Fantasy Football Today - ADP Risers, Big News, Twitter Polls, and Emails (08/09 Fantasy Football Podcast)

Episode Date: August 9, 2021

Would you rather start your team with Travis Kelce/Joe Mixon or Ezekiel Elliott/Darren Waller? Dave and Heath weigh in and so do our Twitter followers! Also, why is Heath so low on Clyde Edwards-Helai...re (8:53)? ... A look at the big headlines (15:00)! Saquon Barkley could practice this week but Kenny Golladay remains out. Curtis Samuel is dropping in Heath's rankings. Is Laviska Shenault a riser? ... We tell you about some players who are making some noise in training camp and feel poised to rise up draft boards! Mecole Hardman (29:30), Zack Moss (32:10), Darnell Mooney (37:40) and more. Plus more Twitter polls about how to start your team (46:40). Barkley and Chubb or Aaron Jones and Diggs? ... Your emails at fantasyfootball@cbsi.com 'Fantasy Football Today' is available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Stitcher, Google Podcasts, Castbox, and wherever else you listen to podcasts. Follow our FFT team on Twitter: @FFToday, @AdamAizer, @JameyEisenberg, @daverichard, @heathcummingssr, @ctowerscbs, @BenSchragg Watch FFT on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/fantasyfootballtoday Join our Facebook group https://www.facebook.com/groups/FantasyFootballToday/ Sign up for the FFT newsletter https://www.cbssports.com/newsletter You can listen to Fantasy Football Today on your smart speakers! Simply say "Alexa, play the latest episode of the Fantasy Football Today podcast" or "Hey Google, play the latest episode of the Fantasy Football Today podcast." To hear more from the CBS Sports Podcast Network, visit https://www.cbssports.com/podcasts/ To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 Kick off an exciting football season with BetMGM, an official sportsbook partner of the National Football League. Yard after yard, down after down, the sportsbook born in Vegas gives you the chance to take action to the end zone and celebrate every highlight reel play. And as an official sportsbook partner of the NFL, BetMGM is the best place to fuel your football fandom on every game day. With a variety of exciting features, BetMGM offers you plenty of seamless ways to jump straight onto the gridiron and to embrace peak sports action. Ready for another season of gridiron glory? What are you waiting for?
Starting point is 00:00:38 Get off the bench, into the huddle, and head for the end zone all season long. Visit BetMGM.com for terms and conditions. Must be 19 years of age or older. Ontario only. Please gamble responsibly. Gambling problem? For free assistance, call the Connex Ontario helpline at 1-866-531-2600.
Starting point is 00:00:59 BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario. Hey, Dave, Jamie, Heath, and Beck. Hey, what's up, everybody? I hope you're in a good mood and ready to talk some fantasy football. I'm in a good mood because Saquon Barkley might practice today. It is a good day in fantasy football land. You know, I thought we were going to have a lot of injuries to talk about, but so far, you know, it wasn't that bad of a weekend.
Starting point is 00:01:45 Justin Jefferson seems like he's going to be okay. But we'll talk about some players who are turning heads and making headlines. Do you need to be drafting Darnell Mooney? Is he pushing his way closer to the top 100? We'll talk about it right now on Fantasy Football Today. I'm Adam Azer with Dave Richard and Heath Cummings. Dave, I'll have you know that I discovered a new delicious pizza place right in my neighborhood, and I'm very excited about it.
Starting point is 00:02:06 It was a great weekend in that regard. And I discovered a terrible pizza place far from my neighborhood that was recommended to me over 10 years ago that I didn't get the chance to go to until this weekend. What? I've got a pizza take. How weird. Okay. I like Detroit-style pizza better than New York-style pizza. I don't know what that is, but you also don't know what New York-style pizza is, but go ahead.
Starting point is 00:02:31 Heath, can you clarify Detroit-style pizza? Yeah, I don't know what that is. It's a square. It's a thick crust. Yep. And it's phenomenally delicious. And where did you acquire such a pie? There is a newish place called Ra Ra's in our neighborhood. And it is really, really good. I mean, I've had, the thing is, I know
Starting point is 00:02:57 exactly what New York pizza is because I had pizza in New York. I've never had pizza in Detroit. I'm only getting, but like fake Detroit pizza is much better than real New York. I've never had pizza in Detroit. I'm only getting... But like, fake Detroit pizza is much better than real New York pizza. Okay, okay. I can't wait to get Detroit pizza when I go to Detroit this week. That's good to know. I wish I had known that before I went and found
Starting point is 00:03:17 a place that had a crust that tasted like matzah. Oh, that's never good. Alright, so... The topping quality was good, but the crust was very matzah. If you ever go to New York, don't do what Heath did. Don't eat in Times Square. It's a tourist trap. There's bad pizza there.
Starting point is 00:03:30 Now. What made your pizza so good? Let's talk about football. Let's talk about fantasy football here. Hold on, hold on. No, it was. Your pizza. Stop.
Starting point is 00:03:37 Come on, Dave. You're. Come on. We need to talk about the important stuff, too, Adam. I will promise you later I will give you the full pizza review. But let's get to some Twitter polls here. I'm fat, okay? I like to know these things.
Starting point is 00:03:49 We did our tight end preview, and you might be considering Travis Kelsey maybe as early as fifth overall. I know a lot of people are very excited about him. His ADP is around ninth overall. I did ask this question on Twitter, and I thought it was a really interesting debate. I knew who was going to win because everybody hates Joe Mixon. But which start do you prefer in full PPR?
Starting point is 00:04:10 Kelsey and Mixon or Zeke and Waller? If I take Zeke, do I have to take Waller in round two? Well, if you want the tight end, yeah, because you're not getting him in round three. Yeah, for me, this one's not. And it's close in terms of perceptive value and stuff like that but in terms of projections i have travis kelsey like 40 points better than darren waller and i have zeke 20 points better than mixin so i would much much much rather have kelsey and mixin than waller and zeke i'll go the other way i'll i'll take Zeke and count on the bounce-back year from him
Starting point is 00:04:48 rather than the bounce-back year from Mixon while getting Darren Waller, who is a downgrade from Travis Kelsey for whatever it's worth, but I think Waller keeps going strong. Yeah, I knew Mixon's going to lose every Twitter poll. I could ask Mixon or Zach Moss, and he's going to lose to Zach Moss at this point, I think. But Kelsey and Mixon
Starting point is 00:05:08 got 46.5% of the vote. Zeke and Waller got 53.5% of the vote. It's kind of interesting because if you look at their points per game in 2020 and I only did Zeke with Zach first five games. He was awesome. He averaged 21.6 points per game
Starting point is 00:05:24 in PPR. But if you look at their points per game in 2020 and their points per game in 2019, Zeke and Waller beat Kelsey and Mixon both seasons, which I thought was interesting, Heath. Well, yeah, but I really this frustrates me. I think it's why you do it but we are perfectly happy citing everyone's Dallas stats with Dak but never thinking there's any chance that Dak will repeat the stats that he did because we know they're not going to throw 700 passes and run 800 plays but what should I should I really take in his I don't think you should use a four and a half game sample size that we know is not predictive I used all five number of plays I used all five games I understand I I unless and
Starting point is 00:06:11 I'm fine with this if we want to start talking about Dak as QB one then we can talk about CD lamb with Dak and Zeke with Dak and all that but you can't use their stats in these games that we know are like fairy tale land yeah. Yeah, I get it. But what was I supposed to use for Zeke? You could just say Zeke in 2019, the last season when all of these guys played a full season under normal circumstances, Zeke and Waller were better. Okay, fine. That was part of it.
