Fresh Air - 'Kids Are Not OK' Says Mental Health Expert
Episode Date: April 2, 2024A global pandemic, school shootings, climate change, war: Children and teenagers are experiencing and being treated for unprecedented levels of anxiety and depression. We talk with founding president ...of the Child Mind Institute, Dr. Harold Koplewicz, about screen time, suicidal ideation, and testing for ADHD. His latest book is Scaffold Parenting: Raising Resilient, Self-Reliant, and Secure Kids in an Age of Anxiety. Also, Justin Chang reviews the film La Chimera.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Support for this podcast and the following message come from the NPR Wine Club, which has generated over $1.75 million to support NPR programming.
Whether buying a few bottles or joining the club, you can learn more at nprwineclub.org slash podcast. Must be 21 or older to purchase.
This is Fresh Air. I'm Terry Gross.
There's so many reasons for children to be anxious today,
beyond all the standard childhood problems. There's the setbacks from the COVID lockdown,
mass shootings in schools, feelings they're not measuring up to the great lives they see
represented on social media, fears about the whole planet being in jeopardy. It's hardly
unusual for parents to be unsure how to handle their child's anxiety, depression, learning problems, anger, tantrums,
and it can be difficult for parents to evaluate whether their child should see a therapist or take medication.
My guest, child psychiatrist Harold Koplowitz, has dealt with these issues with many children and their parents,
and there have been times he's been confounded about issues his own children faced.
He's the founding president of the Child Mind Institute.
Its stated mission is transforming the lives of children and families
struggling with mental health and learning disorders
by giving them the help they need to thrive.
The institute also conducts related research.
From 1997 to 2009, he was the first director of the NYU Child Study Center.
Koplowitz recently stepped down from his 25-year tenure as editor-in-chief of the Journal of Child
and Adolescent Psychopharmacology. His latest book is titled Scaffold Parenting, Raising Resilient,
Self-Reliant, and Sec secure kids in an age of anxiety.
Dr. Harold Koplowitz, welcome to Fresh Air.
What are some of the problems and anxieties you're seeing now that you can connect to outside problems like the COVID lockdown
and its lingering after effects?
How are you seeing that manifest in the children's anxieties that you're seeing?
Well, I think our kids are not okay.
And unfortunately, they weren't doing very well before COVID. But COVID has had a negative effect
on all children, children with mental health disorders and kids who are typically developing
children. Being locked up for two years and living with fear that somebody close to you,
someone near and dear, will die is very problematic. And we also know that one million Americans did
die, which means that about 170,000 American children lost a caregiver or a parent. And if
we go back to 2001, after 9-11, we lost 3,000 Americans.
And I can tell you that in New York, in certain pockets, Staten Island, where there were a lot of firemen, and Manhasset, where there were a lot of finance people who were in the building, and certainly people around Ground Zero, it was very hard to get kids to go back to school.
Attendance rates didn't return to 9-10, to September 10th levels for over a year,
and sometimes even longer.
So we do know that this kind of traumatic event is going to have lingering effects,
and we have seen increases in anxiety disorders and in depression, particularly in girls, but certainly even in boys.
There are higher rates of kids trying to hurt themselves.
And there is even an increase in the number of young people who have committed suicide.
So there is no doubt that we had a problem before and we have a greater problem now. The average child isn't necessarily
like watching cable news or reading the newspaper, but you pick up a lot of this on social media,
and it's also just in the air. Like everybody's talking about these issues like environmental
catastrophe, you know, political divisions. Is this the end of democracy? Is the planet burning?
I mean, you're just, it's just in the air now.
Well, you know, there's something dramatically changed between 2010 and 2018.
So the numbers started to jump when we started looking at children's mental health.
There were higher rates of visits to emergency rooms by kids for suicidal thought and suicidal behavior. And the increase
in the number of kids who died from suicide went from around 5,000 to 6,000. Now, just think about
that. If it was diabetes, if it was cancer, that would have made the front page of every newspaper
every single day. It would be on cable news 24-7. And somehow, we don't take mental health disorders as seriously
as we take physical disorders. And so, you know, what happened between 2010 and 2018 is that all
of us started carrying a device with us that connected us to everybody on the planet 24-7. And that definitely had a negative effect on a certain
percentage of the population. So I want to be clear that social media is not like smoking.
