Fresh Air - 'Oppenheimer' Dir. Christopher Nolan / Mark Ronson On The 'Barbie' Soundtrack

Episode Date: February 2, 2024

Oppenheimer and Barbie have been nominated for 13 and 8 Oscars, respectively. We feature our interview with Christopher Nolan, who wrote and directed Oppenheimer, about the making of the atomic bomb. ...Also, we hear from prolific music producer Mark Ronson about the soundtrack and score of Barbie. He co-wrote one of the songs that's been nominated for an Oscar and a Grammy, "I'm Just Ken."David Bianculli reviews the latest installment of Ryan Murphy's FX anthology series Feud, this time about Truman Capote.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 This is Fresh Air. I'm Tanya Mosley. Today we begin our countdown to the Oscars with our very own Oppenheimer Barbie double feature. Let's start with Oppenheimer, which is nominated for 13 Academy Awards, including Best Picture, Director, Actor, Supporting Actor and Actress, Adapted Screenplay, Original Score, and more. The film is also nominated for a Grammy, which takes place this Sunday for Best Score or Soundtrack. Oppenheimer is about J. Robert Oppenheimer, the man known as the father of the atom bomb. He was a theoretical physicist and directed Los Alamos, the secret project in New Mexico where researchers created, designed, and tested the first atomic bomb, which was intended to end
Starting point is 00:00:45 World War II. By the time it was tested, Germany had surrendered, but Japan had not. In 1945, the U.S. dropped atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. That ended the war, but it's estimated that as many as 200,000 people were killed. After the war, Oppenheimer became an advocate of arms control and opposed military plans for massive strategic bombing with nuclear weapons, which he considered genocidal. He also opposed the creation of the even deadlier hydrogen bomb. In 1954, during the height of the anti-communist era, Oppenheimer was accused of being a risk to national security because of his alleged ties to the Communist Party. He protested at a hearing which resulted in him being stripped of his security clearance.
Starting point is 00:01:37 Nearly 70 years later, in December of 2022, Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm revoked that decision. Terry interviewed Oppenheimer writer and director Christopher Nolan last August. Nolan is also known for his World War II film Dunkirk, as well as Tenet, The Batman Trilogy, Inception, Insomnia, and Memento. Let's start with a clip from Oppenheimer speaking with Leslie Groves, the general who headed the Manhattan Project, which Los Alamos was part of. Groves asks Oppenheimer about the possibility that the atom bomb test could set off a chain reaction that would set fire to the atmosphere and destroy Earth, a possibility he'd heard one of the top nuclear physicists, Enrico Fermi, refer to. Oppenheimer is played by Killian
Starting point is 00:02:26 Murphy and Groves by Matt Damon. Groves speaks first. What did Fermi mean by atmospheric ignition? Well, we had a moment where it looked like the chain reaction from an atomic device might never stop. Setting fire to the atmosphere. What was Fermi still taking side bets on it? Call it gallows humor. Are we saying there's a chance that when we push that button, we destroy
Starting point is 00:02:57 the world? Nothing in our research over three years supports that conclusion. Except it's the most remote possibility. How remote? Chances are near zero. Near zero. What do you want from theory alone? Zero would be nice. Okay, that's a scene from Oppenheimer, And my guest is the writer and director of the film, Christopher Nolan. Christopher Nolan, welcome back to Fresh Air. It's a pleasure to have you back on the show. Thank you. There wasn't going to be this atmospheric ignition where the whole atmosphere would catch on fire and destroy Earth.
Starting point is 00:03:56 But I guess you never really know, based on theoretical physics, what's going to happen when you blow up an atom bomb. So what was it like for you to think about that as you were making the movie? I think for me, that knowledge that leading up to the Trinity test, the leading scientists led by Oppenheimer's story and making a film from it. Because it's simply the most high stakes, dramatic situation that you could conceive of. It beats anything in fiction. I'd actually put a reference to it in my previous film, Tenet, in dialogue. I used it as an analogy for the science fiction situation at the heart of that film. But we referred to that moment. And then after finishing that film, it was actually one of the stars of Tenet, Rob Pattinson. He gave me a book of Oppenheimer speeches, post-World War II speeches, in which you see him trying to reckon with.
