Founders - #327 Ted Turner
Episode Date: November 14, 2023What I learned from reading Ted Turner's Autobiography.----Get access to the World’s Most Valuable Notebook for Founders by investing in a subscription to Founders Notes----Listen to Art of Investin...g #4 David Senra Lessons from the Founder Historian. ----(9:00) My net worth dropped by about 67 million per week, or nearly 10 million per day, every day for two and a half years.(10:00) Once to drive home a point about the difficulties of attracting good loyal employees he told me: Jesus only had to pick 12 disciples and even one of those didn't turn out well.(10:00) Early to bed, early to rise, work like hell, and advertise .(11:00) Total Recall: My Unbelievably True Life Story by Arnold Schwarzenegger. (Founders #141)(13:30) The problem isn't getting rich, it's staying sane. — Charlie Munger(17:00) I learned a lesson that would stick with me throughout my career. When the chips are down in the pressure's on it's amazing to how creative people can be.(20:00) My father always maintained many of the different billboard businesses as separate legal entities. (He didn’t want to dilute ownership of his main company and separate entities allowed for periodic reorganization to offset capital gains liabilities.(20:30) When you own an asset your job is to maximize its value.(23:00) He combines the assets he has in a way his competitors can not.(24:00) The more I learned about TV stations the more I realized that ours was a disaster. Of the 35 people who were on the payroll when we took over only two were still there a year later —the custodian and the receptionist.(25:00) Ted Turner believed in the power of television more than almost anybody else.(30:30) My dad taught me early on that longterm relationships with your customers and partners are very important. You never know how the guy who you're friendly with today might be able to help you tomorrow.(31:00) Cable Cowboy: John Malone and the Rise of the Modern Cable Business by Mark Robichaux. (Founders #268)(32:00) What other people in his industry sees as a threat, Ted sees as an opportunity.(37:00) These issues were all unchartered territory. All of us, the regulators, the broadcasters, the program suppliers and the leagues were sorting things out on the fly. I was working as hard as I could. I'd go all out during the day, working on sales, distribution, regulatory issues, whatever the battle happened to be, and I'd worked right up until it was time to fall asleep. I had a pull down Murphy bed in my office and I would literally work until the point of total exhaustion. Then I'd put my head on the pillow at night worried about problems. Then I'd wake up and spend the entire next day trying to solve them.(44:00) One of the most important ideas in the book is the power of Belief: Clearly the company for whom the economics of 24 hour news would have made the most sense with a big three broadcasters. They already had most of what was needed: studios, bureaus, reporters, anchors. They had everything but a belief in cable.(45:00) I'm going to be a billionaire. And here's why. I'm going to put this station up on a satellite and I'm going to get a news thing going. Sports, movies and news, 24 hours a day, all over the world. He said this in 1976.(46:00) Henry Ford didn't need focus groups to tell him that people would prefer inexpensive, dependable automobiles over horses. Alexander Graham Bell never stopped to worry about whether people would prefer speaking to each other on a phone.(49:00) I'm always convinced that one of the reasons that I've been successful is that I've almost always competed against people who were bigger and stronger, but who had less commitment and desire than I did. For Turner Broadcasting this dispute meant everything. We had to win.(52:00) Ted’s Superstation idea is printing money: $177 million in revenue and $66 million in profit. This is in the 1980s!(53:00) It would be 13 years before we faced another 24 hour news channel.(57:00) He has a keen understanding of how to combine assets to create an advantage that no one else has.(58:00) The Gambler: How Penniless Dropout Kirk Kerkorian Became the Greatest Deal Maker in Capitalist History by William C. Rempel. (Founders #65)(58:00) Genius has the fewest moving parts. Never get into deals that are too complicated.----Get access to the World’s Most Valuable Notebook for Founders by investing in a subscription to Founders Notes----“I have listened to every episode released and look forward to every episode that comes out. The only criticism I would have is that after each podcast I usually want to buy the book because I am interested, so my poor wallet suffers.” — GarethBe like Gareth. Buy a book: All the books featured on Founders Podcast ----Founders Notes gives you the ability to tap into the collective knowledge of history's greatest entrepreneurs on demand. Use it to supplement the decisions you make in your work. Get access to Founders Notes here. ----“I have listened to every episode released and look forward to every episode that comes out. The only criticism I would have is that after each podcast I usually want to buy the book because I am interested so my poor wallet suffers. ” — GarethBe like Gareth. Buy a book: All the books featured on Founders Podcast
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Okay, so two quick things before we jump into this unbelievable episode on Ted Turner. I think
the intro to this podcast is one of, frankly, just one of the most shocking intros that I've
ever done. And it kind of sets the tone for Ted's just incredible, you know, multi-decade long
career. The first thing I want to talk to you about is I was invited to fly to Notre Dame
to actually speak to a class
called The Art of Investing. That class was actually recorded and turned into a podcast.
So whatever podcast player you're listening to this on, if you don't mind going and searching
for Art of Investing, do me a favor, follow that show and then listen to episode number four.
The feedback on that episode has been incredible, but more importantly to you
is that in about 90 minutes, I try to summarize the best I can about the main lessons that I've
learned from this seven or eight years of intensive study on history's greatest founders.
The second thing I want to tell you about is this collaboration that I have with Readwise.
A bunch of people have already subscribed to this. So back in 2019,
one of the co-founders of my favorite app, the best app I pay for, I literally could not make
the podcast without it, is called Readwise. I've been talking about it for years. I've been tweeting
about it for years. Every single other interview on other people's podcasts I go on, I talk about
this. And I did this way before I knew I was going to partner with them on my own product. So I built this product with ReadWise. It's called Founders Notes. You can see
it at foundersnotes.com, and it's founders with an S, just like the podcast. So foundersnotes.com.
I got a DM from Tristan in 2019, and he was the one that made me aware of ReadWise. It was perfect.
And the reason it was perfect is because I have way more highlights and notes on my books than most people
do. So I have over 20,000 over the years, I've added over 20,000 highlights and notes for all
the books that I read for the podcast to the ReadWise app. And so and the reason I do that is
because I'm able to search everything that I've ever done. I use this every day, I search it every
day. It really is the world's most valuable notebook for founders.
So I contacted the founders of ReadWise and said, hey, can we do this?
Can we actually do this project together?
I want to make my own version.
I want people to have access to everything that I see.
Literally, if you sign up at foundersnotes.com, you are able to search and see every single
one of my highlights and notes.
It's exactly what I see.
And so as an illustration of just one of the ways that I use this
is at the end of this episode,
I'm going to include this 20-minute episode I made for my AMA feed
where somebody asked me, like,
how did history's greatest entrepreneurs think about hiring?
And anytime I'm asked a question like that,
anytime I'm making a podcast,
what I do is I'm constantly searching my ReadWise app, which is now available at FoundersNotes.com.
And just it gives me a complete list of all the different ways that history's greatest founders have thought about whatever subject I happen to be thinking about or working on or investigating. So at the very end of this episode, you're going to hear me speak for 20
minutes. And it's answering the question, how did history's greatest entrepreneurs think about
hiring and all that information came from me searching my notes and highlights, which is
exactly what you can do with founders notes. Keep in mind, this is made for founders already running
successful companies, those already running successful companies will get the most value
out of this because it's a way for you to reference the thoughts and ideas of history's greatest founders and then you know how
to apply them to whatever's going on in your company at the at this very moment the other
thing i want to tell you it is currently priced at 50 what it will be so it's actually going to
double in price and the reason i did this is because i'm adding a bunch of features that i
think are incredible and i have to build out the landing page and everything else you sign up now
obviously as i add features you're not you don't have to pay any additional. I truly do
believe it is the world's most valuable notebook for founders and the value you get out of it will
be incredible. You can get immediate access to over 20,000 of my highlights and notes right now
by going to foundersnotes.com. Turner Advertising Company was already one of the largest billboard companies in the South.
When my father put together a deal that would make it the biggest.
My father had developed a close relationship with a successful billboard operator in Minnesota named Bob Nagel.
And together they hatched a deal.
They would go in, purchase General Outdoor, and then split it into two pieces.
Nagel's company would take the properties in the North, while my father would own the markets in the south.
This merger would quadruple our revenues overnight.
To afford the deal, my father had to finance nearly all of the purchase price.
When the dust settled on the General Outdoor acquisition,
my father moved into our new headquarters as CEO of the biggest
outdoor advertising company in the South. Dad was elated. This was the most energized I had
ever seen him. Unbeknownst to all of us, this upbeat behavior came just as he was approaching
the brink of a collapse. Almost overnight, his behavior became significantly more erratic and unpredictable. One day, he'd be high as a kite, and the next, he'd be in a state of abject depression.
He had always been a fairly large man, but now he was putting on more weight and growing a big potbelly.
After years of smoking two or three packs of cigarettes a day,
he had developed a bad case of emphysema that, combined with his drinking and
his weight gain, took a heavy toll on him physically. It's clear to me now that reaching
new heights in business and material wealth actually undermined his mental state. He told
me a memorable story on this subject. He was preparing to enter Duke University just as the
Great Depression hit. His parents lost nearly everything, and they
struggled to tell him that they could no longer afford his tuition. At that young age, he consoled
his mother, saying, don't worry, mom. When I grow up, I'm going to work really hard, and I'm going
to be a success. I'm going to be a millionaire, and I'm going to own a plantation and a yacht.
He had achieved all three of these things. He said that now having checked off each
of these goals, he was having a really tough time re-evaluating things and coming up with a plan
for the rest of his life. He then told me something that I've never forgotten. He said,
son, you be sure to set your goals so high that you can't possibly accomplish them in one lifetime.
That way, you'll always have something ahead of you.
I made the mistake of setting my goals too low,
and now I'm having a hard time coming up with new ones.
In addition to achieving all that he'd ever hoped to,
this new acquisition seemed to trigger other insecurities in dad.
