Founders - #132 Edwin Land (Steve Jobs's Hero)
Episode Date: June 20, 2020What I learned from reading The Instant Image: Edwin Land and the Polaroid Experience by Mark Olshaker. ----Come see a live show with me and Patrick O'Shaughnessy from Invest Like The Best on October... 19th in New York City. Get your tickets here! ----Subscribe to listen to Founders Premium — Subscribers can listen to Ask Me Anything (AMA) episodes and every bonus episode. ---[1:42] The word “problem” had completely departed from Edwin land's vocabulary to be replaced by the word “opportunity”. [2:01] What was it about this man and his company that allowed such confidence and seeming lack of concern with the traditional top priorities of American business? [2:38] There is something unique about Polaroid having to do both with the human dimension of the company, and with a unity of vision of its founder and guiding genius. [3:36] Perhaps the single most important aspect of Land's character is his ability to regard things around him in a new and totally different way. [4:14] Right from the beginning of his career Land had paid scant attention to what experts had to say, trusting his own instincts instead. [4:49] Land has always believed that for any item sufficiently ingenious and intriguing, a new market could be created. Conventional wisdom has little capacity with which to evaluate a market that did not exist prior to the product that defines it. [5:21] He feels that creativity is an individual thing. Not generally applicable to group generation. [5:52] Land is a man deeply caught up in the creative potential of the individual. [6:33] An institution is the lengthened shadow of one man. [7:43] Apple founder Steve Jobs once hailed Edwin Land, the founder of Polaroid and the father of instant photography, as "a national treasure" and once confessed to a reporter that meeting Land was "like visiting a shrine." By his own admission, Jobs modeled much of his own career after Land’s. Both Jobs and Land stand out today as unique and towering figures in the history of technology. Neither had a college degree, but both built highly successful and innovative organizations. Jobs and Land were both perfectionists with an almost fanatic attentiveness to detail, in addition to being consummate showmen and instinctive marketers. In many ways, Edwin Land was the original Steve Jobs. [8:36] There's a rule that they don't teach you at the Harvard business school. It is, if anything is worth doing it's worth doing to excess. [11:22] Steve Jobs: I always thought of myself as a humanities person as a kid, but I liked electronics. Then I read something that one of my heroes, Edwin Land of Polaroid, said about the importance of people who could stand at the intersection of humanities and sciences. And I decided that's what I wanted to do. [12:51] In a world full of cooks, Edwin Land was a chef. [Link to The Cook and The Chef: Elon Musk’s Secret Sauce] [19:34] Land was asked what he wanted to be when he was younger: I had two goals. To be the world's greatest scientist and to be the world's greatest novelist. [21:28] Everyone acknowledged that the future of Polaroid corporation would be determined by what went on in the brain of Edwin Land. [22:01] My motto is very personal and may not fit anyone else or any other company. It is: Don't do anything that someone else can do. [22:54] Fortunately our company has been one which has been dedicated throughout its life to making only things which others can not make. [25:06] Land had far more faith in his own potential, and that of the company he inspired, than did any of the experts looking in from the outside. [27:30] Polaroid failed to build a successful company by selling to other businesses: Each [product] would have involved millions of dollars in revenue for the company, but each invention involved a certain degree of transformation of an existing industry controlled by an existing power structure. From this Land realizes he needs to control the relationship with the customer. He realizes he needs to sell directly to the end user. [36:16] Edwin Land is inspired by, and learned from, people that came before him. One example of this is Alexander Graham Bell. Edwin Land is not worried about the marketing [of a new product] because Bell went through the same thing: Land apparently lost little sleep over the initial situation, calling to mind that the same sort of reaction had greeted the public introduction of Bell's telephone, 70 years earlier. The telephone had been a dominant symbol in Land's thinking. He began making numerous connections between his camera and the telephone. [40:16] Over the years, I have learned that every significant invention has several characteristics. By definition it must be startling, unexpected, and must come into a world that is not prepared for it. If the world were prepared for it, it would not be much of an invention. [40:46] It is the public's role to resist [a new invention, a new product/service]. [41:29] It took us a lifetime to understand that if we're to make a new commodity —a commodity of beauty —then we must be prepared for the extensive teaching program needed to prepare society for the magnitude of our invention. [45:12] Only the individual— and not the large group— can see a part of the world in a totally new and different way. [48:08] Land's view is that a company should be scientifically daring and financially conservative. [50:30] To understand more about every aspect of light, Edwin Land read every single book on light that was available in the New York City Public Library. That reminded me of one of my favorite lectures ever: Running Down A Dream: How to Succeed and Thrive in a Career You Love[51:59] Land on the problem with formal education: Young people for the most part —unless they are geniuses— after a very short time in college, give up any hope of being individually great. [54:16] Among all the components and Land's intellectual arsenal, the chief one seems to be simple concentration. —“I have listened to every episode released and look forward to every episode that comes out. The only criticism I would have is that after each podcast I usually want to buy the book because I am interested, so my poor wallet suffers.”— GarethBe like Gareth. Buy a book. It's good for you. It's good for Founders. A list of all the books featured on Founders Podcast. ----Founders Notes gives you the ability to tap into the collective knowledge of history's greatest entrepreneurs on demand. Use it to supplement the decisions you make in your work. Get access to Founders Notes here. ----“I have listened to every episode released and look forward to every episode that comes out. The only criticism I would have is that after each podcast I usually want to buy the book because I am interested so my poor wallet suffers. ” — GarethBe like Gareth. Buy a book: All the books featured on Founders Podcast
Transcript
Discussion (0)
High technological drama was the way Edwin Land described his company's situation in the spring of 1971.
This phrase impressed me more than any other single thing I had read from him,
perhaps because it was so characteristic of his entire outlook and approach.
At the time he said it, the SX-70 camera system, one of the dreams of Land's life,
had already cost millions of dollars and had not yet turned back a dime.
The company was establishing manufacturing capability and experiencing wrenching growing pains in the process.
And the solutions to the myriad of scientific issues attending the camera's evolution were looming just out of reach.
I could easily imagine other corporate leaders of international stature retreating behind such well-worn expressions as negative cash flow,
unfavorable balances, and unforeseen developmental increments.
But to Edwin Land, facing what Fortune magazine would call
the biggest gamble ever made on a consumer product,
amidst this onslaught of seemingly insurmountable problems,
inside the corporation in the form of cost overruns and the technologies which refuse to be born,
and outside in the form of a gradually deflating consumer economy,
was to be regarded as the stuff of high technological drama.
The next several years after 1971 would be increasingly difficult ones for Polaroid,
a company whose dazzling success had little prepared it for lean times.
But I was struck by the observation that the word problem had completely departed from Edwin Land's vocabulary
to be replaced by the word opportunity. What was it about this man and his company that allowed
such confidence and seeming lack of concern with the traditional top priorities of American business?
