Hidden Brain - You 2.0: The Wisdom of Stoicism
Episode Date: July 21, 2025What does it mean to be stoic? Many of us assume it means you have a stiff upper lip, or that you suppress your emotions. That's what Massimo Pigliucci thought — until he started to peruse a book ca...lled Meditations. It was written nearly two thousand years ago by the Roman Emperor Marcus Aurelius. But Massimo, now a philosopher, says Meditations, and Stoic philosophy more broadly, offer wisdom that continues to speak to our lives. This week, we explore Stoic ideas and what they tell us about a life well lived. Do you have follow-up questions and ideas about stoicism after listening to this episode? If you’d be comfortable sharing your comments and questions with the Hidden Brain audience, please record a voice memo on your phone and email it to us at ideas@hiddenbrain.org. Use the subject line “stoicism.”
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This is Hidden Brain. I'm Shankar Vedant.
To be human, to be alive, is to be vulnerable to sadness and suffering.
For centuries, artists, writers, and thinkers have tried to capture what this feels like.
The author William Styron once said,
The great drizzle of horror induced by depression takes on the quality of physical pain.
But it is not an immediately identifiable pain, like that of a broken limb.
It may be more accurate to say that despair comes to resemble the diabolical discomfort
of being imprisoned in a fiercely overheated room.
And because no breeze stirs this cauldron,
because there is no escape from the smothering confinement,
it is entirely natural that the victim begins to think ceaselessly of oblivion.
Sometimes our suffering is connected to what we see in the world.
During the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln, who was already prone to depression, was often
consumed by the horrors of the war.
His secretary, John Hay, would note that he would sit for hours staring vacantly out the
window, his face displaying the deepest sorrow imaginable.
But as long as humans have been suffering, humans have also been trying to find paths
out of suffering.
Philosophers, scientists, and spiritual leaders have offered many ideas on how to live a life
of contentment. Today on the show, we explore the ideas of an unusual philosopher king who lived some
19 centuries ago.
There's a reason his meditations about a life worth living have survived nearly 2,000
years.
Ancient ideas to help us find a way out of modern despondencies.
This week on Hidden Brain. Ancient ideas to help us find a way out of modern despondencies.
This week on Hidden Brain.
Most of us have been there. Low points in our life when we look around and realize that
something needs to change.
What we do in these moments can spell the difference between a life of well-being or
a life of despair.
At the City College of New York, philosopher Massimo Piliucci has personal experience with
such moments in his own life.
Massimo Piliucci, welcome to Hidden Brain.
It's a pleasure to be here.
Thanks for having me.
Massimo, your world fell apart when you turned 40.
Where were you living at the time?
I was in Knoxville, Tennessee, the buckle of the Bible belt, as they call it.
And what was going on in your life?
I had
started my academic career at the University of Tennessee. I had I was a
biologist at the time, not a philosopher, and I was being treated very well by the
university there. But at the same time there were a couple of things that were
problematic. Number one, the local culture was difficult for me to live in. I was a
professor of evolutionary biology.
My students, some of them actually told me
that I was probably gonna go to hell.
So I was like, you know, that's challenging.
But the more important bit was that I had a daughter
from a previous relationship
and she was living on the East Coast in Connecticut.
So I always wanted to move back into that area
and that is problematic for somebody who is a full professor with tenure because there are very few positions available, especially in the East Coast, because everybody wants to go there and typically universities hire junior faculty, not senior professionals. So that was a problem.
So that was a problem.
Massimo tried to address the situation by applying for jobs on the East Coast. As luck would have it, he landed a position with Stony Brook University on Long Island.
But even as it seemed like a solution was at hand for one challenge, others cropped up.
Massimo and his wife started having problems
in their marriage.
Instead of moving together to Long Island,
they decided to get a divorce.
And then Massimo's father,
who lived thousands of miles away,
was diagnosed with cancer.
So my father had been hit by multiple types of cancer. He was a big smoker. So at that
point, my mother, his ex-wife, made a comment. He said, which is Italian for the bad weeds never die.
She meant it as a joke, but it was, you know.
She meant it as a joke, but it was, you know. And then all of a sudden things took a turn for the worse and it killed him in a matter
of weeks.
In fact, it was so fast that I did not have the time to really do anything.
You know, I was on my way, literally on my way to the airport to get on the plane to
get to Rome and go see him.
And my brother called me saying, you know, that just that. I literally broke down crying on the
highway. I had to pull over. So I was able to get to his funeral, but not, but not being there
in the last few moments. So at this point, picture this, In a span of a few months I got hit
with this news that apparently I'm gonna be divorced, my father dies and in the
meantime of course I had accepted the position at Stony Brook which meant that
I had a new job, I had to move across the country and I had to find a new house.
