Invest Like the Best with Patrick O'Shaughnessy - Jon Stein – The State of Automated Investing - [Invest Like the Best, EP.09]
Episode Date: November 1, 2016Would you be comfortable with a robo-advisor running your entire investment portfolio? That’s the hope of our guest this week, Jon Stein, founder and CEO of Betterment. Betterment manages $5 bil...lion dollars for over 175,000 clients. Patrick and Jon explore the challenge of getting young people to invest, Betterment’s recent foray into areas like the 401(k) market, and how Betterment works with financial advisors. If you’re unsure about robo-advisors, this conversation will make you better understand what they can do for you. Please Enjoy! For comprehensive show notes on this episode go to investorfieldguide.com/stein/ For more episodes go to InvestorFieldGuide.com/podcast. Sign up for the book club, where you’ll get a full investor curriculum and then 3-4 suggestions every month at InvestorFieldGuide.com/bookclub Follow Patrick on twitter at @patrick_oshag
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This podcast is sponsored by CFA Institute, the Global Association of Investment Professionals
whose mission is to lead the investment profession by promoting the highest standards of
ethics, education, and professional excellence for the ultimate benefit of society.
CFA Institute serves a global community of investment professionals working to build an
investment industry where investors' interests come first, financial markets function at their
best, and economies grow.
The chartered financial analyst credential is the most respected and recognized investment
management designation in the world.
The views expressed in this podcast do not necessarily represent the views of CFA Institute.
Hello and welcome, everyone.
I'm Patrick O'Shaughnessy and this is Invest Like the Best.
This show is an open-ended exploration of markets, ideas, methods, stories,
and of strategies that will help you better invest both your time and your money.
You can learn more and stay up to date at investorfield guide.com.
Patrick O'Shaughnessy is a principal and portfolio manager at O'Shaunacy Asset Management.
opinions expressed by Patrick and podcast guests are solely their own opinions and do not reflect
the opinion of Oshamously Asset Management. This podcast is for informational purposes only and should
not be relied upon as a basis for investment decisions. Clients of Oshonosy Asset Management
may maintain positions in the securities discussed in this podcast. My guest today is John Stein.
John is the founder and CEO of Betterment, which as a leading robo advisor, manages about $5 billion
for more than 175,000 clients. John and I discuss.
us the challenges of getting young people to invest, Betterment's recent foray into areas like
the 401k market, and how Betterment works with financial advisors. For show notes on this episode,
visit investorfieldguide.com forward slash Stein. And now, please enjoy my conversation with
John Stein. Thanks, John, very much for being here with me today. Maybe you could start,
since most of my listeners will be familiar with Betterment, but some won't. Maybe you could start
by just describing briefly what you do as if you were talking to, say, a cousin that doesn't know
anything about betterment.
Right.
I would probably first ask my cousin what she does with her money today.
I always like to start with that because people have so many different points of view on financial
services.
If there was no answer, if I was talking to a group, I would say, we are an investment management
service.
Our mission is to make our customers' financial lives better by helping to make better
financial decisions. Customers come to us. They tell us about their goals and their financial needs.
Based on what we hear from them, we build portfolios for them. We manage those portfolios over time
to reduce risk, to reduce taxes, to coordinate across their different types of investment accounts
and get them a better net return at the end of the day and help them achieve their goals more quickly.
So one of the things I'm most fascinated about because I generally failed at this same task is how you
get to young investors. So I wrote a book called Millennial Money. And what I found was people
love the message, nod their head, and then do nothing, mostly because you're talking about a goal
that, in most cases, talking about retirement is decades away, and that's just not how people are
wired to act. Maybe they'll nod their head, but they won't do anything. So thinking about customer
acquisition, especially in the millennial generation, what have you learned? What's the secret? Is it even
impossible to get younger people to act with such a distant goal in mind.
It's funny. I feel your pain. I sometimes say that our biggest competitor is inertia.
It's so hard to get people to act. It's so hard to get them to pay attention to their money
because everyone's so busy and has all these other things that they want to do,
which is part of the reason that I started the company, right? It's hard to get time to think
about your money to rebalance or to tax manage it or to do the things that you know you should
be doing. Many of us just want to kind of put our heads in the sand or, you know, do something,
anything other than actually attend to our finances. To make it accessible to people and to get
people over the hump and actually get started, I knew that we had to make it as easy as possible.
