I Can’t Sleep - The Gilded Age | Gentle Bedtime Reading for Sleep
Episode Date: March 22, 2024Ease into rest with this calm bedtime reading on the Gilded Age, created to help with insomnia and sleepless nights. In this soothing episode, Benjamin explores the history of America’s Gilded Age, ...a time of rapid industrial growth, great wealth, and sharp social contrasts in the late 19th century. His gentle, steady narration blends knowledge with relaxation—no whispers, no hypnosis, just calm, fact-filled storytelling to quiet the mind. Whether you’re struggling with stress, anxiety, or sleeplessness, press play, unwind, and drift into restful sleep while discovering the fascinating story of the Gilded Age. Want More? Request a Topic: https://www.icantsleeppodcast.com/request-a-topic Ad-Free Episodes: https://icantsleep.supportingcast.fm/ Shop Sleep-Friendly Products: https://www.icantsleeppodcast.com/sponsors Join the Discussion on Discord: https://discord.gg/myhGhVUhn7 This content is derived from the Wikipedia article on The Gilded Age, available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) license. Read the full article: Wikipedia – The Gilded Age. Happy sleeping! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
You're listening to a Glassbox media podcast.
What if I told you that most of the modern day self-help advice you've been hearing could actually make you worse?
The key to a better life isn't about feel-good gimmicks that sound catchy.
The Mentally Stronger Podcast gives you access to a licensed therapist who shares science-backed tools that will actually change your life.
Hi, I'm Amy Morin, psychotherapist, mental strength trainer, and international best-selling author.
In each episode, we cover research-back strategies, like how to stop relying on willpower and start
creating habits for lasting change.
And the five mental strength-building exercises you can do from your couch.
I also speak to world-class experts like Dr. Nicole Kane, who shares how to permanently
heal anxiety by addressing the root cause.
With over 200 episodes in our catalog, this podcast is for you if you're ready to crush
self-doubt, conquer challenges, and become stronger than ever with therapist-approved
strategies that can change your life. Listen to Mentally Stronger with Therapist Amy Morin, wherever
you get your podcasts. Welcome to the I Can't Sleep Podcast, where I read random articles
from across the web to bore you to sleep with my soothing voice. I'm your host, Benjamin Boster.
Today's episode is from a Wikipedia article titled, Gilded Age. In United States,
States history, the Gilded Age is roughly the period from about the 1870s to the late 1890s,
which occurred between the Reconstruction era and the Progressive Era. It was named after an 1873
Mark Twain novel by historians in the 1920s, who saw this interval of economic expansion as an era
of materialistic excesses combined with political corruption. It was a time of rapid economic growth,
especially in the northern and western United States.
As American wages grew much higher than those in Europe,
especially for skilled workers,
and industrialization demanded an increasing unskilled labor force,
the period saw an influx of millions of European immigrants.
The rapid expansion of industrialization led to real wage growth of 40%
from 1860 to 1890,
and spread across the increased,
increasing labor force.
The average annual wage per industrial worker, including men, women, and children,
rose from $380 in 1880, about $11,523 in 2022, to $584 in 1890, $18,370,000, a gain of 59.
The Gilded Age was also an era of poverty, especially in the South, and growing inequality as millions of immigrants poured into the United States, and the high concentration of wealth became more visible and contentious.
Railroads were the major growth industry, was the factory system, mining, and finance increasing in importance.
Immigration from Europe and the eastern United States led to the rapid growth of the West,
based on farming, ranching, and mining.
Labor unions became increasingly important in the rapidly growing industrial cities.
Two major nationwide depressions, the panic of 1873, and the panic of 1893,
interrupted growth and caused social and political upheavals.
The South remained economically devastated after the American Civil War.
The region's economy became increasingly top.
to commodities, cotton, and tobacco production, which suffered from low prices.
With the end of the Reconstruction era in 1877 and the rise of Jim Crow laws,
African-American people in the South were stripped of political power and voting rights
and were left economically disadvantaged.
The political landscape was notable in that despite rampant corruption,
election turnout was comparatively high among all classes.
though the extent of the franchise was generally limited to men,
and national elections saw two evenly matched parties.
