How to Be a Better Human - How to make the most of a finite life (w/ Oliver Burkeman)
Episode Date: February 3, 2025There’s only so much you can do in a week – or, according to Oliver Burkeman, in the roughly 4,000 weeks the average human lives. Oliver is a journalist and author of the books Four Thousand Weeks...: Time Management for Mortals, Meditations for Mortals, and the newsletter “The Imperfectionist.” Chris and Oliver discuss the paradox of why change can only occur once we accept that we might not be able to change. Oliver also shares how life’s mishaps can become our most treasured memories and why sharing your imperfections is an act of generosity.For the full text transcript, visit go.ted.com/BHTranscripts Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
You're listening to How To Be A Better Human.
I am your host Chris Duffy.
Today on the podcast, we're going to be talking about one of the big existential questions
that humans have faced for thousands of years.
What do you do with your time on this planet?
Now if you are expecting us to get to the bottom of that question to give you a complete
and definitive answer in the next 40ish minutes, I have some terrible news for you.
You have lost your mind.
We are not going to be getting to the bottom of the meaning of life on this one podcast
episode.
If you thought we were, you are delusional.
But we will be talking with the journalist Oliver Berkman, and we will be trying to figure
out some ways that we can think about this and tackle that question
on our own for ourselves. And Oliver has helped many, many people to think more deeply about their
time on Earth. And one of the ways that he has done that is to simply point out the undeniable fact
about our existence, which is that it is limited. Here's a clip from Oliver's TEDx talk where he's
talking about exactly this. I think we need to think in a very different way about time.
And to get towards an answer, I think it's really helpful
if we turn to an idea that has a very long history in philosophy.
It's there in Seneca and the Stoics, it's there in the Buddhists,
and later on in Nietzsche and in Heidegger.
And that's this idea that in some sense, most of us live our lives in a deep state of denial
about how finite our lives are.
Really shockingly finite, actually.
The average human lifespan is about 4,000 weeks long.
It's not that we don't know we're going to die.
I mean, we know we're going to die.
If anybody here didn't realize that,
I'm sorry to be the one to break it to die. I mean, we know we're going to die. If anybody here didn't realize that, I'm sorry to be the one to break it to you. But it's that we don't accept it deep down. We don't
live as if we were finite humans. We instead do everything we can to try to maintain this
comforting illusion that there will always be more time for everything, that we can fit
more in. Sometimes when I talk in this way, people think I'm saying something incredibly depressing.
Like, frankly, I'd rather just go through my life deluded than face such a miserable truth.
Or that it's really stressful, like that I'm suggesting we should go through our lives,
like, freaking out all the time about the fact that we're going to die.
But I think that the lesson from philosophers since Seneca onwards is that this way of thinking,
it's
not depressing or stressful at all.
It's actually really, really liberating and relaxing.
It's a huge weight off your shoulders.
We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back with more from Oliver Berkman.
Stick around because we're going to take even more weight off of your shoulders.
I promise you're going to feel so relaxed.
It's going to be like incredible how light you feel.
Or maybe it'll just be more of a podcast.
Either way, you have to stick around to find out.
If you're at a point in life when you're ready to lead with purpose, we can get you
there.
The University of Victoria's MBA in Sustainable Innovation is not like other MBA programs.
It's for true changemakers who want to think differently and solve the world's most pressing
challenges.
From healthcare and the environment to energy, government, and technology, it's your path
to meaningful leadership in all sectors.
For details, visit uvic.ca slash future MBA.
That's uvic.ca slash future MBA.
From fleet management to flexible truck rentals to technology solutions.
At Enterprise Mobility, we help businesses find the right mobility solutions so they
can find new opportunities.
Because if your business is on the road, we want to make sure it's on the road to success.
Enterprise Mobility, moving you moves the world.
Where can I get help hiring people with disabilities?
There are hundreds of thousands of Canadians with disabilities who are ready to work,
and many local organizations are available to help you find qualified candidates
and make your workplace more accessible and inclusive.
Visit Canada.ca slash right here to connect with one near you today.
A message from the Government of Canada.
Today we are talking about our brief but wonderful time on Earth with the journalist and author Oliver Berkman. Hello, my name is Oliver Berkman. I'm an author and a journalist. I wrote a book called
4000 Weeks, Time Management for Mortals, and my new book is Meditations
for Mortals.
I'm delighted to be talking to you because I've been a longtime reader of your newsletter,
The Imperfectionist, and big fan of both of your books.
I'm also interested because you've made a pretty big change in your personal life over
the last few years, and you moved from New York to North York, which I just find somewhat delightful on a linguistic level.
