followHIM - Thoughts to Keep in Mind #1 • Reading the Old Testament • Dr. Ross Baron • Dec 29 - Jan 4
Episode Date: December 29, 2025“Thoughts to Keep in Mind” are simple themes in Come, Follow Me that help make the scriptures clearer, more Christ-centered, and easier to apply to daily life. This year, Dr. Ross Baron is the gue...st on all eight episodes.YOUTUBE: https://youtu.be/q8CSEMP2w4oFREE PDF DOWNLOADS OF followHIM QUOTE BOOKSNew Testament: https://tinyurl.com/PodcastNTBookOld Testament: https://tinyurl.com/PodcastOTBookBook of Mormon: https://tinyurl.com/PodcastBMBookWEEKLY NEWSLETTERhttps://tinyurl.com/followHIMnewsletterSOCIAL MEDIAInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/followHIMpodcastFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/followhimpodcastThanks to the followHIM team:Steve & Shannon Sorensen: Cofounder, Executive Producer, SponsorDavid & Verla Sorensen: SponsorsDr. Hank Smith: Co-hostJohn Bytheway: Co-hostDavid Perry: ProducerKyle Nelson: Marketing, SponsorLisa Spice: Client Relations, Editor, Show NotesWill Stoughton: Video EditorKrystal Roberts: Translation Team, English & French Transcripts, WebsiteAriel Cuadra: Spanish TranscriptsAmelia Kabwika : Portuguese TranscriptsHeather Barlow: Communications DirectorSydney Smith: Social Media, Graphic Design"Let Zion in Her Beauty Rise" by Marshall McDonaldhttps://www.marshallmcdonaldmusic.com
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Coming up on this episode of Follow Him.
It says Kachna.
Now, nah in Hebrew can be translated as please.
And it doesn't get in here.
And I don't know why.
But it's the only place I know where God says please when he gives a command.
Hello, everyone, and welcome to Follow Him.
As you know, it is an Old Testament year.
Last year, we had voices of the restoration.
We had Dr. Garrett-Dirkmont with us, which was wonderful.
We are in the Old Testament, and I am so happy we have Dr. Ross Barron with us,
who is going to be doing, not voices of the restoration, but thoughts to keep in mind.
Hank, there are so many thoughts.
I'm wondering if I've got the capacity to keep them all in mind.
John, I got to tell you, when it comes to keeping things in mind, there is no one like Ross Barron.
I could bring up anything with Ross, and he'd be like, I understand that, I know about that,
whether it be like playing the guitar, playing the drums, surfing.
The guy has done literally everything.
We get him how many times?
I think we get him eight times.
Our listeners will probably recognize that we've had Brother Barron with us.
Old Testament, New Testament, Book of Mormon.
He knows a lot, and he's been on the prices right.
Right.
I was reading your bio, Ross.
Tell us what you won on the prices, right?
Because it cracked me up.
I won a mop, a stove, and a barrel sauna.
I don't even know what a barrel sauna is.
He did neither until he got it.
It's a barrel and it's a sauna.
The name says what it is.
When they announced that you win a barrel sauna,
does the music go,
da-da-da-da-da-ma.
When you win a barrel sauna.
Or is it, the good music one.
Yeah, no, there's a clip, a student of mine made of me on, it's seven minutes.
You should see my face when they say, and behind this door, boom, barrel sauna.
Yeah.
And this was Bob Barker, by the way.
This isn't Drew Carey.
Like, I was on with Bob Barker.
And my goal was to say, Bob at the beginning of every sentence and then Bob at the end of every sentence.
And if you watch the clip, it's pretty funny.
You did it.
You managed to do it.
I did.
Oh, yeah.
It's pretty hilarious.
And I had a t-shirt that said, bark for Bob.
Because he's really into animal riots.
Yeah, he was.
Yeah, that's right.
Get your pet spayed or neutered.
Yeah, I remember.
Exactly.
Look at you, Hank.
Oh, yeah.
I remember.
I had to go ask my mom what that meant.
Yeah, oh, yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
John, I'm telling you, over the course of this year, we're going to get more like this.
He's just, he really has done everything.
I hope everyone will listen.
These aren't the standard come follow me lessons.
These are additions like voices of the restoration last year.
What I remember was.
your Old Testament time, when you talked about the fact that you would have question and answer
sessions with folks from all faiths. You even did that on the radio at one point. Isn't that right?
Correct. Yep. In L.A.
I would love to listen, but I would not love to be in the hot seat for that one. I would say,
can I phone a friend?
Let me call Ross. Lifeline. Yeah. Yeah. I call Ross. In fact, why do we just bring him on
in and have him do this for us? I'll go ahead and take a seat. And that's why we're here.
there's a lot of different categories we're looking at today
the thoughts to keep in mind lesson is simply called reading the Old Testament
I'm so excited about this because Hank Old Testament is an area where I don't feel as strong
as some of the others maybe there's a lot of us out there that feel that way
and that's why I'm so glad to have Ross here to help us he is so smart but he can speak to
those of us who are new at this reading the Old Testament Ross where do you want to take us
today. The idea for today's episode, I have like top 10 things to keep in mind. So hopefully our
mind capacity to 10 things. Then I wanted to do, once we did the top 10 things to keep in mind,
I thought we could actually go into a couple of verses where we can model some of these ideas.
Wonderful. What an adjustment from the Doctrine of Covenants where it's modern scripture.
These are people that are a couple of centuries removed from us. But when we're starting the Old
assessment, how many centuries are we going back here? Yeah, we're talking big time, far away.
It's a foreign country. One, it's massive. Compared to all the other scriptures, it's intimidating
because it's a big book. Two, it's like, really? I don't understand most of it. I'm going to read
the book of Mormon this year. I'm going to go back to the book of Mormon this year, and I'm sure it's
important, and maybe I'll pick up a couple of things. Maybe convince us, maybe give us a persuasive speech on
what do you see here?
I think that's a critical question.
One of the things to keep in mind
is that the Old Testament
or the Hebrew Bible
is the setting for the Book of Mormon.
In other words, if you're like,
I love the Book of Mormon,
you're actually in an Old Testament setting
when you're reading the Book of Mormon.
Until Christ comes,
so we're talking First Nephi
through Third Nephi 11,
you're in an Old Testament setting.
When you are reading the Book of Mormon,
you are 100% content.
textually situated in an Old Testament text. If you're like, oh, I don't understand the Old Testament,
which I get, there can be some tough things and we're going to work through those. But what I'm saying
is that the book of Mormon essentially is an Old Testament book. Four years ago, we went through the
Old Testament. John, you and I both are pretty honest here. I saw the book of Mormon in a
brand new light as we studied the Old Testament. Things clicked. Oh, that's why Lehigh says that.
Oh, that's why King Benjamin gathered them together in their tents. Ross, what I'm hearing you say is,
hey, you want to love the Book of Mormon even more? Come with us. I heard somebody phrase it this way.
I'm not sure I'm convinced of it yet. The Keystone to the Keystone, right? The Keystone is the Book of Mormon.
But the Keystone to the Keystone to the Old Testament. I think that's an interesting way to phrase it.
By the way, I would even say with what you were saying earlier about, oh, it's so huge, we can
prioritize things. I think we can look where prophets and apostles are focusing in terms of the
Old Testament. We can look at where Jesus focuses in the Old Testament, where Paul focuses
in the Old Testament. Even Nephi, he's going to bring up particular stories from the Old
Testament as are Alma and others that will focus our attention. This is probably where we should be
focusing. I love the book of Habakkuk. Don't get me wrong. But I'm not sure Habakkuk is the book
we should focus on all year? Because there's not, there's not prophets in other books.
Exactly. And I don't want Habakkuk mad at me in the spirit, but you get what I'm saying.
He's an awesome prophet. It's just not been a focus of either Jesus or of Book of Mormon prophets.
That's all I'm saying. I'm grateful for that. I love the scriptures. I spend my career in the
scriptures, but I can absolutely see someone who's thinking, I don't have time for this kind of thing.
And I know there's power in the Book of Mormon. I'm going to keep learning it. But I hope those listening today,
will think, you know, I'm going to stick with it this year. Maybe for the first time in my life,
I'm going to really grasp. Not all of it. None of us understand all of it, but a lot more than you used to.
When I teach Jesus Christ in the everlasting gospel, we spent a chunk of time in the Old Testament.
I do a top five at the end of my class. They have to write an assignment. Their top five
of assignments and why. They always refer to something we talked about in the Old Testament,
that changed their perspective, that really helped them understand, or that even motivated them
to be closer to Christ. That's super critical.
Yeah, I love it. Let's jump in. I'm going to do my top 10 talking about each one. The first idea, and this isn't going to surprise anybody, we should first and foremost seek the companionship of the spirit. The Old Testament, Hank, you said it earlier. It's like travel into a foreign country. That is 100% correct. cultures, traditions, language, even euphemisms, they're so different. We need the companionship of the spirit to help us guide us through what is important, what's not important. How do I understand?
this, and how does this help me in my life? Elder Kim B. Clark, former Commissioner of Church
Education, General Authority 70, a former president of BYU, Idaho, former dean of the Harvard
Business School. He gave a talk about deep learning. Three things. He said, this is what is deep learning.
