Global News Podcast - Trump criticises Israel over ongoing strikes in Lebanon

Episode Date: June 17, 2026

President Trump has criticised Israel for continuing to strike Hezbollah targets ahead of the formal signing of a US-Iran deal in Switzerland on Friday. He said Israel didn't need to knock down an apartment block every time it was looking for someone from Hezbollah. Lebanese state media reported at least four deaths. Also: Britain's Ministry of Defence is investigating after a retired British couple said a Russian warship had fired warning shots near their yacht in the Channel on Tuesday; the US vice president JD Vance has a new memoir out - this time about religion; how illegal Iranian oil is smuggled across the mountains into Pakistan; and the Williams sisters return to Wimbledon at the ages of 44 and 46. The Global News Podcast brings you the breaking news you need to hear, as it happens. Listen for the latest headlines and current affairs from around the world. Politics, economics, climate, business, technology, health – we cover it all with expert analysis and insight. Get the news that matters, delivered twice a day on weekdays and daily at weekends, plus special bonus episodes reacting to urgent breaking stories. Follow or subscribe now and never miss a moment. Get in touch: [e-mail] Photo: A car and ambulance belonging to Hezbollah's health unit damaged during an Israeli strike on the village of Al Shaabiyeh in southern Lebanon Credit: EPA/Shutterstock

This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK. Every story is in some way a technology story. And on the interface, we decode the tech that's rewiring your week and your world. On this week's episode, will your resume forever be stuck in AI limbo? Is slow messaging better than instant messaging? And why on earth are tech CEOs making their own game show? Listen on BBC.com or wherever you get your podcast. This is the Global News podcast from the BBC World Service.

I'm Will Chalk and in the early hours of Wednesday the 17th of June, these are our main stories. President Trump has criticised Israel for continuing strikes against Hezbollah targets in Lebanon, despite the deal with Iran that's meant to halt the fighting. Britain's Ministry of Defence is investigating after a UK-registered yacht said a Russian warship fired warning shots near it in the channel on Tuesday morning. Also in this podcast, the US Vice President J.D. Vance has a new book out and in tennis. Serida Williams gets involved, volleys away and raises her arms al-off. She goes to hug her sister, Venus.

The Williams sisters are returning to Wimbledon at the ages of 44 and 46. So we're just two days away from the official signing of the US-Iran ceasefire deal, but Israel continues to refuse to abide by Donald Trump's demands to stop launching attacks in Lebanon. Mr Trump and the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu were on the same page when they launched the war at the end of February, saying their aim was to upend the Iranian regime and with it any chance of Iran developing nuclear weapons. But Mr Netanyahu also has his own agenda, especially when it comes to Lebanon and the Iran-backed militant group Hezbollah. And then, at the G7 summit in France, a stern public criticism of Mr Netanyahu from Donald Trump, saying his actions in Lebanon could jeopardize the deal.

James Waterhouse filed this report from the summit. As the leaders of some of the world's richest countries once again gathered for their customary group photo shoot, the serene surroundings of the French Alps and the smiles did not reflect some of the deep divisions among the attendees. There had been ambitions of discussing topics such as global inequality, online safety and cancer treatment, but what has instead dominated is once again Donald Trump

and America's foreign policy. There was a summit on the U.S. Israeli war with Iran, and Washington's allies wanted assurances that its claimed peace agreement was robust enough to prevent Tehran from re-arming and to keep the vital strait of Hormuz open. During the talks, President Trump gave his most pointed public criticism yet of his close ally, Israel,

and of its operations against the Iranian-backed Hezbollah in southern Lebanon. I'll tell you what, Israel's fighting Hezbollah too long, and too many people are being killed. And you don't have to knock down, an apartment house every time you're looking for somebody. Because there are a lot of people in those apartment houses, and they're not all Hezbollah, that I can tell you. And I suggested to Israel to let Syria take care of Hezbollah's.

