Huberman Lab - Dr. Natalie Crawford: Female Hormone Health, Fertility & Vitality
Episode Date: November 13, 2023In this episode, my guest is Natalie Crawford, MD, a double board-certified physician specializing in obstetrics and gynecology, fertility and reproductive health and host of the “As a Woman” podc...ast. We discuss female hormones, nutrition, supplementation, reproductive health, and fertility, including how the timing and duration of puberty impact a woman’s long-term hormone cycles and menopause. We also discuss the pros and cons of various birth control methods and how hormonal vs. non-hormonal birth control each affects fertility. We cover the factors that impact egg and sperm quality and how to leverage timing for conception. We also discuss procedures to assess female fertility, including egg count and hormone testing, the process of egg freezing, in vitro fertilization (IVF) and other reproductive options. This episode represents fairly comprehensive coverage of female hormones and reproductive health, highlighting important tests and screening, behavioral, nutritional, supplement and prescription-based tools that women of any age can use to improve their fertility, hormone function and overall health. For the full show notes, please visit hubermanlab.com. Thank you to our sponsors AG1: https://drinkag1.com/huberman Maui Nui: https://mauinuivenison.com/huberman Helix Sleep: https://helixsleep.com/huberman InsideTracker: https://insidetracker.com/huberman Momentous: https://www.livemomentous.com/huberman Timestamps (00:00:00) Dr. Natalie Crawford (00:01:40) Sponsors: Maui Nui Venison & Helix Sleep; The Brain Body Contract (00:04:59) Female Puberty & Growth Characteristics, Height (00:13:27) Eggs & Ovulation, Harvesting Eggs, In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) (00:17:31) Endocrine Disruptors, Fetal Development (00:21:39) Lavender, Tea Tree & Evening Primrose Oils, Scents, Diapers (00:25:13) Breast Milk vs. Formula & Fertility (00:26:04) Menstruation Cycle & Hormones, Timing (00:34:08) Sponsor: AG1 (00:35:59) Estrogen, Progesterone & Menstrual Cycle (00:38:08) Hormonal Birth Control & Ovarian Reserve, AMH Testing, Fertility (00:42:42) Spermatogenesis & Testosterone; Heat: Ovaries vs Testes (00:46:11) Period & Pregnancy, Conception Window (00:48:56) Estrogen, Libido & Ovulation; Mittelschmerz (00:51:33) Tool: Intercourse Timing & Conception; Artificial Insemination, IVF (00:55:03) Egg/Sperm Quality, Cigarettes, Vaping, Cannabis & Alcohol (01:02:20) Sponsor: InsideTracker (01:03:29) Intrauterine Device (IUD), Depo-Provera & Fertility (01:10:00) Birth Control Risks & Benefits, Cancers, Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) (01:19:39) Blood Clotting & Birth Control Pill; Health Screening (01:24:50) Tool: AMH Testing, Ovarian Reserve, Antral Follicle Count Ultrasound (01:29:55) IVF, In Vitro Maturation (IVM); Early Ovarian Reserve Screening (01:35:40) Tools: Egg Freezing, IVF; Age & Egg Quality (01:43:37) Egg Freezing & IVF Procedures, Maternal Age, Success Rates (01:51:30) Tool: Sperm Freezing & Paternal Age, Vasectomy (01:55:01) Hormones, Egg Freezing & IVF (02:00:42) Three-Parent IVF, Mitochondrial DNA (02:05:21) IVF Embryo Storage & Donation; Donor Education & Consent (02:14:29) Autism, Developmental Disorders, IVF Babies, Age (02:20:36) Tools: Sleep, Nutrition & Fertility; Dietary Fat (02:27:32) Protein, Meat, Tofu, Fish; Sugar, Artificial Sweeteners; Weight & Miscarriage (02:37:38) Tools: Supplements; Prenatal Vitamins, Omega 3s, Vitamin D, Coenzyme Q10 (02:42:26) L-Carnitine & Male Fertility; PCOS & Myo-inositol; Metformin (02:47:11) Egg Retrieval, Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome, Minimal Stimulation (02:57:56) INVOcell (03:03:12) Egg Freezing, Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI), Sperm Fragmentation (03:11:45) Genetic Testing, IVF Transfer & Success Rate, Embryo Banking (03:15:10) Menopause (03:19:47) Hormone Replacement Therapy & Menopause (03:22:25) Early-signs of Menopause (03:25:18) Zero-Cost Support, Spotify & Apple Reviews, Sponsors, YouTube Feedback, Momentous, Social Media, Neural Network Newsletter Disclaimer
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome to the Uberman Lab podcast where we discuss science and science-based tools for everyday life.
I'm Andrew Uberman and I'm a professor of neurobiology and
Ophthalmology at Stanford School of Medicine. My guest today is Dr. Natalie Crawford. Dr. Natalie Crawford is a medical doctor
specializing in obstetrics and gynecology,
reproductive endocrinology, and infertility.
She also holds a degree in nutrition science.
Dr. Crawford runs a clinical practice, seeing patients daily,
as well as being actively involved in public education,
both through social media and through her popular podcast entitled As A Woman.
Today, Dr. Crawford teaches us about all aspects of female hormones and hormone health and fertility, beginning as far
back as in utero, when we were still in our mother's womb, and extending as far forward
as menopause.
We discuss topics such as the timing of puberty and what the timing of puberty in girls
means for their fertility, and we discuss birth control, both hormonal and non-hormonal
forms of birth control, and how birth control may or may not relate to long-term fertility and different aspects of female health. We also talk extensively about measuring
fertility, that is, egg count. We also talk about egg retrieval, aka freezing ones eggs,
as well as in vitro fertilization. And we also take a deep dive into the popular and important
topics of nutrition and supplementation as they relate to fertility, as they relate to pregnancy,
but also how they relate to female hormone health generally.
Indeed, Dr. Crawford provides us with a master class on female hormones and fertility,
one that I know that all women ought to benefit from and that men would benefit from listening
to as well.
Before we begin, I'd like to emphasize that this podcast is separate from my teaching
and research roles at Stanford.
It is, however, part of my desire and effort to bring zero cost to consumer information about science and science-related tools to the general public.
In keeping with that theme, I'd like to thank the sponsors of today's podcast.
Our first sponsor is Maui Newi Venison.
Maui Newi Venison is the most nutrient-dense and delicious red meat available.
I've spoken before on this podcast in solo episodes and with guests about the need to get
approximately one gram of high quality protein per pound of body weight each day for optimal
nutrition.
There are many different ways that one can do that, but a key thing is to make sure
that you're not doing that by ingesting excessive calories.
Maui New Eventusin has the highest density of quality protein per calorie, and it achieves
that in delicious things like ground meats, venison steaks, jerky, and bone broth.
I particularly like the ground venison.
I make those into venison burgers probably five times a week or more.
I also like the jerky for its convenience, especially when I'm traveling or I'm especially
busy with work, and know that I'm getting an extremely nutrient dense high quality
source of protein. If you'd like to try Maui Newi Venison, you can go to MauiNewEvenison.com-slaeshuberman
and get 20% off your first order. Again, that's MauiNewEvenison.com-slaeshuberman to get 20% off.
Today's episode is also brought to us by Helix sleep.
Helix sleep makes mattresses and pillows that are tailored to your unique sleep needs.
Now sleep is the foundation of mental health physical health and performance.
When we are sleeping well and enough mental health physical health and
performance all stand to be at their best. One of the key things to getting a
great night sleep is to make sure that your mattress is tailored to your unique
sleep needs.
Helix Sleep has a brief two-minute quiz that if you go to their website, you take that quiz
and answer questions such as, do you tend to sleep on your back, your side, your stomach,
do you tend to run hot or cold in the middle of the night, maybe you don't know the answers
to those questions, and that's fine.
At the end of that two-minute quiz, they will match you to a mattress that's ideal for your
sleep needs.
I sleep on the dusk of the USK mattress, and when I started sleeping on a dusk mattress
about two years ago, my sleep immediately improved.
So if you're interested in upgrading your mattress, go to helixleap.com slash huberman.
Take their two minute sleep quiz and they'll match you to a customized mattress for you,
and you'll get up to $350 off any mattress order and two free pillows.
Again, if interested, go to helixleap.com slash huberman for up to $350 off any mattress order and two free pillows. Again, if interested, go to helixleap.com slash
huberman for up to $350 off and two free pillows.
I'm pleased to announce that we will be hosting
four live events in Australia,
each of which is entitled The Brain Body Contract,
during which I will share science and science related tools
for mental health, physical health, and performance.
There will also be a live question and answer session.
We have limited tickets still available for the event in Melbourne on February 10th,
as well as the event in Brisbane on February 24th.
Our event in Sydney at the Sydney Opera House sold out very quickly,
so as a consequence, we've now scheduled a second event in Sydney
at the Aware Super Theater on February 18th.
To access tickets to any of these events, you can go to HubermanLab.com slash events and
use the code Huberman at checkout.
I hope to see you there, and as always, thank you for your interest in science.
And now for my discussion with Dr. Natalie Crawford.
Dr. Crawford, welcome.
Thank you so much for having me.
I'm honored to be here.
Well, I've been paying attention to your content
for a long time, and I find it to be incredibly clear,
informative, and for many people actionable.
So today, I'd like to talk about both fertility
and of course hormones, but as we both know,
fertility is not limited to a discussion about hormones,
and actually relates to things like behaviors, sex behaviors, end-other behaviors, nutrition, supplementation. So we'll get into all of it. But
if we could just back up developmentally and talk a little bit about female puberty,
because I think pretty much everything we'll talk about today is related to what happens
puberty forward, mostly in females, but we will also discuss male fertility and hormones a bit.
And the question I have is, is there anything about a woman's timing or, let's just say, patterns of puberty, right?
How frequently they menstruate early on, what the timing of menstruation is in terms of their age, etc.
That provides hints or maybe even facts or directives about her future fertility or how long
her fertility might last.
This is a great question and I think defining some terminology before we begin is helpful.
So if we go all the way back to when you're a fetus
inside your mom.
So when there's a female fetus inside your mom,
you have the most eggs you're ever going to have
at about 20 weeks gestation.
You have about six to seven million eggs.
By the time you're born, you've already lost
more than half of those.
And you continually lose eggs all the time.
So the analogy that I always use and you do too,
is imagining that there's a vault inside the ovary
where all your eggs are kept,
and every single month, since the moment you have an ovary,
you lose a group of these eggs.
And when there's more inside, you're losing more.
So you're losing all of these eggs
throughout early fetal development,
and then up until the time period, even of puberty. When you reach puberty,
you have a lessening of the number of eggs in your ovary to the point where it can start to respond
to the signals from the brain. So we think about puberty on certain females. First, we have
really thealarchy, which is the development of breasts. So that happens about two years on average
before you have minarchy, which is your period starting.
So what happens is the brain, as we know from the hypothalamus since our GNRH, and then
we have FSH coming out, which really starts to stimulate those follicles.
So FSH or follicle stimulating hormone, well-named hormone for the female, of course men have
it too, and it's less well-named for them.
But it starts to get
those follicles which house the eggs to grow and make estrogen. Women have about two years of
estrogen exposure alone, so unopposed estrogen, with no progesterone because they're not yet
ovulating. And that's when you start to see breast budding, and you start to see the development of
some of those secondary sex characteristics before you actually have a period.
What are some of the other secondary sex
characteristics that precede menarchy?
So you said breast bud development
and then breast development on average
about two years before.
About a few years before, you have sexual hair development.
So actually, Adrenalic E is one of the first,
usually comes right before at the same time with breast bud.
So two to three years before you'll see your period.
So, genital hair underarm hair typically. Yeah two to three years before you'll see your period.
And then-
So a general hair underarm hair, typically.
Exactly, yeah, general hair usually first
and then underarm hair.
And we're getting right down into the weeds here,
which is good.
A goal of this podcast is to normalize all aspects of health,
including sexual health and reproductive health.
Is that commensurate also with the development of body odor, you know, because as a young boy who
eventually hit puberty and became a young man and now I suppose I'm in middle age 48,
I can tell you that the locker room smelled a lot different before and after middle school,
right? Right. Like the, in other words, boys start to smell stinky. Um, right?
They do. Yes. And that's usually around that same time of sexual hair development is when
you start to have those glands around the hair and making some of those odors that start
to produce stink. Do they reflect hormones themselves? Not this, like, the smell, the actual
smell doesn't actually reflect levels of hormones or anything like that.
It is just that your body, your gonads, whether it is testes or ovaries are now starting to respond
to those brain signals. The brain is turned on. They're starting to respond in your body,
starting to mature in a way to get to the point where it can support reproduction.
The reason I ask that question is not to get people thinking about stinky smells, but
The reason I ask that question is not to get people thinking about stinky smells, but and by the way, some people love the musty smell of their own,
but arm cancer, others, you know, we're referring to adults, by the way,
but the reason I ask is that there's a wealth of data in animal models,
including non-human primates, suggesting that exposure to the odors of others can either stimulate or accelerate
puberty.
Is there any evidence for that in humans?
So there's mild evidence, and it's murky because we also know that anything that could
be an endocrine disruptor, which a lot of sense or fragrances are are also can accelerate the onset of puberty
by disrupting part of this system.
And so we know that toxins and, you know,
scents and a lot of the world that we're exposed to
is part of the reason why we're seeing puberty
having such a younger age now in females,
specifically, but in both, but in females
than we have before.
We have young girls seeing their onset of menarchia
their period at a much younger age.
How much younger?
I've seen the various graphs for different countries,
but can we say that 10 years ago on average,
girls in the United States and Northern Europe
were hitting menarchia at about 12 to 13 years old?
Yeah, so we'll use menarchia for the purpose of this. So having your period, 10 to 13 years old. Yeah, so we'll use Menarchy for the purpose of this.
So having your period, you know, 10 to 20 years ago,
you will see most data would say,
oh, 13 to 15 would have been kind of the average age.
And now we're really seeing it shift
to be starting at 10 to 11 and completing by 13, 14.
So most girls are definitely going through
the puberty change earlier.
The other thing to note is that most girls get their final
high growth right before they start their period too.
So not only are we seeing a change in this getting starting earlier,
what we're also seeing is probably some reduction in height
from having gone through puberty at an earlier process,
because once you start actually menstruating,
once the ovaries have really started to learn how to respond
to that FSH and grow the follicle,
and it gets to the point where you can start ovulating.
So about two years later,
then that ovulatory period,
those high levels of estrogen are going to go
and they're going to close those growth plates.
So you've really started to limit your final adult height
as well when you go through puberty earlier.
And that's definitely something that's a huge concern
for percocious puberty or very young puberty, right?
And we can use blockers when there are children
who start to exhibit signs of puberty.
And one of the main reasons people do that
is to try to get them to a greater adult height
if they're really starting to go through puberty at a very young age.
Is that also true for males?
That is happening earlier.
Yeah, earlier puberty means that your growth spurt, in terms of height, is going to be truncated.
Not the same.
And you probably most men will say, oh, but I had my growths for, you know, kind of after I started having some
of the puberty change that happened,
but because it is this estrogen related process
and women that we see that growths for really your final
height is within that year of when your period starts.
Interesting.
Yeah, this discussion is certainly not about me,
but I was one of these, but I thought it was kind of an odd duck.
I hit puberty about 13, 14.
Let's just say I knew I did, but I didn't shave until I was after college. My growth spurt between freshman and sophomore year, I grew up foot.
Right.
So I was like, you know, grow full foot, but I was the same weight.
So I was like real tall, real skinny or pre tall, you know, real skinny.
And then it seems like, you know, some people in my life would argue that puberty
is still occurring for me, but it feels like it's know, some people in my life would argue that puberty is still occurring for me.
It feels like it's very long and protracted,
which leads me to a very specific question.
If puberty arrives, let's, again,
defined as menarchy for sake of our discussion right now,
if puberty arrives early in a girl,
does that mean that her fertility will shut down
earlier as well?
Very question, it does not. So the age of which you start the onset of your period Does that mean that her fertility will shut down earlier as well? Great question.
It does not.
So the age of which you start the onset of your period does not impact how long you're
going to have a reproductive lifespan.
And that's because you have the eggs inside that vault.
You're losing them every month no matter what.
So you lost them all those years before your period started no matter if your period came
at 10 or at 15.
It's just about when did they start allowing your body to ovulate,
determined by being able to carry a baby, your body nothing so you can be pregnant.
I think this is so important to highlight because it puts together what you said earlier about the loss of eggs even as a fetus.
I think most people
sort of assume that the reduction in egg count is due to ovulation,
and the fact that, you know, one egg ovulates typically, but that other eggs are deployed
in that ovulatory cycle, and then those those basically are taken out of the vault and
out of the opportunity for fertilization. But what you're saying is that the eggs are
constantly being called from the vault, starting from early embryonic development,
and that ovulation is a distinct step in some sense unrelated to the loss of eggs.
I think this is going to be very important for our discussion later about
potential egg harvest, because I think some people have it in mind.
The long misconceptions that you're losing eggs from your fault.
And that's not the case.
You're just accessing the ones outside.
So you're not, so we can just answer this now, perhaps.
It seems, if I understand correctly, that if one were to harvest eggs for IVF or for embryogenesis
in addition to a set of them aside later or freeze them for later. If they want to use them,
XOR or fertilized embryos, that one is not reducing their total number of eggs any more
than they would, how they just let their cycles proceed naturally.
Exactly.
That's such an important point. I think a lot of people believe the opposite.
That's probably the number one thing that patients fear when they come talk to me about egg freezing
or going through IVF is
I don't want to harm my future fertility. I don't want to cause myself to run out of eggs earlier or going to menopause earlier.
And it's explaining this process to them that your ovaries are on a pathway that you can't change.
Those eggs are coming out of the vault regardless of if you're on birth control pills, you're pregnant, we do IVF. What it were modifying is one's not going to ovulate and have the rest of them die.
We're going to try to give you medication to get them all to grow so we can take all
of the ones that have been released from the vault that month and give them a chance
for later. And the next month, you'll have another group come out.
So IVF is not about stimulating hyper-release or excessive release of eggs.
It's about stimulating the growth of the ones that have been released so that they can
be frozen as stage either for later fertilization or fertilizing addition than frozen as embryos.
Is that right?
Exactly.
And we just use the hormones that your body normally makes in a different way.
The medications we use are FSH and LH to get the eggs to grow.
So people
will say, I don't want to take all these weird hormones or strange medications, but we're
just manipulating that normal process that happens in the natural menstrual cycle in order
to say, hey, this month, let's get all these eggs to grow. Let's try to improve the efficiency
of finding which eggs are going to be normal or not and help you along this process.
I think a good number of people are now going to head to the IVF clinic.
I think that, again, I really want to highlight this.
I think most people that I've spoken to assume that the process of harvesting eggs for freezing
for fertilization then or later is going to diminish their fertility because they're basically
pulling more out of the savings account, so to speak.
Right.
You're making the withdrawal no matter what.
Well, such an important point for people to know and propagate.
Getting back to puberty a little bit later on, I wanted to get into endocrine disruptors
and things of that sort.
But since you brought it up, I've heard things such as, okay, things like evening primrose
oil. If mom is putting evening primrose oil on her, has it in her shampoo that I've heard of
young males getting precocious breast bud development.
Keep in mind, folks, that some transient breast bud development is characteristic of some
normal puberty in males.
It sometimes shows up and goes, I knew some kids like that in the neighborhood.
They got teased a little bit and then they stopped getting teased.
Hopefully nowadays they don't tease those kids.
But when I was growing up, those kids got teased, not by me, but by other people.
But it was normal and it passed for some, right?
It occurred normally and then passed.
But I've heard that things like exposure to evening primrose oil, maybe even just through
contact with mom, can increase the frequency or degree of that
male breast-bud development.
Is it also true that young girls can undergo precocious puberty or, let's just say, accelerate
or exacerbated puberty through contact with things like evening primrose oil, which
is, I think, has some pseudo-estrogen-like properties?
It's important to differentiate that the secondary sex characteristics
we see like breastbed development are from estrogen,
but it's not really puberty being initiated
when it's from an endocrine disrupting chemical.
So taking, you know, being exposed to evening primrose
or lavender or tea tree oil in a male
isn't going to cause them to start to go into puberty,
but it is going to expose him to estrogen when his body is not,
and therefore stimulate some breastbed development.
Same thing can happen in young girls,
meaning they could show some of those secondary sex signs
earlier than they normally would.
And this is why, if that's happening at a really young age,
kids should go to a pediatric endocrinologist
who are going to check things like bone age and see if you've really started the puberty process or not,
or is it an outside exposure, which is causing it?
Interestingly, about the young child exposure and development, the other thing to say that's
really interesting and relevant in my field is that when we think about how many eggs are
in the vault
and everybody's born with this different number and I'm sure we'll talk about ovarian reserve,
what we now know is that the vault, your ovaries are most susceptible to whatever your mother does
when she's pregnant with you and that that epigenetic, that programming, which is happening,
is predisposing young women to probably having some of them low
ovarian reserve, some of them having diseases we associate with in fertility, like PCOS or endometriosis.
And we haven't yet characterized what all they are. But if we look at the incidents of some of
these disease that we see now, what we do know is that the time period of which these people were pregnant,
the 80s and 90s was not the healthiest time when it comes to interchindrasuptures and plastic
exposures and chemicals and all of this processed stuff. Let's just say that people have been exposed
to. They were really seeing that those that ovarian susceptibility to egg quality and quantity happens in that beetle
development period.
It's interesting because there's some parallels to male fetal development, like the fact
that you have these early organizing effects of hormones like dihydro testosterone, which
essentially stimulate the growth of the penis, but also then establish
a propensity for hormones during puberty to activate growth of the sex organs, but also
activate the brain areas that are responsible for a host of different things.