Number one, you know and understand. Number two, you take effective righteous action, and number three,
it helps you become more like your Heavenly Father. Think about that. I want to do deep learning,
and it's not just spiritual stuff.
Deep learning applies to statistics
and to biology and humanities,
but as it relates to our study of the Old Testament,
knowing and understanding,
knowing to me is head,
understanding is when it drops to the heart.
You have to have the Holy Ghost.
Number two, you take effect of righteous action.
It's not about knowing a ton of stuff.
It's actually about doing things.
Then number three, the point of doing those things
is to help me become like our Heavenly Father.
That is awesome.
As we're studying, I want us to look for deep learning.
I want us to look for places where we can have those kinds of experiences, playing a musical
instrument, learning another language, learning a sport, all are deep learning activities.
It's so interesting.
I grew up, Hank you said, I grew up surfing.
I did.
Southern California surfed every day.
People would say, tell me about surfing.
I want to learn how to surf.
Well, you can't read books about surfing.
You actually have to go surfing.
You're going to make a ton of mistakes.
You have to take the action, and then it's going to help you become something different.
I taught mission prep for years.
I love mission prep, but there's a point in mission prep where I'm like, I can't tell you
anything more about being a missionary.
You have to go.
You got to go.
You got to go.
I don't want to tell you about planning your day anymore.
I just like, go be.
And I think Elder Bednar gave you talk years ago.
Remember when he said, the best preparation for mission is to be a mission.
now. You got to be a missionary now. Had an interesting deep learning experience with Kim B. Clark
that you guys might enjoy. When I first came to BYU, Idaho in 2005, my mom and dad, who are not
members of the church, they were a little concerned. I was leaving Southern California, going up to
Rexburg, Idaho. Everybody was like, what's going to go on? What's going on? Elder Bednar had been called
into the 12th in 2004. So they had an interim president, a guy named Bob Wilkes, and then they were calling
a new president. Kimby Clark has been called to be the new president.
president, the former dean of the Harvard Business School. Unbeknownst to me, my mom and dad were listening
to Kim B. Clark in an interview on a program called Charlie Rose. Charlie Rose used to do lengthy
interviews, very similar to the way you guys do the podcast. My mom and dad are watching. Again, I don't
know anything about this. Charlie Rose says, Dr. Clark, why in the world would you go to Rexburg,
Idaho to lead a little teeny four-year college? And like, what? You're the dean of the Harvard
Business School. Like, you're at the pinnacle of the world. And he goes, well,
Charlie, if Moses asked you to do something, would you do it?
And Charlie Rose kind of caught off guard.
This is like a secular program.
Charlie Rose says, well, I guess if Moses asked me to do something, I'd do it.
And then Elder Clark says, Moses asked me to do this.
And his name's Gordon B. Hinkley.
My mom and dad are listening to this.
And they're like, whoa, we're feeling something.
We don't know what we're feeling.
This is incredible.
They call me up and they're like,
we love Kim Clark, like they're going off. I haven't met him. Then we have a meeting. It's our
first meeting in the Taylor Chapel at BYU, Idaho, and it's Kim Clark in this meeting. I'll never forget
it. And it was the faculty there and Kim Clark, and he gives this inaugural to the faculty. And they did his
Q&A. And I raised my hand and I said, President Clark, I just want to thank you for your Charlie Rose
interview because it really affected my mom and dad who aren't members of the church. And he's like,
oh, thanks so much. The next day, I'm on the quad, and he was there, and he's like, hey, you,
you, I don't remember your name. And I said, yeah, president. And he said, I've been thinking
about your parents all night. I want to invite them up as my personal guests for my inauguration
when the first presidency comes. He goes, do you think they'd be okay with that? I was like, yes.
Call my mom and dad. They're like, that's so great. So they extend an official invitation.
my mom and dad got to be like with the first presidency and like I didn't get to go into any of those things. They did. Ross, tell us about your parents a little bit. Like what am I envisioning here? As of right now, they're 93 years old. They're doing amazing. They live alone. They have a busier social calendar than I do. They travel around. It's incredible. But because of that experience with Kim Clark and subsequent experiences with Kim Clark, whenever they're in circles that you,
You and I could not get in in Los Angeles.
Somebody will say something about or against the church.
My mom and dad will be like, no, that's not true.
That is not the case.
We know these people.
We've been in meetings with them.
We met President Hinkley.
We know Kim Clark.
It's incredible.
I believe the Lord orchestrated that opportunity and they defend the church and promote the church.
My mom says she tells my conversion story more than I do.
She wants me to make a pamphlet out.
She can just hand out because people always say, how many grandkids do you have? And my mom will say, well, we have two children and we have 11 grandchildren. And then she'll go, oh, each one has five or six. No, my son has nine. Is he a rabbi? And my mom will be like, kind of. Anyway, there you go. That's my Kim Clark story with deep learning and how powerful that is. First and foremost, we seek the companionship of the spirit. We use the spirit.
number one so we can know and understand so we can take effective righteous action and so we can
become more like our heavenly father that's key in understanding the old testament that's number one
number two things to keep in mind the god of the old testament and the god of the new testament
same god we over index in the church that the god of the old testament is wrathful vengeful
harsh and even in latter day saint gospel doctrine classes that comes up all the
But Jehovah, Jesus is the God of the Old Testament, and he has the same character attributes and
perfections as the God of the New Testament. I actually say we've got to keep in mind this all the time
and a superficial reading without understanding certain things of the Old Testament might lead one to
make that assumption or make that conclusion quickly. But that's not the case. As you're reading
the Old Testament. You look for Jesus Christ. You look for and deepen your love for him and what's being
taught about him. What is being taught about the Savior? I'm going to emphasize that through the year and
hopefully in some other episodes I might show, I have one particular thing where I want to show
specifically how we reconcile that to make sure we understand that the God in the New Testament,
God of the Old Testament, same God. Ross, I think this is pretty critical.
critical because it's almost as if we categorize, wow, the God of the Old Testament is mean.
And here comes Jesus, this really merciful guy. When you read closely, it's not true.
It actually misunderstands the God of the New Testament and misunderstands the God of the Old Testament.
And we know from lectures on faith that having a correct idea of God's character attributes and
perfections is the first principle to actually having faith leading them to life and salvation.
We've got to get that. You've got to get three things right. You've got to get three things right.
You got to get who God is.
You got to get who we are.
And then ironically, you got to get who Satan is.
And if you get those three things right, you're going to go right.
For example, if you go to the temple, I don't know what you're going to totally get your first time out of the temple, but you're going to know who God is.
You're going to know who God is. You're going to know who we are in relation to God and you're going to know who Satan is.
If you go to Joseph Smith in the Grove, when Joseph Smith comes out of the grove, he knows who God is, he knows who he is, and he knows who Satan is.
You go to Moses chapter one, his experience.
He knows who God is, he knows who He is, and he knows who Satan is.
My concept here is that by understanding the Old Testament, we deepen and powerfully expand our understanding of who God is, who we are, and who Satan is.
Because those things come out.
If nothing else happens, that framework for starting the Old Testament, exactly, look for the Savior, look for Jehovah, look for Jesus as you read the Old Testament.
That alone will bless everybody.
It gives us a way to focus.
When you said who God is who we are, who Satan is, I went, oh, that's Joseph Smith,
and then you said it, Sacred Grove.
And then I said, that's Moses One.
And I'm also thinking of the temptations of Jesus.
Same thing.
Baptism, temptations.
The temptations are so critical because we all think the temptation initially is turned the stones to bread.
But the actual first temptation, and through it all, the thread is, it's an identity temptation.
if thou be the son of God.
It's who you are.
And then the bookend, the temptations in Matthew 4,
and then later on the cross.
If you be the son of God, come down off the cross.
The identity temptation never leaves
who you are in relation to God and who Satan is.
Wow. Power, power.
We ready to roll?
That's President Nelson.
Child of God, child of the covenant,
disciple of Christ, identity. Awesome.
Always remember that.
Number three, this is going to be hard.
Okay, everyone breathe.
The way history was is not the way history had to be.
Follow me, follow me.
I'm going to use the story of Joseph who was sold into Egypt.
Then I'm going to go back to the fall because this is going to be tough.
I'm going to need people to think through this.
Joseph, in my view, Joseph is going to go down into Egypt.
That is God's plan.
But he doesn't have to go down to Egypt because his brothers sell him.
Now, circling back to the fall.
Adam and Eve are going to leave the garden
and to leave the garden they got to eat the fruit
but they don't have to listen to Satan to do it
because the way history was is not the way history had to be
Ross I think you're right on people have to have agency
and it can't be well they had to do that
Satan had to do it he did the brothers had to sell him
amen isn't one school of thought
basically everything that happens must have been God's will
And you're like, well, doesn't it say in Matthew, it is not the will of the father that any of these little ones should perish, but little ones do perish.
Is everything that happens God's will? No, there's this free agency thing going on here.
Is he able, though, to turn things to good like he did for Joseph? Yeah, and he says so. That's a great point.
The way history was is not the way history had to be. And I just want to be clear that people don't think I've gone too far.
Joseph's going to Egypt. Adam and Eve are going to leave.
leave the garden. It just doesn't have to necessarily be the way that that happened.
