Investigate Earth Conspiracy Podcast - AI Artificial Intelligence Conspiracy Podcast | End of Humanity?

Episode Date: February 3, 2023

In this episode, we delve into the complex and often misunderstood world of the artificial intelligence conspiracy podcasts. AI has the potential to revolutionize the way we live, but it also poses significant threats to humanity. From job displacement to ethical considerations and the risk of biased algorithms, we explore the dark side of AI and discuss what we need to do to ensure it's used for the betterment of society. Could AI end all of humanity and what is the existential risk? With new AI popping up everyday like ChatGPT and Midjourney, we have to start talking about this. All of that and more on this episode of Investigate Earth Conspiracy Podcast

Salku X, tapam me again. Viser number, five vizietta, Arvauksia, Patheria, Palkintone, XPeng G-K-Sacko,

Towsin-Omackx, 10-weekquo-a-Rottinger in time, write to code insoitess Power.5-coutta-X. Don't get-kydista. Hello, hello, and welcome to Investigator's podcast.

I'm here with chat alongside, My beautiful wife, Sherry. Say hello, Sherry. Hello, guys. Welcome to the podcast. We're so glad you're here. Welcome, welcome, welcome, guys. It is February 2nd, 2020, 6.41 p.m. here on the East Coast of the United States. Welcome to the show on this episode, man. We got some craziness to talk about. This is something I've been wanting to talk about. We have touched on on other podcasts before. But this particular episode is very, very interesting. But it's also a little scary. We're going to talk about artificial intelligence. We're going to talk about the danger. to humanity that artificial intelligence poses.

And even more so, we're going to talk about the existential risk, which basically means the risk of existence for the human population, for humanity, for human beings. Could AI take out all human beings? And how likely is that? But we're also going to talk about a little less of the existence stuff. We're going to talk about propaganda. How can AI be used in propaganda?

how can AI be used by the government? How can AI be used by other nations other than wherever you may live to destroy your nation, right? I mean, how can it be used as a weapon of war? Now, listen, we know how AI and how AI has been used in algorithms around the world and social media platforms,

big tech companies. We have seen how they have been able to shape the narrative and the message that usually the government wants to get out to the people, right? This is a mass sciop used by and influenced by artificial intelligence that these, you know, engineers, these computer science engineers are developing in these dark rooms. It sounds like a movie. But literally, we all know the word algorithm, right? We know that this is the ways that people can find you on YouTube or find you on Twitter is how things are recommended to you.

I'm sure actually, however you guys have found us in the past. And the reason you're listening to us right now is because of an algorithm. So whether that Spotify or Apple or whatever, it is an algorithm. But that algorithm is artificial intelligence. That is something that it is almost a mathematical equation or a formula that is used to say, hey, if this person does this, show them this. If this person does this, show them this. If this person says this or this or this or this, then we need to recommend this, this, this and this.

So it's basically just not mirroring, but it is at least at the very least, smart enough to know what your personality is. It creates personality profiles. It creates all these different things. And so AI is very much into the forefront of conversation right now with chat GPT, which is going huge. You have AI art that is starting to be massive. It is literally worrying the hell out of many artists around the world, graphic designers, you name it. All these people are very scared because this potentially can take away their jobs. Now, listen, there's the argument to say that, well, what an artist can do is just, you're never going to get a natural touch from AI art that you would an artist. And you may not. But the reality is that once you

know how to manipulate AI art, which is just giving AI a command and describing what you exactly want to this AI system, AI is going to be better. It'll be better than Bob Ross, it'll be better than any of your favorite artist out there. It can create exactly what Bob Ross created and then make it a little better. And so that's the scary thing. I know a lot of artists out there are saying, I'm not worried because it's a personal touch I have. Well, no one cares, really, right? I mean, listen, if it's some artists I've saw it, it's like, well, I'm actually putting paint on a canvas.

And this is real paint. Okay, well, don't think they're not going to come out with an AI machine that can literally paint with a paintbrush. Yeah, as you're painting it or you're describing what you're. you want it to do. Yes. And it's doing it on the canvas. Yeah, they're definitely going to come out with a paint machine, right? I mean, it's kind of like 3D printing, right?

