Hidden True Crime - FILICIDE: Lindsay Clancy and Lori Vallow Daybell. What leads a mother to kill her children?
Episode Date: February 7, 2023This was recorded during our Hidden Hour LIVE SHOW on our YouTube channel: Hidden True Crime on February 3, 2023. Each Friday night our Hidden Gems can ask our host--forensic psychologist Dr. John Mat...thias--questions. A Massachusetts community is in shock when a seemingly wonderful mother--Lindsay Clancy--is charged with strangling her three children. Another mother--Lori Vallow Daybell--is set for trial this April after being charged in the deaths of her two children--Tylee Ryan and JJ Vallow. What is filicide? Why do mothers kill? How does this happen? What is the difference between these two women and their alleged crimes? NOTE: If you are thinking of harming yourself or a child, call 911 or your local emergency number. The National Maternal Mental Health Hotline: 1-833-9-HELP4MOMS (1-833-943-5746) provides access to trained counselors and resources 24 hours a day, 7 days a week in 60 languages. HIDDEN: A TRUE CRIME PODCAST is: CRIMINAL PSYCHOLOGY REINVENTED. Join a forensic psychologist and journalist (who happen to be husband and wife) on a journey into the darkest recesses of the human mind and the unconscious motivations that drive human behaviors in order to understand the world and ourselves. Subscribe for Friday night lives, psychological analysis, and insider interviews for an in depth look at crimes. DR. JOHN MATTHIAS is a licensed clinical and forensic psychologist with 30 years’ experience in both clinical and forensic work. He serves as an expert witness for the federal government and has consulted on numerous high-profile cases for District Attorney’s offices and defense attorneys in several states. In the forensic area, Dr. Matthias has developed expertise in personality assessments, hidden behavioral motivations, complex trauma and criminal psychology. In the clinical realm, he has worked with numerous victims. He received his Master’s degree in Marriage, Family and Child counseling, as well his doctorate degree, from the University of Southern California. Dr. Matthias graduated with honors in philosophy from Princeton University, and he won the prestigious McCosh Thesis prize while there. In high school he graduated valedictorian from a large public high school in Chicago where he was chosen to participate in a ground-breaking valedictory study that continues to this day. Dr. Matthias has been an adjunct assistant professor in the University of Nevada Las Vegas clinical psychology doctoral program since 2007. He supervises UNLV doctoral students on forensic assessments, clinical case formulation, and various therapeutic approaches to clinical work. LAUREN MATTHIAS has worked as an anchor and reporter for ABC, NBC, and FOX News in East Idaho, Boise, and Salt Lake City, Utah. She spent a decade reporting on a diverse range of topics from high profile crimes to Presidential visits. Most recently, she reported for Salt Lake City’s ABC affiliate News4Utah. In 2015 she received the Idaho State Broadcaster’s Association Best Reporter award. She left the reporting world to produce the Hidden True Crime Podcast along with her husband Dr. John Matthias, a forensic psychologist. Your support helps us produce these podcasts/videos. We have some big plans to explore the true crime terrain in a way that no one else has attempted. WEBSITE: https://hiddentruecrime.com/ TO SUPPORT: https://www.patreon.com/hiddentruecrime https://paypal.me/hiddentruecrime https://cash.app/$hiddenTruecrime Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands Our Sponsors:* Check out Acorns: https://acorns.com/HIDDENTRUECRIME* Check out Acorns: https://acorns.com/HIDDENTRUECRIME* Check out Armoire and use my code HIDDENTRUECRIME for a great deal: https://www.armoire.style* Check out Effecty and use my code HIDDENTRUECRIME for a great deal: https://www.effecty.com* Check out Happy Mammoth and use my code HIDDENTRUECRIME for a great deal: https://happymammoth.comSupport this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/hidden-a-true-crime-podcast1836/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Lately, I've been trying to be more intentional about what I wear, intentional about everything,
just choosing pieces that feel effortless, still put together, timeless, but also not overthinking it
every morning. It's why I keep going back to quince. Their pieces just make getting dressed
easier and I feel so classy. I feel elevated. The fits are flattering. The fabric is really
high quality. Everything is wearable day to day. I actually got this really, really,
beautiful yellow V-neck midi dress from them, and I paired it with some Italian leather sandals.
It's one of those outfits that just works. It feels polished but still comfortable. It's exactly
what I've been looking for. What surprises me, though, is the quality for the price. Quince uses
premium materials like European linen, organic cotton, but they cut out the middleman. So
everything is priced way lower than you'd expect. Refresh.
your every day with luxury you can actually use. Head to quince.com slash hidden true crime for free shipping
on your order and 365 day returns. That's quince, quince, ui and c e.com slash hidden true crime for
free shipping and 365 day returns. Quince.com slash hidden true crime. It's the Ashley President's Day
sale going on now. Right now you can feel the freedom to save up to $1,000 on select mattresses.
Plus, you can snooze now, pay later with up to 60 months special financing.
And for a limited time, receive a $300 coupon with the purchase of a premium mattress.
Customizing your sleep has never been easier.
Hurry in and start saving today.
Only at Ashley in North Charleston and Mount Pleasant.
Subject to credit approval.
Minimum monthly payments required.
Minimum purchase required.
See store for details.
Ladies and gentlemen, we are now boarding group A.
Please have your boarding passes ready to scan.
If your phone is cracked, old, or was...
chewed up by your Chihuahua travel companion, please refrain from holding up the line.
Instead, go to Verizon and trade in any phone in any condition from one of their top brands
for the new Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus with Galaxy AI and a watch and tab on any plan.
Only on Verizon.
With new line on my plan, service plan required for watch and tab.
Additional terms apply.
See Verizon.com for details.
We are going to be discussing a sensitive topic, so I want to tell people beforehand.
we are going to be talking about philicide.
I always have questions for Dr. John about filicide.
Clearly, we have been covering the Daybell case from the very beginning
and we plan to cover the trial in April.
And that's also a case of filicide, a mother taking her children's lives.
I want to say that up front.
The reason that this came up was because of a case
many of you know about that happened just last month, where three young children were killed by their mother.
Why don't I share the summary of this case?
And we'll go from there.
We have some great questions, and we'll start.
For those that are not as familiar with the case out of Massachusetts, it was the evening of January 24th,
and police arrived at a home in Duxbury, Massachusetts.
It's about 30 miles outside of Boston.
