Freakonomics Radio - 37. Mouse in the Salad
Episode Date: July 20, 2011In restaurants and in life, bad things happen. But what happens next is just as important. ...
Transcript
Discussion (0)
So I'm on Broadway, walking down Broadway in the low 90s, and I'm about to get to this restaurant
where I used to go all the time. Well, you know, once a week, once every couple weeks,
and have these long backgammon games with my friend James Altucher. And it's called the Pen Quotidien.
And it's kind of a chain, but a classy chain
with this big wooden communal table.
And I used to go, like I said, quite often
with my friend James and play backgammon
and eat healthy, delicious, expensive food.
And then something happened that one day
that led to my not coming back here once.
And today's the day that I'm going to revisit the scene of the crime.
How do you feel? Are you nervous?
No, I'm not really nervous.
I mean, am I nervous about something bad happening again? No. I mean, because the thing that happened was bad enough that it has to be very unlikely.
Because if it happened more frequently, then there's no way the place would still be in business.
So I know that it's a very rare event.
And logic tells me it's a very rare event.
The Pen Quotidien is a civilized place.
That's really the best word for it, civilized.
It serves good pastries and strong coffee,
nice salads and tartans, open-faced sandwiches
on organic brown bread, things like that.
The clientele has a learned feel.
A lot of MacBooks, a lot of enlightened conversation,
classical music playing in the background.
The one I used to go to is on the Upper West Side of Manhattan, Broadway and 91st Street.
Yeah, so I'm looking, let's see, I'm looking at brunch.
There's a vegetable quiche.
There's a roasted turkey and avocado tartan.
It's a sharing platteratter i brought one of our producers
with me chris neary the plan was to eat first and then talk to the manager about the bad thing that
happened so chris what are you uh thinking of eating here i'm gonna give you one word of advice
since you haven't eaten here before. This is just a personal preference.
I'm staying away from salads.
I'll explain later.
Well, actually, let's explain right now. From WNYC and APM American Public Media, this is Freakonomics Radio, the podcast that explores the hidden side of everything.
Here's your host, Stephen Dubner.
Here's the guy I used to go to Le Pen Quotidien with all the time, James Altucher.
And it was very comfortable because of the big tables.
We had a lot of space we could spread out.
So we would meet there at 1145, which was always crucial because you beat the lunch crowd by 15 minutes without sacrificing on your appetite or anything.
James is a neat guy, really smart guy.
And he's done a lot of things.
He's been an investor, a financial writer.
He was a dot-com
whiz. He was a nationally ranked chess master. James and I play backgammon, usually over lunch,
these long-running 101-point matches that might take a couple of years to complete if we play
every two or three weeks. For a long time, we played at City Diner on Broadway and 90th, but
the waitress that James liked there quit.
So we moved a block uptown to the Pen Quotidien.
For the most part, we were really happy there until last summer.
We were in the middle of a game when the incident happened.
I noticed this woman was crying at the table next to us.
She was crying.
Right behind you.
She was sitting right behind you.
Yeah, right behind me.
And she was sort of crying and half screaming.
I don't know if you could imagine that because it doesn't normally happen.
Like little kids don't cry like that.
You don't usually see adults like kind of crying and screaming at the same time.
And what was your first thought?
Curiosity.
So I wanted to know what was going on.
Like one, the woman she was with was walking around.
The manager was coming over.
And this one woman was kind of like paralyzed, crying, screaming.
What did you think might have happened to her?
Because I remember my thought.
What was your initial thought?
My thought is that these were two old friends.
These were two ladies who were maybe in their, I don't know,
60s or so, it seemed like.
Maybe someone had died?
I thought that they were old friends
and one of them, her husband
had recently died. This was just
the scenario that my mind conjured
in a millisecond. And that
they were having a discussion about it
and the emotion just welled up and she kind of lost it,
which seemed like a perfectly natural thing to happen.
I didn't feel like that because that you,
that sort of crying is sadness.
