Futility Closet - 255-Death on the Ice
Episode Date: July 1, 2019In 1914, 132 sealers found themselves stranded on a North Atlantic icefield as a bitter blizzard approached. Thinly dressed and with little food, they faced a harrowing night on the ice. In this week...'s episode of the Futility Closet podcast we'll tell the story of the Newfoundland sealing disaster, one of the most dramatic chapters in Canadian maritime history. We'll also meet another battlefield dog and puzzle over a rejected necklace. Intro: England has seen some curious cricket matches. In 1940 two Australian planes collided in midair and landed as one. Above: Crewmembers carry bodies aboard the Bellaventure. Sources for our feature on the 1914 sealing disaster: Cassie Brown, Death on the Ice: The Great Newfoundland Sealing Disaster of 1914, 2015. Melvin Baker, "The Struggle for Influence and Power: William Coaker, Abram Kean, and the Newfoundland Sealing Industry, 1908–1915," Newfoundland and Labrador Studies 28:1 (2013). Willeen Keough, "(Re-) Telling Newfoundland Sealing Masculinity: Narrative and Counter-Narrative," Journal of the Canadian Historical Association/Revue de la Société historique du Canada 21:1 (2010), 131-150. R.M. Kennedy, "National Dreams and Inconsolable Losses: The Burden of Melancholia in Newfoundland Culture," in Despite This Loss: Essays on Culture, Memory, and Identity in Newfoundland and Labrador, 2010, 103-116. Kjell-G. Kjær, "Where Have All the Barque Rigged Sealers Gone?", Polar Record 44:3 (July 2008), 265-275. Helen Peters, "Shannon Ryan, The Ice Hunters: A History of Newfoundland Sealing to 1914, Newfoundland History Series 8 [review]," Newfoundland and Labrador Studies 12:1 (1996). Raymond Blake, "Sean Cadigan, Death on Two Fronts: National Tragedies and the Fate of Democracy in Newfoundland, 1914–34 [review]," Newfoundland and Labrador Studies 30:1 (2015). Michael Harrington and Barbara Moon, "Tragedy on Ice: One of the Most Dramatic Disasters in Canadian History Occurred on the Newfoundland Ice Floes in 1914," Maclean's 113:48 (Nov. 27, 2000), 76. "Disaster on the Ice," [Winnipeg] Beaver 89:3 (June/July 2009), 22-23. Guy Ray, "Seal Wars," Canadian Geographic 120:2 (January/February 2000), 36-48. Jenny Higgins, "1914 Sealing Disaster," The [Newfoundland and Labrador] Independent, April 1, 2011. Sue Bailey, "Newfoundland Marks 1914 Sealing Disaster With Father and Son's Frozen Embrace," Guelph Mercury, March 30, 2014. "Frozen Embrace to Mark 1914 Tragedy at Sea," Prince George [B.C.] Citizen, March 31, 2014, A.13. "The 1914 Sealing Disaster: 100 Years Later," CBC News, March 30, 2014. Francine Kopun, "Gale of 1914 Proved Deadly," Toronto Star, April 24, 2007, A8. Tim B. Rogers, "The Sinking of the Southern Cross," [Winnipeg] Beaver 89:3 (June/July 2009), 16-22. Alison Auld and Michael MacDonald, "Questions Raised About Coast Guard's Actions in Fatal Sealing Accident," Canadian Press, March 29, 2008. Joanna Dawson, "Newfoundland's 1914 Sealing Disaster," Canada's History, March 31, 2014. Sean T. Cadigan, "Tuff, George," Dictionary of Canadian Biography (accessed June 16, 2019). "The 1914 Sealing Disaster," Newfoundland and Labrador Heritage (accessed June 16, 2019). Wes Kean and the S.S. Newfoundland. Listener mail: Wikipedia, "Rin Tin Tin" (accessed June 19, 2019). Michael Schaub, "'Rin Tin Tin': The Dog Who Never Died," National Public Radio, Sept. 29, 2011. Linda Holmes, "Rin Tin Tin: From Battlefield to Hollywood, a Story of Friendship," Weekend Edition Saturday, National Public Radio, Sept. 24, 2011. John Banville, "Rin Tin Tin: The Life and the Legend by Susan Orlean – review," Guardian, Feb. 2, 2012. Wikipedia, "The Lighthouse by the Sea" (accessed June 21, 2019). Wikipedia, "Political Colour" (accessed June 17, 2019). "Why Is the Conservative Party Blue?" BBC News, April 20, 2006. Wikipedia, "Red States and Blue States" (accessed June 22, 2019). Stephen Battaglio, "When Red Meant Democratic and Blue Was Republican," Los Angeles Times, Nov. 3, 2016. Ruaridh Arrow, "Gene Sharp: Author of the Nonviolent Revolution Rulebook," BBC News, Feb. 21, 2011. "Commentary: Braille Restaurant Menus Are Still Hard to Find," Chicago Lighthouse (accessed June 22, 2019). Sophie Meixner and Tara Cassidy, "Braille on the Menu to Accommodate Blind and Vision Impaired Patrons," ABC News, June 1, 2018. Josh Haskell and Armando Barragan, "Blind Monrovia Student Creates Braille Menus for Local Restaurants," KABC-TV Los Angeles, May 11, 2019. This week's lateral thinking puzzle was contributed by listeners Jeff and Emmett Moxon. You can listen using the player above, download this episode directly, or subscribe on Google Podcasts, on Apple Podcasts, or via the RSS feed at https://futilitycloset.libsyn.com/rss. Please consider becoming a patron of Futility Closet -- you can choose the amount you want to pledge, and we've set up some rewards to help thank you for your support. You can also make a one-time donation on the Support Us page of the Futility Closet website. Many thanks to Doug Ross for the music in this episode. If you have any questions or comments you can reach us at podcast@futilitycloset.com. Thanks for listening!