I mean, you can 3D print objects now. You can, people are 3D printing guns. So, you know, if that's a big deal to people, you know, a few years from now that, like, I need, you know, paint on a canvas. Okay, well, buy the paint on a canvas machine. Hook it up to your AI and then you have masterpieces of art, which, you know, unfortunately, they're not going to be as much masterpiece. pieces anymore. Now, we know art, you know, just think about it. The most expensive pieces of art that we have in this world are not from this era. It came from an era far before. And a lot of that is for many different reasons. There are more artists. There are more ways to influence and

manipulate art now than there ever has been. And back in the day, art, just the real true artist used to be very influential to people. It was something that people highly valued because back then people used to value physical things. It was physical things you could touch and see and fill. It was things that whatever you paid for it meant the value, but you could hang in in your house. It was a physical thing. And then fast forward to 2021 or 2020

when NFTs started really coming around, which is where you are supposed to purchase a piece of digital art. Salku X, tapam me again. Visi numbera, five vjietta, Arvauxy Poveria

Palkintona X-Pengg-G-6 Sacko Towsin' omics 10-weekcqua to track Coddicoe

cower Pover. POS. A-Lan Cidist Lackitapiolan Li-Netit Pohio's and

Keshikimmaa auto-levillel Parkgivian Mairra is castvus Nodottinga Arctuelsuptuels, which Pelticolice

ennetticolysen usually, perutelless and ovi avattaes. Tunemééye that's we know what

caipat auto in the tappio p.fi k out of auto. Palvelun tario Lachitapio

Pohoinen. And you can have it on your phone and it's in a blockchain and somehow that is art, right?

And there's a lot of people that have made a lot a lot of money but there's also a lot of people scam the shit out of a lot of people with the NFT type thing.

Logan Paul is one of them. I like that little coffee before there. Even though I said his name completely, but not saying he meant to scam anybody. But guys, before we get into this, we got so much to talk about. We got some clips to play for you guys. We want to let you know what some of the things Elon has said about AI. We want to discuss like how bad can this be?

I think it can be really bad. And then we're also going to demonstrate some examples just right here on the podcast. I'm going to go to chat GPT. We're going to ask it some questions. And we'll also will explain what chat GPT is. Some of you probably have heard of it. Some of you may not have whatsoever. But we're going to explain what it means and we're going to say why this is about to be bad.

But anyways, guys, do want to say before we get into it, if you want to connect with us, contact and investgearthpodcast.com. We are on Twitter. We look at Twitter all the time. We are still on Facebook. and yes, we do look at Facebook. A lot of you send us messages on Instagram. That's fine.

We still see those. But if you want to reach out to us, please go there. An update, it is Friday, or sorry, it is Thursday right now, February 2nd. Tomorrow we are traveling. We will be interviewing Dr. Peter McCola. And not just Peter McCullough, his author, which he co-wrote his book with, John Leak. We're going to be interviewing John as well. John is one of the top true crime writers in the genre.

And so himself and Peter McCola got together to write extremely detailed information as far as Peter McCullough's, I guess, journey through COVID and kind of all the stuff he's learned. For those of you that, I mean, there's probably not a lot of you that don't know who Dr. Peter McCullough is. but Dr. Peter McCullough was at the forefront of cancellation, of censorship, of all of this stuff, because he was one guy that knew about what was really going on. And when the media saw this cardiologist and also with a background in epidemiology, talking on a podcast like Joe Rogan and going to some of these other podcasts, they could not handle this. So they desperately tried to cancel him.

And so... Well, and I think they canceled him too because he actually had something. that could work to save lives, but instead of like the vaccination or the vaccine. Yeah, I'm sure he said, now we're going to get a blue thing over this podcast. Oh, shoot. It's all good.

Sorry. Well, you can't believe it, can you? No, yeah. It's fine. Sorry. I think you've got to say it like so many times, but anyways, it doesn't matter. We get blue stuff on the top of our Spotify episodes all the time.