It's not terrible for everyone. But it is particularly bad for kids who have mental
health disorders. And we've really looked at this very carefully at the Child Mind Institute, where we had done a study before COVID that was looking for an objective test, a biological test.
Psychiatry is the only discipline in medicine that doesn't have an objective test, doesn't
have a chest x-ray or a blood test or a strep test. And therefore, that's the holy grail, right? We make the diagnosis with clinical information,
which is how you start all diagnosis in every part of medicine,
but you can confirm it with an EKG or with a brain scan.
So psychiatry is missing that.
And so we started something called the Healthy Brain Network
where we offered any parent who was worried about their child
who was between the ages of 5 and 21
free psychiatric evaluation, free neuropsych testing, which looks for learning disabilities,
a functional MRI, an EEG, physical fitness, cardiovascular status, nutritional status.
And this became, and still, the largest collection of the developing brain of kids 5 to 21 that's ever been collected.
And we share it with scientists around the world who make an agreement with us that they won't try to find out who the subjects are.
Wait, so is the point of this to figure out is there like a biological diagnosis you can make. Does the cohort of people who have like depression or
anxiety or whatever share certain biological markers? Is that the point?
That would be the point. The real trick is, can you tell the difference between one atypical child
and another? Not the difference between a typical developing child and someone who may have a mental
health disorder or a learning disorder, but the difference between Terry who has anxiety and Harold who has depression. And
is there something on the EEG or on the functional MRI? Can we find a definitive objective test?
But the good news here is that when you collect all this data, and it turns out that 9%
of the 7,000 kids that participated
did not have a disorder. They had symptoms, but they didn't meet psychiatric criteria for a
diagnosis. You now have described very accurately and very specifically, phenotypically, what these
kids look like. And then you get COVID. And you find that their use of social media jumps. They
are using the internet six to eight hours a day. All the kids in the state? No, no, no, just a large
percentage of them. And we start defining that as problematic internet usage. Not only are you using
it a lot, but when you force them to stop, they get distressed. It almost feels like an addiction,
right? And we do know that it turns out for the 9% who are typically developing kids that when
you use the internet more than six to eight hours a day, you will sleep less, you will
exercise less, and you'll have less interactions in real life.
All three of them are important for healthy brain development, but you don't become mentally
ill.
However, if you have a mental health
disorder and you start behaving that way, your symptoms get worse. It's almost like a toxic
agent. It turns out that the internet usage of over six to eight hours a day can make your
symptoms of depression, your symptoms of ADHD significantly worse, which is a really important phenomena. Why do you think that is?
Well, it's a very good question why.
Our guess is that for these kids, someone who has depression, they're already socially
more isolated than the average person, and they start losing their skill set and their
ambition to interact with the rest of the world. Kids with ADHD can get very hyper
focused with certain activities and at times feel very lost, very impulsive, feel very often like a
failure when they can't pay attention in school or are missing things that everyone else is picking
up. So what's important about this is that if you're a parent and you know your child has one of these disorders, you have to be very aware that their usage of social media, it could potentially be toxic.
And it has to be controlled.
It can't be unlimited.
Not that it's good for anyone to have unlimited, but it's particularly bad for those kids.
So we know that social media was out there between 2010 and 2018. And unfortunately,
there's no regulation on it. And it means that parents have to be more aware. I mean, I think
of it as, you know, a jungle, right? The jungle is an exciting place, very nutritious fruit and
vegetables and lots of terrific stuff. Maybe medicines even can get discovered in the jungle. But it also has snakes.
It also has dangerous plants that can kill you.
It also has animals.
And therefore, if you're going to let your child participate,
you should be a very active participant in that permission.
So if you think that social media can be very harmful to certain children,
how would you suggest parents try to limit their time on social media? That's something that is
really hard to do. I think it is challenging, but I think it's very doable. We also have some
good data. We know that parents who are using the
internet in a problematic way are more likely to have kids that are doing it. Parents have to model
this. They have to have periods where we're putting the phone away at nighttime and you're
not allowed to look at it because we want you to sleep. We do want to look and see how much time
you're spending on it. And we want you to be aware of how much time you're spending on it. So it's not punitive. It's a collaboration,
especially if they're a teenager or preteen. But I also think that it's time for us to get
much more sophisticated about this. I want to talk with you a little bit about suicide since
you brought it up. And I want to ask you first, just in terms of our show, we always give warnings when
we're going to be talking about suicide. And we always give the suicide prevention hotline number.
