Fresh Air - Inside The 'Mad House' Of Congressional Disfunction

Episode Date: March 25, 2025

The MAGA-controlled 118th House passed only 27 bills that became law — the lowest number since the Great Depression. Journalists Annie Karni and Luke Broadwater examine the chaos in a new book, Mad House: How Donald Trump, MAGA Mean Girls, a Former Used Car Salesman, a Florida Nepo Baby, and a Man with Rats in His Walls Broke Congress. Sign up for our free weekly newsletter to get special behind-the-scenes content, producer recommendations, and gems from the archive. Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy

Imagine, if you will, a show from NPR that's not like NPR, a show that focuses not on the important but the stupid, which features stories about people smuggling animals in their pants and competent criminals in ridiculous science studies, and call it Wait, Wait, Don't Tell Me because the good names were taken. Listen to NPR's Wait, Wait, Don't Tell Me. Yes, that is what it is called wherever You Get Your Podcast. This is Fresh Air. I'm Dave Davies.

If you follow the news, you know these are strange and turbulent times in Washington, as the Trump administration sinks to shrink and recast the federal government with blinding speed and fury. Trump's opponents would no doubt like to see Congress assert its authority to stop the dismantling of agencies and programs its past members have authorized. We haven't seen much of that, but we have seen bills introduced to enable a third Donald Trump term, rename Dulles Airport after him, and carve his image into Mount Rushmore. Whatever happens, our two guests today have the experience, insight, and sources to tell the story. Annie Carney and Luke Broadwater are both veteran reporters who cover Washington

for the New York Times, and they've written a new book about the 118th Congress, the one elected in 2022. It's a look inside the corridors of power when Democrat Joe Biden was president, dealing with what the authors say was the first MAGA- controlled Congress, one that fully adopted the extremism and stagecraft of Trumpism. There are fascinating accounts of high stakes negotiations and of House members cursing, insulting and threatening each other, but not a lot of serious legislating. The House passed only 27 bills that became law in its two year session, the lowest number

since the Great Depression. Before joining the New York Times in 2018, Annie Carney worked at Politico, the New York Daily News, and the New York Post. Luke Broadwater worked for nearly a decade at the Baltimore Sun, where he won a Pulitzer Prize for stories about a scandal at the state's largest hospital system that led to the resignation of Baltimore's mayor. Carney and Broadwater's new book is Madhouse, How Donald Trump, Maga Mean Girls, a former

used car salesman, the Florida nepo baby, and a man with rats in his walls broke Congress. We recorded our conversation yesterday. Annie Carney, Luke Broadwater, welcome back to Fresh Air. Thank you so much for having us. Yeah, thank you. That is a colorful title and I thought we would begin with an audio clip of a moment in 2024 which kind of captures some of the craziness of this particular Congress and its breakdown in civility. This was a hearing at the House Oversight Committee where the ostensible purpose was to consider a motion to hold Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt of Congress. The sound we'll hear, you might have heard it before, it's a little confusing at moments.

We'll hear eventually from Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, but it begins when Texas Democrat Jasmine Crockett is criticizing Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Green, and Green makes an insulting comment about Crockett's eye makeup. Let's listen. Do you know what we're here for? You know we're here. I don't think you know what you're here for. Well you don't want to talk about it. I think your fake eyelashes are messing up. Hold on, hold on.

Order. I do have a point of order and I would like to move to take down Miss Green's words. That is absolutely unacceptable. How dare you attack the physical appearance of another person. Are your feelings hurt? Move her words down. Oh. Oh girl, baby girl.

Oh really? Don't even play with me. Baby girl, I don't think so. We are going to move and we're going gonna take your words down. I second that motion I'm just curious just to better understand your ruling if someone on this committee then starts talking about Somebody's bleach-blind bad-built butch body that would not be engaging in personalities, correct? Oh what now? Chairman I make a motion to strike those words. I don't think that's a part of it. I'm trying to find clarification on what... Chairman, motion to strike those words.

We're not going to do this. Look, you guys earlier literally just... Good times under the Capitol dome. That was an insane night. Yeah, well, so either of you can pick this up. But just tell us a little, give us some context for this and what it tells us about this Congress. Well, first of all, let's remember, this is a hearing that's happening at night, to start with.