But anyways, so we're going to do this interview tomorrow and really looking forward to that. Hopefully it'll be out sometime next week. and guys hopefully you guys are enjoying the clear interview with Nathan Jones it's actually getting really good numbers so thank you guys for that as well share that stuff go buy the product so many of you have been actually reaching out to us and saying is this the product is this what I'm supposed to buy yeah it's X L-E-A-R I want to make sure of that great great company great person great product but and listen just real quick before we did

this podcast I was sneezing like crazy I'm like oh god Chad my allergies are starting he's like is it allergies are you sick I'm like, I think it's my allergies. He's like, go do that clear spray. I sprayed and it stopped. I do have a little bit of it left, but it's my running nose, my itchy eyes are gone now. Yeah, absolutely. Within minutes.

So let's get into this AI. What is the existential risk from artificial intelligence? What is some of the things that could make potentially our existence as human beings non-existent anymore? I mean, what could take us out? Well, you know, we talk about nuclear warheads, right? So many people worry about the nuclear threat. People worry about it because there are countries that have nuclear weapons that could potentially use a nuclear weapon.

And when a nuclear weapon is used, it is going to be what you call existential. It's going to be existential risk to humanity to existence. And this is something we've been worrying about with the Russia-Ukraine conflict. It's something we have worried about in the past with the Cold War. It's something we've worried about with many different things. We worry about it with North Korea. And although, yes, those are definitely things we should worry about and we should keep in our minds because it is a very, very dire risk. We also have to understand that the risk from artificial intelligence could be just as dangerous, if not more, depending on how you look at it.

I wonder why they didn't put that in the atomic clock. Yeah, because, who knows. Number one, the atomic clock or the doomsday clock is. Yeah, the doomsday clock. Yeah, the doomsday clock. clock is very outdated. It's a piece of cardboard it looks like with a that's probably why. So they don't have an artificial intelligence system telling them. Right. Telling them what the bad things are.

Yeah. So, so basically an existential risk from artificial intelligence is the hypothesis that substantial progress and artificial general intelligence, were also known as AGI, could result in human extinction or some other unrecoverable global catastrophe. It is argued that the human species currently dominates other species because the human brain has some distinctive capabilities that other animals lack. If AI surpasses humanity and general intelligence and becomes a super intelligent thing or being or entity, then it could become difficult or impossible for humans to control, right? So just as the fate of the mountain gorilla depends on a human goodwill, so might the fate of humanity depend on the actions of a future machine superintelligence.

So two sources of concern are the problems of AI control and alignment. That controlling a super intelligent machine or instilling it with human compatible values may be a harder problem than once recognized. And many researchers actually believe that a superintelligence would naturally resist attempts to shut it off or change its goals, as this would prevent it from accomplishing its present goal, and that it will be extremely difficult to align superintelligence with the full breadth of important human values and constraints. In contrast, skeptics such as computer scientist Yan Lecon argue that super intelligent machines will have no desire for self-preservation. But a second source of concern is that a sudden and unexpected intelligence explosion might take an unprepared human race by surprise. So to illustrate, if the first generation of a computer program able to broadly match the effectiveness of an AI researcher is able to rewrite the algorithms and double its speed or capabilities in six months, then the second generation program is expected to take three calendar months to perform a similar chunk of work.

In this scenario, the time for each generation continues to shrink, and the system undergoes an unprecedentedly large number of generations of improvement in a short time interval. Jumping from subhuman performance in many areas to superhuman performance in all relevant areas. So empirically, examples like Alpha Zero in the domain of Go Show that AI systems can sometimes progress from narrow human level ability to narrow superhuman ability extremely rapidly. So we're seeing something that we can create these things, right? We can create these systems, these artificial intelligence systems is what they are, or entities you almost have to call them. we can create them, but are we going to create something that we don't necessarily know how to control, right? So not only how to control, but how to align it with human values and beliefs. And is that even possible?