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome to the Futility Closet podcast, forgotten stories from the pages of history.
Visit us online to sample more than 10,000 quirky curiosities from eccentric cricket
to a piggyback landing.
This is episode 255.
I'm Greg Ross.
And I'm Sharon Ross. In 1914, 132 sealers
found themselves stranded on a North Atlantic ice field as a bitter blizzard approached.
Thinly dressed and with little food, they faced a harrowing night on the ice. In today's show,
we'll tell the story of the Newfoundland ceiling disaster, one of the most dramatic chapters in
Canadian maritime history. We'll also meet another battlefield dog and puzzle over a rejected necklace.
In telling the story of Howard Blackburn, the fisherman caught in a blizzard in episode 209,
I mentioned that the Grand Banks of Newfoundland were some of
the richest fishing grounds in the world. But the early settlers in that area quickly discovered
another resource, harp seals, which produced hundreds of thousands of pups on the ice north
and east of the island each February. Seal meat was rich food, the hides made excellent leather
for boots and clothing, and the fat made good soap and lamp fuel, so a new industry was born.
For more than a century, the seal hunt was an annual adventure for the men and boys of that
region. By the 1850s, they were collecting more than half a million pelts a year in a season
measured in weeks. But it was a treacherous business. Ships had to enter an ice field that
was shifting constantly and find their way through the pack without being crushed and sunk. Over the
years, more than a thousand men lost their lives on sinking ships and on foot,
trying to traverse the shifting ice pans to reach their prey.
Economically, the hunt quickly produced a society of haves and have-nots.
The shipowners grew rich while refusing to provide clothing or safety equipment to the workers.
The typical sealer got $30 to $40 for six or seven weeks of very hard physical work,
with little sleep or food, and constant cold and danger. The men lived atop mounting piles of
pelts and fat until even their drinking water was fouled with blood, and those who were injured had
to recover on their own or die without care. On March 19, 1914, the SSS in Newfoundland made her
way out of St. John's Harbor, captained by 29-year-old
Wes Keene. The ship was 42 years old, underpowered, and too long and narrow to maneuver safely in the
ice fields. And as he picked up the rest of his crew, Keene found that the old hands were pessimistic.
That winter was already being called the winter of storms, and there were regular reports of ships
lost at sea or missing with all hands. But the younger men still hoped for a good catch.
The seal population was dwindling,
but a lucky crew could still kill and skin 5,000 or 6,000 seals a day.
The Newfoundland headed to the sealing grounds with a group of other ships,
including the Florizel, skippered by West Keene's elder brother Joe,
and the Stefano, under their father, Abram Keene,
the imperious commodore of the sealing fleet,
a strict taskmaster and the only ice skipper ever to bring home a million seals.
The younger ships quickly passed the Newfoundland, and by March 20th, they were quickly into the seals.
They had no way to communicate with the Newfoundland when she was out of sight.
Unlike the other ships, she had no wireless set.
The owners had removed it to save money.
Ten days passed before she reappeared. She'd been
jammed in the ice and had managed to collect only a few hundred pelts. The brief season was already
nearly over. Only a few days remained before the young seals would start to head for the water and
swim for the Arctic. Laboriously, the ship managed to work its way far enough north to spot the ships
skippered by Wes Keane's father and brother, who had found the main population of seals on the sheet ice west of the Arctic flows. But now the Newfoundland was jammed
again in the ice, too far away to participate. On March 31st, the Newfoundland was still stuck
five or six miles southeast of the other ships, so Wes Keane decided to send his men walking across
the ice to his father's ship, the Stefano. They'd arrived too late to walk back again, so they'd have to spend the night aboard the Stefano and the Florizel, but he was sure those
ships would accept them. The second hand, George Tuff, volunteered to lead the men across the ice.