Seeing his parents lose everything in the Depression
created a deep-seated concern about going too far into debt. His post-
acquisition interest payments were big, and the company needed large capital investments to
continue its growth. The billboard business was doing well, and he shouldn't have had trouble
meeting his obligations. This was an irrational fear of losing everything, and it began to consume
him. He tried to get his addictions under control by
checking into rehab. They managed to curb his drinking and his smoking, but then he was also
prescribed a variety of medications. My dad basically swapped alcohol and tobacco for
prescription drugs. After years of grooming me to succeed him, all of a sudden he seemed in a panic
about the company's future. It was the middle of the week and I was in Atlanta working. My phone rang and it was my
father calling. He said that he was calling to tell me that he was selling a large chunk of the
company. I couldn't believe it. I was stunned. I tried to talk him out of it. I told him that
the company was doing well and there was no doubt in my mind that we could make our debt payments.
When it was clear I wasn't getting anywhere, my shock gave way to anger, and I said,
Dad, all my life you taught me to work hard and not to be a quitter,
and now you're the one who's quitting.
What happened to you? How could you do this?
Dad remained surprisingly calm and unmoved.
I hung up the phone, dazed and disappointed.
Just a few days later, I got another call.
But this time it was my stepmother.
Dad was dead.
After having a relaxing breakfast, my father walked up to his bathroom, climbed into the tub, and shot himself.
I never thought it would come to this.
I had lost my best friend.
That is an insane excerpt from the book that we're going to talk about today, which is Ted Turner's autobiography.
It is called Call Me Ted.
I want to start a few years before his father's suicide.
Ted is around.
This is this is an insane story.
There's so much that's going on that happens in this book.
So Ted is around 24, 25 years old when his dad kills himself.
He inherits his dad's company. The
company is worth in like today's dollars at that time, something around $15 million. For the next
50 years, Ted Turner is going to work on this company. He's going to sell the company to Time
Warner for $8 billion. And then a few years later, Time Warner is going to merge with AOL.
Ted Turner's stock goes up to a value of $10 billion. And then he winds up losing over the
next 30 months, $8 billion. He has this funny line in the book where he says, my network dropped
by about 67 million per week or nearly 10 million per day every day for two and a half years.
Losing that much money so quickly might have been a record, but it obviously wasn't the kind that I was hoping to set. So his merger, his sale to Time Warner
actually happens about 37 years in the future from where we are. His dad is still alive. He just,
he's around college age. He'd been working for his dad's billboard company every summer and every
year since he was 12 years old. So he's like, okay, I have a very complicated relationship with my father, but I need to stop delaying the inevitable. And I'm actually going
to work full time at the Turner Advertising Company, which at this point in history is just
an outdoor advertising company. Their sole focus is they have a bunch of billboards.
And so Ted describes the education that his dad is giving him once he comes to work with his dad
full time. There were many days when he'd drive me to and from work, and the entire ride, he'd only talk to me about the
business. It was almost as though he gave me the business degree that he didn't get in college.
He'd punctuate his lessons with funny stories or memorable expressions. Once, to drive home a point
about the difficulties of attracting good, loyal employees, he told me, heck, Jesus only had to pick 12 disciples
and even one of those didn't turn out well.
One of his favorite mottos was one that I've used for myself ever since.
Early to bed, early to rise, work like hell, and advertise.
That's a great line.
It's funny, actually, that Arnold Schwarzenegger
actually adopted that as his motto as well.
He would repeat in his biography,
early to bed, early to rise, work like hell and advertise.
And so one thing that sticks out about Ted Turner
is in his early life, his dad sent him
to a bunch of like Christian military academies.
And he was really trying to teach his son
like self-discipline and a fierce work ethic.
Ted is clearly being groomed to take over his dad's company.
He's going into the company
and he doesn't want people to think
that he's getting handouts. And this is the first time we see a hint that Ted is definitely a
workaholic. Many times he never leaves his office. He sets up a bed. He sleeps there. He wakes up,
gets to work. He works all the time. And he does that later on in life, but he's also doing this
as a 21 year old. I was trying to do my best to do everything right. I would work the hardest,
follow every rule and seek excellence in everything I did. As the boss's son, I made a point to impress the other employees by being
the first one to arrive every morning and the last one to leave at night. And so there's probably
about 50 pages that just deal with the relationship that Ted had with his father. There's a bunch of
stuff in here. It's interesting that we're still, we haven't got to the point where his dad shoots
himself. And then Ted's response is that he lost his best friend because frankly, there was a lot it's interesting that we're still we haven't got to the point where his dad shoots himself
and then Ted's response is that he lost his best friend because frankly there was a lot of times
I was like man I wouldn't want my son to describe me this way they had a very complicated
contemptuous relationship his dad is definitely a control freak his dad is definitely a dictator
Ted's own kids would describe Ted that way as well but at this point when you're 21 he's like
I'm my own man too.
And so he's actually having a conversation with his dad
because it's just reaching a boiling point
where his dad's just trying to control
every single decision, personal or professional,
that Ted is gonna make.
And this is what he says to his dad.
Dad, it gets tough when you're involved
in every aspect of my life.
You tell me where I should live, who I should date.
I'd like you to consider letting me be myself a little bit. In my business life, I'll do anything you say, but please
try not to bug me so much about my personal life. When I want advice, I'll ask for it. But if not,
please let me try to work this out for myself. And the fact that Ted stood up for himself,
told his dad exactly how he felt and what he wanted to happen was really important because
this was what happens next. He actually gets a letter from his dad. Well, first he's driving him to the airport and his dad tells him, son,
you're starting out where most men finish. Meaning here I was 21 years old running a business. A few
days after I got a letter from him telling me what a great job I was doing and how proud he was of
me. My father was very sparing with his praise and nothing he ever did before or after that day
ever made me feel as good. Within three years of that letter, his father would be dead.
And so as I go over all the notes of this complicated deal he put together,
the fact that he was abusing drugs and alcohol, the fact that he was out of rehab,
there's a line that I heard from Charlie Munger one day that I've never forgotten.
And it's something that he's realized with human history, with a lot of really successful
entrepreneurs and executives.
And he says that the problem isn't getting rich.
The problem is staying sane.
The problem isn't getting rich.
The problem is staying sane.
Ted's father got rich, but he was incapable of staying sane.
So imagine you're Ted Turner at this point in the
story. You're 24 years old. Your father, who was your best friend, didn't say anything, didn't
leave a note, went into the bathroom and shot himself in the head. So not only did you lose
your best friend, but now you have to try to save his company. And what he's realizing is he had
signed this deal to sell off these assets back to Bob Nagel the day before he killed
himself. And he actually wrote it. It was a handwritten note. And so from Ted's perspective,
it's like, OK, well, my dad and Bob Nagel were friends. My dad was obviously not of a sound mind
when he entered into the agreement, considering that he signed it one day and then popped his top
the next. I'm going to get out of this deal. But now he's a 24-year-old
inexperienced entrepreneur going to a 60-year-old man that has built an incredible company saying,
hey, how can we get out of this deal? And Bob's like, listen, I admire your father. I'm very sad
that he died, but I have no intention of letting you get out of this deal. This deal will continue
and go forward. And so this is the first time in the book we see some traits that Ted's going to have his whole life. He likes to fight.
He just does. He doesn't back down. The giant conglomerates that this guy takes on in the early
days of like the cable industry and the satellite TV industry is incredible. He's involved in
multiple lawsuits. And so he's like, OK, well, this guy thinks I'm just some snot nosed 24 year
old rich kid. He thought, oh, like I'm going some snot-nosed 24-year-old rich kid.
He thought, oh, like I'm going to threaten his son. His dad's not here to save him. He's going
to back down. Ted doesn't do that at all. And so Ted's like, okay, let me go and actually read
all of like this very informal agreement. And what he realizes is that Bob Nagel made a giant mistake
that he did not actually call for a non-complete cause clause for the employees of
Ted's dad's company. And so Ted's idea is like, how can I severely diminish the value of this
asset? So Bob's not going to actually want it anymore. And so he says, I'm going to jump his
leases. So I didn't know anything about this. He says in the billboard business, a company's leases
are its most valuable assets. And if you really wanted to mess up a competitor, jumping the leases was a great way to do it.
So what does that mean?
Most of these leases, so what the billboard companies did, right?
They'd go around to people that owned a bunch of land next to highways or high traffic areas.
They go knock on the door and say, hey, we'd like to put up a billboard here.
In return, we'll pay you, you know, this is 1950.
So it's like, we'll pay you $25 a month or $50 a month.
You can enter into these agreements with us.
But guess what?
If you change your mind, you can always cancel a lease within 60 to 90 days.
And so Ted's like, okay, so I'm going to jump all these leases.
I'm going to use the exact same people.
So the exact same group of people that signed up the leases are now going to contact these people again, but with from a different company and say, hey, I know you can cancel in 60 to 90 days.
You're getting paid $50 a month or $25 a month.
Guess what?
We're going to pay you $75 a month if you'll switch that lease to our company.
So for the next few weeks, all Ted Turner and his team do is they go and work the phones and they're feverishly just renegotiating and jumping all these leases.
And over a matter of few weeks, he did significant damage to these assets that Nagel wanted to
acquire.
And so finally, Nagel figures out what he's doing.
And so he comes up with a deal.
He's like, OK, if you pay me $200,000, then we can cancel the deal.
And Ted's like, OK, great. I agree right away. Here's the problem. Ted doesn't have $200,000, then we can cancel the deal. And Ted's like, okay, great.
I agree right away.
Here's the problem.
Ted doesn't have $200,000.
This is another main theme from his career. He's constantly agreeing to deals.
Then he realizes, oh, I don't have that money.
So he's got to constantly get really creative on how to raise the funds.
This gets really complicated later on.
This is like a more simple idea.
So he had this idea where he's like, okay, we agreement i'm gonna pay him 200 grand i'm gonna keep all the assets that my dad
was trying to get rid of the day before he committed suicide but i need to find a creative
way out and so this is what ted says in the book let me read this part to you i learned a lesson
that would stick with me throughout my career when the chips are down and the pressure is on
it's amazing to see how creative people can be. And with a 90 day clock ticking, so Bob gave him 90 days to come up with the money.
We had to get really creative very fast. So now this was very interesting. He realized, well,
Bob's a very rich guy. He makes a lot of income at this point in American history.
