Fresh Air - A Foster Parent On Loving & Letting Go
Episode Date: February 6, 2024When Mark Daley and his husband, Jason, became foster parents to two brothers, they fell in love with the children right away. But Daley and his husband also know that their family could change at any... moment. Eventually, the boys were reunified with their biological parents. Daley's memoir is Safe: A Memoir of Fatherhood, Foster Care, and the Risks We Take for Family. Daley talks about the foster care system at large, as well as the joy and pain he and Jason experienced as foster parents.Also, TV critic David Bianculli reflects on Curb Your Enthusiasm, as it enters its 12th and final season.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This is Fresh Air. I'm Terry Gross.
No matter how hard we tried, we just couldn't get pregnant,
jokes my guest Mark Daly in the opening sentence of his new memoir.
It wasn't a fertility problem. It was that Daly's spouse was his husband.
They both wanted to have children, which meant their choices were surrogacy,
which they were ambivalent about, private adoption, which could take years,
or foster children. In 2016, they chose fostering.
They soon became the foster parents of two brothers, three months and 13 months old.
Daly and his spouse, Jason, fell in love with the children, and the boys thrived. But when the boys'
birth parents decided to fight in court to get the boys back, Daly was alarmed at the possibility of
losing the children he loved.
He worried about them being returned to their birth parents who were dealing with mental health
and addiction issues and seemed to be indifferent to their children and even worse, neglectful.
Through the ups and downs of his family's story, Daly writes about the larger foster care system
and the ways in which it's a dysfunctional bureaucracy. Daly started consulting for child
welfare nonprofits before fostering. Although he thinks the system failed him, he recognizes the
importance of foster care and founded the organization TheFosterParent.com, a national
platform to connect interested families with foster organizations. He also founded One Iowa, the state's largest LGBTQ
organization. He was a communications director for Hillary Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign.
His new book is called Safe, a memoir of fatherhood, foster care, and the risks we take
for family. He and his husband Jason are now the parents of three adopted siblings.
Mark Daly, welcome to Fresh Air.
I found this book very moving and also very informative about foster care.
Why did you decide to foster instead of surrogacy?
Well, thank you so much for having me, Terry, first and foremost.
You know, this was a decision that we took very seriously.
I have three cousins that entered our family through foster care,
so it was something that I've known about for almost all of my life. I really can't imagine my life
without those cousins. And so it was something that I was passionate about and something I
thought that maybe we would do at some point in time. But we were really pursuing surrogacy,
thinking that was really how we were going to get started. And just by chance, we happened to go out and have breakfast with a friend of ours who was graduating college, and she
had aged out of the foster care system herself. And over the breakfast, she confided a few things
in us. She said, you know, first, that she was raised by some wonderful maternal women, who were
not her mother, of course, but that they had always had
biological children who had come before her. And she always felt like maybe she came second.
And, you know, we left that breakfast with two realities sort of striking us in the face. The
first was, of course, that as two men, our child would be raised without a mother. And the second one was that if we were
to do surrogacy first, would we sort of unintentionally be putting a foster child in the
same situation that our friend found herself in? And so we left, you know, that breakfast and we
got in our car and started talking. And before we knew it, we had changed plans and decided to foster first.
Once you decided to foster, you had to go to preparatory meetings about what to expect
with an emphasis on the difficulties you'd likely face as foster parents,
difficulties because the children would have likely been exposed to trauma.
That is one of the main reasons children end up in the foster care system.
So tell us about some of the more alarming warnings you were given at these meetings.
Yeah, you know, one of the exercises we did in particular was they made us watch this video,
and it was about a seven-year-old boy, and he had gone through so many different things.
And at the end of it, we had to explain sort of the differences between
what is a loss that is something that everyone experiences,
you know, something that just with maturity or maturational loss,
this idea that maybe we go to school for the first time,
we have a babysitter, our parents leave, we have this sort of separation there,
but every one of us has sort of gone through that.
And then there's situational losses.
And these are the differences that oftentimes kids in foster care experience. Maybe it is,
you know, dealing with a parent or caregiver who struggles with mental health issues,
addiction, poverty, violence, you know, death of a loved one, abuse, whatever it might be,
and sort of counting, you know, the number of different situational losses
that this child in this video had experienced, and understanding how commonplace that was in
foster care. That was really a hard thing for, you know, us to just think about this idea that,
you know, we wanted to take in this child and really, you know, love them and give them
opportunities and everything that everyone wants for their babies, but realizing at first that in order to do that, we'd first have to help them heal.