That is so important. I want to throw in one more thing because I love it. David McCullough comes
to BYU. I can't remember early 2000s and says something so simple. He said, nobody ever lived in the
past. No one ever looks around and goes, isn't this crazy here being in the past? Look at us in our
authentic clothes. I can't wait for fill in the blank to happen. He said, when you do that,
you lose all the courage. Washington didn't know that he was going to cross the Delaware and
win. If you think he did, you lose the enormity of that decision. There's obviously prophets in the
Old Testament, but you can't see Joseph going, well, I can't wait until I get to Egypt and save the
family. He doesn't know. No.
That's great. And McCullough, of course, wrote those amazing books, 1776, and yeah, phenomenal. Great historian.
We can link that in this show notes. What are we on number four? We're number four. This is what I suggest. Let's say the assignment for Come Follow Me is Genesis 1 through 6. My suggestion is read through it. I don't want to say fast, but read through it to get the lay of the land. As you're getting the lay of land, you look for converting principles. Look for Jesus Christ. You look for
connections to be made and what it can teach me about Christ. Then you go back, follow me on this,
and you focus on those things and slow way down. I'm going to do Genesis 1 through 6, boom,
I'm going to read it pretty quick, get the lay of the land, figure out kind of what's going on.
I should be able to explain the storyline to somebody. As I was reading little converting principles
all along the way, and then I'm going to go back, and I'm going to slow way down on those things.
I want to model that a little bit and a little later.
So number five is then ask questions of the text.
One of the assignments I give my students is to ask questions of the text.
Sometimes I'll say, I want you to take this verse and I need you to come back with 15 relevant questions for that text.
And they'll be like, that's impossible.
You can't ask 15 questions of that text.
And I'll go, that's the assignment, go do it.
They'll generally come back saying that was one of the most helpful things.
Slow down, look at the text, ask questions.
So my son, my oldest son, Josh, has a 12-year-old son named Spencer.
And Spencer had to give a talk, and the talk was on Luke 252.
Jesus increased stature in favor with God and with man.
My son said, okay, Spencer, go ask 11 questions of the text.
And Spencer was like, there's no possible way.
It's one verse.
Yeah, it's one verse.
Yeah, no impossible.
So he came back and he said, my son was looking at his questions.
He was like, these are really good.
And one of them was, in what ways did Jesus,
increase in his social-like connection with men.
Spencer goes, that's the question I'm wondering about.
And my son's like, okay, so what do you think?
He goes, well, he must have known him pretty well
because he gave the Apostle's nicknames.
That's awesome.
Yeah.
That is so insightful.
He slowed down, asked a question of the text.
The text drew him to other things.
Then he starts to learn about the character and nature of Jesus.
What a powerful deal that is.
is. That's beautiful. Ask questions of the text. We're going to talk about that too. Number six,
consider the context of the scriptures. Hank, you said it like out of the gate. And I say, remember
that you're traveling in a foreign land. It's so funny. I worked with this guy right before my mission.
His name was Acidro, Sid, Spanish guy from Mexico, spoke amazing English. Amazing man, inspiring,
worked hard, wasn't a Latter-day Saint. And at the end of the day, he would say to me, Ross,
I'm so tired and sick of this day.
And I'd be like, Sid, we don't say tired and sick.
We say sick and tired.
And he's like, I said sick and tired.
I said, no, you said tired and sick.
If a native speaker says tired and sick, that means they're tired and they're sick.
But if they say sick and tired, that means they're frustrated.
And he goes, that's the dumbest thing I've ever heard.
And I go, that is dumb.
But again, a native speaker picks that up instantly.
we're in the Old Testament. It's a foreign land. They're saying things. We think we understand them. We're reading too fast. We might not understand. It might be Sid saying, I'm so tired and sick of this day. And all native speakers are going, no, you're not. You know, you're not. Are you tired? Because you guys are both native speakers. You instantly picked it up. He did that wrong. That happens all the time when we're reading ancient scripture. That we've got to be tuned in and be humble enough to say,
Okay, okay, I'm in this foreign land.
I need to be respectful of cultures, customs,
languages, euphemisms, colloquialisms.
And where can I go for help?
Well, sometimes we're going to connect to the Book of Mormon,
which is going to help us understand it.
We're going to triangulate it with the doctrine and covenants,
with the Perlegray Price, and other things.
That'll help us.
That's my number six.
Yeah.
Occasionally.
It's definitely not the majority of our listeners,
but occasionally we'll hear from someone who will say,
I don't do podcasts.
I want to go straight to the source myself.
I really, and it's highly critical.
And I get that.
I get that.
When it comes to things like that, idioms in the Old Testament.
Yeah.
The only place I've learned them is from those who have studied this, those who speak Hebrew.
And I remember Elder Ballard saying, use these resources that we have in the church.
He even said it, a BYU devoid.
I go to the experts here at BYU when I want to know about some history.
I can find the exact quote for you.
I am not saying that podcasts are the great, you got to listen to a come follow me podcast
if you really want to know the scriptures.
But one of the reasons we do what we do is to provide Ross speaks Hebrew.
He's going to show us some things.
I don't care how many times I read it.
I would never see it because I don't speak Hebrew.
That's true.
I love what you're saying.
I listen to your podcast, by the way.
I love the insights of the scholars, of people that know the text that have paid a price.
It inspires me than to go dig deeper in the source.
Exactly.
I cannot tell you how many times I have been inspired by one of your guests to go then dig deeper for myself.
And then, again, I know and understand.
I take effect of righteous action, and I become more like my Heavenly Father, which is deep learning.
Inspired by someone who's paid a price. Yeah, there's nothing wrong with that. That's awesome.
Where is it in the book of Acts, where someone's reading the book of Isaiah?
Do you understand what you're reading?
Philip the eunuch, yeah. Someone should guide me. Yeah. We've all said that, right?
Do you understand you're reading? No, absolutely not. Well, let me help you.
Well, just keep trying. Bye. Yeah.
Keep reading the same thing over and over.
Right.
No, that's awesome.
Thank you for saying that.
Hank, I'm glad you said that.
I got to teach a class at FSY this year.
That was really fun.
And one of the classes they ask every teacher to share, one of the beginning classes,
is to learn to use trusted sources beyond your standard works.
I remember a time when I had a couple of converts in my class,
Guess how long they had been members when they got in my class? Two weeks. Suddenly, I'm trying to listen with their ears. That's super, super helpful. That's great. I want to bring up the Joseph Smith translation. Please, please, please use the Joseph Smith translation. It's footnoted or it's in your appendix. I was wondering if we could for a moment go to Section 35 of the Doctrine Covenant.
Some people don't fully get what the Joseph Smith translation is.
This verse is power.
Section 35 of the doctrine in covenants.
This is New York, December 1830.
Now, we just got out of Doctrine Covenants, so you guys know that Oliver Cowdery,
Parley P. Pratt, Peter Whitmer, and Ebas Peterson have gone on a mission, and they stopped
in Kirtland, baptized, I think, 127 people in a couple of weeks.
one of them was Sidney Rigdon.
Sidney Rigdon is so excited.
He's going to leave Kurtland, go up to Palmyra, and try to meet Joseph.
And he does, he meets Joseph, and we get Section 35 of the Doctrine and Covenants.
In it, verse 20, he's going to say, this is the first verse about what the Joseph Smith
translation is.
I'm reading Section 35, verse 20.
In a commandment I give unto thee, that is Sidney, that thou, Sydney, shall write for him,
Joseph. The Book of Mormon's already been translated. We're not talking about that. Oliver's on a
mission. Oliver was the scribe, essentially. Others people were too, but Oliver essentially. And the
scriptures shall be given, even as they are in mine own bosom to the salvation of mine own elect.
Now notice, the scripture shall be given even as they are in my own bosom. Not even as they are in
ancient manuscripts, not even as they are in original Hebrew or original Greek or whatever the person
spoke, I use the Joseph Smith translations, and I think there's some verses that without it
would be highly problematic figuring out who God is, who we are, and who Satan is.
Go to Exodus chapter four. This is when Moses has been called, he doesn't really want to be
the prophet, but the Lord is called him, and he's going to go before Pharaoh. The King James
chapter 4 verse 21 says quote and the lord said into moses when thou goest to return into egypt see that thou do all those
wonders before pharaoh which i have put in thine hand but i will harden his heart that he shall not let the
people go theologically that's a problem because again we're back john on what you said about agency
about free will god's hardening hearts yeah god's hardening his heart what chance does pharaoh have now if you look at
footnote 21c, it actually reads,
which I have put in thine hand,
and I will prosper thee,
but Pharaoh will harden his heart
and he will not let the people go.
Wow. Thank you. Problem solved.
I don't have to tie myself up in yoga positions
trying to figure out what's going on there
theologically.
I can now understand via a prophet.
Again, as I teach,
I'm always going to the JST,
always going to the JST.
If there's a JST, I'm using it.
And I actually think it's one of the witnesses
of the prophet Joseph Smith
and of his divine mission.
I do. I find it powerful.
Use scripture study helps.
Use, I love what you said, John,
about trusted resources.
Use Bible Hub.
Use the blue letter Bible.
Use the words of living prophets
via the citation index
and use the Joseph Smith translation.
Okay, so that's number seven.
Let me ask you a quick question.
Where do you go for other versions of the Bible?
I particularly like Bible Hub,
Not a Latter-day Saint site.
I use blue letterbibble.org.
It's also free.