And why is it happening at night? Because some of the members who are on this committee had spent their work day that day in Manhattan outside of the federal courthouse where Trump was on trial Defending him because a gag order prevented him from speaking for himself. So it's already a little emotional like different vibe when you start a hearing at 8 p.m. Famously like anything that starts in the evening in Congress, many people are drunk. There is like something called the drunk caucus that other members refer to. Leadership is

always wary of scheduling votes at night because drinking is a problem. I'm sorry to interrupt, but I read this in the book and I was astonished to read this. Yes. It is among people who work in the Capitol and reporters. It's like not a revelation Everyone just knows this but it is a revelation to most people who don't so anyway, this is starting at night When you were playing that clip, I just couldn't help but thinking that everyone is being peak themselves in that moment Ostensibly like who even remembers what this hearing was about? What happens here is that Green makes what Crockett thinks is a racist attack, kind of making fun of her eyelashes, which Crockett in an interview later told us. She's seen those attacks online. It's

like a ghetto girl thing and Marjorie Taylor Green was picking up like some loaded comment to make a comment about her. And all the crazy things that Green has said during her time in Congress, talking about eyelashes might really not rank up there, but there is one hard and fast rule that you can't do face to face ad hominem attacks. It's known as quote unquote engaging in personalities. So there's not a lot of rules in Congress, but she actually can't engage in personalities. And this was an ad hominem attack. So they go after Greene.

And when Jasmine Crockett comes up with her famous now line, she smartly phrases it as a question. So it's not actually a direct ad hominem attack at Greene. So they're all kind of playing a game here. And one interesting thing is you can hear AOC getting pretty heated here. And in some ways, this was a moment that Green won. Green is constantly wanting to engage with AOC.

She wants to get into it with the most famous House Democrat. And usually, AOC does not take the bait. But in this clip, you can hear she gets to her. She takes the bait. She gets into a heated back and forth with Green, which is kind of what Green wants here. Right. Calls her baby girl. Yeah.

Yeah. I mean, in some ways, this was the real moment when the Democrats in the House embraced the Republican style of politics. During this Congress, the first Congress controlled by the MAGA movement, pretty much every Republican who got themselves on TV did so by emulating the style of Donald Trump. Democrats had always believed in Michelle Obama's axiom, which was, when they go low, we go higher. Jasmine Crockett clearly decided when they go low we go lower and we're gonna we're gonna fight them down in the mud and You know it sort of typified and exemplified everything that this Congress became and that is

dysfunctional seeding power to Trump Really just fighting to fight to make viral moments. Right. And, you know, whether going lower is an improvement or not is a matter of opinion. Whether this was like a great moment for Democrats or not is really a matter of opinion. But usually when things go viral online, it's not a great sign for the functionality of Congress. And in this case, no one even remembered what the hearing was ostensibly about. You know, it's interesting because I remember

in the book where you describe this shift in strategy by Democrats, we're not gonna sort of stay above the fray. We are going to engage and give it right back to them. And that part of the theory was that Republican members would think about what their future careers will be like if they have embarrassed themselves and adopted things which defy reality or decorum. Did that strategy work at all?

Yeah, so I don't believe it has worked according to the election results. It seems that voters actually like the fisticuffs. They like Donald Trump's brand of politics. Certainly in these red districts, they like it. This is a successful way to win primaries on the right is to be the loudest, the biggest fighter, the most extreme.

That gives you a loyal, loving fan base on the right. And so, you know, what we're seeing now in the Democratic Party is I think there's a desire among the populace for the Democrats to become more of the party of fighting and not the party that plays by, you know, Robert's rules and keeps things super professional. You know, one other thing that I just – a general observation about the account of this Congress that you provide us is how many times there are physical threats among members? I mean, in many cases, leaders of Congress, things like, you know, say that again and I'll kick your you-know know what or I'll drop you.

