Fantasy Football Today - Devil's Advocate! Refuting Dave and Jamey's Breakouts/Busts (07/21 Fantasy Football Podcast)

Episode Date: July 21, 2025

Bid on Draft-A-Thon items here! ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://tiltify.com/@cbs-sports/fft-draftathon-2025⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Vote for Fantasy Footb...all Today in the "Sports" category: https://podcastawards.com/app/signup Dave and Jamey can make great breakout or bust cases for several players, but today we're going to put those cases under the microscope and play Devil's Advocate. Let's start with breakout cases for Garrett Wilson (3:00) and Marvin Harrison Jr. (17:05). Why is this going to be the year that Wilson actually converts targets into Fantasy points? Is Harrison Jr. just an overrated prospect that won't live up to the hype? ... News and notes (28:50) including our thoughts on Elijah Arroyo and then it's back to Devil's Advocate on Brock Bowers being a bust (35:00). He's so good! Is Ashton Jeanty really going to take that many targets away from Bowers? ... Finally, we play Devil's Advocate on bust calls on Zay Flowers (46:35), Tetairoa McMillan (54:15) and D'Andre Swift (1:00:00). Will Caleb Williams throw enough passes to his running backs? ... Your emails at fantasyfootball@cbsi.com Fantasy Football Today is available for free on the Audacy app as well as Apple Podcasts, Spotify and wherever else you listen to podcasts Watch FFT on YouTube⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ https://www.youtube.com/fantasyfootballtoday⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Shop our store: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠shop.cbssports.com/fantasy⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠  SUBSCRIBE to FFT Dynasty on Apple: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/fantasy-football-today-dynasty/id1696679179⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ FOLLOW FFT Dynasty on Spotify: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://open.spotify.com/show/2aHlmMJw1m8FareKybdNfG?si=8487e2f9611b4438&nd=1⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ SUBSCRIBE to FFT DFS on Apple: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/fantasy-football-today-dfs/id1579415837⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ FOLLOW FFT DFS on Spotify: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://open.spotify.com/show/5zU7pBvGK3KPhfb69Q1hNr?si=1c5030a3b1a64be2⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Follow our FFT team on Twitter:⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ @FFToday⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠,⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ @AdamAizer⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠,⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ @JameyEisenberg⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠,⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ @daverichard⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠,⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ @heathcummingssr⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Follow the brand new FFT TikTok account: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.tiktok.com/@fftoday⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Join our Facebook group⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ https://www.facebook.com/groups/FantasyFootballToday/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Sign up for the FFT newsletter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ https://www.cbssports.com/newsletter⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 Book club on Monday. Gym on Tuesday. Ugh! Date night on Wednesday. Out on the town on Thursday! Woo! Quiet night in on Friday. It's good to have a routine. And it's good for your eyes too.
Starting point is 00:00:19 Because with regular comprehensive eye exams at Specsavers, you'll know just how healthy they are. Visit Specsavers.ca to book your next eye exam. Eye exams provided by independent optometrists. I'm Chris Hadfield, astronaut and citizen of planet Earth. Join me on a journey into the systems that power the world. No politics, just real conversations with real people shaping the future of energy. Listen wherever you get your podcasts.
Starting point is 00:00:45 This is fantasy football today from CBS Sports. What a play! Can you believe this? No I can't. It's time to dominate your fantasy league. Off to the races and he stays at his feet. This is gonna go the distance. Now here's some combination of Adam, Dave, Jamie and Heath.
Starting point is 00:01:04 Now here's some combination of Adam, Dave, Jamie and Heath. Well, can Zay Flowers take the next step this season? Does Ashton Gentry's arrival in Las Vegas really mean less production for Brock Bowers? Why are all the Ohio statewide receivers so bad and are they going to break out this year? It's a little bit of an exaggeration, I suppose. Welcome to Fantasy Football. Today is Monday, July 21st. It is FFT open day. Yeah. Dave and I are wearing the same shirt. How about that? Yes.
Starting point is 00:01:32 It's our FFT open shirt. Dave, welcome back. Hopefully not the same size. Cause that would be like a nightie for you and a tidy for me. Great to be back. I missed you both. I missed everybody.
Starting point is 00:01:47 I haven't paid attention to a bit of football at all in the last week, so I'm going to need some help filling in the blanks. I don't really believe that to be true, but okay. It's not true. Apparently we have a really good thumbnail today. I'd love to see it. Thomas's thumbnail game is A plus. All right, so today we're looking at some sleepers, breakouts and busts, six of them in total, three for Jamie, three for Dave, a combination,
Starting point is 00:02:13 not three sleepers, three breakouts, three busts, just six players we're talking about. They fall into one of those three categories. And I am going to play devil's advocate. I'm gonna say, no, you're wrong because, and maybe I believe them. Maybe I don't. We'll find out, but we'll have Dave and Jamie support their claims. Back it up.
Starting point is 00:02:30 And then we're going to do some news and notes. We've got some players on the pop list and whatnot. And we'll tell you about the FFT open and how to be part of the best, maybe the second best beyond Scott Fish Bowl fantasy football tournament in the world. All right. Let's start with the Ohio State guys. We're just going to do a couple here. We'll jump back into this topic a little bit later. But Jamie has Garrett Wilson as a breakout.
Starting point is 00:02:51 Dave has Marvin Harrison Jr. as a breakout. Garrett Wilson, I looked at CBS ADP, Fantasy Pros ADP, Football Guys ADP. Garrett Wilson is one of the most consistent here, if not the most. He is going as wide receiver 14 or 15 and 32nd to 33rd in all three average draft positions. Marvin Harrison Jr. is going anywhere between 36th and 40th and he is wide receiver 18 and 19.
Starting point is 00:03:20 So I don't even think we can say, well, on this side, he's a breakout on this. It's the same ADP for both of them. So Jamie, you're, you're making a case for Garrett Wilson as a breakout. Uh, why don't you go ahead and make your case. And then I will give the devil's advocate. It's every year, right? He's a breakout. Uh, hopefully this is the year that it finally happens.
Starting point is 00:03:38 Um, obviously he's going to lead this team in targets and probably by a significant margin last year, 154 targets, uh, which was number four in the NFL, and he probably would have been better than that if there was no Devontae Adams joining the team in the middle of the season because we saw how the targets sort of shifted in Adams' direction. But I like the fact that he has a history with Justin Fields. The two were together at Ohio State, and I think that will matter. But mostly it's about the opportunity here. And we keep, understandably so, but it's not just this situation but we
Starting point is 00:04:08 keep you know sort of assigning the Ben Johnson offense to what's gonna happen in Chicago well this is a version of the Lions offense is going to the Jets and I know it's not the same passing game it's not gonna be the same level of production for for fields based on his history by any stretch. But when you look at the opportunity that Wilson has to play the Amonra St. Brown role, the Jameson Williams role, the Sam Laporta role, and everything else under the sun for this team, he's going to have the opportunity here to just get a lot of volume, which I think is going to matter. So we saw Fields get solid, if not above average, great production, whatever you want to label it with DJ Moore,
Starting point is 00:04:45 when those two were together in Chicago, I think the same thing will happen for Garrett Wilson, maybe to an even better level. So I'm excited about the opportunity for him and someone that you should look forward toward the back end around three. Okay. Devil's advocate on Garrett Wilson. Wish you were going a little bit closer to the back end of round three. I know you 32nd to 33rd might be a little bit rich for you, but it's not, not much. He always gets targets. 147 targets as a rookie who's wide receiver 31 per game.
Starting point is 00:05:17 168 targets in his second season. He's wide receiver 33 per game in full PPR, 46 the non. 153 targets last year, he was wide receiver 19 per game, but that's still lower than what he's being drafted as. Wide receiver 14 or 15. And I'm supposed to believe that Justin Fields is the cure. You're gonna say he's had terrible quarterback play his whole career.
Starting point is 00:05:40 Well, he's been on two teams that have actually thrown for 4,000 yards. He's been on two teams that have been top half of the league and gross passing yards per game touchdowns. On the other hand, not so good. He's been on teams that are 31st, 32nd, but last year, sixth, just through the sixth most touchdowns last year, they threw the ball a ton. I'm supposed to believe that Justin Fields is the guy that's going to get
Starting point is 00:05:58 Garrett Wilson, that's going to make him better. Garrett Wilson, by the way, does not do well on deep balls in his career. He has one of the lowest catch rates in the NFL in the last three years since he's been in the league. Let's say among like 20th percentile in catch rate on passes of 20 or more area yards. That needs to change. So I don't think anything's really changing for him.