Starting point is 00:06:39 That was half of the analysis. Okay, fine. That was the good half. All right. All right. All right. So some split there. And I think if you said Zeke and Waller, which 53.5% of the voters did, that's a strike against taking Kelsey as early as fifth overall. Because you almost certainly can get Waller with your second round pick.
Starting point is 00:07:00 And to be clear, I don't have Kelsey fifth overall. I've got him seventh or eighth. So I would take Zeke over Kelsey. I just wouldn't take waller and run two why um because i think there's i don't think waller is going to be that close to kelsey you think what do you think he's going to be in terms of the other players that you can get in the middle of round two like he was actually better per game than Justin Jefferson in full PPR last year. I'm pretty sure he was better per game than AJ Brown.
Starting point is 00:07:29 He had a lot more catches. I would, I would rather have Calvin Ridley or Stefan digs or the Andre Hopkins. Okay. Yeah. But I feel like they're off the board. What are the range? I would rather have AJ Brown too,
Starting point is 00:07:41 because I think he's going to take a step forward. I would take Waller over Jefferson. All right. You guys are fun. All right, Dave, because I think he's going to take a step forward. I would take Waller over Jefferson. All right. You guys are fun. All right, Dave, we'll get you back in there in a second. Leave your mailbag questions in Apple Podcasts, and we'll answer it on Saturday's mailbag show. But here's the thing. So you've been asking a lot of questions in Apple Podcasts and leaving us five-star reviews, and I appreciate it.
Starting point is 00:08:01 First of all, a couple things. One, we would really appreciate a review in addition to the question. We want people who haven't listened to the show to know what you like about the show. So they say, oh, I'm not just reading fantasy questions. I'm reading a nice review. I get the sense that this is a good fantasy show. So please, if you could, leave a review.
Starting point is 00:08:18 That would be great. Second, I'm more or less done with Keeper questions only because we're getting so many questions now, and Keeper questions only help one person. So let's try... Tweet them to me. What? Tweet them to me. Okay, yeah, tweet them. Right, we answer on Twitter. At Dave Richard, if you're watching on
Starting point is 00:08:34 YouTube, you can see our Twitter handles. At Dave Richard, at Heath Cummings, S-R, Heath Cummings Sr., at Adam Azer, A-I-Z-E-R, at Jamie Eisenberg, J-A-M-E-Y, at C-Towers CBS, I think I got it-E-Y, at CtowersCBS. I think I got it all. But yeah, please leave non-keeper questions if you can,
Starting point is 00:08:51 and that goes with the emailers as well, fantasyfootballatcbsi.com. Do you guys remember the Dream Team? The movie or the real Dream Team that won the gold medal in the Olympics? The real one. Yeah, of course. Okay, great, Because Paramount Plus has an awesome documentary.
Starting point is 00:09:07 So Magic. Yes. Jordan. Yes, yes. I'm so glad you're bringing this up. Barkley, Bird, Malone, Ewing. The 1992 Dream Team changed the game of basketball forever.
Starting point is 00:09:16 Dream Team, Birth of the Modern Athlete is a new five-part original series streaming exclusively on Paramount Plus. The documentary takes you deep into the greatest basketball team ever assembled with never-before-heard audio interviews from the players themselves. Hear from the team as they break down the greatest exhibition game ever, Team Magic versus Team Jordan, and how the torch was passed.
Starting point is 00:09:40 You can watch Dream Team, Birth of the Modern Athlete, a new five-part series now streaming exclusively on paramount plus that sounds good it's awesome oh you watched it yes oh cool that's great all right i'm into that all right let's do an email here conrad from the third largest city city in Washington State? Yeah, I'm drawing a blank on that. Spokane? That was my guess. Maybe. Yeah. That would be a good call. I like how on the video, Shrek pops
Starting point is 00:10:18 in. Spokane? Pops right out. I just thought of a new team name. It's not fantasy football relevant. How about Jeremy Spokane? Oh, gosh. No, come on. That's good.
Starting point is 00:10:30 No, no. Subject line was, why, Heath? How about Spokane like an idiot moron? That's better. Thank you. I listen to all your podcasts. Over the years, I've learned that my opinions are usually more similar to Heath's as far as rankings go.
Starting point is 00:10:47 I've been listening all offseason on different rankings disputes, but while putting together my own rankings, I saw that Heath was much lower on Clyde Edwards-Elair. I view CEH as more of a second-rounder, so I would like to hear the reason why Heath is low to justify me dropping him down my draft board. Well, Conrad, I appreciate the fact that you think like me. And if you think like me, then you should always embrace those times
Starting point is 00:11:12 when your rankings are different than everyone else's because that's part of the fun of being us. The reason that I am concerned about Clyde Edwards-Solaire is because of his unusual rookie year when he was a 70% of the snap guy, 67% all of the first six games of the season, and then never again. I think he had one game over 60% in his last 10 games.
Starting point is 00:11:38 The team brought in Le'Veon Bell. In the playoffs, they favored Darrell Williams on passing downs. And now in training camp, we're hearing about how good Jarek McKinnon is on passing downs. And we're hearing about Darrell Williams scoring goal line touchdowns. And I am just concerned. If you remember Ben Gretsch from a couple years ago, he liked to talk about the trap backs.
Starting point is 00:11:57 The guys are going to get a bunch of carries, but they don't catch a bunch of passes. And they don't necessarily do a lot in short yardage. I'm afraid that Clyde Edwards-Alaire is a trap back. He played 50 third-down snaps. I almost said 35th-down snaps. That would have been weird. 50 third-down snaps last year. That's an average of 3.8 per game.
Starting point is 00:12:17 How does he improve on that? How does he get more when they've got McKinnon and Williams there? So I'm a little nervous. I'm not entirely sure that the goal-line role is going to go to Daryl Williams, but I'm also not entirely sure that the goal line role is going to go to Edwards-Hilaire when Mahomes was dominating from inside the three-yard line last year. So I'm nervous, too. I do have him ranked higher than you do, Heath.
