Guerrilla History - Guerrilla History Pilot
Episode Date: November 7, 2020Welcome to the Guerrilla History Podcast's pilot episode! Guerrilla History is the podcast that acts as a reconnaissance report of global proletarian history, and aims to use the lessons of history to... analyze the present. Your hosts are immunobiologist Henry Hakamaki, Professor Adnan Husain, historian and Director of the School of Religion at Queens University, and Revolutionary Left Radio's Breht O'Shea. In this pilot episode, the guys run through what the vision and goals of this podcast will be, as well as some topics that we hope to cover in the near future. We hope that the discussion will be useful to you, and if you have any questions or guest/topic suggestions, email them to us at guerrillahistorypod@gmail.com. Follow us on social media! Our podcast can be found on twitter at https://twitter.com/guerrilla_pod, and can be supported on patreon at https://www.patreon.com/guerrillahistory. Your contributions will make the show possible to continue and succeed! To follow the hosts, Henry can be found on twitter at https://twitter.com/huck1995, and also has a patreon to help support himself through the pandemic where he breaks down science and public health research and news at https://www.patreon.com/huck1995. Adnan can be followed on twitter at https://twitter.com/adnanahusain, and also runs The Majlis Podcast, which can be found at https://anchor.fm/msgp-queens, and the Muslim Societies-Global Perspectives group at Queens University, https://www.facebook.com/MSGPQU/. Breht is the host of Revolutionary Left Radio, which can be followed on twitter at https://twitter.com/RevLeftRadio and on Libsyn at https://revolutionaryleftradio.libsyn.com/, and cohost of The Red Menace Podcast, which can be followed on twitter at https://twitter.com/Red_Menace_Pod and on Libsyn https://redmenace.libsyn.com/. You can support those two podcasts by visiting https://www.patreon.com/RevLeftRadio and https://www.patreon.com/TheRedMenace. Thanks to Ryan Hakamaki, who designed and created the podcast's artwork.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
You don't remember den, Ben, boo?
No!
The same thing happened in Algeria, in Africa.
They didn't have anything but a rank.
The French had all these highly mechanized instruments of warfare.
But they put some guerrilla action on.
Hello, and welcome to guerrilla history.
The podcast that acts as a reconnaissance report of global proletarian history and aims to use
the lessons of history to analyze the present. I'm your host, Henry Huckamacki, joined by
my co-host, Professor Adnan Hussein, historian and director of the School of Religion at
Queens University in Ontario, Canada. Hello, Adnan. Hi, Henry. Great to be with you. Nice to
have you here. And Brett O'Shea, host of Revolutionary Left Radio and co-host of the Red Menace
podcast. Hello, Brett. Hello, happy to be here, excited for this project. Yeah, it's great to have
you and I'm glad to be starting it with both of you. So today we're going to be launching our
podcast, guerrilla history, which is really exciting for me because too often there's a lot of
proletarian history that's overlooked in mainstream media and even in independent media. So here we're
going to try to bring light to a lot of these subjects. But before we get into talking about
what our podcast is going to be going forward, perhaps let's get an introduction to who each
of us are for the listeners that they know who's talking to them. Adnan, you want to begin?
Who are you? Oh, well, you summed up at least my institutional affiliations. I'm a historian,
and I teach at Queens University in Kingston, Ontario, Canada. And I'm actually a medieval
historian by specialty. So I focus on Muslim-Christian-Jewish interaction. So it's far removed from
some of the current sorts of histories we'll be talking about. But I've always had a great love and
interest in the way in which the past can inform contemporary understanding for social justice,
struggles, and activism. So I'm really delighted to be involved with this. And in my, you know,
free time and outside of the work that I do professionally as a historian of medieval Europe,
I'm engaged in various kinds of social justice movements in my community and helping people
understand more about the Middle East. And so I run a program called Muslim Society's Global
Perspectives Project at Queen's University that tries to do a lot of public education about the
Middle East and Islamic world to deal with the questions and problems about Islamophobia in the
community. And so I often like to use history as a way to ground those kinds of analysis of
those kinds of issues. And so that's the kind of project I see this podcast being really
useful for. As I understand, this isn't the first time you've done a project like this. You
previously had a project called Radio Bandung. Would you like to talk about that briefly?
