Imaginary Worlds - Guys and Dolls
Episode Date: July 7, 2022I’ve long been fascinated by automatons – wind up mechanical beings that create the illusion of life. People have been making automatons for centuries, but how many automatons get to sing opera? T...his week’s episode comes from the podcast Aria Code from WQXR, WNYC Studios and The Metropolitan Opera. The show breaks down famous arias and looks at the meaning behind them. Host Rhiannon Giddens, along with Soprano Erin Morley, conductor Johannes Debus, machine learning researcher Caroline Sinders, and psychologist Robert Epstein explore Jacques Offenbach’s 1881 opera The Tales of Hoffmann and how its automated character Olympia echoes current day concerns about A.I. technology. This episode is sponsored by Nord VPN. Exclusive deal -- grab the NordVPN deal at https://nordvpn.com/imaginaryworlds. Try it risk-free now with a 30-day money-back guarantee! Our ad partner is Multitude. If you’re interested in advertising on Imaginary Worlds, you can contact them here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
How do stop losses work on Kraken?
Let's say I have a birthday party on Wednesday night, but an important meeting Thursday morning.
So, sensible me pre-books a taxi for 10pm with alerts.
Voila! I won't be getting carried away and staying out till 2.
That's stop loss orders on Kraken. An easy way to plan ahead.
Go to Kraken.com and see what crypto can be.
Not investment advice. Crypto trading involves risk of loss.
See Kraken.com slash legal slash CA dash PRU dash disclaimer
for info on Kraken's undertaking to register in Canada.
Introducing Tim's new Infuser Energy Beverages,
made with natural caffeine.
They come in two refreshing flavors,
Blackberry Yuzu and Mango Starfruit.
Try them today, only at Tim's.
At participating Tim's restaurants in Canada
for a limited time.
It's time for Tim's. You participating Tim's restaurants in Canada for a limited time. It's time for Tim's.
You're listening to Imaginary Worlds,
a show about how we create them and why we suspend our disbelief.
I'm Eric Malinsky.
This episode is brought to you by Secret.
Secret deodorant gives you 72 hours of clinically proven odor protection
free of aluminum, parabens, dyes, talc, and baking soda.
It's made with pH-balancing minerals and crafted with skin-conditioning oils.
So whether you're going for a run or just running late,
do what life throws your way and smell like you didn't.
Find Secret at your nearest Walmart or Shoppers Drug Mart today.
When I was working as an animation storyboard artist in Los
Angeles, some of my work was very creative, but some of it was very technical. And when I was
doing the really technical stuff, I found that I drew better if half my brain was occupied.
So I decided to use that brain space to learn about operas. I began by listening to
Opera for Dummies, the book on tape. Seriously. But my tastes did get more sophisticated over time.
I started listening to opera CDs, and eventually I started going to the Los Angeles Opera.
And one day, I was sitting in the audience,
it was a Saturday matinee, and I was watching Tales of Hoffman by Jacques Offenbach. In the
second act, we meet a character who seems to be a robot. I double-checked the program to see when
this opera was written. It was 1881. I thought, how could this be a robot? I mean,
was this opera that forward-thinking? I soon realized the character was supposed to be a
sophisticated, life-sized, wind-up doll. In other words, she was an automaton.
Automatons are mechanical beings that are designed with clockwork precision
to give the illusion of life. People have been making automatons for centuries.
I never forgot that singing wind-up doll from Tales of Hoffman.
And ever since I started this podcast,
I've been trying to figure out a way to talk about this character.
Then I came across the podcast Aria Code.
Aria Code is a co-production of WQXR, WNYC Studios, and the Metropolitan Opera.
Each episode, they take an aria and decode the meaning behind it. And in their episode about
Tales of Hoffman, they connected the dots between this character from the 19th century
and current day concerns about artificial intelligence.
It is a really interesting episode, and we're going to hear it after the break.
So here's the episode, which is called Guys and Dolls from the podcast Aria Code, hosted by Rhiannon Giddens.
So Hoffman is an utterly human statement, because we're dealing not only with the successes, we're dealing also with the tragedies of human life.
From WQXR and the Metropolitan Opera, this is Aria Code.
I'm Rhianna Gibbons.
As she begins to sing, she's kind of like a baby learning how to walk.
And she's discovering what she's capable of, and it's thrilling to her.
