Futility Closet - 277-The Mad Trapper of Rat River
Episode Date: December 16, 2019In the winter of 1931, a dramatic manhunt unfolded in northern Canada when a reclusive trapper shot a constable and fled across the frigid landscape. In the chase that followed the mysterious fugitiv...e amazed his pursuers with his almost superhuman abilities. In this week's episode of the Futility Closet podcast we'll describe the hunt for the "Mad Trapper of Rat River." We'll also visit a forgotten windbreak and puzzle over a father's age. Intro: Korean soldier Yang Kyoungjong was conscripted successively by Japan, the Soviet Union, and Germany. In 1978, Arnold Rosenberg examined idioms to trace a path to the most incomprehensible natural language. RCMP constable Alfred King is at far left in the photo; constable Edgar Millen is second from right. Sources for our feature on Albert Johnson: Dick North, Mad Trapper of Rat River: A True Story of Canada's Biggest Manhunt, 2005. Barbara Smith, The Mad Trapper: Unearthing a Mystery, 2011. Richard C. Davis, "The Mad Trapper, by Rudy Wiebe," Arctic 35:2 (1982), 342. Leslie McCartney, "'You Need to Tell That True Albert Johnson Story Like We Know It': Meanings Embedded in the Gwich'in Version of the Albert Johnson Story," Canadian Journal of Native Studies 37:1 (2017), 201-235. "Who Was the Mad Trapper of Rat River?", Forensic Magazine, June 6, 2018. "Lawbreakers: More Hustlers, Rustlers and Wild Men," Canada's History 96:2 (April/May 2016). Jay Merrett, "Caught by the Mad Trapper," Canada's History 93:1 (February/March 2013). Bob Butz, "Bad Guys Gone 'Wild,'" Outdoor Life 213:6 (June/July 2006), 19. Alan Phillips, "Who Was the Mad Trapper of Rat River?", Maclean's, Oct. 1, 1955. Barbara Roden, "The Mad Trapper Part 4: The Quest to Identify Albert Johnson Begins," [Ashcroft, B.C.] Journal, Sept. 17, 2019. Barbara Roden, "Golden Country: The Mad Trapper Part 5," [Ashcroft, B.C.] Journal, Oct. 3, 2019. Marc Montgomery, "Canada History: Feb 17, 1932: The End and Beginning of the Mystery of the Mad Trapper," Radio Canada International, Feb. 17, 2017. Michael Gates, "Dick North: Farewell to Yukon's Great Storyteller," Yukon News, Oct. 4, 2013. "Hunt for the Mad Trapper -- The Story Ends," [Swan Hills, Alberta] Grizzly Gazette, March 13, 2012, 5. "Hunt for the Mad Trapper," [Swan Hills, Alberta] Grizzly Gazette, Jan. 10, 2012, 4. Josh Wingrove, "Feb. 17, 1932 / Mounties Get the Mad Trapper," Globe and Mail, Feb. 17, 2011, A.2. Joe McWilliams, "Mad Trapper Story Still Fascinates," [High Prairie, Alberta] South Peace News, Dec. 15, 2010, 6. Darah Hansen, "Tooth Enamel Reveals Mad Trapper No Canadian," Edmonton Journal, May 23, 2009, A.5. James Adams, "DNA Tests Prove Mad Trapper Still a Mystery," Globe and Mail, May 13, 2009, R.1. "Mad Trapper Not a Canadian, Scientific Tests Discover," CBC News, Feb. 20, 2009. Jeff Holubitsky, "Fugitive Could Live All Winter in Deep Bush, Outfitter Says," Edmonton Journal, Oct. 10, 2007, A18. Erin Hitchcock, "The Mad Trapper, Unmasked," [New Westminster, B.C.] Record, Sept. 15, 2007, 3. "Trapper Almost Evades Capture," Guelph Mercury, Aug. 16, 2007, A6. "Filmmakers Exhume Mad Trapper's Body," Nanaimo [B.C] Daily News, Aug. 15, 2007, A2. Keith Bonnell, "Mystery of 'Mad Trapper' Nearly Solved," Vancouver Sun, Aug. 15, 2007, C10. "Mad Trapper's Remains Surface in Historic Dig," CBC News, Aug 13, 2007. Katherine Harding, "Hunt for the Mad Trapper Is Back On," Globe and Mail, May 29, 2007, A.3. "Remains of Mad Trapper of Rat River Could Finally Lead to Identification," [Prince Rupert, B.C.] Daily News, May 7, 2007, 11. "Mad Trapper Mystery May Finally Be Solved," Winnipeg Free Press, May 5, 2007, A.13. Ian Mcinroy, "Tracker of Mad Trapper Remembered," [Barrie, Ontario] Examiner, Jan. 13, 2006, A3. Tom Hawthorn, "He Hunted the Mad Trapper," Globe and Mail, March 15, 2003, F.11. Bob Gilmour, "Frontiersmen Pay Tribute to Trapper's Victim," Edmonton Journal, Sept. 28, 1997, A.10. Kerry Powell, "Glory Days; Mad Trapper's Nemesis; Signal Success," Edmonton Journal, Aug. 6, 1995, B.3. "Group to Retrace Mad Trapper