Starting point is 00:06:23 He has a quarterback that hasn't been good, that's gonna throw a lot less than what we've seen from the Jets in previous seasons where they've averaged 35 or more pass attempts each game. Yeah, he's gonna get a ton of targets, but nothing is new. Nothing is new. The only way Garrett Wilson outperforms his ADP is if he has a Terry McLaurin-like season where he scores a ton of touchdowns and then we'll be calling him a bust the next year because his touchdown rate's gonna have to come down.
Starting point is 00:06:48 So I don't see it. Drafting him as wide receiver 15 feels like drafting him at his ceiling. That is my devil's advocate prediction or case for Garrett Wilson. Dave, why don't you jump in? What do you think? Who is more compelling there?
Starting point is 00:07:01 I think you're both sort of right, but I lean a little bit toward you, Adam. I think he just kind of is what he is. If there is a difference though, it's what he did before Devonta Adams came to town last year, averaged over 11 targets per game in his first six games, had over 16 PPR points per game in his first six games. Can he do that with Justin Fields? No, I don't think so. I don't think he can. I don't think he'll see 11 targets per game. I don't think he'll get north of 15 PPR points per game. I think this is going to be a
Starting point is 00:07:32 conservative offense. I do think he's going to lead them in targets. Wouldn't surprise me if he was around 9 targets per game. You take the whole 2024 season, so what do you average? He was about 9 targets per game, a little more than, I think he was close to 15 PPR points per game. You want to draft him to be around 14-1⁄2, 15 PPR points per game? I'm good with that. And I have a tough time finding a lot of wide receivers that fit into that bucket. When I look in that range of PPR points per game, I have a tough time finding a lot of receivers that I feel good about getting there. I think it's that volume. This is where I agree with Jamie. I think it's that volume that's going to carry Garrett Wilson to getting there. Real quick, before we go back to Jamie, if you think he's going to average 14 and a half PPR fantasy points per game, put that into context. What round do you think 14 and a half PPR fantasy points per game should be drafted in? Right. So this is where
Starting point is 00:08:22 I think where he's being drafted is about right. We're talking about, I don't think you're necessarily going to agree with it, but late round three into round four, maybe a shade later, maybe call them top 50, but probably closer to that three, four turn is where somebody who's got the idea of being 14 and a half, but could be higher is gonna get drafted. All right, Jamie, what'd you think of my case against Garrett Wilson and why is this going to be the year that he actually turns all those targets into better fantasy production?
Starting point is 00:08:55 Well, I don't think you're wrong. I mean, there's a reason why he's not, I think if you were to say a player of his pedigree and opportunity, forget about everything else, that would probably push him into round two. You know, just looking at what the opportunity is there for him. So there's, I think, at least for me, like I'm not taking him where his ADP is. So I will not get Garrett Wilson in the early thirties. I just think the way, at least the drafts I've seen and the way I build my teams, like I'm not looking for him using that spot and I'm ranking that spot.
Starting point is 00:09:26 So it's a matter of first off if he's if he's scoring 14 and a half points that's that's around for picket best if not round five. So I don't I don't think you want to be drafting that player if that's your ceiling then you're probably mistaking him for where he should be going where he's going right now. I think the hope is again again, better offense in general. So while the quarterback play may be a little bit tough to buy into, the hope would be is there easier throws for him,
Starting point is 00:09:54 he uses his athleticism, he does make some more plays down the field. Again, I hate to keep using this word hope, but this is what we're banking on for Garrett Wilson after all these years in the NFL at this point. And I think the Jets just sort of backed that up by giving him the contract that they gave him, you know, so there's a lot of faith here and I'll ask you the same thing when we were talking about Mason Taylor last week that
Starting point is 00:10:12 you brought up. Who's the who's the second best receiver right now for the Jets? Breeze Hall. That would be great. But that's happened before. That's the point like two years ago, Breeze Hall was second on the team in Targets. I don't see that happening. Three years ago, Tyler Conklin was second on the team in targets. I don't see that happening. Three years ago, Tyler Conklin was second on the team in
Starting point is 00:10:27 targets. I might be flipping those, but I think it's going to be the name that you keep bringing up every time there's a news item about the Jets is Josh Reynolds. Yeah. And that's what that's, that's the selling point for Garrett. But, but I'm saying is that's already been the case for him. And it wasn't the case last year when it was year three for him. And now we're into year four where I think there's a, there's a,
Starting point is 00:10:44 you know, hopefully change come. I mean, you know, you mentioned he's dealt with bad quarterback play before. Yes, he's dealt with bad quarterback play before. I hope that some of the things that Justin Fields has learned over the last couple of seasons will help him with their history together, lend itself to Garrett Wilson being a big contributor and north of the 14 and a half points that he scored last year. Yeah, he is gonna throw less. Cause like I said, they've thrown 35 or more pass attempts per game, which is a lot.
Starting point is 00:11:11 They've ranked 6th, 11th and 5th in pass attempts per game in Garrett Wilson's career. Justin Fields, in his, I adjust the games where he's played a 90% snap share or higher. He's averaged 27.1, 21, 30, and 27 pass attempts per game. So let's put him in the 27, 28 range and pass attempts per game. So that's gonna be the challenge there for Garrett Wilson.
Starting point is 00:11:33 I will say that you look at just those numbers on the deep balls, it's really discouraging. Cause when I think of Garrett Wilson, that's what I think is missing for him. He just has not been a vertical threat. He's kind of like a, it feels like he's a slot receiver playing on the outside to me.
Starting point is 00:11:49 Like he's a Chris Goblin, Amanra St. Brown in the best case scenario, because he's not making big plays. However, I went back and I watched all of his targets on 20 air yards or more last year from Aaron Rodgers. Aaron Rodgers sucks. Like he, last year. Like Garrett Wilson, I Rodgers sucks. Like last year, like Garrett Wilson, I mean I saw three or four plays where he just burned
Starting point is 00:12:09 somebody and he could have had a few hundred more, 200 more yards and three more touchdowns maybe, maybe it's a little high on the yard. He could have had much better stats. Now those past temps are hard, right? Like people miss, but I don't know that it was all on Garrett Wilson. I think he's capable of more. I'm torn on him.
Starting point is 00:12:25 That's why I brought him up. I see the arguments both ways and we'll see how the audience, the audience apparently or the fantasy community apparently buys into it. Cause I think 32nd is pretty rich for sure. It's the volume. That's why it's because they see a guy who's clearly going to be the number one receiver on his team clearly is going to have a bunch of catches. And in full PPR that's you know that's
Starting point is 00:12:47 the recipe you want that on your team I think the thing in your roster construction is do you want this to be your number one receiver so if you went running back and one of the tight ends obviously the quarterbacks gonna come into play here with most drafts especially where we see Lamar Jackson's ADP at this point do you want this to be your number one receiver? And to me this is sort of where like not the tier break because we obviously went through a lot of tiers he was in tier four or five for me I don't remember exactly. Do you feel comfortable with Garrett Wilson as your number one receiver? And for me the answer is no. Yeah so just real quick
Starting point is 00:13:22 I mean just thinking about man, those Rogers plays, but is there really that big of a difference between Garrett Wilson and DK Metcalf this year? They both should completely dominate their, their receiving cores and targets. They both are going to be on, I would say the Steelers are going to throw more than the Jets. Maybe I put in the same ballpark, but I get right. Right. It's going to be close. All right. All right. Let's, uh, I don't have them ranked that far apart. I'm with you. All right. Let's take a quick, why's I think Wilson runs way more routes and is way more, you know, uh, agile than DK. All right. Quick break here. Before we go to break, let's take a look at the thumbnail of the day. Look at it, if you're not watching YouTube.
Starting point is 00:14:08 Oh my gosh. Devil's Advocate. How do you even know that movie, Thomas? Like, how did this come about? This is fantastic. I love this movie. I'm a big movie guy. 80s, 90s, I know all the good ones.
Starting point is 00:14:22 I'm not like Dan. I've never seen Devil's Advocate, is it good? Oh, come on. Oh my God. It's one of Keanu Reeves' best movies. That's good, yeah, well, he's, you know, parenthood is Keanu Reeves' best. You see this and you think that Jamie's
Starting point is 00:14:36 the movie star in the family. I know, right? Looking good. My hair's long enough now, I could probably do that. We'll be back on the Devil's Advocate edition. Hoo-ha. This episode is brought to you by Square. You're not just running a restaurant, you're building something big.
