Follow Him: A Come, Follow Me Podcast - Exodus 18-20 -- Part 1 : Dr. Daniel L. Belnap

Episode Date: April 16, 2022

Do our loads become too heavy to bear alone? Join Dr. Dan Belnap as we discuss Moses learning to lead the Israelites, the importance of developing our own spiritual welfare, and the lessons of leadership.Show Notes (English, French, Spanish, Portuguese): https://followhim.co/old-testament/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/followhimpodcastInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/followhimpodcastYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/FollowHimOfficialChannelThanks to the followHIM team:Steve & Shannon Sorensen: Executive Producers/SponsorsDavid & Verla Sorensen: SponsorsDr. Hank Smith: Co-hostJohn Bytheway: Co-hostDavid Perry: ProducerKyle Nelson: MarketingLisa Spice: Client Relations, Show Notes/TranscriptsJamie Neilson: Social Media, Graphic DesignWill Stoughton: Rough Video EditorKrystal Roberts: Transcripts/Language Team/French TranscriptsAriel Cuadra: Spanish TranscriptsIgor Willians: Portuguese Transcripts"Let Zion in Her Beauty Rise" by Marshall McDonaldhttps://www.marshallmcdonaldmusic.com/products/let-zion-in-her-beauty-rise-pianoPlease rate and review the podcast.

Welcome to Follow Him, a weekly podcast dedicated to helping individuals and families with their Come Follow Me study. I'm Hank Smith and I'm John by the way, we love to learn, we love to laugh, we want to learn and laugh with you. As together, we follow him. Hello everyone, welcome to Follow Him. My name is Hank Smith, I'm your host. I'm here with my peculiar treasure, co-host.

John, by the way, John, if there's any word that I think describes, it's peculiar. It's peculiar, yeah. Just this morning my wife said that to me, so. Yeah, oh, it's just sweetheart. We going to be an Exodus 18 19 20 today. We needed a brilliant mind. And we got one. Who's with us, John? We did. I'm really excited to introduce Dr. Dan Bellnap. He was born in Cortelein Idaho, raised in Pocahtello and Sandy, Utah. He served a full-time mission to the Pennsylvania Pittsburgh mission, married Aaron Pinnie.

In 1997, they have four children, Emma, Jack, Samuel, and Tabatha. He received a bachelor's in international relations from BYU, masters in ancient Near Eastern studies, from BYU and a, and a PhD in Northwest Semetics from the University of Chicago. He's worked as a part-time instructor before becoming an assistant professor in 2007 and was advanced to the rank of professor in 2020.

His areas of research include cultural and sociological influences in the book Mormon, use of ritual in ancient and contemporary contexts, doctrines of ascension and theosis, in ancient Near East and Late Antiquity and comparative cosmologies, and his bio has languages, biblical Hebrew, Aramaic, Siric, German, French, and a little Greek. Just amazing. And a lot of our listeners have this book from Creation to Sinai, which Desert Book published recently, which is really helpful in making the Old Testament language symbolism and history, kind of putting those together in an easier way to understand.

Daniel co-wrote that book with Aaron Shade. Yes. From Creation to Sinai. From creation to cyanide. From creation to cyanide. Right where we are today. We're going to be in cyanide today, is that right? Well, we're going to be there. I should say about the book. Aaron and I did not write the book. We are the editors of the book. It's got a number of different authors in it. And some of them appeared on your show. But it was a great, it's a great collaboration, we think. So a compilation of scholarly articles about these chapters that we're studying right now.

Right. Lots of insight. Well, Dan, we want to just glean as much as we can from you. We've left Egypt. We've murmured quite a bit. We are receiving water out of rocks, right? Man of from heaven. How do you want to come at this Exodus 181920? Well, what's interesting is that chapter 18 picks up with a particular narrative, namely the one in which Jethro Moses' father-in-law has come to Moses and said, you are doing way too much. You're taking way too much on your shoulders. You need to spread the authority and the responsibility out. What's interesting about that narrative, just to jump ahead,

is in many ways, you don't get the second half of that story until about numbers 11. In numbers 11, picks it up, and then you have the story of the 70 elders that are gathered at the temple and the two that remain behind and be at her filled with the spirit. To some degree chapter 19 of Exodus all the way through numbers 10, at least according to some biblical scholars is almost like an insert. So you've interrupted the story to expand out this particular period of time or this particular series of events. And those events all have to do with what happens when Israel gets to sign I following Egypt. And so chapter 18 in some ways is separate from chapters 19 and 20, simply because we've got another story, another narrative, but then we have this huge expansion that is Exodus 19 through Numbers 10. So in terms of structure, in terms of the Bible,

that's one of the first things I just point out is that the narrative of 18 really kind of stops until numbers 11 and then that narrative picks up at that point. That's a big insert That's not small. Now we're talking 100 pages. Oh, yeah, and it could be Again, we don't have all the reasons for that. There's a type of methodological approach to scripture, which I think others have talked about on the show. I would assume they have, called source criticism, right? The idea that the version of the Bible that we're reading, regardless of the original writers,

the original authors, we're looking at a later compiled version, much like the Book of Mormon, right? So the Book of Mormon isn't necessarily the original words of, say, Alma, but they're Mormons version of Alma's words. So he uses different sources to tell the narrative. Well, we look at these passages, and according to some biblical scholars, this is one of the most According to some biblical scholars, this is one of the most dense and confused passage of Scripture, simply because they see so many sources that have talked about it. And what that really suggests is, among the narrative so far of the Bible, this may be the most important one.

I remember at one point, we were talking to Dan Peterson. He talked about the beginning of the Moabites right with Lot and his daughters. And I said something to the effect of, oh, so perhaps the writer is putting a little jab at the current enemy, right? And someone wrote in and said, what do you mean the writer? It's Moses. And I was like, well, and you deal with that, I'm sure, your students is, this is Moses, right? And you're like, well, yes and no. The Book of Mormon is a great model for this, because you're looking at a book

that where we know who the editors are, it's Mormon and Marona. They are pretty clear as to what texts they're using. I always like Theretney 5.5, because Mormon tells you exactly why he's using what text he's using, but he tells you something like the fact of like, and the 20th year passed and the 21st and the 22nd and the 23rd and yeah, even the 25th. So he has said nothing about those five years at all, right? And then he says, now, I recognize that if someone else were writing this, they might, there were some great and marvelous things that happened, but I'm not putting that in my record.

And here's why I'm not and what I haven't touched. So the idea that we have an editor or group of editors later that are editing earlier material really shouldn't surprise any Latter-day Saint. And that's what you're seeing in the Bible. Yeah, you're seeing maybe what was some originally written by Moses, but then later editors are adding, taking away. And so do you think this insert, how much of this is Moses? Is there no way to tell?

