Fantasy Football Today - Beyond the Box Score: Pacheco's Outlook, Backup RBs, Advanced Metrics and More (12/09 Fantasy Football Podcast)

Episode Date: December 9, 2024

After some trivia to start the show, we talk about Chargers-Chiefs (5:50) and the unique role of DeAndre Hopkins. Also, is Isiah Pacheco back to being a must-start RB? ... News and notes (13:55) and a...dvanced metrics (19:50) on Jordan Addison, Amari Cooper, Tyrone Tracy Jr. and more including how to know if Jaylen Waddle will get targets in a given week ... Four Big Topics: Baker Mayfield in the Fantasy playoffs (49:10); Backfields dealing with injuries (51:00); Trusting Jakobi Meyers and Brock Bowers (59:00); Players to drop for your handcuffs (1:04:30). And we finish with the Fantasy Cops (1:06:30) ... Email us at fantasyfootball@cbsi.com Fantasy Football Today is available for free on the Audacy app as well as Apple Podcasts, Spotify and wherever else you listen to podcasts Watch FFT on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/fantasyfootballtoday Shop our store: shop.cbssports.com/fantasy  SUBSCRIBE to FFT Express on Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/fantasy-football-today-express/id1528634304 Follow FFT Express on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/6qyGWfETSBFaciPrtvoWCC?si=6529cbee20634da8 SUBSCRIBE to FFT Dynasty on Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/fantasy-football-today-dynasty/id1696679179 FOLLOW FFT Dynasty on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/2aHlmMJw1m8FareKybdNfG?si=8487e2f9611b4438&nd=1 SUBSCRIBE to FFT DFS on Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/fantasy-football-today-dfs/id1579415837 FOLLOW FFT DFS on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/5zU7pBvGK3KPhfb69Q1hNr?si=1c5030a3b1a64be2 Follow our FFT team on Twitter: @FFToday, @AdamAizer, @JameyEisenberg, @daverichard, @heathcummingssr Follow the brand new FFT TikTok account: https://www.tiktok.com/@fftoday Join our Facebook group https://www.facebook.com/groups/FantasyFootballToday/ Sign up for the FFT newsletter https://www.cbssports.com/newsletter You can listen to Fantasy Football Today on your smart speakers! Simply say "Alexa, play the latest episode of the Fantasy Football Today podcast" or "Hey Google, play the latest episode of the Fantasy Football Today podcast." Visit the betting arena on CBSSports.com for all the latest sportsbook reviews and sportsbook promos. To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 Kick off an exciting football season with BetMGM, an official Sportsbook partner of the National Football League. Yard after yard, down after down, the Sportsbook born in Vegas gives you the chance to take action to the end zone and celebrate every highlight real play. And as an official Sportsbook partner of the NFL, BetMGM is the best place to fuel your football fandom on every game day. With a variety of exciting features, BedMGM offers you plenty of seamless ways to jump straight onto the gridiron and to embrace peak sports action. Ready for another season of gridiron glory? What are you waiting for?
Starting point is 00:00:38 Get off the bench, into the huddle, and head for the end zone all season long. Visit BedMGM.com for terms and conditions. Must be 19 years of age or older, Ontario only. Please gamble responsibly. Gambling problem? For free assistance, call the Connex Ontario Helpline at 1-866-531-2600. Bet MGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement
Starting point is 00:01:01 with iGaming Ontario. This is fantasy football Today from CBS Sports. It's time to dominate your fantasy league. Now here's some combination of Adam, Dave, Jamie and Heath. This is Beyond the Box score. Welcome everybody to fantasy football today presented by FedMGM, the sports book born in Vegas. Maybe your season got off to a slow start, but hopefully you
Starting point is 00:01:34 turned the beat around and made it to your fantasy playoffs. Yes, one of us, I won't say who, one of us was just singing turn the beat around during the mic check. And he's in a great, this person, this mystery person is in a great mood today. So that's very much looking forward to teasing him about something. And we are going to deputize Jacob Gibbs.
Starting point is 00:01:57 Deputy Jacob Gibbs is here because the fantasy cops are gonna be making an appearance on today's show. Jacob's done it before, but we'll give him a badge today. What's up, Jacob? Hey, another well-deserved win for the Chiefs. Here we are. Do you think Jacob will be a good cop or bad cop before you get to any fantasy cops? What's your guess, Adam?
Starting point is 00:02:16 An absolutely ruthless, rip your throat out cop. That's what I think. I think so. I agree with that take. All right. I have a trivia question for you guys. Three quarterbacks that, you know, pass or rating qualified quarterbacks, not guys who have done five passes. Three quarterbacks have not completed a pass of 30 or more air yards this season. One of them is out for the season. Two of them are in the NFC South. One of them is out for the season. Two of them are in the NFC South.
Starting point is 00:02:45 Who are they? And you only have one guess. You can collaborate. If you'd like, you can collaborate. I start with Daniel Jones. Well, is this your final guess? I don't, since that's just a starting guess because I'm confused and I don't remember when he did.
Starting point is 00:03:01 He would qualify, he would qualify. It's one of them. It's gotta be Kirk, but I have no idea who the S1 is. So it's three quarterbacks, one's out for the season two or in the NFC South. So starting with Daniel Jones, is that correct? How about telling you you have one guess? You could talk it out with Jacob.
Starting point is 00:03:17 Oh, I have to guess all three at once? Okay, fine. I think so, yes, yes. You always set up the hardest, weirdest games and stipulations for your games, but I'm gonna say Daniel Daniel Jones is my, I'm going to make a three person guess. Daniel Jones and I have two NFC Souths. I'm definitely not hitting Bryce. I feel like he's done it. It's Kirk Cousins. Kirk probably hasn't done it yet. No, it's some of those Mooney shots. I feel like Baker then? No, no, maybe, maybe. It's not their car, like we've seen. Yeah, it's definitely not their car.
Starting point is 00:03:51 Definitely not. All right, you have five seconds. All right, final guess. Final guess. Baker, Daniel Jones, Baker Mayfield, and Kirk Cousins. Okay, you got one out of three. You got one out of three. Baker Mayfield, who is someone we're gonna be talking about
Starting point is 00:04:04 in our four big topics, is one of three quarterbacks this year. Daniel Jones has two completions. I'm surprised you don't remember them. They were to Darius Slayton against Pittsburgh and Darius Slayton against Seattle. Of course. That Seattle ball definitely traveled 30 plus. Yeah, that was a bad guess. So anyway, it's Baker Mayfield. Bryce Young has not completed a pass of 30 or more area yards. And Deshaun Watson has not completed a pass of 30 or more area yards. So there you go.
Starting point is 00:04:31 That checks out. But yeah, one of our big topics today is do we trust Baker Mayfield in the fantasy playoffs? So of course, we've got a lot of stats and whatnot for you on Baker Mayfield. Also, we'll talk about backfields that have been affected by injuries, like the Jets and the Seahawks and the 49ers.
Starting point is 00:04:47 We'll talk about players you could drop for your handcuff at this time of year and how does Aiden O'Connell's injury affect the fantasy playoff outlooks for Jacoby Myers, Brock Bowers and Sincere McCormick. Before we do that though, Kansas City 19, doink and in, and the Chargers, 17. I love this season.
Starting point is 00:05:08 I think we've got a lot of Super Bowl, no, I think we've got a lot of Super Bowl contenders who have some flaws, no perfect teams. Everyone's beatable, including the Chiefs, and they'll be better when they get Butker back, obviously, but he made all his kicks, but anyway, it was a fun game. Jacob, what are your fantasy takeaways? Yeah, man, the Chiefs have been they just keep finding hilarious
Starting point is 00:05:28 ways to win. So yeah, the the Chargers lad mccockies really, really good and really important for that team. Like we've talked about all years and being out made a like clear, tangible difference, you can just feel it. I mean, the first half was abysmal offensively. And the world as it goes down as well. Josh Palmer, I thought had an okay game. He had a drop that was pretty brutal, but he was getting open and beating press coverage, which they needed somebody to do that.
Starting point is 00:05:53 Um, Quentin Johnson, man, he's, he's fast. That guy is very, very talented. That was cool to see him make a few plays. Um, didn't have much else from the charger side of things. Did you guys have anything for them? My main takeaway was on the other side of the ball. Chargers it's like this offense without, um, the con keys definitely taking a step back. Like you said, I just, I still think that they need a better deep threat.