Starting point is 00:12:43 I still think that he's a contender for 1,200 total yards. I think there's a pretty clear top 14. I would put Chris Carson at the top of the next group. But then I think there's just a bunch of guys from 16 to really 23 for me that could be put in different places. But Clyde's in that range and for a lot of people he's a borderline number one running back you so you're saying you have Carson ahead of him oh yeah I've got Carson I've got Gaskin I've got like I've got most running backs whoa
Starting point is 00:13:15 Gaskin wow yeah no it was a lot better than he was last year he was and he saw competition right he saw almost twice as many third down snaps. I think he saw more short yardage goal line work or more opportunities than Edwards-Hilaire had, too. So it just depends on how much more they put on Edwards-Hilaire's plate, and we don't have a good idea of that now, and I'm not sure we're going to have that good of an idea of that by the time the season starts. And maybe because we don't have that good of an idea
Starting point is 00:13:45 it probably means that he won't get it i would just say like and coach speak can get you in a lot of trouble but we've had a lot of trouble with edwards hilaire last year we've heard frank wright come out and say we're going to treat jonathan taylor more like a feature back this year and just work other guys in around him we We heard Sean McVay before Cam Akers went down talking about how that he can be our workhorse running back. I welcome some information like that. If the Chiefs or someone would say, I think Clyde Edwards-Lair is going to be a three-down workhorse back or Clyde's going to score a bunch of touchdowns, anything like that. I'd get more optimistic. I haven't heard anything like that. And you won't not from this coaching staff, because I don't, I don't think that they like
Starting point is 00:14:31 to talk that way about their backs until it's obvious. Like once it's done on the field, like they were talking that way about Kareem hunt after Kareem hunt became the guy a couple of years ago. So I, I, I don't mind taking Edwards-Alaire in late round two, but that's the earliest I would do it. Yeah, and he is going 20th overall before Mixon, which probably everybody is happy about, except for us. He does hate Joe Mixon.
Starting point is 00:15:00 Dobbins, way before Dobbins. I mean, there's a big drop. There's Mixon and... Mixon and Edwards-Elair are back-to-back. They're almost the same exact ADP. And then eight more picks. Seven more picks off the board before Dobbins, then Swift. Would you guys take David Montgomery?
Starting point is 00:15:16 Because Tariq Cohen is still weeks away from coming back. They're saying Damian Williams has been working on passing downs. Would you take David Montgomery or Clyde Edwards-Elair? I don't think Cohen is the problem anymore. I think it's Damian Williams that is not really a problem, but someone who is going to take some work away from Montgomery. I do currently have Edwards-Elair ranked ahead of Montgomery.
Starting point is 00:15:35 I could see myself changing that. I have Montgomery around and a half ahead of Clyde. You just don't want anything to do with Edwards-Elair. And I get it. I totally get it. Well, I look forward to the running back preview because Jamie is I think the highest on Edwards-Hilaire.
Starting point is 00:15:53 Optimistic about him. So we'll get a different viewpoint there and that will be tomorrow's episode. Thank you for the email, Conrad. Let's do the news and notes. So Saquon Barkley could come off the pup list as early as today, Monday and start practicing and I'm not going to ask you to rank them right
Starting point is 00:16:09 now. Let's see how things go. Have we had a podcast since the Saquon Barkley might not play until week three? No. We're both reacting to Saquon Barkley maybe missing the first two weeks and Saquon Barkley coming off the pup.
Starting point is 00:16:31 Why would he miss the first two weeks and Saquon Barkley coming off the pup why would he miss the first two weeks that was the report that they are not rushing anything and he will he in report said somewhere between week one and week three yeah he said it could be as late as week three but they're not ruling out him coming back sooner. This is obviously good news. So bad news report and a good news turn of events. I'm a little more encouraged with Saquon now. I'm glad he's off the pup. Okay. So he's ADP is 12th right now.
Starting point is 00:16:58 How's that? I'm comfortable taking him at 12. I am not. Mix it or Barkley? Mixon. Mixon. Wow.
Starting point is 00:17:09 Okay. I want to just do a Twitter poll right now. I think Barkley's going to get it. The rest of America will. I did a Twitter poll with Mixon, Barkley, and Jonathan Taylor. And I think Mixon got like four votes. Who got the most? Taylor?
Starting point is 00:17:22 I think it was Barkley, actually. Actually, I've noticed that people are much higher on Barkley than we are. They're not as concerned. Right. Not as concerned as we are. I might even do a Twitter poll. I'm not going to waste my time. All right.
Starting point is 00:17:34 Justin Jefferson has a sprained AC joint, shoulder injury. He's wide receiver seven in ADP. Have you guys moved Justin Jefferson down at all? I have not. I, I'd like to learn if he's going to wear a harness to help protect his shoulder for this season. And if we find out that he is, then I will move him down. I was already too low on him compared to ADP. So I've just not moved him, but I'm not getting, I might get him now. Where do you have him? 10. And his ADP is 7.
Starting point is 00:18:07 So that would mean guys like you have A.J. Brown, Keenan Allen ahead of him? I have Keenan Allen, Allen Robbins, and Terry McClure ahead of him. Not A.J. Brown? Yes, A.J. Brown's well ahead of him. Okay. Washington wide receiver Curtis Samuel. He has been doing individual work.
Starting point is 00:18:25 He may not play in the preseason. He is a round eight or nine pick. Wide receiver 42 off the board. This is Curtis Samuel. He's going in between Mike Williams and Michael Gallup. How would you guys rank those three? Samuel, Mike, well, it's actually an ADP. It's Mike Williams, Curtis Samuel, Michael Gallup.
Starting point is 00:18:43 I still have Samuel at the top. I believe I have Gallup ahead of Mike Williams, Curtis Samuel, Michael Gallup. I still have Samuel at the top. I believe I have Gallup ahead of Mike Williams, Mixon ahead of all three. This is one where I'm making a downgrade based on the news and the talk. If they really don't know for sure if he's going to be available to complete a full practice
Starting point is 00:19:04 before the first preseason game it's a new team and yes it's the same coaching staff from two years ago but it's a new quarterback there's a lot of wide receivers they're getting targets from ryan fitzpatrick including adam humphries who kind of plays the same role who fitzpatrick requested they bring onto the team i'm i'm more and curtis sam Samuel is kind of a borderline guy anyway. So he's outside of my... I had him around 36. I've got him closer to 46 now.
Starting point is 00:19:33 Mike Williams, big gap. Then Samuel, then Gallup. It's a good point that he's a borderline guy in terms of average draft position, but I know the people who like Curtis Samuel would say that he really broke out the last eight games of 2020. He was he was really good. And they're hoping that he builds off that. And they're they're seeing Curtis Samuel as a potential breakout.
Starting point is 00:19:59 I didn't mean he was a borderline guy in terms of average draft position. I meant he's a borderline guy in terms of NFL career. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Well, I mean, it's true. It's true. But his last 10 games is what people are excited about. His 16-game pace was 93 catches, 1,069 yards, five touchdowns.
Starting point is 00:20:19 And he was so much better than Robbie Anderson in that stretch. All right. Anyway, back to the news. DJ Chark, finger surgery. He's going to be out hopefully back in week one. They're optimistic that Chark will be back in week one. So now, Dave, is LaVisca Chenault the best Jaguars wide receiver to draft? Because Chark, as of yesterday, was still the first one off the board.
Starting point is 00:20:40 I think I'd rather wait for Chenault at his ADP and Jones at his ADP, Marvin Jones at his ADP, than take Chark at this point. I still, I'm getting a growing sense that this is going to be a spread-it-around type of an offense where there won't be one lead receiver. I think you're going to see those three receivers chop it up with their tight ends, their h back their 35 year old h back with travis etn i i don't know if there's a guy on this team that gets 100 targets this year so taking charke in that round seven eight range i think is reachy i'm going to wait
Starting point is 00:21:19 on him and i'm i may pull him third on that list i might just move him so far down that I just don't draft him in any leagues. Yeah, I updated projections a little bit because I think, again, new coaching staff, new quarterback. I still have Chark projected to leave the team in targets, but I actually have them back-to-back-to-back now. Jones, Chark, Chenault. Back-to-back-to-back in your rankings.