The idea being that hearing talk about suicide can almost be encouraging to someone who has had
suicidal ideation. So do you think that's helpful?
Oh, I think it's important to recognize that even if it's a small percentage, to give people that information, that lifeline is very important, and also to let them know
that they're not alone. So I think the way to think about this is why are teenagers so much more at risk than you or me? And the way to think about
a teenager is they feel everything. They're boiling. They're freezing. I hate you. I love you.
You know, what happened to I'm warm or it's a little cool in here? That doesn't happen. And
in some ways, it's really kind of terrific because they are so creative and they see opportunity
everywhere and they don't
recognize risk very well. I mean, there's some really interesting studies of a teenage boy who
goes and picks up a friend to come into his car and the teenager driver is wearing a seatbelt
and the teenage male who sits down next to him doesn't put a seatbelt on and the teenage driver
takes his seatbelt off. He goes and picks
up a girl and the girl gets into the car and she puts her seatbelt on and the teenage driver now
puts his seatbelt on. So they're very easily moved by their peer group in a way that they hadn't been
before. And parents should note this, that even though the peer group becomes significantly more
influential when you're a teenager,
parents are still the most influential factor in a kid's life.
But it's important that parents keep talking, keep sharing their viewpoint,
keep listening to their kid's viewpoint,
and not back off because their kids say, well, everyone's doing it.
A child comes into your office, let's say a teenager comes into your office,
you think that the possibility of this teenager attempting suicide is real. What do you do to try to prevent that from happening? Have they been thinking about it a long time? Have they stopped doing their usual pleasurable experiences?
They no longer are hanging out with friends or not eating the food that they love.
And you have to really recognize that if they are very serious about it, you have to intervene.
You have to save their lives.
You have to either say to them, I don't feel you're safe, or ask them if they feel safe, and then sometimes
make the decision that they have to be in an environment where they'll be watched in a hospital,
or you'll talk to their parents and see, can they watch them until this mood and this ideation
actually passes? So I just want to pause here and give the National Suicide and Crisis Hotline number.
And this is the number to call or to text.
It's 988.
So it's a simple number, just three numbers, 988, to either call or text the National Suicide and Crisis Hotline. So if you are having thoughts of suicide, please get some help.
You specialize in ADHD, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Why don't you define what the symptoms are and how to recognize it?
So it's a challenge for lots of people to think about it because they think, oh,
aren't we all hyperactive at some time? But the difference here
is a deficit in attention toward what's normal developmentally. So the attention span of a
five-year-old is very different than the attention span of a 10-year-old. But any individual who has
ADHD is chronically less attentive, tends to be more impulsive. And if they have hyperactivity, they're moving around
more. They can get themselves into physical problems because they basically have ants in
their pants. They're constantly in motion. The diagnosis when you have hyperactivity is
much easier to make than when you just have ADD without age. But it's a chronic illness, and therefore,
it may change over time. Your symptoms might lessen. Hyperactivity might go away when you
become a teenager. But you are always going to have a shorter attention span and going to be
more impulsive than the average person your age. I think this is one of the problems in which brain imaging is starting to be used, fMRIs, where you can see which parts of the brain light up in different situations and different thoughts.
How are fMRIs being used in ADHD?
Right. It's the holy grail for us to find that objective test. One of the things we've discovered at the Chalmon Institute is that the way your brain connects to itself while a child's at rest turns out to be diagnostic.
It's called connectomes.
So does the front of the brain connect to the side scans and sent them to a group of people who were statisticians, who were And they said, well, these 150 scans
go together, and these 50 scans go together, and these 100 scans go together. And these are
individuals who've never seen a patient with psychiatric disorder. But what's really interesting
in bucket one, the overwhelming majority of those patients had ADHD. In the group of 50, they had autism. In the group of 100,
they had both ADHD and autism. So we're really excited by the fact that we have found something
that might lead us to a definitive objective test. Now, the important part for everyone to remember,
it's not just one child. It's not a strep test, yes, you're positive,
or someone else is negative. It's a group difference. But that's the way we're going to get closer and closer to making a definitive diagnosis. So in a study like the fMRI study that
you were referring to, how do you know whether the brain is reflecting the behavior or whether the
behavior is predetermined by the brain.
Do you know what I mean?
Sure.
It's like if I move my left arm, if I say I'm going to move my left arm right now and I'm doing it with intent,
it's going to register on an fMRI probably.
