Fresh Air - John Le Carré’s Son Revives His Late Dad's Spy

Episode Date: December 19, 2025

Writer Nick Harkaway grew up hearing his dad read drafts of his George Smiley novels. He picks up le Carré's beloved spymaster character in the novel ‘Karla's Choice,’ now out in paperback. He spoke with Sam Briger about choosing his own pen name, channeling his dad's writing style, and his stint writing copy for a lingerie catalogue.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy

This is Fresh Air. I'm David B. and Cooley. John LeCarray wrote spy novels that transcended the genre. Philip Roth called LeCheret's 1986 novel, A Perfect Spy, the best English novel since the war. The author's most beloved character was George Smiley, the physically unassuming but brilliant British spymaster. He was the protagonist of many Le Corre novels, including Tinker-Taylor Soldier Spy and Smiley's People,

both of which were adapted into hit TV miniseries starring Alec Guinness as George Smiley. LeCherre, whose real name was David Cornwell, died in 2020. But George Smiley returned last year in the novel called Carla's Choice. It was written by Cornwell's son, Nick, who goes by his own pen name, Nick Harkaway.

Harkaway spoke with fresh air Sam Brigger last year. Here's Sam. Carlos Choice takes place in 1963, between LeCarray's novels The Spy who came in from the Cold and Tinker-Taylor Soldier Spy. Smiley has retired from the circus, the nickname for the British Overseas Intelligence Agency, after an agent and his lover were killed in East Berlin, their lives sacrificed for the success of a mission. A decision Smiley initially agreed to but has come to regret. But Smiley is called back into service by his boss, known as Control, to conduct one simple interview, However, that leads to much more than he bargained for.

The story also serves as the origin story of Smiley's nemesis in the KGB, known only as Carla. This is Nick Harkaway's first George Smiley novel, but his eighth overall. They include Tiger Man, Noamon, and Titanium Noir. So Nick Harkaway, welcome to Fresh Air. Hello. Tell me, how did you decide to write a George Smiley novel and why now? I actually decided not to. So we had this conversation running inside the family because when we inherited the estate, the literary estate, we inherited an obligation to try to keep the books read, to keep the name alive, but more than anything else to keep the books in circulation and so on.

And in this moment, the way that you do that is by focusing attention on them through adaptations, through new material, through essentially commercial projects. So the conversation we were having was, you know, what can we do to put the books back in everybody's mind? How do we fulfill this obligation? And the obvious thing is, you need a new book. So I had a list in my head of people who would be amazing at writing a new George Smiley novel. And I had decided I wasn't going to suggest I should do it. I had firm reasons why I wouldn't. And we were having the meeting and my brother, Simon, said, so before we.

get started, there's a really, it's quite a compelling logic that it should be you. And I was like, yeah, I know. And he said, no, but I mean, I'm asking you, you know, will you do it? And in that moment, all the reasons why I wouldn't, it's incredibly challenging. It's this extraordinary piece of 20th century literary history. It's this, it's that. All these things became the reasons why I would. It must have been a pretty daunting task, though, to when you decided to go ahead to actually start writing this book. Oh, yeah, and I mean not past tense either. It's still daunting.

It's still, and it'll be daunting after the book comes out. It'd probably be daunting for the rest of my life. Yeah, no, it's huge. But it's also, but again, that's why it's worth doing. You don't do things that are safe. You do things that are scary. And when I started doing it, yes, it was terrifying, but it also became something that I loved.

What were some of the things in your head that you thought about that sort of overrun? the anxiety or fear about writing this that you were really excited to try to do in the novel? I mean, some non-specific things. I wanted a literary oppressorship with my dad because I watched him write,

I learned writing from him by osmosis, but we never really talked about writing very much. And so the idea of sitting down and holding the controls of the machine and operating it the way he did and working with those characters was a way to learn which I wanted.

Let's talk a little bit about George Smiley. He's physically unremarkable. He's this pudgy, middle-aged guy who you'd likely forget if you saw him in a crowd and that's in part intentional. One character when first meeting him thinks he has more like the personality

of a green grocer rather than a spy master. And not how she would imagine what a spy was like. And you're right, he has a wit so dry that many people miss it and mistake it for dullness. So why do you think your father originally wrote the character like that?