But I wonder how a big change like that
has played into your thinking about the meaning
and the value of your time.
It's an interesting question.
Yeah, we lived in Brooklyn for many years.
My wife is American.
And then we have spent the last few years
in the North York Moors, which is a
it's a national park in the British sense. In the American sense, you can't, well, very few people
live in national parks, but that's not the case here. So it's sort of, it's a beautiful bleak part
of the world, but it is also like a living community of towns and villages. I think we
thought we were doing something very kind of interesting and
radical when we decided to leave or maybe not radical, but at least self-determined.
And when I look back now, I'm just a sort of a pandemic data point, right? Like everybody
was doing this who could, I think, in many ways, not everybody, but anyone who had that ability
was considering it. It's also a return to the area in which I
grew up, not exactly I didn't grow up in the countryside, but it's the part of England where I was raised. I do find that living in a rural area focuses one's mind in certain very helpful
ways on how time is being used. In some ways that's because i am surrounded by landscape that i love and have the opportunity to spend.
Time in that almost everyday you don't out in the blustery winds and under the big skies and all the rest of it and that is you know part of how i want to spend my finite time on the planet.
In another sense, it's inconvenient living along drive from big stores. You've either got to have a car with you or you need to arrange a ride from somebody.
There's all these little ways in which you're not just living in
that purely frictionless space.
That too, I think is actually really helpful in a way.
Sometimes it's annoying because I got to think ahead about what I want to cook for
dinner instead of just rushing out to the store while the pan is sizzling on the stove, which you could practically
do where we lived before. So there's a sort of a, there's a deliberateness that is required
sometimes. And then socially, it's really interesting because yeah, you might feel like it was splendid
isolation, but actually you're a lot more reliant on and interconnected with neighbors in many ways than you need to be anyway in an urban environment.
I think it's interesting to hear you talk about this big life change because one of
the messages of Meditations for Mortals is that we often think we have to make some sort
of huge dramatic shift in our life in order for our life to start or to have meaning or to finally be the person we want to be and
Your big argument is that shift will never happen, right?
That we need to actually start right now and not worry about all of the big changes that could happen
But rather just what is happening today
It's interesting because in some ways you actually did make the big shift that people talk about like if only I moved to another
Country into the countryside.
So even having done that, do you still have that feeling of like,
you do the giant shift and it's still, it doesn't fix all the things.
You still have to do the work every day.
There probably is a little bit of that fantasy whenever anybody moves
long distance or between cities or anything like that.
There's that slight sense of now it's this that is going to answer all my problems.
I think I had already begun to see through that fantasy a bit by the time we made this move.
But yeah, regardless of what I thought, you move somewhere else and you're still there.
You brought yourself with you and all your kind of imperfections and limitations.
I think that one of the things that the new book is very much about is the idea
that this moment of truth or this moment of problem-free living, this moment of getting
over all the things about yourself that annoy you, that isn't coming.
And this is great news.
This is not depressing news at all.
This is news that allows you to get on with living life to the full now instead of postponing
that until the point at which you've completely
fixed your procrastination problems or worked out how to be the perfect parent or whatever
thing it is for you. You don't need to wait for that.
Can we just define some of the terms that I think are, for me, really resonant and that
come up a lot when people are reading you, which is the title of your newsletter, The
Imperfectionist and this idea of imperfectionism. And then related title of your newsletter, The Imperfectionist,
and this idea of imperfectionism. And then relatedly, your book, 4000 Weeks. What is that
number, 4000 Weeks, and what is imperfectionism, and how are those related as we then move into
Meditations for Mortals, your latest book? Sure. Well, 4000 Weeks is very roughly the average
lifespan in the developed world these days. I rounded it down a bit to get to the round figure,
make for better title.
There's something stress-inducing,
I'm well aware in expressing that figure in weeks.
Because if you express it in years,
then it's not as much more a number,
but years feel like large units.
If you express it in days, well,
a day is very quick, it's very easy to waste a day,
in my experience anyway,
but you get a lot of them.
There's something about the week's denominator,
I guess there's a word, that really sort of puts pressure
on those ideas because a week feels short enough to waste
and to sort of not take account of,
and also you don't get very many of them
when you calculate the number in an average lifespan. Now actually I think in some
ways the book is almost an argument against the title and I'll say what I mean by that in that
I think you could take that as an argument that the idea of 4,000 weeks that could lead very
swiftly to a different kind of book and a different kind of set of ideas which would be
life is so short you've got to cram every moment of it with the most
extraordinary experiences you possibly can.
And it's quite stressful, right?
That's like, oh no, more things I've got to do in the course of my day.
So where I actually wanted to take that, I want to say we're actually so finite, we're
so limited in what we can find time for and how much control we can exert over how our lives unfold. We're
so limited that actually, in a sense, we need to give up hope of doing most of the things
we can think of. We need to give up hope of exerting most of the control we might like
to exert. And so there's a kind of a defeat that you have to go through here when you
realize that no matter how much you cram your life with exciting experiences, you'll never get to do more than a tiny fraction of what
the world has to offer. But my argument is that that defeat is incredibly liberating and empowering
and actually leads on to bigger and better accomplishments because that's when you get to
stop trying to do this crazy impossible thing of getting
your arms around the whole of the world and you see that actually your job, as it were,
in the world is to show up and do some things and do them with as much presence as you can
muster and to do them now instead of waiting decades until you feel completely ready to
do them.
So for me, imperfectionism is just the outlook on life that starts from the place
that says, okay, there's always going to be too much to do. There's always going to be
more meaningful things you could in principle do with your time than you're going to be
able to do. So now what? You're always going to be exposed to events. Anything could happen
in any moment. You're never going to cure all the aspects of your personality you don't
like. All of this is never going to happen. So now what? It really is not a recipe for despair or for sort of settling
for a life of mediocrity. It's incredibly exciting because it's like now you can bring
all those meaningful things and those ways of being forward from the future into your
life right now and really get stuck in to being wholeheartedly
who you are right here and now.
It also makes me think that there's kind of this cliche of like, what would you do if
you found out you were going to die in a week? You only had a week to live. And I think that
the cliche answer to that, at least that I've heard, is like, I would travel the world.
I would buy a fancy car. I would do all these drugs, I would like do this wild stuff.
And I think that the reality is that if you actually genuinely knew you had a week to
live, you would probably stay where you are and spend time with the people that you care
about and maybe do a few things that really matter.
You probably wouldn't be out pursuing like the highest possible highs and the most dramatic experiences.
That's not actually what we want to do with our limited time when we know it is limited.
Right. First of all, the aspiration would be that you were in the ideal case.
You would already be living the way that you wanted to spend those final days.
You know, actually, many of us may be living something closer to that than we let ourselves
believe given the pressures in the culture
and from all sorts of other sources
to sort of be super extraordinary.
Like that isn't actually what makes us feel most alive
on a sort of regular basis.
It's a reason to get started on things,
not a reason to give up on them.
So I wanna put a pretty big disclaimer on here,
which I've said many times over the course of this podcast,
but is that, you know, this show is called
How to Be a Better Human.
And I have a lot of qualms about that as a title and an idea.
And I love how you really push back in your book
on the idea that we'd ever become a better person,
some other person who's better and fuller and more generous.
And yet, that also does
not mean that you can't follow your best impulses. When you find yourself having an impulse to
generosity, that you allow that impulse to go through rather than to squash it with some sort
of logical explanation. You give the example of, you know, you walk by someone who's asking for
money and you feel the urge to help them,
to give them some money, but instead you say to yourself, well, I actually heard that it's
more effective to give to a charity that deals with homelessness, so I'm not going to help
this person.
I'm instead going to give to the charity.
But then later on you forget and you don't actually give to the charity, so you've done
nothing, which I think is a very relatable experience.
In my understanding of what being a better human would be,
it's not being a different better human,
it's being the best version of yourself.
And I think that's really hard.
It takes a lot of work, but it also is simpler
than maybe it would look like from the outside,
which I think your example captures,
is that you already have that impulse,
so why not just allow it?
Yeah, I think that's a really deep point.
In fact, there's a sort of a paradox here that
I'm not sure anyone has ever sort of solved, as it were. Maybe it can't be solved, and so I'm
not going to solve it now, but it's captured by that famous line from the humanist psychotherapist
Carl Rogers who says, the curious paradox is that when I accept myself just as I am, then I can change.
And it's also captured in that idea of becoming more of who you are, which, you
know, doesn't really make any sense if we're going to be very sort of rational
and technical about it.
And yet I think most of us can connect with what that means in some sort of.
Pre verbal way.
So again, for my own own benefit as much as for
anybody else is I'm experimenting with this notion of like what would it mean
to allow yourself to be more fully who you are and that's a completely legitimate
definition of the phrase better human if that's the one you want to use. So not
trying to sort of make yourself into a more generous person but accepting the
possibility that you may already be a perfectly generous person and just need to
get a little bit better at the action of, well, not even an action, more like a non-action,
more like not getting in the way of who you are at your best with kind of fear-based,
anxiety-based, control-seeking mental activity that just gets in the way.
It's also related to an insight which I've written about several times from the therapist
Bruce Tift who has this kind of thought experiment. He invites people to take the thing that bothers
you the most about yourself, like maybe you're incredibly distractible or a procrastinator
or you have a short temper or something, and you just sort of think, well, what if I never
change in this regard?
Or what if some version of this is with me to the very end of my life?
Because if I'm just always going to be a bit of a procrastinator, or I would say in my
case a bit of a catastrophizer, a bit anxiety prone, I can just sort of get on with life
now instead of postponing the real part of life till I've fixed this thing.
I can show up now.
Now, as Tift also says, there's something a little bit scary about showing up fully for life, which
is the secret payoff of telling yourself that you've got a big problem that needs fixing.
You don't quite have to show up now because you can tell yourself I'm going to do that when it's
fixed. But overall, I think that notion of like, okay, then I can let go of that and just actually
get on with the things I want to do instead of worrying away at trying to be someone that I'm not.
And it's interesting because when I think about my wife, she doesn't love transitions.
Transitions are hard for her.
Even when we're going somewhere fun, if we're going on a fun vacation, the first day of
getting into the new place is a little bit of a challenge for her.
It's not her favorite day.
Now, when I think about that with her, I don't think,
I hope one day she'll become totally comfortable with all transitions because that's when she'd finally be a good person. I'm just like, yeah, that's Molly. That's fine. But when it's me,
I'm like, oh, why can't I be good with transitions? I wish I was, I'm so bad at
transitions and it's such a huge fatal flaw in my personality. Now, that's actually not my fatal flaw. Mine is probably something more like ego related.
I can have a big head and that is sometimes helpful
and sometimes very unhelpful.
Right, and yet the moment you see it
and the moment you accept that it's a part of you,
you kind of let go of some notion
that you're entirely within your own power
to change yourself.
And yeah, I think that's another thing
that I write about elsewhere in the new book
is this idea that like, there's this lovely quote I use from Adam Phillips, psychoanalyst, he
says along the lines of, you know, if we met the person in reality who is inside our heads
kind of yelling at us, you know, berating yourself, treating yourself in ways you'd
never dream of treating a friend, we just think they were, as he puts it, like he would
just be boring and cruel, right? It's just like, there as he puts it, like he would just be boring
and cruel, right? It's just like, there's just, it's just, that would just be an obnoxious
person. They would need help. This is not somebody to be listened to. Maybe it's somebody
to be empathized with. That's an interesting point. And yet that person lives inside many
of our minds. We hold ourselves to standards that, yeah, are essentially impossible to reach and are just unfairly
applied as against other people. I found that a very useful insight when I first started
exploring work on self-compassion and things like that because something in my nature or
perhaps also my culture predisposes me to think that all that stuff about self-compassion
is kind of cringe and I don't want
to go there and start treating myself as some incredibly special person worthy of vast amounts
of cosmic love or something.
And of course, all we're talking about here is like, could you maybe just extend the same
amount of basic decency to yourself that you already extend to friends naturally,
as anyone who's an okay or even good friend to other people will just naturally do.
And I found that very powerful. It's like, oh yeah, actually, yeah, I don't need to think
I'm special. I just need to think I'm not specially inferior to all the other people in my life.
to all the other people in my life. Okay, we're going to take a very special little break, and then we will be right back
with more from Oliver.
This episode is sponsored by Cozy.
Remember the last time you moved a couch?
It was terrible, right?
A nightmare.
Well, Cozy is changing the game.
They're a Canadian company making modular, high-quality furniture that arrives in compact
boxes that are easy to carry.
And Cozy's pieces grow with you.
Start with a loveseat, then easily expand to a sectional as your family grows.
And Comfort, well, their Ciel collection, is like sitting on a cloud. I mean, perfect for unwinding after a long day of, say, hosting podcasts.
What really stands out is the adaptability. These pieces are built to last, designed to
be disassembled and reassembled without losing stability. It's furniture that evolves with
your lifestyle.
Customize your perfect piece today. Your back and your style will thank you. Transform
your living space today with Cozy. Visit Cozy.ca to customize your furniture and start living
in the future. Cozy. Modern living made simple for you. Road to success. Enterprise mobility. Moving you moves the world.
And we are back. So Oliver, I just want to share an anecdote with you. And this is something
I actually hadn't thought about in a long time. I was maybe 18 or 19 years old. I was
in my first year of university and I was visiting a friend and this friend is very smart, one of my
best friends, and she was going to Harvard. And I remember I was taking the train to visit her and
I was on the train. It happened to be with one of her college roommates who we were sitting
together. We were both on this train up to visit her. And it was the first time that I'd ever seen
like a self-help book, someone actually like our age reading a self-help book. And I remember she was reading this book
that was called Slowing Down to the Speed of Life. And she's like, this is so helpful. This has really
changed my life. And she gave it to me and I read it and I felt like, oh, there's some big
insights in here. But I also remember feeling in the moment, like, this is ridiculous, right? Like
we're 18, we have to slow down to the speed of life.
Like, life hasn't even caught up with us yet.
And yet it also was that idea of like, if I read this book,
I'm gonna figure out the secret
to how to live a meaningful life.
I could change myself in this way.
It felt really compelling.
And that feeling that like, there is a secret out there
that we just haven't uncovered yet is
something that you talk about a lot and that I've never really heard other people talk about in the
same way. That's interesting. Yeah, no, I'm glad that you got it from my writing. I do think that
the thing that underlies all of this is this notion that there is, yes, some way of mastering
the art of being human that you haven't found yet. And maybe quite
a lot of people around you have, and that's annoying, and you've got to find it somehow.
What you learn if you think about this and reflect on it for a while and live for a while
is that if there's any meaning to the idea of mastering the art of being human, it is
in getting more and more comfortable with the sense in which life can't be mastered. As finite human beings, that's not what it is
to live fully as a human, to sort of get on top of life and then direct it from that vantage point.
It's much more about being able to sort of be in it and take action despite the fact that you
don't know if it's the right thing or you don't know if you'll do it every day for the rest of your life or you don't
know if you're doing it well. So yeah, I mean, this book is about action for sure, but it's in
perfect action, which is not actually second rate as against perfect action, right? It's better
because it's the kind that happens in the world. I think also there's this piece of that, I mean, this culture of striving, of reaching
the pinnacle of being at the top. And I think that something that you've described, and
I feel like is really something I see in a lot of people around me, both my age and older
and younger, is this feeling of like, just deep deep exhaustion that like nothing is enough and
I'll never be good enough and I can't ever compete with what is out there and even before
I've begun it's already too late.
And I think it ties into this metaphor that you use the kayak and the super yacht.
The kayak and the super yacht.
And all I mean by this is just that I think to be human,
to be a finite human is effectively to be in a little,
one person kayak on a rapidly moving river, right?
You just find yourself there on the river of time.
There are lots of other people around in their kayaks.
It's not totally solitary, but you know, you're just here
and you're trying to
stay afloat and you respond to what is happening as best as you can.
And sometimes there are very choppy periods and sometimes there are very quiet periods
and you're never really sure what's coming and you just have to navigate into each new
moment as best as you can.
This is a very vulnerable and risky and a little bit scary situation, but it's also very exhilarating, right? It really is being
alive. And I think that what a lot of us sort of naturally, instinctively, let's
say, want instead is what I think of as life on the super yacht, right? Where
you're on the kind of third floor story bridge of a huge fancy multimillion dollar boat in the air conditioned control
room. I don't actually claim to know a huge amount about how super yachts are piloted
and somebody's going to pull me up on this.
I know, as you were saying it, I was like, I've never been on a super yacht.
But you program the route into the navigational computer system and you sit back and you're in control
and you're confident about where you're going and it feels very secure.
At the same time, there's something sterile and lifeless about it, which I think is an
important point not to miss.
Anyway, I just think that a lot of the things we do when it comes to trying to manage our
time, the ways we try to set up our lives, can be
best understood as ways of trying to feel like we're really on the super yacht when
in fact we're in the kayak. Ways of trying not to feel what it is to be a limited human.
So an obvious one of those is if you're perpetually on a quest to discover the perfect productivity
system, to perfect morning routine,
the perfect set of protocols that is going to make you invincible, then you're never
going to get there because what you're trying to do is antithetical to being human.
I think that again and again what I'm actually saying in my writing is basically, if we can
just a little bit let back in the reality that in
fact we're in the kayak, that's not only just true, but it is actually A, more associated
with getting things moving and accomplishing things and doing things. That's where you
actually do things instead of postponing them until you're totally sure that you're on a
super yacht. You just dive into doing them now.
And secondly, it has more of what the German social theorist Hartmut Roser calls resonance.
The thing that we really want from life is not total control over it.
It is this kind of vibrancy that really depends to some extent, he argues, and I agree, on
not being in total control of it.
It also makes me think that when we look back on our most treasured memories or the times when we felt like we had a really meaningful period in our life, it's almost never like, and it was comfortable and quiet and nothing happened.
Right. Like even though we think we want that and there was nothing going on, that's not what you look back on to go.
You know, you look back on the periods of struggle or discomfort, or at the very least, it being less than ideal
and you making the best of it with friends or family.
Those are the periods that you look back and you laugh on.
It's so rare that someone says like,
remember when we stayed at that perfectly,
totally clean rental house
and it was exactly what the pictures looked like?
That's not a very big memory.
Whereas remember when we got to the house
and it turns out that there was a giant puddle of water
in the middle of the house and all of the beds were broken
and we had to sleep in a tent outside.
That is the memory that people actually have
and treasure later on, even though in the moment
it's uncomfortable and unpleasant maybe.
Right, yeah.
And I refer in one part of the new book to this saying,
this quotation that almost everything in life
is either a good time or a good story.
Not everything. I'm not claiming that there aren't just true tragedies that before people,
but it's really striking how frequently the things,
the memories we sort of treasure are in some sense,
memories of things not working out.
It may be that this is actually on some level the same phenomenon
though as the one that people who are struck
by real severe crises, major serious diagnoses of illnesses, do surprisingly frequently look
back on those things as things that they're in some sense glad that they happened in terms
of how they focused their minds on what mattered the most.
In all these different levels of intensity, you get this sort of basic principle that when things slip
out of our control, it's at least possible and perhaps quite frequent, that turns out
to be for the best.
Coming at it from as a comedian too, like that idea of it's either a good time or a
good story, that is definitionally what it means to be a comedian, to look at the world
that way, I would say, right?
Like it's either pleasant, fine,
or this is fodder for my comedy later on.
That is so how you look at the world as a comedian, I think.
That's such a great point.
How many sort of comedians bits drawn from life in any way
are about everything going fine and nothing happening.
It's like, that wouldn't be funny.
I can't think of a faster way to get people
to throw things at you on stage,
then to tell them the things that are going well. It's funny. Now I'm laughing,
but I'm laughing because the idea is ridiculous. And I think the deep truth there, I mean,
humor is like there is something very much not superficial and profound about the capacity to
laugh at what is happening to you or has happened to you or has happened to somebody else when
you're laughing in an empathetic, sort of non-contemptuous way. There's something about
the sort of position of laughing at the cosmic joke of all this, which is right in the heart
what I'm trying to get at. And whether I do it amusingly or not is not for me to say,
but I think that one thing that can come from feeling your way into this viewpoint
on the world is a real sort of deep belly laugh at what we are as humans and how things
don't work out for us.
Okay, we're going to take a short break, but when we come back, we're going to talk
about one of Oliver's favorite jokes of all time.
You do not want to miss this.
If you're at a point in life when you're ready to lead with purpose, we can get you there. The University of Victoria's MBA in Sustainable Innovation is not like other MBA programs.
It's for true changemakers who want to think differently
and solve the world's most pressing challenges.
From healthcare and the environment to energy,
government, and technology,
it's your path to meaningful leadership in all sectors.
For details, visit uvic.ca slash future MBA.
That's u-v-i-c dot c-ca slash future MBA.
From fleet management to flexible truck rentals
to technology solutions.
At Enterprise Mobility, we help businesses
find the right mobility solutions
so they can find new opportunities.
Because if your business is on the road,
we wanna make sure it's on the road to success.
Enterprise Mobility, moving you moves the world.
And we are back.
So Oliver, several of the quotes in your book are surprisingly from comedians, right?
You have a Mitch Hedberg quote that I thought was fantastic,
a Mitch Hedberg joke about how I'm going to butcher it.
But basically, you know, if you're lost in the woods, what you should do is just build a log cabin
and live there.
You have dramatically improved your situation.
I was lost, but now I live here.
Yeah, right.
Exactly.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
I was lost, but now I live here.
Perfect.
I missed the punchline.
Of course, that's the most important part.
That's very funny, but it also hits this kind of profound truth that you're writing about,
which is that where you are is where you are writing about, which is that like that is where
you are is where you are period. I think that joke is incredibly profound. It's the idea that we're
all sort of lost and that setting up home in the middle of that lostness and that lack of control
is what we're here to do. I mean, I don't want to put ideas posthumously into Mitch Hedberg's mind
about it, but that's what that means to me. And I think it's incredibly deep and also very, very funny.
I feel like this will resonate with you too, is that I have a friend who's Quaker, and he gave me this Quaker phrase, which I'm not Quaker, but I have now written and is on my desk, which just says,
proceed as the way opens. Because to me, that is just, that's all that you can ever do is just take the next step. Proceed as the way opens. You don't have to know where you're going. That's fascinating to me. I love that phrase.
I was raised as a Quaker actually, but it's new to me and it feels like a very Zen Quaker
insight. So the question I have though is when we have this relentless focus on the
next step and on action, how do we ever get to rest? When is it ever okay to not be doing
something? Like how do you have a moment where you can draw a line and just be present and not have to be moving forward
towards something yet again?
I think doing can be at least partly
a present moment thing, right?
Maybe it is inherently and only a present moment thing.
It's not about, are you getting through the list?
I think that it's really important to not only focus,
let's put it that way, be realistic about it,
on all the things left to do, which is effectively an infinite list, right? So if you compare
what you've done to all the things left to do, you're always
going to feel bad because there's always somewhere further to go and more things
to do, more actions to take. But the idea of focusing on what you have done, the
simplest way of doing this is literally to keep a done list, right? Just to keep
a list during the day where you write down the things that you have
completed as you complete them.
It just, you know, bends your focus back again, a little bit to the comparison of
what you've done as against zero, right?
Not as against infinity, which is a very depressing place to be, but as against
what if I hadn't done anything today?
And there's a sort of a discipline that arises from that, which is like, okay,
well, whatever
I do next, I'm going to be adding it to my done list.
So let me choose something.
Let me choose something that I can complete and then let me do it so that I can add it
in a very satisfying way to this list.
I mean, maybe this is only something that list geeks like myself really find so satisfying,
but I think the spirit of it is pretty satisfying.
And that's why, you know, there's an even simpler way of so-called productivity
technique that I've written about before, which I still return to sometimes, which
is literally to get a notebook, write something down on a line that you're
gonna do, answer five emails, I don't know, make a call, do that one thing, cross it
out, then write the next thing on the line underneath it,
and do that thing, then cross it out.
This shouldn't work.
It's not a plan for the day,
it's not a set of goals and visions
and quarterly targets or anything like that.
Yet there's something very powerful about it because it is
this act of settling into your finite nature,
picking something that feels like the right thing to do,
writing it down and inherently requires you to sort of say
what done would look like on some level,
getting to that point, and then in
a very sort of ritualistic ceremonial way,
crossing it out and letting it go.
There's something really powerful about that.
It's very much in tune with who we really are as humans.
I think.
Well, I love the idea of letting things go and crossing them out.
And I also love the idea of just deciding that like there is an amount that is okay
for now or for this time or for today, because I think that for me at least, I can really
get into this idea of I have to do it all.
I have to like, if I maximize all of the time, then I'll be able to write this book in two
weeks rather than two months. And that would be better. Both what works and also what makes
me happy and to have meaning and purpose is when I think about it more as like I'm building
a muscle rather than I'm trying to accomplish the task at once. And so it's like, if I just
sit down, I mean, my technique for writing is I literally will put on a white noise machine
and set a timer for 45 minutes. And then I just, my role is I is I literally will put on a white noise machine and set a timer for 45 minutes
And then I just my role is I just don't get out of the chair
But the trick for me is that 45 minutes it took a lot of effort to work my way up to 45 minutes
I'm just sitting in the chair not even actively writing
like at first I was like I could do this for 10 and then eventually I got to 30 and then 45 and I
Found that honestly the best days once I'm really in my trained zone,
I could maybe do two or three of those 45s.
But that's over the course of a whole day.
And I find that really what my goal is just to get myself
into the endurance of being able to do that.
That as a goal feels much more tolerable than like,
I'm gonna write four chapters today in my book.
Even if I was to do it, it just burns me completely out.
Yeah, and I think that's really well put. And that number, you know, I've written in this most
recent book about this kind of strange three to four hour rule of creative productivity that seems
to be the sort of optimal amount for pretty much almost anybody if they have the freedom to do it,
to put into their core work, if their work involves thinking or creativity or writing.
I don't hit it every day at all, but if you can do three 45-minute periods,
factoring in a few rests, that's that amount.
Coming back to do that over and over again is infinitely more meaningful and
productive than managing to do six or seven hours,
two days running, being exhausted,
and then just overwhelmed by the prospect
of doing another hour on it that you can't be bothered
and you throw it away for six months, right?
I mean, that's not the way forward.
You know, we were talking and laughing about the idea
of how much an audience would hate you
if you were standing on stage at a comedy show
and talking about how great your life is.
And that's certainly true.
But I think that sometimes people mistake that idea
as like the audience would hate you
because they're jealous of you
or because their lives are not good.
And I actually think the truth is that like
when you are connecting with another person,
certainly on stage in comedy,
but I think also just off stage
when you're having a conversation, right?
Like if you really make someone laugh, a lot of times they say, oh, that's so truestage when you're having a conversation, right? Like if you really make someone laugh,
a lot of times they say, oh, that's so true.
Oh, that's so true, right?
Like, because it connects to them.
There's this feeling that you and they have seen something
or experienced something in the same way.
And it makes me think about how we often want
to present ourselves as perfect as we've got it all together,
thinking that will impress other people or bring us closer to them, when in reality, that's the least
relatable position you could be at. If someone comes over to your house and
there's not a speck of dirt, it's actually the least relatable thing you
could do. And you talk about this idea, which I loved, of scruffy hospitality.
So this term scruffy hospitality comes from this Anglican pastor from Tennessee,
Jack King, who uses it and tells a story of it in his own life of him and his wife enjoying
having friends around for dinner but having such a complicated checklist of things they
went through to make the house perfect for visitors that it was putting them off having
visitors. And his resolution, their resolution to start just inviting people to eat what was in the cupboards
and to sit in the kitchen as the kitchen was and to walk over the unmowed lawn, you know,
because that actually allowed the thing to take place. And the sort of idea here, the
underlying idea, it's not just that, you know, it's okay to not be perfect about these things,
it's that there is more connection usually when you kind of let your guard down, when you relate to people from a position of openness about flaws. There's fascinating
research in imposter syndrome that says that actually the best thing that leaders and mentors
can do for younger people in an organization, say, is to be honest about their own struggles,
rather than to sort of provide a perfect role
model to inspire you to be like and one day you could be that perfect, but instead to
just be open about the ways in which they don't feel perfect themselves.
I'm always struck in my newsletter, for example.
If I write something about what I do when I'm overwhelmed by email or something, I will
get some messages from people kind of surprised that I ever still do get overwhelmed by email,
even though I call the newsletter the imperfectionist and feel like I write quite often about my
own sort of struggles with these things.
And then secondly, they will be liberated on some level by that, not just in the sense
of like, well, if he's overwhelmed by email, that gives me permission to just be useless
at email, actually liberated to kind of address some more of their email, that gives me permission to just be useless at email, actually liberated to address some more of their email.
It's like there's something in the freeingness of
realizing that we are on some level all in the same boat,
all struggling with these same conditions of modernity.
It doesn't make you want to give up,
it makes you want to say, well, okay,
I can roll up my sleeves and do my bit
because I'm as qualified to do this as anybody else.
So there's something incredibly, there's actually something generous in sharing your imperfections
and faults, I think.
It's not just that you should be allowed to do it.
It's that it's almost a positive good.
And also separately, there is something so sweet and also absolutely hilarious about
responding via email to a person to tell them, I'm so glad you shared that you get overwhelmed by email.
I'm sending you this email to say, I really relate to you being overwhelmed by email.
It's a perfect summary of the human condition to me.
Yeah, absolutely.
Oliver Berkman, thank you so much for being on the show. This was such a pleasure talking to you.
I really enjoyed it.
I've really enjoyed it too. Thanks very much, Chris.
That is it for this episode of How to be a Better Human.
Thank you so much to today's guest, Oliver Berkman.
He spent a portion of his 4,000 weeks talking with us here today and I really, really, really
appreciate it.
His new book is called Meditations for Mortals and his fantastic newsletter is called The
Imperfectionist.
I am your host, Chris Duffy, and you can find more from me,
including my imperfect newsletter and other projects
that are similarly imperfect at chrisduffycomedy.com.
How to Be a Better Human is put together by a team
who I am so truly deeply grateful to spend my weeks with.
On the Ted side, we've got mortals with the skills of gods
Daniela Ballerezzo, Ban Ban Chang, Chloe, Shasha Brooks,
Lainey Lott, Antonia Lay, and Joseph DeBriene.
This episode was fact checked by Julia Dickerson
and Mateus Salas, who love to see an untrue fact die.
And on the PRX side, there's a crew whose every move
is worthy of deep meditation.
I'm talking about Morgan Flannery, Norgil,
Patrick Grant, and Jocelyn Gonzalez.
And of course, thanks to you for listening.
You have so many choices for what to do with your time, so many podcasts out there in the
world to listen to.
Thank you for listening to this one.
Please share this episode with a friend or a family member who you think would enjoy
it.
We will be back next week with even more How to Be a Better Human.
Now, I cannot promise you 4,000 more episodes, but I can promise that we have got you covered
for at least a few more of your weeks.
Thank you for listening, and please take care.
From fleet management to flexible truck rentals to technology solutions at
Enterprise Mobility we help businesses find the right mobility solutions so they
can find new opportunities.
Because if your business is on the road, we want to make sure it's on the road to success.
Enterprise Mobility.
Moving you moves the world.