Global News Podcast - Tehran calls reports of US talks 'fake news'

Episode Date: March 24, 2026

The speaker of Iran's parliament has said no negotiations have taken place with the United States, contradicting President Trump's announcement that talks were ongoing. Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said ''fake news'' was being used to manipulate the financial and oil markets. Also: a special report on the increase in Israeli settler attacks in the occupied West Bank. At least 60 people have been killed after a Colombian Air Force plane crashed shortly after takeoff. Leonid Radvinsky, the billionaire owner of the online platform OnlyFans has died aged 43. Drone footage has captured sperm whales headbutting each other, something scientists had only speculated about until now. And we delve into the long history of human-animal companionship, and examine what our relationship with our pets reveals about us.The Global News Podcast brings you the breaking news you need to hear, as it happens. Listen for the latest headlines and current affairs from around the world. Politics, economics, climate, business, technology, health – we cover it all with expert analysis and insight. Get the news that matters, delivered twice a day on weekdays and daily at weekends, plus special bonus episodes reacting to urgent breaking stories. Follow or subscribe now and never miss a moment. Get in touch: [e-mail]

This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK. You're not at the office. You're solving murders in the Scottish Highlands. You're not in your car. You're in a candlelit carriage on the way to the ball. This winter, see it differently when you stream the best of British TV with Britbox. Catch a new original series like Riot Women. New seasons of fan favourites like Shetland. The body's been found. And on paralleled collections of Jane Austen, Agatha Christie and Moore.

It's time to see it differently with Britbox. Watch with a free trial now at Britbox.com. Everything right now is a tech story. From the gadgets that we buy to the ways that we communicate with each other, to the ways that we work, to the ways that governments around the world are changing, all of it is mediated by technology. And on the Vergecast, twice a week,

we try to make sense of all of it. All of the news, all of the new stuff, all the biggest stories, what it all means and how it makes us feel. On the Verkast, twice a week, wherever you find podcasts. You're listening to the Global News podcast from the BBC World Service. Hello, I'm Oliver Conway. We're recording this at 5 o'clock GMT on Tuesday the 24th of March.

The Speaker of the Iranian Parliament denies claims by President Trump that peace talks are underway between Iran and the US. The Colombian military says 66 soldiers have died in a plane crash, and we report on the increase in Israeli settler attacks in the occupied West Bank. Also in the podcast, A Swaroski cat flap studded with crystals. You can buy enormously expensive satin pajamas for your dog or your cat, and even your ferret.

Is your pet controlling your life and your wallet? In the face of turmoil on the markets and defiance, from Iranian hardliners, President Trump has for now backed down on his threat to obliterate Iran's power plants. He had said he would target them if the Strait of Hormuz was not reopened within 48 hours. That deadline has now passed and the crucial waterway remains shut, but the U.S. has not attacked. Instead, Mr. Trump says he's paused the threatened strikes because peace talks are underway. We are now having really good discussions. They want peace. They've agreed. they will not have a nuclear weapon, etc., etc.

But we'll see, you have to get it done. But I would say there's a very good chance. And so we're giving it five days, and then we're going to see where that takes us. And I would say at the end of this period, I think it could very well end up being a very good deal for everybody, as good as if we went all the way and just literally annihilated the place, which if we don't have to do that, that would be a good thing, not a bad thing.

But Iran says there have been no negotiations. Speaker of the Iranian Parliament, Mohamed Baghe Ali Baf, mentioned as Iran's possible negotiator, said it was all fake news to manipulate the financial and oil markets. John Bolton was U.S. National Security Advisor in the first Trump term. What does he make of it all? I find it a little bit difficult to believe that there really are negotiations with Iran that are as close to bringing an end to the war. As he says, I think he was very worried about the markets in Asia,

and it was convenient to avoid a bloodbath on American stock exchanges too. And it may cause him to declare victory where victory doesn't exist. What we're doing is showing our weakness by allowing Iran to dictate the terms on which the struggle is going to end, that they'll open the Strait of Hormuz when they choose to. So we could lose a very significant opportunity here because Trump feels the domestic political pressure and is looking for an exit, no matter what, the long-term consequences, much of which might be felt after he leaves office. John Bolton. So what is actually happening in terms of negotiations, if anything?