My continuing interest, as I attempted to analyze it, seemed to stem at least partially
from the elements that set Polaroid apart from virtually every other American company,
and also from a man who is impossible to typecast by any readily applicable standard.
The Polaroid story is several different but interrelated stories, all converging in the
singular personality of Edwin Land. Polaroid is far from the largest, nor has it grown the fastest,
of its high-technology bellwethers. There is, however, something unique about Polaroid,
having to do both with the human dimension of the company and with the unity
of vision of its founder and guiding genius. Polaroid executives now take great pains to point
out that the almost 70-year-old Land is not the company, but its development and the development
of the industry it pioneered is the story of Edwin Land. In Land, I saw a number of
American types and traditions coming together. He is a New England inventor in direct spiritual
lineage from Eli Whitney, Charles Goodyear, and George Westinghouse. He is perhaps the last of
the major technological visionaries come business entrepreneurs in the larger-than-life tradition of Henry Ford and the other photographic giant, George Eastman.
He is the contemporary incarnation of the American dream.
Perhaps the single most important aspect of Land's character, and the one to which he owes his and Polaroid's success, is his ability to regard things around him in a new and totally different way.
There is the instant camera, his most famous invention,
the polarizing filter which began his career and founded his company,
and most recently, the polar vision system of instant motion pictures.
All of these are radical departures from previous thought and
practice, each coming at a moment and forming into an instant image of what needed to be done
to see it through to reality. Right from the beginning of his career, Land had paid scant
attention to what experts had to say, trusting his own instincts instead. For example, most experts who continually predicted that land and Polaroid would fail in the marketplace
with each new product or development were evaluating those products only in terms of the way they fit into the current market.
Clearly, in most cases, the new products had little to do, technologically,
with what was available on the current market except that they too produced photographs and
there was a market for cameras. But Land has always believed that for any item sufficiently
ingenious and intriguing, a new market could be created. Conventional wisdom has little capacity
with which to evaluate a market that did not exist prior to the product that defines it.
Land had already gotten his co-workers out of the habit of relying on what was already there.
It is not merely a concept of successful marketing, but the basis of his theory of
inventiveness and creativity. He feels that creativity is an individual thing, not generally applicable
to group generation. As he wrote in the Harvard Business Review, I think human beings in the mass
are fun at square dances, exciting to be with in a theater audience, and thrilling to cheer with at
the California Stanford or Harvard Yale games. At the same time, I think whether outside science or within science,
there is no such thing as group originality or group creativity. Land is a man deeply caught up
in the creative potential of the individual. This is not surprising since Land owes his success
to the realizing of his own creative potential.
But it's not just himself, his scientific brethren,
and his artistic peers that Land is talking about.
He is talking about all of us.
That is an excerpt from the book that I want to talk to you about today,
which is The Instant Image, Edwin Land and the Polaroid Experience.
And it comes from a section in the book called The Lengthened Shadow. And what that is a reference to is a quote by Ralph Waldo Emerson,
who says an institution is the lengthened shadow of one man. And that is a great way to think about
Polaroid and the influence that Edwin Land had on his company. So this is going to be the start of a three-part
series that I'm going to do on Edwin Land. I previously covered two different books on Edwin
Land, all the way back on Founders 40. I talked to you about what I learned from reading Insisting
on the Impossible and the book Instant, The Story of Polaroid. About two months ago, a listener
named Dustin sent me a message that he went down this rabbit hole reading every
single book that he could find on Edwin Land. And he's the one that put me on to the next three
books that I'll be talking to you about. Interesting to note, the book I have in my hand
is 42 years old, and it smells like it's 42 years old. And before I jump into the book,
you might be wondering,
in case you don't know who Edwin Land is, I'm going to be covering a giant book on Edwin Land.
It's called A Triumph for Genius, Edwin Land, Polaroid, and the Kodak Patent War. I want to
read the product description before I jump back into an instant image so you have an understanding
in case you're coming to Edwin Land brand new about why he's so important. And it says,
Apple founder Steve Jobs once hailed Edwin Land, the about why he's so important. And it says, Apple founder
Steve Jobs once hailed Edwin Land, the founder of Polaroid and the father of instant photography,
as a national treasure, and once confessed to a reporter that meeting Land was like visiting a
shrine. By his own admission, Jobs modeled much of his own career after Lands. Both Jobs and Land
stand out today as unique and towering figures in the
history of technology. Neither had a college degree, but both built highly successful,
innovative organizations. Jobs and Lanz were both perfectionists with an almost fanatical
attentiveness to detail. In addition to being consummate showmen and instinctive marketers,
in many ways, Edwin L Land was the original Steve Jobs.
Okay, so let's jump in the book. I want to start with this great quote by Edwin Land. It's one of
my favorite quotes of his, and it gives you an insight into the extreme character that he
definitely was. He says, there's a rule that they don't teach you at the Harvard Business School.
It is, if anything is worth doing, it's worth doing to excess. And we're going to see several examples
today of him living that quote in his life. Something to understand about him, this is not
like a typical biography. He's extremely private. He was a private driven person. And this gives us
a little insight into what was driving him. He says, on one of the few occasions that Land did
briefly open up to someone outside
his small and fiercely loyal inner circle, he confided to a professor friend that he had always
been tremendously impressed and overwhelmed by his businessman father and determined from an
early age that he would someday outdo him. This confession seems to be typical of great men and
has a sort of classical ring to it.
It helps to explain, however, only the drive and not the imagination and insight.
So the foundation for the company that would one day become Polaroid happens.
He's a 17-year-old freshman at Harvard University.
He's actually visiting New York and he sees the glare from, there's two different stories, the glare from Times Square and then a glare from an oncoming headlight.
And he invents, he had a fascination with light and optics and perception.
And in an instant, this is why the book's called Instant Image, this is why I'm telling you this section, he comes up with the idea. He invents the polarizer, right? Something you know about Edwin Land. If you took every single person that we've covered so far on the
podcast, he would place number three in the most in terms of number of patents. So number one would
be Thomas Edison. Number two would be Adi Dassler, the founder of Adidas. And then three, Land had,
I think, over 535 patents in his life. And this is one of the first ones.
So I'm going to skip over that section, but I want to talk about this idea.
This is also something that Steve Jobs referenced in an interview.
When he met Land, they had a discussion about seeing the product in their mind in finished form,
knowing where they wanted to go and then figuring out a way to invent it to like
almost uh reverse engineer it um through a series of obviously trial experiments and in the it was
interesting to me is um jobs is leaving the meeting and he's talking to scully john scully at the time
um who eventually uh kicks steve jobs out of the company um and he and he says something that's
interesting he said yeah that's interesting.
He said, yeah, that's how he was referencing his meeting with Edwin Land.