Did you doubt that you'd be capable of doing that?
I think that I definitely had concerns about it. You know, I knew that we had a tremendously
amazing group of friends and family around us.
We had support systems.
We are resourceful people.
And so, you know, I was up for the challenge.
But, you know, what we really wanted, honestly, Terry, was a baby.
You know, in my work in foster care, I thought that, well, I had heard all these stories about, you know, moms who maybe went out of the maternity ward to go smoke a cigarette and never returned. And so what I was hoping is we would get this child who needed parents and wanted to be raised and hopefully we would get them so early in life that we could spare them some of the more, you know, terrible situations that kids in foster care often find themselves in. When you got the call that there are two brothers
aged three months and 13 months old who you could foster,
what were you told about them?
I had a list of questions.
I knew that it would be a very emotional moment,
and so I pulled out these questions and I started asking things like,
do they have any other siblings who are in the system that have been adopted, you know, and so on and so forth.
And it turns out they did in that case.
They had an older sibling who had already been, the parental rights had been terminated and he'd been adopted by an aunt or uncle.
And that relative was not either able or willing to take in the younger boys as well.
I asked things about, you know, what was the deal with the parents?
Did we know anything?
And truthfully, what happens is when a child enters the system, the social workers are just trying to find, you know, a home that can take them.
It's more about finding a home than it is
about finding the right home. And that's really due to the lack of available homes that we have.
So what were you told and what were you not allowed to be told about the parents and the boys?
So when we first got the call, we didn't know very much. In fact, the very first time my husband spoke to them, he was told that they were, you know, Latino twins. And then when they called back a little bit later, when he was able to reach me, we were told that no, in fact, they were not twins. They were actually, you know, white boys, and they were three months and 13 months old. And so it's very much the game of telephone, you know. And then when we first
met with the social worker who came to our house, you know, I wanted to ask a million questions. But
you know, you're in this really difficult situation because just because you're caring
for someone's children doesn't really give you, you know, courtside seats to their life either.
I mean, these people are obviously experiencing the most difficult time of their life. And you have to be respectful and mindful of that. But there was also a curiosity factor to it, of course. But even more than that, really, was this idea that if the children had been exposed to anything, I wanted to make sure that I could get them any specialized help or care that they needed.
And were you allowed to be told what kind of trauma they had experienced, if any?
I think we would have been told if that was known from the front end.
I think that there was very limited knowledge of what had really happened.
We got the greatest sense of this later, you know, as we were talking to the
parents themselves actually told us more than anybody. What did they tell you?
You know, they just talked about their own childhood and the stuff they'd gone through
where they were living, you know, once the boys were removed, and this is, you know, what happens,
you know, they were, they were living with their, with the grandmother. And once the boys were gone, they had been sharing a mattress on the floor in the family room.
But when the boys were detained, the parents then moved to the car that they had leased, which then took away his job because he was driving for Uber.
And then ultimately that lost their income.
So eventually the car would be repossessed.
And, you know, it's just this one domino that fell that just sort of triggered this whole series. And it's just far too common, not just in our story, but in America now with poverty and things that people are dealing with.
And you learned that the mother, Amber, had bipolar disorder and wasn't taking her medication. And both she and her husband had addiction problems. And they were in and out of rehab.
So that's, you know, a lot of problems to have.
It is a lot.
I remember we were at a, really early on, we were at a sort of a meeting between the social workers and the biological parents and us and the children.
And there was a therapist there who was doing some work with the kids.
And the mother was going on about how, you know, to the social worker about how she never should have
lost her children. And the social worker was just remaining very, very calm. And then eventually,
she just turned and said, Hey, Amber, look, I don't even have a clean drug test from you yet.
And which sort of, you know, changed the tone of the room, you know, immediately.
And I would learn out a few weeks later that the mother
was pregnant again with their third child. All I could think to myself is here's this child that's
now, you know, probably being exposed. Yeah. Statistically, what were the odds that they're
going to remain with you permanently? Well, in California, 55% of children reunify.
And that, you know, as far and the remainder go on to, some of them are adopted by either, you know, family members, by foster parents.
Some go into legal guardianship.
Some age out of the foster care system.
You know, some run away.
There's different numbers there.
That was always something, you know, in foster care, the goal is always reunification.
And it should be.
I really
wholeheartedly believe that. You know, we obviously wanted to take in a baby. But like I said before,
this, we wanted to take in a child who needed a family. We didn't want to take one from someone
else, parents who are able to care for and take and keep a child safe.