Starting point is 00:14:52 And Square's there for all of it. Giving your customers more ways to order, whether that's in person with Square Kiosk or online. Instant access to your sales, plus the funding you need to go even bigger. And real-time insights so you know what's working, what's not, and what's next. Because when you're doing big things,
Starting point is 00:15:11 your tools should too. Visit square.ca to get started. Oh, Adam can finally appreciate that comment from Brian. What a comment. Adam looks like Silvio from Sopranos. Okay, yeah, I think, who's Silvio? Oh,ranos. Okay, yeah, I think who's Silvio? Oh, go away. Stop, stop.
Starting point is 00:15:29 All right, hey, real quick. I started watching a movie that I was surprised at how good it was. It's a Paramount movie, so I feel like I can plug it. Terminator Dark Fate. I watched the first 20 minutes or so, it was really good. It got like a 70% on Rotten Tomatoes. Looking forward to finishing it.
Starting point is 00:15:46 Okay. Which one's that one? It's from five years ago, I think. Arnold is it. Oh, it's when Arnold comes back, right? Yeah, yeah. But I haven't gotten to Arnold yet. Have you seen it?
Starting point is 00:15:56 Yeah. Is it good? Yeah, it's pretty solid. Yeah, it seemed pretty good. Okay, Marvin Harrison Jr. I saw Eddington this weekend. That was crazy. You saw what?
Starting point is 00:16:03 Eddington. Never heard of it. I'm not doing so well today. Dave, Marvin Harrison Jr. as a breakout. I thought you didn't like Marvin Harrison Jr. I don't love him, but when I define a breakout, it's a player that I think can be better than what he was last year. And he sucked last year. Didn't even average 12 PPR fantasy points.
Starting point is 00:16:26 So I think he can outperform that, but I'm not reaching for him. I'm not gonna take him over Garrett Wilson, for example. He's going between 36 and 40. That's the most compelling case I've heard from Martin Harrison yet, this offseason. Yeah, he should be better than he was last year. He was wide receiver 41 per game,
Starting point is 00:16:44 but he's being drafted as wide receiver 18 or 19. He's a top 40 pick. And I'm fine with pretty much all that. I'd like to get them a little bit later than 40th overall, but I don't think I'm thinking 50th overall on Marvin Harrison Jr. The fact that they're bulking them up, they want to make them a better player and contested catches, want to make them a more physical part of their offense. I get
Starting point is 00:17:06 it. He just needs to get on the same page with Kyler Murray. I don't like hearing that Kyler Murray's telling people that he wants to run more. That's not going to be good for anybody in that offense other than Kyler Murray. But I think Marvin Airston still has good talent as long as they use him the right way. Shorten that A-dot, not treat him like he's some sort of a speedster. He's not, he's, he's much more of a sophisticated route runner who's trying to add a physical edge. He was terrible in Contested Catches last year. He can get better there. He scored a bunch of touchdowns last year. He can get better there. I'm hoping that he can take a nice step forward and get, you know, maybe to where we were talking with Garrett Wilson a few minutes ago, that 14½ PPR point range. I think he can get there. And I think he does have it in him. Assuming that target volume goes higher than what we think that he could be, um, you know, somewhere in the neighborhood of a top 12 ish fantasy wide
Starting point is 00:17:54 receiver, but that's the ceiling call. I think he's going to be much more of a like decent wide receiver too. I feel like he's getting drafted that way. Okay. So that's Marvin Harrison. My, my devil's advocate for Marvin Harrison. I'm going to use one of my favorite Simpsons quotes. Marvin Harrison, he's, get this, a little slow. This is Hover being so stupid, not realizing that he is slow. But no, I mean, so I also looked at the most of the targets of his 20 plus area yard pass attempts. And you already said it, Dave, he's not a speedster. But I mean, this guy
Starting point is 00:18:29 is not separating. Unlike Garrett Wilson, who's who can burn guys, Marvin Harrison Jr. is gonna have to make contests and catches. And I just don't like that he added weight. I want him to be a little bit more agile. Now he's adding weight. I don't know that there's enough pass volume. Kyler Murray last year averaged the fewest pass attempts per game of his career. When you just look at his healthy games, he says he wants to run more. Obviously Trey McBride is there.
Starting point is 00:18:57 The one thing Marvin Harrison had last year was end zone targets. He had some among the most end zone targets in the NFL. If that goes away, we're not talking about a guy who's getting a lot of yak. We're not talking a lot about a guy who's doing well on his deep balls. He caught 35% of his deep ball targets, which is okay, but it's not great. No. So he needs those end zone targets to get those touchdowns. And I don't know, quite frankly, I'm just not blown away by what we saw. I'm disappointed in what we saw on the field based on the fact that he was the most hyped wide receiver
Starting point is 00:19:33 coming out in a long time. I don't look at it like, he doesn't look like Julio Jones. He doesn't look like AJ Green. He doesn't look like Malik neighbors. He's just not that good of an athlete in my opinion. I know that sounds kind of crazy. And he gained weight.
Starting point is 00:19:45 So I'm not sure he's gonna break out. I don't know that he's gonna match his pedigree. That's my devil's advocate argument. Well, I think first off, the reason I think he gained weight was not for contested catches. He was actually tied for second in the NFL among wide receivers last year
Starting point is 00:19:58 for contested catches with nine. Wait a minute, in what stat? Contested catches. Like opportunities or actual catches? I was looking at the list from FTN fantasy, for what that's worth. And they have Drake London one with 13. And then they have four other guys tied with nine Marvin Harris. Can you read those names? Because I always felt like that wasn't such a great stat because it
Starting point is 00:20:22 meant you were not separating a lot like Keon Coleman in college, for example, a lot of contests. Here's the list that they have CD lamb is on the list, which obviously he separate. Garrett Wilson is on the list and Sarah McLaurin is on the list. So it's Drake London. Again, this is FTN fantasy 2024 contested catch leaders. Drake London, one with 13, three guys tied with nine CD lamb, Garrett Wilson, Marvin Harrison, Jr. And then Terry McLaurin right behind them with eight. All right So i've got marvin harrison with 16 contested catches on 38 attempts 38 attempts is close to the top
Starting point is 00:20:53 Of opportunities on contested catches, but it only caught 16 of them. That's 42 percent. I've got mccloren. This is from pro football focus 25 catches from mccloren that was first was first Marvin Harrison is tied for 11th with 16. And he wouldn't have even had 16 if he didn't have so many opportunities that he didn't do well on. So I don't know, I guess we probably the best way to go about it would be to have Adam go back and watch every single target that Marvin Harrison had and have him figure out opportunities there were it's subjective. That's kind of one of the problems with that stat. But Jamie, I'm sorry, we cut you off. What'd you want to say there? No, no, no. I mean, first off, he had one broken tackle last year. So I think that was a big part of it was that they want him
Starting point is 00:21:30 to get a little bit more physical in that regard. So when they does get the ball in his hands that he's not getting brought down or not being able to separate, which is part of it too. I mean, look, you're not getting tackled if you're running away from people. So, and to go back to your point, Adam, in terms of his metrics in some cases, maybe this is why he didn't want to run at the combine because he didn't want people to say that
Starting point is 00:21:54 maybe he wasn't so fast. That's exactly what I thought. I honestly, I may have said that a while ago. I really feel like he would not have been the first wide receiver taken if he had run at the combine. Possibly, you know, and that, one critique from our colleague, Pete Prisco, why he liked Malik neighbors better was he didn't think that Harrison ran as well as neighbors.
Starting point is 00:22:15 And so it's true. There's clearly, um, again, uh, a belief in where you think Marvin Harrison's stats will go and you reference something in regard to Garrett Wilson. It wouldn't shock me if Harrison has a Terry McClellan-like season because as I've said the last couple of weeks, you know, and my favorite co-analyst because he agrees with everything I say, Dan, agrees with Dan, he's coming off a rookie season with eight touchdowns. So it's not like there's a long way to go for him to get to that number that we're looking
Starting point is 00:22:52 at 10, 12, you know, it's possible for him to be there. And I do think the Kyler running thing isn't that huge of a negative because we have seen Kyler in the past when he's run, again, different caliber wide receiver, more proven guys, but he's still got good numbers with Deandre Hopkins. He's still got numbers for Marquise Brown. It's not like these guys were terrible because Kyler was still running. Now you do have two guys to support here with Trey McBride, so that's a big part of this as well. But I also think that, look, the expectations have certainly been moved for Harrison.
Starting point is 00:23:24 Round two pick a year ago, in some cases round one, because we were all excited about the hype for what he was supposed to be as a prospect. And then it unfolds where he's one of the biggest busts of 2024 at any position. And so now you're buying back into, you know, to, you know, where Dave is coming from of just being better than what he was a year ago and putting up better stats. I hope that's the ground floor for him, you know, because again, if we can get to 10 touchdowns, 12 touchdowns, I don't think he's going to be a 15 touchdown guy in this offense, but 10 is not that much of a ask for where he was in his rookie campaign.