Starting point is 00:05:02 And you're reading about the great minds of the time trying to reckon with the consequences of this thing that they've unleashed on the world. But that initial notion, that fact that I learned of, that they couldn't, using theory alone, completely eliminate the possibility of global destruction
Starting point is 00:05:21 based on triggering the first atomic test, I just wanted to be in that room. I wanted to take the audience into that room for the moment where they would push that button. So much work went into making the first atom bomb. And so many theoretical physicists were involved, all the calculations. And then you have the reality of it exploding. So the bomb worked. All their work paid off. It was a success. And in the film, all the scientists are gathered and they're applauding. That's before it was actually used for real. Knowing what you know now, how did it feel to watch their enthusiasm, their applause, to film that? It felt very exciting. I felt lost in the excitement of it. And that was really the idea.
Starting point is 00:06:13 I mean, at the heart of the film, there's a pivot. And it's really the pivot between the successful Trinity test and then the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the actual use of the weapon. And so for me, the focus of the film, it needed to be this build towards the most incredible excitement and tension around that test, whether or not they could pull off this extraordinary feat that they had been drawn into trying to accomplish based on this desperate race against the Nazis to be the first power to harness control power of atomic weapons. And the Germans had split the atom. The Nazis had the best physicists or some of the best physicists in the world at their disposal. And they were trying as hard as they could to make the first atomic bomb. And so Oppenheimer and his fellow scientists who were called upon by
Starting point is 00:07:10 their country, they had no choice. And there's this moment, of course, where they're pushing for years, spending billions of dollars. They've built this whole community out in the middle of nowhere devoted to this one thing of making this chain reaction happen, making this atomic blast work. And it all boils down to that moment of the Trinity test. And they pull it off. And there's such joy and excitement around that. And I wanted the audience to be caught up in that. I wanted to be caught up in that. I wanted to be caught up in that. But then, you know, you come to film the
Starting point is 00:07:46 scenes where we're looking from Oppenheimer's point of view, we're experiencing the news of the bombings coming through, unbelievably awful, and change the world forever. Whether we like it or not, we live in Oppenheimer's world, and we always will. What's your approach to biopics? Like what liberties to take and what to be faithful to? Well, in a funny sort of way, my approach is to not even acknowledge biopic as a genre. In other words, if something works, like Lawrence of Arabia, for example, you don't think of it as a biopic. You think of it as a great adventure story, even though obviously it's telling the story of somebody's life. Or Citizen Kane or one of these great films. I mean, obviously it's fiction. But for me, I had the benefit of this extraordinary book, American Prometheus, that was written. Martin Sherwin, who first started writing it,
Starting point is 00:08:42 he spent 25 years researching Oppenheimer's story and speaking to everybody who knew him and all the rest. So by the time he and Kai Bird finished, put the book out, it won the Pulitzer Prize, I had this extraordinary sort of Bible to work from. And so for me, it was really a process of saying, okay, what's the exciting story that develops, the cinematic story that develops from a reading of it, from several readings of it? And then started to develop a structure for how I might be able to put the audience into an Oppenheimer's head. When you're not working, do you live in your head a lot? And does your head become a kind of dark place where negative thoughts consume you?
Starting point is 00:09:24 No. I mean, I certainly live in my head a lot it's how i work um you know uh i think oppenheimer of all the films i've worked on it's the one that i actually find the most disturbing the most under my skin i was quite glad to be finished making it to be quite frank and it's because I try to approach it from his point of view and try to find genuine positivity in his story, in his relationships, in the things that he was able to achieve and the ways in which he was able to defend himself or the ways his friends would stand up for him and all the rest. But there's no getting around the undeniable darkness of
Starting point is 00:10:05 his situation, his story, and how it has affected the world. And, you know, movies are a sort of collective dream. There's a sense in which Oppenheimer is a collective nightmare. And there's something about telling that and getting it out in the world that stops it being, you know, my own personal thing. That helps. So I want to ask you about dreams. You know, you edit some of your films out of chronological sequence. And I think dreams are that way too. Like dreams often don't make any sense at all.
Starting point is 00:10:35 You have to kind of look for the meaning within them and interpret them. But they don't make chronological sense. You just kind of hop from one scene to another that may or may not be related. Do you think that your dream life has influenced your editing life at all? And one of your, I mean, Inception is literally about dreams. It's about like stealing dreams and implanting information in someone's mind through dreams, like tapping into other people's dreams. Well, it's also about what you just described. It's about the timescale of dreams. You know, Inception is very much about
Starting point is 00:11:11 how you can have a much longer, a feeling of a much longer period of your life in a very short space of time in a dream. So yeah, that film in particular really drilled down on my relationship with my dream life and the relationship between dreams and reality uh but i think cinema in general for me is very influenced by its relationship uh with dreams there is a there's a very real sense in which movies are are sort of shared dream, are shared kind of dream consciousness.