But you know, you fell in love with these two boys and you wanted them in your life
forever, but you weren't sure if the parents would want or get them back.
So you didn't know whether to prepare for handing them back to their parents or save
money for their college education.
It's a very emotionally perplexing and anxiety-producing way to live.
Absolutely. I'm not a person who does well with the gray. I like to have a certainty,
whether it's yes, it's no, it's here's the plan. And when you're sort of living at the mercy of
whether or not the system decides they're staying or going.
You know, there were certain things the parents did where they were having real successes.
And, you know, you would have to be a heartless individual to not root them on when they're
having those, you know, and we certainly were supportive in those sense.
But there are other things that you would experience when you're with them that you
were like, oh, gosh, I just don't know that if they go home, they're going to be safe.
And it was a really difficult challenge.
Plus, you know, as you said, the moment you see these babies, you fall in love.
That's just what happens.
So I want to get back to the idea of not knowing whether these children would stay with you or whether they would be back with their biological parents. What are the rules for defining, you know, for judging
whether children stay with the foster parents or return to their biological parents?
You know, I believe it varies by places of where you live around the country. But, you know,
here in California, you know, there's a
whole entire justice system set up to protect the rights of children and families. And so ultimately,
the courts have the final say at the end of the day. But in court, you know, the biological parents,
the children, and the county that, you know, the agency that has detained the child,
all represented by attorneys that, you know, have their own cases to make here. So usually it's something that's ultimately decided by a judge.
But you as the foster parents don't have an attorney, right?
No, no. Foster parents really don't have a say. You know, we were allowed to submit a document
into the court that just really asked very direct questions about health and well-being.
But that was really the only voice that we had.
You were surprised and baffled when the parents started trying to get their two children back.
Why were you so surprised?
I think, you know, the surprise came in because there was so many opportunities where they just
hadn't stepped up so that when they finally did, it was like, wait a minute, what's going
on here?
You know, like, I just, I think I had kind of told myself that, you know, they're not,
there were so many things that the court had ordered them to do, whether it was go to rehab,
take parenting classes, and they weren't doing any of it, you know, get drug tested, these different things. None of it were steps they had done. So when they did, it was just sort of like, oh, wait a minute. And I think at that point, I had sort of told myself, well, babies aren't going to stay. They're never going to go home if they don't do these certain things. And then when they started, I was like, oh, wait a minute.
The game just changed here on that sense.
They were allowed supervised three-hour visits with the children.
And you were there for some of the visits.
But there were also visits at their biological parents' home, which you weren't always there for.
So when you had visits together with the parents and the children,
what were your impressions of the parents and how they reacted to their own children?
You know, there were often times where the older child would walk in and the mother would just
run to him and hug him and kiss him and so on. And the baby, you know, she just
seemed very indifferent towards. And I really struggled with it because, you know, obviously,
I was crazy about both these children. And I just hated for him to have to experience that,
not even knowing whether or not he was even processing, you know, who she was at that point,
you know. But it was really hard
to see that. And also, yeah, you thought that the parents were kind of indifferent to the kids a lot
of the time. They ended the visits early. They didn't show up for some of them. They showed up
late for other visits. And when the kids went to the parents' home, they'd return with problems. What kind of problems?
Yeah.
You know, when the children would go to their house, you know, they would come back and there was regression issues.
So there was, you know, biting or pinching or, you know, or having tantrums and meltdowns.
You know, it was very clear that they hadn't had naps or, you know, the food was sort of, you know, just thrown at them
whenever, like in the sense of, you know, they were eating, you know, junk food and, you know,
which I don't judge anyone for feeding junk food in that sense either. But it was, you know,
it was very clear that just these kids were exhausted. There was no schedule, you know,
and I can't, I don't say that with a judgment towards them. I think it's more about the behaviors that the kids were having when they came back, where they were so well adjusted and it was hard for them.
And there was also like the diaper rash and the diarrhea that they'd return with.
Absolutely.
And your heart just breaks.
You've got these children with these terrible diaper rash and you'd work all week to try to get it to go away.
And then they'd go spend the weekend with their biological parents and come back with a new one the next week.
You're just thinking, how long are they sitting in this soiled diaper?
Yeah.
Your husband, Jason, had dealt with addiction.
He'd been sober for 15 years, but he had problems with alcohol in the past.
Was he especially understanding of the problems the parents were facing with addiction?
