Founders - #265 Becoming Steve Jobs: The Evolution of a Reckless Upstart into a Visionary Leader
Episode Date: August 30, 2022What I learned from rereading Becoming Steve Jobs: The Evolution of a Reckless Upstart into a Visionary Leader by Brent Schlender and Rick Tetzeli----Get access to the World’s Most Valuable Notebook... for Founders at Founders Notes.com----[3:11] His mind was never a captive of reality.[5:16] A complete list of every Founders episode on Steve Jobs and the founders Steve studied: Steve Jobs’s Heroes[7:15] Steve Jobs and The Next Big Thing by Randall Stross (Founders #77)[9:05] Steve Job’s Commencement Address[9:40] Driven and curious, even when things were tough, he was a learning machine.[10:20] He learned how to manage himself.[12:45] Anything could be figured out and since anything could be figured out anything could be built.[14:10] It was a calculation based on arrogance. — The Fish That Ate the Whale: The Life and Times of America's Banana King by Rich Cohen (Founders #255)[18:00] We were no longer aiming for the handful of hobbyists who liked to assemble their own computers. For every one of them there were a thousand people who would want the machine to be ready to run.[17:40] He was a free thinker whose ideas would often run against the conventional wisdom of any community in which he operated.[19:55] He had no qualms about calling anyone up in search of information or help.[20:40] I've never found anybody who didn't want to help me when I've asked them for help.I've never found anyone who's said no or hung up the phone when I called. I just asked.Most people never pick up the phone and call. Most people never ask.[21:50] First you believe. Then you work on getting other people to share your belief.[24:55] All the podcasts on Edwin Land:Land's Polaroid: A Company and the Man Who Invented It by Peter C. Wensberg (Founders #263)A Triumph of Genius: Edwin Land, Polaroid, and the Kodak Patent War by Ronald Fierstein (Founders #134)Land's Polaroid: A Company and the Man Who Invented It by Peter C. Wensberg (Founders #133)The Instant Image: Edwin Land and the Polaroid Experienceby Mark Olshaker (Founders #132)Insisting On The Impossible: The Life of Edwin Land and Instant: The Story of Polaroid (Founders #40)[25:00] My friend Frederick’s newsletter I was interviewed for[30:20] He was an extraordinary speaker and he wielded that tool to great effect.[31:00] Never underestimate the value of an ally. — Estée Lauder: A Success Story by Estée Lauder. (Founders #217)[32:50] If you go to sleep on a win you’re going to wake up with a loss.[33:00] Hard Drive: Bill Gates and the Making of the Microsoft Empire by James Wallace and Jim Erickson (Founders #140)[34:20] Software development requires very little capital investment. It is basically intellectual capital. The main cost is the labor required to design and test it. There's no need for expensive factories. It can be replicated endlessly for practically nothing.[38:10] He cared passionately and he never dialed it in.[39:45] To Pixar And Beyond: My Unlikely Journey with Steve Jobs to Make Entertainment History by Lawrence Levy (Founders #235)[42:58] Time carries most of the weight.[43:30] People that are learning machines and then refuse to quit are incredibly hard to beat. Steve jobs was a learning machine who refused to quit.[44:17] Steve Jobs and The Next Big Thing by Randall Stross (Founders #77)[49:40] Creativity Inc by Ed Catmull[50:30] There were times when the reactions against Steve baffled Steve.I remember him sometimes saying to me: Why are they upset?What that said to me was that he didn't intend to get that outcome. It was a lack of skill as opposed to meanness. A lack of skill of dealing with other people.[55:50] Creative thinking, at its best, is chalk full of failures and dead ends.[56:40] Successful people listen. Those that don’t listen don’t last long. —Michael Jordan: The Life by Roland Lazenby. (Founders #212) [58:40] You can't go to the library and find a book titled The Business Model for Animation. The reason you can't is because there's only been one company Disney that's ever done it well, and they were not interested in telling the world how lucrative it was.[1:01:20] The company is one of the most amazing inventions of humans.[1:02:25] The only purpose for me in building a company is so that the company can make products. One is a means to the other.[1:04:00] Personal History by Katherine Graham (Founders #152)[1:10:11] Creative Selection: Inside Apple's Design Process During the Golden Age of Steve Jobs by Ken Kocienda[1:11:12] What am I focusing on that sets me apart from my competitors?[1:13:00] The channel? We lost $2 billion last year. Who gives a fuck about the channel?[1:15:21] Time carries most of the weight. Stay in the game as long as possible.[1:16:41] The information he'd glean would go into the learning machine that was his brain. Sometimes that's where it would sit, and nothing would happen. Sometimes he'd concoct a way to combine it with something else he'd seen, or perhaps to twist it in a way to benefit an entirely different project altogether. This was one of his great talents, the ability to synthesize separate developments and technologies into something previously unimaginable.----Get access to the World’s Most Valuable Notebook for Founders at Founders Notes.com----“I have listened to every episode released and look forward to every episode that comes out. The only criticism I would have is that after each podcast I usually want to buy the book because I am interested so my poor wallet suffers. ” — GarethBe like Gareth. Buy a book: All the books featured on Founders Podcast ----Founders Notes gives you the ability to tap into the collective knowledge of history's greatest entrepreneurs on demand. Use it to supplement the decisions you make in your work. Get access to Founders Notes here. ----“I have listened to every episode released and look forward to every episode that comes out. The only criticism I would have is that after each podcast I usually want to buy the book because I am interested so my poor wallet suffers. ” — GarethBe like Gareth. Buy a book: All the books featured on Founders Podcast
Transcript
Discussion (0)
He shaped how I came to view the world.
We were both strong-minded, but he had a fully formed aesthetic and I did not.
It is hard enough to see what is already there, to remove the many impediments to a clear view of reality.
But Steve's gift was even greater.
He saw clearly what was not there, what could be there, and what had to be there.
His mind was never a captive of reality. Quite the contrary,
he imagined what reality lacked and set out to remedy it. His ideas were not arguments,
but intuitions, born of a true inner freedom. For this reason, he possessed an uncannily large sense of possibility, an epic sense of possibility.
Steve's love of beauty and his impatience with ugliness pervaded our lives. No object was too
small or insignificant to be exempt from Steve's examination of the meaning and the quality of its form. He looked at things and then created things from the
standpoint of perfection. That could be an unforgiving standpoint, but over time I came to
see its reasons, to understand Steve's unbelievable rigor, which he imposed first and most strenuously on himself. He was the most unfettered thinker I have ever known.
That was Steve's wife speaking at his memorial service after he passed away, and it's an excerpt
from the book that I'm going to talk to you about today, which is Becoming Steve Jobs,
The Evolution of a Reckless Upstart into a Visionary Leader, and it was written by Brent
Schlender and Rick Tetzeli.
So this is the second time I read this book. I originally read it several years ago.
It was episode 19 of Founders. At the time I first read this book, though, I had only read
two books about Steve Jobs. So I didn't really have an advanced understanding of who he was
and why his career is so important for future generations of entrepreneurs to study.
Since then, I've read over 10 books on Steve Jobs, many of them multiple times, and then
I tracked down every single biography I could find about the people that he discussed, whether
heroes or influences or people he studied when he was building Apple.
I made episodes about every single one of those books.
I'm going to include it in the show notes.
You can also go to founderspodcast.com and you'll find it there. It's about 40 different
episodes. And so all that reading and all that time invested heavily informs when I pick up the
book the second time. And the reason I wanted to reread this book is because if you should read,
you know, as many books as possible as you can about Steve Jobs, in my opinion,
but if you only had time to read one or if you only wanted to read one,
this is the one I would choose.
And the reason for that is because it's the book that covers most deeply his evolution,
the change from a reckless but gifted 20-year-old entrepreneur
into the older, wiser, maybe greatest entrepreneur of all time.
And Steve was able to make that transition because he was a
learning machine constantly honing his craft, which the author goes into right in the prologue when he
tells us why he wrote the book. I wanted to offer a fuller picture and deeper understanding of the
man I had covered so intensely. So that is Brent writing, one of the co-authors, and he actually
was a reporter and a writer. He covered Steve and the technology industry for over 20 years. And this is the perfect paragraph to start with because it's
going to inform the discussion that you and I are going to have about Steve today, right?
The most basic question about Steve's career is this. How could the man who had been such an
inconsistent, inconsiderate, rash, and wrongheaded businessman that he was exiled from the company
he had founded become the venerated CEO who
revived Apple and created a whole new set of culture divining products that transformed the
company into the most valuable and admired enterprise on earth. And then he gets into
the period of time in Steve's life, which I agree with what he's about to say here is it's most
important to study. There's a fantastic book I read a long time ago. After you read this book, I would read Steve Jobs and the next big thing.
It's written by Randall Strauss. It covers his wilderness years, the years between when he left
Apple and he returned. It's originally episode 77 of Founders. If you haven't listened to it,
you might want to listen to it after you get done with this episode. I kept coming back to the time
that many have described as his wilderness years, the dozen years between his first tenure at Apple and his return.
That era, from 1985 to 1997, is easy to overlook.
The lows aren't as dramatic as the blowups of his first tenure at Apple,
and the highs aren't as thrilling as those engineered in the first decade of the 21st century.
These were muddled, complicated times.
I call them on that podcast, it is bizarro Steve Jobs.
And the reason I call it that is because you have one of the most gifted entrepreneurs of all time
making bad decision after bad decision over and over again as he's trying to build next.
But those years are in fact the critical ones of his career.
That is when he learned most everything that made his
later success possible. And that is when he started to temper and channel his behavior.
To overlook those years is to fall into the trap of only celebrating success. We can learn as much,
if not more from failure, from promising paths that turned into dead ends. The vision,
understanding, patience, and wisdom that
informed Steve's last decade were forged in the trials of those intervening years.
And this next sentence is really the punchline of what he's trying to tell us. And I agree with it
after reading, you know, all these books on Steve Jobs, especially Steve Jobs and the next big thing,
he had to go through that. The last act of his career, the most valuable work he ever did,
would not have occurred without that happening. He mentioned that himself, if you have ever gone
back and listened to that commencement address that he gave at Stanford, I think back in 2005.
