IHIP News - Chaos Erupts After Trump Makes Fatal Move Exposing His Plot to Never Leave WH

Episode Date: July 15, 2026

Trump is hunkering down to defy democracy with Author Greg Jackson. Pre-order Jennifer’s new book Not Today, Fascists today: https://linktr.ee/ivehaditpodcastFollow Us:I've Had It Podcast: @IvehaditpodcastJennifer Welch: @mizzwelchSpecial Guest: Greg JacksonSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

You teach at the college where Charlie Kirk was assassinated. I now get to see all sorts of hot takes that I know are demonstrably wrong. I think silence by white folk like you and me is capitulating to the fascist violence. The fake news that we just talk about. I want to be careful, though, here when you say fake news, that's something that Trump uses a lot. So are you a Trump supporter? Are you? So, goodness, where do I start with this? Joining me today on IHIP News is Greg Jackson.

He is a historian and host of History That Doesn't Suck podcast, an author of a new book, Been There, Done That. Professor, how are you today? I'm doing all right. Yourself? Fantastic. In your new book, you argue that America's problems at the moment aren't unprecedented. make the case for my listeners who read the news every day and feel like this is like an abusive shit show that this isn't the worst it can be absolutely look as i state right out the gate i am

saying that things are copacetic uh what i am saying is that we tend to romanticize the past and we lose sight of the fact that a liberal democracy requires constant fights and it has been constant fights and so i go through over a century of american history taking a from the 1790s up to 1900, regaling you with tales of fake news, of contested elections, and political violence that I think will make most people's hair stand on edge. So is your purpose of that to let people know that if we are engaged and if we participate, it can hold? Yes.

In fact, that's what I drive to in the conclusion is that, look, well, I've encountered as I've traveled the country as this, as my career took this odd turn. I'm a university professor, right? Like, let's start there. I have a PhD. I'm a tenured history professor. And then my podcast, history that doesn't suck, it blew up. And the next thing I know I'm touring the country, I'm getting to speak with people that I otherwise never would have met.

And the question I get at Q&A after Q&A is, are we at the end? Is this falling apart? That's what drove me to say. I'm going to do a deep study. put my historical skills to use and really interrogate the question. And this book is the product. And what I came away with as I stared into the deepest, darkest abysses of our history was the realization that our institutions are stronger than we tend to think they are in the moment and that our better angels, if I can use a Lincoln phrase, do tend to come out of

woodwork. That's what we've had happen over our course of 250 years. But that isn't a Pollyanna, everything's going to be okay. The message is that those better angels do have to show up. And what I want to demonstrate is that previous generations have fought similar battles. And the point to that isn't to say, oh, so everything's great, but rather to say, look, you've won these battles before, right? If we personify America, Uncle Sam is in the ring, he's fighting an old contender, he's beaten before. So this lack of hope, that cynicism is my biggest fear. Jen. Synicism is what will kill the republic. So that's what my point is. I'm not here to say everything's easy. Everything's fine. Don't sweat. I'm actually saying, yes, sweat it, but you're

strong enough for this. That's the point. You read, you write in your book about political violence kind of being baked into this country's history. And I completely agree with that. And you teach at the college where Charlie Kirk was assassinated. So when politicians, when politicians clutch their pearls and say, this is not who we are. Historically, we have been a country that, at least in my lifetime and my parent, that values the profits that gunmakers make over safety of its citizenry. We value the profits that health insurance companies make over the treatment of somebody with cancer. We really have a violent history, whether that violence is active, meaning an active shooter that shoots somebody, or passive. The passive bigotry of not standing up for sick people and standing up to corporations,

there's a real reckoning that I think, you know, Trump's kind of like late stage, Versailles stuff, it's really exposing to the electorate that you're talking about that's looking for hope. Like we're starting to diagnose what a lot of the problems are that during the 90s or the early 2000s, we were kind of on cruise control, especially if you're a white person and you make pretty good money. Politics didn't really affect you much. We're all starting to open our eyes a little bit to these problems that have been simmering that perhaps prep the psychological soil for fascism to take hold. And as you see, as you're a professor and you see this administration, attack universities and attack education. Are you concerned about those attacks

and other universities that have capitulated and bent the knee to this regime? So goodness, let me start with your pointing out, as I rightly do in my book, the violence that is rampant in our history. Yeah. Yeah, and that is one of the big takeaways I got from this book, which pushed me into political thought.