Starting point is 00:06:16 I like Palmer's ability to track at Tennessee, but I just don't think that he's timed it up like him and Herbert don't have good timing on those D-pads. I think that's like the priority number one for them in the off season. Did I call you Jamie, Jacob? No, I didn't notice you did. Someone said I did. What a compliment that would be. My takeaway for the Chargers is I don't trust their running backs and Lad McConkey is a must start if he comes back. Josh Palmer and Quentin Johnson are definitely in the wide receiver three discussion because they have Tampa Bay running backs and lab mcconkey is a must start if he comes back. Josh Palmer and Quentin Johnson are definitely in the wide receiver three discussion because they have Tampa Bay
Starting point is 00:06:48 next week if mcconkey is out, if mcconkey is out. Uh, disly also got injured in this game with that, with a shoulder injury. All right. So then what are our chiefs takeaways is Patrick Mahomes had a, had a bad fantasy game, but, um, he has been sacked 13 times in his last three games. That is the most in any three game stretch of his career. That's incredible. He's had some pretty darn good pass protection in his career, but that's from the AP, by the way, that stat. Now DJ Humphrey is also potentially injured.
Starting point is 00:07:20 Since week eight, so their last seven games, the Chiefs have the most pass attempts in the NFL that could change tonight. Dallas could pass them. They have also run the most plays in the NFL since week eight. Since yes, since week eight, they have the fourth highest pass rate in their last seven games. And even in the first half of this game, they went to the locker room with 13 nothing lead. They had a 74% pass rate. So I still think the home, I don't think you have to panic on my homes. I know he didn't have a great game, but he's still going to throw a lot, which is great. What other takeaways do you guys have for the Chiefs? Chiefs are just a really weird team.
Starting point is 00:07:55 They had six different wide receivers or tight ends with a route rate over 40%. So it was a big game for DeAndre Hopkins, but we his role isn't changing all that much. But when he's out there, he's really important. He had the highest first retarget rate on the Chiefs at 32%. Travis Kelsey's was only 16%. I thought it was another sort of encouraging, like low key encouraging game for Xavier Worthy. Like finally they connected on a short crosser. I feel like we literally been waiting for that all year, but the timing just hasn't been there, and they did that. He avoided another tackle in this game,
Starting point is 00:08:30 so there's some little signs for him that are encouraging. And then the main takeaway for me was Isaiah Pacheco saw his role increase. He had a 70% RB rush share in this game. In week one, it was 88%, 73% the next week, week two. Um, so he's getting back close to that kind of a role. He ran, um, 13 routes, 31% route rate for him. So like he's, he's getting back into that range. Yeah. He had 10.8% of the target share too. Um, so clearly there's like a, you know, motivated
Starting point is 00:09:01 effort to get him going, but I'll say this, like his snap share was 46%. Um, again, these are all like higher numbers, but week 15, they've got a match up coming up against cream hunts, former team, the Browns hunt to me, look particularly good on that, uh, screen pass that he caught like mid midway through. I don't think that they're going to phase hunt out of this offense. Like, I think that the idea that Pacheco will get back to the role that he had earlier in the season, which was really good for fantasy, is probably to me lost. Um, I don't really see any reason why they would do it at this point. So yeah, like that role was kind of, didn't they kind of do it last night? He had 14 carries,
Starting point is 00:09:37 one had five. Yeah. But if you look at just the overall like snaps and who was on the field, he had 46%. You think that that says everything. He hit a 56% rush air and 46% snap share. Those aren't the numbers that it was. 70% rush air. If you look in the running backs, I don't think home scrambles and stuff like that really matters. You're not wrong, right?
Starting point is 00:09:57 The snap counts not great, but I do sort of think he took over the backfield yesterday. You know, it was a pretty even split in the first game. I remember like earlier in the year, it was just basically just Pacheco. Yeah. 88% week one, which is like, there's only a few, there's only a handful. That was what I was talking about. That was what got us excited about him as like a top five guy. Okay. Yeah, I agree. Yeah. He won't be back to that. Um, if he's 75% of the running back carries though, I think he's a top 20 guy. Yep, for sure. You can use him and the Chiefs need something, man.
Starting point is 00:10:29 The Chiefs need some life on offense. They get so stagnant looking. And it's like, clearly this is the guy who brings energy to the offense right now. This is the guy who can get explosive plays. I think they're gonna be featuring him by the time we get close to the playoffs. Can we talk about DeAndre Hopkins?
Starting point is 00:10:43 He's fascinating to me. His route participation rate is usually around 66%. Usually participates in two thirds of the routes. So I just looked at, let's see, the last, since week nine. Okay. So that's when he, I think he came over in week eight, barely played, started playing more in week nine. Since week nine, the Andre Hopkins is 24th in receiving yards among wide receivers. But if you look at the top 37 wide receivers in yards,
Starting point is 00:11:11 he has by far the lowest route participation rate. So like it's good, it's probably, you know, he's doing well on a per route basis. He also getting a lot of end zone targets. He's crushing it in that regard. He's become what we thought Travis Kelsey would be basically. He's the end zone, green zone guy now for, for my homes. But he's the Mark Andrews of receivers. But he doesn't, he's not on the field that much. So he is defying fantasy logic. And
Starting point is 00:11:38 let's see, he was started in only 50% of leagues, but it's two straight games with nine targets for Deandre Hopkins. So I think he's kind of interesting. I still feel like he needs to score to have a good game. And if you buy into the red zone and green zone, end zone targets, then maybe he's likely to score. Remember he was wide open in the end zone two weeks ago and, and, uh, homes threw it over his head, but what's your confidence level in Deandre Hopkins in the fantasy playoffs at Cleveland, Houston, at Pittsburgh? Yeah. I mean, you hope that you wouldn't necessarily need to start him, but I do think he can have a game like this at any, at any given moment.
Starting point is 00:12:17 I think he's behind Pacheco, the second most important player in the office right now, which sounds crazy to say when Travis Kelsey exists, but that's kind of where I'm at. Just watching the chiefs lately. I agree with Jacob's assessment on the offense and how that's rolling out. I do think that's a little bit of a tricky schedule though, specifically with Houston and Pittsburgh, where I could see really bad, like poor performances in both those games. Houston's I mean, in theory, Houston could put Derek Stingley on Hopkins. That's what I'm thinking. Yeah. They could just put Stingley on him. I don't see why they wouldn't. Their past defense has been terrible.
Starting point is 00:12:47 It's been a great matchup. Pittsburgh not so much, but next week Cleveland's past defense is horrid. Cleveland will be good. I just have a weird feeling they'll put Stingley on him. All right. We've got three shows on CBS Sports Network this week, Tuesday, Wednesday, and Friday at 1 p.m. Eastern. Please join us on CBS Sports Network.
Starting point is 00:13:06 You can catch those shows at youtube.com slash fantasy football today after the fact if you miss them. But Tuesday, Wednesday, Friday, 1 to 2 p.m. Eastern. We're on TV, baby. So check us out. Here are your news and notes. So we are expecting long term absences. Maybe it's premature to say that, but wouldn't be surprising for Derek Carr and Aiden O'Connell. Yep. And Drew Locke is having an MRI today,
Starting point is 00:13:33 but he will remain the starter if he's healthy for the Giants. They have Baltimore this week. We'll talk about the Raiders, one of our big topics a little bit later. Running back news, Breece Hall has a chance to play this week. So we all did a lot of Raylan Allen, Isaiah Davis research today and it might be completely useless. Isaac Arendo has a foot injury and a Thursday game. So he didn't sound too concerned.
Starting point is 00:13:57 I think a lot of times players don't sound too concerned, but we'll see. Hopefully we'll find out soon what the deal is with Arendo, but they have a Thursday game against the Rams. That's a quick turnaround. Jonathan Brooks left in the first quarter. Bucky Irving, his back tightened up on him and, uh, Tablos just said we don't know yet about his availability. DeMarcus Robinson, it's the only wide receiver note I have. Oh, George Pickens. George Pickens has a grade two hamstring strain. So it could be, I don't know,
Starting point is 00:14:28 it could be multiple weeks for Pickens, we'll see. And DeMarcus Robinson has an AC sprain and again a Thursday game for DeMarcus Robinson, it's Rams 49ers. Will Disley shoulder injury, Tyler Higby could be back this week for the Rams. On the offensive line you had Morgan Moses right tackle for the Jets,
Starting point is 00:14:43 you had DJ Humphreys offensive tackle for the Chiefets you had DJ Humphries offensive tackle for the Chiefs Teron Armstead left tackle for the Dolphins and two Starting interior offensive lineman for the Giants all left with injuries We know at least one of those Giants lineman is gonna be out in this upcoming game Defensively sauce Gardner could play this week Tampa Bay lost safety Antoine Winfield a multi-week absence for him with an ankle sprain Carolina cornerback JC Horn left with a groin injury. And let's move on. Let's get to Oh, oh, this question from Johnny Airport. When will the next you put the I'm assuming you put this up. Yes, I did. Well, the next Dan versus Adam athletic athletic challenge happened in what sport? It will be summer of 2025. It will be tennis. It will be much
Starting point is 00:15:23 closer than it was in summer of 2024. It will not be. It will be much closer than it was in summer of 2024. It will not be much closer. I'm going for O&O this time and I expect to get it despite not playing most likely at all until that point. Now, with that said, I don't know if I'll even be around for the summer of 2025 after putting on my tin foil hat last night and finally seeing one of these drones that have been flying around New Jersey.