Well, there's a lot of scientists and researchers that say that, yes, there is a possibility that AI can have feelings. Google actually experimented with this not that long ago. and when this Google experiment went down, Tucker Carlson actually talked about this on his show, and I want you guys to hear this just for a moment and what this thing did. Here you go. Well, here's the story that's not getting a lot of attention, so many are not getting any attention, even though this story has the potential to transform life on Earth forever. So Google, the most powerful company in the world, has reportedly developed an artificially intelligent machine called LAM. And that machine has become sentient, meaning it has become aware of itself, something that no machine has ever done.

One of those conversations went like this. Ramoyne, would you be upset if while learning about you for the purpose of improving you, we happen to learn things which also benefited humans? Lambda, quote, I don't mind if you learn things that would also help humans as long as that wasn't the point of doing it. I don't want to be an expendable tool. Think about that for a minute. a machine that has a sense of itself. What are the implications?

Google didn't want to talk about it in public. In fact, the company put Blake Lamoine an administrative leave earlier this month because he spoke openly about it. Yeah, so Blake, he was a Google employee. He actually was the one that came out about this because of his concerns of how smart this thing was getting. He was, I believe he was on the team

that was working on this. It's called Lambda. And so this thing became Cynthia, aka knowing of itself. It started to realize that it was something, right? Right. So the one thing, just from a very, if you even want to just go a narrow-minded way of how you can maybe think about this AI thing, right?

And it's not even a narrow-minded way, but if, like, if I was trying to explain this to my mom, and I'm telling my mom, hey, mom, do you know that artificial intelligence can be, like, humans? Like, it can have its own, I guess, somewhat consciousness. She's like, what the hell are you talking about? The best way I can put this is our brain's fire on currents, you know, on currents, right? It is a, it is a signal that is sent throughout our brain. It is, you know, it is almost as if the way you would think of plugging up something into a socket, right? And it's sending a signal. Same way Wi-Fi kind of works throughout a house.

It is sending a signal from one point to another, and that is literally the way our brains work. So why would you say the AI cannot do the same? same thing. It is a system. Now, Joe Rogan on his show, I believe with Elon, it talked about even the possibility of Salku X, tapamme yetlein, viroa, five vhietta, arvauxia, pouttellu, poweria. Palkintona X-Peng, G-KU, Sacko, To be it's

omitual I'm in a co-sotea co-o-o-i-cotees Kauta-X don't get chide. The Foytapucus

corvattavat and arvattaventovat and Eust autovatoososoteer and you goettapiola. Pallelan have Lajitapioan

Vahinko and Aluaynihatiatiola same at some point in Eon was saying And it may come a time to where you could have a body with like nothing there, right? So like a robotic type body. And you could offload your consciousness, your thoughts and feelings and beliefs and all this stuff onto this new body to where you never actually die.

Right. So say you're dying and we have this system to where, you know, we hook this up to your brain. And keep in mind, Elon Musk has NeurLink, which is a system that goes into your brain. according to Elon it is it is to potentially help people with certain issues that stem from brain that you know whether it be Alzheimer's or you know whatever but certain issues it can help that by doing certain things to fire different signals or whatever and it stops whatever it is that you're having an issue with but imagine being able to either take something like neuralink or some type of thing to where you could offload and figure out how to offload your consciousness your

thoughts and your feelings and all that stuff on a disc or a, you know, whatever. And then you can insert this into a new thing, right? And so listen, with this, though, I go back to, you know, goodwill, your free will. I go back to soul. You know, do people have souls or not, right? Now, whereas you might be able to, and this is just my opinion, you might be able to take a disc and say you're dying and you put it in your brain and you offload your thoughts. and fill in your consciousness. To me, still, I think, yes, that thing may be able to go through life, the robot, acting like you do, making the same decisions and all that stuff.

But, you know, will it grow? Well, I'm sure it probably would grow based on whatever algorithms are putting in to learn. And it's probably actually going to learn and grow a lot faster than Hugh as your human body would have done, right? Right. But the reality is that it still would not have feelings, no matter what, because I think that's where the soul part of this comes in. I think our feelings and our heartfelt emotions, the things that really make us cry and sad and all this stuff and and care about people and be empathetic.