What I like about it, I've used it for a long time.
I love Bible Hub as well.
But I can click on Bibles,
and I can get 27 different versions of that verse
and just do a comparison.
It's powerful.
So whether it's the NIV, the ASB, the RSV,
or any other version, I can look quickly and compare.
I want to throw one more thing at you,
and this isn't really Old Testament,
but it is going to come up.
Occasionally, a student, a friend will ask me,
wait, wait, wait,
Joseph Smith changed something in Isaiah to say this.
Yet it doesn't say that in the Book of Mormon.
So I've got a version of Isaiah in the Bible.
I've got a JST version,
and then I've got a Book of Mormon version,
and all three of them are different.
That's a question that I've been asked many, many times.
So either of you want to take that on?
So when Moroni shows up,
he quotes the Malachi prophecy and he quotes it in a particular way and then Joseph in section
128 he'll say I'm going to write it this way because it suits my purposes I could have written
a different way but it's fine the way it is now I think that's super interesting that there is a
latitude with the Holy Ghost with prophets and with particular peoples at particular times
to hear things a particular way Joseph used to say don't put stakes around the almighty in other words
don't put limits around the Almighty. If he wants us to understand Malachi in this particular way,
cool. And then Moronai, speaking by the power of the Holy Ghost, Second Nephi 32-3,
he can then expand it for a different particular way, and then Joseph the Prophet can use it his way as well.
And I think that's totally perfectly fine. That would be my response.
The way I've tried to explain it, and you guys tell me if I'm right, is sometimes we think
the scriptures have to be one way. It's static. I want to find the,
earliest form, you know, that's, what do they call it, textual criticism. I want to find the
earliest one, and that one's the most true. Well, what if a prophet comes along and says,
well, I'm going to make that a little clearer. It's not that one is untrue. It's just that
another one gives you more insight, just like what you said. He quoted Malachi differently.
I will plant in the hearts of the children the promises made to the fathers. It's a more
dynamic thing. All of those are true, and we can learn from all of them. It's not that
there's one correct and one false. Also, Ross, tell us something about if you could rename the
Joseph Smith translation, what might you call it? The Joseph Smith, is it always translating lost
text? No, no. In fact, I think I'm so glad you asked that. I actually think Joseph Smith
translation, the word translation can create some problems because I've translated Hebrew to English.
I use a lexicon and I use verb charts and I use a computer and I use what people in the past have
said. That's not what Joseph's doing. We're going to use the word translate and it's very loose.
That's why I always go to section 35 verse 20. I'm going to reveal to my servant Joseph the things
that are in my own bosom, not things that are in ancient manuscripts necessarily. Right?
Now, section seven of the doctrine covenants? It could be. It absolutely could be. But what if we got
an original Matthew, like what if somebody said, this is the original Matthew? And we might look at
the JSTs. They might not be exactly the same. And I would be 100% fine. He never claimed he was doing
that. We don't want to make claims for Joseph that Joseph's not making for himself. I love John that
you brought that up. And I bring that up with my classes. Super important to understand. By the way,
the book of Abraham. One of the big problems is when people talk about the book of Abraham is they get into a
conversation where they want to stake out ground about translating. Well, Joseph isn't translating
the way Egyptologists translate. I'm not criticizing Egyptologists. I'm glad there's Egyptologists.
We know a few. Yeah. And they're amazing. But Joseph's not claiming to do that. Yeah.
Thank you for saying that. Sometimes I think I want to call it the Joseph Smith clarification or the
Joseph Smith revelation. And sometimes, yeah, maybe that is original text. We could get.
get so fastened to the words and the oldest text that when Jesus comes and says something,
we're going to go, hey, wait a minute, give me chapter on verse on that.
You imagine.
I think that's probably a bad idea.
When the word shows up and gives us the word, he's going to give us more.
We're not going to say, I don't know where you got that.
Show me chapter and verse.
That would be a bad idea.
I would add that we really have to get rid of the idea that there is a correct way.
Like there is one correct way.
Ross, that scripture you mentioned, how many times does it come up in scripture?
I will send you the prophet.
I will send it.
And it's almost different every single time.
I guarantee if I had all them in front of me, I'd say, Lord, which one's right?
And he would say, ah, all of them.
I like this one for this reason.
I like this one for this reason.
Yeah.
What didn't he say later?
I could have rendered a plainer translation.
I could have said bind or seal instead of turn.
I would love to see Maroni going, you'd render it.
differently, huh? Yeah, I like how you said it, but I would say it this way. And then Malachi
comes over and says, actually, why don't we talk to the original guy? Yeah. I love it, Ross.
Let's see scripture is very fluid. Dynamic, fluid, dynamic, and prophetically, not static,
prophetically guided. I'm going to read something from President Oaks. Is that okay, when he was
elder oaks quote if we harden our hearts reject continuing revelation and limit our learning to
what we can obtain by study and reason on the precise language of the present canon of scriptures
our understanding will be limited to what alma called the lesser portion of the word
the lord promised nephi unto him that receiveth i will give more and from them that shall say we have
enough from them shall be taken away even that which they have. Second E. 25, 2830. That verse capsulizes
the Latter-day Saint belief in the importance of continuing revelation as we read and interpret
scriptures. Even if there were no additional revelation to be added to the published canon, an open
canon would still be an essential part of our belief and practice in scripture reading. We believe
that the scriptures, which are a revelation of the past, cannot be understood without open,
Openness to the revelations of the present, unquote.
Beautiful.
I want to give the reference.
It's Dalin H. Oaks, Scripture Reading and Revelation, N-Sign, January 1995.
Oh, love it.
And that goes along with Dr. Millett's experience.
The canon is open.
Exactly.
Aren't we thrilled about that?
I tell my students, if we get more scriptures, you're going to have a lot more of these religion classes.
Well, also, I don't know if you guys remember.
but John, you brought up when I did that, those community firesides. And in one of my statements I
made, I said, the church isn't based on the Bible. It's based on what the Bible is based on,
and that's Revelation through prophets. And then the guy asked me, well, is the church based on the
Book of Mormon? And I said, nope, it's based on the Book of Mormon's based on Revelation through
prophets. That is absolutely critical to understand. That is the most powerful position you can be in,
And by the way, the church is not based on the Bible.
It's based on what the Bible is based on revelation through prophets.
Boom, pow.
After you offended everyone else in the room.
Exactly.
Ross, tell me, I mean, you've had interaction with many, many different faiths.
Joseph Smith, how is he in 18, 1830?
What is he, 25?
1830 is 24.
He comes along and says, let me change the Bible.
Yep.
The audacity.
Yeah.
It's kind of like Jesus comes along.
You've heard it said of old time, this, but I say this.
Who does he think he is?
Actually, he knows who he is.
Yep, he does know who he is.
Yeah.
I'm going to say number eight, this is really critical because expectations,
if they're false, then they're not met and then we get all disappointed.
Don't expect the Old Testament to present a thorough and precise history of humankind.
That's not its intent.
That's not what the original authors and compilers we're trying to do.
And, and, and, that is really not an ancient world way to think.
They're not trying to create a linear historical thing.
So people are like, wait, what's going on?
We don't have to worry about that.
It's not a precise history of humankind.
That's not what it is.
That's not what they wanted.
And that's really an expectation thing.
You don't have to worry about it.
We're okay. We're totally okay.
Ross, as you and I talked about coming on for these thoughts to keep in mind lessons,
I know you were interested, you went right to the manual, and there you just quoted it.
Don't expect the Old Testament to present a thorough and precise history of humankind.
A little bit later, did all of the prophets, poets, compilers?
No, their words would be read by people all over the world thousands of years later?
We don't know.
But we marvel that this is exactly what happened.
Nations, rose and fell, cities were conquered.
Kings lived and died, but the Old Testament,
outlasted them all. I like that. What's your expectation coming in? That same idea specifically for
oh, the creation story. Was the creation story to present the scientific methods that God used
to make the universe? Yeah. Or is it a story to get something else from? Because we have how many
different creation accounts? Pearl of Great Price and the temple and Genesis, they don't have to
match perfectly because that's not the intent. That's not the intent.
intent. No, that's exactly right. Beautiful. Number nine, sometimes we want our prophets to be
perfect. Right. We want the House of Israel to be perfect. We want all these things to be a particular
way. Why? Because we have expectations about what a prophet ought to be or what people that follow
Jesus ought to be. But we're all in this thing trying to work it out. One of the coolest things
about the Old Testament is it doesn't sanitize the text. You get Genesis 27 and Isaac's kind of
senile, Rebecca's like, you need a blessing. I don't know if dad's going to give you the right
blessing and we're in a million different machinations to try to get the blessing. And you know what
my take is at the end of Genesis 27 is that everyone got the blessing they were going to get
anyway. By the way, with saying that, I'm not trying to criticize Isaac, Rebecca. I am going to
criticize Jacob a little bit in this one, and Esau. The idea is that they made mistakes. It's okay.
It's okay. And the Lord works through that. You don't have to sanitize it. We don't have to make it
perfect. Then teaching wise, you don't have to go out of your way to try to make it perfect.
Students will be like, but wait, did Jacob lie? Yeah, he did. Yeah, he did. Well, is that okay?