Patrick Clancy called 911 because his wife had tried to commit suicide by jumping out of a second
story window of their house. Some media reports implied that she had she had slashes on her wrists
and neck, but I've only read that in a couple of places. 32-year-old Lindsay Clancy, a labor
and delivery nurse who was on leave from work and her husband Patrick was attending to her
and their young children. He left only briefly to pick up some takeout for dinner.
32-year-old Lindsay Clancy, a mother of three, and this labor delivery nurse, survived the
suicide attempt. When police arrived at their Cape Cod style home, they found the couple's
three young children, five-year-old Cora, three-year-old Dawson, and eight-month-old Callan
unresponsive. Lindsay is now charged with strangling all three of her children before attempting
to take her own life. She is charged with two counts of homicide. She's yet to have been charged
in Callan's death, that's the youngest, the eight-month-old, but he survived for two days before
is coming to his injuries, so she's been charged right now with two counts of homicide.
While I was horrified when I learned about this, the day after, the morning after it happened,
as the days went on and more has come out, this case started to affect me, and I had to ask
Dr. John, Dr. Bade.
I read the GoFundMe to John.
Was it last week, John?
When was it?
Earlier this week.
It was earlier this week.
It's been a long week.
Yeah, it was earlier this week.
And I got emotional reading it to John,
reading the words of Lindsay's husband, Patrick.
It was written just days after losing his children.
And I'm going to read some of that here.
I feel like we need to share this before talking about
this case. So this is written by Patrick Clancy, Lindsay's husband and the father of the three children
he lost on January 28th. That would be four days after he lost his three children. A lot of people
have said they can't imagine, and they're right, there's absolutely nothing that can prepare you.
The shock and pain is excruciating and relentless. I'm constantly reminded of them, and with a little
sleep I get, I dream about them on repeat. Any parent knows it's impossible to understand how much
you will love your kids until you have them. The same goes for the devastation of losing them.
They were the essence of my life and I am lost without them. My family was the best thing that ever
happened to me. I took so much pride in being Lindsay's husband and a dad to Cora, Dawson, and Callan.
I always reminded myself that each day with them was a new gift. Callan usually woke up
up first and would rest his head on my shoulder for a few minutes as he adjusted to morning.
Dawson typically sing or spoke his thoughts out loud for a while before we'd go get him.
Cora was a big girl and would simply walk downstairs.
I can still vividly picture her coming into the living room each morning with her hair
a mess, smile on her face.
We always started our days together reading books, cuddling up on the couch and playing
with the magnet tiles.
I loved taking them places.
whether vacationing skiing out on a boat or at Duxbury Beach, one of our favorite places on earth,
they gave me purpose and I never took it for granted.
There is now a massive void where that purpose once was.
I want to share some thoughts about Lindsay.
She's recently been portrayed largely by people who had never met her and never knew who the real Lindsay was.
Our marriage was wonderful and grew stronger as her condition rapidly worsened.
I took as much pride in being her husband as I did in being a father and felt persistently lucky to have her in my life.
I still remember the very moment I first laid eyes on her and can recall how overcome I was with the kind of love at first sight you only see in movies.
It really did not take long before I was certain I wanted to marry her.
We said I love you to each other multiple times daily as if it were a reflex.
We habitually started every morning with a passionate hug,
yielding a sigh of relief like we had received each the perfect medicine.
If too much time passed without a hug,
she looked at me and asked, did you forget?
We mutually understood the reality that people can have bad days,
but we stuck to the rule that when one of us got lost,
the other was always there to bring them home.
Always.
She loved being a nurse,
but nothing matched her intense love for our kids and dedication of being a mother.
It was all she ever wanted.
Her passion taught me how to be a better father.
I want to ask all of you that you find it deep within yourselves to forgive Lindsay as I have.
The real Lindsay was generously loving and caring towards everyone, me, our kids, family, friends, and her patience.
The very fiber of her soul are loving.
All I wish for her now is that she can somehow find people.
peace. I promise that I'll put all of my energy into healing and rediscovering my purpose. I owe that to
all of you, Duxbury, Fire, and Police, our compassionate healthcare workers, our local faith leaders,
especially to Cora, Dawson, and Callan. I don't know how or when I'll be able to do it, but your love
and generosity will help me get started. I know that love always wins. Cora Dawson and Callan,
you gave me so much in your short time here. I don't know if the pain will ever go away, but I'll do my
to carry on in your honor.
Data loves you so much and will always remember you with love and endless gratitude.
I've never read a GoFundMe like that.
One thing, though, that I noticed in the GoFundMe or John and I both noticed was that he
mentioned a condition she suffered from, Lindsay suffered from.
So we know today, though, now, news came down just today.
According to Lindsay's defense attorney, Lindsay's defense attorney did interviews with both
the Boston Globe as well as the Boston Herald.
And the defense attorney for Lindsay states that she had been seeking help for a long time for postpartum mental health issues.
The attorney says that she was overmedicated on 13 different psychiatric drugs since Callan's birth eight months previously.
So October to 2022 until now 13 different psychiatric drugs.
And a judge has officially granted a motion for a forensic psychologist to assess Lindsay before her.
her arraignment, I believe, which is Tuesday. These are a few statements from her defense attorney.
The effects of those drugs and her fragile and emotional state after giving birth to her third
child returning her into a zombie. It's over medication, absolutely over medication, possibly with a
component of postpartum depression. That's what Kevin Redington, the defense attorney, stated.
She has medical care and treatment on a regular basis. And her husband was very proactive in trying to
protect her and help her with the doctor's medication she was prescribed. They went through hell
and they did not come back. It is absolutely staggering. Reddington told the Herald, referring to the drug
cocktails that he said rested impulse control away from Lindsay. She had homicidal and suicidal ideations.
She was in a living hell and the husband did the best he could. End quote from Redington. I just felt like
We needed to set the stage with that summary and that recent news that came out today from the defense attorney.
John and I did reach out to our hidden gems to let them know about tonight's discussion.
And we have some questions.
I have the first one from Millie.
Millie's question for Dr. John concerns altruistic philicide.
She asks, does altruistic filicide ever factor into postpartum cases?
I think the short answer is yes.
But in order to answer that question, I think we need to back up a little bit and talk about the different types of philicide and how researchers have seen philicide.
The predominant category, this is from, I'm referring to a textbook here that I think is one of the best textbooks on, it's called Domestic Homicide Patterns and Dynamics.