Starting point is 00:21:43 Yes, in terms of my projections. Oh, okay. All just between, I think, 37, 38, 39. I would take all of them ahead of Curtis Samuel. Oh, ahead of Curtis Samuel. Okay, hold on. I just want to follow up with this, Dave, because you said you'd rather take Chenault and Jones
Starting point is 00:21:59 at their ADPs, but I wonder, especially with Chenault, if this is going to lead to a rise in his average draft position. It might. It absolutely might, especially with Chenault, if this is going to lead to a rise in his average draft position. It might. It absolutely might, especially after this week. If he puts up some nice film in the preseason, then it absolutely will move up his ADP.
Starting point is 00:22:16 Fluid situation. Let's see what happens with Chenault. I think it might make Jones one of the better bargains on draft day. Heath, my question to you is, what are the target projections that you have for these guys in Jacksonville? I think it's probably higher. I think I have them all over 100 targets.
Starting point is 00:22:33 I'm just trying to pull it up right here. Yeah, so I've got 124 for Chark, 118 for Chennault, 118 for Marvin Jones, 71 for ETN. Yeah. I'm done taking any of these receivers in round seven for now. You have to. Round eight is where I think I'd probably be the
Starting point is 00:22:56 most okay taking Chenault just because he's the healthiest guy that's got some good PPR value, but I don't know which ADP we're looking at and which one we're using to figure out Marvin Jones, but I don't know which ADP we're looking at and which one we're using to figure out Marvin Jones. But after pick 100, I'm in.
Starting point is 00:23:08 Would you take LaVisca Chenault or Devante Smith? Still Smith. Uh, Chenault. Okay. Was that always the case or is that the injury? That's the injury. All right.
Starting point is 00:23:23 Speaking of injured wide receivers, Kenny Galladay out two to three weeks, hopefully with a hamstring injury. Did we talk? I don't think we talked about this, did we? It was in the midst of our quarterback and tight end preview. Well, we'll talk about it anyway. I haven't read maybe a single good thing about the Giants offense
Starting point is 00:23:40 so far in training camp. It seems pretty bad. And Galladay out now. Shepard apparently is having a training camp. It seems pretty bad. And Galladay out now. Shepard apparently is having a good camp. You know, Galladay seems to be falling a bit in the ADP since August 1st. He is now behind. I know he's behind.
Starting point is 00:23:57 Well, this says he's tied with Beckham. I think he's probably going behind Beckham, which seems a little weird. But 66th overall, so that's a round six pick for Kenny Galladay. Are you guys still okay with him in round six? I've got him 73rd overall in my PPR rankings. That's technically early round. Sounds like we lost Dave's mic.
Starting point is 00:24:21 Yeah, but I agree with Dave. End of round six, early round seven that's a good place for that's a good place for Galladay and there's upside from there it's just you can't have any sort of faith in him I would take him ahead of all of the Jacksonville
Starting point is 00:24:38 wide receivers I'd take him ahead of most of the guys we've talked about today but he's not I'm not sure he's going to be in my top 30 when I update rankings at the end of this week Dave I'm not sure he's going to be in my top 30 when I update rankings at the end of this week. Dave, I'm not sure if you can hear us, but we lost your microphone. Can you hear me now?
Starting point is 00:24:51 Yes, I can hear you now. There you go. You're back. Okay. All right. Sorry if we cut you off there. That was the reason why. Hunter Henry hurt his shoulder in practice on Sunday. It's not believed to be serious, but this is pretty recent news, so we'll react to it maybe later in the week. And then some contract stuff.
Starting point is 00:25:06 Miami restructured Xavier Howard's contract. They're star cornerbacks. That's good. Michael Gallup is not going to get a contract extension before the season starts, so this will be his walk year, basically. He'll be a free agent in 2022. That's Michael Gallup. They also, I think, don't owe any money to Amari Cooper beginning in 2022,
Starting point is 00:25:25 so Dallas' wide receiving unit could look a little bit different next year. The Colts gave Darius Leonard, star linebacker, a five-year extension, nearly $100 million. The Bills gave Josh Allen a pretty big extension. Decent, I would say. $258 million in six years, $150 million guaranteed. Just $43 million a year. It's okay. Trey Lance is being prepped to play situationally this year.
Starting point is 00:25:51 You thinking that's like a Taysom Hill kind of deal? Who's this, Trey Lance? Yeah. Yeah, I think that's maybe where he starts this season. And that was kind of the hunch that we had all along was that he would play just a little bit from, from week to week early on and then eventually take over. So almost like what we saw with Jalen hurts last year,
Starting point is 00:26:11 but I bet his timeline will be faster than Jalen hurts. His timeline. I was trying to remember how much did Lamar play his rookie year? A little bit. It was probably in the neighborhood of five snaps a game. Excuse me until he got in there to replace him, and then he was every snap. I thought that this report about Michael Thomas
Starting point is 00:26:31 ignoring phone calls from the coaches and the training staff during the offseason was pretty interesting. What do you guys make of this, Michael Thomas? Well, almost as interesting as his tweet today. Oh, I didn't see it. I think, do you have the exact tweet dave because it's i don't want to misquote michael thomas let's go get that he'll come after you if you do i'll get it i'll pull it up basically something to the effect of they try to ruin your reputation when you've saved
Starting point is 00:26:56 theirs by not telling everything no you know i'll tell you someone i'm afraid of there it is oh there we go i i did pretty well. I love the Comic Sans. Okay, let's read it. They try to damage your reputation. You save theirs by not telling your side of the story. All right. Yeah, it's not.
Starting point is 00:27:16 Who knows? Does this affect fantasy football at all? I think that there's some frustration building between Sean Payton and Michael Thomas over the timeline of the surgery what I'm sorry what nothing I I concur I also think there's some frustration building between Michael Thomas and Sean Payton yeah he's obviously I mean it just maybe it means he's not going to rush to get back, you know? It might.
Starting point is 00:27:47 It might mean he's not on the Saints for a whole lot longer either. This season, I would imagine. Yeah. But what a mess. I just wanted to say that I'm really glad that I don't cover the NBA because I am so afraid of talking about Kevin Durant. If you say anything bad about Kevin Durant, he is coming after you.
Starting point is 00:28:04 That guy does not like to be slandered. Okay. So I love you about Kevin Durant, he is coming after you. That guy does not like to be slandered. Okay, so I love you, Kevin Durant. I'm glad that we live in the same state now. We're like friends now. Love you, KD. All right, some players who are making, oh, do you make anything about Darren Waller and Julio Jones having missed some practices?
Starting point is 00:28:21 Is this a story? I wouldn't worry about Waller. Julio, I think we have to wait and see. Obviously, he's an older receiver. We know that he's dealt with injuries in the past. I downgraded Julio just a little bit. He's still in my top 15, but I put him behind the Rams and Tyler Lockett.