Starting point is 00:11:48 They have an interesting effect on the brain. You know, when you see a film, it's often quite, it's quite interesting to talk to people who've seen a film about the time span of the film they saw, not the literal time they were sitting there in the cinema, but what time slice it represents of the characters lives, for example. And that's a very complicated aspect of how movies get into our brains and how we look at them and how we sort of judge them. So in Inception, your movie about dreams, Leonardo DiCaprio says, we never remember the beginning of a dream. Is that true? I mean, it's a question I've
Starting point is 00:12:25 never asked myself. I don't know if I remember the beginning of my dreams, because I'm lucky if I remember my dreams. And when I do, it's usually I remember the mood, I remember a few frames of the dream. I don't really remember the chronology very well. And I have no idea where it started. So what made you think of that? I wrote Inception, you know, very much from my own impression of the way I dream and sort of dream rules. And I sort of trusted that there'd be enough people in the audience that roughly corresponded with the way that I dream, that it wouldn't be overly controversial. I remember many years ago seeing a film.
Starting point is 00:13:11 I think it was George Burns. I think it was Oh God. There's a moment where somebody says, well, you know, they say, am I dreaming? And they say, well, is it in color? You know, they say, yeah. And it's like, okay, well, you know, it's not a dream because you only dream in black and white. And I remember as a kid thinking,
Starting point is 00:13:24 well, I don't dream in black and white. That's weird. But this is the danger. You know, when you write about memory, you know, when I was doing Memento, for example, you know, it is a very personal thing and everybody's brain is a little different. The way we process the world is a little different. I know that I, as an audience member, I respond to a consistent rule set, if you like. So as long as the film is telling me up front that, okay,
Starting point is 00:13:45 this is how we see the world, this is the world of the film you're watching, as long as they're sort of true to that in the telling of the story, then I'm okay with it. You know, that whole question of like, oh, we only dream in black and white. People used to ask each other that, do you dream in black and white or in color? And do you think that was because our only understanding in that time of what imagery looked like in representation outside of paintings was film and TV, which were in black and white? I think that's a... And photographs. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:14:18 No, I think you've hit the nail on the head, actually. And I think it relates to the earlier answer of the relationship between you know our view of dreams and our and our view of motion pictures yeah the way in which you remember movies is very similar the way in which you remember dreams and and every now and again you see a film that taps that in a in a way you know i think memento for a lot of people sort of bled off the page if you like or off the strip of film running through the projector and built a bigger world in people's minds. I think the films of David Lynch have always done that incredibly well over the years. They have a dream logic that quite often you...
Starting point is 00:14:56 I remember seeing Lost Highway, for example, and not really understanding the film at all. And then a couple of weeks later, remembering the film the way I would remember one of my own dreams. And that suddenly felt like a sort of remarkable feat that Lynch had achieved in terms of mapping a dream into the space of a motion picture and vice versa. ...on an IMAX, and a lot of people will not have the opportunity of seeing it that way. But I think some people are puzzled, like, why shoot a movie that's largely people talking to each other and people thinking and people being anguished over the possibilities of the bomb?
Starting point is 00:15:34 Why shoot that in IMAX, which is usually reserved for films that have incredible landscapes or that have incredible um fantastical cinematography well i've used imax for years um and going into oppenheimer talking to heuter my dp um we knew that it would give us with its high resolution it's sort of extraordinary analog color, sharpness, all of these things, the big screens that you projected on. We knew it would give us the landscapes of New Mexico, that it would give us the Trinity test, which we felt had to be a showstopper. But we actually got really excited about the idea of the human face. You know, how can it help us jump into Oppenheimer's head? story is told subjectively I even wrote the script in the first person you know I this I that we were looking for the visual equivalent
Starting point is 00:16:33 of that and so taking those high-resolution IMAX cameras and you know really just trying to be there for the intimate moments of the story in a way that we felt we hadn't really seen people do before with that format. That was a source of particular excitement for us. Does it pain you to think that probably a lot of people will end up watching Oppenheimer on their phones or on little tablets? No, not at all. I actually, you know, I'm one of the first generations of filmmakers who grew up with home video. So, you know, my family got its first VHS player when I was about 11 years old.