Obviously, I do that already for a living, but I ended up going far deeper than I expected to, which that's the mark of a good book, right? Yeah. It takes you places you don't mean to go. I feel like I really faced down just how violent our species is. And I did come away with more faith in liberal democracy in that, I believe, even with our many episodes of violence. And this is not to say that any of it's acceptable. This is the hard thing that we need to be able to grasp is that progress and in doing better than other.

Churchill, right? Democracy is the best, or excuse me, the worst form of government apart from all the others, right? This like acknowledgement of the imperfection that is there. And, you know, I went into the Baltimore riots in my book, this instance where, Jeffersonian Republicans literally murdered Federalists because they disagreed over a war declaration and tortured them, held their eyeballs open after beating them senseless and dripped candle wax on them and convinced themselves. They were doing this patriotically, right? That's the sort of thing I do want Americans to realize that's in us. That's in our ability to do, even with

our institutions, our ideas, as great as they are, that human nature is. is still there. So we have to look to those better ideals. As you mentioned, yeah, I teach at Utah Valley University. My career's been built here. My wife teaches here. This is my community. And I was not on campus that day. I was actually writing as it happened. And that for being an event I was not at, it sure has impacted my life. You know, our entire campus community feels it. And again, the fake news that I discussed in my book. Well, I now get to see all sorts of hot takes that I know are demonstrably wrong by

members of the media. I'll say probably wouldn't be members of the media. Like what's an example of a take that's to demonstrably wrong. So my viewer and I know. Yeah, you know, I'll go ahead name one. Candice Owens. And I couldn't, I couldn't even begin to, well, I don't want to begin, to be honest,

to list the things that, you know, the clips that that gets sent. But, you know, incorrectly identifying people in roles that they don't have. The, the, well, I said I wouldn't. I'll stop there. But you know, these have very real impacts. So you know, what strikes me most about the brutal murder of Charlie Kirk is that nobody that loves him or supports him is speaking out against gun violence. They're speaking about everything else, but they're not speaking about the thing that killed him, which is America has a crazy gun problem. And it's very unique to us.

And it's amazing to me that we all witnessed such a brutal murder on the phone and not his wife, nobody in politics that he worked with, nobody in Turning Point. Not one person mentions the senseless gun deaths. And what a disservice does that do to Charlie Kirk, but to all of the other people who have been killed senselessly because we value the profits of the gun system and all of the profiteers that make all of these guns. We value their profits more than we do other human beings, so much so that we all saw somebody get murdered,

who I completely disagree with almost everything Charlie Kirk said. I found him to be racist. I found him to be homophobic. I found him to be a religious bigot of the highest order. But I don't think he should have died. I don't think he should have been brutally murdered at that age, at any age. And nobody will speak to the fact of what really kills him. And that's just in this era of Trumpism, where we've ushered in all of this anti-intellectualism

that nobody can really peg what really killed this guy. Utah State University should not have had a gun on campus that day, period. Well, Jen, you know, this is, I mean, again, this is kind of exactly why I've written this book is I want to facilitate better conversation. I want Americans to realize that we've got to be able to talk across the aisle. And I know that might sound like a platitude, but for each side to tell themselves how much they agree with each other, that doesn't move the needle. There's got to be, there's got to be that discourse that happens. And moreover, you know, the idea that this stuff is unique, that is the thing that I want to take to task and that I have, that this sort of violence is there, that the fake news that we just talked about. I mean, this example in and of itself, it encaps me so much.

