Huberman Lab - Dr. David Anderson: The Biology of Aggression, Mating, & Arousal
Episode Date: September 12, 2022My guest is David Anderson, PhD, a world expert in the science of sexual behavior, violent aggression, fear and other motivated states. Dr. Anderson is a Professor of Biology at the California Institu...te of Technology (Caltech), a member of the National Academy of Sciences and an investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI). We discuss how states of mind (and body) arise and persist and how they probably better explain human behavior than emotions per se. We also discuss the many kinds of arousal that create varying levels of pressure for certain behaviors to emerge. We discuss different types of violent aggression and how they are impacted by biological sex, gender, context, prior experience, and hormones, and the neural interconnectedness of fear, aggression and sexual behavior. We also discuss peptides and their role in social isolation-induced anxiety and aggression. Dr. Anderson also describes novel, potentially powerful therapeutics for mental health. This episode should interest anyone wanting to learn more about mental health, human emotions, sexual and/or violent behavior.  For the full show notes, visit hubermanlab.com. Thank you to our sponsors AG1 (Athletic Greens): https://athleticgreens.com/huberman LMNT: https://drinklmnt.com/huberman Supplements from Momentous https://www.livemomentous.com/huberman Timestamps (00:00:00) Dr. David Anderson, Emotions & Aggression (00:03:49) Sponsors: LMNT (00:08:10) Emotions vs. States (00:10:36) Dimensions of States: Persistence, Intensity & Generalization (00:14:38) Arousal & Valence (00:18:11) Aggression, Optogenetics & Stimulating Aggression in Mice, VMH (00:24:42) Aggression Types: Offensive, Defensive & Predatory (00:29:20) Evolution & Development of Defensive vs. Offensive Behaviors, Fear (00:35:38) Hydraulic Pressures for States & Homeostasis (00:37:24) Sponsor: AG1 (00:39:46) Hydraulic Pressure & Aggression (00:44:50) Balancing Fear & Aggression (00:48:31) Aggression & Hormones: Estrogen, Progesterone & Testosterone (00:52:33) Female Aggression, Motherhood (00:59:48) Mating & Aggressive Behaviors (01:05:10) Neurobiology of Sexual Fetishes (01:10:06) Temperature, Mating Behavior & Aggression (01:15:25) Mounting: Sexual Behavior or Dominance? (01:20:59) Females & Male-Type Mounting Behavior (01:24:40) PAG (Periaqueductal Gray) Brain Region: Pain Modulation & Fear (01:30:38) Tachykinins & Social Isolation: Anxiety, Fear & Aggression (01:43:49) Brain, Body & Emotions; Somatic Marker Hypothesis & Vagus Nerve (01:52:52) Zero-Cost Support, YouTube Feedback, Spotify & Apple Reviews, Sponsors, Momentous Supplements, AG1 (Athletic Greens), Instagram, Twitter, Neural Network Newsletter, Huberman Lab Clips Title Card Photo Credit: Mike Blabac Disclaimer
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome to the Uberman Lab podcast where we discuss science and science-based tools for everyday life.
I'm Andrew Uberman and I'm a professor of neurobiology and
Ophthalmology at Stanford School of Medicine. Today my guest is Dr. David Anderson. Dr. Anderson is a professor of biology at the California Institute of Technology
Often commonly referred to as Caltech
University.
Dr. Anderson's research focuses on emotions and states of mind and body, and indeed,
he emphasizes how emotions like happiness, sadness, anger, and so on are actually subcategories
of what are generally governed by states, that is, things that are occurring in the nervous
system in our brain and in the connections between brain and body that dictate whether or not we feel good about how we are feeling and that drive our behaviors that is by us to be an action or in action and
strongly influence the way we interpret our experience and our surroundings. Today Dr. Anderson teaches us for instance, why people become aggressive and why that aggression can sometimes take
the form of rage.
Also talk about sexual behavior and the boundaries and overlap between aggression and sexual
behavior.
And that discussion about aggression and sexual behavior also starts to focus on particular
aspects of neural circuits and states of mind and body that govern things like, for instance,
male-male aggression versus instance, mail mail aggression versus
mail, female aggression versus female female aggression.
So today you will learn a lot about the biological mechanisms that govern why we feel the way
we feel.
Indeed, Dr. Andersen is an author of a terrific new popular book entitled The Nature of the
Beast, How Emotions Guide Us.
I've read this book several times now.
I can tell you it contains so many gems that are firmly grounded in the scientific research.
In fact, a lot of what's in the book contrasts with many of the common myths about emotions and biology.
So whether or not you're a therapist or you're a biologist or you're simply just somebody interested
in why we feel the way we feel and why we act the way we act,
I cannot recommend the book highly enough.
Again, the title is The Nature of the Beast,
How Emotions Guide Us.
Today's discussion also ventures into topics
such as mental health and mental illness.
And some of the exciting discoveries
that have been made by Dr. Anderson's laboratory
and other laboratories, identifying specific peptides.
That is, small proteins that can govern whether or not
people feel anxious or less anxious,
aggressive or less aggressive.
This is an important area of research that has direct implications for much of what we
read about in the news, both unfortunate and fortunate events, and that will no doubt
drive the future of mental health treatments.
Dr. Anderson is considered one of the most pioneering and important researchers in
neurobiology of our time.
Indeed, he is a member of the National Academy of Sciences
and a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator.
I've mentioned the HHMI once or twice before,
when we've had other HHMI guests on this podcast,
but for those of you that are not familiar,
the Howard Hughes Medical Institute
funds a small number of investigators
doing particularly high-risk, high-benefit work,
and it is an extremely competitive process to identify
those Howard Hughes investigators.
They're essentially appointed, and then every five years, they have to compete against
one another and against a new incoming flock of would-be HHMI investigators to get another
five years of funding.
They are literally given a grade every five years as to whether or not they can continue,
not continue, or whether or not they should worry about being funded for an extended period
of time.
Dr. Anderson has been an investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute since 1989.
Before we begin, I'd like to emphasize that this podcast is separate from my teaching
and research roles at Stanford.
It is, however, part of my desire and effort to bring zero cost to consumer information
about science and science-related tools to the general public.
In keeping with that theme, I'd like to thank the sponsors of today's podcast.
Our first sponsor is Element.
Element is an electrolyte drink with everything you need and nothing you don't.
That means plenty of salt, magnesium, and potassium, the so-called electrolyte, and no
sugar.
Salt, magnesium, and potassium are critical to the function of all the cells
in your body, in particular to the function of your nerve cells, also called neurons. In
fact, in order for your neurons to function properly, all three electrolytes need to be
present in the proper ratios, and we now know that even slight reductions in electrolyte
concentrations or dehydration of the body can lead to deficits in cognitive and physical
performance.
Element contains a science-backed electrolyte ratio of 1000 milligrams,
that's one gram of sodium, 200 milligrams of potassium, and 60 milligrams of magnesium.
I typically drink element first thing in the morning when I wake up in order to hydrate my body
and make sure I have enough electrolytes.
And while I do any kind of physical training and after physical training as well,
especially if I've been sweating a lot, if you'd like to try element, you can go to Drink
Element, that's LMNT.com slash Huberman to claim a free element sample pack with your
purchase. Again, that's drink element LMNT.com slash Huberman. And now for my discussion with
Dr. David Anderson, David, great to be here and great to finally sit down and chat with you.
Great to be here too, thank you so much.
Yeah, I have a ton of questions,
but I wanna start with something fairly basic,
but that I'm aware it's a pretty vast landscape.
And that's the difference between emotions and states,
if indeed there is a difference,
and how we should think about emotions.
What are they?
They have all these names, happiness, sadness, depression,
anger, rage.
How should we think about them?
And why might states be at least as useful
a thing to think about if not more useful?
That's great.
First, the short answer to your question
is that I see emotions as a type of internal state,
in the sense that arousals also a type of internal state, motivations a type of internal state,
sleep is a type of internal state. And the sort of simplest way I think of internal states is that
as you've shown in your own work, they change the input to output transformation of the brain.
When you're asleep, you don't hear something
that you would hear if you were awake
unless it's a really, really loud noise.
So from that broad perspective,
I see emotion as a class of state that controls behavior.
The reason I think it's useful to think about it as a state is it puts the focus on it
as a neurobiological process rather than as a psychological process.
And this gets around all of the definitional problems that people have with the word
emotion, where many people equate emotion with feeling, which is a subjective sense that we can only
study in humans because to find out what someone's feeling, you have to ask them and people are the
only animals that can talk that we can understand. So that's how I think about emotion. It's the,
if you think, if you think of an iceberg, it's the part of the iceberg that's below the surface
of the water.
The feeling part is the tip that's sort of floating
above the surface of your consciousness.
Not that that isn't important, it is,
but you have to understand consciousness
if you want to understand feelings.
And we're not ready to study that in animals yet. And so that's how I think
about it. What are the different components of a state? You know, you mentioned a rousal as a
key component. What are some of the other features of states that represent below the tip of the ice. Right. Right. So you can break
states up into different facets or people would call them dimensions. And so there have been
people who have thought of emotions as having just really two dimensions, an arousal dimension,
having just really two dimensions, an arousal dimension,
how intense is it, and also a valence dimension,
which is is it positive or negative, good or bad. Ralph Adolfson, I have tried to expand that a little bit
to think about components of emotion,
particularly those that distinguish emotion states from motivational states,
because they are very closely related. One of those important properties is persistence.
And this is something that distinguishes state-driven behaviors from simple reflexes. Reflexes tend to terminate when the stimulus turns off, like the doctor
hitting your knee with a hammer. It initiates with the stimulus onset and it terminates
with the stimulus offset. Emotions tend to outlast often, the stimulus that evoke them.
If you're walking along a trail here in Southern California, you hear a rattlesnake rattling,
you're gonna jump in the air,
but your heart is gonna continue to beat
and your palms sweat and your mouth is gonna be dry
for a while after it slithered off in the bush
and you're gonna be hyper-vigil,
and if you see something that even remotely looks snake-like,
a stick, you're gonna stop and jump.
So persistence is an important feature of emotion states.