And I didn't quite feel,
I felt more of a terror thing happening.
And so that's why I,
I stood up and basically walked over to the table.
And what happened then?
Well, she's crying, and the manager's over there, and there was a dead mouse in her salad.
Say it again.
So, le pain quotidien, I walked over there, there was a dead mouse in a salad. Kind of curled up, almost looking like a little fetus baby,
but it was a fully grown mouse.
Yep.
A mouse carcass in the salad.
I had James take a picture of it with my cell phone.
It's pretty disgusting.
We weren't done eating, and we were in the middle of a backgammon game,
but we decided to leave.
I think you can understand why.
You actually wanted to do an experiment, I seem to remember.
All right.
For the record, I remember things a little bit differently than James.
You said, let's start walking out the door without paying.
And the manager is obviously going to follow us.
And you were going to say, let's see how the manager prices our meal.
I'm pretty sure I didn't suggest we try to dine and dash. As I remember, we went up front and asked to see the manager.
So the manager followed us out the door and you said, look, we're really not feeling well. We had
to leave. We'll pay whatever you want. You offered the manager the opportunity to price the meal. It
was very Freakonomics-ish of you. And the manager, and you said to me in advance what you thought the manager should do.
And in fact, he did do that, which is he said, look, the meal's on us.
Don't worry about it.
I hope you and your friends come back here.
So he did the absolute right thing.
The manager looked pretty shaken up himself by the mouse.
And really, he couldn't have handled things that much better.
I mean, look, bad things happen in life.
It's what you do next that matters, right?
But the way James tells the story isn't exactly how I remember it.
Here's how I remember it.
I said to the manager, we're leaving now because the mouse grossed us out, and we've
eaten some of our food, and if you want us to pay, we'll pay, but I don't think we
should pay.
Now, how's that different from the way James tells it?
You offered the manager the opportunity to price the meal.
Well, yes and no.
I offered him the chance to set the price,
but only after I suggested what the price should be, which was zero.
I was engaging in a little anchoring, as behavioral economists call it.
That simply means trying to influence the outcome of a decision
by establishing a numerical anchor,
whether or not that number actually makes sense.
We'll get back to the mouse and the salad in a few minutes,
but first, a little detour into the world of anchoring.
The original experiment was they asked people a question.
I think it was what percentage of African countries are represented in the United Nations.
That's Richard Thaler, who teaches at the University of Chicago.
Many people, myself included, would call him the godfather of behavioral economics.
When I think of anchoring, I think of Dick Thaler.
And they had a wheel of fortune that they spun with numbers between zero and 100,
and it would stop at some number, say 35, and then they would ask people,
do you think the right answer is above or below 35? And then what do you think the answer
is? And people's answers were influenced by the number that came up on that Wheel of Fortune,
even though they saw that the number was generated at random. So if you ask people, do you think the percentage of countries in Africa represented in
the UN has anything to do with the number that came up on the Wheel of Fortune, they'd say,
no, of course not. What are you, crazy? But nevertheless, if they start at 35,
they're going to come up with a lower number than if they start at 85. It's pretty much inevitable. So the starting point influences the final answer, even if the starting point is meaningless.
That's how anchoring works.
I mean, think about it.
If I tell you that my boss is a brilliant person, just a mind-blowingly brilliant guy, and then you meet him, and your impression is that he's a massive idiot, you're probably less likely to actually conclude he's an idiot
because I've anchored you to the idea that he's brilliant.
At Le Pen Quotidien, when I talked to the manager on the way out,
I set the anchor of the price of our lunch at zero.
If he wanted to charge us for our mousy meal, he'd have to dislodge the anchor.
I asked Richard Thaler how he thought I handled it. Well, I think it is the case that in many situations you want the other
side to make the first offer. You do? I would think that's exactly wrong. Why is that? Well,
because sometimes they're going to offer a deal better than you would have asked for.
Rats.
