Futility Closet - 346-A Desperate Winter in Antarctica
Episode Date: June 14, 2021In 1898 a Belgian ship on a scientific expedition was frozen into the sea off the coast of Antarctica. During the long polar night, its 18 men would confront fear, death, illness, and despair. In thi...s week's episode of the Futility Closet podcast we'll describe life aboard the Belgica during its long, dark southern winter. We'll also consider a devaluing signature and puzzle over some missing music. Intro: George S. Kaufman was uninterested in Eddie Fisher's dating problems. The Hatter and the March Hare impugn one another's honesty. Sources for our feature on the Belgian Antarctic Expedition of 1897–1899: Julian Sancton, Madhouse at the End of the Earth: The Belgica's Journey Into the Dark Antarctic Night, 2021. Roland Huntford, The Last Place on Earth, 1985. T.H. Baughman, Before the Heroes Came: Antarctica in the 1890s, 1994. Marilyn Landis, Antarctica: Exploring the Extreme, 2001. Frederick Albert Cook, Through the First Antarctic Night, 1898-1899: A Narrative of the Voyage of the "Belgica" Among Newly Discovered Lands and Over an Unknown Sea About the South Pole, 1900. Henryk Arçtowski, The Antarctic Voyage of the Belgica During the Years 1897, 1898, and 1899, 1902. Patrick De Deckker, "On the Long-Ignored Scientific Achievements of the Belgica Expedition 1897-1899," Polar Research 37:1 (2018), 1474695. Alexandru Marinescu, "An Original Document About the History of the Antarctic Expedition 'Belgica,'" in Charles W. Finkl and Christopher Makowski, eds., Diversity in Coastal Marine Sciences: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary Research of Geology, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, and Remote Sensing, 2017. Jacek Machowski, "Contribution of H. Arçtowski and AB Dobrowolski to the Antarctic Expedition of Belgica (1897-1899)," Polish Polar Research 19:1-2 (1998), 15-30. Kjell-G. Kjær, "Belgica in the Arctic," Polar Record 41:3 (2005), 205-214. Roger H. Charlier, "Philatelic Panorama of Some Belgian Antarctic Marine Contributions, 19th-21st Centuries: From Belgica to Princess Elisabeth," Journal of Coastal Research 26:2 (2010), 359-376. Hugo Decleir and Gaston R. Demarée, "The Belgica Antarctic Expedition, 1897-1899: A View, 120 Years Later," Okhotsk Sea and Polar Oceans Research 5 (2021), 7-14. Claude de Broyer and Thierry Kuyken, "The Celebration of the Centennial of the Belgica Antarctic Expedition: A Tribute to the Pioneers," Polish Polar Research 22:1 (2001), 71-76. Ian N. Higginson, "Roald Amundsen's Belgica Diary: The First Scientific Expedition to the Antarctic, Edited by Hugo Decleir," Arctic 54:1 (2001), 86-87. Henryk Gurgul, "Henryk Arçtowski and Antoni Dobrowolski in the Hundredth Anniversary of 'Belgica' Expedition to Antarctica," Oceanologia 39:2 (1997), 197-199. Evert Lataire et al., "The Contradictions Between the Original Three Master Belgica and Present Regulations," in Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Historic Ships 2009, 2009. Roger H. Charlier et al., "Belgica's Antarctic Toponymic Legacy," Journal of Coastal Research 26:6 (November 2010), 1168-1171. Peder Roberts, "Belgium's Day in the Midnight Sun," Metascience 12:3 (November 2003), 345-348. Pat Millar, "The Tension Between Emotive/Aesthetic and Analytic/Scientific Motifs in the Work of Amateur Visual Documenters of Antarctica's Heroic Era," Polar Record 53:3 (May 2017), 245-256. Pat Millar, "Frederick A. Cook: The Role of Photography in the Making of His Polar Explorer-Hero Image," Polar Record 51:4 (July 2015), 432-443. H.R. Guly, "'Polar Anaemia': Cardiac Failure During the Heroic Age of Antarctic Exploration," Polar Record 48:2 (April 2012), 157-164. Shane McCorristine and Jane S.P. Mocellin, "Christmas at the Poles: Emotions, Food, and Festivities on Polar Expeditions, 1818-1912," Polar Record 52:5 (September 2016), 562-577. Lawrence A. Palinkas and Peter Suedfeld, "Psychological Effects of Polar Expeditions," Lancet 371:9607 (Jan. 12-18, 2008), 153-63. Arnoldus Schytte