Global News Podcast - ICC judges hear charges against ex-Philippine leader

Episode Date: February 23, 2026

Prosecutors at the International Criminal Court have begun setting out their case against the former president of the Philippines, Rodrigo Duterte, who is accused of crimes against humanity over his bloody ‘war on drugs’. Hearings in The Hague will decide whether there is enough evidence to move to a full trial. Also: aid agencies in South Sudan say intensified fighting between government and opposition forces has displaced hundreds of thousands of people; Australia’s prime minister Anthony Albanese tells Britain his country would support any move to remove Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, King Charles’s brother, from the line of royal succession; the boss of Netflix tells the BBC its bid for Warner Bros Discovery is stronger than a rival offer from Paramount; as the fourth anniversary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine approaches, President Volodymyr Zelensky’s chief of staff says another round of talks aimed at ending the war could take place by the end of the week; a racial slur shouted by Tourette’s campaigner John Davidson during the BAFTA Film Awards sparks debate about how the condition should be understood; and scientists reveal a new species of dinosaur discovered in the Sahara desert.

This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK. This is not the future we were promised. Like, how about that for a tagline for the show? From the BBC, this is the interface, the show that explores how tech is rewiring your week and your world. This isn't about quarterly earnings or about tech reviews. It's about what technology is actually doing to your work and your politics, your everyday life.

And all the bizarre ways people are using, the internet. Listen on BBC.com or wherever you get your podcasts. This is the Global News podcast from the BBC World Service. I'm Janet Jalil and at 16 hours GMT on Monday the 23rd of February, these are our main stories. The International Criminal Court is determining whether the former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte should stand trial for crimes against humanity. The UN appeals for more humanitarian assistance to help 200,000 civilians fleeing violence in South Sudan. Australia's Prime Minister says he supports removing Andrew Mountbatten-Winzer from the Royal Line

of Succession. Also in this podcast? The best thing for our business is people love movies and television. And the best way you love movies is to watch them, at home, in the theaters, wherever you want to watch them. We talk to the boss of Netflix about the future of entertainment. People in positions of power cannot escape the rule of law. Those were the words of the prosecutor at the International Criminal Court, as a long-awaited hearing began to determine

whether the former Philippine president, Rodrigo Duterte, should face a full trial. The 80-year-old is accused of crimes against humanity over an anti-drugs crackdown which he oversaw while he was in office, in which thousands of people were killed. Duterte has spent nearly a year in a Dutch detention centre after being arrested in Manila and flown to the Hague. His decision not to attend the hearing has angered the relatives of those who died

with dozens of protesters outside the ICC as the hearing began. We will be here in the ICC. We'll be here every step of the way until we get justice, until the police chiefs are there, until we see the changes that we want to. But Mr Duterte's lawyer says he maintains he's absolutely innocent and the charges against him are politically motivated. Howard Johnson, who was the BBC's correspondent in the Philippines

at the time that these alleged crimes occurred, was at the Hague. I saw bodies on streets as a result of this drug war policy. I interviewed Rodrigo Duterte in 2017 and asked him about these so-called extrajudicial killings and he said to me in a very fire exchange, that he said that he wasn't responsible for the killings themselves. He said that ordering the killing of drug addicts didn't mean that he was culpable for the deaths that we were seeing on the streets.

I met his right-hand man, Senator Bongo, who crushed my business card in his hand. That was the reputation of the BBC in the country at the time. And we also had an exchange once between a lot of his supporters online after I made a documentary about Rodrigo Duterte, in which I received hundreds of messages threatening all sorts of things like death threats, following me on the streets. So this was a very threatening time to work in the country as a journalist.

Howard Johnson. Also at The Hague is our correspondent Anna Holligan, who gave us this update shortly before we recorded this podcast. We have been hearing from the prosecution in court. They said that the killings weren't random or spontaneous, but part of a widespread and systematic attack against. the civilian population. So this is all about Rodrigo Duterte's so-called war on drugs. The prosecution have been outlining their case. They said that he was at the heart of a common plan to neutralize individuals thought to be involved in drugs. One of the first things he did

after becoming mayor of DeVo City, they said, was set up the devout death squads and instructed them to kill suspected drug users and dealers. Then when he was campaigning to become president, He said that he would carry out a similar policy, ordered the military to hunt down and kill drug criminals. And then as president, they said he rolled out this campaign nationwide. It was called Double Barrel. And it was an effort to carry out extrajudicial killings that the prosecution said he wasn't prepared to give those suspected of committing crimes

the same opportunity as Rodrigo Duterte, the former president of the Philippines, has today in the Hague, which is to experience due process. So they've been outlined in case right now his defence team are presenting their opening statements. Rodrigo de Tartre is not here. He has submitted a letter. I have a copy of it here to the judges saying that he is too tired. He's too old to take part in legal proceedings.