Jason was really understanding.
In fact, there were times where, you know, the mom in particular would call
and they would be on speakerphone having a conversation
and I would be like the third wheel in the room just listening to them
because he really understands what it's like.
And, you know, the one day at a time mentality
and the fact that you know what addiction
means and what it can do and how hard it is and so I really I mean it was a moment where
I even fell more in love with him so we were torn between wanting the family to be reunited
you know the children to return to their parents and wanting to keep the children yourself because
you love them,
because you worried about the kind of care they'd get if they were reunited with their parents.
Yeah, it was an absolutely, I mean, it was really such a hard situation to be in because you really, the last thing I'd ever want to do is make my family on the back of another family.
You know, that realization that
for my family to stay together meant that another family had to break apart, that is a really
difficult pill to swallow. Do you think most foster parents enter the system with the idea that
this is something they're willing to do temporarily? Or do you think most foster parents
want the children to remain with them permanently?
I think that there is definitely a divide in there. I think that there, I hope that we are able to attract more people who see it as the temporary, you know, I'm helping a family going
through a really difficult position. But that being said, you know, not all kids do reunify. And so we do need families that are willing to open their homes and lives to a child in need.
I guess some people are fostered by several different parents because, you know, the parents might not want to foster indefinitely. So they're back in the system and then back with different parents.
Yeah. I mean, you know, kids, one of the major pushes in the system is to try to keep kids within their family.
And I think what they find is that children who are moved to an aunt, an uncle, a grandparent, you know, they tend to have fewer moves. And also just from a trauma standpoint, the idea of being
removed from your family and your school and moving into a stranger's home is just traumatic,
where if you're going to stay with your aunt or uncle, it's not as traumatic in that sense.
So we need to take a short break here. So let's do that. And then we'll talk more about your
experience as a foster parent and your experience
within the foster care bureaucracy. So we'll be right back. If you're just joining us, my guest
is Mark Daly, and he's the author of the new memoir, Safe, a memoir of fatherhood, foster care,
and the risks we take for family. I'm Terry Gross, and this is Fresh Air. I'm Anne-Marie Baldonado here to tell you about the most recent
bonus episode of Fresh Air. I didn't really set out looking for a high school movie to write but
it sort of worked the other way around. That's comedian, actor, and screenwriter Tina Fey who
ended up writing two high school movies Mean Girls and and Mean Girls the Musical, which is now in theaters.
We'll listen back to Terry's 2004 interview with Faye on Fresh Air Plus, and you can too at plus.npr.org.
Let's get back to my interview with Mark Daly.
His new memoir, Safe, is about the experiences he and his husband Jason had fostering two brothers.
The boys were three months and 13 months old when they arrived in 2016.
Mark and his husband Jason fell in love with the boys and were plagued by the uncertainty of whether their birth parents would want them back
and concerned about what would happen to the boys if they were returned to their parents.
In telling this family story,
Mark Daly writes about the frequent dysfunction within the foster care system, but he still sees the importance of foster care for both foster parents and the children and for society as well.
He founded the organization TheFosterParent.com, a national platform to connect interested families
with foster organizations. He also founded One Iowa, the state's largest LGBTQ plus organization.
He was a communications director for Hillary Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign.
Mark and Jason are now the parents of three adopted siblings.
Let's talk about the dysfunction within the foster care bureaucracy that you found so frustrating and often infuriating.
First of all, the number of meetings and the amount of time you spent waiting for the judge to hear the case, you kept wondering how would somebody who has to show up for work between 9 to 5 possibly able to deal with this?
You owned your own company, so you could make your own hours when you needed to, although you had to cancel meetings at the last minute.
I mean, it was a problem for you, but you imagined it would be even worse for somebody with inflexible hours. What were some of the things that you had to
drop everything for in order to appear for whichever kind of meeting it was?
Yeah, I mean, there were days where we would get calls and say, it's four o'clock on a Thursday,
and the social worker was coming the next morning at 10am. And we'd say, well, you know,
no one's planning to be home. You know, we have work and she'd say, well, you know, no one's planning to be home. You know,
we have work and she'd say, well, it's the last day of the month, I have to be there.
It's like, well, you know, you couldn't have given us any more notice. There were so many times we
were told to be at the courthouse by 9am. We would get there, we would check in, but your case didn't
get called until it got called. So you could be there all day. And I just, as I'm sitting in there, I kept thinking about all these families around us and how many of them
had to go out and get jobs to try to get their kids back, to prove to a judge they're doing
everything they can. And so imagine being in week two of your new job, going to your boss and saying,
hey, I need some time off to go try to get my kids back. Like, how does that make you look?