Now any psychologist worth insult would tell you that one or two of those things
is pretty stressful. Four or five of them simultaneously? That's a lot.
So during this time of upheaval in your life, you found consolation and guidance in an unexpected
source. It was
a book you had encountered many years earlier in college, but rereading it this time, you
felt like it was speaking directly to you. What was this book, Massimo?
The book was The Meditations by Marcus Aurelius, which is a stoic book. And that's interesting
in itself because the first time that I came across Marcus Aurelius
I thought Stoics? Who wants to live a life like a Stoic? I mean aren't these the kind of people
that go around with a stiff upper lip and suppressing emotions right? So kind of like Mr Spock from
Star Trek. So when I came across Marcus again I thought hmm I don't know about this thing.
So when I came across Marcus again I thought hmm I don't know about this thing.
And then I opened the meditations and one of the first phrases... so the meditation is not the kind of book that you necessarily read cover to cover because it is it was the personal philosophical
diary or journal of the emperor so it was not in fact meant for publication. So when I opened it up
at random one of the first few sentences opened it up at random, one of the
first few sentences that I found is in one of the later books and it said
something like, you don't like the cucumber because it's bitter. Well, don't
eat it. Why do you have to go on and complain about the fact that there are
bitter cucumbers in the world? That struck me as very powerful and very insightful.
We tend to complain all the time
about the fact that things don't go our way,
that the world is not the way we would like it to be.
And those complaints don't do anything practical.
They're not actionable.
So complaining about it becomes simply a way
to wallow in your self pity or to fuel your own dissatisfaction with the world, which makes the thing worse.
So now you have both an external situation, some aspect of the world that you don't like, and you are making yourself inwardly worse by complaining about it in a way that it gets frustrating because you can't do anything about it. So I went back to that phrase it says okay there
are bitter cucumbers in the world that's a fact right? I do not have the power to
eliminate bitter cucumbers from the world. I do have the power to refuse to
eat them and that's it. Marcus is absolutely right. I don't need the
additional step of complaining and involving in this fact that the world is so unfair because there is bit of cue commerce.
That was the beginning or one of the beginnings because I also got pretty much at the same time another stunning phrase from Epictetus,
another stunning phrase from Epictetus, who was one of the inspirations to Marcus, so the two are very closely related. Epictetus was another interesting guy. You know, Marcus Aurelius was
an emperor, so literally the most powerful person in the Mediterranean world at the time. Epictetus
was at the opposite extreme. He was a slave. He started out life as a slave. He was actually
eventually freed and he became actually one of the most
well-known and respected teachers in the Mediterranean area at the beginning of the second century. So he had a completely different sort of life trajectory. And yet the ideas,
the Stoic ideas, resonated a panther with both of these people and both of them became major conduits
for later generations. And one of the things that Epictetus says
at the beginning of the discourses is,
so you wanna make money,
he's talking to some of his friends,
you wanna make money or you want me to make money
so that I can help you.
Well, that's all fine.
But what am I gonna do with that money?
The money itself isn't gonna tell me.
What's gonna tell me is my faculty of judgment.
Epictetus uses this to make the general stoic point that so-called externals, things like
money or health even or reputation, are not the fundamental thing.
They're not crucial because it all depends on how you use them.
You can be very rich and do a lot of damage or you may be very poor and actually use
your resources very wisely. To Epictetus and Marcus it's not fame or money or
wealth or whatever it is per se, it's how you use them that makes a difference
and that struck me as another fundamental insight from Stoicism that
why are you now focusing on improving your decision-making ability?
And you keep focusing instead on more or less mindlessly
follow what society at large tells you.
You're trying to become more wealthy, more famous and so on and so forth.
Hold on. What are you going to do with all that stuff once you have it?
When we come back, how the ideas of Marcus Aurelius can help us steer a course through the challenges of modern life. You're listening to Hidden Brain, I'm Shankar Vedanta.
This is Hidden Brain. I'm Shankar Vedanta.
Massimo Pelliucci is a philosopher at the City College of New York. At a low point in his life,
he rediscovered a 1900 year old set of personal reflections written by the Roman emperor, Marcus Aurelius. It is widely known today by the simplest of titles,
meditations.
Massimo, describe who Marcus Aurelius was
and the kind of world in which he operated.
So he was one of the so-called five good emperors.
Marcus had a difficult time as an emperor.
He did not want to be an emperor.
He was really not that interested.
In the meditations at some point he says,
you can live a good life anywhere.