Not all states have persistence.
So for example, you think about hunger.
Once you've eaten, the state is gone.
You're not hungry anymore.
But if you're really angry and you get into a fight with somebody, even after
the fight is over, you may remain riled up for a long time and it takes you a while to calm down.
And that may have to do with the arousal dimension or some other part of it. And then
generalization is an important component of emotion states that make them, if they have
been triggered in one situation, they can apply to another situation.
And my favorite example of that is you come home from work and your kid is screaming.
If you had a good day at work, you might pick it up and sue it.
If you had a bad day at work, you might react very differently to it and scream at it.
That's a generalization of the state that was triggered at work by something your boss
said to you to a completely different interaction.
That's something that distinguishes emotion states from motivation states.
Motivation states are really specific.
Find and eat food, obtain and consume water, and they're involved in homeostatic maintenance.
So states are very multifaceted and just asking questions about how these components of states are
encoded, like what makes a state persist, what gives a state a positive or a negative
valence, how do you crank up or crank down the intensity of the state?
It just opens up a whole bunch of questions that you can ask in the brain
with the kinds of tools we have now.
You mentioned arousal a few times and you mentioned valence, realizing that there are these
other aspects of states.
I'd like to just talk about arousal a little bit more and valence because at a very basic
level, it seems to me that arousal, we can be very alert and
pissed off, stressed, worried, we can have insomnia.
We can also be very alert and be quite happy.
So the valence flips.
We can be very, you know, people can be sexually aroused.
People can be aroused in all sorts of ways.
Is there any simple or simple-ish neurochemical signature
that can flip valence?
So for instance, is there any way that we can safely say that arousal with some additional
dopamine release is going to be of positive valence?
And arousal with very low dopamine is going to be of negative valence.
I would be reluctant to say that it's a chemical flip.
I would say it's more likely to be a circuit flip, different circuits being engaged.
And it might be that a given neurochemical even dopamine is involved in both positively
valence to rousal and negatively valence to rousal.
That's why people think about these as different axes.
So I think the interesting question that you touch on is, is a rousal something that is
just completely generic in the brain, or are there actually different kinds of rousal
that are specific to different behaviors?
And you raise the question, sexual arousal feels different
from aggressive arousal, for example.
And we actually published a paper on this back in 2009
in fruit flies, where we found some evidence
for two types of arousal states,
one of which is sleep wake arousal,
you're more arous when you wake up than when you're asleep, and fly show that.
And the other is a startle response and arousal response to a mechanical stimulus, a not
just mechanical stimulus.
If you puff air on flies, kind of like trying to swat the wasp away from your burglary,
a picnic table, they come back more and more and more vigorously.
And we were able to dissect this and show that although both of those forms of arousal
required dopamine, they were exerted through completely separable neural circuits in the fly. And so that really put, number one, the emphasis on,
it's the circuit that determines the type of arousal,
but also that arousal isn't unitary,
that there are behavior-specific forms of arousal.
And I think the jury is still out as to whether there is such a thing
as completely generalized arousal
or not.
I think some people would argue there is, but I think more attention needs to be paid to
this question of domain specific or behavior specific forms of arousal.
It's a super interesting idea because I always thought of arousal as long as continuum,
like you need to be in a panic attack at the one end of the extreme where you can be
in a coma. And then somewhere in the middle you're alert and calm. But then this
issue of valence really, as you say, presents this opportunity that really there might be multiple
circuits for arousal or multiple mechanisms that would include neurochemicals as well as different
neural pathways. So I'd like to talk a bit about a state,
if it is indeed a state, which is aggression.
Your labs worked extensively on this.
And if you would, could you highlight some of the key findings
there, which brain areas are involved,
the beautiful work of Da'ulin and others in your lab,
that point to the idea that indeed, there are kind of switches in your lab, that point to the idea
that indeed there are kind of switches in the brain,
but that thinking of switches for aggression
might be too simple.
How should we think about aggression?
And I'll just sort of skew the question a bit more
by saying we see lots of different kinds of aggression.
This terrible school shooting down in Texas recently,
clearly an act that included aggression.
And yet, you could imagine that's a very different type of aggression
than an all-out rage or a controlled aggression.
There's a lot of variation there.
So what are your thoughts on aggression,
how it's generated the neural circuit mechanisms,
and some of the variation in what we call aggression.
Yeah, this is a great question, and it's a large area.
I would say that the first of all,
the word aggression in my mind
refers more to a description of behavior
than it does to an internal state.
Aggression could reflect an internal state
that we would call anger in humans
or could reflect fear, or it could reflect hunger
if it's predatory aggression.
And so this gets at the issue that you raised
of the different types of aggression that exist.
The work that Daiyue did when she was in my lab that really broke open the field to the
application of modern genetic tools for studying circuits and mice is that she found a way
to evoke aggression in mice using opthogenetics to activate specific neurons
in a region of the hypothalamus, the ventramedial hypothalamus,
with EMH, which people had been studying
and looking at for decades, following
first the work of, in cats, the famous Nobel Prize-winning work of Walter Hess, and then followed by work
done by Menow Krook in the Netherlands, in rats where they would stick electrical wires
into the brain and send electric currents into the brain, and they could trigger a placid cat to suddenly bear its teeth hiss and
almost strike out of the experimenter, and they could trigger rats to fight with each
other.
And even in Hess's original experiments, he describes two types of aggression that he evokes
from cats, depending on where in the hypothalamus he puts his
electrode, one of which he calls defensive rage.
That's the ears laid back, teeth bared and hissing, and the other one is predatory aggression,
where the cat has its ears forward and it's like batting with its paw at a mouse-like object like it
wants to catch it and eat it. So he already had at that stage some information about segregation
in the brain of different forms of aggression. So fast forward to 2008-2009 when Daiu came to the lab, and we had started working on aggression and fruit
flies, and I wanted to bring it into mice so that we could apply genetic tools.
And we started by having Daiu, who was an electrophysiologist, just repeat the electrical
stimulation of the ventramedial hypothalamus in the mouse, just like
people had done in rats and cats and hamsters, even in monkeys.
And she could not get that experiment to work over 40 different trials.
It just didn't work.
What she got instead was fear behaviors.
She got freezing, cornering, and crouching. And finally,
in desperation, and we got a lot of input from Menno Crook on this, he really was
mystified. Why doesn't it work in mice? We realized why there had been no paper
on brain stimulated aggression in mice in 50 years because the experiment doesn't work.
And the one bit of credit I can claim there is I convinced
Diu to try optogenetics because it just had sort of come into use
deep in the brain from Carl Dice Roth and others work.
And I thought maybe because it could be directed more specifically
to a region of the brain and types of cells and optogenetics,
then electrical stimulation, it might work.
And Dice said, never, never going to work.
If it doesn't work with electricity, why should it work with
optogenetics?
And the fact is that it did work,
and we were able to trigger aggression
in this region using optogenetic stimulation
of ventramedial hypothalamus.
And in retrospect, I think the reason
that we were seeing all these fear behaviors
is because right at the upper part, if you think of ventramedial hypothalamus
like a pair sitting on the ground, the fat part of the pair near the ground is where the aggression
neurons are, but the upper part of the pair has fear neurons. And it could be because it's so small
in a mouse, when you inject electrical current anywhere in the pair,
it flows up through the entire pair
and it activates the fear circuits
and those totally dominate aggression.
And so that's why we were never able to see
any fighting with electrical stimulation,
whereas when you use optogenetics,
you can find the stimulation just to the region where you've implanted
the channel redopsin gene into those neurons.
And so in fast-forward from that, from a lot of work, from Da'yu now on her own at NYU,
and with her postdoc Anna Gret Faulkner, there is as well as work of other people, there's evidence that the type of fighting that we were,
that we elicit when we stimulate VMH is offensive aggression
that is actually rewarding to male mice.
They like it.
They like it.
Male mice will press, learn to poke their nose
or press a bar to get the opportunity
to beat up a subordinate mail mouse. And in more recent experiments, if you activate
those neurons and the mouse has a chance to be in one of two compartments in a box, they
will gravitate towards the compartment where those neurons are activated. It has a positive valence.
And when I went into this field and I was thinking,
well, what goes on in my brain and my body when I'm furious?
It certainly doesn't feel like a rewarding experience.
It's not something that I would want to repeat because it feels good when I'm in that state.
It doesn't feel good at all when I'm in that state.
And it is still, I think, a mystery
as to where that type of aggression,
which is more defensive aggression,
the kind of aggression you feel if you're being attacked
or if you've been cheated by somebody
where that is encoded in the brain
and how that works. Still, I think, is a very
important mystery that we haven't solved.
And predatory aggression there has been some progress on.
So my show predatory aggression, they use that to catch crickets that they eat and that
involves different circuits than the ventramedial hypophilomic circuits. So, it's become clear that if you want to call it the state of aggressiveness is multifaceted,
it depends on the type of aggression, and it involves different sorts of circuits.
There is a paper suggesting that there might be a final common pathway for all aggression
in a region, which is one of my favorites. It's called the substantiate in Namanada,
the substance with no name. I like that.
And that are so creative.
Or the nucleus ambiguous, or the zona in Serta, these are places that no one can think of what they are. Anyhow, that might be a final common pathway
for predatory aggression and offensive
and defensive aggression,
but it can be really hard to tell just from looking
at a mouse fight, whether it's engaged
in offensive or defensive aggression.
We've tried to take that apart
using machine learning analysis of behavior.
But in rats, for example, it's much clearer when the animal is engaged in offensive versus
defensive aggression.
They direct their bites at different parts of the opponent's body, in particular.
In particular, offensive aggression is flank directed.
Defensive aggression goes for the neck,
goes for the throat.
I've seen some nature specials
where in a very barbaric way, at least to me,
it seems like hyenas will try and go after
the reproductive axis, they'll go after testicles
and penis and they basically wanna,
it seems they wanna limit future breeding potential.
Or create pain, or create pain or both.
Yeah.
I mean, in terms of offensive aggression and your reflection that it doesn't feel good,
I mean, I can say, I know some people who really enjoy fighting, I have a relative who's
a lawyer.