There's no way to tell, but what I would say is I don't have a problem with the original being Moses at all. What I'm saying is that groups that have come later have used it for different purposes, different teaching purposes, right? And by virtue of that, the final compilers have just taken all of these traditions and just kind of crammed them all together. It's kind of like if you're looking at a sculpture, it's kind of important to see it from more than just one side. You need to see two or three or other sides, right? You get a full three-dimensional understanding of that sculpture. Well, we can look at it the same way. These

these later editors or compilers have looked at this material and they have two or three different versions of the story and all four from different perspectives and they're putting them together. As a Latter-day Saint, we do that with the first vision. Joseph Smith has four versions of the first vision in different contexts to different people. Doesn't mean any one of them is wrong, doesn't mean he lied about anything, but by using those four, we get a better grasp of what the first vision is, correct? And so we can think the same thing. Really, the only difference here in the Bible with the book of Mormon is the book of Mormon. We know who the editor is, right? It's Mormon. He tells us out, right? This time, this time we don't really know, but we can guess to some degree what they're trying to do. I mean,

the book of Deuteronomy ends with someone writing, and if it's Moses, it's awesome, because he's like, and there was Moses, and there's been no prophet like Moses sin. So, I mean, he's like, and there was Moses and there's been no profit like Moses since. I mean, he's the greatest thing ever, which if Moses is right, Matt, that's awesome. Yeah. Just before he dies, there's no unlike Moses. Right. But, but I think the idea that you're looking at different versions and the same thing shows up at the end of the book of John. And, and, and so you just see these places where it's clear that these are texts that are important. And then these events where you have multiple, here's the way I'd put it, almost multiple witnesses of this event, just like you would have multiple witnesses elsewhere. You have these

different sources all talking about the same event. And a later compiler going, you know what? These all work together. Great. Great. Well, John, we're going to have to say, okay, there's a little break here in between Exodus, 18 and 19. And when we get to numbers 11, we'll have to say, hey, we're back on to the storyline. That's exactly what we're, meanwhile, meanwhile, back at the ranch. Yeah, that's it. Okay. Well, let's do 18. And then, let's do 19 and 20 but realize that this is the beginning of a an insert. I like that. So, so chapter 18 has the basic story as I mentioned earlier, at least a summarized earlier. Moses has a bit of a problem. They're all out of Egypt and he's taking way too much on his own time, right? He's taking way too much. And so his father-in-law comes to him and I always like this because it's father-in-law, ultimately, that it's

his father-in-law saying it, I think, is intriguing. It suggests that Moses, perhaps, isn't paying as much attention to his two Jethro's daughter as Jethro thinks, right? So the father-in-law is coming to give him some advice going, um, yeah, you know what, you need to pay more attention with your family. That's what you need to be doing. If it was my family, it would have gone from my wife to my mother-in-law, from my mother-in-law to my father-in-law and father-in-law to me. There you go. That's exactly right. That's exactly right. So, uh, and so that's what you see, right? Um, verse 14, I think, does a pretty good job of this. So, That's exactly right. That's exactly right. That's exactly right. That's exactly right. That's exactly right. That's exactly right. That's exactly right.

That's exactly right. That's exactly right. That's exactly right. That's exactly right. That's exactly right. That's exactly right. That's exactly right. That's exactly right.

That's exactly right. That's exactly right. That's exactly right. That's exactly right. That's exactly right. That's exactly right. That's exactly right. That's exactly right.

That's exactly right. That's exactly right. That's exactly right. That's exactly right. That's exactly right. That's exactly right. That's exactly right. they self alone and all die people stand by thee from morning until even. Right? And Moses responses, well, the people come to me to inquire of God and to make judgments and make these decisions. And verse 17, Moses father lost satan to him, the thing that thou doest is not good. Right? And that's not good, Moses. Now we'll surely wear away both thou and this people that is with thee for this thing is too heavy for thee. Now, are not able to perform it alone. Right? And so he gives this counsel, you need to have more people or even better, you need to teach them and then they need to govern themselves. Wow. I am hearing so much application here for our listeners who, you know, because we are a, we're a Luke, isn't it Luke 1, Dan?

With God, all things are possible. We're a, with God, all things are possible people. And here we've got this great principle of, uh, you're human. And you're going to wear out if you're, if you're not delegating and teaching. That's exactly it, right? And it's interesting because Jethro is suggesting one, you've gotta have more help, two, we've gotta figure out how the people need to be

spiritually self-sufficient. They need to know the principles, they need to be able to govern themselves and move forward that way. And that's just a principle that you see I, across all dispensations, don't you? This idea that you cannot rely on the leadership alone. In the Book of Mormon, when Mosiah makes the changes, Mosiah 2, makes the changes to the governmental structure.

One of the reasons he provides is it's not particularly fair that one person, the king, has to pay the price for all of this. And so he creates this equality in the land, but the way it's phrased is the equality for everyone to pay the price for their behavior. Individually, and you see this in Dr. and Covenants, the idea that the more that the Lord has to tell us, the more we lose out on some blessings or understandings, right? The more things have to be spelled out, the less we have in terms of our own spiritual

growth. And Paul talks about that in Corinthians where he points out that you guys are suing one another. And yeah, you can need to take it up within the church, but the truth is figure out how to resolve it yourself. So it's just this idea over and over again that we are ultimately responsible for our own spiritual welfare. Yeah, this is I would love to just flush out this just a little bit more. John, why don't you? Cause I'm sure you have some addition here just as serving as bishop, the idea, cause I've seen,

I've seen bishops do this. I've seen release site presidents do this. They kind of take on everything. In an effort to be the best bishop, the best servant, they can be, they sometimes wear themselves out. Did you see that at all? You're just trying to do your job

and do what the Lord wants you to do. And sometimes you need a jet throw to come along and help you. I think when I was a bishop, there was some council we got to push more to the word council. And now it has been shifted even more where you remember elder cooks talk a couple of general conferences ago

about let the elder's quorum presidency and the release of society presidency help with some of the counseling and things and they're trying to move the bishops closer to the youth kind of have made the bishops the young men's president now and get them closer to the youth. And so we see it still going on and it's not only a kind of a cultural shift for the leadership but for all of the members. Well, I don't want to talk to those Corm Presidents. I don't want to talk to the bishop. And we're trying to help the bishops be able to do all they need to do and take care of their families.

This is an issue that has always gone on, where there's a leader. No, don't pass me off to one of the leaders of thousands or hundreds or 50s. I need to talk to Moses, right? You can kind of see that happening. I remember when I was in Aaronic priesthood, somebody did a lesson on this, and they passed out an organizational chart, and it had Moses at the top, and then all of these categories,

it was like commerce, agriculture, traffic, bicycle licenses, and it was just like 60 of them that were all Moses, and it said, under this plan, it took Moses 40 years And then here's Jethro's plan and it showed these Organizational chart, you know somebody just was clever and made this but could it be one of the earliest lessons on delegation that we've ever seen I've never been Bishop, but I was the executive secretary for a bishop and he was like I think all bishops probably are. He was just

made sure that he was available for the members. But there was something that I saw and I would counsel him against. I said, I think there's what I almost call spiritual vampirism. You've got a few people that rely on the spirituality of the bishop to give them their spirituality. So they were constantly calling and at late at night and saying, I need a blessing. And we don't want to not give blessings. But the idea was that it was really encroaching a lot on the bishops time and using his spirituality to be their spirituality. Does that make sense? What I'm saying there? And it would be like, okay, how are we going to resolve this? How's this going to work out? Because this individual is taking a lot of your time from your family, a lot of your

sleep to borrow your spiritual strength. And Dan, I like what Jethro says here. He says, you're not only going to wear away, but this isn't good for the people. Yeah. This is not good for this people. They'll, it's almost like Moses is a bottleneck. If everything has to run through you, we're never going to get anything done and people are going to spend most of their time, life waiting in line.

We don't want people to spend their life waiting to talk to you. Or they'll blame Moses for whatever happens. There's no agency here. Yeah, make this decision for me, and if it's not right, believe me, I'll come back and I'll tell you. And I found a lot of times as a bishop, I, boy, had somebody once that just finally said to me, you're not going to tell me what to do. Are you?

And I said, no, I'm not. This is a big one, but this is yours. You need to own this and decide. And do you trust the Lord to guide you? Because I do, but I'm not going to make that one for you. I'm reminded as we've been talking about President Nelson's emphasis on learning to hear him for yourself, some of the things you mentioned, Dan. I thought, well, yeah, I loved how, and I know Hank loves this, is given a talk on it, but how the Lord deals with the brother of

Jared. The brother of Jared tries to hand the Lord the problem, and the Lord says, wow, what are you going to do about that? Pushes it right back to him. And it took me a while to learn as a bishop to go, wow, what are you going to do about that? Yeah, and even better, the brother of Jared story is great because he then goes on and say, what are you going to do about it, oh, and by the way, you can't do this, this, this and this. Yeah, yeah, yeah. So you can almost see brother of Jared going, I, well, you know what, I would drill a hole.