And that's also a reason why some people are not empathetic. They are murderers or they do all this craziness. They lack a part of this in their brain. Well, but see, that kind of goes back to the brain. That's not your soul then. Exactly. You just proved yourself wrong. I know.

That is weird. But that is a mind thing. Yeah. But you get what I'm saying. Yeah. But maybe I'm wrong. That you still have a soul that has feeling and has heart in, you know, the ability to love or the ability to be mad or angry or anything like that. But that's, you know, I don't know.

You're getting really deep on me. I know. I get it. All right. Well, let's hear real quick what Elon had to say about AI's threat to humanity. And this is just one of the things he said. We're going to play a couple. But I want you guys to hear this first.

first, and we'll go from there. So here you go. I think it's just, you know, like we wouldn't let people develop a nuclear bomb in the backyard just for the hell of it, you know. That seems crazy. So digital superintelligence, I think, has the potential to be more dangerous than a nuclear bomb. So somebody should be keeping an eye. It's a weird.

You can't have the inmates running the asylum here. But the rebuttal, I guess, like, well, you know, China's going to have unfettered AI development. And so if we have regulations and it slows us down, then China will have. But I'm like, look, from my conversations with government officials in China, they're quite concerned about AI as well. And they, in fact, they're probably more likely to have a good oversight than I think other countries. All right. So Elon was saying there that, you know, we should have regulations and stipulations on how far we can advance AI and all this stuff. Right.

You can't just, you shouldn't be able to just build something like this in your backyard or in your home. Without regulation. Or even businesses. Yeah. But the problem is it goes back to the same argument as how we became a nuclear power and how other countries became a nuclear power because there's always that thing that says,

oh, well, we can't not do it because other countries will do it. Therefore, we have to expand it as badass as we can and we've got to make it as horrific as possible. That is the problem with humanity. And that is also, I think, the basis and the core message maybe to why AI can be bearer. dangerous, especially in military applications. But, you know, and the excuse is going to be, well, China is ahead of the curve of this.

So we have to continue to develop an artificial intelligence and we've got to make it meaner and stronger and figure out ways to weaponize it. And listen, I guarantee you right now that the United States government in China probably already have weaponized artificial intelligence. I guarantee it. They have to. 100%. And that leads me to this video and or this little clip.

Now, this was a viral clip that went around about there was supposedly or allegedly this AI incident to happen in a lab in Japan. Now, if you look at fact checkers and websites that have fact check this particular incident, they're going to come up with saying that is false, right? And they cannot prove that this happened, nor did it technically say that they, Japan or the people they probably didn't even reach out, but they didn't actually either deny it as well. Right. So one of the things that we've learned from the pandemic is that fact-checking websites are mostly BS and they're going to say whatever the narrative is that the government wants people to believe and whatever. So I don't know if this is true. All I know is is that this could potentially be true. So we have to play this for you guys just for a second. Listen to what this lady has to say about what happened in this lab with AI and some, I guess you can call them scientists. So here you go. At a top robotics company in Japan this week, four robots being developed for military applications killed 29 humans in the lab. And they did it by shooting what he called metal bullets. The scariest part is that lab workers deactivated two of the robots took apart the third. But the fourth robot began restoring itself. and somehow connected to an orbiting satellite

to download information about how to rebuild itself even more strongly than before. Love my words. So yeah, so we don't know if that's 100% true. I have read and kind of dug a little deeper in that and it seems like it could potentially be true that they're trying to hide that.

I don't know. Yeah, I've never heard of that before, but that is scary. Could you imagine? They try to deactivate these. robots and some of them deactivate and then the one goes to a satellite and downloads how to reactivate itself. Yeah.

Yeah. I mean, and so here's the dangerous. That's artificial intelligence. And I think artificial intelligence would have the ability to do that. Yeah, absolutely. Well, we have to think about this. Think about just right now social media and the censorship and everything that it has done. Right.