The failures, stinging reversals, miscommunications, bad judgment calls,
emphasis on the wrong values, the whole Pandora's box of immaturity were necessary prerequisites to the clarity,
moderation, reflection, and steadiness that he would display in later years. And yet, even as
you read about that time period, and he's making, you know, like you can clearly see in hindsight,
well, Steve, that's a terrible idea. Why are you doing that? You are impressed by his unwillingness
to quit. His perseverance was remarkable.
Driven and curious, even when things were tough,
he was a learning machine during these years.
And finally, I want to wrap up this section
before I go to what I think is the most important,
one of the most important events that happens in Steve's childhood.
Really, you can think about this section,
this next section is like why the book is named Becoming Steve Jobs.
And I wanted to include this because I really believe like this right now, this paragraph,
this is the process that you and I are in the middle of. Most of the people that you and I study on the podcast are dead. Their story is written. You and I are writing our story now.
Steve is a great object lesson in someone who masterfully improved his ability to make better So let's go to when Steve was five years old.
His father was a middle class,
maybe lower middle class mechanic, craftsman. He made furniture and he also rebuilt cars on the
weekend. And even from a very young age, he taught his son to take pride in the quality of what
you're making. And later in the book, and I'll talk to you about it later, there is a conversation
that's happening between Steve Jobs and Johnny Ive.
And they're having a discussion on how are we going to define success at Apple?
How do we know if we can consider the work that we're doing success?
Like what are the metrics that we're actually going to agree on?
And I think the conclusion they arrive at is the correct one. And that discussion is completely informed, in my opinion,
by what's happening when he's a young kid and the lessons that his father taught him.
He taught his son the paramount value of taking one's time, paying attention to details. And since
Paul was anything but rich, putting in the legwork to hunt for spare parts that were a good value.
He had a workbench out in his garage.
When I was about five or six, he sectioned off a little piece of it and said, Steve, this is your
workbench now. He showed me how to build things. It really was very good for me. He spent a lot of
time with me, teaching me how to build things. Paul is also raising his son in the right area. This is
the area that's now called Silicon Valley. This is in the late 1960s and early 1970s.
And this talks about the people that they're interacting with. This area attracted highly
educated electrical engineers, chemists, computer programmers, and physicists who were drawn to the
region's blossoming semiconductor telecommunications and electronics company living there a curious child could easily develop a much deeper sense of the
leading edge of technology than those growing up elsewhere in the country so you can combine the
environment with what his father's teaching he's like listen everything around you was built by
somebody else and these are not great mysteries you can learn to take them apart you can learn to
prove them you can learn then to build your own things that add value to other people in the world.
The implicit promise in all of this was that anything could be figured out.
And since anything could be figured out, anything could be built.
And that is so important because about 12 years after this is happening in Steve's life,
he's hanging out with Steve Wozniak and he's like, hey, we can also build our own computer.
Other people are building computers.
We don't have to build them, one,
the way everybody else is doing it,
but we can actually build a computer and sell it.
That was Steve Jobs' main contribution,
and sell it to other people.
And so I want to go to where Steve Wozniak
and Steve Jobs are having this conversation,
and where Steve makes a calculation based on
arrogance and he wound up being correct. This is really important. So at the time, for simplicity's
sake, we can just think about what Wozniak is building as a computer. He's working at HP at
the time and he's like, hey, Steve Jobs, we can't make our own computer. Why don't we pitch this to
my employer? Like they might want to manufacture a version version of this concept and the reason i say
it's a calculation based on arrogance is because steve has no education no experience no contacts
no resources and very little money and he's like we don't need hp and this is what he says he didn't
think was needed hp he thought he and was could develop a business of their own that business that
idea more eventually morphs into Apple. And the premise,
the idea behind what's happening here, you and I have seen over and over and over again in the
history of entrepreneurship. I use that maxim as a way for me to remember it because it came from
that book, The Fish That Ate the Whale. I just reread that book. It's episode 255 if you haven't
listened to it. But at the time, Sam Zimuri is an 18-year-old penniless immigrant living in Alabama.
So you have him on one hand.
On the other hand is one of the world's largest multinational corporations at that time in history,
United Fruit Company.
And he's saying, hey, these bananas that you guys are just throwing out,
I can actually find a market for.
I can build this.
I can build your trash as the cornerstone, the foundation of my future empire.
And that line is from that book. It was a calculation based on arrogance.
And Zamuri, like Jobs, where we are in this story, was right.
And so Steve says, forget that. We don't need HP. Let's gather up our meager resources and sell them.
So it says to raise cash, Steve sold his treasured Volkswagen minibus and was sold his
precious HP 65 programmable calculator. This is this is so wild. Think about, you know, Apple
today is what multiple trillion dollar company. This is the very first product they're going to
make together that they actually sell into the Apple brand, I should say. And they spent a
thousand dollars. And I want to bring that up because I was reading this. It says after spending
a thousand dollars in designing the board and contracting to have a few dozen made, they wind up making
their money back by selling these for fifty dollars a piece of that fifty dollar sales price.
Thirty dollars is profit. And this is when Steve makes the decision. He's like, hey,
we need to form a company. Let's name the company Apple. I'll get there in a minute.
But when I got to this section, there's something that Jeff Bezos said that has never left my mind.
And I've
known this for years and I've mentioned this several times on the podcast, but he talks about,
he was talking about the experience, like the unique experience that Amazon has because they've
grown multiple $10 million businesses into billion dollar businesses. And he talks about having that
institutional knowledge is very important. And he says it in a metaphor that's fantastic. And he
says, we know from our, this is Jeff speaking now, we know from our past experiences that big things start small. The biggest oak
starts from an acorn. If you want to do anything new, you've got to be willing to let that acorn
grow into a little sapling and then into a small tree. And maybe one day it will be a big business
on its own. And this next story is an example of that so they make their
first version of their computer they register apple as a california business this is in 1976
and they were part of this small group of hobbyists people are really enthusiastic about
technology and personal computing i don't even think there was such a term as personal computing
at this time in history if i'm not mistaken and so they go to present it and this is important
so stephen was made one more trip to the Homebrew Computer Club to show off their finished,
fully assembled version of their new computer.
The reaction from most club members, however, was tepid.
Most were tinkers who believe that half the fun of computing was in designing and building
their own machines.
It's not in this book.
There's another fantastic, Steve reflects on this later on in life in another book I
read.
And he's like, the one insight that I had is like for every one hobbyist, right,
that actually wants to go through the trouble of like building their own computer and picking out the parts and doing all that stuff.
He's like, there's a thousand customers that just want to go to the store and buy a computer like they'd buy any other appliance.
And so if you think about what I'm about to read to you now, go back to that line.
It's a calculation based on arrogance, right?
So they do this presentation.
Almost everybody in the club is like, no, this doesn't make sense.
This is against our ethos.
It says, with the Apple I, all you had to do was set it up, connect it to a keyboard and a monitor, plug it in and turn it on.
So like, this is stupid.
This isn't going to work.
Now, why is that important?
Because this next sentence is fantastic understanding of Steve Jobs.
And I would argue almost every other person that you and I study on this podcast.
He was a free thinker whose ideas would often run against
the conventional wisdom of any community in which he operated.
Steve didn't care at all.
It was irrelevant, your criticism of what he wanted to do.
He was going to make it happen.
And it's what happens at the very end of this meeting. This guy named Paul walks up to them. He owns a small computer shop. I think it
might be like a small chain of computer shops. And it says, the owner of the Byte Shop computer
store introduced himself to Steve and Woz after the presentation. He was impressed enough to want
to talk about doing some business. So Steve always jumps on things as fast as possible.
They're like, okay, cool. We'll do some business. The next day, Steve walks into Paul's shop.
He walks over to the bite shop, right?
And he does a deal with Paul where he says,
okay, you pay $500 and we'll make 50 of them.
He goes from prototype the night before
to $25,000 in sales.
And this story was always humorous to me
because you think about, you know,
Apple, the multi-trillion dollar company today think about this the first apple sale ever made was
made barefoot barefoot he walks into the bite shop and does this sale he does not have shoes on
and then there's a line here that i think is really important steve said yes first and then
learn how to later without missing a beat, Steve happily promised delivery,
even though he and Woz had neither the wherewithal to buy the components
nor anything like a factory or a labor force necessary to build anything.
So at the beginning of Apple, we have the first major conflict in Steve's life.
He has this famous saying that he says later on, this famous maxim.
He's like, listen, it's more fun to be a pirate than join the Navy.
He wanted to build insanely great products from the time he was a very young man until the day
he died. He did not want to be a businessman. As he told me several times, I didn't want to
be a businessman because all the businessmen I knew I didn't want to be like. Steve's natural
inclination was to position himself as the critic, the rebel, the visionary, a nimble David against
the stodgy Goliath. And so one way to resolve this conflict,
he's like, listen, we know we're building a good product. They're about to build the Apple II,
one of the most commercially successful Apple products of all time, but to do so, they need
help. And so there's just one sentence here that if you've spent any time studying the life of
Steve Jobs, you know is one of his superpowers. He had no qualms about calling anyone up in search
of information or help. That is a trait that he had at the very beginning of his lifepowers. He had no qualms about calling anyone up in search of information or help. That
is a trait that he had at the very beginning of his life, the one he possessed his entire life.
So I'm going to go to another, I'm going to go to my notebook. So I, I, this is like several years
ago. There's this interview with Steve. He's probably late thirties, maybe early forties.
I think this is like right before he goes back to Apple. And he's talking about his ability
to ask for help. And he's talking about how this is something that separates people like him who
accomplish things from people who just dream about it. And so this is a these are notes from
a talk that he gave, you know, probably 40 years ago, 30 years ago, he says, I've always actually
found something to be very true, which is most people don't get those experiences because they
never ask. I have never found anybody who didn't want to help me when I've asked them for help. I have never found
anyone who said no or hung up the phone when I called. I just asked. And when people ask me,
I try to be as responsive to pay back that debt of gratitude. Most people never pick up the phone
and call. Most people never ask.
And that is what separates the people that do things
from the people that just dream about them.
You got to act and you got to be willing to fail.
You got to be ready to crash and burn with people on the phone,
with starting a company, with whatever.
If you're afraid of failing, you won't get very far.
And I think a key part here is the fact that Steve had a deep
belief in the excellence of what him and Woz were building. And so he has no problem. He starts
going around Silicon Valley and one phone call after another, he's like, I'm going to find people
that can help me. I'm going to find venture capitalists. I'm going to find company builders.