Yeah, you're not going to do that. Fire? No, that's not going to happen. Fire is a bad idea on a boat. Let's see. That's so great. And it's almost as if it's just a bit of jerseying. It sounds like you know, right? It sounds like you know what I should do. Go ahead and tell me. No, no. It makes me laugh. It's like, listen, in a later scripture, you're going to say, if any of you lack

wisdom, let him ask of God, I just did. And you said, what will you have me do? Let him ask of God. I just did and you said what will you have me do? So you need the growth Mahan Rai. So you go figure it out and I'll inspire you a little bit, you know It's a great story Dan I had to learn this as a professor when I first got there I don't know if you remember but in my office I would constantly have Some students in there And I liked it. I had a good time, but I could see that there are a couple of students. That was their spirituality, all of a sudden, was coming and sitting in the office.

I'm going, oh no, what have I? I've created this on my own. I did this. I told the story in class about, I was talking to a student in my office the other day, and she's telling me about this. And all of a sudden, I've got five lined up You know ready to have some spiritual time and I'm like holy cow. I think I did this to it took me a couple of years before I learned I should point out I haven't had students come to my office like hank. I mean that's that's a friendly. Oh, there's a

There's a take a number outside his I think it's like whoa boy. And it's like the DMV there, you know? Down the hallway. Hey there, your door's open. Do you know Hank? I'm like, yeah, I'm a heck. I think I was hurting the kids. Some of those students, I was enabling, and they needed to figure out some of these things

on their own or go to the proper channel. The brother of Jared grew through that experience. That's the outcome I think the Lord wanted there was for the brother Jared to grow. First little lesson portion here, I can help bear the burden of doing the Lord's work. As you read the counsel Moses received from his father-in-law, ponder how you can be like the men of truth, sometimes translated, trustworthy men, described in verse 21, and how can you help bear the burden

of your church leaders? And then also you might also consider where the you at times are trying to do too much. How might Jethro's counsel apply to you? So like I said, this has always been an issue and starting in Exodus and even today, am I doing too much? Can I delegate more?

And when we don't delegate, we're not helping other people grow to my mission president always used to say, a good leader trains leaders as he leads. And he wanted to help other people grow through experience. The challenge I think is at least in leadership position is when you do that, you open up the potentiality to failure. Or if you're a new bishop or a new leadership and you delegate something, is it going to be done?

How's it going to be done? Interestingly, for me, that's where number 11, the second half of the story, kicks in, right? Because that's where we pick up. And he actually has called 70 men. Someone else is going to do numbers 11 so I don't want to steal their thunder. But numbers 11 has the calling of those 70 and he gathers them all at the tabernacle to have, I don't know, leadership meeting of some kind and two of them don't go. They just don't

show up. For whatever reason, kids birthday party, they're like, nope, can't. The more things change, the more they stay the same. Exactly. We had a soccer game. So what were the sports? But it's interesting because he takes the 70 out it says, verse 25 and numbers 11, and the Lord came down in a cloud and spaken to him and took the spirit that was upon him and gave it into the 70 elders and came to pass it when the spirit rested upon them. They prophesied, did not cease, but there remained two men in the camp. The name of the one was LDAD and the other was MADAD. And the spirit rested upon them, they prophesied did not cease. But there remained two men in the camp, the name of the one was Elda, and the other was Meadad, and the spirit rested upon them, and they were of them that was written, but were not out in the tabernacle, and they prophesied in the camp. What I think intriguing about that is it would suggest

them that Moses wanted everyone to be in the tabernacle who was called, but there were other ways to accomplish what needed to be done. So I think one of the challenges that leaders sometimes do have is not only do they take too much on their own, but they have a particular way they want things done. But if you're going to delegate it to the ward council, you actually have to let the ward council do it their way. As long as the spirit is present and people are doing their calling,

then you need to learn how to trust them. And so I think that's the second half of this lesson. Yeah, now he calls them and now he's got a trust that they're going to be able to do it their way. And that's when the young man runs, tells Moses what's happened to Joshua's like my Lord, you gotta forbid them, Moses, you can't let them do that. And Moses' response happened to Joshua's like my Lord, you got to forbid them, Moses.

You can't let them do that. And Moses' response is envious thou for my sake. Would God that all the Lord's people were prophets? And to me, that right there is Moses as a leader just going, oh, man, if I could get the people to do this, that would be perfect. This is such a great lesson. And I'm thinking as a parent, sometimes I do things for my children

and I can hear Jethro saying, you're gonna wear away and you're gonna wear away your children. If it's too heavy for a parent to do everything, I let me share with you a story that I've always thought was so funny. This is from Elder Bednar. He's giving an example of this with children and he says, let me give you a silly illustration. Sister Bednar and I have three sons. I like to have a yard

that looks nice and so I was fairly meticulous about how you mo the lawn. And I was famous in our neighborhood for the neatness of the trimming around the lawn. I mean, people would come into our neighborhood and say, how do you do that? They would come and ask for lessons. So one day I began teaching one of our sons how to do this and he messed it up. Now, I know none of you have done this, but my first instinct was to take the weed eater away from him because I didn't want him to mess it up.

And then came one of these amazing moments where you think, so let me make sure I understand this. Not messing up the trimming around the lawn is more important than helping your son learn. So he just obliterated the edges of the lawn. You know what? It grows back and it's not a big deal. And he did it a second time and he was bad if not worse than the first time. And each time it was horrible, but it got a little better. And the long run outcome was I didn't trim the lawn anymore, and he did it as well as I did. You have to take

some inevitable hits on the front end, and you're invested in that, and it's kind of painful. And what was really cool is when he learned how to do it, his brother wanted to learn how to do it, which I never could have pulled off. Just a great little anecdote about this same idea of allowing people to fail a little bit. My mission, President, used to say, never come to your boss with a problem. Always come with a recommendation, which was helpful to me as a bishop.

The award council, like, Bishop, here's this problem, I'd say, what do you recommend, or come back with a recommendation? That's the study it out in your mind part that section nine teaches us about. So this is a fun topic because we all have experience in this. This is a very practical narrative. I think you don't even have to be a believer to look at that and go, yes, that's true. I see the wisdom of that lesson. When I was elder to the court president, you know what, we've got to move.

Will you call some people? And my response was no. Now, I'm willing to do it as your friend, and I'm willing to do it as your neighbor, but it is not part of my ecclesiastical calling to get people to help you to move. That's your responsibility. And I promise you, your neighbors will be more than happy to help, but it. That's your responsibility and I promise you your neighbors will be more than happy to help, but it is your job. Yeah. There's no section 171 about Elder's Core moving. I've looked in the handbook. It's not there. Is there anything else in 18 you want to do? Because

that was really fun. I thought that was so practical and I think a lot of people listening will go, practical, and I think a lot of people listening will go, I probably do need to, I'm wearing away. Well, I think we can look at the organization of the church and we can see in all of this, oh, this is why we have ministering brothers and sisters. This is why there are counselors. This is, and it's brilliant. And we have to work at helping it work so that it all doesn't end up on the bishop's desk. But I like the way you put it. This very

practical. This is, we practice this every, every week. Right. I mean, it all gets summed up in verse 26. And they judge the people at all seasons. The hard causes they brought into Moses. But every small matter they judged themselves. And that should be how that goes. Then verse 27 just goes, and Moses led his father law to part. And I think that says something about the relationship Moses has with his father in law. I think he took the advice. It tells us that Moses is humble even now actually has a close relationship with his father-in-law. Close enough that he's like, thank you.

