Global News Podcast - Stay calm on Greenland UK tells Trump and EU

Episode Date: January 19, 2026

Keir Starmer has given a special address to set out Britain's stance over Donald Trump's threat to impose tariffs on European countries opposing his move to annex Greenland. The British prime minister said tariffs were no way to resolve differences within an alliance, and that calm discussion was needed instead. Also: Mr Trump criticises Norway, mistakenly accusing its government of not awarding him the Nobel Peace Prize; Investigations begin after Spain's worst train crash in a decade; the Pentagon prepares to deploy 1500 soldiers to Minnesota where protests continue over immigrant deportations; Snap elections are announced in Japan next month; Russia's President Putin is invited onto the Gaza peace board; trials are underway for a blood test for Alzheimers; and why short attention spans may be changing the ways films are made.The Global News Podcast brings you the breaking news you need to hear, as it happens. Listen for the latest headlines and current affairs from around the world. Politics, economics, climate, business, technology, health – we cover it all with expert analysis and insight.Get the news that matters, delivered twice a day on weekdays and daily at weekends, plus special bonus episodes reacting to urgent breaking stories. Follow or subscribe now and never miss a moment. Get in touch: [e-mail]

This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK. Shopping for a car should be exciting, not exhausting, but sometimes it can feel like a maze. That's where Car Gurus comes in. They have advanced search tools, unbiased deal ratings and price history, so you know a great deal when you see one. It's no wonder Car Gurus is the number one rated car shopping app in Canada on the Apple App and Google Play Store. Buy your next car today with Car Gurus at Car Gurus.com. Go to Cargooros.ca to make sure your big deal is the best deal. That's C-A-R-G-U-R-U-S dot CA.

Car gurus.com. You're not at the office. You're solving murders in the Scottish Highlands. You're not in your car. You're in a candlelit carriage on the way to the ball. This winter, see it differently when you stream the best of British TV with Britbox. Catch a new original series like Riot Women. New seasons of fan favourites like Shetland.

The body's been found. and on paralleled collections of Jane Austen, Agatha Christie and more. It's time to see it differently with Britbox. Watch with a free trial now at Britbox.com. This is the Global News podcast from the BBC World Service. I'm Valerie Sanderson at 1600 hours GMT on Monday the 19th of January. These are our main stories.

The British Prime Minister, Kier Starrmer, says President Trump's plan to impose tariffs on countries opposed to his goal to take over Greenland is completely wrong. At least 39 people have died in a train crash in Spain. Japan's Prime Minister calls a snap election. Also in this podcast, I'm looking at the presence of three proteins that have been linked to Alzheimer's disease,

so-called blood-based biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease. Could a simple finger-prick blood test be the future for diagnosing Alzheimer's? There have been many tests for European leaders during the first year of Donald Trump's second term in the White House. But so far, they've tried to manage, placate and charm the US President. Now his aim of acquiring the semi-autonomous territory of Greenland, part of the Kingdom of Denmark, has alarmed politicians to such an extent they're pushing back. Some senior EU figures are openly accusing the US President of blackmail over Greenland. Here is Germany's finance minister, Lars Klingbilt, speaking alongside his friend.

French counterpart. Germany and France agree that we will not allow ourselves to be blackmailed. There will be a united, clear response from Europe, and we are now preparing united countermeasures with our European partners. We are preparing for the event that President Trump maintains his tariff threat. Washington insists there will be punishment in the form of trade tariffs from next month for any country that stands in the way of the President's ambition to acquire Greenland. President Macron of France wants the EU to fight back by deploying for the first time the EU's trade bazooka. We'll have more on that shortly. By contrast, Britain's Prime Minister Kier Starrmer has called for a calm discussion between allies. In his speech at Downing Street,

he reiterated the unified EU position, that the future of Greenland is for its people and Denmark to decide. And he criticised. President Trump's threat on tariffs. The use of tariffs against allies is completely wrong. It is not the right way to resolve differences within an alliance. Nor is it helpful to frame efforts to strengthen Greenland security as a justification for economic pressure. Our political correspondent Rob Watson gave me his assessment.

It would be fair to say that amongst America's, European allies. He is the leader of what might be described as the softly, softly approach, Valerie, that let's take it diplomatically. Let's not turn the heat up any higher. But it is difficult domestically here in the UK because, of course, there are plenty of politicians and, of course, plenty of ordinary voters who think, come on, Sakeer, tell Donald Trump what you really think that this is all completely unacceptable. In other words, have a sort of love actually moment, that film where the British Prime Minister takes it to a, a fictional American president, that that isn't going to happen.