I think he wanted, I mean, I think first of all, it was because he wanted to say that the spy world is not the world of James Bond, the one that he knew. Which was, it was almost an antidote to the James Bond novels originally. Yeah, and, you know, in the UK

you had James Bond, Bulldog Drummond, you had these very, you know, very much action hero type spy stories. And his experience was not that. It wasn't these sort of incredibly energetic combat-oriented people, you know, sort of flawless heroes. It was ordinary people doing a hard, endless, possibly slightly futile thing and banging up against their own flaws. And he wanted, you know, to show the humanity.

showing the humanity so that you can understand it and feel compassionate about it is a big part of everything he wrote so I think that's where it is and Smiley is in many ways the epitome of that he's just this guy

and yet at the same time of course he's this tremendously intelligent reasoner and he's empathic and he understands people before they understand themselves I'd like you to just read a little bit from the book this is, as Smiley is going back to the circus for the first time.

He's been asked to come back after he's retired. And he's been enjoying his life. He's been spending time with his wife. He hasn't really been thinking about espionage. He's experiencing joy in a way that he hasn't in a very long time. But now he has to return to the circus, which is the nickname for the intelligence agency. And he has to go through this transformation in order to become a very long time. a spy again. And I asked you to shorten the excerpt, but if you could please read it for us,

that would be great. For Smiley, the experience of returning to the circus that evening was like a willed drowning. It was as if, as he climbed St. Martin's Lane in the direction of his old office, he were making his way down onto the plain of an abyssal sea. For the last months, he had lived in a daylight world, had espoused its meanings and attitudes, and enjoyed the simple pleasures of other men. Now, as he approached the familiar door, he found that he was once again engaging in the exercise of paranoia which had governed his former life. Deliberately, he let the nature and movements of his fellow pedestrians

function as a random factor in his own movements, making up ridiculous rules as he went along. The notion of constant danger was a madness that men in his profession must both inhabit and put aside, and the truth was more complex, that the world could change in an instant from, clear and kind to desperate and cold, and the trick to survival lay in knowing that instant before it happened and not when. This was a skill he had once possessed, but could not guarantee

until he tested it again. By the time he reached the circus he was, as he had been for the three preceding decades of his life, afraid. That's Nick Harkaway reading from his new book, Carlos' choice. So Nick, tell us about that idea that you came up with, that in order to be a spy, You really must be afraid. I think the job of the spy in many ways is to think the unthinkable. To ask yourself the questions which in normal life you would dismiss as absurd. I had some brief discussions. I did a consultancy gig here in the UK where people were asking me to look at what are the unseeable threats, what are the invisible ones.

And it's very hard. You can't look at the back of your own. and head in the mirror. But a spy's job is to do that all the time. And to do it, if you're an operative in the field, to do it in the micro as well, to ask yourself whether the waiter is putting something in your drink, you know, to question whether the person you see delivering the mail is actually a postman. And I mean, we are to a certain extent speaking of fantasy life, but hypervigilance, that sense of looking at everything twice and seeing things out of place, the psychological trait that people develop who've been in traumatic situations for prolonged periods

of time, I have absolutely no doubt that that is an aspect of being in the field in an espionage context. And this is in his own country, but you have characters that have to go behind the iron curtain, and their contingencies, they're worried, have I picked the right shoes, are they scuffed enough? Are they going to look too new? Did I forget to put on the right watch? Am I, did I just whistle a song that's going to betray my origins? And you actually have a funny moment where a Soviet spy tells someone that he was trained at a facility that had a dozen different kinds of toilets because the one thing that would betray you the quickest would be if you

didn't really understand how to use a bathroom that supposedly you'd lived with your entire life. So, first of all, was that something you came up with it, or have you had you heard that? So I had a long time ago a conversation with a guy who identified himself as having been trained at a facility like that, which I thought was, I mean, the most extraordinary idea, you know, but the logic is impeccable. Yeah, it makes sense. If you don't know, like, the cold water is, say, switched in the sink, then that's going to give you up right away. Yep. I mean, yes. So it would seem.