Route," Hamilton Spectator, March 5, 1994, A8. Rudy Wiebe, "Trapper Identification Fails to Convince Author," Edmonton Journal, Sept. 2, 1989, E6. Garth Hopkins, "Sequel to The Mad Trapper of Rat River Fascinating Piece of Work," Vancouver Sun, July 29, 1989, D4. Alan Hustak, "a.k.a. the Mad Trapper," [Montreal] Gazette, May 13, 1989, K12. Lynne Van Luven, "Hobby-Turned-Obsession Led to Mad Trapper Solution," Edmonton Journal, May 13, 1989, D3. "Hunt Resumes for Elusive Mad Trapper," Ottawa Citizen, May 9, 1987, H15. "Mad Trapper Film Sparks Furor," Globe and Mail, April 2, 1980, P.16. "Royal Police Get Insane Trapper -- Dead," Las Vegas Age, Feb. 18, 1932, 1. "A Most Bizarre Case: The Mad Trapper of Rat River," Whitehorse Star, Feb. 17, 1932. "Mad Trapper Eludes Cops," Las Vegas Age, Feb. 10, 1932, 1. "Plane Nears Aklavik in Hunt for Trapper," [Washington, D.C.] Evening Star, Feb. 5, 1932, C-5. "Canadian Trapper Slays Policeman," Bismarck Tribune, Feb. 1, 1932, 2. "'Mad Hermit' Flees Canadian Police," [Washington, D.C.] Evening Star, Jan. 27, 1932, A-7. "10 Men Off to Take Barricaded Trapper," [Washington, D.C.] Evening Star, Jan. 20, 1932, B-5. "Canadian Trapper Has Defied Police," Bismarck Tribune, Jan. 14, 1932, 1. "Arctic Trapper Defies Officers," [Washington, D.C.] Evening Star, Jan. 14, 1932, A-16. "Constable Millen's Cairn Territorial Historic Site," Prince of Wales Northern Heritage Centre (accessed Dec. 1, 2019). Edward Butts, "Albert Johnson, 'The Mad Trapper of Rat River,'" Canadian Encyclopedia, Jan. 22, 2008. Leslie McCartney, "That Albert Johnson Story: Aboriginal Oral History Inclusion in Canadian Archives," First Nations, First Thoughts Conference, University of Edinburgh, May 2005. Listener mail: Wikipedia, "Anna Sorokin," (accessed Dec. 4, 2019). "A Fake Heiress Bilked NYC Socialites for Years. Then the Elaborate Hoax Unraveled," CBS News, March 27, 2019. Emily Palmer, "A Fake Heiress Called Anna Delvey Conned the City's Wealthy. 'I'm Not Sorry,' She Says," New York Times, May 10, 2019. "Anna Sorokin: Fake Heiress Apologises as She Is Sentenced," BBC News, May 9, 2019. Jonathan Allen, "Fake Heiress Who Dazzled New York Elite Gets 4 to 12 Years for Fraud," Reuters, May 9, 2019. Encyclopaedia Britannica, "Dust Bowl," Dec. 12, 2019. "Dust Bowl," History.com, March 14, 2019. Adam Wernick, "Trees That Helped Save America's Farms During the Dust Bowl Are Now Under Threat," Public Radio International, Feb. 3, 2018. Wikipedia, "Great Plains Shelterbelt" (accessed Dec. 2, 2019). This week's lateral thinking puzzle was contributed by listener Paul Bigler. Here's a corroborating link (warning -- this spoils the puzzle). You can listen using the player above, download this episode directly, or subscribe on Google Podcasts, on Apple Podcasts, or via the RSS feed at https://futilitycloset.libsyn.com/rss. Please consider becoming a patron of Futility Closet -- you can choose the amount you want to pledge, and we've set up some rewards to help thank you for your support. You can also make a one-time donation on the Support Us page of the Futility Closet website. Many thanks to Doug Ross for the music in this episode. If you have any questions or comments you can reach us at podcast@futilitycloset.com. Thanks for listening!
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome to the Futility Closet podcast, forgotten stories from the pages of history.
Visit us online to sample more than 10,000 quirky curiosities from a triply conscripted
soldier to the hardest natural language.
This is episode 277.
I'm Greg Ross. And I'm Sharon Ross.
In the winter of 1931, a dramatic manhunt unfolded in northern Canada when a reclusive
trapper shot a constable and fled across the frigid landscape. In the chase that followed,
the mysterious fugitive amazed his pursuers with his almost superhuman abilities. In today's show,
we'll describe the hunt for the
mad trapper of Rat River. We'll also visit a forgotten windbreak and puzzle over a father's age.
And just a quick programming note, we'll be off next week, so we'll be back with a new episode on December 30th.