And he repeated the argument he's made really ever since President Trump's inauguration, which is, look, you know, whatever, however angry you might feel about stuff, the relationship between the US and the UK is so important for us in terms of our security and economics. You have to keep talking. Yeah, but what happens if Mr. Trump isn't up for calm discussions? But that is the great question, Valerie. And it was put to him after his statement in Downing Street by several.

of my colleagues, and he refuses to countenance that, saying that he believes that there will be a diplomatic solution, that he doesn't think that this will come in any way to sort of military action or anything remotely like it. But that is the key question. I mean, what does happen if this talking and if this diplomacy doesn't work? I mean, I think that would be a crisis of absolutely existential proportions for the West. Rob Watson. So what might happen next? Kelly Ann Shaw was the deputy assistant to the US president for international economic affairs in the first Trump administration. She told the BBC she believes Mr Trump is prepared to negotiate. I think there's a negotiated outcome here. We'll see

the president in Switzerland this week in Davos with a number of European leaders. I would imagine there will be some very frank conversations. But when I see the president threatening tariffs, what I hear is I want to negotiate something here. And so I think we'll ultimately see something that works for Denmark, something that works the United States and something that works for Greenland. As Kelly Ann Shaw mentioned there, European leaders are meeting this week on Thursday to discuss their response, and it's thought they'll consider a raft of retaliatory measures. One potential issue, well, our Brussels correspondent Nick Beek says not all the countries are on the same page. This feels like a precarious moment for the EU because it's been on this roller coaster ride

for the past year trying to placate or charm or manage Donald Trump, but this is the most dangerous turn yet. And what you've got is openly, some EU leaders accusing Donald Trump of blackmail. The dilemma here is if they don't do anything, they can look weak, and that may embolden Mr Trump even further over Greenland. If they go too far, then there's the risk of a trade war with the US, their biggest partner. President Macron of France, he says the EU, really needs to be tough at this moment. He's talked about using the EU's trade bazooka, as it's

known. Basically, this would be counter tariffs. It was a weapon that they designed originally to basically deal with bullying by a hostile external country. And at the time, they were thinking of China. You know, they weren't thinking of the United States. But you've got people like Georgia Maloney of Italy saying that a trade war would be really damaging to both sides. She says there needs to be a diplomatic solution to this. And she's tried to characterize this as a misunderstanding of the EU and the US position on Greenland. But I think the problem is that the positions of the two sides, you know, they're poles apart and they're completely incompatible with each other. Nick Beak.

Well, as all this is unfolding, President Trump has linked his aim for control of Greenland to his failure to win the Nobel Peace Prize in 2025. telling Norway's Prime Minister he no longer feels obliged to think purely of peace. He's blamed the Norwegian government for the decision, though it's not in that government's gift. Our global affairs reporter, Paul Moss, told me more. The text started by reiterating America's claims over Greenland. Donald Trump said the world would only be safe if the US had total and complete control over Greenland. He then questioned why Denmark currently had sovereignty, said it was just, there were no documents to support this. it was just down to the fact that a Danish boat landed there a few centuries ago.

And rather ominously, he said plenty of American boats had landed at Greenland. And yes, as you say, he went on to say that because Norway hadn't given him the Nobel Peace Prize, he didn't have to think purely about peace when it came to foreign policy decisions. Now, I should emphasise Mr. Trump did say that peace would remain a predominant consideration, but nonetheless he made clear his thinking had changed because Norway hadn't given him the prize. as you say, it's particularly odd because it isn't the Norwegian government that gives it. It's an independent committee. The Norwegian Prime Minister, Jonas Gostura, says, look, I have repeatedly tried to explain to Donald Trump.

It's not us, but it seems the message didn't get through. Now, everybody listening to this is going to wonder, why does the Nobel Peace Prize mean so much to Donald Trump? It's hard to understand, isn't it? I mean, as so often in explaining Donald Trump's stance, I think political analysis will take you a certain amount of the way, but you do need a psychologist. I will have a go. I think it's partly because of his relationship with Barack Obama. Donald Trump really was contemptuous of Barack Obama.