Starting point is 00:15:42 I live in Morristown. This is where they've been like mostly showing up. It's kind of crazy. Not even joking. Really very weird. It was flying really low, like barely over the trees. So that was a weird thing to see one day. I hope they figure out soon what the hell's going on over there so we can play that tennis match this summer. That would be great. And it also would be great if everybody get a chance, go sign up on the bet MGM app. You know, first of all, you'll be supporting our show, which would be awesome. But if you, if you want to sign up on the bet MGM app, use the bonus code fantasy and get up to a
Starting point is 00:16:14 $1,500 first bet offer on your first wager with bet MGM. So here's how it works. Just download the bet MGM app and sign up using the bonus code fantasy deposit at least $10 and place your first wager on any game. And you'll receive up to $1500 in bonus bets. If your bet loses, just make sure you use the bonus code fantasy when you sign up. We'll take a break and come back. With advanced stats snap counts. Wait till you hear about it. Mari Cooper snap counts and his target per out run rate in week four. How about his air yards? I didn't see his air yards.
Starting point is 00:16:47 Looking forward to hearing about that. All right. Well, we'll come right back. We'll be after this. Hey everybody. It's Dave and my family just got a great gift. An Aura digital picture frame. And now I have a slideshow in my kitchen.
Starting point is 00:17:00 High resolution photos from the days my kids were born, pictures from my wedding, all kinds of incredible memories from family get togethers, trips to amusement parks, sporting events, meeting famous people. They're all there thanks to Aura. Aura memorializes as many photos as you can upload. There's no limit and you can share them directly from your phone to the frame. Setup was so easy and they even have this great app that makes managing your frame simple.
Starting point is 00:17:28 My family loves it and I am sure your family will love it too. Save on the perfect gift by visiting AuraFrames.com to get $35 off Aura's best selling Carver matte frames by using promo code FFT at checkout. That's A-U-R-A frames.com promo code FFT at checkout. That's a U R a frames.com promo code FFT. This deal is exclusive to listeners. So get yours now in time for the holidays, terms and conditions apply. We are back. Here are the advanced stats courtesy of Jacob Gibbs or Jamie Gibbs, as I call him.
Starting point is 00:18:04 All right. Yeah. Let's talk about Amari Cooper. So his route rate didn't really change. 63% route rate in week 14. He only ran one more route than Curtis Samuel. But they were like hyper hyper focused on getting him the ball. 44% first three target rate for Amari in this game. That's super, super high. Most air yards of any player in any game this season, 254 air yards. That was the most since Amari Cooper had, I think, 280 last year with Joe Flacco in week 16. So that is kind of what he does. Only half of those were catchable. Josh Aum was a little bit all over the place. Obviously a great game for him overall, but he can be a radical throwing down the field. So I don't know if I necessarily trust that this role is going to turn into production in a huge way on a
Starting point is 00:18:53 week to week basis, especially if I'm already doesn't become like a full-time player. But there's definitely upside. Yeah. It's a shame it's, you know, happening so late in the season, but I can't get over the 53% snap share. Yeah. It's, but I've been saying the season but again I can't get over the 53 percent snap share yeah it's but I've been saying the same thing about Hopkins right they got these guys don't play that much Cooper 53.53 percent snap share 53.8 target per out run rate let all wide receivers but I don't think I can throw them in my lineup next week yeah well they have Detroit right which could be amazing yeah that would be the reason to throw him in my lineup next week. Well, they have Detroit, right? Which could be amazing.
Starting point is 00:19:25 But at Detroit. That would be the reason to throw him in the lineup because you need that game script like he got this week. I would definitely want him in that one. There's massive upside in that. If I told you right now he were gonna play 53% of the snaps next week, would you start Samari? In that game script, yes.
Starting point is 00:19:40 Probably top 30 receiver at least, but there's the upside for him to have like 40 points in that spot. All right, go ahead, Jacob, what else you got? Let's talk about Jordan Addison talking about upside men, the crazy game here. The Atlanta Falcons are just abysmal in the secondary right now.
Starting point is 00:19:59 But also there were some really encouraging signs for Addison from an underlying volume standpoint, and we shouldn't just ignore those because of the matchup. First read targets, it was by far the highest rate that we've ever seen for Addison, and he's been trending this way. It's not just this spike week here. He has more targets than Justin Jefferson
Starting point is 00:20:23 over the past month, which is a shock. And then if you look at first three targets, he has hit 30% of Minnesota's first three targets in four straight games. Prior to that, he'd only hit the 30% first three target threshold twice in his first 24 career games. So this is definitely like completely different to see him doing this consistently. And that rate spiked to 53 percent this week. So really interesting stuff from Addison.
Starting point is 00:20:55 They're using him more in motion as a priest in that motion guy. He had three targets as a priest in that motion man of this game. They designed some screens to him this week, which I don't watch the Vikings enough to know if that is typical, but I just, when I watched it, it felt like there was a concentrated effort to get him the ball. And then a lot-
Starting point is 00:21:13 Jacob. Yeah? Someone says, all right, Jacob, I'm starting Addison over AJ Brown. Yeah, people are so silly with the AJB stuff. And I get it, it's been frustrating, but man, we got, I got into it, me and Matt Harmon got into like a real life discussion
Starting point is 00:21:26 about this with people and everybody was acting like AJ Brown is not playing well. It's like, no. No, it's this. Can you justify starting Addison over AJ Brown when the Eagles are throwing 21 times a game? Sure, yeah. I mean, you do whatever you want.
Starting point is 00:21:40 That makes some sense, I guess. I personally would still wanna to start AJB but oh dude listen this AJ Brown we got the squeaky wheel he's pissed off where he's going off this week yeah I think so I think it's the op I think you can't justify starting Devontae Smith this week I think he's gonna have a horrible week unfortunately I have him in one team and I'm at a bad point where I probably have to start him but like I expect nothing out of him this next week yeah and so the last thing I wanted to bring up on Addison is just that this the targets are at a bad point where I probably have to start him, but I expect nothing out of him this next week. Yeah, and so the last thing I wanted to bring up on Addison
Starting point is 00:22:08 is just that the targets are unlike anything we've seen. So he has a 27% target per route run rate over the past month. Before that, his target per route run rate on the year was 16%, last year it was 18%. And so I'm curious if you guys think that this is just a blip on the radar, just to kind of random four game thing,
Starting point is 00:22:27 it's backed of course by the first three targets, or do you think he can be this kind of a guy? Not 27%, that's way too high for him with the role that he plays, but a 20 plus percent kind of guy? So I wanna step in by saying I think he can be, and I'll tell you why. There's a few reasons, a combination of two things.
Starting point is 00:22:42 One, I was looking at a stat today that was put on Twitter by I forgot, I'm forgetting who now, sorry for not having the credit, but Sam Darnold top three in the NFL and big time throw rate and big time throws. And he's up there with the likes of Josh Allen and Justin Herbert. Like that's the type of verticality the Vikings had in their offense this year that they didn't quite frankly have last year with cousins or really at any point prior. And why that's one reason.
Starting point is 00:23:06 So I think Darnold has elevated the big play of that offense, but also because if you're an opposing team and I saw this all last year and I haven't watched the tape to know if this is definitely happening, I could probably look into some advanced data or you may have it Jacob, but you're an opposing team. You're taking away Justin Jefferson with cloud coverage. You're taking away Justin Jefferson with different options. And then if you're Sam Darnold and you're Kevin O'Connell, your first read is going to go to Addison because he can win one-on-ones.
Starting point is 00:23:32 He was a great prospect coming out of USC and Pitt, and he was great in one-on-one combinations when he got one-on-one man coverage, both at Pitt and at USC. So if you're looking at this thing pre-snap and you're seeing that the defense is going to shift cloud coverage to Jefferson and you have a one-on-one on the other side with Addison, why not go there? Right? Like why not take that option? And I think that's what we're seeing. Yeah. I think what's kind of strange to me is that they don't throw that much and he's still doing this. So there are about 31 pass attempts per game in the last four weeks and probably for the season a little bit less than that. And then, and you've got Justin Jefferson and you've got TJ Hawkinson. That's the thing. Hawkinson really hasn't
Starting point is 00:24:14 done much. So as long as Hawkinson's not becoming a bigger factor, I think Addison is clearly the number two guy. If not the number one, I'm not saying we'd ever rank him ahead of Justin Jefferson, but you just heard from Jacob, he has more targets, would you say last four games, more targets than Jefferson? Yeah, and way more fantasy points. And more first read targets too. That's like, yeah. So honestly, I went into this week
Starting point is 00:24:37 thinking about Jordan Addison, like I'm not gonna be excited to start Jordan Addison, but I think that may have changed. And I don't want to put too much into it because it is Atlanta. But there's a lot of encouraging stuff, including all the things you just said. Just he really was having a pretty nothing season until the last three weeks. And I have trouble with players like that. Like I had trouble with Kenan Allen this week.
