In Our Time - Melvyn Bragg meets Misha Glenny
Episode Date: January 22, 2026Before Misha Glenny's first edition on 15th January, BBC Radio 4's flagship news programme Today has brought Melvyn Bragg and Misha Glenny together so they can share their ideas about In Our Time's su...ccess and discuss what, if anything, will change with Misha. While Justin Webb chaired this discussion, here you will hear Melvyn introduce it and at the end he has a message for Misha and for listeners around the world.This is a longer version of the discussion broadcast on Today on Radio 4 on Christmas Eve 2025 which was produced by Jade Bogart-Preleur, when Melvyn Bragg was the guest editor.In Our Time is a BBC Studios Production.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hello, it's Melvin Bragg here.
On Christmas Eve, I had the pleasure of being guest editor on the Today program on BBC Radio 4,
and for this, I spoke to my successor on in our time, Misha Gleney.
We thought you might like to hear this, so here it is.
Our discussion was led by the Today presenter, Justin Webb.
Melvin, let's begin with the Eternal Appeal.
I mean, it's a kind of obvious place to begin, but it is an important place to begin.
Why is it that this incredible thing, this cultural event,
and this hugely important event in so many people's lives,
not just in Britain and around the world.
Why? What is it that took off?
I think what took off is curiosity.
I think one of the most striking characteristics that we have is curiosity.
That's one thing.
People want to know stuff.
And when you're listening in pubs and that,
people are talking about what they know to each other.
And secondly, I think that a lot of us, me included,
had a very patchy education.
And many things come up about, and almost anything to do with science,
I'm more interested than anything else because they didn't teach it at my school.
They skimmed through, you know.
So it's those two things.
And then because of the way we, I was about to say constructed,
because of the way we put together,
it was interesting to go from one thing to another to another to another.
And then we decided that was one of the principles.
we were going from talking about ancient China
to talking about my favorite opening by any scientists
which is a billion billion light years away
and then he followed that, there's that.
And the other thing is that we hit on something
that I wanted to do when I was doing start of the week
but we didn't do enough, which is we only,
basically only talk to academics
and it became their program
and they listened to it, each other listened to it
and it became their program
and the next thing is to finish this
is that they have, we then said
they have to be teaching academics
so they're used to talking to people like me
who doesn't know anything
and that is almost 100% kept
that they teach, they finish in this studio
and they go back to their universities
of colleges and they teach
and those four things came together
Also, there's a vacuum.
People were bouncing on academics once or twice,
but we were consistently talking to academics
about stuff they knew more than anybody else
to somebody who knew nothing at all.
Misha, what would you add to that?
I would add to that.
If there's anything to be added to it.
There is something to be added,
and that's Melvin himself.
Because, Melvin, if you think about it,
I mean, the format is really quite straightforward.
It's not, you know, there aren't too many bells and whistles.
to it. It's three academics talking about stuff that they know about. Why does it work? Well,
that's where you came in because you create in every episode, and I've listened to a lot of them now,
a really comprehensible arc, a story whereby you come into a subject that you know nothing about,
and 45 minutes later or whatever it is, you go away thinking, I've always wondered what that
is about and now at least I understand the basics of it.
An example of that for you?
Plate tectonics.
I just, I can remember when I was listening to it.
It was about sort of 10, 15 years ago.
So I was rushing.
I was making breakfast and I had to get out.
And I was listening to this stuff about plate tectonics.
And I just dropped everything and sat down.
Including the plates.
Including the plates.
Sat down and listened to it.
And when at the end, because it starts off with, you know, huge sort of rocks sliding underneath each other and everything.
But by the end, there is this revelatory explanation that without plague tectonics, there is no life.
Yeah.
And that it's at the very, it's the most fundamental level.
And knew nothing about it.
And I have never forgotten it.
Now, do you, does it differ when you're doing a subject that you do know something about?
to when you're doing something, I assume with plate tectonics, when you don't.
You're starting really from scratch.
How does it affect you, has it affected you when you've been doing your research?
Well, I try harder when I don't know anything, but I also enjoy it more.