The top, he was at the highest bracket, like income tax bracket. And so at this point,
he's like, well, if I pay you 200 grand in cash, that's taxed at a 90% rate. So you wind up with what $20,000. And
the government, the US government gets 180,000. Obviously, you don't want to do that. Because
this is being treated as a short term capital game. And therefore, it's taxes ordinary income,
right? And so he goes, well, what if I actually give you
stock in Turner Advertising, which is the company that he inherited from his dad.
And then that way you can hold the equity as long as you need to, to shield yourself from any
heavy tax that you would get on a short-term gain. And Bob's like, okay, I accept that offer.
So I want to jump to another example where Ted always has to get really creative when he's
financing these deals.
And something to know about him, he's acquisitive by nature.
If he has, you know, billboards in Georgia, he wants to expand into Tennessee.
If he has billboards, he wants to get into radio.
If he has billboards on radio, he wants to get into billboards, radio, and TV.
If he starts buying the Atlanta Braves, then he wants to also own the Atlanta Hawks.
This is something he does his entire life.
He's very, very acquisitive. At this point, he says, I'm eager to expand.
I found a very profitable billboard company in Chattanooga, Tennessee, but the price was a million dollars. Great. I'll buy it. Here's the problem. I didn't have that kind of cash.
So he convinces the seller, right? This is how he makes the acquisition of no money down.
He's like, will you finance 75% of the purchase price over seven years at a very high interest rate? He says yes.
Then he goes to a bank that's actually looking to expand their investments in the South,
and they lent Ted the rest of the money in return for equity in the Chattanooga company.
So this is another important thing that he learned from his dad. His main company is Turner
Advertising. If you're going to go and acquire another company, don't just fold that into Turner Advertising.
You want to keep that as a separate entity. He says, my father always maintained many of the
different billboard businesses as separate legal entities. And so in this deal, this is important.
Why? For two reasons. He could offer the bank the equity in the Chattanooga company without diluting his ownership of the main entity, which is Turner Advertising. It also allows for periodic
reorganization to offset potential capital gains liabilities. And especially at the time,
this is still important to this day, but it's really important when your top marginal tax rate
is 90%. So he continues to expand by acquisition,
but he's not content being the biggest billboard company around.
He wants to get into new and exciting industries.
So the first thing he does, he's like,
okay, I want to go and buy a bunch of radio stations.
Now, this is very important because he repeats multiple times throughout the book
that when you own an asset, your job is to maximize its value.
And what Ted is really great at,
this may be the most important idea
other than he failed to, he's a dictator.
And if you're a dictator,
you want to listen to James Dyson
when he said one of the most important things
is retention of total control.
Ted is a dictator, but then sells his company
and then loses control.
And it's very frustrating when he watches other people
take $10 billion of his assets
and drive it into the ground.
And so that was another big mistake.
But other than that, I think the most important idea in this book for me is that he's really great
at combining his assets in a way that his competitors can't. So you can think about this
as like you find an advantage by doing only what you can do. And so there's a bunch of people that
own radio stations. That's great. Not many people own a bunch of radio stations and also
own a billboard company. And so this idea, what he's about to do here, he also does when he gets
into TV, which we're going to jump into a minute. So he starts buying up these radio stations. He's
like, well, I'm just not going to like, if I'm going to buy my first radio station, like what
is the advantage that I have that other people don't? I should buy a radio station in the same market where I already have billboards. So there's two things that happen
here. One, he benefits from an efficiency in sales and promotion because he's selling ads.
It's the same thing. Like if I'm selling ads on a, on a billboard, right? My sales team can sell
ads on billboards. My sales team, the same very sales, the very same sales team can also sell ads in a radio station. So that was fascinating, but even better is what he does. So let's say I own a radio
station, right? And I want to compete. What do you want? You want more listeners than the other
people. It's it's, this isn't podcasts, right? It's not like, Oh, anybody all over the world
can listen to it. You're listening to it in a specific geo you're constrained by a specific
geographic location. So therefore it is a much more, you're constrained by a specific geographic location.
So therefore it is a much more zero sum game. So I want to take listenership right away from the people because we're fighting over,
let's say all the residents of Atlanta and I want to beat the other radio stations.
And so what happens is like, okay, well you have a radio station.
I have a radio station.
We're competing against each other. But guess what? I have the biggest
billboard and outdoor advertising company in this area. 15% of my ad inventory on my billboard
company every month goes unsold. Guess what I'm going to do? I'm going to put ads for my radio
station. I'm going to use that unsold inventory because it has no cost to me, right?
I'm going to put the ads for my radio station on these billboards. That's going to increase listenership. I'm going to have more listeners than you. I'm going to make more money in ad
revenue. Eventually, I can acquire all these other radio stations. He does this exact same
idea in local TV stations before he gets into satellite and cable TV as well. And again,
it comes from this main idea. He does this in a
variety of ways. He's combining the assets that he has in a way that his competitors cannot.
And he's also good at taking ideas that worked in one industry and transferring them to another.
He doesn't even like, like, if you really think how crazy this is, right? 90%, maybe not, 80% of
the book is his career in TV. He says, I never developed a
passion. This is why I never developed a passion for radio the way I later would for television.
This is why he's going to start getting into the TV business. He thought the TV business was way
more exciting. And he says, you should always bet on the medium that looked like it would grow the
fastest. And obviously TV is going to grow a lot faster than radio is from this point in history. And so he's like, well, listen, if it
comes down to buying a lousy radio station or a lousy TV station, then the choice is easy because
I want to bet on the medium that looked like it would grow. And so when he buys this local TV
station, you're only watching if you're in and around the Atlanta area. This is before, remember,
there were decades before the internet, for God's sake,
but this was before cable and satellite TV.
That does not exist.
This is all like an antenna.
So he does the exact same thing here.
He's like, okay, well, I still have this, you know,
15% of the billboard inventory.
It's gonna go unsold.
So I'm just gonna put ads for my TV station on these billboards, just like I did
when I only had radio stations. And when he
says that these are lousy, right? These are lousy TV stations. He means it. Listen to this. This is
the first channel that he buys, the first station he buys. The more I learned about TV stations,
the more I realized that ours was a disaster. Of the 35 people who were on the payroll when we
took over, only two were still there a year later, the custodian and the receptionist.
One of the most important things about Ted Turner
and understanding his career
is that he believed in the power of TV,
specifically if you could have a 24-hour station
or if you could reach people all over the world.
If you were not constrained by, you know,
just this small, being in one small city, right?
He believed in the power of television more than almost anybody else.
Remember, he built a media company.
All of his money is going to come from ads.
And so this is the first hint that he gets that TV can be an incredible distribution
channel.
And so one of the people that are paying him to do a show on their TV
is these televangelists that are going to wind up becoming infamous many decades into the future.
Jim and Tammy Faye Baker. Jim is known for he becomes one of the largest televangelists in
the world and then gets caught, I think, with a bunch of hookers and he like cries on TV and
stuff. This is like a very well-known event that happened, but this is multiple decades before that happened. And listen to this. The only show that aired live from our
studios, which was a religious program hosted by a young couple named Jim and Tammy Faye Baker.
Well, before they went on to national fame, they got started with this local show. And before long,
they were bringing in more money in a week than the entire station made in a month.
Okay, so at this point in Ted's career, he owns one. There's only two independent TV stations in
the Atlanta area. He owns one of them. The other one is going to go out of business. Remember,
he said they're lousy businesses, especially when there's almost no financing. So when you get in a
jam, it's really hard to get financing. But what happens here is a blessing because he's like,
okay, well, it helps if I can be the only one bidding because you're buying content. And at
this time, it is restricted by your geographical location. That means that you can't bid on
syndicated programming from say MGM, right? MGM studios for Atlanta, unless you own a show or
unless you own a station in Atlanta.
So there's only two previous bidders. Now the other bidder is gone. And so he's the only buyer
in this entire market. And so what Ted's are also really good at is he happens to understand,
he spends a lot of time thinking about, thinking about and understanding the financial incentives
of the person that he is buying from. Again, he understands the financial incentives of the person that he is buying from. Again, he understands the financial
incentives of the person he is buying from. And so he's like, well, if the other station's gone,
no one else is in Atlanta is buying old movies. And why is that important? Because there's
thousands of old movies and thousands of TV shows that no one else is competing to air them on in
the market that right now he finds himself with a temporary monopoly on, right? And these old films were long since fully amortized by the studios
and they don't have to pay any of the talent. So that means that any revenue that is generated
by selling these old movies to Ted drops straight to their bottom line. And so as a result of this,
he's able to get great pricing.
He buys about every single movie that he can get his hands on, and he strikes long-term deals whenever possible. This series of events, like this advantage, is going to change as soon as
there's another bidder in the market. So the long-term part of that is actually really important.
And he's doing business with MGM, Warner Brothers, Paramount, MCA, all of them.
And then he also has sports.
What he realizes is that now that we're in the 1970s, that local sports is huge.
And so he winds up being the one he bids on and he winds up broadcasting all the Atlanta Braves baseball games.
And so this is an idea that you and I have talked about over and over again, the fact that relationships run the world.
This is how he winds up buying the Atlanta Braves and why.
Remember, his channel is the one that carries the Braves games.
And so he's like, listen, the ratings for the local Atlanta Braves games, I think is the highest thing, highest rated show that he has on his TV network or TV station, rather.
Right.
But the problem is, is like that fluctuates whether the team is winning or losing team
wins more games.
Obviously, more people tune in.
Right. And so he goes to the president of the club. His name is Dan. wins more games. Obviously, more people tune in, right?
And so he goes to the president of the club.
His name is Dan.
He's like, Dan, I consider us to be partners.
We need to add some more excitement next year.
What are you going to do to get the team on track?
And Dan tells him, well, I'm not going to do anything because I'm going to sell the team.
And Ted's freaking out.
He's like, what are you talking about?
Who are you going to sell it to?
And Dan says, I'm going to sell it to you.