Starting point is 00:17:13 And so I've sort of come of age in a world of film where more people are always going to see your film in the home. That's always been the case. But the thing about the way film distribution works is if you make your film for the biggest possible screen and you put it out there in the biggest possible way, firstly, the technical quality of the image carries through to all the subsequent versions of the film that you then master. I'm interested in your relationship to technology.
Starting point is 00:17:46 I mean, you're using state-of-the-art technology, you know, 70 millimeter for IMAX. At the same time, I've read that you don't have real like tech cell phone. I think you have like a flip phone maybe. And I think there's other like tech things like email maybe that you don't use. And so it strikes me as a kind of strange that you'd use such like state-of-the-art,
Starting point is 00:18:13 you know, cinematography, but, you know, reject things like a cell phone. At the same time, I know that there's like CGI. You don't like to use CGI because it looks fake to you. So like, where do you draw the line with technology? Technology is whatever the tools are available to us. So I shoot my films on celluloid film, preferably IMAX celluloid film, because it's the best analogy for the way the eye sees the world. So it gives you the highest possible quality. For me, it's about using the best tool for the job. So, for example, you know, sometimes I get asked
Starting point is 00:18:48 whether I still, you know, edit on film. And I've never edited on film. I've always edited on the computer because it's the only practical way to do it. But then when we finish the creative process of editing, we cut the film up, we cut the negative up, we glue it together, we print from there, and that's the finishing process. So for me, you know, the approach to technology is always
Starting point is 00:19:08 about how can it help you? How can it help you do something better? And I've always liked not having a smartphone in my pocket, because it just sort of means when you get those, those pockets of time, you know, when you turn up early for a meeting, you're waiting for somebody or whatever, you spend a bit more time thinking and and just you know i suppose using your imagination in a way and for me with the amount of work that i try to do and and figuring out what the next project is advancing different things in my mind having those pockets of time is actually pretty valuable i've also got terribly addictive personality and i think think if I had a smartphone, I'd spend the whole time just on it and, you know, absorbed in it the way I see a lot of people absorbed in it. So it's something I never started doing. And now it feels
Starting point is 00:19:56 a bit of a superpower that I don't have one. So I'm going to try and maintain my allegiance to the dumb phone or the flip phone. Thank you so much for coming back to our show. Sure. Thank you for having me. Christopher Nolan wrote and directed the film Oppenheimer, which is nominated for 13 Oscars and a Grammy for the score. The Grammys take place on Sunday. After we take a short break, my interview with Mark Ronson, the co-executive producer of the Barbie score and soundtrack.
Starting point is 00:20:27 I'm Tanya Mosley, and this is Fresh Air. If you've seen the most popular movie of last year, there's no denying it, you know this tune. Cause I'm just kin, anywhere else I be a ten. Is it my destiny to live and die a life of blood, fertility? The song I'm Just Kin from the movie Barbie is up this year for a Grammy Award and an Oscar. It's written by Mark Ronson, who is the co-executive producer of the score and soundtrack for the fantasy comedy film, which follows Kin and Barbie as they leave Barbie Land and enter the real world. It was directed by Greta Gerwig and co-written by Gerwig and Noah Baumbach. Barbie is nominated for eight Academy Awards, including Best Picture, Supporting Actor and
Starting point is 00:21:35 Actress, Adapted Screenplay, Production Design, Costume Design, and twice for original songs, I'm Just Ken and What Was I Made For? Barbie is also nominated for 11 Grammys, including for Record of the Year and Song of the Year, as well as Best Song and Best Score Soundtrack. Mark Ronson, who is an Oscar-winning music producer, was tapped by Greta Gerwig to produce the soundtrack. He's known for his work as a DJ and record producer and songwriter, creating party hits, pop songs, and soulful arrangements for stars like Amy Winehouse, Lady Gaga, Adele, and Bruno Mars. But believe it or not, even with all of his credentials, Ronson lost a lot of sleep over Gerwig's request. Even before Barbie came out, critics were forecasting that it was destined to be one of the highest-grossing films to date. It was also the first time Ronson had created a soundtrack of this scope and size.