I want to be careful, though, here, when you say fake news, that's something that Trump uses a lot. Yeah. And he uses that to dismantle expertise and to dismantle facts. And he's weaponized that phrase. And so will you define when you say fake news what you're referring to? Yes. I'm referring to intentional misinformation. That's how it's defined by the New York Times. That's how it's defined by scholars. And I state that clearly in chapter one. And that's specifically why I do not label James Mass and Alexander Hamilton's complete slans against each other. Their gross misrepresentations of each other in their newspapers as fake news. because they believed it. So arguably, we could say that many of the things a lot of us call fake news today are not that. We need to know the intent, like libel and slander. So that's where I come down on that term. Yeah. Also, it's not a new term. As I get to in chapter 8, fake news has at least been in existence since 1894. That's when I first showed up, 1894. That's what gets me about a lot of

this stuff is how painfully unoriginal, a lot of stuff that Trump says, make America great again, was first coined by Ronald Reagan. You're saying fake news was coined in the 1800s. A lot of his playbook and a lot of Stephen Miller's speeches are eerily reminiscent of Hitler or Joseph Goebbels' speeches, just translated from German to English. The hunting, you know, his campaign promise of he's going to get rid of the enemy from within. And now he is launching a lot of McCarthy-era-style red scare tactics of getting the Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, to ask Congress for an additional $350 billion in funding to fight communism within the United States of America. A lot of this stuff has already been tried and defeated. And yet these morons are trying it all

again. And as far as you talk about talking to people across the aisle, I'm not really interested in doing that with people that triple trumped. Now, if somebody voted for Mitt Romney, who I disagreed with, I wouldn't have any problem sitting down and talking to somebody who voted for Mitt Romney three times because Mitt Romney was a decent person. The dehumanization, the murders of Renee Good and Alex Pretty, the deported. of people that are immigrants to countries that they have no affiliation with, making a place called Alligator Alcatraz, the dismissive nature of trans people, of gay people, of black people, of immigrants is so abhorrent to me. I don't want to sit down and talk to these people.

Now, this is where we differ. They want to call me a libtard and they hope that I die or move out of the country. I don't wish them ill will. I hope they have health care. I hope that they have, can send their kids to a school where their kids don't have to do active shooter drills. But I don't want to sit down and talk to these people because I think they're fucking crazy and I think they're in a cult. I think these people are cooked. I think they've morally broken themselves so much that I think the best way to communicate

with them is positive policy that impacts their lives. Look, that's an entirely fair. take, I'm not saying that, you know, we all, again, none of my answers are simplistic. They really aren't. I'm not saying everything's hunky-dory, and I'm not saying that if we all just sat down and had a good chat, we could have a kumbaya moment and feel good and hold hands. No. In fact, my whole point is that we have violently, viciously disagreed with each other.

We've lied to each other. The lies stated in the election of 1828 were so bad. they literally put Rachel Jackson in the grave for God's sake. But here's here's where I think we need to discuss. Yes, these things happen in history and we can go and it's good to know and it's comfort, you know, we overcame them. But we have a monster at the door at the gates right now. And it is materially affecting Americans' lives right this very moment.

And to not identify it as the savagery that this regime is doing seems dismissive of the people that are experiences, the very abuses that this administration is purposefully extolling on them because of their desire for recreational cruelty and to plunder the country. And so I think that in order to get through this, we have to with very clear eyes call it what it is. fascism, as clear-eyed as we possibly can, recreational cruelty, bigotry, homophobia, Christian nationalism. And we have to be explicit because I have found when I experience anxiety and there's something I don't know, the not knowing makes me even more anxious. And so knowing things, knowing what we're up against is so important. And while this interview's been great, You've tiptoed around identifying in clear terms what we're up against and what Trump is and what has been ushered into America right now. And I think that we all have to be explicit in calling it what it is.

Otherwise, it's just a passive form of gaslighting. Interesting. So my mind goes to Paxton's anatomy of fascism. the foremost scholar on on fascism. And he makes a few points. Again, historian, academic. Well, I don't want to dance, but I definitely want to get meaty here. He points out that a number of the things that we identify with fascism,

basically a form of extreme national, I always think it's valuable to define these sorts of things, right? So fascism itself itself, my working definition, of that is that it is a form of extreme nationalism. It glories in blood and military conquest. Check. Check. That it doesn't have a clear economic policy. Check. It will do whatever is in the good of the state. Cult of personality with a one-party system. And so those are all factors. And this is where, Jen, And I feel like perhaps, and I want to put words in your mouth, tell me if you think I've got you wrong.

I think you're speaking like we're past 1933 and I'm saying we're not, that we're past the Acerbo law. If we go with the Italy comparison, I'm saying we're in the epicenter of it. And I think that he is making moves right now to intervene in the last guardrail that we have, which are these midterms that are coming up. And he is making moves. He has already been talking about having ICE at polling places. Well, who did Brett Kavanaugh rule that ICE could harass with impunity?