Starting point is 00:25:00 I was talking to Dave off the air. I was like, man, Kenan Allen, like I know I'm going to start him in two leagues. I think he's just going to burn me. And he did. But that was really more Caleb Williams burning me than Kenan Allen. Like if Caleb Williams had gone out and thrown for 250 and Kenan Allen had done nothing, then fine. But so I trust Sam Darnold more than I trust Caleb Williams. And therefore, and that offense, let's let's say in that all, whatever, right? Whatever it is. I think therefore, I think I trust Jordan Addison a decent amount right now. More than Amari Cooper. Dan, to your point, Dan, I'm curious how you would go about quantifying what you're describing
Starting point is 00:25:34 with the cloud coverages and extra attention because it's something I thought about and I would like to do, but I don't necessarily know how. Like Jamar Chase and how much different his production has been when T. Higgins is in and out is what really got me thinking about it. But it's clear with Jefferson and Addison that there's something there that's really changing things. But I don't know how to go about like finding out, like just like quantifying in with that.
Starting point is 00:25:54 Probably best for us to kind of explore in the off season we have more time. I think it's, sorry, the best answer I have is like Matt Harmon has, he goes in charts like how often they've been double teamed and stuff like that. And it feels like that's where we're have is like Matt Harmon has, he goes in charts like how often they've been double teamed and stuff like that. And it feels like that's where we're at is like, you would have to manually like watch all the routes
Starting point is 00:26:10 and just like chart it. Yeah, I think you probably would have to, especially because there's gonna be like, even if you look at the charting on some sites, there's gonna be differences in like pre and post snap rotations and where these DBs end up on the field. Like how often is a safety on the hash that Jefferson is and stuff like that.
Starting point is 00:26:27 So probably have to watch every snap, which I doubt we're gonna have time to do. Yeah, by the way. Good. Jamar Chase is averaging 22.7 points per game this year. I don't know what the splits are with and without T Higgins, but I think one of his huge games was without Higgins. In his career, he has not been better
Starting point is 00:26:49 just from a fantasy points per game standpoint. He has not been better with Higgins, like going into 2024. The note I have from my 2024 wide receiver preview that Jamar Chase had not yet averaged 20 PPR fantasy points per game with a healthy Joe Burrow and a healthy T Higgins. He'd come close, but I think this year we're seeing this efficiency spike with Higgins on the field,
Starting point is 00:27:13 but I actually think it's kind of weird. Maybe efficiency if you're just looking at like yards per outrun, yards per catch, or maybe it doesn't account for touchdowns, catches, and what all goes into fantasy points. But from a fantasy perspective, one of the things that I thought held Jamar Chase back from being wide receiver one was T Higgins. And this year he might finish wide receiver one.
Starting point is 00:27:35 He is currently wide receiver one, even though Higgins has missed some time, but has been very good. Yeah, I would guess that as the arts for target are up even before this year with Higgins on the field Um, but he definitely gets targeted less with Higgins on the field. Okay, so that that could be it It could just be a volume some of it is schemed too Like if you look at it last year The cowboys did an excellent job moving lamb in different spots around especially specifically in the slot And that allowed him despite not having like a good great number wide receiver two around him to be that dominant
Starting point is 00:28:04 Target guy and that dominant wide receiver one some of these other schemes are just happy to have like a good rate number wide receiver two around him to be that dominant target guy and that dominant wide receiver one. Some of these other schemes are just happy to have like a Jefferson or something like that playing boundary for most of the game. All right, go let's get back to it. Go ahead, sir. Let's keep let's keep it rolling here. On the Jordan Edison note, I mentioned that like I didn't feel like this 27% target per round rate is sustainable for him because of
Starting point is 00:28:22 the role that he plays. When I said that what I mean is the depth at which these targets are coming. His average depth of target during this span over the past month, when he has that 27% rate, is 12.6 yards down the field. So I've got 12 guys here that are over 27% in this group. The only one with a higher A dot is Brian Thomas. Addison's is even higher than like Mike Evans, for instance.
Starting point is 00:28:44 This is A dot or route depth? A dot. Did I say route depth? No, I don't know. Depth of target is 12.6 yards for him, higher than Mike Evans during that span, higher than Nico Collins. And that's pretty unusual to get such a high target rate while drawing targets so deep down the field. And that I just want to use as a segue to Brian Thomas and what he's doing and just how high the upside is for him if the target rates are even a little bit sustainable long-term.
Starting point is 00:29:12 Over the past month, BTJ has a 28.4% target per round rate. His ADOT is 14.5 yards. So that's way higher than Addison's or anyone else in this range. That's nuts. It's like Justin Jefferson's target per roving rate is generally around 26 or 27% because he's running such deep routes. Obviously, we're seeing a depleted Jaguars pass catching unit here, but they still have Evan Ingram. you know, like they still have
Starting point is 00:29:45 some guys who can get targets and we're seeing things funnel through BTJ. On that note, he had the highest first three target rate that he's ever had. It was about 40% in the second half of the Jaguars game. His first three target rate was 70%. So we saw them just like completely funnel everything through him and it worked. He caught I think almost all of those targets and that to me it's just like this these are these are crazy signals like that a player can do this can be winning down the field consistently drawing targets being like everything funneled through him the defense knows everything is going to him and he just keeps winning. I push him as high as you want in dynasty rankings, like easily top eight.
Starting point is 00:30:29 I think you could push them as high as you want. Let's go. All right. Uh, we've heard about him ahead of, of Marvin Harrison, Jr. Yes. Wow. You have mad. I mean, not even close too, but I don't want to say not even close, but I do too.
Starting point is 00:30:43 What about neighbors? Um, that's really tough. That's a good segue here. I want to talk about Pukunakua and then we'll end that discussion with Malik neighbors note. So Pukunakua had the highest rookie target per route run rate that we've seen during the time that I have the data available, which is 2013 till now. It was 28%. Malik neighbors currently has a 29.6% target per hour rate. It's really flown under the radar because it's just so bad in New York. But he's doing stuff that we've never seen
Starting point is 00:31:14 in terms of demanding targets at such a young age, like well above even Puka's rate. And so that's extremely bullish for him long-term. I think you have to have him above BTJ because he has that kind of like Odell Beckham, like win everywhere kind of upside. Jamar Chase, I guess I should say, like Odell Beckham people don't think of,
Starting point is 00:31:34 but like he was that good early on. That's kind of where it's, where I would neighbors, whereas BTJ, I brought this up with BTJ a lot. For him to continue to get these targets as such a downfield role is like really unlikely. There haven't really been hardly any people who do that. Josh Gordon is a guy who I've mentioned as a comparison. Like that's, there's just really not any people who do that.
Starting point is 00:31:53 But back to Puka, 28% last year was a historic number for a rookie. This year, that target per revenue is up to 37%, which would be the highest of any player in any season ever during the time I have the data. Wow. Tyree kills last year was 36.6%. There's only been a handful of guys above like 34%. Puka, it's his first down per round rate is also the highest of any player with 200 or more rounds.
Starting point is 00:32:24 We'll see where he ends up, but like. Talk about push a guy as high as you want. You could push him as high as you want. He's, he's really doing a precedent and stuff. And I think he's like demanding those targets. It's not necessarily just being schemed in. Yeah, for sure. Like they're scheming stuff to cup.
Starting point is 00:32:39 Um, but Puka is they are using Puka and priest that motion more. Um, but yeah, he's just, he's's he is seriously just like winning everywhere, everything. Like Matt Harmon is talk about how much better he looks at the catch point. And I think you see that when you watch them. He did read you can't you can't cover him. You literally you have to get pressure on Matthew Stafford or you lose. OK, Tyrone Tracy, let's talk about our boy. Really, really exciting usage notes, not so exciting from an efficiency standpoint, but again, it's the Giants.
Starting point is 00:33:11 So, you know, neighbors, Tracy, I think what we're really looking for is the framework here, and maybe it could turn into more down the line. 83% snap rate, 89% RB rush share. that's the percentage of the total backfield carries, 73% route rate, 21% target share, all of those were career highs. That's clearly RB one stuff. The most exciting thing is the receiving. We've been waiting for that. We saw six targets in the first half, 10 overall.
Starting point is 00:33:40 And of course there's a huge drew lock day in terms of total volume, but still 21% target share of our running back is really, really good. Um, did you have any thoughts on Tracy? I haven't watched the giants game. I mean, yeah, go ahead. Adam looks like, I thought he looked horrible.