He loves to argue and fight.
I don't think of him as physically aggressive.
In fact, he's not, but loves to fight and loves to prosecute and go after people.
And he's pretty effective at it. Right. Of a friend, former military special operations. And
very calm guy had a great career in the military special operations. And he'd, he'll quite,
you know, plainly say, I love to fight. It's one of the one of my great joys.
He really enjoyed his work.
Yeah.
And and also respected the other side because they offered the opportunity to test that
that and to experience that joy.
So in a kind of bizarre way to somebody like me who I'll certainly defend my stance if
I need to, but I certainly don't consider myself somebody who offensively goes after
people just to go after them.
There's no quote unquote dopamine hit here.
Right.
Acknowledging that dopamine does many things, of course.
I have a couple of questions about the way you describe the circuitry.
I should say the way the circuitry is arranged.
And of course, we don't know because we weren't consulted the design phase.
But why do you think there would be such a close
positioning of neurons that can elicit such divergent states and behaviors?
I mean, you're talking about this pear-shaped structure where the neurons that generate
fear are cheek-to-jowl with the neurons that generate offensive aggression of all things.
It's like putting the neurons that control swallowing
next to the neurons that control vomiting. It just seems to me that on the one hand, this
is the way that neural circuits are often arranged. And yet to me, it's always been
perplexing as to why this would be the case.
Yeah, I think that is a very profound question. And I've wondered about that a lot. If you think from an evolutionary perspective,
it might have been the case that defensive behaviors and fear arose before offensive aggression
offensive aggression, because animals first and foremost have to defend themselves from predation by other animals.
And maybe it's only when they're comfortable with having warded off predation and made
themselves safe that they can start to think about who's going to be the alpha male in
my group here. And so it could be that if you think
that brain regions and cell populations evolved
by duplication and modification of pre-existing cell
populations, that might be the way
that those regions wound up next to each other.
And developmentally, they start out
from a common pool of precursors that
expresses the same gene, the fear neurons and the aggression
neurons.
And then with development, it gets shut off
in the aggression neurons and maintained
in the fear neurons.
Now, that view says, oh, it's just an,
it's an accident of evolution and development.
But I think there must be a functional part as well.
So one thing we know about offensive aggression is that strong fear shuts it down, whereas
defensive aggression, at least in rats, is actually enhanced by fear.
It's one of the big differences between defensive aggression and offensive aggression.
And you think about it, if offensive aggression is rewarding and pleasurable, if you start
to get really scared, that tends to take the fun out of it.
And maybe these two regions are close to each other to facilitate inhibition of aggression
by the fear neurons.
We know for a fact that if we deliberately stimulate those fear neurons at the top of
the pair, when two animals are involved in a fight, it just stops the fight, dead in
its tracks, and they go off into the corner and freeze.
So at least hierarchically, it seems like fear is the dominant behavior over offensive
aggression.
And how that inhibition would work is not clear,
because all these neurons are pretty much excitatory.
They're almost all glutamateurgic.
And so one of the interesting questions for the future is how exactly
does fear dominate over and shut down offensive aggression in the brain?
How does that work? Is it all circuitry or their chemicals involved?
What's the mechanism and when is it called into play?
But I think that's the way I tend to think about why these neurons are all mixed up together.
And it's not just fight and freezing or fight and flight.
There are also metabolic neurons that are mixed together in VMH as well.
Controlling body-wide metabolism. Yeah. There are neurons there that respond to glucose when glucose
goes up in your bloodstream. They're activated. And VMH has a whole history in the field of obesity
because if you destroy it in a rat, you get a fat rat.
So the way most of the world thinks about VMA is they think about, oh, that's the thing
that keeps you from getting fat.
It's the anti-obesity area, but in the area of social behavior, we see it as a center for
control of aggression and fear behaviors. And again, why these neurons and these functions,
I like to call them the 4Fs, feeding, freezing, fighting,
and mating, that they all seem to be closely
intermingled with each other, maybe because crosstalk
between them is very important to help the animal's brain
decide what behavior to prioritize
and what behavior to shut down at any given moment.
One of the things that we will do is link to the incredible videos of these mice that
have selective stimulation of neurons in the VMH, dius, and the other studies that you've
done.
Whenever I teach, I show those videos at some point, with the caveats and warnings that are required,
when one is about to see a video of a mouse trying to mate
with another mouse, or mating with another mouse,
and they seem both to be quite happy about the mating experience,
at least as far as we know, as observers of mice.
And then upon stimulation of those VMH neurons,
one of the mice essentially tries to kill the other mouse.
And then when that stimulation is stopped,
they basically go back to hanging out.
They don't go right back to mating.
Some reconciliation clearly that needs to happen first.
We assume, but it's just so striking.
I think equally striking is the video
where the mouse is alone in there with the glove.
The VMH neurons are stimulated and the mouse goes into a rage.
It looks like it wants to kill the glove, basically.
So striking, I encourage people to go watch those because it really puts a tremendous amount
of color on what we're describing.
It's just the idea that there are switches in the brain
to me really became clear upon seeing that.
One of the concepts, excuse me,
one of the concepts that you've raised in your lectures
before and that I think was Hess's idea
is this idea of a sort of hydraulic pressure.
Or maybe it was Conrad, Conrad, I can't speak down.
Excuse me, Conrad Lorenz, who talked about
a kind of hydraulic pressure towards behavior.
I'm fascinated by this idea of hydraulic pressure
because I don't consider myself a hot tempered person,
but I am familiar with the fact that when I lose my temper,
it takes quite a while for me to simmer down.
I can't think about anything else,
I don't wanna think about anything else.
In fact, trying to think about anything else becomes aversive to me, which to me underscores
this notion of prioritization of the different states and potentially conflicting states.
What do you think funnels into this idea of hydraulic pressure toward a state?
And why is it perhaps that sometimes we can be very angry
and if we succeed in winning an argument,
all of a sudden it will subside.
Because clear that means that there are external influences.
It's a complex space here that we're creating.
I realize I'm creating a bit of a cloud
and I'm doing it on purpose.
Because to me, the idea of a hydraulic pressure
towards a state like sleep, there's a sleep pressure.
There's a pressure towards a grid.
That all makes sense.
But what's involved?
Is it too multifactorial to actually separate out the variables?
But what's really driving hydraulic pressure toward a given state?
Yeah.
So, a really important question.
I think one way that is helpful, at least for me, to break this question apart and think
about it, is to distinguish homeostatic behaviors that is need-based behaviors, where the pressure
is built up because of a need like, I'm hungry, I need to eat, I'm thirsty, I need to drink, I'm hot, I need to get to a cold place.
It's basically the thermostat model of your brain. You have a set point, and then if the temperature gets too hot,
you turn on the AC, and if the temperature gets too cold, you turn on the heater, and you put yourself back to the set point.
I don't think that's how aggression works.
That is, it's not that we all go around,
at least subjectively.
I don't go around with an accumulating need to fight,
which I then look for something at excuse to release it.
Now, maybe there are people that do that
and they go out and look for bar fights to get into.
Or Twitter.
Yeah, Twitter seems to be. of half-joking because Twitter seems to draw a reasonably
sized crowd of people that are there for combat of some sort.
Even though the total intellectual power of any of their comments is about that of a cap
gun, they seem to really like to fire off that cap.
But I agree.
I'd like to take a quick break and acknowledge one of our sponsors, Athletic Greens.
Athletic Greens, now called AG1, is a vitamin mineral probiotic drink that covers all of your
foundational nutritional needs.
I've been taking Athletic Greens since 2012, so I'm delighted that they're sponsoring
the podcast.
The reason I started taking Athletic Greens and the reason I still take athletic greens once
or usually twice a day is that it gets to be
the probiotics that I need for gut health.
Our gut is very important.
It's populated by gut microbiota
that communicate with the brain, the immune system,
and basically all the biological systems of our body
to strongly impact our immediate and long-term health.
And those probiotics and athletic greens are optimal
and vital for microbiotic health.
In addition, athletic greens contains a number of adaptogens, vitamins and minerals that
make sure that all of my foundational nutritional needs are met, and it tastes great.
If you'd like to try athletic greens, you can go to atlettegreens.com slash huberman,
and they'll give you five free travel packs that make it really easy to mix up athletic greens while you're on the road and the car on the plane, et cetera.
And they'll give you a year supply of vitamin D3K2.
Again, that's at lettagreens.com slash
Huberman to get the five free travel packs
and the year supply of vitamin D3K2.
Yeah, so you can think of this accumulated hydraulic pressure
either being based on something that you were deprived of, creating an accumulating need, or something that you want to do, building up a driver or pressure to do that. At least for me, is as gradual increases in neural activity in a particular region of the brain.
And so, for example, in the area of the hypothalamus that controls feeding, Scott Sternson and others
have shown that the hungrier you get, the higher the level of activity in that region in the
brain, and then when you eat, boom, the activity goes right
back down again. And that state is actually negatively valent. So it's like the animal,
quote unquote, feels increasingly uncomfortable, just like we feel increasingly uncomfortable
of a hungrier we are. And then when we eat, it taps it down. But there is this increased activity. And I think in
the case of aggression, our data and others show that the more strongly you drive this region of
the brain optogenetically, the more of just a hair trigger you need to set the animal off to get
it to fight. The interesting thing is that if there is nothing
for the animal to attack, it doesn't really do much
when you're stimulating this region.
It wanders around the cage a little bit more,
but it will not actually show overt attack
if, unless you put something in front of it.
And the same thing is true for the areas we've described
that control mating behavior.
This is what Lindsay is working on.
You can stimulate those areas till you're blue in the face,
and the mouse just sort of wanders around.
But if you put another mouse in WAM,
you will try to mount that mouse
if you put a cum quad in the cage.
He'll try to mount the cum quad.
And so it becomes a sort of any port in the storm.
So there is this idea that the drive is building up pressure
that somehow needs to be released, where that pressure is actually being exerted.
If you accept that it's increased activity in some circuit or circuits, some place,
what is it pushing up against that needs something else to sort of unplug it
in the Lorentz hydraulic model? That's, you don't see the behavior
until you release a valve on this bucket and let the accumulated pressure flow out.