He's like, that's how I feel.
And I thought that choice of word was really interesting.
Not that's how I am, that's how I think, that's how I feel.
And I think that just speaks to the bond that Jobs had with Edwin Land.
In fact, right before he died, Jobs died, he's reflecting back
on, he says, I always, this is Jobs speaking, he says, I always thought of myself as a humanities
person as a kid, but I liked electronics. Then I read something that one of my heroes, Edwin Land
of Polaroid said about the importance of people who could stand at the intersection of humanities
and sciences. And I decided that's what I wanted to do. So not only does Jobs share that belief
and that idea, but he also shared this belief that you could have this instant image experience.
And so this is a description of that. Here we see the first important example in Land's career of
the instant image, an idea of tremendous moment and far-reaching implication occurring without warning in a flash of brilliant inspiration.
Nearly every major insight of Land's career would happen in a similar fashion.
In each case, the instant image would be neither the beginning nor the end of the work,
merely the moment when all the elements came magically together so that the problem could be seen, understood, and approached.
The inspiration, Land would be quick to point out, was neither blind luck nor a fortunate gift of the
gods. He had prepared himself through countless hours of familiarization with all the elements
of the challenge, whether consciously or not, and he would spend the next several years filling in many gaps in his and the world's understanding of the subject.
And the note I left to myself on this next section is,
In a world full of cooks, Edwin Land was a chef.
And that's me recalling a podcast I did a long time ago on Tim Urban's essay, long blog post essay on Elon Musk.
I think it's called The Cook and the Chef.
I'll link to it in the show notes if you want to read it.
It's fantastic.
You can also go back and listen to the podcast I did on it.
Land seems never to have been bound by or wedded to what has happened before.
Though he's always been able to build on past knowledge and discoveries,
he has not been put off by what previously had been considered impossible.
What is more unusual than this is that
Land was able to maintain this fresh and unburdened outlook into mature life and infuse it into so
many of his associates, co-workers, and students. And so right after Land makes this discovery when
he was really young, we see an example of Land's resourcefulness. So he's going to drop out of harvard and he says
and it says land took a leave of absence from harvard and moved to new york city during the
day he availed himself of the voluminous resources of the new york public library
reading everything he could get his hands on relative to the subject of light polarization
in the evenings he began conducting. This is an example of
relentless resourcefulness here. He's using New York Public Library so he can read everything.
He's doing that for free. And now he needs a place to run his experiments. But he doesn't
have a lot of money. He doesn't have access. He doesn't know anybody. So he figures a way
around that. He says when he found himself in need of more sophisticated equipment than he
personally owned, Land scouted out a well-equipped physics laboratory
at Columbia University.
He discovered he could get in after dark
by entering through a habitually unlocked window
and conduct his experimental inquiries
there into the early morning hours.
So when he was at Harvard,
it says his physics section leader
was this guy named George Wheelwright.
So George becomes interested in land experiments and they get together and they start a company.
It's called Land Wheelwright.
And this is the company that eventually changes into Polaroid.
So let's talk first about the first days of the company.
And then there's some traits or ideas that Land kept.
He started at an early age and kept throughout his life.
So it says neither Land nor Wheelwright had much in the way of business experience, both being in their 20s.
But they had enough enthusiasm for their work and enough confidence in their own abilities to be basically unconcerned about making money.
That's another thing that Land repeats his whole life, that he just wants to make the best.
He wants to do science and he wants to make the best products possible.
And he feels if he does those two things that money will take care of itself um so it says on
a larger scale land had has maintained this trait throughout his life knowing his market ahead of
time has never been one of land's primary concerns he feels and already did at the beginning of his
career that a market would come to exist for any worthwhile product or service he could
come up with so the first product is this uh his first invention which is the polarizing sheet
plastic and land's application of this this is before they realize hey you know they're young
they're idealistic they're like okay um he came up with an application where it could reduce
um headlight glare so at time, a lot of people
were dying because they'd be blinded by the headlights of oncoming traffic. In fact, in the
early days of the company, they put on the board, I think 50 people a night died. So he used that
as like a company-wide announcement that, hey, we're on a mission to solve this problem. And
the faster we solve it, the more lives we save, right? And so this is the difference between what they had to do to survive in the early days of the company and what they wanted to do.
And he's also going to understand later in life that, you know, if he's making products for other companies, he has no control.
He needs to control the entire system and the relationship with the customer, which he doesn't have.
So he'll learn that later.
The importance of the headlight idea in the early days of the company
as an ongoing dream and motivation cannot be overstated.
It represented at the same time a chance for a financially secure base.
So there was already more than 20 million cars on the road in the United States at this time.
So he's like, okay, we have a huge opportunity here because, of course,
if we could save lives, all 20 million of those cars would need to be converted.
And they're going to use my invention, which I own the patent on.
That doesn't occur.
It occurs over time slowly, but not on the scale, at the time scale they need it.
OK, also would represent a significant improvement in public safety in the United States.
The notion that they would one day see this idea come to fruition is the basic motivation that kept
land and wheelwright in business again an abiding sense of faith in self and that everything
eventually would work out so that's two things that um you need to know about edwin land he he
has unlimited confidence in his abilities to figure things out and he feels if he figures
things out the problems will the solutions to the problems will take care of themselves.
While there's slow going on the meetings with the automotive manufacturers at the time,
they start meeting with Kodak
and they agree to a deal where,
it says Kodak agreed to use Polaroid,
that's the name of the polarizing sheet plastic,
it's not the name of the company yet,
for photographic light filters so they
get a deal uh with kodak kodak's the a giant company i will eventually do the biography of
george eastman um because he was such an important uh entrepreneurial figure in the late 1800s
but this is the result of the contract he says the revenue from the kodak contract furnished
land and wheelwright with a little breathing space, allowing them to continue their research.
And so at this point, we're going to see how we're going to get into Land's idea for his life.
And we're going to see where that deviates from most other people's.
So it says so far, the story has been as most of the elements of the standard American business venture saga.
Two bright and optimistic entrepreneurs with an idea that they are sure in
time will catch on. And there's little to distinguish it from numerous other undertakings.
Land, however, had other ideas. And this is where we begin to diverge from the traditional scenario.
First of all, the business world, where he could be his own boss and his own company
and not be constrained by typical university formality appealed to him so something
to know about land is later in life he was asked by he always gave these lectures like mit and
harvard and other places because that's um polar bear was the headquarters was in cambridge and
somebody asked him when i think he's like 70 years old something like that and they're like what did
you like what did you what was your ambition just when you were a kid, like when you were younger? What did you want your life to be? And he said, I had two goals,
to be the world's greatest scientist and to be the world's greatest novelist. So again,
that really does speak to the kind of outsized intellect, ambition, and drive that Edwin Land
has. This is a very extreme character. So let's get back to this. So he's talking about, hey,
maybe I'll be an academic, but he didn't like to be
constrained by typical university formality. Okay. So that's one of his motivations to starting a
company. So he says, also, he saw himself primarily as an inventor and innovator,
and he figured the best place to carry on his work was in an environment of his own creation.