Starting point is 00:28:41 Oh, wow. Okay, Tyler Lockett. Yeah. Well, I know. i know yeah yeah nobody else ranks in there all right some players who are making headlines let's talk about potential adp risers we haven't had a preseason game yet except for the hall of fame game and i don't really know how much we're going to get out of preseason it just seems like when i was a boy starters played a lot in the preseason especially that third preseason game and now you just don't really see it as much but hopefully we get something to build off of some some information to use at least there have been a couple of coaches Sean Payton Vic Fangio who have come out and said that they're going to treat the third preseason game
Starting point is 00:29:19 like the third preseason game meaning because it's two weeks away from when there's actual NFL action, they're going to play their starters into the second half. Well, did that wait, hold on. Did they say they're going to play their starters into the second half? Because I feel like coaches are treating that third preseason game differently now than they used to,
Starting point is 00:29:37 you know, used to be able to kind of bank was as I remember it anyway, bank on starters playing into the third quarter, but I don't know that you do anymore. If they were going to do that, if a coach was going to play their playing into the third quarter. But I don't know that you do anymore. If they were going to do that, if a coach was going to play their starters into the third quarter, then that's the game they would do it in is the third preseason game. In the fourth preseason game, none of the starters play.
Starting point is 00:29:55 Half of the second teamers play. It's usually the back end of the roster, so they make good decisions on cut down day. But that game seems to be gone. I don't think the coaches are going to use any of the preseason games just for the back end of the roster anymore and i think ron rivera said that uh this week they will be playing their starters in their first preseason game so i think like we'll have some coaches that especially probably that have a lot of turnover that we will see some of that um i have some not really breaking news but but Mikko Hardman is listed first on the,
Starting point is 00:30:26 on the first team on the chiefs first unofficial death chart. I believe it's the first time he's ever been listed ahead of DeMarcus Robinson. All right. And I, we should start there because he wasn't even in this, some players making headlines segment, but he should be because he's having a good camp by all accounts,
Starting point is 00:30:39 Mikko Hardman. So, you know, is this a guy that could push his way into Jaguars wide receiver territory? He's there for me. I had him in my top 35 at the beginning of the off season. And then I felt like a dope and I kind of made him into Marcus Robinson and Brian Pringle all in the same range. And now he's clearly separated from those guys. according to every piece of information that we get that people are writing features on how much better he is every single day we hear about him
Starting point is 00:31:10 making a great play everyone says it's clear he's the number two wide receiver so i've gone back to projecting it like he's clearly the number two wide receiver and that makes him a top 35 wide receiver for me i um i actually currently have him projected ahead of the Jacksonville wide receivers. I get the sentiment, and I'm not quite as encouraged as you are, Heath, so I'm going to let you take him ahead of those Jacksonville wide receivers. I'd have to think about whether or not I would take him ahead of Marvin Jones, as silly as that might sound to some of you. Last year, and we can discuss this a little bit, only six times did a receiver on the chiefs not named tyree kill give you at least 13 ppr points in a game six times all year now that might have been because they were splitting up that number two role like some weeks it was sammy
Starting point is 00:31:56 when he was healthy and some weeks it was robinson some weeks it was hardman and if we're going to agree that okay every week it's going to be Hardman and that's it, then maybe he gets six games with 13-plus PPR all by himself this season, and that's not bad, but I don't know if that's somebody that I'm taking where you're taking him, Heath. Yeah, I've got a Mikkel Hardman-Azer stat that I put out on Twitter this morning. Over the past three years, Sammy Watkins has averaged about six targets a game in this Chiefs offense. Six targets a game over
Starting point is 00:32:28 a 17-game season would be 102 targets. Mecole Hardman has seen 103 targets in his career. He has 67 catches, 1,098 yards, and 10 touchdowns. That is a damn good stat. The only problem is, if it were a
Starting point is 00:32:44 true Acer stat, you probably would have eliminated the games that Sammy Watkins left with an injury, which is probably like 15 of them in that time frame. Which would have made it even better, probably. It would have made the targets per game even higher. That's a really cool stat. I like that. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:33:00 Okay, so Antonio Brown or Mikko Hardman? Brown. That's the range that i have man i would still take brown but that's that's for me the uh the range so this is like round eight we're talking yep yeah all right let's go to our next one zach moss so i'll actually throw it back to you heath because you maybe you were less in on moss are you starting to buy it a little bit um i i am not ignoring it and like i don't know that i'm in on moss i'm less excited about taking singletary except he was going and he's like double digit round joe mixon um ADP only moves one direction. People hate Devin Singletary in round 11 or 12.
Starting point is 00:33:47 Okay, yeah. I'm okay with Moss in the drafts where he's there round nine or later. I don't really... Like, I saw somebody talking about Myles Gaskin versus Zach Moss the other day, and I've seen trey sermon versus zach moss i guess that's but maybe a little better but it kind of goes back to the thing like the difference for me between sermon and moss is that if trey sermon gets 15 touches a game he's probably a top 20 running back if zach moss gets 15 touches a game. 13 of them are probably carries between the 20s.
Starting point is 00:34:25 Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. Well, would you... Okay, so then let's not go that high. How about Damian Harris? I'd rather have Harris. How about Ronald Jones? Hey, come on. That was my question.
Starting point is 00:34:38 Ronald Jones. Okay, ask it. Dave is going to tell you something about Zach Moss that sounds like he's playing the game operation, but about why Zach Moss might be a little overrated. But yes, Ronald Jones or Zach Moss. I'm taking Jones. Yeah, I'm not sure.
Starting point is 00:34:56 I've just made an adjustment to Moss, but it's probably Jones. I mean, just look at how this run game has operated the last two seasons. It's been mediocrity among running backs. They're not getting a lot of work. I think they ran the ball the sixth, fifth or sixth fewest time times of all team RBs last year. This is, this is a Josh Allen centric offense.
Starting point is 00:35:23 Everybody that's watched the Bills knows that. And Allen is the one that cleans up when it comes to red zone touchdowns on the ground. That could change, though. It really could change. Give the operation. How does that change? Because they've had their opportunities. They've had their opportunities.
Starting point is 00:35:38 Frank Gore two years ago, Zach Moss last year. They just didn't do well with them. Look, it's not like Allen's going to completely go away near the goal line, but you are talking about potentially the number one offense. They could lead the NFL in scoring. I think we probably all would put them in the top five if we were naming our five favorite offenses. There's touchdowns to go around.
Starting point is 00:36:00 If he's going to be... I don't know who gets the passing downs. That's the thing. I made the case that Moss was really... You know who gets the passing don't know who gets the passing downs. That's the thing. I mean, I made the case that Moss was really. You know who gets the passing downs? Josh Allen gets the passing downs. I mean, someone's going to. Devin Singletary had a decent amount of catches last year.
Starting point is 00:36:13 I'm saying if Zach Moss can get 35 catches and be the primary running back, then I think he's a round seven pick. He needs, and then this is the thing that I don't think is very likely for either of them, and why I'm just taking the one that goes in round 12. I think both of them need the other one to go away to be a round seven pick.
Starting point is 00:36:36 I don't think there's a big, I don't think you're going to see a situation where Zach Moss or Devin Singletary is getting 70% of the running back touches if the other one's there on the team. Oh, I don't agree with that. I mean, I really feel like Moss has that opportunity. I don't think Singletary does.