Starting point is 00:22:31 What followed was a year of conceptualizing, producing, and composing songs for the album with artists like Nicki Minaj, Sam Smith, Billie Eilish, Dua Lipa, and Pink Pantheress. Ronson is the co-executive producer of Barbie the I'm Just Ken, sung by Ryan Gosling, who plays Ken. Let's listen. Doesn't seem to matter what I do I'm always number two No one knows how hard I tried Oh, I have feelings that I can't explain Driving me insane All my life been so polite
Starting point is 00:23:27 But I'll sleep alone tonight Cause I'm just kin Anywhere else I be a ten Is it my destiny to live and die A life of blunt fragility I'm just kin That was I'm Just Kin from the Barbie Movie soundtrack. Mark, you wrote these lyrics, but you're not usually a lyrics guy, right? I'm not.
Starting point is 00:23:55 You know, when you're working with different artists as a producer, your job is always just to fill any hole that's needed. But I work with a lot of brilliant lyricists, people like Amy Winehouse, obviously, or Adele and Lady Gaga. And sometimes you're just there to provide the music, to bounce ideas, to be an editor, just to do the arrangements sometimes. But I love coming up with a lyric
Starting point is 00:24:16 or helping someone when they're like a little block to fill a hole here and there. But that's not really the thing that I start with. But I was so inspired by this script and Greta and her vision. I love the whole message of it. I love the whole idea of it. Obviously, Barbie's story is so wonderful. And then Ken's story that's going on on the side about this guy.
Starting point is 00:24:40 And maybe it was because I knew Ryan Gosling was playing it, so I had the advantage of picturing him saying every line as I'm reading this script, but he just got his hooks in me, that character, you know, and, and, uh, he's dopey, but you root for him. And, you know, all he wants is just for this person to feel the same way about him that he feels about her. And it's never going to happen so um i i just i had this line i think i was walking to the studio one day my studio in in manhattan and i just i'm just can anywhere else i'd be a 10 it just came to me and i was like that's kind of sounds like something to
Starting point is 00:25:19 start a chorus from you know i wasn't even thinking at that point, I'm going to write this song by myself or, or, or write the lyrics. And I got to the piano and I just was working. I found the chords in a melody that I, that I thought was good. That all you can ever tell is, is it, is it making you excited when you're in the studio, you know? And, and I sent off the demo to, to Greta and she just wrote back so enthusiastically. I agree with you about Ken's storyline in particular. It was a surprise for me. Of course, we know that Ken would be a part of the movie, but the richness and the layering of his character and this song in particular adds another dimension to it. When I was in the movie theater watching it and the line, blonde fragility came up,
Starting point is 00:26:06 it was like, oh, wait, these lyrics are actually kind of deep. And you came up with that lyric as well. Yeah. That's all I had when I was writing the chorus. It was, I'm just can't anywhere else I'd be of 10. And I kind of mumbled the rest and da, da, da, da, da. I think it was all my blonde fragility was the original lyric but i kind of mumbled that lyric as well because it was like maybe taking a bit too much license to like i just met greta noah i didn't want them to think like i'm trying to be provide the funny or the thing like you guys are the genius writers like let me just give you a song but she was like are
Starting point is 00:26:43 you mumbling is there something about blonde fragility? And, you know, of course, it was a nod to white fragility, the book, like everything. But it just felt right. And then we wrote the rest of the chorus, Andrew and I, together. Gosling definitely brought your lyrics to life. And I read that when you were in the studio with Brantley Cooper for the song Shallow for Stars Born, you warmed him up to sing with pop tunes. What did you do with Ryan Gosling in the studio? You know, it's awkward being with anyone in the studio for the very first time because it's a vulnerable place. And, you know, you're about to go on this, embark on this thing and you're feeling each other out. And as a producer, you're seeing what somebody's vocal range is and their limits,
Starting point is 00:27:28 and you always want to push them, but then not push too far because you're pushing somewhere, a place, a range they don't have. Then you can shatter their confidence. And then the whole session is like a wash. And then add to the fact that Ryan is a giant movie star, and he's coming in here, and he's like one hour off from shooting this giant film. And we came into the studio and we just talked for a little while and 15 minutes and we're like, okay, should we try this? And in the beginning, because Andrew sung on the demo and he has such an amazing range, I just thought, okay, let me make this a little bit easier for Ryan. We're going to lower it a key or two and just start there. And then as Ryan
Starting point is 00:28:09 just started to get warm up, I was like, okay, we could kind of bump this up another key. Oh, now we can bump it up. And now we're in the original key and he's just giving this wonderful vocal performance. And also because he's just such an incredible actor, he's imbuing all these words with even a different context and emotion than what Andrew and I had even been able to add to it. Because he is Ken, and he was almost acting out the song as he was singing in a way that was like, oh, I don't know if that's true, but it felt like he was inhabiting the song, which was really wonderful. And I could hear it in what was coming back through the speaker. Let's take a short break. If you're just joining us, I'm talking with Grammy Award winning music producer Mark Ronson.