You both have been around a while. I know, Luke, I know you covered City Hall and the Maryland legislature. Have you ever seen anything like this? Not like this. I mean, the... You're right. That was a striking revelation as well. We would often go back to people and ask them what happened in this room or that room. Time after time, they would recount how somebody said something to them and they would say,

you know, if you do that again, I'll knock you out or some other sort of threat. Some of these were examples that played out on the House floor. You know, Eric Swalwell and Kevin McCarthy coming up to each other and using the P word, right? You had Tim Burchett and Kevin McCarthy in the hallway. You had... Danielle Pletka Tim Burchett and Patrick McHenry on the floor. A lot of it is Republican on Republican, not just intra-party kids.

Patrick McCallum Yes. Yeah. Oftentimes, it's members of, you know, the same caucus even getting into it with each other. Obviously, we talked about Lauren Boebert and Marjorie Taylor Greene and why they hate each other so much. One thing that I learned in that scene with Jasmine Crockett in the oversight room is going back and reporting it later is that Lauren Boebert is actually the preferred Republican of the Democrats. That they see her as much easier to work with and actually she has friendships on the left. When her grandchild was born, Jamie Raskin of all people sent her a baby gift that said,

I may take a lot of naps but I'm still woke. in books that people wish they had read in the newspapers. As you did this, did did you put some of this stuff in the paper or did you mostly save it for the book? We did. I think that along the way I found reporting the book a great help to my day job writing about Congress for the New York Times. I got a lot of daily stories out of book reporting. But you can also, you're doing interviews under embargo. So people are willing to tell you things that they wouldn't tell you for the daily paper when you say, this is not for use until March 2025.

So I think that criticism, I understand why it's made, but it's not really fair. A lot of stuff isn't available in real time. And it's, and I think it's made, but it's not really fair. A lot of stuff isn't available in real time. And I think it's valuable to have it out eventually for history, for understanding the moment better, but it's just simply not available to use in real time. So would you rather have it never, or would you rather have it later?

And the book is the later. So sometimes we would be able to peel off stuff and ask sources, is it OK if I use this now? But it's up the agreement when you do these interviews is that it's embargoed for the book and you can't really violate that agreement. Well, I want to talk about what's going on these days in the Capitol. I mean, your book deals with the two year period that ended, I guess, in January. But boy, a lot's happening right now. And Democrats are trying to figure out how to deal with Donald Trump, who is riding a wave and with his team trying to reshape government in a dramatic fashion.

And there are real divisions within the Democratic Party on what to do about it, how to handle it. You've written about how the Senate minority leader, Chuck Schumer, kind of has a take-it-all-on approach, you know, respond to everything, whereas Hakeem Jeffries, the leader of the Democrats in the House, kind of picks his battle. I guess a difference in emphasis. I'm wondering what you are hearing from rank-and-file Democrats in Congress about this debate. Frustration. I think, you know, right now what's happening is Chuck Schumer has become the bogeyman of the Democratic Party among rank-and-file House Democrats and among voters

for just emotion and frustration at just wanting to do more, wanting to fight back. And this is because last week he voted with Republicans to stave off a government shutdown. If Democrats had not joined Republicans in the Senate, we would be in a government shutdown right now. And Chuck Schumer has been defending this decision for the past week saying that would have been much, much worse. Elon Musk and Donald Trump wanted a shutdown. It would have allowed them to decide which programs are essential and not essential and therefore never bring them back.

His example that he's been talking a lot about is SNAP, food stamps. They could just say during a shutdown, this is not essential. And during a shutdown, there's no court check. So that could just go away. So on the merits, there's a good argument there. It's understandable why he did what he did. On the politics, there was a good argument there. It's understandable why he did what he did. On the politics, there was white hot anger at caving to Donald Trump. One day he said he was gonna stand up and be against it, the next day he voted for it.