I'm going to find anybody that can tell me how can I take this idea and transform it into a company?
He had such faith in the excellence of his work that he just assumed that someone would eventually agree to fund it.
And the way I think about that is like, how can I take that idea and never forget it?
First, you believe and then you work on making other people believe, too.
He tirelessly navigated the Valley's network of experts, one phone call and one meeting at a time.
And so then we skip ahead in the timeline and we see these two main ideas that I want to talk to
you about, which is this is about the evolution of Steve Jobs, the fact that he was not static,
he changed. And that Steve, like every single other one of history's greatest entrepreneurs,
spent their very valuable time studying the great entrepreneurs that came before them.
That is why there's almost 40 episodes on Steve Jobs and the people he studied in the
archive. Listen to this. Steve developed a reputation as an egomaniac who wasn't willing
to learn from others. It is a fundamental misunderstanding of the man, even during his
youngest, brashest, and most overbearing years, the time in history where we are in Apple's history
and in Steve's life history. While Steve didn't yet have the skills to build a great company,
he admired those who had pulled it off,
and he would go to great lengths to meet them and learn from them.
Now, this is Steve talking about the lessons he learned
from some of technology's greatest entrepreneurs and company builders, right?
None of these people were really in it for the money.
Dave Packard, for example, left all his money to the foundation, obviously one of the co-founders of HP.
He may have died the richest guy in the cemetery, but he wasn't in it for the money.
Bob Noyce, co-founder of Intel, is another.
I'm old enough.
So this is this quote that I'm reading from Steve Jobs.
This comes towards the end of his life.
So he's reflecting back on it.
He says, I'm old enough to have been able to get to know these guys before they passed away
is what he's talking about.
I met Andy Grove, who was then the CEO of Intel.
When I was 21, I called him up and I told him,
there's a superpower again, right?
He's just gonna call you on the phone.
He winds up calling Bill Hewlett,
which is David Packard's partner, obviously,
when he was like 12 or 13 years old,
because everybody's name and number used to be in the white pages.
So he just, he had the, like, that just proves like his level of,
I guess, aggressiveness or his like default aggressive nature.
He just calls them up.
He's like, hey, I'm just 12 years old.
I'm Steve Jobs.
I'm trying to build a frequency counter.
You guys have parts for them.
Will you give me parts?
And Bill winds up laughing and laughing. And then not only gives him the parts, but gives him the job during the summer to assemble
frequency counters at HP. So it says, I'm old enough to have known, to be able to get to know
these guys. I met Andy Grove, CEO of Intel, when I was 21. I called him up and told him I had heard
he was really good at operations and asked if he could take, if I could take him out to lunch.
I did that with Jerry Sanders, founder of Advanced Micro Devices, and with Charlie Spork,
founder of National Semiconductor, and others. Basically, I got to, this is the main reason I'm telling you this and why it's so important that you and I do the same, whether we do it in person or whether we have to use, you know, these people mentors in like a historical context, which is exactly what books are. We're all company builders. And the particular scent of Silicon Valley at that time made a very big impression on me.
And on the very next page, he talks about the person I've spent.
I just spent what?
The last right before I read this book, I spent probably 10 days reading.
It's got to be close to a thousand pages on Edwin Land.
I just reread three books on Edwin Land.
They're the last two episodes.
Obviously, there's five or six episodes on Edwin Land in the archive.
And this is the reason. It's because wewin Land in the archive, and this is the
reason. It's because we have, in my opinion, Steve Jobs is the greatest entrepreneur to ever live,
and he's saying, hey, this is my hero. This is the person I patterned my career off of.
I just was interviewed on a podcast and a newsletter with my friend Frederick,
and something he asked me, which I don't know if it'll make it in there, but he's like,
why do you read books? You don't just read one book on a person
like he was he mentioned edwin lane he's like you read five books on edwin lane he's like essentially
like what is wrong with you i told him i can't help it i have to read once i find somebody
interesting i have to read every single thing i can find on him i've just always been like that
some were heroes like edwin lane steve admired many things about land his obsessive commitment
now this is steve talking about why he admired one of the reasons he admired Edwin Land. His obsessive commitment to creating products of style, practicality,
and great consumer appeal and his reliance on gut instinct rather than consumer research
and the restless obsession and invention he brought to the company he founded. That is Steve
describing Edwin Land. Come on, come on on you could take out edwin land's name
put in steve jobs and it's the exact it still holds true steve had an obsessive commitment
to creating products of style practicality and great consumer appeal he steve relied on gut
instinct rather than consumer research and steve had a restless obsession and an invention that
he brought to the company he founded i never get tired of hearing stories like this i absolutely
love it i'm going to move ahead because i want to hit on another thing. Again, this is not a
summary of the book. These are just the ideas that I want to remember. The ideas that I think I can
use in my work, the ideas I know you can use in your work. And this is the idea. The storyteller,
one of my favorite quotes of Steve Jobs is like, the storyteller is the most powerful person in
the world. And storytelling is a skill like anything else. And one that you can practice
and get better at. And so listen to how good.
Now, obviously, we all know.
You've probably seen a lot of the product demonstrations and the interviews that Steve did later in his life.
He was also gifted.
Now, he's a better storyteller later, obviously.
But he was gifted.
Listen to the storytelling ability he has as a 22-year-old.
This is remarkable.
There is a long and wonderful quote from a New Yorker piece in late 1977 that offers
rich proof of Steve's fully formed verbal mastery. It was written at a time when the average reader
knew so little about computers. So the magazine's reporter is at a like a computer conference,
right? And he finds a young Steve Jobs manning the Apple computer booth. And so he walks up to him
and here let's go into Steve's verbal mastery.
I wish we had these personal machines when I was growing up, Jobs tells him,
before continuing on for a total of 224 words. This is a masterclass in marketing, sales,
and product positioning in 224 words, in my opinion. People have been hearing all sorts
of things about computers during the past 10 years through the media. Supposedly, computers
have been controlling various aspects of their lives.
Yet, in spite of that, most adults have no idea what a computer really is or what it can or can't do.
Now, for the first time, people can actually buy a computer for the price of a good stereo,
interact with it, and find out what it's all about.
Consider the camera.
There are thousands of people across the country taking photography courses.
They'll never be professional photographers. They just want to understand what the photographic process is all about.
Same with computers.
We started a little personal computing manufacturing company in a garage in Los Altos in 1976.
Now we're the largest personal computer company in the world.
We make what we think of as the Rolls Royce of personal computers.
It's a domesticated computer.
People expect blinking lights, but what they find is that it looks like a portable typewriter,
which, connected to a suitable readout screen, is able to display in color.
There's a feedback it gives to people who use it, and the enthusiasm of the users is tremendous.
We're always asked what it can do, what and it can do a lot of things.
But in my opinion, the real thing it is doing right now is to teach people how to program the computer.
That's the end of the 224 words.
Then this author, this Brent's interpretation of what just occurred is fantastic.
So I'm going to read that to you as well.
The reporter asked if Steve would mind us telling his age.
22. speaking off the cuff
to a passing journalist steve finds so many ways to demystify for the average person the insanely
geeky device that he and was had created he understood their fundamental fear that computers
may take over too much of modern life he sympathizes with their ignorance he offers
several analogies which is how most people think.
Analogies are extremely useful way to get ideas into other people's brains. He offers several
analogies to comforting examples that they will understand. Typewriters, cameras. Indeed, he makes
using a computer seem no more complicated than taking a photograph. Going so far as to call the
Apple II domesticated, and yet he elevates this is this is
his gift it's incredible that he was able to do this so at a young age listen to this this is
about the product positioning part i mentioned earlier and yet he elevates both his computer
assuming his company and its computer into something aspirational he links this machine
made a few months earlier a few months ago by some disheveled California misfits to Rolls-Royce, the 73-year-old paragon
of sophisticated industrial manufacturing and elite consumer taste. He even calls Apple a
world leader, an absolutely unprovable claim that rockets the little company into the same league
as IBM, which was then the industry's giant.
He was an extraordinary speaker, and he wielded that tool to great effect.
So that's the upside of young Steve Jobs.
Let's go to the downside, or one of the downsides.
This is the dividing line in Steve's life.
If you're not valuable to his work, you are completely replaceable.
And so this is somebody describing Steve at this point. His name's Lee Clow. He was the ad director. He wants to becoming a very close friend of Steve Jobs. He says, Steve had this incredible bandwidth, but he devoted almost all
of it to work. And this is pre-evolution of Steve, right? He gets, he's so much better at dealing
with people, at leading people, at building a company in the second return to
Apple than he was in the first. And he made a mistake that you and I know not to make,
because when we went over Estee Lauder's fantastic autobiography, it's back on episode 270,
or excuse me, 217. She made the point multiple times in that book, and I think I brought it to
your attention multiple times in that episode, to never underestimate the value of an ally.
Stop going around collecting enemies. Collect allies and friends. Steve was incapable,
absolutely incapable of doing this at this point in his career, and this leads him to getting
kicked out of his own company when he turns 30. Steve's behavior isolated him within the company.
He had little sense at this point of how important it can be to have true allies in a corporate setting. It was a blind spot that would catch up to him eventually.
And so no study of Steve Jobs' life is complete without introducing a main supporting character.
Their careers weave in and out of each other's for decades. And that's Bill Gates. This is the
first time Bill Gates pops up in the story. The Apple II is already super successful. They're selling a ton of them.
Steve is rich.
Apple is already public.
Bill Gates is on the come up.
They're meeting.
They're both in their 20s and says in 1981, Bill Gates visited Apple.
The 26-year-old CEO of Microsoft made the trip fairly often since his company worked closely with Apple on programming languages.
At the time, Steve was far richer and far more well-known.
And the reason I'm bringing this to your attention is because it's a massive mistake Steve's about to make here.
This is what Bill Gates saw that Steve Jobs missed.
And it's the impact that a major company like IBM is going to have when it ships its first personal computer.
And because of the immense success, they go from zero computers sold to a public company four years later that's
printing money. The Apple II is a massive hit. And that quick success inflated, you know, Steve's
already gigantic ego. And it opens up blind spots when you do that. The way I think about this,
if you go to sleep on a win, you're going to wake up with a loss. Steve is about to go to sleep on
a win. So let's go to what, again, I love studying the early days of Bill Gates.