We had to make it really frictionless. And so from sign up to funding to setting up your goals,
to coordinating across all of them, we've made it seamless. We've made it effective.
It takes less time than it does anywhere else.
Anybody can do it.
And I think that has been our secret of customer acquisition.
It's just making it so easy that people feel comfortable.
They can get it done in a small amount of time, and they get their questions answered as they go.
So I certainly agree that it's easy.
I've gone through the process to kind of see the user interface and very sleek, very easy, straightforward.
My bigger question, though, is, okay, so granted that once you're on Betterment.com, yeah, it's easy.
How do you get people to even know about you, to know that this is an option?
We were lucky at the start that we launched at a tech conference, and something like 20,000 people
saw that initial presentation at TechCrunch.
And, you know, 500 of the braver ones decided to sign up.
I mean, back then, we were totally an unknown quantity.
Is it about eight years ago?
This is 2010.
Oh, okay, 2010.
And there we had, you know, great, we had 500 customers.
And ever since that day, our biggest source of new customers has been referrals.
The single most popular way that people find out about us is word of mouth.
And that has continued to scale with the business.
So lots of people hear about us from others.
And hey, this is what I do.
We've been fortunate to receive a good press along the way.
We write a lot.
We write our own content and publish it and distribute it.
We try to get our message out there through our customers and through other.
rather means as efficiently as we can.
So does the data on your clients, does it fit the narrative that this is this kind of
robot advice or automated investment solution is something popular with young people?
Like if you had to say a weighted average age or something like that of your clients,
how old are they?
It is popular with young people and they're flocking to it.
Millennials love it.
But our target customer is somebody who's maybe age 45 or so, somebody who's a mid-career
professional with 250,000 to 2 million net net worth, somebody who's really facing the tough
decisions about am I prepared for retirement, you know, do I have enough save to put my kids
through college? Like those kinds of big questions, those are the things that we think
were best suited to help advise on and solve for. So would that be like the average age of,
you know, let's say large clients? Is it someone mid-career versus someone younger? That's right.
That is right. So in the setup process, the orientation has a list of, or at least it for me,
you know, when I went through it, I'm 31, so I'm sure it's different for different demographics,
but a list of, I think they're called priorities or goals, you know, retirement, savings,
general investing, et cetera. Is there one of those that has the lion's share, if you're
to bucket assets under management into the different priority buckets? Is there one that that takes
most of it or is it pretty well spread out? Retirement is by far our most popular.
goal. It's the number one thing that people come to betterment to save for. And I think partly that's
because that's just what most people, like, it's the most important thing in life that people have
to save for as retirement. You've got to save more for that than for anything else. Number two is
just kind of general building wealth. I don't know when I'm going to use it. I might use it
for a down payment on a house. I might save it and, you know, it'll put my kids through school.
Number three is a safety net. I just want some funds that I set aside for today. But we're
entirement is the top goal. What's the, I guess your, your embedderments combined origin story? What,
what did you do prior to betterment and what was the threshold you crossed, so to speak,
to make the decision to kind of go the entrepreneurial route and found the company?
My background in college, I studied economics and psychology. And I was always really interested
in the intersection of those fields, what we call behavioral economics or the science of decision
making and how we help people make better decisions. After college, leveraging that that economics
experience, I wound up in finance. I was consulting to banks, helping them with product management,
risk management, investment portfolio policy, things like this. And I found through that experience
of working with the banks that I was learning a lot and I loved it, but I found so often they were
building products without talking to their customers. You know, it would be a six-month project
and we would never once talk to the customer to figure out what they wanted.
We were just iterating on existing mortgage products or deposit products.
And in my own personal life, I was investing, and I had earned a CFA, and I went to business
school.
And so people were coming to me to ask about investing, and what do you do?
And I'd say, well, I start, you know, here, and I buy these mutual funds, and then you
want to rebalance every once in a while.
But, you know, people would glaze over pretty quickly.
I realized it was complicated.
And I knew that the banks weren't going to solve that problem.