Oh, yes. I had a radio show for a while that I think is a real precursor to what I hope this will become and even grow into a more successful sort of survey of history. It was called Radio Bandung and it was on the local, you know, Queens University, CFRC College radio station. And I did it with a colleague in history. And we tried to basically talk about third world, anti-colonial, anti-racism.
movements for social justice, worker struggles,
and we would interview people who had written books
about history in the 20th century
and have a conversation with them
and then try and think about ways in which this history
could be relevant to our contemporary situation,
both to understand it but also to transform it.
Great. Brett, I've been on your show before, Rev. Left.
You've been a guest of me on the day
David Feldman show before.
Who are you for the listeners that perhaps aren't familiar with you?
Yeah.
Well, my name is Brett O'Shea, and I run two podcasts currently.
One is Rev. Left Radio, which has been on the air for almost four years.
It started right after Trump was actually elected.
And it actually grew out of organizing efforts on the ground through a basically working
class collective of people coming together in the wake of not just the Trump election,
but the rise in far-right sort of agitation and organization in our community as well as around the country.
But we had some prominent fascist and neo-Nazi types who we came together to organize,
to create a front to work against and to out to the community
and just to give the community heads up, keep track and tabs on these organizations
and try to give people the necessary information to keep themselves safe.
And that evolved into a broader organizing effort,
and part of that organizing effort was to do political education.
And so RevLeft came out of that, and it was initially just supposed to be like a local thing,
but once you put it online, it can fall into anybody's hands.
And before we knew it, we had a national and then an international audience.
And then from that, we created a secondary podcast really focused just on political theory texts.
So reading and explaining those texts that a lot of people on the left like to talk about
and argue about, but few actually sit down and read much less.
understand and we wanted to fill that gap so we created red menace with my co-host alison escalante and
between these two shows which focused on different things but are obviously related we've built up
quite a base of listeners and then when i was approached about you know doing this third podcast really
focused on history which is already deeply an interest of mine i jumped at the chance so yeah that that's
basically who i am and where i come from yeah and i've i've been a big fan of both of those shows that you
run for a long time pretty much since both of them have started and they've really taught me a lot and
I'm hoping that this new project can basically do the same for other people by bringing perspectives
that they otherwise wouldn't be exposed to and bringing those things to light so that people can
really digest this stuff that they never would come across otherwise. So I guess I'll introduce
myself briefly now. My name's Henry Huckimacki. I'm a graduate researcher of immunobiology. So a little
bit divorced from what you would expect in a history podcast, but I've been an activist since my
undergraduate days and deeply involved with, you know, the left and advocacy and have had a deep
interest both academically as well as personally in political science, international affairs
and history for basically as long as I can remember. So this is really what you could consider
a passion project of mine, even though it doesn't necessarily fall within my academic
discipline. So we may have episodes going forward that do tangentially mention science.
I know we had discussed potentially having an episode coming up in the future about the
history of pandemics as well as how that influenced society, because that's something that a lot
of people don't really think about, is how these pandemics have influenced society.
So those would fall within my specific academic wheelhouse.
But primarily what this podcast is going to be is looking at movements throughout history
and to take lessons out of those going forward.
But before I get you two to talk about what you would like to get out of this project,
what you would like the listeners to get out of this project,
I think let's hit some interstitial music.
we'll get our thoughts together
and then we'll come back
and we'll talk about
what we see this podcast being
as well as why we think
that the listeners
should be listening
to this podcast
and what we hope
that they get out of it.
So we're back on guerrilla history.