The dominant issues were cultural,
especially regarding prohibition, education, and ethnic or racial groups,
and economic, tariffs, and money supply.
With the rapid growth of cities, political machines increasingly took control of urban politics.
In business, powerhouse.
national-wide trusts formed in some industries. Unions crusaded for the eight-hour workday and the
abolition of child labor. Middle-class reformers demanded civil service reform, prohibition of liquor
and beer, and women's suffrage. Local governments across the north and west built public
schools chiefly at the elementary level. Public high schools started to emerge. The numerous
religious denominations were growing in membership and wealth, with Catholicism becoming the
largest. They all expanded their missionary activity to the world arena. Catholics, Lutherans,
and Episcopalians set up religious schools, and the largest of those schools set up numerous
colleges, hospitals, and charities. Many of the problems faced by society, especially the poor,
gave rise to attempted reforms in the subsequent progressive era.
The term gilded age was applied to the era by 1920s historians,
who took the term from one of Mark Twain's lesser-known novels,
A Gilded Age, A Tale of Today, 1873.
The book, co-written with Charles Dudley Warner,
satirized the promised golden age after the Civil War,
portrayed as an era of serious social problems,
masked by a thin gold gilding of economic expansion.
In the 1920s and 1930s, the metaphor gilded age
began to be applied to a designated period in American history.
The term was adopted by literary and cultural critics
as well as historians, including Van Wick Brooks, Lewis Mumford,
Charles Austin Beard, Mary Ritterbeard, Vernon Lewis Parrington,
and Matthew Josephson.
For them, gilded age was a pejorative term for a time of materialistic excesses and widespread political corruption.
The early half of the Gilded Age roughly coincided with the middle portion of the Victorian era in Britain and the Belle Epic in France.
With respect to eras of American history, historical views vary as to when the Gilded Age began, ranging from starting right after the Slibert's.
Civil War ended in 1865, or 1873, or as the Reconstruction era ended in 1877.
The date marking the end of the Gilded Age also varies. The ending is generally given as the
beginning of the Progressive Era in the 1890s, sometimes the United States presidential election
of 1896. The Gilded Age was a period of economic growth as the United States jumped the lead in
industrialization ahead of Britain. The nation was rapidly expanding its economy into new areas,
especially heavy industry like factories, railroads, and coal mining. In 1869, the first transcontinental
railroad opened up the far-west mining and ranching regions. Travel from New York to San Francisco
then took six days instead of six months. Railroad track mileage tripled from 1860,
to 1880, and then doubled again by 1920.
The new track linked formally isolated areas with larger markets
and allowed for the rise of commercial farming, ranching, and mining,
creating a truly national marketplace.
American steel production rose to surpass the combined totals of Britain, Germany, and France.
Investors in London and Paris poured money into the railroads
through the American financial market centered in Wall Street.
By 1900, the process of economic concentration had extended into most branches of industry.
A few large corporations called truss dominated in steel, oil, sugar, meat, and farm machinery.
Through vertical integration, these trusts were able to control each aspect of the production of a specific good,
ensuring that the profits made on the finished product were maximized and prices minimized,
and by controlling access to the raw materials, prevented other companies from being able to
compete in the marketplace.
Several monopolies, most famously Standard Oil, came to dominate their markets by keeping
prices low when competitors appeared.
They grew at a rate four times faster than that of the competitive sectors.
Increased mechanization of industry is a major mark of the Gilded Ages search for cheaper ways to create more product.
Frederick Winslow-Taylor observed that worker efficiency and steel could be improved through the use of very close observations,
with a stopwatch to eliminate wasted effort.
Mechanization made some factories and assemblage of unskilled laborers performing simple and repetitive tasks under the direction of skilled foreman.
and engineers.
Machine shops grew rapidly, and they comprised highly skilled workers and engineers.
Both the number of unskilled and skilled workers increased as their wage rates grew.
Engineering colleges were established to feed the enormous demand for expertise.