It's by Liam and Conrad.
It's an excellent textbook for all things related to essentially homicides.
that revolve around families.
So their first main category of philicide is what they call pathological.
And then there's there's a few subtites under the pathological category.
But pathological filicide is essentially driven by psychopathology.
In other words, mental illness.
Their belief supported by their research is that most phyllisides are driven by
severe psychopathology and more specifically by severe depression.
and or psychosis, oftentimes the pathological category for philocyte, most of the philocides are committed
by biological mothers in this category. In the category of pathological philicide, which again is
related to severe mental illness, usually some type of depression, severe depression or severe
psychosis is what they call the altruistic category. So this gets to Millie's question. What is altruistic
filicide. Altruistic filicide is filicide that attempts to alleviate the real or imagine suffering
of the victims or children, obviously, if we're talking about filicide. Altruistic suicide is an
interesting category because I think there's some overlap typically with some of the other categories,
but they also mentioned, Liam and Kornstadt mentioned that they prefer not to call it altruistic
philicide. They prefer not to call it that. They call it pseudo-altruistic filicide because
obviously the victim benefits in no way whatsoever.
It's the perception of the perpetrator that is perceived to be altruistic and not altruism
towards the victim because the victim clearly would not perceive that act as being
favorable.
So they clarify that point.
I think it's interesting to think about altruistic suicide.
If we talk about somebody like Lori Daybell, for example, who believed, I think, at some
level that her children were going to go to the New Jerusalem, and she perceived her kids to be
zombies. So since they were zombies, and since they were suffering a great deal of zombies,
there's an altruistic component to that. She believes that they're going to be happier and safer
in the afterlife and the New Jerusalem. So I think Lori Daybell tends to fit this category to
some degree. And there's another interesting component. As long as we're talking about Lori
Daybell, I should mention that in this category, there's actually an over-representation of males,
specifically boys that have disabilities and more specifically, sometimes males, boys with autism,
and JJ was autistic. And we saw this with Lori in the sense that Lori was complaining about
how busy, how energetic JJ was at the end. And he was climbing on cabinets and creating kind of
behavioral problems. And you have to wonder if at some level that was a part of this. I think the
altruism wasn't just geared towards this idea of sparing them from being zombies. I think there's
always more to it. And I think at least in the case of JJ and Tiley even to some degree too,
Tiley was perceived as being a bit of a rebel and causing problems for her. And so I think in some ways
that could be part of this too,
that although, again,
I would refer to it as pseudo-altruism,
but perhaps Lori had the perception
that JJ's behavioral issues
would be resolved
if she murdered him.
Or Tiley's rebelliousness
and anger towards life would somehow be resolved
if she murdered her.
With Lori DeBell, this idea of altruism is complex,
and there's multiple levels to it.
So I'm throwing that out there to show
that this idea of
altruistic filicide can be fairly complex.
And of course, there's a story of, there can also be, I think, a sacrificial component
to altruistic filicide in the sense that you do it for a greater good.
So in other words, like the story of Abraham and Isaac.
Isaac was never sacrificed, but the goal was to appease God and to show God that Abraham,
we wanted to show God that his true alliance was with God and not with the material world.
the physical world. So there's an altruistic component, I think, oftentimes to sacrifice. And we know
Colby had talked to me many times about the fact that his mother would often talk about that story.
And so you have to wonder, again, adding to the complexity of this category, I think there's a
question here about whether there's a sacrificial component. When we talk about Lori now, I think
there's this idea that she wanted to alleviate their pain because they were zombies that perhaps
she perceived her children as being unhappy because they were somewhat rebellious and or disabled.
And finally, perhaps there's a sacrificial component that has some biblical roots,
which is consistent with her religious beliefs. So I think this idea of altruistic
philocyte is complex. And oftentimes it can go hand in hand with the other category we're
going to talk about, which is also a form of pathological philocyte, but it's one of the
subtypes, which is the psychotic category.
Well, I have a lot of questions, especially when it comes to Lori Dayball, because,
and I see that Kay's case here, Kay Woodcock, JJ's grandmother, those new to the Daybell case,
Kay Woodcock is the one who sounded the alarm that JJ was missing,
and that's when people learned that JJ and Tiley were both missing and how the media heard
word of this tragic case.
She's here with us tonight.
I definitely don't put Lori in the same category as I'm now putting Lindsay Clancy.
And I want to talk about that.
But before we do, I think this might be a good time if we're on that topic.
We received an incredible comment on our Patreon, patreon.com slash hidden true crime,
one of our community members there.
Could I share that, John?
Sure.
This is from Beth Weber.
And she left this on one of our Patreon.
podcast episodes about Matthew Coleman, a father who killed his children that we've also covered.
And she writes about that. So this was a couple of months ago. She has given me permission to read this
today. She wrote this back in July of last year. This reminds me of Andrea Yates and sadly of myself.
You ask, why does this keep happening? I can only share my own experience, but maybe this will shine a little
light. I was a pastor's wife in a very high demand, fundamental version of Christianity. In these
circles, there's a lot of pulpit time given to teaching how Christian mothers should raise
godly children. I took notes, read books, listened to Christian teachers, but I failed. My children
in no way resembled the image I was given of a godly child. I know now that I was not a failure,
that there was nothing wrong with my children, but I was overwhelmed. I needed support. The only place
I knew to turn for that support was my high demand religion. What I received was instruction and more
instruction, and I never found the peace and joy what was promised to me as a Christian mother.
And then horrifying thoughts started. Maybe it would be better to send my children to heaven while
they were still innocent. If I continued to fail them in such a huge way, I would be duming them to
hell. I love them too much to ever let my children be tormented for eternity in hell. Thankfully,
I was horrified at my thoughts. I never harmed my children or myself, but I did live with a deep-seeded
belief of failure for a long, long time. I received treatment for anxiety and depression,
and I slowly moved out from under the high demands of my religion.
I know my account is similar to Andrea Yates.
When I hear of parents killing their young children,
I wonder how many are suffering from unrealistic expectations of themselves and their children.
I wonder in searching for how to deal with the overwhelm that sometimes is parenting,
they turn to sources that only feed their anxieties.
Per-fringed teaching and even not so fringe with deeply troubled parents,
I believe that's a dangerous recipe.
I just felt the wispy fingertips of this darkness and it greatly, greatly scared me.
And I want to thank Beth for that comment when she left it in July.
Both John and I were very grateful for her story.