In the summer of 1931, a blonde man with a powerful build floated down the Peel River on a handmade log raft and landed above Fort McPherson, a small settlement in the Northwest
Territories. He bought a few items at a trading post where he revealed a slight Scandinavian
accent. He knew what he wanted and seemed to have a lot of money. But he was evasive as to his origins and his identity was unclear. I'm going to call him
Albert Johnson because that was the name he first became known by, but his real name is a mystery.
He pitched his tent for three weeks, then bought a canoe, rode up the Rat River, and built an
eight-by-ten-foot cabin on its banks for the winter trapping season. Nothing more was heard of him until Christmas Day,
when a local man complained to Constable Edgar Millen of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police
that Johnson had been tampering with his traps.
The day after Christmas, Millen ordered two other constables to mush to Johnson's cabin and question him.
The two reached the cabin at noon on December 28th.
They saw him looking at them through the window,
but he wouldn't answer the door, though they
entreated him for an hour.
They realized they could do nothing further without a search warrant, and that meant going
80 miles down the Husky River to Aklavik and reporting the incident to Inspector Alexander
Eames, commander of the Mounties Arctic Subdivision.
They made the trip in two days, and Eames issued the warrant and sent them back with
two additional constables.
They arrived at the cabin on December 31st. Constable Alfred King left the other three by
the riverbank and approached the cabin, noting that smoke was rising from the stovepipe. He
called, Are you there, Mr. Johnson? There was no answer. King said that he had a warrant and that
he'd have to force the door if Johnson didn't open it. There was still no response, so King
approached the door. When he
knocked, a shot rang out. Johnson had fired through the door, hitting King in the chest and knocking
him into the snow. He crawled back to the riverbank, where the others fired a series of shots
to keep Johnson down while they pulled King over the bank. He was bleeding profusely, so the three
unhit constables lashed him to a sled and started a desperate 80-mile run to save his life. The temperature
was 40 below zero Fahrenheit, their dogs had already run for half a day, and a wind had sprung
up, filling the trail with drifting snow and increasing the danger of frostbite. Though they
constantly had to lower and hoist the wounded man across the portages of the Husky River,
they reached Aklavik in a record 20 hours. At its small hospital, doctors found that the slug had
passed through King's chest but had missed his vital organs. He would eventually recover.
No one could understand why Johnson had shot King. The Mounties' visit had been fairly routine.
Eames organized nine men and 42 dogs to go after him, and a posse left Eklavik on January 4,
1932. In order to avoid ambushes, they circled inland as they approached the cabin,
and due to some misjudgments, this cost them more time and supplies than they'd planned.
But when they reached it, shortly before noon on January 9, Johnson was still there.
The Mounties arranged themselves along the riverbank, which extended in a half-circle
around the cabin. Eames shouted to Johnson to come out and told him that King was still alive,
meaning that he wouldn't be charged with murder. There was no response, but it quickly became clear that Johnson had no intention
of surrendering. Every time the Mounties approached the cabin, he met them with such heavy gunfire
that they were forced to retreat. He had a sawed-off shotgun and a.22 rifle with the stock
sawed off, and he had punched loopholes in all four sides of the cabin. At one point, Knut Lang
managed to slam the butt of his rifle
against the four-foot door, forcing it open. He said that Johnson was shooting from a pit he'd
dug inside the cabin. The siege lengthened into hours and kept the men stationary along the
riverbank in temperatures of 45 degrees below zero, and they were low on food. Eames knew he'd
either have to fight his way into the cabin or retreat to get more supplies. But Johnson fought ferociously.
The battle had started at noon and was still going at 9 p.m. Eames ordered flares lit, hoping to blind
Johnson, and he also began throwing sticks of dynamite at the cabin, hoping to dislodge parts
of the walls, door, or roof. That didn't work either, and now the temperature was dropping.
In his heated cabin, Johnson could outweigh them. By midnight, the flares had gone
out. Canute Lang managed to land a stick of dynamite on top of the cabin where it blew a
hole in the roof and knocked off the stovepipe. Lang burst again through the cabin door and found
himself looking at Johnson, but for some reason failed to fire. Johnson recovered and started
shooting again, and Lang retreated to the riverbank. It was almost 3 a.m. when Eames resolved
on one last effort. He bound up the
remaining dynamite, four pounds worth, and threw it 20 yards across the clearing. The blast tore
the roof off the cabin and partially caved in its sides. Eames and Carl Garland charged across the
clearing, hoping to overpower Johnson if he was dazed. Garland was carrying a flashlight, hoping
to blind Johnson with it temporarily. Instead, when they reached the door, Johnson shot the flashlight out of Garland's hand, and the two men had to retreat to the riverbank
again. The man in the cabin was beginning to seem superhuman. Some of the posse suggested burning
him out, but Eames wanted to take him alive. He decided to go back to Eklavik. So at 4 a.m.,
the Mounties left the scene. One man had outfought nine others for 15 hours. It's still not clear why
Johnson fought over such a seemingly small dispute with another trapper. It's thought,
and this is speculation as almost everything is, that perhaps he was wanted for a serious crime
and suspected that when they'd gone to get the warrant that they had identified him. But in any
case, in that case, he wouldn't have felt that it was safe to get captured under any circumstances because they'd identify him and then he'd face some grave punishment for whatever it was he'd done.