Many through the federal government-sponsored moral land grant acts
passed to stimulate public education, particularly in the agricultural and technical,
ag and tech fields. Railroads, which had previously invented railroad time to standardize time
zones, production, and lifestyles, created modern management with clear chains of command,
statistical reporting, and complex bureaucratic systems. They systematize the roles of middle
managers and set up explicit career tracks for both skilled blue-collar jobs and for white-collar
managers. These advances spread from railroads into finance, manufacturing, and trade.
Together with rapid growth of small business, a new middle class was rapidly growing, especially in
northern cities. The nation became a world leader and applied technology. From 1860 to 1890,
500,000 patents were issued for new inventions. Over 10 times the number granted in the previous
70 years.
George Westinghouse invented air brakes for trains, making them both safer and faster and faster.
Theodore Vale established the American Telephone and Telegraph Company and built a great communications
network.
Alicia Otis developed the elevator, allowing the construction of skyscrapers and the concentration
of even greater populations in urban centers.
Thomas Set us in, in addition to inventing hundreds of devices,
established the first electrical lighting utility, based it on direct current and an efficient
incandescent lamp. Electric power deliveries spread rapidly across Gilded Age cities. The streets were
lighted at night and electric streetcars allowed for faster commuting to work and easier shopping.
Petroleum launched a new industry beginning with the Pennsylvania oil fields in the 1860s. The United
States dominated the global industry into the 1950s.
Kerosene replaced whale oil and candles for lighting homes.
John D. Rockefeller founded Standard Oil Company and monopolized the oil industry.
It mostly produced kerosene before the automobile created a demand for gasoline in the 20th century.
According to historian Henry Adams, the system of railroads needed the engineers of a generation
for it required all the new machinery to be created, capital banks, mines, furnaces, shops,
powerhouses, technical knowledge, mechanical population, together with a steady remodeling of social
and political habits, ideas, and institutions to fit the new scale and suit the new conditions.
A generation from 1865 to 1895 was already mortgaged to the railways.
and no one knew it better than the generation itself.
The impact can be examined through five aspects,
shipping, finance, management, careers, and popular reaction.
Shipping Freight and Passengers
Railroads provided a highly efficient network
for shipping freight and passengers throughout the U.S.
spurring the evolution of a large national market.
This had a transformative impact on most sector,
of the economy, including manufacturing, retail and wholesale, agriculture, and finance.
The result was an integrated market practically the size of Europe's, with no internal barriers,
tariffs, or language barriers to hamper it, and a common financial and legal system to support it.
Basis of the private financial system
Railroad financing provided the basis for a dramatic expansion of the private financial system.
Construction of railroads was far more expensive than factories.
In 1860, the combined total of railroad stocks and bonds was $1.8 billion.
1897, it reached $10.6 billion, compared to a total national debt of $1.2 billion.
funding came primarily from private finance throughout the northeast and from Europe, especially Britain,
with about 10% coming from the federal government, especially in the form of land grants that could be realized when a certain amount of trackage was opened.
The emerging American financial system was based on railroad bonds.
By 1860, New York was the dominant financial market.
The British invested heavily on railroads.
around the world, but nowhere more so than the United States. The total came to about $3 billion by
1914. In 1914 to 1917, they liquidated their American assets to pay for war supplies.
Inventing modern management. Railroad management designed complex systems that could
handle far more complicated simultaneous relationships than could be dreamed of by the local factory
owner who could patrol every part of his own factory in a matter of hours.
Civil engineers became the senior management of railroads.
The leading innovators were the Western Railroad of Massachusetts
and the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad in the 1840s,
the Erie in the 1850s, and the Pennsylvania in the 1860s.
Career Paths
The railroads invented the career path in the private sector for both blue and white-collar
workers. Railroading became a lifetime career for young men. Women were rarely hired. A typical career
pass would see a young man hired at age 18 as a shop laborer and promoted to skilled mechanic at age 24,
breakmen at 25, freight conductor at 27, and passenger conductor at age 57. White-collar career paths
likewise were delineated. Educated young men started in clerical or
statistical work, and moved up to station agents or bureaucrats at the divisional or central headquarters.