And the reason I say relationships run the world is because, one, it in these books over, you see this in these biographies over and over
again, but it's also something that his dad told him a long time ago. He says, my dad taught me
early on that long-term relationships with your customers and partners are very important. You
never know how the guy who you're friendly with today might be able to help you tomorrow. And so
what's happening? He's like, they're offering me a first look chance to buy the franchise. And this is another example where Ted does not have the money. And this is
what he says. It's like, it doesn't matter. I don't have any money. I have to do this.
The Braves were a key asset and I had to go for them. By owning the team, I could control its
long-term TV rights. They were too important to his TV station. And so they're like, okay,
we want $10 million for the
team. Could you imagine buying a professional sports team for $10 million, by the way? And so
this is where he has to get creative. He's like, okay, I can give you a million dollars down,
and then you give me nine years to pay the rest at a high interest rate. And they say yes.
Another smart thing Ted does. So he understood, this is very fascinating. We're going to get
into literally the invention of the cable TV industry. The best book I've read, this is very fascinating. We're going to get into literally the invention of the cable TV industry.
The best book I've read on this is actually Cable Cowboy.
It's actually episode 268, if you haven't gone back and listened to it.
It tells the story of John Malone.
Oh, that's another thing.
The remarkable thing about this book is all the different people that at the time,
they're still coming up, but these people are world famous.
A lot of these people now are in their 80s.
Most of them are multi-billionaires.
I love reading stories about people,
like these intersection of these like A players
that all either know each other,
sometimes they collaborate.
Like, let me give you an example.
Ted Turner goes to a meeting.
There's four people in the meeting.
Ted Turner, John Malone, Warren Buffett, and Bob Iger.
And this is before Bob Iger was the CEO
of Disney. John Malone's
in this book all the time because he saves
Ted's ass a couple times.
But also, the book is structured
in a way where Ted will be telling a story
and then there'll be other people throughout his
life that commentate on what was also
taking place at that time. And some of them
were like, I have a little different view on that.
And so John Malone, what I think I'm going to do is actually,
you could buy the Kindle version of the book and just search John Malone and just read all of
like Malone's excerpts. And I think it's actually, that's even worth the price of the book alone.
There's just a million, like really interesting people that are spread throughout the book.
That was one of my favorite parts about reading the book. But let me get back to this, though.
What was fascinating is right now,
Ted is considered a broadcaster.
He owns a TV station.
You can only get access to that TV station
if you have an antenna.
And yet this is the brand new cable TV industry
is going to be seen as a threat by broadcasters. Ted is a broadcaster,
and he realizes this is not a threat. This is an opportunity. So he says, I also saw that people
were signing up for a new service to get local stations they were unable to tune into with their
antenna, which is the basis of his TV business at this point. This technology was often referred to as CATV, which stood for Community
Atena Television, or more simply, cable TV. Ted thinks this is a massive opportunity. So anytime
he thinks there's a massive opportunity, Ted does the same thing. He goes and tries to build
relationships with the main players in that industry. So he goes and becomes friendly
with the cable TV operators.
And this is hilarious because this is what they tell him. They told me that I was their first
friendly broadcaster that they had ever met. Back then, broadcasters saw cable operators as the
enemy. For many years, local TV stations had a monopoly and they viewed cable operators with
fear and suspicion. Why? Because broadcasters say, hey, how dare you
import distant stations? I have a local monopoly and you're coming over the top. And Ted thought
that was a stupid position to have because he's like, no, you're not coming over the top.
You're greatly expanding my audience. Now, instead of 20,000 people watching the show or 100,000
people watching the show, there's going to be millions of people watching my shows so at this point he starts the the first they call it a superstation so uh he's credited with
creating this like the superstation concept he was the first person uh this is actually going
to be tbs what we know is tbs and he's always on the forefront he's so usually so far ahead of
other people that uh whether it's financial
institution like banks don't understand how to loan them money because they don't understand
what he's doing, or in many cases, advertisers, they're not comfortable. And so this is fascinating
because he couldn't convince traditional advertisers to buy ads. He finds small
companies with products to sell and then gives them distribution. So the thing that saves his
ass until he can bridge this gap is the fact that he does direct response. So think about you've undoubtedly seen these. Let's say you are a manufacturer of steak knives and you're a small company. You go on TV and you, you know, sell your sell your steak knives in like a two minute commercial like Billy Mays style. Right. These are the small companies that he chooses to partner with. And here's the thing. This is, again, he's always proving his concept.
He knows that TV can be an incredible distribution channel because back when nobody was watching
his station, he saw Jim and Tammy Faye Baker make all this money.
And it's the same thing that's happening now when he expands to this region.
He's like, of course, the bigger the market, of course, you're going to increase your sales.
So he says, we managed to sell a lot of merchandise.
Direct response revenue would prove to be vital for us while we work to convince traditional
advertisers that we were well worth considering.
And remember, I said he was acquisitive.
He sees this article and it mentions that there's this brand new company called Home
Box Office, HBO, that is going to be a new pay for movie channel that's going to distribute
their signal not by antenna, not by cable, but by satellite.
This is going to be both one, a massive opportunity and a big headache because he's buying content
from other people.
Those people that are selling the content usually like to sell it by, again, they're
geographically constrained.
He's like, no, no, no.
Not only am I don't want to just put in like one little city or one little state, I'm going to broadcast this all over the world and people
flip out. So I'll get there in one second. Now, this is also interesting. And it is John Malone's
take on Ted Turner at this point in Ted's career that he was impervious to roadblocks that would
stop people from even starting. So he says, this is John Malone. Remember, John Malone describing Ted Turner. He always had this kind of basic, almost childish logic about him that refuses
to accept artificial impediments. I think one of his biggest secrets of success over the years
is that the things that most of us would sit there and ponder, all these regulatory and legal reasons
why it might not be something you could do, and Ted would just say, oh, hell, you can overcome those kind of things.
And he'd just go and do it.
And so he's making enemies everywhere.
He's fighting with, he's like, we managed to alienate the Hollywood studios,
the sports leagues, the broadcast networks,
and the local stations all over the country.
And so he has to fight this actually in Washington.
There's going to be a bunch of lawsuits, a bunch of regulations.
This is what I mean.
He's going to describe what he did. This is one of the most difficult periods of his life.
But this also speaks to this obsessive workaholic nature that he has. There is a bunch of stuff in
the book about his childhood, which was crazy, about the way he went through multiple divorces,
talks about, you know, wasn't really around when his kids were there. If you're interested in that, I'm going to skip over that
from I want to focus on really how he built his business. But there is a lot of that in the book.
And it's well worth reading. But this is he's describing the hardest part of period of his life.
These issues were all uncharted territory. All of us, the regulators, the broadcasters,
the program suppliers and the leagues, the sports leagues, were sorting things out on the fly. I was working as hard as I could. I'd go all out during the day
working on sales, distribution, regulatory issues, whatever the battle happened to be,
and I'd work right up until it was time to fall asleep. I had a pull-down Murphy bed in my office,
and I would literally work until the point of total exhaustion. Then I'd put my head on the
pillow at night, worried about problems. Then I'd put my head on the pillow at night,
worried about problems. Then I'd wake up and spend the entire next day trying to solve them.
And so in many cases, the solutions he comes up with to these problems is very creative. And so one of the problems he has at this point is there's this company called Nielsen. So Nielsen
is the one that measures viewership for regular TV stations. At this point, remember, he's one of the first, I think he is the first superstation on a satellite. And they're
like, hey, we're not going to measure your audience. We can't document your audience outside
of Atlanta. You know, you're spread out all over the place. It's too expensive for us to do it.
And if they don't do it, then he can't sell ads against it because he can't prove how big his
audience is, right? They literally turn over the Nielsen data to the advertisers and that's what they sell
their ads against. Now, here's the problem. He's like, yeah, but this is bullshit. This is not why
you're saying that. Your real motivation is because your customer base is actually the broadcast
networks and the local stations, and I'm competing them and out-competing them with the satellite.
And so eventually he's going to threaten to sue them. They're going to wind up acquiescing to his demands. But before then, he's like,
this is a problem I need to prove. Like essentially his problem is like, OK, how can I prove that
people all over the country are watching my superstation if I don't have any analytics?
And this is where he had that blessing in disguise where he couldn't earlier in the story,
he couldn't sell regional, nobody would buy regional advertising, right? So he's like, oh, I got to go to direct response.
And he realizes, oh, okay. Well, since we were running so much and we're relying on direct
response so much, we know where our customers are because they send in personal checks and the
postmark tells us where the check comes from. Check this out. Direct response advertising could
be a solution to our problem. Since many of our orders for direct response products came in the form of personal checks mailed directly to our Atlanta
offices, we could tell where they were coming from based on the postmarks on the envelopes.
So he has his team. He says, okay, I want you to put all the checks from our customers
into one of two piles. You have the Atlanta pile, which is the market that Nielsen wants to verify, and the non-Atlanta pile.
And very quickly, he realized, oh, my God, the non-Atlanta stack grew to such a size that it dwarfed the size of the local one.
Obviously, I have a lot larger audience outside of Atlanta than I do inside of it.
And so he's doing anything he can to get an advantage and to keep his company alive.
But keep in mind, there's usually a very slow lag. And he describes this part of human nature.
It's like no one wants to be the first person that does something, but once other people do it,
a lot of people flood in. It was nearly two full years before we got any meaningful national buys.
What we were doing was so new and so unique that everyone was slow to adapt. But once a few of the biggest players
validated our concept, the rest began to follow. And then he's constantly looking for these ways
to differentiate himself from competitors. I remember. So when I was a kid, there's this
thing called TV Guide. TV Guide was literally a physical book that would tell you what's on TV.
Eventually it got digitized and essentially they copied what was in the book onto TV. But what I couldn't understand is like when I would want to watch like TNT or TBS, which
Ted Turner owned, they would start their programs at a different hour. And I didn't know why. And
so Ted's going to explain why. And it worked because this worked on me. So he says the listings
in the TV guide for every other channel started and ended at the top and the bottom of the hour.
So it was very common for TV. Everything starts at seven, everything. And the next show starts at eight.
Everybody does the exact same way. And he's like, okay, well, if we can extend a program through
the end of the hour, and then we'd start, we'd, he pushed his, the start time back five minutes.
