Hidden Brain - Episode 41: Defeated

Episode Date: August 9, 2016

While everyone is focused on the Olympic winners in Rio, we're zooming in on loss. We have the story of how a world-champion judo player reacted to a devastating defeat, plus a Stopwatch Science on how losing affects us all.

This is Hidden Brain, I'm Shankar Vedantam. It's almost that time... ...for the Olympics. The pageantry, the dreams, breathtaking victories... ...for fans, it's an event of extraordinary drama. Athletes from across the globe competing at the very highest level at the limits of human endurance. Social scientists find the games equally compelling for what they reveal about human behavior.

When a match ends, the winners and losers do something. That's immediate, automatic, it's unconscious, they have no control of it, it just happens. About a second later, then they come to their senses and they realize that they're on stage. And whatever rules they've learned to manage their expressions kick in then. Coming up, what the Olympics can teach us about human behavior, from a professor who's also an Olympic judo coach. Stay with us. My guest today is David Matsumoto. He's a professor of psychology at San Francisco State University.

He's used the Olympics as a laboratory for psychological observations. But he's also been a part of the Olympics. David's coach the US Olympic judo team and his daughter has competed in the games. I'm going to talk to him today first about his research and then about what a sharp I'd psychologist might observe about human behavior at the games. David, welcome to Hidden Brain. Thank you so much for having me. You photographed 84 athletes from 34 countries who were competing in

the 2004 Athens Olympics judo competitions and you photographed them at the moments when they won or lost their matches. What did you find? Well, what you find is that people all around the world show exactly the same types of expressions depending upon whether they want to loss. So those who won a match or won a medal, for example, invariably showed some kind of enjoyment smile. And those who lost the last match showed nothing sometimes. Some of them showed sadness.

Some of them showed some kind of distress. But the interesting thing about these findings is that those patterns vary depending upon whether they won or lost, but they'd not vary across any of the countries or cultures that the athletes came from. Now most laypeople would not necessarily be surprised by this. They would sort of say, yeah, sure people win, they sort of look the same, but why is this interesting from a scientific perspective? Well, it's interesting because actually before our study, there were many, many studies that

have shown that similar types of patterns of findings, cross-cultural similarities in these expressions. But there was never a study that was done in what we call an ecologically valid environment out in the real world to show that people actually do this stuff in the real world outside of a psychology laboratory. And I was just very, very fortunate to be able to do this study at the Olympics, which is a perfect social psychological laboratory. In some ways, the study was basically making the argument, I suppose, that at least in the moment of triumph, people's reactions were shaped by what seemed

like biologically innate imperatives. Yeah, that's exactly right. However, that study by itself fell a little short. So in actuality, we had the second study, which studied the Paralympic Athletes. And in every sport in the Paralympic says a different disability for judo, it's blindness. And so we compared the expressions of the blind athletes to those of the sighted athletes, and we found exactly the same things.

So these are athletes who've been blind. Some of them presumably blind from birth. They presumably have... No, they haven't really... They make it even clearer than that. We had athletes who are congenitally blind. So blind from birth, there's no presumption about what they've seen. They've been impossible to see those expressions. And the fact that they produce the same things on their faces for certain emotions and then their bodies for triumph

absolutely suggest that these things are biologically innate. What did the facial expression of triumph look like? Well triumph is actually a whole body response and involves the expansion of the chest, raising the hands, oftentimes with a fist, a little bit of fierce or aggressive look in the face and oftentimes a stern gaze at some kind of target. Now one of the things you found which I found really fascinating was yes you do find evidence that some of these expressions are biologically innate but you also find that culture plays

a huge role at the Olympics. Tell me about that part of the study. What we did was study the expressions across time. So even though we were using a camera, we were using a camera that was shooting eight photographs a second. And so across a number of seconds we can see how expression is transformed across time. So immediately when a match ends the winners and losers do something. That's immediate, automatic, it's unconscious, they have no control of it, it just happens.