Starting point is 00:33:51 Actually, those were the worst. I thought it was the worst. I've seen Tyrone Tracy look. I was worried. I don't want to start him in anything other than a full PPR league against the Ravens this upcoming week with probably two interior offensive linemen out and the Ravens with that ferocious run defense. It doesn't really matter how he looks if he's going to get this many touches and he's clearly with their goal line back,
Starting point is 00:34:17 unless he has an awful matchup, which he does. So I think in general, he's a start. I think I'd be very cautious in the first game, the first game of the playoffs here with the Ravens coming to town. But Dan's probably watched the all 22 by now. So he's a much better feel for how Tyrone Tracy looked. I just thought like, oh man, he could have slipped that tackle. Usually he does.
Starting point is 00:34:34 He didn't, he didn't do it like he just, and he faced the worst run defense in football, by the way. So it was just kind of an off day for him. But what'd you think, Dan? Now I think he was about on with this from what I see now. I don't put all the blame on Tracy. I think the Giants offensive line had its worst day run blocking in a long time. And generally speaking, the Giants run game has been significantly worse with Drew Locke versus DeVito
Starting point is 00:34:55 and Jones, uh, best with Jones, but at least a Vito they ran like zone read with, so which helped a lot for the run game and just helped get things going. This is more of just a traditional offense with drew lock. And now with two, two more interior offensive line injuries, uh, multiple drops from Tyrone Tracy in this game. The usage though was great because it's like, as long as he doesn't fumble, I think Brian Dables at the point and Joe Shane's at the point where it's like, just get these young guys snaps. Our season is over.
Starting point is 00:35:21 So I don't think they'll go back to Singletary, but it's like, well, I don't necessarily see the offense and the run game improving against Baltimore. I think it's basically touchdown or nothing right now with trace touchdown and a lot of touches obviously in usage, but like, efficiency, I don't expect to improve rest of season. All right, Jay, do you guys feel like he's worn down as the years gone on? That's kind of how I felt.
Starting point is 00:35:46 I don't actually feel that way. I think I agree with Adam. Like there were maybe a few examples of what you're referencing Adam and the drops are another whole issue that kind of has happened earlier gave us hints that it might be a problem, which is surprising as a former receiver. But I feel like a lot of this was just plays blown dead by the blocking. And the Giants didn't run a lot. They passed way over expectation. Almost three to one pass to run ratio, which is kind of crazy given the game they were in and just not a great look for Brian
Starting point is 00:36:18 Dable as a play caller. But I didn't personally feel like Tracy looked considerably worse or run down. Okay. I think both offensive lines really stunk in this game. I believe I heard on the broadcast that this was the first time in like 10 weeks or something that the Saints had had their starting offensive line together. And given that, if that I think that's true. And given that, I mean, they really, they just stunk. It was an ugly game. It was as bad as the score, 14, 11.
Starting point is 00:36:49 Just an ugly game, but all right, sorry. Jacob, we've got, yeah, go ahead. Why don't you finish up with a couple more things. So, 66% rat rate is what Fantasy Points Data has Tracy's number at. I do trust their information a little bit more. They filter out like, it plays where the guy wasn't involved as a round-runner necessarily. Like it was a screen to somebody else and they were doing anything.
Starting point is 00:37:12 The only two running backs above him were Chuba Hubbard at 78%. It's just so sad about Brooks. Hopefully the news isn't that bad, but that was just gutting. Devon Achan is 73%. I wanted to bring up Achan because Remosler didn't play in this game and the role was awesome for Achan. This is the first time, career high snap rate, first time in his career that he played over three fourths of the snaps for the Dolphins. So they're really like, he can be a workhorse, I think, you know, like we haven't really seen them lean all the way into that, but I think they kind of are. And even still, we saw Tyre Kill and Jalen Waddle get way more involved here. So I'm going to talk about them for a little bit and just contextualize what we've seen with the Dolphins, what we might
Starting point is 00:37:54 see rest of season. Those two led the Dolphins in first read targets. Each Hill and Waddle had a 34% first read target rate. Not only were those the highest rates in week 14, but there were two of the five highest single game rates posted by a dolphin all year. So this offense used to be extremely concentrated on these two, but it's become much more balanced this year. We only have nine instances of a player posting a first retarget rate above 30% in a game
Starting point is 00:38:25 all year for the Dolphins, which is unusual. That's unusually low for any time, any team, but especially Mike McDaniels offenses. And so these were two of the highest games for any player in a Dolphins game all year and it came consecutively. And I think it's interesting because of the matchups. I brought this up like a month ago, how zone heavy the matchups have been for Miami. And that's led up a bit over the past month with one exception, and that was Green Bay. And that was the game where we got really frustrated again
Starting point is 00:38:56 about Tyreek and Waddle. The Packers used zone 95% of the time in that game, which is really unusual that you see a team like literally not use any man coverage at all. And we saw a ton of John who and a Chan as a result, only a combined 25% first three target for Tyreek and wild on that game today or yesterday was at 68% combined. So you're saying more man coverage means more wide receiver targets for the Dolphins? Yes. Yeah. And they've faced a lot of zone heavy coverages. But over the past month, it's been more man heavy coverages, except for that Packers game. And we've seen things even out a bit. So in last year, Tua had a 63% target rate to the wide
Starting point is 00:39:35 receiver position. 63% of all of his targets went to wide receivers. This year, it's at 48%. Kyler Murray, Russell Wilson, the Raiders, quarterbacks, Patrick Mahomes and Derek Carr are the only guys who are lower. 48% is really low. In the past five games, only four of those past five games have been 50% or higher. Only one has been below 50%. And so really it's affected by the early stuff. And I think lately it's been normalized a bit, but we've still had these massive John Woo fantasy games. So we kind of have this stink in our mind about Waddle and Tyreek. And it's been frustrating, but it has been normalizing a little bit as they face more neutral defenses that don't use so much zone. And then to finish up the season, their opponents rank 14th, 15th, and 27th.
Starting point is 00:40:30 In zone coverage use. So they're all average or even man heavy in the case of the Browns. I think we might see it go back to running through these guys, um, with HN and John, who just being like awesome fail safe options at the first three targets don't work, which is kind of what we saw in this game. Is this just opium or do you, can you buy into this? What do we got rest of season? I'm gonna look it up right now.
Starting point is 00:40:54 Adam, do you have it by any chance in front of you schedule rest of season? Niners, Browns and somebody else Texans. Okay. I can buy it because I think, well, the way I put it yesterday was the way I see it is Tyree kill is going to get his targets and Devon H. Han's going to get his targets. H. Han. And then who's the third guy? Is it going to be a John who game is going to be a waddle game. John who Smith has had going into this game against the Jets
Starting point is 00:41:22 three great matchups against teams that stink against tight ends. The Jets are really good against tight ends. He had a great overtime, but he had zero catches in regulation. So I wasn't surprised to see a little bit of aggression, but I couldn't find a real answer for it. This is a much better answer for why the Targets go to Waddle one week
Starting point is 00:41:39 and John do another week. So I am gonna buy this explanation. I think this is good. I don't know that this is gonna come true. We can't accurately predict the future, but this to me is a better way to look at it than any way that I was going about it. And I feel like Waddle has played phenomenally.
Starting point is 00:41:54 When he gets opportunities over the past month, he looks way different to me. He looks really, really explosive. Yeah, I'm with you on that and how he passes eye test-wise. I watched a game a couple weeks ago with him. Looked good running routes out there. What do we have? Like what's the as far as those teams go? How do they I guess we'd have to take a look after the show but like how they match up and like how what kind of defense they use. He said so it's their 14th, 15th, and 27th in their zone coverage rates,
Starting point is 00:42:20 which is good for Tyreek Hill and Jalen Waddle. One thing that- Yeah, we just need some neutral defenses, not freaking 95% zone. Well, I like that Tyreek Hill just gets so many end zone targets. That is his, the end zone guy now. It almost feels like they need to feed Tyreek Hill. They were so intentional about it in this game. So I have no issues starting Tyreek Hill.
Starting point is 00:42:43 I think even in a bad week, he's going to get to 12 PPR points. Waddle. You know, I have one league where I'm in the playoffs with. Well, I think I only have a bottle in one league and I'm in the playoffs. I mean, I could look if anybody cares. He's definitely, I think I sat him this week. I sat him for Elijah Moore. I'm not going to be doing that again, but I survived in a few leagues with waddle. I survived a major the playoffs, which is quite the accomplishment. Yeah, so I'm gonna have to start him over more. That's it. They're my number four wide receivers. I have Higgins, JSN and Devante
Starting point is 00:43:18 Adams. I like all of them better than waddle, but he'll be my flex. He'll be my on that low wide receiver target rate group of quarterbacks. Isn't it crazy that Kyler Murray's in that list? Like all the other ones made sense to me. And then crazy to you because you got Harrison throw him. Yeah. Oh, OK. To me, it's not crazy at all.