And can you stick around until these changes are in effect and counsel me further? And when it all gets resolved, as opposed to he does, Moses led his father-in-law to part and Jethro went his own way into his own land. So he's like, you're good, I'm going back home. Send the kids down for some application. Yeah.

You did well. Maybe Moses, well Ramsey always just said, so said so till he written so it shall be done. And you know, everything happened. And so how do I do this? The names are slightly confusing, but it's possible that Jethro actually used the one that gave Moses the priesthood, for instance. And by virtue of that, it may have been not as priesthood authority, but certainly a priesthood advisor if that works. And by virtue of that, then this is practical priesthood administration advice as well. How the councils of the church should run. You can do a comparison with this with Dr.

and Cummins 121 and how to administer and use the priesthood properly, right? Persuading. Long suffering, brotherly kindness. I thought I heard a little Joseph Smith in there. Teach them correct principles and let them govern themselves. Was he pretty effective at this idea of you take it, you go? I think when you look at the history of, for instance, of Zion and Missouri,

I think you'd have to look at that as a place where, yeah, just by virtue of the limitations of travel and Missouri, I think you'd have to look at that as a place where, yeah, I mean, just by virtue of the limitations of travel and communication, there's a lot of things that are similar with the ancient world, but as I look at these two, in terms of the ability to communicate and the ability to travel, these two limited, if you had the church organization, right, in the New Testament, One of the challenges that arose was the fact that you now had these congregations, but if there was any type of local changes and authority or persecution,

you're not gonna be able to get people into the city and you're not gonna be able to get letters or epistles to them. So it doesn't take long, and even if you could, it would take, I don't know, a letter if you wrote in Jerusalem to get to Rome two months. And so you get two months there, two months back. That's a lot of time to travel down to Zion from Kirtland, for instance.

That's, it's a couple of weeks. So it doesn't take long for things to go awry quickly. By virtue of that, I think, just by the very necessity of things, people had to rely more on the spiritual independence for lack of a better term of others. You just, you had no choice. Any small matter. That is such a perfect verse in 26. Every small matter, they judged themselves.

You got to be able to figure it out on your own. This is such a great chapter. Well, and then the other element of that is what exactly is a small matter. I think that's subjective too, isn't it? So I would think, so hopefully you've taught people the law and the principles well enough that by far most things are small matters. First Corinthians, the letter that Paul writes to the people of Corinth, it's intriguing because it's got some big matters and it's got a bunch of small matters and they can't distinguish between the two. And then there's some matters that should never have been a matter at all and yet clearly are, right? So you look at

and go, that's a big matter, but it should never have been one. You know the answer to that question. That's just, that's a given. This should never have been an issue, but you made it an issue. And so I think sometimes there are small matters that become big matters, but never should have been. I'm writing spiritual self-reliance, you know, right across the top of the page. And as a leader, too, helping people develop and having confidence in themselves and not saying, yeah, come to me, look to me. And we've put this in the context of priesthood, right? And yet that holds to anyone within any really priesthood authority position.

That includes relief site presidents. My experience and a grant granted, it's subjective and anecdotal. When I was elder's corn president, and I'd have my counterparts release site president. They can take a lot on I mean we think of the Bishop who has to use so much spiritual strength. I think release site presence carry a huge load in any given ward and I think this is in fact one of their challenges too because they don't want to put anyone out, and they've got members of their organization who are mothers. And so they, you know, all of these different things that take up time. So I think it

relieves my present in many ways, it spends more time and energy than other, maybe other leaders. I can't say that, but in the sense that they have a lot of responsibilities and this importance, uh, the lesson of delegation, and then learning to trust that delegation. Once you've delegated it, now let them figure out how to do themselves is as much a lesson for the relief site of president as it is for the mission. That's for sure. Absolutely. Young women's president as well. Absolutely. Young women's president as well. Primary? Yeah. On small matters, it's good to give people the tools they need to figure this out on their

own. So the next time, they don't come to you. They can do it on their own. So a little training up front can really go a long way. I've described it before this way that in some ways those in these leadership positions be they bishop, reliefs, say president and women's president primary, whatever it is, elders come president. Their job in some ways is to take care, particularly the bishop, but to take care of almost emergencies that pop up, put out fires, the hard causes of verse 26, right? But there are chronic issues or endemic issues in a given organization and that really should be the responsibility of the board council. That will take care of that. We've got long-term

issues that require more planning, more structure. That's the job of the board council. And we'll go back and we'll report on what we've been doing in terms of those larger chronic endemic issues. Maybe one of the most relevant chapters of the Old Testament I've ever seen. You know, our listeners might want to go back and find Elder Quentin, El Cook's talk in April 2021, general conference called Bishops, Shepherds over the Lord's flock, and you'll see some of these same principles we've been talking about, outlined in that talk, about delegation and letting people lead.

And I'll tell you something I just thought of is I'm sure grateful for the Jethros in my life who are willing to pull me aside and say, I think this is a bad idea. And Hank, I was just, I'm looking at Exodus 1824 thinking, I bet my father-in-law is going to show me that verse. So Moses harkened to the voice of his father-in-law and did all that he had said. When someone pulls you aside and says the thing that thou doest is not good. Yeah, we just give straight to Exodus 19, that's what we do when talking about my father-in-laws. Just like, what? Champagne. Yeah, I don't know, there's no chapter. I've never read that one.

All right, well Dan, why don't we keep There's no chapter. I've never read that one. All right. Well, Dan, why don't we keep going? Turn over 19 back to you again. So this is the beginning of what you'd say was this insert that's going to last all the way through numbers 11. Right. And I don't know if inserts the right language for it, but to say that they've clearly,

in some ways, separated the story of the counselors or the calling of these helpers for Moses and then Conund a great detail about the next set of events, right? And these next events in 19, ended in 20, in many ways, get to the heart of what it means to be Israel. That the lineage of Jacob, we get that. But what's about to happen in 19 is the emergence of a covenant that is going to make him distinctive. And so obviously all narratives of the Bible are of value. But in many ways, this one becomes a defining narrative for Israel, then most. And this is probably why it has been, at least again, from a source critical perspective, so worked and reworked and edited and additions put in from different groups are like, oh, you know what?

This is affected us this way. This is a story, this narrative and the events that happened in Exodus 19 and 20 are found in every book of scripture we have. They're alluded to in the Book of Mormon. They're referenced in the New Testament. They're found in the Doctrine Covenants. This event, these events in 1920 are fundamental and foundational into an understanding of Israel and perhaps more importantly, the experience that Israel should be having.

Like a declaration of independence to the United States, right? Just fundamental to who we are. It's if you're going to be Israel, you need to understand the story. Yeah. And this is in many ways this is where it begins. Well, it starts right off there. It's the third month. They've left Egypt.