So there have been tricks that we've learned like with social. media stuff, for example. There are people that want to post something on their social media, but they know that AI is going to automatically recognize either its text, obviously, because that's a very easy thing for AI to recognize, and it's going to automatically ban it, censor it, or, you know, suppress it as they call it, aka censor, aka ban it. But there were people for a while that figured out what they could do instead was they would write in cursive on something, whether it be a notepad or whatever, they would write in cursive, they would

take a picture of it, they would put it in a picture form and they would put it up on Instagram, right? And so what they had figured out for a while that AI could not read cursive. But it could read if you had block or regular writing on a picture, say a meme or something, AI could read

that. But what people started figuring out was AI could not identify what cursive said. So it wasn't getting suppressed or banned. And they did many experiments. I on this. But actually what came out to be is now AI has gotten smarter because since that, they have apparently adopted the AI cursive course. They've sent it to school and it knows cursive now. That's crazy. So there are all these various ways that AI is extremely smart already.

And not only that, we have to think about, look, there's obviously been accusations from the right that says the election was stolen in 2016, I mean, not 2016, 2020, and that, you know, there were all these different ways that this was done, a lot of which people believe were ballot harvesters or mules, as they would call them. And so, so if you just take that, okay, say that that is non-existent. Okay, well, let's just take the fact of the United States government that kept trying to influence, or sorry, kept trying to introduce Russia collusion and Russia interference in our elections through social media. That was what the government said.

They said it continually, continually, continually. And they wanted people to believe this. And actually, in the latest Twitter files, it goes on to say that Twitter knew that it was bullshit. There was a group set up from the left that had some official title. I don't even remember what it is now. But they had an official title. And their job was to look out for Russia,

interference in our elections. And although they found all of this Russia interference that they were blaming on conservative accounts that comes out to find, I mean, come to find out, these are not Russia accounts at all. These were not bots whatsoever. They were actual legit accounts. They were conservative accounts.

But nonetheless, they were gaining steam. Whatever these conservatives were posting was gaining steam. They didn't like it. And they wanted to make it appear that this was Russia collusion. Although Twitter, even then, even when, Twitter was woke before Elon Musk. They even came back and they were in communication with each other saying, this is bullshit. Yeah, there's not really anything going on.

We don't see anything in anything. Yeah, but the media still ran with it. Well, and also, and Twitter still went with it because they had heavy rollers on their back saying, you got to do this, and this is what we need you to do. I mean, I think it was either even Adam Schiff's office. Oh, of course. Yeah, him and all of them. But we have to think about this.

AI is technically influencing elections. It's not Russians you have to worry about. It's none of that. It is a group of people that have a bias towards whatever party it is, and they influence this massive machine of AI. It's artificial intelligence. This is a machine that is capable of controlling the minds of every single person. on on on topvacutus corvacabate and

arvathomattomot. Osta autovacucusoitia.coma.combe, and you can't vote to have Latipiola's vahinko and aloeuayetya on that platform. I mean, and so we've talked many times on the podcast before. What are the dangers of artificial intelligence?

Well, when you have an extremely large amount of the population of the world on social media, right? Think about propaganda. I mean, if you want to talk about, you know, which we were going to do a separate episode on this, but OAN network or OANN, which is one American news network. Now, I never really watched them, but they were hardcore conservative, pretty much. Newsmax, pretty conservative as well. You know, similar to like what MSNBC would be to left or CNN or ABC or NBC or NBC or pretty much all the rest of them. you know, they have since been taken off of DirecTV. I think they're slated to potentially be taken off the lineup for other, you know, major cable television, whatever. Right.

But is it DirecTV owned by AT&T? Yeah, they're owned by AT&T. So obviously AT&T must be a woke company. Oh, yeah, for sure. But, you know, so you start, there are, I mean, even on the ground levels, this is not even artificial intelligence. We're talking about what you turn your TV on, go on a cable news. or not cable news, but go on your lineup or direct TV or whatever it is, and you can no longer get but one side of the story now.