And that's one of the things we're trying to study
in the context of the mating behavior as well.
How does the information that there's an object
in front of you come together with this drive state
that is generated by stimulating these neurons
in the hypothalamus to say, okay, pull the trigger
and go, it's time to mate, it's time to attack.
And we're just starting to get some insights into that now.
Fascinating.
And I should mention people, Dr. Anderson mentioned,
Lindsay, Lindsay is a former graduate student of mine
that's now a postdoc in David's lab.
And I haven't caught up with her recently
to hear about these experiments,
but they sound fascinating.
I would love to spend some time on this issue of,
why is it that a mouse won't attack nothing,
but it'll attack even a glove,
and why we'll only try and mate
if there's another mouse to mate with.
It's actually, I think fortunately for you,
you're not spending a lot of time
on Twitter and Instagram or YouTube,
but there's
this whole online community that exists now. As far as I know, it's almost exclusively
young males who are obsessed with this idea. I'll just say it has a name. It's called No Fap of No
Mastervation as a way to maintain their motivation to go out and actually seek mates because of the
ready availability of online
pornography, there's probably a much larger population of young males that are never actually
going out and seeking mates because they're getting porn addicted, et cetera.
There's actually a serious issue that came up in our episode with Anilemke, who wrote the
book Dopamine Nation, because they available ability of pornography.
There's a whole social context that's being created around this ingenuine addiction.
So humans are not like the mice or mice are not like
the humans seem to resolve the issue on their own
in ways that might actually impede
seeking and finding of sexual partners
and or long-term mates.
So a serious issue there, I raise it as a serious issue
that I hear a lot about because I get asked
hundreds, if not thousands of questions about this.
Is there any physiological basis for what they call no-fap?
And I never actually reply because there's no data.
But what you're raising here is a very interesting, mechanistic scenario that can, as you mentioned,
is being explored.
So what do we know about the internal state of a mouse
whose VMH is being stimulated,
or a mouse whose other brain region
that can stimulate the desire to mate?
What do we know about the internal state of that mouse
if it's just alone in the cage wandering around?
Is it wandering around really wanting to mate
and really wanting to fight?
We of course don't know, but is its heart rate up? Is it's around really wanting to mate and really wanting to fight? Of course, don't know, but is it's heart rate up?
Is it blood pressure up?
Is it wishing that there was pornography?
Is it something's going on, presumably, that's different than prior to that stimulation?
And is it a rousal?
And what do you think it is about the visual
or olfactory perception of a conspecific
that ungates this tremendous repertoire of behaviors?
Right.
That is the central question.
I can say, at least with respect to the fear neurons
that sit on top of the aggression neurons,
we know that when those neurons are activated
optogenetically in the same way we would activate
the aggression neurons, that there's clearly
an arousal process that's occurring.
You can see the pupils dilate in the animal.
There is an increase in stress hormone release
into the bloodstream.
We've shown that heart rate goes up.
So in addition to the drive to actually
freeze, which is what those animals do, there is autonomic arousal and neuroendocrine activation
of stress responses. And some of that is probably shared by the aggression neurons and the mating
neurons, although we haven't investigated it in as much detail.
But I wouldn't be surprised because they project
to many of the same regions
that the fear neurons project to,
which is an interesting issue in the context
to discuss later, maybe, in the context of,
why we're comfortable with mental illnesses that are
based on maladaptations of fear, but not mental illnesses that are based on maladaptations of
aggression if they have pretty similar circuits in the brain. But that's how I would imagine there
is an arousal dimension, as you say, their stress hormones that are activated. These regions, VMH, projects to about 30 different regions
in the brain, and it gets input from about 30 different regions.
So I kind of see it as both an antenna and a broadcasting center.
It's like a satellite dish that takes in information
from different sensory modalities, smell, maybe vision, mechanical sensation, and
then it sort of synthesizes and integrates that into a fairly low dimensional, as the
computational people call it, representation of this pressure to attack, and it broadcasts
that all over the brain to trigger all these systems
that have to be brought into play if the animal is going to engage in aggression.
Because aggression is a very risky thing for an animal to engage in.
It could wind up losing and it could wind up getting killed.
And so its brain constantly has to make a cost-benefit analysis of whether to continue on that path
or to back off as well.
And I think that part of this broadcasting function of this region is engaging all these
other brain domains that play a role in this kind of cost-benefit analysis.
I want to talk more about mating behavior, but as a segway to that, as we're talking
about aggression and mating behavior, I think hormones. And whenever there's an opportunity on this
podcast to shatter a common myth, I grab it. One of the common myths that's out there, and I think
that persists, is that testosterone makes animals and humans aggressive,
and estrogen makes animals placid and kind or emotional.
And as we both know, nothing could be further from the truth.
Although there's some truth to the idea
that these hormones are all involved.
Robert Sapolsky supplied some information to me
when he came on this podcast that,
if you give people exogenous testosterone, it tends
to make them more of the way they were before, if they were jerk before, they'll become more
of a jerk, if they were very altruistic, they'll become more altruistic.
And then eventually I pointed out you'll aromatize that testosterone into estrogen and you'll
start getting opposite effects.
So it's a murky space.
It's not straightforward.
But if I'm not mistaken, testosterone plays a role in generating aggression.
However, the specific hormones that are involved in generating aggression via VMH are things other than testosterone.
Could you tell us a little bit more about that because there's some interesting surprises in there?
Yeah, that's a really important question. So, when we finally identified the neurons in VMH,
that control aggression with a molecular marker,
we found out that that marker was the estrogen receptor.
So, that might strike you as a little strange.
Why should aggression promoting neurons in male mice
be labeled with the estrogen receptor.
Other labs have shown that the estrogen receptor
in adult male mice is necessary for aggression.
If you knock out the gene in VMH, they don't fight.
And it's been shown, and a lot of this has worked
from your colleague, Nierau Shah, at Stanford,
who is one of my former PhD students, that if
you castrate a mouse and it loses the ability to fight, not only can you rescue fighting
with a testosterone implant, but you can rescue it with an estrogen implant.
So you can bypass completely the requirement for testosterone to restore aggressiveness to the mice.
And as you say, it's because many of the effects of testosterone, although not all, many of
them are mediated by its conversion to estrogen.
By a process called aromatization, it's carried out by an enzyme called aromatase.
In fact, people may have, most of your listeners may have heard of aromatease because aromatease
inhibitors are widely used in female humans as adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.
They are a way of reducing the production of estrogen by preventing testosterone from
being converted into estrogen.
And in fact, there are a lot of animal experiments showing if you give males aromatase inhibitors,
they stop fighting as well as also stop being sexually active.
And so that's one of the counterintuitive ideas.
And Nirao has shown that progesterone also seems to play a role in aggression, because
these aggression neurons also express the progesterone receptor. So here are two hormones that
are classically thought of as female reproductive hormones. This is what goes up and goes down
during the estrus cycle, estrogen and progesterone. and yet they're playing a very important role in controlling aggression
in male mice, and presumably in male humans as well. Fascinating. So, astrogen is doing many more
things than I think most people believe. And testosterone is doing maybe different and fewer things in some cases and more and others.
I've known some aggressive females over the time I've been alive.
What's involved in female aggression that's unique from the pathways that generate male aggression?
Great question.
So we and other labs have studied this in both mice and also in fruit flies. So one thing in mice that
distinguishes aggression and females from males is that male mice are pretty much ready to fight
at the drop of a hat. Female mice only fight when they are nurturing and nursing their pups after
they've delivered a litter. And there's a window there where they become hyper aggressive.
And then after their pups are weaned,
that aggressiveness goes away.
So this is pretty remarkable that you take a virgin female mouse
and expose it to a male,
and her response is to become sexually receptive
and to mate with him.
And now you let her have her pups and you put the same male or another male mouse in the cage with her,
and instead of trying to mate with him, she attacks him. So there is some presumably hormonal and also neuronal
switch that's occurring in the brain that switches the response of the female from sex to aggression
when she goes from virginity to maternity. And we recently showed in a paper
this is work from one of my students among you, Liu, that within VMH and females
there are two clearly divisible subsets of estrogen receptor neurons.
And she showed that one of those subsets controls fighting
and the other one controls mating.
And in fact, if you stimulate the fighting specific subset
in a virgin, you can get the virgin to attack,
which is something that we were never able to do before.
And if you stimulate the mating one, you enhance mating.
The reason we could never get these results
when we stimulated the whole population
of estrogen receptor neurons is that these effects
are opposite and they cancel out.
And so it turns out that if you measure the activity
of the fighting and the mating neurons
going from a virgin to a
maternal female.
The aggression neurons are very low in their activity in the virgin, but once the female
has pups, the activation ability of those neurons goes way up and the mating neurons stay
the same.
So if you think of the balance between them
like a sea saw in the Virgin, there is more activity in the mating neurons that in the fighting
neurons, whereas in the nursing mother, there's more activity or more activation in the other way around.
The fighting neurons in the mating. Did I say fighting and mating the first? Mating neurons dominate,
fighting in the Virgin, fighting neurons dominate mating in the mother. So that's a really cool
observation, and it's not something that happens in males, and we don't know what causes that
or controls that. Interestingly, this gets into the whole issue of neurons that are present in females,
but not in males.
So we've known for, the field has known for a long time that male and female fruit flies
have sex-specific neurons.
And most of the neurons that we've identified in fruit flies that control fighting in
males are male-specific.
They're not found in the female brain, but recently we discovered a set of female-specific
fighting neurons in the female brain, together with a couple of other laboratories.
Now, they do share one common population of neurons in both male and female flies that
in females activates the female-specific female flies that in females activates the female
specific fighting neurons and in males activates the male specific fighting neurons.
So it's kind of a hierarchy with this common neuron on top.
And in mice, we discovered that there are male specific neurons in VMH and those neurons
are activated during male aggression. Now, the neurons that
are active in females when females fight in VMH are not sex-specific. So, they are also
found in males. So, this is already showing you some complexity. The male mouse VMH has
both male-specific aggression neurons and generic aggression neurons.