I asked David Willis in the United States. President Trump has said that talks are underway and that his special envoy, Steve Whitkoff, and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, held discussions with Iranian official yesterday and will continue to talk to that official. and that the talks were involving, he said, a top person in the Iranian regime whom he wouldn't name, although he did confirm that it wasn't Iran's new supreme leader. The individual in question is thought to be Mohammed Baga Khalifv, who is the Speaker of the Iranian Parliament. And there are reports that Steve Wittkoff and Jared Kushner could meet a negotiating delegation from Iran as early as this week in Pakistan.

possibly with the US Vice President J.D. Vance joining those talks. The White House hasn't denied those suggestions and an administration official confirmed that President Trump did indeed speak by phone today to Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and Mr. Netanyahu afterwards, acknowledged that the US thought a deal with Iran was possible. The Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman said that messages had been received from friendly countries, and that's thought to be Egypt, Pakistan, the Gulf states, indicating that the United States was in favor of negotiating an end to this conflict, although that particular individual denied that any such talks had so far taken place. The majority of people here, Oliver, remain opposed to this conflict, and they've seen

petrol prices saw. They've seen the conflict drag on. It's now entering. it's fourth week, and they've heard plenty of mixed messaging from Donald Trump in terms of both timelines and objectives. David Willis. But why is President Trump talking peace just 48 hours after threatening to wipe out Iran's energy infrastructure? Sanam Vakil is head of the Middle East and North Africa program at the Chatham House think tank. First of all, this was a very bad threat to make because striking Iran's electricity, grid, its power capabilities would have 100% resulted in retaliation across the region.

And there has certainly been lobbying from Gulf countries, if not more, to perhaps get President Trump to walk back a bad decision. Secondly, of course, there is the persistent speculation that President Trump is trying to manage the markets. So Trump quickly on Monday morning tried to temper oil prices, which are expected to continue to go up. But thirdly, there's nothing wrong with test running what negotiations would look like. I don't think that this is going to quickly end or cease this war, but this could be a first effort at testing the waters. And from what I hear, it is Iran's Speaker of the Parliament, Mohamed Bahre-Rollibov, who is in communication

with a new American interlocutor that could be JD Vance. Despite the heavy blows and the decapitation strategy underway, the Iranian system is still intact. It's intact because it's not personalized. It's bureaucratic and institutional. And it still has plenty of individuals working in that system that have history, that have experience, that have decision-making authority. And Kahlibov has been Speaker of the Parliament for quite some time, but he's been a well-known figure within that system. He also sits on the Supreme National Security Council, which is the body where theoretically foreign policy decisions are made in consensus and recommendations are put forward.

Sanam Bakilov Chatham House. With his analysis of what possible negotiations may involve, here's our international editor, Jeremy Bowen. If there were talks, the agenda would have to be massive and complicated. What about the enriched uranium that could be used to make a nuclear weapon? What about the alliances Iran has around the region, like Hezbollah and, in the region? Lebanon. And what about the Strait of Hormuz? The most potent weapon that Iran seems to have discovered, in fact, knew about all along. Plenty of people asked, why didn't President Trump know about it? The Iranians, if it is that kind of real negotiation at some point, will make their

own demands. They'll want to retain control in some way of the Strait of Hormuz, maybe lift sanctions, maybe get some assurance that the Israelis are not going to attack them. So I think that what we're seeing right now, is it perhaps Trump preparing a declaration of victory? Gulf states don't want to be left with a mess in the region, or is it simply an attempt to reassure the markets? That seems to be one of the most credible things. The point is, though, to have victory in war, you need a defined objective, you need a clear exit strategy, you need a plan for what's coming next. And the evidence is that he had none of those things, whereas Iran has had this plan to make this into a war of attrition. And what President Trump has done has dismissed all those worries and doubts that

previous American presidents have had about attacking Iran because of all the difficulties it would cause. And I think he's discovering that that's why they chose not to destroy the Islamic Republic, but try to contain it instead. Our international editor, Jeremy Bowen, with the world focused on the Iran war, there's been an increase in Israeli settler attacks in the occupied West Bank, the larger of the two Palestinian territories. Six Palestinians have been shot dead by settlers this month, according to the local health ministry. Over the past two nights, settlers have gone on the rampage after an 18-year-old settler was killed in a car crash. At least 10 people were injured in a village east

of Nablus, from where our Middle East correspondent Yoland Nell reports. I've just come into what must have been just one day ago, a very smart villa, a multi-storied house, and now it has been burnt to ashes inside. All the furniture is charred. It was set alight in a big settler attack. The family was just here watching television. There's what remains of the TV screen there up on the wall. The house belongs to Barhan Omar, who's a bank manager.