Starting point is 00:23:55 Then can he get to a thousand yards receiving? Well, that's a few more big plays. And obviously again, breaking some more tackles, maybe getting some of those ends on opportunities and you know, Kyler making things happen with his legs where there's broken plays now. And we see some of that as well. So I think he's a great round four buy. If he goes round five or later, I feel it's like a steal. And again, I don't want him to be my number one receiver, no matter how you start, you
Starting point is 00:24:19 know, two running backs, tight end quarterback, whatever the case may be, because I don't think he's going around three. But he's in that group. You know, he's basically like the start of the blob, you know, 20 to 40, or you can make a case for almost all these guys to be number two caliber wide receivers. You just got to take again, the realistic approach of he may not ever be that type of prospect, the Julio Jones, AJ Green type of guys, but he can still be a really good wide receiver. Maybe he has sort of like that Drake London maturation process whereby year three, we're looking at, you know, a top tier fantasy wide receiver, maybe has sort of like that Drake London maturation process, where by year three, we're looking
Starting point is 00:24:45 at, you know, a top tier fantasy wide receiver, tier two guy. And obviously, it could go sideways if he doesn't get an increase in target volume, or he added this muscle and he's still not, you know, winning on contested catches, and he's still averaging, I think it's 2.4 yards after catch per reception, which is gross. So there, there are definitely ways that this could get worse. The biggest issue for me is that the Cardinals try and use them the exact same way they did last year. Like they didn't learn from anything that happened. They didn't self scout themselves.
Starting point is 00:25:16 I don't see that happening. I think the Cardinals know that they've got a chance to make some moves this year. They've got to try and get this first round pick going. They should be doing everything in their power to put them in a position to be an effective pass catcher. Ergo, getting a lot of targets, having a lot of numbers to go with it. He should be a better receiver in year two. Adam, what's his dad's name? What's coach's name? Oh, stop. So Marvin Harrison Jr. Yeah, not enough in terms of targets like easy layups. Basically
Starting point is 00:25:48 the lowest. I'm not going to go through all the numbers, but there was no fantasy relevant wide receiver that had fewer targets of zero to five air yards than Marvin Harrison Jr. Except AJ Brown who missed three or four games. It was on the most run heavy team in the NFL. So give him some layups. All right. Listen, today is a big day. Tonight is a big night. 7 p.m. Eastern. We begin our fundraiser to raise over $60,000 for St. Jude all through the FFT Open. What is the FFT Open? Started out with eight leagues, then 12 leagues. This year, 24 leagues. They're all 12 team leagues. You compete within your league for the first 13 weeks of the season. Then weeks 14 and 15 are the playoffs in your leagues.
Starting point is 00:26:31 If you win your division, you move on to the FFT Open semi-finals and hopefully the finals. It's gonna be 24 division winners competing in week 16. The top eight highest scores, and obviously they're gonna be players that are on, you know, multiple teams, right? So you're just competing with these other league winners.
Starting point is 00:26:52 The eight highest scores advance to week 17 and the highest score of week 17 wins the FFT Open. So I've got a division, Jamie's got a division, Dave's got a division. We've got 24 of these divisions, a lot of CBS guys, some non-CBS guys like Chris Harris, Scott Fish, the fantasy life guys like Ian Harditz who we had on last week. If you're a Jets fan, Lige Duzable has got a league. There's Dan Schneier looking like he's 10 years old in that picture, Alfredo Brown. Anyway, 7
Starting point is 00:27:22 PM tonight, all of these spots become available, $250 each. I know it's a lot, but it all goes to St. Jude. We're gonna sell it out and it's gonna be $66,000 for St. Jude. So we'll see you at this URL, tinyurl.com slash 2025 FFT. tinyurl.com slash 2025 FFT, 7 p.m. Eastern tonight. I'm guessing that my league, Dave's, Jamie's and Heath's
Starting point is 00:27:53 will fill up within a minute or two. So if you wanna be in one of those four, get there on time. A few others might fill up that fast. I think a lot of them will be available for the next few days. It's my guess. We've never done 24 leagues, so it's ambitious, but be there tonight. tinyurl.com slash 2025
Starting point is 00:28:10 FFT. All right. Let's run through some news and notes real quick here. Rashid Rice will be a full participant in training camp and left tackle Josh Simmons, their first round pick, maybe left tackle, maybe right tackle. We'll see. They got some competition there for the chiefs, but he appears healthy. It's great news for them. But Rishi Rice. All right. Suspension aside, guys, we'll wait and see what the suspension is. Are you treating Rishi Rice as a healthy player right now?
Starting point is 00:28:36 Like fully healthy, normal. If there was no suspension, I would expect him to be on his normal snapshot week one. Okay. I will always just say it and we'll talk to, we'll talk to a, you know, a sports doctor before, before too long. It's on my list of priorities. Is he going to be the same as he was that we just don't know. Detroit left tackle Taylor Decker's on the pup list. He could be back soon though. And I mentioned how much better their run defense was when Levi
Starting point is 00:29:03 on Ruzoriki was in the lineup last year. We knew he was going to be on PUP. Well, he's actually going to miss the entire season for the Lions with a torn ACL. Chris Godwin not practicing with the team as of now. He's a candidate to start camp on PUP. All right. This is a big one, Jamie. Seattle released Noah Fant. He had 64 targets in 14 games last year. That's, that ain't nothing. Yeah, that's not. No, that's not that's I don't really worry about last year, though. I mean, the whole thing is different. New quarterback, new coordinator, like so many moving parts. Like, for me, it's not.
Starting point is 00:29:35 All right. Well, yeah, I would like to, you know, that GIF of me dancing. Yeah. That could be all the people who drafted Elijah Arroyo last week on their Scott Fishbowl team. Including me, by the way. Yeah, no, it's it's and I think you're very high on him in dynasty, right? You drafted him in our big burger league. Yeah, it's a huge opportunity. Look, you're talking about, you know, guys scored seven touchdowns 35 or 45 targets last year at Miami and 590 yards receiving, you know, guy that can in an offense again a lot of moving parts, you know, so he's a top 20 tight end for me. I think I'm tight in 17. He moved ahead of Mason Taylor who was my third favorite rookie tight end
Starting point is 00:30:14 now a Royals in that spot Taylor's fourth and so wouldn't surprise me if he's you know in the same range of production as as Loveland and Warren, you know, just again given his opportunity here with Sam Darnold I would certainly take the other two rookies well ahead of him. But just how this all sort of plays out. Look, Cooper Cubs got to stay healthy is 32 years old. Really behind Jackson's been the Jigba and cup. It's thin, you know, Marcos Valdez Cantling who comes with Kubiak is going to be a part of this.
Starting point is 00:30:40 But there's a big chance here, you know, so the the one question I think we have to see is it may not be early in the season where Arroyo shines Because I think AJ barn will get the first opportunity They're just being a guy that's on the team and you know Certainly based on everything that I read I wrote a story on Arroyo. You can read it on site And just so people are aware I'm gonna be doing a lot more like news reaction. So like there's a story on the 49ers from the public So basically anytime something happens, I'm gonna to be doing a lot more news reactions. So there's a story on the 49ers from the Pup List. So basically, any time something happens, I'm going to be reacting to it pretty quickly.
Starting point is 00:31:11 So Barner is, they're probably going to lean on him for his blocking. And especially, you'll see him a lot in 12 personnel. But I do think there's a huge opportunity here for this kid. And any time you see these second round tight ends, this was the port of his rookie season. That's why I was excited, for example, about Ben Sennett with his chance in Washington.
Starting point is 00:31:31 There's just a clear path here for him to get opportunities. Now, to your point about Phant, three years he scored three touchdowns in two years. I'm sorry, he scored one touchdown in his last two years. In 2022, he's better find the end zone. But one touchdown in his last two years, He never top 50 catches never top 500 yards So for what that's worth if you're just looking at the history here and even last year with McDonald But I do think again, you know totally changed everything new quarterback new system new
Starting point is 00:31:58 Receivers around him, you know Metcalfe not there lock. It's not there So there's a there's just an easy path here for one of these Take a chance on a late round pick with one of these rookie tight ends and he's one of those guys all right uh here's another rookie tight end just keep them on your radar ronde gatzens getting a lot of good press daniel popper of the athletic thinks he can make an impact in the passing game if he can get on the field enough and he's gonna have to block you know well enough i guess for that uh tennessee quarterback will Leves is out for the season with a shoulder injury.