And then the female VMAH, the mating cells, are only found in females.
They are female-specific and not found in the male brain.
And so we're trying to find out what these sex-specific populations of neurons are doing,
but that indicates that that is some of the mechanism by which different sexes show different behaviors.
I'm fixated on this transition
from the virgin female mouse to the maternal female mouse.
I have a couple of questions about
whether or not, for instance,
the transition is governed by the presence of pops.
So for instance, if you take a virgin female,
she'll mate with a male,
when she's had pops, she'll try and fight that male or presumably another intruder female, she'll mate with a male, when she's had Pups, she'll try and fight that male,
or presumably another intruder female, right?
Equally towards females and male intruders.
Does that require the presence of her Pups, meaning if you were to take those Pups and
give them to another mother, it does she revert to the more virgin-like behavior?
Is it related to, is it triggered by lactation, or could it actually be triggered by the
mating behavior itself?
Because it's possible for the Virgin to become a non-Virgin, but not actually have a litter of Pops.
Right. Those are all great questions, and we don't know the answer.
Most of them, what I can say is that a nursing mother doesn't have to have her Pops with her in the cage
in order to attack an intruder male or an intruder female.
She is just in a state of brain
that makes her aggressive to any intruder.
And those aggression neurons in that female's brain
are activated by both male and female intruders equally,
whereas in male mice, the aggression neurons
are only ever activated by males, not by females,
because males are never supposed to attack females.
They're only supposed to mate with them.
So that's another difference in how those neurons are tuned
to signals from different conspecifics.
Does it require lactation?
I don't know the answer to that.
I think there are some experiments where people
have tried to, classical experiments.
People have tried to reproduce the changes in hormones
that occur during pregnancy in female rats
to see if it can make them aggressive.
And some of those manipulations do, to some
extent.
But there's a whole biology there that remains to be explored about how much of this is
hormone, how much of this is circuitry and electricity, and how much of it is other
factors that we haven't identified yet.
I don't want to answer for a pro boner but well, I'll just ask the question.
The other day, I was watching ferrets mate, right?
Mustalids are, they're mustalids and they, they're mating behavior.
I guess I didn't say why I was watching this.
It doesn't matter.
It simply doesn't matter.
But if one observes the mating behaviors of different animals, we know that there's
a tremendous range of mating behaviors in humans.
There can be no aggressive component that can be aggressive component in humans.
They have all sorts of kinks and fetishes and behaviors, and most of which probably has
never been documented because most of this happens in private.
And here I always say on this podcast, anytime we're talking about sexual behavior in humans,
we're always making the presumption that it's a consensual age appropriate, context appropriate,
and species appropriate.
Let's say we're talking about a lot of different species.
With that said, just to set context,
I was watching this video of ferrets mating,
and it's quite violent actually.
There's a lot of neck biting,
there's a lot of squealing.
If I were going to project an anthropomorphized,
I'd say it's not really clear they both want to be there.
It, you would just, one would make really clear they both want to be there.
You would just, one would make that assumption.
And of course, we don't know.
We have no idea.
This could be the ritual.
It seems to me that there is some crossover of aggression and mating behavior circuitry
during the act of mating.
And do you think that reflects this sort of stew of competing neurons that are
prioritizing in real time? Because of course, as states, they have persistence, as you point
out, and you can imagine that states overlapping in four different states, the motivational
drive to mate, the motivational drive to get away from this experience, the motivational
drive to to eat at some experience, the motivational drive to
eat at some point, to defecate at some point.
All of these things are competing and what we're really seeing is a bias in probabilities.
But when you look at mating behavior of various animals, you see an aggressive component sometimes,
but not always.
Is it species specific?
Is it context specific?
And more generally, do you think that there is crosstalk
between these different neuronal populations?
And the animal itself might be kind of confused
about what's going on.
Right.
Great, great questions.
I can't really speak to the issue of whether this is
species specific, because I'm not a naturalist or a zoologist.
I've seen, like you have in the wild, for example,
lions when they mate. I've seen like you have in the wild, for example, lions when they
mate.
I've seen them in Africa.
There's often a biting component of that as well.
One of the things that surprised us when we identified neurons in VMHVL that control
aggression in males is that within that population, there is a subset of neurons that is activated by females during male-female mating
encounters.
Now, you don't generally think of mouse sex as rough sex,
but there is a lot of what superficially
looks like violent behavior sometimes,
especially if the female rejects the male and runs away.
And there's some evidence that those female selective neurons
in VMH are part of the mating behavior.
If you shut them down, the animals don't mate as effectively
as they otherwise would.
What happens when you stimulate them we don't yet know because we don't have a way to specifically
do that without activating the male aggression neurons.
But I think they must be there for a reason because VMA is not traditionally the brain region
to which male sexual behavior has been assigned,
that's another area called the medial preoptic area. And there we have shown that there are neurons
that definitely stimulate mating behavior. In fact, if we activate those mating neurons in a
male while it's in the middle of attacking another male. It will stop fighting, start singing to that male,
and start to try to mount that male
until we shut those neurons off.
So those are the make-love-not-war neurons,
and VMAG are the make-war-not-love neurons,
and there are dense interconnections
between these two nuclei,
which are very close to each other in the brain.
And we've shown that some of those connections are mutually inhibitory to prevent the animal from attacking a mate that it's supposed to be mating with,
or to prevent it from mating with an animal that's supposed to be attacking.
But it's also possible that there are some cooperative
interactions between those structures as well as antagonistic interactions, and the
balance of whether it's the cooperative or antagonistic interactions that are firing
at any given moment in a mating encounter, as you suggest, may determine whether at a moment of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of, of the wiring is there for that to happen. I'm sure people's minds are running wild with all this.
I'll just use this as an opportunity to raise something.
I've wondered about for far too long, which is, I have a friend who's a psychiatrist who
works on the treatment of fetishes.
This is not a psychiatrist that I was treated by.
I don't just point that out.
But they mentioned something very interesting to me long ago,
which is that when you look at true fetishes and what meets the criteria for fetish, that
there does seem to be some, what one would think would be competing circuitry that suddenly
becomes aligned.
For instance, avoidance of feces, dead bodies, feet, things that are very infectious, typically those states
and of disgust are antagonistic to states of desire, as one would hope is present during
sexual behavior.
Fetishes often involve exactly those things that are aversive, feet, dead bodies, disgusting things to most people.
And true fetishes in the pathologic sense
exist when people have basically a requirement
for thinking about or even the presence
of those ordinarily disgusting things
in order to become sexually aroused.
As if the circuitry has crossed over, and the statement that rung in my mind was,
people don't develop fetishes to mailboxes,
or to the color red,
or to random objects and things.
They develop fetishes to things that are highly infectious
and counter reproductive-appetitive states.
So I find that interesting.
I don't know if you have any reflections on that as to why that might be.
I'm tempted to ask whether or not you've ever observed fetish-like behavior in mice.
But I find it fascinating that you have this area of the brain that so highly can serve
the hypothalamus, which you have these dense populations intermixed, and that the addition
of a four brain, especially in humans, that can think and make decisions,
could in some ways facilitate the expression
of these primitive behaviors,
but could also complicate the expression
of primitive behaviors.
Right.
I would agree, I think one way of looking at fetishes
from a neurobiological standpoint is that they represent
a kind of repetitive conditioning where something
that is natively aversive or disgusting by being repeatedly paired with a rewarding experience
changes its valence, its sign, so that now it somehow produces the anticipation of reward the next time a person sees it.
I don't know how I don't know that literature in animals, so I don't know if you could condition a mouse to eat feces, for example,
although there are animals that are naturally coprophagic. That is, and maybe mice do that occasionally. I'm not sure.
But that is one way to think about it, and that could certainly involve in humans the more
recently evolved parts of the brain, the cortex that is sort of orchestrating both what behaviors are
happening and whether reward states are turning on in association
with those behaviors that are happening.
That's the part that I think is difficult and challenging to study in a mouse, but certainly
bears thinking about, because it's a really interesting, again, counterintuitive aspect, again, rough
sex people that want to have fighting or violence or aggressiveness in order to be sexually
aroused and fetishes.
And in fact, when we made that discovery initially, it raised rapists, for example, and engage in sexual violence might,
in some level, have their wires crossed in some way that these states that are supposed to be
pretty much separated and mutually antagonistic are not and are actually more rewarding and reinforcing.
I think it's going gonna be a long time
before we have figured it out.
But when you think about it,
there is no treatment that we have
for a violent sexual offender
that eliminates the violence,
but not the sexual desire and sexual urge.
Whether it's physical castration or chemical castration,
it eliminates both. Definitely an area that I think well human neuroscience in general needs a
lot of tools, right, in terms of how to probe and manipulate neural circuitry. I'd love to turn to
this area that you mentioned the medial preoptic area. I'm fascinated by it because just as within the VMA,
you have these neurons for mating and fighting or aggression.
My understanding is medial preoptic area contains neurons for mating,
but also for temperature regulation.
And perhaps I'm making too much of a leap here,
but I've always wondered about this phrase in heat. Certainly the menstrual and or ester cycle in females is related to changes in body temperature.
In fact, measuring body temperature is one way that women can fairly reliably predict
ovulation, et cetera.
Although additional, this is not a show about contraception, please rely on multiple methods
as necessary.
Don't use this discussion as your guide for contraception
based on temperature.
But if you stimulate certain neurons in the medial
preoptic area, you can trigger dramatic changes
in body temperature and or mating behavior.
What's the relationship if any between temperature and mating?
Or do we simply not know?
I don't know what the relationship is between temperature and mating, or do we simply not know? I don't know what the relationship is
between temperature and mating neurons in the preoptic area.
I suspect that they are different populations of neurons
because it's become pretty clear
that the preoptic area has many different subsets
of neurons that are specifically active
during different behaviors, even different phases of mating behavior.
So there are mounting neurons, there are intermission, thrusting neurons, and ejaculation neurons,
and sniffing neurons.
Wait, wait.
So I think I've heard this before, but I just want to make sure that people get this.
I want to make sure I get this.
So you're telling me, withinioprioptic area there,
specific neurons that if you stimulate them,
will make males thrust as if they're mating.