As Land later explained, I planned a company in which I could work
scientifically and still have my inventions used. What the 28-year-old inventor vaguely envisioned,
the 68-year-old corporate chairman still adheres to. So something important to know about this book
is this book ends and Land is still in control of his company. He loses control of his company. I
think he's like 75 years old at the time when he loses control
a few years after this book is published.
It's also the decision that Jobs says
is one of the dumbest things
he's ever heard in his life.
So what I like is that
the book I'm doing next week
is published about 10 years after this book is.
So we see after Landon already left the company
and then the third book I'm going to do
is published 20 years, 25 years after that.
So there's this idea that I learned from David Olgravy.
I don't know if I learned it from him, but he's the one that put it into words.
And he talks about like why he was so obsessed with doing research and getting really good
at his craft was because he wanted to transform himself into a formidable individual, right?
And that's a good description of Edwin
Land. The note I left myself was Edwin Land was a formidable individual, and this is an example of
that. So even at this stage, the 28-year-old Land struck the Wall Street establishment as being so
unique that they turned back control of the company they had just bought and made the man
they had bought it from promise
to stay around for at least a decade everyone acknowledged that the future of polaroid
corporation would be determined by what went on in the brain of edwin land unlike most new business
capital ventures what they had brought what they had bought into was not a new technology a new product or concrete assets but one man's mind
so they're talking about they didn't really buy a company for me they're talking about bankers
helped them organize polaroid and raise money and it's a public company so that's what they're
talking about there so i want to tell you a little bit about pull now the name of the company's
polaroid this a little bit about the early years there's a quote um he talks about he's like i got
a motto to organize my life around it works
for me but it's not for everybody and he says don't do anything that someone else can do and
we see that he he realized this idea even when he's extremely young so it says land was undoubtedly
beginning to see the advantage of producing items no one else could offer he decided then with a
clarity of vision few others could adhere to that there was no point in ever having polaroid produce
products that were already on the market let me pause there before i get back to the rest of the
paragraph this is he he applies this to the extreme polaroid winds up doing about a decade's
worth of research and development on a photocopier before xerox exists then xerox winds up going to
market before they finish all the research and development needed so polaroid just scraps it before Xerox exists. Then Xerox winds up going to market
before they finish all the research and development needed.
So Polaroid just scraps it.
It's like, well, we don't need to make it because they did.
30 years later, Land wrote an annual report.
Fortunately, our company has been one
which has been dedicated throughout its life
to making only things which others cannot make.
Land's genius was such that others could not think up what he could
or turn out the kinds of products his company could turn out.
And the ever more impressive wall of patents he erected
between his discoveries and the outside world,
enforced by a dedicated cadre of specialist patent attorneys,
meant that once the technological cat was out of the bag,
it was still exclusively Polaroids.
So this goes more into,
this paragraph's about Land's primary motivation
not being financial.
We've heard Steve Jobs echo this.
He said, I have no desire
to be the richest person in the cemetery.
I want to go to work every day
and feel like I'm doing something,
contributing and doing something good,
building the best products.
Land would say something similar.
He says, there's no evidence to suggest
that Edwin Land was averse to becoming rich.
He winds up becoming, I think at the time, like the eighth richest person in the United
States.
Like he's unbelievably wealthy.
But that came from a lifetime of ownership and control of Polar Rights.
So it says, although his family's comfortable circumstances probably prevented his having
the kind of security grounded hunger for success of, say, a Charles Goodyear.
Charles Goodyear is actually compared to Edwin Lane a few times in this book.
You'll remember, if you haven't listened to it, I did a podcast on his biography, which was insane.
He's literally homeless, having to sell possessions, and still trying to invent rubber.
I think it was Founders No. 69, but I could be wrong about that.
Whose family was literally starving when he came up with the formula for vulcanized rubber.
And if one examines the biographies of many other successful businessmen,
it can be noted that their amassing of fabulous wealth became a goal in and of itself.
That is, they had a way of gauging their success because of a very real need
to accomplish and achieve success in accumulating dollars.
They're saying it's the most easily quantifiable standard.
Being a man who could measure his success in scientific and technical terms,
Land had no such need for large sums of money as a tangible symbol of personal advancement.
Like George Lucas before him, Land unapologetically invested in what he believed in most,
which was himself, and this is the result of that land had far more faith in his own potential and that of the company he inspired
than did any of the other experts looking in from the outside so what they're talking about there is
at the time polaroid still working uh they're licensing stuff to kodak they're trying to sell
things to the automobile manufacturers and so financial analysts at the time are saying, you know, you should just close up shop, give up. Like,
what are you doing here? This direct quote says, from a narrow dollar and cents point of view,
Land and his colleagues might easily benefit financially by selling out to a large established
firm. Certainly, Land would acquire greater financial security by doing so. Wrong. Not
even close, buddy. 24 years after the Harvard study was published,
Fortuneless and Land is one of the eighth wealthiest men in America.
We've seen this before, right in the early years of Amazon.
Jeff Bezos goes and gives a talk at Harvard Business School,
and you got this arrogant, snotty-nosed Harvard Business School student
saying, hey, you seem like a nice guy,
but really I think you should sell it to Barnes and Nobles before they flatten you. Moving on, one of the greatest things about
this book in particular is we see that success was a slow process. There was a lot of false starts.
So it says, during this period, a steady stream of inventions and new applications were emerging
from Edwin Lynn's brain and polaroids labs and
were meeting with varying degrees of financial success but the company had yet to make the big
splash which its founders and backers had hoped would come with the polarized headlights
so it talks about like they're meeting a lot of resistance something big something else big was
needed to take its place so they thought they were going after this giant market of 20 million automobiles it's not coming yet guys what are we going to do
we need something else um so that's something else that they come up with is hey let's make
this is hilarious um because this is happening in 1950s i think 1940s uh they decided hey we're
going to make a bunch of 3d glasses so says, during the brief heyday of three-dimensional movies,
Polaroid did sell over 5 million pairs of cardboard frame glasses a year.
They're like, yes, we hit on it.
According to reports, the craze was over so quickly
that the company and the movie studios were left sitting on warehouses full of lenses.
Uh-oh.
So it talks about the potential, the unrealized potential of both two,
of these two markets that they thought they were going to hit on.
That being the polarized headlight system and then 3D movie glasses.
It says each would have involved millions of dollars in revenue for the company.
But each invention involved a certain degree of transformation of an existing industry controlled by existing power structure.
That's such an important sentence.
I'm going to read it again.