Starting point is 00:28:55 He's the executive producer of the soundtrack for Barbie, the album. We'll continue our conversation after a short break. This is Fresh Air. This is Fresh Air, and today we're talking to Grammy Award-winning music producer Mark Ronson. His latest work is as executive producer of the soundtrack for Barbie, the summer hit directed by Greta Gerwig and written by Gerwig and Noah Baumbach. Ronson also composed the film Score with Andrew Wyatt. Okay, so when Greta Gerwig contacted you, you were basically like, I'm a huge fan. Of course, I'm on board, which kind of made me surprised when I read that it wasn't exactly a slam dunk that you'd get every artist you wanted for this soundtrack. You had to actually do some maneuvering, calling up friends and friends of friends? I think a lot of people
Starting point is 00:29:45 definitely just came to the table on the basis of Greta and the films that she's made before. And, you know, certainly in the case of Billie Eilish and Pink Pantheress, that was the case. Some people came because Barbie was important to them and figured in their lives. And that was people like Carol G. Then what we had to do was show everybody a piece of the film. And what we did was, you know, because this is still early on, Greta was still editing the film. We would show maybe 20 minutes of the film, just different scenes enough so people could get the sense of the film and the tone and the arc. And then Greta and I had spent time before deciding where we would love a Sam Smith song to go, where we would love a Pink Panther song to go, and get to show them specifically the scene.
Starting point is 00:30:30 And that's what's so great about a lot of the songs that people wrote, because they seem so bespoke the way that Charlie wrote Speed Drive for a chase scene through Mattel offices slash car chase. I think that what's great is that sometimes you listen to it and you're like, what came first, the songs or the film? It has this nice interwoven thing. Every artist took what they saw, took the conversation with Greta and just turned it into, you know, everyone ran with it and did something different. The song, What Was I Made For, sung by Billie Eilish, I think director Greta Gerwig calls it the glittery pink heart at the center of the film.
Starting point is 00:31:12 It really does get to the heart of Barbie's predicament, which is basically what happens when the world turns against you. Let's listen. I used to float Now I just fall down I used to know But I'm not sure now What I was made for What was I made for?
Starting point is 00:31:54 Taking a drive, I was an ideal Not so alive, turns out I'm not real Just something you paid for What was I made for? Cause I, I, I don't know how to feel But I wanna try I don't know how to feel That was What Was I Made For? written by Billy and Phineas Eilish. And it is such an important storytelling device in this movie, Mark.
Starting point is 00:32:54 What was your reaction when you first heard it? Greta and I, I think we got it at the same time, like a text thread or something. And I think we just immediately called each other like what is this song is just insane like what what is I was basically like what is wrong with these kids why are they so good they're so young like you know like this is you know especially when it got to that lyric like it's not what he's made for like about like the way that it sort of applies to the film and could be applied to many things i get you know and so we andrew and i had been working on a lot of pieces for the score for the more emotional moments
Starting point is 00:33:34 and some of them oddly enough weren't really that dissimilar to to what billy and phineas's song were so there were moments when we're like, let's take this song and make their song this thread that we weave through the film. And so we had been trying to come up with something for a while, some chords and some score, and we're like, let's just find a way to combine these two ideas and concepts, the Billy and Phineas song,
Starting point is 00:34:01 mixed with what we had already been doing. Can you briefly describe the differences between writing a song and creating a musical score? Because this was part of this project that was different and new for you. So different. And, you know, a lot of my instincts as a songwriter, when you're making a pop song, you're constantly thinking of hooks and melodies and air candy and secondary hooks and tertiary hooks and stuff like that. And really, score, sometimes, of course, you want to have memorable melodies and things, but you really also need to get out the way. You can't be a distraction. You're there to support the emotional undertow of the film at that moment, especially when there's dialogue or
Starting point is 00:34:42 an important scene going on. And I love know, I love film scores so much, like everything from the obvious John Williams and John Barry and Danny Elfman to, you know, the 80s scores, like Dave Grusin and stuff like that. Like, I love those soundtracks. I've always collected them. But we'd never done anything like that. I want to play a piece from the score.