Now we've introduced
their selves,
myself,
Professor Hussein and Brett,
And now let's talk a little bit about what we see this podcast becoming in the months to come,
hopefully years to come, and what we want our listeners to get out of it.
So who wants to get their perspective out there first as to what they want this to become?
I can start off.
Yeah, just quickly.
I think it's incredibly important for anybody who wants to understand the present state of the country.
of the world, which I think a lot of people are struggling to understand. It's essential that you
study history. But the way that history is studied obviously diverts in different ways. We all know
that the general sort of cliche that history is written by the victors, or in Vijay Prasad's
new book, he says, history is often written by the stenographers of power. And so what we get
handed down to us is a version of history that really comes from the ruling class's perspective
in most cases. And even when subversive, even revolutionary movements are described,
they're almost always described, at least vaguely from a perspective that's not wholly their
own. It's from the perspective of in the time those who opposed them. And so I think even when
I think about political theory, which is something that's very close to my heart, something
we do on Red Menace, which is these deep dives in a political theory, when somebody comes up
and says, where should I start? You know, I'm almost, you know, always tempted to put
them in the direction of studying history first because i think almost equally an understanding a really
firm understanding of history is um it really equips you intellectually and critically with the knowledge
necessary to understand things even more so than just political theory in a vacuum now ideally
political theory and history combined give you a really good understanding of things but i think
history might even be in many cases at least um even more fundamental and so you know doing that
history and doing it from the perspective of the most oppressed, from the perspective of the
proletariat, of the colonized, I think is useful, incredibly useful work that you don't see
enough of. And to come to the table with that explicit perspective, I think is what we hope to
accomplish here with guerrilla history. I think what Brett raised are some really fantastic
and important points about the value of history. What I imagine in some ways, the episodes of
this podcast being or performing in a way are sort of field reports, field intelligence from the
terrain of history in doing these reconnaissance style history, which is a concept that famous
Canadian historian of the left, Ian Mackay, sort of termed as a way to guide a kind of
counter history that doesn't just do what Brett mentioned, the stenography of power.
but actually provides a kind of usable understanding of the past as a kind of intelligence report to aid
activist and movements for struggle and change for social justice. And that's how I imagine and
understand history can and should be understood and studied as a resource that is available to
us, both to learn from, but also to understand our world in order to really assess the
powers and the array of forces and how they're mobilized and organized where their weak spots
are, you need to have a good resume and understanding of history, how that has changed, and then
also to take inspiration from some of the struggles, whether successful or not, that we should be
in solidarity with, that we should learn from in order to understand how we can adapt
knowledge to our present and contemporary social struggles for freedom, liberation, equality,
and justice. And I think another important point is that we really do imagine this as a global
sort of history. That is, we're interested in the third world, in worker struggles and
movements all around the world over the last few centuries that can,
tribute to the way in which this globalized world connects our struggles. We have to understand
the interdependence of our struggles. Too often, we take just a local or national perspective
in our history and in our struggle. And I'm hopeful that if we learn from the patterns of
revolutionary struggle and change around the world, that we will be much better equipped to provide
the kind of solidarity that's necessary for these to be successful and to contribute to a truly
global moment for social change. Yeah, I agree entirely with what both of you were saying.
I think that unfortunately the way that history is taught, at least in the United States,
far too often boils down to when something happened and where something happened
as opposed to why something happened
and how that event influenced the future going forward.
So what's really key for us here
is not just to focus on dates and places,
but for us to take lessons out of these events
that we can apply to analyzing current events,
both within the country that the event that we're talking about,
happened in as well as globally, as Adnan just mentioned.