I think this was TBS was five minutes. I thought when I was younger, one of them was five and 15
minutes, but maybe it was all five. So he's describing why he did this.
We're going to extend a program through the end of the hour and start the following one at 7.05.
I envision that people watching our competition would start flipping around at the end of their shows.
And while the other channels would all be running commercials, we'd be showing programming.
The other benefit of this strategy was that we got our own little slot in every
program guide. A group of channels would be listed together at the top and bottom of the hour,
but we were by ourselves on the 05 and 35 minute mark. We tried this and immediately
our ratings improved. And so again, this constant trial and error. Another thing that he does that
he gets criticized for later on that I thought was actually really smart is he did heavy investments.
Remember, he's like buying all these old movies, right? He's syndicating all these old movies.
He's using them in a bunch of different formats, a bunch of different TV stations that he owns.
And there's a new technology that comes along that would recolorize them. This is like decades ago,
and it was very expensive.
He'd have to pay like 200 grand per every single film.
You're like, oh, you want to take this black and white film and you want to turn it to color?
Great, Ted.
That's going to be 200 grand.
And no, it was like, you're out of your mind.
It's way too expensive.
People considered it.
It was like almost like graffiti because why are you doing this?
It was meant to be black and white.
Ted didn't care about any of that stuff.
And what happens is he's like,
okay, I could run the black and white version of that movie and then I can invest 200,000.
Then now I have the color version
and I'd run that exact same movie.
One is a black and white, one is in color.
The color one would get six times the amount of viewers.
So in other words, it would pay for itself very quickly
because it gets six times the audience. Ted is always paying attention. Ted is always adaptable. the amount of viewers. So in other words, it would pay for itself very quickly because he's got six
times the audience. Ted is always paying attention. Ted is always adaptable. And that leads him,
I think if most people ask, like, what is Ted Turner known for? I think it would be the invention
of the first, the world's first 24-hour news station, CNN. And what was fascinating is he's
like, well, that idea was rather obvious. And why was it obvious to him and other people? Because
he's paying attention to this industry. He's obsessed with this industry. And he's like, well, that idea was rather obvious. And why was it obvious to him and other people? Because he's paying attention to this industry. He's obsessed with this industry.
And he's like, well, what came before CNN? Well, you had HBO, which is a 24 hour movie network.
People love that. Then you had ESPN, which is a 24 hour sports service. And people love that.
Why wouldn't there there should be a 24 hour news channel? And he thought about this idea for five
years before he winds up doing it,
because he's like, obviously the big three networks, ABC, CBS, NBC, they have tons of
reporters. They have news boroughs all over the world. They have all these assets that I don't
have that I have to build to do. Obviously they see that we should just take those assets,
produce more content. So instead of doing, uh, they, they did news four hours a day at this time.
Let's add an extra 20 hours.
We're going to do it 24 hours a day.
And of course, we're going to grow a giant audience.
And so for five years, Ted Turner has this idea.
He's just waiting, waiting, waiting, and they don't do it.
And that leads us to one of the most important ideas in the book, the power of belief.
Clearly, the company for whom the economics of 24-hour news
would have made the most sense were the big three broadcasters. They already had most of what was
needed. Studios, bureaus, reporters, anchors. They had everything but a belief in cable.
And this is such an important point because over and over again in the early days of his career, they would call he's like Ted Turner's nuts.
This guy's crazy.
He's not nuts.
He's not crazy.
He's early.
He sees something that you don't see.
Listen to this.
He's 38 years old.
And this is how much he has a belief in cable and cable TV.
He's on a plane and he's like, I'm going to be a billionaire.
He's saying this in October of 1976. He's on a plane and he's like, I'm going to be a billionaire. He's saying this in October of 1976. He's 38. So it says the guy's telling the story that said next time we managed
to get seats together on the plane. He pulls out a copy of the Delta Airlines magazine and he turns
to the map of the United States and starts explaining to me how he's going to be a billionaire.
Make sure you buy my stock. I'm going to be a billionaire and here's why. I'm going to put this station up on a satellite
and I'm gonna get a news thing going.
Sports, movies, and news, 24 hours a day,
all over the world.
He said that in 1976.
That is incredible.
I haven't even mentioned yet
the fact that this guy is a voracious reader
and you already know, before I say this to you,
what do you think he's reading? What do you think he's reading? You know what he's reading. He's
reading history. He's reading biographies. He's constantly, I don't know if I'm going to, there's
some highlights on this, but he's constantly comparing stuff he read in books, like from
history to what's taking place in his, in his life. And I love this part. He's like, I'm often
asked if we ever did any formal research on the viability of a 24
hour news or 24 hour cable news station. My answer is no. I had spent over five years thinking about
it. Henry Ford didn't need focus groups to tell him that people would prefer inexpensive,
dependable automobiles over horses. Alexander Graham Bell never stopped to worry about whether
people would prefer speaking to each other on a phone. If viewers liked watching news on television, why wouldn't they want the option to do it any hour of the day? it because you have all these people saying that Ted Turner was like literally jumping up on desks
and people were like literally like screaming that people didn't understand what he saw.
But his actions show this. And he's like, you know what? I don't have enough money or experience.
I believe in this idea of CNN so much. I'm going to sell off all my other assets to fund this
unproven idea. And so this is where it gets really crazy
what he was willing to do to make this dream happen. He says, listen, we're breaking one of
the golden rules of startups. We're launching a business and we know, we know we do not have
sufficient capital. It's not going to be profitable enough on the money we have. So he's like, okay,
I got to figure out what the hell I'm doing. And again, like I said before, he's always so far
ahead. There's no lenders or investors. They don't understand what he's doing. So he's like,
okay, my only option is I got to sell assets. And I'm going to put all these profitable assets that
would make me a very rich man if I just did that. And I'm going to sell them all, take that money,
and maybe light it all on fire if CNN fails. This is pretty wild. So he has to go to these very
difficult, almost like loan sharks.
They're highly collateralized. They're very high interest rates. He wants to take money from a
factoring company. So they actually come in and actually check his books every week before giving
him more cash. But the main idea I want to tell you about what's going on here is really asking
yourself the question, what is the most valuable but least strategic asset
that I have that I can sell so I can actually make it to the next fuel station? That's going
to make more sense because he's going to do another historical analogy. And so he's looking
around all the stuff he's owning. He's like, okay, I'm selling in the billboards, selling
the radio station. So he's like, well, I own the Atlanta Braves and the Atlanta Hawks,
but I can't, they're very, very valuable, but they're too important strategically to the actual like all like his his TV stations.
He's like, I can't sell them.
And so he's looking around for the most valuable and least strategic asset.
He has this local TV station in Charlotte that eight years before he had bought for a million dollars.
Remember, he's always early.
And now that business is valued at 20 million. So he sells that for 20 million dollars, takes a 19 million dollar profit.
And this is why this is excellent. I've always been a student of military history. I thought
the CNN launch strategy was similar to Rommel's desert campaign during World War Two. So Rommel
was a German general. He's fighting the British in World War Two. He knew he didn't have enough
fuel to conduct an entire offensive. He's he's a tanker. He's they the British in World War II. He knew he didn't have enough fuel to conduct an entire offensive. He's a tanker. They have Panzer tanks at this point. What he
intended to do was strike when they weren't expecting it, meaning the British, overrun their
lines and then capture their fuel dumps. At that point, he could refuel his Panzer's tanks and
continue the offensive. This is Ted's strategy. My vision for financing CNN was similar.
If we had enough cash to get on the air and could somehow get through our first year of operation, people would see that this was viable.
And then once the concept was proven, we would have easier access to capital.
So he kind of has like a burn the boats, no plan B mentality.
There is something that happens over and over again where it's like, how the hell is this guy, this little startup going against some of the biggest companies in
the world, some of those profitable companies in the world. He talks about like going to meetings
with some of the people he's competing with. They're at like this like shack in Atlanta.
He goes up to their company headquarters in New York and it's like they're eating on like China
from Versailles. They have a million dollar artwork.
And I'm like, what the hell is going on?
And he winds up winning.
And he talks about this.
And he says, I'm always convinced that one of the reasons that I've been successful is
that I've almost always competed against people who were bigger and stronger, but who had
less commitment and desire than I did.
And so in this case, he's fighting RCA.
RCA was a huge company.
But for Turner Broadcasting, this dispute meant everything. We had to win. And so I just went through and looked at all my notes that are that's happening during this time trying to figure out like, what is the main theme here? And there's just a couple things that he has that his opponents don't, even though they have more assets, and he shouldn't have won. He's fully committed, right, where they have, this is just like one dispute and they had, there's a huge conglomerate. They're not fully focused. He has a
stronger desire as a result of that. He has more belief by far, by far, he's got more belief about
cable and satellite TV than anyone else. More belief about the fact that this makes no sense
that no one else has made a 24 hour cable news network yet. And he's got the highest
level of enthusiasm. This guy is one of the greatest one-on-one salespeople. Even when he
recruits talent, they just say over and over again, listen, he's very charismatic and his
enthusiasm is very infectious. And it's almost like how people describe Steve Jobs, like that
reality distortion field, that when you're in his presence, like there's an aura, you cannot understand it. And you know that because when you leave it,
you're almost like you snap out of it. You stop being hypnotized. And you're like,
what the hell just happened? This guy completely hypnotized. Ted Turner is capable of completely
hypnotizing people with his enthusiasm and his sheer belief in what he is doing.
And so there's a bunch of times where he's, there's a bunch of anti-competitive behavior.
He threatens all these like antitrust
and monopolistic lawsuits.
So in this case, he launches CNN
and then ABC and Westinghouse
are gonna do a joint venture.
They're essentially gonna copy CNN,
but instead of charging the cable networks for it,
they're gonna be like,
oh, you can have our channels for free.
Ted Turner's like, you know, this is predatory, anti-competitive behavior, willing to sue you, winds up not backing down.
They wind up saying, OK, they never launched their version.
I think it was called like SNC or something like that.
And they're like, OK, we'll we'll back out of this.
You have to pay us twenty five million dollars.