People that look suspicious or had accents. The Kavanaugh rule, which is systemic racism. So I'm very concerned that we have three branches of government and two of the three have capitulated to the executive branch. I'm very concerned for the safety of my black and brown fellow Americans, particularly those that might have an accent, that can legally vote, that are going to try to go vote, especially when we've seen somebody who's just murdered yesterday in Maine by this regime. A guy was pulled out of his car, shot in the head with his three-year-old daughter. And so I would say we're at the epicenter of all of that stuff right now. And these are very dangerous people of fascism. So when I say past 19-30, I'm not trying to like.

I know that you, what my listeners are looking for on my show. Yeah. Is heart-hitting acknowledgments as to what we're up against. And I appreciate so much that our history has been violent. And for black people, I would argue, they've lived in a fascist America for a very long time. What we saw happen to Renee Good and Alex Preddy was new for white people to see, but that was not new for black Americans to see the state arbitrarily execute somebody. Sure. 50,000 plus lynchings in the reconstruction era.

Yeah, I take your point. Yeah. And I feel like we're escalating to such a place right now that we all have to sound the alarm bells about how important this next election is because it is the final guardrail because he's surrounded by a bunch of dipships, morally rotten, corrupt dipships. And there's no other way to dance around it. I'm not trying to be cute. I'm not trying to be patronizing to them. That's what they are. This is not America's best foot forward. These are all people that have failed forward that he intentionally, and I've had Timothy Snyder, Ruth Ben-Giott, and Jason Stanley, all historians and experts in fascism on this

podcast. And they've all rung the alarm bells about all of the steps and machinations that Trump and his army of obsequious sycophants are colluding to do right now. And I think that all roads look to trying to rig the election so that he can stay in power because their dream these guys is to make the United States a Christian nationalist nation. And my argument isn't to dismiss the concerns that you have, Jen. It's to point out that as extreme as this moment feels, what I'm saying is that Americans have felt that extremity, generation after generation.

And there is value, very meaningful value to us understanding that that pressure is more the norm than abnormal because this is you know as james mass and tells us in farewell is 51 that men are not angels that power is a constant thing that uh that nefarious actors will reach i think what i'm not getting from you that is kind of unsettling okay is any critique of trump in this regime as a historian as some i i'm not getting from you that is kind of unsettling okay is any critique of trump in this regime as a historian as some i'm just not seeing that so my are you a trump supporter are you i i'm not um and i will i'll tell you candidly i have been very um nonpartisan in the history that i put forward uh not in a dance around way to me it's highly disciplined it is

do you think that's helpful to be nonpartisan now as a white person that when we see all of these immigrants and marginalized people, LGBTQ plus people under attack, don't you think that's the time for us to stand up and use our privilege and our microphones in the most vociferous, helpful way we possibly can? I think that as a professor, that being a voice that the, that the middle is that is still unsure what is the middle? Well, it's not like center left and center right disappeared, Jen. Right, but what is the middle with, here's, I agree, and 10 years ago we had that, but right now, as we're seeing a man who has abysmal approval rating, something in the low 30s, there's been zero investigation of the murders of Alex Preddy, Renegget, or any of the other people that have died in ICE custody, zero. They have done all of this stuff with impunity.

Trump is talking about the SAVE Act, which would disenfranchise millions of women and their ability to vote. And my home state of Oklahoma, women have lost their right to abortion care. And some are dying because they're unable to have a private procedure with their OBGYN. So these issues are existential right now. They're not, for me, and, Pardon the pushback, but I think that these conversations are important and healthy. The middle is a place where somebody with your skin color and my skin color and our income can sit because it hasn't affected us yet. But if you think about what Trump will come for, his people tried to kill Mike Pence.

They built a gallo and a noose and he was white, Christian, Republican, Trump ass kisser, extraordinary and they chanted hang Mike Pence. So I believe this moment we're in is existential. And I think silence by white folk like you and me is capitulating to the fascist violence. And I don't think it's helpful. And I think we all as Americans, whether it's me with you on this podcast or people in our families or people in our social circles, this is not a middle. The middle is a luxury that your complexion offers you. This is a time to stand up and fight with every American against these injustices and encourage each other to turn out so that it is too big to rig because there is so much suffering right now. Black and brown communities, LGBTQ plus communities. And my moral compass is with them.