He'd built this house for his family. We had taken precautions, but we're not expecting so many of them to come. We thought they wanted to kill us. It was terrifying when you are sitting with your family and your children, and then you come under attack. I'm crying out of fear for my children. This is a village. It's called Deer al-Hatab. It's on the eastern side of Nabilis, surrounded by olive groves. And this is the road, which locals say,

was absolutely packed last night with settlers. There's still graffiti that's up on the walls, a Star of David over here. And it's here that villages say dozens of settlers forced open a big black iron gate and entered into another property. what remains of a car here, really just the wreckage of a car at this point. This is the house of Samur Omar and his wife. They were here with their four children and didn't expect anything like this at all. It was so scary. I never imagined something like this would happen.

My daughter ran inside and told me the settlers are burning the house down. I took my family outside because we were suffocating from the smoke. I didn't know what to do because the settlers were throwing stones at us. We had our hands on our heads. So Samara has shown me up the stairs to the rooftop where there's a wooden ladder. He was saying that his daughter was so frightened she could barely get up here. But this is the only way that his family managed to make it out of the house to get up here on the very top of the roof,

away from all the smoke and the stones that were being thrown in this direction. And from here you've got a really good view all around. I can see the built-up city of Nablus over on one side. And then here past all of the olive trees, which locals say belong to the village, but they're no longer able to go to them without getting a permission from the Israeli military. Well, here on the hillsides,

you've got a couple of new outposts, and there's an Israeli military watchtower over there as well. And then on the far hill, there is the settlement of Ilan Moray. That's where a funeral took place for a young settler that was the trigger for the latest violence. His family says that he was killed deliberately by a Palestinian. Palestinians say it was a car accident. But after that funeral, mourners came to attack the village.

there was actually a wave of attacks across the occupied West Bank. Now, the Israeli military has condemned the arson that was carried out, the disturbances, violent assault with several people hurt in this village, including one man shot in the foot, but locals criticise the army for not letting Palestinian ambulances and firefighters get here quicker. In the past two years, there has been a real acceleration in settler violence, which Palestinians say is designed to push them off their land. And now, since the start of the Iran War,

Palestinians are saying that there has been a new uptick in this kind of violence. It's the same pattern repeating itself again. Reporting from the West Bank, Yoland now. And still to come on the podcast. We've captured a series of interactions that show them, not just ramming, but nuzzling each other and shoving against each other in a kind of play, big issue. gives us a new window into the social lives of these animals.

After centuries of speculation, sperm whales are filmed bashing heads for the first time. Hi, everyone. This is Kara Swisher. And I'm Scott Galloway. And we want to tell you about Pivot, our twice weekly podcast. That's right, Kara. What a thrill. It's a chance for us to break down all the big things happening in tech, business, and politics. Yes, and I keep you in check so people can make it through each episode, whether it's digging into constant changes in the world of and social media or trying to keep up whatever the FIlan is doing, we're here to give you our take on all of that.

Every Tuesday and Friday morning, we drop a new episode about some of the major stories of the moment. And Scott is a prediction machine, gazing into his crystal ball to tell you about where it's all heading. That's right. So if that sounds like a good time for you, especially Mr. That's Right, you can follow us on your favorite podcast app

to get new episodes every week. Boom. You're listening to the Global News Podcast. The authorities in Colombia say 66 people have now been confirmed dead after a military transport plane crashed shortly after takeoff. Our South America correspondent Ione Wells has the details. There was videos shared extensively on social media showing these huge plumes of black smoke, big flames at the location of this crash,

which seems to be in the south of Colombia, near the borders with Ecuador and Peru. Since then, officials in the country have said that there were, were 125 people on board, 114 passengers, 11 crew members. What's really not very clear at the moment is what actually caused this crash. There aren't really any details so far about what might have happened, but we understand that the plane hit the ground only one and a half kilometres away from where it initially took off. And because it was this military plane, there was a lot of ammunition being carried on board, all of which seems to have detonated as a result of a fire on the aircraft, causing this huge flames and smoke, as we've seen in these videos.