So I only mention that because what I'd like to kind of illustrate in the background
here is that basically our reproductive health begins really prior to conception.
Really, it's dependent on mom and dad, but certainly to a great degree on mom.
But then fetal development is going to be important.
So, sort of us being able to pick our parents.
I do have a couple of questions about lavender, tea tree oil, and evening primrose oil. I was aware that evening primrose oil, excuse me,
can somehow bind estrogen receptors
or mimic some of the ester dial or something similar to it.
I wasn't aware of tea tree oil or lavender.
Here are we talking about oils, what about aromas,
and how concerned do people have to be about this stuff?
Because I mean, you'll go into a
restaurant bathroom, they'll be Pope Paris, some people wear perfume. I mean, we don't want to set
up paranoia. No, but I think people should know about this stuff. Tea trade oil is in a lot of
those natural shampoos. A lot of the shampoos. The ones that burn. Yes, the one that tingle your
scalp. So people love them though. Constant exposure is very different
than a one time hand washing in the bathroom.
And I think that's the big difference for everything
when we talk about chemicals or toxins
or exposures in the world.
You can't live in a toxin-free world,
but choosing what you put in and on your body
on a regular basis does set the tone
for certain physiologic changes.
And so using unscented products, especially with children,
is a really important thing, because we
want to make sure that their lifetime exposure to some of these
things, especially doing critical times, is much less.
And so you'll see people recommend things like your laundry
detergent, what's sensor in your laundry detergent, you know, what sensor in your laundry detergent,
the shampoo and conditioner are a big one
and the soaps that you use on a day-to-day basis
in your house or the oils you put on your body.
Lavender is huge because there's this whole community of people,
they want to rub lavender oil on their baby's feet
and help them sleep, but really we can see,
and if somebody goes and shadows
of pediatric endocrinologist for
a day, they'll see some kids come in, and this will be the reason why.
What about cloth diapers versus non-cloth diapers?
I've heard that you have your very strong cloth diaper proponents, right?
And then because they seem to feel or believe that non-cloth diapers somehow contain things that can get into baby's skin.
And maybe there's a bigger question here. Is baby's skin more permeable than adult skin?
I don't know if baby's skin is more permeable than all of that.
I don't either.
To me, it seems like it would be hard to imagine it is, but babies do seem to have this
incredible skin, right?
Their skin is so smooth and you want to squeeze their cheeks and all this kind of stuff.
But yeah, the idea that would be more permeable.
I think it's more that their development is this time is very important and
setting the stage for a lot of what happens later. Versus an adulthood, those
stepwise developmental processes have already happened. So I think that's why
we pay so much attention to what happens in the, you know, childhood period of time, because we're now learning about those later consequences
of what you're exposed to. It's not that, you know, regular diapers versus cloth, whatever
we want to say, it wasn't necessarily better than the other. It's more, honestly, a personal
preference. Babies are exposed to them a lot, and there's been a lot of attention to that. But similarly, somebody could use cloth
and wash it with a detergent
that then has certain chemicals in it.
So there hasn't been a study shown
that this one thing is an exposure for a baby
that somebody needs to be worried about.
There's definitely companies now
which are promoting and talking about,
traditional diapers that they are making sure have less toxins
in them.
And I always think anytime you can decrease toxin exposure to a child is going to be very
important.
Is there any evidence for breast milk versus formula in terms of impact on future reproductive
development or reproductive status of a child?
That's a complicated question because breast milk exposure, at least for the first six months
of a child's life, certainly helps with the immune system development, and we know that
poor immune development can lead to a higher risk of autoimmune disease later, what people
call leaky gut, and some of those diseases certainly are correlated with fertility.
So, I wouldn't say we've gone so far to say that
if you don't breastfeed your child,
they're going to have fertility issues,
but we do know that there's an in-between correlation
with things that breastfeeding is protective against
and how those diseases themselves
may relate to fertility in the female later on.
Okay, so if we're thinking about a young girl slash woman because we're talking about puberty,
right? So I don't know what the exact nomenclature is there. You know, my experience is I'll
I'll offend and somebody no matter what. But a girl who undergoes puberty, right? So a young woman
who's maybe 13 or so, so she's early teens, undergoes puberty and therefore is continuing
to lose eggs from the vault.
But now is undergoing presumably, roughly every 28 days, menarchy.
But let's talk about this 28 days thing because I think a lot of people think that quote
unquote normal menstruation is always 28 days and we know that's not true.
So what is the range of normal durations between menstruations cycles or duration of the menstruation
cycle? And let's also define when the menstruation cycle starts, probably for the males mostly.
Sure, sure. So let's think through the cycle.
We'll do a quick one over and then answer the questions.
So what we think of is cycle day one,
or when you're going to say this starts,
is going to be the day that you start bleeding.
So that's actually shutting the endometrial lining
from what grew the last time.
So any spotting even would be considered day one?
OK.
So we can get back to it.
But there's problematic.
If you have a lot of spotting before that full flow starts a day or so can be really normal just as the bodies adjusting to the drop and
progesterone. But let's just start at the beginning day one, you have a period, a mincees. This is when you're actually bleeding at this time period. We like to think about all of those new eggs being out of the vault, being susceptible to that FSH, which of course
is that well-named hormone because it
stimulates the follicle to grow in each egg
is in a follicle.
That egg starts to grow and makes estrogen.
That estrogen stimulates the proliferation
of the lining of the uterus and preparation
for potentially that pregnancy that may come.
And also, that estrogen makes you feel really great, right?
That's the follicular phase, name so because that follicle is growing and it's an FSH dominant
phase where you have a lot of estrogen.
And people feel great when they have a lot of estrogen because...
Women feel good with estrogen.
Because of the relationship between estrogen and other neuromodulators like dopamine serotonin.
And is that happening in parallel or are they somehow related?
Like is estrogen controlling the release of serotonin, and is that happening in parallel or are they somehow related? Like, is estrogen controlling the release of serotonin
somehow and vice versa, or are they just kind of coincidentally
happening in parallel?
We definitely think that there's more of a correlation causation
than just coincidence, because we know there's time periods
where people are more depressed within your cycle,
correlating with those low estrogen levels,
and we know that when you go into menopause or you run out of eggs and you're now in a low
estrogen phase, we see a lot more of a depressed mood.
And you know, anodonia, lack of response to things which would normally give you pleasure
happens more frequently.
The female brain loves estrogen and it's protective against things like dementia.
So this is a time period where women are going to be more energetic,
they're going to have more energy, more focus.
This is the estrogen dominant phase of the cycle.
And when you have seen that estrogen at its high levels,
which it's only made from a mature follicle,
and it's very specific, 200 pg per meter for 50 hours,
that's the brain's clue.
Okay, we must have a mature egg,
and it can send out that surge of LH or luteinizing hormone.
And now you ovulate.
And when you ovulate, the follicle opens up,
releases, closes back,
and then it's the corpus luteum,
and we've entered the luteol phase.
And the corpus luteum is the name suggests a corpus.
It's like a body that's basically the corps of what,
it's a dead alpha. It's a dead alpha, yes. And she the egg before. that's basically the corps of what,
it's actually, yeah, then she the egg before. And what I find so amazing, I mean, biology is so beautiful,
instead of just taking that tissue and saying,
okay, let's just discard this,
or that becomes the trigger for the next phase of the.
It is essential for life, right?
The corpus luteum, which makes progesterone,
opens and closes the implantation window.
It is what allows somebody to get pregnant
and for our species to continue.
It's so it's extremely fascinating.
And that corpus luteum gets stimulated
to produce progesterone impulses
throughout the entire luteal phase
because it's still controlled by the brain
unless you get pregnant.
And then in that loodial phase,
progesterone is fascinating.
It's trying to protect you from things
which could potentially harm your baby.
So suddenly now, you have less energy,
you want to sleep more, you want to eat more,
you maybe do not want to have sex as much,
because your body is suddenly saying,
let's just protect this potential implantation
that you're going to have.
If that pregnancy doesn't come, the corpus luteum
can only live 12 to 14 days.
It has a very distinct lifespan.
And then it dies.
Your estrogen and progesterone both drop.
You bleed starting over the next cycle
and a new group of follicles comes out to be released.
And the reason why walking through that varies succinctly, but is important when you're asking how long is the normal cycle.
Because the loodial phase is pretty set at 12 to 14 days. The follicular phase can vary in person to person.
And what we know, though, is for one individual. If your menstrual cycle, your reproductive hormones
are working right, it should be relatively constant for you. And so if your periods
are every 24 days, but they've always been every 24 to 25 days, then that's not concerning.
And if your periods are every 33 days, but they've always been every 33 days, then that's
not concerning. But we do get concerned when there's a change in your period.
Or when we get concerned, when people have what I like to say is
irregularly regular periods.
Because what you'll see textbooks tell you is that your periods could be
as short as 21 days, as long as 35 days,
and that can all be normal.
But people will hop between them. They'll have one cycle that is 24 days in length,
from day one to the last day before the next day one, then the next cycle is 32.
And then it's 26 and then it's 34.
And that's not normal.
That's too irregular.
And that can be a sign that something is not communicating correctly within your reproductive
hormones.
So what I tell patients is in general, your period should be less than 35 days apart, and
you should be able to look at a calendar and with your finger, put a finger on the date
and within a couple days of accuracy be able to predict when your period's coming.
And if you can't, there could likely be something that is interfering with the hormonal
signals between the brain and the ovary. And one of the biggest, really, one of the only things we see
as women start to have fewer eggs in the vault is a shortening of their cycles. So you have a regular
period. And suddenly now you have less eggs in the vault, so less are coming out each month.
And when the brain sends out that FSH signal, now there's fewer eggs, so it's not getting as
dilute, and you have one starting to respond sooner. So suddenly you're ovulating shorter, faster
in your cycle. You're ovulating on cycle day nine instead of 14. Your alludial phase is still set, but the person who comes to see
me and says, my periods have always been 28 to 30 days, but now they're every 24. I just
figure it's no big deal. I have red flags going off everywhere because I'm now really concerned
that potentially their ovarian reserve has dropped to a point where we are starting to see
clinical changes.
Now, of course, things like thyroid and prolactin and other hormones can also cause such changes,
but that's why you'll hear most reproductive endocrinologists say your periods of vital sign.
And what we really mean is the regularity at which it comes and the predictability of it
is telling us if your hormones are all communicating in a normal fashion or
if something could potentially be off.
As we all know, quality nutrition influences, of course, our physical health, but also
our mental health and our cognitive functioning, our memory, our ability to learn new things
and to focus.
And we know that one of the most important features of high quality nutrition is making sure that
we get enough vitamins and minerals from high quality, unprocessed or minimally processed sources, as well as enough probiotics and
prebiotics and fiber to support basically all the cellular functions in our body, including
the gut microbiome.
Now I, like most everybody, try to get optimal nutrition from whole foods, ideally, mostly
from minimally processed or non-processed foods.
However, one of the challenges that I and so many other people face is getting enough
servings of high quality fruits and vegetables per day, as well as fiber and probiotics that
often accompany those fruits and vegetables.
That's why way back in 2012, long before I ever had a podcast, I started drinking AG1.
And so I'm delighted that AG1 is sponsoring the Hubert Minlab podcast.
The reason I started taking AG1 and the reason I still drink AG1 once or twice a day is
that it provides all of my foundational nutritional needs.
That is, it provides insurance that I get the proper amounts of those vitamins, minerals,
probiotics, and fiber to ensure optimal mental health, physical health, and performance.
If you'd like to try AG1, you can go to drinkag1.com slash Huberman to claim a special offer.
They're giving away 5 free travel packs plus a year supply of vitamin D3K2.
Again, that's drinkag1.com slash Huberman to claim that special offer.
Let me see if I have this correct.
We've got this thing that we call the menstrual cycle,
the ovulatory cycle.
There's two phases, a follicular phase and alludial phase.
Fillicular preces the alludial phase.
The alludial phase tends to be, if I heard correctly,
fairly fixed, about 14 days.
The follicular phase can vary in duration,
maybe 10 to 14 days, maybe even 10 to 18 days,
depending on something about their brain
to overecommunication.
For those that aren't familiar with this, I always learned that estrogen primes progesterone,
that's kind of the really basic top contour description of the ovulatory cycle, that estrogen
is going to slowly climb toward the point of ovulation
and then there's a peak and then a drop and then progesterone is going to dominate in the
luteal phase the second half. You said that estrogen is associated with a psychological level
and a physiological level, more energy, feelings of vitality and some of that estrogen increase
is actually coming from the one egg
that got stimulated the most, the one that got selected.
So it picked for the team, potentially for the team,
but got picked, potentially for fertilization.
And that egg sheds its corpus luteum,
which is this piece of the egg,
that then triggers the progesterone
that dominates the luteal face.
Do I have that right?
Mostly, mostly. Yeah, please correct me where I'm wrong.
The follicle in which the egg grows, right? When you ovulate, it ruptures the cyst burst.
A follicle's a cyst, a cyst is a fluid-filled structure. Follicles of fluid-filled structure
that holds an egg. So when you ovulate and you get that LH surge, the cyst burst, it opens up
and the egg comes out of it, and then it reheals and becomes the corpus luteum.
Got it.
So just a little bit different in timing.
And you're right with estrogen-primes progesterone,
but really, we think about it the layer of the uterus
because estrogen stimulates the growth of that lining
and then progesterone stabilizes it
and allows implantation to occur.
But the sequence of events of when you're estrogen dominant
and progesterone deficient, which is the follicular phase,
and people will come in having lab strone randomly
and they're all concerned that they don't have progesterone.
And when you talk to them about where they are in their cycle,
you say, you're not supposed to have progesterone,
that's your follicular phase.
This is perfectly normal.
OK, great.
Thanks for that clarification. to have progesterone, that's your follicular phase. This is perfectly normal. Okay, great.
Thanks for that clarification.
I get a lot of questions about birth control,
but on my social media handles.
Don't we all, don't we all?
To be clear.
It's a vast topic for exploration,
but along the lines of what we're talking about now,
I've heard and I suspect it may
not be true, but tell me, is there any evidence that taking birth control can disrupt the
process that you just described?
And when we talk about birth control, we should probably define what we're talking about.
So there are hormone-based birth controls, aka the pill.
There are also hormone-based birth controls that are not in pill form.
There are IUDs that are copper IUDs, there are other IUDs.
Let's just talk about hormone-based contraception in females.
If, which many of them, as I understand, are estrogen mimics or estrogen themselves,
that suppress ovulation, do they diminish or increase the number of eggs that
are taken from the vault?
Fantastic question.
Let's talk about what people say is the pill.
So let's specifically talk about combined oral contraception, the pill which has ethanol
estradiol and some type of progestin.
No, contraception does not change the release of eggs out of the vault.
They are occurring at the same process and the same pathway.
You're not ovulating because that estrogen does prevent
FSH from coming from the brain.
So you have the group of eggs still come out of the vault.
There's no FSH.
They just all die.
The next group comes out.
So when you are saying,
are you going to run out of eggs faster?
Is it going to harm your fertility?
Does birth control impair the process?
The answer is no.
But there's a couple important caveats.
One is that the birth control pills,
especially if you take them continuously
or for a prolonged period of time, the body smart.
And the ovaries start to say, well, we're not really
doing anything.
And one of those markers of ovarian reserve we have is AMH, and that's anti-molarian hormone. And AMH is made from the granulosa
cells or the cells that surround every follicle. So in the shortest way possible, more eggs
in the vault, more come out every month, higher AMH. Fewer eggs in the vault, fewer come
out, lower AMH. If your AMH is being suppressed because of the birth control pill,
because it's decreasing the activity of those granulosa cells, you might get a low AMH value
when you've been on the birth control pill for a long time. That is completely reversible.
But it can be significant. So if somebody is wanting to get an AMH level, let's say somebody comes
to my clinic, they're not trying to get pregnant and they're on the pill,
and they're considering freezing their eggs,
so we're going to check their ovarian reserve.
If we draw it, I always say this, AMH may be up to 30% lower
and somebody who is on the birth control pill,
so we can still draw it,
and if it comes back in the normal range, we feel good. But if it does come back low, we're going to have to make a decision.
Are we going to stop the birth control pill for a period of some months,
use alternative contraception if you don't want to be pregnant,
and then repeat this test to see if this is a true low,
because we do see that young women do have low ovarian reserve sometimes,
or was this just suppressed because you were on
the birth control pill?
So we see it impact some of the hormone testing
that we can do, and I think that's an important distinction,
and we can see that the longer you take it,
that potentially, it might actually improve your fertility
if you had underlying endometriosis,
or some medical conditions that we see associated with infertility,
so prolonged pill users can potentially improve their fertility versus people who are trying to get pregnant
that same age who were not on the pill.
Those studies are complicated, right, because of selection bias, because if you've been on the pill for 10 years,
you're a little bit older, so is it that they were preventing pregnancy and the other group potentially had
some exposures, so they were inherently more infertile than the group that was on the pill.
But we do know that the pill doesn't cause infertility.
And I use it all the time.
All the time in IVF cycles, we put people on the birth control pill because we can actually
synchronize that group of eggs that comes out of the vault
to grow together because your body doesn't want to have
20 babies at one time, right? And what we're trying to do with IVF get 20 eggs to grow if that's what's out of the vault
really goes against the check-in balance of the human body to not have 20 babies at once.
Why is it that
males who take testosterone synthetic testosterone testosterone, it shuts down their
own testosterone production and sperm production, but females who take estrogen in the form of
birth control pills, it doesn't shut down estrogen production by the ovaries.
So I love this question, you know the answer, so I like it extra because I know you're asking.
Spurmatogenesis is a constant and ongoing process, right?
So in women, you're born with all the eggs you're ever going to have.
And what we're talking about is if we stop FSH at that moment, we're just impacting the
ability to ovulate at that time.
But we're not changing this constant loss throughout the vault.
Spirmatogenesis, right?
The sperm is made every single day.
You're making brand new sperm.
So 72 days for the sperm to be created in the testes
and 18 days to find their way out the ejaculatory system.
And so exposures that you have that stop the production
of FSH and LH inhibit the development,
the creation of new sperm.
So somebody who's been on testosterone will tell the brain,
the brain doesn't know it's from your taking it.
It says, hey, we have plenty of sperm, we're good,
we don't need anymore.
So the brain then gets suppressed
and doesn't make that FSH and LH,
therefore not stimulating both
for their testosterone production,
because you don't need that,
but testosterone production and sperm production
go hand in hand.
So therefore you're no longer making new sperm.
And in fact, the longer you're on testosterone,
the harder it may be to get sperm production to come back
and in 25% of people, they may not get it back
if they've been on prolonged testosterone exposure.
So it's really because of what women will sometimes say is unfair,
which is the fact that you're born with all these eggs
and you run out of them.
They accumulate the wear and tear of your life, right?
We see egg quality being a huge issue and female reproduction.
Yet men get to have new sperm every 90 days.
They get to wash away whatever bad deeds they did and can change their lifestyle and their
exposures and have very different sperm.
But because of that same process, things that shut off the production of FSH LH really
impact sperm quite significantly.
You mentioned bad deeds for sperm, not by sperm, I said, for sperm.
And we know that heat is a pretty dramatic insult to this pormatogenesis cycle.
Saunas and hot tubs and whatnot.
I did receive the question as to whether or not
heat exposure, Saunas hot tubs, et cetera.
Are they detrimental to ovulation or egg production in any way?
I mean, obviously things are more internal in females.
The ovaries are internal, but is there any evidence for that?
I mean, the body does heat up.
Yeah, it doesn't harm the ovulatory period or the ovaries are internal, but is there any evidence for that? I mean, the body does heat up. Yeah, there's no, it doesn't harm the ovulatory period or the ovaries.
And just like we know, the reason why the testes are so susceptible is because they're
supposed to be at a cooler temperature.
That's why they're in the scrotum outside the body.
That's why the testes are so susceptible to heat changes.
But the ovaries being inside the body, they're not in the same way.
Now, when somebody's pregnant, important distinction, right, we know that the development, especially
organ development of an embryo, can be more sensitive to certain things and that heat
exposure at that time, whether it's hot tubules or extreme fevers, even can make a difference
in development of a fetus, but when it's coming to the ovulatory cycle
or hormone production, heat in the female
doesn't make any difference.
Well, I wanna be clear before I ask the next question
that I don't wanna be responsible
for any unwanted pregnancies, but when I was in high school,
they told us that women can get pregnant
even while they have their period.
Is that true?
It seems like a lie based on everything you're saying,
but I don't want anyone to run out
and test that hypothesis without having the facts first.
So in general, if somebody has extremely regular cycles,
then that's a complete lie.
You can't get pregnant on your period.
The reason why they tell us this is one,
especially when you're younger,
your period cycles tend
to be irregular.
Their body hasn't fully matured to have that regularity, and that we know that sperm do live
in the reproductive tract for much longer than the egg does.
So sperm can live there for up to five days.
So if somebody did have a shorter period window, let's say their normal periods are
going to be 24 days, they're ovulating on cycle day 10. If they have a regular period that's
five or six days, they could potentially have intercourse that end part of that period.
The sperm could live for five days and be right there when you have the egg in route. So
it's not the most fertile time for sure and in most people
that is considered a time when you're not going to get pregnant, but especially when you're younger
and you have more irregularity or in people who have a short cycle window that might not be the case.
So by extension, can we conclude then that the most fertile time is going to be when sperm
that the most fertile time is going to be when sperm meets egg, let's say timing of intercourse for the time being, because there's can be a delay there.
When sperm meets egg on obviously day of ovulation or day after, day of.
The egg lives for 24 hours.
So the egg can only be fertilized for 24 hours while it's in the
phallopian tube. Once the egg is entered the uterus, it can't be fertilized
anymore. So it has this very short window of time where it will allow sperm to
enter it. Now, sperm can live for five days. So we'll say the fertile window is
this five-day period ending on the day of ovulation. You will hear a lot of us,
a lot of doctors say the day after ovulation,
because you really know exactly what time you
ovulated on and if the egg has 24 hours,
then that extra day could potentially be helpful.