The walk would be warm, so some of the men left behind their heavy jackets, and Tuff brought no
compass since he didn't expect to need one. By 10 a.m., the sealers were making their way,
single file, toward the Stefano. The ice was the worst Tuff had seen in 18 years, and as they observed the signs, the men grew increasingly concerned about the weather.
When they'd walked about four miles, someone suggested going back to the Newfoundland,
and after some discussion, 34 men in the back turned and headed back to the ship.
The rest went on, since they were now nearer to the Stefano than to their own ship,
though they felt increasing misgivings about the worsening weather. They were right to worry. A blizzard was now attacking Cape
Breton and the entire south coast of Newfoundland. By the time Abram Keene took the men aboard the
Stefano at 1120, the first flakes of snow were beginning to fall. The Stefano now steamed
southwest, heading for a patch of seals. Abram Keene told the Newfoundland's men that he'd put
them back on the ice after their lunch. They wouldn't be staying on his ship as they'd expected.
But Keene told Tuff that he'd put them down two miles closer to the Newfoundland than he'd pick
them up, so they could kill 14 or 1500 seals and get back to their own ship before nightfall.
This was a grave miscalculation. The men had walked six to seven miles before he'd pick them up,
not four to five as he thought. And in the thickening snow, Keene's crew confused the flags they were seeing. Keene
was taking the Newfoundland's men a mile farther west than he believed. The upshot was that he put
down the Newfoundland's men in a worsening blizzard much farther from their ship than he realized.
But he was in a hurry to collect his own men, who were five or six miles to the northwest,
and no one dared to question him.
He headed off north at 1150 a.m.
These 132 men had expected to spend the night on the Stefano,
and now they found themselves alone on the ice in a worsening storm.
They were angry at George Tuff, who now insisted they kill seals before they returned to the Newfoundland.
The men insisted there was no time for this,
but Tuff said it had been Abram Keane's order and he was unwilling to countermand it. They found a few seals, but not many, and finally Tuff agreed that they should make for the Newfoundland. They couldn't see the ship directly, but started walking southeast
by east, which they thought was the right direction. They guessed it should take about six hours to
reach the ship. At 1245 p.m., the snow was beginning to drift and the ice flows were tilting on a heavy
swell when a savage blizzard struck suddenly out of the southeast. They could hear the Stefano's whistle guiding
her own men aboard, but their best hope now was to reach their own ship. At 2.30pm, they found
their outbound path from the morning. Now they just had to follow that south to the ship. As
visibility dropped, the Stefano and the Florizel picked up their remaining men, leaving only the
Newfoundland's party on the ice. Those men thought they were in fine shape. Their ship was only a mile away, the path was
well marked, and they had three and a half hours of daylight remaining. But after only a few hundred
yards, they spotted something that stopped them cold. It was a crimson flag bearing the number
198. The Stefano had left it there. They'd passed it on the way out after marching four hours from
their ship. They were dog-tired way out after marching four hours from their ship.
They were dog-tired, and they were trying to make their way over some of the worst ice in the world.
They had already walked two hours to get to this point, and now it was clear that their ship was four times farther away than they'd realized. The author Cassie Brown, who's written an excellent
book about all this, says the men could have chosen to stay where they were, but apparently
no one thought of it. They could have burned the pelts they had, eaten nearby seal carcasses, and built a shelter of ice
and snow. Instead, they started for the Newfoundland, though they knew it would be dark before they
reached her. That was a mistake. The snow was too wet to drift, but it was knee-deep and exhausting
to walk through. The daylight was fading quickly, and the bad weather would bring dark an hour early.
At the heart of this developing tragedy is the fact that the Newfoundland didn't have a wireless set. Wes Keane was sure that his
men were on the Stefano. Through his glass, he'd seen them climb aboard that morning, and he knew
his father wouldn't put them off in weather like this. Abram Keane was sure that they'd reached
the Newfoundland, since he thought it was close by. So each captain thought the crew was safely
aboard the other's ship, and with no way to communicate, they had no way to realize their mistake.
It was normal practice for a ship to blow its whistle regularly in a storm,
but the Newfoundland wasn't doing this because Wes Keane believed all his men were safely aboard his father's ship.
He gave one man permission to give the whistle a blow or two, and that man blew it twice and no more.