And this is a fundamental understanding that Land realizes like i need i'm not doing this anymore i'm wasting a
ton of time and i cannot convince these other people these third parties of the brilliance of
my inventions each invention involved a certain degree of transformation of an existing industry
controlled by an existing power structure so this is where he's like i'm going to bypass bypass this
by inventing uh products i can sell directly to consumers so i'm going to expound on this on the
next page um talks about learning the need for control and integration polarity could go on
supplying filters for kodak cameras and lenses for sunglasses and polarizing discs for school rooms
but this is essentially the role of a supplier. And we have
to conclude that a man of land's depth and scope did not see his company spending its corporate
existence tapping into other people's vision. So this is one of the vice presidents of Polaroid
at the time writing in 1969. He says, we learned an important lesson. In the movie business,
there were too many forces, too many people to deal with. It was an undisciplined industry.
We learned that the best way is to sell as directly to the consumer as possible,
where we could control as many factors as possible in the marketplace.
So that was true in 1969.
It was true in 1869.
And it sure as hell true today.
The next big invention, and Land certainly was confident that there would be one
would have to be controlled right from headquarters no longer trusting outsiders for the translation
of his ideas into usable commodities the inventor would next time take his case directly to the
people polaroid would do the next one themselves from beginning to end.
So now I'm fast forwarding in the history of Polaroid.
This is where he hits on.
He's on vacation.
He's taking photographs of his three-year-old daughter.
And she says, Daddy, why can't I see the picture?
And this is the instant image example of inventing instant photography. And he says, like, by the time he pondered this for several hours,
and by the time he was done with that brainstorm he had said he'd solved every problem except the
problems that it took from like 1941 to 1972 to solve so there's a little tongue-in-cheek there
he's a really funny person if you hear him speak he's extremely he's again he reminds me a lot of
jobs later let me give an example of this um he loved using superlatives you know if you ever
watch jobs product demonstrations,
Land would talk about how wonderful his inventions were.
It's the best camera ever made.
He would disparage later in his life, Kodak.
Polaroid winds up winning the largest patent infringement case against Kodak.
This is like four decades into the future.
That's where we are in the story.
Kodak winds up having to pay him almost a billion dollars.
And he's just relentless.
Even as like an old,
he's like 70 years old,
70, old, older person at the time.
And he said he was comparing
like their cheap imitations.
Reminds me of Jobs talking about Windows
in the Macintosh days
and later on Google's Android operating system compared to ios
and lan says he's really dismissive of kodak's uh products and you know because the the product
that kodak copied is you know you take the picture and it's like the polar picture the famous thing
you know you take the picture and out comes this you know white uh framed uh picture and within
like a minute or so 30 seconds whatever is, you see the picture you just
took.
And so he talks about, you know, Kodak imitated that.
They violated my patents.
But he talked about it's slow, like it comes out, takes forever.
And he says, gives you an insight into like his showmanship and his flair for the dramatic
and understanding of how like humans react to superlatives.
And he says, theirs evac evacuates ours ejaculates
and so after he has this experience with this brainstorm at the the prompting of his three-year-old
czar's question he realized it is possible for instant photography remember there's nothing like
this time kodak has a a monopoly because they they have a great uh tagline i think it's like
you press the button and we do the rest so So you take a picture of Kodak camera.
Once the roll of film's out, you just drop it in the mail.
And seven days later, they're going to send you back their pictures, right?
And the profit margin on that film was something like 60 to 80%.
So Kodak is printing money, right?
They're not worried about instant photography.
But the section I want to read to you is that the Polaroid camera,
land was secretive, just like jobs.
The Polaroid camera was developed in secret,
just like the iPhone was. If you want to know more about the development of the iPhone and went into
that, I did a bonus episode on Steve jobs based on the book creative selection. But anyways,
it says within six months of his original inspiration land had worked out most of the
essential details of the instant photography system. The work was done by him and a small
group of associates in secret. Not too different from
what we learned about Henry Ford and the Model T, right? The rest of the company's employees knew
nothing of the research going on in the Locke laboratory. So it's true for Edmund Land and the
Polaroid camera, true for Steve Jobs and iPhone, true for Henry Ford and the Model T. I'm sure
there's other examples as well throughout history. Now, keep in mind, this is going to take a lot of
research and development they have to solve. Again, keep in mind, this is going to take a lot of research and development.
They have to solve.
Again, he thinks of his work as he's a scientist, right?
That's how he thinks of himself.
So he's solving scientific problems.
And so it's important to remember during this time, Polaroid was struggling at this point in their history.
It was not clear that they were going to survive.
This is post-World War II.
They had done some military work.
That work had dried up but it says the first three post-war years saw polaroid strapped with record deficits
while the great hope of the corporate future uh the automobile headlight project had continued
to languish and so we see he's having to invent a completely new technology and a completely new product
that doesn't exist in a time
where there's not a lot of money.
They're going through
severe financial distress.
So at this point,
the author's talking about
comparing and contrasting
Kodak with Polaroid
and Land with George Eastman.
I'll eventually cover the book by Eastman,
but I do want to just,
this thing, this surprised me.
It says Eastman's influence lived long after him. He himself lived into his seventies, at which point he decided he
had enough and put a bullet through his heart. So he committed suicide. He was in great pain.
He had like a spine, like severe bone on bone pain at the time. And it was never diagnosed,
but he had some kind of deformity with his spine that
caused great pain. In fact, I looked it up. His suicide note says, to my friends, my work is done.
Why wait? Signed, G.E. George Eastman. But the reason I bring this up was one that was surprising,
so I wanted to share that with you in case you didn't know that. But Eastman and Land built their
companies around, Jeff Bezos has this idea that you need to build your business around things that don't change, right?
Don't follow fads.
So he says, like in Amazon's case, hey, 10 years from now,
are people going to want less selection?
No.
Are they going to want to get their packages slower?
No.
Are they going to want to have bad customer support?
No.
So we invest heavily in things that do not change.
And in Land and Eastman's case the delight of photography the human the delight
that humans get from it is something you can build upon the delight that people get from that
um is constants just like today we take you know billion trillions of i don't even know how many
photographs we take now in the digital era but it says the newness of photographs had worn off
within a few years of eastman's first kodak. The delight of capturing each other on film never did.
Land has a lot of quotes and ideas around inventions having to come to a world that's not ready for it, right?
And what we see is when he releases this system, just like the iPhone, it seems like, oh, once you see it, that's, that's, yes, that's, it seems obvious in retrospect. So it says the device land used is so simple that this is a reports in the media of the product demonstration, the reaction to it.
Okay.
The device land use is so simple that it's hard to believe that it really could do the job.
All this seems so simple that as usual, we wonder why it was not done before.
Okay.