So, goodness, where do I start here with this? Thank you. I appreciate your passion. And I think we agree more than you might be thinking. But yeah, I think we probably do have some disagreement here as well. I think that it's valuable to have those who, those who are fighting vociferously. and I also think that it's valuable to be able to build trust as an expert, yes, being able to say, look, I want to lay out the history for you to let you be able to see what's happened

without telling you what conclusion you're supposed to make. I've been in the classroom for over a decade and having those sorts of conversations. You don't think it's objectively true that the government shouldn't arbitrarily deny people due process and kill them? Of course. That's just where we are. You know what I mean? Like, I think that I think that that's just where we are and it does a disservice to not call it out. And I don't know if you're fearful because of the university that you teach at. And I'm sure it's probably pretty mageleaning in Utah. It's as red as it gets. And I understand those people because I grew up.

Yeah, UVU is, I mean, it's university. I want to read over read into that. We have faculty of you know, every different sort of persuasion you can imagine. It's a very welcoming community. Well, I just, I thank you for your time today. And I just hope that as we all have microphones and I'm so proud that your podcast is blown up and then you're willing to offer people hope. I also think we have to offer them our unconditional support, especially the most marginalized among us. And I say this to you as an atheist who has never had any religion in my life. I feel a moral calling and sharing this earth with other human beings to stick up for the most marginalized.

And those people happen to be the scapegoats that this fascist regime is using to distract from the plundering that they're doing with all of our systems right now. And so I encourage you to go watch my episodes with your colleagues, Ruth Ben Giotte, Jason Stanley, and Timothy Snyder, because they're really experts in this. and sound the alarm bells as to what we're up against, which is scary, but it's also therapeutic to know the truth of what is exactly happening right now and the people that we need to advocate for the most are the very people that this regime is bullying. Well, thank you. I'll be happy to give that a listen. I also think that you will find, and I don't mean this in a change of mind sort of way, Jen. I think you'll find. I think you'll find chapter seven very interesting. That is the chapter in which I walk through the Supreme Court

decisions that lead Mike Pence to, excuse me, Supreme Court decisions and congressional decisions that lead Mike Pence to say on January 6th, I don't have the power to count these votes. That that history I think is really important for Americans to understand. And that's what I seek to calmly explain. So I think that if you dive into that, you may see, you're going to walk away thinking, okay, maybe there's a little bit more. I walk away from that thinking J.D. Vance is a million times more corrupt than Mike Pence. Oh, I mean, walk away from my chapter, not January 6th. Right. I know, I know, but I'm just saying the one thing. The one thing Trump learned from Trump 1.0 is how to be better at self-preservation. He learned to not have a Mike Pence.

He learned and he got somebody who Peter Till was able to buy. So think about how morally rotten J.D. Vance is. He said Trump was America's Hitler, opioid and opiate for the masses. And then he does a complete 180. And Trump humiliates him every single day, made him the fraud czar. I mean, in a completely humiliating move. So I have zero faith right now in the institutions because these corrupt men are upholding them. And I'm not hearing.

I'm not here to have faith in them or any of that. What I'm trying to say is that we have a history that tells us these sorts of things have happened before. And they contain lessons for how we approach it in the present. And that's what my hundreds of pages lay out. Okay. I hope that there is a Mike Pence-style person that exists in the Trump regime that upholds because I love this country. And I think it's beautiful. And I think it's full of so many beautiful people.

So I hope that your premise is true. I just, I don't trust these people at all. I think this is something different. And I'm not asking anyone to trust any regime or politician. I'm asking us to trust the people. I'm encouraging us to be engaged. So I do want to be very clear as we wrap up. I get the impression you might mistakenly think I'm somehow writing an apology letter or an approval thing.

No, I'm trying to very clearly, starkly say, this is what we've done in the past. These are things that we've gone through. We've overcome them. We can fight them today. And I deliver it. Yeah, I'm a very measured person in my words. But I think you're going to find a lot of precision and scalpel cutting that you'll enjoy. I like it.

All right. Have a great day. Thank you. You too. Thanks.