Here, as on the Stefano, the men were unwilling to question their orders.
Outside, the dusk was falling, and the Newfoundland men struggled south. The snow made it hard to see,
and eventually they lost all trace of the path. Either they had wandered astray, or it had been
obliterated by the snow. They shouted for the ship, but got no response. Facing a night on the ice now,
they broke into three groups to avoid sinking an ice pan by overcrowding it, and set to work
building shelters. These were really just walls of ice to block the effects of the wind, but that
might equal 30 or 40 degrees of temperature Fahrenheit, which could mean the difference
between life and death. Most of them were too exhausted to do it properly, so two of the
shelters were rather inadequate, but master watch Arthur Mooland drove his men to build a proper
wall 30 feet long and turned in at the ends to guard against the wind's shifting. Each group set some equipment ablaze to keep warm and ate what
food it had left. They were now in a full-scale blizzard. The walls of ice gave the men only
partial shelter, and their fires gradually went out as they ran out of fuel. Near midnight, the snow
turned to a torrential rain, which kept up for more than an hour, and then icy air rushed in
from the north. The wind picked up, and the up for more than an hour, and then icy air rushed in from the north.
The wind picked up, and the temperature fell to 16 above zero, freezing the rain into sleet.
With the windchill factor, the temperature was now 20 below zero. The men were wet through,
and soon ice covered their clothing, eyebrows, lashes, and stubble. Some men wore ice to the
roots of their hair, but they couldn't remove it because their mittens, too, were frozen lumps.
A sealer named Jesse Collins went from man to man biting off the ice and froze his lips in doing so.
But he got the men to mind fishing and marching on parade to keep them moving. They said prayers
and sang hymns. But the wind shifted to north by west, making their feeble shelters useless.
At some point, the snow stopped, but the wind continued at gale force, and the drifting snow
was as blinding as the blizzard had been. By dawn, the pans were littered with dead men, including Edward Tippett,
his arms frozen around the bodies of his two sons. On the Stefano that morning, the men were
increasingly angry at Abram Keene, but fear of him still kept them from confronting him.
From the Newfoundland, where the snow had drifted to 15 feet, Wes Keene could catch
glimpses of the Stefano, and he made plans to
pick up his men there when the ice had loosened a bit. On the ice, the sealers stayed where they
were. The wind would kill them now if they set out looking for their ships. They had gone now
more than 24 hours without food and were kept alive by the thought that the whole fleet must
now be searching for them. As they circled the pans, hopelessly seeking better shelter, though,
some fell through, wetting their feet and legs. They were pulled out by those who were able, but in many cases, shock quickly killed them.
Others simply collapsed of exhaustion, and if they couldn't be bullied to their feet, they died.
Most of the men on Thomas Dawson's ice pan were dead. Dawson himself had broken the trail the day
before and had now fallen through the ice three times. Utterly exhausted, he insisted on lying
down on the ice to sleep. That left only two, he insisted on lying down on the ice to sleep.
That left only two living men standing on the pan, which was so thick with bodies that they
couldn't find room to walk. They were shifting the bodies to clear a path when one of the two
collapsed and died, but the other, John Howlett, somehow found the strength to keep rising.
He'd now been without sleep for more than 48 hours. The snow squalls stopped, but the drifting
continued. The men's faces were now blistered and
purple with frostburn, and the drifts were waist-deep in places, making it hard to keep
moving. They cut clothing from the dead to keep themselves warm. On Masterwatch Arthur Mullen's
pan, only two men had died. As more came to him, he set them to work building another shelter.
It kept them busy, and if the wind didn't abate, then another night on the ice wasn't impossible.
By mid-afternoon, the wind had slackened somewhat and the sun came out, but the wind chill was still
minus 20, and the events of the closing day became an unfolding nightmare. George Tuff climbed an ice
pinnacle and spotted a ship a couple of miles to the northwest, the Bella Venture. But just when
his men had moved within a quarter mile, the ship turned around and headed north. It had put down
some sealers on the opposite side, but no one ever looked in their direction.
Tuff realized this meant no one was even looking for them.
Several men abandoned hope and died within minutes of learning this.
The nightmare went on.
Tuff saw the Stefano approach, then steam away.
The Newfoundland II was in sight, but she was four miles away and apparently trapped in the ice.
Twelve sealers headed for her in three separate groups.
Tuff's party had covered half the distance
when the Newfoundland broke free and steamed away from them.
Three ships in one afternoon had tempted them with rescue
and then abandoned them.
They'd had no rest for two days,
and now they faced another night on the ice
under the cruel northwest wind.
All day the windchill factor had been minus 20,
and with the loss of the sun it dropped to minus 30.
