I Can’t Sleep - Innovation | Calming Bedtime Reading for Sleep
Episode Date: June 13, 2025Relax with this calm bedtime reading designed to ease insomnia and bring peace to sleepless nights. Tonight’s gentle episode explores innovation, the process of creating new ideas, technologies, and... methods that shape the way we live and work. You’ll learn about its role in history, the factors that encourage it, and how it continues to drive progress, all shared in Benjamin’s steady, peaceful narration. There’s no whispering or hypnosis—just tranquil, fact-filled storytelling to quiet your mind and reduce stress. Press play, let curiosity soften, and drift into restful sleep. Want More? Request a topic: https://www.icantsleeppodcast.com/request-a-topic Listen ad-free & support the show: https://icantsleep.supportingcast.fm/ Shop sleep-friendly products: https://www.icantsleeppodcast.com/sponsors Join the discussion on Discord: https://discord.gg/myhGhVUhn7 This content is derived from the Wikipedia article on Innovation, available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) license. Read the full article: Wikipedia - Innovation. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
You're listening to a Glassbox media podcast.
What if I told you that most of the modern day self-help advice you've been hearing could actually make you worse?
The key to a better life isn't about feel-good gimmicks that sound catchy.
The Mentally Stronger Podcast gives you access to a licensed therapist who shares science-backed tools that will actually change your life.
Hi, I'm Amy Morin, psychotherapist, mental strength trainer, and international best-selling author.
In each episode, we cover research-back strategies, like how to stop relying on willpower and start creating habits for lasting change.
And the five mental strength-building exercises you can do from your couch.
I also speak to world-class experts like Dr. Nicole Kane, who shares how to permanently heal anxiety by addressing the root cause.
With over 200 episodes in our catalog, this podcast is for you if you're ready to crush self-doubt, conquer challenges,
and become stronger than ever with therapist-approved strategies that can change your life.
Listen to Mentally Stronger with therapist Amy Morin, wherever you get your podcasts.
Welcome to the I Can't Sleep Podcast, where I help you learn a little and sleep a lot.
I'm your host, Benjamin Boster, and tonight let's fall asleep learning about innovation.
Innovation is the practical implementation of ideas, the result in the introduction of new goods or services
or improvement in offering goods or services.
ISO TC 279 and the standard ISO 56,000 2020, defines innovation as a new or changed entity, realizing or redistributing value.
Others have different definitions.
A common element in the definitions is a focus on newness, improvement, and spread of ideas or technologies.
Innovation often takes place through the development of more effective products, processes, services,
services, technologies, artworks, or business models that innovators make available to markets,
governments, and society. Innovation is related to, but not the same as invention.
Innovation is more apt to involve the practical implementation of an invention,
i.e. new slash improved ability, to make a meaningful impact in a market or
society, and not all innovations require a new invention.
Technical innovation often manifests itself via the engineering process when the problem being
solved is of a technical or scientific nature.
The opposite of innovation is ex-novation.
Surveys of the literature on innovation have found a variety of definitions.
In 2009, Berege at All found around 60 definitions in different scientific papers,
while a 2014 survey found over 40.
Based on their survey, Barrege at all attempted to formulate a multidisciplinary definition
and arrived at the following.
Innovation is the multi-stage process whereby organizations transform ideas
into new or improved products, service, or processes,
in order to advance, compete,
and differentiate themselves successfully in their marketplace.
In a study of how the software industry considers innovation,
the following definition given by Crosin and Opiden
was considered to be the most complete.
Crosson and Opiden built on the definition,
given in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development OECD, Oslo Manual.
Innovation is production or adoption, assimilation, and exploitation of a value-added novelty
in economic and social spheres.
Renewal and enlargement of products, services, and markets, development of new methods of new methods
and the establishment of new management systems.
It is both a process and an outcome.
American sociologist Everett Rogers defined it as follows.
An idea, practice, or object that is perceived as new by an individual or other unit of adoption.