Blix, "On Roald Amundsen's Scientific Achievements," Polar Research 35:1 (2016), 1-7. Paul Pelseneer and Henryk Arçtowski, "The Belgian Antarctic Expedition," Geographical Journal 19:3 (March 1902), 387-389. Henryk Arçtowski, "The Antarctic Voyage of the 'Belgica' During the Years 1897, 1898, and 1899," Geographical Journal 18:4 (October 1901), 353-390. W.T. Blanford, et al., "The Antarctic Voyage of the 'Belgica' During the Years 1897, 1898, and 1899: Discussion," Geographical Journal 18:4 (October 1901), 390-394. Peter J. Anderson, "How the South Was Won," Wilson Quarterly 5:4 (Autumn 1981), 52-68. David H. Stam and Deirdre C. Stam, "Bending Time: The Function of Periodicals in Nineteenth-Century Polar Naval Expeditions," Victorian Periodicals Review 41:4 (Winter 2008), 301-322. Julian Sancton, "The Antarctic Expedition That Changed Modern Medicine," Time, May 12, 2021. Tom Kizzia, "Moving to Mars," New Yorker, April 13, 2015. Julian Sancton, "A Brief History of People Losing Their Minds in Antarctica," GQ, May 3, 2021. Julian Sancton, "The Explorer Who Charted the Course to Peace in Antarctica," Boston Globe, May 16, 2021. Sara Wheeler, "Freezing for Belgium," Wall Street Journal, May 13, 2021. Nicole Cliffe, "The Tale of a Chaotic and Failed Attempt to Explore Antarctica in 1897," New York Times, May 6, 2021. "Baron de Gerlache, Explorer, Dies, 69; Led Expeditions to Arctic and Antarctic -- Head of Belgian Marine Bureau," New York Times, Dec. 5, 1934. "Cook's Antarctic Trip; Joined the Belgica Expedition at the Last Moment," New York Times, Sept. 3, 1909. "A Visit to the Antarctic Region," San Francisco Call, June 24, 1899. "Return of Dr. Cook," [Meriden, Conn.] Journal, June 23, 1899. Frederick A. Cook, "A Trip to the Antarctic," New York Times, Jan. 2, 1898. "Belgian Antarctic Expedition (1897-1899)," Frederick A. Cook Digital Exhibition, Ohio State University (accessed May 30, 2021). Listener mail: vlogbrothers, "John's World Record," YouTube, April 2, 2021 (video). Jane Wakefield, "App Used by Emergency Services Under Scrutiny," BBC News, April 29, 2021. Jane Wakefield, "Rescuers Question What3Words' Use in Emergencies," BBC News, June 1, 2021. Zack Whittaker, "What3Words Sent a Legal Threat to a Security Researcher for Sharing an Open-Source Alternative," TechCrunch, April 30, 2021. Aaron Toponce's Twitter profile. This week's lateral thinking puzzle was contributed by listener Izzy Cope. You can listen using the player above, download this episode directly, or subscribe on Google Podcasts, on Apple Podcasts, or via the RSS feed at https://futilitycloset.libsyn.com/rss. Please consider becoming a patron of Futility Closet -- you can choose the amount you want to pledge, and we've set up some rewards to help thank you for your support. You can also make a one-time donation on the Support Us page of the Futility Closet website. Many thanks to Doug Ross for the music in this episode. If you have any questions or comments you can reach us at podcast@futilitycloset.com. Thanks for listening!
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome to the Futility Closet podcast, forgotten stories from the pages of history.
Visit us online to sample more than 11,000 quirky curiosities from galactic indifference
to an accusatory hatter.
This is episode 346.
I'm Greg Ross.. I'm Greg Ross.
And I'm Sharon Ross. In 1898, a Belgian ship on a scientific expedition was frozen into the sea
off the coast of Antarctica. During the long polar night, its 18 men would confront fear,
death, illness, and despair. In today's show, we'll describe life aboard the Belgica
during its long, dark southern winter.
We'll also consider a devaluing signature and puzzle over some missing music.
At the end of the 19th century, Antarctica remained virtually unknown.
It had first been spotted in 1820, but except for a
few coastlines, it was still a blank spot on the map. It was known that its interior was larger
than North America, but no one knew whether this was open water, a continent, or an ocean of ice.