Starting point is 00:32:26 Dave, do you think Cam Ward's gonna start for them now? Sure sounds like it's gonna be Cam Ward. Big shockeroo there. Cincinnati signed quarterback Desmond Ritter, Ricky Pearsall and Brandon Iyuk are both on the pup list. So Jamie has already talked about, he wrote something on that, but they can obviously come off.
Starting point is 00:32:46 We're expecting Pierce all to come off hopefully pretty soon. Iuk not necessarily might start the season on the Puplist and miss four games. Raiders defensive tackle Christian Wilkins is on the Puplist as he recovers from foot surgery. It's a big offseason edition for them last year. Wilkins barely played last year hoping he can come back, come off the Puplist pretty soon. Glenn Smith of the locked on Cowboys podcast I can't say I'm too familiar with with this show but he did say that coaches have expressed that rookie running back Jaden blue is borderline lazy so we're gonna keep an
Starting point is 00:33:19 eye on that. A lot of people in Dallas were shooting that. Is that right? Well you would expect them to refute it I think Glenn Smith was a former Cowboys coach. I mean, like even other media members just saying. Okay. Okay. I hope so. Christian Watson is on the Pup List. We'll keep an eye on him. All right. Let's get one more Devil's advocate in here before we take a second break. Just to go back to the Godwin thing. I don't think he can go on the pop list now. Did they start camp officially? The thing I saw from Rick Stroud who covers the team, he's one of the best beat writers, you know, that covers A-Team.
Starting point is 00:33:51 He said that he's working off the side with the trainer. So I think if that's the case and they haven't put him on public, if they've started practicing, I don't know for sure. So if they're actually practicing, I don't think he'd go on the pop list. I think you're right about that, yeah. Right. Then he's out for the season or something like that. But right now. No, don't think he'd go on the populist. I think you're right about that, yeah. Right.
Starting point is 00:34:05 Then he's out for the season or something like that. But right. No, don't say that. No, that won't happen. All right, let's do a devil's advocate here. Let's talk about Zay Flau. You know what, I'm gonna switch the order here. Let's go Brock Bowers.
Starting point is 00:34:19 Because I think you both had him on the bus list, right? Is that, am I right about that? He's on more about ADP than anything else. Right. Absolutely. Yeah, absolutely. So but I think you guys both like Brock Bowers kind of at the tooth return, and he's going 16th overall. Is that am I accurate there and saying that? Correct. Okay. I believe I like him after the tooth return, which means I'm just not getting
Starting point is 00:34:40 him. But what do you like 26th or something on him? Yeah, yeah, it's close enough. Okay. 27. Okay. All right. Well, go ahead. You guys tell me why Dave, uh, one minute for you, one minute for Jamie. Go ahead. They added Ashton Genti in the draft. This is a team that was top five in past attempts last year. So there were huge opportunities for Bowers to get a ton of targets and he did very well with them. It was over 8 targets per game. I see that number coming down. I think Gentie is going to take a lot of touchdown opportunities away from everybody. Not to mention he's going to catch the ball. Gentie will out of the backfield. And this is going to be a run-centric offense. It isn't about one of the rookie wide receivers. It's not about Jacoby Myers. They do get an upgraded quarterback in Gino.
Starting point is 00:35:24 There's no doubt that that's going to help. And it's not like Brock Bowers is going to totally suck. But I think if you're drafting them in the same range where you could get a top-tier player at running back or wide receiver, I think you're making a mistake for a guy who averaged just like just over 15 PPR points per game last year. I get it. You want to have an advantage at tight end. Just because you want to have that advantage at tight end, doesn't mean you should mess up your draft and take somebody sooner than you should to get it. Jamie, your case is for Bowers as a bus. If he's going 16th overall,
Starting point is 00:35:58 it's basically the same thing. I mean, you know, you're just looking at a player that is elite and I hope he will continue to be elite, but I just see the targets coming down. And I think we're going to see probably something of a similar production from a touchdown perspective in the same range. So first off, if you're taking a tight end early, I prefer McBride.
Starting point is 00:36:17 He's my number one tight end. So I would rather take him ahead of Bowers in PPR and have PPR. But it's really just about the cost. I think you're, you know, and I'll go back to something to just continue to say what you said. And I know I sort of phrased it the wrong way. So correct me if I'm going to say it wrong again. But it was when we were talking about Kittle and where Kittle's production was last year to be the number one tight end from a points per game perspective. And you said if you're expecting those two guys to be that much better than Kittle, then they need to take a bigger leap than that. And I just don't think that they're going to.
Starting point is 00:36:47 They need to be, I think what I said or what I wanted to say was that maybe like Kelsey, all three of them finish. Well, I don't know about that, but all three of them finished, all three of them scored about 15 and a half to be honest. Right. None of them were 16 again. They all, if you're drafting Bowers and McBride in the second round, they need to do better than they did last year. Correct. And I don't think they're going to be significantly better. Okay. Yeah. I don't know that they need to be Kelsey because Kelsey probably played like a top five overall player, but they need to be, you know, Waller at his peak, Cattle at his peak. Well, maybe, I mean, Cattle had like a 1300 yard300 yard season, but all right, here's my devil's advocate.
Starting point is 00:37:27 I know they're gonna throw less. I know they're gonna run more. It's not apples to apples, unfortunately. I wish it were a little bit better of a comparison, but I looked at the Cowboys the year before they drafted Zeke and the Giants the year before they drafted Barkley. And you know what happened? Both years, they ran the ball more and threw the ball less
Starting point is 00:37:46 after they drafted those running backs in the top five or whatever it was. But you know what else happened? They threw for more yards. They threw for more touchdowns. I know that the targets might come down, but they're going to be a better offense because of Ashton Gentile. So I think that will help make up for it. Again, it's not apples to apples. It's like the Giants, Odell Beckham played four games the year before they drafted Barkley and then he was healthy. The year they drafted Barkley, we played like 12 games. The year that the Cowboys drafted Zeke, they also, I think they drafted Prescott that year, or that was at least the first year that he played. They both played, you know, their first year Zeke and Dak. The year before that was like Matt Castle was their leading passer.
Starting point is 00:38:29 So again, it's not apples to apples, but Gent is just going to make them better. I hate the fact that that Bowers and Kyle Pitts averaged basically the same yards per out run as rookies. And we've seen what happened to Kyle Pitts' career, but Powers just feels different. I mean, he's so damn good and he is going to dominate targets for them, even if it's more like 140. This isn't for me about not drafting Bowers. Like you know, sometimes you call a player a bus and you say, don't draft them. There are two players that I'm going to continue to say are bus candidates based on where their average draft position is Brock Bowers and Lamar Jackson.
Starting point is 00:39:02 Jackson and our ADP, at least last time I looked, is going almost 10 spots ahead of Josh Allen. I don't understand that. If you like those guys in somewhat of a similar range, which most people do, why would you not be drafting them close to each other? I think Jackson's better, but I would still rather have Josh Allen 10 picks later if that's the case
Starting point is 00:39:18 of what I'm getting, and then you factor in the sliding scale, and the same thing goes for Bowers. Taking him in round two just feels a little bit too close to what you're asking him to produce that Whereas again, I like another tight end better and I think kiddles gonna be right there with those guys also and you're getting him Late round three or some cases around four So I think you're just asking you're just paying too much of a premium for those two players in particular So it's really just about the ADP more so than the the player the situation all things
Starting point is 00:39:41 I do think the Raiders offense is gonna be better clearly, you know, you bring in Everything it should be better back clearly. You know, you bring in everything. It should be better backfield by far better quarterback play better. And then everything from a sliding scale from that perspective. So hopefully Bowers doesn't lose too much, but he is going to lose a little bit. I mean, he's not going to get as many opportunities. And so can he score more? Hopefully.
Starting point is 00:39:58 Can he catch the ball at the same rate? Hopefully. I mean, look, when you have this level of production, it's why everybody was so pissed about Kyle Pitts. You thought, okay, thousand yard rookie season, most receiving yards ever for a tight end in his rookie campaign. You know, it seemed like a layup and it wasn't. And hopefully the same thing.
Starting point is 00:40:14 Hopefully that does not happen with Brock Bowers in year two. I believe an injury was also part of the reason why Pitts took a step back his second year. Here are some names that are being taken after Bowers in our ADP. You tell me if you would take these guys or Bowers. Drake London. London. AJ Brown. Brown. Derek Henry. Henry. Josh Jacobs. Jacob. Bowers. Lad McConkey. Bowers. McConkey. Jonathan Taylor. Taylor. Bowers. Kyron Williams. Bowers. Kyron. But do Jonathan Taylor. Taylor. Bowers. Kyron Williams.