What we have heard from authorities in the country is that there hasn't been any indication of an attack by illegal actors. I think there were certainly concerns, given the location, given it was right on the border. This is an area where there is a lot of criminal activity that takes place. But I think, interestingly, there are some reports that this is the same type of plane that has been responsible for other crashes in the region previously. And I think there will certainly be kind of questions for the Air Force

about what the safety of this particular aircraft was. Our South America correspondent Ione Wells. The owner of OnlyFans, Leonid Radvinsky, has died at the age of 43, leaving the fate of the multi-billion-dollar streaming empire up in the air. The site transformed the porn industry by enabling adult content creators to reach their audiences directly for a 20% cut of their revenue. The boom in the site's popularity brought scrutiny from lawmakers and regulators and accusations of a failure to deal with illegal content.

When OnlyFans announced it would no longer allow sexual material, a backlash from subscribers and creators prompted a quick U-turn. Anna Iovine from the digital media website Mashable spoke to Rebecca Kespi. OnlyFans is a subscription platform where creators offer content like photos and videos behind a paywall so customers who subscribe can have access to it. And while not each and every creator on OnlyFans uploads nude or explicit content, that is what it's known for because it's not just free pornography. It's you have to make an account and put in your credit card information in order to subscribe to a creator. Okay, so Leonard Radvinsky has died, but many point to him as being the person that sort of helped the platform take off, really.

Yes. while he was alive, he was described as reclusive often in the media. So not much is known about him personally or his illness, but he was a tech entrepreneur. And prior to buying OnlyFans in 2018, he founded a website called My Freecams, where performers put on live pornographic webcam shows. So he was definitely not a stranger to the industry. And in 2018, he bought a majority stake in Onlyfans. And that's when the site really pivoted to porn. instead of just advertising as a way for musicians or quote-unquote safe for work creators to make some extra money. Now it's a way for porn creators to make some extra money. And then two years later, when COVID hit, that's when OnlyFans really took off. It has fundamentally changed the porn industry. It's really contributed to the rise of the independent creator, much like YouTube has for safe for work creators. It's lowered the barrier to entry. You don't need to live somewhere like Los Angeles or Las Vegas to shoot with a porn studio now, you can actually just make content in your

bedroom. And what does that do for lawmakers and scrutiny regulators, that sort of thing? Is that better or worse with only fans? I would say it's worse. There's been a ton of scrutiny on only fans, as there has been a ton of scrutiny worldwide on the porn industry in general since the advent of Pornhub and free porn online. So, for example, the British regulator Offcom, mentioned investigation a couple years ago over whether minors were accessing only fans and actually ended up finding only fans over a million dollars because they couldn't adequately say how they're age checking. Anna Iovine, in the 18th and 19th century, seafarers wrote about seeing whales striking each other with their heads, occasionally even sinking ships, providing

the inspiration for the novel Moby Dick. Until now, though, there wasn't any concrete evidence of whales actually banging their heads together. But scientists say the act has now been caught on camera for the first time, as Chantel Hartle reports. Many stories have been told of ships and the men who sail them, of sea beasts and the men who hunt them, but none has captured the imagination through the years so much as Herman Melville's immortal story of Captain Ahar,

who lost his very soul in the bitterness of vengeance against the great white wave. Moby Dick. Moby Dick, the novel and film inspired by the sinking of the American whaling ship, Essex, in the Pacific Ocean in 1820. The vessel was reportedly sunk by two head-on strikes from a large sperm whale. Of the 20-man crew, only a handful survived, including the first mate, Owen Chase, who published his version of events a year later. It appeared with tenfold fury and vengeance in his aspect, he wrote.

his head about half out of the water, and in that way he came upon us and again struck the ship. Other similar accounts of whaling ships being sunk by sperm whales were reported in the 18th and 19th centuries. But only now have scientists seen what this headbutting behaviour actually looks like. We've known for a long time that large male sperm whales will use their heads as battering rams. And what we've collected here is a series of observations which suggest how that behaviour. develops in young adolescent male sperm whales because we've captured a series of interactions that show them not just ramming but nuzzling each other and shoving against each other in a kind of play. That's Dr. Luke Rendell, one of the authors of the study published in the Marine