According to Alan Altschuler and Robert D. Ben,
innovation includes original invention and creative use.
These writers define innovation as generation, admission, and realization of new ideas, products, services, and processes.
Two main dimensions of innovation are a degree of novelty, either whether an innovation is new to the firm,
new to the market, new to the industry, or new to the world, and kind of innovation,
i.e. whether it is process or product service system innovation.
Organizational researchers have also distinguished innovation separately from creativity
by providing an updated definition of these two related constraints.
Workplace creativity concerns the cognitive and behavioral processes
applied when attempting to generate novel ideas.
Workplace innovation concerns the processes applied when attempting to implement new ideas.
Specifically, innovation involves some combination of problem opportunity identification,
the introduction, adoption, or modification of new ideas germane to organizational needs,
the promotion of these ideas, and the practical implementation of these ideas.
Peter Drecker wrote,
Innovation is the specific function of entrepreneurship,
whether in an existing business, a public service institution,
or a new venture started by a lone individual in the family kitchen.
It is a means by which the entrepreneur either creates new wealth-producing resources
or endows existing resources with enhanced potential for creating wealth.
In general, innovation is distinguished from creativity
by its emphasis on the implementation of creative ideas in an economic setting.
Amabilé and Pratt in 2016, drawing on the literature,
distinguished between creativity the production of novel and useful ideas
by an individual or small group of individuals working together, and innovation the successful
implementation of creative ideas within an organization.
In 1957, the economist Robert Sallow was able to demonstrate that economic growth had two components.
The first component could be attributed to growth in production, including wage labor
in capital. The second component was found to be productivity. Ever since, economic historians have
tried to explain the process of innovation itself, rather than assuming that technological inventions
and technological progress result in productivity growth. The concept of innovation emerged after
the Second World War, mostly thanks to the works of Joseph Schumpeter, who describe the economic
effects of innovation processes as constructive destruction. Today, consistent neo-Shumpeterian
scholars see innovation not as neutral or apolitical processes. Rather, innovation can be seen
as socially constructed processes. Therefore, its conception depends on the political and societal
context in which innovation is taking place. According to Shannon Walsh, innovation today is best
understood as innovation under capital. This means that the current hegemonic purpose for
innovation is capital valorization and profit maximization, exemplified by the appropriation
of knowledge, e.g. through patenting. The widespread practice of planned obsolescence,
including lack of repairability by design, and the Jevons paradox that describes negative consequences
of eco-efficiency as energy-reducing effects tend to trigger mechanisms leading to energy-increasing effects.
Several frameworks have been proposed for defining types of innovation.
Sustaining versus disruptive innovation.
One framework proposed by Clayton Christensen draws a distinction between sustaining and disruptive
Innovations.
Sustaining innovations is the improvement of a product or service based on the known need
of current customers, e.g. faster microprocessors, flat-screen televisions.
Disruptive innovation in contrast refers to a process by which a new product or service
creates a new market, e.g. transistor radio.
free crowdsourced encyclopedia, etc., eventually displacing established competitors.
According to Christensen, disruptive innovations are critical to long-term success and business.
Disruptive innovation is often enabled by disruptive technology.
Marco Yoncidi and Kareem R. Lakhani define foundational technology as having the potential technology as having the potential.
to create new foundations for global technology systems over the longer term.
Foundational technology tends to transform business operating models
as entirely new business models emerge over many years,
with gradual and steady adoption of the innovation,
leading to waves of technological and institutional change
that gain momentum more slowly.
The advent of the packet-switched communication protocol TCPIP,
originally introduced in 1972 to support a single use case
for United States Department of Defense electronic communication email,
and which changed widespread adoption only in the mid-1990s,
with the advent of the World Wide Web,
as a foundational technology.
Four types of innovation model.
Another framework was suggested by Henderson and Clark.
They divide innovation into four types.