He said he will forget within minutes. So that's part of the defence's argument that he's at 80 years old, from dementia, but these claims that he's not able to follow the proceedings have been rejected by the judges here. They say he's fit enough for these hearings, at least to go ahead. And the families of those who died during that so-called drug war, he's been called a coward by some of them. And this is very frustrating for them because they say they've been waiting a long time for justice. Exactly, years. And I spoke to one relative on the way in, and she said that she has been waiting almost her entire life for this moment to see him before the judges.

And in fact, that was one of the things mentioned by the victim's representative, that in refusing to appear in court or even by a video link from his detention centre, not far from here, he has done them out of some access to justice. There was also a very graphic image shown this morning of one of the victims in his partner's arms dead after one of these alleged killings. So much more graphic testimony to come over the coming days here at the ICC. Anna Holligan. Humanitarian groups in South Sudan say that intensified fighting

between government and opposition groups has displaced hundreds of thousands of people with many of them in dire need of medical care of food assistance. The renewed clashes between the South Sudanese army and forces loyal to the suspended first vice president, Rijk Macha, have prompted concerns that the world's youngest nation and one of its poorest is on the brink of sliding back into another full-blown civil war. Matcha is currently on trial in the capital Juba on charges of murder, treason and crimes against humanity, something he denies.

The violence has severely affected the delivery of essential humanitarian assistance. Boll Rambang is a community organiser who also runs a local radio station. He sent the BBC This Voice Note on site. At the moment, the humanitarian situation is extremely critical. There is no humanitarian presence in your quest boomer, no poor distribution, no mobile clinics, no nutrition services, and no clean water supply. In the last 72 hours alone, 20 days are being consumed, including seven children. The major causes are anger, exhaustion, untreat illness, impact it wound, and lack of self-drinking water.

Without immediate humanitarian intervention, intervention, mortality is expected to increase. The UN's humanitarian chief, Tom Fletcher, has been visiting South Sudan from where he's been speaking to Rob Young. I was up in Jong-Lay state and Upper Nile State as well, and I met many of those displaced by conflict, people who fled their homes in the last few days, and who are coming to us in nothing.

Actually, you've got six million people hungry across South Sudan. You've got seven and ten people needing help right now, and they're telling horrific stories. You know, I met a 70-year-old grandmother who's having her limbs amputated because of bullet wounds. I held a child, an 18-month-year-old child with bullet wounds in his legs as well. So you've got high hunger levels, you've got cholera, you've got immense amounts of misery and hardship, and also immense amounts of sexual violence. And one trend recently is a real upsurge in violence against women and girls.

When you saw those victims, did you get a sense? that they were caught up in the violence or that perhaps they were being deliberately targeted? So it's very hard to tell. Many of them are injured as they're fleeing, their homes. Many of them are hit in airstrikes, and so they have burn wounds. But the wounds, and of course these are civilians that are meeting,

the wounds for them look quite methodical. You know, if someone is shot in both their calves, you know, it's quite hard to do that by accident. So certainly in the hospitals, we're seeing evidence, I think, of lots of deliberate targeting of civilians. And so, you know, we've got to be out there. What we find is that nearer the UN bases, people feel a bit safer. But ultimately, they won't feel safe while this conflict is raging. You know, I'm meeting and met a lot of grandmothers who were carrying their grandchildren because their own kids had all been killed or abducted.

So you've got tragedy after tragedy after tragedy. You've got people surviving just eating the leaves from the trees and saying that they haven't eaten properly for days. It's truly grim. People are eating leaves from the trees. There are so little food. That's right. That's right.

They've got these la lob trees. They call them. And they get the leaves down and they boil them up. And they showed me what that looks like. You know, virtually no nutritional value. at all. So one of the things we're trying to do, and one of the things we've done in the last couple of days with this visit, is to open up new access routes for our aid convoys, for our aid to get to these civilians in areas that we weren't able to reach even a week ago.