I think maybe the most popular episode of Founders ever was episode 140.
When I read that book, Hard Drive, I'm going to reread the book again soon.
And the reason I think that that book is so fantastic is because for as famous and as successful as Bill Gates is, there's not very many great biographies of him.
And that is nearly a perfect biography for you and I to study
because it covers the first 35 years of his life.
You have an understanding exactly who he is, how extreme he is,
and then it ends in the Microsoft IPO.
And so at this point in the book that I'm holding in my hand,
where we're at, Gates comes to visit.
Steve is like, yo, do you see what's about to happen here, man?
And Steve is completely oblivious.
Gates came to business naturally.
Gates predicted, this is fascinating too,
an entirely new kind of software industry would arise.
Really, the author's telling us about
what is the most important impact or insight Bill Gates had
that impacted the technology industry.
So think about the ideas, like,
to have a pure software company was not something people ever considered.
Gates predicted an entirely new kind of software industry would arise.
At that point, this is why. At that point, software development was mostly in the hands of the makers of computer hardware, who buried the development costs in the final price of the
devices they sold. The prospect of making money by building software, Gates believed,
would spur innovation. And he wrote a manifesto about this. It says,
Gates' manifesto is every bit as significant as Moore's Law and the explosion of personal computing.
Software development requires very little capital investment.
It is basically intellectual capital.
The main cost is the labor required to design and test it.
There's no need for expensive factories.
It can be replicated endlessly for practically nothing.
Gates was right on this point.
Accepting the fact that software was worth paying for led to the emergence of a dynamic new industry.
This was Gates' greatest contribution to the world.
And it's so amazing he saw this before anybody else did.
Think about how much economic value comes from software today.
Like, it's incalculable, right?
And what's crazy is, like, he had this idea back in the 1970s.
Microsoft winds up being the first company in history.
I always found this fascinating.
It's the first company in history to sell a billion dollars of software in one year.
And part of being able to do that is obviously he's relentless.
I think I called him on that podcast.
There's so many people that have sent me messages over the years about...
I called Bill Gates, the young Bill Gates, that he was Genghis Khan dressed in a Mr. Rogers costume.
And I don't know where that came from, other than when you read the book, it's clear.
Like he's one of the most ruthless and relentless entrepreneurs in history.
And you wouldn't picture that like looking at him.
And people who knew that when he was 21 somebody else uh said that he was in this he was in this um fight over uh there was like some kind of lawsuit going on and on the other
side of the lawsuit is this new company and bill's former partner and bill's former partner is like
dude this is not going to be easy as fighting this guy they took a look at you know they're
like this this is some 21 year old kid nerd with shaggy hair. He's like, we'll eat him alive.
And he says it was kind of like Churchill thinking he could deal with Stalin.
So I wasn't the only one to realize how extreme he was at that age.
So let's go back to this stuff.
So it says, listen, you know, he was right.
The idea that the software is worth paying for, that you can build entire new businesses around it,
entire new industries that can enable so much more if you get it out of the hands of hardware makers was Gates' greatest contribution to the world. He was his role as the
first champion of the concept that software itself had value. And again, I don't think you probably
become the first or you found the company that becomes the first company to sell a billion
dollars worth of software without arriving at that insight before most people even like before a lot of other people
like there is an advantage to just arriving at insights that is completely at odds with the
existing nature of the uh the industry that you're operating in right steve had always decided this
is the problem so they're having this conversation and you know ibm's this is 1981 ibm shipping his
first computer and steve's like this is irrelevant
no one's going to choose that ugly piece of thing over this like piece of art this master
like uh result of this this master craftsmanship that we've made here steve had always derided big
blue ibm as a lumbering monstrosity and truly believe that no discerning buyer would ever
perfect or would ever prefer a computer from IBM to one made by Apple.
Gates, on the other hand, knew this might be the beginning of something big. But on that fall
afternoon, no one Gates spoke to at Apple seemed aware that their world was about to change,
much less acted worried. Years later, Gates remembered that I kept walking around asking,
isn't this a big deal but no one seemed concerned
and then the book is just full like spread out through so many pages i hope you buy the book i
hope i can convince you to buy the book and if you do i would work through it very slowly it's only
400 pages uh but still it took me over 20 hours to really like digest and understand and i do not
obviously never rush through it definitely not going to rush through this book because there's
just so it covers just so much history of not only Steve's
life the technology industry Apple in particular but spread throughout the book there's just these
fantastic one-liners and they don't need much explanation they give you an insight of who he
was and what was important to him he cared passionately and he never dialed it in so let's
go through this idea that our strengths and weaknesses are constantly there.
They complement each other.
They work off each other.
Our successes and failures do the same.
If you really think about what's taking place,
at this point in the story,
he's all, for all intents and purposes,
gonna get kicked out of Apple.
And it goes back to this idea
that if you go to sleep on a win,
you'll wake up with a loss.
After the initial success with the Apple II,
think about this.
Steve, probably the greatest entrepreneur to ever live,
is going to have three commercial failures in a row. The Apple III, the Lisa, and the Macintosh.
Now, the Macintosh, obviously, is like one of the most beloved computers, but commercially
successful. Like the huge launch they did around it, the sales start off really, really great,
and then they quickly peter out to the point, I think this book makes the point where a few years, even after this, the Apple two is still responsible for something like
70 or 80% of all of Apple's revenue. So think about it. You can have a massive success. Then
you've got three straight failures, but even at the same time that he's having three straight
failures, he is right about this. This is where he discovers hidden in George Lucas's Lucasfilm division is what's going
to eventually become Pixar.
Pixar is what makes Steve Jobs a billionaire.
The entire unbelievable, unpredictable journey of how he goes from almost spending his last
dollar on Pixar.
When he leaves Apple, he has like $70 million.
He puts 50 of it into Pixar over time, and they're still
losing money before they do Toy Story. I did this entire podcast on this because the first CFO,
the guy that Steve recruited, he wrote a book about the history of Pixar, which is fascinating.
It's episode 235. If you haven't listened to that, I would go back. That's almost like another
Steve Jobs episode because he's obviously a main character in there. But just the level of persistence is just unbelievable.
So I don't want to get distracted, though.
The point I'm trying to make here is in the middle of failure after failure after failure is one of his greatest successes.
He just didn't know it at the time.
So he visits the graphics group, which is what Lucas's division is called.
They're going to be renamed Pixar.
And he realizes, oh, these are the best in the world at what they're doing.
Apple should buy them. At this point, he didn't have any sway with the board. He's just about to be renamed Pixar. And he realizes, oh, these are the best in the world at what they're doing. Apple should buy them.
At this point, he didn't have any sway with the board.
He's just about to get kicked out.
So they're like, no, Steve, we're not buying them.
He visited a graphics group made up of leading-edge computer graphic technicians
who were working for film director George Lucas
and began to think that the possibilities for computers with high-end 3D graphics images were limitless.
This is in the 80s. This is happening.
So he suggested that the Apple board might want to consider buying the group. These guys were way ahead of us on graphics. Way ahead,
Steve said. They were way, way, way ahead of anybody. I just knew in my bones that this was
going to be very important. The board was not paying much attention to Steve anymore, and they
passed on acquiring what would eventually become known as Pixar. So he gets fired. He goes into a
deep, deep depression. This is incredibly important
for you and I to realize the ups and downs of life never end until we die. And especially for
entrepreneurs, because this entrepreneurial emotional rollercoaster, the best term I've
ever heard about this comes from Marc Andreessen, where he's like, listen, if you're building a
company, you only experience two emotions. And they're almost like there's like a bipolarness
to this. It's euphoria and terror we
are in the terror part of steve jobs story you have one of the most aggressive driven people
that have ever lived and he's completely lost he's thinking about leaving the computer industry
forever retiring and being an artist in europe for a while he behaved more like a retiree than
one of the world's most highly driven 30 year olds. He just wasn't ready. He did not have
the skill set yet to be able to not only found a great company, but to lead a great company.
He was a slave to so much else, to his celebrity, to his unbalanced and obsessive desire for
perfection, to his managerial flightiness, to his shortcomings as an analyst of his own industry, to his burning need for revenge, and the most important part, to his own blindness of his faults. At 30 years old,
Steve Jobs wasn't ready. And why is that important for you and I to remind ourselves of that? Because
in this industry, there's like this entrepreneurial industry that gives into this myth that you have
these like young 20- something year old geniuses
that start a company and can do it for a long time and and they just intuitively get it you and i
know how many biographies of in the history of entrepreneurship have we gone over i can't think
of an example where the younger version of the entrepreneur is better than the older version
that doesn't mean you can't have success as a young person doesn't mean obviously you can't
start a company you can manage you can keep you can do it for decade after decade but if all these entrepreneurs if we could
if we could dig them up from their grave and ask them at what point in history do you think at one
point in your life do you think you were the the peak of your powers the best they're not going to
say when i was 20 when i was 25 when i was 30 a main theme of this podcast that is rooted in like
my subconscious now is that time carries most of the weight. And in nearly every case,
you can have a 40 or 50 year old version of the entrepreneurs you and I study. And if they,
we were able to have them do a one-on-one battle for their 20 or 25 year old version of themselves,
they would kick the living shit out of them. The 45 year old version of Steve Jobs could take
10 of the 25 year old versions of Steve Jobs. And the reason I bring
this up because I talk to founders all the time and someone's like, oh, I'm 30, I'm 35. I haven't
achieved what I, what I, what I thought I would at this age or, oh, it's too late. Bull shit.
If you're in that spot, just keep going. People that are learning machines and they refuse to
quit are incredibly hard to beat. Steve Jobs was a learning machine who refused to quit.
And in this book that I hold in my hand right now,
you have a 30-year-old Steve Jobs saying,
I give up.
I can't do this anymore.
I am brokenhearted.
But that feeling passed.
He got up, dusted himself off, said,
Okay, you win the first fight.
Now best two out of three.
Here's another example of Steve Jobs, a young Steve Jobs, not being ready yet.
He's raised a bunch of money from Ross Perot, from giant corporations.
Every single decision he's making winds up being the wrong one.
There's an entire book about that, like I mentioned earlier.
Please do pick up that book and read it, especially if you're in the middle of building a company.