If you have to be in a palace,
then you can have a good life even in a palace,
which tells you that he wasn't exactly thrilled.
And he did not have an easy reign,
unlike the others, especially his predecessor Antoninus
Pius.
Because during Marcus' reign a number of things happened.
Two frontier wars.
There was an attack on the frontiers of the empire in the east by the Parthians and from
the north from a number of German tribes, chiefly the Marcomanni.
It had to deal with an internal rebellion by one of his lieutenants who declared himself
emperor.
Rome was hit by a devastating flood of the Tiber River that destroyed half of the city.
A huge earthquake demolished the city of Smyrna in modern western Turkey and the emperor also
had to deal with that.
So he had his hands full. And what he did throughout
was to do his best in order to apply his stoic philosophy to the situation. So here's a case
where we literally have an emperor philosopher or a philosopher king as Plato would put it.
We have somebody who is not only interested in philosophy for its own sake, but he actually is determined to use philosophy
as a way of life and therefore as a framework
to make decisions both personal and political.
And that really did make a difference.
Arguably, that's one of the things
that made him a great emperor.
["The Great Emperor's Theme"]
So, the Stoics basically talk about a regular part of life, which is a practice known as evening meditation.
What is this, Massimo?
How is it conducted?
You can think of the entire meditations as a series of evening meditations, but the exercise is also described
briefly in Epictetus and at more length in Seneca. It basically consists in this. Before you go to bed
you take a little bit of time, not a lot, five, ten minutes maybe, you get into a quiet corner
both your house and your mind, and then you go and reflect on salient events
that happened during the day,
asking yourself how you reacted,
how you handled those things.
Seneca specifically, for instance, says,
you know, you should go over and say,
what have I learned today?
How am I improved myself?
In what way am I better? Epictetus is even more specific.
It says that we need to ask ourselves three questions. What did I do wrong? What did I
do right? And what could I do better the next time that something like that happens?
It has very good empirical backing from modern science. It really does work. It is a kind
of self-analysis. Now, there is a limitation in doing self analysis which is, especially modern psychologists have
demonstrated, you know human beings are very good at rationalizing. So you can
write down things and then you can you can make up all sorts of excuses about
why you did certain things or you didn't do other things. But the stories were
aware of that which is why they said well you need to do said, well, you need to do the self-analysis,
you need to do the self-examination, but you also need some help.
And there are two major sources of help for the Stoics.
One is to imagine a role model.
So imagine that you're actually talking to somebody.
If you notice, the meditation is written in the second person.
It's not, I did this, but you did this.
As if Marcus were writing to a friend
or to somebody else who was listening
and he was giving advice to that person.
Even though he was talking about himself.
Even though he was talking about himself.
And again, that is very good.
I was just reading an article the other day
in psychological literature.
There's pretty good evidence that this technique helps achieving an emotional detachment to
some extent from your own actions and therefore engaging more analytically, more critically
with what you've done.
And the other external help is talking to a friend, literally talking to a friend.
And the Stoics thought
that friends, real friends, are so-called friends of virtue. The kind of friends
that are okay telling you that you're doing something wrong if they do think
that you're doing something wrong. And you don't need a lot of them, but it's
important to have at least one. To have that kind of person that you can go and have a drink and say,
you know, I got this issue, what do you think?
So I understand that these evening meditations have now become a regular part of your life, Massimo?
Yeah, I've been doing it for years. Do you understand that these evening meditations have now become a regular part of your life, Massimo?
Yeah, I've been doing it for years. And if you know that there is a recurring issue, let's say anger, for instance, or frustration, or whatever it is, then you just say, okay, how was I doing five years ago with this?
Or what kind of themes was I preoccupied with? What kind of issues were bothering me ten years ago as opposed to now? And so it becomes also a way to keep track of progress.
Am I doing better on this thing? Is it something that 10 years ago was bothering me a lot
and now it's not because I've actually made progress?
And if not, then perhaps that's one thing
that I need to focus on that I was not
sufficiently aware of.
So before you became a student of Marcus Aurelius
and Stoic philosophy, Massimo,
you wrestled with your feelings
about a particular aspect of your physique.
What was it that bothered you?
I've always been a little bit overweight
since I was a kid, and in fact, arguably still am.
And so I struggled with that because,
and initially I struggled with that
in an unhealthy way,
I would say, which is kind of typical
because you have pressure from your peers,
even my own parents.
My parents brought me to a dietician
when I was in middle school or something like that,
which probably was way of an overreaction
because the problem certainly was not that dramatic.
But once you get into, you know,
you observe the notion from others,
including the people who love you,
that there is an issue, that there is a problem,
that you need really to work on it,
then it becomes, it easily becomes an obsession.