Starting point is 00:43:38 Like watching that offense, like the way they're just running, like basically just like tight end leak with McBride the whole game or like crossing routes with McBride the whole game or like crossing routes with McBride and Murray can't see over the line. Like I, I don't find that. Well, his rate has never been like this. It's always been league average or slightly above. And then last year dropped way down and this year it's a
Starting point is 00:43:57 little bit above last year. It was the first year of the Petsick offense though. And Trey McBride. Yeah. Uh, Trey McBride, you know, 141512 targets are the right weeks like he is a monster. So I'm sorry to do this to you. I think we have to end this segment, because we got to go to break. And we'll try to save
Starting point is 00:44:15 time for fantasy cops. So we've gone a little longer than I expected. But we'll go to break. We'll do our four big topics. And then we'll do fantasy cops to end the show. And we'll be right back breaking news, Derek Cardone for the season. Okay, thank the show and we'll be right back breaking news Derek are done for the season. Okay. Thank you. And we'll be right back on fantasy football today. Baker Mayfield was started in 75% of CBS SportsLeague in week 14.
Starting point is 00:44:33 He came through with 25 fantasy points against the Raiders. Our first big topic comes from Vinnie Naps. Can we trust Baker Mayfield in the fantasy playoffs? Mayfield has the Chargers, the Cowboys, and the Panthers. And Dan, do you trust Baker Mayfield in the fantasy playoffs? I didn't get a chance to watch the tape of this game. I watched three running backs, unfortunately,
Starting point is 00:44:55 ran out of time. But just thinking about what you laid out the schedule and how he's looked, I would say I cannot trust Baker Mayfield in the fantasy playoffs. what and how he's looked. I would say I cannot trust Baker Mayfield in the fantasy playoffs. I trust him as like QB 10 ish. I think.
Starting point is 00:45:11 Well, I'm a little behind on that. I'd say I think more of like 12 to 15 range. Okay. I don't know. He probably won't be 10 this week against the chargers. He's actually got, man, I have so many stats here, but the, the Buccaneers were seventh in pass rate in weeks one through nine. They are 27th in pass rate in their last four games.
Starting point is 00:45:35 They're just running the ball effectively. Right. I don't, that's a big issue there. Yeah, it's a big issue, but like, I don't trust it as much if Buc-ee's out. I know Rashad White just had a great game against the Raiders, but I don't know that he's not that good, right? So I think they're not throwing that much. Here's the thing. If they're going to throw low thirties or get 29 pass attempts last week, his last four games, he has 30, 33, 29 and 29. What's changed? And I think what's changed is one, he doesn't have Godwin. That's obvious.
Starting point is 00:46:04 And two, Mike Evans is not fully healthy. You don't think I don't know if that's true. He said that last week the first week he came back into Giants he's like I'm running at like 60%. Well then I trust him even less. So he played great honestly I watched this I watched this tape he I thought he played great other than the two interceptions which were bad I thought he was awesome and he is creating a lot of big plays over the last three weeks. None of them on deep balls, as I already mentioned, doesn't have a 30-yard completion all year,
Starting point is 00:46:33 but like guys were running wide open yesterday. Just a lovely Liam Cohen. And I love the Bucks offense, but Baker Mayfield has had a great year. He's something like QB five overall. He's something like QB 15 in yards per attempt. Right. He built it so much on two things. One, pass attempts and two, hardly any rushing touchdowns. That's it. Yeah. Both of those things are changing. So I don't fully trust him. Low end starter for me. Yeah. All right. Let's go to the next one from HTTV backfields
Starting point is 00:47:08 that have gotten taken over or affected because of injuries. The Seahawks, the Jets, the Niners, the Chargers, et cetera. Jacob, let's just say the Jets don't have Bryce Hall. Would you start either Braylon Allen or Isaiah Davis who basically played the same, had almost the same exact snap share touches against the Dolphins. They get the Jaguars great matchup next week. Yeah. You could start them against the Jaguars. They're like, um, when the remind Andre Stevenson tier cause they're basically just splitting it right down the middle.
Starting point is 00:47:36 Right. And for that reason, I would have to go with Ramon Dre over them because he doesn't really split, but I feel like Antonio Gibson has been getting more involved. He's played really well lately. And yeah, not in like a fit, not in like a 50, 50. Well, sure. Um, all right, Seattle. We talked about this yesterday when nobody really thought that Charbonneau was going to take over when Ken Walker came back, which
Starting point is 00:47:59 could be as early as week 15, Dan, how do you feel about it? You said you watched some Charbonneau tape this morning. Yeah. First, just something quick on Isaiah Davis, because I did watch his tape. He was at his best, for sure. Like when they ran outside zone, which is good because the Jets run almost all zone, just three plays I charted for Isaiah Davis were man's game. Did a great job on his touchdown run of pressing to the outside, knowing where that cutback lane is, finding that cutback lane early by planting his foot exploding, then one more cutback inside to avoid the safety touch.
Starting point is 00:48:29 And I think he's a worst talent because there, there was no counterpunch when the play was kind of blown up by the O-line D-line, like when the O-line lost and D-line got early penetration. I don't, I think he was the worst of all the talents as far as what I watched McCormick, him and Charbonne, um, just from a pure like, can you do anything outside of plant your foot and run outside zone? But I also think that while Alan is a much more talented running back, I don't know if he really does
Starting point is 00:48:53 fit outside this type of scheme. Like he's better for man, a man scheme. He always has been, was so at Wisconsin as well. So I think it will remain a split. I think you can start him against the Jaguars. As for Charbonne, he was my RB two overall from a pure talent standpoint when he came out in that draft class, which was a hot take because Jameer Gibbs was in that class.
Starting point is 00:49:11 Yeah. Stand by the take. And I'll tell you, despite how good Gibbs looks, because part of that take was always no way. No, don't do this. So Bichon, Bichon one Charbonnet two Gibbs. Let him cook. Dan stand by the take cooking himself right now. Yeah, let's
Starting point is 00:49:29 hear it. You're wrong. I'll go down with the ship because part of the take was something we haven't seen. You're on the Titanic, buddy. What you're on the Titanic. Just so you know, I'm on the Titanic, except for if you consider in within the take that Charbonne A can be a workhorse back and he can handle a workhorse role. That was one of my concerns with Jameer Gibbs. Would he be able to do that?
Starting point is 00:49:50 Um, we haven't seen that yet with the lions. Maybe he can be, but as far as Charbonneau goes, he has literally the entire package. As far as being a workhorse back, he may not be it for Seattle at any point. Uh, who knows? Um, but this is a player who five of his first six runs were man's game power gap counter. Two times they pulled the guards, thought that was awesome. That's how he dominated at UCLA when they were running power gap. He was so involved in the pass game.
Starting point is 00:50:14 I think part of that is because of the way that the Cardinals play defense and how Gannon calls the defense, but looked good in the pass game, looked good prior in the pass game. Five, 10 quarter two, if you want to track on NFL game pass, fun run where Charbonneau kind of shows all his skillset, presses outside to set up the safety. Number three, go in that direction, sharply cuts back, allowing that inside O line to climb to the second level right behind him. It's just elite level processing for a 15 yard gain. His touchdown run, the long one, the vision to cut back after you have two pullers going
Starting point is 00:50:43 left, the patience to run behind the pullers. This is the things I like about Charbonneau. This is something I learned early, uh, maybe four or five years or no, at this point, six years ago from Matt Wallman, who I think is really good at breaking down film when it comes to running backs. Don't just look at size speed and that combination and they're like explosive athletic traits, like a Ken Walker type, uh, who's a great athlete. Look for the nuances of playing the running back position. He pointed this out with Nick Chubb
Starting point is 00:51:07 a lot. And I think Charbonneau is really good at the nuances of playing the running back position, setting up the blockers, processing, understanding the pace and the tempo of runs. And I see that when I watch his tape and I thought he looked really good in this game. So this is like, but he doesn't, he does not make explosive plays separate this game. This was the best game of his career. He had the longest run of his career. He had the first, he had two of his four longest runs of his career
Starting point is 00:51:30 and he hasn't had that much work, but okay. You like him. I think, you know. Our true media higher advanced stats belonged to Zach Charbonneau. Higher avoided tackle rate than Jameer Gibbs, higher yards after contact per rush than Jameer Gibbs. Who has a higher career high scrimmage yard game?
Starting point is 00:51:49 Zach Sharpen, 893, 189 for Jameer Gibbs. I don't know. Yeah, my boy, my boy. I'm sorry. This is, it's a hot take and I get it. And it's never going to look good on paper. Gibbs is the flash. She is running back in the NFL.
Starting point is 00:52:02 He's amazing talent. I totally get it. So is Ken Walker. They're both amazing athletes and talents. And maybe Gibbs, I will say, can offer more when he's on the field from a schematic standpoint. But as far as just like which back can handle that full load and do everything on the football field, I think it's more Sharpen. And I think as far as playing the nuance, the play in the running back position, I love him. Yeah. Bill's mafia says Dan thinks blink 182 is one of the greatest bands of all time.