And why did I just say that a 45-year-old Steve Jobs or a 40-year-old Steve Jobs would kick the living crap out of the younger
version of him? He is trying to do a negotiation with a giant company, IBM. He needs this money
right now. He needs a win. They're about to give him them $60 million that he desperately needs.
And we're going to contrast this right now with the Disney-Pix Pixar negotiations that he's going to do like 15 years into the
future, which was a masterful negotiation. This is the, whatever the opposite of a masterful
negotiation is. IBM had decided to license his next step operating system for use in, uh, for
use in a line of its own engineering workstations. The world's biggest computer company running
Steve's operating system
seemed like it would be a great endorsement. They would also provide $60 million, which was
critical operating capital for Next at this time because they were burning through its investors'
money. But Steve never seemed to quite know how to play his cards with IBM. He displayed an
unsettled and juvenile mix of hubris and uncertainty.
There was one meeting where he went in, one meeting with IBM, obviously, where he went in and actually told them,
I really don't understand why you guys want to help us.
Psychologically and emotionally, signing on with IBM was every bit as complicated for Steve as begging Bill Gates to support his computer.
So they're referencing a story that happened earlier in the history of next where he's like bill we like he's at this point uh they were so steve was still trying to
make next hardware and he's like bill we need you really to uh to build software for this thing
please and remember the reversal of fortunes they meet in steve's office steve's a richer more
successful than one bill gates is 26 now a decade later the roles are completely reversed right
steve i think at this time bill gates is close to being one of the richest people in the world. And Bill Gates tells Steve, develop for it.
I'll piss on it. And so he shows his ruthlessness. He's like, you're not selling anything. This
market is tiny. I'm not developing anything for it. So that's what they're referencing there.
So it says, Steve wanted to be the hero, not a secondary partner to a more powerful
computer company. If IBM sold a lot of computers running their version
of Next, Next Step, the glory would be theirs and not his. Remember, there's ego. I understand it's
not the ideal situation, but you're burning through money. You're not selling anything.
He's about to have a mass exodus of like the first, I think they start next with him and like
five other people. Almost all of them are about to leave very shortly. So he's in dire need. That's
why you have to get this deal done. And so it says he killed the IBM deal by failing to follow through as a good business partner.
So the person that eventually, the person that reached out that wanted to do the deal,
it gets replaced. So now there's another person running the company or in charge of this division
rather. And his name is Canovino, I think. So it says Canovino logically assumed IBM could use
next 2.0 version on its machines,
but then Steve met him and held him up for more money, leading to another round of protracted
negotiations. And they say Steve overplayed his hand. This Conovino guy got pissed off,
and he just stopped taking Steve's calls and just abandoned the project.
And what this book does wonderfully is comparing and contrasting. When he's making every wrong decision at Next, right, he's in the middle of a giant failure.
Another part of him was spending time at Pixar. And Pixar, the experience he has at Pixar,
is everything for Steve's growth as a leader and a CEO later on when he goes back to Apple.
At Pixar, he would lay the foundation of two of his greatest strengths, his ability to fight back
in times of distress and his ability to make the most of an innovation that put him ahead of anyone else
in that field in other words it taught him how to keep his head and fight back when cornered and how
to run like the wind in the open field and it became the place where he really learned and this
is this is so important that what they're about to the point he's trying they're going to make
right here albeit slowly so he's really learned but slowly and reluctantly and against his natural instincts.
This is the evolution.
Remember, becoming Steve Jobs, the evolution of a reckless upstart into a visionary leader.
This is the beginning of the evolution.
He began to go against his natural instincts that sometimes the best management technique is to forego micromanagement
and give
good talented people the room they need to succeed. The co-founder of Pixar, the guy that wrote
Creativity Inc., Ed Catmull, taught Steve Jobs more about management than anyone else in his
entire career. Although it would take almost a decade, Steve's Pixar adventure would help him
rediscover his self-respect, make him a billionaire, and align him with people who would teach him more
about the management than anyone he'd ever worked with. Without the case that Catmull, Ed Catmull, is the best manager of creative people ever.
Overseeing the Motley Crue at Pixar had turned Catmull into an expert imaginative manager of creative people.
He started treating management itself as a kind of art. This quiet bearded man with a
measured professional demeanor knows more about managing and motivating creative people than
anyone I've met. So this is now Brent. Remember, he covered the technology industry. He's interviewed
a ton of people, 70s, 80s, 90s, all of these entrepreneurs and very formidable founders,
many of which I've done episodes about, right? He's saying, listen, this guy knew more about managing
and motivating creative people than anyone I've met,
including Sony's founder, Akia Morita,
Intel's Andy Grove, Bill Gates, Jeffrey Katzenberg,
and Southwest Airlines' Herb Keller.
His success would prove a powerful example for Steve.
At the end of his fantastic book, Creativity, Inc.,
there's an afterword called The Steve We Knew.
I think it's like 20 or 30 pages. And he just tells the story of his relationship book, Creativity Inc. There's an afterword called The Steve We Knew. I think
it's like 20 or 30 pages. And he just tells the story of his relationship with Steve. And he's
just like the Steve that's reported about in the news, his public persona. This is after he passed
away, obviously, is not the person that I worked every day with. You know, they had the longest
uninterrupted partnership in Steve's life. It was like 25 or 26 years, 24 years, something like that.
And so I just want
to pull out one or two things that Catmull says in this book, because I think this is so important.
Over time, Catmull became perhaps the keenest observer of Steve Jobs. This and what he says,
he's like this reckless, jerky asshole behavior that Steve was known for when he was in his 20s
and 30s was true, but it was a deficit of skill this blew my mind
catmull called catmull saw pertain potential for change there were times when the reactions
against steve baffled steve i remember him meaning steve sometimes saying to me why are they upset
what what that said to me was that he didn't intend to get that outcome. This is the most important sentence of
what Ed is telling you and I. It was a lack of skill as opposed to meanness. A lack of skill
of dealing with other people. And so I already mentioned earlier the fact that it's, how many
investors would have done that? The idea is like, I have 70 million. I believe in this. My main
company, Nex, is not doing well. I'm going to dump $50 million of the $70 million I have into Pixar.
And I'm still writing checks every month.
Every month.
The crazy thing is, up until they do this distribution deal, the original distribution deal with Disney,
Steve is floating the company every month.
It's just like, there's no end in sight here.
And so, this is just a few sentences.
And it just jumps off the page if you've done any studying about Steve Jobs, Pixar, Next, Ed Catmull and everything else.
And so we go back to what Catmull says.
Steve once told us that he had nothing to prove when he started Next, Catmull recalls.
Now, I don't believe that for a second.
We knew that he had everything to prove with next. We were the only other gamble that he took. And he said we turned
out to be such a handful to begin with that he stopped taking any other gambles beyond those.
Now, I'm going to pause there before I get to my second point, because I want to make the first
point here. This is remarkable. He didn't know. If you think about what's taking place of what
Kamal just told us and where we are in the history of Steve Jobs' life, Steve did not know then.
But these two bets were all he needed pixar is going to make
him a billionaire a few years from now next gets him back to apple and then the lessons he learned
in his wilderness years turns helps turn apple into the most valuable company in the world
then we get into catmull's next points steve's main reason for keeping pixar alive was that he
still believed in this little
band of geniuses and their leaders the business seemed to be even though the business seemed to
be going nowhere he had great admiration for catmull's business and management expertise
and then the other co-founder is lassiter which is probably the greatest animator of all time
and lassiter was one of those rare geniuses who can always make life seem full of possibilities
what's the second point there everyone tells you bet on small groups of smart people. Bet on small groups of smart people.
Steve actually did it. And then there's a caption in the photo overlay in the middle of the book.
You see Ed Catmull's face. The caption is the perfect summary of what I'm trying to get across.
Watching Pixar's president Ed Catmull, Steve absorbed a series of lessons about managing a creative corporation that became the foundation of his moderated,
evolved is another way to think about that, right? His moderated behavior upon his return to Apple.
At this point in Pixar's history, they're still trying to sell, I'm pretty sure they're still
trying to sell computer hardware. There's actually a, their computer was named the Pixar computer.
That's where the company's name came from. What Ed anditer what catmull and lassiter really want to do is
they want to make the first the world's first computer animated full feature-length animated
movie and so to show off some of the things that their storytelling ability and what their hardware
and their technology could do they would do these little short films they could be like five minutes
long eight minutes long but this is like this is
just a paragraph but there's so many lessons embedded in here if we're gonna if me and you
can pause for a second and really think about what's happening okay so main thing here is like
like edwin land who you and i've just discovered the last or just discussed the last two weeks
edwin land made a lot of non-economic decisions steve did steve did too when lasseter had gone
to steve to get approval for the budget
of a short film called The Tin Toy, Steve's response had been, just make it great. Tin Toy
winds up winning the Oscar for the best short animated film. It's incredible. So then Steve
winds up after they win the Oscar, he takes everybody out that had worked on the short film
to dinner. And this is now a part of his life, at least for one night, where we have the euphoria aspect
of the entrepreneur emotional rollercoaster.
Euphoria and terror.
At least for one night, this is a euphoria.
He was so proud, Lester said.
I remember grabbing the Oscar
and putting it right in front of him at dinner.
You asked me to make it great, I told him.
There you go.
That was the dinner where I met Laureen.
This is gonna wind up being his wife.
I think it's just his girlfriend at this point.
Yep, that's right.
She and Steve had started dating a few months earlier.
We just loved being with the two of them that night
because Steve was so clearly in love.
He had his arm around Laureen all night,
and he was so happy,
so full of feeling like everything is champagne bubbles in your life.
He was so excited.
He had won an Oscar, and he had this marvelous woman. And so this
is the note I wrote myself when I got to this part of the book. Pause here. Think about this.
This is 1989. He has at least six to seven years of intense struggle ahead of him. He has already
gone through four years of stagnant failure and that is after having his heart ripped
out by losing the company he founded this is my punchline to myself that i want to share with you
it is one thing to know that you have to persevere it is another thing completely to actually do it
and something that's going to help you persevere is a lesson that Steve learned directly from Pixar and their process in making movies, which can be applied to building any product or any company.
And this is what he learned.
Creative thinking at its best is chock full of failures and dead ends.
And Catmull says, when you're out there on on the edge some things go right and some things go
wrong if nothing is going wrong you're fooling yourself and Steve believes that and Steve's
receptive to learning from Ed because he believes in Ed's mind I liked him from the very moment I
met him Steve told me he found him an intellectual match Ed is a quiet guy and you can mistake the
quietness for weakness but it's not it. It's strength. Ed's really thoughtful.