Certainly someone in a training facility somewhere apparently believes that. So, Nick, this could be considered a prequel to Tinker Taylor, Soldier Spy, if you care to use that word. And one of the things that a prequel can do is kind of explain the background to behavior in the original book. And one of the things I really like about this book is that you rehabilitate the character of Anne, George Smiley's wife. In your father's books, Anne is almost always off stage. having very public and multiple affairs, being unfaithful to Smiley. And in fact, in Tinker Taylor,

she's sort of a pawn in a huge betrayal of Smiley. And so when you read those books, like it's hard not to think of Anne as a kind of villain, but you turn that on your head in this book. Yeah. I mean, with Anne specifically I wanted to do that. But in general, when I approached the, the characters and the story that I, you know, that I knew I was fitting into. One of the things

I wanted was to have a situation where they would on the one hand kind of be illuminated by the story, but on the other hand, that would just leave you with more questions. And so when you learn things about the characters in Carla's Choice, and you're going to see them again later in Tinker Taylor if you go on and read Tinker Taylor and so on, what I want is for you to feel that you know them, but somehow that just makes them more mysterious. The more you learn about people the less, you know, the more there is to know. And so with Anne and with George, first of all, when I was talking to people about Anne and George's relationship, I asked a bunch of people who love my father's books.

And I said, does Anne love George? And everybody said yes. No one has any doubt that she loves him. And no one has any doubt that he loves her. So why doesn't it work? They have a relationship which by any measure ought to work. and yet it doesn't. It's fundamentally broken

by the time you get to Tinker Taylor. And so I wanted to elucidate and I wanted to kind of say why that could be. How can that be? And then obviously, you know, the book ends where it does and that leaves you with kind of,

yeah, but how come, you know, surely there must be something they can do. One of the things that I find so sad about Tinker Taylor Soldier Spy is that George spends the most amount of his time trying to figure out two people like one is his nemesis

Carla in the KGB but the other is Anne his wife and they're both mysteries to him that's not a positive view of marriage I guess I would say too no it's not well and I don't think it's a secret

that my dad was abandoned by his mother at the age of five and his relationships you know I mean by the way for good and sufficient reason because his father was a monster you know so his relationships were shaped by that as you would expect I mean and he was you know he was in a traumatic environment for an extraordinarily chunky part of his his young life and eventually kind of ran away from school and ran away from the UK and found himself a place to exist in

in Bern and so on but you know so you know without wishing to be kind of armchair psychologist about it it it's not hard to see why you know particularly in his earlier writing the female characters tend to be absent and offstage or inaccessible, because that's what he knew. We'll talk about your dad's family life a little bit later, but before we get to that, how did you approach the language of this book? It seems to me that you're emulating your father's style of writing, which I think is quite different from your own instincts as a writer. Like your father tended to write pretty straightforward, elegant, but simple sentences. And I think, when I read your previous books

I feel like you tend to be playful in the structure of your sentences. Like they they're almost Victorian in their complexity. Sometimes I feel like I'm on a roller coaster and the pleasure is sort of watching the daring of the sentence

and there's like humor almost embedded in the sentence structure. So how did you go about writing more in your father's style? So lots to unpack there. The first thing is my father's style isn't constant across this writing. I mean, of course it's not because it's a huge career.

But with the Smiley Books, particularly, you have the first three, called for the dead, murder of quality, and spire coming from the cold. And they are, as you describe, shorter sentences, quite declarative. They're almost noirish. They have quite simple plot lines. And they obey this dictum that he had that he liked to trot out from civil service telegrams and civil service reports. 400 words, no adjectives.

They're very clear and stark. And then by the time you get to Tinker Taylor, you've had a couple of books in between, you have a different ethos at work. The language is much more roving, much more illusory. The book is more complex. The structures are more complex. And it's more poetic.

So that's the first thing. There's a lot going on. And then his language changes again in the post. Cold War novels. There's a whole other thing going on there. So that's number one. Second thing is, yes, my writing in my books does tend to be denser, playful, and so on.

But part of that with my earlier books is an absolutely determined attempt to put some clear blue water between him and me. And the thing that I realized when I started talking about Carlos Choice, and I would have been so great to have this thought before I wrote the book, not because it would have changed anything, but because it would have made me feel much safer.