The second night was an indescribable hell.
They saw visions and heard voices.
Some sank into despair.
Others began to rave.
Northward, they could see the lights of the ships twinkling obliviously.
Nine men set out to reach them, and all of them froze to death.
Others died sitting, standing, singing, and walking.
Tom Dawson, who had somehow survived lying down to sleep on the
first night, did it again on the second. John Howlett piled dead bodies around him to keep
off the wind. At last the sun came up. In the log of the Newfoundland, Wes Keane reported for the
first time some doubts about the safety of his men. He tried again to reach the Stefano, but his
ship was trapped again in the ice. On the ice, Arthur Mooland could see the Belaventure, the Stefano, the Florizel, and the Newfoundland. He suggested to George Tuff that
they try to reach the Newfoundland before she got free. They had struggled to within two miles of
her when Tuff finally gave out. He was ice blind and could barely see, and he'd wet his feet several
times during the night. As the men tended to him, Moulin looked again toward the Newfoundland. He
could see the ship, but maddeningly, the men on it were looking toward the Stefano, not in his direction. But then, for no very clear
reason, Wes Keane swung his glass around the ice field, spotted Mooland and his men, and realized
to his horror that his sealers had spent two days and nights on the ice. He leapt up to send a
distress signal to the other ships, but he had no flares or wireless set. The international distress
signal was a black ball hoisted above his ensign, so in desperation he raised a bucket of coal above a
flag. To his relief, the other ships recognized the signal and sent word around by wireless,
and together they finally sent men out to the survivors with blankets and food.
Even during the rescue, the tragedy continued. Some of the survivors were so weak that they
died even as they were being fed. One of them, in a delirium, turned and ran from his rescuers.
When men from the Bellaventure approached Alfred Maidment and asked his name,
the effort of answering killed him, and he dropped back dead.
Tom Dawson, amazingly, was alive.
Still buried under bodies, he dreamed of the daughter of his friend Abram Parsons,
secondhand of the Bellaventure.
She told him,
Cheer up, Tom, Papa is coming.
And he woke in
time to see her father walk up. And Arthur Mooland walked back to the Newfoundland, climbed the side
of the ship unaided, passed into the cabin, ate a light meal, went to his bunk, asked to be roused
in three hours with another meal, and went to sleep. When Abram and Wes Keene finally met,
anything that was said between them was said in private. Newfoundland's total crew had been 189 men.
They found 69 bodies and 112 answered roll call.
That left eight men missing.
They had probably fallen into the water.
The crew practically mutinied against Abram Keene, whom everyone blamed.
He insisted he had put down the Newfoundland's crew only four miles from their own ship.
In truth, it was closer to eight.
He had stopped sounding his own whistle at 8 p.m. the first night and had told his son Joe he was sure the Newfoundland's crew
were safely aboard their own ship. The news of the disaster reached St. John's by telegraph on
the evening of April 2nd and spread quickly across the island. Hundreds of people lined the waterfront
two days later as the Bella Ventura steamed through the narrows with corpses on its deck.
A reporter with the Evening Telegram wrote, the vision sent a shudder through the narrows with corpses on its deck. A reporter with the Evening Telegram wrote,
The vision sent a shudder through the crowd.
The bodies had been laid there just as they were brought in from the ice,
many of them with limbs contracted and drawn up in postures which the cold had brought about.
In an inquiry held in 1915, no one was held legally responsible for the tragedy,
but Wess and Abram Keene were found guilty of errors in judgment,
as was George Tuff, the officer in charge of the sealers on the ice. A commission recommended that all ships thereafter carry wireless sets, barometers, and thermometers, and in 1916 the government prohibited sealers from
being on the ice after dark. Alec Harvey, representing the Newfoundland's owners,
admitted that the ship's wireless set had been removed because it wasn't giving returns for the
money invested. Asked whether he thought of it as a safety device, he said,
the safety of the crew was not thought of at all.
Futility Closet is supported entirely by our incredible listeners. We always appreciate all the different ways that many of our listeners help the show. Thank you. Patreon also gives us a good way to share some extras with our show's supporters, like outtakes, peeks behind the scenes, extra information on some of the stories,
and updates on Sasha, our slightly spoiled feline mascot.
You can learn more about our Patreon campaign at patreon.com slash futilitycloset,
or see the support us section of our website for the link.