That would explain at least some motivation for doing this.
Yeah.
But no one knows.
That's all just speculation as everything else is.
On January 14th, 1932, Millen and Garland were sent back to keep an eye on Johnson.
They found that he'd abandoned the cabin. On going through it, they found it hard to believe he'd survived the final dynamite blast,
and there was no clue as to his identity. Longwave broadcasts were now beginning to
publicize the story of Johnson's holdout. Somewhere, he acquired the epithet,
the Mad Trapper of Rat River. That stuck, and the fact that he'd held out against a larger force
began to win him sympathy. This drama was unfolding during the Depression, and listeners rooted for the underdog. A heavy snow had begun
during the night of the siege and continued all the next day, so there was no trace of Johnson's
track. With no idea what direction he'd headed, his pursuers would have to search an area of 100
square miles, from the Richardson Mountains on the Yukon border to the Mackenzie River to the east,
and they'd be searching in the brief daylight of the northern winter. Eames wrote in his official report,
I note in press reports that Johnson is referred to as the demented trapper. On the contrary,
he showed himself to be an extremely shrewd and resolute man, capable of quick thought and action,
a tough and desperate character. The second posse left Aklavik on January 16, 1932,
bringing with them some homemade weapons
and a fragile radio. They made it to the Rat River and set up a base camp nine miles east
of Johnson's cabin, but found nothing, and by January 21, they were low on supplies and reduced
their number to four men. It was hard to decide which direction to pursue next. The Rat River
Valley was a tangle of spruce, poplar, willow, and cottonwood. It would be hard enough to find
a man who got lost by accident, let alone one who was hiding deliberately. They decided to continue up the
river. The going was slow. They were facing low temperatures, drifting snow, and short days,
and Johnson had the whole wilderness to hide in and might turn and ambush them at any point.
Worse, on January 28th, the temperature dropped to 47 below zero. The pursuers were getting
exhausted and their supplies were dwindling, but late that day, Quartermaster Sergeant R.F. Riddell found the
faint traces of a two-day-old track. They set out the next day to follow this and managed to trail
Johnson through several of his old camps. At length, they lost the track, but what they saw
revealed incredible discipline and wiliness. Johnson never crossed a creek except on ice
blown free of snow, and generally he kept
to the ridges where his trail was minimized. Often he traveled in a zigzag pattern, presumably so he
could spot pursuers. He built each of his fires under the cover of a snowbank to avoid being seen,
and he must be snaring squirrels and rabbits rather than shooting to avoid being heard.
Though he was carrying a heavy pack, he was making twice their speed, and he had climbed cliffs, trotted through spruce forests, and crawled through dense willow. And the trails he left were
so sophisticated and confusing that at one point two of his trackers met head-on. The pursuers were
now far up the Rat River. They were discussing which way to turn when a man came mushing upriver
to tell them he'd heard a shot fired in the vicinity of the Bear River, near where Millen
and his men had first picked up the trail. Possibly Johnson had shot a caribou to replenish
his supply of food, hoping that his pursuers had lost his track. Millen led his men there,
and they picked up Johnson's trail again. They followed it down the river and up a creek,
finding fragments of caribou along the way. They lost it after climbing a ridge,
but then looked down into a canyon and saw a wisp of smoke.
They followed the ridge until they were almost above the camp.
They could see a fire and the edge of a tarp, and they could hear Johnson puttering and whistling among the trees,
but after two hours' wait in temperatures of 50 below, they never actually saw him.
By that time, frost was collecting inside their clothing, so at dusk they headed back to their camp.
The next day brought a raging blizzard.
so at dusk they headed back to their camp. The next day brought a raging blizzard. Riddell and Garland descended into the canyon and managed to take up positions just 15 yards from Johnson
without being noticed. He was hemmed in against a steep cliff. The two others had started down
the ridge toward the creek bed when one of them slipped. Johnson heard him, racked a shell into
the breach of his rifle, and fired at Edgar Millen. Millen and Noel Verville dropped to the ground and fired back.
Johnson dove across his campfire toward a hole left by a fallen spruce. As he did so, Carl Garland,
a veteran of the Swedish army, fired at him, and Johnson collapsed in a heap behind an overturned
tree. Millen called for Johnson to give himself up, but there was no response. Minutes went by,
then an hour. There was no sound. He was, apart from being brilliantly
good at keeping himself alive in the Arctic Circle in January, Johnson apparently had special
training and experience. He was extremely good with firearms, which has led some people to
speculate that he had some experience in the police or the military. He was about the right
age to have served in World War I, but there again, nobody knows. After two hours, darkness
was approaching, and that might give Johnson. After two hours, darkness was approaching,
and that might give Johnson a chance to escape, so Millen, against Verville's advice, decided to
go in and route him out. Riddell and Millen had walked about five paces when a rifle shot rang
through the canyon and a slug whistled over Riddell's head. Millen and Johnson exchanged
shots, and Millen fell. He'd been shot through the heart. Riddell headed back to Eklavik to report
the news,
and Garland and Verville built a stage cache to keep Millen's body safe from predators.