They've gone through the Red Sea. When they're traveling, they get to Sinai. It's taken three months to get there, but they're finally at Sinai. And when they get to Sinai, Moses is called by the Lord to the top of the mountain. So in many ways, he's been to Sinai already once, the burning bush story, and now they're finally to Sinai, and the Lord calls him back up. When he gets up there, a covenant, or at least covenant terminology, appears beginning

in about verse three, and it's going to run through verse six, right? And so when you look at it, it says, thou shalt say to the house of Jacob and to the children of Israel, you have seen what I did under the Egyptians and how I bear you on eagle's wings and brought you unto myself. Now, therefore, if you will obey my voice indeed and keep my covenant, then you should be a peculiar treasure unto me above all people for all the earth is mine. When I read that, there's a number of elements to it. The first one is something I teach my students is the role of therefore, in verse five, right? It's a conjunction. Conjunctions are a value in the scriptures. They don't necessarily have, they're not

intrinsically doctrinal. They're not like the word atonement, which just brings up a whole constellation of ideas and concepts. But what they do is establish relationships that allow us to fully grasp doctrine. And in this case, we're dealing primarily with a covenant, but what I find fascinating is how it sets up the concept of faith. In this sense, it says, you know what I've done. Therefore, you can trust me when I tell you what I'm going to do, right? You know it. You've experienced it. You have this understanding. And therefore, when I tell you I'm going to do this, you can trust that. And that seems essential to me. That to me is a great

example of faith. You know what I've done. Therefore, when I tell you all do this, trust me. I've given you some enough evidence for you to go on that you can now step out in faith here. And that's a big deal because I think sometimes we define faith too often as an engagement where we lack knowledge. So it's, I don't know, therefore, I have to have that faith. And yet in this case, and I think at all cases where I see it in the scriptures dealing with faith, it's reliant on what you do know. And the more you know, the more faith you have. And I think that connection to knowledge is something that we don't often think about, but is absolutely vital to faith. Your faith is stronger than the more you know. And the more you experience.

The more you understand and see the Lord's hand in your life, and that's why gratitude, I think, is an important principle. God doesn't need it because his self-esteem is so fragile, and if it's not for him, then it's got to be for whom. And what I find interesting about gratitude is when you are engaged in true gratitude, prayer, whatever context it's going to be, it becomes revelatory. Example that I give is sometimes when you're hiking up a mountain, you can't see over the next ridge and the next set of switchbacks and it's just exhausting. But if you turn around and look behind you to see how far you actually have come up the mountain, it gives you strength to go up that next set of switchbacks. You might not know what's ahead, but you do know what's behind. And so gratitude is

revelatory in much of the way, the same way prophecy is, it's revelatory. And it reveals to you what has been done, and particularly the way in which the Lord's been involved in your life, which gives you the power and the strength to move forward into the future with that trust. It seems to be a theme in the Book of Mormon. Remember what the Lord has done. Remember what the Lord has done. So you can move forward in trust because you've seen it done in the past. Yeah, we see it in Moroni's promise. Sometimes we go too fast, past Moroni 10-3. Ponder how merciful God has been since the creation of Adam and ponder it in your hearts.

It's more subtle in the scriptures, but I think there's a powerful theme in there of, and not necessarily being reflected in these verses, but you can find places where the Lord says, and I'll remember you. I remember you. I remember these things. I'll remember. So there's an element here where you can find where God says, I have faith in you. I trust in you. And I think that's a strength that we ought to keep. Paul

talks about that in collations, right? That he sustained by his faith in Christ who trusted in him, too. And so this idea that we're sustained by God's faith in us, as well as our faith in God, I think it's vitally important. Yeah. And the thing that he's reminding them of isn't small, right? You saw how I got you out of Egypt. Like that's not a thing that anybody missed. You know, what happened? Did you notice that object lesson?

You remember when we walked to the Red sea, that wasn't a magic trick. That was, that was, that was me. So and therefore becomes quite strong at that point. Therefore, therefore, there are a big deal in the scriptures. And when you find them, they'll help you establish relationships between the concepts. Sometimes they're cause and effect. Sometimes they're causing effect, sometimes they're summative, but either way they're always going to demonstrate a relationship in these two elements of a text. They're powerful. Dan, can you tell us, because I think I remember Brent Topp that we've also had on the podcast. I think he has a whole book about a peculiar treasure,

but is it Segu Lá, the Hebrew or something, for peculiar treasure? So is it Segu la the Hebrew or something for peculiar treasure? So we see the principle of faith being expressed here or the reliance on faith, but when you get into the actual promises that are being made, they're contingent. You know what I've done, therefore, if you accept my covenant, if you keep my covenant, then I'm going to make you a peculiar treasure, this segula, right? And it does mean treasure. And he defines it further as a treasure above all people. So it's going to be this identifying, this unique, identifying marker that will mark Israel and demonstrate their uniqueness.

So what God has planned for Israel in terms of uniqueness. That is further outlined in verse 6 when he says, you shall be unto me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation. So when he talks about this peculiar treasure, he then specifies it and says, and by that I mean ultimately a kingdom of priests and a holy nation. Now the Hebrew phrasing there for that kingdom of priests, this monlequate coheneme is tricky, the way it's constructed in the Hebrew. And I don't want to bore people with all the details that lies behind it, but it's led to a variety of different translations. And what exactly a kingdom of priests is? How literally are

you supposed to take this? Do we take this within the constructive form or can they be two absolute noun forms, meaning you should be unto me, kings and priests. That's the way some have translated this. Kingdom of priests certainly works here, but people have a question as to who exactly is meant to be a kingdom of priests and what would that mean? What does a priest, what would a kingdom of priests look like? And to some degree, that interpretation, how you understand that, is governed by what you think is about to follow in terms of an experience. And what I mean by that is, Moses goes down off the mountain, asks Israel and says, okay, so this is what God has said. If you're willing to keep his covenant,

he'll make you a peculiar treasure, a kingdom of priests, a holy nation. What do you think? And the people I'll answer in verse 8, oh, the Lord has spoken well. Yeah, we'll do it. So Moses goes back up the mountain. This is the second time up the mountain now. And he says, the people agree to this to which the Lord says, awesome. Let's seal the deal. When we think of a covenant, sometimes we focus in on the oath of the covenant, right? That the speaking or the agreements made between the two parties. But at least in the Old Testament, more often not, a covenant carries with it an act, a ritual act, a formal act of some kind that represents the ratification of this relationship that's been established, whether it's a meal, whether it is a changing of clothing, whatever it is, there's an act that goes with the oath. And those two things,

the oath that's made between the two parties and the formal act that ratifies that relationship, those two things got to go hand in hand in terms of a covenant-making process. I would love for our listeners to get a list of glimpses into this idea because we have young Latter-day Saints who go through the temple and they're like, I don't know what that was, that was, you know, what is going on? And I think this is some understanding

that you can give them and say, look, when God makes governance in the Old Testament, there's a, I like what you said, an act of ratification, whether it be and then you, you know, of dinner, a change of clothes, is that similar to what you'd say, hey, this is what happens today and the endowment. We make an agreement. We're going to ratify this agreement. Yeah, more often not ritual is social. It's a communal act. Even if it's done on an

individual level, it's communal at some level, because it demonstrates inclusion into a group or that maintaining the structure of the group or ultimately to exclude from a group. If behaviors are such a manner that they're no longer conducive to that community, then you have rituals of exclusion or excommunication. But most rituals have to do with inclusion into a group, a community, or maintaining the integrity of that community. So you can think of that from a Latter-day Saint perspective aspectives. We look at our ordinances Elder Bednar has talked about this to some degree and pointed out that it's our ordinances are more than ritual, but having said that they carry with it these

social elements of ritual. We have baptism which is inclusion into a community. We have the sacrament which maintains the integrity of the community. Obviously the temple has a whole series of them. And going along with that is that more often not they have new understandings of identity. So who you are your definition of yourself changes as you move through this. If you go to baptism what changes in your sense of self? Well now you are a member of the Church of Christ, right?

You are a brother and sister in the gospel with these people that are around you. In the temple, there's no question that there is a new identity that's being established, where if not a new identity, an understanding of your true identity, let's put it that way. A divine nature, perhaps in this manner, so explicitly demonstrated. So these acts of ratification are not just, hey, let's seal the deal. It's, let me teach you as well.