How does that make you feel?
It just, my heart broke for these families.
Yeah, and the caseworker who called you and said,
so we'll have a meeting at 10 in the morning.
And I was like, there's no notice at all.
She was an example of an incompetent caseworker.
Can you compare for us the difference between working with a competent
and an incompetent caseworker as an adoptive, as a foster parent?
We had a couple of social workers who were just remarkable. They were very professional. They
always, we knew where the line we could cross was, you know, not to cross. But they arrived when they
told us they would be there. You know, if they were running late, they called. All the paperwork
was submitted on time. The things that we asked for, they got us answers to.
And then we had one who, you know, wouldn't respond to emails or calls.
Or she would try to schedule visits and then change the times or set them up for one day she scheduled a visit at our house.
At the same time, she scheduled a visit with the biological parents.
It's like, how are the kids going to be in two places at once?
Yeah.
One of the things you found, among the many things you found very disturbing, was that
the judge didn't seem to know much about any people in this drama.
Not about you, not about the children, not about the parents.
And even this, Amber, the mother, was pregnant again
and the judge had no idea until, I guess,
until he saw her and then congratulated her.
But that's a pretty critical thing to know
if you're ruling on something as important as
can you take care of the children
and now it would be like three children,
two of whom I think would be under two.
Yeah, there was so many times
we would hear from social workers,
oh, I've got to get my reports in,
I've got to file this, you know,
so we have it in time for court.
And, you know, I've got to update this record
to make sure it's sent to the judge on time.
And then, you know, you're sitting in the courtroom
and the parents walk in
and they have their infant with them. And the judge looks up and, you know, says hello sitting in the courtroom and the parents walk in and they have their infant with them.
And the judge looks up and, you know, says hello and then says, and who's this?
And they, you know, introduce the baby and the judge says, oh, congratulations.
And it's just mind blowing to think, oh, wait, you didn't know there was a third one?
That's right.
She had already had the baby.
She wasn't pregnant.
Yeah.
Yeah.
So is that the judge who made the final ruling?
So the judge actually said that they would stay with us for another six months. But
that was the same judge who had actually ruled in their detention, which was actually ultimately
overturned. The judge ruled that they should stay with us for another six months. And we kind of
expected at that time that, you know, this was really make or break time for the parents, whether or not the
kids would be able to go back, depending upon whether or not the parents were able to finish
with their recovery, figure out what they're going to do as far as a place to live, employment,
how they're going to provide for their kids. And what had happened was the parents had filed an appeal of the initial detention
saying they never should have been taken away in the first place.
And that's really what interfered with our case.
And so the kids went back prematurely because the California Court of Appeals ruled in their favor.
What was it like for you to find out you had to give back the children?
How long had it been, by the way, since you had been parenting them?
It had been about 15 or 16 months that they had been with us.
You know, we fully expected at some point we might have to.
But, I mean, it certainly didn't make it any easier. And what really gave us the
big fear was that we just didn't know what it was going to be like. We just felt like they
weren't ready yet. It wasn't that they could never be ready. It was just that it was too early.
You know, we had just started doing more visits with them. You know, things weren't looking great
when they were coming back, but with continued support, they could start to look better.
And so it was really upsetting.
What was your goodbye like with the children?
Because they were too young to understand what was happening.
They were too young to understand what a foster parent is
or why they weren't with their parents.
I'm not sure if they even understood which parents
were which. Yeah, the day they left, we had, you know, packed up a bunch of their stuff. And one
of the social workers from the nonprofit that we were fostered through, licensed through, had come
over to pick them up so that we really didn't have to drive over there and drop them off because she
just knew it was going to be really emotional for us.
And so, you know, we helped get them in her car.
And, you know, I remember putting the baby in the car seat
and his brother was asking for him.
And I just, you know, it broke my heart.
But all I could think was, you know, thank God they have each other.
You know, they were so close and so tight.
So what happened to the children?
So ultimately, we waited. We knew that they were going to come back in. It was just in
my heart. I just, I knew it wasn't right yet. But you know, they were in a position because
they were so young, and even though they had a younger sister too, they weren't really exposed to any reporters. There were no teachers or doctors or nurses or anything that they were
coming in contact with regularly who would lodge any sort of complaint. And, you know, we obviously
hoped that they would be okay. But a little over a year later, I woke up to a text message from a friend of mine that said, you know, there are, she said, I'm not sure you're ready for this, but my adoption worker was at the house today.