I was born in 1972, and I grew up with my dad reading his work, new pages. He'd write in the early morning and then come to the breakfast table, read them across the table to my mother. Sometimes she'd type them up, and then he'd be reading them again in the afternoon from the typescript,

or he'd be working on the typescript the following morning. And incidentally, I love this. They used to use scissors and a stapler. That was cut and paste. because we're pre-digital word processing. But in the fundamental years where I was developing language at all, an hour, two hours of my day consisted of hearing the George Smiley novels being written. So when I came to write this and I thought I got to turn the dial a little bit towards Dad,

it was one percent, one notch and suddenly it was there. Really? It was that easy to come to? It was so simple. So, Nick, you grew up really during the height of your father's career. And when his books came out, it was an event. Like, everyone read his books. I remember them sitting on my parents' bedside table. And your father was one of the most famous, if not the most famous writers of his time.

He was a celebrity as a writer, but he was also considered a serious novelist. What was it like to be his son at that time? Like, what was your home like? So the first thing I should say is that it's unknowable for me in a way because I don't know what it was like to be anybody else's kid. And for most of my life, I have imagined that because my mother made a huge effort to keep our lives somewhat down to earth in various ways and was very successful in that, that my life was sort of mostly like everybody else's,

but not in certain very specific ways. And the more I look at it now from a distance, the more I realize that's nonsense on an epic scale. My life was very odd by any reasonable standard. I mean, so how did it actually, how did it work? I mean, we've talked about him reading across the table to my mom and so on. And that's not something most people experience, and certainly it's not something most people experience

with kind of genre-defining, historical period, defining fiction. I remember, on the one hand, we lived, when I was little, we lived on a house on the Cornish cliff. Our nearest neighbor was a mile away. I'm a Gen X kid. I spent my time walking up and down the coastal path with a dog by myself at the age of six.

I was a little bit feral. I came back with mud on my face, and I dreamed Lord of the Rings dreams because I was reading Lord of the Rings. a year later, you know, and I mean, I just thought I lived in Rivendale. And then every so often the house would fill up with people, and those people would be in some way important that I didn't properly understand. And they would be publishers, and they would be foreign correspondents and journalists, and some of them would be politicians, and some of them would have no defined profession. You know, and they were fascinating.

We're listening to Sam Brigger's interview from last year with novelist Nick Harkaway about his book, Carla's choice. It's now out in paperback. Harkaway's novel takes place during the Cold War and follows the pursuits of Spymaster George Smiley, a character created by Harkaway's father, John LeCarray. More after a break, I'm David B. and Cooley, and this is Fresh Air. This is Fresh Air. I'm TV critic David Bein Cooley. Let's get back to our interview. with novelist Nick Harkaway. That's the pen name of Nick Cornwell, son of David Cornwell, better known by his pen name, John LeCarray. If all those aliases remind you of a good spy thriller, well then I guess that's appropriate. John LeCherry wrote spy novels considered great literary fiction. They often revolved around his most beloved character, British spymaster George Smiley. LeCherry died in 2020, but his son, Nick Harkaway, has written a non-apeutic. novel featuring George Smiley called Carlos Choice. It takes place in the time period between two

of his father's best-known books, the spy who came in from the cold, and Tinker Taylor's soldier spy. This is Nick Harkaway's eighth novel. His books include The Gone Away World, Titanium Noir, and Tiger Man. Sam Brigger spoke with Nick Harkaway last year. Why did you decide to use a pen name? I mean, I think you, you probably could have gotten away with being Nick Cornwell since you wouldn't have been associated with your father because, well, perhaps you would have been, but he was more known as a novelist as John La Cere. So there's two reasons why.

And the first one you just experienced, which is saying Nick Cornwell is quite difficult. It's just genuinely hard. Nick Harkaway is not easy to say. Well, but you don't have to do the double C in the middle, right? The second thing is actually you're, I mean, you're right and you're wrong about whether I would have been associated with my dad. The name of David Cornwall was sufficiently well-known, certainly within the industry,

that it wouldn't have been a very big fig leaf. But also, when you go into any bookshop in London and look in the C section for Cornwell, you find Patricia Cornwall and Bernard Cornwall. And between them, they have, I don't know, 100 books or something more. And I was like, I'm going to write one book,