Mm-hmm. Okay. Right. Particularly, ultimately, dealing with identity, which becomes so fundamental to your engagement with that community or that group. Okay, yeah, this is really great because you saw what I did.

I wanna do something grand with you. I wanna make you peculiar. And the idea, by the way, we've talked about this before, so I don't know if we need to hit it again, but God doesn't say you're better than other people. He's saying, I can use you to bless the whole earth, the whole earth is mine. Right. In fact, you can see that in there with that kingdom of priests. If however you're going to define priests, a priest has the primary function to act as an intermediary or an intervener between

God and others. That's the function of a priest to bless others and bring them closer in their relationship with God. That is the function of a priest. This event in Exodus 19 and 20 seems at least to me to be one of the central themes to the book of Hebrews as well. And so, for instance, in chapter 5, it does talk about the priesthood there and why God calls priests. The purpose for those priests is, too, he says, bring gifts and sacrifices under the Lord, but it goes further to say, so that they might have compassion upon the ignorant and the out of the way. That suggests right there that wanting at least to the writer of Hebrews that wanted the primary functions of the priesthood, and therefore of calling a priest a high priest,

in that case, is to show compassion upon the ignorant and the out of the way. And that's a whole other discussion in and of itself, which you guys can deal with when you get into the new testament. But the idea that the priesthood has a function to demonstrate compassion on two particular groups, the ignorant, and those that are out of the way, I think, is telling. And that element of it, with the out of the way, that does remind me of the concept of suckering that is found in the book of Mormon. That's exactly who you sucker, those who are out of the way. Is the author here connecting this to the same covenant of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, where they were kind of called the same way? You're going to, I'm going to set you apart to bless the earth.

It's certainly possible. I mean, so you have an illusion back to this concept of a holy nation. And yet, having said that, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are not being mentioned explicitly here at all. That doesn't mean this isn't a connection back to it, but it does suggest that this is, in some ways, a new element to these older covenants. There's a new focus, a new perspective with a new set of people. They're not the patriarchs.

They're another group of people who have had their own experiences. So I think it does tie back. But what you're about to see, particularly in Leviticus, the Leviticus has a law, a version of this law code that we're about to receive. And it stresses their importance to be holy. And Deuteronomy is going to refer to them as a, as a holy people. Moving forward, the association of Israel as holy becomes really significant. And I could be wrong, but as I think back to the Abrahamic covenant, he isn't referred to as holy. That doesn't mean he wasn't holy. There's clearly a distinction in a separation, which is what some people believe holy means. The Hebrew word for holy, this cadush, right? means at some level to separate that there's a level of separation and

That seems to be the case here. There will be nations and then there will be a holy nation and that holy nation has a different function and a different purpose Now that can lead into a greater discussion as to what the nature of holiness is and so while I mentioned that it just greater discussion as to what the nature of holiness is. And so while I mentioned that it just says separation, some good biblical scholars have noted that the concept of holiness carries it with a sense of of of wholeness or completion to complete or finish something to be whole. As if to suggest that if Israel I'm going to ask you to be holy, I really ask you to be whole, complete. And then you play with that even further, as there are two adjectival forms of this word holy, they get translated to word holy. And the distinction between those two suggests a level of dynamics, or a dynamicism, meaning that things that are codosh, like God, the Holy One of Israel,

are expected to make things holy, as opposed to things that are codash, which are holy, right? They're sacred. They're separated, but they're holy. This becomes a big deal when you get into, for instance, Saloveticus 19 that says, be holy, even as I am holy. So now the question is, which agyctival form is being expressed and what does that say? So if it says codash, then he's simply saying,

I want you to be holy, separate, sacred, even as I am. But if he's using Kodash or Kadoosh, then he's got a bit of a different nuance to this. I want you to not only be holy, but I want you to make things holy, even as I am holy. And that dynamic element ties in, I think, to all of this. Now, in this case, it's going to be Kadesh because it's a perfectly good adjective for the noun, a nation. But when he actually commands Israel to be holy, it's going to be Kadesh. So he expects Israel to make things whole, make things complete, make things finished. Tie it all together.

That's what ordinances often do. Ordinances help us become whole and complete and finished. Tie it all together, that's what ordinances often do. Ordinances help us become whole and complete and finished. Going back to your acts of ratification, would you, it was ordinance kind of the same idea there? Well, ordinances in English word, which is nice and vague. In this, it can, it can represent ritual behavior and it can also represent legal presidencies. Okay. Yeah, that's because it is nice and vague. You can get it in church. You can get it in the city, the county building, right?

The ordinance. That's exactly the nice and vague. That could be my autobiography title. Nice and vague. Nice and vague. I see here the Lord saying, I'd like to do this. I like that the most, most us the people, right? There's a, there's an agency there. I'd like to do this. I like that the Moses asks the people, right? There's an agency there.

Do you want to do this? Yes, we do. Okay, let's now how are they going to ratify it? Okay, so that's where it begins to pick up down here in verse 10. So Moses comes back up and says, the people have agreed we've now created, we've had our oath, right?

You said you would do, we said what we would do. So the ratification begins and the Lord says in Moses, go into the people and sanctify them today into the Nurel and let them wash up close and be ready against the third day. For the third day, the Lord will come down in the side of all the people upon Mount Sinai. So what he's being told is, okay, we all agreed, let's seal the deal. I'm coming down in three days. If I'm going to make you a kingdom of priests, then we probably ought to meet. And so I'm going to come down in three days, and you will, and I'm going to do it in the side of all the people. All the people should be able to see me. And that's what we're going to do. That's

our, that's our meeting. And what's the idea of washing your clothes? What's the idea of washing yourself? Well, I think everyone knows that you have to be, you know, clean clothes in the presence of God. He doesn't like dirty clothes. No, I'm just, I actually don't think he cares much about the state of the clothing itself, but it will represent your spiritual state. So what he's telling Israel says, you've got three days to get ready, because I'm coming down. And when I'm down, I expect to see you. So it's being represented in this. I don't think the Lord is actually going to have a huge problem if someone's got dirty clothes or scuffed up hems, but they will represent their spiritual state. It does

represent their spiritual state. Much like Levin yeast in their house. He's probably not overly concerned about how much yeast you have in your house, but he's concerned about how much corruption you have in your life. It's the principle that's in play here. And he says, and then in verse 12, now in the meantime, set up this boundary

around the base of Mount Sinai so that nobody comes up here unprepared and sees me on top of Sinai. I like that. Put a boundary up. There's a temple recommend desk, right, right at the base of Sinai. And then 14. And so Moses goes down. He tells the people, saying, to find, get ready for the third day. And in verse 16, there's the third day. And you have all of the meteorological phenomena that is associated with the presence of God, right? When you have a theophany, this is what you're going to have. There's

thunders, there's lightenings, there's clouds, the voice of the trumpet. I mean, this is, this is a true, a full-blown theophany that's happening on Mount Sinai. This is great. Now, what happens next is where this gets a bit tricky. And this is a place where scholars point out things get a little unexpected. Okay. Because what happens is the Moses brings all the people out of the camp and they stood at the nether part of the mountain. And Mount Sinai is, right, the Lord's there. He's descended onto the top of the mountain. And you get verse 20, where from the top of Sinai, Moses is called up to the top of the mountain again. The Lord calls Moses to come up there. And then you get verse 21. And the

Lord said unto Moses, go down, charge the people, lest they break through unto the Lord to gaze and many of them perish. The instruction said, is basically, you have got to make sure that boundary is in place, because I don't want the people coming up here to see me. Now this is tricky because, back there in verse 11, it suggests that seeing God was, in fact, the intended purpose for this day's visit. That this was exactly what was supposed to have happened, and yet now when it happens, the Lord's like, oh, set up that boundary, I don't want anyone coming up here to see me.