And she has three kids that have just been assigned to her that their parents are no longer in the reunification service, you know, getting reunification services, and they're available for
adoption if you're interested. And so, I ran it by Jason, you know, I wasn't really sure what to
think. And he said, let's find out their story. And so, we did, we got into a potential match
situation. And a few months later, the kids moved in with us. And those are, of course, the kids that I've adopted.
But if you fast forward, you know, 10 months after our children moved in with us,
we got a call from the county that the boys and the younger sister were now back in care.
And would we consider taking them in?
That must have been such a hard decision. You love those boys, but no, they were babies when you got them. They were like
three months and 13 months old, and this was two years later. So they were more developed,
and they did that development in the home of their birth parents, who you thought probably
weren't quite ready yet to parent the children. So what kind of math did you do in your own head to decide
what was best for all your children, the three adopted children, and the two boys who you'd
fostered? And what was best for you and your husband? It was absolutely a horrific position
for us to be in. You know, we obviously love all six children in that situation. But
at the end of the day, you know,
Wait, there's five children, right? Who did I miss?
Well, no, the boys had a younger sister now.
So they were offering, right, so the three of them had to be together.
Yeah, exactly. So we would have gone from three to six kids. And, you know, our house is only so
big, but the county said they would have
worked with us. And I think our initial reaction was, yes, okay, let's do this.
And then we started to talk and the agency that we had gone through, thankfully said,
let's get on the phone and talk this through before you make a really emotional decision.
And so, we got on the phone with them and they said, you know, look, we talked to the social
worker and the kids have been through a lot since they left your care and the boys are much more aggressive than they were. And all I could
think about is the children that we have adopted now and, or we're on the way to adoption with,
and, you know, they're very petite and any sort of, you know, roughhousing would really hurt them.
And I had to protect them. But also, would I be doing what was right for the other three kids, bringing them in,
knowing that my attention would be divided amongst six children, that all of them have
their own, you know, needs and things that we need to take care of, and the help that
we need to get them, the therapy appointments, the doctor's appointments, the school, the
extracurricular, the fun stuff, you know?
And not to mention, they're in a situation now where they could still go back to their biological parents. And we'd have
to go through this again, but only this time, you know, what if we bonded as a large family in the
sense we now have children to worry about, you know? Meaning the kids that we're adopting.
So, oftentimes I think about it and I remember the decision that the boy's
grandmother ultimately made at the beginning when she said, I can't do this even though I love them.
And that was, to find myself in her position was just really, it was terrible.
Well, let me reintroduce you again. If you're just joining us, my guest is Mark Daly,
author of the book Safe, a memoir of fatherhood, foster care, and the risks we take for family.
We'll be right back.
This is Fresh Air.
I have to say, although you're sympathetic to the plight of the parents, it also doesn't make them look like terribly responsible parents.
So this book will be published, and it might do really well.
So how—do you think about the parents finding out about it and reading it
and feeling perhaps like they were misrepresented because they don't—
I mean, you're very sympathetic to their plight,
but they don't come off very well in the book in terms of being responsible and being capable of overcoming their problems.
You know, I went to Painting Links, obviously, to sort of hide their identities and do whatever I could, you know, to change names and locations, all those things, you know, to make sure that they were protected. I think the truth is that, you know,
I'm only one person in this whole story. And that we all have our own different perspectives.
And there were different times that that came to light, you know, for me in living this just when,
when I was complaining about the issues with the social worker. And then all of a sudden,
when the mom said something about it, I was like, right, you know, I mean, I have a car,
and I have a job and I have a job
and I have all of these resources that she doesn't have. It must be so much more difficult for her.
You know, I think it just, so I think that, you know, certainly she's probably not going to like
the way that she's presented in this, but I'm also just trying to share my perspective, really with the hope that we can do more across the board, you know, that people will step up and recognize the challenges of addiction, mental health, poverty.
Also, I wonder if this went through your mind that the person with more privilege and more money shouldn't be the person who wins.
It shouldn't by default be the person who wins. It shouldn't by default be the
person who wins. I completely agree. I mean, look, it is not fair to compare what we have and what
they have, right? I mean, I have very fortunate to have grown up in a loving working class family,
and I've been afforded opportunities that these parents have never had. You know,
I don't deal with the intergenerational trauma and the abuse that they've gone through and
experienced or, you know, the mental health issues that they struggle with. It is not a,
we didn't start this with a level playing field. That being said, they should never prioritize
folks like myself over families that can get it together and keep their child safe.