So we're getting now to areas that weren't getting enough help, and we're surging in the food and the medicine and the shelter. But it's just not enough because, you know, we're facing massive cuts and the needs here are just overwhelming. Sudan, just to the north, often is referred to by many humanitarian workers as a forgotten conflict. How do you characterize the conflict in South Sudan? Sudan, and I visited Darfur twice in the last year, to try to make it less of a forgotten conflict. You know, it's the epicenter of violence right now, over 20 million people needing help.

But the reality for South Sudan is it's the forgotten conflict, the forgotten conflict. At least Sudan is getting some security council attention. it's getting some attention from key member states from world powers. I've just been in Washington for a pledging conference for Sudan, whereas South Sudan is getting, I'm afraid, none of that. The UN humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher speaking from South Sudan. The Australian Prime Minister, Anthony Albanese, has told Britain that his country would support any proposal to remove Andrew Mountbatten, Windsor, the King's brother, from the line of royal succession. The UK government says it's considering passing a law to do this after Andrew's arrest last week,

but it needs agreement from other Commonwealth countries where King Charles is head of state. The former prince is also facing allegations from ex-government officials that he charged British taxpayers for massages and excessive travel costs when he was Britain's trade envoy. Nick Johnson told us more about the significance of Australia's comments. I think they are extremely significant. I mean, in order for Andrew to be removed from the line of succession, it would have to become law in all 15 nations of which the king is sovereign. Now, outside of the UK, Australia is now the first to say it would support such a move.

And it's done so very publicly. In that letter, Anthony Albanese described allegations against Andrew as grave and ones that Australians take very seriously. Here, though, in the UK, we're unlikely to get a significant response from the UK government, regarding Andrew's future while that police investigation is ongoing. And of course, Andrew has consistently and strenuously denied any wrongdoing. And Nick, tell us about these latest allegations from former government officials. Yeah, these are claims which have been made by two former civil servants who want to remain anonymous.

They say that while Andrew was the UK's trade envoy, so that was between 2001 and 2011. They say he used taxpayer money to claim off expenses for things like, massages, as well as what's been described as an unnecessary travel experiences and costs for his entourage. One former official actually said that staff were reluctant to challenge Andrew's expenses claims and that his trips were rubber stamped rather than given any scrutiny. Now there's no suggestion that this behaviour was unlawful. We've put these claims to the former Prince. He's always denied any wrongdoing in his links to Epstein, but also in his role as trade envoy. Nick Johnson. The first takeover battle for Warner Brothers' discovery has enough drama to make it onto the

silver screen, but it could also have real repercussions for the future of cinema. The boss of Netflix has told the BBC that its bid for Warner is better than a rival one from Paramount, despite concerns about its impact on cinema going. Last December, Warner Brothers agreed to a takeover offer of $83 billion from Netflix for some of its assets, but Paramount, there made a rival offer of $108 billion. Netflix CEO Ted Sarandos told the BBC that if his deal was successful, it would expand the entertainment industry.

The reason why you would do a Netflix deal versus the Sparama deal, our deal is growth. We've been growing and growing and growing this business since we started. We've been growing, like in the UK, we've spent $6 billion on original programming in the UK since 2020. We have created 50,000.

thousand jobs in this economy. So in the other model, in the Paramount model, it's the classic horizontal media mergers that are always bad for consumers, always bad for creators, because basically what they're just taking as two studios and collapsing them to one. There's five major studios left in Hollywood. If the Paramat deal were to go through, it would be four. Our business correspondent Theo Leggett told us what the aims of the rival entertainment giants were. It's all about clout in a changing media market. market really. Paramount Skydance, to give it its full name, is after scale. It wants to be able to compete with the giants of the industry. So that is Netflix. It's also Disney. Warner Brothers

would give it access to 120 million streaming subscribers from their HBO Max or Max channel, as well as a number of more conventional pay TV channels. Netflix, meanwhile, wants to get access to original content. So Warner Brothers back catalog, as well as its studios, so that it can boost its own movie offerings while preventing rivals from getting hold of them. Because with these cut emerges, it's preventing your rivals from getting hold of things that's almost as important as having them yourself. And as you heard Ted Sarandos saying there, Netflix claims its deal would lead to a bigger business and Paramount would introduce cuts.