Starting point is 00:40:46 Bowers. Kyron. But do you know why, like, do you know why for me? T. Higgins. Bowers, but here's, okay, here's the other part of this. Like, you're also, so I would take A.J. Brown and Derrick Henry, that's my cutoff. I think it's 18 guys, and then for me,
Starting point is 00:40:59 I start considering the tight ends, and I do think my strategy changes a lot in a two receiver league versus a three receiver league. In a two receiver league, I really wanna stand out at tight end. In a three receiver league or a super flex league, it is less important for me. So, and the other thing is like,
Starting point is 00:41:16 if you're in the middle of round two, let's say he's at 16 is too early for me, but let's say he gets to 20 and Bowers and McBride are there. I feel very confident that you are going to love your third round pick. Your third round pick could be Higgins or Tyreek Hill or Kyron Williams or maybe Jonathan Taylor or Bucky Irving or Chase Brown. It's a deep part of the draft in the middle of round three. It gives you a little bit of freedom to take Brock Bowers there if you really want that
Starting point is 00:41:42 edge at tight end. I don't disagree with any of that, especially because you're looking at you control your your your fate at that point, because you see the pool of players available to you when you're taking him at 16. You're at the mercy of what's going to fall to you. And so to you, I don't disagree with what you said about, you know, prioritizing tight end in that format. But when you start to get to where he would be, if you take him at 16 and then you see what's available to you in round three and knowing that you could get Kittle there or Kittle in early round four. Yeah, Kittle even a little later. Kittle is the best argument, I think, for Bowers's bus case.
Starting point is 00:42:17 Like Tim, because you can't really say McBride, right? Because you're not really not going to be in a position where you pass on Bowers in round two and then you can get McBride in round three. Right. They're going to go with a no. In your scenario, you can't if it's 20. Yeah. Then you'd have to make it to like 28 or something like that. But if they're both available and you're at 23rd or 22nd overall, you have a chance.
Starting point is 00:42:39 But in most cases, you're not going to be able to pass on Bowers to get McBride. You are going to be able to pass on Bowers to get McBride. You are going to be able to pass on Bowers to get Kittle though. That's the best case I think that you guys have made as the Bowers being drafted too early. Sure. Which is of course, there's also the idea that you're going to be able to get a really great player in round two and get one of those great players that you're talking about because you're right, you're going to love your round three pick no matter what you do in round two. So I don't mind going after running backs from receivers with my first three picks.
Starting point is 00:43:07 No, of course. I mentioned this last week. I think we were talking about Kittle that I would do the research on his numbers without Ayuk and without Debo. Sure. Without Debo, he's played 13 games in his career since 2019, 16.1 PPR points per game
Starting point is 00:43:24 without Debo on the field. Makes sense. He's played per game without Debo on the field. He's played 12 games without Ayuk on the field. Obviously most of those were last year. He averaged 14.6 PPR points per game. Three of those games, he played three games where overlap where they both were out. None of them were with Brock Purdy. So I kind of just threw those out. I didn't do any with McCaffrey on off the field. So just strictly what he did without Debo and without I I there has to be a big target jump there to our A's are starting. This is My heart is a flutter right now. I just love I love this segment. This is terrific And by the way, the Bucks open Tampa Bay opens camp
Starting point is 00:44:01 Veterans report tomorrow. So that guess that yeah, yeah All right. We got to get we gotta get a break in here. We have three more devil's advocates for you. It's gonna be a long show. It's gonna be a beyond the box score level show. Good. All right, we'll be right back on fantasy football today. So I mentioned earlier,
Starting point is 00:44:20 Garrett Wilson and Marvin Harrison and even Brock Bowers. These are three guys who they're ADPs, depending on where you look, it's really not that different. Marvin Harrison Jr. was about 36 to 40th. He was wide receiver 18 or 19. Garrett Wilson was wide receiver 14 or 15. He's going about 31st-ish overall. I looked at three different ADP sources.
Starting point is 00:44:38 Brock Bowers going, you know, tight end one. He's about 16th overall. Zay Flowers is a little bit different. Zay Flowers based on CBS, the best ADP if you want to draft Flowers, he's about 16th overall. Zay Flowers is a little bit different. Zay Flowers based on CBS, the best ADP, if you want to draft Flowers, he's 68th overall, he's wide receiver 32. On Fantasy Pro, Zay Flowers is 61st overall, wide receiver 28.
Starting point is 00:44:56 On football guys, he's wide receiver 26th overall, and he's 55th. And by the way, football guys and fantasy pros aggregate different sources. So Zay Flowers is anywhere from 55th to 68th overall wide receiver 26 to wide receiver 32 overall It's a huge range Jamie you have say flowers on your bus list What what is that kind of 80? I don't is that based on a particular ADP? What do you think about say flowers? It just feels like he always gets drafted too soon
Starting point is 00:45:24 It's do you think 55th is too soon. And do you think 68th is too soon? That's the range I see. 58th is the 50. 55th is definitely too soon. 68th is sort of the range where I would start to consider it. But then it starts to, you know, I'd like to know the receivers going around him, because that's a big part of this for me as well. Okay, so that would be on CBS, it's Jameson Williams, Chris Godwin, they're ahead of him.
Starting point is 00:45:49 Jalen Waddle, Chris Olave are going behind him. What's the bus case for Zay Flowers? I just don't think he's going to live up to what his talent level is. It's another one of these guys we talk about every year that he's in. And he's in an amazing offense But it just does not feature him and I don't think it ever will you know so maybe there's a bunch of injuries and that's what happens and we see the best of Zay Flowers, but I Just think like he's gonna have these spike games where he looks the part and then they're gonna be games where Marc Andrews scores
Starting point is 00:46:20 Two touchdowns and Isaiah likely has a big game and now Deandre Hopkins in the mix and Rashad Bateman, who led them in receiving touchdowns last year at that position, you know, there are just so many options that Lamar Jackson leans on. Let's not forget about Derek Henry and the way Lamar Jackson runs, you know. So it's just such a multifaceted offense that they don't need Zay Flowers to be an alpha.
Starting point is 00:46:40 You know, he is their best receiver. And then they go and add, you know, a proven guy like Hopkins who I think Jim Harbaugh said was born to be a Raven and Hopkins said himself like he feels like he's a missing piece for them and they resign Bateman and they're talking about likely is having a Pro Bowl season so it just doesn't all fit with Andrew still being there. So yeah again, I think flowers is a They're kind of I don't want to say they're the same type of player, but it feels like Ze Flowers is almost a better version of Khalil Shakir. You know, just a guy that's going to get you solid production, just not elite production. And if he ever scored more touchdowns, it would be a different conversation. But like,
Starting point is 00:47:19 how far apart are they in terms of being at the same level of production? I just don't see like a huge difference for these two guys. And not talent. Just numbers. Jim Collison Yeah, 12.3 PPR points per game for Zay Flowers last year, 12.2 for Shakir. So I get it from that perspective. And you, you laid it out, Jamie, there are a lot of mouths to feed in an offense that doesn't throw the ball a ton. And that's what makes me frankly upset, because I think Zay Flowers is an amazing talent at wide receiver. I love what he's capable of doing. He's faster than anybody that they have. He's, he's definitely more agile, can change directions, all that stuff. But he just doesn't get those
Starting point is 00:47:58 opportunities. And you can look back to, I think it was 2023, those last five games, Mark Andrews was out. And he was a monster. Zay Flowers was a monster. He was like 17 PPR points per game. Last year, to start the year, Zay Flowers averaged around 15 PPR points per game, weeks 1 through 9, when Mark Andrews was slow to kind of round in the form. And then we all know that Mark Andrews went on a touchdown streak to basically end last year. There were only three games last year where both Zay Flowers and Mandrews had six plus targets. All right. So here's the devil's advocate on Zay Flowers, who's wide receiver 29 and our consensus rankings. And in ADP, he's pretty close to that. He is an ascending player. He's going into his third year. I know Jamie loves that.
Starting point is 00:48:48 And I actually think there are enough targets because he played 20% of the snaps in week 18. You take that game away, he's on pace for 121 targets. That's just over seven targets per game. Now I recognize this. If you drive Zay Flowers, it's gonna be a little bit of a bumpy road. Someone pointed out in the chat, he has too many games
Starting point is 00:49:06 where they're just complete duds. And yeah, the Ravens are great, they don't throw a lot, they're gonna win some games by 35 points, and they're gonna be two targets for Flowers, he's gonna be a total dud. But all we need are the touchdowns. The 17 game pace for Flowers last year, if you remove week 18 with 78 catches,
Starting point is 00:49:23 which isn't great, but it's fine for a guy who's being drafted around wide receiver 30, 1112 yards, four touchdowns on 121 targets. So let's get up to seven touchdowns maybe and I could see it happening if he gets more targets near the end zone, because he is an explosive player, he can beat you deep. He is a good yak guy. He's not like, for example, Keenan Allen had a big touchdown problem in his career. He wasn't a big yak guy. He wasn't a downfield guy.