And as difficult as it sounds in verse 21, it makes it sound as if the reason they're not meeting is because of God himself. In other words, go down, charge the people, less they break through. It sounds like the people are at the boundary and want to do what? They want to come up. They want to come up. They want to do this. And the Lord's like,

nope, nope, I'm I'm rescinding my offer. We're not we're not doing that today. That's unexpected. Yeah. It is unexpected. And when you look at earlier elements in the book of Exodus, everything has been leading to Israel is going to have this relationship with God. Israel is going to do these things. Israel's going to do it until the event happens. And all of a sudden Israel is not allowed to. And that's tricky. It's what I say, it gets tricky in the text, because it's not what you would expect. It's not what the text is setting up. And so we've got a bit of it just joining, if that makes any sense. It's disconnected. It doesn't feel right. And that's where that's where chapter 20 comes into play. Now, I know that the first part of it meaning, if that makes any sense. It's disconnected, it doesn't feel right. And that's where chapter 20 comes into play. Now, I know that the first part of it deals

with the Ten Commandments, but if you pick up the narrative in verse 18, the first 17 verses are so deal with the Ten Commandments, but if you pick up the narrative again in verse 18, here's what we have, and all the people saw the thundering in the lightening and the noise of the trumpet and the mountain smoking. And when the people saw it, they removed and stood afar off. So what you have are kind of two different versions now of the same event.

In the first one, it seems to be it's a Lord saying, yeah, I'm not going to let you come up here and see me. But now we get Exodus 20. It's not the Lord that is holding people back from seeing Him. It's what? It's the people themselves. They saw this and they removed and stood afar off. The Lord, verse 21, back in Exodus 19 says, less they perish.

They say something very similar in the next in 20. We don't want to go up there, less we die. That's exactly right. And you can see that in verse 19 and they said under Moses, speak that with us and we will hear, but let not God speak with us lest we die. So you have two different versions, the same things happening, which means on this day, Israel was expected to see God, but did not see God. So chapter 19 suggests that maybe it's because for whatever reason,

God wasn't feeling it that day, and then you get chapter 20 Which is like nope the people themselves removed themselves Moses goes on first 20 fear not for God is come to prove you and that his fear may be before your faces and The people stood afar off and Moses drew near under the thick darkness where God was So in this pivotal event this covenant which was to be ratified by the people becoming a kingdom of priests, apparently by entering into the presence of God Himself, it didn't happen. It didn't happen. And that's where this event becomes now this, for lack of a better term, a lesson throughout any scripture dealing with

Israel again. It's going to be alluded to in Deuteronomy 5 and Deuteronomy 10. Interestingly, from those perspective, they're not going to take the chapter 19 version of the story. They're going to take the Exodus 20 version of the story when that is the people that removed, there was the people that said we don't want to hear, the people that did these things. And it's at this point where the book of Mormon becomes valuable to us. Because in Jacob 1, verse 7, Jacob's describing the work that he and the other spiritual leaders were doing, and this is the way he describes it. He says, wherefore we labor diligently among our people, that we might persuade them to

come into Christ, and partake in the goodness of God that they might enter into his rest, less by any means he should swear in his wrath that they should not enter in partake in the goodness of God that they might enter into his rest, less by any means he should swear in his wrath that they should not enter in, as in the days of the provocation, in the days of temptation, while the children of his will and the wilderness. Well, he's used two phrases here that even though they don't show up in Exodus 19 and Exodus 20, will in fact be alluded to elsewhere in the Old Testament, Psalm 95 in particular. And it's this concept of entering into God's rest and provoking the Lord, the provocation. Now, the truth is, Israel provokes the Lord

all over the place in these stories, right? I mean, you've got the waters of Meribah, which are alluded to, you've got the Golden Calf story, you've got the Coil story, you've got Chora, you've got all of these narratives that will run through the rest of Exodus through numbers of where they clearly provoke the Lord. And by like, take a stick and just poke that bear.

But the ultimate provocation, it seems to be here, Exodus 19 and 20. And you can actually see this best by restoration scripture, meaning if you turn to doctrine, come in it's 84. Beginning, yeah, 19 through 24, it's going to set the southeast, talking about the priesthood and about the keys of the mysteries of the kingdom, even the key of the knowledge of God, and points out again that in the ordinances, both the laws and in the rituals that we associate the priesthood, and without the ordinances thereof in the authority of the priesthood, the power of God and this is not manifest unto men in the flesh. For without this, no man can see the face of God even the Father and the Lamb.

So Joseph is explaining, or at least the Lord is explaining to Joseph, ways in which the priesthood is necessary for this incredible experience to see the face of God. Now, verse 23, This Moses plainly taught to the children of Israel in the wilderness and sought diligently to sanctify his people that they might behold the face of God. This seems to be a direct illusion back to Exodus 19. Right? That he did everything he could to sanctify his people to behold the face of God,

but they hardened their hearts and could not endure his presence. That's exactly what Exodus 20 describes, right? That they hardened their hearts and could not endure. They did not enter into his presence. And therefore the Lord and his wrath for his angle was kinded against them so that they should not enter into his rest while in the wilderness, which rest is the fullness of His glory. I.e., they could have been in the presence of God and they did not, and therefore He swore, while you're in the wilderness, it's not going to happen.

This event where Israel enters into a covenant relationship with God, of which the culminating element of that should have been an experience where they enter into the presence of God, and they did not. And this seems to be the ultimate provocation. And why do you feel like this is in the origin story? Is it because later on, they're going to do this so many times that it's going to be a pattern of God wants this? You agree, and then you fail to live up to your obligations. That's a pattern in my life. I think ultimately it's because this is an experience that should be happening. This is,

if you're Israel, this is what it's going to make you separate and distinct. You have the opportunity to enter into the presence of the Lord. Hebrews chapter 4, so verse 6, but as Christ is Son over his own house, whose house are we? If we hold fast the confidence of the rejoicing of their hope, firm unto the end, wherefore as the Holy Ghost say, if today if you will hear his voice, hearted not your hearts as in the provocation

in the day of temptation in the wilderness. That's Psalm 95, where in the means is when your father tempted me, proved me in some of my works for the years. Wherefore I was grieved with that generation and said they do always err in their heart and have not known my ways. So I sworn my wrath, they shall not enter into my rest. Now, if you go to chapter 4, here's how it begins. Let us, therefore, fear, less a promise being left us of entering into his rest, any of you should seem to come short of it. The writer here is saying is that there was an early Christian understanding within the church

and in early Christianity that this promise applied to them as well. So there's a promise that if you do these things, you can enter into his rest, the fullness of his glory. This is a promise that defines, I think, Israel. Regardless of what dispensation you're in, regardless of the differences of experience, this is a promise that is given to Israel, that I expect you to be a kingdom of priests, a holy nation, and by virtue of that, we're going to have to meet. And yet so many of us fall short of it. So, human, it's God wants this, I want this, and when it comes to the moment of choosing, I fall short. I don't know why Israel. Part of it could have been that they look at that and went, there's no way I can be ready in three days. So it's back to this

concept of faith. I always wonder about that. If I were told that the Lord is coming in three days and that I needed to meet him in three days, and here's what I need to do to be ready, do I think washing my clothes would make me ready in three days? Do I think I could do it? And yet, my response to that is, is if the Lord tells you that three days is enough, then it must be enough. So they don't believe him? Yeah, at some level, they don't trust in that aspect of it. Chapter four of Hebrews continues this. At the end of it, it talks about Christ and what he's made possible, and then it describes and it experience, verse 16.