But really, it's five days ending on the day of ovulation,
and people with very regular cycles or who can track them,
and they know when that ovulation is happening.
The day before and the day of ovulation, those are the two top-heading days.
So if you're kind of not in the mood to have lots of sex, those are going to be the days
you target to have the highest chance of conceiving.
And what is the relationship between estrogen, libido, and ovulation and females?
The higher your estrogen is, the increased libido that you're going to have.
And of course, you see those peak estrogen levels,
which are going to trigger that LH surge.
The body is made to get pregnant.
You're going to have that peak estrogen,
that peak libido right before and
right at that ovulatory time period so that,
hopefully, you also want to have intercourse and get pregnant.
I've heard before, let's just say that some people,
be careful here,
can sense literally the deployment of the egg,
the ovulation, they report that they can feel
that let's just say that the departure of the egg,
is that an imaginary thing?
No, no, that's very real.
I always like that image that people can know when that happens.
It's so real it has a negative.
We not sure.
We not sure when men generally know when their sperm are leaving their body. Let's hope
they do. But why wouldn't there be an internal sense for women also of what's going on?
I mean, we have interoception. There's a ton of nerve,
innervation of that area.
It doesn't communicate to the brain,
excellent as far as tracking to where that sensation is,
but you're right.
I already said ovulation is the rupture of assist, right?
It is rupturing and the egg is being released
and those follicular fluid is also exiting
and going into the paratoneal cavity.
And so there is a group of women who can
feel that, especially people who are very in tune with their body. And it has a name, it's called
middle schmerts. The pain almost feels like a crampy pain that happens in the middle of the cycle,
and that is your ovulatory pain. How interesting. What is it called? Middle schmerts.
Okay, we'll put that in the show no captions and whoever does is going to have to
get the spelling right. Middle schmarts. Amazing. Amazing. Amazing and foreign to me, but for obvious reasons,
uh, but amazing. I'm always astonished in how incredibly well orchestrated this whole process is.
It's just such an incredible feat of biology.
I mean, the number of things that have to be timed correctly
and the use and I don't wanna say reuse,
but the repurposing of tissues for different things
and like it's what an incredible dance.
That's just amazing.
It's beautiful.
I mean, I'm so nerdy because I just love how everything
has to communicate just perfectly.
It makes you and all of all the pregnancies that just happen just all the time because
really things have to synchronize really at the wonderful time period.
And even though this isn't what we're talking about, I've heard you say this, so I want
to say this.
People always ask every single day, well, how much sex should you have?
When should you have sex?
Is there too much sex?
And what we know is that you definitely should not decrease
your sexual intercourse interval.
So if you are in a relationship
and you are sex everyday people, have sex everyday,
you will 100% hit intercourse throughout your entire
fertile window on the day that you ovulate,
you're depositing the same sperm there
because you're not generating new sperm.
It's whether the load went half and half and half and half or if it went in one big group.
But if you're constantly putting more sperm out there, you have a higher chance.
And so studies go back and always say daily intercourse,
as I say, with the highest chance of accountability, especially during the fertile window.
However, for couples who are not sex everyday people,
that idea can cause a lot of stress.
Stress of course impacts the system
in a lot of different ways.
It can also cause sexual burnout
where they no longer feel like being intimate
or having sex on the day they're actually ovulating
because they've been doing it this whole time leading up.
And that's where the time period of saying,
have sex every other day throughout the fertile window,
so starting five or six days before you think you're going to ovulate,
and then try to target having an intercourse on the day before and the day of ovulation.
And the reason why people said,
every other day or a few days prior to kind of get some sperm exposure there in case you
ovulated early, but really to try to prevent some of that increased stress that can happen when you're trying to conceive,
especially if you have programmed or timed inner course that needs to happen on an everyday interval.
But the odds of getting pregnant by saving up sperm for two or three days, that's not higher.
I'm curious then why, if let's just say hypothetically, someone is donating or freezing sperm or doing
IVF, why they instruct the male to not ejaculate for 48 to 72 hours prior to, let's just say,
depositing sperm in such a funny word, but it works.
Two points.
One, if we're doing a C-Mine analysis,
now we're trying to evaluate this sperm.
Any test has certain normal parameters,
and these are all based on a 48 to 72 hour abstinence period.
Yes, if you ejaculate more frequently,
you're going to have less sperm.
That can be very normal, but if we're looking at a test with set normal parameters that
are based on two to three days of not having an intercourse, that's why we want you to do
it for that.
If we're doing, let's say, IUI or Intruder and Insumination, also known as artificial
insumination, or where we take the sperm and put it in a catheter and put it in the uterus,
we're trying to get more players further down the field.
And in that case, I know when you ovulate
because I'm timing it perfectly,
and I am trying to get as many possible in this process,
because we're not just having them deposited in the vagina,
we're trying to get them further.
So we want more because that's part of that treatment process.
And similarly with IVF, I wanna have as many sperm as possible to sort through and pick out the best looking
the most modal, the most normally shaped ones. So we're trying to get just a better sample
and by having these normal guidelines, we're able to judge this is low for what it should
be, which can also be a clue to other problems.
I definitely want to talk about chemistry, both interpersonal chemistry and literally
ejaculate and vaginal chemistry.
But before we do that, I'm curious,
whether or not we can just touch on a few of the things
that a lot of people wonder about in terms of egg quality.
And if they touch on sperm quality,
maybe we can also just mention that.
But for instance, does cannabis, either by edible or by smoking cannabis, impact at quality,
in either direction, alcohol would be the next.
And then I'm going to assume, and I have to do this strictly because of what I understand
about drugs of abuse like cocaine and amphetamine,
methamphetamine, that none of those can be good for systems of the body because they create so much stress for the body.
But let's just say alcohol and cannabis.
I read a statistic when researching an episode on cannabis that shocked me, which is that 15%, 1%, 5%, not 1.5%, 15% of American women,
at least in this one study, survey reported having consumed or smoked cannabis during known
pregnancy, which is wild.
Unless, of course, I'm just naive and THC is not harmful to the fetus, but I have a
hard time believing that.
So what gives?
I mean, here we're to end there, I actually just threw in fetal development.
So is cannabis is alcohol bad for egg quality?
So there are different things that are the same thing in one.
So let's answer them each individually.
So we'll go with the one that everybody knows and has accepted now that they wouldn't have accepted 40 years,
got right? Smoking cigarettes. So that's obviously bad. Decreases the number of eggs you have in
the vault. Smoking cigarettes actually gets them to your vault, decreases the number that you have.
You have a higher chance of going into menopause earlier and it increases the risk of having abnormal
chromosomes, which is what we really think about when we think about egg quality, right?
Impacting those myotic spindles inside the eggs, which hold the chromosomes in their
perfect position, they are associated, they get wear and tear from things that cause inflammation
or are toxic.
So cigarette smoke, we know decreases egg quality, egg quantity, increases miscarriage,
and then of course has fetal impacts.
Just ask you, when we talk about,
there's nicotine, which itself is not carcinogenic,
and then there's the smoking process,
which brings in a bunch of other things.
The question I know is burning in everybody's mind
is vaping.
Right, because vaping is,
I'm very bullish on this.
I mean, it's very clear that the chemicals associated
with vaping are just, oh, so bad for everybody's health.
But it's distinctly different from saying that nicotine
is bad for one's health.
And it can be, but without doing too much of a deep dive,
are there any data that show that vaping is bad
for egg quality?
Of course, there's not as much data
because it just hasn't been around as long.
But yes,
vaping definitely has chemicals that looks like it's associated with poor success rates
and IVF cycles.
And that's really kind of one of the most finite measures of Equality we can see because
we're really testing the egg at a level in a lab versus just, are you getting pregnant
naturally?
And it started to interject again, but anytime a conversation like this comes up,
especially between two people in the health science space,
there are these shouts, because I hear them, literally,
where people say, well, listen, I've vaped every day,
and I've had three healthy babies,
and I think that my response is always,
okay, there's gonna be a distribution of responses,
and then of course, how much healthier could your babies
have been?
Had you not vaped during pregnancy or vaped prior to pregnancy or anything.
I think these are the key issues that like you can't rewind the clock as far as I know
right in the absence of a time machine.
You can't rewind the clock.
So I mean basically everything you're saying is that smoking cigarettes or vaping nicotine
just can't be good for egg quality.
We know that. We know that can't be good for actuality. We know that.
We know that it's not good for getting pregnant.
We know that it's not good for sperm.
And therefore, we also know it's going to impact pregnancy
rates, you know, things like cannabis, right?
Decreases sperm production, decreases sperm motility, changes
sperm morphology, the shape of it, changes the DNA, it
increases the fragmentation of the DNA.
If your partner uses cannabis and you get pregnant,
you have a higher chance of miscarriage
because of the sperm association with the cannabis.
Now, edible cannabis is always important.
I don't know, right, because you can't study something
that's illegal, so a lot of this data is just more new
and a lot of it's going to be observational.
And in states like Colorado and California where, you know,
Canvas is essentially legal. Yeah, I'm assuming they're more data. But okay, so
smoking, end-or-vaping, nicotine, cannabis, either edible or smoked very likely detrimental to
egg quality and sperm quality, which is not to say that one
can't conceive. It just means that the quality of your baby, your child, will not be as high as the
quality of that baby if you didn't do that. Is that right? And I'm not trying to demonize anyone
that did do this during pregnancy. A lot of people didn't know, but this is really about people
trying to make choices in anticipation of future pregnancy.
Yeah, and when you're trying to set yourself up for success because we know infertilities
becoming more common, we don't always know who is going to have it. And when you find yourself
in that position, specifically, you now want to optimize everything you can. So if there's
something that is going to make these sperm quality worse and the egg quality worse
and your success with treatment lower
and your miscarriage rate higher,
we're going to recommend that you not do it.
If you're trying to get pregnant naturally,
all these things correlate over,
but of course, there's always going to be outliers
and exceptions.
I'm going to sit here and tell you
that the odds of getting pregnant at age 43
are less than 3% per month
And every single person is gonna be like but my aunt Barbara or I know this person who did because
Three persons not zero and you're talking about natural
I'm not sure by by
Having all fashion way yes, okay, right? But yes, so people will get pregnant people will have healthy children who do
Have exposures to nicotine to cannabis,
even to alcohol, even though we know that alcohol can cause fetal alcohol syndrome, zero
percent of alcohol should be the acceptable level in pregnancy.
And then does alcohol impact fertility such a complicated question, and this is probably
due to the amount you consume and the frequency of which you consume it. Alcohol is a toxin that your liver must filter out and we know it causes
inflammation. Anybody who's had a fun night with alcohol knows they can wake up
the next day and they feel different. Their body is processing that alcohol.
And that inflammation, especially if it's chronic, chronic exposure, we know
chronic inflammation is one of the things that
we see impacting egg quality and sperm quality.
So certainly, if you enjoy alcohol, it should be something that is an in moderation, one
or two drinks a week at the most, and you should not do it at all once you find out your
pregnant.
I'd like to take a quick break and thank our sponsor, Inside Tracker.
Inside Tracker is a personalized nutrition platform that analyzes data from your blood
and DNA to help you better understand your body and help you reach your health goals.
I have long-bidden believer in getting regular blood work done.
For the simple reason that many of the factors that impact your immediate and long-term
health can only be assessed with a quality blood test.
The problem with a lot of blood and DNA tests out there, however, is that they'll give you
information about certain lipid markers or hormone markers, but no information about
what to do with all of that data.
Inside Tracker makes it very easy to look at your levels of hormones, metabolic factors,
lipids, et cetera, and then to assess what sorts of behavioral, nutritional, supplementation,
or perhaps other interventions you might want to use in order to bring those numbers into the ranges that are optimal for your health.
Inside Tracker's ultimate plan now includes three new hormone markers that are critical
to measure during a woman's reproductive and menopausal years.
These are ester dial, progesterone, and thyroid stimulating hormone.
If you'd like to try inside tracker, you can go to insidetracker.com slash huberman
to get 20% off any of inside trackers plans.
Again, that's inside tracker.com slash Huberman to get 20% off.
When we were talking about birth control, I unfortunately moved us forward and forgot to
ask about IUDs.
Oh, yeah.
So, my understanding is that the copper IUD works by creating a sort of not actually electric,
but a kind of electric fence that kills sperm.
Spirm don't like copper.
Spirm don't like copper, copper likes to kill sperm.
There's some interesting history.
I've been reading along the history of medicine
of people who, for whatever reason,
were forced into or chose to be in the sex trade prostitutes
using inserting copper coins into their vaginal tract to try and kill sperm, but to varying
degrees of success.
Obviously, there's a whole socioeconomic landscape around that.
So, I think it's obvious what I'm referring to, but very interesting, but that's just one
form of IUD, right?
There are some other IUDs, and then there's, of course, the ring we didn't talk about that.
So maybe we just touch on a few of those
within the context of whether or not it
alters a quality end or future fertility
when one takes the ring out, takes the IUD out.
This is a great question because a lot of people
don't know this, and I'll roll through
a few of the top birth control methods
and just thinking through.
Copper IUD, as you already said, no hormonal involvement. It causes inflammation and a toxic environment inside
the uterus isolated. Does cause sometimes heavier periods, but they should still be regular
if they are irregular. That's a sign of a hormonal issue because you still ovulate with the copper
IUD. Is it literally a copper wire woven in the tissue of the nose? Yeah, well the IUD is a little T,
and the arms have copper wires wrapped around them.
And those are, they grow into the uterine lining.
They don't grow into the uterine lining.
IUD just sits in there,
and just the presence of that copper
causes that inflammatory reaction
and that toxic environment.
And is it toxic to the environment
in ways that are detrimental to the woman or just a sperm.
Both. I mean, implantation is not going to occur likely, right? I mean, nothing has 100% successful,
but it's much harder for an embryo to implant within that highly inflammatory environment.
To me, amazing that people figured this out before the avid of like laboratories.
Right. Let's just put some copper and some muters and see what happens. You know, it really speaks to the urgency that must have existed to preventing pregnancy,
and that just how costly, biologically and-
The pregnancy is?
The financial pregnancy is.
And pregnancy is not health neutral, so it is something that somebody needs to be in
of right health, or it can be a deadly circumstance.
When we get back to other IUDs,
so IUDs that more people are more familiar with
are the progesterone-based IUDs.
This is gonna be your Marena, Kailena, Lailetta.
They have a bunch of different names
based on the amount of progesterone
and how long they last for.
These work mostly by thinning out the uterine lining.
As we already said, progesterone compacts the uterine lining to prepare it for implantation
and a normal cycle.
But if you have constant exposure to progesterone, what is going to happen is it's going to prevent
the uterine lining from growing and it gets it very, very thin.
Not all IUDs.
In fact, most of them don't prevent ovulation, only in about 50% of people do they actually
prevent ovulation. So their main mechanism of action is
this endometrial effect. When you remove the IUD, especially
if you are already ovulating, no problem. The problem we
do see in some people with progesterone IUDs that maybe
isn't talked about as much, is that this prolonged progesterone exposure,
because people are putting IUDs in for five to seven years,
and not having a period for that length of time
because the endometrium has become so atrophic or non-existent
that you're no longer bleeding,
despite the fact that you may be ovulating.
It can take a while for that lining to grow back.
And so it's not uncommon to have an
IUD in place. And if you have no period, you're going to say this is great. I don't have a period.
Wonderful. You get it removed. And now your period hasn't come back. And that leads people to
sometimes be concerned that the IUD is causing them not to ovulate or they have this.
And fertility caused by the IUD. But really what it is is that the linings become so, so thin
that it can take many months of that unopposed estrogen exposure on the follicular phase
to get it thick enough to finally bleed when you're ovulating.
So I do tell people if they have a progesterone IUD to get it removed three to six months
before they want to get pregnant,
use some other form of contraception, but give their body time to make sure they have that
regular period pattern back. Important distinction, if you're still ovulating and having a period
on an IUD, then this is going to be less of a concern because if you're growing enough
of aligning to then shed it, we're less worried about it.
But if you are amenoric or have absence of your periods
with an IUD, we need to think about removing it
for a period of time before you get pregnant
so that your body can grow that lining again.
When it comes to some of the other things that you mentioned,
one you didn't ask that I wanna mention
is the depot purvera shot.
The depot purvera shot is a
high dose of pedestrian high enough to actually prevent ovulation. So in that circumstance, you are
not ovulating and therefore if you don't ovulate, you're not going to get pregnant.
Depot purvera is proven to prevent ovulation for three months. So when you take it, you need to
get it every three months to have a proven contraceptive benefit.
However, it can last in your system for 18 months and prevent ovulation for up to 18 months.
So I will see people who liked that option for contraception. And now they haven't had a period
in a long time, but their last depot shot was six months ago, and they're all frustrated by the fact
when I tell them, well, you still may not have another period
for a year plus because this high level of progesterone
that you've already injected into your system
can last a substantial amount of time.
So that is a contraceptive option
that I tell people to discontinue a year and a half
to two years before they want to get pregnant,
which sometimes
people don't know that yet. And so that's something that can be a contraceptive option for if you're very remote from wanting to have a child. But in people who are in their child-bearing
years contemplating family building soon, that is not my favorite option.
So you haven't mentioned, because I haven't asked any
Negative consequences of birth control of any kind and I'm not encouraging you to if you don't believe in them I know that this is a very controversial
topic, but
You know one of the more popular studies discussed on social media is one that I've spent some time with the paper
And a few of the papers that stemmed from it
not a huge of the papers that stemmed from it. Not a huge study, but describing that how women rate the faces of men as either more, essentially
what happens is there seems to be at least in this study a, there was a statistically
significant bias for women to select particular male faces as attractive and those male faces
tended to be of the more you know square jaw AK masculine features right in air quotes right this is what the study
found
But that when women were on oral contraception presumably estrogen progestin type oral contraception that that effect
was smeared.
They had a not a statistically significant tendency to choose the quote unquote more masculine
face.
I have to be very careful with my language here because you know, it's easy to get description
of a study like this wrong.
And that has led a lot of people to think that birth control is going to throw off their
partner choice.
Now of course, there's a small study.
Studies like it are not always so well controlled.
But is there any evidence that birth control, oral estrogen, progestin-based birth control
just to keep it specific, can increase rates of cancers, can decrease rates of cancers, can lead to any sorts of
disruptions in bodily function or health. That's really like a rock solid result.
That's been seen by multiple studies, clinical trials, or we still just in the dark about a lot of
this stuff. Okay, so nothing is without risk. Getting pregnant is not without risk. Taking the birth control pill is not without risk.
We do see that there's been a lot of not informed consent
in people who are taking the birth control pill,
meaning maybe they weren't educated about
what all of their options were,
the positives and the negatives about each one of them.
If we're going to reference the combo to the pill,
estrogen progesterone pill. Important to understand combo to the pill, estrogen progesterone pill,
important to understand that neither the estrogen
nor the progesterone are the same estrogen progesterone
that your ovaries make, right?
It's ethanol estridial,
which your brain interprets as an estrogen,
but other parts of your body may not,
and then it's various types of progestins,
some of which have even androgenic
or male hormone-like properties,
and some of which do not.
So there's a ton of variation,
even the amount of ethanol esteridial
that each pill has with your low, low,
and your low pills having less,
and even with the modern day average pill
having a lot less estrogen than it used to.
When you're on the birth control pill,
your ovaries aren't making estradial. And
that estradial is important in growing the uterine lining, but also for the genital structures.
And so we think about vaginal health and both our health. We certainly see that especially
with continuous use. So if we distinguish, you take the pill for 21 days and you have a seven-day break where you
might bleed or you take sugar pills and then you take them again, a lot of people now are taking
continuously where you have exposure to these compounds every single day. So in the wheel,
the little pouch with the wheel of different colored pills. They've seen these on the countertop
and previous relationships.
And then there's the ones that sometimes people just
opt not to take because those are the,
not the placebo, they're the sugar pills.
So there's no need to take estrogen during that phase.
And then they repeat.
Exactly.
Okay, but some people are taking estrogen
all the way around.
All the way around.
Very common right now.
And they're not wrong.
They say, oh, well, why have a period in these little breaks?
It's not really a reflection of my hormone status,
which is accurate.
And so they're taking them continuously.
You also have less pill failure pregnancies.
So if you're using the pill for contraception,
that can be a great strategy.
But the longer you take them,
we do see some vaginal level of our changes, right?
And so a trophic faginitis, people who
notice increased sensitivity, decreased elasticity,
increased discomfort with intercourse,
increased in yeast infections, that can sometimes
be see because that environment is different.
Now, that's just one thing that can come from the pill.
We also see the pill be life saving for other people.
They have terrible, you know, PMS or pre-minceral dysphoria syndrome where they're mental health
when they change from high to low estrogen.
It's always the change in estrogen that interferes.
Can cause some people to really have mental health issues that are so severe that having
that stable hormone level is helpful.
And so the pill can be extremely beneficial for some people.
When it comes to mental health, it can be beneficial for people who have issues with very
heavy periods in anemia and instead of getting blood transfusions, you know, taking the
birth control pill, might prevent the lining of the uterus from growing so much that they
bleed so much.
Same thing with fibroids, people
with PCOS. PCOS is polycystic ovarian syndrome. If we want to put it very simply, you have
a lot of eggs in your vault, so you release a lot of eggs every month. And what this does
is the FSH signal gets diluted. And so you're not responding to the normal signal and you
don't ovulate. And because the ovary is a hormone-making factory,
it gets really bored when it can't make estrogen
because that egg's not growing.
So it starts to make testosterone.
So you start to see this antigen-dominant environment
associated with lack of ovulation
and having a lot of follicles inside the ovary
that are not really responding.