and they're going to put it right next to these... And no one's ever going to find it. Never mind if they never mind if they know. look for it. Even if they look for it, they're never going to see me. And I just thought, okay, I'm just going to, I'm going to have a pseudonym. And the other thing was, to be honest, I knew from my father's life that having a pseudonym is a really useful shield. If somebody wants to yell at Nick Harkaway, they can really do it as much as they like. In the end, however much it upsets me, it doesn't get to me. You know, but when somebody comes for you

in your real name, that's a different experience. Why Harkaway? Because it does kind of rhyme with Lecarre, doesn't it? I know. Isn't that weird? I did not notice that until much too late to change it. I think it's because I just, again, like, osmotically, I believe that the rhythm of a pseudonym should have, the second part should have three syllables. You know the story about my dad choosing his own pseudonym, that he was told he should have a good, solid, like two monosyllables, good English name. And he was so irritated by this advice that he chose to make up a French name instead. So anyway, yeah. So I, when I decided

I watched a name, I went to Brewer's Dictionary of Frays and Fable, and I literally let it flop open and stuck pins in the words. And I had a list of 20 absolutely stupid names. Hockway was the last one. Can you give us another one? Do you have a... Cantaloupe. Thomas Cantaloupe. Which would not have been good. No. So, Nick, your paternal grandfather, Ronnie, it's known that he was a con man. He did time for fraud. At one point, he was an arms dealer.

Your father would have periods of life with him where they would be living the high life and then other times when they had to hide from creditors. And your father seems to have wrestled with this relationship his whole life. Like my favorite chapter of his memoir, The Pigeon Tunnel. is all about his father and his novel A Perfect Spy Considered one of his best

Is also a way Where he's wrestling with With his dad He died when you were very young Do you know if you ever met him I was in a room with him As a baby And he immediately looked to me

And said there you are you see My eyes At which point My mother apparently kind of stepped between us And said No he does not You know, Ronnie was a con man and he did do prison time. He didn't do enough.

You know, and my dad, although he talked about Ronnie and he didn't struggle with Ronnie, he was haunted by Ronnie. He was sort of onwardly terrorized by Ronnie. Ronnie was walking trauma with a shiny smile. And, you know, and the weird thing, he had that thing that some really terrible people have where even the people he worst misused were pleased to see him when he turned up again. People he can't, people whose life savings he ruined would go to court to defend him, would, you know, because he was charming and he made everybody feel good. but you know I have I have the privilege of having grown up with the funny Ronnie stories

and not with Ronnie but in my kind of adulthood as I look at my dad's life and my dad and incidentally you know when we say they were hiding from the bailiffs and they were hiding from the law and so on Ronnie was hiding from the law and his

minor children were dragged along for the Right. And your dad was at times recruited to work for him to... Yeah, no, not just recruited. I mean, I think the reason that Ronnie wanted his children to counterfeit the manners of the aristocracy and the elite class in the UK at the time was because that was how you got a better class of Mark. Oh, really? So that was just to defer the future crimes.

I'm sure he told himself or told them that he just wanted them to... to be better than him, but I have absolutely no doubt that he wanted them to be his doorways, his signers, his, you know, his access. We're listening to the interview Fresh Air Sam Brigger recorded with Nick Harkaway last year. Harkaway's novel, Carla's Choice, is now out in paperback. It's a new story about George Smiley, the British spymaster made famous in the books written by Harkaway's father, John LaCarray. More after a break, this is Fresh Air. This is Fresh Air.

Let's get back to our interview with novelist Nick Harkaway. His novel, Carla's Choice, is now out in paperback. It's set in the world of his father, John Lackeray's spy books, centered around the beloved British spy, George Smiley. Harkaway spoke with Sam Brigger last year. When we left off, we were talking about his father's childhood as a son of a con man. Let's listen to a clip where Likari is talking about his father from the 2023 documentary, The Pigeon Tunnel by Errol Morris. The other voice you'll hear is Errol Morris.