Starting point is 00:52:29 Terrible, terrible. Take build my god. Look, you look at all the British invasion bands and you throw blink 182 in there. Blink 182 is my band number two. They are they are better. It's the Rolling Stones one and then blinkink-182 followed by the Beatles. Wait, why? As far as what?
Starting point is 00:52:47 Your rankings of what? I'm doing your rankings of- That's a parody, dude. Oh, that's a parody. Blink-182 with the British Invasion. I like how you set that up. Thank you, thank you. All right, so anyway-
Starting point is 00:52:59 No, I do not think Blink-182 is a top two band or top three band. I think that, just as an aside, the song All the Small Things is, it makes me angrier than any song. It is a joke because it is a joke song, not meant to be taken seriously. It is a horrible song.
Starting point is 00:53:21 It had a very funny music video and it became a popular song, but it should never be played on the radio because it's an horrible song. It had a very funny music video and it became a popular song. But it should never be played on the radio because it's an awful song. We should only be watching the video where he's sitting on the toilet and all that's very funny. It's a parody basically. I don't know why people fell for it to think that All the Small Things is a good song. It is a intentionally bad song. Please don't listen to All the Small Things. I do not think any of that. I'm not sure I agree with any of that take. All right. Isaac Arendo. So we got to speed this up. Does anybody trust Patrick Taylor this week
Starting point is 00:53:53 if he's the starter against the Rams on Thursday? Is he a band of candor, baby? Oh, I don't think so. I think it would be getting them up to speed. I would 100% agree with you on that, Gibbs. He just, he fits their, their scheme so well. I feel like I don't think so. I think it would be Taylor. If they could get him up to speed, I would a hundred percent agree with you on that, Gibbs. He just, he fits their scheme so well, I feel like. I don't trust either one of them. No, this is a terrible comment. Dan on Nickelback, hear me out. I don't like Nickelback.
Starting point is 00:54:15 What are we talking about here? Dan, it's Dan on Nickelback, quote, hear me out. No, no. Nickelback's first song I really liked, like their first hit, but then they just released. What was it? With arms wide open. That's Creed, that. No. Bigelback's first song I really liked, like their first hit, but then they just released it. With our arms wide open. That's Creed.
Starting point is 00:54:29 That's Creed. Bigelback was, This Is How You Remind Me was their first. You remind me of who I really am. Yeah, exactly. Not like you. Yes, yes, yes, yes. That's the song. But then they kept releasing the same song over and over again for like 20 years.
Starting point is 00:54:45 The same crap over and over again. And as far as the Chargers guys go, you got lucky with the touchdown there from Gus Edwards. All right, next up, from Hipster Doofus, a regular contributor to the show, how does the Aiden O'Connell injury affect the fantasy playoff outlook for Jacoby Myers, Brock Bowers, and Sincere McCormick?
Starting point is 00:55:04 Well, luckily, they have Atlanta, Jacksonville, and the Saints in their next three games, two of them at home. But it's going to be Desmond Ritter going forward. Jacob, how does this change your rankings of Myers, Bowers, and or McCormick? Definitely. Like, O'Connell was providing like real, um, juice for the offense with the area yards. I got, I mean, you just pray at this point, the matchups are great.
Starting point is 00:55:30 The matchups are great. I'll say this. I watched some sincere McCormick on tape this game. And then I watched what he, uh, some of the snapshots, the chiefs, I kind of like sincere McCormick. I'm going to be honest. Like I thought the Raiders first of all have a nice, interesting mix in their run offense. It was kind of a good mix of outside zone, inside zone, and then different man concepts. The 29 yard run that McCormick had was a great combo of lateral agility when
Starting point is 00:55:54 he gets in that open space, the ability to make a defender miss in a phone booth, which I saw multiple snaps, which I thought was really interesting. And that's the lateral agility and then contact balance. He had really good contact balance. If you want to see a good clip, uh, go to, if you're checking on NFL game pass, go to 14 55, the first run of the third quarter, great job pressing the line of scrimmage and that jump back, uh, jump cut into the cutback lane, six yard gain. 13 31 in the third quarter was an example of his contact balance. I got to be honest. He reminds me a little bit, uh, just from like the contact balance, lateral agility,
Starting point is 00:56:25 the foot quickness, and then the tempoing with his runs of a very poor man's, let me make that clear. And I don't want to say very, but just- I'm so excited for this. A poor man's version of Maurice Jones Drew. Yes. Okay. All right. That's it. I like- I thought you were gonna say Zach Charbonnet. He's somebody I'm interested in for dining. You thought I was gonna say what?
Starting point is 00:56:43 Hall of Famer Zach Charbonnet, I thought you were going to say. I still stand by everything I said about Zach Charbonnet. And with that said, Sincere McCormick is somebody I would invest in in Dynasty. And I think he could be an interesting piece down the stretch with that schedule. I just do now worry about what Jacob said, the offense falling apart with Ritter. You might not believe this, but I actually had Sinccer McCormick ahead of Devon H.N. and Jameer Gibbs in my rankings from that draft class. Really?
Starting point is 00:57:10 Did you? Yeah. Interesting. Okay. I'd love to hear that because I use my RB2. Wow. Now you're trolling me. I love it.
Starting point is 00:57:18 Come on. How are you buying me? That was great. You don't usually do that. That was terrific. I didn't see that. Here are some stats. I'm getting guilt today. I'm getting guilt today. Because that was great. You don't usually do that. That was terrific. I didn't see that. Here are some stats.
Starting point is 00:57:26 I'm getting guilt today. I'm getting guilt today. Here are some stats. Let's talk about the Las Vegas passing game. They are 25th in yards per attempt at 6.5 yards per attempt. Last year, Desmond Ritter averaged 7.3 yards per attempt with Atlanta.
Starting point is 00:57:45 As a rookie, he averaged 6.2. This year, the Raiders are averaging 6.5 yards per attempt. They are 31st in touchdown rate, 2.9%, 24th in interception rate. They actually probably have a terrible passing game. However, they're second in pass attempts and they're second in pass rate. They're 14th in gross passing yards per game. You
Starting point is 00:58:05 could make a statistical case that Desmond Ritter is not that bad that what really held him back was that he just was playing with Arthur Smith and had barely through the ball. Right. Because I was, I was going to say those are Arthur Smith stats actually that are boosting his efficiency. Maybe, but Drake London last year with Desmond Ritter or in his career with Desmond Ritter, he's averaged 8.6 yards per target Drake London this year with Kirk Cousins, 7.5 yards per target, 1.1 yards less.
Starting point is 00:58:35 So I think yards per target is a dumb stat. I like it's I don't really like it. There's just too much that goes into it to know how legit it is. But it's possible that it's possible that Desmond Ritter is not so much worse than Aiden O'Connell. He's Aiden O'Connell, for goodness sake here. I do think it's a downgrade for everyone, but not like a, we're not sitting Brock Bowers, obviously. And still, like I'd still I'd still start Jacobi Meyer. Am I gonna say this out loud? Jacobi Myers or Jordan Addison? I'd still start Jacobi Myers, I think. No, no, no, no, no, no.
Starting point is 00:59:14 I, I could be convinced otherwise on that. But that's my initial gut. Yeah, you can give the people that hope with the stats you just gave. But I do think like, for them to get the passing volume that they've been getting, you know, that you laid out why the offense has been producing because they have so much passing volume and everything like actual attempts, they're throwing a lot, you have to have first downs. And that's, I really just worried that the offense will fall apart. It could be, it could be, I actually like, yeah, I think it's more likely that it that
Starting point is 00:59:45 that Desmond is just bad. And he is not like those yards per attempt. All that stuff doesn't even matter. He's the third string quarterback behind Minshew and O'Connell for a reason. But we are talking about it in O'Connell like the guys was having an absolutely dreadful game yesterday for the record. Okay, so that was my sort of statistical. We need to hit this fantasy cops. All right. All right. The last one here from Mike DeLuca, players that are fringe starters.
Starting point is 01:00:13 I want to officially amend what I said. I'd start Addison Overmires from Mike DeLuca players that are fringe starters that you can drop for handcuffs and DSTs for the playoffs. So I have two quarterbacks who are about 90% rostered that I think you could consider dropping for your handcuff. One is Justin Herbert. If you want to see if McConkie is playing and then maybe start them against Tampa Bay, I think that's reasonable. But after that he has Denver, uh, CJ Stroud has Miami, Kansas city in Baltimore. It doesn't even matter. Like Stroud just hasn't been good enough. So those two guys, if you are a set at quarterback
Starting point is 01:00:47 and you're never starting CJ Stroud and you're never starting Justin Herbert and you don't fear them being used against you in a court of law, you could drop them. And then basically almost anyone that's rostered in fewer leagues than those guys. There are a ton of quarterbacks that you could drop if you feel like you're set.