And the antigenization of other tissues like body hair, deepening
of voice.
And body hair.
Typically, the level of testosterone made in PCOS isn't truly deepening voice.
It can, if there is an ovarian tumor making testosterone or certain other conditions, but
typically with PCOS, you see increase in body hair, increase in acne, and you can see
some even like male
patterned baldings, some temporal baldings of women, so some hair loss.
Yeah, the widow's peaking.
Yeah, the widow peaking and then sending out in these two areas.
And then we see an increase in body composition toward the male level.
So if we think about a male body holding your fat in your abdominal reach, and if we think
about the traditional female body holding more fat in the hips and thighs area, we see
that when this hormone shifts in PCOS, you tend to get more abdominal fat distribution,
which then leads to further insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome.
But in PCOS, because you're not ovulating, and those ovaries, each little follicle makes
a tiny amount of estrogen.
We'll say each little follicle, when it's not responding, will make one to two picograms
of estrogen.
But if you have 50 of them each month, you're having some constant estrogen exposure, so
that lining of the uterus is being constantly stimulated to grow, and you're never getting
the progesterone to stabilize never getting the progesterone
to stabilize, or the progesterone would draw to bleed.
So endometrial cancer is much higher in people with PCOS
who don't ovulate, and the birth control pill can prevent
that.
Any unopposed estrogen situation, because the body is made
to have both estrogen and progesterone.
So we see an immense decrease in endometrial cancer,
an immense drop in ovarian cancer.
Ovarian cancer comes from the remodeling of the ovary. So every time you have a follicle grow,
and it ruptures, and it makes the corpus lodeum, and then it heals up, those are opportunities
for those cancer cells to go away in that remodeling process and lead to ovarian cancer. And because you're not ovulating
on the pill, your incidence of ovarian cancer drops dramatically. Ten years of pale use has dropped
the chance you could ovarian cancer by more than 90%. And of course, ovarian cancer is super
hard to diagnose because the innervation to the paratoneial system is poor and you don't have any outward signs
often till late stage disease.
That being said,
could you potentially have an increased breast cancer
in some people?
By taking the pill.
By taking the pill, that's a concern,
especially in people who might be predisposed
to this for some other reason.
So you might have brachimutations
or something like that.
And then is there a situation where the pill certainly masks what's going on with your menstrual
cycle? And I really think this is where women's health has a huge history and paternalism,
meaning doctors would just tell people this is what you're going to do. So your periods are
irregular, here is the birth control pill. And they're not explaining why or the pros and cons to it.
And what happens is people are not being taught how their bodies
work. And now they are because of your podcast amongst others.
And now they're able to know that my periods of vital sign, and I
don't know what it is, because the pill is producing a different
environment. The pills also been associated with potentially development
of things like leaky gut or IBS.
And so there is a definite change in your environment
when you're on the birth control pill.
Increase risk of blood clots
because of how it's processed in the liver,
increasing your clotting factors.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
You know, I'm aware that a fairly high percentage of people have mutations
in factor five, lightened, a clotting factor. Fewer people are, as we say, homozygous have
two deficient copies, mutant copies, I should say. But there are many people out there that
have one mutant copy of factor five, lightened. And my understanding is that oral contraception
in females can really exacerbate the factor five, and in my understanding is that oral contraception in females
can really exacerbate the factor five, lidon mutation.
Do you suggest that people get their factor five,
lidon genetics analyzed?
I mean, it's pretty inexpensive to do, right?
I think on a standard blood test,
you can just ask for the factor five analysis,
and it's not like a really in-depth thing.
You don't have to fly to another country. You don't have to fly to another country.
You don't have to fly to another country.
You don't have to fly to another country.
You don't have to fly to another country.
You don't have to fly to another country.
You don't have to fly to another country.
You don't have to fly to another country.
You don't have to fly to another country.
You don't have to fly to another country.
You don't have to fly to another country.
You don't have to fly to another country.
You don't have to fly to another country.
You don't have to fly to another country.
You don't have to fly to another country.
You don't have to fly to another country.
You don't have to fly to another country.
You don't have to fly to another country.
You don't have to fly to another country.
You don't have to fly to another country. You don't have to fly to another country. You don't have to fly to another country. You don't have to fly to another country. You don't have to fly to another country. cigarettes because the combination of the pill and cigarette smoking can increase the risk of a stroke.
But the recommendation is not to screen them to see if they have any inherited clotting disorders.
That said, if you ever have a blood clot on the birth control pill, because you're traveling on a plane or you're just on the pill or you're living your life, you're now going to get this extensive
workup to find out if you do have that. It's by no means wrong, and specifically you should,
if anybody in your family has ever had a DVT,
so a deep vein thrombosis, so blood clot in their leg,
or a pulmonary embolism or a PE.
So anybody in your family has had one of those,
you should 100% get worked up for clotting disorders,
and if you have something like a e-cary factor five,
you should no longer take the birth control pill.
And specifically the pill, because it's an oral pill and how it's metabolized in the liver
is actually what is causing the change in those clotting factors because that's where
they're made as well.
So it doesn't mean you can't take any form of contraception, but we do want to make sure
that we counsel you appropriately.
I never think it's wrong to be an advocate for your own health
or to ask questions.
It's important to know that screening,
I mean, I'll get on my soap box
because we'll talk about screening for ovarian reserve
and it is 100% not recommended
even though I think it should be.
Yeah, my next question was gonna be about
testing AMH levels.
And we'll return to that for those that hear that and it sounds cryptic as well as getting
an ultrasound just seeing basically how many eggs are likely to be in the vault on both sides.
Okay, so we have to remember that screening recommendations come from at what point in
the population does it make sense to spend the money to test for a disease based on the likelihood
of finding it.
So if we think about, right, that's what your pap smear guidelines and your colonoscopy
and your mammograms, everything is all based on when are you going to find enough cases
at some age to make it worthwhile of testing, which is a crazy principle, especially in the
US because the government's not paying for our health care.
So why should these guidelines be based
on when is it cost effective to do testing?
Well, I'll put in a, this is gonna sound a little bit
conspiratorial, but it's not.
I mean, I think that given that for people
who have insurance, private hate insurance
or through their work, that there's a cost
to doing these tests of any kind,
calling Oscar B, A, M, H, et cetera.
And they must have figured out the optimal point
on the graph with which they can reduce their payout
to people who, for instance, get colon cancer,
if they didn't get the colonoscopy at 45,
as opposed to 50, as opposed to 60, as opposed to 25.
I mean, the reality we know is that the more information
you have, the better choices you can make, I mean, the only caveat know is that the more information you have, the better choices you can make.
I mean, the only caveat to that would be that for some, not all, but for some people, sort
of the hyperchondriatic type, sometimes more information leads to more anxiety, which
leads to more problems.
But that's a rare instance.
I always think that in general, data is always good.
I agree.
Having the information at hand about your body
and being able to make educated choices versus being in a position
where you say, I had no idea that I had factor five light
and I had this terrible blood clot
because pulmonary embolism can kill people.
We all know that, right?
So we talk about this rare thing,
but it can happen.
But this is really where it can be tough. It can be tough to find
even a doctor who may like we said, factor five is a blood test and relatively inexpensive,
so that one is not hard. But physicians live in a weird world where you know they have
recommendations based on screening, based on the likelihood of finding disease that they follow.
And when they go off of those, they start introducing themselves to why are you not following medical
guidelines.
But for an individual, this is really tough to advocate for yourself.
And the one thing that I'll say to you, this is why pain attention to your body is so important,
right?
Understanding your stool habits and what's normal and what's not so that you can catch early signs of things and
present for that colonoscopy earlier.
The current screening guideline for should you get your ovarian reserve check is that you should not.
ACOG, the American College of OBGYN has an entire
practice bulletin situation saying there's no utility and screening for AMH.
Okay.
I totally disagree, but.
I'm glad you disagree.
I mean, to me, it just seems nuts.
Okay.
Or ovaries rather.
I mean, the AMH is a blood draw.
AMH is a blood test.
It's a blood draw.
It one could opt to do the ultrasound as well,
which is of course more invasive.
But a woman who are seeing their OBGYN are probably familiar
with pelvic exams.
Yeah, I mean it's a vaginal ultrasound, but it's not painful.
Not painful, but different than a blood draw, just for this closure.
And I've heard of women in their early 30s going in, getting their AMH levels
checked, getting their ultrasound in and going, oh my goodness, they're down to like, you
know, I don't want to throw out numbers because this actually can get tricky.
You know, they'll say, oh, you have whatever, you know, four follicles.
And then someone in their early 40s will have 20 follicles and then people start to
sort of becomes a scorekeeping thing and of course
follicle quality there a bunch about their things and then you can tell us more about those but
Let's say someone did not have insurance or or insurance permission to
To get this pay for what is the proximate cost of getting one's AMH levels
Analyzed 79 dollars $79 to find out essentially where
your ovarian reserve is at.
So let's talk about this.
I already said this in my soapbox.
So A-cog says you shouldn't screen it
because AMH does not predict your fecundability, right?
Your body's ability to get pregnant in that month
is independent of your AMH.
And for the most part, that's true, right?
Because let's say you have a person,
and they're both 30 of two people,
one has low ovarian reserves.
They have five eggs coming out of the vault,
and this one has normal ovarian reserve,
and they have 20 eggs coming out of the vault.
And we should probably clarify that the number of,
because you said this earlier,
but the number of eggs coming out of the vault
is an indirect measure of how many eggs is in the vault.
When that number is going down, it means the number of eggs in the vault is likely is an indirect measure of how many eggs is in the vault. When that number is going down,
it means the number of eggs in the vault
is likely going down as well.
It's also down.
Because your body starts to take smaller withdrawals
as you start to run out of.
The vault wants to be at equilibrium, right?
It really wants to be in this middle ground.
So when you have too many, it shoots out more every month.
It's too crowded, it doesn't want that.
And then when it starts to get low,
it gets scared about being empty
and sends out fewer per month.
So what you see outside the vault,
and that is called an antropolical counter.
And AFC, it's an ultrasound-based measurement
of how many eggs you have outside the vault
at one point in time.
And on the ultrasound, if one looks,
this is gonna show up as,
so what it looked like, little hollow spaces,
so not gray stuff, but all the bodies.
I say chocolate chips and the chocolate chip cookie.
If we can imagine that over here.
Yeah, it looks like a chocolate chip cookie,
the chocolate chips, small, little dark, fluid-filled
follicles, each one of those houses an egg.
Some bigger than others because they're more mature than others.
Based on when you check in the cycle.
So if you're looking in that early follicular phase
when somebody's on their period, they all should be small because nothing's been stimulated.
If I'm looking periobulatory, I'll see that dominant follicle that's about to ovulate and
then everything else will be small.
And is there a graph that people can look at or that we could link to that says, okay,
the average with a distribution of standard error on either side for, let's say, a 28-year-old woman or a 37-year-old woman
or a 45-year-old woman of the number of follicles on the right and left side, and as I understand,
asymmetries are common. Yeah. Tens to be, like if someone goes in and you got six follicles
on the left side and 12 on the other side, how do people gauge what whether or not?
Fantastic points. One, because their doctor should tell them,
but that doesn't always happen.
But yes, we, we add these counts together
to get your antropolical count, because there is often
asymmetry.
But what we should expect, let's say, in somebody who's 30,
is you should have in the 16 to 20 range
of total follicles per month.
Right and left side, come on.
Come on.
OK.
When you're 35, that number is closer to like 14 to 16.
So starting to drop, it's still pretty good.
When you're 40, it's 8 to 10.
When you're 44, 2 to 4.
Right, so you start to have this immense drop
that exponentially starts to increase
really around age 37.
So things start to kind of get into this severe zone really around age 37. So things start to kind of get into this severe
zone really after age 37.
And we didn't really talk about ages 18 to 25, but there are people who get pregnant
in that age bracket. Is the follicle count very, very high? Is there sort of a nonlinear
drop off or?
Yeah, their follicle count will be higher. And I mean, I occasionally have patients who
are very young, but have infertility or higher. And I mean, I occasionally have patients who are very young,
but have infertility or want to freeze their eggs.
I've also had patients in that age range who are in premature
ovarian failure, right?
Because there can be things that go wrong even early.
But we should probably highlight again something
that you said earlier, but gosh, you know, this, like,
contradicts so much of what's out there, which is that
even if you have low follicle count, if you collect eggs, you're not changing what's in the vault. You're not pulling from the vault.
Not you can't. Right. Those eggs are spent. You now have the opportunity to turn them into
potential pregnant. Correct. I mean, side note, right? We haven't even dove into IVF, but that's
the next wave of technology is what we call IVM and vitro maturation. People are trying to figure
out how can you get eggs from the vault and get them to grow
in the lab, because that would open up possibilities for people who have fewer eggs to have our higher
efficiency of this process.
Because one of the limiting factors when you're doing fertility, when you're doing egg freezing
or IVF is how many eggs can you get per month, and that's why some people have to do cycle
after cycle, because they can only get five eggs or five eggs. But if we circle back to what we were saying when
we got off on this beautiful tangent, is that no matter if you have five or you have 20 eggs
outside the vault, you're ovulating one. So you're trying to get pregnant naturally. That's what
fecundability is, probability of getting pregnant per month naturally. You have the same chance if
you're the same age, regardless
of if you have five eggs or you have 20 eggs. And that's why ACOG came in and said, well,
AMH doesn't impact for condibility. It doesn't predict your ability to get pregnant or who's
going to have infertility and who's not going to have infertility. So there's no utility
and screening for it in people. Now.
For one, some speechless.
I mean, that argument makes sense
through the lens of just probabilities of pregnancy
through natural conception.
But it completely erases the very,
very, very real situation
where people are making choices about, for instance,
whether or not to stay with a given partner,
whether or not to leave a given partner, whether or not to accelerate the process of building a family.
I hate my ex, I have a baby now.
There's so many factors that this American college of whoever, whoever is completely...
Oh, but you want to, like, they're a big deal.
But they're crazy. And that's what I say.
They argue in their statement that finding that you have, I'm like, I'm real in it.
I mean, I think it's trying to think of analogy that doesn't fail, but it's like if you can,
it's just like saying, okay, if you can walk now, great, there's no reason to test for
this inevitable paralysis that's going to happen at different rates and different people.
And there are things that you can do to offset.
In other words, you could like take a little bit of some tissue that will allow you to walk in the future,
but we're not gonna do that
because if you can walk now, you can walk down.
It's good now.
That's absurd.
And that's really what it is.
And they say, well, finding out that you have low
ovarian reserve at a young age is going to cause
undue stress that is unwarranted
because most people don't have infertility.
And so they're purely putting it through the lens
of your likelihood to get pregnant.
But it's actionable stress.
Exactly.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And if you were just stressed, like, hey, guess what?
And I know people who have family members
with hunting and mutations, and some opt to not know,
whether or not they themselves have the hunting
and mutation.
And it's a very personal choice, right?
Sure.
But here, whereas unfortunately, there still
isn't a cure for Huntingdon's,
hopefully someday there will be, Malcolm Wood.
But in the meantime, there is essentially a cure
for this situation, which is the harvest
and potential fertilization.
There's at least an opportunity.
And this is what I say.
And of course, you and I feel similarly.
Education and data, like being the one to make the choice
is an extremely important distinction
versus having it happen to you.
So if you're young and you find out you have low ovarian reserve, is that gonna make a difference?
And it very well might. You might now freeze your eggs when you wouldn't have otherwise.
You might now start to try to get pregnant if you're partnered. When you otherwise were just waiting.
But my change of the conversation with your partner too, right? Because a lot of people think they can just wait.
I don't even be like, oh, oh.
Oh, I'm 130.
I can totally wait.
But if you have a low ovarian reserve,
then that you may lose the opportunity for parenthood.
And for a lot of people, this is a life goal.
And this is what's wild to me.
When on earth, besides reproduction,
do we have life goals that we take the approach?
I'll just wait and see if it's a problem later.
Never, right?
If you want to become a doctor,
you want to become an athlete,
you are constantly working towards that goal
or understanding what it's going to take to get there.
But why does the goal of parenthood,
that the attitude is completely,
I'm not going to think about it until later.
And then I'll deal with it if it becomes a problem.
Because you could make changes, you could freeze your eggs, you could try to get pregnant
sooner, you could evaluate for reasons of low ovarian reserve.
Do you have a genetic mutation or an autoimmune disease?
Why is it low?
It's not just always a big unknown.
There can be some actual things that potentially
might be impactful for your health long term.
So I think it's wild that this is the current conversation.
And I will say, I know personally a lot of OBGYNs,
who 100% will draw an AMH blood test if you're at your annual
and you ask.
And I recommend all of my OB friends,
because I see people at a different stage, right?
When they see me, they're struggling to get pregnant
or they wanna freeze their eggs.
But when we talk about this, I say,
hey, just like you say,
are you trying to get pregnant now?
And if somebody says no, and your follow-up question is,
well, do you wanna be on birth control?
The same question should be, well, do you want to be on birth control? The same question should be,
well, do you want to be pregnant at some point?
And if so, should you consider freezing your eggs
or getting this blood test checked?
And very often, people will make a different decision
with that information.
So glad that you're highlighting this,
because my understanding is,
at least in the state of California,
I don't know about other states, or if it even varies by state, that the
opportunity to harvest eggs and freeze them, there's a hard cutoff at age, I think it is
42. Prior to age 42, they'll do it. After 42, they'll do it if and only if you're willing
to do in vitro fertilization to actually fertilize and then they'll freeze it after 42, they'll do it if and only if you're willing to do
in vitro fertilization to actually fertilize and then they'll freeze embryos.
But they're far more reluctant to collect eggs after age 42.
Yes and no. So when you think about egg freezing and IVF are really the same
process, right? When you're going through the exact same thing, you're taking the
eggs out of the body and then you're either just phrasing them as an egg or
you're fertilizing them in the lab,
and that's IVF, and making an embryo right away.
Egg phrasing has changed dynamically
over the past 10 years,
whereas 10 years ago, survival rate of eggs in the lab
was 40%, really terrible.
And so we really didn't offer it to many people.
It wasn't something that was talked about,
and now it feels trendy almost,
but it's really just the tech has gotten so much better.
And cheaper.
Yeah, a 90% of eggs now survive the freestyle.
So 90% is not a low number by any means.
Embryos are much stronger, right?
And egg is a single cell.
It's a single cell.
And embryo, when we freeze an embryo that's day five or six,
is 300 plus cells. So embryo, when we freeze an embryo that's day five or six, is 300
plus cells, so it's so much stronger. And those embryos survive the freeze thought 99%
of the time. So yes, there's a 9% difference. That being said, making embryos is a lot more
expensive, eggs is cheaper. You could do two rounds of eggs and have just as many eggs or
we have more eggs than if you'd made them into embryos right away.
So I never recommend that somebody commits to a sperm source that they don't want to have
a child with unless that's the sperm source they want to have a child.
And this has changed because when embryo survival was so much greater than egg survival, especially
if you had few eggs or you were older, making embryos was the only option.
What we do know is that egg quality
decreases immensely as we get older.
And we've touched on this, but we haven't really mentioned it.
So not only do you have fewer eggs as you get older,
the chromosomes inside start to lose their positioning.
And so we think about egg quality, we think
about genetic normalcy, and we know that the
rates of aneuploidy or abnormal chromosomes increases proportionally to your age.
Which for people that aren't going to predispose, not always, to miscarriages if they're implanted
or potentially even the formation of a fetus that carries, for instance, trisomies, so chromosome
or repeats, or lack of certain chromosomes. These could be deadly, or they could be capable
of carrying to term and then have undetectable to mild to severe developmental abnormalities.
Correct. Correct. And this is why you have a lower probability of pregnancy per month as you
get older. So if we look at your natural fecundability, it's not because you have a lower probability of pregnancy per month as you get older.
So if we look at your natural fecundability, it's not because you have fewer eggs, because
we already said your egg count per month doesn't impact your probability of getting pregnant.
It's because the normalcy of those chromosomes has changed so dramatically that the odds
that your body's randomly choosing the good one to ovulate, becomes so low, and that's why those natural fertility rates
are so low because most genetically abnormal eggs
do not fertilize or implant.
But if they do, they have a significantly higher chance
of miscarriage.
It's 40% at age 40, right?
So you have a much lower chance of seeing the positive pregnancy
test, but then your chance of losing that pregnancy
is significantly higher as well.
So when we are counseling somebody about egg phrasing, what we know is that not every egg is going to fertilize with sperm,
going to make an embryo, going to be genetically normal, or even implant when it is genetically normal.
There is huge loss in human reproduction, meaning the more eggs you have at a younger age,
the better the ROI on this process is going to be.
It doesn't mean you don't do it when people get older,
but every clinic does have a cutoff,
and every clinic's going to be a little bit different.
A lot of different reasons why.
We actually probably have an older cutoff,
so we will let somebody go through IVF
or freeze their eggs up to age 45. And it's a lot about informed consent and having the approach that you're smart
enough that if I give you the odds and I walk you through how many eggs you are and the likelihood
of them making into embryos, you can say, yeah, but four eggs or ten eggs is way more than zero
based on my circumstance.
And that is worth it to me because it gives me the opportunity to potentially have a child
when otherwise my opportunity is going to be zero.
So a lot of this is rooted in paternalism that people can't, as a patient, understand
these odds and they have unrealistic expectations.
I think there's a huge shift in reproductive medicine to really counseling patients and understand these odds and they have unrealistic expectations.
I think there's a huge shift in reproductive medicine to really counseling patients and giving them autonomy and some of these decisions, but there does become a point where
there's a likelihood of finding a normal egg is so, so low that the money or the expense of the process
doesn't make sense and people should utilize egg donation or other opportunities for conception.
This drop in both the number of eggs and the egg quality, they really start to become so profound at age 37 and on.