Every episode, we take a part in aria to see how it's wired. Today, it's
Les Oiseaux dans la Charmure
from The Tales of Hoffman by Jacques
Offenbach. We can't think
clearly when evolutionary
forces are driving
us in a certain direction.
The wishful thinking kicks in
no matter who you are.
This show is usually about the amazing things human voices can do.
But today, we're going to talk about the robots in our lives.
And I'm not just talking about Alexa, y'all.
Now, robots and machines can't sing opera.
But there is one exception.
Her name is Olympia, and she comes from the tales of Hoffman, or Le Conte d'Hoffman.
In the opera, Hoffman is a poet, and he's recounting three of his biggest dating disasters.
The first was with Olympia. Now, Olympia is an automaton, a wind-up doll in the form of a woman,
but Hoffman's not clued in. He's wearing these special glasses that make her seem real, and he's head over heels. Olympia fans the flames of his infatuation
with her incredible acrobatic aria,
Les oiseaux dans la charme,
which means the birds in the arbor.
But people usually just call it the doll song.
So Hoffman is lost in his dream of love.
But that's all it is, a dream, an illusion.
I've got four guests today to help us
get plugged into the very human experience
of falling for a robot.
First,
soprano Erin Morley.
She gets pretty jazzed about singing this aria.
A lampia's mechanical
doll, she is meant to impress her audience.
And so the singer can go
nuts.
You have permission to show off for the sake of showing off.
And that's fun.
Next, Johannes Debus.
He conducted the performance from The Met that you'll hear today.
And he fell in love with the musical variety that Offenbach writes into this opera.
Offenbach seems to have the greatest sympathy with all his characters.
The good things, the not so good things. And on top of it, he does that with such a light approach. There's always vivacity, elegance, beauty. There's nothing that does not feel human.
Third, Caroline Sinders, a machine learning design researcher and artist.
I look at how technology affects people in society
through the lens of design and human rights.
And finally, Dr. Robert Epstein,
senior research psychologist
at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology.
He's a leading expert in distinguishing computers from people.
We're completely different from any computer that we ever build. research, and technology. He's a leading expert in distinguishing computers from people.
We're completely different from any computer that we ever build. We're organisms. We're built
to socialize. We're built to form relationships. We are not built to think logically and to be
rational all the time. Our lives are always going to be driven, first and foremost, by emotions.
Our lives are always going to be driven, first and foremost, by emotions.
All right, time to decode Les Oiseaux dans la Charmée, or The Doll Song, from Tales of Hoffman by Jacques Offenbach.
It's hard to say historically what's the start of artificial intelligence. If we're thinking of machines,
I would argue the creation
of the mechanical Turk chess machine
in the 1800s would be the start of that.
But if we're thinking then
of non-human entities with agency,
one could hypothetically go back
to the beginning of time.
What of ghost tales and folk tales and folklore and religion
that talk about different non-human entities enacting with agency?
Perhaps that's also the birth of artificial intelligence. Le Kontofman is based on source material by E.T.A. Hoffman, the early 19th century German
writer. So we have this wonderful, weird, crazy, interesting inventor called Spallanzani.
And he comes up with all sorts of machines that are new and unusual.
And he has created this mechanical doll, Olympia.
I think in our days it would be an android.
It's a figure that looks like a girl, and yet it's fully mechanical.
And it can speak.
And as we will see, it can even sing.
He's trying to pass her off as his daughter, and he's hoping she'll make him very rich.
And he invites people to come to his house, and he creates sort of this salon.
In our days, we would call it a fundraiser, because he is in debt and desperately needs money.
Coppelius is a sort of co-creator of this doll with Spallanzani.
And he has given Hoffman these rose-colored glasses.
And Hoffman, in his romantic passion,
he buys those glasses immediately, puts them on,
sees the doll and forgets that this is a doll.
The glasses make him believe that this person is a real person.
And Hoffman falls madly in love with her.
About 14 years ago, I got online looking for possible matches for myself,
basically trying to find someone to have a date with or a relationship with.
And I ran across a profile,
and the profile said on it,
Ivana, and it had some pretty pictures.
And so I started writing to Ivana.
I was pretty excited.
Her pictures were lovely.
A lot of them were family photos, and I thought that was a very good sign.
She also indicated that she was educated,
and she was expressing affection very early on,
and that was fun, so I would sign my little notes to her with love. We're complicated creatures and beautifully so.
And online we live our happiest moments, our saddest moments, and even our most mundane and neutral moments.