Only three expeditions had ever sailed south of the 70th parallel. Geographical societies suggested that an era of Antarctic
exploration was overdue, and a Belgian naval officer named Adrian de Gerlache was determined
to take part. In 1896, he organized a scientific expedition to document Antarctica's life and
geology, sound its seabed, and chart its coastlines. The expedition he proposed would last almost two
years, retreating to Australia for the coldest months as no one had yet passed a winter below
the Antarctic Circle. With luck, when spring came, they might hope to make a search for the
South Magnetic Pole, which was then thought to lie around the 75th parallel. The expedition was
funded by a national subscription campaign. de Gerlach acquired a three-masted steam whaler of 25 tons, which he rechristened the Belgica and assembled an international crew. The scientists were Eastern European, the Cook was French, and half the crew was Norwegian, including a 24-year-old first mate named Roald Amundsen.
year old first mate named Roald Amundsen. de Gerlach was casting about for a doctor when he received a telegram from Frederick Cook, an American physician who had explored northern
Greenland with Robert Peary. de Gerlach agreed to pick him up in South America. The Belgica departed
Ostend on August 23, 1897, with 13 Belgians and 10 foreigners on a journey of 10,000 miles.
They encountered problems almost
immediately. Tensions among the crew raised continuing discipline problems, and the vessel
was so overloaded that as they passed through the Bay of Biscay, the deck was scarcely two feet
above the waterline. Frederick Cook came aboard in Rio to serve as the ship's surgeon, photographer,
and anthropologist, but by December 14th,
the continuing desertions and dismissals had left them with only 19 men aboard, and so far behind
schedule that they might not have time to complete their early explorations before winter set in.
They ran aground in Tierra del Fuego, took seven days to cross the southern ocean,
and lost a sailor overboard in a gale among the first
icebergs. But the next day, they had their first glimpse of the Antarctic continent. Cook wrote,
Everything about us had an other-world appearance. The scenery, the life, the clouds,
the atmosphere, the water, everything wore an air of mystery. In three weeks, they made 20
separate landings, more than all previous expeditions combined, and named every
landmark and species they met, while the nights grew steadily longer and the cold deeper. They
lost so much time in surveying the continent's northern reaches that they didn't cross the
Antarctic Circle until mid-February, and as they sailed into the Bellingshausen Sea, a thickening
mass of pack ice stretched to the horizon. The sound of the freezing sea alarmed
the men, particularly the scientists. One French explorer had likened it to the distant murmur of
a great city at the bottom of a valley. They sailed into a vast emptiness, marking their
progress on a featureless chart. The gathering ice would hold the ship for an hour or two and
then loosen. Cook wrote, we are as hopelessly isolated as if we were on longer sure of de Gerlache's intentions.
The delays so far had made for disappointing progress,
and if they withdrew now for the winter, as they'd originally planned,
Belgium would be unlikely to extend their funding.
winter, as they'd originally planned, Belgium would be unlikely to extend their funding. But they might win some glory by becoming the first ship to winter south of the Antarctic Circle.
On February 23rd, de Gerloche asked his officers and scientists about the prospect of wintering in
the ice. Everyone opposed it, everyone but Amundsen, who seemed to enjoy danger. He wrote,
They do not want to sail further into the ice any longer. Why did we
come here then? Wasn't it to discover unknown territory? That cannot be done by staying at the
edge of the ice and waiting. On February 28th, a storm shattered the edge of the pack and opened
leads into the heart of the sea ice. Venturing forward would leave them entrapped for months or
even years. The nearest vessel was probably hundreds of miles away, and once trapped,
they would lack the resources to row or even march out. But de Gerlache gave the order to sail south,
and the ice closed around the ship. Five days later, he wrote in the log,
unfurled all the sails. The ship doesn't move. De Gerlache described the pack as an immense field
of ice through which not even the most powerful
ship could force its way. They had no way of knowing how large it was or the distance to land.
They were forced simply to drift with it across the Bellingshausen Sea. That meant the ship was
now simply a house for 18 men. De Gerlach wrote, we are no longer navigators but a small colony of
prisoners serving their sentence. They were safe for the time being, but the sun would set for good in mid-May,
and three months of darkness would follow.
No one knew how cold it would get because no one had ever spent a winter this far south.
Cook was the only man with experience in a polar night lasting months,
and he'd implored de Gerlache not to do this.