Because to be honest with you, I think they do a better job of doing it. There was also a meeting about the war in Ukraine, lower down on the U.S. President's priorities. He was urged to better support Kiev and get tougher on Moscow. President Zelensky managed to secure some time with Mr. Trump today, but knows his American counterpart is losing interest in helping end the invasion of his country. I think that President Trump can do it, or maybe only him. I don't know, really. We will see what Europeans will do. Of course, Europe wants negotiations with coordination with the United

States, but we don't know all the tracks. For the host of Manuel Macron, this will be his last G7 as France's president, and he wants his legacy to be one of uniting Europe and the West. The undeniable truth, however, is that these formats have become centred on charming Donald Trump with varying levels of success. James Waterhouse there. I asked our North America correspondent David Willis, what those statements from Donald Trump tell us about his relationship with Benjamin Netanyahu? It's extraordinarily strong language from Donald Trump. Well, these are his most outspoken comments of the kind to date. And they reveal the extent of his frustration, I think.

with Benjamin Netanyahu and his concern that an agreement with Iran could easily be derailed by what's happening in Lebanon. There is thought to be real anger, certainly real frustration in the White House about the way that Benjamin Netanyahu has handled the conflict

in Lebanon against Hezbollah. The president had previously condemned an Israeli strike on Beirut last weekend as vicious. And today he went further than that, accusing Israel of using disproportionate force, as he put it, saying that you don't have to knock down an apartment building every time you are looking for someone. Now, Israel strongly objects to this deal with Iran, of course, not least because, according to the Iranians,

one of the conditions is that Israel abandoned the conflict in Lebanon and withdraw from there. Now, Benjamin Netanyahu is thought to regard that deal as a form of, has been a form of, has capitulation, if you like, and has said that his forces will remain there as long as is necessary in order to hit Hezbollah in self-defense. But Donald Trump is desperate to end this war with Iran. He doesn't want any chance of an agreement to be scuppered by Israel's conflict with Hezbollah. Yeah, and you've got Benjamin Netanyahu under pressure in his own country, but also Donald Trump under pressure in his own country. His popularity ratings plummeting. Just a How much pressure is he under?

Enormous pressure, here at home, certainly. Iran's blockade of that vital energy supply, waterway, the Strait of Hormuz, provoke a global energy crisis. It's seen petrol prices soaring as a result. And even with the promise that we now have that the Strait of Hormuz may soon be reopening, experts believe that it could be weeks or even months before shipping volume returns to pre-war levels, along, of course, with the price of fuel and fertilizer. Polls have consistently shown that the majority of people here oppose the war with Iran, and those polls have also shown that Americans are more concerned about so-called cost-of-living issues,

chiefly, of course, inflation than they are with a conflict in the Middle East. Hence, any easing of those pressures cannot really come soon enough, as far as Donald Trump is concerned, particularly given the fact that the midterm elections here are now less than five months away. It's interesting that polls published earlier this month will show that 70% of those interviewed disapproved of President Trump's handling of the US economy. David Willis in Los Angeles there.

Now, it's not what most people who go sailing off the south coast of England have in mind for their trip. A Russian warship firing warning shots at them to try and make them change course. But it's what happened to retired British car. couple Alan and Jane Kelvey earlier. They told the BBC the Russian warship had come within 500 metres of their yacht as they drifted in heavy fog just outside UK territorial waters. They gave out five blasts on their horn, which means have you seen us? We immediately turned

two degrees to port so that they could see we'd made a deliberate change of course, which meant we had seen them. And then a minute or so later they gave another five blasts. on their horn, immediately followed by four to five small arms fire that wasn't aimed at us. It was a warning fire that went up in the air, we believe. Now, the timing of all this is crucial because it comes just two days after Royal Marine Commandos intercepted a tanker belonging to Russia's so-called shadow fleet carrying sanctioned oil. And on Tuesday, concerns over British defences and the threat from Russia were voiced in Parliament. Our maritime specialist, David Waddell, first explained to me the regulations in place to keep vessels clear of each other.

These rules formally, they are the international regulations for preventing collisions at sea. That's what they're called. They really govern the behaviour of all vessels, large and small, who might pose a collision threat to each other. They cover all sorts of circumstances and they are such that there is usually a giveaway vessel and a stand-on vessel which should normally hold its course. and it is normally the case that a ship under power, a frigate, for example, should give way to a yacht under sail. In fog, we might expect lighter winds in which the yacht would have been more vulnerable than usual,

that would give a powered vessel an even greater imperative to keep clear. Now, the Russian Defence Ministries argued that the yacht was on a dangerous approach towards the warship in open waters in which the commander of a frigate with a cruising speed in excess of 30 knots might argue she was under threat from a sailing yacht likely to have been making way under five knots on the face of it, that's an extraordinary argument. Right, so the onus usually on the frigate then, but there are circumstances in which the yacht