Because these deals are slightly different as well. Netflix wants to buy the more lucrative parts of Warner Brothers outfit. So the streaming services, the movie studios, that kind of thing. whereas Paramount Skydance, what's the whole lot, including the conventional pay TV channels, which are seen as more of a declining business. And tell us about the concerns, in particular with Netflix. In terms of what it means for the future of cinema,

well, Netflix is, its origins are something you come home and you watch in the evenings on your television. What people want to see is some kind of commitment that there will still be movies that you go to the movie theatre and see. You go to the cinema. So that angle has been played up a bit by Paris. Paramount, that it was moving away from its traditions. There's very much a denial that that's what's happening,

that taking over the studios, for example, would be about producing more original movie content that could be screened first in movie theatres, that kind of thing. Mr. Sarandos was asked about in that interview about the intervention of President Trump for him to sack a Netflix board member. Well, yes, you have to remember this whole deal is immensely political. Paramount Skydance, of course, is run by David Ellison,

who's the son of the US billionaire and Republican Party donor, Larry Ellison, who's providing funding guarantees for the deal. At one point, Jared Kushner, whose President Trump's son-in-law was also involved, though his company since recused itself. Now, what we saw here was President Trump taking to truth social, his own social media network,

calling for Netflix to sack Susan Rice. Now, she's somebody who was very closely associated with the Obama administration, she was a diplomat, so he's called on Netflix to sack her because she's seen as somebody too democratic. Mr. Sarandos responded to this by saying, look, this is a business deal, it's not a political deal. And he said, President Tom, well, he likes to say things on social media. Theo Leggett.

Still to come in this podcast? Another team member brushed against a bone that was sticking out of the ground and comes up, but what do you think this is? And it's the crest of this dinosaur. We knew we had a new species. The epic journey across the Sahara Desert that unearthed a new dinosaur species. This is not the future we were promised. Like, how about that for a tagline for the show?

From the BBC, this is the interface, the show that explores how tech is rewiring your week and your world. This isn't about quarterly earnings or about tech reviews. It's about what technology is actually doing to your work and your politics, your everyday life. And all the bizarre ways people are using the internet. Listen on BBC.com or wherever you get your podcasts. Another round of talks aimed at ending the war in Ukraine could be held at the end of the week.

That's according to President Vladimir Zelenskyy's chief of staff, speaking on the eve of the fourth anniversary of the Russian full-scale invasion. Ukraine has been under sustained pressure from President Trump to agree to a deal. Our diplomatic correspondent, Paul Adams, is in Kiev, and he spoke to us about the latest negotiations. We are in the middle of a kind of process at the moment. We've had several recent rounds of negotiations, and we think, and the Ukrainians believe that it is likely

that we will have another round possibly as early as Thursday. Once again, in Geneva, just as we will be seeing another round of talks involving the Americans and the Iranians as well on that completely separate issue. Once again, we're going to see both issues discussed more or less at the same time in the same place. This morning I went to see one of President Zelensky's negotiating team, Serhi Kisalitsa. He is a former ambassador to the United Nations, and he forms part of the negotiating team that is dealing with military matters. And he told me that they are making progress. Here's a flavor of what he had to say. We have in the last two meetings in Abu Dhabi and one meeting

in Geneva, kind of an agreement at least for 90% of the issues. We're not able to deal with about 10% of the issues because they are politically conditioned. And that 10% includes the things we're all very familiar with, the status of the remaining part of the Donbos, the Zaporizia nuclear power plant. Is that essentially what we're talking about? Exactly, because you need to know where and how

the line of contact and line of disengagement goes through the territory. And this line should be easily, a quite long one. And also then you need to know if the sides pull out or they stay where they stay and things like that. You talk to most Ukrainians and they say they never want to see another Russian in their lives. You are there in the room dealing with representatives of... a leader who has tried very hard at the cost of more than a million of his own men to subjugate and defeat you. What is that like? I saw much worse, believe me. I spent five years in New York. And I told myself, and I also told my stuff, you know, don't let the enemy to poison you with

their rhetorics. Because if you are poisoned, then you are not operational. Donald Trump has put an enormous amount of public pressure on Ukraine. Do you feel that pressure from the Americans in the room? Yes, indeed. There is a lot of pressure on Ukraine. They say, stop the killings, find the compromise. So it's not that you are pressed to the wall by the Americans, and they tell you, pull out. But they say, we must find this solution. You must find this solution.