And therefore not healthy.
So I struggle with that on and off, you know,
so self-image, sometimes it got me into trouble
in terms of relationships.
I just wouldn't know how to handle
or wouldn't know how to pursue necessarily
a friendship or a relationship
because of my body image problem.
So Marcus Aurelius has some insight to contribute here.
He says that it's important to respect
what he calls the dichotomy of control.
What is this idea, Massimo?
This is a fundamental stoic idea.
In fact, the phrase dichotomy of control is actually modern.
The ancients themselves, Epictetus, who was Marcus Aurelius' influence,
one of the major influences on Marcus, he calls it the fundamental rule,
which right there tells you, you know, it's important.
So the fundamental rule says that some things are up to us
and other things are not up to us.
And then it gives you the advice of,
look, if there is in fact this distinction,
you need to focus on the stuff that is up to you
because that's where your agency is actually efficacious.
That's where you can make a difference.
And you need to develop a mindful,
purposeful attitude of acceptance and equanimity toward
the kinds of things that are not up to you.
This is a notion that comes up in a number of other cultures.
It's not just stoic.
It comes out in Judaism, ancient Judaism, ancient Buddhism, modern Christianity, the
Serenity Prayer, for instance, that it's an early 20th century
Christian prayer used in meetings of 12-step organizations like Alcoholic Anonymous,
essentially does the same thing. It asks God in this case to give you the wisdom to figure out
what it is that you can change, what you cannot, the courage to change what you can, and the certainty to accept what you cannot.
Now, Epictetus and Marcus say that
what is up to us are essentially your judgments,
your assessment of a situation and how to deal with it.
That's all.
Your response to the world, in other words.
Your response to the world.
What is not up to us is pretty much everything else.
Which is counterintuitive, right?
Because you say, wait a minute.
So Epitetus and Marcus both list a series of these things
that are not up to us.
And they start with health.
So they say health, wealth, reputation, career,
relationships and all that.
It's like health, what do you mean health
is not up to me?
Of course, so now we were talking about my body image problems, what do you mean my health is not up to me? Of course. So now we were talking about my body image problems.
What do you mean my health is not up to me?
Of course it is.
I can do all sorts of things about my health, right?
I can eat a good diet.
You know, I can go and exercise.
I can go to the doctor on a regular basis
and practice preventive medicine.
I mean, I can do all those.
But then you think about it and say, ah, but wait a minute.
Those are all judgments or decisions to act or not to act.
What I don't control,
what is not up to me is the outcomes.
Sure, I can eat healthy,
I can go to the gym, which I do, largely,
and I go regularly to the doctor.
Nevertheless, there are a lot of other factors
that contribute to the outcome, to the actual health
that are not under my control.
I can make all the efforts I want,
but to some extent I am limited by my own genetics
and my own early upbringing.
We know that both the genetics and early development,
even intrauterine development before you're born
and certainly the first few months of development,
those are crucial to determine, you know, how're going to respond long-term to certain things.
And I had no control over those.
I can't rearrange my jeans.
I didn't pick my jeans and so on and so forth.
So the general idea then becomes that, look, on the one hand, you accept from the get-go
the notion that you do not have full control over anything, anything that is external,
none of those things.
And you need to be okay with it
because what are your choices?
There's only two choices.
You're either okay with it or you throw a tantrum.
Throwing a tantrum doesn't help.
It's the kind of thing that children do
because they're not emotionally mature.
An adult is not supposed to do that sort of stuff.
Also, throwing a tantrum not only doesn't help,
but actually gets in the way,
because now you're adding the actual injury
from the external to an internal imposed injury.
The fact that now you feel bad because you've lost control,
you're anxious and so on and so forth.
So you need to focus on what actually you can do,
which is empowering, because the idea is what actually you can do, which is empowering
because The idea is not that you can't do anything about anything. You can do quite a bit
It's just that you need to be very clear on the limits and what exactly it is that you can and cannot do and once you
are clear on that your dimensions become much more efficacious and therefore you feel better and
Broadly speaking you get better outcomes.
So Marcus himself followed this advice when a terrible plague struck his part of the world. What happened during this time in the Roman Empire, Massimo, and how did Marcus respond to it?
Yeah, Marcus' reign was made very difficult by a number of issues. One of them is the
Antonine Plague, which was the worst plague to hit antiquity. It killed close to five
million people, and it was probably caused by measles brought back by the legions that
were fighting on the east side of the empire.
He also had to deal with natural disasters,
a major flood of the Tiber that devastated Rome,
a major earthquake that raised Smyrna
in modern western Turkey.