Just when you were talking about sacrifice,
she literally mentions this idea of sacrificing her children so they wouldn't
suffer in hell. Yeah, and I think that gets into, that story gets into maybe multiple types of
philicide or potential philocyte. Thankfully, she didn't harm her children. But having a child is
very stressful. And I think it can upend, sometimes it can upend their expectations of how we are
as parents. And this idea of perfectionism, I think, comes into play too. That if parents have
this idea that they have to be perfect parents, then they're probably going to be deeply
disappointed at some point because it's whatever those expectations were prior to children
often get challenged once we have kids. And in addition to all the other stressors of work
and spouses and whatever else is going on our lives, just having a child in and of itself is
very stressful. And so I think for some parents, they're just not prepared for.
that there are a lot of questions and include mine in this though about how again lindsay is
is not lorry valo i think in some ways lorry valetabell this seems like a completely separate thing to
me we've we've heard things about lorry's past and the way she mothered and and the way that
she just didn't seem to have emotion in a lot of places how she manipulated people while
there are some similarities tell me how they're different
I'm not trying to compare Lori Valo-Daybell to Lindsay Clancy.
In fact, the reason why we're talking about Lindsay Clancy is to show the differences in
phyllicide, types of phyllisides.
So I haven't gotten there yet, but so I was going to jump into the psychotic category.
And this is the category where psychosis drives behavior.
So this would be postpartum depression.
This would be more severely postpartum depression.
This is the category that Lindsay Clancy seems to land in much more than Lori Daybell.
Lori Daybell, that's why I talked about her in terms of the altruistic category of
Philicide because she seems to fit that category.
Lindsay Clancy seems more clearly to fall into this other category of psychotic filicide.
So what are some of the underlying elements that lead to postpartum psychosis?
typically or postpartum depression, both of those.
Typically those would be a mood disorder with psychosis,
possibly some previous history of schizophrenia,
and the final one is drug-induced psychosis.
You just mentioned that the attorney said
that she was taking 13 different medications
for suicidal and homicidal ideation.
It's certainly not hard to imagine
that there's drug-induced psychosis going on.
Is this a postpartum?
Is this a drug-induced psychosis?
I don't know.
There's so many elements here to try to tease out.
It's really hard to know.
It could be that it started
as some type of postpartum depression,
and then she was medicated and over-medicated,
and she had some suicidal and homicidal ideation.
So they threw more meds at her,
and now she's in a drug-induced psychosis
in addition to a postpartum psychosis,
and I think that's what the attorney is really suggesting,
here is that this is a mess. This is a mess that wasn't a mess initially, but because of over-medication
and because of underlying postpartum issues, this becomes a real problem, and it eventually leads
unfortunately to the tragic outcome. So I'm not suggesting that Lori Daybell is in any way
similar to Lindsay Clancy. In fact, I'm saying the opposite. I think it's fair to say that Lori
Daybell did not have postpartum depression. So whatever is going on with her, did she have mental
health issues? Yeah. Or was she on medications because she thought she was a superior
bean, right, that she had translated bean. So she wasn't taking medication either. So right,
no postpartum, no medication for Lori Valo Daybilt. Right. Exactly. So I'm, I think,
and when we talk about, if we talk about somebody like Andrew Yeh,
actually that's interesting. She's a very interesting case in the sense that I think you have
both the altruistic component and the postpartum component. So I think with Andrew Yeats,
you actually see some combination there that there was a psychiatrist, a forensic psychiatrist,
who actually testified for her defense, who pointed out essentially that she was,
she was killing the children because she didn't want to be, she didn't want to be condemned to
how forever and experience eternal damnation for her children.
And so the psychiatrist that was testifying, his name was Resnick, Philip Resnick,
he saw those as delusional.
And he saw that delusion as being driven by psychosis.
So he essentially, he didn't say why.
I would interpret that a little bit and say that sometimes religious beliefs,
especially extreme religious beliefs, they help.
explain the psychosis. So when people are experiencing psychosis, sometimes they don't know what's going on.
They're lost. And they have to grab onto something. They want to grab something that grounds them.
And so religion becomes a possible way to ground them. So what's going on is the psychosis is creating a
fractured cell. The self is falling apart. It's disintegrating. And so instead of saying,
oh, I'm experiencing psychosis, what happens is, in cases like Andrew Yeats,
somebody will latch on to religious beliefs to feel grounded and to say,
see, this isn't psychosis, this is God talking to me.
The religious beliefs, in other way, in other words, become a way to minimize the psychosis
and to help the person feel more grounded.
Unfortunately, it's still psychosis in the sense that they're becoming more divorce
from reality. So those religious beliefs don't really help in terms of stemming or preventing the violence.
They're not going to do it. In fact, they might contribute more to it because in Andrea Yates' case,
by becoming more extreme in her beliefs, she's more likely to harm the children because she thinks
the children are going to be condemned to eternal damnation.
Okay.
Which is what Beth, our, our gem also stated was that she kept seeking help in her high demand religion, which was making it even worse, rather than seeking help with mental health experts or seeing it as a mental health issue.
She thought that she needed to become a better mother and kept turning.
Right.
I don't think that, right.
I don't think that Beth experienced psychosis in the sense that Andrew Yates did or Lindsay Clancy.
So I think, I don't, you know, it seems like there's a little bit of religion in Lindsay Clancy's beliefs,
but it's not clear. We just don't know enough about her at this point.
But the psychosis is definitely prominent.
It's a salient feature of what was going on there.
And, you know, the attorney makes it clear that this is, it appears to be some combination of drug-inducing.
Most people don't realize how much their personal information is being bought and sold every day.
Data brokers are making billions, pulling details about you from public records and the Internet,
and then packaging and selling it, usually without your consent.
That's how your information lands in the hands of scammers, spammers, even stalkers.
It's why you get endless robocalls and why ads seem to follow you everywhere.
That's where ORA comes in.
ORA actively removes your data from broker sites and keeps it off.
They also instantly alert you if your information shows up in a breach or on the dark
web. But ORA goes beyond data protection. With one app, you get a VPN, antivirus, password manager,
spam call protection, dark web monitoring, and even up to $5 million in identity theft insurance,
all backed by 24-7 U.S.-based fraud support. Other companies might sell just credit monitoring,
or just a VPN. ORA gives you all of it, together, at the same price competitors charge for just
one service. Start your free trial today atora.com slash remove. Protect yourself now at
ora.com slash remove.