The scientists felt betrayed, but it was now clear that they were trapped, and the men went about preparing the ship for winter. Cook began to observe the crew more as an anthropologist than as a doctor.
They sought comfort in activity and routine.
The scientists built huts near the ship to study astronomy, meteorology, and magnetism.
Geologist Henrik Arktowski made depth soundings and divined correctly that Antarctica is one big
continent. But in the bitter winds of late March, the crew began to tire of outdoor work,
and de Gerlach worried that morale would drop again. As the autumn deepened, they began to tire of outdoor work, and de Gerlach worried that morale would drop again.
As the autumn deepened, they began to shirk their duties, bored and stultified by the monotony.
The pack ice carried them along aimlessly at 10 miles per day, but the view never changed.
Cook wrote,
It is a strange sensation to know that you are moving rapidly over an unknown sea and yet see nothing to indicate a movement.
We pass no fixed point and can see no
pieces of ice stir. Everything is quiet. The entire horizon drifts with us. We are part of
the endless frozen sea. And Gaels now confined them to the ship for days. To stave off boredom,
de Gerlach drew up a calendar of special occasions. They celebrated birthdays, anniversaries, and
national holidays, as well as the stocks of
food would allow. On April 7th, one man found several volumes of an illustrated magazine that
had been donated by a patron in Antwerp. It contained pinups of famous actresses, cabaret
performers, and socialites from Paris, so they set up a beauty contest among 500 pictures.
Categories included irreproachable character, grace personified,
shapely hands, and supple waist. The winner, for the record, was American socialite Clara Ward.
de Gerlach opened some champagne, and the men offered a toast to all the beauties.
But by late April, the boredom was unbearable, and the gathering darkness began to prey on them.
At this latitude, they were now losing up to 25 minutes of daylight every day. In two weeks, the night grew by more than three hours. Some men refused to
perform their daily tasks, exercise, or even take their weekly sponge bath unless they were ordered
directly to do so, and they resented the canned food. Cook wrote, the stomach demands things with
a natural fiber or some tough, gritty substance. At this time, as a relief, we would have taken kindly to something containing pebbles or sand.
How we longed to use our teeth.
To compound their misery, on May 17th, the sun disappeared.
It would not reappear for 70 days.
De Gerlach spent most of his time in his cabin, and even the cat withdrew.
Cook wrote,
Around the tables, in the laboratory, and in the
fo'c'sle, men are sitting about, sad and dejected, lost in dreams of melancholy. We are at this
moment as tired of each other's company as we are of the cold monotony of the black night.
He had expected this, but was surprised at its depth. A melancholy or a depression seemed to
pervade the ship. Cook wrote, The curtain of blackness which has fallen over the outer world of icy desolation has descended upon the inner world of our souls.
The most active men coped best, so Cook wrote, exercised, tinkered with equipment, did photographic
work, and attended to his shipmates, who began to complain of headaches, insomnia, sleepiness,
and surprising cardiac symptoms. Their heart rates rose
alarmingly with even mild exercise. Cook wrote,
The sun seems to supply an indescribable something which controls and steadies the heart.
In its absence, it goes like an engine without a governor.
de Gerlach imposed a schedule, but the men couldn't follow it. They lay awake,
listening to the creaking of floorboards and the pressures of the ice pack, which drove up the prow and tilted the ship to starboard so that the floor slanted under their
feet. On June 4th, Lieutenant Emil Danko died of heart failure. He was buried at sea and his memory
haunted the men. Cook wrote,
We are constantly picturing to ourselves the form of our late companion, floating about in a standing
position with the weights to
his feet, under the frozen surface and perhaps under the Belgica. Three weeks later, the ship's
cat died. Cook called her the only speck of sentimental life within reach. Her loss brought
a proliferation of rats, which invaded cabins looking for crumbs. The men plugged their ears
with bits of old cloth but could still hear them scurrying.
The darkness, the depression, the slanted floor, the rats, and the constant fear that ice might
crush the hull began to threaten the men's sense of sanity. In July, Cook and Amundsen heard screams
from the afterdeck but found no one there. Cook wrote, the long night with its potential capacity
for tragedy makes a madhouse of every polar camp. Here men love and hate each other in a passion which defies description. Murder,
suicide, starvation, insanity, icy death, and all the acts of the devil become regular mental
pictures. Arktowski said simply, we are in a madhouse. It was Cook who made sense of it.