He was part of the Bertha movement, which claimed completely falsely that Barack Obama had been born abroad in Africa and therefore wasn't allowed to be president. And then what did Barack Obama do? He had the temerity not just to be elected, but to be re-elected, and he got the Nobel Peace Prize. Now, many think Donald Trump's thinking

as if it was good enough for Barack Obama, it's good enough. for me. And, you know, can't underestimate how, overestimate how much she wants this. He's actively lobbied for the prize. This just isn't the done thing. And last week, it emerged at the woman who did get the Nobel Peace Prize last year. The Venezuela Maria Machada flew to Washington and presented Donald Trump with her Nobel Prize award. And there he is grinning, holding up this award, as if he won it. I mean, you know, just compare for comparison, if last year's winners of the, the Pulitzer Prize for journalism for some reason decided that they'd been a terrible mistake and really the journalism

award should have gone to Paul Moss. They could turn up at the office and hand over the medal to me, but the fact is that wouldn't mean that I'd won. And yet Donald Trump seems to act as if it does. This really is a top issue for the US president. Paul Moss. And for more on this story, you can go on YouTube. Search for BBC News, click on the logo, then choose podcasts and Global News Podcasts. There's a new story available every weekday. Next to the worst train crash in Spain in more than a decade, according to the country's civil guard.

As we record this, there are still no clear answers as to why a high-speed train, bound for Madrid, derailed and barreled into an oncoming train, killing at least 39 people and injuring more than 120. Survivors from the crash in Angelesia say the initial impact felt like an earthquake. The first thing we noticed, This was a sudden breaking, although we remained in place, but we didn't have time to react when in a fraction of a second

another much stronger impact came, which caused suitcases, clothes and people to be scattered all over the carriage. The impact was like a sudden blow. The lights went out. I was sitting in the last seats of the carriage and I was thrown over. I don't know how many times I rolled over. I don't know how, but I hit my back. There were people screaming and all the suits.

Suitcases fell on top of people's heads. Our correspondent, Guy Hedgeko, is close to the scene of the accident. We know that a train heading from the southern city of Malaga, heading north, some of its carriages were derailed, just as another train was heading the other way, heading south. That second train was then derailed by the collision, and it was pushed down an embankment. Ever since then, rescue workers have been working, first of all, to pull the... survivors out of the wreckage, a wreckage that was twisted metal, carriages that have been turned upside down.

And then more recently, we've been told that the rescuer's work is probably more about recovering bodies because the local authorities here in Andalusia have said that they believe that the death toll is probably going to increase even further. Guy Hedgeko in Spain. Still to come in this podcast? I think it might be a bit of a fork in the road, you know. Because do you respect films as a great popular art form? Or do we treat cinema as kind of like a glorified screen saver?

Has the way that movies are made, produced and consumed changed forever in the age of the smartphone? If journalism is the first draft of history, what happens if that draft is flawed? In 1999, four Russian apartment buildings were bombed, hundreds killed. But even now, we still have. don't know for sure who did it. It's a mystery that sparked chilling theories. I'm Helena Merriman and in a new BBC series I'm talking to the reporters who first covered this story. What did they miss the first time? The History Bureau, Putin and the apartment bombs. Listen on BBC.com or wherever you get your podcasts. Japan is set to hold a snap election on February 8th. It's been

announced by the Prime Minister Sanei Tagichi, who's been in office and October and is currently enjoying popular support. I got more from our correspondent in Seoul, Chikwon. Well, Ms. Takaichi came to the office with a promise of boosting Japan's economy, which has been sluggish for many years. And her party, the Liberal Democratic Party, barely managed to hold onto power in the last election and now has a minority government. So she has a really ambitious stimulus bill that she wants through the parliament,

and this is supposed to deliver the economic boost that she promised. So to push that through with ease, she wants a large majority and she feels now is the time. And tell us more about her. She is Japan's first female prime minister and has big plans for the country, doesn't she? She does. I mean, she is the first female prime minister and she is also a conservative prime minister here. And she is really flying high on her personal popularity. No Japanese prime minister has been this popular since 2012 when Shinzo Abe was in power. Now, she is clearly leveraging her popularity to have an election win here. She said today that this is a vote for her, vote liberal Democrats, to keep her in power. So she might also be betting that the public is now ready for some stability.

She is Japan's fourth prime minister in five years. But her win is also far from guaranteed come February. Japan is still going through the cost of living crisis. And while she is popular, her party is not. And she has made controversial comments, hasn't she, on Taiwan, that have angered China. Tell us more about that. Well, back in November when she was just elected, Ms. Takaiichi suggested that Japan could send its military to defend Taiwan. This is the self-governing island that Beijing still holds claim. And of course, this is a red line for Beijing. It made Beijing very, very angry. And they pulled out all kinds of tools to retaliate, including export control.