Think of the last thing you posted on Facebook or Twitter,
for example. We live our fully human lives online, but online structures are created with technology
and design, right? Human hands made technology. And this leads to all kinds of friction when
companies are using things like artificial intelligence to try to understand the content people are posting
and even their emotions.
So Olympia's song happens in the Salon de Spallanzani.
And Olympia is here making her first appearance at this party
and performs and impresses everyone.
But everyone can tell she's not quite human,
except for Hoffman, who is viewing her through these glasses,
who's seeing what he wants to see,
and he is seeing his, quote-unquote, ideal woman.
It was a good conversation.
She was telling me about her family.
She was telling me about her friends.
She was telling me about her activities.
So I told her about my family and my friends and my activities.
I was disappointed when she suddenly admitted
that she really did not live in Southern California,
which is where I live, but that she was actually in Russia.
That was disappointing.
But it took me, you know, a split second to remember the fact that all four of my grandparents came to the U.S. from Russia.
So, OK, she's from Russia.
I guess in some sense, so am I.
I guess in some sense, so am I.
There are noted examples of different dating platforms actually inserting bots into the platform where people think they're interacting with a human and they're actually interacting with a bot.
One really well-known example is the dating site Ashley Madison, where it was geared towards married men.
is the dating site Ashley Madison,
where it was geared towards married men.
There were thousands of bots that people were interacting with that were presented as real women,
and the amount of bots sort of interacting with people,
I believe at some point,
actually was almost equal to the amount of real women online.
I'm trying to set the stage here.
I mean, I've got frequent interaction with Ivana.
That's a good sign, because sometimes when you write to people online,
they don't respond, because maybe they're communicating
with 50 other people at the same time.
But she was responsive, at least in the sense that when I wrote to her,
she wrote back. So that was good. It was almost a perfectly normal, healthy, getting to know you
interaction. I say almost because her English was very poor.
interaction. I say almost because her English was very poor. So what we hear at the beginning of the aria is the harp. That's sort of the overall sound world of it. Plus this beautiful, innocent flute
on top of the harp accompaniment. So it's something very intimate. On top of it, it's in a key that somehow I personally associate with romantic feeling.
A flat major.
I think it's meant to evoke a very feminine quality in her.
It's kind of a waltz.
That as well is, I think, associated with lots of positive feelings.
Nothing in it that sort of would trouble you
or that would confuse you from the onset.
And then, then she mentioned something about
going on a walk in the park with her girlfriend
and what a nice walk they had in the park
that one caught my eye
because this was the middle of winter
and she's in a part of Russia which is very cold
and so I looked up
the weather.
And when she was supposedly on this walk, there was a blizzard in her area.
And the temperature was far below zero.
So, of course, I said, hey, I looked up the weather.
It looks like it's really cold there and terrible storm.
And, you know, is that common to go on walks when the weather's terrible?
And she wrote back another nice long email with lots of details about this and that.
But she didn't answer that question.
So that really made me think.
And so I started by asking more and more and more specific questions
to see whether she ever answered them. And generally, she did not.
Conversations have a rhythm to them. They have patterns. They have a dance. And we can take what can feel abstract, like a human conversation, and actually break it into concrete components.
And the bots are pulling from a corpus of data, a collection of data responses, a collection of texts that they've been trained on.
And then they're sort of parroting that back.
So if you ask something outside of the corpus, that's where you'll start to see the edges and failures of the bot. That's
where you'll start to see this uncanny valley, which is something that feels so close to human.
And then there's a break and we see how inhuman or unhuman it is. That's the uncanny valley.
Machines don't quite understand context, like telling a joke or sarcasm. And that's something we can't really program into these interactions.
That's where they really start to fail.
It always puts a smile on my face when Olympia starts to sing Les oiseaux dans la charmille.
And it's not the most profound text, let's put it that way.
It has rather a silly angle.
All she's actually saying is,
here is my song, everything inspires love.
Aren't you falling in love?
The birds in the bower are inspiring me to love.
It's a bit like, huh?
What is she talking about?
Does that make sense?
Yeah, okay, she's talking about those birds and so on.
And then she's talking about the sky.
Everything is talking about love.
Her words are deliberately uninteresting
because she's not conscious of what she's singing.
It's just a bunch of syllables to her.
And then I started to type in random alphabet letters.
Now, if you type in random alphabet letters to a real person, they freak out.
I mean, they say, I can't understand what you're typing.