And that's when we really start to see both these things are overlapping at the same time.
So if you're waiting till age 35, 36 for your first kid. But you want two or three.
We've got to really look forward about,
is that strategy makes sense?
Well, what is your AMH?
One, are you going to run out of eggs before then?
Two, how what other issues could be going on?
Is the sperm fine or the tubes open?
Because we are seeing that when people start families later,
when people have more chronic illness and autoimmune disease and obesity,
that it's much harder to get pregnant. And so the birth rates, right, are for the first time
in a long time across the board are dropping, and infertility is rising because of all of these
factors combined. So based on everything you just said,
and yes, I'm gonna say it a fifth time,
because the misconception about this
is one of the primary reasons why people avoid harvesting eggs.
It's not the only reason,
but when you harvest eggs, freeze them.
Now, it sounds like the viability of those eggs
is quite strong compared to a few years ago.
So that's great, 90% recovery when they fall
them is not going to diminish the number of eggs in the vault. Such a critical point.
And post age 37, there's a, sounds like a nonlinear drop off in egg quality for most.
And these are averages.
Of course.
So everyone, so the people that got pregnant with healthy kids in their late 30s and 40s,
you know, yes, we hear you.
Congratulations.
We're happy.
But this speaks to the,
I don't know, the logic.
Anyway, we're not putting any emotion or circumstances on this,
but the logic of somebody in their, let's say late 20s, early 30s,
getting their AMH levels through a roughly $80 blood
draw, and then perhaps based on their life goals and circumstances, doing either one or
several rounds of egg collection and freezing.
Especially since it sounds like you don't need to fertilize those eggs, so if one doesn't
have a partner who's concerned about what they're going to do, who's going to provide the sperm?
You know, because, of course, some people choose to raise kids on their own, but parenting
is a whole other issue, but they could do that later.
So that raises the questions of what are the health risks, if any any pain levels, if any, and that includes psychological
pain of egg harvest?
I have a question.
Going back to what you said earlier, this is going to be injecting synthetic mimics of
FSH and LH, fall customulating hormone and luteinizing hormone, maybe some growth hormone.
I hear nowadays there's also the practice of injecting these are essentially platelet-rich plasma,
platelet-rich plasma, excuse me, PRP and perhaps even into the ovarian vault.
We can get back to that. So there's a bunch of stuff that's being done to someone there's
low stem where people are getting low doses of these drugs. There's high stem where there's
like a full blast. Maybe you could walk us through that procedure in just sort of general contour,
because it would require a lot of time to go through it all in detail.
But is this a horrible thing to go through? Is it mild to go through? Is it like a walk in the park?
Let's walk through it all. So I love this, and this is my bread and butter, and this is what I do
every day. Studies tell us that if you are not ready to have a family by age 32 to 33,
that is the optimal time for the average person to intervene and freeze their eggs. It's not
up for debate. It's when you have both the intersection of still a good egg quality and good egg
quantity on average. And so that is younger than a lot of people are thinking about having families.
And the reason why is when we really think about what happens to the egg afterward, that's
what's really critically important.
So I'm going to answer the question about what you go through, but just thinking, we already
said, you freeze your eggs, 90% of them are going to survive the freeze though.
About 75% will be fertilized by sperm, and about 50% of those will even make it to an implantation
stage embryo or a blast as well.
And we're assuming healthy sperm.
So sperm, no DNA, excessive DNA fragmentation.
You already have an nail in the head.
One of the biggest issues with egg freezing is I don't know the future.
I don't know if this sperm is going to be great or not.
I don't know.
It could be from a pot smoker, just kidding pot smokers.
Not kidding, pot smokers, But we don't know, right?
So we have this future yet undetermined sperm source.
So I am going to assume you're going to fall average
on these data points that we're going to walk through.
But the reality is, you buffer the risk
by having more eggs frozen.
And that's why people are going through multiple rounds
or cycles because we don't know.
We don't know how that fertilization will be.
If you have 20 eggs and 18 survived the freestyle and 14 fertilized and seven make it to the blastocyst stage, if your age 30,
we would anticipate around 60 to 70% of them are going to be genetically normal. And you're
young, so that's already kind of a big hit at that age. So let's say of the seven, four of
them are genetically normal. When I go to transfer them, I have up best a 65% chance of live birth per embryo,
which is really good when you put in the lens of accountability and peak success tends to be closer
to 20%. And you're going to implant one embryo at a time? 100% we're going to implant one embryo at
a time now. Does anyone ask for two? People ask for two. Doctors will do two. It is, it lowers live birth rates.
If we're looking at giving each embryo
the healthiest opportunity at becoming a baby.
Number one, embryos with IVF have a slightly higher chance
of monosigotic 20, right?
So 20, fraternal 20 comes.
If you ovulate two eggs, they both get fertilized.
So each baby is completely different
genetically own egg-owned sperm.
Monosigotic is from an embryo split.
Because of the IVF process, likely putting the embryo in the catheter, maybe having that
outer surface touched, predisposes it to splitting after you put it into the body.
So more identical twins.
Yeah, we have two. Two to more identical twins, monosegotic,
2% chance of monosegotic twins with IVF,
and the natural chance is 0.03%.
So significantly higher, even though ultimately not a
probable outcome, I'm going to have a couple patients a year
who are going to have monosegotic twins.
And if I put two embryos in, I've now won, taken this from a potential twin pregnancy
to a triplet or even a quad, if they both split.
So, hence presumably like the octomum cases and things like that.
Well, that one, they just literally put eight embryos inside, but that's a whole, I mean,
that's medical malpractice, right?
But really, most of the time when we're talking about embryos, we're talking about people
with infertility or people who've spent a significant amount of money, a huge portion of fertility as embryo quality,
right?
The competency of the embryo, the genetics of the embryo, it's expensive to go through
egg freezing and IVF.
Yet the uterine environment is another component.
It doesn't make sense to waste multiple embryos in the same uterine environment, statistically,
it doesn't make sense.
It also doesn't make sense to make your embryos compete the same uterine environment, statistically it doesn't make sense. It also doesn't make sense
to make your embryos compete against each other.
So will people put one embryo into,
let's just say DNA mom, right,
and one into surrogate mom,
and try and get two siblings simultaneously?
I've definitely done that and had patients do that.
It's not common because serigacy,
using a gestational carrier is so expensive
and they're such limited supply.
It's very hard to find somebody who wants to go through
the act of carrying a child for somebody else.
But that definitely is a strategy that some people utilize,
especially if they're older or they're concerned
that they might have a lower chance of implantation,
but they want to give themselves a try. But if we look at one embryo, 65 lower chance of implantation, but they wanna give themselves a try.
But if we look at one embryo,
65% chance of success.
Cumulative probability after the second is 88%, okay?
Almost everybody's pregnant after two,
and these are you employed genetically normal embryos, okay?
And then if you go to the third,
so cumulatively after three, you employed embryo transfers, each one being a single embryos, okay? And then if you go to the third, so cumulatively after three, you played embryo
transfers. Each one being a single embryo, 95% of people have a baby in their arms, meaning
the incidence of her current implantation failure is actually pretty low, 5%. But how many
normal embryos do you need for what family size if you're freezing your eggs? Because you got 20 eggs at age 30,
and the example I gave,
and you just made four normal embryos, right?
So that's really unlikely to make three or four kids.
It would, it has a really good chance of making one,
gives you the opportunity for a second,
but that's also presuming that everything happened perfectly,
that the sperm is not pot smoking sperm,
but not bad quality sperm.
There's not other environmental issues
when it comes to your own health
when you're trying to get pregnant
or other diseases you may have.
So we really need a higher number of eggs,
specifically, when we don't know
what the equation will truly look like
for one individual person when they go through the process.
And one of the only added benefits of embryos,
especially if you are partnered,
if you're with somebody who you do want to have children with,
you just don't want to have them yet,
is that I know the downstream, I know the number,
I know how many embryos I have,
and if it's not enough to give you a high chance
of what you want your family to be,
you can intervene now, right?
Because by definition with egg freezing, we're not wanting to be pregnant for years.
So if you're doing this with a partner and you're making embryos,
and now I say we only got one genetically normal embryo,
you have the opportunity to choose to either go through more cycles and store more embryos
for later to maybe try to get pregnant sooner because there's some underlying issue with
your fertility.
You can make a choice because you're falling off the curve there.
Good.
I ask you a question.
So you mentioned age about 32, 33 in an ideal circumstance with the finances there, et cetera.
One would harvest eggs unless they're already starting a family through natural means.
What about for sperm?
I mean, we've all heard the studies that with increased age of the sperm that there's
a higher, although still statistically pretty small in sense of things like spectrum conditions. So do you recommend to young girls, men in
their late 20s or early 30s to free sperm?
I mean, it's never going to be wrong to save your gametes because we don't have crystal
balls for the future, right? So your gametes are your eggs and your sperm. That increase
and we'll just say negative outcome from advanced paternal age really starts
to be seen at age 50. So most men are not looking at primarily starting their family after
that age. However, what I run into all the time is maybe you're working on a second family
or maybe life has gone down a different pathway. And now you're with a partner who potentially
is younger and wants to conceive,
and you now have older sperm.
Having sperm in the bank is so cheap and easy to free sperm.
Eggs, I haven't even answered your primary question.
And the process of collecting sperm
while not entirely without its issues is far simpler.
It's embarrassing at best, but it's much simpler, right?
Yeah, it's much simpler.
There's generally doesn't require hormone injections,
although maybe for rare instances where people
are hypoganadil or something.
But if you're going to freeze your sperm, you're right.
You're typically, you're going to get some blood work done
because most places that store sperm per FDA guidelines
have to make sure that if you carried an infectious disease,
it's stored in a special tank.
So you'll have to get blood work done,
you have to abstain for your two to three days,
collect into a cup, you're done.
Which by the way guys, you can do it home
and bring it in.
It's sperm are so stable.
Yes.
If you've ever done this, you just bring it in.
It's pretty, let's say.
It's in the little bit of, I think I'm not gonna feign
that my friend did this and told me.
But you know, it's kind of outrageously easy
in the sense that you just bring it in
and they'll like take it out in the lobby and be like,
is that your name? And they'll do like the very different than the egg collection procedure.
So here's what I'll say about sperm and what I wish more men knew slush more men dead.
If you're going to get a vasectomy because you are choosing that you don't want to have kids
and we see many men who do this, they say they don't want to have kids, they want to go get a vasectomy, yet later on in life, you don't have a crystal ball about life as dynamic and things can change.
If you're going to get a vasectomy, go free sperm first. Why are so many men getting vasectomies?
I don't have the answer to that. I haven't heard this. Yeah, a lot of men are getting vasectomies.
Even I think to just take control over not having child out there when they don't want to.
So maybe this explains the drop in birth rates.
I'm just kidding.
It's multi-factorial.
But so many people, even if you're in your family, let's say you have two kids and you
all decided you're going to get the vasectomy so that you don't have any more children, things
happen, terrible things happen.
Life changes.
There might be a circumstance where you potentially would have another kid if something really bad
happened or you just changed your mind.
Freezing sperm is so easy and so much easier than if you don't, not all the septomy reversals
work, especially the longer that it's been reversed, the lower the likelihood that it's
actually going to work.
And very often if it does, you don't get sperm
in sufficient levels for timed intercourse,
and you're seeing me in the office.
And freezing sperm is cheap.
I mean, it's relatively cheap.
It's like $400, right?
So it's much, much cheaper all in than the entire
egg freezing process.
So to answer the original question, when you go through
egg freezing, most people do fantastic.
And we'll just use egg freezing on IVF interchangeably here, because what you as a person is going through
to harvest your eggs or to take them out of your body is exactly the same, right?
The distinction between egg freezing and IVF is all about what happens on the lab
end of it after they've come out of your body. So if we have this group of eggs that comes out of the vault, your body doesn't want to
allow them all to grow, even if it's a low number, right?
That's the check-in balance to not have so many kids.
So we need to override that process, and what we tend to do with this is to use a combination
of hormonal medications, and very often I describe it to patients as suppressing your
body and then stimulating it.
So if I can temporarily stop the production of FSH and you have a group of eggs come out of the vault
and we can imagine that FSH is their food and there is no food because you're taking the birth control pill for three weeks.
These eggs are going to synchronize, be very small, be very hungry.
For lack of a better word, their FSH receptors are going to open all up.
It's like a nest of baby birds that are all now starving
instead of the hungry bird gets the worm.
So now we go with this suppression period for a few weeks.
We can come in and give genetic opens, which is FSH and LH.
FSH is now synthetically made in a lab.
It's very easy, it's a synthetic compound that mimics the structure of the brain FSH and LH. FSH is now synthetically made in a lab. It's very easy. It's a synthetic compound that mimics the structure of the brain FSH.
We actually can't synthetically make LH very interesting. We don't have a way to make it yet.
And so we use the purified urine of menopausal women because when you're in menopause,
your FSH and LH levels are naturally so high because they're trying to get that
egg to make some estrogen.
So here are some of the, we've covered male hormone health before.
And there's been a discussion of HCG, human-chorionic, gonadotropin, which is essentially mimics LH.
In the end of receptor, it does, yes.
All right.
So is, um, pregnant human-chorionic gonadotropin,
is it purified from postmenopausal women's urine?
Or is it synthetic?
HCG is synthetic.
And so what, why can't, um...
What's the mountain, it's called menopure.
Menopure.
Menopure is a combination of FSH and LH.
The reason why we give HCG to men
to try to stimulate the spermatogenesis process, which of course,
if we could just give LH, we'd give LH.
It's the same reason why we give HCG for a trigger if we are going to go through fertility
treatments.
And we're trying to mimic that LH surge, which naturally would cause ovulation.
We actually are giving HCG because it does mimic LH when it comes to the receptor action
of it.
But when it comes to really, especially in getting
follicular development and the relationship between LH and FSH,
meaning LH is really providing some of the hormone substrate
that we need to be able to make estrogen.
And so you really need some LH in a lot of people,
depending on your protocol, or if you're older
and you're naturally making less.
The example or the offshoot would be like the PCOS patient
who has some naturally high LH,
sometimes they don't actually need LH in their protocol.
But the tail.
Who are these postmanopausal women
that are supplying their urine?
They're paid, right?
Right.
Yeah, I sort of matched them on some island,
some place. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Go to I sort of imagine them on some island in some place.
Yeah, yeah.
Go to the menopause.
Gang paid to urine it.
It is called menopure.
Like, it's purified menopausal urine, right?
I did not know that.
Most people don't know that.
They know now.
No, they know.
And so we use FSH and LH.
We'll just say in lack of better terms,
those are the two primary compounds that we're giving over
the course of, on average, a 12-day period to get the follicles to grow and the eggs to mature. So you can measure
egg maturity by blood levels of estradiol and by trans-vaginal ultrasound. So when you're going
through egg freezing or IVF, you're taking these hormone shots of FSH and LH, and they are getting those follicles to start to grow,
the eggs are starting to mature, we are monitoring them along the way, trying to determine the
time period where we think most of the eggs will be in the mature range. These eggs have gotten
too maturity. You then are going to take a trigger shot, which allows that final stage of meiosis,
so those chromosomes can separate.
We think about the egg.
We remember that normal female genetics, 46 XX,
and I always think about in the egg
that these chromosomes are lined up.
Your eggs are frozen inside your body.
When you're born, your eggs are in metaphase of meiosis.
So that's when, right, metaphase,
chromosomes meet in the middle
and they're held apart by these myotic spindles.
And this is why eggs are so stinking fragile
because they're held like this.
And those myotic spindles just absorb the wear and tear of your life.
But when you use that trigger shot, that LH search naturally
or that HCG in a cycle,
that's when you're going to get that final separation
into half the eggs, half those chromosomes into the egg.
So for people listening, think about like a zipper and you're pulling a part of a zipper
that then you now have the chromosomes just one one, you now have half the chromosomes
because why? Because in successful fertilization realization the other chromosomes are going to come from
sperm. This sperm and that's why this process has more error. The older you are and the longer your chromosomes have been sitting there because those spindles are going to break down and we're
going to have that increase in an uploiti like we already said purely because of this impact.
Can I ask a question about that specifically? I think now would be the right time to ask,
which is that my understanding is that a lot of the dynamics of pulling a part of this impact. Can I ask a question about that specifically? I think now would be the right time to ask,
which is that my understanding is that a lot of the dynamics
of pulling apart of this is it for like thing,
these chromosomes, and then is related to mitochondrial DNA.
Because there are a lot of mechanics,
we're literally talking about an egg splitting itself,
in half and then-
And mitochondria is its powerhouse.
Yeah, and the mitochondria,
and so mitochondrial health is a big topic these days.
And so we sure to touch on nutrition supplementation and prescription drugs that impact mitochondrial health is a big topic these days. And so we were sure to touch on nutrition supplementation
and prescription drugs that impact mitochondrial health.
But I've heard of a new procedure called 3-parent IVF
where they're taking basically the DNA from the intended mom,
the DNA from intended dad, and then putting it into a surrogate, like a donor egg that is where the DNA has been
sucked out, and then, you know, because it has healthier, younger mitochondrial DNA. So you're
essentially, let's say you've got a couple in there, like, let's say late 30s or early 40s,
and they're not getting successful embryos or implantations or whatever,
the things aren't working.
They'll take the DNA from mom and dad,
and they'll merge it with a third parent encapsulation.
There are clinics that do this.
I know that a lot of this was actually
been done in Eastern Europe until recently.
Mexico offers either places in Mexico that do this.
In England, it's been used to solve mitochondrial dysfunction,
but in the US, this is still not legal, is that right?
Yes.
So the purpose of what you're talking about,
essentially, when we think about utilizing a donor mitochondrial
or donor egg, the point of that technology
existed to help cure mitochondrial diseases,
which are 100% fatal. And so you would have this subset of people who would,
because if you're the mom, you always pass on your mitochondria to all of the
offspring. So if there's disease inherent in your mitochondria, everybody's
going to get it. And these are very severe diseases.
So the idea of this was first to say, hey, can we overcome this mitochondria disease and give up
people the opportunity, which it has done that, right? Now-
So it works when done properly? When done properly, especially for that purpose. Now that
purpose is distinct because those people aren't infertile, right? There's
something else going on within their mitochondrial disease utilizing that technology to overcome age-related
changes in the eggs has not been successful yet. Are we hopeful that it can? Will people charge
you money for it in certain places? Yes, but you're you're hitting on a really important topic is that the political environment of embryo, research in the United States makes it
extremely hard for us to be the pioneers of new technology in this space. And that is
because a lot of views about an embryo or Windows life began that happens here in the U.S. that
results in limiting the availability and the possibility of doing research in a meaningful
way on human embryos.
Right, because it would require the destruction of a lot of, and it would also, and I looked
into this a little bit as a, from an perspective to be clear. It would also require that
the abortions be performed differently because suction abortions destroy embryos in ways that
extraction abortions don't. So that is a very controversial topic. I mean, it's something that
maybe will return to in an episode about stem cells in the future. Yeah, it's fascinating because
especially if you look at IVF, the whole separate issue is that
there's millions of embryos that people are no longer using because they have had success, they had
extra embryos in the bank, they got divorced, a variety of reasons, and a lot of people would like
to donate their embryos to science. Feel like, hey, I don't want to have this embryo implanted. I don't want to
carry this child, but potentially could something good or could it help advance the field? But that's
not really a tangible option. When people do that, what is actually happening is their embryos
are being utilized to train embryologists, which is valid, right? To teach them how to
thought and freeze and biopsy and do different things, so it's still useful.
But it's not in a meaningful way like we'd really love to be able to utilize to advance
the science, especially for these embryos that have been created, yet people no longer
need them for family growth.
So what happens to all the embryos that people don't use?
It's a fantastic question.
And right now they sit in storage. This is, well this is a new problem.
Okay. IVF is only 40-ish years old. Embryo freezing alone, right? The first IVF,
oh my, we haven't even gone through the whole process, but the first IVF baby,
there's no FSH LH to stimulate more of the eggs outside the vault to grow. So they followed
the single follicle and they didn't have
the procedure which we do now, which is a minimally invasive procedure to extract eggs. We go vaginally
with a needle attached to the ultrasound and we enter into each follicle and we drain it. The very
first IVF, you followed one follicle and you went in abdominally with a surgery to get put that
needle into the follicle and drain it out and give that just one egg a chance.
And then of course, there was no embryo freezing originally.
So the field is still rather young
to understand some of this.
And as technology rapidly improves,
we see things like better success rates
with freezing and thawing embryos,
better process of getting more embryos to grow.
But now we have a lot of embryos in storage
that may or may not be used.
I personally tell people, you should keep your embryos,
you should pay the storage fee,
until no matter what, the worst thing on planet Earth
happens to you, you're done having children.
Because sadly, I live in a spectrum with my field
where I see a lot of sadness.
And people who maybe have lost a child,
something else has happened, and they have maybe a sibling
who they feel like they really want to give this sibling child
the chance to be a sibling again.
And often you're much older when you're experiencing this.
And if you had had embryos frozen that you could have used, but you got rid of them, you're going older when you're experiencing this. And if you had had embryos frozen
that you could have used but you got rid of them,
you're gonna be really upset
if you find yourself in that circumstance.
So I always say, you should save them
until you know that you don't not going to need them.
And then what do you do with them?
Most people just discard them.
Some people will donate them to labs,
which is called for research,
but mostly it's for
embryologists training. To get better at doing that. Which is also important.
But embryo donations a new thing. So being able to just like we have people who donate sperm and donate eggs, embryo donation is the next evolution of an opportunity to allow more people to become parents. It's a little bit of the Wild West.
People finding people in Facebook groups and connecting.
It's this whole other dynamic when it comes to what we call third party reproduction
or, you know, what do you do with known donors and things like that?
But it's a very interesting concept.