And thanks so much to everyone who helps
make Futility Closet possible. John Levine wrote, Dear Sasha and assistants, the story in number 248
about Smokey the dog found in a foxhole in New Guinea reminded me of another war dog story.
dog found in a foxhole in New Guinea reminded me of another war dog story. In September 1918,
near the end of World War I, American soldier Lee Duncan was sent to inspect the ruins of a German encampment near Verdun in northeastern France. He found a German shepherd and her litter of very
young puppies and somehow managed to bring them all back to the U.S. base. At the time, few Americans
had ever seen a German Shepherd,
although they were familiar in Germany,
and the adult was a working dog,
carrying messages for the Germans.
Duncan kept two of the puppies,
which he named after some popular French dolls.
He brought them back to the U.S. and home to California,
where one of them had a long movie career.
You've probably heard of him.
The toy after which he was named was called Rin Tin Tin.
I've always wondered where that came from. It's such an unusual name.
Yeah, there were two dolls, Rin Tin Tin and Nanette, and he named his two puppies after them.
So Rin Tin Tin, who would go on to become a world-famous Hollywood star,
was found by Lee Duncan in a mostly destroyed dog kennel,
one of just a small number of canine survivors of American shelling,
and was brought back to base and housed with his little family in an empty oil barrel.
Duncan was a shy and solitary man who had spent five years in an orphanage as a child
when his mother couldn't care for him,
but he always had a deep emotional connection with dogs
and apparently an unusual ability to train them.
Rinty, as Duncan nicknamed him, besides being very trainable, also had an unusually expressive face.
For example, in the 1925 film The Clash of the Wolves, he has to convey that he believes he's
leaving his pack to die, and from what I read, he really sells it. Starting his career in the era
of silent movies, so where nobody was speaking,
Rin Tin Tin was seen as being the equal of any of the other actors. He appeared in 27 films where
he received his own salary, separate from Duncan's as his trainer, and he actually earned more than
most of his human co-stars. For example, in the 1924 film Lighthouse by the Sea, Rinty earned $1,000 a week, while the lead human actor,
William Collier Jr., was paid $150 a week. And incidentally, when I was looking up this film,
I learned that Anne Frank had watched it from a rented reel with her friends for her 13th birthday
as she was a big fan of Rin Tin Tin. Now that we're talking about it, I don't know that I've
ever actually seen a film. I know the name and there's all these stories about it. I don't know if I've ever actually
seen a movie. No, I don't think I have either. But Rintonton was really enormously popular in
his time. At the first Academy Awards in 1929, only a last minute rule change prevented him
from winning the award for best actor after he received the most votes. When he died in 1932, there were breaking
news bulletins, and the next day, an hour-long program about him was broadcast across the U.S.
Newspapers around the country carried obituaries, magazines wrote articles about his life,
and a special news feature on him was shown to movie audiences. By this time, Duncan had already
been training some of Rinty's descendants, and there were different versions of Rin Tin Tin in film, radio, and then television for many years.
But Duncan was very affected by his beloved pet's death and wrote a poem to him that ended with,
A real unselfish love like yours, old pal, is something I shall never know again, and I must always be a better man because you loved me greatly, Rin Tin Tin.
Susan Orlean published a book in 2011 about Rin Tin Tin, and The Guardian reports that she asked
Duncan's daughter Carolyn if she had ever felt any sibling rivalry with her father's dogs.
Carolyn laughed and said, no, there was never any rivalry. The dogs came first.
That sounds bitter. No, there was never any rivalry. The dogs came first.
That sounds bitter.
John also addressed in his email Greg's comments in episode 248 with regards to red versus blue,
about how in the U.S. those colors are associated with particular political parties.
John said, oddly, the U.S. has the colors opposite from everyone else. In the UK,
the conservatives are blue, labor is red. In Canada, the conservatives are also blue,
the liberals are red, and the New Democratic Party, which is to the left of the liberals,
is orange. In Australia, the Liberal Party, which is liberal in the classical sense of unregulated markets and is quite right-wing, is blue, labor is red. You get the idea. The Green
Party is always green, of course. Similarly, Claire Hennessy wrote, Good day, Sharon, Greg,
and Sasha. I just finished listening to episode 248 and thought I would drop you a line about
your comments about red states and blue states. We in Australia have our federal election this
weekend, so your comments reminded me that the United States is one of only a few countries
that refers to conservative states as red and more liberal-leaning states as blue. This is an interesting link about colorism. bizarre from an Australian perspective to see your Republican Party represented by red as this is
traditionally the color of the labor movement and workers' rights. Here is an interesting link about
colors and political associations around the world. Keep up the good work. And Claire sent a link to a
quite extensive Wikipedia article on political colors. I hadn't realized that many colors are
associated with particular political ideologies or parties, and many countries use
some kind of color scheme, such as the U.S.'s red and blue. This can get rather more colorful in
countries that have several parties, as each has its own associated color. As John and Claire noted,
red usually symbolizes left-wing ideologies and has traditionally been associated with socialism
and communism, dating back to the use of a red flag in the French Revolution of 1848. Nowadays, the association of red with more radical ideologies
has actually led some more moderate or center-left parties to adopt pink instead of red. In the UK,
the Conservative Party's colors were historically red, white, and blue, but after the Labour Party
started using red, the Conserv conservatives moved to using blue alone,
and this seems to have spread to other countries.