Is there something wrong with your computer?
You know, but she didn't.
It had absolutely no effect.
She just sent me back the usual friendly, affectionate email.
So there's a lot of staccato?
Every syllable has one note and then a rest, so everything is a bit cut off.
Tout parle à la jeune fille.
which I think suggests repetition and machinery.
Here we hear so clearly that this is not a real human being. And underneath, the accompaniment of a waltz.
A bit of a hurdy-gurdy music.
I like to inject certain elements of life and intelligence
into the body language of Olympia,
and sometimes that means an unexpected wink. But in other moments,
it's a total vacancy in the eyes. What you're trying to do as a performer is seem
brainless and alive at the same time. And it's really tricky to do.
It takes a lot of thought to seem this thoughtless, I think.
The machine takes over the action and starts its own life in a way.
Until the system breaks down.
The batteries start to run out.
And what we see is a lot of really fast melismas, a lot of notes on one syllable
that meander.
And her line slows down to the point where we're left with just an arpeggio that gets
halted on a high B flat.
halted on a high B flat.
And then comes this kind of composed glissando.
This very funny sliding down from the B flat.
Let's say a motor dies. The pitch level just sinks. And the machine is out of power.
And she collapses.
Crash.
So they have to rewind the mechanism.
So you have this kind of innocent song of love, this innocent waltz, juxtaposed with those elements of
something is not right here. Something is going wrong. I began to think something was wrong.
I would say something like, hey, maybe we should try a phone call. Or, you know, there's a chance
I could give lectures in Moscow. Would
you like to meet at some point? Anything. It could be even about something in the news. And
to those kinds of questions, I wasn't getting answers. And that was it. I mean, I realized
I had been fooled. Obviously, there's a lot to say here about why Hoffman falls in love with a beautiful but brainless woman.
Hoffman sees something really easy in Olympia.
He sees zero conflict.
He sees someone who is existing to serve his purposes and to fulfill his desires.
And when Hoffman tries to speak to her, he goes on and on and waxes poetic.
And she just sits there like a sounding board.
And then she responds, we, we.
And that is literally all she says aside from her aria is we. Yes, whatever you say.
And I think there's a lot of deep commentary here about what some men want women to be
and how women are often treated as objects and expected to have no feelings and expected to just be beautiful and impressive
and say yes and don't be difficult.
And that's who Olympia is.
When we think of the bots we engage with in our daily lives,
so many of them are female-facing.
And there's been a few studies into this
as to why are female voices more palpable to audiences?
Are they more subservient?
The automaton and her design in particular has this lack of emotional resonance,
primarily because she's designed to only do a few things.
And she's also designed in a way where she has to be pleasing so people will come and buy more.
designed in a way where she has to be pleasing so people will come and buy more.
And let's also mention the fact that her inventors are men. They're fighting over who's responsible for which body parts. They're fighting over who's going to make the most money off of her.
money off of her. And then one of these men ends up destroying her. So, Alampia is really a symbol of the objectification of women.
So, the second verse comes around. She's just been injected with another dose of battery.
And so, she has totally fresh energy
and she's ready to take this to the next level.
And she goes on with basically what she had sung before.
This time, even together with the chorus,
who sort of maybe supports our own, as an audience,
feelings of admiration, of amazement, of, oh, this is incredible.
I haven't seen something like that.
I haven't heard something like that.
What is it?
Yeah.
And the overall joy of that moment.
She spends the whole second verse trying to top herself, really.
I like to think of Olympia as a learning robot.
As she begins to sing, she's kind of like a baby learning how to walk.
And she's discovering what she's capable of, and it's thrilling to walk. And she's discovering what she's capable of and it's thrilling to her.
And the further
she gets in the aria, she's
showing that there are no
limits on her abilities and she's
discovering this as it happens.
And she's making fools of her inventors
because they discover they can't
control her.
And she's making fools of her inventors because they discover they can't control her.
And that is really fun to play. It's really magical because we see this doll.
We know it's not a real human being.
And yet, then starts the music, which is so incredibly charming and beautiful.
which is so incredibly charming and beautiful.
Did I stop communicating with her immediately?
No.
I sent a few more messages because, you know,
I was giving her the benefit of the doubt.
That's a wishful thinking operating.
You know, that's a single person wanting to find a good mate operating, and it completely boggles our minds. We can't think clearly when evolutionary forces
are driving us in a certain direction. And okay, you know, that's not necessarily a bad thing.