About a second later, then they come to their senses and they realize that they're on stage. And whatever rules they've learned to manage their expressions, kick in then. And that's that second expression or third expression sometimes where you see these vast cultural differences. Some athletes are smiling, some athletes show nothing, some athletes start crying, some athletes do something else. But it's very interesting how you see the change at that point, but cultural invariance at the beginning. You find that even though you have this range of emotions that kicks in after the first second

or the first couple of seconds, these are not random. These actually are in some ways culturally determined that you actually find athletes from certain countries behave predictably differently than athletes from other countries. Yes, we were able to identify the various patterns of that cultural variation later on. So, they're the neutralizers. Those who kind of show nothing as stereotypes, you can pick up Eastern Soviet block or also Soviet block countries, Eastern Europe. Those who have some communist history in them Cuba for example are like that. You can think of the de-amplifiers, those who show something but it's muted a little bit. There are a lot of North American

western kind of cultures that do that. There's those that smile a lot after something, even those that have something negative, you can think of the East Asians as something like that. So yes, there's these very interesting cultural, geographic variations on how the major patterns go in the cultural regulation. So in other words, people express what really maybe is happening inside them, but then the culture kicks in

and says, here's the way you off to behave in the situation. That's exactly what it is in that. And the reason why most of us don't see that immediate reaction is because when something happens, we're often looking at the thing that happened. So by the time we look at the person who it happened to, they're already on the cultural regulation part. And it's people like us who have a camera on that person all the time who are watching the immediate reactions, we can get the immediate reaction. One of the most celebrated studies looking at the Olympics, we featured at elsewhere in Hidden Brain.

This is a study by Thomas Gillovich at Cornell, along with Victoria Medvek and Scott Medi. He analyzed the expressions on the faces of metal winners in the Barcelona Olympics. And he found that in general, bronze metal winners looked happier than silver metal winners in the Barcelona Olympics. And he found that in general, bronze metal winners looked happier than silver metal winners. I'm gonna let you tell me why that might be the case, but also how your own research both amplified and has a nuance to that finding.

Well, we found exactly the same things. Actually, one of the great things about our study is that not only were we able to study the expressions of the athletes right when they wanna loss, right when they're on the mat, We could follow them 30 minutes later in the middle ceremony so we saw what the same person did who had the same result but it's now the social context is different and you're exactly right the silver medallists everybody on the podium smiles. So there's no question about it because

this is a very public televised thing. But if you measure the exact muscles that are moving in the smiles, you find that, let's call the silver metal smiles more of the miserable smile because they've got a lot of other things going on. You can see the, you won't see the crinkle in the eyes. Sometimes you'll see the downturning of the lips because they're really trying to control

some negative feelings along with the smile. So some of them look miserable when they're smiling. And Gilevich would argue this is because a cell of metal winners are comparing themselves to the gold medal winners, saying if I only had gone half a second faster, if I'd only jumped a little bit faster, I could have been, I could be a gold medal winner.

That's exactly right. And so when you get to the bronze medalist, they have more reason to be happier because the alternative is nothing. Whereas the silver medalist, the alternative was the gold. And so in our study, we also found that the bronze medalists had more of the enjoyment smiles than the silver medalists did. The only exceptions that we found to this bronze medalist thing that I thought was really interesting when I look back at our data, there are some bronze medalists who did not look very happy.

And these were generally the winners of the world championships of the previous year who came into the Olympics as the favorite, and they had to settle for bronze. So because they had to settle for bronze, they were not as happy as those who are getting a bronze. And a lot of them didn't expect to get a medal or they were just happy to get a medal. Fascinating.

When we come back, I'm going to ask David about his own experience of the Olympics. And what a psychologist might learn from being a coach and being a parent of an Olympia. Stay with us. Give me some sense of the scale of what's happening in an athlete on the judo mad in the Olympics. I mean, physiologically, what's happening to that? I'll tell you exactly what's happening because we've actually studied this kind of thing. You know, if you and I are sitting down here right now having this conversation, if we clocked our heart rate, if we're healthy and normal, we probably about 60, 72, something

like that, since we're doing something that's really exciting right now, maybe we're at 80 or something. If you imagine yourself taking a jog, you might be at 70% of your max heart rate, which would maybe be at 1.3, 1.40 depending upon your age. In a judo match, we've actually clocked athletes heart rates around 200 beats a minute. Wow. And these are highly conditioned athletes. You've got to be highly conditioned to be at 200 beats a minute. And these are highly conditioned athletes. Highly, you've got to be highly conditioned to be at 200 beats a minute. And this is 200 beats a minute in combat conditions. Now, think about what I'm saying. You're going to be at 200 beats a minute in combat conditions, thinking clearly, being on your game,

knowing exactly what you're doing technically, strategically and everything else. To get to that point, it's not easy. It's nothing that we can sit around and talk about. It's nothing that I can really sit here and kind of help you like a traditional psychologist would. To tell you the truth, I've got to get you to be really physical. And I've got to train your body to tolerate the lactic acid that your body generates as I get you to that profile.