Psychosis and postpartum psychosis and or postpartum depression.
Yeah, I know that the Clancy's were Catholic or they attended a Catholic church.
There was a story about how a priest sat with Patrick Clancy the following morning,
and they do seem to have a close-knit religious community.
So we do know that they were faithful people, but right, that's all we know right now,
as far as their religious background goes.
There's a forensic psychologist.
His last name is McKee.
He wrote a book called Why Mother's Kill.
And he has, he also has a series of categories for philocyte that he's used.
I've talked about him in our podcast before when we were talking about the Dayball case.
You can read his book if you want to get into the minutia of, he made these arguments.
These categories are much more detailed than I'm going to talk about.
But I think it might be helpful, too, to talk about some of his ideas.
to make distinctions between Lori Daybell and Lindsay Clancy.
What's one financial lesson you learned the hard way?
I'll go first.
It's not too late to start saving.
Today's episode is sponsored by Acorns.
Acorns is a financial wellness app that makes it easy to start saving and investing for your future.
You don't need to be an expert.
Acorns will recommend a diversified portfolio that matches you and your money goals.
You don't need to be rich.
Acorns lets you get started with the spare money you have right now.
And one of the best things about acorns is they allow you to see projected growth on their website.
Simply go online, type in how much money you'd put in and see the potential future balance of your account.
Sign up now and join the over 13 million all-time customers who have already saved and invested over $22 billion with acorns.
Head to acorns.com slash hidden true crime or download the acorns app to get started.
Paid non-client endorsement compensation provides incentive to positively promote acorns.
Tier one compensation provides.
Investing involves risk, Acorns Advisors, LLC, and SEC registered investment advisor.
A few important disclosures at acorns.com slash hidden true crime.
Does anyone else find themselves saying, I feel way older than I actually am, or I feel
way younger?
Did you know there might be some truth behind that feeling?
That's where true diagnostic comes in.
With their true age test, you can discover your true biological age, plus get insights
into health risks for heart disease or Alzheimer's, even your mortality.
I just ordered my true diagnostic test, and while nervous, I'm looking forward to what it may tell me about my own health so I can take control of things now.
When taking tests pertaining to my health, I want to make sure it's scientifically backed and true diagnostic is.
Their true age test is based on peer-reviewed research from scientists working at Harvard, Duke, and Yale.
And by tracking your biological age, you can actually see how the changes you make, whether that's exercise, diet, or sleep, will affect your health over time.
Ready to find out your biological age?
Right now, our listeners can get 20% off their entire order at TrueDiagnostic.com by using code Hidden True Crime at checkout.
That's True Diagnostic, T-R-U-D-A-G and O-T-I-C-C-C-D-N-O-S-T-I-C-C-C-T-C-C-ROM.
Just use code Hidden True Crime to save 20% off.
Plus, if you subscribe, you'll get an additional 20% off.
Discover your true age today.
Ryan Seacrest here.
When you have a busy schedule, it's important to maximize your
your downtime.
One of the best ways to do that is by going to chumbacasino.com.
Chumba Casino has all your favorite social casino games like spin slots, bingo,
and solitaire that you can play for free for a chance to redeem some serious prizes.
So hop on to chumbacasino.com now and live the chumba life.
Sponsored by Chumba Casino.
His categories are, and he's only talking about mothers here, so he's not,
philicide can also be males, by the way.
Males who tend to kill their children tend to often have some antisocial qualities, not surprisingly.
They also tend to be step-parents more than biological parents, and they tend to harm older kids.
It's much less likely that a male committing suicide will harm a younger child.
So a child typically under the age of 10 or 8, usually the male will not, men will not kill younger kids as much as women and specifically biological parents or biological mothers.
But McKee's categories are, his first category is the detached mother here.
He sees this as a bonding issue.
He sees this is related to probably some type of insecure attachment or maybe even a rejection of the child.
So mothers in this case are just, they're just not bonding with the child.
They're very detached.
So there's no investment in the child, and they're more likely in that sense to harm them.
Then he has the category of what he calls the abusive slash neglectful mother.
These are mothers that are either excessively violent towards their kids.
So in other words, they're stern disciplinarians that use a great deal of force to discipline their children or they're their opposite.
They use no, they're completely neglectful.
They have, there's no discipline.
They don't look after their kids at all.
they don't feed their kids.
So like this is extreme neglect.
They just don't care about their kids that much.
The third category is what he calls the psychotic depressed category.
This is the category that involves mental illness.
So this is the category we just talked about where it could be postpartum depression,
psychosis.
It could be, it's the mental illness category.
So typically these mothers are severely mentally ill in some way.
His fourth category is what he calls the retaliatory category.
The goal here is to punish other people for interfering in the relationship.
So this category is not as prominent.
There's not as many mothers that fit this category,
but the goal is to retaliate against others if they're perceived to interfere with the relationship.
And this would be a classic example of this would be the famous story of Medea
who murdered her two children because her husband, Jason, was unfaithful.
she wanted to get back in him.
She wanted to punish him.
That's sometimes called the Medea complex.
It's not super common, by the way.
Usually you'll see men.
You'll see males engage in the Medea complex more than women.
And the final category that McKee talks about is the psychopathic category.
And the goal here, as the word implies, he's not talking about mothers that are straight psychopaths,
but he's talking about mothers that are more exploitative and they're more self-absorbed and they're more narselytive.
and they're more narcissistic, and so therefore, they're more focused on themselves and their needs
than their children.
If you look at McKee's categories, again, I think there's big distinctions there between
Lori DeBow and Lindsay Clancy that I think Lindsay Clancy more clearly fits the mental health
or the psychotic slash depressed category.
And Lori, Lori DeBow would tend to fit the fifth category, which is more psychopathic,
that she's more exploitative, she's more manipulative.
So again, I think these categories that McKee talks about are useful in terms of understanding how to really make sense of philicide.
That does help me better understand the differences.
It's an important point, too, that there's no one specific way of assessing filicide.
There's different typologies, there's different research, and that's typically true in social sciences in general, that filicide, like so many human problems and so many issues around criminality, is kind of.
complex and there's no one specific way of assessing it that's the absolute truth or the way that it should be assessed.
There's multiple ways of perceiving it.
One of our listeners, Angie writes, are there warning signs to where you know this is likely?
And what can you do or who would you call if you are concerned of a possible problem?