So he's under a lot of pressure right now. I think the issue that's going on right now is there was not a lot of explaining that a short term government spending bill in March of 2025 is not the fight. People want to know what is the fight? Where are we going to have an opportunity to stand up to Republicans? This looked like one of the few times when Democrats had a role to play and they caved. Chuck Schumer has been hammered by Nancy Pelosi. Jeffries has been not really supportive. He was asked, do you have confidence in Schumer's leadership? And he said, next

question. So it's there's a lot of intensity right now between the House and the Senate. You've seen Bernie Sanders and AOC out there doing these huge rallies over the past few days. I mean, they don't we're it's not clear yet what Democrats are doing, but there's obviously such a huge deep desire to do more than their leaders are currently doing. And people feel that Schumer is out of step with the moment. He sat for us for the book and he told us, these are his words, that once the Republican Party removes the turd of Donald Trump, it will go back to being the old Republican Party. And he described Donald Trump as being sort of an evil sorcerer, in his words, that had

sort of cast a spell over Republicans and Republican voters. And what we really discovered reporting this book out is that every member of the House Republicans that we talked to had embraced the MAGA movement and made it their own. It was not solely the function of Donald Trump anymore. They had taken it in some instances even further to the right than where Donald Trump is with MAGA. And so, you know, our belief is, having done all these interviews,

that MAGA will exist long after Donald Trump leaves the political scene. Right, and there's plenty of evidence in stories you tell in the book that if people forget the MAGA base, they will pay for it. And so, it's not just Donald Trump, it's the people who have come to believe. Right. Another thing that's developed is it's not just Donald Trump. In fact, there's

a whole right-wing ecosystem that does the work for him of threatening, of making you fall in line. He really doesn't need to anymore be the one to threaten you with a primary challenge if you don't vote the way he wants you to vote. There's Charlie Kirk and Steve Bannon and this whole ecosystem that knows the playbook and doesn't need direction. So it kind of just exists on its own now.

Yeah, two of the, I guess we could call them characters in the book were Steve Bannon and Russell Vogt, who now are wielding even more influence in the Trump administration. And we document in this book how they were able to sort of dictate how things were happening on Capitol Hill through their allies in the House Republicans and also through their influence, especially on Bannon's podcast. He was able to text directly with members and acted in some cases like a stage parent, sort of coaching them on how to approach certain situations to get the most MAGA outcome.

Trevor Burrus You know, people know of Steve Bannon. They may know he has a podcast, but it's a four-hour daily podcast. Is this right? He's recording four hours every weekdays and two hours every weekend. And what he's really doing, his recording studio is in his basement, which is about a stone's throw from the Capitol. And he allows these far-right members that he agrees with to come on, and he gives them a platform.

They raise money there. Like he asks, like, where do you send donations? He prompts them multiple times during the interview. He gives them a platform that allows them to circumvent usually how you gain power in Washington, which is through leadership, through, like, the leadership suites and lobbyists and mainstream media. This circumvents that. This is just directly to the base,

and he gives them this huge platform. And there's just this constant stream back and forth between Bannon's house and the house floor. They just walk back and forth. He worked a lot closely with Matt Gates on unseating Kevin McCarthy. He was a strategist and a stage parent. So that is a whole new ecosystem that's

helping the far-right members. I'm going to take another break here. Let me reintroduce you. We are speaking with Luke Broadwater and Annie Carney. Both are correspondents for the New York Times. Annie Carney covers Congress. Luke Broadwater covers the White House. Both of them were deeply involved in covering the last Congress, and they have a new book about it. It's called Mad House, How Donald Trump, Maga Mean Girls, a former used car salesman, a Florida nepo baby, and a man with rats in his walls broke Congress. We'll be back to talk more after this short break.

I'm Dave Davies and this is Fresh Air. Hi, this is Molly C.V. Nesbitt, digital producer at Fresh Air. And this is Terri Gross, host of the show. One of the things I do is write the weekly newsletter. And I'm a newsletter fan. I read it every Saturday after breakfast. The newsletter includes all the week's shows, staff recommendations, and Molly picks timely highlights from the archive.