But it's not like I have a disorder that's moving my left arm.
It's like I've decided to behave this way and it's registering in my brain.
So, you know, let's think about this for a second. This is exactly where the field of
research in functional MRI has gone to. You know, they used to give a trigger to a kid,
you know, pay attention to this while you're in the machine, or we're going to show you scary
faces and see what happened to the brain. It turns out that the most powerful way of doing this
is just letting kids rest or sleep in the functional MRI.
And your brain is incredibly active while you're at rest or sleeping,
and that's when you're going to see most of these connections.
So in the case of the study, we weren't triggering them.
We weren't saying, you know, this clearly should be what makes it,
you know, we'll catch them being inattentive, and then we'll look at the MRI. We're just looking at their brains
at rest. Oh, that's really interesting. So has this affected your treatment at all?
So we're not there yet. You know, it's not ready for prime time. I wish, you know, I could say,
oh, we're going to give everyone EEGs because they're only 60 bucks and an MRI is 500 and we found some
correlation. That's what I'm hoping for. But, you know, science has to wait for real data.
So at this moment, we still have to rely on clinical diagnosis. You're asking parents what
they think. You're asking teachers and report cards because this is not something that just
pops up when you're about to apply to college or because you didn't make partner at the law firm. This is a lifelong
illness and you can document that by looking at things from a longitudinal basis. And then you
have to examine the child. The child basically confirms the diagnosis or doesn't. I think it's
fascinating when you do give a kid meds, and they do significantly
better, that a young child will tell you the medicine's not working. And you say, really,
what's changed? She said, my teacher is much nicer. I said, that's really interesting. You
take a pill and your teacher is much nicer. That really is absolutely amazing. And they said, yeah,
you know, you're eight years old. Okay. Well, we need to take another break here. So let me
reintroduce you. If you're just joining us, my guest we need to take another break here. So let me reintroduce you.
If you're just joining us, my guest is Dr. Harold Koplowitz.
He is a child psychiatrist.
He's the founding president of the Child Mind Institute.
And his books include Scaffold Parenting, Raising Resilient, Self-Reliant, and Secure Kids in an Age of Anxiety.
We'll be right back after a short break.
I'm Terry Gross, and this is Fresh Air.
Hi there, it's Tanya Mosley, here to share more about my new series of Fresh Air Plus bonus
episodes. I love when he casts his mom in movies. It feels so authentic. I know, you know, she was
also in the film Goodfellas, which I also love. I need to get that screenplay, by the way. I don't have that
one. For the next few weeks leading up to the Academy Awards, I'll be talking about all of my
favorite movies with my colleague Anne-Marie Baldonado. If you want to hear what movies I love
and which screenplays I actually own and use as creative direction,
sign up for Fresh Air Plus at plus.npr.org.
Your middle son has dyslexia. No one realized it at first. How did you discover what it was?
Because this is, I assume, one of the issues that you treat as a child psychiatrist.
Right. Well, I think dyslexia has very often been put into
another category until about the last 25 years, so that it was something educational experts did
and not necessarily child psychiatrists. And brain scans and functional MRIs have changed that.
But in the case of our family, he was four years old. We were visiting his grandmother for a day. And she was a pretty neutral individual, very careful not to say anything critical or even say anything overly praising. And she said, no, his stories are out of sequence. And I don't think he knows my name. I love listening to him, but everything seems a little
mixed up. And I was the one who said, you know, we should listen to grandma here. And we went on
this journey to figure out what was wrong. We had him tested. And the tester said, oh, he's very
bright. Well, at four years old, you don't read on these kinds of neuropsych testing. But she did mention that he had some word retrieval problems and that
he couldn't name certain things. And she was concerned that maybe he didn't recognize the
alphabet. And I remember at the time saying, what do we do about it? And she said, well,
it's going to cost a lot of money and it's going to take a lot of time. And I thought,
well, he's four years old. He has a lot of time. And for this,
we'll find a lot of money. We'll mortgage our house. He's got to learn how to read.
So we went on this journey and it turned out that we waste a lot of time. There were a lot of dead ends where we thought we were doing well, but it turns out he was memorizing words that he couldn't
decode the language. He couldn't tell the difference
between Sally, Susan, and Sarah. And it was only by third grade when math turned into word problems
that we saw how frustrated he was and how he recognized that he was ahead of kids in math,
but way behind them in reading. And he knew this was happening. And that gave us the moment to
reevaluate and figure out a more evidence-based
approach. Which was? Well, it turns out that a multisensory approach to learning how to read,
teaching kids the sounds of the language, brother sounds, what your lips look like.