I knew that the investment firms weren't going to solve that problem because I'd been inside enough of them to know that's just not how they thought about things.
I wanted to start a company that focused first on the customer and built everything that that customer wanted to solve that customer's problem.
That's when we talked about making it efficient to sign up.
That was something that frustrated me.
I'd open like seven different brokerage accounts.
None of them was easy.
None of them did exactly what I wanted, which was just manage my money for me.
So I wanted to automate the whole process and make it easy and accessible.
Do you think of yourself as more a tech company or more of an investing company today?
We definitely think of us as a tech company that happens to be solving customer problems and investing.
Got it.
We are engineers in our mindset.
We are engineers predominantly in the makeup of the team.
You know, we've got about half the team is engineers or product managers.
a much smaller percentage of the team is investment professionals.
We've got, I mean, some of the smartest people on the team are, you know, PhDs and CFPs and CFAs of finance,
and they're building this advice, but we're building that and automating it and delivering it and advising on it in a very efficient way to make those people really scale.
So talk to me about the investment portfolio choices.
So the ETFs you've chosen, the partners you have, and how.
you chose, like, for example, I was actually a bit surprised to see an emphasis on value in
the U.S. portion of the equity portfolios, given that at least prior to looking at that, my
impression was most of these, of you and your competitors have been pure plain vanilla
cap-weighted indexes. So talk me through how you get, say, to a value tilt in the portfolio.
What's that decision-making process?
What we do is we optimize a portfolio for our customers and for each individual
customers' needs based on their goals, based on their situation.
If you're in New York, you can get New York community bonds.
If you're in California, you get California Mutant and so on.
But at the top level, we think about how do we most efficiently invest this customer's
assets to reach their goals?
And we have models that say, if you're invested for the long term, you want a relatively
aggressive portfolio that captures global equity.
We have global asset allocations.
We look at things like what factors outperform in the long term.
And values and small cap are some of those factors that tend to outperform just very slightly over the very long term.
So we have a slight tilt towards those factors in the portfolio.
Within any given asset class, we'll choose the best ETFs in that asset class from any provider,
be it Vanguard or Schwab or Goldman or whoever it might be, looking at the expense ratio,
looking at the liquidity of that fund, looking at the tracking error, to minimize those things
to optimize and get the best net returns for the investors.
Is there someone here that has the title Chief Investment Officer?
We have a managing director of investments, who is that for us.
And we have an investment advisory committee.
Got it.
Could you foresee a world where you launched ETFs of your own, where, you know, especially
as you continue to grow, I realize Vanguard's expense ratios are,
extremely reasonable, you know, eight basis points or whatever the case may be. But as that
AUM number for betterment continues to get bigger, do you think it will make sense for you to get
into that part of the business ever? I won't say never because you never know how things go,
but my sense of where the world is heading is that ETFs are a great product, mutual funds were
a great product before. ETFs are better because they're more efficient because they drive the cost
down so low to access global diversification, it's almost free. I mean, it's four basis
points in some of these ETFs. We could not match that cost if we tried to manufacture own ETF.
And in fact, no one could. Only the, you know, there's scale in those companies that are
manufacturing those ETFs. It's so efficient. You've got to have so many assets to do it at that
low cost. So we're really lucky to have those ETS to be able to buy them at that low cost.
ETSFs, one of the great things for customers about them is you can buy any of them on the market,
and so there's competition and price in the way that there isn't in mutual funds.
Mutual funds, you go to one provider.
It's hard to get funds from another provider.
If you're at that provider, you have to build separate pipes to do that.
And so there's less price competition.
ETS are so cheap because of the price competition.
So we're happy to take advantage of that.
We don't see a lot of value in manufacturing our own ETFs because they're already so cheap.
So you mentioned small and value tilt.
you know, kind of classic academic equity research behind those two factors, how often do you think
that could or might change? So, you know, there's other factors that are more recently popular.
Some people now say small cap effect isn't really there. Frankly, that's what we find,
something like momentum or quality and all these factors in the factor zoo that have become
very popular. Do you think that the tilts that you've introduced will change through time, or do you
think you'll be pretty static?