Then they all retreated to a campsite that established a mile away. Sergeant Earl Hersey
was waiting for them there. The next morning, he retrieved Millen's body, and they found that
Johnson had escaped by climbing the vertical cliff, chopping handholds with his axe, and had
dropped snow over his route afterward to cover his trail.
At this point in his account of all this, journalist Dick North writes,
the men seemed to be fighting a demon rather than a human being, and the demon had won again.
Eames requested that a plane be brought in to pursue Johnson in the North Country. The RCMP
had never before resorted to this measure in tracking a man, but Eames saw the increasing
supply trouble that a ground pursuit would face. Five teams of five dogs might consume 500 pounds of fish in 10 days. The request was
approved. Millen had been killed on Saturday, January 30th, and by Wednesday, Western Canadian
Airways had leased a Belanca monoplane to use in the hunt. It would be flown by Wilfred Wap May,
who'd made his name as a flying ace in the war. On February 2nd, 1932, a new party set off to the
Rat River. They found that after climbing the cliff, Johnson had disappeared into the creek
beds and canyons in the watershed of the Rat and Barrier Rivers. The manhunt now extended over the
whole breadth of the Northland. With the increased publicity, the RCMP felt its reputation was on the
line. If you've heard anything about the Mounties, you've heard that they always get their man.
But the plane soon proved its value, where before it had taken three days to get supplies to the men, now it took 24
minutes. And now Wap May could search for Johnson's track from the air, which saved time. Johnson had
been craftily setting up false trails as he ascended the barrier river, but May could spot
those from the plane so the men could avoid them. In fact, if not for the plane, Johnson might have
escaped entirely,
because on February 9th, during a blizzard that stopped the pursuers and grounded the plane,
he bolted across the Richardson Mountains. This is practically impossible. The Richardsons are an extension of the Rockies, and at that latitude, they're barren crags and precipices where wind
chill factors regularly reach 100 below zero. The locals had ruled out the possibility that
Johnson would try to travel straight across the mountains in winter, especially now after he'd been chased for 30 days. The
pursuers had been watching the passes and seen nothing, but on February 12th, a trapper named
Pete Alexie reported snowshoe tracks east of La Pierre House in the Yukon. To this day, no one
knows how Johnson accomplished this. Following up Alexie's report, May spotted Johnson's tracks
from the air leading
from the Bell River up one of its tributaries, the Eagle, but they soon disappeared among the
tracks of a herd of caribou. Evidently, he'd followed the herd to hide his movements. But the
next day, May was able to pick up the trail again 20 miles further up the Eagle. On February 15th
and 16th, fog grounded the plane, but a dog sled party made its way up the river, cutting spruce
trees and making giant arrows in the snow to show May where they'd gone. On the 17th, the sky was clearing when the ground party
broke camp. They didn't know it, but they had slept just across from Johnson on one of the river's
hairpin turns. It appears that he'd assumed they were coming downriver rather than going up,
and shortly before noon, the posse ran straight into him. In the lead were Sergeant Hersey and
seven Huskies. Johnson
was backtracking, stepping into his old tracks and heading downriver. Startled, he put on his
snowshoes and made for the bank of the river. Hersey grabbed his rifle and started to fire.
Johnson ran a few steps and shot back, sending a bullet through Hersey's elbow, knee, and chest.
As the other Mounties arrived, May signaled for the party to divide, and they moved up both sides
of the river, flanking him. Johnson had run 40 yards and thrown himself into the snow, where he removed
his pack and used it as a bulwark. With both halves of the pursuing party firing at Johnson,
Eames joined May in the center and shouted twice to Johnson to surrender. Practically surrounded
now, he had no hope of escape, but he made no response. One shot hit some ammunition in his
pocket, and the explosion took some flesh out of his thigh. He was hit also in the shoulder and the side, but he kept firing.
Eames called a third time for him to surrender, but he only kept shooting. So they poured fire
in on him. Seven bullets hit him before he was killed by a slug through the spinal column.
In the plane above, Watt May and Jack Bowen were able to photograph the final firefight.
It was so cold that they could hear the rifle shots from the plane.
When Johnson was dead, May landed on the river and walked over to the body.
As he stooped over it, he said,
I got the worst shock I've ever had,
for Johnson's lips were curled back from his teeth
in the most terrible sneer I've ever seen on a man's face.
It was the most awful grimace of hate I'd ever seen.
The hard-boiled, bitter hate of a man who knows he's trapped at last and has determined to take as many enemies as he can with him down the trail
he knows he's going to hit. Hersey was flown to a clavik and survived. The doctor there also
photographed Johnson's body and did a complete physical exam. He estimated that Johnson had been
between 35 and 40 years old. His possessions included $2,410 in cash, including two American $5 bills,
but there were no papers or identification on his body. Johnson had said not one word during the
entire drama, from the Mounties' first appearance at his cabin on December 28th to his death on the
Eagle River 48 days and 300 kilometers later. The RCMP circulated the description and the photo,
but no clue emerged as to Albert Johnson's roots.