It's a fun read. It's also the only place where we tell you what's coming up next week, an exclusive. So subscribe at whyy.org slash fresh air and look for an email from Molly every Saturday morning. You know Annie Carney you were saying that, I think you both mentioned this, that there were cases in the last Congress where there were Republicans who publicly towed the MAGA line and were good soldiers but that privately had serious qualms about it. And I'm wondering if you are hearing privately from Republican members these days whether they're worried about the cuts that the administration is making

through Elon Musk and Doge and you know honor the effect of tariffs. Are they concerned about what this is going to do to Republicans' popularity? Yes. I mean, vulnerable Republicans are very scared. Our colleague Katie Edmondson did a profile of David Valadeo, a very vulnerable member from California who, I mean, a huge percentage of his state is on Medicaid. So this idea, this threat that they're going to cut Medicaid is very worrisome for some Republicans across the country. And we've seen some senators trying to support Doge in abstract, but trying to defend against cuts in their state. So they're scared because the cuts in their state

could lead to them losing their jobs. We've also seen senators like Tom Tillis in North Carolina try and find a way not to support some of these most controversial cabinet nominees. Tom Tillis went to great lengths to try and find a way to vote against Pete Hegseth for defense secretary. And ultimately it was too hard and he fell in line. Joni Ernst too is of Iowa. She's a survivor of sexual assault, has a military background, expressed concerns about Pete Hegseth and the right wing echo chamber threatened a primary challenge and she fell in line. So we've seen tiny attempts to break with the party line and those who want a political future who care about getting reelected eventually cave.

There's not a lot of room for that right now, but certainly vulnerable Republicans are very concerned about potential Medicaid cuts that would be deeply unpopular with their voters. I'm wondering how they feel about Elon Musk generally. I mean, he came in and got a hold of the payment system and the Treasury Department and was able to essentially, as he said, it put AID in the woodshipper, the Agency for International Development. How do they view his role? Aaron Powell I mean, it looks to me like they are embracing

Elon Musk and his mission very much so. Each chamber has set up its own doge caucus and they are trying to implement his cuts into their various spending plans. When he comes to Capitol Hill, he gave out his private cell phone number to members. He has tried to court people individually. And he's posing for pictures. But Elon Musk, his polling is much lower than Donald Trump's. The public at large does not feel the same way they feel about Trump as they do with

Elon Musk. Democrats I believe are focusing in on him as perhaps their best target. He wasn't elected. He's extremely rich. They know that there's a lot of populist anger against the wealthy. So if the richest man in the world who has all these contracts with the federal government is coming in slashing the jobs of regular workers, and there are federal workers not just in DC but all over the country, you can see how

that could be a potent political weapon for Democrats to wield. Trevor Burrus Trump has a big agenda of tax cuts coming, apart from all that he's doing to restructure the government. He wants to make the tax cuts that were made in the last administration permanent, and that's probably going to have a big impact on the deficit, increasing it. How does that look to play in the Congress? Aaron Powell I think that that is one of the very salient points that you've made.

As Elon Musk and Doge are cutting small agencies and saving pennies on the dollar, the House Republicans are planning to extend these tax cuts, and they're planning to raise the debt by four trillion dollars and so There's a bit of discordant notes within the Republican Party about how much they actually care about the debt because the bigger actions they're taking are going to increase the debt and You know one could see you know dismantling the Department of Education and dismantling USAID and laying off probationary workers as very, very small dollar figures compared to the amount of debt that they're going to be increasing. And so I don't know how Republican voters process that.

It seems that many care about the debt when it's under a Democrat, but don't care when it's under a Republican. But this Congress is planning to raise the debt significantly. Let me reintroduce you again. We are speaking with Andy Carney and Luke Broadwater, both our correspondents for The New York Times. Their new book about the last Congress is titled Madhouse. We'll talk more after this short break. This is Fresh Air. One of the reasons that the last Congress that you wrote about was so

chaotic was that Republicans had a majority, but a very narrow one, and you had about 20 or so members who simply were going to follow their own dictates and couldn't be persuaded by Kevin McCarthy or anybody else to do what the leadership wanted. Who were they? What were they after? So, yeah, I mean, that is the basic issue of the last Congress and this Congress is that when you have a tiny majority, any member can throw themselves in the mix and make themselves the deciding vote.