My father was a confidence trickster. Life was a stage where pretense was everything. Being off stage was boring. And risk was attractive. But above all, what was attractive was the imprint of personality. of truth we didn't speak of conviction we didn't speak so you felt like a dupe

no I joined I joined you polish your act learn to tell funny stories show off you discover early that there is no center to a human being I wasn't a dupe I

was invited to dupe other people. So that's John LeCarray from the documentary based on his memoir, The Pigeant Tunnel. And Nick, you know, in the memoir, your father goes on to explain that that learning how to be a liar, that watching his father's cons, like he thinks that that set him up for his two main careers, being a spy and being a writer, because he says at one point, I'm a liar. Born to lying, bred to it, trained to it by an industry that lies for living, practiced in it as a novelist. I was wondering what you thought of that idea. I think it's undeniable. And I think, incidentally, I would throw in the contemporary British public school system, which taught emotional deceit at a very high level. You know, he was shipped off to boarding school at five. And I was talking to someone who said, you know, in that situation, you have to choose whether you love your family or you love the school. And it's just less painful to love the school. You know, and those institutions

turned out our colonial governors, our military commanders. It was a machine for the creation of the British Empire. And that was what Ronnie wanted to participate in. And it's what he wanted his sons to become. And so, do you see that that sort of extends to you that, like, your ability as a writer is due in part to, like, this lineage that goes back to your grandfather? Yeah, because stories were the currency around our table. When I was growing up, if I came home from school, I had a story. Dad would have something to share.

We'd swap stories as a way of getting to know each other. If I came back from when I was at university, when I came home, you know, what's the best story you've got? Come on, let's have it. What's been fun? What's been interesting? What's been strange? And, you know, and vice versa.

And we traded stories as emotional currency as a way of reestablishing contact and closeness. And so, you know, so in that situation, you learn to tell stories. And I've done it completely unconsciously with my own children. In fact, we play a game where everybody in the room comes up with an object or a thing or even just an idea and you all say them out loud at the same time and then people take turns knitting them together into a narrative that makes sense.

It's a great car game for children. You can do it. Unlike I spy, you can do it indefinitely because it's attractive to children and it's attractive to adults. Would you practice those stories as a kid? Because if you knew you were going to have to tell a story, would you perform them in your mind to get them right? No. No, you learn to do them first time. You learn effectively basic improv.

And that also, by the way, is still part of the curriculum of the schools that I went to. You know, just that kind of baseline ability to start from a question to which you don't know the answer and knit a response that's plausible. And when we had Boris Johnson as our prime minister, I was watching him do all the things I learned how to do, just make up a plausible answer to a question you have no idea about. So you went to a boarding school as well? I did not go to boarding school. I went to a minor or mid-grade, UK, London public school, but not a boarding school.

But were you taught to lie there as well? Oh, yes, directly. Very extremely, extremely elegantly and openly. We had a moment where one of our teachers said, look, in five minutes, we're going to talk about the influence of Ludwig Brand on T.S. Eliot. And we all looked at each other in absolute horror. And he goes, no, there is no Ludwig Brand. but there will come a moment in your life

whether it's professional or whether it's academic or whatever when you have to answer a question you don't know the answer to and I will tell you right now the best thing to do is say I'm so sorry I have absolutely no idea but there are contexts where you cannot do that

and you are not leaving this building unable to counterfeit an answer Wow that's remarkable I think actually incidentally a really superb skill because also the other thing it teaches you is had a spot when someone else is doing it well because of their language or you're looking for tells or what are you doing well the first so i mean

the first thing that we were taught was um you say well i think the really interesting thing about brand is maybe not his direct uh influence on elliott but the discussion with pound and then you can talk about pound and elliott for as long as you like which right so you've gotten rid of the thing you don't know exactly and then when but then you look back at your interlocutor and they say of course they do because they want to be polite and they want to be part of this interesting conversation. They say, well, yes, and of course, you know, brand was also involved with, you know, with some of the other intellectuals in that circle. And interestingly, with a lot of visual artists, you know, and you bring up then whatever, you know, whatever visual artist you want to do. And little by little in the course of the conversation, you can get more information from them about brand.

And so by the end of the conversation, you can actually know enough to say something obvious, but nonetheless, which they will agree with because they've just told you. overtly about Brandon Elliott, and then they think you're very clever. Well, now I'm just questioning this whole interview. I haven't had the opportunity to do it. You know, getting back to your father's family, his mother ran away from the family, abandoning him at five. Do you think that it was hard for your father to figure out how to be a parent himself because he had no good role models?