Radical Innovation
Establishes a new dominant design,
and hence a new set of core design concepts
embodied in components that are linked together
in a new architecture.
Incremental innovation.
Refines and extends an established design.
Improvement occurs in individual components,
but the underlying core design concepts and the links between them remain the same.
Architectural innovation.
Innovation that changes only the relationships between them,
the core design concepts.
modular innovation.
Innovation that changes only the core design concepts of a technology.
While Henderson and Clark, as well as Christensen, talk about technical innovation,
there are other kinds of innovation as well,
such as service innovation and organizational innovation,
non-economic innovation.
As distinct from business-centric views of innovation,
concentrating on generating profit for a firm.
Other types of innovation include social innovation,
religious innovation, sustainable innovation,
or green innovation, and responsible innovation.
Open innovation.
One type of innovation that has been the focus of recent literature
is open innovation or crowdsourcing.
Open Innovation refers to the use of individuals outside of an organizational context
who have no expertise in a given area to solve complex problems.
User Innovation
Similar to Open Innovation
User Innovation is when companies rely on users of their goods and services
to come up with, help to develop, and even help to implement new ideas.
Innovation must be understood in the historical setting in which its processes were and are taking place.
The first full-length discussion about innovation was published by the Greek philosopher and historian Xenophon,
about 430 to 355 BCE.
He viewed the concept as multifaceted and connected to political action.
The work for innovation that he uses, kinatomia, had previously occurred in two plays by Aristophanes.
Plato discussed innovation in his law's dialogue and was not very fond of the concept.
He was skeptical to it both in culture, dancing and art, and in education.
He did not believe in introducing new games and toys to the kids.
Aristotle did not like organizational innovations.
He believed that all possible forms of organization had been discovered.
Before the 4th century in Rome, the words Novitas and Res Nova, Nova, Nova, were used,
with either negative or positive judgment on the innovator. This concept meant renewing and was
incorporated into the new Latin verb word, E novo, I renew, or I restore, and the centuries
have followed. The Vulgate version of the Bible, late 4th century C.E. used the word in spiritual
as well as political contexts.
It also appeared in poetry,
mainly with spiritual connotations,
but was also connected to political,
material, and cultural aspects.
Machiavelli's The Prince, 1513,
discusses innovation in a political setting.
Machiavelli portrays it as a strategy,
a prince may employ,
in order to cope with a constant,
constantly changing world, as well as a corruption within it.
Here innovation is described as introducing change in government,
new laws and institutions.
Machiavelli's later book, The Discourses 1528,
characterizes innovation as imitation,
as a return to the original that has been corrupted by people and by time.
Thus for Machiavelli, innovation came with positive connotations.
This is, however, an exception in the usage of the concept of innovation from the 16th century
and onward.
No innovator from the Renaissance until the late 19th century ever thought of applying the word
innovator upon themselves.
It was a word used to attack enemies.
From the 1400s through the 1600s, the concept of innovation was pejorative.
The term was an early modern synonym for rebellion, revolt, and heresy.
In the 1800s, people promoting capitalism saw socialism as innovation
and spent a lot of energy working against it.
For instance, Goldwyn Smith, 1823 to 1910, saw the spread of social innovations as an attack on money and banks.
These social innovations were socialism, communism, nationalism, cooperative associations.
In the 20th century, the concept of innovation did not become popular until after the Second World War of 1939.
to 1945.
This is the point in time when people started to talk about technological product innovation
and tie it to the idea of economic growth and competitive advantage.
Joseph Schumpeter, 1883 to 1950, who contributed greatly to the study of innovation economics,
as seen as the one who made the term popular.