And officially, that's where it stands today.
The man's identity has never been discovered.
The Yukon journalist Dick North, who spent 40 years studying this case,
came to believe in the 1980s that he was Johnny Johnson,
a horse thief and bank robber who'd served prison terms in North Dakota and Montana
before disappearing in 1922.
Johnny closely matched Albert in age, height, before disappearing in 1922. Johnny closely matched
Albert in age, height, and hair and eye color. North got Johnny's fingerprints and asked to
exhume Albert's body from its grave in a clavik, hoping that the permafrost might have preserved
Albert's fingerprints so that a match could be found. He was denied permission, but in 2007,
two Alberta filmmakers got it and they exhumed the trapper's body. DNA and isotope testing showed
that Johnny Johnson was not a match, and neither were DNAed the trapper's body. DNA and isotope testing showed that Johnny Johnson
was not a match, and neither were DNA samples provided by 12 families who, it was thought,
might have been related. Isotopes in the trapper's teeth showed that he'd grown up in the American
Midwest or in Scandinavia, and intriguingly, he'd had expensive, sophisticated dental work done.
David Sweet, a forensic odontologist at the University of British Columbia, said Johnson had, quote, tooth-colored and gold fillings and a gold bridge. He said
access to this kind of bridge work would have been non-existent in the far north and available
only to people with means. That's one of the only specific clues as to his identity even today.
His DNA samples are stored permanently at the Bureau of Legal Dentistry at the University of
British Columbia in Vancouver,
so if any new evidence comes forward, it can be tested there.
But this story is now nearly 90 years old,
and increasingly it looks as though this evasive man may get to keep his anonymity forever.
This podcast is supported entirely by our wonderful listeners. We are always grateful to everyone who helps support the show.
And this week, we're sending out a special Futility Closet thank you to Andrew Watson,
our newest super patron.
If you value this show and want to help support it so that we can keep on making it,
please check out our Patreon page at patreon.com slash futilitycloset. And thanks so much to all
of our incredible supporters. We appreciate every donation and pledge that we get.
The main story in episode 271 was about scam artist Cassie Chadwick, who posed as an heiress
in the early 20th century in order to live a life of extreme extravagance, and a few of our
listeners let us know about a recent story that was rather similar. Irene Liberale wrote,
I've just listened to your most recent episode and you might already know about this, but I would be
remiss not to point out the similarities between the story of Cassie Chadwick and contemporary fraudster Anna
Delvey. Russian-born Anna Sorokin moved to New York in the early 2010s, changed her name, and
somehow managed to convince banks and wealthy people that she was a German heiress. I was
fascinated by her story ever since I came across an article about her arrest in late 2017.
It seems that she faced more difficulties in securing credit than Ms. Chadwick did over 100 years ago,
and that some financial institutions were suspicious from the start,
but Anna still managed to live it up for several years before being eventually caught.
What I found interesting about her case is that in her post-arrest interviews, Anna Delvey seemed genuinely confident that she would be able to pay back the money she owed. We don't have that kind of insight
about Cassie Chadwick, so we can only speculate at what she was thinking. You'd said in the podcast
that we don't know why Cassie did it since she must have known she'd be caught, but I think we
should also consider the possibility that she believed she wouldn't, or maybe she had a compulsion
so strong that the chance of being caught didn't factor into her thought process. Either way, it's an interesting
story and a fascinating reminder that across time, human nature remains the same. Thank you,
as always, for a very interesting podcast. It's the highlight of my Monday, or Thursday,
in this case. Anna Sorokina, usually known as Anna Sorokin, was born into a Russian working-class family
that moved to Germany in 2007, when Sorokin was 16.
After graduating high school in 2011, she moved several times, and in 2013, moved to
New York City, where she presented herself as Anna Delvey, a wealthy German heiress.
She stayed in luxury hotels, wore designer clothes, and freely handed out $100 tips.
Sorokin maneuvered friends into paying for her lavish lifestyle,
claimed difficulties in getting her funds transferred from overseas,
deposited bad checks and withdrew cash based on them,
promised wire transfers that never materialized, or simply skipped out on her bills.
She invited a friend on an all-expenses-paid trip to Morocco
and then stuck her with the $62,000 tab,
used fake bank statements to attempt to secure a $22 million loan,
with which she was purportedly going to open a private arts club,
and persuaded a bank employee to give her a $100,000 loan to cover her due diligence costs.
Sorokin was arrested in 2017,
and in 2019, she was convicted
of multiple counts of theft of services, larceny, and attempted larceny for defrauding hotels,
restaurants, a private jet operator, her acquaintances, and banks. Sorokin was sentenced
to four to 12 years in prison and ordered to pay restitution of almost $200,000. According to The
Guardian, at Sorokin's sentencing, the judge in
the case said she was stunned by the depth of the defendant's deception, her labyrinthine lies that
kept her con afloat. But in two interviews with the New York Times, Sorokin maintained that she
hadn't done anything wrong, as she had always intended to pay everyone back. She claimed that
a lot of what happened had just been misunderstandings, and while she said that she did regret the way that she had done certain things,
overall she said, I'm not sorry. I'd be lying to you and to everyone else and to myself if I said
I was sorry for anything. When asked if she would do the same things again if given the chance,
the New York Times reported that Sorokin shrugged and laughing said, yes, probably so.