What he called polar anemia, fatigue, erratic pulse, inattentiveness, confusion, and blankness
is now more commonly known as winter over syndrome,
a recognized malady that afflicts those who spend a winter in the Antarctic.
Cook attributed it to lack of sun.
He wrote, oh, for that heavenly ball of fire, not for the heat, the human economy can regulate that,
but for the light, the hope of life.
He thought humans needed
sunlight just as plants do. So he ordered the most severely affected men to strip and stand for hours
in the glow of a red-hot stove, a procedure he called the baking treatment. Many who did this
reported that it eased their psychological distress. This is considered the first known
medical application of light therapy, which is used today to treat seasonal
affective disorder and related forms of depression. This was an improvement, but some physical ailment
still afflicted the men. To keep them active, Cook made them walk on the ice around the ship for an
hour each day, an exercise that got the nickname the Madhouse Promenade. Cook suspected that the
illness was scurvy, but the ship's stores of lime juice seemed powerless to reverse it.
He recalled his time with the Inuit in the north, who subsisted on meat and blubber and did not get scurvy.
So he began to give the men fresh penguin and seal meat every day, as rare as they could stomach,
though even he admitted that penguin was an ordeal.
He wrote,
He wrote,
Amundsen ate his raw and was back nearly to normal within a few days.
Cook couldn't really explain why this worked because the cause of scurvy wasn't yet understood,
but we understand it today.
There was no vitamin C in the canned food they'd been eating, and the ascorbic acid in the lime juice would have oxidized
during bottling. Most animals can synthesize their own ascorbic acid, and the oils in penguin and
seal meat contain enough vitamin C to allay scurvy in humans. On July 22nd, after more than two months
of darkness, the sun crept back into view.
De Gerlach wrote,
Looking at his companions, Cook found they'd aged ten years.
He wrote,
the accumulated suffering of the 70 dayless nights. Their skin had a sickly jaundiced color,
green and yellow and muddy. We accused each other of appearing as if we had not washed for months.
As the days lengthened, the ship came back to life. The men cut their hair and beards and returned to their former duties. But the effects of their suffering still lingered among them,
and Cook knew that their survival depended on freeing the ship that summer. He told the officers that many men would die if this weren't done. They must abandon their
goals and focus on survival. In late September, warm temperatures began to thaw the ice, but the
ship remained stuck in a flow two miles wide. By the summer solstice, the sun still had not broken
the pack, and the men began to despair. Cook had already identified four men who he
suspected would die in a second winter, and he expected that more would go insane. At a meeting
of officers, he pressed strongly for an effort to exit the pack, but no one could think how to
accomplish this. Finally, de Gerlach proposed cutting their way out with ice saws. This was
almost impossibly ambitious. In the weeks that remained to them before winter,
they'd have to clear a canal hundreds of meters long to open water, and the ice that trapped the ship was still several feet thick. But there was nothing for it. The daylight and the temperature
were both dropping fast. The men threw themselves into the work, eating seven meals a day,
and on February 15th, the canal was free enough to permit passage. They used explosives to break up the last ice around the stern,
and for the first time since March 1898, the ship could move.
They sailed into the port of Punta Arenas, Chile, at sunrise on March 28th, 1899,
and set foot on land for the first time in more than a year.
After so many months on sea, skis, and ice, they had forgotten how to walk
normally. Cook wrote, we spread our legs, dragged our feet, braced and balanced our bodies with
every step, and altogether our gait was ridiculous. The sight of two pretty girls, he said, sent a new
sensation through us like that of a phoradic battery, but the women avoided their gaze.
Cook wrote, our skins were rough like nutmeg graters, and our hair was long, stubborn, and liberally lined with bunches of gray,
though the eldest among us was less than 35 years of age.
The expedition ended there.
They lacked both the money and the resolution to undertake a second season.
De Gerlach hadn't reached a record latitude or found the South Magnetic Pole,
but he did establish many historic firsts.
They'd made several important geographical discoveries, charted the coast, recorded
weather conditions for a year, and begun magnetic studies of the southern continent.
As the party broke up, Cook and Amundsen promised to write and hoped to see each other again.
That was ironic because in the years that followed, they drove to opposite ends of the earth.
That was ironic because in the years that followed, they drove to opposite ends of the earth.
Amundsen conquered the South Pole in 1911, and Cook claimed to reach the North Pole in 1908.
Two years before that, he'd claimed to reach the summit of Alaska's Mount McKinley, as we discussed in Episode 77.