And in the last Congress, it gave this group of the 20 who are far-right members outsized power. And I think that one of the best examples of how further right the House was than the country was, was during those three weeks when they could not elect another speaker. One of the people going for it was Tom Emmer. He's been in leadership for a long time. He's from Minnesota. He, at some point when he was a state legislator, voted for same-sex marriage. When he was up running for Speaker of the House, this position was a non-starter for a lot of these deeply Christian red state congressmen who got up

and said to him, you don't need to get right with me, you need to get right with God. And I can't support you for speaker if you took that vote. Now, this was like remarkable to me because this is a moment when like you can't get elected president like same sex marriage is broadly popular with Republicans and Democrats alike across the country. You couldn't be elected president by being anti same sex marriage probably But in the House, which is pulled right by this small faction, you can't get elected speaker with that position. These people wielded outsized influence and they're socially conservative, they're fiscally conservative, they're mostly

pro-Trump and that's who really kind of decided how the House functioned last year, or more likely did not function. In our book, we document how Mike Johnson plotted his way to the speakership. He likes to say, it just sort of landed in his lap, but you don't become the most powerful person in Congress by accident or by just praying. He was strategizing from January about maybe there's a path for him. And he and his very canny chief made it happen. But now his entire ticket to power is Trump.

And he has acted more like a junior member of the White House staff than as a leader of a co-equal branch of government because he has no power without Trump. The way he gets his members to fall in line on a bill he needs them to vote for is to say, well, you don't agree, you're going to have to call the president. Right, and he's done a complete 180 on Ukraine.

I mean, one of the things that you describe is when Biden was still in office and they wanted to get that military aid package for Ukraine done, that Mike Johnson actually quite skillfully negotiated an arrangement where he could make that happen. Yes, we wrote a lot about, there was a lot more behind the scenes going on of Johnson working secretly in a very, with the White House to get this done.

The Biden White House, right? The Biden White House. Like he, his chief of staff would meet with a top Biden advisor late at night in a dog park in their neighborhood and trade paper folders because they didn't want anything in writing. They thought that if these hard right members got wind of what they were doing, it would fall apart. So he was really working to get this deal done.

He had been convinced by the intelligence that if Ukraine did not get financial support, Putin would steamroll across to Poland and then we would have to get involved in a war. And he made the case and he did finally bring a funding bill to the floor. At the time, this was seen as fairly remarkable in the same way that Pence, Mike Pence was remarkable in that you're not really doing anything particularly remarkable. You're literally doing your job, which was bring a bill to the floor and see if it has the votes to pass. But in a moment with the pressure on him, it seemed like he had actually stood up to the pressure. And at the time, Marjorie Taylor Greene was threatening to oust him from his job because of this. So he actually did,

was threatening to oust him from his job because of this. So he actually did, you know, at the time, make a hard decision, which was, I'm going to potentially risk my job to do what I think is the right thing. And now we saw him at the State of the Union. I actually couldn't help but knowing from our reporting all that he had done to secure Ukraine funding. When Trump, during his address to the joint session,

was complaining about Ukraine funding, Johnson was shaking his head on the dais behind him, like, I can't believe this. Terrible, terrible. And now he, the only way he defends what he did last year is to say, I set the table for Trump to end this war. But it's a complete 180 to fall in line with Trump's position. And in the book, we take you inside the room for a private one-on-one meeting between Marjorie

Taylor Greene and Mike Johnson as she's trying to kick him out as speaker and he's trying to fund Ukraine. And the showdown between these two is pretty incredible. So I would encourage people when they get the book to read that chapter. Danielle Pletka He says to her, Marjorie, have you ever been to Europe? And she says, no. And he says, have you ever served in the military? And she says, no. And he says, but you expect me to take your word for this over our generals, four-star generals, our guys, Trump guys? And she says, well, the American people know,

and you would know if you weren't such a P word. Uh-huh. Those guys are all in a deep state now. Yeah. I found this section of the book interesting where you describe so many Republicans who are just leaving Congress, either not running for re-election or in some cases quitting mid-term.

Apart from the difficulty of living in a world where if you don't fall in behind Trump, it's awful, it just isn't a great gig, really, which is surprising, you know, because I mean, look, this is a dream come true. You're a member of this body that Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy served in. Why was it a bad gig? I mean, writing this would convince me that being a member of Congress, maybe being a senator is a nicer gig.