Schumpeter argued that industries must incessantly revolutionize
the economic structure from within, that is, innovate with better or more effective processes
and products, as well as with market distribution, such as the transition from the craft shop
to factory. He famously asserted that creative destruction is the essential fact about
capitalism. In business and in economics, innovation can
provide a catalyst for growth when entrepreneurs continuously search for better ways to satisfy
their customer base, with improved quality, durability, service, and price. Searches which may come
to fruition in innovation with advanced technologies and organizational strategies. Shumpeter's findings
coincided with rapid advances in transportation and communications in the beginning of
of the 20th century, which had huge impacts for the economic concepts of factor endowments
and comparative advantage as new combinations of resources or production techniques
constantly transform markets to satisfy consumer needs. Hence, innovation behavior becomes relevant
for economic success. An early model included only three phases of innovation.
According to Utterback, 1971, these phases were, one, idea generation, two, problem solving, and three, implementation.
By the time one completed phase two, one had an invention. But until one got it to the point of having an economic impact, one did not have an innovation.
diffusion was not considered a phase of innovation.
Focus at this point in time was on manufacturing.
A prime example of innovation involved the boom of Silicon Valley startups out of the Stanford Industrial Park.
In 1957, dissatisfied employees of Shockley Semiconductor,
the company of Nobel laureate William Shockley, co-inventor of the Transcendant,
left to form an independent firm, Fairchild Semiconductor.
After several years, Fairchild developed into a formidable presence in the sector.
Eventually, these founders left to start their own companies based on their own unique ideas,
and then leading employees started their own firms.
Over the next 20 years, this process resulted in the momentum.
resulted in the momentous startup company explosion of information technology firms.
Silicon Valley began as 65 new entrepreneurs born out of Shockley's eight former employees.
All organizations can innovate, including, for example, hospitals, universities, and local governments.
The organization requires a proper structure in order to retain communities.
to retain competitive advantage.
Organizations can also improve profits and performance
by providing workgroups opportunities and resources to innovate,
in addition to employees' core job tasks.
Executives and managers have been advised to break away from traditional ways of thinking
and use change to their advantage.
The world of work is changing with the increased use of technology, and companies are becoming
increasingly competitive.
Companies will have to downsize or re-engineer their operations to remain competitive.
This will affect employment, as businesses will be forced to reduce the number of people employed
while accomplishing the same amount of work, if not more.
For instance, former mayor Martin O'Malley
pushed the city of Baltimore to use CityStat,
a performance measurement data and management system
that allows city officials to maintain statistics
on several areas from crime trends to the conditions of potholes.
This system aided in better evaluation of policies and procedures
and procedures, with accountability and efficiency in terms of time and money.
In its first year, CityStat saved the city's $13.2 million.
Even mass transit systems have innovated with hybrid bus fleets to real-time tracking at bus stands.
In addition, the growing use of mobile data terminals and vehicles that serve as communication
hubs between vehicles and a control center, automatically send data on location, passenger
counts, engine performance, mileage, and other information.
This tool helps to deliver and manage transportation systems.
Still, other innovative strategies include hospitals digitizing medical information and electronic
medical records.
For example, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's Hope Six initiatives
turned severely distressed public housing in urban areas into revitalized mixed-income environments.
The Harlem Children's Zone used a community-based approach to educate local area children.
and the Environmental Protection Agency's brownfield grants
facilitates turning over brownfields for environmental protection, green spaces, community, and commercial development.
Innovation may occur due to effort from a range of different agents by chance
or as a result of a major system failure.
According to Peter F. Drucker, the general source,
of innovations are changes in industry structure, in market structure, in local and global
demographics, in human perception, and the amount of available scientific knowledge, etc.
In the simplest linear model of innovation, the traditionally recognized source is
manufacturer innovation. This is where a person or business innovates in order to sell the
innovation. Another source of innovation is end-user innovation. This is where a person or company
develops an innovation for their own personal or in-house use, because existing products do not
meet their needs. MIT economist Eric von Hippel identified end-user innovation as the most
important source in his classic book on the subject, the sources of innovation. The Robotics
engineer Joseph F. Engelberger asserts that innovations require only three things. One, a recognized need,
two, competent people with relevant technology, and three, financial support. The Klein chain-linked
model of innovation places emphasis on potential market needs as drivers of the innovation process,
and describes the complex and often iterative feedback loops
between marketing, design, manufacturing, and R&D.