How do you get athletes as a coach to actually keep thinking when their bodies are in the state of hyperarousal? Well, first of all, you have to get them to be used to be that state of hyperarousal. So there's a long period of time. I mean, we're talking, it'll take several years of what we call periodized training to get an athlete to be at peak physical condition. Once you're there or along the way you're there, what you can do is then add in some drills, cognitive drills for athletes to do once they're at that level. So for example, I can create a situation where I'll get an athlete's hard rate up to 200. It's not easy, it's not fun. You don't want to be that person.

But once you're there, I can have you do a crossword puzzle. Or one of the things that we used to do is we used to have people run around a track sprinting the 800 meters around the track and once they come off the track, untidy humongous ropes with knots in them, which is entirely frustrating to do. But you know, you got to deal with the frustration

when your heart is going at 200 beats a minute to do this little complex cognition task. One of the things that I'm fine so fascinating is that so much of the Olympics actually happens out of sight of the TV cameras. So athletes have to get ready, they have to warm up. In fact, just getting to your competition itself can be a struggle, especially if you're competing on day one. Well, you're exactly right, because most of the public who watch these sports, who are

great, by the way, we wouldn't be here without our fans, but most of the public just turns on the TV and can see this peak performance and competition really is maybe the third thing that the athletes are worrying about. Maybe it's the main thing, but it's always the third thing. The first thing that we're always worrying about, number one is making weight. Because in judo, you got a weight division. And so, and everyone is, we call it walking around weight. Everyone's walking around weight is heavier

than what their weight division is. So you got to be on a program to cut down to a certain amount right before you're weighing in. Then you, everyone's got a routine to cut to weigh in. And it's not fun cutting weight. an amount right before you're weighing in, then you, everyone's got a routine to cut to weigh in. And it's not fun cutting weight. And it's not fun being with 20 people who are starving themselves. And if you have to be in starvation mode for a week, 10 days, whatever that is, it's a

miserable experience. No, some people do that better than others, but it's not the thing that you think that you want to be doing with your life in most of the time. So that's the first thing that the athlete is thinking about. What's the second? The second thing is the jet lag. So the Olympics are in Rio, and if you're coming from where I live, which is San Francisco, you're four hours away, and so you have to think about the four-hour difference.

If the Olympics were in Athens, like they were in 2004, now we're talking about a 10-hour difference. Olympics are going to be in Tokyo in 2020, and now we're talking about nine-hour difference Olympics are going to be in Tokyo in 2020 now we're talking about nine hour difference the other way if you're in San Francisco and These are big differences because if you're talking about peak performance You want people to be rested well fed well in peak mental condition And it's especially difficult if you're competing on day one and you want to be in the opening ceremonies And the thing that people don't know about the opening ceremonies is it usually ends around midnight wherever the host country is,

and everyone's got to get on a bus that the local committee sets up, and it's just chaos. It's just a zoo, so many athletes get lost. Buses don't know where to go, and so you might get on your bus at 12 o'clock and you might be back in the village at 3 a.m., and you might have a 6am way in time.

And so obviously if you did that it kind of screws you up for that competition. It turns out that flying east and flying west to get to the games is not the same thing. That in some ways it's better for the human body if you happen to be flying in one direction rather than the other. Yes, in fact it's easier to go in one direction rather than another because our bodies are built to function better on a 25-hour cycle than a 24-hour cycle. That's why it's easier for us to stay up longer than it is to get up earlier. And how that translates to travel is, when we travel west, our time zones are getting

later. So we're not- We just have to stay up a little bit later. We just have to stay up a little bit later. We just have to stay up a little bit later. And that's easier. When we travel east, like I came from San Francisco and here I am later. Yeah, stay up a little later. And that's easier when we travel east, like I came from San Francisco and here I am in DC now. That's a three hour time zone.

So this morning I had to be at a certain place at seven o'clock, which is four o'clock my time, which means I had to get up at three o'clock my time, which is more difficult. So yes, it's, we take these kinds of factors into account. You know, I think when people think about the Olympics who haven't been there, it seems very glamorous, very fun, you know, you're on this world stage,

everyone's watching you, everyone's cheering for you, everyone's hoping that you do well, and they clap for you when you succeed, and you're at peak performance, and it seems like it's sort of a glorious time in your life, in the life of the coaching staff, and so on. Is that how it actually feels when you're there?