Ted's like, I don't have that money right now, but I have to.
Again, how many times has he said this? I don't have the money, but I have to do this deal. And so it says, one of my
top financial advisors reasoned with me that fighting it out with them, with Westinghouse
and ABC, was costing me right now $4 million a month. So for the cost of about six months or
more of fighting, well, we could buy them out altogether. We decided to settle for the $25
million. Now this is, that's interesting. That's fine. This is the crazy, mind-blowing thing that
I can't understand. The next sentence blows my mind. CNN obviously gets a large viewership. It's
obviously working, even though he's going to bleed a couple million dollars for a few years before
it becomes wildly profitable. We know that his 24 that 24 hour like super station, because his, his TBS
super station is printing money, right? I think they were making around this time,
a hundred, I want to say 160. Let me see if I can find it real quick.
A hundred and seven, sorry, 177 million in revenue and 66 million in profit. So clearly
why wouldn't that work with news as well, right? It's a 24-hour satellite station.
And so this is the crazy thing, the crazy sentence.
After he settles with ABC and Westinghouse and they never launch their 24-hour news network,
it says, it would be 13 years before we faced another 24-hour news channel.
Imagine having an unbelievably lucrative, brand new opportunity, and you don't
even have a competitor for 13 years. And again, Ted uses an historical analogy. Turner Broadcasting,
defeating ABC and Westinghouse in the early 1980s, was like Luxembourg going to war with both the
United States and Soviet Union and winning. And so there's several examples in the book where it's
like, okay,
why aren't they, these broadcast networks, why aren't they doing a 24-hour news station, right?
If you're a broadcast network, and so what I mean by broadcast network, and we need to be clear about this, this is like the big three. This is ABC, CBS, and NBC, right? And everything he's
doing is like, these are cable networks. And he's like, why aren't, like, a broadcast network and a
cable network under the same ownership actually makes a lot of sense?
Why is nobody doing this?
I think there's another example of the fact that he just understood the industry more so than other people.
And you have an inkling that you might be able to do that because there's something that's obvious to you, like an opportunity hiding in plain sight.
It's obvious to you that no one else sees.
So he says, to my continued amazement, the network stayed on the sidelines and watched the launch of other cable channels.
So not only did you have his TBS, the Superstation, you have ESPN, you have HBO,
you have all these other experiments, you're seeing things like MTV, Nickelodeon, the Discovery
Channel. And his hypothesis, Ted's hypothesis about why this was happening is saying it's almost
like the innovator's dilemma. They were worrying more about the previous night's ratings and the
money that comes from that than the long-term future of their business.
And so he keeps trying to merge Turner Broadcasting with,
this is, again, just how this whole thing ends up,
when he tries to merge later on with GE,
and he's having this conversation with Jack Welch.
The note I left myself, there's not even a highlight there,
but I'm just reading about this page after page after page. There's probably like a hundred pages where this is like, he's
always trying to be a bigger part of a bigger company. And to me, it's like, that's not your
personality. And so I just wrote to myself, why does he keep trying to sell his company and then
have a position at the larger company? He's not going to be in charge. And I didn't know when I
wrote that note to myself, what was going to happen when he gets to Time Warner and effectively gets fired. But we're not there yet. So at this point, he's still,
again, trying to merge Turner Broadcasting with another one of the big three networks.
And his whole point, and this is just about the news part of it, which I thought was really smart.
He's like, well, you guys have, in this case, at CBS. You guys at CBS, you have four hours of news a day, right?
Okay.
I have CNN and I have headline news.
So we have 48 hours.
That means if we combine, we have 52 hours, 48 plus four, right?
52 hours against which to amortize our costs.
ABC and NBC has the same thing you do.
They have four hours a day.
Combined with me, we have 52 now
and then we can amortize the cost across those 52
and we'll leave our competitors in the dust.
And there's another benefit
because the antitrust rules at this time
prohibited the broadcast networks
from vertically integrating.
So that means they cannot produce
their own programming at this time.
They would license most of their shows
from like Hollywood studios.
And so his whole point was like, okay, well, CBS, you're going and you're going to a studio
and you're leasing a show like MASH.
MASH was like the biggest TV show at this point in history.
So you get the first run of MASH, but then the actual owner of the show, which in this
case is 20th Century Fox, then goes around and sells its reruns to a local station or
a cable channel.
And CBS doesn't make a dime off this off-network syndication, but you would make a dime if you owned a cable network.
So it's like if CBS and the Superstation, which is TBS, were part of the same company,
we could negotiate a comprehensive corporate deal with Fox.
CBS can build the show into a hit, right?
They get the first run.
And then TBS would have the
option to syndicate the hit episodes. In other words, you'd make more money. You'd make money
on both the transactions. Right now, you're only making money on one of the transactions. And you
could argue that because it's a hit on CBS is what gives the value for the secondary transaction.
It's Ted's point here, which is like really smart. This guy is just very keen is the
way I guess we would think about it. He has a keen understanding of how to combine assets to create
an advantage that no one else has. And I think the mistake he makes, which we're going to get to here
now, is he just lets his deals get too complex. And so CBS turns him down and says, OK, well,
I need content. Like, what can I do? And he goes and does a deal with MGM. And remember how his dad killed himself
because he thought he over leveraged himself
and he was risking everything else?
Ted Turner actually does that.
And he over leverages himself in this deal.
Kirk Kerkorian, who I did a long time ago.
I'm going to reread that book.
So many people ask me to do another episode on it.
I think it's like episode 65.
So probably, you know, five or six years ago, this book called
The Gambler. A lot of people know it. It's an excellent book. It's the biography of Kirk
Kerkorian. So Ted Turner is actually buying MGM from Kirk Kerkorian. And he winds up screwing
himself. And he actually has to call on John Malone and John Malone saves him. And as a result,
then he has like some veto power. So this is like the first
step where Ted Turner actually kind of has a boss, not a complete boss, but hey,
over a certain amount, he can't just go and like buy and do deals anymore without like approval
from his board. This is really important, actually, because I think genius has the fewest moving
parts. And I think the biggest weakness that I see in this
book and one I want to avoid for myself is like, never get into deals that are too complicated.
Ted's deals are way too complicated. They have way too much debt. And they rely on the future
company performance that is impossible to predict. And so he finds himself in a bad deal and very
a few months away from losing everything. And good thing he is good friends with and calls John Malone, who's really good at situations like this. By the end of 1986, it was clear that if I didn't successfully change the company's ownership structure, within five quarters, I would lose
control of Turner Broadcasting, exactly what his father feared Ted did. This is insane.
Calling on John Malone turned out to be the best thing I could have done. And so John Malone also
describes what's going on. I'm just going to pull out one sentence here. I think you'll get, you'll understand this. He took his leverage too
high and the structure of the leverage was a problem. And so it goes into all these deals
he's trying to do with these giant companies. I mentioned GE and Jack Welch before. He tries,
he almost does a deal where he sells to Bill Gates and Microsoft. And that's when I was like,
hey, why does he keep trying to sell the company and then have a position at the larger company
that he's not going to be in charge of?
And part of this is because he's already lost
complete autonomy.
He does not adhere to James Dyson's principle
of retention of total control
and the importance of retention of total control.
And Bill Gates talks about this.
He's like, listen, Ted had these weird control provisions
relative to the other cable guys
who own pieces of his company.
This is the rescue package that John Malone put together to save him from Kirk Corian.
It drove Ted kind of crazy.
He never really knew how to deal with having sort of a boss.
So it's not really a boss, but it's kind of a boss, you know.
You get up one morning with a wild idea and then you have to think, am I going to get vetoed?
Ted did not like this. And
again, I really think the most important, most prominent instinct, natural instinct and founder
and entrepreneurial types is the control and conquer instinct. I think what we think we want
money or prestige or status, but I really think what we actually want is control. And so I think
there's a lot of wisdom in James Dyson's maxim that,
you know, retention of total control, never relinquish total control. And I think the loss
of total control, being exhausted and flat out running for three decades, and then also somebody
offering you $8 billion leads to why he sold to Time Warner. The final reason I agreed to do the deal was a simple one.
I was tired.
It was now more than 30 years since my father's death and I'd been running the company on my own ever since.
30 years of long weeks and 18-hour days
would get to anyone.
And by this time, I was flat out exhausted.
I made the official announcement in September of 1995.
The little billboard company that I struggled to hold together had grown into a diversified entity that was being acquired at a value of more than $8 billion.
I would now be the largest shareholder of the biggest communication company in the world.
I wish my father could have seen what we'd accomplished with the business that he'd left.
I'm sure he would have been proud.
And that is where I'll leave it.
Highly recommend reading the book if you're interested in building a media company.
I think there's a lot of ideas actually here that are transferable outside of media,
including this just really smart way to combine assets in a way that your competitors can't.
It is unbelievably dense.
It is easy to read, but there's so much going on on every page. What I would do is, one, take your time can't. It is unbelievably dense. It is easy to read, but there's so much
going on on every page. What I would do is one, take your time with it. And two, I would go and
highlight and do a lot of notes. And then what I would do is I read, there was so much going on,
even like a single page or maybe two or three pages. I have to rewrite out what actually is
happening to understand. So I would definitely take your time with it. If you want to buy the
book and support the podcast at the same time, there'll be a link down below. That is 337 books down, 1,000 to go,
and I'll talk to you again soon. Okay, so what you're about to hear is this question I was asked
a few months ago. I actually recorded this a few months ago. They asked, how did History's Greatest
Entrepreneurs think about hiring? All the answers. People think I have a better memory than I
actually do. If people say, oh, David, you have a great memory.
My wife would laugh at that because I forget things all the time. It's not that I have a
good memory. It's I reread things over and over and over again. Every single answer,
every single reference you're about to hear in this 20-minute mini episode came from me searching
all of my notes and highlights. That option is now available to you. If you like what you hear,
if you think it's valuable, if you're already running a successful company and you want an
easy way to reference the ideas of history's greatest entrepreneurs in a searchable database
that you can go through at your convenience anytime you want, then you can go to foundersnotes.com
and sign up. I want to start out first with why this is so important. There's actually this book that came out in 1997.