So this problem is emerging as the technology is getting better.
I'm realizing now remembering, rather, that when I was in college and graduate school,
you would see these ads in the student paper for egg donors and sperm donors.
Spirmer generate throughout the lifespan,
so that's a kind of less controversial issue,
but this is now not allowed most places
to advertise for egg donors on college campuses.
That's my understanding.
The egg donors were often paid whatever they were paid.
I'm not gonna say it was reasonable amounts or a dot,
because I don't recall what they were paid.
Everyone's circumstances are different.
But the argument that most people use against this is, oh, these people are giving up eggs
that they could otherwise use, but we now know that's not true.
So do you have any knowledge of, like, what was the rationale for limiting the recruitment
of egg donors?
Anyway, I'm not arguing for again. for limiting the recruitment of ag donors.
Anyway, I'm not arguing for her again. So I just, it's no longer supported
based on what you said by the argument
that they're losing eggs, they would otherwise
be able to take care of.
Some of this about proper informed consent,
especially at an age where the financial incentive
can be very persuasive without understanding
not that it harms your fertility later, but that you're going to have genetic children
out there.
And you might potentially, and we are seeing this now, we don't know if you individually
will have infertility for a variety of reasons, because you're not trying to have a family
until much later.
But the same concern doesn't seem to exist for men who are donating sperm.
I mean, it should.
There's this whole donor-conceived community where people are really talking about putting
new restrictions on, will you sperm donation, for example?
There are sperm donors who have hundreds of children, hundreds, right?
They're these sibling pods because it's been so unlimited
and sperm banks are a business that work to make money
and they make money by selling more sperm.
But that's not healthy.
One for a population, you need genetic diversity,
but also it's not healthy necessarily for one person
of all these half-siblings and to just not know
when you're going to run into somebody
who could potentially be your sibling.
Is it this guy at the bar that you like?
Do you have to worry about that if your donor conceived?
So we're starting to see sperm banks finally start to real back
and put limitations on how many families,
total children's tough, right?
Because one family might have a child
and you want them to be able to have sibling children, but at least for how many families that that donor can contribute to.
And we're seeing sperm donors deal with the fact that now there's no anonymous donation.
We can act like anonymous donation exists, meaning it is not identified at the time that somebody's
utilizing the sperm, but with direct to consumer testing for genetics,
like 23 and me and ancestry,
people are being connected with their sperm donors,
with their egg donors, with their sibling pods,
and then we have to believe that technology's
only going to improve over time.
So what people do for money, especially when they're young,
I think without understanding the
potential ramifications. And I don't want to act like sperm donation or egg donation are bad.
They give people the opportunity to become parents that otherwise might not be able to. And that
is a lovely and a beautiful gift. But you need to understand what that might mean and how that might impact your own potential
children later to to know that there you have genetic half sublings out there.
Egg donation, people do get compensated much better than sperm donation.
There's certain characteristics that are hard to find that get compensated even more so.
And certain, you know, ethnicities,
doctorate degrees and things like that where somebody can really pay for their
education by donating their eggs.
It's a dilemma because what you'd love to say is like free some eggs for you
too. If you're going to do that, you're at the perfect age to freeze your own
eggs. And there's been strategies to try to mitigate this.
And I don't want to get off too much on a tangent,
but it's a really fine line that you
walk with what people understand.
So there is a company, and I won't name them,
but they are promoting that young women donate their eggs,
and they will freeze half of them for you,
and half of them will go and become donor
eggs.
Interesting business model, but I could see the potential ethical concern.
So I think ethically this sounds good because you get to freeze some eggs, but I think more
people will donate eggs than otherwise would have for some of the reasons we previously stated.
And I also think you would get more money by simply donating your eggs
and then turning around and paying for us
round of freezing your own eggs.
You would get paid more and you'd have more eggs
because one of the issues is,
do you now falsely believe that you have enough eggs
in the bank because you did this split,
but you don't really have enough
because we already walked through the math at 20 eggs,
doesn't really result in such a high probability
of having a multi-child family.
So, you know, there's a lot of ethical debate
in gamy and embryo donation.
It definitely is the Wild West,
and there's an uncharted territory,
even in embryo donation.
There's places who are very unethical about it,
who will only
allow people to have embryos if they are heterosexual, and married for three years, make
a certain income, submit to a home study.
Yet, they let the people have no say over the embryos that are transferred, be it how
many, what stage, what quality, and they're taking people's money and putting terrible embryos inside of them,
and really wasting their resources, which could have been used in another way.
Yeah, the dangers of profitization of biology.
Right, and tech entering spaces is amazing, but also technology starts to advance before studies.
Right?
Tech is going to become, has more finance backing
than we see scientific studies get.
I feel like one of the major questions out there
is whether or not IVF babies, we'll just call them that,
have a higher incidence of things like spectrum conditions
or other developmental trajectories, let's
call them.
And I'm not trying to be politically correct here, but I think nowadays the word disorder
has to be really carefully examined when considering any neurologic and psychiatric situation.
We've had discussions about this on this podcast before, but a lot of
people are wondering just to be direct.
A lot of people are wondering, do more IVF babies have autism than non-IVF babies?
Is this a good question?
And it's changed over time in a couple different ways, and I think this is important to understand.
So if we just think about the hormonal environment with natural conception,
and you know, you have a peak estrogen, let's say, of 200 something, you have progesterone
being made, the placenta is implanting. And what is the main difference with IVF babies?
And a lot of it has been tied back to the uterine environment, especially in what we call
fresh embryo transfers, which is really not a common, especially in what we call fresh embryo transfers,
which is really not a common practice anymore.
So in a fresh embryo transfer,
I'm gonna take the eggs out of your body,
fertilize them in the lab, and grow out embryos,
and then I'm going to put the best embryo
back in your body five days later
at the natural time of implantation.
And if we rewind the clock, that's how IVF was done, right?
When you couldn't freeze embryos very well and they didn't survive. And you'd put lots of embryos inside because they
wouldn't survive. And that's the early days of IVF when you saw a lot of multiples, a lot of
high-order multiples. And of course, multiples have their own distinct issues that put them at
higher risk for developmental disorders and issues with development and birth risk in general.
Right?
They're common to be fair.
They're commonly referred to as disorders.
I just think around autism in particular,
there's a camp, a growing camp out there
that want to refer to differently.
We've covered this.
Anytime this comes up, I bring up both
just to highlight the fact that, yes,
we are aware
and sensitive to that emerging issue.
Right now, unfortunately, for sake of conversation, there's no new nomenclature, so we could easily
get caught down in the attempt to try and smooth over everything with everybody and as a
consequence, confuse everybody.
So I think we'll go for clarity forward with the understanding that the nomenclature
is changing.
I can't even say alcoholism anymore because it's alcohol use disorder and I don't have a problem with that.
But a lot of people wonder if those are two different things.
And we want to simplify science for people.
Exactly. So feel free.
Okay. So when we first were doing IVF, we're putting embryos back in an extremely unnatural environment.
If you have 20 eggs growing and each egg makes 200
kilograms of estrogen, suddenly now you have these extremely high super
physiologic estrogen levels, higher progesterone levels because there's more
corpus luteums, and this environment is not the normal for how the placenta
would invade into that maternal blood circulature, and a lot of these issues
that are commonly associated became so because of placental issues. And a lot of these issues that are commonly associated
became so because of placental issues.
So a lot of things like growth restriction,
small fragestational age, preterm birth,
which further puts you at risk
for other developmental disorders,
were associated with these fresh transfers.
The field has changed.
We do a lot of frozen embryo transfers,
a lot of it for this reason.
We see huge improvement in neonatal outcomes when you lead off that high hormonal uterine environment
and then regrow the lining of the uterus and a hormonal level that's more natural and then
transfer the embryo. And we see completely different fetal outcomes. So that's fantastic as far as looking
at the change over the field.
But of course, if you take all IVF babies over all time,
it's a little murky because you have modern practice
and old practice.
We also know that infertility people,
if you can diagnose with infertility.
So you're under age 35 and you try to get pregnant
with regular periods
for one year and have not had success or you're 35 and older and you've tried for six months
and you've not had success, you meet the medical definition for infertility. When that happens,
you now statistically, regardless if you get pregnant naturally in the next month or
you do IVF, you have a 1% higher chance of birth defects,
and you have a slightly higher chance
of developmental disorders.
So is it more population-based versus procedure-based?
And there's probably something to that to underlying
a lot of potentially what goes in
or what can cause infertility when it comes to quality
of eggs or sperm or uterine environment or things
that we're still learning about.
When it comes to autism specifically, the number one strongest association we have is Advanced
paternal age.
So when you look at the people and the male sperm comes from an ejaculation after age 50,
that one does have the highest significance associated with autism
and also with some other very interesting autosomodominant disorders. So we don't want to take advanced
paternal age likely, although it does get so much less attention than what we call advanced
maternal age or being over age 35 in a woman. And that is purely because of the differences
and the sperm and the
egg environment and how their quality is impactful.
Thank you for that answer.
I think it's really important for people to hear that because the lower out there is
that IVF higher incidence of autism and IVF babies, but it sounds like a good percentage
of those could be because of age-related
factors as well as technology-related factors and that the technology is getting better
all the time if I understood correctly.
Well, we didn't complete the discussion of IVF and I want to do that.
Talk about XC and a few other things.
I know that's definitely your wheelhouse.
Before we do that, can we inject a little subcomversation around this because I neglected to bring
this up earlier?
I know there's a lot of curiosity about this and then we'll finish off IVF.
Can we do that?
Sort of a pause in the IVF.
So the eggs are out, they're frozen, sperm's out, it's frozen, or maybe they're going to
put a non-fose. Excuse me.
Spirms directly onto those unfrozen eggs will pause their intermission for those potential
embryos.
And talk about something that you've been very open about, which is, and a lot of people
are not, frankly, in your profession.
So I really appreciate this, which is nutrition and supplementation to optimize the health
of a quality and not just for people who want to get pregnant, but for people who believe
that fertility is a proxy for overall health.
So I mean, are there things that people should eat and not eat, things that people should
supplement and not supplement in order to optimize their fertility.
I mean, this is definitely an interest of mine, right? All my fellowship research cycles around
fecundability and natural fertility. And I think we really do a disservice by how medicine really
is categorized by organ systems because we act like things in one place don't impact the other.
As if. Right. But it's you have a body and your body,
and especially your hormones change and fluctuate
and they're meant to.
They are meant to be a dynamic system.
But the world and the environment of which
you are subjecting your body to has proven changes
on both hormonal function and also when it comes
to egg and sperm quality.
And so if you are somebody who just wants to live your healthiest life and have your most
regular periods and have your hormones as well balanced as they can be for a lack of a better
word, we'll just say that that means that they're functioning normally.
Then pay attention to the things that you do are really important.
And so I know this is a big one for you. Sleep is probably the number one thing that people don't do that does impact their reproductive hormone system,
and therefore can impact against sperm quality because sleep is when you have cellular repair
and when you can drop your inflammation levels.
We know that inflammation is just toxic to eggs and sperm.
It is.
The inflammatory environment is not ideal for conception. And then for a female,
you have to deal with the fact that you have your egg quality, but you also have how inflammation or
what you're exposed to impacts your uterine environment. So you have a two-fold situation here. So
none of this should be shocking news when it comes to nutrition, but it is not
talked about enough. You're right. Decreasing inflammation by the foods that we put in our body is
consistently shown with an improvement in fecundability, an improvement in ovulation, an improvement in
success with IVF, and a decrease in miscarriage. Right? Huge studies have looked at these.
Now, the Vic caveat is that nutrition studies are super hard
because people who consume flax, for example,
tend to have other good health behaviors
that sometimes make it hard to identify what flax did
versus their general health versus somebody
who eats fast food every day.
So, nutrition studies tend to be observational, and fertility studies are really hard too,
because what endpoint are you using? Is it getting pregnant? Is it live birth? Are you
looking at IVF? Are you looking at natural fertility? And we have a lot of different overlap
that makes both of these a little bit difficult. And so they're all cohort based
or population based studies,
where you analyze how people perform
when it comes to fertility treatments
or getting pregnant naturally
based on their exposures to certain things.
Diet's high in fruits and vegetables are good for you, right?
Fiber, antioxidants, fruit is not bad,
fruit got this really bad reputation. Really, I love fruit. I love fruit too, but people think that it has sugar and that it's bad for you, fiber, antioxidants. Fruit is not bad. Fruit got this really bad reputation.
Really, I love fruit.
I love fruit too, but people think that it has sugar
and that it's bad for you.
It has fructose.
But it is not that type of sugar is not bad for you.
If we can just agree on the fact that fruit has a lot
of nutritional benefit, especially when it comes to vitamins
and antioxidants that can be extremely beneficial
in decreasing inflammation.
Grains, so whole grains, especially that your body provide a lot of great fiber. that can be extremely beneficial in decreasing inflammation. Oh, grain.
So whole grains, especially that your body, you know,
provide a lot of great fiber.
So of course, if you have siliac or you're gluten intolerant,
you're a different category, but there was so much focus
on keto and people eliminating grains as a food group overall.
And even though that might be utilized in a dietary strategy
to lose weight and losing weight can improve fertility, likely
because of inflammation being the primary driver, because we know that even in studies
where I take donor eggs and I transfer that embryo into somebody who's overweight, they
have lower odds of success than if they were a normal BMI.
So we can't act like that causation
is just on egg quality from obesity, right?
There's also some inflammations and inflammatory changes
that impact the body's ability or desire
to allow an embryo to implant.
So fruits, veggies, whole grains are all good.
Interestingly, you know, dairy tends to be,
okay, in most studies, but what we do see is that,
if you're gonna have dairy, have the real thing,
the processed dairy, the skim milk,
that actually decreases your fertility.
And likely because the processing
to make it still look like milk,
when you take out the fat,
is adding in things
that are unnatural potentially impacting your fertility.
I don't drink milk anymore, but when I was a teenager, I drank half and half.
I'm not recommending anyone to that.
Remember I was a skein teenager?
You were trying to book that.
Well, no, I just could afford to.
I wasn't trying at that age.
I wasn't trying to at all, but it was just delicious.
But so, cheeses, whole, full fat milk,
half and half yogurt.
Yeah, but don't choose the skin one.
Choose the actual one that comes with some of the milk fat.
Fat is not bad for you.
There's also this right,
or hopefully we're getting away from it,
but there's been such a low fat craze
or this real attention that fat is so bad.
But fat comes in so many important
forms, avocados and oils and nuts, dairy, meat, fat and cholesterol are the backbone for all hormones,
right? So you need that in order for your body to make the estrogen and progesterone that it needs
to allow this whole process to happen.
And so there's this idea that those are bad for you. That's just really not. So healthy fats, whole grains, fruits, veggies. And what about proteins and meats? Because I think within those
categories, you know, I'm a big fan of sustainably, you know, like raised meats if possible. Some
people choose not to eat meat, but fish, eggs, love it all. Okay, so let's just go through the meats
and the myth and the facts.
So we'll do tofu.
So there's this big issue that tofu has soy
and that too much soy can be bad
because soy can be a phytoestrogen.
Tofu does not negatively impact fertility, even in men.
In fact, it can improve it
because it does have some antioxidant-like properties,
lots of iron.
When it comes to fish, fish are fantastic sources
of healthy fats and omega-3 fatty acids,
which are very crucial in the reproductive process.
We do worry about if you're pregnant,
having too much fish and overexposure to mercury
and how that can impact fetal brain development.
So the general recommendation is three servings per week.
That doesn't mean- Let me guess the serving
is like four to six ounces.
It's supposed to be like a real human.
That needs, you know, six to eight ounces of it.
And I think it's important to say,
even though people will tell you that
when you're trying to get pregnant with the idea
of we don't know when you're going to be pregnant,
if you're going through things like egg freezing or IVF and you know when you're going to get pregnant with the idea of we don't know when you're going to be pregnant. If you're going through things like egg freezing
or IVF and you know when you're going to be pregnant,
I wouldn't feel like you have to restrict yourself
on the consumption of seafood during those time periods
when you know you're not pregnant yet.
Because really the concern is about that mercury
and what it could potentially do to a fetal brain.
And raw seafood, correct?
No sushi, no sashimi.
Well, when you're pregnant correct,
and that's mostly because of the risk of infectious disease
that can cause severe brain development and other issues.
What are they doing in Japan?
I don't know.
I don't live there.
They probably laugh at this.
They probably do laugh at us.
They probably do laugh at us.
So who's been pregnant in Japan?
Every child, tell us.
Yeah, or conceived in Japan.
Tell us, don't tell us the story of the conception
like but tell us tell us also. Did you have sashimi?
Overall
meat is a really broad category and studies study it differently like is it all meat?
Are you distinguishing now red meat and chicken? Are you putting it all together?
I mean obviously, I think we can all come to the agreement that process needs are not
good for a variety of different reasons.
In addition to being carcinogenic, those toxins do negatively impact fertility.
Now, so deli meat, no bueno.
So, yeah, but in specifically, those things like the bacon and the things that are really
highly prostate hot dogs, sorry, the fourth-digit-l-i-hot dog picnic,
but those things really do not provide nutritional advantages
and only harm. Especially then, when we have red meat,
for the most part, red meat when isolated individually
and most circumstances in moderation tends to be fine.
I usually tell my patients, I want them to eat a plant forward diet,
but that doesn't mean no meat,
but I say, look at your meat servings,
I don't want it red meat every single day,
because there was a study looking at IVF
and looking at embryos,
and the more servings,
a lot of nutritional studies based things on quartile.
So who eats the lowest,
and the second most, and the third most, and the top most. And people who ate in that top quartile of red meat had
lower progression of embryos through the culture. So less embryos that
developed, less normal embryos and lower success rates. And do we know anything
about how that meat was arriving? Or we're talking about like like Hogi sandwiches
or we're talking about like grass fed grass fed steaks, you know.
Right, these studies are not wonderful,
but that doesn't mean that they don't hold merit
in helping us guide counseling,
but, you know, that one was how many servings of red meat
do you eat in a week, right?
So we don't really know,
does the really ethically source the grass fed,
you know, this environment, which we feel like
is much less toxic than potentially, let's say, like a cattle factory where the cows are injected with all sorts of things. Is there a difference in how those impact your reproduction?
Probably, right? If this cow is getting injected with a lot of hormones, why are we thinking that
it's not impacting the meat that you're then ingesting into your body?
No, I think our audience will certainly subscribe to that idea.
I think most of them will.
I mean, the notion that like the pollutants you breathe in the air somehow are not the
air that you breathe in here long, is just like completely not.
What?
And the idea-
The people feel the way and they hold strongly to this idea that it can't be this thing that I love that is causing this problem, right?
The denial of the association between what we put in and on our body and how it impacts our body's function is really strong in some people.
And I think it's really just lack of education and awareness because the medical community for so long did not address these factors, right?
Your doctor never talked to you about nutrition.
And so it just became this idea that it must not matter, otherwise your doctor would talk to you about it.
I think sugar is the last thing I just didn't mention, but added sugar and artificial sugars are bad for you.
Artificial sugars.
Artificial sugars too.
Including stevia sort of plant-based low-calorie sweetener.
Stevia itself hasn't been studied as much as the other ones.
Things like sweeten low and all of those.
But what we do know is that they interfe- they cause inflammation inside the body.
And then they also cause and cause a stress reaction. then they also cause a stress reaction,
and they can cause higher rates of miscarriage
when you intake more sugar and artificial sugar.
So that's a lot to wrap your head around,
and I see the same thing to every patient.
One cake, one this, one hot dog.
I mean, those things individually
are not gonna make a difference, right?
It's the choices that you make every single day
that are going to set you up to be your healthy self or not.
And so you should make choices in line
with how you want to treat yourself.
You want to be in your best health.
You want your hormones functioning the best.
And if that added helps you get pregnant when you want to,
helps you have a better chance of success with IVF.
Oh my gosh, what a fantastic benefit.
But that doesn't mean you can't enjoy
some of these bad things here and there,
as long as you've set yourself up on the day-to-day,
where you're giving your body lots of nutritious food
that it needs to make hormones.
Similarly, being very underway in calorie restricting,
we all know is really terrible for your reproductive system
and can cause the brain to totally shut down ovulation
because it senses that you can't have a pregnancy.
If people miscarry, excuse me,
for by virtue of being underway, does the body,
like I learned some years ago,
I think this is still true, that one of the signals
for the onset of puberty and females is that leptin hormone is secreted from body fat,
that then signals to the brain, to the hypothalamus, like, okay, there's enough reserves to create
environment. It's a signal about environmental.
Yeah, there's enough extra fat to have a baby.
Yeah, and there's presumably enough food around
to sustain that baby.
Right.
Our miscarriages and lack of body fat correlated.
On both ends of the spectrum, yes.
Right, so lack of body fat and being overweight,
we see decrease in getting pregnant per month
and we see increase in losing pregnancies.
So certainly there is a healthy medium where your body has what it needs.
And that makes sense because if you have, I like to even say, hypothelemic dysfunction.
So maybe your brain's not totally shut off where it's sending out no hormones and you're
not ovulating, because you're not getting pregnant in that circumstance.
But certainly, ovulation disorders are on a spectrum where you go from a perfectly synchronized cycle
to one that prolongs it, you know, gets shorter together
than prolongs and then you have nothing.
There's this spectrum of dysfunction,
which is representing your hormones,
not being necessarily perfect
and that can have impacts on the placenta
trying to grow into that uterus.
I mean, the placenta is fascinating, right? An entire talk just on the placenta trying to grow into that uterus. I mean, the placenta is fascinating, right?
An entire talk just on the placenta.
But it has, it does this incredible job where your body has
to not reject it yet, allow it to eat away at the side
of your uterus and grow into your blood vessels.
But that requires a very specific hormonal environment
for it to be done and to be done, right?