So he had a lot of issues to deal with.
Every time he says to himself,
okay, what here is up to me and what is not up to me?
For instance, in the case of the plague,
the resources of the empire were already depleted
by the war against the Parthians.
So, you know, even though the Roman empire was rich,
there is a limit, obviously.
And so what Marcus thought one of the things
that was up to him was to
actually sell a lot of the imperial treasury and jewels. So he essentially did auctions where he
sold out a bunch of stuff that he thought I don't need this. This is not making my life
better but it has the potential to help with the relief effort.
And so that's what he did.
But he was not expecting the plague to just go away.
He said, we don't understand what a plague is in the first place.
We don't know what causes this thing.
We just have to write it out.
We just have to do our best in order to deal with it and then it will go away at some point
by itself. This was a situation where Marcus wrote in his journal something along the lines of
what can you do here? Where can you make a difference?
And just as importantly, he kept repeating to himself that in those areas where he couldn't do anything,
it was okay.
He had to accept that.
This was not something that you want to lose your sleep over,
because A, it doesn't help, and B, if you lose your sleep over it,
then you're actually going to be less efficacious in the kind of things you actually can't do.
Has this changed the way that you think about your own body image, Massimo? It has.
I am far less bothered by the issue these days.
I focus on what is under my control.
So when I go out for dinner, I try to stay away from things that I know
that are not good for me,
minimize the damage as my wife and I call it.
And then when I'm home,
you know, we have more control of course over what we eat.
As I said, I go and exercise on a regular basis
and I go to the doctor and you know, that's it.
But you know, during the pandemic, for instance,
I was reminded one more time that Epictetus and Marcus
are right, because one day,
I suddenly collapsed the floor
and was brought to the emergency room.
I had absolutely no control over my body, nothing.
Turns out to be a readily minor thing.
It was a slipped disc and I recovered very quickly
and you know thanked Zeus for painkillers and stuff like that. But that was an instant reminder
that you know although now it's been years that you exercise, you eat healthy, all that sort of
stuff, suddenly you wake up in the morning, you're about to go out and you collapse on the floor with the very intense feeling
that you have no control over your body.
Okay, what would Epictetus or Marcus have said at this point?
Well, they would have said, okay, you just run
into one of those externals that is not up to you.
The only thing you can do is to accept it
and see what you can do about it in order to recover,
to handle the situation, et cetera.
I understand that Marcus Aurelius talks at length
about the urgency of embracing the present moment,
since none of us ever know
how many of those moments we have left.
Talk about this idea, Massimo.
That's right, when I was young, as a lot of young people,
you kind of think that you're immortal.
And that's of course not true, right?
I mean, I have looked up my actuarial statistics,
so to speak, sometime recently,
and turns out that for somebody my age
and my ethnic background living in New York,
there is a certain life expectancy.
And I looked it up and said, oh, okay, so
statistically speaking, I have a couple more decades. But that's only statistically speaking.
Of course I could die today. I could cross the street and a car could hit me and that's
the end of it. Or again, I could contract a lethal disease and I could die. So there is all sorts of stuff that can happen
in any time in somebody's life, right?
Whether you're young, middle-aged, late, et cetera, et cetera.
And what the Stoics do is they bring that
to the forefront of their way of looking at life.
Seneca and then Marcus constantly say to themselves,
act as if this was the last day of your life. Or if you want to put it more positively,
you get up in the morning and you realize that you have one more day. Yay celebrate that day
because you don't know if you're going to have a second one and so on and so forth. Now this may sound kind of depressing and you know morbid and all
that sort of stuff but in fact they're getting at something fundamental here.
The notion that what makes our life meaningful is precisely the fact that
it's finite. If we actually live forever, if you if you got to do the same things
over and over and over ad infin and over, nothing will matter.
You always have a remote controller you can rewind and redo it over.
So it will lose meaning.
The reality is, by focusing, by reminding yourself that time is in fact finite, and
not only that, but that you don't know how much you have left then
you need to redouble your efforts to spend the time that you have in a way
that it's meaningful joyous you know it's the way you really want to spend
your life think about it this way so you go you're on a on a trip somewhere
let's say in the national near the national parks out west, and you have a car where the gauge for the
gas is broken.
You don't know how much gas you have.
You can estimate.
You can say, well, I started out with a full tank three days ago, so perhaps it's around
here, but you don't know for sure.
Now, at that point, you need to make very careful decisions
about where you're going.
You can't just take all sorts of detours
for all sorts of reasons or for no reason at all,
because you might get stuck in the middle of nowhere.
You might not get to do what you actually want to do.