So I want to talk about some of the early marketing
efforts that i found very interesting on how you know they have a product uh that should have
universal appeal but how do you educate people about it and how do you get them excited for it
so this is some of the ideas they had polar would have to handle the marketing of the instant camera
itself this was one field of business in which the company had relatively little experience
in the past most of the products they made had been manufactured for other companies.
Land apparently lost little sleep
over this initial situation,
calling to mind that the same,
this is beautiful because he's,
just like we are,
he's inspired by and learns from people
that came before him.
So Land has an affinity
for somebody that I cannot believe.
I have not read their biography yet
and I apologize to you in advance. I will rectify have not read their biography yet. And I apologize
to you in advance. I will rectify this as soon as I can. And that's the inventor of the telephone,
Alexander Graham Bell. So he's like, I'm not worried about the marketing of this, right?
Because Bell went through the same thing. Land apparently lost a little sleep over the initial
situation, calling to mind that the same sort of reaction had greeted the public introduction of
Bell's telephone 70 years earlier. The telephone had been a dominant symbol in land's thinking in later years he began making
numerous connections between his camera and telephone and i got a lot of quotes on that i
don't know if they're going to be in this book uh or the next one but i will talk to you more
about that land concluded that the company would follow the traditional sales route and offer its
product to retail stores they were not quite sure how to go about actually putting the cameras in the store nationally, though.
So they're like, OK, we don't know how to do this nationally.
And this is the smartest thing.
People don't like, again, everybody thinks of the company.
The reason I spend so much time focusing on the early days of the founder's life and the early days of the company is because we know what Polaroid is now. I mean, it's kind of, it's gone now, a shell of itself, whatever the case is. But
at this time, they had so much more opportunity and unknown in the future than looking backwards,
right? And so it's like, well, I don't know how to sell this thing. I'm going to put it in retail
stores, but how do I do that nationally? It's like, okay, well, I don't know. Why don't we
just try with one store?
Do the most simple thing first.
And that's what they do.
And it's a good indication that they invented something
there's a lot of demand for, it says.
So they put the first camera,
it was first offered to sale to the public
at the Jordan Marsh department store in Boston.
This is 1948, the day after Thanksgiving.
As this was the only retail outlet in the country selling the camera,
demand was intense.
So they thought, okay, we might be able to sell out.
They put like 50, what is it, 56 cameras,
something like that.
Let's say 50 something cameras.
And they're like, maybe we'll sell all these from the day after Thanksgiving to Christmas.
They sell out the first day, they're gone.
This was exactly the reaction that they had hoped for.
This display of enthusiasm to the point where the retailer was unable to keep up with demand gave the camera an added fascination. So
then they build on this. They don't have any more they can sell right now because they're
manufacturing them. So it says the next marketing mini blitz took place in Miami. This is January
of the following year. The logic was that since, again, we'll start with one city, right? Or excuse me, one store. Now we're going to start with one city. The logic was that since
a good percentage of the people in Miami at any given time were vacationers with a fair amount
of pocket money on hand, they would provide a receptive market for a new luxury item.
And of course, the fact that they were travelers was at least equal significance since they would
be expected to be taking a lot of pictures. this is just common sense stuff right and when they returned home this is also genius and they would turn home
they would rapidly spread interest in the camera to all parts of the country in that way each
community would be seated with cameras to build up anticipation for the time when the product could
finally be distributed on a national basis next step was to select one major store in each target city
and offer that establishment.
There's another smart move.
I'm going to pick one.
I started with one store in Boston, went in one city.
Now in all cities, I'm going to pick one store for a 30-day exclusive.
But guess what?
We don't have any money for marketing.
That means if you want this contract, you're going to pay for it.
Another genius idea.
So it says they'll give you a 30-day exclusive on selling the camera in return for certain considerations polaroid one was to provide
advertising and promotion in that city something polaroid did not have the money for itself
and having the camera sold in but a single store in each city would further contribute to the image
of exclusivity and desirability that polaroid was after A lot of what I found most interesting in this book is really when
Land just speaks about his philosophy, the way he thinks of what he's doing. And this is Land
on human nature, how human nature interacts with new inventions. So he's speaking to Forbes,
there's an excerpt from an interview, Forbes magazine in 1975, and this is Edmund Land
speaking. Over the years, I've learned that every single significant invention has several characteristics.
By definition, it must be startling, unexpected, and must come to a world that is not prepared
for it.
If the world were prepared for it, it would not be much of an invention.
The second great invention for supporting the first invention is finding how to relate
the invention itself to the public.
Listen to this next sentence.
How fascinating is this? It is the invention itself to the public. Listen to this next sentence. How fascinating is this?
It is the public's role to resist.
All of us have a miscellany of ideas,
most of which are not consequential.
It is the duty of the inventor to build a new gestalt
to quietly substitute the gestalt the old one took,
the old one had place in the framework of society when he does so he's comparing the instant photographer for photography to codex
system like if you can get a picture right away why would you ever wait seven days for it that
doesn't make any sense so i'm going to educate you on why i feel that that my way is better is
what he's saying there and when he does his invention calmly and equitably becomes part of everyday life, and no one can understand why it wasn't always there.
It took us a lifetime to understand that if we are to make for every man a new commodity,
a commodity of beauty, then we must be prepared for the extensive teaching program needed to
prepare society for the magnitude of our invention i was surprised by this next idea
this is something i talked about all the way back on the podcast i did on akio marito the genius
founder of sony sony did something that's freaking genius i don't understand why more companies don't
he hired a paid critic i think if i remember correctly i don't have in front of me he was a
music student sony was making speakers at the time, maybe?
Something that needed somebody with a good ear.
And so this person was just writing in about all that.
He loved Sony products, but he's like, you have a lot of deficiencies.
I want to point them out to you so you can fix them.
Akio Murito loved that idea.
He hired him to point out the flaws in his product.
And like two decades later, that person winds up becoming the president of Sony.
So again, I think it's natural for human service criticism. But if you truly have somebody that loves what you're doing, and they think it could be improved in certain ways, like that's be receptive to that information. And this is very similar to what Edwin Land's doing here. He says, this guy named Adams, Adams signed on as a paid consultant, let's really say paid critic, to Polaroid and became famous within the company for his long memos, which were
as detailed as some of his photos. Oh, so I didn't, I need to back up and tell you who this is. This is
the legendary photographer Ansel Adams, that he winds up building a lifetime friendship with Edwin
Land. He said, later in his life, he said Edwin Land not only
had the greatest mind that he ever encountered, but the greatest heart too. So Ansel Adams signed
on as a paid consultant to Polaroid and became famous with the company for his long memos,
which were as detailed as some of his photographs, suggesting ways in which the value of Polaroid
film could be enhanced, as well as new applications for Polaroid photographic
technology. Adams was credited with several Polaroid product innovations. This is Edwin
Land on patents and individual creativity. Land is one of the major supporters of the American
patent system. His type of work essentially involves marketing the results of new scientific
and technological breakthroughs. Land therefore sets great store in the protection of the innovator with regard to his own ideas,
which, at its best, the patent system represents.