And there was a program called Linda Mood Bell, which is now in 50 states. And it's very intensive. You spend four hours a day doing these exercises
with a different tutor every hour.
And then you do another 30 minutes or 40 minutes of homework.
And they basically teach you how to break the code,
that the rest of us are learning how to read
with only one side of our brain.
And they are teaching you how to read thinking, you thinking that your brain thinks it's Italian or Spanish,
that you're learning a foreign language.
And it's really a remarkable intervention.
I'm going to stop you. What do you mean by that,
that your brain thinks you're learning a foreign language?
Well, when we learn a foreign language, we use both sides of our brain.
When we're learning...
We do?
Yes.
I hadn't heard that before.
Right. And we're learning our native language. We activate one side of the brain, and kids with dyslexia under-activate that brain. And so when you teach them a new way of learning, it's like teaching them a foreign language. And so when you check what's going on in a functional MRI, they're lighting up both sides of their brain. The thing that's really awful about dyslexia, as far as I'm concerned, is what it does to kids' self-esteem. So that, you know, once a year I get to interview someone
who's struggled with it, whether it's Orlando Bloom or Ari Emanuel or, you know, Lorraine Bracco,
and you hear how bad they felt about themselves. So Think about it. Every day you go to work and every day you feel like a failure.
So it's not surprising that you think you're stupid or that you don't want to be there.
And what all these successful people have in common is a great mom.
Barbara Corcoran has it.
And she told me that the nuns were really giving her a tough time in parochial school.
And her mother said, don't listen to the nuns.
You're not stupid.
They're stupid.
Well, having a mom who's telling you you're still bright
or Orlando Bloom's mom who said, let's do poetry.
You know, those are these great moms
who are basically saying, I'm on your side
and we're going to figure this out.
But for those who don't have those moms,
school is impossible.
There's high school dropout rates.
There are high rates of getting involved in the juvenile justice system because you're not in school.
And when we look at the juvenile justice system, we see that 70% of the inmates have dyslexia.
You know, I used to think that dyslexia was a problem with, like, reversing words.
So you'd have to read slowly because words would get reversed in your mind.
But it's much more profound than that.
Can you give us like the latest understanding of what dyslexia is?
Sure. So that's a myth, the D, the B.
What it really is, first of all, it's a brain-based disorder.
And there's two major symptoms.
One is alphabet recognition, being able to look
at the A and knowing it's an A and looking at the D and knowing it's a D. And we all learn that
kind of, you know, very easily. And the other is phonemic awareness, hearing the sounds of the
language, being able to say to yourself or let your brain recognize that S-L-O-W comes out slow and S-H-O-W comes out show.
And so you have to be able to hear those two different phonemes.
And I will tell you that now that America is recognizing that this kind of evidence-based learning is really important, that we have to teach kids phonemes.
We have to teach them how to read no matter who they are. We are really addressing this in an earlier age. So
kids who have dyslexia will be picked up sooner and will be able to get interventions
that are more effective again before it affects their self-esteem.
So let me introduce you here. If you're just joining us, my guest is Dr. Harold Koplowitz.
He's a child psychiatrist, author of the book Scaffold Parenting, Raising Resilient, Self-Reliant, and Secure Kids in an Age of Anxiety, and founding president of the Child Mind Institute.
We'll be right back.
This is Fresh Air.
So this is a kind of personal question, but knowing what you know now, and there's so much more research that's been done into childhood, you know, behavioral problems and mental health disorders.
Do you think you had any undiagnosed problems as a child?
I don't think so.
I don't mean that like I recognize symptoms and not your behavior? No, but I would tell you that I clearly
became much more of a student when I was in college than I was in high school. I had Eastern
European parents. I had parents who survived the Holocaust and got to the United States in 1949.
And they didn't believe that education was a journey. It was a destination. And they couldn't wait until, you know, you graduated and go to college.
And so I was two years younger than everyone in elementary school.
And I think that was most probably not a great idea that most boys developed, you know, late.
And so that was a problem. And I would also tell you that, you know, the parents that I had when I was growing up were much more traumatized by the Holocaust than the parents I had later on in life when they were in their 80s and 90s and were less anxious and the nightmares had stopped and they felt more comfortable in the United States and also comfortable that, you know, I was going to be successful.