Let us therefore come boldly under the throne of grace. Now that requires us to understand a little bit about the temple rather than the town apple, but if the throne of grace is God's throne, then it's within the holy of holies, right? And the same idea is repeated, by the way, in Hebrews 10, which describes it this way. This is a new covenant. I will put in them. This is chapter 10, verse 16, I will put my laws into their hearts and into their minds, will I write them? And there are sins and equities, well will I remember no more. Now where remission of these is, there is no more offering for sin,

having therefore brethren boldness to enter into the holiest by the blood of Jesus. These two chapters talk about the ability to enter into the holiest of places or approach the throne of God. What strikes me about it is not only does it suggest that the Atomina of Christ makes it possible for us to enter into the presence of God, literally into the presence of God, but in both verses it talks about being able to do so boldly. There's an understanding here that the Atomina of Christ makes it possible for us to be bold in the presence of God.

And I don't think that means disrespectful, and it doesn't mean air-referent. But it does mean, well, it means whatever you're going to define boldness with. Confidence? Surety? These are the things that Israel could have had entering into the presence of God, and yet did not. You know, Alma gives such an awesome contrast. And Alma, five, when you're brought to stand before God, can you look up? He doesn't say, are you clean or are

you prepared? He just, I love this. Can you look up? And Alma 12, 14, I think that first one's Alma 5, 14 or something, but Alma 12, 14, you will not dare to look up. You will fame be glad to command the rocks and the mountains to fall upon you to hide you from his presence if you're not prepared. But the idea of, can you look up? Reminds me to have enus who says, then I will see his face with pleasure. And maybe that's what that, that boldness means to, to, because I've, I've wondered, what does that mean boldly? It just means that you're confident in the atonement, you're confident that you're

prepared because of what the Savior's done for you. So Joseph F. Smith tells the story of a dream he had. And for those of you who studied the life of Joseph F. Smith, that mission in Hawaii was tricky. That was difficult. He was 15 years old, wasn't he? 15 years old. Yeah. And you read it. You felt very isolated, very alone, very forgot. He was sick when he got there. He was sick. So he has this dream in which he's going to go to the temple. You know, it's a very famous one. We all know it.

But to me, it's a great example of this boldness and can't find his temple clothing. Finally, finds it, runs to the temple. There's his, what, Uncle Joseph Smith looking down on him, frowning disprovenly, you're late, Joseph. And his response is, yes, but I'm clean and just walks right by him. That is that boldness. He knows he belongs there, he knows he deserves to be there. And so he is. And so there's this boldness idea, I think John, you brought up a Alma five. One of the intriguing things about

that is that's of course the wicked, right? But Alma actually described earlier in the verses that, do you look forward with an eye of faith? Do you see your mortality putting on immortality? Do you see your corruption putting on in corruption? Can you imagine unto yourselves the God saying, enter in, you blessed? And now you know that he's talking about it to the wicked going, or do you think that you're going to be able to lie to God? But I think those other questions are intriguing, because I think they tie into this boldness, which is, do we think about that often?

Do we think about what it's like to be in the presence of God? Do we imagine what eternal life is like? If those verses hold true, Alma has just suggested that, as weird as it sounds, imagination plays a fundamental role in the expression of faith, looking forward with an eye of faith and seeing something that hasn't been yet, but will be, do you imagine it? Do you imagine what it's like to be in the presence of God? Do you imagine it?

Do we explore the contours of what it means to have eternal life? And it seems to me that that long term, that ability to not just look up, but as Peter is going to call it, see a far off, becomes absolutely essential to survival. And in a day and age, particularly down, and this is me getting on my soapbox a bit, but in a day and age where so much information is flying around so fast, so often, that to some degree there's an element of where we're constantly reacting to the barrage of inspiration that's coming in. It's a constant reaction. We have no choice but to deal with what keeps flashing before our eyes all the time. And yet to see a far off means

you've got to lift yourself from that, lift your gaze from that, and see a long perspective. In my perleric price class, they talk about the importance of a vision of scale. And recognizing that one of the things that when profits have visions is more often not, they're shown the scale and the immensity of this work. It's cosmic in scope. So Moses sees the earth and all the inhabitants of the earth and every particle of the earth and enixies millions of earths like this. And Abraham has the work of God expanded before his eyes and John and all of these individuals have this expansion of vision, not just the vision itself, but an expansion of an understanding

of the cosmos and the work of God within that huge cosmic scale. And I think there's an importance to seeing a far off. They say, man is nothing which thing I never suppose this idea of. I'm seeing life in its proper perspective instead of like in it with the information flying around me. I'm seeing oh I'm seeing it from God's point of view a little bit. Right Right, and that experience these are lights were meant to have I think is tied into that Why weren't they ready in three days? I don't know but it makes me think they were concentrating on the three days more than the horizon They didn't see a far off. But if my clothes aren't clean enough, yeah. And maybe part of it is we don't actually believe

that that's an event that can really happen. I don't think we think enough about entering into the presence of God and what that's like and yet the doctrine of covenant is full of that. And the Book of Mormon has narrative, after narrative of people who do, and the New Testament talks about it. There's a promise, there's a promise that's given

that this can happen so that you can bless all mankind. You're expected to be a king of priests to bless everybody. And so yeah, the story is ultimately negative for Israel at that time for those 40 years, but it lays out an experience that any Israelite is expected to have in any dispensation. In fact, I've quoted enough of Hebrews, but there's one more. You get to Hebrews chapter 12 and to get verse 18.

And this is what it says, for you are not come under the mount that might be touched that burned with fire, nor into blackness and darkness and tempest in the sound of a trumpet in the voice of words. That's our illusion back to Exodus 19, isn't it? Exodus 19, 20. And it's saying, you are not supposed to have that experience, verse 20, for they could not endure that which was commanded. And so terrible was the sight that Moses said, I seem to be in quake. He says, that is not the experience that we're meant to have. Verse 22, but you are coming to Mount Sin and under the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to a innumerable company of angels, to the general assembly in the church of the firstborn, which you're written in heaven, and to God the judge of all, and to the spirits of just men being

perfect, and to Jesus the mediator, the new covenant, to the blood of spring, like that speak of better things than that available, see that you refuse not him that speaketh. See that refuse not him that speaketh. This is the experience that Israel could have had and did not have. This is the experience that the writer of Hebrews is saying, the Christians should have, whether or not they did as another story, and what I can tell you is that by 1832, and the great vision that Joseph Smith has of the three degrees of glory, these verses are alluded to in them and show up then in a series of teachings from Joseph from here to the end of his life.

He's constantly alluding to that. In 1842, I want to say in September, in October, writing for the Times and Seasons, Evening and Morningstar, I can't remember in September, or October, writing for the times and seasons, evening and morning star, I can't remember which periodical it is. But he talks about this experience and says, we ought to be having this. This is what the saint should be doing. This is an experience.

And since I am playing with that, here's section 107, right? This is in our doctrine and covenants, talking about the powers of the priesthood. You get verse 18, which says, the power and the authority of the higher or mccusic priesthood is to hold the keys of all the spiritual blessings of the church. It's then followed by a verse which appears to reflect the blessings, spiritual blessings of the church, to have the privilege of receiving the mysteries of the kingdom

of heaven, to have the heavens opened unto them, to commune with the general assembly and church of the firstborn, and to enjoy the communion and presence of, to commune with the general assembly and church of the firstborn, and to enjoy the communion and presence of God the Father, and Jesus the mediator of the New Covenant. Now, I don't think we talk about this enough. And yet, it's straight out, these are the spiritual blessings that the church has available. And so, and so I'm back to the question that I've asked is, how often do we think about it? Do we even take these seriously? Do we, do we think that they're only for a certain select group of people, or are they blessings that are available to anyone by virtue of the male kids who have increased it? And what does it mean if they are available to everyone?

Please join us for part two of this podcast.