Although imprisoned and facing deportation to Germany, Sorokin still has plenty of plans for
her future. She plans to write books about both her exploits in New York and her experiences in
jail and then prison, and told the New York Times, I guess I'm fortunate enough to go to real prison,
so I'll have more material. She claims that she is making investments in technology and
cryptocurrency and hopes to start an investment fund, although her lawyer was quoted as saying, so I'll have more material. She claims that she is making investments in technology and cryptocurrency
and hopes to start an investment fund, although her lawyer was quoted as saying,
I don't know how realistic some of these business endeavors are. At least one book has been published
so far about Sorokin's exploits, written by Rachel Williams, a former photo editor for Vanity Fair,
who was manipulated into paying for the $62,000 Morocco trip. And projects about Sorkin
are in the works for both Netflix and HBO. Williams had testified against Sorkin at the
trial, and during her testimony, she had burst into tears and called the theft the worst experience
of her life. She was quoted in a CBS News article as having said of Sorkin's act,
it was a magic trick. I'm embarrassed to say that I was one of the props
and the audience too. It amazes me that some people can live so recklessly. That's all so
floridly illegal. It just seems like you're just asking to go to prison. But then I think sometimes
maybe people behave that way because they know someone else got away with it.
That would make more sense. Otherwise, it seems like you'd be sort of crazy just to try that and hope that it works. Or you talk yourself into it. I
mean, Sorkin somehow at least presents that she didn't think she was doing anything illegal
because she was convinced she was going to pay all these people back eventually, somehow.
Maybe that, I don't know how, maybe that actually works sometimes. It's hard to see how.
I don't know how. Maybe that actually works sometimes. It's hard to see how.
In episode 265, Greg told us about an 18th century hedge that ran for more than a thousand miles across India. And then in episode 271, I discussed a wall of trees that the Indian
government is considering to help restore degraded land. We received follow-ups on this
topic from two of our listeners. Richard Clark wrote,
I want to let you know I am part of a three-generation family that listens to and loves the futility closet.
I listen, my children listen, and now my grandchildren listen. Thank you.
You recently mentioned a story about India where the government is wanting to build offensive trees across the country to help restore the land.
A very similar plan was actually enacted here in the U.S.
The Dust Bowl wreaked havoc across this country, and as part of the solution, offensive trees was proposed. The plan changed into many groups of forests that were planted, and those forests
stretched from North Dakota to the Texas Panhandle. Again, thank you for the great work.
And Brian Arnold wrote, I've enjoyed the discussion of the Trans-India Hedge and the
follow-on stories. I'd like to add one of my own. A few years back, I've enjoyed the discussion of the Trans India Hedge and the follow-on stories.
I'd like to add one of my own. A few years back, I read an excellent book on the American Dust Bowl
called The Worst Hard Time. I was surprised to discover something in the middle of the story,
where solutions being considered by the government were discussed. Among many of the solutions you
would expect to hear, FDR personally wanted to plant a huge line of trees, stretching from the Brazos
River to the Canadian border, in the middle of the country, to serve as a giant windbreak and
prevent further soil erosion. This has come to be called the Great Plains Shelter Belt,
and was comprised of 220 million trees covering over 18,000 square miles. As you might guess,
there is some disagreement about whether or not this helped the Dust Bowl in the short term,
but it has had its long-term benefits.
This sort of project has a word, sort of the opposite of Sharon's newly discovered desertification.
It's afforestation.
There is discussion about how to restore the shelter belt going forward
to enable it to continue to serve as a giant soil erosion-thwarting windbreak.
Anyway, keep up the good work.
The Dust Bowl was a name given to
a section of the American Great Plains comprising parts of Colorado, Kansas, Texas, Oklahoma, and
New Mexico that suffered severe dust storms throughout several years of drought in the 1930s.
After years of over cultivation and poor land management, the drought and high winds created
so-called black blizzards
of choking dust that sometimes traveled as far as the east coast. People and livestock were killed
and crops failed throughout the entire region. And so, as Richard and Brian said, some 220 million
trees were planted to create a series of walls starting in 1935. Initiated by President Franklin
Roosevelt, the project was called the Great Plains Shelter
Belt, although in the end it was actually composed of over 30,000 different shelter belts
that created windbreaks to reduce wind speed and also improve water retention in the soil
and generally stabilize the land and protect the topsoil. While this afforestation did provide many
long-term benefits in the area, currently many many of the shelterbelts are in decline,
or in some cases are being actively cut down by farmers who want more land for crops.
Journalist Carson Vaughn looked into this issue
and spoke with a number of agroforestry officials in the Great Plains,
and he reports a lot of concern about losing the shelterbelts.