Now I'm wondering what the Penn Quotidian would have given me if I'd let them set the anchor, like Thaler suggests.
Maybe a lifetime of free dining?
On the other hand, I'm not sure I want a lifetime of free dining at a place that puts mice in their salads.
So James and I took our backgammon game elsewhere,
and I didn't set foot in a pen quotidian for months.
Coming up, if you're running a business,
what do you do after that very bad thing has already happened?
And we'll go back to the scene of the mouse with
the Pen Quotidian CEO. This whole incident started to question our basic philosophy of food. Mouse and salad?
From WNYC and APM American Public Media, this is Freakonomics Radio.
Here's your host, Stephen Dubner. So I went back to James, my backgammon partner
slash investor friend, to get his take on the mouse in the salad. He had an interesting view.
Every chain that goes from regional to national goes through this, not necessarily these types
of health issues, but Starbucks, McDonald's, they all had their growth issues.
And this one is having its growth issue in this particular way.
But is this a growth issue or is this just one mouse in the – I mean it's just a mouse in the salad.
I mean it was –
No, this is a growth issue because too many things went wrong.
So each one thing has a low probability.
So a mouse gets into an open salad bag that happens to be lying around.
That's
inappropriate. The mouse dies there. So I don't know, was it there overnight? The guy takes his
hand in and puts it in a bowl and didn't see the mouse. The waitress or waiter brings the mouse
over and didn't notice it. So four or five things went wrong. Maybe the salad was delivered with the
mouse in it to the store to begin with. So we don't know where it went wrong.
This is a typical thing that could happen.
Not this exact thing, but this aspect of things breaking down, multiple things breaking down,
happens when you're doing that regional to national surge of a business.
Le Pen Quotidien is a growing company.
It started in Brussels in 1990, and now it has more than 150 locations in 16
countries. And it's planning to grow some more, adding about 50 locations in the U.S., England,
and France over the next few years. But I wondered, is that growth responsible for the mouse in the
salad? I wondered a lot of other things, too, like what did the 91st Street location do after the mouse incident to prevent a replay?
How did they make amends to the customer who got served the mouse?
And most of all, when you're running a business and something bad, something really bad happens, how do you regain the trust of your customers?
Hi, how are you?
These were some of the questions I wanted to ask the Penn Quotidian,
and that's why I went back that day.
I found the manager on duty, a nice enough guy, and asked if we could talk.
I pulled out a picture of the mouse in the salad.
And suddenly, he wasn't quite as nice.
I will not.
You will not. He remembered the incident, to be sure, but he said he wouldn't talk, couldn't talk about it.
He gave me a card from the Penn Quotidien's New York headquarters.
Suggested I talk to corporate communications.
So I gave him a call.
A very nice woman told me that the appropriate party would get back to me soon.
But it didn't happen.
I kept calling.
I was told that a lawyer and then a PR person would answer my questions about the
mouse and the salad, but neither one did. I thought this was strange. If something like this happened
at your company, wouldn't you at least want to return some reporter's call and explain yourself,
maybe offer an apology, as pro forma as that apology might be?
Since Le Pen Quotidien wasn't talking to me, I called someone else.
Someone with his own disaster experience.
Yeah, I'm Andrew Gowers. I'm a consultant on communications.
After a long and storied career in journalism, Gowers went into corporate communications.
First at Lehman Brothers, not long before it collapsed.
And then straight to BP, where he worked during the Deepwater Horizon spill.
His job in each case was to represent his company to the public.
It puts one little mouse in the salad into perspective, doesn't it?
I asked Gowers what a company, large or small, needs to do when disaster strikes.
I do think there's a serious premium on doing your best to be as
transparent and clear about what's going on as possible. I say that in an appropriately cautious
way because as I said before, in crises, it's very often not possible to know everything that's
going on. But if there's any suggestion that you are behind the curve in terms of withholding information or worse still disguising or
gilding information, then you are on a hiding to a very difficult place.