Our belief is there is no one right way to diversify a portfolio.
If you get 10 professors of finance or practitioners of finance in a room, each will have a
slightly different view about the factors you should use or the tilts or this and that.
And they'll all be equally right and they'll all be equally wrong.
The truth of it is when we make these kinds of predictions, we're looking at historic data.
And as long as you're being relatively reasonable and have,
and have a globally diversified portfolio, a broadly diversified portfolio,
you're doing about the best that you can with the information that's out there.
You can optimize a little bit here and there, but somebody else might argue it the other way.
Our view is we should diversify as much as possible.
If you can demonstrate that over a long period of time, there's evidence that a certain
strategy outperforms, then that's something that we want to make available to our customers.
Tell me a little bit about the non kind of, you know, what you see,
when you go to betterment.com, the straight to investor product. I've seen things about your
for a into the 401K space, which I think is a really interesting space. You know, partnerships with
Uber, things like that. It seems like there are, I won't call them pivots, but I'll just call them
extensions, right, that you are doing, you're applying technology and what you've learned
into some new spaces. So maybe start with 401K. Tell me what you're doing there. What was wrong,
what you're trying to make more efficient or fix or improve upon for 401K investors?
I think the 401K is so exciting.
I mean, this is, it is our biggest product launch in a year.
And the Uber thing is kind of an extension of that.
I think it's a good word for it.
It's making our service available to all of the Uber drivers, just to more people.
The 401K is so exciting because everyone's got one, right?
Like, you have to save in your retirement plan.
And it's so tax advantage that everyone has to do it.
And uniformly, everyone says their 401k is terrible.
I mean, you go around and people complain about the options that they have, or if it's not
the investment options, it's the user experience and the difficulty of managing the
account.
There's complaints about every 401K.
There's just been so little innovation in there.
And we see that, you know, a lot of people say when you see these spaces where there hasn't
been a lot of innovation, like, watch out.
That's a, you know, it's a tricky business.
to get into, I see that as a real sign of opportunity. I mean, it was the same thing when we got
into investment management in the first place. People said, and you maybe have had a similar
experience, boy, is that like, that's a tricky business, that's difficult. You know, there's lots
of entrenched players, this and that. To me, that's a sign that there's like, there's a real
opportunity. People are scared of going into it. That's probably a pretty attractive business to go
Yeah, you find the S&P 500 funds and these things charging a percent and a half is crazy kind of entrenched systems.
So what is the process there?
Is it a business-to-business sales process where you are people on the Betterman team are going to institution XYZ and saying, you know, here's our offering and swap it in?
Is that simple?
It is going to the business and competing head-to-head against fidelity or whoever the current 401k plan is.
and winning that business.
I guess now and in the near-term future,
how does Betterman's, if you aggregate it up your revenues,
what does the pie look like in terms of assets or revenues coming from these different sources?
So I know 401K is new, but I think it's $5 or $6 billion that you manage now.
How much of that is still the simple, you know, direct-to-consumer
versus some of these other things that you've started to work your way into?
So we don't really talk about that breakdown of assets.
The retail business, the direct-to-consumer,
all, you know, the lion's share of our assets. It's still the biggest. And as we look toward the
future, I think the 401 business could be just as big. There's something like $5 trillion in retail
investment accounts. There's something like $7 trillion in IRAs and another $5 trillion in 401Ks for
customers like our target customer. And all of those are big and interesting markets to us. And I don't
know in 10 years, which will be the largest, but I hope that we'll build, you know, big, exciting
businesses in each. So if I wanted to hire betterment for my firm's 401k, is the process that my employees
would go through basically the same as what I would go through as a straight investor? It's different
just because it's a 401k. The company is signing up rather than the individual. But once the company
signs up, the process that the participancy or the employees see is almost identical to the
betterment experience. You set your contribution levels, but you still get the same great
web experience, the mobile experience. You can see all your accounts in one.
place, you get the account aggregation, you can see your IRAs and your taxable accounts right there
next to your 401k. So it's one dashboard for all of your finance. So it would be, you know,
right now I can go in and mess around and make stupid behavioral timing mistakes to my heart's
content and change percentages and go to cash and do all the dumb things that ruin everyone's returns.