Both of Cook's claims came under a cloud, and though Amundsen remained a stalwart supporter,
Cook remained a controversial figure, a different man, somehow somehow than the resourceful optimist of the Belgica. In 1923, in sentencing
him to 14 years in prison for a fraudulent oil company promotion, the judge called Cook the
Machiavelli of the 20th century, and the New York Times wrote he will count forever among
the greatest imposters of the world. Amundsen said, to me, he was always a genius.
In episode 339, I read an email from a listener who had sold a baseball signed by Babe Ruth that
turned out to be worth more than most such balls, since his had been signed only by Ruth,
and many other baseballs had been signed by both Ruth and Lou Gehrig, thus making the listener's
ball more rare and valuable for the lack of Gehrig's signature. Alain Etan sent a follow-up
to this, along with a helpful audiophile
for the pronunciation of his name, saying, Salutations, Futilitators. This was a pleasant
coincidence to hear, as I just yesterday saw the following Vlogbrothers video, which outlines how
author John Green signed his name 250,000 times for the first printing of his new book, The
Anthropocene Reviewed, thus making unsigned copies of the book more valuable than signed ones
because they are rarer, exactly like the baseball.
Thanks for potting and casting.
And Alon sent a link to a video of Hank Green,
author John Green's brother, from April 2nd.
I hadn't realized that John Green has apparently been signing
hundreds of thousands of copies of his recent
books when they're printed, leading Hank to say, ostensibly to his brother,
you have one of the least valuable signatures of any author in the world.
Hank explains that all copies of the first edition of The Fault in Our Stars were signed,
except for a few that were essentially mistakes, making the unsigned copies more rare, and says,
your signature on a copy of
The Fault in Our Stars makes it less valuable. It has negative value. Hank does say at the end of
the video that this concept of value is only in terms of collectors, where rarity is so important,
but that the signature does add special value to the readers, and so it is a rather nice and
impressive thing for John to do. That does raise the question of the point or value of an autograph.
What's the point?
Why are they done at all?
It's just an odd convention.
That it sums somebody's signature on any random thing is worth money.
Yeah, I guess because it's rare.
Just because it's rare.
Creating it in order to make something that's rare.
We've discussed the what three words location encoding system a few times on this show,
starting in episode 218 for those who want more of an explanation for it.
Briefly, in this system, the Earth is divided into three by three meter squares, each having
its own three word address.
Several of our listeners sent us follow ups on this topic recently.
Toby Wardman and Robin Kruger sent us links to recent BBC News articles
about some concerns being raised with the system.
What three words, which the BBC says is used
by 85% of emergency services in the UK,
is facing scrutiny after a security consultant found,
an April 29th article says,
thousands of locations with similar words
less than one kilometer, 0.6 miles
apart. The article quotes researcher Andrew Tierney as saying, I discovered that large
numbers of plurals and homophones are actually very close to each other. In time-critical
situations such as a life-threatening accident, emergency services personnel going to the wrong
location could be the difference between life and death.
The article cites concerning examples such as Circle Goal Leader versus Circle Goal Leaders that are less than two kilometers apart along the Thames, and Stream Rivers Abode versus Steam
Rivers Abode that are about 50 kilometers away from each other in Sheffield and Leeds.
A BBC article from June 1st says that the
Head of Information and Communications Technology for Mountain Rescue England and Wales gave them
a list of 45 locations from the last year that rescuers had been given from walkers or climbers
needing help, but these locations turned out to be incorrect, in some cases very incorrect, as they
should have all been in England or Wales and some of them were in Asia, Australia, or North America. And as the rescue teams are often
getting these addresses from emergency services rather than directly from the people in distress,
the rescuers don't have an easy way to try to verify the addresses they think they have.
The BBC reports that W3W acknowledges that there are some similar addresses near each other,
but that such examples are rare.
Chris Sheldrick, one of the co-founders of the system, told the BBC,
whilst the overwhelming proportion of similar-sounding three-word combinations
will be so far apart that an error is obvious,
there will still be cases where similar-sounding word combinations are nearby.
And said that while you could find such examples of similar addresses near each other,
they represent a 1 in 2.5 million occurrence
out of the 242 billion three-word addresses used in the UK.
A spokesperson for the company said that
we regularly check in with the emergency services that use the system to receive feedback.