And you have to remember that China is Japan's number two trading partner, and this is very much concerning to many businesses in Japan. But it also had contributed to her popularity. In fact, her popularity went up after this spat with China, especially among her conservative base. And they really see her as a brave politician who is standing up to what they see as China's bullying. Jake Kwan, the Kremlin, says President Putin has been invited to join Donald Trump's Board of Peace for Gaza. A draft charter has been sent to 60 countries inviting

them to take up three-year memberships. A global affairs correspondent, Sebastian Usher, told me more about the Board of Peace and what were to make of the invitation to President Putin to join it. I think there's a certain amount of confusion about all these different boards that there are over Gaza. The Board of Peace actually is the kind of big oversight one which leaders of the world are being invited to. And in fact, the way that's being presented is it won't just be about Gaza, but if it is successful in Gaza, it will then be like almost an alternative UN. So at least 60 invitations have been sent out. I don't think President Putin should feel too special about his invitation. But obviously, when you have something called the Board of Peace and you are sending it out to leaders who essentially have invaded other countries, it does bring that all into quite sharp relief.

I mean, the other groups that are involved in Gaza, there's the Palestinian one, the technocratic one, which is meant to deal with the day-to-day running of Gaza, if it ever gets going to that extent. Their names were announced last week. Israel's not happy with some of those names, as you would imagine. There is also an executive board, which is a lot of regional senior officials are involved in that, but also Trump's special envoy, Steve Wickcoff, his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, Tony Blair is on that one. That's the one which will be, you know, actually taking an active role in the reconstruction of Gaza. As I say, this Board of Peace at the moment seems to be more a kind of symbolic membership, maybe a bit like Mr Trump's own club, Mar-a-Lago. They have said that for permanent membership you need to pay a billion dollars. Ah, so what does it tell us about his ambitions for this?

Is it just about money or is it about prestige as well? I think it's always both when it's president. Trump. But as I say, this Board of Peace, where are that goes? I mean, in a sense, it's not, I think, the essential part of the way that Gaza, if we ever get to that stage, is rebuilt. I think it's those other boards, which are the ones which are going to be directly involved in the reconstruction and in trying to find a new way of governance that will really matter. But I'm sure there are many countries, not many of so far said they've signed up. Hungary is certainly one. But many who will be tempted to sign up. But they may bulk at the I

idea of paying a billion dollars to do so. Sebastian Usher. An international medical trial is investigating whether a simple finger-prick blood test could be used to diagnose Alzheimer's disease. It involves a thousand volunteers over the age of 60 in the US, Britain and Canada. The BBC's medical editor of Fergus Walsh reports.

Playing tennis is one way 66-year-old Michael Sandberg stays healthy. So reducing his risk of a host of diseases, including Alzheimer's. Dr Sandberg, a London GP, is keen to know how his brain is ageing. I think if you pick it up early, people can do better with what's available.

All right, so what we're going to do, I'm just going to clean your finger here, and then I'm just going to do the little finger prick. That's why Michael is having this finger prick test. A couple of drops of his blood are being collected as part of a trial to see whether it can spot risk factors for Alzheimer's disease. That's brilliant. Thank you. That's all it is.

Very great. Pretty straightforward. His sample ends up at the Dementia Research Institute Labs in London, where it's analysed. Dr. Giovanni Lally, from the Medical Research Charity LifeArc, explains. We are looking at the presence of three proteins that have been linked to Alzheimer's disease, so-called blood-based biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease. And analysing the concentration, the levels of these proteins, may tell us whether a person is at risk of developing Alzheimer's disease.

Michael also has a highly detailed pet brain scan, which uses a radioactive tracer to detect the rogue proteins called amyloid and tau that accumulate in the brains of patients who get Alzheimer's. But only two in a hundred Alzheimer's patients ever have this kind of detail. detailed and expensive analysis. So how does the finger-prick test compare to the scam? Hello, Michael, hello. Come in and sit down.

Today's results day. Michael is given his results by Dr. Ema McSweeney, a neuro-radologist from Reconition Health. So Michael, I'm really pleased to be able to record both a negative and both correlate, which is brilliant. So in terms of risk at the minute, you're well down, you're not even on the radar. Michael, that must be a relief.

It's a huge relief. So one of the most frightening tests I think you can do properly, be honest. This is, of course, just one set of results. Scientists will need to analyse the findings from all 1,000 volunteers on the trial in the UK and North America before they know how useful the finger-prick blood test is at spotting Alzheimer's risk. But Dr. Emma McSweeney is hopeful.