I had graduated medical school.
I had children.
I was married.
And that seemed to really calm them down.
But I do recognize that they were overly invested in my being successful because they were trying to recreate stuff that they lost. My father started a business. I think they struggled financially.
My mother eventually went back to school and got a BA and then an MSW.
But there was this idea of what could have been if there wouldn't have been the Holocaust.
And therefore, my sister and I had to carry is, you know, understandable, but was very unpleasant
when it was happening. Were your parents in camps? My father was literally in 14 concentration camps
and the Warsaw Ghetto. And how is that possible? Well, at the very first camp, they asked who knows
how to make airplanes. And my father raised his hand. And when asked about that, he
said, well, they had already killed the lawyers. And he figured, well, I know how to use a
screwdriver. I'll figure it out. And he went from camp to camp, and he was with one other man who
kept being moved with him. And they got a little piece of metal. And the other guy was very artistic. And he engraved a sailboat and a horn
of plenty. And on the other side, every time they moved from one camp to another, my father inscribed
the date and the name of the camp. And they were hoping there would be at least a record that what
they were experiencing would be recorded and documented. And that piece of metal, by the way,
is at the U.S. Holocaust Museum in New York.
I'm sorry, in D.C., in Washington, D.C.
So you mentioned your mother was in camps too?
No, my mother got papers as a Catholic,
and false papers as a Catholic,
and walked out of the ghetto.
And in some ways, it was more trying for her in the
respect that, think about it, you have fake papers. And if the Gestapo stops you and starts
really examining the papers and starts asking you questions like, what is your mother and father's
name? Oh, they're dead. Okay. And what was your priest's name? And where are you from?
It wouldn't take very long. So she moved around 16 different villages outside of Warsaw, working as a maid. And she was a terrible housekeeper. So it is really amazing how she managed to do that because she, you know, she really had a very tough time and was very isolated and just basically, you know, surviving from day to day. And it was, I think, a little more than two years where
she was moving around. The war ended first in Poland. And so my father didn't come and find
her until several months later. Well, they were married before the war started.
Well, I wish I could tell you that's true. And that was the story I was told. But it turns out
that when my then 12-year-old son was doing a – my wife insisted that if he was going to be bar mitzvahed, it had to be intergenerational.
So he kept asking my mother her life story and recording it.
And at a certain point, my son said, I don't understand, Grandma.
Where was the infrastructure in the ghetto for you to get married?
And my mother said, oh, you know, in the Jewish religion, you can get married in the stars and the moon.
And my son said, I don't think that's true. I think you need a contract. And she said, well, August 12th,
it was the day I lost my virginity with your grandfather. And he came home and said, I don't
know if grandma and grandpa ever were married. I think they're celebrating the day they had sex.
So I called my mother and said, I don't understand. Why did you tell him that? She said,
I never slept with anybody else. And I thought, enough. And he asked much better questions than you ever did. So I think
they got married when they were leaving Poland to go to a displaced persons camp in Germany.
And I have to tell you as an example, their people, my mother was madly in love with my father
before the war. She lusted for him. He was very attractive,
and he was a lawyer already. And then after the war, when he returned, he was skin and bones.
And he was truly a different person. And she was a different person. She was no longer a bit of a
princess. She was a survivor. She knew how. And he came and found her. And she said, I'm I'm going to let you come in. But I'm leaving. I've got papers to go either to Palestine or to Australia or Canada or the United States. I'm not staying here. And he said, well, I am staying here. I'm a lawyer and we're going to make a lot of money. And she said, that's OK. The idea that they lived together for three months and she got the papers and he decided to go with her, it's really a very romantic story that they fell in love again.
And my father, every year on their anniversary, would give my mother, if they had money, he gave her a red rose for every year they were together and three white roses for the three years they weren't together with the same note, life had no color without you.
So they really rediscovered each
other. And I think that bond was so close. In some ways, my sister and I sometimes felt out of it,
because they were such a partnership that that's what carried them through later on.
What impact do you think it had on you as a child to know that they were having these
nightmares, these concentration camp or posing as a Catholic kind of nightmares.
Did they tell you about that?
Could you sense it?
And in the same mode there, like, did they let on what they had experienced and how traumatic it was?
So the stories were never consistent or chronological.
So you only got bits and pieces.