might have to keep clear of the warship. In a harbour situation perhaps or somewhere near shallow waters, it's normal that yachts would keep clear of ships. This incident occurred in deep open waters. British officials believe the Admiral Grigorovic was attempting to signal, it was drifting rather than being powered by its engines,

therefore making it less maneuverable. That would change the calculus, requiring the yacht to keep clear. Abode the yacht, Jane Kelvey told the BBC in the clip we've just heard that they made an initial course correction of two degrees. Normally a larger course correction might be expected to indicate clear intentions. Those five blasts of the horn, she mentioned. Strictly that means, what are your intentions? Russia says their ship tried to contact the yacht by rail.

and also fired flares by way of warning. That accounts disputed by the Kelvys. Right. And as to why this ship was in these waters in the first place, I mean, just to remind people, this is just off the coast of Britain. Well, last week, a NATO source told BBC verify that the Admiral Grigorovic had been ordered by Moscow to escort Shadowfleet vessels through the channel. You mentioned one a short time ago.

She's understood to have been operating in the area for some time. That's the frigate. and had been repeatedly resupplied by a repair vessel. This may explain why, if true, the engines were off, if she wasn't on passage as such. Now, I've sailed in these waters between the Isle of White and Sherberg on the coast of Normandy. This is a very busy stretch of water,

and while it's not a formal shipping lane, it is close to what is by far the busiest traffic separation scheme in the world. The English Channel shipping lanes carry 500 ships a day, normally more, several times busier than the Strait of Hormuz in normal times. So I'm maritime expert David Waddell. A best-selling book about a complex childhood, followed by another one, two years out from a US presidential election. That proved to be the literary path to the White House for Barack Obama. So will history repeat itself for J.D. Vance?

Tuesday saw the publication of Communion, Finding My Way Back to Faith. The US Vice President's follow-up to 2016's Hillbilly Elegy, his political. career-launching memoir of growing up in poverty in rural Ohio. And J.D. Vance has been doing the press rounds, including on the ABC talk show The View, where he called his notorious description about Democrats being childless cat ladies as one of the dumbest things he's ever said. He also spoke to The Atlantic and staff writer Vivian Salama. She spoke to the BBC's James Kumasami. He really sets out to talk about how he came to discover

his faith. He's a Catholic convert. And he converted in 2019. His first book, Hillbilly Elegy, was published in 2016. So this was aimed at kind of filling that gap because a lot of the first book talks about his religious skepticism, if you will. And since then, he's sort of been on this quest to find spirituality, to find maybe a spiritual home. And he talks about having done so through a lot of trial and error in his life. his sort of non-religious Protestant upbringing and eventually kind of discovering or rediscovering the Catholic Church later in life. To what extent is this an attempt to finish his journey to the very top of American politics? You know, it is a right of passage for any presidential candidate, if you

will, to write a memoir. And of course, he's already done that. But this one sort of picks up on the spiritual element of it, which for a Republican especially, and especially as the party gets more and more conservative, that element of it is really significant. They make up a big voting block for Republicans. And so I said, I told him, you know, I'm a skeptic and I'm going to ask you, you know, are you trying to win over the religious conservatives here? And so I asked him about that shift. And he sort of brushed aside the political element of it. Your assessment, though, I mean, the timing of this, the fact he's on all the talk shows, he's talking to you. I mean, is this not clearly part of a longer-term pitch for the presidency?

Oh, there's no question about it. He is believed to be the heir apparent to President Trump, and he represents a very different brand of sort of the MAGA politician to President Trump, whose views we would tell you are pretty malleable in terms of ideologies that he promotes. J.D. Vance is much more of a believer. He's much more sort of traditional textbook MAGA official. And yet he's still having trouble breaking through in terms of getting the voters to know who he is and distinguishing himself from President Trump. And this book in a way tries to do that in terms of even the religious component to it. He talks about, you know, religion in such a way that President Trump never does. I mean, President Trump has really stepped away and calls himself a non-practicing Christian.