It's called In the Company of Giants.
I think it's episode 208 of Founders.
It's two Stanford MBA students, if I remember correctly,
and they're interviewing a bunch of technology company founders.
And in there, Steve Jobs is one of them.
This is right, I think, even before he came back to Apple.
And they were talking about, well, yeah, we know it's important to hire,
but in a typical startup, a manager or a founder may not always have time to spend recruiting other people.
And I first read Steve's answer to this, you know, I don't know, two years ago, and I never forgot it.
I think it's excellent.
I think it sets up why this question is so important.
And you should really be spending, especially in the
early days, like basically all your time doing this. In a typical startup, a manager may not
always have the time to spend recruiting other people. Then Steve jumps in. I disagree totally.
I think it's the most important job. Assume you're by yourself in a startup and you want a partner.
You take a lot of time finding a partner, right? He would be half of your company. I'm going to
pause there. This idea of looking at each new
hire as a percentage of the company is genius. Why should you take any less time finding a third
or fourth of your company or a fifth of your company? When you're in a startup, the first
10 people will determine whether the company succeeds or not. Each is 10% of the company. So why wouldn't you take as much time as necessary
to find all A players? If three, three of the 10, were not so great, why would you start a company
where 30% of your people are not so great? A small company depends on great people much more than a
big company does. Okay, so to answer this question, the advantage that
I have making founders and that you have as a byproduct of listening to founders
is not only that I've read 300-something biographies of entrepreneurs now, but I have
all of my notes and highlights stored in my ReadWise app. And that means I can search for
any topic. I can look at the past highlights of books or I can search for keywords. So what I did is, first of all, like what I've started to do with these AMA questions
is I read them, decide which ones I'm going to do next, and then think about it for a
few days.
I don't put any, I just literally, I know that's the next question.
Just let my brain work on it in the background for a few days.
And then I'll go through and start searching all of my notes.
And so that's what I did here.
And so there's a bunch of, you know, I don't have, I may have like 10 or 15 different founders
talking about hiring. The first idea is the most obvious, but I think probably works best when
you're already established. So Steve Jobs is talking about, hey, you know, the great way to
hire is just find great work and find the people that did that and then try to hire them.
When you're Steve Jobs, that's a lot easier, right? Than if you're just somebody that doesn't
have reputation, maybe you don't have resources, maybe your company's rather new or not as well
known. David Ogilvie, I just did Confessions of an Advertising Man a couple episodes ago,
I think 306 or something like that, 307. And he did the same thing, but he's David
Olgovie at that point. So he would find, he'd go through magazines, find great advertising,
great copywriting, and he'd write the person a letter and then set up a phone call. And he says
he wouldn't, he was so well known and, you know, he's one of the best in his field that he wouldn't
even have to offer a job, just the conversation, then the person would,
he would want to hire the person, never mention it, and the person would apply to him.
And so again, I think if you can do that, then of course, it's straightforward. Find somebody that does great work. Usually you can do this. I actually have a friend, I can't say who it is.
He's doing this right now, actually. I have a friend that's really good at doing this. He's
finding people that do great stuff on the internet and then just cold DMing them and then
getting convincing them to work on things. And that usually works, especially with people like
younger people earlier in their career. There's a bunch of different ways to think about this and
a bunch of different ways to prioritize. So the first thing that came to mind that I found
surprising is you read any biography on Rockefeller and he
had a couple ideas where he felt the optimization, you know, table stakes that you're intelligent and
you're driven and you're hardworking, right? We don't even have, like, if you're listening to
this, you already know that, but he prioritized hiring people with social skills. And so this
is what he said. The ability to deal with people is as purchasable
a commodity as sugar or coffee. And I pay more for that ability than any other under the sun.
There's the second part to this, though. And this also works well if you have access to more
resources. Rockefeller would hire people as he found, as he found talented people, not as he
needed them. It's not like, okay, Standard Oil has six open spots. Let's go find six candidates, right? He'd come across what
he considered a talented person. It didn't even matter if he didn't know what they were going to
do. He's like, I'm just going to stack his team. And if you really think about his partners at
Standard Oil, he essentially built a company, an executive team of founders, because he was buying up all their companies.
So it's very rare.
But there's a line from Titan I want to read to you.
Taking for granted the growth of his empire, he hired talented people as found, not as
needed.
And then I found another idea in the hiring, like the actual interview process.
So there's this guy named Vannevar Bush.
I did two episodes on him.
I think it's 270 and 271. He is the most important American ever in history in terms of connecting the scientificrest Gump of this historical period. He is involved in everything from the Manhattan Project to discovering like a young Claude Shannon to building a mechanical computer.
Like this guy literally has done.
He's just he pops up in these books over and over again.
If you were reading about American business history during World War Two and post-World War Two, you are going to come across the name Vannevar Bush over and over again.
I read his fantastic autobiography called Pieces of the Action, and I came across this weird highlight. And so this is his brilliant and
unusual job interview process. And so he's talking about this organization he's running called AMRAD.
At AMRAD, I hired a young physicist from Texas named C.G. Smith. The way I hired him is interesting.
An interview of that sort is always likely to be on an artificial basis and somewhat
embarrassing.
So I discussed with him a technical point on which I was then genuinely puzzled.
The next day, he came in with a neat solution, and I hired him at once.
Here's another idea.
This is from Nolan Bushnell.
Nolan Bushnell is the founder of Atari, founder of Chuck E. Cheese, and Steve Jobs' mentor.
He hired Steve Jobs when
Steve Jobs was like 19 at Atari. He would ask people their reading habits in interviews. This
is why. One of the best ways his whole thing was he wanted to build all of his companies laid on a
foundation of creative people. So that's what he's looking for. He's like, I need creative people.
One of the best ways to find creative people is to ask a simple question. What books do you like?
I've never met a creative person in my life that didn't respond with
enthusiasm to a question about reading habits. Actually, which books people read is not as
important as the simple fact that they read it all. I've known many talented engineers who hated
science fiction but loved, say, books on birdwatching. A blatant but often accurate
generalization. People who are curious and passionate read, people who are apathetic and indifferent don't. I remember one, that's such a great line,
and I obviously agree with it. I remember one, I'm going to read it again, a blatant but often
accurate generalization. People who are curious and passionate read, people who are apathetic
and indifferent don't. I remember one particular woman who during an interview told me that she
had read every book that I had read. So I started mentioning books I hadn't read and she had read those too.
I didn't know how someone in her late 20s found this much time to read so much. But I was so
impressed that I hired her right there and assigned her to international marketing, which was having
problems. This is why I'm reading this whole section to you. A job with a lot of moving parts
benefits from a brain that has a lot of moving parts.
It wouldn't be possible to have read that many books without such a brain.
So do you see what I mean?
We start with Steve Jobs saying this is the most important thing that your role as the
leader of the company and the founders do, right?
And it's so important to study.
And this is why I'm glad this question exists and why
I'm glad that I took the time and I had the foresight to like, hey, I should really organize
my thoughts and notes because there's no way I would have remembered all this without being able
to search my read-wise, right? But you have Rockefeller saying, this is what's important to me.
You have Bush saying, this is how I hire. Now you have Nolan Bush now saying, well, here's another
weird thing that I learned. Let me go through what Warren Buffett says about this. So this is how I hire. Now you have Nolan Bush now saying, well, here's another weird thing that I learned. Let me go through what Warren Buffett says about this. So this is about the quality.
One thing that is consistent, whether it's Jobs, Buffett, Bezos, Peter Thiel, this just pops up
over and over again. They talk about the importance of trying to find people that are better than you.
The hiring bar constantly has to increase. Now, obviously, the larger the company gets, that's impossible. Steve Jobs has this great quote where he's like, you know,
Pixar was the first time I saw an entire team, entire company of A players, but they had 400
players. They had 400 team members. He's like, at the time, Apple had 3,000. It's like, it's
impossible to have 3,000 A players. So there is some number that your company may grow to where it's just,
you're just not, you're not going to have thousands of A players. In my argument, I don't
even know if you get a 400, I guess you, I mean, I'll take Steve's word for it on there and Pixar
definitely produce great products, but it's probably a lot lower than that as well.
So Warren Buffett would tell you to use David Ogilvie's hiring philosophy. And so Warren said,
Charlie and I know that the right players will make almost any team manager look good. Again, that is why it's the most important function of
the founder, maybe directly next to the product or right above the product, actually, because those
are the people building your product. We subscribe to the philosophy of Ogilvie and Mathers founding
genius, David Ogilvie. This is what Ogilvie said. If each of us hires people who are smaller than
we are, we should become a company of dwarves. But if each of us hires people who are smaller than we are, we should become a company of dwarfs.
But if each of us hires people who are bigger than we are, we shall become a company of giants.
Jeff Bezos used a variation of Ogilvy's idea too.
Jeff used to say in Amazon, every time we hire someone, he or she should raise the bar for the next hire so that the overall talent pool is always improving. They talk about this idea on Amazon where the future hires that we do should be so good
that if you had applied for the job you already have at Amazon, you wouldn't get in.
That's a very interesting idea.
Take your time with recruiting.
Take your time with hiring.
There's this great book on the history of PayPal.
It's written, actually, I've recently become friends with the author.
His name is Jimmy Soni.
And this is in his book.
The most fascinating thing that I found was that PayPal prioritized speed.
So from the time they're founded to the time they sell to eBay, it's like four years.
Jimmy spent more time researching the book than, he spent six years researching the book.
I always tease him.
He goes, like, you took longer on a book than they took to start and sell their company.
It just speaks to, like, the quality he's trying to do.
But as a byproduct of that, like, obviously they move fast, but they prioritize speed over everything else except in one area, recruiting.
Max Lutgen kept the bar for talent exceedingly high, even if that came at the expense of speedy staffing.
Max kept repeating
A's hire A's, B's hire C's. So the first B you hire takes the whole company down. Let's read
that again. A players hire A players, B players hire C players. So the first B player you hire
takes the whole company down. Additionally, the team, the company leaders mandated that all
prospects, here's another idea for you, all prospects must meet every single member of the team.