And also the people who are in that realm are extremely good talkers.
And they're very used to doing things concisely and helping you to move on.
They're quite generous to each other as well, really.
That's interesting.
More generous than in the arts, perhaps.
Yes, on the whole.
Yeah, I think they're very generous.
But I do notice, Melvin, I mean, again, I'm listening very closely to these programs now,
that when somebody is rabbiting on a bit too long,
you always find the right moment to come in and say,
absolutely fascinating, but let's move on.
But it's really important because otherwise they'd just be rabbiting on for 40 minutes.
What's the skill of doing that, then?
Well, everybody who comes on the program now, the academics,
we're talking about very, very bright people.
They generally know each other.
They don't want to steal time from each other.
And they've got the hang of it.
And you can tell really by waving a finger, it's your turn now.
And they go that way.
It's very, very rarely that anybody wants to filibust it.
They see it as what it is.
A conversation.
It's more than a conversation.
It's an investigation between three people.
people who really know what they're talking about and don't begrudge other people talking as well.
They often say, oh, he knows a bit more about that than I do.
And so it's always a shared investigation.
I think that's what people like.
Also, there's no plugging at all.
I said we have no plugging and we have no plugging.
And I think that's a big thing.
You also don't tell me as the listener how I should think differently about my
my previous thoughts, prejudices, etc.
In other words, you go to a museum now
and there'll be some set of contexts
written for you that you should think of decolonising
or whatever the thing is that you're meant to be thinking about.
You don't do that, do you?
You've never done it.
No.
Why not?
I just want to stick to the subject
and that's quite enough to do
and when you're surrounded by people
who know as much as these people do.
So they want to pass this information on.
And it's curiosity, we're all curious, but it's the teaching thing, I think, that was the key to it.
So, Misha, how does it change now?
Well, first of all, I want to say, try stepping into these boots.
This is going to be really difficult.
Melvin is the program.
The program is Melvin.
There's no getting away from that.
I am hugely honoured to be taking this role on, but I don't want to go in and smash up the
China, as it were. I want to do what Melvin has been doing very well, I mean, brilliantly for
so many years, and I need to get my feet under the table. Now, it may be that there are certain
areas. I'm thinking particularly of some aspects of European literature, South American history,
possibly, where I've done work in the past that I would like to bring up. I mean, I'm going through
all of the episodes to see what you've done and what you haven't done.
What he's missed.
Exactly.
That will be a difficult task, I suspect.
It is a difficult task because there is so many.
But I think there'll be a slightly more European focus,
but I don't want to forget the rest of the world either.
But I love the science programs.
I find the science programs for exactly the same reason as you did.
I now confess I got an unclassified in my O-level physics.
I've been struggling to overcome that quack.
Catch up over since.
So this is very useful.
Lord Carrington used to say, when asked about scientific matters,
former Foreign Secretary of course,
in a early Thatcher government,
used to say, I went to school before science was invented, my dear.
Which I always thought was a rather good thing to say.
Now, tell us more.
The first time I met you, Misha,
we were in a hotel in Bosnia,
under mortar fire, and you were broadcasting in German.
So you are a man of many talents.
Tell us about the way in which you've gone from there to here.
Well, I was at the BBC as the Central Europe correspondent,
which is when you met me based in Vienna,
but I've been obsessed by Eastern Europe in particular
in the communist world ever since my teens.
So to be the BBC Central Europe correspondent in 1989,
when you have the biggest foreign story since the Second World War was a dream.
I mean, what can I say?
I knew Havel, I knew Van Wien-Ser, I knew all these people and had done for 10 years or so.
So when they were forming the new governments, I knew who was in the government before they'd even thought of it.
It was fantastic.
But after that came the wars in Yugoslavia.
And one of the things I picked up on during the wars,
in Yugoslavia was the fact that organized crime played an absolutely critical role in the atrocities
in that war.
And it was that study of organized crime, which made me realize there's a lot more going on in
the world than just the Balkans.
I'd spent too much time in the Balkans by then.