Starting point is 00:49:51 Keenan Allen more or less had to catch the ball in the end zone to score a touchdown. Zay Flowers is a dynamic ascending player who again was getting seven targets per game last year. I think he can find a way to score more touchdowns. Maybe they're on big plays. Remember that stat I gave about the wide receivers that come out of round seven through nine and perform really well. They almost always average seven or more targets per game. Flowers ain't going to make it to that round, but still seven
Starting point is 00:50:17 targets per game is huge for a wide receiver. He was on pace for that last year. If you remove week 18, it just needs to score more touchdowns. And I think this is a guy, I think you're drafting a more or less at his floor at wide receiver 30. But do you, do you think he's getting more targets this year or the same targets with Hopkins now part of the mix and all the hype that they're giving, whether it happens or not, but likely, you're talking overall targets, Jamie, or like red zone targets?
Starting point is 00:50:46 Targets per game. Yeah, I think it could be the same. I think it could be even better because I think Derek Henry could have a worse year. Henry averaged what? Almost six yards per carry last year, something crazy like that, right? They might have to throw a little bit more. They always throw for a good amount of yards. They'll throw for a good amount of touchdowns, just targets and catches that are the problem. They're kind of like the 49ers. The guys make
Starting point is 00:51:08 the most out of their targets like Brandon, Ayuk, and Debo have. So I'm not too concerned about the targets. I'm more concerned about the touchdowns because I know the targets aren't going to be great. I think they'll be good enough. All right, let's go to our next guy. Do you know how many wide receivers in the Lamar Jackson era have averaged 15 or more PPR points? Zero. I know that, but I think the fact that Mark Andrews had 69 targets on in 17 games last year and Zay Flowers had 116 tells me a lot.
Starting point is 00:51:38 He is the guy. Mark Andrews was phased out more than ever last year. But there's a problem and that's touchdowns. And it's not just Mark Andrews as a blocker to Zay Flowers being a, you know, seeing his touchdowns go up like we're hoping for, for Marvin Harrison, for example, or Brock Bowers, for example. But they got Derek Henry. And what do you think Derek Henry's going to do? I know, I know. That dude's going to swallow up all the touchdowns. I think if you draft- It's a miracle Mark Anders had what he had last year. If you draft Flowers as wide receiver 30,
Starting point is 00:52:08 I think that's more or less close to his floor. I agree. But if Henry gets hurt or Henry's not as good, this like a Devontae Smith situation, not everybody in this group of receivers is like this. I think there's huge upside, top 15 upside, not top five or six upside, but top 15 upside for Rosé Flowers, cause he's that if he scores. Yeah. All right, it's Ted remote. Ted Rowe McMillan as a bust
Starting point is 00:52:31 I'm gonna play devil's advocate on this. This is Dave's call He's more or less going right around the same time as Zay flowers So we're looking more like wide receiver 28 27 28 for Ted Rowe McMillan In some places gonna be ahead of Flowers, in some places that'll be behind him. But you're calling Tedarowa McMillan a bust, Dave. Good talent, I don't like that he's going like basically the round five, six turn.
Starting point is 00:52:56 I think he's solid in round six. I'd like him better in round seven. Of course, I'd rather get everybody around in a half after their ADP. But I think that the Panthers are still going to spread targets around. They did that for much of last year. There was a spell last year toward the end of the season. Keelan averaged over seven targets per game.
Starting point is 00:53:14 But for the most part, the guys in that offense, they're right around six, six and a half targets per game. I think that's where McMillan's going to end up living. So he's going to not only need volume, but he's also gonna need really good efficiency, which might be asking too much of a rookie like this to go in and be a big factor and be a big stat producer. For the Panthers, I like the way the Panthers finished last year. Loved Bryce Young at an 8% touchdown rate to end last year. He looked awesome. Is that coming back this year? I got a question about that too. And so I don't I don't want to draft McMillan, like call it 60th, 63rd, somewhere in that range. I feel like that's
Starting point is 00:53:50 a little too close to the ceiling for a first year receiver that's not known for blazing speed, but for big size. Okay, devil's advocate on that is I don't buy that argument that they're going to spread the ball around. Adam Thielen is going to be 35 years old next month. Xavier Leigh gets coming off a pretty irrelevant rookie season. I think they drafted Tedarola McMillans, so they don't have to spread the ball around. And if you look at the wide receivers in this range, Zay Flowers, Xavier Worthy, McMillan, George Pickens, Travis Hunter, Jalen Waddle. I think Calvin Ridley falls in, is one of the better ones in what I'm about to say. I think Ted Arroyo McMillan has the most target upside,
Starting point is 00:54:31 among the most target upside. This guy could get 140 targets. I'd be hoping for 120 for flowers. McMillan wouldn't shock me if he led every wide receiver, if you're looking at this list. I think the two guys that lead the way in targets are probably Ridley McMillan, maybe Olavi, but Stavante Smith, Zay Flowers, Rashid Rice, George Pickens, Ridley McMillan, Debo, Waddle, Olavi, Jennings, Cup, Pearsall. That's the case I would make is just so much target volume. Jamie. Jamie Bounds I would say Rice per game. Yeah, I agree with you. I think they're going to give this guy an opportunity to make plays whether that plays itself out Well, we'll see, you know
Starting point is 00:55:10 I don't think Adam Thielins going away because it feels like that's a guy Bryce Young loves And for what it's worth Joe person who covers the Panthers for the athletic I think it was last week They did a breakout for every player and he listed Xavier LeGette as the breakout player for the Panthers. He has a former first round pick, so could he have an opportunity just to be better than he was a year ago, which isn't a big stretch, but also how much of a factor will he be? I just think that they went out and drafted McMillan for a reason, almost exactly the
Starting point is 00:55:38 way you laid it out. You see that Bryce Young took a big step forward in the second half of the season after he was benched. You saw this offense starting to look competent. It's one of the more underrated offensive lines in the game, you know, and so for what Dave Canales is looking to build and to find an alpha in this receiving core, he may have done it. That being said, this isn't a speed guy. This is a guy I think is going to have to win on some contested catches. I think touchdowns are going to really matter here for him. So how much will he live up to where he's getting drafted?
Starting point is 00:56:08 I think it's a great spot for him because you look at the guys after him, you start talking upside, upside, upside. You also see a lot of the downside. Debo Samuel and his situation, Jalen Waddle and what we saw last year, et cetera, et cetera. And the guys in front of him, look, he's like a Calvin Ridley, you know, on a questionable passing game where he's going to be most likely lead guy. Pickens is the second guy. Rice is his bend.
Starting point is 00:56:31 Flowers, we just got through talking about, you know. So there's a good spot to take a chance on somebody that I think if he hits, you're going to be thrilled about it. So I think it's also like what we see with a lot of these rookies, you know, second half of the season, I think will matter because until they figure out like, okay, feeling 35 and we get not a, you know, maybe even a start worthy player on his own team. Like a Macmillan earns those opportunities. I think is a runaway. How do you guys rank Macmillan, Calvin Ridley and Rashid and sorry, is a flowers in full PPR? Zay first Macmillan second and Ridley third.
Starting point is 00:57:06 Right now it's Macmillan, Ridley, Flowers. How about in half PPR? Macmillan, Flowers. It's going to be the same order for me. And same for James. Anytime you start to take away the PPR factor and go down to non PPR, Flowers loses for me because I don't think the touchdowns are coming. No, but he's not a big receptions guy.
Starting point is 00:57:26 Right. Yeah. I think that that's where McMillan and potentially Ridley could lose. Well, that's what I'm saying. Flowers is third for me in any format, but the further away we get from PPR, it's harder to buy Flowers. All right. Cause that's an interesting take.
Starting point is 00:57:40 Cause instead of thinking about the receptions, it's thinking about the touchdowns, but I could see that. Okay. Last one here is Deandre Swift. So I'll just channel my inner Heath. I'll just make the devil's advocate case. Dave, you have him as a bust. Deandre Swift is another guy. ADP is really wildly different depending on where you go on CBS 70th overall RB 27, but on fantasy pros, 59th overall, RB 21 for DeAndre Swift.