The Pen Quotidian wasn't being very transparent, were they? I gave them another call. They still
wouldn't talk. It was frustrating. I'll be honest, it was puzzling. And then finally,
after many weeks and many requests, my cell phone rang.
It was the company's CEO.
He agreed to meet me back at the scene of the mouse.
So my name is Vincent Herbert.
I'm from Belgium.
I'm 46.
I have three kids, fantastic wife, living in New York for 20 years, and I'm currently very busy at living a great journey with Le Pain Quotidien
as I am overseeing the strategy and I'm overseeing Le Pain Quotidien worldwide.
So Vincent Herbert and I sat at one end of the very long communal table
and I asked what he did about the mouse and the salad.
There is a crisis happening and if you look it, and if you do introspection,
in fact, it tells you, Vincent, go and dig into the business, which I did.
I went to see, you know, I asked all the questions.
Why did it happen?
What about the quality assurance?
What about the vendor?
What about all the processes?
What did we do about the vendor? What about all the processes? What did we do about the customer?
How do we respond to the media if the media comes to us?
And by asking those questions, I'm coming to realize that there are a couple of things that I could do better.
And I think that is the opportunity of owning things that are happening to you.
Talk to me about the fact that you, the president, wanted to come here and talk to me about this incident, whereas the other people who work in your firm took exactly the opposite tack.
And what that says about the way firms handle bad news these days.
I think, well, for us, it's a very new occurrence to have the media coming to us.
We're pretty shy to the media.
And therefore, what I realized through that incident, another good opportunity, a good lesson,
is that we need to get better at understanding how to partner with the media
so that we are open and transparent in the right
context. The first reaction indeed of my team was scared and paralyzed. You know, like, you know, don't know what to do. It's only going to be negative.
It's a huge liability.
The less we say, the better it is.
Kind of avoiding, and as a person, and as a leader of this organization, I very much disagree with that.
I think this is an opportunity again to tell the people what we stand for.
Okay. So Herbert is pulling his company down the road toward transparency. But the first
thing I wanted to know is, what happened? How did that mouse even get in that poor lady's salad?
Yeah, so we went through all the processes, asked many questions to all the people,
and we determined with the vendor that it came from the field.
So it came from the lettuce, from the field, and it was very, very interesting
and a very important moment when, in fact, this whole incident started to question
our basic philosophy of food,
which is our philosophy of Panko Chen, it's organic food.
You know, we believe in organic farming.
And when an incident like this, it's amazing how an incident like this
couldn't make people think about, well, do we keep going organic?
Because this is a business.
And something like this, if it's taken out of proportion, out of context,
and we jump all over this, it could destroy this business.
It could destroy this small growing company.
People, it was amazing how in my team, even in my team,
we knew and some people said, well, we're just going to change.
We're not organic.
You know, we're just going to, you know, we're going to go to a vendor. So some people are saying because the mouse came into the salad from the field and because it's an organic vendor,
presumably if we got non-organic salad, we would not have a mouse.
So there are people putting putting the pressure
on to do that what did you say to that well there was no pressure there was there was a again a
rational deductive suggestion to say well if we don't want this to happen again we just change
our philosophy and we go from organic to conventional we use pesticides and we use all
those crazy things and and yes they are not going to be any baby
field mouses in lettuce and it's not going to happen again. There was nobody on the team
that suggested that we had to change the philosophy. That was very reconverting for me to say,
OK, my team still are diehard believers in the core philosophy of Le Pain Quotidien.
And for me, there was no question.
So the mouse and the salad became an internal referendum on whether Le Pain Quotidien should carry on its organic mission. And the answer was a big fat yes. Now, is it true that being organic
is what led to the mouse? That is, if Le pan quotidian used conventional greens, would the mouse have
necessarily been eliminated
before it got to the salad bowl?