The overwhelming
response is positive, and time and time again, we have been humbled to see stories where our
technology has turned out to be life-saving. W3W noted that other address systems can also cause
what they called communication errors, and I have to say that this is certainly true for traditional
addresses, as we live near a street that sounds similar to our street's name and we get mail for the other street pretty often or even people at
our door looking for someone who lives on the other street. So I can imagine that this type
of problem could occur in almost any address system where people can misspeak or mishear or
just confuse two similar things. It was noted in the article that there can also be issues with
people writing things down incorrectly or with understanding different accents. I had mentioned in episode
218 that Sheldrick, one of the co-founders of W3W, had been motivated to create a new address
system when he was working as a concert organizer, and he had to deal with equipment and bands
sometimes ending up at wrong locations because of problems with existing address systems, and that included using GPS coordinates to try to be more accurate.
The BBC reports that W3W said that any tool can be subject to human error, and I have to say that
that does unfortunately sound about right to me, although I can see how the use of similar words
for different addresses would potentially increase the chance of errors. That's a big task, avoiding ambiguity among billions of locations.
Yeah.
I mean, there's 57 trillion locations in what, three words?
Yeah.
So, but any system, you're just going to have that problem.
Yeah, you think it might be more reliable to switch to numbers instead of words, but
then it's just, that's a lot less accessible.
Try to get people to remember or correctly report a long string of numbers without transposing
them or misspeaking any of them.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And just in case you were planning a day in the British mountains, Mountain Rescue England
and Wales would very much like to encourage you to carry a paper map and a compass and
to know how to use both.
Dane Labonte from Fiskdale, Massachusetts wrote,
Hi Greg and Sharon. You've mentioned what three words a few times and I just saw this article you
may find interesting. A security researcher created a free version of the idea called
what free words and what three words threaten legal action. I guess a business needs to do
what it needs to do, but with an aspirational goal of helping people and the relatively
incredibly small adoption rate of tools like this, you'd think they could coexist.
I've listened to your podcast for years and I'm excited to finally have something to write
in about.
I'm subscribed to way too many podcasts, but Futility Closet is always at the top of my
queue and listen to as soon as it's available.
Thanks for making great content.
And Dane sent a link to an article from TechCrunch from April 30th about how Aaron Topanz received a letter from the law firm representing What3Words asking him to delete his tweets related to the open source alternative, WhatFreeWords, to disclose who he had shared copies of the software with, to agree to not make any more copies of the software, and to delete any copies that he had.
The letter implied possible legal action against him if he didn't comply,
and TechCrunch reported that Topanz did accede to the demands to avoid such a possibility.
The article notes that critics of W3W argue that its proprietary technology makes it difficult to scrutinize for potential problems or security vulnerabilities. It was partly these concerns about the lack of openness that led to the creation of What Free
Words. TechCrunch reported that the project's website stated that this open source system
was created by reverse engineering W3W, but that to avoid violating the other company's copyright,
they didn't use any of their code. However, W3W chief executive Chris Sheldrick characterized the
incident as action being taken against an unauthorized version of our software, which
was offered for distribution, but also stated that they weren't requesting any criticisms of W3W to be
taken down. TechCrunch reported that at the time of their article, several websites still had copies
of the What Free Words code, so you may still be able to find it if you
have a hankering to use it or to check it out. And when I saw his Twitter account on June 5th,
Topanz's bio read, Cis Admin at X Mission, creator of atCypherMonkey, threatened by atWhat3Words
for sharing open source. And beyond W3W claims of copyright violations, I can see that having
more than one version of three-word addresses in use could potentially cause significant confusion.
And these are global systems, so there's not one governing body to decide what to do, what solution to adopt.
Yeah.
And Matt Sides wrote,
Dear Futilitarians,
Looking online this morning for a local garage at which to get my car tires checked,
I noticed the first one had a What3Words address on their website.
This is great, although maybe not surprising as it turns out I live in the same town as W3W's founder.
In looking to see which other W3W codes they could have selected from within their building,
I accidentally clicked on the building next door.
The square I hit next door had the code SUMMITSLUGKEBAB. This seems particularly unfortunate as it's a Turkish
restaurant specializing in kebabs. Mmm, slug kebabs. I then wondered where kebab kebab kebab
went and it turns out to be a restaurant in Quito, Ecuador, but it's a Japanese restaurant
and doesn't do kebabs. A wasted opportunity. Thought you might be momentarily amused.
I wonder if that's a cause for legal action.
Or if you could sell a desirable location, you know.