I mean, it seems like he was a very loving dad, but he had to sort of figure it out from from scratch i think that's true i mean i think he had bizarrely good role models who were not his parents he had teachers he had aunts he had his irish grandmother he had these kind of people who stepped into those roles half of them were kind of con artists and chauffeurs and dancing girls but they you know but they did the job because it was there and they were decent people um decent people but crooks some of the time you know But not, you know, it's possible to be a crook and not be Ronnie Cornwall. So, but yeah, he had to make it up.

But then I think, I mean, I'm a parent now. And you always have to make it up. You know, you said that your father was haunted by his father. And, you know, and he tried to figure out what to make of his father through his writing. And I was wondering that if in some ways, if your father haunts you, not as an unwanted spirit, but because you chose to become a writer because he has such a presence as a novelist. Like when you're writing, do you sort of see him looking at your work over your shoulder? I hoped in the kind of inevitable kind of corny movie sequence way that when I wrote this book,

I would sort of look up from my desk and see him sitting in the chair by the window, kind of, you know, maybe with a kind of Obi-1 canobi vibe. Remember the semicolon? He's a force ghost. Exactly. And of course I didn't. And I'm not sure I even really hoped it. I just, you know, it just would have felt kind of movie appropriate.

But what I got instead was the companionship of occupying the space that he occupied the business of standing and holding the levers of the smiley machine and moving them around. And there is a kind of. unity that I get from that which is incredibly emotionally powerful and some days it's actually kind of too emotionally powerful you have to kind of tamp it down but I'm not haunted by him I I'm even in the most benign sense

I grieve occasionally I mean you know that doesn't go away it just gets manageable you know but I when he died I had this extraordinary moment because it was the deep days of COVID lockdowns in the UK and he was in a hospital we couldn't go into he was allowed in because he was ultimately an end-of-life care they would let one person in every day

and there were only two people allowed to be on that list so they could alternate and two of my three brothers then were in town and one of them Tim who alas is also now dead had a more shaky relationship with him at the time and I had to have this extraordinary sort of moment where one of us could go and see him and one of us couldn't and I was like, well, okay, it's obviously you

because I really didn't have anything that I needed to say or that I needed him to say to me we had no unfinished business and I felt that Tim did and he went in and they held hands I don't know whether they even spoke really but it mattered to Tim it was important

and I hoped that the next day they would bend the rules for me because anything was possible in that moment if you asked nicely enough because it was obvious what was happening. And then he died at 9 o'clock that night. And obviously, on the one hand, I wish I could have kind of said hi and by one more time,

however awful that would have been. But I also don't regret the decision for one second because there was nothing outstanding between us. And your brother, Tim, passed away a few years after that, didn't he? Yeah, he died by ridiculous medical accident. I mean, not in a hospital situation. He had a pulmonary embolism, I think, and died on holiday. So, you know, that, yeah, it was a rough few years.

Nick Harkaway, speaking with Sam Brigger last year. Harkaway's novel, Carlos Choice, is a new story about George Smiley, the British spymaster, made famous in the books written by Harkaway's father, John LeCarray. More after a break, this is fresh air. This is fresh air. Let's get back to our interview with novelist Nick Harkaway. His novel, Carlos Choice, is now out in paperback. It's set in the world of his father, John Lakerre's spy books, centered around the beloved

British spy George Smiley. Harkaway spoke with Sam Brigger last year. There was a collection of your father's letters came out a few years ago. It's called A Private Spy. And there's one letter to you in this book. And I was wondering if you wouldn't mind if I read it. Yeah, it's terrifying. I can't remember which one it is.

Okay, well, I don't think it doesn't read terrifying. But this was on the occasion of your 21st birthday. I don't know if in Britain turning 21 is a big a deal as it is in the United States. It doesn't have any legal consequences anymore here, but it's still symbolically. A rite of passage in some ways. Yeah. Okay. So here, here it goes.

My dearest Nick, I've had this little candlestick in my workroom for the last 25 years, from the last years of my first marriage and all through my second till today. It acquired a corny but real symbolism for me. and in bad times I would shove a candle into it and light it as some kind of affirmation of belief in myself, my talent, my survival. For this reason, I wish you to have it now, with my love, as an antidote to occasional despair. I hope it will remind you that you are a good man when you need reminding, and your own man and no one else's, and that you have one life only and no candle ever got longer, and that you have a great spirit and a lot to do with all my love David.