Apparently not. We talked to some
agricultural academics who
told us that typical pesticides
don't actually discourage things
like rodents. In other words, you
can't just flip a chemical switch
and make sure that no
mouse ever ends up in your salad.
The woman who got served that rodent at the Pen Quotidian,
the woman whom I had imagined was distraught over some kind of a private loss rather than a public mouse,
she didn't want to be interviewed, and she didn't want me to use her name on the air.
But we did exchange a few emails.
Want to know the most amazing thing?
She still eats at the Pen Quotidien,
the same Pen Quotidien, all the time.
She said she respects and admires their organic mission
and she forgave them for the mouse entirely.
I asked Vincent Herbert how that happened.
He said the Pen Quot quotidien kept her trust.
By being brutally honest.
And I think the honesty, the transparency, the empathy with that incident was very important.
I think the customer understood, one, that this is something that is very unusual.
And we're talking about an incident that happened a year ago in one store.
But she understood that we felt for this.
We were sorry.
We're going to do everything we can.
But we were honest.
We were just human beings talking to another human being and saying,
this happens.
We're not going to run away from it.
It happened.
And we're sorry. but this is life.
And I think this is a great person.
She understood that this is life.
There are no guarantees.
The only thing that is given to us is to do our best effort.
What did you, besides all that,
besides communicating with her in a very human, humane way,
did you let her eat
here for free for a year, a lifetime?
Was there any kind of arrangement like that?
Not that I know.
I think monetary stimuli and those kind of things, I don't think that that would make
any difference.
At the end of the day, it's like motivating people to work in a company.
It's not the money that you pay. It's more the culture, the honesty, the transparency, the way you treat people, the way you talk to them.
I think that's more important.
I think that's where the team did a good job is they were just, you know, they were not hiding.
They were just like, hey, this is, it doesn't reflect, this is not what we represent.
We're trying to do our best.
We have a setback.
And we're really going to try to do better.
I mean, let's be honest.
You're talking to me.
This is a story that will work its way into the public bloodstream.
Someday, somebody may write a Harvard Business Review case study
of this is the way Vincent Herbert took a bad
incident at a restaurant and turned it into a positive. I mean, is that? Yeah, it is. And I
think what I know, and I spoke with a couple of friends and my wife, and she's definitely my big
mentor. By the way, she's an animal psychologist, so she understands those instincts and she's definitely my big mentor. By the way, she's an animal psychologist, so she understands those instincts
and she definitely understands me very well.
And we were thinking a little bit about the fear factor.
And, you know, when things like this happen,
the first instinct is kind of like fear, scared.
You know, I got to go hiding.
You know, this is bad. And I think that the fear factor can push you to do something extraordinary.
And I'm nervous about this, you know, because I don't quite know well enough what your intentions are with this.
But again, I got to trust that by being brutally honest within an environment of a setback,
that it's not going to be taken out of context, that we're going to get stronger out of this.
This is an opportunity to tell the people that we have integrity, that we have resilience, we have tenacity.
And I think we will keep going organic.
We are not going to jeopardize, we're not going to compromise our vision to provide organic food
to our people. And it's about taking certain risks and managing them.
How can you help but respect Vincent Herber? Yes, it took a while for his company to
answer the call, but here he is now, front and center, taking ownership of the mouse in the
salad. I mean, good for him. Bad things happen in life. It might be your fault. It might not be.
But at some point, somebody's got to put up his hand and say, I'm taking responsibility for better or worse, for the incident itself and for the aftermath.
By the way, when I went back to the Pen Quotidien, I stuck to the quiche.
Just didn't have the stomach for a salad.
Freakonomics Radio is produced by WNYC, APM American Public Media, and Dubner Productions.
This episode was produced by Chris Neary with help from Diana Wynn, Susie Lechtenberg, and Colin Campbell.
David Herman is our engineer.
If you want more Freakonomics Radio, you can subscribe to our podcast on iTunes or go to Freakonomics.com,
where you'll find lots of radio, a blog, the books, and more.