I mean, he had another conversion, didn't he? He was a never-trumper. He was very overtly a critic of. Donald Trump. You some very strong language about him back in the day, and obviously he's now his right-hand man in the White House. So is he now trying to gently distance himself by stressing this side of his personality, which is very different to the one that Donald Trump emphasizes of his? I mean, just to emphasize your point, he once called Donald Trump Hitler. And now he is one of these staunchest defenders of President Trump and the administration's policies. And he talks

about that in the book, although he does not, he very conveniently leaves out the Hitler reference, but he does talk about his skepticism about President Trump once upon a time. And he says, you know, I'm never going to be able to convince some of my political opponents of this journey that I had and they're going to be skeptical of me and that's fine. But the bottom line is that I started to really look at his policies after his first term and I saw them as being effective. Vivian Salama of the Atlantic, speaking to the BBC's James Kumar Assami. Still to come in this podcast, we meet the motorbike riders being paid a pittance to smuggle oil out of Iran. I'm helpless. That's why I'm here. Just look at the heat. We sleep during the journey.

We travel day and night. Now I will go and sell this petrol. Every story is in some way a technology story. And on the interface, we decode the tech that's rewiring your week and your world. On this week's episode, will your resume forever be stuck in AI limbo? Is slow messaging better than instant messaging? And why on earth are tech CEOs making their own game show? Listen on BBC.com or wherever you get your podcast. This is the Global News Podcast.

Now, it's arguably one of the big challenges of our times. The impact AI is having on the job market. And it's likely to affect younger people the most as they decide what careers to choose. It's a problem, 17-year-old Thia, who lives in Seattle in the US, is worried about. So she asked her dad, Babeth, who spent 25 years at Microsoft leading AI and customer experience initiatives, what profession she should move into. He developed a guide for her and other young people. Rahul Tandon has been speaking to them both.

You will hear from Thia first. I wasn't necessarily kind of scared of AI. I just didn't know which direction to kind of go with it, you know? Because, like, I think that was kind of my thought process. Bobbeth, can I come to you here? You're a dad like me with a young daughter who's about to enter the world of employment at some point in the next few years. Were you worried about the impact of AI on her? I mean, I'm worried about the impact it's going to have on my daughter's career prospects.

Yeah, Wari was really in the form of timing for me, Rahul, and let me explain that. You know, really, if you look at previous automation waves, they sort of displaced workers over decades. But with AI, it's actually displacing entry-level professional roles in three to five years. I mean, we can already see the impact of that in the industry. We can see the progression of that technology going at risk-quick speed. So Tia's generation, when I looked at it, they won't have the runway that you and me have or the generations before us. And that really terrified me because there isn't a lot of opportunity to learn the craft and then course correct over time. So here you are.

Your daughter comes to you. And then you come up with this guide of, I suppose, if we take it at face value, you know, the best careers. Let's start with a question every parent, every child wants an answer to. What are the AI proof professions? Are there any? What AI is really taking out today is that 20 to 30 percent of the bottom rung where the tasks were mostly repetitive, those kind of things are already automated. They have already eroded from the bottom rungs. But there will be some careers, won't there, which are less at risk from AI. Medicine, doctors, nurses. Are those safer from the research you've done?

Yes, absolutely. So the fundamental here is to really look at carriers from the aspects that AI cannot replicate in terms of emotional intelligence. You know, it's not just being in the room, but the ability to understand the sentiments across the person who's sitting with you. Of course, careers that demand physical dexterity, you know, careers that include a lot of skilled, you know, labor, for example, your electricians, plumbers, and the carriers that score highest in my research, all anchor on at least one of these women capabilities.

Yeah, and they were healthcare, weren't they, skilled traders. Education was high there as well. Thea, I know before Dad's research, before you asked him the question, and he went off and did all of this, finance was something you were looking at after the research. Are you still looking at that or are you going to become a plumber? No, I'm not looking at finance anymore. I'm thinking of international relations. I think for sure this generation would have to think harder, but I think they also have to think smarter. It's not really necessarily about working harder. than our parents, I think it's more about choosing differently and making more deliberate decisions than my parents previously did when making career pathways. Rahul Tandun speaking to Thea and her father, Babeth. Iran's export economy has long been propped up by one thing, oil, and the war with the US has shattered that. But illegal Iranian oil is still leaving the country.