So this is Land talking about it.
To a large and fundamentally uncreative...
Come on, tell me this is not going to sound like Steve Jobs here.
To a large and fundamentally uncreative company, patents are a threat and a nuisance. For such organizations, innovation elsewhere represents a dangerous threat rather than a wholesome challenge. that innovation of great significance will not thrive and also so that they may acquire at low
cost the results of any innovation elsewhere which happens to become significant in the same speech
lan went on to reaffirm his faith in the individual innovator he feels that all innovation comes from
the individual um and that history is not guaranteed like progress is not guaranteed just as time passes on.
He does not believe that at all.
He calls that idea nonsense.
And there's some speeches of his that I'll quote from heavily moving into future podcasts with his regard to this.
And it usually comes with his scathing criticisms of formal education.
And then it beats out of the individual student his desire for greatness.
So it's something to know about land.
He's going to bring up the power of individuals over and over and over again.
Something I obviously very, very much believe in.
He implied that only the individual and not the large group can see a part of the world in a totally new and different way as he himself had.
So this is him talking about.
Now, this is a long section.
I love what he's going to say here.
Spontaneously and unpredictably, individuals arise here and there in the world, here and there in time, who introduce great clarifications, new words, new languages, and fresh statements, which cause the rate of scientific progress to jump ahead by 10,
20, or 100 years. We accept these men by paying tribute to their names, Ptolemy, Copernicus,
Galileo, Newton, Faraday, Maxwell, Einstein, but then we fail to learn the lesson that their names teach.
Just as the great steps in scientific history are taken by the giants of the centuries,
where they slough off the tentacles of the group mind,
so every significant step in each lesser field,
in each single field,
is taken by some individual who has freed himself from a way of thinking that is held by his friends and associates who may be more intelligent, better educated, better disciplined, but who have not mastered the art of the fresh, clean look at the old, old knowledge. If these individuals whom we call creative are in the domain of pure science
in a university, their reward and encouragement will come naturally from their scientific peers.
If, however, they are working in the domain of implied industrial science, which is how he thinks
of product creation and what he's doing, applied industrial science, then they themselves and the
industry that supports them
must be encouraged to disseminate that knowledge promptly
in this era when pure science and implied science
are almost indistinguishable.
One way to think about how Land ran,
like what's Land's philosophy on running Polaroid, right?
And I would say if you had to, if you could,
I don't even know if it's possible,
but if you had to, if you could, I don't even know if it's possible, but if you could summarize,
he would tell you that you need to be scientifically daring
and financially conservative.
So this is a little bit more about that.
And though it has grown enormously,
Land still maintained tight control of Polaroid.
The degree of fiscal conservatism exercised by Polaroid
is as unusual for a large corporation
as is the degree of Land's of Polaroid explaining.
He explains that as part of the chief's basic
philosophy meaning land land's view is that the company should be scientifically daring and
financially conservative uh talks about they don't have debt and then they put a lot of their money
into um municipal bonds and this is why i wonder i i this is really me questioning i wonder if he
did this on purpose let me read this to you and I'll tell you what I mean there. Because, you know, he grew up around academia, even though he criticizes it heavily. You know, he never spent much time more than a few miles away from Harvard and MIT. income from a large holding of municipal bonds, which produces tax-free revenues for the company.
This income source almost approximates the endowment concept of a large university.
So I wonder if he was, I haven't found anything on this. I'm just speculating here. I wonder if he
was inspired by what MIT and Harvard and other institutions like it do with their money,
which I think now is obviously different than it was, you know,
we're talking almost 50 years ago where we are in the story right now.
Actually, closer to 60 years.
I think another thing I admire a lot about Edwin Land is he set up the company
around his natural instincts.
And that's a great way to think about Charlie Munger's quote.
He's like, you need to follow your natural drift. Like you can't just try to copy what me and Warren Buffett
did because that may not suit your personality. This suits our personality. Who are you?
What's important to you? And build your company around that. And we see that with Edwin Land.
So it says, Land had established the company in such a way that its practical economic pursuits
were keeping with his own
personal intellectual interests. There's a great deal of alignment there. There's no conflict.
Depending on whom one talked to, Land was primarily thought of as an inventor, a corporate leader,
a sophisticated engineer, a renegade academic. I really like that term. He referred to himself as
a scientist. Land had begun both his scientific and business careers with the study of the behavioral and properties of light. This study created an
industry. That's a hell of a statement. His own natural intellectual interest created an industry.
It also created in Land a lifelong interest in the aspect of light. Once he understood the basic
properties of light, a feat he accomplished in his teens by going through every volume in the New York library possessed on the subject.
So that's that. You know what that reminded me of?
In my notebook, which you have access to, there's I took this notes on one of my favorite lectures ever.
It's by this guy named Bill Gurley. He's an he's an investor.
He gave a talk. I think it was to Texas MBA students.
It's called Running Down a Dream.
So in this talk,
Bill Gurley talks about
what he learned from Danny Meyer,
Bobby Knight, and Bob Dylan
and how they approach their craft.
So there's a couple of quotes in there
I think line up with what,
you know, Edwin Landon, 17 years old,
reading every single book
in the New York Public Library
about the subject he's interested in. So he says, this is Bill Gurley now, he says, strive to know more than
anyone else about your particular craft. You should be the most knowledgeable person. It is
possible to gather more information than somebody else. Be obsessive about learning in your field.
Hone your craft constantly. Understand everything you can possibly about your craft. Consider it an
obligation. Hold yourself accountable. Keep learning over time study the history know the pioneers
what we're doing here right and then this is the final quote that made me think of what edwin land
did uh the good news if you're going to research something this is your lucky day information is
freely available on the internet the bad news you have zero excuse for not being the most
knowledgeable person in any subject you want.
The information there is right there at your fingertips.
So that's in the Internet age. It's way easier.
Imagine having to sit in a library all day. Much more difficult, right?
But that's exactly what Edwin Land did.
There's a lot of text in here that him talking about the problems of formal education.
I'm just going to read one to you.
He says,
our young people,
for the most part,
unless they are geniuses,
after a very short time in college,
give up any hope of being individually great.
Land saw that as a catastrophic,
catastrophic problem for society,
one that needed to be fixed right away.
Something I love about Edwin Land is he was comfortable saying the words,
I don't know.
So an example of this,
they would go and give lectures and seminars.
Land and other executives,
there's actually somebody,
it's called the Vision Research Laboratory.
And so they'd go and meet with the students, right?
This is very important to him.
He spent a lot of time with students.