In your system, it's the same idea where you take some sort of questionnaire, you have a number,
a risk level, and then the portfolio matches that and it's not really monkeyed with. Is that
Is that fair? Is that right?
That's right.
Now, you're the owner of the account.
Of course, I can go, I can go ratchet up and down my risk tolerance, right?
Yes, you can.
Now, when we try to help you make good decisions around that,
so one of the things that we've done is, and you may have seen this in your account,
when you're about to make a transaction,
we'll tell you what are the likely taxes that you'll pay on that transaction?
We call it tax impact preview.
And when we show customers that information,
75% of those who have a costly transaction decide not to go through with the trade.
which is incredible because this is data that's always been there no matter where you're investing,
no one else has ever surfaced that information to customers in an automated in-app way.
And so customers are making better decisions.
Reducing 75% means not only did all those people not pay the tax, but they also didn't market time.
And so it has a really huge impact on their returns.
Tell me a little bit about the decision to gate people from trading during Brexit.
Sure. I think that's broadly misunderstood, and I think it's just one of those things. It's like a hard topic for people to get their heads around.
You know, we always look at volatility and we thoughtfully trade for our customers. We always pause trading at the open because markets tend to, you know, in ETF markets especially tend to be quite volatile at the open and at the close. So we watch out for things like that. And Brexit was one of those days when all the major banks pause trading because they were working.
worried about volatility, the same thing that we were worried about. Not levels of the market. Doesn't
matter if it's up or down, but just can you get a fair price? Will you get good execution on your
trades? And as soon as we were sure that we would get good execution on our customer's orders,
we executed everyone and we executed everyone that day, faster, by the way, than any of our competitors
actually executed orders for customers. So I'm not really sure why that's a story, but it's one of
those things. Yeah, fair enough. How do you think your clients will behave during
Whenever we get our next real protracted bear market, one of the, again, maybe this is a story
that doesn't deserve to be one, but one of the common refrains is that the value of a financial
advisor is now more and more behavioral, right? So they used to pick stocks, now maybe they pick an
asset allocation or pick managers, but above all else, they're earning their keep-through behavior
management. Do you think that that's valid? And what do you think will happen with your
clients relative to a well-managed, behaviorally managed client of a financial advisor during a,
you know, a bad bear market. I think advisors you talk about behavioral management are selling
themselves short. I think there's a lot more that a good advisor can do, understanding the
client's needs, understanding their goals, investing them appropriately given those things.
It may feel like market-related behavioral management, but it generally isn't. In our research and in our
own customer base, customers aren't calling in because of what the market's doing. They're calling in
because of life events. They're calling in because they have a question about, oh, I got this
inheritance, or, oh, like, you know, I'm going through a divorce and I want to know, like, how
this and that will work. I'm thinking about setting up a joint account. You know, I just got married.
It's stuff like this that causes, like, real financial questions and, uh, and prompts the need for
advice. And we provide advice in those same situations where people need advisors. I mean,
we've got, um, advisors that will refer you to, who are partners on our,
or meant for advisors platform. We've got our own financial planning experts here who will help people
get started and get set up with an appropriate financial plan and answer questions. And of course,
there's the advice in the app if you prefer to self-service. What are the key tools or ways that
you're working with advisors? So selling not to 401Ks, but to other financial advisors, a technology
tool. What's the potential for growth there? What are the services that you offer? So for financial
advisors, we offer a way to automate many of the kind of typical back office processes that you
might have to do, especially if you're a smaller advisor and you don't have a whole team of people
working on this stuff behind you, things like tax loss harvesting or tax coordination
across a portfolio or just rebalancing and simple things like changing an asset allocation
over time on a glide path. We do all of that for you so that you can do things like
set the appropriate goals for the client and walk them through that plan.
You can do things like estate planning or create trusts or whatever it is that's your specialty.
And you can do that for more clients because you can leverage this across more clients
and spend more time talking to those clients and building the relationships.
It's a great service because not only does it help you with your existing clients,
but we'll refer clients to you.
If clients have a question that suits your specialty, we will connect them to you.
and we think that's a valuable service.