The BBC World Service has gained rare access. to the motorbike couriers who smuggle millions of litres of Iranian fuel across the mountains into Pakistan. It's then sold on the black market. The riders who risk their lives for tiny profits say the Iran war has led to a new smuggling boom in Pakistan's poorest region. Farhat Javid reports. On the edge of Pakistan's border with Iran,

thousands of motorbikes are gathered together, kicking up dust in blistering heat. The rider's faces are protected with scarves and goggles. They are smugglers and here for one thing, Iranian fuel. On large containers strapped to their bikes, they move it from Iran's border into Blocestan, Pakistan's poorest province. It's the front line of what some estimate to be a billion-dollar illegal fuel smuggling operation. In footage obtained exclusively by the BBC from inside Iran, we see this fuel being loaded onto trucks,

ready to be delivered into the hands of drivers like Mazar, not his real name, in Pakistan. Once a farmer, he had to turn to smuggling after drought hit. I'm helpless. That's why I'm here. Just look at the heat. We sleep during the journey, we travel day and night, and then sleep in the morning. Now I will go and sell this petrol. It's hard work with small returns.

For a profit of just $11 a day, Mazar travels more than 12 hours through unforgiving terrain under constant threat of violence due to the region's decades-long armed insurgency. His worn-out motorbike is loaded with hundreds of litres of flammable fuel, adding more risk to an already dangerous journey. In hot weather, these soften and catch fire.

I have to die one day anyway. I don't worry about it. I could die now. Who knows? That is a last decision. Smuggling here isn't new. It's a well-established black market. But since the war in Iran, it seems more fuel has been crossing the border.

Earlier this month, Pakistan's oil companies warned the government that smuggling had pushed official fuel sales to their lowest level in 27 years. A decline, they say, is costing the government more than $50 million a month. Paddy Ginn, the senior expert for the global initiative against transnational organized crime. The Iran war has led to a hike of prices on the petrol forecourts in Pakistan. And criminal actors are increasing their amount of smuggled fuel to profit from this. It's ramped up and it's an absolutely essential survival. network or survival means, both the Iranian regime, but also for the communities on both sides

of the borders. Local authorities here deny smuggling is on the rise, but admit it's an industry which is hard to control. Shahid Rind is an aid to the chief minister of Palochesthan. Look, you have to give us the benefit of the doubt, as this is a porous border. We not only fenced our border with Afghanistan, but also started fencing the border with Iran. There may be one or two points where smugglers can take advantage. Smuggling is a lifeline for millions who rely on it as a means of survival. It's lucrative for some, but not those at the lowest end of the network. Couriers like Mazar.

Few other job opportunities in Balochistan mean they will continue to take the huge risks for very little return. The Iranian government did not respond to a request for comment. Javid. Finally, the return of a truly legendary tennis duo to a truly legendary tennis tournament. The 23-time Grand Slam singles champion Serena Williams and her sister Venus will be back at this year's Wimbledon after being given a wild card for the women's doubles. Katie Gournell reports. Serena Williams gets involved, volleys away and raises her arms al off. She goes to hug her sister Venus. They are Wimbledon doubles champions.

They are one of the most successful partnerships in tennis history. Venus and Serena Williams have won the women's doubles at Wimbledon six times together, most recently, in 2016. Now the 45 and 44-year-old sisters are set to team up again on the grass courts where they built their legend. It's a reunion many tennis fans thought they might never see. Four years ago, Serena played what many expected was the final match of her career at the U.S. Open. But last week, the 23-time Grand Slammed singles champion made her much-anticipated comeback in the women's doubles at Queens. And Serena Williams is back with a bang.

Now that comeback is set to reach another level. Here's former British number one, Annabelle Croft. Venus and Serena are already icons of the sport, and they have brought so much to the world of tennis. And I think for young kids to be able to see them back out there, together, it just feels like it's a really special moment in time. Everybody is so intrigued, but so, so excited. Neither sister has a wild card to compete in the singles at Wimbledon,

though intriguingly there is still one spot left. Katie Gournell. And that's all from us for now. If you want to get in touch, you can email us at globalpodcast at bbc.com. You can also find us on X at BBC World Service. use the hashtag global news pod. We have a sister podcast, The Global Story, which goes in depth and beyond the headlines on one big story.

This edition of the Global News podcast was mixed by Risenwin Dorrell, and the producer was Muzafat Shakir. The editor is Karen Martin, and I'm Will Chalk. Until next time, goodbye. Every story is in some way a technology story, and on the interface, we decode the tech that's rewiring your week and your world. On this week's episode, Will your resume forever be stuck in AI limbo?

Is slow messaging better than instant messaging? And why on earth are tech CEOs making their own game show? Listen on BBC.com or wherever you get your podcast.