No. And in fact, over the next five chapters, he's going to get karma like you don't
even believe he's going to be lied to and deceived in multiple ways then he becomes a different
person he actually raises up and becomes a different person wrestles with god gets a new name
and becomes the man he needed to become he lied it's okay like that's that's what the text says
i say don't try to sanitize the text let the text speak which will by the way elevate god
It elevates God working through imperfect human beings, points to the perfection, beauty, grandeur, and majesty of Jesus Christ, and allows human beings to be human beings.
So when your bishop doesn't say hi to you as he's walking down the hallway, don't leave the church.
He's working through it as well.
He's trying to figure stuff out.
And if president, you know, the church is older, that's okay.
God is using these human beings who he trusts to do his work.
My number nine is don't try to sanitize the text.
Russ, play that out in a seminary class or a Sunday school class.
Why is this so important?
And it is.
Yeah, I think it's so critical.
I believe in a seminary class and in a gospel doctrine class, it will be refreshing to members
when you let the text stand and then just pull back and say, what are the principles?
What points of doctrine did we learn from that text?
don't try to push it because what we try to do then is like, well, what he meant was or what he said was, but that's not what the text said.
Then we start setting up a false idol almost and then it's too easy to knock down.
So don't do it. Just don't do it. It's refreshing. Especially young people, 18 to 30 years old, they want it.
They want the truth, unvarnished, kind of J. Ruman Clark. You don't have to sneak up on them.
You don't have to whisper it in their ears. They just want it out there. So you're reading Genesis 27.
It's a funky story.
I'm like, down, let's go, let's bring it.
The principle in the end that everyone got the blessing they would have got anyway, that's power.
When Isaac laid his hands on those heads, he gave the blessing.
God can do his work.
Don't sanitize the text.
It's there for a reason.
This is a New Testament reference.
James and John want to blow up a Samaritan village.
Let's blow him up.
That is, that's what they suggested to Jesus, right?
That's genocide.
Do you want to blow up this race?
And if you say, wow, that's not really what they meant.
They're actually really, nope, that's what they said.
That's what they said.
Yeah, that's what they said.
That's what they meant.
They end up teaching Samaritans.
And they end up baptizing.
In fact, remember, they baptized as Acts chapter 8, this whole area in Samaria, and they didn't know what the Holy Ghost was.
So Peter James and John have to come up and confer the Holy Ghost.
So it's a beautiful bookend there. I love that. So great. I like that. Let it say what it says.
Yesterday, I was teaching the book of Mark. And as an intro, I used what somebody quoted on our podcast. Hank, Julie M. Smith had this great introduction from BYU New Testament Commentary.com.
She says this beautiful introduction about discipleship and says, okay, let's look at the book of Mark. The disciples didn't understand the parables.
They fought with each other.
They asked who was the greatest in the kingdom of God.
They actually turned Jesus in.
I guess one of them did.
And she goes through this list of how they are struggling to figure out how to be disciples.
I love what you said, Ross.
We don't need to sanitize that.
So are we.
We're struggling with what it means to be disciples too.
Exactly.
The new married couple where they're working out stuff in their marriage or the new missionary
or the new seminary teacher, and they're like, I'm not perfect. Well, you're working through it.
Like, it's okay. This is awesome. Give yourself some grace. The Lord's given us grace. That's not an
excuse to be mediocre, but it's an opportunity for us to realize that prophets, apostles.
In fact, you brought up John, which one is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven? What do you think
they really want to know? They want to know which one of them, Jesus, it's you, Peter. And Peter's like,
I told you guys, I told you it was me, he called me the rock.
And Jesus is like, I called you the rock because you sank when you walked on water.
You're misinterpreting why I called you rock, okay?
That's not why I called you rock.
I've never heard that.
I just think it's cute that like, yeah, it shows it unvarnished.
Yeah.
Ross, is this more than almost any other book of scripture?
Yes, by far.
The Old Testament in terms of sanitizing does not sanitize.
It shows us in all the glory of our weakness, our human frailty, and our fallenness.
Going back to the Book of Mormon in an Old Testament setting, here's this perfect family
that listens to the Jerusalem Tabernacle Choir as they travel across the Arabian Peninsula.
No, it's actually, let's kill Dad.
No, let's kill Nephi.
Hey, let's kill Dad and Nephi.
You can imagine, hey, Lehi, what are you writing there?
Well, Sarai, I'm writing down all of our family problems.
really what are you going to do with that send it to every nation kindred tongue and people oh yeah that's
great there's a couple of main themes we can keep in mind old testament has some things these aren't
exhaustive but i'm going to give three main ones god will fight our battles number two covenants
and number three sacrifice again there are other themes clearly all tying to jesus christ but man
one of them is, and we miss this a little bit, that when we're in the covenant, God will fight our
battles. He's going to take us through and make it work for us, whatever that battle might be.
There is this thing about sacrifice that is critical to the Old Testament. By the way, our Protestant
friends who we love and we will call them Christians, but the idea of a covenant requires
mutual voluntarily. We enter into a covenant. We bind ourselves to the Savior. We make covenants
and ordinances and stuff has to be done. That Old Testament idea transfers into the New Testament
and to the Book of Mormon and of course the Prologer Prize and the Doctrine Convents.
That's my 10th one, is you've got to understand some overall meta themes that are going on
while you're getting into the details and in the weeds. God will fight our battles, that God
is in covenant relationship with us. There is a law of sacrifice, pointing to the ultimate sacrifice
of Jesus Christ. It's a good thing we're in a covenant relationship with him, because I think he would
have walked away a long time ago if he weren't in a covenant relationship with us. You guys can't do
anything right. I love the idea of thinking of a covenant as a relationship, not just a contract.
Because if we think of a contract, I think a piece of paper, I sign it, I'd put it on the shelf.
When it's a relationship, I feel a loyalty to Christ.
It makes me think differently about my covenants when it's a relationship.
And I like that I hear more of us talking about covenants that way instead of contract.
Super helpful, by the way.
Super helpful.
I love what you said, because if you read Genesis, God says this, you're my family.
This family's going to bless all the families.
By the end, you're thinking, he better get a new family.
Like this is, you Joe's the worst family.
Yeah.
Ross, one of my friends, her name is Hillary Wright.
She was listening four years ago to our show.
And she said, Hank, I got so tired of Hesed, Hesed this, has said that.
Hesed is a theme that comes up over and over and over.
It's just not translated like that.
Can you speak to that kind of theme?
Yes, I can.
That's the idea of the covenant relationship.
And in fact, in my personal prayers, I don't want to sound trite, but I actually say, I'm grateful for thy chesed towards me.
Thy everlasting kindness, thy grace, thy generosity, thy tender mercies.
There's a latitude in that translation.
But I love what you said, John.
Loyalty.
He's not given up on us.
If we don't give up on him, when I have a young man or a young woman come to me and they're struggling with some particular issue and I'm serving as the bishop right now,
They'll say, should I partake of the sacrament Sunday?
Often, I'll say, are you willing to take upon yourself the name of Christ?
If you're planning on sinning on Tuesday, that's a mockery.
But if you're willing, then God's willing.
And they'll say, well, what if I make a mistake?
That's not what the covenant's about.
That loyalty transcends you making a mistake.
But if you're willing, then we're going to the mat for you.
I said, I as a bishop will go to the mat for you.
The Lord will go to the mat for you.
If it's a mockery, if you're planning premeditated sin, that's not what we're talking about.
That Chesed relationship, that loyalty, no, we don't kick you out of the covenant.
Uh-uh, not happening.
We're going to work with you and we're going to do everything, literally everything, Jacob
Chapter 5, what more could I have done for my vineyard?
What more could I have done for you?
And the answer always is, there's nothing more I could have done.
I've done everything.
That is chesed.
We work things out.
There's loyalty and you work things out.
and you repent and you keep coming back.
I always know the difference between the Holy Ghost and Satan.
And one of the ways I know the difference is,
if the voice in my head is give up,
stop trying, throw in the towel, that's Satan.
I have been rebuked by the Holy Ghost, by the way.
I go on record, the Holy Ghost has rebuked me.
But in the rebuke, always whispers hope.
Always.
Satan never whispers hope.
Give it up. You're not good enough. You might as well do that now that you've done this. That's Satan. This idea, Hank, that you brought up with your friend. It is central, central and so critical. And by the way, hopeful. One of the questions in the endorsement interview for church education, it's an open-ended question, which I really love. It is, what does the atonement of Jesus Christ and of his role as your savior and redeemer mean to you? Then as a priested leader, you just shut up.
To hear the responses of the students is miraculous.
A lot of them will center around the opportunity that the Atonement of Jesus Christ gives me to change, to be better, to become something different, and to have hope.
That idea, God will fight our battles.
I feel with my limited understanding of Isaiah, it's like, don't make alliances with other nations.
Make the alliance with me.
I will fight your battles.
For a teenager, I'm thinking,
Brother Brad Wilcox,
you got this because he's got you.
Thankfully, that loyalty goes both ways.
He's going to be loyal to us
and help us through things.
That's kind of like Hesed.
Yeah.
Well, and I think it's interesting
what you said, John,
when the Assyrians are surrounding Jerusalem
and they're like, what do we do?
Nothing.
Isaiah says, be quiet.
Don't do anything.
God's going to fight your battle.
Wait a minute, we shouldn't do anything.
Be an alliance with him, with God, trust God.