You mentioned before that part of why you built this was you were frustrated that you couldn't
use a service like this, you know, so it was a need that you had that you wanted to fulfill.
If I think about that same thing, I think betterment is a lot of it,
but I would love if there was an ability to have more customization where I get all the same stuff,
but instead of SP 500, I get to choose something else.
Is that something that you are open to, or do you think that that is a recipe for,
for disaster to give people more leeway to maybe just keep making all the same mistakes they
tend to.
I'm excited to hear you say that because just last week we announced partnerships with Vanguard
and with Goldman Sachs.
So we now have Vanguard set of portfolios and a GSM or Goldman Sachs asset management set of
portfolios.
The Vanguard is the kind of classic Vanguard purely passive approach.
By the way, the betterment portfolio is a combination of maybe four different ETF
manufacturers that we think are best in each asset class. The Vanguard one is their take on a
globally diversified portfolio. The GSM one is more actively managed. It's got some smart beta
style approaches to it. Different customers and different advisors place value on those things. And again,
if you think about 12 professionals in our room, like all experts in the field, they'll have
slightly different answers. These are slightly different answers that appeal to other people. And we
think that that's appropriate if that's your philosophy and that's how you want to
manage your account, then your advisor can put you into those types of funds.
So that's a broader set. What about maybe the anarchy version of this where anything
that's exchanged listed, you know, I have access to so I can go and say, okay, you've got me
at 37% VEA. I want that to be in some random ETF that I choose. There is more flexibility
than that. So there's more than just this couple. I mean, I think about Cambria as another
advisor on the platform, Meb Fabers.
my good friends.
Yeah, great.
I mean, great, great guy and great, great funds.
You know, and we continue to introduce more and more flexibility there.
There is some limit to that where, you know, if you just let people do anything,
well, you're not really providing much advice.
So we're doing all of it through this lens of, you know, there's an advisor intermediating it
and helping the client with those choices or there are guardrails on it.
And it works within our advice framework.
Tell me a little bit about how you run the business.
personality-wise, how you think about experimentation, exploration, failure, things like that,
in trying to come up with interesting lines of business, entire new products, improvements.
Yeah, I mean, I risk sounding trait, I feel like, in this,
because I'll probably tell you a lot of the same platitudes about, yes, you know,
we want to fail fast and test lots of things.
You know, I think we're what we value most when I think of our core values.
We talk all the time about efficiency.
Efficiency is core to what we do.
We think we've built one of the most efficient financial services companies ever,
and that's essential to us.
We think about iteration as a core value.
And this idea of it's not about failing fast, it's just trying things and, like, constantly improving.
You never are looking for perfect.
You're just looking to make it better and better with each iteration.
We talk about building an institution.
And by that, I mean, building for the long term, right?
We may talk about, you know, here's what we're going to do this year, but we're doing it with an eye toward this vision of being our customer's central financial relationship, of being one of the most, you know, impactful financial services companies of a generation.
And we talk about empowerment.
So I think we empower our team to do great work by giving them great information, transparency, and then letting them execute.
And the final thing I'll say, the fifth value that we have is the idea of pursuing.
happiness, that ultimately this is what we're all pursuing. We want to make sure that our customers
are delighted in the experience that we're helping them to pursue their goals. Is there any
systematic process or checklist or set of rules around that exploration and all those values?
So in thinking about, let's say, new areas of research or development, things that people want
to explore, build, test, how is that, is the system like a, is, is the system like a,
is there someone at the head of a, let's call it research team that's deciding kind of what gets
resources and who those resources are?
I'm thinking of our investments and advice teams, and there's a number of really smart people
on those teams.
And you may know some of them from the website or other podcasts or things like this,
people like Lisa Wang or Dan Egan or Alex Binky, all of them, you know, real experts in their respective areas,
whether it's investments or, you know, quantitative investing or advice,
and they're each pushing experiments and learning in those areas.
Do you think it's fair to say that the 1.0 version of Robo advice,
call it question and answer, risk tolerance,
matching portfolio, basic rebalancing tax loss, that kind of stuff,
will be free is a commodity that will cost nothing in, say, five years.
You know, you have someone like Schwab,
and I realize all the caveats around what they do.
But still the bottom line is that it's a zero percent fee, right?