But how much longer can it really go on? Surely the time has come to strike a deal, however painful and unsatisfactory that deal might be. Right. The degree of resilience and determination of the Ukrainian people is very high. Ukrainian army of 2026 is nothing compared to 2022. So there is no reason for us to surrender. Ukrainian negotiator Sirhi Kisilitsa speaking to Paul Adams in Kiev. Well, as well as the hundreds of thousands of casualties in Ukraine over the last four years, the conflict has had dramatic consequences in Russia too. Our Russia editor, Steve Rosenberg, travelled to Lipitzk, halfway between Moscow and the Ukrainian border to see the effect of the war on Russians.

In the town of Yiliats, walk down Orjin-Lakidze Street, And you'll come to a butcher, a baker and an online shopping collection point. Look up and you'll see a mural. It takes up an entire side of a nine-story block of flats. It shows the faces of five Russian soldiers. Local men killed fighting in Ukraine. The giant image hangs over this town, like the war on Ukraine hangs over Russia.

I noticed that passers by are not looking up at the picture. It's as if after four years, for people here, this war is no longer something extraordinary. Irina, who works at the bus station, stops to talk to me. She tells me that the husband of her friend has been killed fighting in Ukraine and her cousin's son and grandson, The Russian authorities do not publish casualty figures for this war. But conversations like this one point to huge battlefield losses.

More and more Russians tell me about family, friends, or friends of friends who've been wounded or killed in Ukraine. Irina sends aid packages to Russian soldiers on the front line. She doesn't criticize the war, but she is confused by it. In World War II, we knew what. we were fighting for, Irina says. I'm not sure what we're fighting for now. Over the last four years,

the Russian authorities have come up with all kinds of answers to that question. President Putin has spoken of denazifying Ukraine, demilitarizing it. Russian officials talked variously about defending Russian speakers there, reclaiming historical Russian land, about halting NATO expansion and about protecting Russia itself from alleged Western plots to destroy it. Mixed messaging. In an apartment block across town, it's proving difficult and complicated to deal with a leaking pipe. In the lobby entrance, there's ice on the floor and on the walls. and the lift stopped working.

Ivan Pavlovich complains to me about the water that's trickling down and about his utility bills that are going up. He concedes that life would be easier without a war on. But... If I were younger, I'd go and fight, Ivan declares. The special military operation is excellent. It's just that prices keep rising. Pensions go up, but then price.

prices go up even more. So what do I gain? Nothing. In the lobby, the Cold War has begun. Someone is breaking up the ice and disposing of it outside. Not everyone in Russia joins the dots and connects their social and economic problems with a costly war on Ukraine. But many Russians do feel that life is getting harder and few seem to believe it was. will get any easier, anytime soon. That report by Steve Rosenberg. And for more on this story, you can go onto YouTube, search for BBC News, click on the logo, then choose podcasts and global news podcasts. There's a new story available every weekday.

Now, in our previous edition, we told you about the big winners from the BAFTA Film Awards, including a surprise win for the British actor Robert Arameo. His film, I swear, is about John Davidson, a campaigner for Tourette's syndrome, which can cause sudden involuntary and repetitive movements or sounds known as ticks. Mr Davidson was in the audience and his shouting could be heard several times during the ceremony. When two black actors, Der Roy Lindo and Michael B. Jordan went up on stage to present an award, the audience heard Mr Davidson use a racial slur. The show's presenter, Alan Cumming, apologized. You may have heard some strong and offensive language tonight. If you have seen the film, I swear, you will know that film is about the experience of a person with Tourette's syndrome.

Tourette's syndrome is a disability and the ticks you've heard tonight are involuntary, which means the person who has Tourette syndrome has no control over their language. We apologise if you were offended. Mr Davidson left the ceremony partway through, reportedly of his own accord. Oscar winner Jamie Fox posted that the slur was unacceptable. And now the BBC has abolished. for not editing out the highly offensive term, despite the broadcast being on a two-hour delay. Lauren Wyatt was diagnosed with Tourette's when she was 17 and shares her experience of the condition on social media.

What's her perspective on what happened at the Bafters? It is definitely a very difficult situation. People have every right to be hurt or upset by this tick. However you feel as a result of that word is valid, but it does not mean that there was malicious intent behind tick. People with Tourette's do not get to choose our ticks. Our ticks do not represent our personal feelings or beliefs, and I think that's really important to remember. A lot of people's kind of argument against this has been, well, if he said it as a tick, it must be in his vocabulary. My response to that would be that that word is in most people's vocabulary. Being in someone's vocabulary doesn't mean that they use the word. It doesn't mean that they've ever said it. And with