He's going to take care of it.
Really?
Nothing?
Are you serious?
Because they're right there, and there's a lot of them.
Their campfires are burning.
Yeah, don't do anything.
I'm going to take care of this.
Power.
It'll be all right.
It'll be okay.
Now that we've done the top 10 on thoughts to keep in mind,
I thought it might be fun to do a little modeling.
Let's go look at a couple of texts and have some fun.
Let's go to Genesis chapter 22.
Genesis 22, if you know your Genesis, which apparently Hank's upset about, you know your Genesis.
I know my genesis.
This is when God, this is the Isaac Abraham situation.
So we all there, Genesis chapter 22, verse 1.
And it came to pass after these things.
Now, that phrase, and it came to pass after these things, in Hebrew, it's by,
that specific phrase shows up eight times.
Eight times.
You might have thought, wait, no, it shows up more.
And it came to pass, shows up 328 times.
And it came to pass after these things shows up eight times.
And check it out in the context of Abraham, Joseph, Joshua, and Elijah.
How about them prophets?
That's where the phrase,
and it came to pass after these things shows up.
It begs the question, what things?
The narrator who's ever writing Genesis 22,
presumably either Moses is or Moses is redacting
or editing some other manuscript.
Whoever does this is saying it came to pass after these things
and then we're going to introduce the text.
The question is what things?
The life of Abraham.
Look, people, we met Abraham in Genesis 11.
this man has been through everything he's been through every trial every test and passed with flying colors here it is and it came to pass after these things what are we going to do now what are we going to do now isn't he done so then it says this that god did tempt Abraham is where your footnote comes into play look down at the bottom for tempt the Hebrew says test or prove
The verb is the wrong translation.
The verb is nassah.
That means test, prove, try.
It came to pass after these things
and it came to pass after these things
that God did try, test, prove Abraham.
Hasn't he been tested, tried, and proved enough?
We don't have it in English.
But in Hebrew, ancient Hebrew, biblical Hebrew,
the verb comes first, then the subject.
In English we say, the subject comes first than a verb.
But in biblical Hebrew, the verb comes first.
Hebrew, the verb comes first, unless there's emphasis.
And in this case that God did tempt Abraham, the subject came first.
Elohim comes first.
Veha Elohim, Nisah et Abraham, which is, and God did try, test, prove Abraham.
I'm going to even say something different.
This is me playing rabbi a little bit here, okay?
The word Nassah, which is try test prove, is in the Piel form of Hebrew, which is the intensive
form and it pretty much only shows up in the intensive form but i was thinking about this because
abraham who we rent in genesis chapter 11 has literally shown himself loyal and in the covenant always
so what's going on here perhaps another word for try test prove would be train he's going to train him
okay now think think think we know what's going to happen in genesis 22 he's going to be asked
to offer his son.
Then it begs the question,
if you're training, training for what?
Training to become like God.
God's going to have to do this
and it came to pass after these things.
What things?
This amazing life you've led, Abraham.
Do we have to try you more?
I don't think so.
I don't think it's try, test prove.
I think it's training ground now.
We're talking elite Navy SEAL training.
We're talking, you are,
the elite now. Jacob chapter 4, verse 5 in the book of Mormon. This is in the similitude of the
sacrifice of the only begotten of the father. When it came to pass after these things, God subject
did train Abraham. The narrator knows we don't know yet. And you're like, what's going to happen
now? And said unto him, Abraham, behold, here I am. And I can't help myself. I got to go to verse
too. Okay, now the English, take now thy son, thine only son, Isaac, whom thou love us. The Hebrew
leaves Isaac to the end. The Hebrew leaves Isaac to the end. I can't help myself. Can I do it in
Hebrew? John? Okay. Please do. It's it's kachna. It's kachna. It's kachna. It's kachna. At
Bincha, et Yehidachah, Asher Ahavta, at Yitzhak.
Okay, in other words, Isaac, you heard Yitzhak.
Isaac is at the end.
The Hebrew is, take now by son, thine only son, whom thou lovest, dot, dot, dot, Isaac.
Because he's got two sons.
He's got two sons.
So it begs the question, wait a minute, your only son?
What, you're only, Yehidehah?
Why is it your only son when you have another son?
Get thee into the land of Moriah.
in Jerusalem, offer him there for a what?
By the way, it's caused him to be offered up
for a burnt offering, an Ola offering,
the consuming offering.
This is pre-mosaic.
This is you got to do, like in Leviticus chapter 1,
I don't know if you're aware,
but the way you would have do an offering
is you're going to slit the throat,
bleed the person out,
basically cut them up in different parts
so that you have the head,
you have the torso, you have the legs,
and then you have the innards,
all laid in order on the altar,
and then you 100% burn it,
so that it completely is consumed and goes up to God.
That is the Ola offering or the burnt offering.
That's what's going on right now.
Now, one thing I want to say,
in the English text,
take neither sign, the only sign from the left,
it says, kachna.
Now, nah in Hebrew can be translated as please.
And it doesn't get in here,
and I don't know why,
but it's the only place I know where God,
says please when he gives a command it's the only place i know where the lord says please because remember
and it came to pass after these things abraham has been tried he has been tested he has been proven
but now we're going into training we're going into a higher level now he's going to say in
verse two kakhna ad binkha take please thy son thine only son whom thou love us isaac and you're
going to do this why because jacob chapter four verse five it's going to be in similar to
of my only begotten son.
There's a case where we slow down,
look at the test, ask some questions,
and it came to pass after these things,
seems like a formulaic thing,
like no big deal,
but actually I think there's something to it.
It's wonderful.
I'm looking at footnote to be on the word,
thine only son,
and John 316,
God so loved the world
that he gave his only begotten son.
And so the similitude you're talking about, even using the word only there.
That bird offering, that was pretty graphic what you talked about there.
But let it say what it says.
That's what you told us.
Yeah, exactly.
Don't sanitize the text.
By the way, that's what Abraham says.
Like, look at verse three.
And Abraham rose up early in the morning.
Vajakim babboker.
By the way, he didn't have to use that.
The narrator could have said he got up.
But he doesn't get up.
He gets up early in the morning.
Abraham is on a different level.
He hears the command.
He vayashkems in the boker.
He gets up, that was some gringo Hebrew right there.
He gets up early in the morning to be obedient to the command of God.
So powerful.
And then it doesn't seem like they're saying anything.
Like there's no text until verse four.
He lifts up his eyes on the third day.
This is a pretty sober trip.
They don't have Hank along and John having fun.
We're just trudging towards Mariah.
That's an interesting thing.
Anyway, that is one way of slowing down, looking at a text, digging deep, finding connections and asking questions of the text.
Again, pretty formulaic, and it came to pass after these things.
We blow by that.
But I always taught my class and go, what things?
What are we talking about?
Abraham.
We met him in Genesis 11.
This is Genesis 22, people.
You realize who we're talking about?
Wow, incredible.
I love it.
Do you have another couple of examples for us that we're going to practice?
I do.
Let's go to 2nd Samuel in Chapter 11.
The greatest king of Israel.
The first king was Saul.
If you know your Old Testament, then you had David, then you have Solomon.
Before Saul, it was a reign of judges, and one of the greatest judges was Samuel.
who's a prophet.
In 1 Samuel chapter 8, he doesn't want the people to have a king.
You guys are know the story.
And they clamor for a king.
He says, okay, we're going to give you a king, but man, you guys are going to be a problem.
He lets them act, just like you're saying, right?
Exactly.
The way history was is not the way history had to be.
One of the great lines of President Henry V. Iring in an interview was when he was asked about keeping the commandments.
And he said, I want to do what.
God prefers not what he permits.
That is a fabulous, wonderful way to think about it.
Because when you're with young people,
they'll ask you about lines.
And then I always bring up the present iron quote.
Let's do what God prefers, not what he permits.
It's a helpful way.
It's a helpful frame.
And your point, John, like, 1 Samuel 8,
he preferred they not have a king.
But he permitted their use of agency
and gave them a king.
but he warned them.
So here we are in Second Samuel 11.
Can you see the Lord going?
Okay, okay.
It's going to take us about 2,500 years to recover from this decision, but let's go for it.
Right.
Your call, though.
Your call.
Yeah.
Second Samuel 11, for Latter-day Saints, a critical story.
Some of our other friends and different religions don't love Second Samuel 11 and 12.
It's a super important story.
So, and it came to pass, after the year.
was expired. Now, again, we got to be careful. We read that in an English context and think,
oh, it's January 1, right? It's the new year. No, for them, the new year is in the spring.
Technically, that would have been Aviv is spring. This would have been, and it came past after the
year was expired, we're talking spring. At the time when kings go forth to battle, because they
didn't fight traditionally during winter. That David sent Joab and his servants with him in all
Israel and they destroyed the children of Amman, so that's over in Jordan, and besieged Rabah over
in Jordan, then this line from the narrator, whoever's narrating in Second Samuel, but David
tarried still at Jerusalem. If you're teaching this or you're studying this, you better slow down
right here. And you've got to ask some questions. And the question has to be, why is David staying
at Jerusalem if they're fighting in Amman? And you textualize it. This is a warrior king. He's not
afraid. I said, David is not. Oh, my word, I'm going to stay at Jerusalem. I'm afraid. This is a
warrior king. Him staying at Jerusalem violates my mantra, which is be where you're supposed to be
when you're supposed to be there. If you be where you're supposed to be there, it will eliminate
most problems in your life. And he's not where he's supposed to be when he's supposed to be there.