Now, the next one is the most bizarre.
It makes sense if you study, I did this three part on Larry Ellison, three part series on
Larry Ellison.
I should read those books again because the podcast is like 50 times bigger than when
I published those episodes.
And he's just, he's crazy. So he would hire based on the
confidence, the self-confidence level of the candidate. Listen to this. I have tears in my
eyes. I don't know why I'm laughing. Okay. This is just so, because this is, you read about Larry
Ellison and he's one of these people, it's like really easy to interface with because you just,
you just know exactly who he is and what's important to him. it's like really easy to interface with because you just know exactly who he is
and what's important to him.
That's why I think it's so funny.
Ellison insisted that his recruiters
hire only the finest and cockiest
new college graduates.
When they were recruiting from universities,
they'd ask people,
are you the smartest person you know?
And if they said yes,
they would hire them.
If they said no,
they would say who is
and they would go hire that guy
instead. I don't know if you got the smartest people that way, but you definitely got the most
arrogant. Ellison's, and this is why, the personality of the founder is largely the
culture of the company. Apple is Steve Jobs. Apple is just Steve Jobs with 10,000 lives,
right? I was just texting a founder friend of mine. He listens to the podcast. I actually met
him through the podcast. And he's going through this
process of self-discovery.
He's already started
a bunch of companies
that are really successful,
but he's like,
I think I'm more of
this type of founder
than the other type of founder.
And that's good
that he's doing that
because hopefully
his next mission
is his life's mission.
And you can't get
to your life's mission
unless you figure out
who you are.
Ellison knew who he was.
Ellison's swaggering
combative style
became a part of the company's identity.
This arrogant culture had a lot to do
with Oracle's success.
Here's another odd idea for you.
Izzy Sharp, the founder of Four Seasons,
actually could figure it out that in his business,
which was hotels, right,
that hiring the right person
could actually be a form of distribution for his hotel.
He gave me the idea
because of what? What do we know? What do you and I know in our bones? That history's greatest
founders all read biographies. They all read biographies of people that came before them and
took ideas from them. Izzy Sharp is trying to build Four Seasons. What do you think he did?
He picked up a biography of Cesar Ritz, the guy that Ritz-Carlton is named after,
arguably the greatest hotelier of all time. And when he realized that, oh shit, Ritz-Carlton is named after, arguably the greatest hotelier of all time.
And when he realized, oh, shit, Ritz, he says, remembering that Cesar Ritz made his hotels world famous by hiring some of the foremost chefs, we decided to do something similar.
So what is he talking about?
Cesar Ritz went out and partnered with August Escoffier.
What Cesar Ritz was to hotel, to building hotels, August Escoffier was to French cooking.
And so what happened is you partner with world-famous chefs.
People come into your restaurant that's in the hotel because they're a world-famous chef,
and now they know about your hotel.
That leads to more activity in your restaurant that you own, but also leads to more brand recognition of your hotel.
And then as a byproduct of that, more people staying at the hotel.
So hiring as a form of distribution, this is fascinating.
That is a fascinating idea. Okay, here's the problem. You can identify great people, right?
Maybe they even want to come work. Like you've identified them, you've sold them, hey,
this is our mission, this is what we're doing. And yet humans have complicated lives. They have
spouses, they have kids, they have a reason maybe they can't move across the country to work for you, even though they want to.
So there's a problem-solving element that you see in these books on you have to solve.
Like you've already identified the person.
You've recruited them.
They can't go for some other reason.
Okay.
Well, the great founders are not going to take no for an answer.
I read in this book called Liftoff,
which is about the first six years of SpaceX.
This is what Elon Musk did.
They had anticipated his friend's issue.
Having convinced Musk they needed to bring
this brilliant young engineer from Turkey on board,
it became a matter of solving the problem.
His wife had a job in San Francisco.
She would need one in Los Angeles, right?
Because that's where SpaceX is at the time.
These were solvable problems,
and Elon's better at solving problems
than almost anyone else.
Musk, therefore, came into his job interview prepared.
About halfway through, Musk told the guy
that he wants to hire,
so I heard you don't want to move to LA,
and one of the reasons is that your wife works for Google.
Well, I just talked to Larry,
and they're going to transfer your wife down to LA,
so what are you going to do now?
To solve this problem, Musk had called his friend Larry Page, the co-founder of Google.
The engineer sat in stunned silence for a moment, but then he replied, given all that,
he would come to work at SpaceX. That's really smart. There is another idea when you're promoting,
are you going to promote from within or from without? You know, that's dependent on you,
depending on what's going on. I do think this is interesting though there's a guy named les schwab who built
this this really uh valuable chain of uh like tire companies in the pacific northwest i actually found
out about him because charlie munger is like hey you should read this biography he said it in uh
he didn't say it to me personally he said it to uh in like one of the Berkshire meetings, that to study, Les Schwab had
one of the smartest financial incentive structures or any company that Charlie Munger had come
across. So this is what Les Schwab did. He did not want to hire from, he didn't want to hire
other people from other companies because they might come with bad habits. He liked to train his
own executives. And so he says, in our 34 years of business, we have never hired a manager from the outside. Every single one of our more than
250 managers and assistant managers started at the bottom changing tires. They have all earned
their management job by working up. And then another thing, if you're going to hire the best
of the best and A players, A players don't like to be micromanaged. And so this came in Larry Miller's autobiography called Driven.
He owns like 93 companies all throughout Utah, car dealerships, movie theaters, all kinds of crazy stuff.
But he also owned the NBA team Utah Jazz.
And what was fascinating is he's trying to recruit Jerry Sloan as the coach at the point.
And Jerry Sloan would only take the job on one condition, and I really like it.
I really like this idea.
If you hire me, let me run the team in business, right?
That's what you're hiring me for.
One of the best things we had ever done was hire Jerry Sloan as coach.
At the time, he said, I'm only going to ask you for one thing.
If I get fired, let me get fired for my own decisions.
If you hire me, let me run the team slash business.
Here's another idea from Thomas Edison that I think is fascinating. Really,
the way I think about a founder is like, you're developing skills that you can't hire for.
You're going to hire for everything else, but you shouldn't be hireable. And Edison wasn't.
Edison, expressing his views on the preeminent role of applied scientists, which that's what
he considered himself, coined the expression, I can hire mathematicians, but they can't hire me. And so when I read that paragraph for the
first time, the note I left myself was develop skills that you can't hire for. Capitalism
rewards things that are both rare and valuable. Estee Lauder would give you advice that you need
to hire people aligned with your thinking and values. Hire the best people. This is vital.
Hire people who think as you do and treat them well. In our business, they are a top priority. So this idea is like, that seems kind of weird. Like,
hire people who think like you. There's obviously not one right way to build a business. I think
your business should be an expression of your personality and who you are as a person at the
core. And so I think there is an art to the building of your business. And the reason I use
the word art, I don't mean in like a hoity-toity, you know, pretentious manner. That's not me at all.
I don't even care about art at all, really. I mean that you're making decisions not just based
on economics. Like there are non-economic important decisions based on how you're building your
business. Like you could probably make more money doing a decision A, but decision A goes against who you are as a person, or you
just don't like it, or it's just not as elegant or beautiful. And so therefore you don't do it.
So that's what I mean about, you know, hire people who think as you do. And for whatever reason,
when I read Estee Lauder say that, I was like, okay, there's like this art to what she's doing.
One thing that's going to be helpful in recruiting, this comes from Peter Thiel. I think this is the book Zero to One.
Understand that most companies don't even differentiate their pitches to potential
recruits and to hiring. So therefore, as a byproduct of that, you're going to wind up
with a lower overall talent base. And so he says, what's wrong with valuable stock,
smart people are pressing problems? Nothing. But every company makes these claims, so they won't help you stand out. General and undifferentiated pitches to join your even above and beyond that, the mission that you're trying to engage everybody to join you in, that pitch, that sale you're trying to make to potential recruits should be differentiated.
If that person's applying to five other jobs, they may not like your mission, they may not like your pitch, but they shouldn't be able to compare it to anything else.
Another quote from Nolan Bushnell, hire for passion and intensity. That's what he would do. Or that's what he did when he
found Steve Jobs. If there was a single characteristic that separates Steve Jobs from
the mass of employees, it was his passionate enthusiasm. Steve had one full, one speed,
full blast. This was the primary reason we hired him. And one thing all these founders have in
common is that he know how important hiring is.
And when something's important, you do it yourself.
This is, again, Elon Musk on hiring.
He interviewed the first 3,000 employees at SpaceX.
That's how important it was.
One of Musk's most valuable skills
was his ability to determine
whether someone would fit his mold.
His people had to be brilliant.
They had to be hardworking, and there could be no nonsense.
There are a ton of phonies out there, and not many who are the real deal,
Musk said of his approach to interviewing engineers.
I can usually tell within 15 minutes, and I can for sure tell within a few days of working with them.
Musk made hiring a priority.
He personally met with every single person the company hired through the first 3,000 employees.
It required late nights and weekends, but he felt it was important to get the right people for his company. And then to close on this, we started with Steve Jobs telling
us why it was so important and why it should be a large part of how you spend your time.
And now we'll close with what you do after. What do you do after you hire the person? This is what
he says. It's not just recruiting. After recruiting, it's building an environment that makes people
feel they are surrounded by equally talented people and their work is bigger than they are.
The feeling that their work will have a tremendous influence and is part of a strong, clear vision.
So that is the end to that 20-minute mini episode.
I just re-listened to the whole thing.
And it really does, I think, it's a perfect explanation and illustration of why I think Founders Notes is so valuable.
Because some of those books I haven't read in five, six years.
And just the ability to have a searchable database of all these ideas, like this collected knowledge of some of history's greatest entrepreneurs to reference and then contextually apply to our own businesses.
It's nothing short of, like, it's magic.
That's really the way I think about it.
I think it's a massive superpower.
It gives me a massive superpower.
I couldn't make the podcast without it.
I also think if you have access to it,
it'll make your business better.
And so if you're already running a successful business,
I highly recommend that you invest in a subscription
and you can do that by going to foundersnotes.com.