No, so this is not based on stimulation experiments.
It's based on imaging experiments right now
that we see when we look in the preoptic area,
what neurons are active
during different phases of aggression, we see that there are different neurons that are active
during sniffing, mounting, thrusting, and ejaculation. And they become repeatedly activated each time
the animal goes through that cycle. During mating. During the mating cycle.
There are also some neurons there that are active
during aggression, which are distinct.
And we don't know whether those neurons are there
to promote aggression or to inhibit mating
when animals are fighting.
We have some evidence that suggests it may be the latter,
but we don't know for sure yet.
The thermosensitive neurons are really interesting
because you mentioned the phrase in heat,
and then in the context of aggression,
you talk about hot-blooded people or hotheads.
There's just recently a paper showing
there are thermoregulatory neurons in VMH as well.
So all of these homeostatic systems
for metabolic control and
temperature control are intermingled in these nuclei, these zones that control
these basic survival behaviors like mating and aggression and predator
defense. And I would imagine that the thermal regulation is tightly connected to energy expenditure
and that again, these neurons are mixed together to facilitate integration of all these signals
by the brain in some way that we don't understand to maintain the proper balance between energy
conservation and energy consumption during this particular
behavior or that behavior.
I mean, I've always been fascinated by the question, why is it that violence goes up in the
summertime when the temperatures are high?
Does it really have something to do with the idea that increased temperature increases
violence?
It seems hard to believe because we're homeoothermic and we pretty much stay around 98.6 Fahrenheit.
Could be other social reasons why that happens.
People are outside out on the street bumping into each other.
But I think there could well be something that ties thermal regulation to aggressiveness as
well as to mating behavior.
Fascinating, yeah.
I asked in the hopes that maybe in the years to come, your lab will parse some of the
temperature relationships.
And I realize it could be also regulated by hormones in general.
So it's tapping into two systems for completely different reasons.
But anyway, an area that intrigued me because of this notion of hotheadedness,
cool, common, collected.
And also the fact that I probably should have asked about this earlier,
that arousal itself is tethered to the whole mating and reproductive process.
I mean, without a sort of sea-sawing back between the sympathetic and parasimphetic arousal
relaxed states, there is no mating that will take place.
So it's fascinating the way these different competing forces and sea saws operate.
Several times during the discussion so far, we've hit on this idea that the same behavior can reflect different states and different
states can converge on multiple behaviors as well.
You had a paper not long ago about mounting behavior, which I found fascinating.
Maybe you could tell us about that result because to me it really speaks to the fact that
mounting behavior can in one context be
sexual and in another context actually be related to we presume dominance.
And I think that my friends who practice jujitsu will say, when I talk about that result,
they say, of course, you know, mounting the other person and dominating them.
There's nothing sexual about it.
It's about overtaking them physically,
literally being on their next side, as opposed to on their own, lying on their own back.
It's just fascinating, very primitive, and yet I think, speaks to this idea that mounting
behavior might be one of the most fundamental ways in which animals and perhaps even humans
express dominance and or sexual interactions.
Yep, and that's a fascinating question, and it was harder to figure out than you might have fought.
So, there's been this debate for a long time in the field when you see two male mice mounting
each other, is this homosexual behavior, is this case of mistaken sexual identification,
or is this dominance behavior?
And if you train an AI algorithm to try to distinguish male-male mounting from male-female
mounting, it does not do a very good job because, motorically, those behaviors look so similar. And so how did we wind up figuring out
that most male, male, mounting is dominance mounting?
There are two important clues.
One is the context.
And so male, male mounting tends
to be more prominent among mice when they haven't had a lot of fighting experience.
And then as they become more experienced in fighting, they will show relatively less mounting towards the other mail and more attack.
And they'll transition quickly from mounting to attack. And so the mounting is always seen
in this context of an overall aggressive interaction.
And then the second thing,
which believe it or not was suggested
by a computational theoretical person in my lab,
and Kennedy, who now is her own lab at Northwestern,
she said, well, males are known to sing when they mount
females, ultrasonic vocalizations.
Why don't you see what kinds of songs they're singing when they're mounting males?
Maybe it's a different kind of song.
What we found out is they don't sing at all when they're mounting a male.
So you can easily distinguish whether mounting behavior by a male mouse is reproductive or agonistic aggressive
according to whether it's accompanied by ultrasonic vocalizations or not. And it turns out that
different brain regions are maximally active during these different types of mounting. So VMH, the aggression locusts,
is actually active during dominance mounting,
and you can stimulate mounting if you,
dominance mounting, if you weakly activate VMH,
whereas MPOA is most strongly activated
during sexual mounting, and that's always accompanied by the ultrasonic
vocalization.
So this shows how difficult and dangerous it can be to try to infer an animal state or
intent or emotion from the behavior that it's exhibiting, because the same behavior can
mean very different things, depending on the context of the interaction with the animal. And I would say even more so when that animal is a human or is multiple humans.
That's right. And there are many examples. Animals show chasing to obtain food,
a prey animal that they're going to kill and eat, and they show chasing to obtain a mate
that they're going to have sex with. And so the intent of the chasing is completely different.
And we don't know in all these cases whether there are separate circuits or common circuits
that are being activated.
I'm obsessed with dogs and dog breeds and et cetera, et cetera.
One thing I can tell you is that female dogs will mount and thrust.
We had a female pit bull mix, a very sweet dog, but in observing her, it convinced me that
one can never assume that male dogs are more aggressive than female dogs.
There's a, it turns out in talking to people who are quite skilled at dog genetics and
dog breeding, that there is a dominance hierarchy
within a litter and it crosses over male-female delineations. So you can get a female in the
litter that's very dominant in a male that's very subordinate and no one really knows what
relates to this is also why little dogs sometimes will get right up in the face of a big
doberman pincher and just start barking, which is an idiotic thing for it to do,
but they can be dominant over a much larger dog.
Very strange.
To me, anyway, female female mounting.
Do you observe it in mice?
Are there known circuits?
And what evokes female female mounting?
Or female to male mounting if it occurs?
Good.
Yes, there is female.
There are clear examples of females
displaying male type mounting behavior
towards other females.
We see this most commonly in the lab
where we are housing females with their sisters, say,
three or four in a cage.
We take one out and we have her mate with a male, where the
male is doing the mounting.
Now we take that female and we put her back in the cage with her litter mates and she starts
mounting them.
Now, what the function of that is, if it has any function or what it means, what's driving
it, we don't know. But we do know that if we stimulate the neurons
of control mounting in males in the medial preoptic area,
if we stimulate that same population in females,
it evokes male type mounting towards either a male
or a female target.
In fact, we have a movie where we have a female that has just been mounted by a male or a female target. In fact, we have a movie where we have a female that has
just been mounted by a male. So the male's on top and she's underneath. And we stimulate
those, that region of MPOA in the female. And she crawls out from underneath the male
who has just mounted her, circles around behind him and climbs up on top of him and starts to try to mount him
and thrust at him.
That has a name online, it's called a switch.
Is that right?
Don't ask me how I know that.
Okay.
But it's a pretty, yeah.
It's a term that you hear.
You also hear the term topping from the bottom,
which it sounds like that is a literal topping from the bottom.
That's a more of a psychological phrase from what I hear.
I have friends that are educating me in this language,
mostly because I find this kind of neurobiological discussion
fascinating at some point, right?
We, I attempt in my mind to superimpose observations
from the online communities that I've told about
and asked about to this, but I should point out it's always dangerous. And in fact,
in a probably to make a one-to-one link, humans are, they maintain all the same neural circuitry
and pathways that we're talking about today and mice, but that forbrain does allow for context, et cetera. Yep. So what the function is of female mounting, I don't know, it could be a type of dominance
display.
It's hard to measure that because people haven't worked on female dominance hierarchies to
the same extent that they've worked on male dominance hierarchies, but it indicates that the circuits for male type mounting are there
in females, as early work from Catherine Doolock suggested some years ago. Fascinating.
I love that paper because as you pointed out for Chase, you know, for mounting behavior,
you know, we see it and we think one thing specifically. And after hearing this result, actually, I'm not a big fan of fight sports.
I watch them occasionally because friends are into them, but I've seen boxing matches,
MMA matches, where at the end of a round, if someone felt that they dominated, they
will do the unsportsman-like thing of thrusting on the back of the other person because
they get off almost like I dominated you. And I dominated you. And so mimicking sexual-like behavior,
but there's no reason to think that it's sexual,
but they're sending a message of dominance
is what implies.
I'd love to talk about something slightly
off from this circuitry,
but I think that's related to the circuitry at least
in some way, which is this structure
that I've always been fascinated by, and I can't figure out what the hell it's for. It seems to be involved in everything, which is the
P.A.G., the periacaductal gray, which is a little bit further back in the brain for people that
don't know. It's been studied in the context of pain. It's been studied in the context of the so-called
lordosis response, the receptivity or arching of the back of the female to receive intermission and mating from the male.
How should we think about P.A.G?
Clearly it can't be involved in everything.
I'm guessing it's at least as complex as some of these other regions that we've been talking about,
different types of neurons controlling different things.
But how does P.A.G play into this?
In particular, I want to know, is there some mechanism of
pain modulation in control during
fighting and or mating?
And the reason I ask is that while I'm not combat sports person years ago, I did a little
bit of martial arts and it always was impressive to me how little it hurt to get punched during
a fight and how much it hurt afterwards. Right? So there clearly is some endogenous pain control that then wears off and then you feel beat
up.
Or at least in my case, I felt beat up.
What's P.A.G. doing vis-a-vis pain and what's pain doing vis-a-vis these other behaviors?
Good.
Good.
So, I think of P.A.G. like an old-fashioned telephone switchboard,
where there are calls coming in,
and then the cables have to be punched into the right hole to get the information
to be routed to the right recipient on the other end of it.
Because pretty much every type of innate behavior you can think of has had the Pag implicated.
And there's a whole literature showing the involvement of the Pag in fear, different regions of the Pag.
The dorsal Pag is involved in panic-like behavior, running away.