At each level, they had more and more knowledge, experience, and human capital. They were very
hard to replace and were virtually guaranteed permanent jobs, and provided with insurance and medical
care. Hiring, firing, and wage rates were set not by foreman, but by central administrators to minimize
favoritism and personality conflicts.
Everything was done by the book,
whereby an increasingly complex set of rules
dictated to everyone exactly what should be done in every
circumstance and exactly what their rank and pay would be.
By the 1880s, the career railroaders were retiring
and pension systems were invented to provide for them.
Railroad controversy.
America developed a love-hate relationship with railroads.
Boosters in every city worked feverishly to make sure the railroad came through, knowing their urban dreams depended upon it.
The mechanical size, scope, and efficiency of the railroads made a profound impression.
People dressed in their Sunday best to go down to the terminal to watch the train come in.
Travel became much easier, cheaper and more common.
Shoppers from small towns could make day trips to big city stores.
Hotels, resorts, and tourist attractions were built to accommodate the demand.
The realization that anyone could buy a ticket for a thousand-mile trip was empowering.
Historians Gary Cross and Rick Shostock argue,
With the freedom to travel came a greater sense of national identity
and a reduction in regional cultural diversity.
Farm children could more easily acquaint themselves with the big city,
and Easterners could readily visit the West.
It is hard to imagine a United States of continental proportions without the railroad.
The civil and mechanical engineers became model citizens,
bringing their can-do spirit and their systematic work effort to all phases of the economy,
as well as local and national government.
By 1910, major cities were building magnificent palatial railroad stations,
such as the Pennsylvania Station in New York City and the Union Station in Washington, D.C.
But there was also a dark side.
By the 1870s, railroads were vilified by Western farmers
who absorbed the Granger movement theme
that monopolistic carriers controlled too much pricing power
and that the state legislatures had to regulate maximum prices.
Local merchants and shippers supported the demand
and got some Granger laws passed.
Anti-railroad complaints were loudly repeated in the late 19th
century political rhetoric.
One of the most hated railroad men in the country was Callis P. Huntington, 1821 to
1900, the president of the Southern Pacific Railroad, who dominated California's economy
and politics. One textbook argues, Huntington came to symbolize the greed and corruption
of late 19th century business. Business rivals and political reformers accused him of every
conceivable evil.
Journalists and cartoonists made their reputations by pilloring him.
Historians have cast Huntington as the state's most despicable villain.
However, Huntington defended himself.
The motives back of my actions have been honest ones,
and the results have redounded far more to the benefit of California than they have to my own.
Impact on farming.
The growth of railroads from the 1850s to 1880s made commercial farming much more
feasible and profitable.
Millions of acres were open to settlement once the railroad was nearby and provided a long
distance outlet for wheat, cattle, and hogs that reached all the way to Europe.
Rural America became one giant marketplace, as wholesalers bought the consumer products produced
by the factories in the east and shipped them to local merchants in small stores nationwide.
shipping live animals was slow and expensive.
It was more efficient to slaughter them in major packing centers such as Chicago, Kansas City,
St. Louis, Milwaukee, and Cincinnati, and then shipped dressed meat out in refrigerator freight cars.
The cars were cooled by slabs of ice that had been harvested from the northern lakes in wintertime
and stored for summer and fall usage.
Chicago, the main railroad center, benefited enormously, with Kansas City a distant second.
Historian William Cronin concludes,
Because of the Chicago Packers, ranchers in Wyoming and feedlot farmers in Iowa regularly found a reliable market for their animals,
and on average received better prices for the animals they sold there.
At the same time, and for the same reason, Americans of all classes found a greater variety of more,
and better meats on their tables, purchased on average at lower prices than ever before.
Seen in this slide, the Packers' rigid system of economy seemed a very good thing indeed.
During the 1870s and 1880s, the U.S. economy rose at the fastest rate in its history,
with real wages, wealth, GDP, and capital formation all increasing rapidly.
For example, from 1865 to 1898, the output of wheat increased in.
increased by 256 percent, corn by 222 percent, coal by 800 percent, and miles of railway track by
567 percent. Thick national networks for transportation and communication were created.