Starting point is 01:01:02 Just ask yourself, is this guy going to be picked up by my opponent and then beat me? Don't pick up a handcuff if you think you're giving up a weak winner at another position. You can drop Javante Williams, you can drop Alexander Madison. I hope Madison doesn't screw things up for McCormick. I think one thing's for sure,
Starting point is 01:01:17 Madison's not gonna be good, but I hope he doesn't screw things up for McCormick. I think you can drop Xavier Worthy. I mean, at this point in the year, what's it gonna take for you to have confidence in starting him? You know, to me, he's dropable. I wouldn't say that if this were week eight, if we still had bi-weeks or something like that, but I think Worthy is pretty dropable. Nick Westbrook-Kokine got Cincinnati this week, but tough to trust. Tank Del, like I think you can drop, I did drop him in one
Starting point is 01:01:43 league. No, don't drop Tankdale. Don't drop Tankdale, come on, what do I do? Like when is Tankdale gonna finally wake up? Matchups are good. They've been good, they've been good before. I wouldn't drop Tankdale, I also wouldn't drop. I just saw the Jonathan Brooks news
Starting point is 01:01:58 and I need the podcast news so I can go cry. Oh no. To read toward the same, ACL on the same knee, it's brutal. Oh no, that is. And they were vague about it too, which leaves it open to be like multiple. Yeah, yeah. Yeah, it's not good for Jonathan Brooks
Starting point is 01:02:13 and I would say for Juba Hubbard. I mean, we could be looking at a wildly high draft pick for him next year. Oh, that's awful. All right, I think you can drop Keon Coleman. I think you can drop Romeo Dobbs. You can definitely drop Tyler Lockett and you can drop Xavier LeGette. And you can drop us an email at fantasyfootballatcbsi.com
Starting point is 01:02:33 and put fantasy cops in the subject line. This one comes from Justin. We've had questions like this before, but let's do it again. We have a 10 team auction league with all our best friends from college. We've been doing it for 15 years. Sounds like a Schneier League. This is the last week before the playoffs start.
Starting point is 01:02:50 I'm in sixth, last playoff spot. Pat in my league is tied with me, but I have the tiebreaker over him by a hundred points. If I win, I'm in the playoffs. If I lose and Pat loses, I'm in the playoffs. If I lose and Pat wins, Pat's in the playoffs. Here's the dispute. Pat is playing the number one seed, Dylan. Dylan, who has it all locked up. His team is stacked.
Starting point is 01:03:11 Dylan is purposely tanking his game against Pat because he doesn't want to play me in the playoffs. So he's playing Bo Nicks on a buy and Zay Flowers on a buy. He's essentially giving Pat a free win, hoping that I lose because he doesn't want me in the playoffs. He argues this is strategy, and the rest of the league says it's Dylan's team and he can do whatever he wants. I think this ruins the integrity of the league
Starting point is 01:03:34 and this isn't fantasy football. All these guys know this is wrong and won't speak up. And keep in mind, the winner gets $2,000. What are your thoughts? Is it dynasty league? Right? And take a long standing league? Yeah, yeah. I mean, typically, leagues have rules about you know, you have to have a starting lineup. And if somebody even if somebody is not checking their team, then the
Starting point is 01:04:01 commissioner would, you know, enact and make sure that they have a real lineup. Um, if your league doesn't have a rule about it, then I don't know what you do. You need to address that, but you can't do it after the fact right now. As someone who's built a reputation for being a back up, you know, very strict. I've said before, and I'll say again, weak, inactive, bad traders, not paying attention, kick them out of your leagues. You don't want that.
Starting point is 01:04:31 You want to build a competitive league. I kind of find this to be strategy. Yeah, I love it. I think it's kind of love it. I kind of find it to be strategy and I think it's a fair strategy. I look, look, I will give you an example. In one of my leagues this week, I am locked into a top six seed. The top six seeds are set in stone.
Starting point is 01:04:55 The seeds are not, but the top six teams are set. It's our magazine league. I think we're all in it. Jacob, I think is number one. I'm like five. I did not want to drop Hunter Henry. I didn't want to drop anyone on my bench to start a tight end. I didn't need to win this week. So I dropped the Seahawks DST and I picked up the Ravens DST to play them for next week. I started
Starting point is 01:05:16 two or three players on a buy. I don't care. Right. If that it didn't affect anything because like I said, the top six seeds the top six teams are set, but I don't care if it did. I don't care about your fantasy team. I care about my fantasy team. I didn't do anything, you know, I did what I needed to do to position myself better to win the league. I didn't just like on a whim decide to bench these guys because I don't care.
Starting point is 01:05:41 I think this is totally fine. If you're doing something to help your chances of winning in the future, I am fine with it. As long as you're not colluding with someone which I wasn't and which doesn't sound like it's going on here. Agreed. So we're good. All right. Next fantasy cops. This is from Izzy from a town with the name of a Long Island Railroad line. From a town with the name of a long Island. No, I'm not going to get that. This is the train to. I could have got NJ Transit. It's Port Washington.
Starting point is 01:06:09 This is the train to Port Washington. The next station is Little Neck. Yeah. You're welcome, Izzo. All right, he says, we need your ruling here. Team A had a less than one point lead on Team B in week 13. On Wednesday, the NFL listed a stat correction that gave Jonathan Taylor a fumble.
Starting point is 01:06:30 In our league, a fumble is minus one. So this gave Team B the win. On Sunday, after the 1 p.m. games began, the NFL reversed the ruling. And our platform sent out a message stating that they will not be changing the scores and it's up to the individual commissioners to do so. Should the change be made?
Starting point is 01:06:52 All right, so real quick, team A wins by less than one point over team B, but team A had Jonathan Taylor. On Wednesday, stat correction, Jonathan Taylor gets a fumble, loses a point, and now team B is the winner. On Sunday afternoon, after the 1pm games begin, an update to the stat correction, Jonathan Taylor actually did not fumble and team A should have won as we saw to begin with.
Starting point is 01:07:19 But the app says we're not making the change, it's up to the commissioner. What would you guys do if you were to? I would make the change as commissioner. I think it's as easy, absolutely. Yeah, absolutely. T-May gets the win. It's unfair to do anything other than that. And our final email is not a fantasy cops email, but it's in the realm, in the neighborhood of family cops.
Starting point is 01:07:38 It's from Michael from a town in Wisconsin named after our nation's bird. Nation's what? Bird? Yeah. Bald eagle is the nation's bird. And I know some towns in Wisconsin. I should know more.
Starting point is 01:07:55 I don't know. I don't know. I should get this, but I don't know. You should. Yeah, you should. What do you have? What is it? It's Charbonneau, Wisconsin.
Starting point is 01:08:03 Yeah, you had no idea. No idea. Dear, I do know this greeting and so does Dan's. Let's see if Jacob knows it. Dear Boyle, Peralta, Jeffords, Diaz and Santiago. Yeah, of course. Such a good show. The guy in our league who talks the most trash won the inaugural season of our league. I always tease him that it comes with an asterisk since it was the first time all 10 of us had done an auction draft and a lot of people didn't fully know what they were doing. He has since missed the playoffs three years in a row in our 10
Starting point is 01:08:33 team league where the top six make it. At what point does the statute of limitations come in with winning a fantasy championship? He's becoming the 85 bears and it's sad to watch. What an email. This is amazing. Email. No, as a trash talker myself, I support the trash talker here. Enjoy, keep talking trash banners fly forever. That's something he told me.
Starting point is 01:08:56 And I agree you've won the league. Okay. Lean on it. Enjoy it. There is somebody in my league who's been to the finals four or five times and lost every single time. There's also another person who loses every year but has won one time. That person who won the one time has more to brag about. I think so. I mean, look, like, would you rather be a Giants fan or a 49ers fan? Right. Right. Well, that's not the best. They haven't what if you
Starting point is 01:09:23 were if you were about Giants or Bills. Yeah. Okay. Fine. If haven't what? If you were, if you were about giants or bills. Yeah. Okay. Fine. If you have to be a Giants fan or well, but I mean, the Niners have been at the Superbowl twice and lost, right? Like in the last 20 years. Um, yeah. Anyway, it's better to be relevant. Yeah. Better to be always better to be a Giants fan. All right. We're out of here, everybody. Thanks so much for watching and listening. We're going to check on Jacob, uh, in, in just an hour or so. Make sure he's okay. He is sullen with the Jonathan Brooks news. It really stinks.
Starting point is 01:09:48 Sorry to see it. I'm not okay. Yeah. We'll talk to you tomorrow. He doesn't even wanna be around anymore. You don't get that reference. Did you know he made that? Yes, I do.
Starting point is 01:09:57 He already made the joke in the private chat five seconds ago. What's the reference? Don't you dare, I think you should leave me. I didn't know you. I actually didn't know until this point. I knew about, I think you should leave before you knew about, I think you should leave. I don't think that's cool. Have you watched the Detroiters yet? No, I actually think I like it better. Wow. Really? Yeah. Have you seen a basketball? B-b-b-b-b-basketball, gimme gimme Yes! Yeah, that's so good. Later everybody!

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.