For example, and it's something that we've,
mentioned Vijay Prashad before and just a teaser, he's going to be our first guest. So for the
next episode of guerrilla history, Vijay Prashad will be the guest. In his new book, he mentioned
quite rightly that the Carnation Revolution in Portugal wouldn't have been possible without the
anti-colonial struggles against Portuguese colonial power in Africa. If you were only looking at
those anti-colonial struggles, you wouldn't necessarily tie them into the Carnation Revolution. And if you
were only looking at the Carnation Revolution and Portugal itself, you wouldn't necessarily
be looking at those anti-colonial struggles. So to really go in and dive deep and be able to look
at these events, not just, okay, this year, this event happened in 1974, the Carnation Revolution
happened. Yeah, understanding the dates is useful for putting a timeline together of what happened
and when things happened. But that's not the full picture. You really have to have this
interconnectedness between events, cause and effect, to be able to understand history and to be
able to actually utilize history, because as we know, understanding history is good, but using
history to affect change is really what the key is. So I think that it's important that we
take not only a global perspective, but really look for these lessons. Again, some of these
movements that we were talking about, proletarian movements across the world, especially in
the third world, which is where I think that we should really be diving deep into because
those are the most overlooked movements in contemporary history literature. We need to be looking
into those events and taking out what the good was from that movement, what the bad was from
that movement, what the ugly was from that movement. Why did they succeed? Why did they fail? What
could they have done better? What did they do? That was unexpectedly good. Because when we take those
lessons out, we not only can see how that event affect other events in the past, but we can take
those positive lessons from those events to utilize trying to move forward ourselves and to try
to avoid the negatives that they face that they didn't potentially foresee in the past. So I think that
that's really the key when we're using history is to be able to really get lessons out of it,
not just to be able to see what happened and where it happened,
but to really get that understanding of this was good, this was bad,
this is something that could be tried. Adnan?
Well, I think that was a great example to use about the relationship, for example,
between anti-colonial struggles for liberation in Africa
and their consequences on a fascistic regime in Europe,
in the case of Portugal.
And I think it's also those connections.
As you say, a lot of the third world histories
or the histories of people in Asia, Africa, and Latin America
are typically less focused on when we're talking about the history of the left.
it's really important to see that these struggles are common and that there are links between
what happens there in our world and what happens inside Europe, North America, and so forth.
And that's why I think the Malcolm X quote from the bullet famous speech of 1964 is such a
perfect way of encapsulating guerrilla history and the reconnaissance reports we want to offer
because Malcolm X himself was using history at that moment.
It had been nine, ten years or so since the Battle of Diem Ben-Fu,
and he tells his audience, do you remember Die M. Ben-Fu?
And they immediately react in this way.
Why? Because it's a moment that illustrates a point that he's trying to make,
that is a historic lesson, that it is possible to defeat the colonial powers,
that they are weakening and to give people a sense of hope and inspiration that their struggle could
matter. Because one thing that happened a lot in the African American freedom struggle in the
United States is that people would focus on the fact that they were a minority, a racial minority
in white America and that the system was too strong and that it would be impossible for them
to struggle for freedom in an aggressive and in an uncompromising way.
They imagined very often that we had to lobby and appeal for the power structure to open
itself up.
And what Malcolm X was arguing was that this power structure is weaker than you think, and we
need to have affiliations and lines of solidarity with contemporary, anti-colonial, anti-racism
struggles around the world and imagine ourselves as part of that struggle. And when we do that,
then we will feel emboldened to take political action in our own context. And that's the value
of history that he saw. Remember Diem Ben-Fu, and as he pointed out, asymmetric war was brought
these great powers to their knees and accomplished amazing things. So we need to take some
inspiration from history, and that's the purpose, I think, of these sorts of episodes is to guide
the same kind of activist political thinking based on historical analysis. Let's remember,
D.M. Ben-Fu. Yeah, absolutely. Well said. And I think what we're all getting at or we're all saying
in different ways is also indicative of a general approach, which I think we're all going to take,
which, you know, can roughly be realized as a dialectical method, which means that we view history
as being connected with everything else around it, right?
You have to understand the history leading up to an event to understand that event.