The corruption became the dominant form of business organization and a scientific management
revolution transformed business operations. By the beginning of the 20th century, gross domestic
product and industrial production in the United States led the world.
Kennedy reports that U.S. national income and absolute figures in per capita was so far above
everybody else's by 1914. Per capita income in the United States was $377 in 1914, compared to
Britain in second place at $244, Germany at $184, France at $1,154,000. France at $1,5,000.
$53 and Italy at $108, while Russia and Japan trailed far behind at $41 and $36.
London remained the financial center of the world until 1914, yet the United States' growth
caused foreigners to ask, as British author W.T. Steed wrote in 1901, What is the secret of American
success? The businessman of the Second Industrial Revolution created industrial towns and cities
in the Northeast was the new factories and hired an ethnically diverse industrial working class,
many of them new immigrants from Europe.
Wealthy industrialists and financiers such as John D. Rockefeller, Jay Gould, Henry Clay Frick,
Andrew Mellon, Andrew Carnegie, Henry Flagler, Henry Huddleston Rogers, J.P. Morgan,
Leland Stanford, Meyer Guggenheim, Jacob Schiff, Charles Crocker,
and Cornelius Fanderbilt would sometimes be labeled robber barons by their critics,
who argue their fortunes were made at the expense of the working class,
by chicanery and a betrayal of democracy.
Their admirers argued that they were captains of industry,
who built a core America industrial economy,
and also the non-profit sector through acts of philanthropy.
For instance, Andrew Carnegie donated over 90% of his wealth
and said that philanthropy was their duty, the gospel of wealth.
Private money endowed thousands of colleges, hospitals, museums, academies, schools,
opera houses, public libraries, and charities.
John D. Rockefeller donated over $500 million to various charities,
slightly over half his entire net worth.
Reflecting this, many business leaders were influenced by Herbert Spencer's theory of social Darwinism,
which justified laissez-faire capitalism, competition, and social stratification.
This emerging industrial economy quickly expanded to meet the new market demands.
From 1869 to 1879, the U.S. economy grew at a rate of 6.8% for NNP, GDP minus capital depreciation,
and 4.5% for NNP per capita.
The economy repeated this period of growth in the 1880s,
in which the wealth of the nation grew at an annual rate of 3.8%,
while the GDP was also doubled.
Libertarian economist Milton Friedman states that for the 1880s,
the highest decadal rate of growth of real reproducible, tangible wealth per head
from 1805 to 1950 for periods of about 10 years was apparently reached in the
80s with approximately 3.8%. The rapid expansion of industrialization led to real wage growth
of 60% from 1860 to 1890 spread across the increasing labor force. Real wages adjusting for inflation
rose steadily with the exact percentage increase depending on the dates in the specific workforce.
The Census Bureau reported in 1892 that the average annual wage per industrial worker,
including men, women, and children, rose from $380 in 1880 to $564 in 1890, a gain of 48%.
Economic historian Clarence D. Long estimates that in terms of constant $1914,
The average annual incomes of all American non-farm employees rose from $375 in 1870 to $395 in 180,
$5190 in 1890, and $573 in 1900, a gain of 53% in 30 years.
Australian historian Peter Shergold found that the standard of living for industrial workers
was higher than in Europe.
He compared wages and the standard of living in Pittsburgh with Birmingham, England,
one of the richest industrial cities of Europe.
After taking account of the cost of living, which was 65% higher in the U.S.,
he found the standard of living of unskilled workers was about the same in the two cities,
while skilled workers in Pittsburgh had about 50% to 100% higher standard of living
as those in Birmingham, England.
Warren B. Catlin proposed that the natural resources in virgin lands that were available in America
acted as a safety valve for poor workers.
Hence, employees had to pay higher wages to higher labor.
According to Shergold, the American advantage grew over time from 1890 to 1914,
and the perceived higher American wage led to a heavy, steady flow of skilled workers from Britain
to industrial America.
According to historian Steve Frazier,
workers generally earned less than $800 a year,
which kept them mired in poverty.
Workers had to put in roughly 60 hours a week to earn this much.
Wage labor was widely condemned as wage slavery in the working class press,
and labor leaders almost always used the phrase in their speeches.