I think in the same breath of all of this, what you're also
asking is, yeah, OK, so that's eating healthy. None of that's really new news for most people.
A lot of those things I just said. Well, I think so, but I do want to thank you, because I think
rarely, if ever, do we hear somebody, he's so physician, be really direct about like, hey, listen,
some read me, yes, not excessive amounts of writing. It's just ideally from sustainable sources,
That's not excessive amounts of revenue. It's just ideally from sustainable sources, whole fat milk products, grains, fruits, vegetables.
I mean, those kind of straight, what, like, do you seem like straight forward directives
are actually pretty rare in the landscape of public health discussion, because more often
than not, people talk about nutrition and these kind of elimination diet type things like,
you know, eliminate all the grains or eliminate all the meat or
you know eliminate all the milk milk fats when in reality I think people forget that like most people out there are omnivores and they can make better choices about not deli meat you know less bacon if any bacon right
some veggies with your lunch right you can make better choices on the day to day I think that is a great point
I think there's a place for supplements I think the big disclaimer that everybody's gonna say
with supplements is that they are not regulated
like the way medications are, right?
And I will say supplements and herbs are different things,
right, a supplement, but many companies are adding herbs
to their supplements and that can get into really murky
territory, especially when it comes to how some of these herbs
do have estrogen and progestin like properties
and can impact reproduction and hormones.
And perhaps even androgenic properties too.
So we can't act like everything's created equal.
So I always tell people, if I recommend you take a supplement
or your doctor does, your due diligence
is to look at what is also included
and make sure it doesn't have these extra added things that they're unaware of because sometimes
they can have negative impact at one stage of your life or another depending on where you
are.
Certainly, you know, a prenatal vitamin which has folic acid, we all know that folic acid
is really important to prevent neural tube defects, but it's also important in cell division
and how the ovary is growing follicles and growing eggs.
So should people, women, but also men,
be taking a vitamin with folic acid,
even when they're not trying to conceive?
There's no harm in having it,
but very often pregnancies occur
when you're not trying to conceive,
and that is a store that needs to be built up three months ahead of time.
So we really need you to be taking that ahead of getting pregnant.
So not just, let's get pregnant right now, I'm going to start this prenatal vitamin.
So I recommend anybody who's in their reproductive years, take a prenatal vitamin.
We also know that many, many people are vitamin D deficient and vitamin D does impact reproduction.
And so I usually say a thousand international units of vitamin D is not going to be harmful
in anybody.
It's going to be helpful for most people.
Some people definitely need higher levels.
So we screen everybody with a vitamin D to see who needs to have extra, but you
know a blanket statement that extra vitamin D is going to be helpful. Omega-3 fatty acids
also extremely important in one being anti-inflammatory, but two brain development of a fetus. So most
prenatals now actually do have those omega-3 fatty acids in them, but if they don't, I recommend
a patient take those.
Just a brief question, Sasha insertion there.
There's a laboratory up at the University of California, Santa Barbara that's published
some really interesting data showing that essentially brain weight, which is just about
one indirect measure of brain health, but brain weight at birth seems to be correlated at least in
some positive way with the amount of essential fatty acids that mom consume during pregnancy.
Does that sound cool?
Yeah, I mean, that does hold.
And there's my studies about that mice are smarter when they have diets, you know, with
omega-3 fatty acids when they are in utero, right?
So the exposure on the time period is really important. you know, with omega-3 fatty acids when they are in utero, right?
So the exposure on the time period is really important.
And omega-3 has a lot of health benefits when it comes to
their antioxidant properties, especially in, like,
an endometriosis, diseases that are very highly inflammatory.
They can be very beneficial.
We're definitely gonna talk about your work about after
baby has arrived and an impact of essential fatty acids.
But what would you say is the dosage cut off
on this podcast before I've sort of thrown out
numbers like one to two grams per day of the EPA form
of essential fatty acid.
And then we could have a whole discussion
about my get three or my get six ratios.
But do you think there's a upper limit?
Is it truly that, you know,
let's say up to four grams per day of EPA is is without the advantageous, is it better than one gram?
I tell people a gram.
A gram.
That's in alignment with pretty much what we've talked about before.
So that's what I recommend.
You know, when I give my hand out to my patients and they're trying to get pregnant, it's
going to have a prenatal, a thousand I use of vitamin D, a gram of omega-3s, and then co-cutan.
Co-cutan, which essentially in general is trying to help the mitochondria.
That's the whole idea here that it is helping provide support across the body in a lot of
different ways, right?
Like co-cutan is using a lot of different areas of the body, but when it comes to reproduction,
when it comes to meiosis and cell division
and ovulation and ed quality and even sperm quality, there's a place for CQ10 showing benefit
without harm, right? And so, no, I said earlier, nothing's without any harm or any risk of harm,
but very, very little. So, I usually recommend if you're trying to get pregnant and you take
CQ10, a dose of 200 milligrams
three times a day. So this kind of higher dose than sometimes people are on. Often prenatals
now have just like 200 total in it.
Right. So the expensive ingredients are usually the lower concentrations and the glands.
You can eat just enough so they can put it on the label.
Right. We include CQ-10. Does the form of C-Q10 matter? Because you'll find them in gel capsules,
you'll also find them in powdered capsules.
I always say, I mean, there might be
for the individual person, I mean, absorption of medication
is really depending on what on gut health and other factors.
But the number one issue with supplementation
is that people don't stick to it.
So I always say, whichever one you're going to consistently take
is going to be the better form.
Right. A question about Elkharnitine. Yeah. And researching a little bit for this episode.
In other say, you know, oral alkharnitine has been associated with some improvements in
forward motility and sperm, maybe egg quality. But we know that a very small percentage of
the oral alkharnitine that one ingest is actually utilized. So some people actually purchase and use injectable alcharnatine,
which is kind of painful,
because it's in an alcohol-based suspension,
so not comfortable.
It's gotta be done in trimoscurally.
But my rate of the data is kind of impressive.
I wouldn't say super impressive.
Are you ever injecting patients or having them inject themselves
with alcharnatine?
This would be both female or
male patients are both, or using oral alkanateen, or the data just not impress you enough to
motivate that. We use a gram of alkanateen with a gram of vitamin C for our male patients who have
any abnormal sperm parameter, and so that is kind of what we consider these sperm enhancement protocol.
And just that. That's what the multivitamin.
So those two with the multivitamin and co-cutan.
So that's kind of like the male protocol.
Of course, there's different specifics for one individual person.
I don't tend to recommend it for most females.
That being said, those who have endometriosis fall into a unique category where inflammation
is so high that usually it's a different environment
where we recommend Elkharnitine, NSEAL-Systeine, Vitamin C and E. They kind of fall into a different
category because they've been known inflammatory disease. But if we're just talking about the person
at whole who maybe wants to take some supplements for their reproductive health that have very little
side effects and for the most part can potentially
be helpful.
It's going to be, you know, co-Q10, alchornateen vitamin C can be helpful, especially for the
male, for the female partner.
We're going to be looking at that extra vitamin D in addition to the prenatal with folic
acid.
And what about women with PCOS?
I get so many questions about PCOS, rhinocytal.
So, and there, we're talking myonositol,
or what is it, the de-kyro?
Do I have that right?
You do have that right.
Myonositol is the main driver of anositol
and how it can be helpful.
If you, most blends are going to have a combination
of both of them, but a much higher ratio of myonositol
to de-kyro.
And so, myonositol is probably the one
that really is doing the work
and PCOS. What is it doing? It is definitely helping the body when it comes to insulin and sugar,
helping the body be more sensitive to insulin or less resistant to it, essentially helping you
respond to what you eat in a better way. And it also looks like it does potentially
decrease some of that inflammation pathway in PCOS. In PCOS, this insulin resistance correlates
with this testosterone production from the ovary, meaning even metformin alone can decrease
testosterone levels based on some of the change that it has in the ovary.
Take note, men.
So many guys taking metformin or burbrine thinking,
oh, this is great, I'm gonna lower my blood sugar,
mimic fasting and live longer.
And then these are also the same people who are writing me
go, how come when I take metformin?
I either have headaches,
because I've essentially hypoglycemia.
Yeah, you can see so low.
But also their testosterone levels are getting crushed,
not in every case, but it happens.
And I think those are things people just don't think about.
They read that a supplement might be beneficial for this one thing that doesn't apply to them
and they start taking it.
Yeah.
Also, the evidence on metform and extending life, we had Peter T. Onnier to talk about this,
the evidence for that is, oh, so poor.
It's just not really that convincing.
It may change, but then now all the excitement
is about wrap up my sin.
And so extending your life while plummeting
your testosterone, you know, I mean, that's a,
actually that strategy has been tried
in the longevity commute.
There was this whole castration idea, right?
Oh, I don't know this.
Oh yeah, this was like the heavens gate cult
where they castrated themselves.
Did they look longer?
Well, they ended up committing mass suicide.
So, so, so, you, so they ended the experiment early.
Rightfully.
Yeah, so in any event, going back to supplements, sorry, could help myself, supplements that
women can potentially take, just to increase their fertility, even if they don't want to get
pregnant, as just kind of creating a milieu of health.
You talked about the nutrition,
you talked about COQ-10, maybe alcharnatine vitamin C,
the essential fatty acids,
getting at least one gram of EPA,
so that might require taking two grams of fish oil
to get the EPA, myonostatol,
so how much are you talking about?
I've seen some pretty high dosages thrown out there.
For myonostatol?
Yeah, for two thousand milligrams.
Okay, taken before sleep, or does it matter?
That one doesn't matter, that one doesn't matter.
Thank you for covering the topic of supplements
and supplementation.
This is probably a good point to return back
to those harvested eggs.
So eggs are out, and there's a collection of them frozen.
Maybe just maybe lives, they're always alive, sorry.
Fresh sperm, they call it fresh sperm.
They're not always alive.
Some portion of the ejaculate is going to be dead sperm, right?
Some live, some four motile, some non-ford motile.
The twitchers, I read, is the name of the...
Hate the twitchers.
Right, the...
And so, okay, they're going to wash the sperm.
Why?
Because most of what people see as a ejaculate or no, excuse me, as a ejaculate is not actually
the sperm, right?
Okay.
Okay.
So, but sperm or wash there in one compartment, you have to egg out, you or your embryologist
at your clinic is then going to, at some point, decide to
combine them. So is it kind of, is it a sperm race or you maybe could explain X-E?
Yeah. And why would one want, why would one opt for X-E? And are there any risks with X-E?
Because they're, you're really at some level. This is the only place where I kind of sit
back and, okay, if somebody you, you know, say neural development, like some level you're saying,
hey, that sperm looks good.
Whereas when you run a sperm race, nature is saying,
hey, this sperm really did beat all the other sperm.
So let's segue first because I think this is nice
because the question I get asked all the time,
when we talk about nutrition and supplements
and all of that is to you now you're doing IVF
or you're freezing your eggs.
And what behaviors are good or bad,
of course, all of those same ones are,
but about how long do you need to do them?
And this is why if you live healthy most of the days,
it doesn't really matter because that's how you're living.
But we already know the sperm cycle is about 90 days.
And the eggs I like to say,
even though they're in the vault, they become,
they start lining up, getting ready to exit the vault, and become more susceptible to the things you're doing
in that 90-day window. And we know that to be true as well. So they start to be pre-selected
for who's coming out the next month. They start to line up. And so making these changes,
as you start thinking about getting pregnant, doing fertility treatments, is still extremely beneficial.
People will often say, well, I haven't been doing that.
So why start now?
It's not gonna make a difference, but truly it can.
Or I'll drink up until the week.
Until the day I'll just get it in.
I know, I know, I know, I'm gonna have my two glasses of wine,
which actually equates to about six glasses of wine
when you measure out by the volume, right? right up until the week before getting pregnant or something.
Yeah, but no.
So, so people always ask, what should I be doing?
Is these healthy behaviors, and you should be doing, you know, this whole time.
When we do IVF, and I'm going to get to all the things you just asked, but earlier you
said, well, how tolerable is it?
The truth is, you're taking shots.
These are subcutaneous shots during the aggro process.
So next to the belly button.
Yeah, next to the belly button, how a diabetic gives insulin
a very small needle.
I mean, nobody loves shots, but they're not
a big intramuscular shot.
It's not like a flu shot or something like that.
This I've been lost in the Texan mosquitoes.
They're way worse than one of these needles.
Exactly.
And so you're going to use those
medications for about 12 to 14 days. You're going to have your follicles grow. You're going to feel
that. So you're going to pelvic pressure. As your estrogen rises, you're also going to third
space, your fluid, which means your fluid, your water component of your blood is going to start to
just eke out a little bit. And you're going to get more bloated.
You're going to have more water weight, you're going to feel puffy
air and that is very common just because of getting the eggs to grow.
You're going to mentally be fine because the female brain
loves high estrogen, so you're doing fine.
And that's one of the main concerns is how emotional will I be
and during this phase of the process, people do great.
When we take the eggs out of the body,
it's about a 20 minute procedure.
It is usually done under IV sedation,
like propylin fentanyl.
And we are watching while we drain those follicles
and get test tubes full of the eggs.
Do some people opt to not use any, say,
I hear the word fentanyl, and I'm sure a lot of people
are like, wait, fentanyl crisis. And I, you know, word fentanyl and I'm sure a lot of people are like, wait, fentanyl crisis.
And I, you know, obviously fentanyl is a drug that has its usage, valid uses in the medical
community.
Does anyone just kind of opt for, you know, just, I mean, we have an anesthesiologist who is
really talking to the patients.
I mean, propyls the base of it.
Certainly, there's some patients who may want to avoid narcotic usage and they use different
strategies.
I mean, there was this huge, right?
The retrieval's podcast came out from like the New York Times
doing a deep dive into a fertility clinic,
Yale, where a nurse was siphoning off fentanyl.
For herself.
For herself and replacing it with saline
and giving patients saline,
these, this clinic did not do anesthesia-based propoval.
So they were supposed to just get fentanyl
and have kind of a less pain environment,
not a no pain environment.
And not just a few, hundreds of women reported extreme pain,
extreme pain through the procedure,
really speaks largely to pain not being taken seriously
when they went and found this out.
Well, what happened to a can't help it us?
What happened to this technician? Well, what happened to, I can't help it, ask. What happened to this technician?
Well, I mean.
Yeah, they're trying to find out no behind bars.
Yeah, I mean, but it's huge as far as to, I can't imagine doing, I do this procedure all
the time, right?
I've done thousands and thousands in my career, and I can't imagine having people be
in pain during it.
So it's, but it's important to know that some clinics
don't use IV sedation or they don't use Prografol,
they don't put you to sleep,
understanding what your clinic is using
is really, really important to set the expectations
or to know, am I going to be awake
or am I going to be asleep?
Can a patient ask you to what specific drugs
are you gonna give me to kill pain?
For sure.
And I mean, some clinics only do one.
Like, I am not going to do a retrieval under no sedation.
Now some clinics would allow that, some clinics, that's all that they do.
But you, that's a huge piece of puzzle that you need to know.
If you're a patient, are you going to be feeling pain, not feeling pain?
What's it going to be like?
I'll say most clinics use propifal
and put patients to sleep.
And so you take a nice little nap for 15 to 20 minutes.
The eggs are retrieved from the follicles
under direct visualization.
They're in test tubes, you wake up,
and you're going to feel crampy.
And you'll get a period 10-ish days later.
But this is when you'll feel you're worse,
and this is just the one thing I want to say
about tolerability of it.
Can you get pregnant in that time?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
There's a case report of an egg donor who is donating her eggs,
and she had sex with her boyfriend.
And because not every egg is always
retrieved from the follicles or some small ones could
ovulate too, and she got pregnant with quintuplets. Whoa. Okay, so you have to really tell people not to have in her
course one from an infectious standpoint because we really are poking, you know,
a pretty large-gauge needle through the vaginal mucosa into the paratonal
cavity. So we don't want to introduce infection, but also for pregnancy and
that time period. And if you got pregnant, your risk of what we call a variant hyperstimulation syndrome, or OHSS,
is very profound.
So what is normally happening is after the retrieval,
your estrogen and progesterone are gonna drop,
you're gonna feel a severe PMS
for lack of a better word.
So you'll be more emotional,
you're still pretty bloated until this all heals.
If you get OHSS, which is very uncommon in modern practice,
but when you did fresh embryo transfers
or people who don't utilize some of the modern protocols,
this means that HCG continues to encourage
all those follicles to make estrogen and progesterone.
And if you are pregnant, you're just gonna have a constant
yet exponential increase
on HCG.
And so this is going to get worse and worse.
So we really don't want people to get pregnant
in that time period.
So when during that time period,
they avoid sex.
So is it in the few days before extraction?
So typically, I usually say it's from like day five
of your stimulation, okay?
So usually the earliest egg retrievals are kind of around cycle day, nine or ten,
if somebody goes fast, until your next period comes. So that's usually about a three-week time
period where we want you to abstain from intercourse. So for the most part though, the more eggs you
have, the more you're going to feel both this hormonal and physical shift than the fewer eggs that you have.
So if you have a low egg count and you need to do IVF or freeze your eggs and you might
do multiple cycles or rounds, you're going to tolerate it actually pretty fine because
you're not going to have these huge shifts.
Physically, you're going to feel fine.
And that's always a big concern.
When you mentioned earlier about different stimulation types,
people have this idea that things that are more natural
are better, right?
Just like this human thought that natural is good
and synthetic is bad.
Naturally, you ovulate one egg a month.
When we're trying to get eggs out of your body,
the success is determined by how many eggs I can get
and how young you are. So it doesn't make sense in most circumstances to do a minimal stimulation protocol,
meaning purposefully underestimulating somebody by saving them money and medication cost in order to
purposely get fewer eggs because they're odds of getting the ultimate success
of what they want is going to be so much lower.
Is there, I don't want you to be in the position
of I don't want to put you rather in the position
of kind of like having to demonize your colleagues
in your profession, but I could see how there's
a pretty significant financial incentive
for people who are really desperate to have children or who just simply might want to have children down the road
to hear low stem is better.
We're talking multiple low stem cycles.
They might be even a fraction of the cost of a full stem cycle, but then there are many,
many more low stem cycles.
You got it.
You can make a lot more money by doing things that are not in the best interest of the patient.
And I mean, that's not uncommon in my field, which is very sad, but it does mean that because
reproduction in IVF are so foreign and unknown, so many people walk in blind, not knowing
if what they're being told really makes sense for their situation.
There are a couple situations where minimal stimulation makes sense.
If you're only going to make three eggs, you're only going to make three eggs.
I don't need all the drugs in the world to tell your body to make three eggs, because there's
only three.
And so that is a scenario where minimal stimulation does make sense.
And then there's the scenario where there's something called InvoCell has your research
exposed you to this.
InvoCell is a way to try to take IVF
into making it more financially accessible
for certain patient populations.
Mainly people who don't ovulate,
like your very refractory PCOS patient
who doesn't respond to medication,
or who have tubal factor infertility, right?
So your fallopian tubes are blocked
because of chlamydia or endometriosis, and we just
have a problem here that against sperm can't get together because you're not ovulating
or your tubes are blocked.
In Invocell, it's a device that is plastic, and you can fit up to 10 eggs in it, and there's
a little middle chamber where the sperm can go.
And so you go through this IVF process with the goal to only get 8 to 10 eggs in it, and there's a little middle chamber where the sperm can go. And so you go through this IVF process
with the goal to only get eight to 10 eggs,
because that's what fits in the device.
And then you put the sperm in the middle of it,
and then you put it inside your vagina,
and you hold it in place with a diaphragm,
and the vagina is the right temperature to incubate.
And so you incubate your embryos
in this little, in-vose-el container inside your vagina. And then five incubate your embryos in this little, in-vosal container inside your vagina.
And then five days later you come in and we take it out and we take the best embryo and we transfer
it. And you can do a fresh transfer because you didn't make so many eggs so your hormones weren't
so high. Do people like this procedure? There's something that seems like like staying in proximity
to this bone. Like you're taking it home. Okay, so I love this procedure, there's something that seems like, like staying in proximity to this permanent egg, like you're taking it home.
Okay, so I love this procedure
in some circumstances,
and I see it applied often in the wrong case
and that can be frustrating, right?
Cause it's still not cheap,
even if it's cheaper than IVF,
it is still not inexpensive and any means.
And so patient selection,
like most things in this field are so important. So let's just say, if you've had no, like if the sperm's the problem, then it's probably
not smart to just presume that the sperm and egg will be fine in there, right?
Like that might be a case where you really do need help with assisted fertilization, or
if you have unexplained infertility.
If we don't know why you haven't been able to get pregnant because everything looks good on paper,
what if fertilization is the issue?
And these are circumstances where you pull out an invoicell
and there's no embryos and you don't really know
where it went wrong.
Was it the fertilization step?
Was it the growth step of the embryos in culture?
So you do have less data, notably I like data.
You can't do genetic testing and this isn't really a strategy that allows you to freeze embry, notably I like data. You can't do genetic testing,
and this isn't really a strategy that allows you
to freeze embryos for future family growth.
That being said, the young patient
who's got greater quality,
who might have really bad PCOS or tubal disease,
it can certainly allow them the opportunity
for a child at a lower price point
when they still have many reproductive years
to finalize their family.
It also is a lovely option for people who need donor sperm to conceive, because the success
rates with this are so much higher than an IUI, which is what a lot of people use,
an intra-utern insemination, or putting the sperm in the uterus. So now we're able to improve
this outcome, so like our same-sex couples or our single parents by choice if it's a single woman who's
trying to become a parent.
Then they need to buy donor sperm and go through the process anyway.
This often can improve that efficacy through the process, pending their age and other factors.
There was a study that was just really neat.
There was a lesbian couple and one of them,
the eggs came out of and the other one incubated the embryos.