You know, something about the showers, right?
That one of my grandmothers died in the showers.
You know, I hate to tell you that they didn't explain the camps to me.
But you also knew that they were so upset by it that you didn't pursue it.
You didn't ask them a lot of things. And I can certainly tell you that since they weren't very Jewish by education or training, the holidays were just terrible.
I mean, you know, most people light a memorial candle for all the people that have died in their family.
Well, all their brothers and sisters and their parents and their cousins.
So that, you know, there were like 10 yard side candles, these memorial candles.
But they weren't kept in the kitchen. They were like, all the ghosts were on the dining room table
for Rosh Hashanah or Yom Kippur. And it's kind of amazing the transformation they made over time,
that, you know, they were literally able to become more stable and calmer and more effective as
adults. You must have grown up with a very dark view of life.
At times, yes.
You know, at times, yes.
And yet, the amazing part about my parents
were they couldn't care less about material things.
So other kids would live in houses near us in Queens
and then in Nassau County
where the slipcovers, plastic slipcovers,
were put on
the furniture. And my mother would say, what are they waiting for? You know, they'll be dead.
They should, you know, if something broke in our house, my mother never cared about it. I mean,
it really gave them a whole different attitude about what was important. And certainly material
things were not important to my parents. They had lost a lot because they stayed, you know, I used why didn't you come to America, for God's sakes? And my mother would say, Al Capone and peasants, they came to America, not the intelligentsia, which is kind of snobby about her academic credentials and who her family was. But they lost a lot because they didn't want to leave property or whatever it was,
or the life that they had. So one last question. Some parents really want to be their children's
best friend, and some parents really want to maintain their stature as the authority figure,
not the best friend. In terms of being a parent yourself, I'm curious where you fit on that spectrum, if you are comfortable talking about that.
Well, I'm not my kid's best friend, you know.
And that's okay.
Because, you know, even though they're all adults now, which is a whole different kind of relationship.
I mean, my children are 41, 37, and 35.
It really is frightening to see that one of my kids has gray hair.
You know, it's like, how did this happen?
Because I'm still 35, you know.
But all along, I think there is this pull that you certainly want your kids to love you
because you love them so much, but it's okay for them not to like you
because you do have so much, but it's okay for them not to like you because you
do have to protect them. And when you protect them, there are certain things that they want to do
that you know are dangerous for them or are just not good for them or not healthy for them.
And so I think it's very hard, if not impossible, to be a friend, which is be a peer, right, and share the same point of view
and not have control. Your friend does not have control over you. It's much more equal. And I
don't think that's possible as a parent. I think the best type of parenting, by the way, is an
authoritative parent who has a lot of warmth, but has a lot of control. So both the kid and the
parent know at the end of the day, the parent is going to make the decision, maybe with input from the child.
But at the end of the day, it's not a democracy. It's going to be the parent who has the
responsibility to make those decisions. Dr. Harold Koplowitz, thank you so much
for talking with us. It's been a pleasure, Terry.
Dr. Harold Koplowitz is the founding president of the Child Mind Institute.
His latest book is titled Scaffold Parenting.
After we take a short break, Justin Chang reviews what he describes as a marvelous new movie.
This is Fresh Air.
In the new Italian drama La Chimera, the English actor Josh O'Connor plays a tomb raider with a gift for finding buried relics in the Tuscan countryside. The wonderful 42-year-old filmmaker Alice Rohrwacher
practices a kind of cinema
that I've come to think of as
Italian magical neorealism. She gives us portraits of hardscrabble lives in poor rural communities,
but they're graced by a whimsical, almost fable-like sense of enchantment. Rohrwacher's
2014 film, The Wonders, was a lyrical drama about a family of Tuscan beekeepers.
She followed that in 2018 with Happy as Lazaro, about a group of sharecroppers on a tobacco farm
whose story moves from picaresque comedy to aching tragedy. Her marvelous new movie, La Chimera,
follows in much the same vein, with one key difference.
While Rohrwacher has generally worked with non-professional Italian actors,
this time she's cast the English actor Josh O'Connor,
best known for his Emmy-winning performance as a young Prince Charles on The Crown.
But O'Connor's character here doesn't give off even a whiff of royalty,
even if his name is Arthur.
When we first meet him, he's asleep on a train bound for his old stomping grounds in Tuscany.
He's just been released from prison after serving some time for the crime of grave robbing.