You know, a kid doesn't need a lot to be, to grow up to be a success.
They just need the minimum, you know.
And they need the love, but you weren't sure they were getting.
The love.
I know that they, I don't question that they love their children.
It's just that, you know,
love doesn't keep you safe. You know, it doesn't make sure that you're not left alone in the
bathtub. Right. One of the things you don't write about in your memoir is the obstacles you faced
as husband and husband, as a gay married couple, fostering children and being accepted by the
foster care system. So I'm assuming that that was not an issue. You know, I live in Los Angeles,
and Los Angeles is not a microcosm of the United States. So I say this with that disclaimer out
there, but they knew that we were there because it was a very deliberate decision. We had talked
long and hard about it. We had done our research. And so we were treated extremely well throughout the process.
Are there obstacles in other states?
Absolutely.
There's more than a dozen states that do not have laws in the book that prevent discrimination
against LGBT families from fostering.
What is so short-sighted about that is that today, same-sex couples are two
times more likely to be fostering than heterosexual couples.
Do you think that's because of the obstacles to getting children if you're a gay couple?
I think it's a combination of that. I think that it is definitely the obstacles. But also,
you know, as gay folks, we've grown up where we have a lot of friends and family who have
experienced being disowned, you know, by their friends and family who have experienced being disowned,
you know, by their friends and family. And so the sense of your chosen family runs a little bit
deeper in the gay community than it does in probably most circles. And I think that adoption
and foster care sort of lends naturally into that. Plus, we have a foster system that has 30% of the youth identify as LGBTQ. So we need families that are affirming.
I think you're a doorway into activism. And now you're like an activist in terms of the foster care system. But you started as a gay activist and founded this group One Iowa to fight for marriage equality. Do you still consider yourself an activist in LGBTQ issues?
I'd like to. I think that right now I am a dad who spends a lot of time at a soccer field and
at dance classes. But there's a lot of activism that needs to be done around the protecting of
LGBT families I'm learning. And I think that is a really big thing that, you know, I see myself
stepping more into.
It's been a pleasure to talk with you and congratulations on the family that you have.
Thank you so much for having me, Terry. This is amazing.
Mark Daly's new memoir is called Safe.
Larry David's HBO comedy series, Curb Your Enthusiasm, began its 12th and final season Sunday.
Our TV critic David Bianculli will have a review after a break. This is Fresh Air. On Sunday, Larry David unveiled the season 12 premiere of his
long-running HBO comedy series Curb Your Enthusiasm, which is also streaming on Max. It's not only the
latest season for Curb, Larry David says it will be the last.
The co-creator of the hit NBC sitcom Seinfeld has been playing an exaggerated, abrasive version of
himself since he launched a Curb Your Enthusiasm special on HBO in 1999. The series began the
following year and has been running on and off ever since. Our TV critic David Bianculli
has been watching and enjoying Curb the whole time and has these thoughts on the newest installment
and the entire run so far. The original Curb Your Enthusiasm special premiered on HBO 25 years ago,
the same year HBO also premiered The Sopranos. A few years earlier, HBO had presented another groundbreaking
program, The Larry Sanders Show, in which Gary Shandling deconstructed the TV talk show.
He did it not only by mounting a fictional version of a Tonight Show-like program,
but also by showing all the behind-the-scenes and personal stuff that went with it.
Larry David's idea for the Curb special,
after his super successful run with the Seinfeld sitcom, was to do a similar thing, except building
to a stand-up act, not a talk show. Here's the way in which Jeff Garlin, playing Larry's agent
Jeff Green, pitched the premise to HBO executives, well, actors playing HBO executives, in that 1999 special. Larry provided
support, but not too much. But, well, let me explain. Larry hasn't done stand-up in nine and
a half years, if you can believe that. And what we want to do is have Larry perform again and have
it lead up to an HBO special, it being two parts. The first part would be a documentary
of everything that Larry has to do
to prepare for the special.
The sets at the clubs,
time alone with his family,
walking down the street, whatever it is.