Vaughn says that on the issue, about half the foresters that he spoke with
actually used the phrase,
another dust bowl, while the other half avoided saying something that specific,
but still said something like, we're going to see some pretty serious consequences.
So I hadn't even known about the shelter belts before hearing from Richard and Brian,
but now I'm hoping that ways will be found to restore and maintain them.
Yeah, I'd never heard anything about this.
No, I knew nothing about it.
You'd think something that big would be much better known.
And Michael Cavanaugh wrote, after a very busy summer when my podcast attention wavered,
I am spending an enjoyable fall catching up on back episodes. Today I heard episode 253 about
tweets outracing earthquakes. I am not a Twitter guy, but I do have some direct experience of this.
In 2010, an earthquake struck east-central Canada with an epicenter near Ottawa. tweets outracing earthquakes. I am not a Twitter guy, but I do have some direct experience of this.
In 2010, an earthquake struck east-central Canada with an epicenter near Ottawa. I was in my house near Toronto and was on a business call to some colleagues in Ottawa. I heard some commotion on
the far end of the line as they hastily abandoned the shaking conference room and ran outside
without telling me what was happening. The speakerphone stayed on at that end, and I found
myself puzzling over what was going on,
as I spoke tentatively into an unresponsive open phone line.
Almost exactly a minute later,
all of the dishes in my cupboards began rattling,
and I surmised the situation.
As the distance is just over 350 kilometers,
the 6-7 seconds per kilometer checks out.
I was pleased to learn the speed of ripples in the restless earth
in such an organic and memorable fashion.
Keep up the great work,
and I look forward to catching up to the current episodes.
I want that to happen to me exactly once,
just so I can know what it's like.
What, to hear somebody else having an earthquake on the phone?
On the phone, and then feel it later.
And then you can time it and see how fast it traveled.
Thanks so much to everyone who writes to us.
We really appreciate hearing from our listeners.
If you have any follow-ups, feedback, questions, or comments,
please send them to podcast at futilitycloset.com.
It's my turn to try to solve a lateral thinking puzzle.
Greg is going to give me an interesting situation,
and I have to work out what is actually going on, asking yes or no questions.
This is from listener Dan Bigler.
In 2007, 47-year-old Jay Richardson saw his father in person for the first time.
At this time, his father was only 28 years old.
How is this possible?
Okay. Are these all this possible? Okay.
Are these all human beings?
Yes.
Is there space travel and relativity involved?
No.
He saw his father for the first time, and his father was 28 years old.
Do you say anything about how old the son is?
Jason, I think his name was?
Yeah, he's 47.
He's 47.
His father is 28 years old.
28 years old.
Okay, is there some kind of funny age system involved?
No.
And when you say 28 years old,
would you say that his father has only been alive for 28 earth years?
Yes.
Really?
Yes.
And when you say father, do you mean someone who donated genetic material to create this person?
Yes.
So you're asking how can a son be older than his father?
Oh, oh, he saw his father for the first time not in person though or did you say in person i didn't say that because it's like oh yes i did
actually oh you did never mind i had this he saw a photograph of his father for the first time and
his father died when he was 28 or is that it the father died when he was 28, or is that it? The father died when he was 28, and he's somehow seeing his father's remains or a likeness of him or something like that.
His father's not still alive.
Yes, actually, that's it.
Jay Richardson's father, J.P. Richardson, was better known as rock and roll star The Big Bopper, most famous for the 1958 single Chantilly Lace.
The Bopper died at age 28 in the 1959 plane crash that also killed Buddy Holly and Richie Valens,
the event known as the Day the Music Died.
His son, Jay Richardson, was born almost three months after the bopper's death.
In 2007, Jay Richardson requested that his father be exhumed to resolve some unanswered questions about his fate,
and during the exhumation observed his father's reportedly well-preserved and still recognizable remains.
He was quoted in the Chicago Tribune,
reportedly well-preserved and still recognizable remains.
He was quoted in the Chicago Tribune,
I saw my father.
I was finally able to get peace for myself,
and hopefully in the process,
my father will be able to rest more peacefully.
Oh, wow.
Thanks, Dan.
Wow.
Thank you.
And if anybody else has a puzzle they'd like to send in for us to try,
please send it to us at podcast at futilitycloset.com.
Just a reminder that we'll be off next week.
In the meantime, if you're looking for more Futility Closet,
you can check out the website at futilitycloset.com,
where you can graze through Greg's collection of over 10,000 quirky curiosities,
browse the Futility Closet store, learn about the Futility Closet books,
and see the show notes for the podcast, with links and
references for the topics we've covered. At the website, you can also find a support us section
with a donate button and a link to our Patreon page, which you can also find at patreon.com
slash futilitycloset. We would really appreciate your support. And if you become a patron,
you can spend next week catching up on all our bonus content, like outtakes, more discussions on some of the stories, and peeks behind the scenes of the show.
If you have any comments or feedback for us, please email us at podcast at futilitycloset.com.
Our music was written and performed by the amazing Doug Ross.
Thanks for listening, and we'll be back in two weeks.