Arthur has a mysterious archaeological talent.
Wielding a divining rod, he can detect the presence of
buried artifacts, many of which date back to the Etruscan civilization more than 2,000 years ago.
Arthur works with a group of tombaroli, or tomb raiders, who rely on him to figure out where to
dig. In this scene, many of those old friends welcome him back with a parade, one of several moments in which Rohrwacher briefly channels the vibrant human chaos of a Fellini film. Arthur is a little reluctant to rejoin his old gang,
since they let him take the rap after their last job.
But he doesn't seem to have anything else to do, or anywhere else to go.
He may be an outsider.
His Italian throughout is decent, but far from perfect.
But it's the only place in the world that feels remotely like home.
And O'Connor plays him with such a deep sense of melancholy that it feels almost special when his
handsome, careworn face breaks into a warm smile. It's not immediately clear what Arthur wants.
Unlike his cohorts, he doesn't seem all that interested in making money off their spoils.
The answer turns out to lie in his dreams, which are haunted by a beautiful young woman named Benyamina,
the love of his life whom he's lost under unclear circumstances.
And so Arthur's determination to go underground becomes a metaphor for his longing for an irretrievable past.
Benjamina is the Eurydice to his Orpheus, and he wants her back desperately.
Arthur is still close to Benjamina's mother, Flora,
played with a wondrous mix of warmth and imperiousness by the great Isabella Rossellini.
Her presence here made me think of her filmmaker father, the neo-realist titan Roberto Rossellini, a fitting association for a movie about how the past is forever seeping in
to the present. One of the pleasures of Lice Rohrwacher's filmmaking is the way she subtly
blurs our sense of time. La Chimera is set in the 1980s, but it could be taking place 20 years earlier
or 20 years later. Rohrwacher and her brilliant cinematographer, Hélène Louvard, shot the movie
on a mix of film stocks and sometimes tweak the image in ways that evoke the cinematic antiquities
of the silent era. As sorrowful as Arthur's journey is, there's a playfulness to Rohrwacher's
sensibility that keeps pulling you in, inviting you to get lost in the movie's mysteries.
One of the story's most significant characters is Italia, played by the Brazilian actor Carol
Duarte, who works in Flora's household. Italia is a bit of an odd duck, with a beguiling bluntness
about her, and she might be just the one to pull Arthur out of his slump and get him to stop living
in the past. I won't give away what happens, except to say that La Chimera builds to not one,
but two thrilling scenes of underground exploration, in which Arthur must finally figure out his life's purpose,
not by using a divining rod, but by following his heart.
And it leads to the most magical movie ending I've seen in some time,
and also the most real.
Justin Chang is a film critic for The New Yorker.
He reviewed La Chimera. It's now in theaters.
Tomorrow on Fresh Air, we'll talk about the controversial legacy of Captain James Cook.
Our guest will be historian Hampton Sides.
His new book is about the British sea captain's four-year voyage to chart lands from the Arctic Circle to the South Pacific.
His treatment of indigenous people left him regarded by many
as an agent of colonialism.
I hope you'll join us.
To keep up with what's on the show
and get highlights of our interviews,
follow us on Instagram
at NPR Fresh Air.
Fresh Air's executive producer
is Danny Miller.
Our technical director and engineer
is Audrey Bentham.
Our engineer today is Adam Staniszewski.
Our interviews and reviews are produced and edited
by Amy Salat, Phyllis Myers,
Anne-Marie Boldenato, Sam Brigger,
Lauren Krenzel, Teresa Madden,
Thea Chaloner, Susan Yakundi, and
Joel Wolfram. Our digital media
producer is Molly C.V. Nesper.
Roberta Shorrock directs the show.
Our co-host is Tanya Mosley.
I'm Terry Gross.
This message comes from NPR sponsor Grammarly.
What if everyone at work were an expert communicator?
Inbox numbers would drop, customer satisfaction scores would rise,
and everyone would be more productive.
That's what happens when you give Grammarly to your entire team.
Grammarly is a secure AI writing partner that understands your business
and can transform it through better communication.
Join 70,000 teams who trust Grammarly with their words and their data.
Learn more at Grammarly.com.
Grammarly. Easier said, done.
Support for NPR and the following message
come from the Kauffman Foundation,
providing access to opportunities
that help people achieve financial stability,
upward mobility, and economic prosperity,
regardless of race, gender, or geography.
Kauffman.org.