Even though it's not really because you're going into their ETFs and there's cash and those other things.
But it seems like just like fees across the asset management business,
there will be downward fee pressure towards zero.
What do you think about that?
No, it won't be free.
Just like the ETFs aren't free, just like a Schwab brokerage account isn't free or a bank account isn't free.
nothing is free because it costs money to provide these services.
Will there be downward fee pressure?
Maybe.
I think what's actually matters most of people is the value that they're getting.
And I think that services, I think that betterment, for instance, continues every month to provide more and more value.
We keep doing more for our customers and we're including it all in the same fee.
It's a little bit like Amazon Prime.
You know, you don't see the prime fee dropping, but Amazon just keeps building in more and more
services for that same fee. Do you, do you have kids? Yeah, I've got two daughters, two years old
and five months. I'm almost exactly the same as me. I've got two and a half, two and a half year
son, a six-month-old daughter. So I'm curious as a dad and something I think about a lot,
thinking forward to when maybe they can, are first allowed or first able to put some money in an
account. What do you think that will look like? That's a long time from now, and I realize
that forecasting these sorts of things can be folly, but it's fun. So I'm going to ask anyway.
It's almost easier to look 10 or 20 years out in a way than it is to look three or five years out.
I know that in 10 or 20 years, when my daughters graduate from college, they're not going to have to
think about how much should I put in my retirement accounts in my on-track to retirement. They're
not going to have to think about should I open a Roth or a traditional IRA because those are
questions that there are answers to and those answers will be accessible to everyone. It'll be like
just the same way that you can Google and figure out what's the capital of Iowa. Just as easy,
the future of investment advice is that it is available to everyone and it's automated for us
in a way that we don't have to think about it. I sometimes make the comparison to the self-driving car.
You don't know really where it's going to be in three or five years. You know in the long term that
we're going to have self-driving cars. The technology will be there, and we're not going to have
to worry about that thing. You still have agency over where you're going. You'll still set the
destination and be able to drive if you want, but the technology will be so great that we're not
going to have to worry about it so much, and we can go on enjoying the things that we really want
to do most in most. What would you say is the most memorable day in Betterment's history?
I often think back to the day that we launched at TechCrunch, and I talked about it at the top.
That was, at the time, I had never spoken in front of such a large audience.
It was 20,000 people watching, you know, probably 2,000 people in the room.
So I was really intimidated just by that large of a crowd and wasn't sort of a natural public speaker.
And I had memorized the entire speech that I gave.
I would never do that now if I were doing it again.
You know, I would just, I would do it more off the cuff.
But I had every word scripted.
And I just remember pacing in the halls backstage.
age, like, for hours practicing and going over it.
I got it wrong.
And, like, all night the night before being up and, like, you know, at the time I had
Blackberry, it sort of dates that.
But I was, like, typing, like, notes in there to edit the presentation at the last
minute.
And I had this record in the morning of, like, every 30 minutes all night long.
Like, there was another note.
I just wasn't sleeping.
That was one of the most stressful, but also most wonderful days of my life.
And it was, you know, it felt like we'd made it when we, when we launched and we
saw those first 500 customers on the platform.
Pretty incredible.
Yeah, I'm sure that that's a big audience.
That's a big one.
Yeah, 2,000 people's big.
It's funny, too, because 500 customers, that's like an average day now for sign-ups.
It's just like, you know, but that was at the time.
You feel those early ones more, though.
Yeah.
Yeah, that's great.
What is the professionally the kindest thing that anyone has ever done for you?
Wow.
Kindest thing.
It's a good, good ask.
So many people have been so generous to us along the way in our.
are partners with various firms and people have been so giving.
It's hard for me to pick, you know, pick one person out.
I don't know.
I was thinking back to my days as a consultant and all the, you know,
I had so many great mentors.
You know, I feel like I'd be leaving someone out if I've singled another one out.
So you don't have to sing.
This you can single out because it's a little more inanimate.
If you had to come up with a couple life-changing books, what would those be?