Then the other one had the embryo transfer.
But it gave both partners a way to feel a little more involved in
the process, which I just think is always a really cool way
when you have these different options with reproduction.
Seems also that it's more of a three-dimensional environment.
I always imagine that the petri dish is an approach,
is that so two-dimensional compared to the body.
All these things, having done cell culture before and
cultured neurons and things like that,
there's all these concerns about the concentration of CO2 and the thing.
God forbid, if there's a fluctuation,
you have backup generators and things, but in know, you know, God forbid, if there's a fluctuation and you
have backup generators and things, but in the electrical flow to the incubators, that's
disruptive. Whereas the natural environment of the body, even though it fluctuates in
temperature, it's, I mean, this is evolved over, you know, tens of thousands, if not, you
know, hundreds of thousands of years to be the process by which embryos are created.
So there's things, so here's where I sort of default in my mind anyway to the kind of like, oh, it seems more natural.
You're incubating in the, quote unquote,
more natural environment.
Yeah, but at the same breath,
why are you having infertility if you're an infertility patient?
Right? So if you need donor sperm,
you maybe don't have infertility.
Or if you have tubal disease,
you have a very defined reason why we don't think
that there's this huge inflammatory issue in your body
or something unknown.
So again, I'll see it apply to people
who really are bad candidates for it,
based on their age or based on their diagnosis.
And so it's not always better, but for the right patient,
I mean, I've had patients have babies that way
who otherwise may not be able to.
So it can really open up the door.
So that's the most minimal of the minimal stimulation,
right, then we have minimal stimulation
because you don't have many eggs,
so we don't really need that.
But for the vast majority of people
who go through egg freezing or IVF,
we are really trying to get as many eggs
as you potentially have.
Everybody has a different number, but whatever you have,
whatever that antropolical count is for you, is what we're trying to get,
and that's what these combination of medications is trying to do.
When the eggs come into the lab, if you have egg freezing,
very important to know is before we get into the XC discussion,
the eggs are stripped of their outer cells, which is called the cumulus. That's what the sperm has to attach to in order to fertilize. In order to freeze the eggs,
this cumulus cells are stripped off, the eggs are frozen. You have to do X-C. So if we're going to
lead into this X-C conversation, if you're freezing your eggs, you're having X-C when you fertilize them.
So I don't want somebody to ever not know that if that is what they are choosing.
And XC is, you can tell us. Yes, XC stands for its ICSI or Interest Cytoplasmic Spurm Injection.
It is taking a sperm that under the microscope looks normal in shape and moves well,
and you're pulling it up into a little needle, and you're essentially using a little laser
on the side of the egg or the zone of polucid of the egg
and you're injecting that one sperm into that egg cytoplasm.
And you're picking that sperm on the basis
of shape, motility.
You're picking what you think is the best sperm in the batch.
Obviously.
Yeah, I mean, there's gonna be one sperm per egg.
So there's multiple sperm that are chosen. But you're picking sperm that look like they have the highest potential.
My understanding is that there's a range from very low to potentially high, but hopefully not high
of DNA fragmentation and pretty much every cell the body. Like the cell is always repairing its DNA.
So when visually selecting a sperm for XC, it's based on morphology, shape and motility.
Right.
You can't see the DNA damage inside the head of the sperm or the DNA itself.
Are we soon to have a technology where you could actually get a die that could label DNA
fragmentation and select, because I feel like, when we talk about embryology, not to get
too far down in the weeds, but the methods of selecting eggs and selecting sperm, I mean, these
are the same methods that have been used in embryology since the 1930s.
This one looks good.
That one looks good.
The skilled embryologists can really develop a real talent at over time of knowing what
correlated with healthy pregnancy and offspring.
I do like technology.
You would think that by now, 2023, that someone would have some dye
that you could drop on the sperm and go,
well, like that one has a lot of DNA fragmentation
and that one doesn't.
There should be better ways to choose which sperm.
There's definitely, people are trying things.
Nothing is proven to be helpful so far.
There's definitely some interest in this
because we're starting to get more insight
as we have become better at embryo culture,
getting embryos to grow, doing genetic testing on embryos,
to understand that that male genome kicks in at day three.
And there's a subset of people who have beautiful fertilization
and embryo growth, day zero to three, and that's all on the egg.
And then as soon as that male genome kicks in,
you have this huge drop-off in your embryo number.
And even some of this is in the context of normal sperm parameters, right?
So things aren't really normal, though,
or there's something underlying it.
Does that mean that every embryo failure on day three
post-feralization is sperm-
No, of course not, but it definitely means that none of the ones before that
can be blamed on the sperm.
And once after that, there's definitely still maternal and sperm contribution.
And we don't want to create any, you know, couple disputes around this.
But it can be in an insight when you're trying to look through somebody's IVF cycle
about potentially modifiable factors, right? Can you improve sperm quality by some of these lifestyle measures? I
mean the debatable thing about a DNA sperm fragmentation. So what is that? It is
not a normal semen analysis, but it is like that as far as it's a sperm sample
that is then sent off to be evaluated how much fragmentation or abnormal DNA is
in the heads of those sperm. The studies have shown that people who have abnormal DNA
sperm fragmentation should do XC.
Okay, that's like the point of the study.
Now, XC's become very commonplace.
So XC choosing the sperm to put into the egg
originally didn't exist, right?
So what's the alternative?
Conventional fertilization.
This is having your P3- dish, your eggs are on it,
you scorch your sperm, you cover it up,
you put it in the incubator.
No, she didn't mean you squirt your sperm.
She meant the embryologist.
Embryologist squirt the sperm on top.
Do we clear it just to be clear?
And then pulls it out.
And the next day sees by which eggs and sperm fertilized.
Well, it's really devastating to pull out the dish
and have no fertilization.
And it definitely is a cause of infertility,
and it can be very hard to know that
because fertilization is not challenged
on a cellular level until you challenge it.
So XC used to be an add-on cost.
It used to be a separate thing
because it was harder
to find embryologists who could do it.
It's so standard that a lot of clinics do it,
the majority of the time,
purely because you often don't know all the variables
that are impacting fertilization,
and you're trying to give somebody
as many opportunities as possible.
XC has, you know, a lot of those original IVF studies
got some of the bad reputation
of being the problem with why you might see that 1% rise of birth defects.
And so Ixi took the brunt from a lot of that.
We really don't see that when we're growing out and we're doing freezing the embryos,
doing frozen transfers.
And I was, I mean, I do Ixi in almost every patient.
I'm not going to say to everyone, but- Well, higher probability of success, right? doing frozen transfers. And I was, I mean, I do exceed almost every patient.
I'm not gonna say to everyone, but-
Well, higher probability of success, right?
Higher probability of success.
So when you get to this point,
and so few people have insurance coverage,
so they're spending their money,
they're getting second mortgages,
they're taking out loans.
If there's one decision that you say,
well, I don't know, you could have zero eggs fertilized,
or I could have the embryologists pick the best sperm
and put them inside the egg
and we expect a 75% chance of fertilization.
That makes sense for the majority of people.
Yeah, that makes sense to me.
I, because I'm obsessed with data
and the blood work fairly regularly,
not obsessively, but twice a year or so.
Now I didn't always do that.
I actually did one of these DNA fragmentation tests.
They're pretty expensive.
You know, they're in the...
They are more than a cement analysis.
Yeah, they're in the, you know, low, you know, there's sort of $1,200, $1,500 or so.
At least the one that I did, it was very informative.
Like I was relieved to see, did a not abnormal levels of DNA fragmentation.
But I will say that based on everything you just said,
it seems like it might be the lower cost option
because the alternative is to go through repeated cycles
of IVF and it's failing,
and that's certainly much more expensive.
It is.
And I mean, I will say that there is some current thought
by my urology colleagues, right?
So I'm not a urologist, but definitely when I have a male
who needs a sperm extraction, maybe he definitely when I have a male who, you
know, needs a sperm extraction, maybe he's had a prior bisectomy, maybe he's got very
low sperm counts, and we're going and we're doing a sperm extraction procedure. That potentially,
if you have a patient who has an abnormal DNA sperm fragmentation, and even with XC has
this drop off an embryo growth after day three, because despair are still being made the same way,
are they still fragmented? That potentially the ejaculatory process could cause some of that
fragmentation in certain men, and by going and doing a sperm extraction and not subjecting those
sperm to the rigors of ejaculation for lack of a better word, could potentially
lessen their fragmentation and
improve outcomes.
And I have some patients who we've gone down that road and that has helped them.
Clear to say there's not a study.
That's not the point of DNA sperm frag is to try to distinguish if potentially XC could
be a helpful technology, but a lot of doctors are offering or doing XC because we want
you to fertilize your eggs.
When they grow it in culture, as we talked about,
IVF changing, the metabolic needs of the embryo
change throughout the process.
And so embryo culture has become so much more successful.
But even in those best case scenarios,
we're looking at 50% progression.
So you're gonna have loss throughout that culture process
no matter what.
And you said 50% progression.
So half of the fertilized embryos that make it past eight, let's say day seven,
then they're screened for chromosome 11 normalities.
So then okay, then you've got, let's say two or three of those, maybe four,
depending on how many eggs were harvested.
And your age.
And then, and age, yes, thank you.
And then, and then you said of those that are implanted into, let's say, a woman, you
45 or younger, you're looking at about anywhere from 30 to 65% successful implantation and pregnancy,
like, healthy baby.
It's usually a 65% chance of life birth if it's a genetically tested embryo.
That, that, that Astra is the F and that's why you're going to see such varying IVF success
rates because if you don't do genetic testing of embryos,
let's use the 40 year old who makes four embryos,
and I send them off for genetic testing.
I anticipate she is one normal embryo.
If I do genetic testing, which takes,
it's called PGT, pre-emploitation genetic testing,
I am testing for aneuploidy as the traditional testing,
meaning does it have the right number of chromosomes?
You can also importantly test for single gene disorders like cystic fibrosis or honeytons,
but if we're just doing PGT for aneuploidy, I expect an age-related proportion of your eggs to
be normal or abnormal. So at age 40, I expect 20 to 25% normal. So I can choose that one and put it
in you and have a 65% chance that you have a baby.
I could not do it.
I still have the same four that one is in there.
But if I go and transfer them each independently, I'm now going to have closer to a 20 to 30%
chance of success, right?
So it is not that I'm changing the embryo by testing it, but I'm allowing myself to have
higher utility of success, higher efficiency,
putting somebody through less failed transfers,
which is extremely important and less miscarriages because those also take time.
One of the most important things is that you have the opportunity to
understand how many potential normal embryos you have in batch cycles.
So you could go into another cycle because I'm 40.
I just met my person.
I really want to have two kids
because my sibling is really important in my life.
Yet naturally, by the age I would be,
for that second child,
it's going to be very hard to conceive.
I can go through IVF and batch some embryo.
So I could save two or three for that second baby
that I'm not going to transfer for a few years. And that's called embryo. So I could save two or three for that second baby that I'm not going to transfer
for a few years. And that's called embryo banking. And that is changing the ways that people
can potentially grow their family at later ages. But you don't know that unless you know
what's normal or not. And it also gives you the chance to go and intervene right now.
Because right now, especially if you're older, I'm gonna have a higher chance of success
than if I am four transfers down the road,
and maybe there was one miscarriage in there too.
We're suddenly now eight months down the road
before I can go do another cycle and get more eggs
versus if I found out that none of those
were genetically normal.
The average 40-year-old might have zero to one
if they have average ovarian reserve per cycle.
So they're going to need multiple cycles.
It's not that it's impossible,
but it's just studying that road of expectation for them.
But if I don't get any normal embryos,
I can turn right around and go get more.
So I am using what's left in that ovarian vault
each month to try to get to that opportunity
of a pregnancy for you in a much more
efficient way by utilizing genetic testing of these embryos.
This is where we can put an ellipse in and sort of like dot dot dot healthy baby, right?
And maybe in the future, if we're lucky, you'll come back and talk to us about healthy pregnancy
and healthy baby onward.
That would be a fun and important set of discussions.
I would like to touch on the, I don't know what's called the issue,
but the topic of menopause, which I assume is defined
as the cessation of mencies, but there I'm guessing,
and I'm guessing it's a constellation of things that happen.
And I have a very straightforward question,
which is, is there an acceleration of the onset of menopause?
Are we seeing that nowadays?
Are there good data on that?
Should people try to delay menopause?
What are some of the things that you talk to patients about
in terms of their considerations of ways to ease that transition
or maybe even offset that transition
with hormone replacement therapy or other approaches.
These are great questions,
and I do think this is going to be a huge interest
in upcoming years as we have learned more
about the menopausal transition
and the health risks really associated
with being hypoestrogenic or having low estrogen.
Menopause if we define it as ovarian failure.
So your ovaries now have no eggs or so few eggs
that they are refractory to the brain sending out FSH.
So your brain is sending out all the FSH and LH that it can.
Your ovary is done and not making any estradiol
or progesterone anymore.
In this time period, what we know is one. and not making any estradiol or progesterone anymore.
In this time period, what we know is one,
are we seeing a population-based increase
in earlier menopause?
There's not been a study to say that
observationally and clinically, I would say yes,
because I see so many younger women
having low ovarian reserve or having premature ovarian
failure or premature ovarian insufficiency, which
is the more politically correct way of saying it.
But when we think about what this is, there are notifiable factors, right?
If running out of eggs is a variable, and we already said certain things like smoking
cigarettes and exposure to toxins and likely chronic inflammation and untreated disease,
we know that having diabetes, those things increase
your risk of going into menopause earlier.
So paying attention to the lifestyle that you have when you're not concerned about your
fertility, right?
When you're in your younger years and maybe you're not worried about getting pregnant yet
or you're not worried about menopause, but those choices that you're making in those
time periods, at least for women, your eggs are going to hold on to them.
So they have an influence later, similarly trying to live a lower inflammatory life and
getting sleep and avoiding toxins of which you can, is some of the best that you can do
to try to naturally prolong when you'll go
through menopause with a huge caveat that everybody is truly born with a
different number and you do not control that. You don't. And so you might have
been born with a lower number and you can't change that trajectory. And you might
have cancer and be exposed to chemotherapy, which also will deeply Eurovarian reserve.
But so do things like endometriosis, especially if it's not
being treated in any fashion.
So that's where we think the birth control pill or
progestin exposure or surgery ways to go and decrease the
inflammation.
It's that inflammation associated with endometriosis that's
really causing these women to have low ovarian reserve
and go into menopause early.
So not only is that impacting fertility and how many eggs
you get and how long you have to grow your family,
but when you go into menopause earlier,
you have lower life expectancy than people
who go into menopause later.
And that's why you even said it earlier.
Fertilities, this variable kind of reflecting longevity
and like health overall.
So what we do know about menopause
is that having that low estrogen,
whether that happens at the average age of menopause
at 51, 52 or at an earlier time period,
it's not good for the brain, you know,
higher risks of dementia, increased risks of osteoporosis, increased
risk of heart disease and stroke, and essentially higher risks of death. And that's not even
to talk about the impact on your life. What it can be like to have hot flashes, heat and
cold and sensitivity to have profound vulvar and vaginal atrophy to the point that you
no longer want to have intercourse, and the changes that it can even have on your gut and your immune system.
So we as a community, you know, of doctors, especially OBGYNs, really recommend hormone
replacement therapy in women who are going through menopause.
And the key here is to initiate it right at the beginning.
That big women's health initiative study, which came out forever ago and showed all this harm
with hormone replacement therapy.
The big issue there was that these people
were hypoestrogenic for 10 plus years in one group
and then started back on the hormones.
And in that circumstance,
they'd already been put into this higher risk category
and their body had adjusted to not having the hormones.
And when re-exposed, they had more adverse events.
But if you are starting on estrogen replacement,
and it can be various, but honestly,
the estrogen that we try to replace
in this time period, much more mimics estradiol.
We have estradiol pills.
You can have vaginal inserts, you're gonna patches.
So it depends on what's going to work for your life, but it is not the birth control pill
most oftenly.
And some people, it might be that's what they choose, but we really are trying to pick
an estrogen that is estradiol, more mimics that natural structure.
And you can't have unopposed estrogen without reaching the risk of intubitrial cancer. And so that's why we need to have some pregestin.
So some people will choose a daily pregestin,
some will choose a cyclic pregestin and still have periods,
some will put in an IUD at this time period and then take their daily estrogen.
There's a lot of different options.
We're trying to find the lowest dose of hormones that
relieves your symptoms to provide you relief
from some of these lifestyle issues, but also helps you not just live longer, right?
We're not just trying to live longer.
We want to be healthy longer.
We want to have a better quality of life.
And certainly, women's health has for long stopped at this mental-possil period.
And then it's been, you're on your own kid.
And this is when we're really starting to see that intervening at that place,
especially for women who go into ovarian failure early.
So those people who have low ovarian reserve,
who I diagnose, I tell all of them,
hey, if you don't freeze your eggs or I never see you again,
you're going to go through mental pause early.
And when you do, I want you to go see somebody.
I don't want you to just ignore it and suffer with these symptoms, which is something that
does commonly happen.
So just making sure that women are empowered to know that these symptoms are what happens,
it's what happens naturally, but by giving their bodies more estrogen and not crazy
high doses, but just these physiologic levels can really improve both the quality and the
longevity of their life. Is it just the presence of the symptoms that signals the onset of menopause or are there
additional cues? Like, for instance, if their cycle is getting shorter or longer?
Yeah, you certainly will have cycle changes. And we consider that the perimenopausal period,
where you're starting to really start seeing a spacing out of your period.
So they're no longer coming at that perfect ovulatory pattern.
When you get into the low ovarian reserve, but you're still ovulating regularly, they first shorten as we said earlier.
But then when they start lengthening or you start skipping months, that's a real big clue that that things are not going in the right direction.
And if you find out you have very, very
low ovarian reserve or you're approaching that perimenopause period, you're going to start to have more
prolonged periods of low estrogen and you'll feel mentally cloudy, fatigued, more headaches,
more hot flashes, lack of libido, those full of our vaginal symptoms, overall more likelihood to have to press the mood,
and that's a lot.
There's a lot.
Well, Natalie, Dr. Crawford,
I want to extend a huge thank you on behalf of myself.
I've learned so much from you today
about fertility, about hormone health for women,
and you've also touched on a number of important issues
about hormone health and fertility for men along the way.
So it's truly been a master class in fertility and hormones and really touched on topics
that are so essential to everybody, even if people aren't seeking to conceive or maybe
think they don't want to.
I mean, there's so many considerations that really extend back to one's teens and if one
is beyond their teens, like whatever age people are essentially, they need to think about these issues and make important decisions.
And you've really also clarified a lot of the, what I think are quite destructive myths
that are prominent out there about, for instance, egg harvest and what that does to one's
fertility.
So first of all, thank you for joining us today.
I know you're extremely busy.
You run a clinic.
You have a, you manage a family as. A co-manage a family. I believe but um you know this is the sort of
of knowledge that is so challenging to find in one place and yet you also have a number of really
spectacular avenues that you deliver information, Instagram, podcasts, books and things of that
sort. We will refer everyone to those links. I've learned so much from you over the years, really,
in following your content.
And today, you've just, like, far exceeded all,
already high expectations.
So thank you ever so much.
Thank you for having me.
And just thank you for giving a space to talk about women's health
and fertility and reproductive medicine.
It means a lot to me.
And it means a lot to the people
who really are trying to do their best every day.
So we appreciate it.
We appreciate you and with some luck,
we'll commit to you to come back and talk to us about
pregnancy and a bit more on some of the topics
that we move through quickly.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you for joining me for today's discussion
about female hormones and fertility
with Dr. Natalie Crawford.
You can find links to her clinical practice as well as to her social media handles in the show
note captions. Please also check out the link to her excellent podcast entitled As A Woman.
If you're learning from Endora and enjoying this podcast, please subscribe to our YouTube channel.
That's a terrific zero-cost way to support us. In addition, please subscribe to the podcast on
both Spotify and Apple, and on both Spotify and Apple. you can leave us up to a five-star review.
Please also check out the sponsors mentioned at the beginning and throughout today's episode.
That's the best way to support this podcast.
If you have questions for me or comments about the podcast,
or guests that you'd like me to consider hosting on the Huberman Lab podcast,
please put those in the comment section on YouTube.
I do read all the comments.
Not during today's episode, but on many previous episodes of the Huberman Lab podcast, we discuss
supplements.
While supplements aren't necessary for everybody, many people derive tremendous benefit from them.
For things like enhancing sleep, hormone support, and improving focus.
If you'd like to learn more about the supplements discussed on the Huberman Lab podcast, you can
go to LiveMomentus, spelled O-U-S, so livemomentus.com.com slash huberman. If you're now already following
me on social media, it's huberman lab on all social media platforms. So that's Instagram,
Twitter, now called X, threads, Facebook, LinkedIn, and on all those places, I discuss science
and science related tools, some of which overlaps with the content of the huberman lab podcast,
but much of which is distinct from the content on the UBRIM and Lab podcast.
So again, it's UBRIM and Lab on all social media platforms.
If you haven't already subscribed to our monthly neural network newsletter, the neural network
newsletter is a completely zero cost newsletter that gives you podcast summaries as well as
toolkits in the form of brief PDFs.
We've had toolkits related to optimizing sleep, to regulating dopamine, deliberate cold exposure, fitness, mental
health, learning, and neuroplasticity, and much more. Again, it's completely zero cost to sign up.
You simply go to HubermanLab.com, go over to the menu tabs, scroll down to newsletter,
and supply your email. I should emphasize that we do not share your email with anybody.
Thank you once again for joining me for today's discussion with Dr. Natalie Crawford.
And last but certainly not least, thank you for your interesting science. Thank you once again for joining me for today's discussion with Dr. Natalie Crawford.
And last but certainly not least, thank you for your interest in science.