Starting point is 00:36:52 I don't agree with it either for a different reason. I think if one of them goes missing, I think Matt Breida gets in there and gets some more opportunities, and they keep going with a two-headed backfield that doesn't get enough work. This is a backfield I'm avoiding. But you just, Adam,
Starting point is 00:37:06 you take Zach Moss in round seven, round eight. I'm avoiding all these guys. It seems like there's like, there is something about Zach Moss that you really like. I think that the Bills like him more than Singletary. I think that they showed their hand down the stretch
Starting point is 00:37:26 last season and in the playoffs before he got injured in the one game. It's like a half of a game. Yeah, but he was completely dominating the carries in their most important game of the year and the catches. So I think they like him. And then every report, well, there was one report about how Singletary was
Starting point is 00:37:42 good, but he's dominated the reports. And that's all I've got to go on. I don't loveary was good. But he's dominated the reports. And that's all I've got to go on. I don't love to do that, but he is getting the buzz. So I just sort of feel like they want to go with Zach Moss. I'm getting a hunch. It obviously could be wrong. It's not based on all that much.
Starting point is 00:37:58 But that's it. And the only problem is the injuries, Dave. Not the only problem, but one of the problems is the injuries. So go ahead. You can read the list. To me, it's the biggest problem is the injuries, Dave. Not the only problem, but one of the problems is the injuries. So go ahead. You can read the list. To me, it's the biggest problem of all. So this is a list of injuries that Zach Moss has accrued since 2018. Here we go. Ankle, knee, shoulder, hamstring.
Starting point is 00:38:15 Hamstring was in February of 2020, by the way. Neck, August of 2020. Toe, September slash October 2020. Ankle, January 2021 that required tight rope surgery i keep thinking he's going to a new injury he's giving dates i can't even count that was pretty bad all right so that's a lot of injuries seven injuries i had eight but i was i was off okay let's go to our next player making some headlines chicago wide receiver Darnell Mooney, who had 631 yards on 98 targets. And his ADOT, you know,
Starting point is 00:38:49 I thought he was a deep guy. His ADOT went way down late in the season. I mean, it was like over eight only once, I think. This is a Bears team that has not had a number two receiver at any position. Tight end, wide receiver, running back, with more than 821 yards since
Starting point is 00:39:05 2014. This has not been the type of team that you want to take two wide receivers on. But could that change this year? Is anybody excited about drafting Darnell Mooney? Yeah. I'm interested if we're talking late round
Starting point is 00:39:21 10, early round 11. And let me see the wide receivers going in that range. Let's start there with Mooney. All right, so we'll go 120th overall. Am I on the running back list? Because Gus Edwards and Latavius Murray are not wide receivers. All right, 120th overall would be Mikko Hardman. That probably will rise.
Starting point is 00:39:42 Jets guys, Elijah Moore, Corey Davis, Devante Parker, Russell Gage, Marvin Jones. Oh, and then the guy that I think should be a big riser, Henry Ruggs, 133rd overall. Would you rather have Ruggs or Mooney? I've got Mooney one spot ahead of Ruggs. Yeah, the only names you said that I would rather have than Mooney were Hardman and Marvin Jones. I would
Starting point is 00:40:05 take him over all the rest of those guys. Over Moore, over the two Jets wide receivers, over Parker, over Russell Gage. See, I don't get that. I mean, why would I take a second Bears receiver? When you could have the number one Jets receiver. No, when I could have the number
Starting point is 00:40:21 one Jets receiver might end up being a really good receiver. Yeah, Darnell Mooney was a fifth round pick. Elijah Moore was a much better prospect. When I could have Russell Gage in the Falcons offense, when I could have Henry Ruggs, who was the first wide receiver selected last year, and John Brown is
Starting point is 00:40:37 on the second team right now. I don't know. This is not the kind of guy that usually breaks out just from a opportunity standpoint. No, but you said it late in the season at two games in November, a game in January, he had nine plus targets and three of those. And he's got a chance to see a little bit of a target boost just overall. I'm not saying he's going to get nine targets every game but he had 98 on the season that's 16 games he's better at math than i am but i think that's going
Starting point is 00:41:10 to follow in right around six targets per game he could end up getting six and a half to seven targets per game i will like him better when justin fields takes over because then those those uh improv improvisational plays could help out Darnell Mooney on deeper throws from fields when he's escaping pressure in the pocket. And I think he's going to continue to see full-time snaps in this offense. I don't, I don't mind drafting him and putting him on my bench and hoping that he becomes a number three receiver for my fantasy team,
Starting point is 00:41:40 but I don't see a ceiling of top 20. Yeah, I think this, I mean, I don't know. I don't know exactly what the ceiling is. I don't, the whole, the Bears have done this since 2014 thing doesn't move me quite as much just because I don't, I think they've already, if Andy Dalton plays 16 games, have probably the best quarterback they've had since 2014. I think Justin Fields is gonna be better than him. Bro, Andy Dalton plays 16 games to have probably the best quarterback they've had since 2014. I think Justin Fields is gonna be better than him. Bro.
Starting point is 00:42:06 Andy Dalton was bad last year. He's, he's not in his prime anymore. I don't know what the prime is for a quarterback or how to evaluate that because Tom Brady was not in his prime for like four years. And then he was good again. Let's, let's,
Starting point is 00:42:22 let's start with Brady versus Dalton. You were talking about Mitchell Trubisky and Nick Foles last year. Yeah's start with Brady versus Dalton. You were talking about Mitchell Trubisky and Nick Foles last year. Yeah, he might be better than last year, but in the last five years, they probably had someone better than Dalton. Dave, do you want to run through the Bears? No, it's okay.
Starting point is 00:42:38 This is a team that threw about 360 passes, I think, to wide receivers last year. Half of those might go down on Robinson, but shipping Anthony Miller off and basically having no number three wide receiver, I expect this to be a very concentrated passing attack at receiver. I think there's a chance Robinson could have 160.
Starting point is 00:42:55 Mooney could be around 120, which is about seven per game, like Dave said. And I do think it's a good sign when as a rookie you earn 98 targets. Okay, very good point. All right, so before we take a break, Marquez Calloway getting a little buzz for the Saints. Troy Kwon Smith's been hurt, obviously. Michael Thomas is hurt, and I called him and he didn't pick up.
Starting point is 00:43:16 And Brian Edwards for Las Vegas is running ahead of John Brown, which is why I was talking about Henry Ruggs. Do you guys make anything of these situations in New Orleans or Vegas? Two fun places to have a bachelor party. I like Callaway. Okay. I like Callaway.
Starting point is 00:43:38 Tall, a little lean, fast, and there's a target drain there, and someone's got to step up in the first few weeks of the season so he's an easy receiver to look at and say i'll draft him late and if he doesn't work out in the first few weeks of the year i can safely cut him because eventually michael thomas will be back and i know that he won't become a breakout guy so that's how i feel about him i think you could probably say the same thing about edwards and Edwards around later because he's he's got an injury history he's not exactly a burner he's
Starting point is 00:44:12 more of a big perimeter type of receiver he's like a low rent version of Allen Robinson if you want to say something like that and no one's necessarily talking about him as being the go-to guy in the Las Vegas offense. Adam, you love Henry Ruggs. We all know how good Darren Waller can be. Easy with the love term there. I'm interested. You want to be BFFs with him. I think Edwards might be good for five targets a game early on,
Starting point is 00:44:38 and if he doesn't do anything with them, John Gruden will switch to Hunter Renfro or Zay Jones or somebody like that. The only thing I disagree with is I don't think we're giving Brian Edwards quite enough credit. All evidence we had coming into last year is that Brian Edwards is a lot better than Marquez Calloway. He was a third-round pick. Calloway was undrafted. He actually ran a slightly faster 40 than Calloway, so I don't think Callaway is faster than him. I would rather draft Edwards than Callaway, but I expect Callaway would possibly be better early in the year until Thomas is back.