He is tearing in Jerusalem, which is weird. He's not with his guy. He's not with his guy. He's
The years passed, and it's not like he needs a rest from war.
He's had all winter.
And it came to past in an even tide that David arose from off his bed.
You got to stop there.
What's strange about that?
He's been sleeping before the evening comes.
Boom.
He's just lazing around playing video games and hanging out in his bed.
He's getting up at evening.
Do you get this picture?
Are we getting a picture?
Like, that's weird.
What are you doing?
What's going on?
It came to pass an even tide
that David arose from off his bed.
Yikes.
He's not a teenage boy,
but he's acting like one.
And he walked upon the roof of the king's house.
Now, the word walk,
this would be a little harder,
but I'm going to throw it out.
The word walk there,
the word walk in Hebrew is halach.
But this is Vajit halak.
Vajit halak is a verb form
which is intensive, reflexive.
And this is not my.
favorite translation. Think about it, you guys. What would be a way to translate walk in
intensive reflexive? He's just been sleeping all day. He's on the roof and he's Vyit halakking on the
roof. What's another word you might put in there? Pacing. Pacing. That's the word I translate.
He's like a caged lion in my view. And I don't totally know why he's a caged lion. I don't
know if he's seen something before or what's going on or he's a caged lion because he knows he
shouldn't be there but my point is we're reading the text carefully and we're asking questions of the
text he's tearing in jerusalem he's getting up late and he's witt halakhing on the gag which is the
roof he's pacing back and forth there's a battle going on from the roof he saw a woman
washing herself and the woman was very beautiful to look upon you have both been to Jerusalem
you've been to the city of David. The king's house was higher up and the city slopes down to the pool
of Siloam. There's a big slope and you have the Gihon Spring. So it's sloping down. It's just
south of the Temple Mount. He's up on something at King's house, his roof, and he's able to look down
and see a woman bathing. Now, bathing practices in ancient times, especially pre-Roman, pretty primitive.
You're going to bathe in a spring or a river or a well, and if you're going to bathe at home, then it's going to usually be in some kind of basin and you're going to be basically doing a sponge bath or you're going to be using oil on your hair, like olive oil, and they had this one thing where they would scrape their skin, but it wouldn't be that often.
It could be, in the case of this woman, a purification ritual from her menstrual cycle.
So there might be that going on. Does that make sense? But the fact that he's now looking at this woman who's bathing, he has a choice. He has free will. We're back to agency. He can choose right there to check himself. As Alma would say, cross yourself in these things. Don't go after the lust of your eyes. Alma chapter 39. And David sent and inquired after the woman. I'm in verse three. And one said, now look at one. One is italical.
Italicized.
Italicized means what?
It means this is where the KJV authors put a word in to make it flow, but it's not really there.
It's not in the text.
And David sent inquired after the woman and said, if I read it that way, who's saying this?
David is to himself, maybe?
Maybe to himself or whoever he's talking to, is not this Bathsheba, the daughter of Eliam, the wife of Uriah the Hittite.
In other words, it's framed as a question.
but it's really rhetorical if in fact I'm reading it correctly. Does that make sense? If I take out the one
and I say and said, he already knows who it is. Okay, now wait, wait, wait, wait. By the way, we should
Batshiva. The Hebrew word Batshiba means daughter of the covenant. The wife of Yeraya. Yeraya
Uriya is the light of Jehovah. Don't kill the light of Jehovah. Don't do that.
Uriah, the Hittite, so it must be a convert or something like that.
Here's the interesting thing.
Bathsheba's dad, Eliam, and Yariah are both, in 2nd Samuel 23, there's a list of David's 30 mighty men.
These are like his elite core soldiers, special forces guys.
They were his comrades and they were his quote unquote,
French buddies before he actually became king. You with me? So Eliam and Yariah are his 30 mighty men.
But wait, it gets more. Eliam's dad is Ahithafil who was David's personal counselor.
Ahithafil, his son is Eliam. His daughter is Bashiba. He took his close friend's wife,
daughter, granddaughter. I know. You thought it couldn't have gotten.
worse. The point, though, is I think part of the point of the story is the betrayal. It's a complete
betrayal of relationships, a complete betrayal of covenant. It's a complete betrayal of light that just
adds to the pathos of this story. Once you understand and dig a little deeper and figure out who
these people are, it's not just some thing. I personally believe he knew who Bathsheba was. Clearly he
does because Hithafil is his, like, trusted counselor.
Uri and Eliam were his mighty comrades in war.
Now he's got this particular situation.
I'm trying to model a bit of a close reading of a text,
looking at context, looking at relationships,
and trying to understand, what can we learn here?
What can we learn here?
There's a lot more you can say about that,
but I think that's good for now on that text.
Go slow and let it say what it says.
Let us say what it says and ask questions.
You could say, who's a Hithafil?
Now you have sources where you could go to, for example, the LDS citation index, go to scriptures, and you could have searched Hithafil.
Then you would have figured out, whoa, that's Eliam's dad and Bathsheba's his granddaughter.
Wait, he's David's trusted counselor.
Yikes.
And it changes the story.
It's more impact.
It's more.
It does.
More impact.
It's more betrayal.
I remember as a teenager when I put it together.
that the same David who slew Goliath was this David and it was kind of a gut punch. I was like,
but wait a minute. It's a hard day. It's a hard day. I love what you said too about,
I want you to say more about that. It's sloping. You could probably see everybody's roof
from up there. Yep. Anybody who's been to the city of David and if you go to where the king's house was,
it would have afforded you a total opportunity to see everyone below had they gone outside and been on the roof or been bathing.
Like it would have been an easy look.
You guys know, so it goes from high up here, slopes all the way down.
Again, the pool of Siloam is south.
The Gihon Spring is south and then east, all of that water would have been there.
The fact, again, that she's bathing at home, either it's a purification ritual or she is taking.
a bath, but it would have been more like a sponge bath. There was no like running water.
Again, adds to the story, what's he doing on the roof? Why is he pacing? Why does he stay at
Jerusalem? What's going on in his mind? So many opportunities to stop. Right. To stop. Be where you're
supposed to be when you're, yeah, you'll get to it. Yeah, you'll get to it. Oh, and the thing that's
interesting is they're progressive, a little step and another little step and another little step
instead of, I need to go in the house and sing a hymn, you know?
Sing more than one.
I thought it might be fun.
Go to Psalms.
I wanted to pick a couple of narratives.
Now we're going to go to one that's not a narrative.
This is going to be a verse that is particularly powerful.
And it's Psalms 82.
Okay, Psalms 82.
We know what 82 is.
In 82.6, the translators, they nailed it. Like, the King James guys, they didn't back off on this.
826 says, I have said, ye are gods, and all of you are children of the most high.
Ye are gods, that is literally Elohim. That's what it says. It says, you're Elohim.
Then it says, all of you are Benet, children of Elion. Elion, you hear the word God there.
Elion is the most high God.
Elion.
So L is singular for God.
Elohim is the masculine plural.
The im on the end.
So cherubim is more than one cherub.
The im is the masculine plural.
Ureem and thumbim.
Urim Vetumim is lights and perfections.
Eam, anytime you hear that,
eam, that is the masculine plural.
The feminine plural is Oot.
Mickvot is like baptismal fonts.
Mikva is the singular.
Mickvote are plural.
You with me?
In this case, he's saying,
you are Elohim.
You're all Elohim.
Which means, again,
this is Latter-day Saint theology
is that we are not a different species than God.
We are literal children of God.
And woven within us is the capacity to become like him.
He's saying scripturally, you guys are Elohim.
By the way, we could bring in a thousand rabbis.
That's what the text says.
Now, some will say, some will say, oh, no, no, no, he means judges here.
Your judges.
The context is about judgment and your judges.
Let me say one other thing about Elohim.
Elohim is plural.
All through Genesis 1, 2, and 3, it's Elohim, plural, plural, plural, but we translate it's singular.
The theology on that from a Protestant Christian view and even from a rabbinic view to a certain extent is that Elohim,
Now, listen to what I'm going to say here, I'm actually using their language, is what's called a, quote, plurality of majesty, unquote, meaning that God is too much to be encapsulated in a singular.
Therefore, when we refer to God and his character and who he is, we have to use the plural.
Do you follow that line of logic?
The problem is that's just totally made up.
but it is like yeah it is just 100% made up that's not in the text and god refers to himself in the
singular and l's all over the place it's just made up it's just because it doesn't fit the theology
we're going to say plurality of majesty just quick side note i think joseph had an argument
with his jewish hebrew tutor over that yeah he did where he's like well that's the masculine
plural and he's like yeah but it doesn't really mean that and jose is like no that's precisely what
I think it was Truman Madsen who told that story. He's like, wait, you said this is what it says. Well, that's not what it really says. What do you mean? That's not whatever. You taught me. That's what it says. I know what a masculine plural is when I see one.
You go back to Genesis 126. Let us. That sounds plural like men in our. That sounds plural image. And after hour, that sounds plural. That sounds plural likeness.
And the reason they did that, John, in 26, is because you can't conjugate yourself out of a singular there.