contextual copro ticks, such as the racial slur tick that John had during the performance, you specifically say the worst thing you could say in a situation. Other examples could be saying, I've got a bomb at an airport, using homophobic slurs in front of gay people, anything like that, shouting insults at people who aren't conventionally attractive. Like all of those words have the potential to cause harm and to hurt people, but that doesn't mean that there is intent behind it. Only around 15% of people tourists have coprolalia, which is the word for the socially inappropriate tics, including swearing and slurs. And I am a part of that percentage who experiences those ticks. I have said very hurtful

things as my tics before. They have never once reflected my true feelings. I think that way people seem to think that our ticks reveal what we really think, what we secretly want to say and that we use it. I often hear the word excuse. I'm using my Tourette's as an excuse to be homophobic, to be racist. Tarets is not an excuse. We cannot control it. We can acknowledge the hurt that our ticks can cause other people, but we can't, we can't be held responsible for what we say. I personally, I will always apologize for the hurt that I've caused through my ticks. I will always say I am very sorry that that happened. I will offer any support that I can to support the person that it might be said in the vicinity of, but there's nothing

I can do to stop it. There is nothing I can do to change it. And I think that two things can exist at once. I think that our ticks can hurt people. Wait, but I think that also you've got to remember that this is involuntary. This does not reflect our personal beliefs. And punishing a teretic person for one of their ticks would be like jailing an innocent man for someone else's crime. Lauren Wyatt. Deep in the Sahara Desert, paleontologists have made a spine-tingling find, a new species of dinosaur, a spinosaurus with a long horn on its head. The expedition to the remote site in Niger was led by Dr. Paul Serino from the University of

Chicago. His team first discovered fossils at the site in 2019, but it was a little bit of It wasn't until they returned with a larger mission in 2022 after the pandemic that they realized the bones belonged to a new species of spinosaurus, dating back about 95 million years. Dr. Serino talked us through his amazing discovery. I'd been to Niger a bunch, but there was one spot I wanted to get to. I found it in a 600-page monograph in French, a geologist who had described the heart of the Sahara. And in one line in this monograph, in French, he said, I found a dagger-shaped tooth. It looks like Carcardontosaurus. Nothing more was said.

There were no drawings, no photographs, and the tooth was lost. But there was that lined, and I couldn't let it go. I tried to get there a couple times, but it was impossible. There were sand seas in between where I was. My chance came in 2019. We come back, having found this site, but exhausted it. Man walks into our camp. Through a couple languages, he says he's.

can take us somewhere, but it's farther. So we followed him, and he pulls up to this incredible fossil field. Back in the laboratory, those bones turned out to be the jaws of spinosaurus, and it did look slightly new, but we weren't sure. And so we returned, and it wasn't more than an hour when someone came running up to me and said, you've got to come and see this. The snout is coming out of the ground. It's our skull. And then another hour or two, when another team member brushed against a bone that was sticking out of the ground and comes up, but what do you think this is? And it's the crest of this dinosaur. We knew we had a new species. This is often the part of the skull that really varies, and there was absolutely no question about it. We had put together that skull

from all new pieces, drawings of the bones that were destroyed, etc. And it's low and long, like an alligator, but this one takes the cake. It's even longer. But then sweeping off the top of the skull is this crest. It looks like a scimitar. We call it. a scimitar-crested dinosaur. Our analysis of the dinosaur is something like a hell heron, something that waited and ambushed and would grab anything that came close, even if it was on land.

It was 40 feet long. It didn't care. It signaled its mates. It threatened its rivals with its crest and with its claws and jaws. And it was a poor swimmer and a non-existent diver, just like a blue heron. It was a stocking predator of the coastline.

Dr Paul Serino. And that's all from us for now, but if you want to get in touch, you can always email us at global podcast at BBC.co.uk. And don't forget our sister podcast, The Global Story, which goes in-depth and beyond the headlines on one big story,

available wherever you get your podcasts. This edition of the Global News podcast was mixed by Mike Campbell. The producer was Arienne Cotchy. The editor is Karen Martin. I'm Janet Jalil. Until next time. Goodbye. I've spent the last three decades trying to better understand money across the border room, the newsroom and the trading floor.

That's longer than most podcasts hosts have been alive. But even though I've got questions, join me, Maren's Upset Web, every week for my show Maren Talks Money from Bloomberg Podcasts, where I have in-depth conversations with fund managers, strategists and experts about her markets really work. And join me for a separate episode where I answer listener questions and how to make those markets work for you. Follow Merrim Talks Money on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen.