How to Talk to People - The Right Choices in Parenting
Episode Date: November 7, 2022The mandates of modern parenting can be dizzying. But in the effort to optimize our parenting, we may lose sight of the values we hope to impart to our children—and the skills necessary for individu...al decision making. A conversation with economist Emily Oster helps with understanding the nuances of choice-making in parenthood. This episode was produced by Rebecca Rashid and is hosted by Arthur Brooks. Editing by A.C. Valdez and Claudine Ebeid. Fact-check by Ena Alvarado. Engineering by Matthew Simonson. Be part of How to Build a Happy Life. Write to us at howtopodcast@theatlantic.com. To support this podcast, and get unlimited access to all of The Atlantic’s journalism, become a subscriber. Music by the Fix (“Saturdays”), Mindme (“Anxiety”), and Gregory David (“Under the Tide”). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
We've all got old stuff that we should toss, but an old 401k?
Make sure it keeps working for you.
A Fidelity Rollover IRA has no account fees or minimums to open.
An easy to follow rollover process makes it simple to get started in under 15 minutes.
Plus, you'll have access to a Rollover specialist.
Whether you've switched jobs or adjust organizing your finances, learn more at fidelity.com slash
Rollover.
Consider all your options in the applicable fees and features of each before moving your
retirement assets.
Videlity brokerage services LLC member NYSE SIPC.
Volvo mild hybrid SUVs, stylish, spacious, and designed to move you safely on every road
at every turn.
Go the extra mile in a Volvo mild hybrid SUV,
part of our fully electrified lineup.
Contact your local retailer to learn more,
or visit VolvoCars.com slash US.
You know, Becca, being a parent is a little like not
seeing a gorilla.
What?
No, no, hear me out.
So there's this experiment that two psychologists at my university undertook in 1999.
It's a famous paper that they wrote called gorillas in our midst.
What it was was a psychology experiment that looked at when people are focusing on one trivial thing,
how they can become effectively blind
to a much bigger thing.
And here's how the experiment went.
They had videotapes that they were playing
to undergraduate students.
And they were of basketball players,
teams of basketball players, two teams of three people, and they
were passing basketballs back and forth.
And the people watching the tapes had to do just one thing, which was count the number
of passes between the players.
Okay.
And see how accurately they could count the passes.
It was kind of complicated because they're passing it back and forth and back and forth.
And then in the middle of the tape, a guy in a gorilla suit walks into the frame
and just walks back and forth and back and forth
behind the people who are passing the ball.
And then at the end, the researcher says
how many times did they pass the ball back and forth
and they give the number and then they ask
what about the guy in the gorilla suit?
And in like 46% of the cases, the people in the experiment said what guy in the gorilla suit. And in like 46% of the cases, the people in the experiment
said, what guy in the gorilla suit? If you see this and you can see this on the internet,
you can get this on YouTube. It's the most obvious thing, but all they saw was passing
the ball. Now, that's what it's like to be the parent of a little kid.
How so? I'm not seeing the analogy here. You're counting the passes and you
miss the gorilla. This is how to build a happy life. I'm Arthur Brooks, Harvard professor
and contributing writer at The Atlantic. And I'm Rebecca Rashid, a producer at The Atlantic. [♪ OUTRO MUSIC PLAYING [♪
You're not paying attention to being happy and having a happy baby.
You're worried about whether or not you boil that pacifier.
You're not worried about the big picture of what's going on in your family and the relationships that you're building
because you're so completely distracted by counting the number of times the kid went
to the bathroom today.
I mean, there's a gorilla back there.
The gorilla is the most amazing thing.
Right.
I'm guilty.
I mean, when my kids were little,
it was, I'm telling you,
I could tell you every bit of minutiae
about what was going on in their little lives.
But a lot of the times I wasn't thinking
to the stuff that I would really like to remember
today, which is what were we feeling, where were we going, how were they developing?
You know, sometimes I didn't even take as many pictures as I wish I had because I was
so occupied with the ball passing, that the funniest thing, the most amazing thing, the guy in the gorilla suit, slipped right by me.
There's a bunch of ways that you could modify your vision that would deliver on some of the things
that you want, but they require acknowledging sacrifices.
If there's any area of life where expectations for ourselves seem impossible to me, but they require acknowledging sacrifices.
If there's any area of life for our expectations for ourselves seem impossible to me, it's parenting.
We tend to be fixated on parenting outcomes,
and that really never works.
I want to understand how parents can actually make good decisions,
or maybe just good enough decisions,
and be happy at the same time. Thanks for doing the show.
Appreciate it.
Of course, I'm excited.
Can you start by introducing yourself on tape?
Do you like it?
I'm Emily Aster.
I'm a professor of economics at Brown University and the author of Expecting Better
Crib Sheet and the Family firm.
Emily Aster is an author on many sensitive issues in parenting.
As a trained economist, Aster takes a data centric approach to parental decision making,
teaching parents how to best understand the data behind the so-called mandates of modern
parenting.
Now, Oster is an economist, not a mental health professional, but her analytical approach
to this personal subject provides a new lens into the complexities
of any individual decision-making.
A lot of my work is on data and is on data in parenting and using data to make decisions
in pregnancy and around our child rearing.
And then also writing about the decision-making part of it,
the part of economics where we think about trading off-cost
and benefits and trying to have structured approaches
to how we make choices,
and in some ways, the sort of central thesis of everything
I do is that those tools which we might
or narrowly think up as useful in kind of business settings
are also pretty useful in our personal lives.
Yeah, yeah, and you know, they about being an economist as you and I are,
is that you feel like you don't know anything
until you get the data.
So did you feel that about being a mom?
Like, yeah, I kind of know, but I don't have really strong opinions.
I better go out and get some data on it.
Was this me search rather than research?
Oh, absolutely.
No, there's no question.
Yes, it's hugely me search.
And I love that.
So expecting better, which is the first book I wrote, was really a book that I wrote while
I was pregnant.
I sold the book at 35 weeks pregnant, having basically done all of this research just so
I could know what to do, right?
Like, you know, some people, well, could I have a cup of coffee?
Maybe I'll read a few different sources and just decide what works for me.
I was like, no, I have to go.
I get to go down the rabbit hole in this.
This is how I'm going to approach the world as I'm going to find out what all the studies
about coffee say and what's the interesting empirical issues associated with this question
and how can I explain it to people?
There's almost a statistician approach even more than an economist approach. But at a minimum, the decisions that we make should be made with all the facts in mind.
And it's almost never the case that the data is going to tell you the decision.
We can't almost can't approach the decision without knowing the evidence behind it.
So give me an example.
You're 35 weeks pregnant, selling a book, by the way, that's just that's awesome. Tell me something that the data
overruled some preconceived notion that you had and that you started to behave differently.
So there are pieces of data that were
surprising. I mean, I think one place where the data probably
pretty clearly affected what I was doing there was about epidurals. So, you know, epidural is pain relief during labor, and I think I'd sort of assume that I would do that.
Epidurals are really good at preventing labor pain, but they have some sort of limits and some downsides in terms of recovery.
It's a place where actually the data doesn't at all make the decision for you.
So it's a sort of example of a place where when I got the data, it wasn't definitive in one direction or the other,
but it was the thing that let me make the decision
that was different than the decision I anticipated.
So it really is this sort of structure of like,
we're gonna get all the information
and then we're gonna make a choice
and that choice is gonna be informed
by the information in the data.
Do you think that since subsequent to the birth
of your children that you do a lot of stuff
differently with your own kids in the basis of your research, if you kept this protocol
up of, you know, I don't know what to do with these kids.
Is this how you're approaching parenting day to day?
Particularly when they were younger.
Yeah, so I think that there's a little bit of a progression.
So you know, you have your first kid and I like everyone else, have my first kid and then
I guess I thought I would have time to figure out how to do it.
You know, I would have time to do the research.
But actually, when you have your first kid,
there's no time to do anything except just like,
basically hang on to the roller coaster.
And I hope that they buckles you in correctly, right?
And so that was a sort of chaotic mess for a few years.
When we had our second, I felt like I was in a much better
position to be prepared.
And that's actually when I wrote the second book.
So I sort of wrote the second book, post the second kid,
because it was much easier to focus on the questions
or the areas of decision making that I thought were really important.
When you write things about parenting,
and particularly when you write about kind of how
to work through the hard parts of parenting.
And you're a kid to sleep, like dealing with discipline.
It's very easy to write what you should do.
It's very hard to implement those things.
So I would say in my own parenting, I'm frequently trying to implement things that I'm failing
and implementing, even though I know that I should implement them.
It's much easier to tell people what to do than to do it yourself.
I find.
Yeah, for sure. I'm a happiness research.
So what, give me an example of something.
So we can make this more calm for you,
because we're talking in the abstract about parenting.
So give me an example of something that, you know,
that data say you got to do this,
and then you'll wind up never doing this.
So here's the thing, it's about sleep.
When you are encouraging your kids to sleep,
or trying to enforce a sleep schedule,
particularly with an older kid,
data tells you basically three things.
You need to have a bedtime routine, that's easy.
You shouldn't have screens before bed, that's also not that hard.
And if your child is coming out of the room routinely,
disrupting you, which is a common thing that little kids or older kids do,
you should be consistent every time
in the way you react.
So if you have said that was the last hug,
then every time they come out,
you should take them back into the room,
put them in the bed, don't do another hug,
leave when they come out again,
you put them back in the room, you can.
So it turns out like that will work, okay?
If you can implement that,
that is basically a very effective.
It actually works pretty quickly.
It works like within a few days.
But it is almost impossible, I find, to implement.
So I have one of my kids is older.
She's very asleep.
But my other kid, it's sort of like a little more variable.
And we have many nights where he will come out a lot of times.
And I will say, this is the last time I'm going to do this.
But I cannot follow through on that.
I just know if I just do it one more time, then eventually
he will just go to sleep and the kind of investment
in the moment of like, do I want to be like holding the door
closed while he screams?
Like, is that what I want to do with my night?
Even though I know that if I do the other thing,
it's going to have these long term consequences.
It's just things like that are just hard to follow.
Yeah, yeah, let them cry it out.
I was like, I mean, I was fine letting you cry it out when it was,
you know, when my kids were babies because I think partly it was a much more
controlled environment.
It was just like much easier to achieve with an older kid, you know,
it's a whole other.
Yeah, they're like, they're claiming they're dying and yeah,
they're like, oh, but I have to, got to get out of the room because I have to pee
I don't think you have to pee you recently pee
So okay the the picture that I'm getting here is that
You should keep an open mind and be open to evidence and you Emily Osterer have a boatload of evidence because what you do for a living
But parents have evidence to based on experiences, and they should be willing and
flexible to update what they do and not be dogmatic on the basis of what people are telling
them, right?
So everybody can be kind of their own kind of economist, but you have to think like an economist,
which is let's see what's really going on and change our behavior on the basis of what
we see and what the patterns actually are as opposed to what the internet is telling me.
Is that fair?
Yeah, I think that's fair,
and I think it's particularly important as kids get older.
So it is going to be much less frequently the case
that we can make statements like the data shows X.
So to give you a concrete example,
there's a lot of really good data showing
that are introducing allergens,
like peanuts, eggs,
things like that, that introducing those to your kids earlier, rather than later,
reduces the risk of allergies later.
Okay, so that's, it turns out it's just like a really good idea to give your kids allergens early.
It's shown in randomized trials.
It's relatively straightforward to implement.
There are more things like that in little kid parenting
where the data will tell you either this is important or this is not important or do
whatever you want.
As your kids get bigger, the things that are coming up are more complicated and they get
really wrapped up in questions around what are our family values, what are we trying to achieve,
what we want our days to look like.
And once you're in that world, there is, I think, more space for
just these kind of differences in the outcomes that we're going to get to. But what I think people
should share or what I think would help people in these spaces is just being more deliberate
in the way they are making those decisions. It's not that you should or should not rely on the
internet. It's that when you come into some complicated decision
or some choice, you should sit down and think about the choice
and give the choice that the space that it needs
in your brain.
And I think that's often what we are missing
in this era of parenting.
You realize people are almost struggling with
even articulating the different options.
And that's kind of getting in the way.
So let me give you like a concrete example of this.
So sort of discussing with them
in the other day, the following issue.
Before they had kids, what they envisioned
for their sort of family meal situation
was that they would all sit down,
they and their spouse and their kid
would sit down at the table at six o'clock every night
and they would eat an interesting meal
that they had prepared and then her 18 month old
would love the food. You know, it would be like a they had prepared and that her 18 month old would love the food.
You know, it would be like a wonderful family activity where they all sat there and like
enjoyed the food and they got to cook interesting things and so on.
Like fast forward 18 months, the reality is that her kid isn't really like her food that
much and is kind of picky.
It's just what it is.
It is impossible to achieve this thing that she was envisioning achieving.
Right. It's impossible. And it's not her fault. It's not that she was envisioning, achieving. It's impossible.
And it's not her fault, it's not that she did something wrong.
It's just kids are picky, and there's a limit amount of time,
and that's just the reality.
Rather than recognizing, okay, I can't have this first best,
but let me figure out what are the key things I do want to have?
Is it more important to sit at the table or interesting foods,
or is it more important to eat together as a family,
or be able to have more time for cooking?
There's a bunch of ways that you could modify your vision
that would deliver on some of the things that you want,
but they require acknowledging sacrifices.
And so we sort of talked about the idea
that by not confronting the limitations that had arrived,
she was not able to get to a second best.
She was envisioning the first best.
She can't have the first best.
So I was saying, let's think about what's the second best.
And instead, we were in the 27th best.
So one of the things that we noticed is we became less and less and less scrupulous with
our parenting as the children were born.
So our first son was born and the know the pacifier falls out right?
Oh my goodness, yeah, no, and so you've got like a ziplock bag full of pacifiers and you take the old pacifier home
you boil it and you boil it for 15 minutes or whatever it is and then you make sure it's completely sterilized.
So the second kid comes along a couple years later and and the pacifier falls out. And so, via you find a drinking fountain, you rinse it off and you give it back to him.
Third child comes along and the pacifier falls out.
And the first thing you do is to look and see if anybody's watching.
And then you wipe it off and put it back in her mouth.
And it turns out that she's the best adjusted of...
Wait, did off?
That would be number four.
You know, but the third is like the best adjusted child, the least stressed out, probably because
that's this bad parenting behavior is correlating with all sorts of other standards that we're
developing here. One of the first themes is be deliberate thing for yourself, but also
one of the themes in your research is relax, man.
Right, yeah, absolutely.
No matter what size your business is or what it does,
FPoint helps you modernize your digital workplace across Microsoft, Google, Salesforce,
and other cloud collaboration platforms.
FPoint provides the most advanced platform to optimize SaaS operations and secure collaboration.
Over 17,000 global customers trust
AppPoint solutions to rapidly reduce costs, improve productivity,
and protect their data with the AppPoint confidence platform.
Request a personalized demo today at
AppPoint.com.
That's a-ve-p-o-i-n-t.com.
You can crush your fingers and all your toes during a data center migration.
You can knock on wood, pluck a dozen for-leave clovers or look to your lucky stars for a successful
office expansion.
You could hold your breath, shut your eyes, and say all the well wishes to help avoid cyber
attacks.
But none of that truly helps you.
Because next level moments need the next level network.
With the security, reliability, and expertise to take your business further.
AT&T Business. The network you can rely on.
Now, you're not a pediatrician and you're not a psychologist.
You're an economist.
What led you as an economist to take up this topic of parenting and families and how to
be parents and how to be kids?
Yeah, so pretty much becoming a parent was sort of the, that was my entry into parenting,
uh, and into writing about parenting. But, you know, I think for, for me, I kind of came into
parenting with the tools from my job. I was familiar or comfortable with the idea of using
tools of data analysis and structure decision making in my life before my parenting. And most of
the writing that I do about parenting uses those tools takes those
those insights. I'm married and not American so my wife's from Barcelona she thinks that Americans
are all about fads and panics that all of American culture is a combination of fads and panics.
So it's like we're all going to do this we all stand for the current thing or we're all freaked
out and protesting this thing all the time.
So she said, you know what, I don't think anything matters that much except love.
And she's sort of a monist in this way. How terrible is that rule?
I don't think that's a terrible rule. I mean, I think if you look at evidence on almost any individual parenting choice, you would struggle to find concrete evidence
that it sort of matters in some meaningful way.
We know on the one hand if we compare
across resource levels,
so if we compare across income groups in the US,
that there are big differences in, say,
school achievement for kids,
based on what happens in the first years.
So obviously, something that is going on
is really important for various aspects
of kids development.
And yet it's very difficult to identify any individual piece
of that, any individual thing that you as a parent could do
to enhance this achievement metric or whatever it is.
And I think like your wife have always
sort of interpreted that result as sort of something
about not so much love, but even just sort of stability, that the idea that like there's
a lot of value to sort of a kind of stable, well-resourced home, and that that is something
that we could be thinking about policy solutions to.
But that is not the same as like, does your Montessori preschool have only wouldn't
toys or whatever?
Yeah, and did you listen to a lot of Mozart when you were still pregnant?
That turns out to be garbage.
That's a fact.
That's a fact.
You know, that's a combination of that and panic, right?
Which gets back to the point, right?
And now speaking of phas and panics, you write about parenting mandates.
So give me an example of a parenting mandate.
So there's this idea that like if you're making infant formula, you have to boil the water.
And it's an example where it turns out the reason to do that is like effectively a hypothetical
risk for something that is more or less not definitely not going to happen or it's like
a tiny, tiny, tiny, probability thing.
And I talk about this as like parenting mandates, it's unfunded parenting mandates, things where you were told,
you know, here is all of the 57,000 things you need to do.
And if you like add up the time for all of those things,
it's, you know, 72 hours every day.
And it's like, well, I only have 24 hours.
Like, which of these things should I do?
It's like, well, all of them.
Okay, but I already told you,
like, that's 72 hours of things.
It's like, well, I guess do them bastards.
It's like, well, I, you know. So what I've already told you like that 72 hours of things was like, well, I guess do them faster. It's like, well, I, you know, so what should
we do instead? I mean, I understand why there are rules. I mean, I get it. I guess that
some of our listeners would say, well, what a privileged conversation. You know, these
people would have all accessed all this, you know, good data and in where raised and
really stable homes. And they can sit there and say that we don't need parenting mandates
where a lot of people didn't have access to this information and easy rules are the best way to do it.
You're not saying that we should get rid of all mandates or I don't know what's your mandate on mandates.
What's hard, I mean, this is a sort of key issue in public health communication, which is
one that came up all the time in the COVID pandemic as well, we somehow need a way to communicate
to people levels of risk. So, co-sleeping is a good example of this. So, the kind of rhetoric
that we have on co-sleeping is like, under no circumstance, should you sleep in the bed with your
baby? This is like the public health advice on this is, you know, that's extremely dangerous.
And we don't provide that with much nuance. And in fact, if you look at the data on that,
it is pretty nuanced in the sense that there are safer
and less safe ways to co-sleep.
So I think even in the safest, it carries some small risk.
But it is much riskier if one of the parents is smoking,
if there are a lot of covers in the bed,
if the baby is premature, early on in life.
There's all kinds of obscenities
to that, which I think could be communicated, but aren't. And people are left in a situation
in which they almost may find it impossible, and you haven't provided them with another
alternative. So people say, literally, you've told me, I can't sleep with my baby, and
my baby will only sleep with me. So there's no solution for this.
And that's where you get into situations and this is the real things that happen where
people say, well, I'm going to try really hard to stay awake.
I'm going to hold the baby because that's the only way it'll sleep.
I'm trying really hard to stay awake.
I'm going to go to, I'm going to sit on the couch.
You told me the worst possible thing is to sleep in the bed with my baby.
Well, it turns out the worst possible thing is to fall asleep accidentally on the couch
with your baby. That is like 50 times as dangerous as co-sleeping in a safest way.
Now by not providing any subtlety in our public health messaging,
we've left people in a situation where the choice that they will make trying to achieve what
you want is a worst choice. And I don't have a solution to that, but I do think that we need to be far more thoughtful
about the way we're sending these messages
because we're sending them to people
and not to autonomous robots
who are able to just say the things that we want.
Yeah, now, there are obviously really bad ways to do that.
I mean, they're really irresponsible ways
to throw out the rule book and say basically,
I don't believe any of this,
so I'm gonna smoke all I'm pregnant.
And there's a ton of evidence that says you shouldn't do that,
even less should you drink all your pregnant, for example.
And there are all kinds of ways that you can put your baby
at risk, but there are some people that are more nuanced
about that.
They're parents who are kind of counter cultural parents.
And they say, I'm gonna do these things
cause I wanna do these things.
And I wanna have a deep connection with my child
and I don't really care what, you know,
daddy internet says, what's your view on
sort of countercultural parenting
where you figured out like people did for millennia?
The broader answer, the broader thing,
I think a lot of people struggle with is
whiplashing between decisions.
So probably the worst decision making approach is to do one thing because one book says it,
and then as soon as you read a different book or your mom comes to visit, do the other thing.
The more you can make one choice and try to stick to it, the easier is your parenting going
to be since many of these choices that you make don't matter very much.
I mean, I think up to these issues that you raise,
which is like, there are some things which are very dangerous,
you should not do.
I mean, that's actually completely, like,
that's completely great.
What I think many people struggle with
is that they struggle to implement that.
Right.
So that in the reality of it, the kind of,
I'm just gonna go with my gut,
doesn't work for everybody, because'm just gonna go with my gut,
doesn't work for everybody,
because for many people that can lead to,
well, I actually wasn't really sure,
and now I'm rethinking it because of the thing
that's person at the playground said to me.
So when people tell me, like, I'm like,
really confident in my decisions,
and I'm not really reading books,
and I'm not really making them based on data,
and I just like, this is what I wanna do,
and this is what works for me. I think that's like that's absolutely fantastic. When they say
I'm going to go in this direction but then as soon as you say well there's here's this piece of
data it's like oh I don't know maybe I made the wrong choice then I think we're in a space where
you actually aren't almost aren't able to go with your gut because the stimulus of the information
is the way you want to go,
but you haven't managed to process it correctly.
Yeah, one of the reasons that people, they don't follow mandates is, as you point out, in
your work, is because kids force a deviation from the script.
The kids themselves actually kind of force a deviation.
Lots of cases of this, you know, I want another hug and it's really compelling
in the terms that you want to give the child another hug,
for example, or you know, when they get a little bit older
and bilingual households, one of the things that we,
all of us in bilingual households find is that the kids
don't necessarily want to talk to the parent
who speaks a non-English language in the United States
in that foreign language.
When you see this again and again and again,
that the non-native English-speaking parent
will be forced into English with the kid by the kid.
It happens all the time, path of least resistance.
So talk to me a little bit about kids forcing changes
to the rules, and if this is good or bad, or should we care?
Yeah, kids are people too.
One of the most challenging aspects of being a person who likes control, who has children,
is the realization that there are some things that you basically can't make them do.
There's many moments in parenting, whether it's sleep or food or something else where you realize,
oh, I actually can't force this person to do this thing.
It closely relates to a set of questions
around how much autonomy your kids have
and how much of the way that your family operates
is going to be driven by the things that the kid wants.
And when you should start thinking about that,
when did your kid get a say in what extra curriculars they do?
When they're 10 months old and you enroll them in baby music, presumably you're not like,
well, would you want to go to the baby music about raffi or do you want to go to the Mozart
baby music or just like enroll them in whatever thing is available.
When your kid is 15, presumably they do get a pretty significant say in what extracurriculars
they're doing.
But where's that line?
Like, when do you listen to them? What's the time that you make that choice?
And how do you know it's going to be the right choice
or not the right choice in the long run?
I think that part of the kid autonomy
around decision making is just, it's really challenging.
You've heard about the free range parenting debate,
which is this debate about whether or not we overstructure
our kids' lives and we over protect our kids. Within normal boundaries of the current conversation, where would you put yourself in this debate?
So in terms of physical autonomy, which is almost how I think of the free range parenting,
so how much do you let your kid walk to the library by themselves or walk home, or I actually think
where I'm relative to my peer group somewhat far on this.
I actually think there's a lot of value to kids in having them navigate the the world outside
of your four walls on their own is pretty important.
Yeah, okay. So you're you're more free range than most people of your generation,
most parents of your generation for sure, right? And you have this view not because you don't
believe that risk exists, but because you as an economist
are trying to assess risk versus reward.
Is that fair to say?
I think that's fair to say, yep.
I think probably also you would assert,
and I would agree with you, that the reason
that more people don't subscribe to this point of view
is because all they hear about is the risk.
They don't hear about the reward.
I mean, you don't hear on the news.
Child walks to library alone and has a great time and becomes better adjusted.
That's not a headline, you know, when the kid doesn't get snatched. And so that's a
problem, isn't it when it's all a risk or reward in the way that we hear about parenting?
Yeah, I think it is. And this goes along with the question of, you know, do I bring my
kid their shoes at school when they forget them?
You know, if my kid forgets their soccer shoes, is their job to bring them and they forget
their soccer shoes, what is my approach to that?
Do what extent do I bring them the soccer shoes or to what extent is it learning experience?
And I think that's a really complicated question.
In some ways, it's complicated for the same reason that it's complicated to know whether
I should go and get my kid that last hug because I know that they will shut them up now
But it will have consequences later. You know if I bring my kid their soccer shoes when they're 10
It's like yeah, then they'll have their soccer shoes and like it's like would be very bad if they had to play
You know somewhat bad if they had to sit out of this game
But like am I still bringing them their soccer shoes when they're 19 and they like went to college?
So I find those conversations just really difficult to navigate to think about what's the right
thing to do.
Yeah.
And by the way, helicopter parenting is all about bringing your child her soccer shoes at
age 19 when she's a sophomore in college.
Absolutely.
I mean, that's a ton of data on this.
There's a ton of actually interesting research on this that shows that helicopter parenting
lowers the sense of autonomy and increases rates of depression and anxiety and attenuates the relationship with the parents.
All the things you think it's not supposed to do, it does. All the good things you think
it's going to bring, it brings the opposite is the bottom line. That's why freedom and autonomy
are so critically important, but habits are habits and habits are ingrained when the kids are
little, right? It's almost that you need a deliberate break in those habits because it's really hard to break those habits
when your kid is older because things feel more consequential.
You know, because it's like, well, now it's the soccer game
that the recruiters are at.
And so I can't like have them forget their shoes
for that game.
There does have to be a point at which you say,
you know, now this is your job.
Like you as a kid, this is your job,
but it's gonna mean that you're gonna have to follow through
on some consequences, and that's a choice
people have to make.
Yeah, we started with being pregnant
and getting out, getting out of our shoes.
And now our kids are forgetting their like,
soccer shoes.
Yeah, soccer shoes in college,
but we're making this progression.
It's interesting, my kids will bring up that,
I had a technique that I used when my kids were
in high school, so I made my kids write a business plan. They made very original business
plans and they all kind of did their own thing. One went to Princeton University, a famous
university, did really well. Another one worked on a farm for two years and that was a sniper
in the Marine Corps. One of them made a run for the border in his study in Spain and they were all part of their, you know, what they were going
to do. Do you agree with that approach and how do you feel about trying to tease out the
way that our kids can be, you know, their own person for the very beginning? Or is that
a dangerous way of approaching parenthood? Should you be giving them more parameters or trying
to encourage them to be kind of free?
Yeah, I mean, I'm not sure I would tell everyone they need their kids to make a business plan,
although I like, what you're getting at that I really find resonant is the idea of your
kids not being an extension of your dreams fulfilled or unfulfilled. We all have these images
or these ideas for like, what are kids are going to be or what they're going to be excited
about and a lot of times
They're the things that we're good at are the things that resonate with us and for many of us a part of parenting that is
Challenging is is seeing you know, okay, well, this is what my kid wants to do and maybe it's not the thing I envision for them
Maybe it's not the thing that that I envision for myself
But it's a thing that they like and then I it's the thing that I need to sort of celebrate the ways in which this person is in fact a person.
And that becomes so much more vivid and visual as your kids get older, you sort of realize.
And that's a part of my own parenting. I find both very, very rewarding and also very hard.
It's easy for me to connect with the pieces of my daughter that we are very similar.
But much harder on the things that she's good at that I'm not.
But they're also the most fun things.
They'd be like, oh my gosh, I could never do that.
I could just absolutely never do that.
And I'm so impressed that you can.
No, it's amazing.
And when you actually see these things,
they know when you're amazed too.
They know when you're blowing smoke.
They know when you're, oh, that's wonderful.
They can sense a participation trophy at 100 meters.
Exactly.
But boy, oh boy, do they know when they've amazed their parents.
So it courage them to do amazing things and then be authentically amazed.
No, my daughter plays a violin and she's like, quite good at it.
And I listen, I'm like, wow, I don't even know what you're talking about.
She's like, oh, that's it.
I'm like, I don't understand the words, but it sounds nice.
That's fantastic.
What do you think is the single biggest mistake
that American parents are making today?
Probably overthinking it.
And I mean, I feel like that's such a ridiculous thing
for someone like me to say, who's like entire thing is like,
think more about your parenting and be more deliberate.
But like, probably there is a sort of mistake somewhere
in here around planning
it too much or relying too much on this idea that like if I could only get this one, like
if I could only find the one key, there's like one key to getting it right.
There's no key to getting it right.
Thank you to our how-to listeners who helped make this show what it is.
We asked you to tell us about your most clever parenting moment.
And here's what you said.
Hi, this is Marilyn from Ockpark, Illinois.
And I think one of my cleverest parenting moments was when my daughter was in middle school
and she posted something that we thought she shouldn't have on social media. As punishment for her irresponsible use of
technology, we took away her phone and told her that for the next week she couldn't
use any technology that wasn't available in 1976, which was when I was in middle
school. That mostly meant that she could only use the landline phone in the kitchen and
had to stand next to the wall pretending the phone was on a cord.
Years later, we still talk about how fun that week was
and I think all of us learned some good lessons.
I remember, for example, that I kept reading
that if my baby was crying during the night,
you should just let him cry it out.
Cry it out, cry it out, cry it out, cry it out.
They call it crying it out.
And it's like, I don't wanna let him cry it out.
I don't wanna do that.
And so I decided I wasn't going to.
And it was fine.
He didn't grow up to be a bank robber.
He didn't grow up to be a horrible spoiled person.
You know, he's great, did well in school
and took responsibility for his actions,
despite the fact that I didn't let him cry it out all the time.
And I remember I was kind of worried at the time
that I was stunting his growth
because I was trying to, you know,
do something that would satisfy my own desires.
But the truth of the matter was that as time went on,
I realized that there's just
a lot more flexibility in the things that you do.
I recognize why they have these guidelines,
it's probably good advice,
but it's just not something to,
you shouldn't set your watch to, you know,
parenting regulations is what I found,
and that was important for me to figure out.
And it turned out that it's not as bad as they say,
or at least, I don't know.
I mean, the truth is, I still don't know.
I still don't know.
And, you know, I'll be a grandfather and not know.
So, I guess I'm more comfortable with not knowing. This episode was produced by me, Rebecca Rashid,
and hosted by Arthur Brooks,
editing by AC Valdez and Claudine Ibeyth.
Fact check by Anna Alvarado,
our engineer is Matthew Simonson.
you