You're not always running for your reelection. A lot of them, with their nice six-year terms, actually make a life in Washington and like can live with their children and have some semblance of a normal life. But for these House members, it's a slog. First of all, there's the travel. I mean, you are back and forth every week. Like if you live across the country, the jet lag and the travel is just crushing. Then there is not seeing your family. Like a lot of people, when they leave, it always sounds like kind of a cop-out or not the real reason if you say like, I want to leave to spend more time with my family. But it's not actually like,

not a factor. We talked to one Brad Wenstrup who left Congress last term and he said that like his 10 year old son would tell his wife like it feels like dad doesn't even exist. So that takes a toll. We talked earlier about the physical violence and the threats has become huge. I mean that these members are under constant threats of violence and they don't have protection. If they want protection they have to pay for it themselves from their campaign accounts. Not to mention then you're doing all this traveling and not having a regular family life and being threatened and and then you're look at it and you're like

for what? When we're here the house floor is frozen. We're not actually voting. We're sitting and taking 15 rounds. It took a week to elect a speaker, like for what? So a lot of people just made the calculation like it's just not worth it anymore. I mean it's broken and I'm killing myself for nothing. I was also just surprised to read that a lot of members sleep, don't rent apartments, they actually sleep in their offices and then shower in the members' gym. Well, that's like a, I mean, it saves money. You know, they don't, a lot of people can't have two residences, and the office sleeping is a long time thing.

It kind of got less popular during COVID and after the Me Too movement, because it's an awkward thing to be like living in your office and having staffers walk in in the morning and you're like brushing your teeth. But people still do it to save money. It's kind of gross, but they get paid $177,000, which I think to most people sounds like a lot of money.

But DC, it's extremely expensive to live in DC. And then you have a family back home and probably a house or a mortgage or at least an apartment back home. And so you have two residences and it becomes very kind of untenable for them to do on one salary unless you're independently wealthy, which a lot of them are. Yeah, a lot of the members of Congress and a lot of the senators are extremely wealthy. But if you're somebody like AOC or somebody else who comes from smaller means, it does become quite difficult.

Also, I spent a lot of time with some younger women, female members, who just doing the job drives home every day for them that this was not created for me. Like, this was a job that was originally created for like older white wealthy men. It was not like I spent some time with Marie glues in Camp Perez She's from Washington State. So like her commute is horrible. She has a toddler. She lives in the woods like Every time she's on that flight back to Washington leaving her kid She's like this job was not created with me in mind. So that's another factor of making

These jobs just really, it takes a toll. Nat. Yeah. And if you want to bring it back to current events, I mean, there's a bill right now to try to allow women who have recently given birthright to be able to vote remotely, which is currently disallowed under the current rules of Congress. Nat. That's a bill that's under active consideration. Danielle Pletka They're trying. There's a bipartisan group who want maternity and paternity leave for new parents.

Annie Carney, Luke Broadwater, thank you so much for speaking with us. Thank you for having us. Yeah, thanks so much. Annie Carney and Luke Broadwater are Washington correspondents for The New York Times. Their new book is Madhouse, How Donald Trump, Maga Mean Girls, a former used car salesman, a Florida nepo baby, and a man with rats in his walls broke Congress. We recorded our conversation yesterday. Coming up, jazz historian Kevin Whitehead reviews a newly released recording of Ella Fitzgerald in concert. This is Fresh Air. Jazz singer Ella Fitzgerald's concert career in the 1960s is amply documented on record, with live albums from Berlin, Rome, Los Angeles, Tokyo, Hamburg, Stockholm, and the French Riviera. Now comes a newly released concert of Ella in Oakland. Jazz historian Kevin Whitehead says it's alright. The reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae,

reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, reggae, Oh honey don't you be that way Ella Fitzgerald, 1967, with a gaggle of Duke Ellington's horn players on a tune she'd first recorded in the 30s, Don't Be That Way. It's from an Oakland Coliseum concert, newly issued as The Moment of Truth. That momentous title suggests it was made at some crucial juncture for Ella,

and not at one more all-star roadshow on which Ellington also appeared, although that series was coming to an end. The moment of truth actually gets its name from her set's rather glib opening tune, a sort of swinging call to the altar. There'll come a time when he looks at you, thrills you through and through and calls your name That'll be the day when you say I do, for you discover that you're too tired of playing a game And then you both know you're through scheming, oh promise me starts to sing in your ear The Ellington Horns again there, playing what are two obviously not Ellington arrangements. On their shared concerts, Duke often sat in on piano with Ella for a number, but he doesn't do so here.