Mammal Science Journal. Using drones, researchers filmed the whales in the Azores in the North Atlantic and the Balearic Islands off eastern Spain between 2020 and 2022. What they don't know yet is why the whales do this. But Dr Rendell has some ideas. We suspect in mature males it is about dominance and obtaining mating opportunities if two of them show up at the same group of females at the same time. It's possible that some of these interactions where they're not sort of swimming at each other and just impacting but actually making quite gentle contact and then pushing against each other may be a sort of slightly safer form of competing. The researchers also speculated that the juveniles headbutting may annoy others.

in their social group, particularly the matriarchs, which could explain why they're forced out of the group early. One of the scientists involved said it was very exciting to observe this behaviour, which had long been a mystery. Chantel Hartle. Moving on to smaller animals now and is your pet controlling your life? Here in Britain, we're famous for our dedication to our cats and dogs. But do we in fact belong to them rather than the other way round?

That relationship between humans and pets is the subject of a new exhibition in the English city of Oxford. Sean Lay went along for the experience, which included a hands-on exhibit explained by curator Charles Foster. I'm sitting by a fake cat. If I stroke it, it amuse at me. If I stroke it even more, it will roll over. It's purring now, as well. And this is a cat which is used to make life better for. patients with dementia. That's Professor Charles Foster, barrister and veterinarian. I'm with him

and his stuffed feline friend in the Western Library, where the exhibition he's curated has just opened. It's not called people and their pets, but pets and their people. I wonder why. One of the exhibits here indicates the colossal financial cost of keeping pets. They say, if you want to understand things, follow the money. If you follow the pet money, you realize who's really in charge. We've just come into the entrance, if we come in, we're confronted by, that is not a pet.

It's not a pet. But proto wolves were pets. Wolves were looking at us when we were up up a little lyrical hunter-gatherers, and gradually they realized that it was advantageous for them to have a relationship with us, and we realized that it was advantageous

for us to have a relationship with them. And so a coalition formed in which we changed. them often not for their good. In the ancient world where there are examples of the worship of animals but also the sentimentalising of animals. Egyptians had a cat goddess called Bastet. So you would go to the cat goddess temple.

At the gate you would buy a mummified cat which you would present to the goddess in much the same way as these days you might buy a candle at the entrance to a church and light it in order to put before an icon. Herodotus talks about the ancient Egyptians loving their cats so much that they would run into a burning building to rescue them. A whole Egyptian household would shave their eyebrows as a sign of mourning when their beloved cat died. We've got some advertising displays here of the over-the-top way that some pet owners dress their pets. Describe what we're seeing, Charles. This is pet bling.

This exhibit shows images. of things that we can buy for our animals. For example, a Swaroski cat flap studded with crystals. You can buy enormously expensive satin pajamas for your dog or your cat and even your ferret. Now, these are tamagotches, and they say that when we can't have a real animal, such is our desire for an animal that we create artificial ones.

So this will demand food from you. You will be able to feed it. You'll be able to take it for walks. What does it say about us that we want to do that? There's another bizarre illustration of exactly that here, and one of the most cynical marketing ploys of all time. And that is the pet rock phenomenon. In the mid-1970s, an advertising executive, Gary Dahl,

started to market pet rocks. And we've got one of them here. There is an ordinary stone in, a cardboard box with holes in it so the pet rock can breathe. Most people, I expect, took this as a joke. It's basically just a stone in a face box. It's just a stone. But some people took it seriously and stroked their rocks and fed their rocks and no doubt took their rocks for a walk around the park. I'm not sure what it says, but it says something pretty worrying. Professor Charles Foster talking to Sean Lay.

And that is all from us for now, but the Global News podcast will be back very soon. This edition was mixed by Kai Perry and produced by Stephanie Zacherson and Chauvin Lehi. Our editors, Karen Martin, I'm Oliver Conway. Until next time, goodbye. Hi, everyone. This is Kara Swisher. And I'm Scott Galloway. And we want to tell you about Pivot, our twice weekly podcast. That's right, Kara. What a thrill.

It's a chance for us to break down all the best. Big things happening in tech, business, and politics. Yes, and I keep you in check so people can make it through each episode, whether it's digging into constant changes in the world of AI and social media or trying to keep up whatever the FIlan is doing. We're here to give you our take on all of that. Every Tuesday and Friday morning, we drop a new episode about some of the major stories of the moment.

And Scott is a prediction machine gazing into his crystal ball to tell you about where it's all heading. That's right. So if that sounds like a good time for you, especially Mr. That's Right, you can follow us on your favorite podcast app to get new episodes every week. Boom.