A recent one, and this is,
is kind of everybody's favorite at the moment, but I really enjoyed Sapiens. I think that's a great
awesome. I guess everyone's reading that. To me, it builds on things that I've learned in
other books like Guns, Germs and Steel, the Jared Diamond book, which is a great one. Or if I think
back to college, like one of my behavioral biology textbooks, sex evolution and behavior and others,
I just learned a lot about people and how we have evolved and how we behave. And I think all of that is
is really, really interesting, fascinating to me.
I also, I've been recently enjoying just books of entrepreneurs and innovators.
And one of my favorites is maybe less well read is the Vanderbilt biography.
I remember that.
It's called The First Tycoon.
And it is amazing.
If you're interested in the history of business in America, Vanderbilt wrote,
I mean, he is the history of business.
He created the corporation.
He created, you know, the first stock.
If he didn't do it himself, he was there.
So it's a really interesting history.
It's funny.
You mentioned Sapiens.
So like any active manager, we have periods of bad underperformance, right?
And we think that discipline is the key.
And you get stressed out, right?
As I'm sure you do when there's problems in the business.
And there's a line in Sapiens that I spend a lot of time in the woods.
And I always repeat this to myself because my favorite part about Sapiens is this concept
that we're just telling ourselves stories.
Like we're creating fictions that then kind of govern how we,
we live. And there's a line there that's something like,
millionaires sincerely believe the story of money and limited liability corporations.
And it's like this little funny line and reminder,
like in some sense,
it's all kind of a farce, right? Yep. It only exists because we say it exists.
Exactly. And, you know,
sometimes we make fun of people for their stories and their beliefs,
but it's all we're doing, right? And it's both kind of makes you laugh,
but also gives you some perspective, right, about what's important on a day-to-day basis.
So speaking day to day, I am, my pet passion is people's daily systems.
So things that you feel are important, and this isn't just professional, this is just
you as a person, you feel it's important to do, if not every day, most days.
I mean, personally, it's important to read my daughter's bedtime story every day.
I always try and get home for that.
Does she have any favorites?
I like the classics, and so we love Dr. Seuss.
And we spend a lot of time with those.
She has so many books.
Make way for ducklings and all of these great books.
That's a good one.
Professionally, I'm pretty rigorous about prioritization.
I keep a Google Doc of my top priorities, and I'm just executing through that.
Otherwise, I get distracted by my inbox or whatever is the most urgent thing that people are coming to me with.
And that happens anyway.
Don't get me wrong.
It's hard to keep out that noise.
But I just try to work through those things in priority order and thereby focus on whatever is most important.
To make sure you get home to see your daughter, we'll just ask one more question and then wrap up.
If there's anything that you want people to know about betterment that maybe they don't already know,
something new that's coming down the pipe, something that they should explore,
if they're a financial advisor, if they're an end investor, if they're an institution,
Any last kind of closing asks of people out there?
Asks would be if you think you know what a robo advisor is or does, but you haven't tried it out,
check it out, see for yourself.
I think that the breadth of services that we offer surprise with people who may be checked in,
you know, a couple of years ago and we've continued to expand and innovate.
And I still feel like we're just getting started.
And I know you share that feeling.
Like there's so much more to do.
There's so much more personalization, the kinds of things that you have.
asked for. And that's all coming online now. One of the problems with some of the podcasts like
this or conversations between people like us is that we tend to be preaching to the choir,
right? People listening will have already been converted. So I would just add on top of that to say,
if you agree, which I bet most of you do, go find some 21-year-old and drag them to a computer
and help them figure this out because it seems like that first step just opening the damn thing
and getting that automation train rolling is the most important aspect.
So please do that.
And with that, we'll wrap up.
And thanks again for spending the time with me.
Thanks so much for having me.
It's fun.
Hey, everyone.
Patrick here again.
To find more episodes of Invest like the Best,
go to investorfieldguide.com forward slash podcast.
If you're a book lover, you can also sign up for my book club at investorfieldguide.com
forward slash book club.
After you sign up, you'll receive a full investor curriculum right away.
and then three to four suggestions of new books every month.
You can also follow me on Twitter at Patrick underscore Oshag, O-S-H-A-G.
If you enjoy the show, please leave a quick review for us on iTunes,
which will help more people discover Invest Like the Best.
Thanks so much for listening.