Starting point is 00:35:04 It's called Mattel, which played every time there was a scene with executives at Mattel. Let's listen. Thank you. Man, I am a sucker for a good score. That was the song Mattel from Barbie, The Score. Mark, for those who haven't seen the movie, all of the Mattel executives are men, and it feels apt that the music harkens kind of to those green little army men that boys used to play with it's very military in its sound what was the process for finding that kind of layering that strengthens the storyline without maybe being too on the nose with it yeah I think we started off as you would say a little bit on the nose. And we had almost scored Mattel in this more like Death Star, Star Wars,
Starting point is 00:36:28 just the more obvious way that it would be to score sort of ominous. And then Noah had such a great idea. And he was like, can you give them sort of a little bit more of like this false nobility, but they're still kind of bumbling idiots. And so we thought of turning the string motif from the Dua Lipa song which is a motif that comes back and you know throughout the movie the the strings that go ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding like wow what if we put that on this marching band but it sounds a bit more like a high school
Starting point is 00:37:03 marching band or you know we're obviously always so college, university marching bands. Like I think it's Grambling State and all the ones and like Beyonce uses that stuff and Lose Yourself. And it's so impactful. And, you know, just me, because having my background as a hip hop DJ, you know, those kind of sounds and stuff, I'm always thinking, OK, we're doing a score, but I can't help it. Those influences are going to creep in. Before this opportunity, was it an aspiration for you to score a film? I'm sure it was. You know, I don't think it was something that I would have ever put my hand up and say, like, I'd like to score Barbie. You know, I think the way that it unfolded was so lucky. Listen, I mean, this is one of,
Starting point is 00:37:49 now one of the biggest films of all time. I don't know if anybody at the very top of this thing would have been like, yeah, let's just risk it all on some guys that have never scored a film before. I think that we sort of proved ourselves probably along the way enough. But I don't know if we'll score another film
Starting point is 00:38:03 because we were so spoiled. I mean, that's a crazy thing to say film because we're so spoiled. I mean, that's a crazy thing to say, but we were so inspired on this. Let's just say that. Yeah, yeah. You know, I mean, when I'm hearing you, I'm also hearing something else like it feels so good and exhilarating and maybe like life affirming to be kind of new at something again, like to use the skills you already have to like then do something even bigger and more expansive with other parts
Starting point is 00:38:31 that like you're contributing your part to. Oh, that's the best. I love that. Like if I ever felt like I was going to stop learning, that's the other thing. Like, you know, during the film, even as crazy as our schedule was i started taking piano lessons again i started taking music theory lessons again i was like i
Starting point is 00:38:49 want to be able to know exactly what the the orchestra notation is to these things i don't want to just be you know kind of coasting by on my ear like so yes and now i'm really gonna you know now i'm actually really going deep into like back to school. But I love that. I love being, A, the excitement of learning something new. B, the humbling of it. It's just, it's the best. Mark Ronson, I really enjoyed this conversation. Thank you so much for joining us.
Starting point is 00:39:18 Thank you. Thank you for having me. Thanks so much. Mark Ronson is co-executive producer of Barbie, the album, which he wrote and produced with Andrew Wyatt. Coming up, a review about the new FX series, Feud, about Truman Capote and the socialite women he both befriended and betrayed. This is Fresh Air. In 2017, the FX network presented the first edition of Ryan Murphy's Feud, an anthology series dramatizing infamous real-life conflicts. The first edition was about the intense rivalry between Hollywood stars Betty Davis and Joan Crawford. Now seven years later, the second installment of Feud has finally arrived. It's called Capote vs. the Swans, and it's an eight-part drama about Truman Capote and the high society women he socialized with and sometimes cruelly wrote about.