This is all Steve talking, okay?
Ed's really thoughtful and he's really, really smart.
He's used to hanging around with really smart people.
And when you're around really smart people, you tend to listen to them.
What did Michael Jordan tell us, right?
I told you when I read Michael Jordan's biography, his 700-page biography.
It's called Michael Jordan, The Life.
It's all the way back on episode 212.
That book changed my life.
That's a main theme that Michael would say over and over again.
He's like, I'm not too dominant.
Maybe the best at his job than anybody's ever been at their job, right?
Then you have one of the most aggressive and dominant alpha personalities,
like alpha male personalities, right?
And yet he's telling you over and over again, he's like, I'm not so dominant that I don't listen.
Successful people listen.
Those that don't listen don't last long.
That is a quote from Michael Jordan.
What are we hearing this?
When you're around really smart people, you tend to listen to them.
Steve listened.
He listened to Catmull.
Steve was constantly trying to learn.
So at this point in the story, Apple has already brought next.
Steve's still trying to figure out, okay, do I want to become back as like full-time CEO?
Like what am I actually going to do my life is pretty good but in the meantime he's like
renegotiating the pixar deal for uh with disney that was his main thing he's like he's their
protector he was their financier but he also did all the negotiating because they didn't need his
advice on how to make a movie he's just like that's not the role he's he's playing now this
highlight i'm about to read to you is one of my favorite highlights that I made in this book.
Remember, I haven't read this book.
It's probably been four years since I read it the first time.
And it expresses an idea that I've compressed down to a maximum that I've repeated over and over again on this podcast.
And that's bad boys move in silence.
When you have something that's working, you do not talk about it.
You shut up.
Because the more you talk about it, the more broadcasting you do
about it, the more it encourages competition. Steve is intensely studying the business model
of animation. How valuable could it possibly be to Disney? And he realizes Disney shuts up about it
because they don't want to encourage competition. And he does it in a fantastical short story. He was truly proud that
he and Lawrence Levy had studied Hollywood closely. That is the guy I told you, the CFO that
wrote the book that I did in the past podcast. Okay. And they had learned enough to understand
how Pixar could cut a great deal in an industry that thrives on plundering. This is Steve's own
word here. The industry thrives on plundering the dumb money of starstruck outsiders.
This is my favorite part.
This is Steve talking.
You can't go to the library and find a book titled The Business Model of Animation.
The reason you can't is because there's only been one company, Disney, that has ever done it well.
And they were not interested in telling the world how lucrative it was.
So then we go into Steve's deliberation,
this decision, am I going to, he didn't even know if it was possible to be CEO of two publicly
traded companies because he was CEO of Pixar at this time too. And so we go into like his
deliberation and then there's just a hilarious Andy Grove story. To know Andy or to know about
Andy is to love him, which you'll see in a minute. According to his wife, Lorene, he was still torn about whether to go back.
She knew that her husband was most fulfilled when he was tackling something gripping and important.
And there's all these series of questions he's asking.
Was he even convinced that Apple had the people and the resources to become competitive?
Did he really want to work that hard now that he had a young family?
Did he want to risk what was left of his reputation?
Steve didn't know it at the time, but his indecisiveness was actually the kind of breakthrough. Steve was developing a more nuanced,
measured approach to decision making, more about his evolution, right? The point of the book is
to study his evolution, to realize who you are today is not going to be who you are in your
final form. Steve was developing a more nuanced, measured approach to decision-making.
Then Steve called his friend and confidant, Andy Grove.
Steve told Grove that he was torn about whether or not to return as Apple's CEO
and wound his way through his torture deliberations.
Grove growled,
Steve, I don't give a shit about Apple.
Just make up your mind.
And then he hung up the phone.
And that helped Steve make the decision because he's like, oh, I do give a shit about Apple. Just make up your mind. And then he hung up the phone. And that helped Steve make the decision because he's like, oh, I do give a shit about Apple. This is the CFO of Apple at
the time describing why it had to be Steve. We needed a spiritual leader that could bring Apple
back as a great product and marketing company. And nobody else great who had those skills was
going to take on Apple at that time. We had to have Steve.
Again, the founder is the guardian of the company's soul.
Steve was the guardian of Apple's soul.
Then I want to bring up another point.
One of my favorite stories, again, I think speaks to this evolution of Steve.
Remember, he was complicating a deal that he desperately needed done with Next and IBM.
He completely overcomplicated it, moved too slow, messed it up, right?
Now he's coming back to Apple.
They're losing a bunch of money.
So he calls up Bill Gates.
And this is Bill Gates on Steve's simplicity.
And Bill does a fantastic job of comparing and contrasting the way Steve negotiated a deal with the way that the previous CEO, Gil Emilio, did.
Reaching an agreement with Microsoft was absolutely critical
to laying the foundation of Apple to be saved.
When Steve called on Gates, he kept things simple.
He explained that he would be willing to drop the litigation,
they're involved in patent litigation, but for a price.
Microsoft would need to publicly announce a five-year commitment
to provide Microsoft Office for the Mac
and then make an investment of $150 million in Apple.
It was classic, remembers Gates.
I'd been negotiating this deal with Emilio and Gil wanted six things,
most of which were not important.
Gil was complicated and I'd be calling him on the phone,
faxing him stuff over the holidays.
And then when Steve comes in, he looks at the deal and says,
here are the two things I want.
And we got a deal done very, very quickly.
So we're still in the late 90s.
Steve is still trying to turn around Apple. And this is where the author gets, very quickly. So we're still in the late 90s. Steve is still
trying to turn around Apple. And this is where the author gets to actually have an interview
and a conversation with them. And he's asked us a question. And this is one of my favorite parts
of the book because Steve tells us, OK, this is why I build companies. And he has a line in here
that's just fantastic. He says the company is one of the most amazing inventions of humans. So it
says one day I asked him if he had come to enjoy the process of building companies,
now that he was trying to do so for the third time.
Uh, no, he said, as if I were a fool.
But if he didn't enjoy building companies,
he sure had a thoughtful and convincing way of describing why he kept doing it.
This is what Steve said.
The only purpose for me in building a company
is so that the company can make products.
One is a means to the other.
Over a period of time, you realize that building a very strong company
and a very strong foundation of talent and culture in a company
is essential to keep making great products.
The company is one of the most amazing inventions of humans.
This abstract construct that's incredibly powerful.
Even so, for me, it's about the products.
It's about working together with really fun, smart, creative people and making wonderful things.
It is not about the money.
What a company is then is a group of people who can make more than just the next big thing.
It is a talent. It is a capability. It is a culture. It is a point of view. And it is a way of working
together to make the next thing and the next one and the next one. So in the last episode,
I talked about this idea that Edwin Land used, that Akio Morita used, and I think it's a very
powerful idea. It's this idea that you should hire a paid critic. In the building of Sony and
Polaroid, they both use that idea to great effect. It's a way
to constantly improve the quality of the product that you're selling to your customers. This is
another idea that's similar to that. Hire an outsider that you can trust and you can organize
your thoughts with. So there is, and I'm going to go into how he uses this idea, but something I
learned from when I read Catherine Graham's fantastic autobiography that was back on episode 152.
A main character in that book is Warren Buffett because Warren Buffett does a major investment into Graham's company.
I think this is happening back in maybe the 70s or something like that.
She had taken over the company. Right. And her husband had committed suicide.
She wasn't expecting to run such a large business.
And so Warren becomes like this mentor and is like like her is her not teaching her everything he a large business. And so Warren becomes like this mentor
and he's like,
not only teaching her everything
he knows about business,
imagine having Warren Buffett,
your one-on-one tutor
as you build your company,
it's gotta be insane, right?
But he also was the person
that she would organize her thoughts with.
And there's a line from that book
I want to read to you
because it's called,
it's Charlie Munger's orangutan theory.
Warren told me he's subscribed to Charlie Munger's Orangutan Theory. Warren told me he's subscribed to Charlie Munger's Orangutan Theory,
which essentially contended that if a smart person goes into a room with an orangutan
and explains whatever his or her idea is, the orangutan just sits there eating his banana.
And at the end of the conversation, the person explaining comes out smarter.
Warren claimed to be my orangutan.
I heard myself talk when I was with him, and I always got a better idea of what I was saying.
Steve used that idea in the rebuilding of Apple, his last and final act.
Steve liked having a confidant, someone he could banter with outside the formal lines of responsibility of daily corporate life.
Mike Slade served that function. So Mike Slade is going to want to be close friends with both Steve Jobs and Bill Gates, but he did not have a formal position. He would just drop in
and essentially shadow Steve for like a day or two, and then they would just talk, right? So he
said he had made it clear that Mike, that is, he had made it clear he did not want an executive
position at Apple.
Slade would show up in Cupertino on Mondays and Tuesdays flying down from Seattle.
No one reported to him.
And Steve had told the group that he had no particular authority.
But when he was at Apple, he almost never left Steve's side.
Steve did not allow himself to relax with his inner circle the way he would with Slade.
So, again, you have an outsider, one that you know you can trust,
and somebody you can organize your thoughts with.
They help your company, but they're not part of your company.
Another trait of history's greatest entrepreneurs, they are involved.
They're not putting their feet up impassive to what the state of their product
or the state of their company is.
This is the level of Steve's involvement.
We went over OSX again and again, pixel by pixel, feature by feature, screen by screen.
There is nothing in that operating system that Steve Jobs did not approve.
And so how was Steve able to do this and still have a family life?
This was actually really interesting because this is an idea that i've uh that's come up a bunch that work and in many cases like you'll there'll be like a
line in a biography it's like oh like his or her work was their hobby work is a hobby it's basically
the idea it's just like they happen to love it they're obsessed with it and so for steve he's
like he had two basically things he wanted to focus on work and family and so this is steve's
schedule they're on better footing.
They're not going to go out of business.
When they were almost maybe on the precipice of bankruptcy,
he's putting a lot more time and effort.
But now, again, he's building out talent just like Ed built out talent at Pixar.
And so I just want to read this to you because I think it might be enlightening
on how he spent his time.