Innovation by businesses is achieved in many ways,
with much attention now given to formal research and development R&D
or breakthrough innovations.
R&D helps spur on patents and other scientific innovations
that leads to productive growth in such areas as industry, medicine, engineering, and government.
Yet, innovations can be developed by less formal on-the-job modifications of practice,
through exchange and combination of professional experience, and by many other routes.
Investigation of relationship between the concepts of innovation and technology transfer revealed overlap.
The more radical and revolutionary innovations tend to emerge from R&D,
while more incremental innovations may emerge from practice,
that there are many exceptions to each of these trends.
Information technology and changing business processes.
and management style,
and produce a work climate favorable to innovation.
For example, the software tool company at Lassian
conducts quarterly ship-it days
in which employees may work on anything related to the company's products.
Google employees work on self-directed projects
from 20% of their time, known as innovation time-off.
Both companies cite these bottom-up processes as major sources for new products and features.
An important innovation factor includes customers buying products or using services.
As a result, organizations may incorporate users in focus groups, user center approach.
work closely with so-called lead users, lead user approach.
Or users might adapt their products themselves.
The lead user method focuses on idea generation based on leading users to develop
breakthrough innovations.
Euster, a project to innovate Europe's surface transportation system, employs such workshops.
Regarding this user innovation, a great deal of innovation is done by those actually implementing and using technologies and products as part of their normal activities.
Sometimes user innovators may become entrepreneurs selling their product.
They may choose to trade their innovation in exchange for other innovations, or they may be a doodob.
by their suppliers.
Nowadays, they may also choose to freely reveal their innovations
using methods like open source.
In such networks of innovation,
the users or communities of users
can further develop technologies and reinvent their social meaning.
One technique for innovating a solution to an identified problem
problem is to actually attempt and experiment with many possible solutions.
This technique was famously used by Thomas Edison's laboratory to find a version of the
incandescent light bulb economically viable for home use, which involved searching through
thousands of possible filament designs before settling on carbonized bamboo.
This technique is sometimes used in pharmaceutical drug discovery.
Thousands of chemical compounds are subjected to high throughput screening
to see if they have any activity against a target molecule,
which has been identified as biologically significant to a disease.
Promising compounds can then be studied,
modified to improve efficacy and reduce side effects,
evaluated for cost of manufacture,
and if successful, turned into treatments.
The related technique of A-B testing
is often used to help optimize the design of websites and mobile apps.
Scholars have argued that the main purpose for innovation today
is profit maximization and capital valorization.
Consequently, programs of organizational innovation
are typically tightly linked to organizational goals
and growth objectives to the business plan
and to market competitive positioning.
Davila at all, 2006, note,
companies cannot grow through cost reduction
and re-engineering alone.
Innovation is a key element in providing aggressive, top-line growth
and for increasing bottom-line results.
One survey across a large number of manufacturing and services organizations
found that systematic programs of organizational innovation
are most frequently driven by improved quality,
creation of new markets, extension of the product range, reduced labor costs, improved production processes,
reduced materials cost, reduced environmental damage, replacement of products or services,
reduced energy consumption, and conformance to regulations. Different goals are appropriate for different
products, processes, and services. According to Andrea Vauna and Mario Pianta, some example
goals of innovation could stem from two different types of technological strategies. Technological
competitiveness and active price competitiveness. Technological competitiveness may have a tendency
to be pursued by smaller firms and can be characterized as efforts for market-oriented innovation,
such as a strategy of market expansion and patenting activity.
On the other hand, active price competitiveness is geared toward process innovations
that lead to efficiency and flexibility, which tend to be pursued by large established firms
as they seek to expand their market foothold.
Whether innovation goals are successfully achieved or otherwise
depends greatly on the environment prevailing in the organization.