As the shift towards wage labor gained momentum, working-class organizations became more militant
in their efforts to strike down the whole system of wages for labor.
In 1886, economist and New York mayoral candidate Henry George, author of Progress and
Poverty, stated, Chattel slavery is dead, but industrial slavery remains.
The unequal distribution of wealth remained high during this period.
From 1860 to 1900, the wealthiest 2% of American households owned more than a third of the nation's wealth,
while the top 10% owned roughly three quarters of it.
The bottom 40% had no wealth at all.
In terms of poverty, the wealthiest 1% owned 51%, while the bottom 44% claimed 1.1%.
Historian Howard Zinn argues that this disparity along with precarious working and living conditions for the
working classes prompted the rise of populist, anarchist, and socialist movements.
French economist Thomas Piquetti notes that economists during this time, such as Wilford Iykeen,
were concerned that the United States was becoming increasingly inegalitarian to the point
of becoming like old Europe, and further and further away from its original pioneering ideal.
According to economist Richard Such, in an alternative view of the era, the bottom 25%
owned 0.32% of the wealth, while the top 0.1% owned 9.4%, which would mean the period had the lowest
wealth gap in record history. He attributes this to the lack of government interference.
There was a significant human cost attached to this period of economic growth, as American industry
had the highest rate of accidents in the world. In 1889, railroads employed 7,0004,000 men,
of whom 20,000 were injured, and 1,972 were killed on the job.
The U.S. was also the only industrial power to have no workman's compensation program in place
to support injured workers.
Craft-oriented labor unions such as carpenters, printers, shoemakers, and cigar makers
grew steadily in the industrial cities after 1870.
These unions used frequent short strikes as a method to attain control
over the labor market and fight off competing unions.
They generally blocked women, blacks, and Chinese from union membership,
but welcomed most European immigrants.
The railroads had their own separate unions,
and especially large episode of unrest estimated at 80,000 railroad workers
and several hundred thousand other Americans, both employed and unemployed,
broke out during the economic depression of the 1870s,
and became known as the Great Railroad Strike of 1877,
which was, according to historian Jack Beatty,
the largest strike anywhere in the world in the 19th century.
This strike did not involve labor unions,
but rather uncoordinated outbursts in numerous cities.
The strike and associated riots lasted 45 days
and resulted in the deaths of several hundred participants.
No police or soldiers were killed,
several hundred more injuries and millions and damages to railroad property.
The unrest was deemed severe enough by the government
that President Rutherfordby Hayes intervened with federal troops.
Starting in the mid-1880s, a new group, the Knights of Labor, grew too rapidly,
and it spun out of control and failed to handle the Great Southwest Railroad strike of 1886.
The Knights avoided violence, but the rest of the rest of the rest of the war.
Reputation collapsed in the wake of the Haymarket Square riot in Chicago in 1886, when anarchists
allegedly bombed the policeman dispersing a meeting. Police then randomly fired into the crowd,
killing and wounded a number of people, including other police, and arbitrarily rounded up anarchists,
including leaders of the movement. Seven anarchists went on trial. Four were hanged even though
no evidence directly linked them to the bombing.
One had in his possession a Knights of Labor membership card.
At its peak, the Knights claimed 700,000 members.
By 1890, membership had plummeted to fewer than 100,000,
than faded away.
Strikes organized by labor unions became routine events by the 1880s,
as the gap between the rich and the poor widened.
There were 37,000 strikes from 1881 to 1905.
by far the largest number were in the building trades, followed far behind by coal miners.
The main goal was control of working conditions and settling which rival union was in control.
Most were a very short duration. In times of depression, strikes were more violent but less successful
because the company was losing money anyway. They were successful in times of prosperity when the company was
losing profits and wanted to settle quickly.
The largest and most dramatic strike was the 1894 Pullman strike, a coordinated effort to
shut down the national railroad system.
The strike was led by the upstart American Railway Union, led by Eugene V. Debs, and was
not supported by the established brotherhoods.
The union defied federal court orders to stop blocking the mail trains, so President
and Cleveland used the U.S. Army to get the trains moving again.