I have to say that the biggest warning sign is always going to be some type of suicidal or homicidal ideation.
In the case of Lindsay Clancy, it appears, and again, we don't know, but it appears that there was some type of suicidal or homicidal ideation before any of this occurred.
And before, as the drugs were increased, as their medication was escalating, it appears that that continued.
And so that was obviously a big red flag.
That's a massive warning sign.
If somebody's having homicidal ideation about harming their kids, we need to take that.
obviously we need to take that really seriously. I don't know why somebody didn't intervene. I mean,
I don't know who knew that information and I don't know how severe it was. And obviously somebody assessed
the risk of that and decided that there wasn't sufficient risk that she needed to be hospitalized,
but somebody definitely could have intervened, I think, at some point. And I will probably learn
more about that as this case develops. But yes, the warning signs. Another warning sign would be
psychosis that's overly severe. So Andrea Yates, after her fourth child,
she attempted suicide and she fell into a very significant, a very severe psychosis after her fourth child.
And she was put on anti-sacotic. She did well with that. Her risk was mitigated to some degree,
which is, by the way, why she felt like it would be okay to have a fifth child.
Andrew Yeats is an example of someone who did well with treatment and was able to effectively reverse
or at least improve her suicidal idea.
I don't know where she was in the end with that, but she did better.
And, you know, another important point about postpartum depression is once you've had it,
your risk of having it again go up dramatically.
There's about a 25 to 50 percent relapse rate or reoccurrence rate.
So if you've had it once, you're more than likely going to have it again,
and oftentimes you're going to get it worse.
I know with Andrew Yates, she had a history of it, and it was especially bad after her
fourth child, but she still decided to have a fifth child in spite of that,
in spite of the risks, and we obviously know what happened there.
It was after her fifth child that she fell into postpartum psychosis and ended up killing her kids.
Lindsay had postpartum psychosis was going to a five-day inpatient.
She wanted to do it, and her patient's insurance denied it.
She knew something was wrong and asked for help.
Lisa Byers, I saw your comment too.
She said she tries to get help for her son, and it's difficult, and the system is broken.
It's hard.
You know, on that issue, so if somebody is talking about harming their children or harming themselves and it's taken seriously, insurance really shouldn't matter.
I mean, I know it does.
I know the reality of the world is that people don't want to admit someone in inpatient treatment without insurance.
But I don't know Boston that well, but there have to be other options.
That if that's taken seriously, it's not about insurance.
There's going to be ways to get the state involved or there's going to be other.
avenues, I think, to find inpatient treatment that may not be the treatment that she anticipated,
but I've been in the mental health field for many years, and I don't know of any mental health
providers that when they hear a mother is seriously going to harm their children, that they're
not going to do something about that. Now, they may not, they may assess the risk as being lower,
that perhaps she just has ideation and she's not going to act on it. She had no history of
violence. She had, as far as I know, she had no history of suicidal.
attempts. You know, I don't, I don't know the details, but I do think that it's possible someone in that
scenario miscalculated. Let's just say that. And as some people have mentioned, her husband was only
gone 25 minutes too, which is just heartbreaking. Right. There was a very small window. That indicates
that she was very intent upon carrying out those actions. Another question we have, Becky,
Sheet asks, would you please ask the knowledgeable Dr. Matthias, what is the difference in postpartum
depression and postpartum psychosis?
I think it's a good question.
There's something called postpartum blues.
And the way mental health folks call it or providers I know, they call it the baby blues.
There's something called the postpartum blues, which you had.
And most women, 80%.
So by most estimates, the prevalence rate of postpartum blues or baby blues,
is about 80% of mothers experiencing it after some time in a reasonably small window after
getting birth.
The vast majority of women who give birth have this.
They have the baby blues.
And typically symptoms will abate fairly quickly.
They won't last for more than a few days.
But some will go on.
In the women who continue to have symptoms for, let's say, up to four months, which is roughly 10% of those 10%, they will,
then experience postpartum depression. The 80% then goes down to roughly 10%. I believe, by the way,
that to get to postpartum depression, it's more than just hormonal. There's some evidence indicating
that there might be some past history of depression or past history of anxiety or mental
illness that contributes to postpartum depression. The numbers drop dramatically as time goes by,
but roughly 10% will experience postpartum depression. And then if things get really severe,
you can move into postpartum psychosis.
And the numbers there are roughly one or two women out of a thousand.
Postpartum psychosis is fairly rare.
It can be the final stop from baby blues to something very severe on the continuum.
Another question is from Lisa Anderson.
And she asks, Dr. John, do you think that someone who is mentally ill with psychosis can knowingly commit a crime?
Do they know what they are doing is wrong when it is happening?
That is a great question.
Thank you, Lisa, for that question.
Can someone who is mentally ill with psychosis knowingly commit a crime?
Do they know what they are doing is wrong when it's happening?
The short answer is yes.
You can be psychotic and still know and still be held responsible for the crime.
This gets into the insanity plea a little bit.
To qualify for the insanity plea, essentially,
you have to be unaware of the consequences of your action and you have to be, you have to
lack an understanding that your actions are wrong. So in other words, you don't really understand
the moral consequences of what you're doing, essentially. There's different levels of psychosis
and psychosis oscillates too. It's not a, it's not just one level. It has ups and downs and there's
different types of psychosis. So you can be psychotic and still have some awareness that what you're doing is
wrong.
you still have some capacity with psychosis to plan. Again, Andrew Yates might be a good example of that,
you know, that she was considered to be psychotic. And actually the, she was initially convicted
of murder and then that, that conviction was overturned on appeal. And then she was found not guilty
by reason of insanity. And she's now in a mental institution or state hospital, I should say.
So that's dealing with her mental health issues and not, she's not being treated as a murderer per se anymore.
She, I think, is an example of someone who could be psychotic, and at least initially, a jury believed that she understood the legal ramifications of what she was doing.
She was able to plan her actions.
She knew she was going to strangle her kids.
You know, there's different types of psychosis.
And so it's a case-by-case situation.
You can be psychotic and still, I think, be held accountable for your crimes.
Which, getting back to Lori Daybell, you know, that's an interesting issue, right?
that the defense is trying to figure out, I think, what to do with her mental health issues and how to address them.
And actually, it seems now like based upon the recent motion that there will not be an expert witness testifying on her behalf for her mental health issues.
So that's an interesting development.
The motion seems to indicate that they're not going to argue that these crimes had anything to do with her mental illness.
