fly into orbit.
Moreover, the more mass you try to fly into space increases the size of a rocket exponentially.
The Apollo program launched something smaller than the size of a truck trailer into space,
but required a rocket, the Saturn 5, vastly larger than one just carrying a small space capsule.
So long as we're using chemical reactions, the exponential growth in the amount of fuel needed
means that there is a limit to how large of something we can launch into orbit using conventional rockets.
You couldn't, for all practical purposes, launch something as large as a cruise ship into orbit all at once.
Another implication is the amount of fuel that is part of any rocket.
Rockets are almost all fuel.
It is common for the mass of a rocket sitting on a launch pad to consist of 85 to 95% fuel.
The actual amount of payload for a rocket is usually around 2 to 4%.
To put this into perspective, the mass of a large cargo ship may only be 3% fuel, and your car is around 4% to 5% fuel.
A freight locomotive may be 11%, and a commercial airliner might be as high as 35%.
A rocket is not dissimilar to a can of soda.
An aluminum can of soda is about 94% soda and 6% can.
The external fuel tank on the space shuttle was 96% fuel, making it even more efficient than a soda can.
So to use the soda can model, all of the soda is rocket fuel, and the can is the apparatus of the rocket,
which is all necessary to put the pull tab into orbit.
This is why engineers have to worry so much about mass and efficiency
when designing anything that's going into space.
Every kilogram has to be accounted for
because it results in significantly more rocket fuel.
And it's also why rockets are built in stages.
You want to shed as much mass as you can in order to increase your velocity.
Getting rid of the lower stages of a rocket when they aren't needed anymore
will help increase velocity.
This is just dealing with the,
mass part of the equation. The other parts of the equation have limits as well. In terms of the
exhaust velocity of the rocket, there are several different rocket fuels that can be used. Solid rocket
fuel can have an exhaust velocity of 3 kilometers per second, and a methane oxygen rocket can
have an exhaust velocity of 4.5 kilometers per second. All other rocket fuels are pretty much somewhere
between those values. So long as we're using rockets that are providing thrust from a chemical reaction,
there is a limit to just how much exhaust velocity there can be.
You can't arbitrarily make it any larger.
The final variable is delta V.
Delta V is one of the biggest factors in any orbital flight.
And as far as launching from the ground is concerned,
the initial point of delta V is zero.
In the case of launching something into space,
it is indicative just how much velocity you need to get anywhere.
Just to use approximate numbers,
something has to go about 8 kilometers per second
to get into low Earth orbit.
which is only about 250 miles or 400 kilometers away.
If you remember back to my episode on how satellites work,
getting into orbit is more about speed than it is about altitude.
We have to go that high to avoid atmospheric drag.
Without drag, you could orbit as high as one meter off the surface.
Once you get into the Earth's orbit, the hard part is done.
From there, the extra velocity needed to get to the moon
is only an additional 6 kilometers per second,
and to Mars an additional 8.
This is why there has been talk of building a base on the moon.
The velocity necessary to escape the gravity of the moon is much less than that to escape the Earth.
If you want to explore the rest of the solar system, it's much easier to do from the moon than it is from the Earth.
From an energy standpoint, the biggest leap in spaceflight wasn't landing on the moon, it was just getting into orbit in the first place.
All of these constraints I've mentioned have led to engineers and physicists to coin the term the tyranny of the rocket equation.
The rocket equation rules everything when it comes to spaceflight.
The design of rockets, spacecraft, satellites, and everything else has to take the rocket
equation into consideration.
Even something novel like Starship by SpaceX, on which I did a previous episode and which
just had its first test launch, is subject to the rocket equation.
Starship is more focused on reducing costs, but still doing so within the confines of the
rocket equation.
If the rocket equation has a tyrannical hold on travel by rockets, is there any way to break this tyranny?
And the answer is, sort of.
You can't break the laws of physics, but you can break the constraints around how rockets function today.
The first way would be to get rid of chemical reactions to provide thrust.
Chemical reactions have a maximum exhaust velocity of about 4.5 kilometers per second,
which is close to what some rockets are doing already.
A far more efficient rocket would be a nuclear thermal rocket.
Uranium has an energy density a million times greater than hydrogen.
A nuclear rocket would work by exposing gas, most probably hydrogen, to an extremely hot nuclear reactor.
If the gas were heated to about 3,000 degrees Kelvin, it could have an exhaust velocity of 10 kilometers per second, more than twice that of a chemical reaction.
However, that's just the beginning.
The theoretical maximum exhaust velocity for a nuclear thermal reactor is 5,000 kilometers per second.
The mere doubling of the exhaust velocity from a nuclear rocket would change everything,
turning the fuel-to-mass ratio from something like a soda can to something perhaps more like an airliner.
NASA is already investigating nuclear rockets for use outside of the Earth's orbit.
The other way around the rocket equation is to cheat on the delta V.
Earlier, I said that going into orbit was an issue of speed, not altitude.
And this is true, mostly.
The higher the orbit, the longer it takes to go around the Earth.
In low Earth orbit, it takes about 90 minutes.
However, if you keep going up, you will eventually reach a point where it takes one day to go around the Earth,
exactly the same as the Earth's rotation.
This is known as geostationary orbit, a subject on which I've done a previous episode.
If you can get 22,236 miles or 35,786 kilometers above the surface of the Earth,
then you are traveling at orbital speeds, even though you just went straight up.
It wouldn't even matter how long it took you to get to that altitude.
The idea proposed to do this would be a space elevator.
A space elevator would be a long cable which extended from geostationary orbit down to the surface of the Earth.
A vehicle would then just need to climb the cable, which could be done with significantly
less energy than with a rocket.
A final way around the equation would just be the discovery of some form of physics that we
currently don't know.
If we learned of some way to nullify the effects of gravity, we could make the rocket equation
moot, but as of now, that is only the realm of science fiction.
Understanding the rocket equation isn't rocket science.
Well, okay, actually, I guess in this case it technically is rocket science, but it isn't
difficult to grasp. The next time you watch a rocket blast off into space, keep in mind the rules
that govern that rocket. It was engineered to perform within the laws of physics, which were outlined
in the late 19th century, by a Russian who lived in a log cabin. The executive producer of Everything
Everywhere Daily is Charles Daniel. The associate producers are Benji Long and Cameron Kiever.
I want to give a big shout out to everyone who supports the show over on Patreon,
including the show's producers. Your support helps me put out a show every single
day. And also, Patreon is currently the only place where Everything Everywhere daily merchandise is
available to the top tier of supporters. If you'd like to talk to other listeners of the show
and members of the Completionist Club, you can join the Everything Everywhere Daily Facebook group
or Discord server. Links to everything are in the show notes.