The ARU vanished, and the traditional Railroad Brotherhood survived but avoided strikes.
The new American Federation of Labor, headed by Samuel Gompers, found the solution.
The AFL was a coalition of unions, each based on strong local chapters.
The AFL coordinated their work in cities and prevented jurisdictional battles.
Comper's repudiated socialism and abandoned the violent nature of the earlier unions.
The AFL worked to control the local labor market, thereby empowering its locals to obtain higher wages and more control over hiring.
As a result, the AFL unions spread to most cities, reaching a peak membership in 1919.
This period saw several financial crises and economic recessions, called Panics.
notably the panic of 1873 and the panic of 1893.
They lasted several years with high urban unemployment,
low incomes for farmers,
low profits for business,
slow overall growth,
and reduced immigration.
They generated political unrest.
Gilded Age politics,
called the third party system,
featured intense competition between two major parties,
with minor parties coming and going,
especially on issues of concern to prohibitionists to labor unions and to farmers.
The Democrats and Republicans, the latter nicknamed the grand old party, GOP, fought over control of offices,
which were the rewards for party activists as well as over major economic issues.
Very high voter turnout typically exceeded 80% or even 90% in some northern states,
as the parties drilled their loyal members, much as an army drills at soldiers.
Turnout in the South was lower.
Average presidential turnout, 1872 to 1900, was 83% in the North and 62% in the South.
Competition was intense, and elections were very close,
and the southern states lingering resentment over the Civil War remained
and meant that much of the South would vote Democratic.
After the end of the reconstruction in 1877, competition in the South took place mainly inside the Democratic Party.
Nationwide, turnout fell sharply after 1900. The major metropolitan centers underwent rapid population
growth and as a result had many lucrative contracts and jobs to award. To take advantage of the new
economic opportunity, both parties built so-called political machines to manage elections,
to reward supporters, and to pay off potential opponents.
Financed by the spoils system, the winning party distributed most local, state, and national
government jobs, and many government contracts to its loyal supporters.
Large cities became dominated by political machines in which constituents supported a candidate in
exchange for anticipated patronage. These votes would be repaid with favors back from the government
once the appropriate candidate was elected. And very often candidates were selected based on their
willingness to play along with the spoils system. The largest and most notorious political machine was
Tammany Hall in New York City, led by Democrat Bostweed. Political corruption was rampant
as business leaders spent significant amounts of money, ensuring that government did not regulate
the activities of big businesses, and they more often than not got what they wanted.
Such corruption was so commonplace that in 1868, the New York State Legislature legalized
such bribery. Historian Howard Zinn argues that the U.S. government was acting
exactly as Karl Marx described capitalist states, pretending neutrality to maintain
order, but serving the interests of the rich.
Historian Mark Walgren, Summers, calls it the era of good stealings, noting how machine
politicians used padded expenses, lucrative contracts, outright embezzlements, and illegal
bond issues.
He concludes, corruption gave the age a distinctive flavor.
It marred the planning and development of the cities, infected lobbyist dealings,
and disgraced even the cleanest of the reconstructed states.
For many reasons, however, its effect on policy was less overwhelming than once imagined.
Corruption influenced a few substantive decisions.
It rarely determined one.
Numerous swindlers were active, especially before the panic of 1873 exposed the falsification
and caused a wave of bankruptcies.
Former President Ulysses S. Grant was the most famous victim,
of scoundrels and conmen, of whom he most trusted Ferdinand Ward.
Grant was cheated out of all his money, although some genuine friends bought Grant's personal
assets and allowed him to keep their use.
Interpreting the phenomena, historian Alan Nevins deplored the moral collapse in government
and business, 1865 to 1873. He argued that at war's end, societies showed confusion
and unsettlement, as well as a hurried aggressive growth on the other.
They united to give birth to an alarming public and private corruption.
Obviously, much of the shocking improbity was due to the heavy wartime expenditures.
Speculators and jobbers waxed fat on government money.
The collection of federal revenues offered large opportunities for graft.
Under the stimulus of greenback inflation, business ran into excesses and lost
side of elementary canons of prudence.