Back when he had been leading the Mac team or driving Next,
Steve had spent many late nights in the office as part of a small team trying to deliver
the next great thing. But now his role at Apple was so different. He was heading up a company with
thousands of employees, and Steve managed everything through a small team of senior executives.
He could do much of his work via email. He would make it home for dinner almost every night,
spend time with his wife and the kids, and then work on his computer late into the night.
On a spectrum plotting how much time parents spend with their kids versus how much time they spend focused on their job, Steve would
land far towards the latter end, meaning spending most of his time at work. Both he and Lorene knew
Steve would always work very, very hard. It had been a basic assumption when they got married.
Neither of us had much of a social life, says Lorene. It was never important to us. Lorene
often worked beside him at night. He'd spend an hour or two talking over Apple business with her. So that's his basic schedule.
I will have to say, the way to think about this,
and, you know, there's a big struggle with, you know,
you have a family, you're addicted to your work,
or you're very passionate about whatever it is.
There's two people I think, you know, there's not, you're not going to be gone like it's not a perfect not a
perfect solution to this but two ideas that may help you is estee lauder struggled with this and
sam walton struggled with this and their partial compromise or partial solution how you think about
it is they made it a family business so est Estee Lauder's husband sold his business.
He worked full time with them.
Her son was in college.
They would send them, this is when Estee Lauder was a private company, they'd send him like
all the financials.
They would send him email, and there's no email at the time.
They'd send him letters about decisions they're making, essentially like making sure that
communication about the family business, he was in the loop even when he wasn't working
on there full time.
So when he came back to the company, he'd know what was going on. So it's kind of like what Jeff
Bezos said. He's like, I don't believe in work-life balance. I believe in work-life harmony.
So for them, they just said, okay, well, we're still going to spend a lot of time together,
but we're going to spend time together working on the business that is providing the life that
our family enjoys. Sam Walton did this similarly where he had his kids work in Walmart stores from
a very, very young age.
Again, I don't think it's not that S.A. Lauder spent an insane amount of time with her children.
Sam Walton didn't either. Steve Jobs didn't as well.
But it's a way to spend more time.
And as they just said, it's also a way to spend more time with his wife because they're sitting next to each other at the computer at night.
He's talking about Apple tour. He's like basically involving with her.
And again, it's a way to organize his thoughts.
And maybe more importantly, now I'm sitting here thinking about it's like a way to organize
your thoughts with somebody that you know you can implicitly trust.
Another good question for you to ask.
What do I focus on that sets me apart from my competitors?
Steve was always most fascinated with the contact point between a person and a computer.
There were good reasons that Steve found this point of interaction so critical.
If the point at which a person interacted with a machine was complicated, remember he just got done saying they went through every pixel, every screen,
every button, everything. He did this for all the devices. There's a fantastic book that talks about
this, especially with the development of the iPhone. It's called Creative Selection. It's one
of the bonus episodes I did in probably two years ago. I think I've read the book three times.
Anybody building a product should order Creative Selection immediately.
It's written by a programmer who demoed and worked directly with Steve.
You can read it in a weekend.
It gives you an insight into how he thought about building products.
But it's this idea where he was just completely obsessed about the point in which a person interacts with the machine.
And this is the reason.
If that point of interaction is complicated, then the customer will likely never unlock its secrets.
Most people don't care about the innards of their computer. They care only what's on the reason. If that point of interaction is complicated, then the customer will likely never unlock its secrets. Most people don't care about the innards of their computer.
They care only what's on the screen and what they can get to through that screen.
Steve understood the profound importance of this from the very beginning of his career.
It was part of what distinguished him from many of the other computer makers, most of whom were engineers who believed that a rational customer.
Point me to a rational human
being. I'm pretty sure that's like a unicorn, right? Most of whom were engineers who believe
that a rational customer would, of course, care deeply about the insides of his or her computer.
So again, Steve focused on the interface, what's on the screen, the point of contact between the
products he makes and the customers he wants to delight, to sell his products to and to delight.
And the way to think about this paragraph, we don't have to remember the details all we have to say is okay what am i focusing on that sets me apart from my competitors
and if you can't come up with something that's a sign there's more work to do another main theme
in the career of steve and almost every other entrepreneur we studied they're obsessed with
control they do not want people in between them and their customers and so they have this idea it's like we're selling all these freaking apple computers
and steve's like i hate these outlets it's just like they're crappy big box department stores
computer retailers the sales people are idiots or he calls them shit i forgot what he calls them
again he evolved and modulated his behavior but but he's still an extreme person. So he never got like a...
He said he deviated very far from the mean.
So he kept that trade his entire life.
I got tears in my eyes right now thinking about it.
But so he has this idea.
It's like, okay, well, we're building products that are different than anybody else.
Our point of focus is different than everybody else.
Why are we selling them the same way everybody else sells?
So he's like, just a few months after he comes back from Apple, he asked a couple people in the companies, like, we need to come up with an online store where Apple could sell its computers directly to customers.
And so this guy named Eddie Q is one of the people that is put in charge of this, and they have this giant meeting.
And everybody in the meeting, besides Eddie and Steve, thinks this isn't going to happen because we can't do that because our distribution partners, these channels, as they call them, they're going to be mad at us.
We don't want to make them mad.
And so Steve asked the others in the room about Q's proposal, which is about the basic idea of selling direct to the customers online.
They were all worried.
The most worrisome about this idea is the potential for alienating our retail partners.
So one of them that's in this meeting says that Steve, isn't all this pointless?
You're not going to do this because the channel will hate it. Q turned to the person that said
that and said, the channel? We lost $2 billion last year. Who gives a fuck about the channel?
Steve perked up. You, he said, pointing to the senior exec, are wrong. And you, he said, looking at Q, are right.
He asked Q to create an online store
and have it completed in two months.
Another great idea Steve learned through experience.
He has this idea called the Apple experience,
but you could put your company name in that,
the your company name experience.
And it's the fact that every single experience
a customer has with your company
will either add or subtract from that customer's impression of your company.
And so that's why Steve obsessed about every single interaction point, not only with the customer and screen and the device, but also as simple as like uploading a credit card or paying for something.
Literally every single time the customer interacts with their company, look at that point and eliminate any points of friction or unhappiness
that can cause a withdrawal from your company's reputation with that customer. Steve had begun
calling this the Apple experience. Steve understood that every interaction a customer had with Apple
could increase or decrease his or her respect for the company. As he put it, a company could
accumulate or withdraw credits from its reputation, which is why he worked so hard to ensure that
every single interaction a customer might have with Apple, from using a Mac, to calling customer support, to buying a single
from the iTunes stores, and then getting billed for it, was excellent. So then I just stumbled
across this fantastic paragraph, which describes, like, it's just, cannot believe from the state of
Apple was in 1997, when he comes back, to now, they've revamped the line, they've
increased profitability, Tim Cook's got inventory under control, their product line is actually
understandable to the consumer.
They're starting to, at one point, only saw themselves as a computer company.
Now they're starting to make little devices.
In fact, what was remarkable is the building of the iPod.
They considered it like making a computer peripheral peripheral is the term they put on it,
which is akin to making a printer. That is a massive success. Then they build the iTunes store
and they're building all these other things around this. But the point is that they lack
the skills as a company to do so. And then the more they gathered skills and the more they
gathered learning, it opened opportunities and unlocked opportunities they couldn't see.
And so this is why I'm going to preach this from the rooftop as much as I can, and maybe even like make a shirt and sell it
is this like time carries most of the weight, like stay in the game as long as possible. Let me just
read this and hopefully it makes sense to you. It is so hard to remember given Apple string of hits,
the resulting ubiquity of its later products and the dominant role it eventually assumed in our
culture, that this rise was entirely unexpected, and a surprise even to the people who engineered it.
One little thing led to another, one success, one particular challenge could spur thoughts
about another product or a different iteration of an existing product or a whole new channel
of revenue. As Steve liked to say, you can only connect the dots of how things really happened
in hindsight. Another idea that I think you and I can use, Steve the synthesizer. Steve did not
like the idea of relegating all forward-looking tinkering to a separate area. Apple did not have
a formal research and development unit per se. Instead, research projects flowered in
pockets all around the company, many of them without Steve's blessing or even awareness.
They'd come to Steve's attention only if one of his key managers decided that the project or
technology showed real potential. In that case, Steve would check it out and the information he
this is home. My goodness gracious. This is so important.
I'm going to read this part two times. In that case, Steve would check it out and the information he'd gleaned would go into the learning machine that was his brain. Sometimes that's where it
would sit and nothing would happen. Sometimes, on the other hand, he'd concoct a way to combine it
with something else that he'd seen or perhaps to twist it in a way to combine it with something else that he'd seen, or perhaps to twist it in a way to benefit an entirely different project altogether. This was one of his great talents, the ability to
synthesize separate developments and technologies into something previously unimaginable. That is
Steve, the synthesizer. That is going to happen the more time you spend on your company. It is
also going to happen the more episodes that you listen to founders, the more of these books.
This is what Steve's doing inside his company.
We're doing for the entire history of entrepreneurship.
There's going to be these weird ideas, these weird lines that you hear, these weird stories that you read when you pick up the book that you might use two years from now, five years from now, ten years from now.
You might use it next week.
It might spawn an idea that you have from a previous experience like, oh, I'll combine the two.
All you're doing is exposing your brain, downloading your your brain a bunch of different ideas from geniuses when it comes to
their work the people that you and i are studying on this podcast are geniuses then think about it
they're so good at what they do somebody wrote a book about it that is crazy and they are doing
exactly what's and i'm trying to do this myself you're obviously doing it i assume you're
doing it as well but that's exactly what steve's saying it's like dude all these things are
pocking up over all these ideas are coming from all these different places many of them are
occurring without our blessing or even our awareness right all these people built our
companies in many cases they built them and ran them their entire lives before you and i were even
born that's they didn't need our blessing and we weren't even aware of it because we didn't exist
then they come to steve's attention only if one of his key managers decided the project or technology They didn't need our blessing and we weren't even aware of it because we didn't exist.
Then they come to Steve's attention only if one of his key managers decided that the project or technology showed real potential.
In that case, Steve would check it out and the information he would gleam would go into the learning machine that was his brain.
Sometimes that is where it would sit and nothing would happen.
Sometimes, on the other hand, he concocted a way to combine it with something else he'd seen or perhaps to twist it in a way to benefit an entirely different project altogether.