This point that Marcus Aurelius is making
was driven home for you, Massimo, when an
episode of Brain Fog sent you to the hospital, because it's not just the amount of time we
have left, but also the amount of good time that we have left.
Yeah, it was a very disturbing episode, which thankfully has now repeated itself.
Basically, I was there trying to write an email
to my students and all of a sudden I realized
that my fingers were hitting the keyboard
but I wasn't writing what I thought I was writing.
I was in fact, I did not know what I was writing.
It's like calling my wife and I said,
you know, I think there's something wrong here.
And we went immediately to the emergency room
and they couldn't find anything wrong. Neither cardiologists. They couldn't find anything wrong.
Neither cardiologists nor neurologists
could find anything wrong.
But nevertheless, it had happened.
And so that was a wake-up call
that there is also your mind that it's not up to you.
So one of the things that the stoics insisted, as we said,
was that your decision-making,
your ability to make sound decisions, that's up to you.
But even they understood that that's only provisional
on the fact that your mind works more or less normally.
At some point it might not, right?
So take me back to the hospital when you went there
with this thing of brain fog.
What happened in the hospital and when and how
did you start to think about the Stoics
and what was happening to you at that time?
So they put me in an emergency room, which means it was somewhat crowded, you know, there was no privacy on it. But I did have my iPad and I did have a charger. And the first thing I did was to
open meditations and discourses and the letters of Seneca and remind myself of, you know, what is it
that these people are telling me
that is so important to me, that is so meaningful to me?
Right now I'm going through a crisis
where I clearly have very little control.
There's not much I can do here, right?
I'm in an emergency room at the mercy
of both whatever is happening to my body
and whatever the doctors and the nurses decide.
There was the anxiety, of course,
of not knowing what had happened.
And maybe a doctor might show up either the same day
or a week later and tell me, you know what?
You got a, I don't know, brain tumor
or something like that, right?
That was certainly a live possibility.
But I decided to do two things about it.
Number one, mostly cast that thought aside
because, well, I don't know.
And until I know, there is nothing I can do about it.
And secondly, from time to time,
I again pick up my tablet and open my journal.
And I started doing what the Stoics refer to
as a premeditatio malorum,
which means it's Latin for thinking about
bad stuff happening in the future.
The notion is to do it in the way in which
Marcus was doing the meditations,
analytically, detaching yourself,
writing to yourself in the second person.
And so I wrote to myself in the second person,
okay, so there is a chance that there is something wrong here
either with your heart or your brain.
So what are you going to do about it?
How are you going to deal with this situation?
If the situation, assuming that the situation is one of the worst case scenarios, are you
ready to handle it?
And what are you going to do in terms of handling it?
Well, one of the first things you're going to do is to figure out as much as possible what in fact it is, so listen to your doctors and
what they're saying, then get a good reasonable estimate of what might happen
in the near future, how long that future might be, and then you redirect, you
reorganize your life accordingly. You make the best use possible of that time.
issues possible of that time.
When we come back, more ideas about what it means to live a good life.
You're listening to Hidden Brain. I'm Shankar Vedanta. Do you have follow-up questions about stoicism?
Have you had moments in your life when you were able to muster your inner stoic and moments
you could not? If you'd be comfortable sharing your thoughts, comments, and questions with a Hidden Brain audience,
please record a voice memo on your phone and email it to us at ideas at hiddenbrain.org.
Use the subject line, stoicism.
The Roman leader Marcus Aurelius lived through turbulent times.
Still, he found ways to attend to his inner world.
Indeed, he argued that it is only by attending to our inner worlds
that our outer worlds can begin to make sense.
Massimo Piliucci is a philosopher at the City College of New York.
He is the author of How to be a Stoic, Massimo Piliucci is a philosopher at the City College of New York.
He is the author of How to be a Stoic, Using Ancient Philosophy to Live a Modern Life.
He is also the co-author, with Gregory Lopez and Meredith Alexander-Kunz, of Beyond Stoicism,
a guide to the good life with Stoics, Skeptics, Epicureans, and other ancient philosophers.
Massimo, before you started studying stoicism,
you often found your emotions spinning out of control.
I understand a pet peeve of yours
was the issue of people pulling out their phones
in the middle of a movie or a show?
Yes, you have no idea how many times
I got upset about that.
Because to me, this was inconceivable.
I would say to myself,
how is this guy possibly not aware of the fact that in the middle of
the movie he's raising his phone and now everybody behind him is looking at his phone instead
of the movie?
How rude!
How could you be so inconsiderate about that sort of stuff?
And that would of course ruin my whole experience at the movies because what are you gonna do about it?
I mean, sometimes I did go and confront the person,
usually fairly nicely.