Right, if a kebab restaurant could purchase the address kebab, kebab, kebab.
Thanks so much to everyone who writes to us.
We always appreciate your comments and follow-ups.
And I do still really appreciate pronunciation help for tricky names.
If you'd like the chance to hear me try to pronounce your name,
you can email us at podcast at futilitycloset.com.
It's Greg's turn to try to solve a lateral thinking puzzle. I'm going to give him an
odd-sounding situation, and he's going to try to guess what's going on by asking yes or no
questions. This puzzle comes from Izzy Cope who says that this actually happened to her.
I listened to a Futility Closet podcast episode. It's completely normal but there's no music.
I listened to a different podcast and I hear music. Later that day I listened to the exact
same Futility Closet podcast episode as before, and it has music.
What's going on?
Okay.
Just to be clear, by exactly the same, she means exactly that.
Yes.
That it's the same file.
Yes.
The same recording.
Yes.
So it's nothing we did on our end.
Right.
Doesn't hear music.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay. Okay. Is this the general phenomenon with her where she doesn't hear music in certain situations, music that's present that other people would hear?
I think that's not correct, if I understand correctly.
If someone else listened to the same... Okay. The first time she listened to our episode,
she didn't hear music.
Right.
Would someone else listening to the same file in the same circumstances have heard music?
Probably not.
Oh.
That's interesting.
So the second time she listened to it, it was in different circumstances somehow.
Yes.
Was there some, I don't even know what this would be.
Is there some device or facility that can remove music from either an audio file or a...
Not that I'm aware of.
I mean, there might be, but that's not what's going on here.
Okay.
Um.
Okay.
So you're saying someone else probably wouldn't have heard music...
In the same circumstances.
But music was present music was present was it that could she hear other like the text or us speaking or whatever
yes she said she could yes and she said she listened to a different podcast and heard the music
she just didn't hear it on ours until she listened to it later and then heard it but it's not the
time it's not the timing alone that accounts for the difference.
Right.
It's the circumstances in which she was listening.
Yes.
Okay, so she listens to our episode and doesn't hear music.
Right.
And listens to this other podcast and does hear it.
Yes.
Did she do that second thing, listen to the other show,
in the same circumstances?
Yes.
That she failed to hear music in ours?
Yes.
Wow.
Would you say that, I don't even know how to ask this,
that she herself hadn't changed in any way?
She herself had not changed in any way.
Yeah, like biologically?
I don't know what I'm asking.
She's in a neurological condition where she doesn't hear music.
She had not changed.
Yeah, because you said someone else wouldn't have heard it either.
Right, in the same circumstances.
Is it something to do with our, no, with our particular music?
Yes.
The low frequencies?
Yes.
Really?
This really happened?
She said this really happened to her.
She thought we'd taken the music out of the podcast at first.
Is it because there was something else going on in the background of wherever she was listening
to it that that I don't
interfered with it or drowned it out or prevented her from hearing low frequencies. Yes, yes, that's
pretty much it. She says, I was listening on my headphones in the car because your podcast only
uses bass guitar. The rumbling of my car, an old VW bus covers it up completely and I hear nothing.
On any other podcast, I would hear the music because it would have higher instruments too.
It's a very specific problem to Futility Closet because of your unusual and totally awesome music.
When I listen to the same Futility Closet podcast again later, I hear the music because I'm at home where it's quiet.
And she says, I was shocked when I was listening because I thought you suddenly had ditched your music.
So thanks to Izzy for that puzzle, which might prove enlightening to someone else if they find themselves in the same situation.
And if you have a puzzle you'd like to have us try, please send that to podcast at futilitycloset.com.
Futility Closet is supported entirely by our amazing listeners.
If you'd like to help support our celebration of the quirky and the curious, you can find a donate button in the support us section of the website at
futilitycloset.com or you can join our Patreon campaign where you'll not only
help support the show,
but also get more information on some of the stories,
extralateral thinking puzzles,
outtakes and peeks behind the scenes.
You can find our Patreon page at patreon.com slash futility closet or see our
website for the link at our website.
You can graze through Greg's collection of of over 11 000 singular snatics browse the futility closet store learn about the
futility closet books and see the show notes for the podcast with the links and references for the
topics we've covered if you have any questions or comments for us you can email us at podcast
at futility closet dot com our music was written and performed by my
magnificent brother-in-law, Doug Ross. Thanks for listening, and we'll talk to you next week.