Meanwhile, it became clear that thievery had found a better opportunity to grow
because the conscience of the nation aroused against slavery
had neglected what seemed minor evils.
The thousands who had rushed into speculations, which they had no moral right to risk,
the pushing hardened men brought to the front by the turmoil,
observed a coarser, lower standard of conduct.
much of the trouble lay in the immense growth of national wealth
unaccompanied by any corresponding growth in civic responsibility
much of the trouble lay in the immense growth of national wealth
unaccompanied by any corresponding growth in civic responsibility
major scandals reached into Congress with the Credit Mobiliar scandal of 1872
and disgraced the White House during the Grand Administration
This corruption divided the Republican Party into two different factions,
the stalwarts led by Roscoe Conkling,
and the half-breeds led by James G. Blaine.
There was a sense that government-enabled political machines intervene in the economy,
and that the resulting favoritism, bribery, inefficiency, waste, and corruption
were having negative consequences.
Accordingly, there were widespread calls for reform,
such as civil service reform led by the Bourbon Democrats and Republican mugwums.
In 1884, their support elected Democrat Grover Cleveland to the White House,
and in doing so gave the Democrats their first national victory since 1856.
The Bourbon Democrats supported a free market policy,
with low tariffs, low taxes, less spending, and in general, a laissez-faire hands-off government.
They argued that tariffs made most goods more expensive for the consumer and subsidized the
trusts monopolies.
They also denounced imperialism and overseas expansion.
By contrast, Republicans insisted the national prosperity dependent on industry that paid
high wages and warned that lowering the tariff would bring disaster because goods from
low-wage European factories would flood American markets.
presidential elections between the two major parties was so closely contested that a slight nudge could tip the election in the advantage of either party, and Congress was marked by political stalemate.
With support from union veterans, businessmen, professionals, craftsmen, and larger farmers, the Republicans consistently carried the north in presidential elections.
The Democrats, often led by Irish Catholics, had a base among Catholics,
or farmers, and traditional party members.
The nation elected a string of relatively weak presidents
collectively referred to as the forgettable presidents,
Johnson, Grant, Hayes, Garfield, Arthur, and Harrison,
with the exception of Cleveland,
who served in the White House during this period.
What little political vitality existed in Gilded Age America
was to be found in local settings or in Congress,
which overshadowed the White House for most,
of this period. Overall, Republican and Democratic political platforms remained remarkably
constant during the years before 1900. Both favored business interests. Republicans called
for high tariffs, while Democrats wanted hard money and free trade. Regulation was rarely an issue.
From 1860 to the early 20th century, the Republicans took advantage of the association of the Democrats
with rum, Romanism, and rebellion.
Rum stood for the liquor interests and the tavern keepers,
in contrast to the GOP, which had a strong dry element.
Romanism meant Roman Catholics, especially Irish Americans,
who ran the Democratic Party in most cities,
and whom the reformers denounced for political corruption
and their separate parochial school system.
Rebellion harked back to the Democrats,
of the Confederacy, who had tried to break the union in 1861, as well as to their northern allies
called copperheads. Demographic trends boosted the Democratic totals as the German and
Irish Catholic immigrants became Democrats and outnumbered the English and Scandinavian Republicans.
The new immigrants who arrived after 1890s seldom voted at this time.
During the 1880s and 1890s, the Republicans struggled against the Democrats' efforts.
winning several close elections and losing two to Grover Cleveland in 1884 and 1992.
Religious lines were sharply drawn.
In the north, about 50% of the voters were pietistic Protestants,
especially Methodists, Scandinavian Lutherans, Presbyterians, congregationalists,
and disciples of Christ, who believed in using the government to reduce social sins,
such as drinking.
They strongly supported the GOP.
in sharp contrast, liturgical groups, especially the Catholics, Episcopalians, and German Lutherans, voted for the Democrats.
They saw the Democratic Party as their best protection from the moralism of the pietists, and especially from the threat of prohibition.
Both parties cut across the class structure, with the Democrats more bottom-heavy and the GOP better represented among businessmen and professionals in the North.