It's a very important moment. If this is successful, it provides a ubiquitous, accurate test which can detect the presence of abnormal amyloid protein in the brain without complicated, expensive investigations. And that report was from our medical editor, Fergus Walsh. Are our attention spans now so short that the way films are made are being affected because we can't concentrate long enough to take in a full load?

movie. The filmmakers and actors, Matt Damon and Ben Affleck, said in a podcast that special effects and plot scripting are changing to accommodate a world where people are easily distracted. Netflix, you know, a standard way to make an action movie that we learned was you usually have like three set pieces, one in the first act, one in the second, one in the third. And they kind of ramp up and the big one with all the explosions. And you spend most of your money on that one in the third act. That's your kind of finale. And now they're like, can we get a big one in the first five minutes. We want people to stay tuned in. And, you know, it wouldn't be terrible if you reiterated the plot three or four times in the dialogue because people are on their phones while

they're watching, you know what I mean? So is this a case of art adapting to suit life or is life ruining an art form? Anna Foster spoke to Tim Roby, film critic for The Telegraph and the TV and culture journalist Hannah Verdei. I think it might be a bit of a fork in the road, you know, because do you respect films as a great popular art form that bring people together, whether it's your family or whether it's, you know, a room full of strangers and allow you to escape everyday reality? Or do we treat cinema as kind of like a glorified screen saver that's just on in the background while everyone doomscrolls through their social media feeds and waits for the world to end? I mean, I think I know which side of that I'm on, but I'm worried that Netflix is on the other side now. Yeah, I suppose Hannah as well to an extent it's where you watch. it. If you're in the cinema, I was going to say it's socially unacceptable. People still do it.

You still see people pull out the phone and give it a quick check. But if you're at home, it's a very different experience. Well, it should be illegal to pull out your phone at the cinema because that's a beautiful spectacle you're watching. But when you're at home, realistically, who isn't watching two or three screens at the same time? And also, with Netflix, I find the younger generation watch subtitles just so that they can get distracted by their phone and catch up very quickly, which I think ruins it. But this is how. are we consuming it now? Yeah.

I mean, there is a question, I suppose, Tim, isn't there? We do it a particular way because we've always done it a particular way. But is that the right way? Yeah, I'm guilty of it myself. I have a pretty bad phone addiction. But I do try at home if I'm going to stick a film on to allow that to be a bit of a sanctuary, to put the phone in the other room or something. And without wanting the little television as a medium,

I understand people sticking the telly on in the background while they do all manner of things. you do the ironing, you watch the TV, etc. But these films that Netflix are paying for, they're paying $100 million, $200 million for these productions. And they're just giving up if they're just saying, well, it's probably just a second priority to everyone's phones at this point. So I think that's a real shame

because they should be using that money ambitiously and saying, well, let's challenge the viewer and maybe see if they can concentrate and follow the plot. Yeah. I guess as well, Hannah, on the flip side of that, they've spent all of that money. and if people are watching it and simultaneously on social media saying how good it is,

maybe that's a good thing for their business model at least. It's a win-win, but I think Netflix has evolved really well to match our attention spans. I think if you look at the Harlan-Coburn adaptations, you get a cliffhanger at the end of every episode to keep you there. And Netflix has been very clever knowing what it's doing there. And yes, if people are hashtagging it on social media, watching along with social media, then, you know, it's more promotion, which is what they need.

And that's how they can spend the money on it. And it is good quality as well. I don't think you lose the quality. It's just that people can use it in a different way. Hannah Verdei and Tim Robi. And that's it from us for now, but there'll be a new edition of the Global News podcast later. If you want to comment on this podcast or the topics covered in it, send us an email. The address is Global Podcast at BBC.co.com.

at UK. You can also find us on X at BBC World Service. Use the hashtag Global Newspot. This edition was mixed by Alana Bowles. The producer was Charles Sanctuary. The editor is Karen Martin. I'm Valerie Sanderson. Until next time, bye-bye. Ever feel like car shopping is designed to make you second-guess yourself? Is this a good price? Am I making the right choice? With car gurus, you don't have to wonder. You get deal ratings, price history and dealer reviews without the surprises. you can shop with confidence. It's no wonder CarGurus is the number one rated car shopping app in Canada on the Apple app and Google Play Store. Buy your next car gurus today with CarGurus at Cargooros.ca. Go to

cargooros.ca.cair-Gurus.cair-C-Gurus.cair-Ca.caugurus.cairus.ca.cairus.ca.com.