The ventral Pag is involved in freezing behavior, both the MPOA and the MH
send projections to the Pag to different regions of the Pag.
So in cross-section, I hate to say this, but in cross-section,
the Pag kind of looks like the water in a toilet when you're standing over an open toilet bowl.
And if you imagine a clock face projected onto that, it's like
the Pag has sectors from one to 12, maybe even more of them, and in each of those sectors,
you find different neurons from the hypothalamus are projecting. So could turn out that there is a
topographic arrangement along the dorsal ventral axis of the peg and
the medilateral axis of the peg that determines the type of behavior that will be emitted when
neurons in that region are stimulated.
I think sort of all of the evidence is pointing in that direction, but by no means has it been
mapped out.
Now the thing that you mentioned about it not hurting
when you got beat up during martial arts,
there is a well-known phenomenon called
fear-induced analgesia, where when an animal is
in a high state of fear, like if it's trying to defend itself,
there is a suppression of pain responses.
And I'm not sure completely about the mechanisms and how well that's understood, but for example,
the adrenal gland has a peptide in it that is released from the adrenal medulla, which controls the fight or flight responses,
and that peptide has analgesic activities.
Now, whether it's called bovine,
adrenal medullary peptide of 22 amino acid residues.
And I only know about it because it activates a receptor
that we discovered many years ago that's involved in pain, and
we thought it promoted pain, but it turns out that this actually inhibits pain.
It's like an endogenous analgesic.
Whether this is happening, this type of analgesia is happening when an animal is engaged
in offensive aggression, or in mating behavior, I don't know, but it certainly is possible.
And I don't know whether these analgesic mechanisms are happening in the Pag. They could also be
happening a little further down in the spinal cord. The Pag is really continuous with the spinal
cord. If you just follow it down towards the tail of an animal, you will wind up in the spinal cord. If you just follow it down towards the tail of an animal,
you will wind up in the spinal cord.
And so it could be that there are influences acting
at many levels on pain in the Pag
and in the spinal cord as well.
And it may well be known, I just don't know it.
I want to distinguish clearly between things
that are not known, that I know are unknown,
which is in a fairly small area where I have expertise from things that may be known,
but I'm ignorant of them because I just don't have a broad enough knowledge base to know that.
Sure. We appreciate those delineations.
Thank you. I think the description of it is an old fashioned telephone switchboard.
Now every time I look into the toilet, I'll think about the pariahquadacle. Great. Every
time I see an image of pariahquadacle, I think about a toilet. That is an excellent description
because I, in fact, I drew a circle with a little thing at the bottom and I'll put a post
or link to a picture of P.A.G. and you'll understand why David and I are chuckling here because indeed it looks like a toilet when staring into a toilet.
Tell us about tacky-kindin. I've talked about this a couple times on different podcast episodes
because of its relationship to social isolation. And in part because the podcast was launched
during a time when there was more socialized solution,
my understanding is that tacky-kindin,
and you'll tell us what it is in a moment,
is present in flies and mice and in humans,
and may do similar things in those species.
That's right.
So tacky-kindin refers to a family of related neuropeptides.
So these are brain chemicals.
They're different from dopamine and serotonin in that they're not small organic molecules.
They're actually short pieces of protein that are directly encoded by genes that are
active in specific neurons and not in others. And when those neurons are active, those neuropeptides are released together with classical
transmitters like glutamate, whatever.
Tachykindins have been famously implicated in pain, particularly tachykindin-1, which
is called substance-P, one of the original pain modulating.
This is something that promotes inflammatory pain.
But there are other tacky kinens, in mice there are two, in humans I think there are three,
and in Grasophila there is one.
And the way we got into tacky kinens is from studying aggression in flies.
We thought since neuropeptides have this remarkable parallel evolutionary conservation of structure
and function like neuropeptide, why controls feeding in worms, in flies, and mice, and
in people.
Oxytocin-like peptides control reproduction in worms, and mice, and in people. Oxytocin-like peptides control reproduction in worms and mice and in people.
We thought we might find peptides that control aggression in flies and in people.
And so we did a screen, unbiased screen of peptides and found indeed that one of the tacky
kinens, Drosophila tacky kinens, those neurons when you activate them strongly
promote aggression, and it depends on the release of tacky kinens.
Now the interesting thing is that in flies, just like in people and practically any other
social animal that shows aggression, social isolation increases aggressiveness.
So putting a violent prisoner in solitary confinement is absolutely the worst most counterproductive
thing you could do to them.
And indeed, we found in flies that social isolation increases the level of tacky kind
in the brain.
And if we shut that gene down, it prevents the isolation from increasing aggression.
So since my lab also works on mice,
it was natural to see whether tacky kinens
might be upregulated in social isolation
and whether they play a role in aggression.
And this is work done by a former post-doc,
Moriel Zelakowski, now at University of Salt Lake City,
in Utah, and she found remarkably that when mice are socially isolated
for two weeks, there is this massive upregulation
of tacky kind in two in their brain.
In fact, if you tag the peptide with a green fluorescent
protein from a jellyfish genetically,
the brain looks green when the mice are socially isolated,
because there's so much of this stuff released.
And she went on to show that that increase in tacky
kindin' is responsible for the effect of social isolation
to increase aggressiveness and to increase fear
and to increase anxiety.
And in fact, there are drugs that block the receptor to increase aggressiveness and to increase fear and to increase anxiety.
And in fact, there are drugs that block the receptor for tacky kindin, which were tested
in humans and abandoned because they had no efficacy in the tests that they were analyzed
for.
If you give those drugs to a socially isolated mouse, it blocks all of the effects of social isolation.
It blocks the aggression, it blocks the increased fear, and the increased anxiety.
And that Moriel described it, the mice just look chill.
It's not a sedative, which is really important.
It's not that the mice are going to sleep.
Most remarkably, is once you socially isolate a mouse and it becomes aggressive, you can never put it back in its cage with its brothers from its litter because it will kill them all overnight.
But if you give it this drug, which is called osanatant, that blocks tacky kind into, that mouse can be returned to the cage with its brothers and will not attack them
and seems to be happy about that for the rest of the time. So this is an incredibly powerful
effect of this drug, and I've been really interested in trying to get pharmaceutical companies
to test this drug, which has a really good safety profile in humans,
in testing it in people who are subjected to social isolation stress or
bereavement stress. And this is one of the areas where I learned an eye-opening
lesson as a basic scientist who naively thought that if you make a discovery
and it has translational
applications to humans, that pharmaceutical companies are going to be falling all over
themselves to try it.
And they are not interested because once burned twice shy, these drugs were tested for efficacy
in schizophrenia.
I have no idea why.
There's very little preclinical data to suggest
that. Not surprisingly, they failed. When a drug fails in clinical trials in Phase 3, it costs
$100 million to the company that carried out that clinical trial. So there's a huge slag heap of discarded pharmaceuticals,
many of them inhibitors of neuropeptide action
that could be useful in other indications,
such as the one we discovered,
but there's a huge economic disincentive
for pharmaceutical companies to test them again
because the conclusion that they drew
from all these failed tests,
particularly in the 2010s and before that,
is that the reason they failed
is because animal experiments with drugs
don't predict how humans will respond to the drugs.
And therefore, we shouldn't try to extrapolate
from any other data that we get from animal experiments,
mouse or rat experiments to humans,
because they'll lead us down the wrong track.
And I think that that is probably wrong.
In some cases, it may be right,
but in other cases, there's good reason to think
because these brain regions and molecules
are so evolutionarily conserved that they ought to be playing a similar role in humans.
In fact, there is a paper showing that in humans that have borderline personality disorder,
there's a strong correlation between their self-reported level
of aggressiveness and serum levels of attacky-kindin, in this case, attacky-kindin one,
as detected by radioamuno assay. This is work of Emma Emmel Cocaro, who's a clinical psychiatrist
at the University of Chicago. So there is a smoking gun in the case of humans as well. And I was actually
trying to interest a pharmaceutical company that was testing these drugs, actually for
treatment of hot flashes in females in humans where there is actually good animal data
to think that it might be useful. But I realized that this clinical trial was going on during the COVID pandemic.
And I approached him and said, look, nature may have actually done for you the experiment
that I want you to do.
Because some of the people who are getting drug or placebo are going to have been socially
isolated.
And some of them will have not.
Why don't you get them to fill out questionnaires and see whether the ones who are given the
drug and socially isolated felt less stressed and less anxious than the ones who are not
socially isolated, and they would not touch it, because they're in the middle of a clinical
trial for a different indication for this drug, and they have to report any observation
that they make about that drug in their patient population.
So if they were to ask these questions
and get an unfavorable answer,
oh my God, I felt even worse when I took this drug,
and I was isolated,
they would be obliged to report that to the FDA,
and that could torpedo the chances for
the drug being approved in the thing that it was in clinical trials for.
So it's better not to ask and not to know, and then it is to try to find out more information
that could lead to another clinical indication.
So I remain convinced that this family of drugs could have very powerful uses in treating
some forms of stress-induced anxiety or aggressiveness in humans, but it's just very difficult for
economic reasons to find a way to get somebody to test that.
Yeah, a true shame that these companies won't do this, and especially given the fact that many
of these drugs exist and their safety profiles are established, because that's always a serious
consideration when embarking on a clinical trial.
Perhaps in hearing this discussion, someone out there will understand the key importance
of this and will reach out to us, will provide ways to do that to get such a study going in humans.
Because I think of enough laboratories
ran small scale clinical trials.
Farmer certainly would perk up their ears, right?
I mean, they're so strategic sometimes to their own.
I mean, I would just, I would like to say also,
I'd like to see this tested on pets.
I mean, there's a huge number of pets right now that are suffering separation anxiety because
humans bought them to keep them company during the COVID pandemic.
And now they're home alone.
And now they're home alone, okay?
And if this thing works in mice, there's certainly a higher chance it's going to work in dogs
or in cats than it is going to work in humans.
And if it did, that would be even more encouragement
to continue along those lines.
People sometimes forget that although we work on animals
and we ultimately want to understand humans,
we care about how our results apply to the welfare of animals
as well, and particularly domestic pets,
which is a billion, multi-billion dollar industry
in this country.