This was one of his great talents, the ability to synthesize separate developments and technologies into something previously unimaginable.
And I just realized something now that I'm rereading this paragraph before I read it to you.
Embedded in that idea is seeing yourself as just one in a line of the entrepreneurs and company builders that came before you. And so interesting, a couple of days ago when I got to the section for the first time,
or I guess the second time, because I've read the book twice now, I just pulled up just one
paragraph from his amazing commencement speech at Stanford. I felt that I had let the previous
generation of entrepreneurs down. He's talking about what he felt like after he got kicked out
of Apple. I felt that I had let the previous generations of entrepreneurs down, that I had dropped the baton
as it was being passed to me. I met with David Packard and Bob Noyce and tried to apologize
for screwing up so badly. I was a very public failure and even thought about running away
from the valley. But something slowly began to dawn on me. I still love what I did.
The turn of events at Apple had not changed that one bit. I had been rejected, but I was still in
love. And so I decided to start over. So I mentioned earlier, huge theme of the book is
the evolution of Steve compared, you know, him making, needing that deal with IBM when he's
at next, messing it up terribly. And I said at that point, hey, we're going to compare this with
his beautiful negotiation. He winds up, you may already know this, but Steve Jobs winds up being
the largest single shareholder in Disney. And I'm going to read some notes that I have took from
years back about synthesizing this in a minute, i want to read you bill gates on steve jobs
disney negotiation because bill's again bill's a main character in the book he's hilarious
but it says bill gates was astounded by what steve had been able to negotiate when he's got the upper
hand he's good at using it says gates you know he would wait people out just look at how much of the
resulting company meaning disney ends up being owned by this fairly small and yes very high tech
and very brilliant animation studio they end up owning a very substantial percentage of the entire disney abc espn entity it is owned
by this little animation studio that took three rounds of negotiation and by the time the
acquisition is being done disney is just flat on its back saying take me because of the political
dynamics of disney at the time they needed that win and steve knew they needed it and so several years ago i wrote out in like a
quick post form uh like just how remarkable this this turn of events was that like how the hell
does steve wind up being like not only you found apple you make it you know make the most successful
consumer device of all time or product of all time before you die.
But, like, you wind up being the largest shareholder in Disney.
Like, how could you not want to study and learn from Steve Jobs?
It's insane.
So I'm just going to read you.
You know, I suck at writing.
These are really just, like, my synthesis of all these books I was reading.
And this is, like, years ago.
But it says, in 1986, Steve Jobs was in exile from Apple, the company that would one day become Pixar.
I'm reading my own notes to you.
This is not in the book, obviously.
It was called Graphics Group
and was owned by Star Wars creator George Lucas.
George Lucas was going through a divorce
and needed to sell off some assets.
Steve agreed to give George Lucas $5 million
for Graphics Group and invest another $5 million
in the company.
They renamed the company Pixar.
Steve would eventually invest
more than $50 million of his own money.
This made him the majority owner of Pixar.
This is important to know.
This was not the first time Steve Jobs had expressed interest in the technology behind Graphics Group.
Years earlier, he had tried to get Apple's board to buy the company.
They turned him down.
After several years of failing to make the Pixar image computer, Pixar decided to go all in on making films.
The problem was that after years of poor sales and rising expenses, they were short on cash.
To solve this problem, Steve signed a $26 million deal to produce three animated films for Disney.
The first of these movies was Toy Story, the world's first entirely computer animated feature film.
Now here's where the story gets interesting.
Steve decided to capitalize on the publicity of Toy Story's release and take Pixar public at the same time.
Toy Story was released on November 22, 1995.
Pixar went public four days later November 22nd, 1995. Pixar went public on four
days later, November 29th, 1995. His two partners, Ed Catmull and John Lasseter, did not want to go
public. They thought it was too early. They wanted to make a few more movies first. That is until
Steve laid out his strategy and told him what was likely coming from Disney. Steve said, let's
assume Toy Story is a big success. It was. It wound up grossing over $370 million the first year. Well, when that happens, this is again, I'm just so impressed by
the clarity of his thinking. Check this out. He's laying this out before it happened. When that
happens, the CEO of Disney, who at the time was Michael Eisner, will realize that he inadvertently
created a rival company for Disney Animation. Pixar only had to make two more films for Disney,
and then they'd be free to do as they like. Steve said Eisner's next move would be to negotiate to renegotiate with Pixar and keep
Pixar closer to Disney's control. Steve said that if they went public and they had more money they'd
be able to negotiate better terms with Disney. Now why did he say that? Because their deal with
Disney they only got like 12 or 15 percent of the revenue because Disney's putting up all the money.
So Steve's like yo let's take the money some of the money we got from pixar let's then go public right
the same week that that is a massive success then we'll take that money and we'll come back to
disney like hey uh we can put up 50 50 we're gonna be 50 50 partners i'm putting up 50 of the money
i want 50 of the profits and so let's go back to where i'm at in these notes steve said that when
they went public they'd and have more money they'd be able to negotiate better terms with Disney. Steve wanted a 50-50 split with Disney
on returns. In order to request this, Pixar had to be able to put up 50% of the production costs.
Going public would allow Pixar to be able to afford this. The time is now, Steve said. This
is our moment, and he was right. A few months later, Eisner approached Jobs and said he wanted
to keep Pixar as a partner. Eisner accepted Steve's 50-50 deal. The good times were not to last.
Steve and Michael Eisner were like oil and water.
They did not get along.
A few years later, negotiations broke down completely,
and Pixar started looking for other partners.
Then Michael Eisner got fired.
The new CEO of Disney was Bob Iger.
When Bob Iger found out that he was going to be the next CEO of Disney,
he called his daughters.
The next person he called was Steve Jobs.
He laid all of his cards out on the table. He told person he called was Steve Jobs. He laid all of his
cards out on the table. He told Steve he valued
Pixar and wanted to make a deal.
This is Bob explaining why he felt Disney
needed to buy Pixar. Michael Eisner
did not understand that Disney's problems
in animation were as acute as ever.
That manifested itself in the way
in which he dealt with Pixar. He was like really rough
with Jobs. When Iger's like, we can't
afford to be rough with him, right?
Because we need those assets.
We need Pixar's assets.
He never felt he needed Pixar
as much as he really did.
Eisner did.
Every negotiation needed to be resolved
by compromises.
Neither one of them,
Eisner and Jobs,
is a master of compromise.
So that's what Bob,
that's the mindset Bob Iger
is coming into this negotiation
when he's about to buy Pixar
for $7 billion, right?
Still in my notes, by the way.
So this is extremely helpful. I should do this more often anyways but wait a minute how did
bob come to the realization that disney needed pixar you won't believe this a random parade at
a disney at disney hong kong made him realize how important pixar was at disney eiger realized he's
standing next to eisner when this happened this is amazing eiger realized that the only characters
in the parade that had been created in the past decade were Pixar's.
A lightbulb went off.
I'm standing next to Michael, but I kept it completely to myself because it was such an indictment of his leadership of animation during that period.
After 10 years of The Lion King, Beauty and the Beast, and Aladdin,
there were 10 years of nothing.
Bob begins to negotiate with Steve to buy Pixar and does something very unusual.
He does something anyone negotiating would tell you never to do.
He tells Steve how badly Disney needs Pixar.
Even more surprising, that worked.
This is how Steve reacted.
That is why I love Bob Iger.
He just blurted it out.
Now, that's the dumbest thing you can do as you enter a negotiation, at least according to a traditional rulebook.
He just put his cards out on the table and said, we're screwed.
I immediately liked the guy because that's how I work too. Let's just put all the cards on the table and said we're screwed i immediately like the guy because that's how i work too let's just put all the cards on the table and see where they fall
and it was a really a dumb idea no of course not because disney purchased pixar for 7.4 billion
dollars how much would pixar be worth today if it was still a private company hell of a lot more
than 7.4 billion and the fact that disney can capitalize on those assets like to a greater
degree than any other company in the world, right?
Steve Jobs was the single largest shareholder in Pixar.
This made Steve Jobs the single largest individual shareholder in Disney.
That is how Steve Jobs ended up owning so many Disney shares.
So that is exactly what Bill Gates, that's a longer story, more detail.
That came from multiple books I had read, and then synthesizing that information across multiple books and there's just like one note that is you know it's extremely
useful for me to go back and just relearn these lessons over and over again and so now we get to
the part where i actually want to end it's what i mentioned earlier i started the podcast with
to me one of the most important events in steve jobs life as a kid five six years old his dad
telling him this is your
workbench now. You can build things. You can make things. Let's explore all the made objects around
us. Let's learn how they're made. And let's add a contribution to the world. That is what you and
I are doing as product builders, as creators of products that make other people's lives better,
right? That is all a business is, just an idea that makes somebody else's life better. So once we do that, then we need to define what success is. And this is the
way Steve and Johnny Ive defined success. I remember a conversation in which we talked about
how do we define our metrics for feeling that we have really succeeded, Johnny said. We both agreed clearly
it is not about share price. Is it about the number of computers we sell? No. It all came back
to whether we felt really proud of what we collectively had designed and built. Were we
proud of that? That's a great question to ask ourselves.
It's a great question to close on.
For the full story, buy the book.
If you buy the book using the link that's in the show notes,
also available at founderspodcast.com.
You'll be supporting the podcast at the same time.
I now have an official partnership with ReadWise,
the app I've been talking about for years.
I cannot make the podcast without ReadWise.
I use it every single day. All of the highlights
and notes on any book that I've read goes in my Readwise app. As a result of that is a giant
database that I can then search. So if there's a quote that comes to mind, I can't remember,
or sometimes you just sit in front of and using their fantastic search engine. And I'll just put
in terms like marketing, distribution, a person's name, a quote that I wanted to remember, and it
pulls up immediately. It is the best app that I pay for., a quote that I wanted to remember, and it pulls up immediately.
It is the best app that I pay for.
And I mean that.
One of the founders, Tristan,
has been listening to Founders Forever.
He's actually, I'm pretty sure,
the one that told me about this years ago.
So normally you get 30 days free if you try ReadWise.
He's giving listeners to founders 60 days free.
ReadWise.io forward slash founders.
All the links I ever talk about are in the show notes
and also available at founderspodcast.com.
That is 265 books down, 1,000 to go, and I'll talk to you again soon.