So yeah, the U.S. has it backward for most of the rest of the world.
That must be confusing because U.S. politics are sort of, you know,
they affect other countries more than the reverse.
So even if you remember to make the reversal, you still have to.
So it's like Claire said, you always have to think about it backwards when you look at a map.
On this topic, Tucker Drake wrote,
hello, Sasha's servants. So we've gone from being assistants to servants in one episode. That's a new love. By now, you've probably gotten a dozen emails on why certain colors
are associated with American political parties. On the off chance that you haven't, allow me to
link you to the Wikipedia article on the subject. Basically, it boils down to random chance in the 2000 election.
Many networks alternated between using red and blue for a particular party,
with some years Republicans being blue, Democrats red.
Then in the next election cycle, the colors were swapped.
Until that is the very contentious year of 2000,
when it took longer than usual to sort out who was going to be America's next president.
After that, the colors assigned to the parties in 2000 just kind of stuck, and here we are. So thanks, Tucker, you were the
only one to send this follow-up. Unlike most of the rest of the world, in recent decades, the political
parties in the U.S. weren't consistently associated with particular colors until the 2000 presidential
election. The lack of consistency of the colors actually
meant that before 2000, the states who had voted for the Republican or the Democratic candidate
were colored differently between the different news media. So some networks and newspapers would
show the states the Republican candidate had won as red, while others would color them blue.
This could be a little confusing, and eventually the media decided to all use the same color scheme,
meaning that during the historic 2000 election, which took over a month to be settled,
everyone ended up using red for Republican and blue for Democrat, leading us to where we are
today. It's funny that we didn't even standardize until 2000. That's pretty recent. Yeah, I was
thinking as I was working on this, I was realizing it actually took me several years to remember
the associations, because when we grew up, the parties weren't associated with any particular colors.
So it had never occurred to me to think of parties as having colors.
That's odd.
Tucker went on to say,
Interestingly enough, Gene Sharp, who founded the Albert Einstein Institution, an organization dedicated to peaceful revolution, has said that
for a peaceful revolution to be successful, it must associate itself with a color. The particular
color need not matter, just that the folks leading the organization have a singular color to rally
behind. A 2011 BBC News article written by the director of a documentary on Jean Sharp called
the now late Sharp, the world's Foremost Expert on Nonviolent
Revolution. Sharp's central point was that the power of dictatorships derives from the obedience
of the people, so that if the people become less consenting, eventually a regime will crumble.
In his books, Sharp listed a variety of what he called nonviolent weapons that oppressed people
can employ, and he argued that as soon
as you choose to fight with violence, you're choosing to fight against your opponent's best
weapons. One of Sharpe's key steps on the path to revolution is use colors and symbols to demonstrate
unity of resistance, which made me think about colors and political parties. Does having consistent
colors help to unify their resistance? And if so, is that
something that you necessarily want in more democratic forms of government, where you could
argue that at least sometimes compromise or consensus building might be more productive?
That's a good point, unfortunately.
So now, yeah, I wonder. So now that we're like red and blue, and so we're so starkly different,
and we're associated with these differences.
It just emphasizes the opposition and the difference between people.
Isaac Dickman-Waz sent an update to the puzzle in episode 248 and the pronunciation tip that his last name rhymes with paws like the things at the end of Sasha's legs.
Hi, Greg, Sharon, and Sasha.
Darren and Sasha. I just finished listening to your episode about Smokey the dog and its lateral thinking puzzle, which hinged on a menu written in Braille, then happened across this story about a
young man in California who was working with local restaurants to make their menus more accessible to
blind patrons. Love the show. Listening every week is one of my highlights. Thanks for all you've
taught me. And Isaac sent a link to an article from May about a blind high school student in Monrovia,
California who has been working to create braille menus for local restaurants so that visually
impaired customers can order more independently. It was a nice little story and it prompted me to
look into the topic a bit where I learned that the social media post that had prompted the puzzle
about how an 18 year old and her family were so excited that she was offered a Braille menu for the first time, had gone viral and hopefully helped raise awareness of how rare
Braille menus are. From what I read, even some of the larger restaurant chains that offer Braille
menus tend not to update the Braille versions as often as the regular menus, so that even if they
are available, the Braille menus are often out of date. I did see several articles, though, similar to the one that Isaac sent,
about people, often students, working in their local area to get Braille menus into some of the restaurants,
or articles about specific restaurants starting to offer Braille menus because of specific customers.