And I got all sorts of responses from the occasional polite,
oh, I'm sorry, I didn't realize it,
to some funny people telling me off
and reacting in a very angry fashion.
He said, I have a right to do whatever they want
with my face. I was like, no, you don't, you're not at home. You're not in your home He said, I have a right to do whatever they want with my friends.
Like, no, you don't, you're not at home.
You're not in your home.
You don't have a right.
So sometimes those things will escalate,
not to the point of physical violence,
but certainly of raised voices or storming off
and calling the manager of the movie theater,
who usually is impossible to find for whatever reason.
And so there was a number of times when this happened.
And of course, this is a minor thing, right?
I mean, you can reasonably argue, look, man,
there's a lot more important things to get upset about,
but it was not just the fact in itself.
It was the inconceivability that somebody would be
so clueless or so inconsiderate
to actually do that kind of thing.
Or someone playing music loudly on the subway was another.
Oh yeah, you know, there are some people apparently
who have not realized that we invented
these wonderful things called earbuds.
You can put them in your ear and not bother anybody.
And I thought often, you know,
when I used to get upset about the subway experience,
I thought maybe one of these days I just have to come
into the subway with a very large boombox.
And as soon as I hear somebody doing that,
turn my own at the highest possible volume
to show him what it's going to happen.
You know, it's as a teaching lesson,
not as, not as a, in a vindictive way,
but as a teaching lesson, you see what would happen if everybody were doing that.
I never actually did it,
but it's been in the back of my mind for a while.
Marcus says, why do you expect people
to be different from what they are?
That's insane.
That's just crazy.
You know that people are in a certain way.
There is a place in the meditation where it says, you know, remember when you get up in the morning and you get out of the door,
remind yourself that you will encounter all sorts of inconsiderate people who will do all sorts of things that you don't like.
This is just a fact of life. Now you can deal with the situation. In some cases you can correct them.
I don't want to give the impression that,
you know, that stoicism is about just laid back
and taking it, right?
This is called the danger of doormatism,
of turning yourself into a doormat
so that everybody walks all over you.
That's not the point.
Marcus says explicitly, there are two things you can do
when somebody's behaving in a way
that you disapprove of.
One is to teach them, to explain to them, you know, look, this is problematic because.
And then failing that, you can bear with them.
You can use your ability to, your patience, your ability to withstand things as a result.
Because what else are you going to do?
Right? Those are pretty much your two options.
So you just have to...
It's not that the two are incompatible.
Of course, you're going to argue and you're going to try to do things
in order to improve the situation.
But if that fails, then you have to accept that,
okay, this time reality didn't go my way.
Too bad.
So he says in one of the passages, the cucumber is bitter, toss it away.
There are briars in the path, turn aside.
That is enough.
You don't need to add,
why are such things found in the world. For you would
be a laughing stock to any student of nature, just as you would be laughed at by a carpenter
and a cobbler if you took them to task, because in their shops are seen sawdust and pairings
from what they are making. Yep, exactly. So he's saying, look, there are certain things that
inevitably have certain consequences. If you are in the business of working wood,
well, there's going to be sawdust. So you cannot complain, you cannot reasonably complain,
you could complain, but it's not reasonable to complain about all the dust in the shop,
because that's an inevitable byproduct of the fact that you're working wood.
And so similarly, to complain about the fact that some people behave irrational, inconsiderately,
or rudely, or whatever it is, under certain circumstances, it's like, what, have you never
met human beings before?
Don't you know that this is the way it works?
Which incidentally doesn't mean that people always do that, right?
Or that they're incorrigible.
So that's why Marcus says, you go and teach them,
talk to them, right? If something bothers you, instead of getting upset and complaining about
the world, just do something about it, right? In another bit of the Meditations, he also says,
you know, remember that it's really impious to not to do, not to act on behalf, you know, justly
and try to correct injustice. So this isn't about not doing anything.
It's about a more realistic approach to reality. And a less self-centered approach.
Because in a sense, right, if you complain about the cucumbers and the briars and all that sort
of stuff, this is a very self-centered view of reality. You want the world to always accommodate to your wishes
and to your preferences, but that's insane.
That's an extreme degree of narcissism,
which is not healthy, right?
["The Last Supper"]
So you recently had an occasion to practice what Marcus Aurelius preached in the face
of an adverse event.
Tell me the story of what happened when you were headed to a subway train in Rome.
Oh, yeah.
So the situation was I was supposed to meet my brother in Rome.
Rome is the city where I grew up, so I'm very comfortable navigating everything,
including the subway system.