We're going to see how he prepares for it
leading up to the special,
and then the actual special,
which would be just him doing straight-ahead stand-up. Stinks, right? So far it stinks, right? The original Seinfeld series,
co-created with Jerry Seinfeld, had a similar interest, showing Jerry's personal life as he
developed material for his stand-up act. But the actual stand-up bits on Seinfeld appeared only briefly And in that Curb special, Larry David subverted expectations
By ending the special without showing the big stand-up routine it was building towards
Instead, he was building something else
Like the special, the subsequent series would follow a carefully crafted plot outline
Yet allow plenty of room for actors to improvise,
which they've been doing hilariously ever since.
This new season of Curb picks up where the last one left off,
with Larry, the TV character Larry,
stuck with two women he can't eject from his life at the moment.
One is Maria Sofia,
the young, untalented star of his new TV sitcom, Young Larry.
The other is Irma, a local politician who, because of her political influence, is Larry's latest significant other, even though he's appalled by her.
Maria Sofia, played by Kayla Monterozo-Mahia, has become an improbable media sensation.
We see her briefly as a guest on Jimmy Kimmel's talk show.
And that cuts to Irma, played by Tracy Ullman,
starting a private morning with Larry by entering his kitchen singing a song.
A TV jingle.
None of it sits well with Larry.
Is there a lot of improv on the show?
Yes, there's a scribish butt.
I make up most of my own lines,
put my own spin on the words, make it better.
I have a structured settlement, but I need cash now.
Call J.G. Wentworth.
Big double seven cash now. I have some big annuities, but I need cash now. Call J.G. Wentworth. 877-CASH-NOW.
I have some big annuities, but I need cash now.
Call J.G. Wentworth.
877-CASH-NOW.
Stop with that commercial.
I don't want to hear that.
Don't sing that in the house.
I want to stop.
I can't stop.
Well, stop.
But what makes Curb really work for me, season in and season out,
is the delicate combination of intricate structure and freewheeling improvisation.
Sunday's final season premiere took Larry to Atlanta
and ended with a classic visual that's a brilliant surprise.
But before that, there were scenes that just sang.
And I'm not talking jingles.
In this scene, Larry and his live-in buddy Leon, played by J.B.
Smoove, are in Atlanta visiting Leon's Auntie Ray with Maria Sophia along for the ride. Maria Sophia
grabs Larry's glasses off his head and gives them to Auntie Ray to try on. When Auntie Ray, played
by Ellia English, returns them, and Larry puts them on and bows his head, they slip right off.
You took my glasses?
I love it. Thank you. Thank you.
What did you do? Why'd you take my glasses?
She wanted to try a new style. I wanted to see what your glasses looked like on her.
You know, you could have asked me.
You would have said no.
Are you serious?
You know, I can see well through them. I think we might have the same prescription.
Can I have my glasses back, please?
All right, fine. Here.
What the hell?
What? What's wrong?
What's wrong?
Yes.
They don't fit.
Oh, my goodness.
You stretched them out.
No, I didn't.
I didn't do anything to them.
They must have been like that when she gave them to me.
No, they weren't like that.
Look at the size of her head.
Are you kidding?
You can't just take a pair of glasses and try them on.
You have a big head. Dare I say freakish?
No, I don't have a big head.
It's excessive. It's like a jack-o'-lantern.
You know what? You got a peanut head, like Mr. Peanut.
Look at this.
That's what I love most about Curb.
Each season, Larry David always knows precisely where he wants to end up.
But he takes time to make the journey more than half the fun.
David Bianculli is a professor of television studies at Rowan University.
He reviewed HBO's Curb Your Enthusiasm, which started its 12th and final season Sunday.
Tomorrow on Fresh Air, MSNBC host Joy Reid talks about Medgar Evers and his wife, Merle Evers.
Medgar was a civil rights leader in
Mississippi who was assassinated in 1963 because of his work fighting for voting rights, desegregation,
and freedom. His murder was followed by the assassinations of President Kennedy, Malcolm X,
Martin Luther King, and Robert Kennedy. Merle became a civil rights activist after becoming a civil rights widow.
I hope you'll join us.
To keep up with what's on the show
and get highlights of our interviews,
follow us on Instagram at NPR Fresh Air.
Fresh Air's executive producer is Danny Miller.
Our technical director and engineer is Audrey Bentham.
Our interviews and reviews are produced and edited by Amy Sallet, Phyllis Myers, Sam Brigger, Lauren Krenzel, Heidi Saman, Anne-Marie Valdonado, Teresa Madden, Thea Chaloner, Seth Kelly, and Susan Yakundi.
Our digital media producer is Molly C.V. Nesper.
Roberta Shorrock directs the show.
Our co-host is Tanya Mosley. I'm Terry Gross.