And so I embarked on going around the world studying organized crime by talking to a lot of bad
people and one or two good people as well.
and that is really was my in our time experience of going to places and doing things that I'd never come across before
and it just expanded my whole understanding of how the world works and that's the kind of thing that I get from listening to the to the program
there's always something that you either never quite understood or never even knew about
what's your advice to him now then as he starts
I think follow what you really want to do
There's so much information out there
And so many people are good at reciting it
And so many people who send in contributions
We have hundreds of lists saying
You should do this, you should do that, you should do the other
And one of the things about bumping into people on the Heath or whatever it is
You haven't done this, you haven't done that
Do you take their advice?
Sometimes
It seems to have taken off in its own way
From the beginning, I wanted it to be eclectic.
Melvin, why do you think it's so popular with younger audiences?
Because in terms of BBC programs, it's one of the top for the under 35s.
I have to come back to what I said to start, really.
The people who are talking about it are teachers,
and they come in here, these small studios.
And they know they've got to get a move on.
They know they've got to cut it short.
They know they can't wander on forever.
And so they have to cut their cloth.
And I think they all think it's as I do.
It's absolute delight.
And the archive that we have now is phenomenal.
Incredible.
It is a phenomenal archive.
It's probably the greatest archive in the world, cultural archive.
It's an interesting point you make about the appeal to young people.
Because one of the things we sort of try sometimes to convince ourselves, it seems to me,
is that everything intellectually is going down the tubes, basically,
that we are not the people we once were,
that we've lost our ability to cope with things that challenge us,
that we don't read lengthy things anymore,
that we don't do this, we don't do that.
And actually, in a sense, this is the opposite, isn't it?
And it's telling us a very different story about ourselves,
and particularly the young.
It is, Justin, and for the last three and a half years,
I've been running an institute in Vienna called the Institute for Human Sciences,
which is an advanced research center.
And we get younger fellows, fellows in their 20s who are either doing their doctorates
or have just finished their doctorates.
And their scholarship is phenomenal.
I mean, way ahead of anything I ever managed to achieve academically or intellectually.
Absolutely terrific.
and we get hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of applications to come and study in that institute.
And so I see this on the ground that there is still an intellectual ferment,
even though we know that all of our brains are being turned to mush by social media and so on.
We are still learning and we are still curious.
And holding steady.
I mean, there is around the place at the moment an epidemic of incompetence.
but on this program
if we've been doing a program
which you will happily take over
there's none of that allowed
because the other people on the program
just shake their heads
and say, you can't say that
that doesn't work, you can't do that
it is down to them and down to
the fact that I go back to
the beginning of what we were all talking about
I think that we are
a curious species
they want to know what's around the corner
what's on the moon
why is this happening? Why is this happening?
I think that's the biggest drive, I think.
I mean, maybe wrong.
But Melvin, you also, you of course point out legendarily
that you are never knowingly relevant in this programme.
And yet, when I listen to these programmes,
you're right, on the surface, it's not knowingly relevant at all.
But underneath at the back of your mind,
your ideas are percolating and you can't help
but wonder how that relates to your own experience
or something that's going on at the moment.
So it's never knowingly relevant, but it often is relevant.
Yes, that's the way knowledge works.
A very good moment at which to finish.
Misha, Melvin, thank you both.
It's been a great privilege to present in our time for so many years,
and I'm delighted that Misha will be taking on the role.
His first programme will be available on Radio 4
and on BBC Sounds on the 15th of January.
I wish Misha the programme and you are listeners around the world, every success.
Hi, it's India here.
I'm very excited to bring you the return of child.
So we've been on the journey of an embryo all the way to a baby's first birthday.
And now we are going to enter the explosive life of the toddler
because this is the perfect place to unpick the very complicated world of emotions.
the emotions that affect us all.
So come with us as over eight episodes
we fall through the abundant and dizzying world of happiness,
descend into the depths of fear
and the gendered and dangerous world of anger,
and then crawl, wobble and bounce our way
through awe, love, anxiety and surprise.
From BBC Radio 4, this is Child,
with me, India Rackerson.
Listen first on BBC Sounds.