Starting point is 00:58:08 And football guys right in the middle, 24th running back off the board and 64th overall. Let's just call him RB 24. And say he's about 64th, right? Football guys is basically the average of CBS and fantasy pros. He has never finished, wait, he stopped me if you heard this, because he's been, you know, banging this
Starting point is 00:58:28 drum. Deandre Swift has never finished lower than RB 24 per game. Now it's been three years in a row where he's been basically RB 23 or 24 per game. I think actually one of those years he had a lot of catches so he was higher in PPR, but but my other devil's advocate case is like, oh, you look at Swift, oh, he wasn't good last year. He averaged 3.8 yards per carry. That was a career low. Roshan Johnson averaged 2.7 yards per carry, I think. His longest run was nine yards, Roshan Johnson. So I don't think this was necessarily a Swift problem here. I guess my point is, I think I agree with Heath on this one.
Starting point is 00:59:05 I don't know how he does worse. How does De'Andre Swift have the worst year of his career when he's never been worse than RB 24 per game and he's left four or five seasons, he's left at least one game early with an injury. So how is this a bus case for a guy who's basically going at his floor? I would agree that he's going pretty close to his floor,
Starting point is 00:59:24 but to me, he's so unexciting. And I know that there is an opportunity. Obviously Chicago went through the entire off season, didn't do boo to improve their run game. It's going to be Deandre Swift leading the way, but he's been basic for the last five seasons. And yet that might mean 23rd or 24th at running back overall. And yeah, I guess you're drafting that right around 70th overall. That's not necessarily such a bad thing. That's good running back depth. That's a guy that you
Starting point is 00:59:53 could potentially start each week as your RB to, assuming that you've got other good players at other positions on your team. Loaded at wide receiver, maybe you win hero RB, you get my point. I, he's never been consistently good. He's never really been a short yardage goal line guy. Past 5 years, with 1 yard to go, short yardage situations, 50 carries, he's converted 32 of them. Inside the 5, 84 snaps over the last 5 years, 45 rushes, 17 touchdowns, 10 in 2024 with Chicago for 3 touchdowns. So yeah, I guess we're drafting them pretty close to the floor. That's the type of player that I like to draft. But if I'm drafting a guy and I go, OK, I'm going to pencil him in for what he's been the past few years, that's 12.5 PPR points per game, there's going to be a voice in my head that says, I can find somebody better than that. I can find somebody with more upside than that. And I just, I'm still going to assume that even though the Bears didn't add anything, they're going to share. He's going to have to lose
Starting point is 01:00:52 some carries along the way, because that's what we've seen from Ben Johnson's offenses in Detroit. He's not going to be a full-time workhorse. I'd be shocked if he gave him a bunch of short yardage goal line opportunities. And I'd be, honestly, I'd be shocked if I don't know, maybe he should be in the range for around 40 catches. Maybe that gets him close to 50 catches. And that would help them out obviously. But he just hasn't been a great fantasy running back. If you're drafting them in round six, though, I suppose I can't argue with that much. Yeah, he is down just with is arguably the worst goal line or short yardage back in football basically among, you know, regular running backs get carried.
Starting point is 01:01:31 So I definitely can't make that I can't make that case for him. Do you think his conversion rate would be so bad if he got those chances in Philadelphia behind that offensive line? I mean, he I can look them up and probably work. Yeah, there's different ways to measure short yardage. I mean, he, I can look them up and tell you exactly what they were. You know, there's, there's different ways to measure short yardage. David gave you some throughout his career, third and one and fourth and one. I mean, it is so bad. And he wasn't the goal line back last year Roshan was so that's not, that's not
Starting point is 01:01:57 going to be I think, a big part of his game. But he does break big runs all the time. He's one of the most explosive running backs in football. It's like since he entered the league, the only guys with more carries of 35 or more yards and Deandre Swift are, I want to say Derek Henry, Jonathan Taylor and Saquon Barkley, something like that. Jamie, where are you on Swift? Oh, I'm not as high as Heath is, but I do think that you're getting a very good player at this spot for sure, given his opportunity. We're sitting here and saying, Caleb Williams got better, and DJ Moore might get better,
Starting point is 01:02:34 and Romo Dunze is going to get better, and Coles and Loveless is in this great spot, and Luther Burns is in this great spot, but Deandre Swift sucks, and giving everybody else a pass for last year and not giving Swift a pass for last year. I think the numbers you gave on Swift and Roshan sort of illustrate that. Like, in a bad situation, he still was better than his competition. And that's what he's still competing with this year. Now, I guess for I guess I should be fair, Jamie, to Roshan. Like, he only had 55 carries and a number of them were near the goal line. So that's not going to help your yards per carry. But go ahead. True. But in any event, it, it was pretty awful for everything Chicago related last season.
Starting point is 01:03:09 And as, as they pointed out, they did nothing, you know, they dropped a seventh round running back, you know, so there still could be a Devin Singletary gets cut and they go get him, you know, or somebody from Detroit's end of their roster, you know, gets released. And that's something that Ben Johnson wants because of familiarity, you know, so we don't know how this is all going to play out. But I think as of as we say to right now, like you look at this list and Hampton starting, you know, there because I think the other guy's a little bit more proven, but like Hampton and who he's sharing with is obviously a very established guy as long as Najee Harris's health is okay. is obviously a very established guy as long as Najee Harris' health is okay. Montgomery's in a timeshare where he may be fading a little bit more as he gets older and Jameer Gibbs is trending in the right direction. Jerevian Henderson is going to share with Ramon Stevenson, like, you know, you start
Starting point is 01:03:52 to see all these competitions and, you know, he's the lead guy, Swift is, and yes, he hasn't had elite level production, but he's been, you know, I think a little bit better than basic. So it's a fallback number two running back, I think, that you're looking at as opposed to where, like, Heath is very aggressive in how he ranks him and drafts him. I would rather have Hampton, for example. I think Heath is the other way on that. So it's just a matter of, I think, where you're able to draft him.
Starting point is 01:04:22 So with a hero RB or a zero RB approach, he's one of my favorite players with a, you know, going running back heavy, I'm probably not taking down yourself. Last in Philadelphia in 2023. He had 14 carries inside the five he had four touchdowns. He had six carries that went to the one yard line. They were all followed up by Jalen hurts, put tush push touchdowns. So he's had some bad touchdown luck in that season. I even had six rushing touchdowns last year.
Starting point is 01:04:51 But I think the catches are actually a big thing for him because that's been that was his specialty early in his career. And it hasn't really been the case the last few seasons. He did that with the one year of Ben Johnson. Yeah, you're right. You're right. Now they got obviously the added target competition, but even if he is not really having any competition, Deandre Swift has never averaged more than 15 carries per game. So he's kind of Aaron Jones like in that. I feel like the most you could expect would be 250, 260 carries. You're not going to want to stretch in Philadelphia.
Starting point is 01:05:22 Well, he had that game against Minnesota where like 27 carries or something, because they were playing six men in the box or whatever. But no, but for a season, he's never averaged more than 15 per game. He needs, it probably needs 40 catches. I wouldn't say needs, but that'd be nice. He averaged five targets per game in Detroit in 2022. Yeah, that's great. Now, if he's and he's averaged right around 3.1 each of his prior two seasons, Chicago, Philadelphia, two offenses that didn't necessarily throw to their running backs a ton. If that's going to be a Ben Johnson staple and they're going to lean on him in the pass
Starting point is 01:05:58 game, then A, we've got to rethink a little bit about some of those peripheral pass catchers in Chicago and B, then we're definitely underrating Deandre Swift. It's possible he can get back there. Can't say it's not. That would help Heath's case. All right. I hope this was a helpful show for all of you. I was going to read some emails, but going to cut it short here and just read one. It's from Scoobestieve. A few weeks ago or last week, I said that obviously Raphael was everybody's favorite Ninja Turtle and then I did a Twitter poll and I was very, very wrong. So Scuba Steve says, I'm going to handle this Ninja Turtles debate. Everyone wanted to be Michelangelo because he was the coolest. Donatella was the easiest character to use in the video games. However, after the live action
Starting point is 01:06:40 movies, most wanted to be Raphael because he kicks the entire footclans butt, especially in Secret of the Ooze. And I did think this was a great theory. Of course, because it backed up your theory. No, I didn't really realize what my theory was. I think he's right. I think that's why I said that because I grew up with that with all the cartoons too. But with that, that's basically just another way of saying Adam is the greatest. Here's my question. No, I didn't think I wasn't saying it like that at all. I just, I didn't realize where it was coming from. I think that's a great point that he makes. And the movies really like you want to be
Starting point is 01:07:15 Rafael. Okay, well, I wanted to be Rafael. I'll tell you that. But we will talk to you tomorrow on fantasy football day. Thanks so much for watching everybody. We'll see you. Paramount podcasts.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.