Starting point is 00:40:11 Our TV critic David Bianculli has this review. FX is promoting feud Capote vs. the Swans as the original Real Housewives, but it's a lot deeper than that and infinitely more watchable. Based on the book Capote's Women by Lawrence Leamer, this eight-part series tells of Truman Capote's friendships with and betrayals of New York's most prominent society women, the ladies who lunch. John Robert Bates, who created the ABC series Brothers and Sisters, developed and wrote this edition of Feud for television, and Gus Van Sant directed most episodes, with others directed by Jennifer Lynch and Max Winkler. However, it's the names in front of the camera, not behind, who demand most of the attention here. Tom Hollander, from the most recent season of The White Lotus, plays Capote,
Starting point is 00:41:05 and captures him so that Capote is a character, not a caricature. And the women playing the swans all get their turns to shine in a cast list that's almost laughably talented and lengthy. Naomi Watts plays Babe Paley, the wife of CBS chairman Bill Paley. Calista Flockhart plays Lee Radziwill, the sister of Jackie Kennedy. Other socialites are played, rivetingly well, by Diane Lane, Chloe Sevigny, Demi Moore, and Molly Ringwald. Treat Williams, who died last year, is featured in his final role as Bill Paley. Even Jessica Lange, who starred as Joan Crawford in the previous Feud series and helped jumpstart Ryan Murphy's TV empire by starring in the first few outings of his earliest anthology series, American Horror Story, is here. She makes a few guest appearances playing Truman's late mother,
Starting point is 00:41:57 and she's haunting in more ways than one. Feud Capote vs. the Swans jumps around in time, showing the characters before and after Esquire magazine published a chapter of Capote's in-progress book in 1975. It was a thinly-veiled expose of the preening, privileged women he called the Swans, and it hurt them deeply. But drama and pain were not new to most of these women. In the scene where we first meet Naomi Watts as Babe Paley, she's venting to her best friend Truman, played by Tom Hollander,
Starting point is 00:42:32 about her husband's recently discovered philandering. What is it? What did he do? I told him I was coming. I gave him just enough warning. I found out Bill was still having his grotesque little affair with Happy Rockefeller. He was still? Now, in our home. Go back. We're talking the governor's wildebeest wife here
Starting point is 00:42:58 that was still going on? I thought that was a one-time affair. So did I. The first feud miniseries veered at times into camp, but Capote versus the Swans takes its story more seriously. It's got the loving details of a Downton Abbey or an upstairs downstairs. Lots of lingering shots of the food and the fashion and the jewels. But this drama is almost exclusively upstairs. And Bates and Van Sant, in particular, frame things beautifully. Capote's famous Black and White Masquerade Ball in 1966 is the subject of the entire third episode,
Starting point is 00:43:35 and it's shot almost completely in black and white. That's because the Maisels brothers were filming a documentary about Capote that same year, which allows Feud to adopt that perspective to interview some of the Swans about their literary acquaintance. Here's Calista Flockhart in a fabulous solo scene as Lee Radziwill, getting made up for her appearance at the Black and White Ball. We have a man, a celebrated little man, trying to outdo himself in a ballet called Dance of the Seven Trumans, wherein he spins himself into butter for having made so many declarations to so many friends. Best friends.
Starting point is 00:44:21 Oh, you're my best friend in the world, of course. Of course you're the guest of honor, babe. I mean, Slim. I mean, Lee. I mean... Et cetera. And here, in another wonderful scene, is Demi Moore as Anne Woodward. She's been slandered by Truman and crashes his masquerade ball, but is thrown out by the author himself. As she's escorted away, she confronts him memorably.
Starting point is 00:44:51 What you're doing to us is so low, so poisonous. One day you will know what this poison tastes like. And remember, the only unforgivable sin is deliberate cruelty. You wrote that, didn't you? Well this is that. This is that. Well, one did write that. At least we know she was paying attention.
Starting point is 00:45:33 Capote vs. the Swans deserves our attention, too. It's a good drama, a compelling story with a powerhouse cast, and in this new installment of Feud, they all do some very powerful work. David Bianculli is professor of television studies at Rowan University in New Jersey. He reviewed FX's feud, Capote vs. the Swans. On Monday's show, award-winning journalist Michelle Norris joins us to talk about her new book, Our Hidden Conversations, What Americans Really Think About Race and Identity. In it, she shares conversations she's collected over the last 14 years from more than 500,000 entries, people from around the world who shared with her their
Starting point is 00:46:12 most honest, intimate, and revealing thoughts about race and identity. I hope you can join us. Fresh Air's executive producer is Danny Miller. Our technical director and engineer is Audrey Bentham, with additional engineering support from Joyce Lieberman, Julian Herzfeld, and Diana Martinez. For Terry Gross, I'm Tanya Mosley.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.