We don't understand things like so much bourgeois history does,
which is almost as static, as Henry said, names and events,
sort of decontextualized from everything happening around them.
So one of the dialectical methods is to understand that everything is deeply related
and to understand something.
You have to understand its relationship to everything else,
that everything is cause and effect,
that everything is analyzed through the internal contradictions of a given movement, society, culture, et cetera.
And then finally, that history doesn't happen in this linear march of progress.
Rather, it happens in ruptural leaps from the status quo to new forms of life.
Even if those forms of life are eventually rolled back by reaction, they represent a jump forward in history.
And so we view history as that, not as some static, linear set of events.
and names. And I think understanding history in that way gives a much more robust understanding
generally of the world around us. And I think that's something that we're all aiming at. And we all come
from three different backgrounds. So we'll have three unique perspectives on everything, but we're
united in the fact that we're seeing history from the eyes of the oppressed and we're applying
this sort of dialectical method to understand it more robustly. Yeah, exactly. And one thing that I want
to point out just as an example of what Brett was just talking about, things move and leaps
and then sometimes they're rolled back by the forces of reaction. Perfect example of that is
colonialism. We were talking about anti and decolonial struggles throughout history. Of course,
back in the 60s and 70s, we had a lot of successful decolonial struggles. But just because
they had these successful decolonial struggles doesn't mean that we don't have neocolonialism now.
And that's something that if you're only focusing on dates and places, that doesn't give you a full picture of what's going on.
If you say, okay, Thomas Sankara came in and that was their decolonial struggle, apartheid in South Africa fell, you had the People's Republic of the Congo, you had the Algerian independence movement.
You had all of these things that occurred that really were successful decolonial struggles.
And if you only were focusing on that event in isolation, you would say, okay, these places have been decolonialized.
And now they're independent.
The people in their country have the say over what they do.
They're sovereign.
They don't have any external forces.
But that's not how history works.
As Brett said, as we have this leap.
We have this decolonial leap.
And that is a major event for the people in those countries.
But if you don't dive under the surface as to what happened afterwards, the same.
see how that was rolled back, you don't realize the neocolonialism and the struggles that the
people in those countries are still facing today. And in many cases, increasingly so, because
the forces of colonialism, they've taken a different form than they were in the past. But that doesn't
mean that they're any less pervasive than they have been in the past. They just have different
methods of operating. And so by taking this dialectical approach to looking at history and being
able to understand that not everything is static, not everything slowly transitions over time,
we can realize that what is happening on the ground in these places that we're looking at
is not necessarily indicated by a individual event. And I think that that's a really important
thing that we're going to highlight within this show is that one successful event or one
failure isn't the end of history. Unlike Francis Fukuyama, there is no end of history. History is
always changing. There's always a struggle and there's always counter struggles. And by understanding
these, we can really get an idea of what's truly happening and not just this blob of broad understanding
of what's happening both within a certain area as well as globally. You really have to dive deep and look
beyond what is necessarily just on the surface.
Well, that's what's so fascinating and wonderful about studying history
is that basically anything and everything that happened before
could be part of one's analysis.
So one can go into the history of events to really understand
whether they were transformative and if so how.
So you think of the French Revolution as a very transformative event
that changed a lot of structures,
but yet also at the same time you have to put it in the context of a longer, you know, period of
transition. So, you know, this is one thing that I think is so fascinating, for example, about
Marx is the way in which he combines. And I think, you know, Brett mentioned that political
theory, economic analysis should be combined with history. And I think that's something that,
for example, Marx really tried to do was, you know, use history as the evidentiary basis for
analysis that would lead to developing some kinds of theoretical and conceptual
understandings about how societies work and operates so that you have a dialectical
understanding of how transformation can take place and needs to take place. And so I think
we may sometimes find that it's really fruitful to talk and go deep in a particular event
that seems very significant.