There's no way to make the text make any sense without the plural.
You've got to make all the verbs agree.
So they were just like, yeah, we can't even do it.
And we can't do it.
They were wearing white wigs in very cold weather in England going,
okay, we're just going to make it plural.
I mean, that's all we're going to do.
I don't have a way to get around this.
All in favor.
All in favor, yeah, yeah, yeah.
No one's going to care.
Could you please say that in Hebrew?
I'd love to hear that.
Okay, so here's the Hebrew, which is so powerful.
And it says this.
I get excited.
I'm glad you asked me this.
It says, Ani Amarti.
Now, Ani Amarti, again, subject first.
It's, I have said.
Now, they're trying to say, I have said.
It should really be something like, even I said.
Because when you put the subject first, it's like, trying to say, I'm empowering.
So, Ani Amarti, I, I said.
And watch this.
Elohim Atem
God's you are
Sounds like Yoda a little bit here
It does, yeah
Even I have said
gods you are
Elohim Atem
Atem is the second masculine plural
You are gods
Uvne
Uvne
Elion Kulechem
And children of the most high
All of you
So I blocked it out
Like literally that's what the Hebrew says
That's not controversial
I would love to have like 20
rabbis sit down with me like they're going to be like yep that's the right translation now they
might interpret it differently obviously like theologize it differently but that's what the text says
now people who say oh the context you're not reading it in context this is about judges look in verse one
he's judging them the word judge comes up in verse two and then verse three we're talking about justice
and defending the poor and the needy then we're going to all die like men verse seven then verse eight
judge comes up again. A lot of people, they're going, no, no, no, no, Elohim, that's judges.
Okay, go to John chapter 10. This is where I love where Jesus is like, yeah, this is what I
meant by those verses. By the way, John chapter 8, John chapter 9, John chapter 10, some of the
most intense back and forth with Pharisees. By the way, John never brings up Sadducee. That word does
in the book of John. It's interesting. Yeah, really. Pharisee does, but not Sadducee. Because I think when
he says Pharisee, he wants to go and spit. John is not bashful about who the good guys are and who the
bad guys are in his view. Now we have some colleagues who think we were maybe like overreaching on
the Pharisees, but if John the beloved were here, he'd be spitting. John chapter 10, let's go first 25.
Jesus answered them, I told you and you believe not, the works that I do in my father's name,
they bear witness of me. But ye believe not because you are not.
not of my sheep, as I said unto you. My sheep hear my voice. I know them. They follow me. And I give
unto them eternal life. And they shall never perish. Neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.
And then here it goes. It's getting more intense. My father, which gave them me is greater than all.
And no man is able to pluck them out of my father's hands. Here it comes. I and my father are one.
Dun, dun, done. Then the Jews took up stones again to stone him. Jesus answered,
works have I showed you from my father? For which of those works do you stone me? The Jews answered
saying, for a good work we stone thee not, but for blasphemy, because thou makeest, thou being a man,
makeest thyself God. Jesus answered them, Psalms 82. Is it not written in your law? I said,
ye are gods. He's not saying they're judges. He is literally responding to their accusation that
he's making himself God by quoting the psalms saying we're all Elohim we all have that within us
verse 35 if he called them gods unto whom the word of God came and that scripture cannot be broken
say ye of him whom the father has sanctified and sent into the world thou blasphemous because i said
i'm the son of god boom amazing wow there's an old testament new testament connection
Part of scripture study is to make connections and make sure you understand.
So somebody says, no, no, no, that's not it, man.
It means judges.
And you'd be like, oh, and we get coward into, oh, yeah, that's true.
No, Jesus said it means you're gods.
Have a super good rest of your day.
Yeah.
Right.
Maybe those scholars are just smarter than Jesus.
Maybe.
I love that.
Jesus used that verse to say, no.
clearly he's not talking about judges. I love that. Nope. Otherwise it makes
zero sense. And Ross, part of that skill you taught us was emphasize the things that
Jesus emphasizes. So Psalms I should spend time there. By the way, the quote from Psalms 82
in John 10 precise. Now that's Greek in John 10, but it is the precise translation from the
Greek to the Hebrew. That's what he's referring to. Yeah. That is power. Ross, one thing
that John and I and our entire team think about are listeners who are in pain, who are suffering.
We have listeners who are going through the suffering of the death of a child or a spouse, a loved one, a divorce.
We have listeners in prison. We have listeners who are racked with mental illness.
One of the reasons I invited you is you feel deeply for people.
as I've gotten to know you over the years.
I don't know exactly where I want you to go with this question
other than can the Old Testament help?
I love the question.
Yeah, let me say this.
To those suffering and all the things you said,
I mean, that's no trivial matter, the deep suffering.
I think you know I had stage four cancer
when I was 44 years old.
And stage four is bad because stage five is the spirit world.
That was a joke, by the way.
That's good.
I had chemotherapy. I had surgeries. I had radiation. We had six kids at home, one son on a mission. It was pretty brutal. And I'm not trying to say that my cancer is the thing and that other people, like, I totally get it. But let me just say this. I like to let scripture study wash over me. What I mean by that is as I study texts and when I had cancer, they had to give me steroids.
to shrink the tumors.
I couldn't sleep.
So I'd be up at three, two in the morning,
literally cannot sleep.
And I would read the Psalms, Old Testament.
We've done kind of a deep dive.
But sometimes I would just read the Psalms
to let the Spirit wash over me and comfort me.
And I can testify that it did.
It's so interesting you bring that up
because I wasn't going to bring that up,
but that is fascinating.
Because literally the Word of God in the Old Testament,
Testament, spoke to my soul, gave me comfort, and spoke peace. It didn't say everything was going to be
all right. It didn't say I was going to live, but it washed over me and gave me strength and hope
to persevere another day. Testified of Jesus Christ, sometimes just reading the word of God
in humility and in a spirit of seeking that grace from God was so powerful. That to me was
powerful, amazing, and unforgettable.
And I'll be forever grateful to the Lord
for his kindness and mercy and patience with me.
Ross, I really appreciate that
there's an invitation this year
to let these words wash over you.
Heal your wounds.
That's exactly right.
I love that we're ending with this
because it really wasn't a deep dive.
At 3 in the morning, I was up,
everybody in the house is asleep i'm facing whatever i'm facing i've opened to the psalms and i'm reading
through them and i'm really not doing a deep dive but it's healing me at least spiritually i can
honestly say that in some respects while i was having cancer my spirit burned as bright as it had
ever burned in my life in terms of my witness of jesus christ my testimony of the reality
of what he did and of the reality of the resurrection, the reality of the plan of salvation,
of the prophet Joseph Smith, and of modern prophets. And it was power. It allowed me to endure well
because through the Word of God, it healed my spirit and soul. It's not just the exact words or
phrases or content that you read. It was putting yourself in that place of pondering, of looking at the
word of God and just putting yourself there and letting that wash over you is healing no matter
what you're reading really if I can say that John isn't that what we're after in our show at least
yeah that's right I'm so glad you bore witness of that because hopefully anybody can go and read
not just listen to a podcast and think you're done with scripture study oh no no no no go into
the words themselves and just read the words themselves I love it
The great part about this, John, is we get to do this again, seven more times with Ross this year.
Hank, I was this excited.
I'm holding my hand up.
And I am so, this is going to be so good.
I can't believe we get to get you back.
This is going to be wonderful.
Those 10 things, I've got them down.
I bet we'll be referring to these often, Hank, as we keep going.
Yep.
When do we have Ross back?
We have Ross back again for another thoughts to keep in mind.
Next, we'll be talking about the covenant, the Abrahamic covenant.
I just don't know how it's possible to understand even the Book of Mormon without
understanding the Abrahamic covenant.
What is that?
And how are we part of it?
I can't wait to hear what Ross is going to teach us about that next time.
I'm pretty excited.
I got a lot to say about it.
It's great.
And that's going to be mid-February.
So as we're looking forward to Valentine's Day,
we're also looking forward to The Covenant with Ross Bear,
Dr. Ross Bear.
Yeah, a lot of fun.
It's right.
What's more romantic than that?
Well, it continues with us.
That's what's so interesting.
We're chosen.
I like to tell my class,
it's kind of like being chosen to mow the lawn.
You've chosen to do a work,
and that is to bless all the families of the earth.
What could be better than that?
No, that's exactly right.
We'd like to thank Dr. Ross Barron, and we're so excited we're going to have him back.
Is it seven more times, Hank?
Seven more times, baby.
As we go through these, I'm excited.
It's going to be wonderful.
As we continue our study of the Old Testament, please come and see us again and enjoy this on Follow Him.
As a thank you to our wonderful listeners, we'd love to gift you the digital version of our book, Finding Jesus Christ in the Old Testament.
It offers short, meaningful insights drawn from our past Old Testament episodes.
Visit followhim.com, that's followhim.com, to download your free copy today, and you'll also find the link to purchase the print edition.
Thank you for being part of our Follow Him family.
Of course, none of this could happen without our incredible production crew.
David Perry, Lisa Spice, Will Stoughton, Crystal Roberts, Ariel Cuadra, Heather Barlow, Amelia Cabuica,
Sidney Smith and Annabelle Sorensen.
Whatever questions or problems you have,
the answer is always found in the life and teachings of Jesus Christ.
Turn to him. Follow him.