Starting point is 00:45:12 Right, so that's why I'm taking Callaway first. And we're going to take a break. When we come back, quick pizza review, some more Twitter polls, and your emails at fantasyfootballatcbsi.com. Did you know 66% of utility damage is caused by not requesting a locate? Don't let your project become part of this statistic. A quick locate request can save you from unexpected downtime,
Starting point is 00:45:35 financial penalties, and keep you safe. Don't let avoidable damage cost you time and money. Click before you dig. Ensure your next project is safe. Visit ontarioonecall.ca. It's free. It's easy. It before you dig. Ensure your next project is safe. Visit OntarioOneCall.ca. It's free. It's easy. It's the law. Data sourced from the ORCGA 2023 Dirt Report. Welcome back to Fantasy Football Today. Okay, Dave, somebody told me, my neighbor told me, you got to try this new place, the Beekman Ale House, if anybody's local, get their pizza.
Starting point is 00:46:03 So it's a 12-inch pizza, which is a really smart size for a pizza because it's a little bit too big for most people, but too small for two people. So you have to order two. Or one big person. Yeah, you and I, I mean, any of us, I would have taken the whole thing down. That's fine.
Starting point is 00:46:20 But we got two. We got a plain, just regular cheese, and we got a barbecued chicken. I love barbecued chicken pizza and it had bacon on it which i actually removed but i'm sure it was great uh had some onion on it it was oh drizzled with barbecue sauce very very thin crust very very crispy and i don't i can't really describe the taste but it just had this oh i've got several words right now I could use to describe the taste. Well, then just think about the cheese pizza. I need screen grabs of Heath's face over the last 30 seconds.
Starting point is 00:46:50 You need screen grabs of the pizza. In fact, I will go upstairs and get a slice and show you if that would help. Would you like that? I could do that while we do a Twitter poll. Ben, what do you think? I don't know if that would really help to see a day-old pizza slice. Oh, that looks nice. This is some real pizza on Saturday night.
Starting point is 00:47:07 There's no barbecue chicken on it. It was great. Had to share this because that's real pizza right there. All right. Now, that is – this is kind of different once in a while. I don't know if it's once in a while. It was really good. You know how everybody else feels about pineapple pizza and how they say it's so bad and not real?
Starting point is 00:47:22 That's how I feel about barbecue chicken pizza. I love pineapple pizza. I mean, throw a little ham on there. Come on. All right. Excuse me. Twitter polls.
Starting point is 00:47:34 PPR league. Which start do you like better? Devante Adams and Clyde Edwards. That's going to be tough for Heath. Or Austin Eckler and Calvin Ridley. Devante Adams and Clyde or Eckler and Ridley? I'm taking Eckler-Ridley. Yeah, that is tough for me,
Starting point is 00:48:03 but I've got a not really that tough because I've got Eckler about 70 points better than Clyde and I've only got Adams about 40 points better Adams and Clyde Edwards-Elair or Eckler and Ridley. Now, what if it's Mixon instead of Edwards-Elair? What if it's Adams and Mixon or Eckler and Ridley? I'd much rather have Adams and Mixon. Yeah, I think I would too. Okay. I have Mixon one spot behind Eckler. Listen, Joe Mixon, attention.
Starting point is 00:48:46 We really need you to come through this year. Okay? It would be huge for us as a podcast. All right. Next up, half PPR league. Half PPR. Which do you like better? For this one, I actually just used the NFC average draft position since
Starting point is 00:49:01 August 1st. Aaron Jones and Stefan Diggs are going, I think, 11th and 14th overall. average draft position since August 1st. Aaron Jones and Stefan Diggs are going I think 11th and 14th overall. Nick Chubb and Saquon Barkley are going 12th and 13th. Would you rather start your team in half PPR,
Starting point is 00:49:16 Barkley and Chubb, or Aaron Jones and Stefan Diggs? Wow, this one's not even close. 68% Jones and Diggs. Yeah, I'll take the other side i'll take the running backs it's easier to take the barkley chubb side now that barkley is coming off the pup list assuming that to be true that means that we'll get him for a majority of the season it's not full ppr so that lowers exactly the number that digs will give you from game to game and i like getting running backs early
Starting point is 00:49:46 so I will take Barkley and Chubb it's not full PPR but I just want to say this for the purposes of if it was full PR I actually have Jones and Diggs both ranked ahead of Barkley and or Chubb if it's full PPR
Starting point is 00:50:01 if it's full PPR this is like it should be 100% Jones and Diggs. Sure. Would you agree with that, Dave? Yes. If it was full PPR, I would take Jones and Diggs. But Heath, you said you'd still do it half PPR, Aaron Jones and Stefan Diggs? I would, yes.
Starting point is 00:50:16 Over Barkley and Chubb. Interesting numbers here. Diggs averaged in half PPR, according to FFToday.com, 16.6 points per game, which was great, but it was five points fewer per game than Devontae Adams. Now, I would say that Diggs was unlucky with touchdowns.
Starting point is 00:50:36 He had 168 targets, most in the NFL, I believe, and he had only eight touchdowns. He had 10 fewer touchdown catches than Devontae Adams, so unlucky there, considering Josh Allen threw, I think, 40. But Diggs averaged 16.6 points per game. That was... So Nick Chubb was actually better than that,
Starting point is 00:50:54 slightly. But, you know, if you A's are statted and you remove the Dallas game when he had six carries, then he was significantly better. Barkley... And they had the polar opposites in terms of touchdown luck last year yeah barkley in his rookie year and his second year he averaged more points than digs averaged last year
Starting point is 00:51:12 uh in half ppr in fact he was a lot better in his rookie year so you know just those numbers really made me favor running backs at that spot in half ppr yep um you know people, do you go with your PPR strategies and rankings or your non PPR if you're playing in a half PPR league? And I think a lot of times our answer is PPR, but I've always kind of lean more toward running back over wide receiver. And this is an example why I think you should. It's just that often the decisions that we're making in half PPR are running back 10 against wide receiver 2. It's not that anybody's saying wide receiver 2
Starting point is 00:51:58 is better than running back 2. No, but I'm saying that Nick Chubb, I would take over Diggs. I wouldn't take him over Hill, but I would take him over wide receiver three. It depends on how much of what happened last year you think is in. If Chubb and Diggs score at the same rate they did last year, then that would be a good decision. If Chubb scores at the rate he did the year before,
Starting point is 00:52:19 that would be a bad decision. No, because he averaged more points than Diggs. Oh, wait, did he? Certainly not in the game scream no he averaged 15.2 points per game in 2019 uh with eight touchdowns which is how many okay all right so good context they both scored eight touchdowns chubb did in 2019 digs did in 2020 and when they scored eight touchdowns dig digs crushed chub 16.6 points per game to 15.2 points per game. And that was with chub getting 36 catches, which were pretty much all before Kareem hunt came.