Sometimes it may be more important
to talk about larger-scale processes,
like, for example,
the sort of decolonization wave
that takes place in Africa
through the 60s and early 70s,
for example, and to have some sense of
how did this all work together,
not just as isolated individual cases
of national liberation,
but how did it change the world as a whole?
looking at structural kinds of issues. And I think, you know, between those things, between events and
these larger processes and structures, there's so much to learn and to understand. And it's really just a
question of scale when we talk about these issues. You can learn so much from looking very closely
at a local event. And you can also understand and appreciate history on a larger global level of
what are the forces and processes that define a particular period or a particular movement.
And I think each of these are useful and everything in between.
Hopefully, in different ways in these episodes, will equip us to analyze and understand history
across that scale, from small scale events to larger global processes.
Yeah, and I think one of the other benefits that you get from doing a deep dive of history,
especially in a way that sees everything is connected,
is that you begin to see yourself and your own life as a historical product.
And you start to realize that you are situated within these historical processes,
whether you wanted to or not, you're dropped right into them.
And to start understanding your own life as an outgrowth of history
and then to understand that we are the vehicles through which history manifests,
that we actually have some agency in the direction that we can push history,
I think is incredibly ennobling and incredibly sort of reifying, at least for me, you know,
it connects me to something much bigger than myself, and that is something that at the very
least is interesting and at the higher levels can be really existentially almost fulfilling in a way
when you understand yourself consciously as a product of history and then as an agent that
can go about changing it and push it on new trajectories. That's an empowering thing.
That's right. I mean, we are the makers of our own history, but we don't make the conditions
in which we make that history.
And so that's the dialectical condition
that we have to understand history
in order to realize,
well, what is it that we can change in our time
as agents?
And what do we inherit that we need to work with?
So I think that's a really important point,
that it really helps us situate ourselves
in our contemporary struggles for social justice
to make a better world
is we have to really understand
where we are
and how we fit into history.
Yeah, excellent.
I mean, I agree with everything that both of you have been saying,
and I'm really looking forward to getting stuck into this project with the two of you.
For these episodes going forward, we're going to be having guests in them,
who are experts either academically or in terms of activism on the ground for specific events,
topics, the like.
And we'll be bringing them on to get a deep dive into these different events,
and then we'll be trying to piece together the bits to try to come up with this overview
of how we should have viewed these events and the lessons that we can take out of them.
So thanks for showing up to this introductory podcast episode.
As I told the listeners earlier, and I'll remind them now,
the next episode that we have will be an interview with Vijay Prashad talking about his book,
Washington Bullets, which is just out.
So if this is the kind of history that you want to be listening to,
Make sure to stay tuned because that's going to be an excellent interview.
I'm sure that VJ is just a wonderful person and a wonderful interviewee.
So Adnan Brett, thanks again.
This was great.
How can our listeners find each of you on social media?
For me, you can just go to Revolutionary LeftRadio.com.
It has both of our shows, Red Menace and Rev. Left Radio.
It has access to our Patreon, our Twitter, everything centralized at Revolutionary Left Radio.com.
You can find me on Twitter at Adnan A. Hussain.
And that's H-U-S-A-I-N for those wondering.
It'll be in the show notes, I'm sure, but just to get that out there.
For me, you can find me on Twitter at Huck 1995.
I also have a Patreon where I write about public health and science.
It helped me get through this pandemic myself.
You can find that at patreon.com forward slash Huck-1995.
And for this show, if you want to follow us on social media,
go to Twitter at Gorilla underscore Pod.
That's G-U-E-R-R-I-L-A-U-L-A-U-L-A-U-L-A-U-L-A-U-L-A.
And our Patreon is available.
Patreon.com forward slash guerrilla history.
Again, same spelling, two R's, two L's.
Thank you both very much.
And we'll get together soon to talk with
Vijay Prashad about his book, Washington Bullets. Take care.
I'm going to be able to.