We'll see, right.
The state doesn't want the defense to include her mental illness.
or her religious beliefs in the defense's argument,
the defense is arguing that it's relevant for issues as simple as sentencing
or maybe avoiding the death penalty.
But who knows how else they might use that?
And again, it's too early,
but it seems like they're trying to jump ahead,
that it's relevant to mitigation, which is sentencing.
You're right.
Seems like maybe they want to argue that her mental health issues
should disqualify her from the death penalty.
they say in their motion that, you know, they believe she's going to be acquitted on all charges.
So maybe it's her relevant if she has mental health issues.
But that remains to be seen.
Here's a question that jumps into Daybell, Lori Daybell.
It's a big question.
I'll think he's on these bold questions.
And then he's like, let's do a whole podcast episode on this.
But we have talked about this a lot in our podcast.
She asks, do you think Lori's beliefs were legitimate to her?
or do you think she had plans and pinned her actions on her religious ideas?
So she's talking about, let's be, let's clarify too, Lori's religious beliefs, her extreme
religious beliefs.
Do you think Lori's extreme religious beliefs were and are legitimate because I believe she is still
standing by them today?
Or did she simply have these plans and did she pin her actions on these religious beliefs?
From what I can gather and from understanding her family culture and her upbringing, it definitely
seems like she saw her religious beliefs as being legitimate and real.
And she subscribed to those beliefs.
She acted on those beliefs.
She still seems to adhere to them.
Seems to me like her beliefs were pretty solid in her mind and they tended to drive her
behavior.
However, you know, as I talked about earlier, there does seem to be.
potentially some maybe psychotic features to Lori.
And I, you know, I haven't seen the, nobody's seen the mental health evaluations,
and we probably won't because they're confidential.
But some of the diagnoses have been disclosed.
And they might indicate there could be some psychoses, although she has been found competent
to stand trial.
So that would tend to undermine that belief.
But let's assume that there are some delusions or psychotic features.
to Lori Daybell. Again, I think there's this, there's this complicated relationship between
clinging on to certain beliefs to feel more grounded and to shore up kind of this fractured
self. And I've talked, I've speculated that she might meet criteria for borderline personality
disorder, which was also in the psych report well before the murders that's been made public.
And in the psych report, the provider talked about was borderline personality disorder or
histrionic personality disorder.
So again, that would complicate matters
because maybe there's some underlying personality issues
that, especially borderline,
where she feels really fractured and chaotic
and doesn't have a strong sense of self.
And again, those religious beliefs
would tend to shore that up.
They would tend to strengthen her sense of self.
Even though her sense of self is in many ways
difficult for her to find
or to she doesn't have a coherent sense of herself.
The religious beliefs give her more of that sense of coherence.
Thank you for that because I do believe that Lori believed her religious beliefs.
It's the question that comes up again and again and again.
And what's the difference between believing something in delusions?
And is she mentally ill?
And is she not?
But there's a lot more going on.
There's a lot more going on with Lori Daybell than simply religious beliefs.
and we talk a lot about that in our original podcast, our first season.
We delve deep into Lori Valo-Dabell and deep into Chad Daybell for those who are interested.
I mean, we did 17 episodes on digging deep into both of them and their histories.
In that sense, too, I think Lori Daibel is much more complex in terms of understanding
phylliside than Lindsay Clancy is, although we don't,
In fairness, we don't know a huge amount about Lindsay Clancy, so maybe we're jumping the gun here.
But it does seem like the postpartum psychosis played a massive role in Lindsay Clancy's in her behavior.
And the number of medications she was taking probably played a major role in that as well.
And we can't say the same with Lori Bells.
So Lori DeBow is more strictly about beliefs and her extreme beliefs, I think,
and this whole idea of altruistic
felicide than Lindsay Clancy
than her behaviors, then her
homicides. Haley
Manigold also is asking a great question
that we are still figuring out.
Hidden True Crime, are you going with
the seasons format? Because we just talked about our first season,
the day-bell case. Like a release schedule
with a break for a couple months during summer or something.
And that's a great question because what we've been doing is we did this
first season. And at this time, we haven't labeled it
a season, but we've been putting
our hidden our lives and making them podcasts, editing them. We are figuring out what to call
our seasons. And we definitely, though, are going to be continuing our day bell season. I don't know.
Maybe John has some, maybe John has more of an idea. I don't think there's going to be a lot of
breaks. I think we're a little behind on content. We're working on a season with the BTK murders.
We're talking about a season with murders around dating apps,
and we have a few other ideas we're also working on,
and we still have to finish up Daybell.
So we have a few episodes that we have sort of left open because of the trial,
and ideally we want to complete our last Daybill episode after the trial.
We're talking about doing a couple, one on Chad, one on Lori, before the trial,
just to solidify some of our thoughts around the daybell case.
So we have more episodes coming on daybell.
We have some episodes coming on BTK.
And of course, we'll be talking about Kohlberger as we learn more.
We're also considering revisiting some of the interviews that I did when it comes to the
daybell case, especially as we gear up towards trial season, just revisit those.
And I've written an episode, so I guess that's a solid way to say it.
Haley, we can't answer all of your questions, but there will be no breaks.
That we can say.
We are here.
No breaks.
We're just, we're trying to get as much content completed as we can.
Question from Patrice.
She asks, how does it differ when a man commits philicide and a woman commits
philicide?
Can a man get postpartum depression?
And let's bring up this.
case of Matthew Coleman.
Matthew Coleman was a surf teacher in California.
He taught children.
He had two children.
A wife took his two young children across the border into Mexico,
killed them with a spearfishing gun because of paranoia,
and then returned or attempted to return home.
But he was stopped at the border because they were looking for him.
Just heartbreaking.
So that's a good example, perhaps, of a case where the father.
Right. So Matthew Coleman is interesting in the sense that he's a male. So he's a little bit of an outlier in terms of his kids were young.
So typically younger children are, they tend to be killed by their mothers. Most men who engage in suicide are usually harming older kids.