Starting point is 00:52:52 So I guess that's a good point. If they score the same amount of touchdowns, maybe digs does win in half PPR. Okay. Fair point. Dave, who would you go with digs or chub in half PPR? I would go with chub and you would go with digs? In half PPR, I would go with Chubb.
Starting point is 00:53:05 And you would go with Diggs, right? Full PPR, I think I would go with Chubb, too, just because I'm hoarding running backs this year. But it's a lot closer in full PPR. Like, I wouldn't fault you if you took Diggs ahead of him. All right, let's do emails. Here we go. From Sal from the Electric City,
Starting point is 00:53:19 which is apparently Scranton, Pennsylvania. My question is about two receiver leagues with a flex. On Friday's podcast, you discussed prioritizing tight end in two receiver leagues, not necessarily three receiver leagues. I think you guys, Jamie and Dave, talked about that on the tight end preview. Shouldn't the same apply for the mobile quarterbacks? I think he probably means like the top five or six quarterbacks
Starting point is 00:53:45 as well is it as simple as just drafting best player available and or filling your starting roster spots if it's just a two receiver league instead of three receiver leagues yeah because just overall the pressure is off of taking wide receivers right so every position will kind of go up in terms of need to draft because you only need to start two wide receivers right so every position will kind of go up in terms of need to draft because you only need to start two wide receivers and the smaller the league the more you can veer toward best player available because you can go and find other uh other players at other positions pretty easily because everybody's going to have an all-star team if it's eight teams ten teams something like that and i will like i
Starting point is 00:54:25 don't think anybody else necessarily agrees with this but it's never stopped me yet um i also think in non-ppr quarterbacks are more valuable yeah because why because they make up a more because the elite wide receivers and the pass catching running backs are closer in value than they are when the catches count. The catches help make those elite wide receivers worth more. Right. Right. They lose value in non-PPR and quarterbacks won't lose any value. Right.
Starting point is 00:54:54 And that's why I took in the draft that we did last Tuesday, I took Mahomes with the 25th pick. I don't think I'd do that in full PPR. That was a non-PPR draft. Okay, from Jim. Maybe I missed it. By the way, Heath, do you have more of a mustache, like a true mustache now than typically you do? No, I just
Starting point is 00:55:15 think the sun's hitting on my face a little bit. I haven't shaved yet this morning. And the microphone covers your chin, so all I see is a mustache. We don't get to see that soul patch. Yeah. It's almost shaped in a heart look at you there it is oh there you go mustache man okay uh from jim maybe i missed it but have you guys discussed the extra game week and how it will impact the fantasy playoffs are you keeping the playoffs weeks 14 through 16 adjusting them to 15 through 17. What are you doing with the extra week?
Starting point is 00:55:50 I'm extending the regular season of fantasy one more week. So now you should play 14 weeks. Your playoffs start in week 15. They'll end in week 17. And then week 18, you can do whatever you want with it. Have a toilet bowl for your league or a battle royal or absolutely nothing. But I think the league's decision to go to 17 games for every team means that fantasy managers get one extra game every year too okay from jpr you should view a second
Starting point is 00:56:31 flex spot as bumping the wide receivers up a little bit and in non-ppr you should view it as bumping the running backs up a little bit because in full ppr a flex should most generally be a receiver and vice versa and none and i think think, okay, we got to clarify, are we talking about a three receiver league with two flexes? That's a lot of, you know, it's a lot of talent. And to me, I don't value tight ends as much in leagues that have more starters,
Starting point is 00:57:00 except for the top three. I don't, do you guys agree with that? Every flex you add reduces the value of every other position. Yeah, and since tight ends are kind of low scoring, again, I'm not talking about the big three. Maybe not
Starting point is 00:57:15 some of the others. I'm not taking Noah Fant. I'm not taking Dallas Goddard. I like Fant. I don't care. I'd rather just use a tight end like in my last pick. Wouldn't it be relative? You would take Dallas Goddard if it was at the right spot
Starting point is 00:57:31 in the draft. Yeah, but... I'm sure you'd take him, and I'm sure you'd consider him for one of those two flex spots if need be. I'm sure he wouldn't be your first choice. If Dallas Goddard's one of my flexes, I feel like I've gone wrong. You don't plan on him being one of your flexes.
Starting point is 00:57:48 You'll draft him as a round 10 pick, as depth and a quality player for your team. This is an imaginary world where he's going in round 10. Well, no. In a league with two flexes. That's what you're doing with players that you're taking in round 10 anyway. In a league with two flexes, he probably could go. Maybe, you know, he could go in round 10. I think people are going to race to fill their second flex spot
Starting point is 00:58:08 before they take their tight end if they didn't really invest in tight end. I think they'd be open to doing that. I don't know if it's a definite thing. All right. Well, you know, I'm just curious about Goddard's real value because I think we've seen his ADP for so long with people just assuming that Zacherts was going to be gone. And lo and behold, he isn't. So I'd like to see more drafts before
Starting point is 00:58:31 we really figure out where Goddard's going. And we still don't know for sure that he won't be. True. True. All right. Brian from Long Island. I've been listening to your podcast, wondering how to best evaluate when someone says, I draft X, Y, Z at the 4-5 turn. It's too soon to take X, Y, Z. You've got to wait at least the 8-9 turn. Really? All right. Well, fine. No, but his question is, since we're always talking about 12-team leagues,
Starting point is 00:58:59 now let's turn it to a 10-team league. How do I translate that to my 10-team league? If you say draft someone at the 4-5 turn, do I just make it a round later? It's drafting fifth in a 10-team non-PPR league, and I'm wondering if Waller in round two is too early. Yeah, in a non-PPR league, taking him 15th overall? Or is that 16th overall?
Starting point is 00:59:23 He said non-PPR? Yeah. It's probably too early in a night early here all right what about the next round what about yeah then that's fine but you might end up getting kittle and not waller like if you have to have waller you're gonna have to reach um when my when i say four or five turn that's kind of code for right around 50th overall in a 12 team league those are picks 48 and 49 so it's just right in that range in the draft so in a 10 team league 50th overall is the
Starting point is 00:59:52 end of round five so or no 15 team league 10 team oh i'm sorry 50th overall last pick around five i'm right right you are correct. Even I know. Finally. Finally, I got something right. So I would say when you hear us talk about a four or five turn, yeah, dock it about a round.
Starting point is 01:00:13 Yeah. Also sounds like a dance move. A four or five turn. A four or five turn? Yeah. Yeah. I think so. I did that in my bar mitzvah.
Starting point is 01:00:21 There you go. Okay. Thanks for listening, everybody. We will talk to you tomorrow with our running backs preview, part one. Hopefully no breaking news. No breaking news until next week. We've got to get our position previews done. Okay, NFL?
Starting point is 01:00:33 Thank you very much for listening. For Heath Cummings, Dave Richard, Ben Schrager, I'm Adam Azer. We'll talk to you tomorrow on Fantasy Football Today.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.