So that's a lovely letter. Do you still have that candlestick? I do. Of course I do. Yeah, no, absolutely. And I have it. And normally, actually at the moment, it's in a cupboard because I need to give it a proper clean. But normally it sits on a little campaign table that he had, which he occasionally used for writing, although it's not very practical, which he gave me a couple of years before he died.

So that's why I have the two of them together. you know it's a it's a lovely letter and and it's it's a very thoughtful gift um were you able to appreciate it at the time you were 21 or were you like oh thanks a lot of candles oh no yeah no i i i knew what i was being given i mean it's no we you know it's very it's it's very un british but we did big gestures we did we did kind of emotional conversations he he would almost have you believe that we were all too buttoned up to do that but if you if you read the books you realize that of course you know they are depictions of actually the Brits coming unbuttoned and in all kinds of you know extraordinary ways and and he was very

much that person he was actually the most cosmopolitan soul um he was somebody who who reached out looking for as it were Gertes germany or or red Vienna or you know the moments when um anything is possible and people mix and great ideas are discovered or great poems or written whatever he went as a child and kind of constantly as an adult he went looking

for those places and so very appropriately he's he's he's the least British Brit despite being sort of iconically and of course he ended up Irish anyway I saved the most important

question for last so I hope you're prepared for this I am, I am. For a while you had a job writing copy for a lingerie catalog. Yes, briefly. So I just was wondering what that was like. And, you know, I assume that a lot of lingerie is purchased by men and not by women, you know, as gifts that perhaps women will appreciate perhaps not. So I was wondering, like, when you're writing copy, were you writing from the perspective of a man or a woman or a woman?

What were you doing? First of all, I think we need to loosen our sense of who wears the lingerie in the situation. Fair enough. Okay. It's open season. Second of all, so this was a friend of mine ran a boutique in North London, and she had this kind of wildly glamorous, goofy selection, which was beloved of all kinds of people. And she said to me, will you, you know, we're doing the catalog. will you do text for the catalogue?

And I said, sure, what do you want? And she had created this extraordinary character, Miss Lala, who was the kind of muse of the boutique, and she wanted it all written in the voice of Miss Lala. And so it was less about describing the number of clips and buttons and how fructfully erotic the whole thing is and more about expressing a kind of massive joy in the ridiculousness and the beauty

and the preposterousness of the whole thing and doing a kind of earth a kit as catwoman kind of, you know, and it was huge fun and it terrifies me that that biography

is still out there in the world for you to find. Can you channel a little Miss Lala for us? You know, I honestly can't. I could... Let me see. Sounds like the J. Peter Chairman Cadillah from Seinfeld. Yeah, well, no, it was so it was kind of, oh, my darlings, you need to understand the sheer iridescent beauty of this piece.

It's just, it makes me feel so divine. And of course, except that it was quite fruity, and I'm not sure what we're allowed to say. But, you know, but it was not very much. No, exactly. No, it was about the joy of being liberated into a world of passion. That was the brief. Well, we should all... For the briefs.

We should all hope for that. Well, Nick Harkaway, it's been a real pleasure to have you on the show and speak with you. And I love the new book. Congratulations. Thank you for being here. Thank you so much. It's a pleasure. Nick Harkaway's novel, Carla's Choice, is now out in paperback.

He spoke with fresh air Sam Brigger last year. On Monday's show, filmmaker Craig Brewer, the director behind Hustle and Flow, Footloose, and Dolomite is my name, is back with a new film about a Milwaukee couple who turned their love of performing into a Neil Diamond tribute band. It's called Song Sung Blue. Hope you can join us. Fresh Air's executive producer is Danny Miller. Our technical director and engineer is Audrey Bentham, with additional engineering support by Joyce Lieberman, Julian Hurstfeld, and Deanna Martinez. Our interviews and reviews are produced and edited by Phyllis Myers, Anne-Marie Baldenado, Lauren Crenzel, Teresa Madden, Monique Nazareth, Thea Chaloner, Susan Yacundi, and Anna Bauman.

Our digital media producer is Molly C.V. Nesper. Hope Wilson is our consulting visual producer. For Terry Gross and Tanya Mosley, I'm David B. and Cooley.