Well, I can't speak for everybody else. I got to say that I never felt that glorious times in the four Olympics and the 12 world championships that I've been to because as a coaching staff member, first of all, you're not done with your feelings until everyone's done competing. And unfortunately, I never had the situation where everyone on my team got a gold medal. And if that happened, then I think after the competition, everything is glorious. But no matter how good our team did, whether it's my local team or the Olympic team or whatever teams we're talking about,

if there's one person that didn't make it, you know, if there's one person that didn't get what they wanted, I felt it. I could have nine players take a go and if one person took a silver, of course I'm happy, but it lingers for me. I think that's true for a lot of people. And I'll give you a good example of this when my daughter made the Olympic team in 2008. At the Olympic trials, her competitor in the finals was another woman from my dojo. And so as a judo instructor, you have two of your players in the finals of the Olympic trials. You know, you're golden because no matter who wins, someone from your dojo is going to

go and be on the Olympic team. But one of the competitors as your daughter. One of them is my daughter and the other one is my student who I treat like a daughter. And on top of that, when we're in competition, I don't have a daughter, I have a daughter. One of one of them is my daughter and the other one is my student who I treat like a daughter. And on top of that when we're in competition, I don't have a daughter, I have a player. You know, and my daughter knew that and we all knew that and I treated my daughter like anybody else in competition. Now after competition, she, you know, she's my daughter. But when we're in competition, she's another player and I got to treat her like I treat everybody else. And so anyway, we have these two players coming up and I have mixed feelings about that. You know, when my daughter won, I was happy for her, but I was very sad for my other player

who lost. So, after that, it was a very bitter sweet thing to have. I have occurred. And yeah, I mean, I don't want to take anything from my daughter as a parent. If I could compartmentalize my feeling solely as a parent, yeah, great. I'm happy. But no one can compartmentalize 100% where I couldn't. And so, as a parent, I feel good, as an instructor, I felt good and bad, and it's mixed up feelings that one had, and I still have it to this day.

I remember it very clearly right now. When you watch the Olympics now, and let's say you're not at the Olympics, let's say you're not going to, are you going to Rio? No. Okay, so when you watch the Olympics now and let's say you're not at the Olympics, let's say you're not going to, are you going to Rio? No. Okay. So when you watch the Olympics on television now, what is it that you're watching? What is it that you pay attention to knowing all that you know as a psychologist who studied the Olympics as a coach, who's coached to the Olympics as a parent at the Olympics?

What do you look for now? I look at a lot of things to take a truth and when I see peak performance of any type doesn't have to be sports. Even when I look at dancers or somebody who's really good at doing something that's difficult to do, they make it look so easy. And I automatically think about the sweat and the tears and the blood and the effort about the sweat and the tears and the blood and the effort for years that that person put in to be able to do that that we saw that was just effortless. When you're at competition, you're talking about, you know, a few minutes, an hour of years of preparation and you can't divorce your memories from those years of preparation, those things overwhelm me actually.

And so when you're thinking about the athletes, you're actually thinking about all of those, the times that we're not seeing on television, all of the waking up at four o'clock in the morning and practicing on the weekends and giving up other aspects of your life, and not just for the people who win, but also for everybody else who's there. Absolutely. I mean, everyone's made a huge sacrifice. And of course, the player or the athlete is always the number one sacrificeer but think about all their support staff. For us for every player that we had on the mat we had a support team of 10 or 20 just to get that person on the mat and so behind one person there's an army and everyone's on the same

team and they never share the limelight they never get the spotlight they just share in the knowledge that they help this person have a peak performance. When that person wins, everyone feels good and when that person loses, everyone feels awful. It's all those people, as well as the athletes, that my heart actually reaches out to when I see these things. David Montemore, I want to thank you for joining me today on Hidden Brain. My pleasure. thank you. This episode of Hidden Brain was produced by Chris Banderayev, and edited by Jenny Schmitt.

Our staff also includes Karam Akkar Kalasin, Maggie Panman, and Max Nassdrak. You can follow us on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram, and listen to my stories on your local public radio station. If you like this episode, give us a review. It helps. I'm Shankar Vedaantum, and this is NPR. you