And I saw an article from the Australian ABC from last year about how rare Braille menus are in that country, too.
So perhaps it's time for more of us to be aware of this issue and hope that more restaurants
will end up enabling their visually impaired customers to read their own menus.
Yeah, I'll confess I hadn't even thought about this issue until it came up for us.
Me too.
Thanks so much to everyone who writes in to us.
We really appreciate all the emails that we get.
So if you have any questions or comments for us, please send them to podcast at futilitycloset.com.
It's my turn to try to solve a lateral thinking puzzle.
Greg is going to give me an odd sounding situation, and I have to try to work out what's going on, asking only yes or no questions. This is from Jeff and Emmett Moxon. A man is out shopping for his wife's birthday,
in particular for a necklace. He goes to a nearby shop and sees a beautiful necklace that he knows
for certain his wife would love to have. The necklace is within his price range, and bringing
this particular necklace home is sure to make her happy on her birthday. However, he does not buy
the necklace. Why? Does he know that somebody else is going to give her happy on her birthday. However, he does not buy the necklace. Why?
Does he know that somebody else is going to give her that necklace?
No.
Okay. Does it have to be a necklace for this to make sense?
Yes.
Okay.
It has to be a necklace. So it couldn't be like he saw a smartphone that she would love for her birthday.
Like, it needs to be a necklace.
Yeah.
Okay.
All right.
Let's back up.
Did this really happen?
Do you know?
I don't think so.
Okay.
I mean, probably somewhere sometime in the world.
So there is a man.
Yes.
Does it matter where this man lives? No.
And he has a wife.
Yes.
And she has a birthday coming up. Yes.
And she is alive. Yes. Okay. Just checking. That would be a very good reason not to buy a necklace.
And he wants to buy her a necklace for her birthday. Does he still intend to buy her a
necklace for her birthday? Has anything changed his mind about that? You mean after he sees this one?
Yes.
I'm going to say maybe not.
Maybe.
Okay.
So he is shopping specifically for necklaces for his wife's birthday.
Yes.
For necklaces, plural, like he doesn't have one particularly in mind?
That's right.
Okay.
And he sees this necklace and he thinks, gee, my wife would love this necklace. That's right. Okay. And he sees this necklace, and he thinks, gee, my wife would love this necklace.
That's right.
Has she previously owned it?
Yes.
He's in a pawn shop.
She's pawned the necklace that he bought her previously or something, and so he realizes that...
No.
No?
Keep going.
He's in a pawn shop, and he sees a necklace that he realizes used to be his wife's, and
she has apparently pawned it.
No.
It was stolen from her.
Yes.
And he thinks, if I bring her back this stolen necklace, that's not much of a gift, because
it's already her necklace.
No.
Did they know it had been stolen?
Yes.
So why wouldn't he want to buy it?
Because they've already put in for the insurance on it.
And so it would be insurance fraud.
No, that doesn't make sense.
Because she's already replaced it?
No.
Do they know who stole it?
No.
Okay.
So what's he going to do next?
Report it to the police.
They need it for evidence.
That's right.
Jeff and Emmett write,
The shop the man goes into is a pawn shop,
and the necklace he sees is a family heirloom that was previously stolen from their home.
He cannot buy the necklace because he has to inform the police of its whereabouts
before he can get it back for her as it's stolen property.
Ah. So thank you, Jeff and Emmett. Thank you. because he has to inform the police of its whereabouts before he can get it back for her as its stolen property.
So thank you, Jeff and Emmett.
Thank you.
And we are always on the lookout for more lateral thinking puzzles.
So if anybody else has a puzzle they'd like to send in for us to try, please send it to podcast at futilitycloset.com.
Futility Closet is a full-time commitment for us
and is supported entirely by our listeners.
If you'd like to become one of the awesome supporters
of our celebration of the quirky and the curious,
please check out our Patreon page at patreon.com slash futilitycloset
or see the support us section of the website at futilitycloset.com.
While you're at the site, you can also browse through Greg's collection
of over 10,000 compendious amusements.
Check out the Futility Closet store
in case you want a penguin-themed shirt
or a mug or a pillowcase.
Learn about the Futility Closet books
and see the show notes for the podcast
with links and references for the topics we've covered.
If you have any questions or comments for us,
you can email us
at podcast at futilitycloset.com. All of the music in our show was written and performed by my very
talented brother-in-law, Doug Ross. Thanks for listening, and we'll talk to you next week.