And so this is an example
of him being comfortable saying, I don't know. It says Land's strong inclination towards control this is very important to me spent a lot of time with students um and so this is an example of of
him being comfortable saying i don't know he says land strong inclination towards control apparently
did not carry over to the actual realm of scientific knowledge he is able to express doubt
a trait many leaders in and out of the scientists sciences have difficulty with
uh so a student in one of the seminars gives an example of that uh so he says another student in
the seminar uh was quoted saying,
I asked John McCann,
John McCann is the person working at Polaroid
that's in charge of the Vision Research Laboratory, right?
So he says, I asked John McCann a question
and he gave me a vague runaround answer.
Then I went and asked Dr. Land
and he said, we have no idea.
I love this.
This is Land's reaction to Sputnik
and at the same time reveals his priorities.
Edwin Land argued eloquently
that the Russians were teaching their youth
to enjoy science and focus on basic research,
while in the United States,
we are not now great builders for the future,
but are rather stressing production
in great quantities of things we have already achieved. So it's like
we're focused on we made something now let's just make more of it. And land's like no no focus on
things that only you can do that no one else can do invent new things bring new products and
services to bear. So now I've come to an idea that I think personally is going to make the
largest impact of my life and it's something that's echoed through several other founders that we've studied together on the podcast, right? And it's the importance of
concentration. And again, I think this can be applied to anything, to what I'm working on,
to what you're working on. He says, among all the components in land's intellectual arsenal,
the chief one seems to be simple concentration. Direct quote from Land. So he says, I find it very important to work intensively for long hours when I'm beginning to see solutions to a problem.
At such times, atavistic competences seem to come welling up.
So let me pause there.
I don't know if you know what that word is.
I had to look it up.
It means relating to or characterized by something ancient or ancestral.
So at times,
activistic competences seem to come welling up. You are handling so many variables
at a barely conscious level
that you can't afford to be interrupted.
If you are, it may take a year
to cover the same ground
you could otherwise cover in 60 hours.
So it says,
Land views his work
in the same light that he views Beethoven's.
Science is for him
a process of uncovering
individual human potential.
There's that word again.
He also believes that discoveries
are not arbitrarily transferable
from one person to the next,
nor might the same individual
under different circumstances be able to might the same individual under different circumstances
be able to achieve the same scientific results. Land is therefore extremely careful in optimizing
his and his associates' chance for success by reminding them of the fragile, tenuous nature
of scientific discovery, or on a more basic level, scientific
uncovery. This seems to be one of the chief tenets of his
Polaroid experience. This next section, it just really speaks
to the importance of having self-belief, which Edwin Land
definitely did. So it says, with assets totaling at least half a
billion dollars, Fortune magazine recounted Polaroid's
shaky financial plight at the end of World War II.
A direct quote from Fortune.
What has happened since is one of the great miracles of business.
Fully documented and widely publicized, but still awesome to contemplate.
I agree.
Land probably agreed with the awesome part of the statement.
But given his own abiding faith in himself and his company,
he considered the outcome something less than miraculous.
Either way you say, he expected it.
Just a few more things here.
He's got a great quote on life and work.
If anything characterized the company, the thing that drives the analyst wild is that we grow and grow and grow, not on the basis of the bottom line, but on the basis of faith.
That if you do your job well, that the last thing you have to worry about is money.
Just as if you live right, you will be happy. And that's one of the things I personally admire most about Edwin Land is he doesn't see business as the separate thing. He sees everything's related
to everything else, the way he lives his life, how you maintain happiness, how you build a
good business, how you do great scientific work, how you educate the people around you. Everything
is connected. You see that in the way he talks and communicates. He's got this, it's really a
philosophy on life that just happens to be tangentially related to product creation,
businesses, craftsmanship, stuff like that. He's also very artistic and rather romantic in his writing.
So this is from marketing materials for one of their cameras.
This is land writing. It's very interesting.
We could not have known and have only just learned,
perhaps mostly from children from two to five,
that a new kind of relationship between people and groups
is brought into being
by the sx70 so again i'm not crazy about his product names honestly uh sx70 is the most
important it's the camera took 30 years to make it's the one he had the idea of he had cameras
before that you could take the picture but this is the the full uh realization of his dream that
you just you pointed at something you look through
the viewfinder you press the button and out comes the picture okay uh so that's the sx70 and this is
what he's the product he's describing uh so it says uh we learned this from children in the two
to five that a new kind of relationship between people and groups is being brought into being by
sx70 when the members of the group are photographing and being photographed and sharing the photographs.
Now, this is where he gets more, you know, idealistic maybe.
It turns out that buried within us, there is a latent interest in each other.
There is tenderness, curiosity, excitement, affection, companionability, and humor.
Imagine somebody today describing their product like that, right?
It turns out in this cold world where man grows distant from man
and even lovers can reach each other only briefly,
that we have a yen for and a primordial competence
for a quiet, good humor delight in each other who the hell is talking
about their products in this way we have a prehistoric tribal competence for a non-physical
non-emotional non-sexual satisfaction in being partners in the lonely exploration of a once
empty planet a few pages later we see more of this his uniqueness
the way he approaches he's writing some of these uh stuff i'm going to quote you he writes in in
in shareholder letters and i read a lot i mean i read all of warren buffett shareholders i read
jeff bezos's like they're very fascinating they're very interesting there's a lot of good information
they're not like poetic um quote this this quote is an example of that
the present is the past biting into the future other corporate leaders might head up businesses
land sees himself as heading up an experience think about the subtitle of this book edwin land
and the polaroid experience he sees himself as heading up an experience any man in land's
position must certainly possess an ego of monumental proportions.
Land is no exception.
Any statement coming from him or a Polaroid official that is not stated in the superlative is likely to be suspect.
During student seminars, he has casually put down the chalk and stopped his equations long enough to make reference to my wonderful camera.
It is the most apparent in
land's frequently drawn analogies to the telephone he said at the 1972 annual meeting my fantasy is
that this camera will be as widely used as a telephone says in time magazine i think that
the camera can have the same impact as a telephone on the way people live and i'll close on this.
In this Forbes interview,
Land was asked how he sees himself.
His self-evaluation was no less ambitious than his evaluations of the products
that are so tied to his personality.
And it should come as no surprise
that this was so.
Direct quote from Land now.
I suppose that I am, first of all,
an artistic person.
I'm interested in love and affection
and sharing and making beauty part of everyday life.
And if I'm lucky enough to be able to earn my living by contributing to a warmer and richer world,
then I feel that is an awfully good luck.
And if I use all my scientific, professional abilities in doing that,
I think that makes for a great life.
That's 132 books down, 1,000 to go. If you want the full story, I'll leave a link that's in your show notes. If you buy the book using that
link, you'll be supporting the podcast at the same time. And I'll talk to you again soon.