And most of them have typically, they'll have some antisocial or psychopathic traits. They tend to be violent.
some degree, usually, whereas Matthew Coleman didn't have any of that. Matthew Coleman was a
surf teacher. He engaged in both types of philosophize that we've talked about tonight, altruistic
and psychotic, I think. Altruistic in the sense that he believed he was killing his children to
save the world. He believes his children were alien human hybrids and they were going to destroy the
world. So he believed he had to kill them because he was saving the world. So there was an altruistic
component. And then there was, I think there was probably, although I don't know, I assume he's going to have
some type of mental health evaluation. There does seem to be some psychotic component in the sense that
he was laboring under these delusions about his children being these alien human hybrids, and he believed it,
and he was committed to it. He's an example of someone who sort of fits both categories and
doesn't fit the typical pattern for males who harm their children.
Question.
What is the difference between psychosis and schizophrenia type symptoms?
A couple people ask this.
Kizzerania is a diagnosis in the DSM.
Psychosis is just more of a, it's a broad category describing someone who has a break with reality.
Psychosis is not a diagnosis per se.
it's more of a descriptive category, which suggests that someone who's psychotic is breaking with reality.
It's a broader explanation, whereas schizophrenia is a specific diagnosis that has criteria,
five criteria that need to be met, or at least five possible criteria that need to be met in order to receive the diagnosis.
We had our first successful book club meeting this week.
Thank you, Dr. John.
We've had a big week.
We had your first book club for January.
And for those wondering, you joined that through Patreon, any tier or a YouTube membership,
Amethyst and Above.
It was a successful, wonderful time.
John talked to everyone.
The questions and the discussion in there was really great and it was a really high level.
But it's a great place to really interact with some of our listeners.
And our community is so smart and so intelligent.
and we're just we love our community because I think our community is is really unusual.
Let's let's end with this question.
Christina asks Dr. John, a forensic psychologist like you, you would testify in a case like this,
right, Lindsay Clancy.
You do this in court.
So I'm curious.
Postpartum, psychosis could go under the insanity plea.
This is a tragic case.
And maybe we can end with this, John, sharing your thoughts.
So the answer is, yes, what I do would allow me to testify in a case.
case like this. And postpartum psychosis could, it could qualify for an insanity plea depending on
the situation and how severe it is. It certainly helped Andrea Yates. It didn't help her initially,
but on appeal it did. So in the end, it helped her. In terms of Lindsay Clancy, I just don't know enough.
My job is always to get as much information as possible. And we're not privy to a lot of insight
information on Lindsay Clancy because none has been released and we don't have a lot of sources. We
have a ton of sources with Daybell that are confidential sources, but we don't have the same
luxury with Lindsay Clancy. So I don't really know enough to know if she would qualify for an
insanity plea. I would guess that her attorney is already starting to do some lobbying publicly
with talk about the over-medication and seems to me like he's moving in that direction.
I think the thing about Philicide that's so difficult to understand is that it's so
counterintuitive that most of us can't imagine harming a child, harming someone who's innocent,
and yet these cases are the complete opposite. They involve people that are harming,
helpless, innocent children. And it's just, it's so, so difficult from a rational standpoint
to understand and to make sense of. And I think, I think that's why there's so much fascination
with those side, because it's, in some ways, in terms of, you know, a normal person,
it's just, it's just mind-boggling that people could do that. And it's so,
counterintuitive. It's important to try to understand it because of the huge ramifications of
harming children. I guess maybe that's a plea for more research or more investment on the part of
psychologists into this matter. I mean, we're doing it to some degree, but I think there's room for
more knowledge and more research in this area. Thanks, everyone, for being with us tonight. For those
that enjoy our podcast. This will be edited in the next few days and we'll share it on our podcast
format as well as ad free on patreon.com slash hidden true crime. And for those on our Patreon and YouTube
memberships, Amethyst and above, for those that we stated we'd have the book club stream that we did,
we haven't shared it yet. It was such a big file. We're having a hard time transferring it over
I can edit it.
So what should be a fairly simple thing has turned out to be a lot more complicated,
but we are learning and we'll be posting the book club stream, January's book club stream soon.
The next book club meeting, somebody asked, is scheduled for February 28th.
That's a Tuesday at 6 p.m. Pacific.
And do you want to tell them the book?
We're reading, John.
The book is going to be the examined life by,
Stephen Gross. That's G-R-O-S-Z. I may be pronouncing his last name incorrectly. He was an American
train psychologist, but he practices in London, and he tends to reflect, to a large degree, my own
approach to clinical work. And I think his book is very readable and accessible and insightful.
So it doesn't directly have anything to do with forensic work, but it
definitely does indirectly in the sense that a lot of forensic work involves a broader understanding
of why human beings do what they do. And he gets to that. So I'm really looking forward to
discussing that book with our listeners. And hopefully you guys can get busy reading it before the
meeting. Yes. So February 28th, 6 p.m. And we hope to see many of you there. All right, everyone,
Have a great Friday night. Thanks for joining us tonight.
And we'll see you next week. Good night.
Your old or broken phone can let you down.
But at Verizon, trade in any old phone from our top brands and get iPhone 16 Pro with Apple Intelligence with a new line on my plan.
And iPad and Apple Watch Series 10.
After all, you don't want your old phone to die on you when you're lost.
Perfect.
Or for your broken phone to glitch at the worst possible time.
Hey, can I get your number?
Trade in your old phone.
for a brand new iPhone 16 Pro, iPad, and Apple Watch.
Visit Verizon.com today.
Additional terms apply.
Service and required for Apple Watch and iPad.
Now's the time for a great deal on a new Honda.
It's time to take an adventure with rugged capability and commanding style.
Check out the Honda Ridgeline, Pilot, or CRV.
For a limited time, well-qualified buyers can get a 3.9% APR on a 2025 pilot
or a 2.9% APR on a 2025 Ridgeline or CRV.
for financing details. Most people don't realize how much their personal information is being
bought and sold every day. Data brokers are making billions, pulling details about you from public records
and the internet, and then packaging and selling it, usually without your consent. That's how
your information lands in the hands of scammers, spammers, even stalkers. It's why you get endless
robocalls and why ads seem to follow you everywhere. That's where ORA comes in. Ora actively
removes your data from broker sites and keeps it off. They also instantly alert you if your information
shows up in a breach or on the dark web.
But ORA goes beyond data protection.
With one app, you get a VPN,
antivirus, password manager,
spam call protection, dark web monitoring,
and even up to $5 million in identity theft insurance,
all backed by 24-7 U.S.-based fraud support.
Other companies might sell just credit monitoring,
or just a VPN.
ORA gives you all of it,
together, at the same price competitors charge for just one service.
Start your free trial today at ORA.com slash remove.
Protect yourself now at
ora.com slash remove.