Duke loved her, but may have been pushing back against the high-handed ways of concert promoter Norman Grants. Ella had her own complaints about the pace of work on Grants' European tours. By 1967 she was a showbiz star and could act the part, rousing audience members who arrive late or leave early, and injecting a Sonny and Cher reference into the lyric to Cole Porter's Let's Do It. Still, at age 50, Fitzgerald remained one of the greatest interpreters of American popular song and a great stage performer. She'll go from one number's extravagant ending directly into the next song's gentle opening verse, instantly recalibrating.

There's a very funny feeling that this feeling's been a-stealing through my brain is not to be ignored. But to really tell the truth, though I'm not a well-known sleuth, I honestly believe that you are bored. You've changed. That sparkle in your voice in 1967. She can get a little shouty on excitable passages, the glass-shattering Ella, if you will, and she has to reach for a few low notes, but she does reach them. Her middle range is as luxurious as ever.

A highlight of her Oakland show is her lone recording of a 60s pop song jazz singers took to right away, Burt Bachrach and Hal David's Alfie. I believe in love, Alfie. Without true love we just exist, I'll fear. Until you find a love you'll never miss, you're nothing, I'll fear. Ella Fitzgerald's Alfie is so good. It survives a short detour into and out of Dean Martin's You're Nobody Till Somebody Loves You. That isn't the only bizarre choice here. She also sings the fly-wayed, if insidiously catchy advertising jingle, music to watch

girls buy. Ella ends her set with a staple of her 60s act, Mack the Knife, where she, like so many twentieth century Americans from all walks of life, felt the call to imitate singer Louis Armstrong's growling. There's a whiff of Ellington feeling in the saxophone backgrounds there, but this music's not about the horn section. The pivotal Ellingtonian here is Duke's longtime drummer Sam Woodyard, who anchors Fitzgerald's trio.

The album The Moment of Truth, Ella at the Coliseum, presents her 1967 Oakland set in concert order, omitting only a couple of tunes she'd recorded with Duke the year before. With her stage pattern included, you get a good look at Ella Fitzgerald on the road. Even if she wasn't at a crossroads. It's keeping track of the pack of watching them even if she wasn't at a crossroads. The girls watch the boys while the boys watch the girls who watch the boys go by.

Eye to eye, together they convene to make a scene, which is the name of the game. Watch a guy watch a dame on every street in town. Up and down, and over and across romance is lost. Guys talk, girls talk, it happens everywhere. Eyes watch, girls walk, pretend to love then care. It's keeping track of the pack of watching them, watching back the next the world go around. Jazz historian Kevin Whitehead reviewed the moment of truth Ella at the Coliseum on Verve.

Kevin is the author of New Dutch Swing, Why Jazz, and Play the Way You Feel. On Tomorrow's Show, in a new book, Amanda Knox shares the difficulties she faced after being convicted and later acquitted of killing her roommate during a study abroad program in Italy. She'll also talk about her journey to reclaim her identity from the notorious tabloid stories that defined her for years. I hope you can join us. To keep up with what's on the show and get highlights of our interviews, follow us on Instagram at NPR Fresh Air. Fresh Air's executive producer is Danny Miller.

Our technical director and engineer is Audrey Bentham. Our managing producer is Sam Brigger. Our interviews and reviews are produced and edited by Phyllis Meyers, Anne-Marie Baldonado, Lauren Quenzel, Teresa Madden, Monique Nazareth, Thaya Challener, Susan Yakundi and Anna Bauman. Our digital media producer is Molly Seving Esper. Roberta Shorrock directs the show. For Terry Gross and Tonya Mosley, I'm Dave Davies.