That keeps the human race going, I suppose. So Hoffman is an utterly human statement
because we're dealing not only with the successes
and our high aspirations,
we're dealing also with the tragedies of human life
and the failures in a way.
I have great sympathy for him. He is searching. He's searching for something. He's
searching for real love. And it's his imagination. And isn't it that often the most beautiful moments in life are those where we are a bit in an illusion.
Yeah, where we see things more bright and more vivid and more rosé than they might actually be.
You know, maybe that's a quality that distinguishes human beings also from the automaton who can only take things at face value.
Humans look for personhood in other things.
It's why we can look at a bunch of squiggly lines and see a smile.
It's why we can form attachment to things like stuffed animals.
We're looking for attachment and personality even inside of inanimate objects.
Bots are really no different and neither are robots.
And so the design of this technology really matters.
So the second verse, we have the exact same moment where she runs out of gas and collapses.
And I typically like to perform this in a way where she's aware of what's happening.
Like, oh no, not again. I was just getting going again.
Then she gets back on her feet and starts singing again and goes further than she did before.
Every phrase has a higher note than the one before. In an effort to outdo herself, she keeps getting higher and higher.
And I love to throw in a high G above high C.
I mean, so we're talking about ridiculously high.
It's the range of the voice that I would call stratospheric.
Because we're getting to heights where we usually would use our oxygen tank to still be able to breathe.
It's so extreme that no one can miss that.
It's really the trapeze act. It's kind of conquering the impossible.
This is really the limit of the human voice.
The singer can show all the technical command of their voices,
so there's a certain form of freedom.
It has to feel a little bit like jazz,
a little bit improvisational.
And although we have all of these cadenzas
and variations completely rehearsed,
it's just nice to have a few different ones in your pocket
so that you can throw them out if they feel good that night.
It does need to feel and seem like she's just discovering and trying and pushing
and the ornaments are spontaneous that really keeps it fresh for me and i think it keeps
everybody on their toes for sure and you have to have a conductor who really trusts you if you're
going to do that obviously i try to listen to singer, try to get an idea what kind of direction the singer is giving those coloraturas.
You know, it's a bit like describing the curve of a thrown ball and where it lands.
Yeah, you try to follow the curve of that thrown ball.
Then you might signal to the orchestra, okay, careful,
listen as I try to listen, and here we go, boom. Yeah, and you hope that everyone is on board.
Doesn't work all the time, I know.
Well, these days I'm reluctant to go online. Would I trust myself to resist the temptations of a bot that has a beautiful picture posted online? I don't know. The wishful thinking
kicks in no matter who you are. You want the next person and the next person and the next person to be the wonderful partner. So you're easily fooled because of wishful thinking. And the programmers and the business
people, they are motivated to fool you too. So we're rapidly moving forward into an era in which
we won't know when we're dealing with a robot and when we're dealing with maybe the love of our lives.
In building more responsible artificial intelligence and technology, it's important
to think about how much the role of design shapes what we see. So I think the answer
here is transparency and regulation and more agency and consent for users. You know, we're living in the dream of Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk and Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos and so many others.
But what if we could live in the dream of our own innovation?
It was a big moment for me in my career when I started singing this role.
This was the first time that I felt like an audience completely went bananas for me in a theater.
I mean, what you feel as a performer when you know that the audience is, like, delighted with what you've done, you just feel like you've given them a gift.
And then they return that gift with their applause.
And it's just this wonderful two-way communication, this wonderful energy that is passed across the pit.
And it feels great. It feels great.
It's a bit like everyone around Olympia turns into a little child full of awe and amazement.
It's like turning the candles on a Christmas tree, so to speak.
That's what it is.
You know, and Olympia is just standing there receiving this applause
and not really able to react to it
in a way that's human,
which is kind of hard
because I just want to break free of the robot
and go, thank you, thank you, thank you.
Soprano Erin Morley, Conductor Johannes Debus,
Machine Learning Researcher Caroline Sinders,
and Psychologist Robert Epstein,
decoding Les Oiseaux dans la Chamie
from Offenbach's The Tales of Hoffman.
Aria Code is a co-production of WQXR,
WNYC Studios, and the Metropolitan Opera. Thanks to WQXR and WNYC for giving me permission to play this episode. You can learn more about Tales of
Hoffman and Aria Code on my website, imaginaryworldspodcast.org.