So if there is ways that they can be made to feel better when they're separated from their
owners, that would certainly be a good thing.
Absolutely.
We will put out the call.
We are putting out the call.
And I know for sure there will be a response.
Just underscoring what we've been talking about even more every time we hear
about a school shooting like in Texas recently or I happen to be in New York during the
time when there was a subway shooting.
For whatever reason I listened to the book about Columbine that went into a very detailed
way about the origin of those boys and that committed that and every single time
there's the
person who commits those acts is socially isolated as far as I know there might be some exceptions there and
sometimes this crosses over with other mental health issues, but sometimes no no apparent mental health issues
So social isolation clearly drives powerful neurochemical and neurobiological
changes. I really hope that tacky kind in one and two, those are the main ones in humans
will be explored in more detail. Also, I didn't know that tacky kind in one is substance
P and substance P is tacky kind in one.
Yes. The tacky kind in one is the gene name and tacky kind in two in humans is called
neurokindin B. That's the name of the
protein. I just refer to it by the gene name because it makes it easier, and I don't have
to keep remembering two names for each thing.
And if I'm not mistaken, you see, you put yourself in the company of geneticists because
of your original training was in genetics, immunology, and areas that were linked to that.
It was in cell biology, and I didn't actually have formal training in genetics as a graduate
student, but I think I'm a geneticist at heart.
That's just the way I like to think about things.
When I started working on flies, that sort of, I came out of the closet as a geneticist,
as it were.
Wonderful.
As long as we're talking about humans, I'd love to get your thoughts about human studies of emotion. I know you wrote this book with Ralph Adolfs. You have this new book,
which we'll provide a link to, which I've read front to back twice. It's phenomenal. I mentioned
it before on the podcast. It's really, there are books that are worth reading and then there are
books that are important. And I think this book is truly important for the general population to
read and understand and neuroscientists should read and understand the contents because we, as a culture, are way off in terms of how
we think about emotions and states and behaviors. So we'll put a link to that. It's really worth
the time and energy to read it. And it's written beautifully, I should say, very accessible
even for non-scientists. There's a heat map diagram in that book that I think about.
This is a heat map diagram of subjective reports that people gave of where they experience
an emotion or a feeling, a somatic feeling in their body or in their head or both when
they are angry, sad, calm, lonely, etc., etc.
And I wouldn't want people to think that those heat maps
were generated by any physiological measurement
because they were not.
And yet, I don't think we can have a discussion
about emotions and states and the sorts of behaviors
that we're talking about today without thinking about the body also.
And I'm not coming to this as a Northern California mind body.
I've been to Esteline once.
I didn't go in the baths.
I went there.
I gave a talk and I left.
It is very beautiful.
If anyone wants to know what it looks like,
I think that final scene of mad men is shot at Esteline.
It's a very beautiful place.
And yet, mind body is a, to me,
is a neurobiological construct
because the nervous system extends through the,
out of the cranial vault and into the spinal cord
and body and back and forth.
Okay.
How should we think about the body
and in terms of states?
And at some point, I'd love for you to comment
on that heat map experiment
because it does seem that there's some regularity
as to where people experience emotions. When people are in a rage a rage for instance they seem to feel it both in their gut and in their head it seems
on average and
people love to extrapolate to gut intuition or that the you know the chakras or angri is in the stomach and this goes to eastern medicine et cetera
in the stomach and this goes to Eastern medicine, et cetera. How should we think about mind-body in the context of states
and think about it as scientists, maybe even as neuroscientists
or geneticists?
Good.
So, for the answer to the first question
about the heat maps and people associating certain parts
of their body with certain emotional feelings,
this goes back to something called the somatic marker
hypothesis that was proposed by Antonio Demasio,
who is a neurologist at USC,
the idea that our subjective feeling of a particular emotion
is in part associated with a sensation of something happening in a particular part of our body.
The gut, the heart, I don't see the liver invoked very much in emotional characterization.
But goal and the goal bladder, somebody having a lot of goal, I don't know why I make a fist when
I say that, but I'm guessing the gall bladder is shaped like a fist.
That's right.
And if there is a physiology underlying these heat maps,
it could reflect increased blood flow
to these different structures.
And that in turn reflects what you were talking about
that is emotion is definitely involves communication
between the brain and the body,
and it's bi-directional communication, and it's mediated by the peripheral nervous system,
the sympathetic and the parasympathetic nervous system, which control heart rate, for example,
blood vessel, blood pressure, and those neurons receive input from the hypothalamus and
other brain regions, central brain regions that control their activity.
And when the brain is put in a particular state, it activates sympathetic and parasympathetic
neurons, which have effects on the heart and on blood pressure.
These in turn feed back onto the brain through the sensory system.
A large part of this bidirectional communication is also mediated through the vagus nerve,
which many of your listeners and viewers may have heard about because it's become a topic of intense activity now.
People have known for a long time.
So the vagus nerve is a bundle of nerve fibers that comes out basically of your skull,
out of the central nervous system, and then sends fibers in to your heart, your gut, all sorts
of visceral organs.
So when you have us, and that information is both used the words earlier in our discussion,
afferent and efferent.
So the vagal fibers sense things that are happening in the body.
So when you're, the reason you feel your stomach hide up in knots,
if your tense, is that those vagal fibers are sensing the contraction of the gut muscles.
And they're also afference, which means that information coming out of the brain can influence those peripheral organs as well.
And there's work from a number of labs just in the last six months or so
where people are starting to decode the components of the different fibers
in the vagus nerve.
And it's amazing how much specificity is.
There are specific vagal nerves that go to the lung,
that control breathing responses, that go to the gut,
that go to other organs.
It's almost like a set of color-coded lines,
labeled lines for those things.
And now, how those vagal afferents play a role in the playing out of emotion states
is a fascinating question that people are just beginning to scrape the surface of. But I
think what's exciting now is that people are going to be developing tools that will allow
us to turn on or turn off specific subsets of fibers within the vagus nerve and ask how that affects particular
emotional behaviors. So you're absolutely right. This brain body connection is critical, not just
for the gut, but for the heart, for the lungs, for all kinds of other parts of your body,
and Darwin recognize that as well. And I think it's a central feature of emotion state.
And I think what underlies our subjective feelings
of an emotion.
Incredible.
David, I have to say as a true fan of the work that your lab
has been doing over so many decades.
And first of all, I was delighted when you stopped working
on stem cells, not because you weren't doing incredible work there, but because I saw a talk where you showed a movie of an octopus
spitting out or not spitting, but squirting out a bunch of ink and escaping, and you said
you were going to work on things of the sort that we're talking about today, fear, aggression,
mating behavior, social behaviors.
It's been incredible to see the work that your lab has done. I know I speak on behalf of a tremendous number of people and I say thank you for taking time out
of your important schedule to share with us what you've learned. My last question is a
simple one, which is will you come back and talk to us again in the future about the
additional work that's sure to come?
I would be happy to do that and I really have appreciated your questions.
They've all been right on the money.
You've hit all of the critical important issues in this field and you've uncovered what
is known, the little bit is known, and how much is not known.
And I think it's important to emphasize the unknown things because that's
what the next generation of neuroscientists has to solve. And so I hope this will help
to attract young people into this field because it's so important, particularly for our understanding
of mental illness and mental health and psychiatry. We've got to figure out how emotion systems are controlled in a
causal way if we ever want to improve the psychiatric treatments that we have now. And that's going to
require the next generation of people coming into the field. Absolutely. I second that. Well, thank you.
It's been a delight. Thank you. Great. Really appreciate it.
Thank you for joining me today for my discussion with Dr. David Anderson. Please also be sure to check
out his new book, The Nature of the Beast, How Emotions Guide Us. It's a truly masterful exploration
of the biology and psychology behind what we call emotions and states of mind and body.
If you're learning from Ender and join this podcast, please subscribe to our YouTube
channel. That's a simple zero-cost way to support us. Please also subscribe to the podcast on Spotify
and Apple, and on both Spotify and Apple, you have the opportunity to leave us up to a five-star
review. If you have questions or comments or suggestions about topics you'd like us to cover,
or guess you'd like us to interview on the Hubertman Lab podcast, please put those in the comment section on YouTube.
We do read all those comments and we do take them to heart.
Please also check out the sponsors mentioned at the beginning of today's podcast.
And check out Momentus Supplements, our new partners in the supplement space, and check out
Athletic Greens.
That's the best way to support this podcast.
If you're not already following us on social media, please do so.
We are Huberman Lab on Twitter and we are also Huberman Lab on Instagram, and both places
I cover science and science-related tools, some of which overlap with the content of the
Huberman Lab podcast, but much of which is unique from the content covered on the Huberman
Lab podcast.
Again, that's Huberman Lab on Instagram and Huberman Lab on Twitter.
Please also check out our neural network monthly newsletter.
This is a newsletter that has summaries of podcast episodes. It also includes a lot of actionable protocols.
It's very easy to sign up for the newsletter. You go to HubertmanLab.com, click on the
menu, go to newsletter, you supply your email, but we do not share your email with anybody.
We have a very clear and rigorous privacy policy, which is we do not share your email
with anybody. And the newsletter comes out once a month and it is completely zero cost.
Again, just go to HubermanLab.com and go to the Neural Network newsletter.
I'd also like to point out that the HubermanLab podcast has a clips channel.
So these are brief clips anywhere from three to 10 minutes that encompass single concepts
and actionable protocols related to sleep to focus, interviews with various
guests. We talk about things like caffeine, when to drink caffeine relative to sleep, alcohol,
when and how, and if anyone should ingest it relative to sleep, dopamine, serotonin,
mental health, physical health, and on and on, all the things that relate to the topics most
of interest to you. You can find that easily by going to YouTube. Look for Huberman Lab clips in the search area, and it will take you there to subscribe, and we are constantly
updating those with new clips. This is especially useful, I believe, for people that have missed
some of the earlier episodes, or you're still working through the Batcad log of Huberman
Lab podcasts, which admittedly can be rather long.
And last, but certainly not least, thank you for your interest in science.
not least thank you for your interest in science.