So I got on the subway and suddenly I feel this guy
right in front of me near the entrance,
it's kind of pushing back very, very hard
as if the subway were overcrowded.
And it was like, but it wasn't overcrowded.
I mean, there was a little bit of people,
but not enough to justify that kind of behavior.
So the first thought was, what is this guy doing?
And before I realized what in fact he was doing,
it had already happened.
This guy had a friend, an associate behind me,
who while I was distracted with the physical pressure
of the other one pushing back on me,
he just picked my pocket. So the wallet was gone. And by the time I realized that's what was going to happen,
it took a fraction of a second, but it was too late. Already the two were out of the subway,
the doors were closing, and that's it. I was all of a sudden without a wallet.
Now, if this happened years ago, I would have been really upset.
I would have been angry, both for myself for being so stupid. It's like, you know, I grew up in this city. I know that these things happened. I was in a particularly touristy area of Rome, so of course
these things happen. You know, again, briars and cucumbers, right? Why would you expect that not to happen? I was angry and myself,
I was angry at those two people. It's like how dare they violate my person and my property and so
on and so forth. So it would have been a normal reaction. Be upset, to be angry, to be dejected
afterwards once you realize what the consequences that action etc etc.
And to my surprise instead the first thing that came up to my mind was
what here is up to you and what is not up to you?
Ah thank you Marcus. So here's the thing I sat down I put out my phone fortunately they did not get
my smartphone and Unfortunately, the
Rome subway has Wi-Fi everywhere, including in tunnels. So the phone was working perfectly.
So what did I do? I thought about it for a second. It's like, okay, let's make a list here.
I immediately contacted via app the credit card companies, blocked the credit cards.
I contacted the DMV and immediately asked for a replacement driver license,
which by the way they sent immediately, like a few days later it was in the mail, and they
immediately allowed me to download a PDF, the function as a temporary driver license. I'm
saying this because Americans often complain so much about the DMV. It's
usually the quintessential example of everything that is wrong with bureaucracy. I don't know
what they're talking about. It was very good. So I did that. Then I thought, okay, how much
cash did I have there? Less than $100. Okay. Fortunately for me, I can absorb that kind
of loss without really much of an impact.
Is there anything else that is left to be done?
No.
So I sat down, I switched to a different app, I started reading a book, and a few stops
later I got off and I met my brother.
Now I told him what happened and my brother of course said, well, I I don't see you upset what what what's going on here you don't you don't seem to be particularly you know
bothered by this thing and I said would it help
I solved what I could I took care immediately of what I could and I and I
told him the guess what now dinner is on you because I have no money
what now dinner is on you because I have no money. It worked. The philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre once said, hell is other people.
In our companion story to this episode, available exclusively to subscribers to Hidden Brain
Plus, we explore ideas from Marcus Aurelius and the Stoics about how we can best manage
our relationships with others.
It's titled U2.0, How to Survive Other People.
If you're not yet a subscriber,
please visit support.hiddenbrain.org.
If you're using an Apple device,
you can go to apple.co slash hiddenbrain.
You can get a free seven day trial in both places.
You'll instantly have access
to all our subscriber-only
content. Again, that's support.hiddenbrain.org or apple.co. slash hiddenbrain.
Massimo Piliucci is a philosopher at the City College of New York. He is the author of How
to be a Stoic, Using Ancient Philosophy to Live a Modern Life.
He's also the co-author, with Gregory Lopez and Meredith Alexander-Kunz, of Beyond Stoicism,
A Guide to the Good Life, with Stoics, Skeptics, Epicureans, and other ancient philosophers.
Massimo, thank you so much for joining me today on Hidden Brain.
It was a pleasure.
Thanks for having me. at ideas at hiddenbrain.org. Use the subject line stoicism.
That email address again is ideas at hiddenbrain.org.
Hidden Brain is produced by Hidden Brain Media.
Our audio production team includes Annie Murphy-Paul,
Kristen Wong, Laura Quirell, Ryan Katz, Autumn Barnes,
Andrew Chadwick, and Nick Woodbury.
Tara Boyle is our executive producer.
I'm Hidden Brain's executive editor.
Our unsung hero this week is Logan Snyder
of Haz Optimization, a firm that does web design,
development, and maintenance, as well as digital marketing.
We recently started working with Logan
and the Haz Optimization team, and they've made the work of maintaining hiddenbrain.org so much easier.
If you need help running your website check them out at hasopt.com that's
hasopt.com. Thank you Logan.
If you're enjoying the episodes in our U2.0 series, please share them with two or three
people in your life.
You can find all the episodes in the series on your preferred podcast platform or at hiddenbrain.org.
I'm Shankar Vedantam.
See you soon. you