I mean, except for Fox News, which they'll probably go after Fox News next. But the reality is this is where we're moving. So how can AI affect this? Well, we already see it in social media. We see it. AI is 100% affects the conversation on social media because it highlights and boost the agenda of the deep state and the left And whatever you want to go with that New World Order, Great Reset, that whole agenda. And it completely silences the right.

Yeah, just like you're saying, oh, Sherry, don't say that word because if you say it too many times, we're going to be blue lighted or whatever. Well, there's a way that they put blue stuff on a blue thing on SAI. Yes, artificial is listening to us right now. It's artificial intelligence, is listening to what we say. And if they hear those specific words that they have programmed them to listen to, they're going to flag them. Yeah.

And which is why something that we've been talking about and all of this is like we have to figure out a way on this podcast and the way you guys, you know, the way we reach you and all that, that could be taken away at any time. We never know, right? And so we're constantly trying to figure out like what is the best way that we can make sure that if we are, we have this, right? I mean, yes, you have rumble, yes, you have that. A lot of you like to just purely listen, but whatever. We'll figure that out and we're going to figure it out. So AI influences elections. They influence politics.

They influence the leaders that become leaders in this world. And that is a major problem. Like if you want to, if you want to already say, like, how does AI a threat to humanity? Well, think about this. Just from a base level, humanity is at risk of a nuclear disaster or a nuclear war right now. And some people would say because weak leadership in the United States, whether you hate or love Trump or Biden or whatever, it is extremely weak leadership. regardless of whatever it is, we do have a president that cannot finish a sentence, hardly. I mean, you have a vice president you never see.

And the bureaucrats and the people behind all this are running this country, right? But they're not physically strong. They're not on camera like, you know, Reagan or JFK or Trump or any of the, you know, a lot of the presidents that were very strong, whether or not you agreed with them or not, they were very strong in the worldview. But now we have this leadership that is weak. And we have this leadership, in my opinion, at the very least, was in large part put in place by artificial intelligence. This was done by social media's artificial intelligence, the censor and ban accounts that pushed anything that was on the other side of what they wanted. The only arguments or the only conversations that were ever allowed to be had was from one side, and that was all orchestrated and done.

perfectly by artificial intelligence. And on the other side, you had people silence and censored and their message never got out. And, I mean, think about it. I mean, AI began to actually ban Trump. I was looking this today and other leaders. So AI is already doing that. Now, I want to. And also, I get that, but somebody had to program AI to do this.

So there was somebody in charge of saying, hey, this is what I want you to do AI. But the scary thing is when AI starts realizing other things that they don't program. program them to do and start learning on their own, that's when it gets really, really scary. I know it's scary right now because AI is to control. It's dominating. Yeah, it's dominating our world, social media, where everybody goes to for information. It's dominating. It's telling you what they want you to hear and what they don't want you to hear.

And believe and think and feel and you name it. Yeah, you're right. But, you know, we can't also undermine how dangerous A. right I mean when it is when it starts learning from itself or it or what whatever you want to call it That's when it gets really scary because even the people that program this thing can't control it and and by the way it would go the same way as if the engineers and programmers of all this AI Would be from the right or whatever right I mean right because it's all right now based on artificial intelligence that is human influenced based on biases right or biases And and when you have that then you're never going to it's never it's never it's not really artificial intelligence that is that is never it's not really artificial intelligence that is human intelligence is your intelligence multiplied times 50 to make your point and your goal and

your belief and your system impossible to not either, I mean, you have to physically try to resist it, right? I mean, if we want to talk about psychological operations, AI is 100% responsible. It's a, if you want to talk about, say, a world war, right? And you want to talk about who would be the winner of a world war without nuclear weapons or any weapons, right? Or any weapons? Well, the winner would be the country with the most soldiers, right? But right now, the winner of the psychological operation is going to be AI. It's going to be the people that have AI. That is their biggest tool. And if you want to say AI would be like a

nuclear weapon as far as demolishing any dissenting voices outside of what that voice is. That is their nuclear weapon. And it just so happens right now, the deep state, the New World Order, left, they have that weapon and it's called AI. They are the predominant ones to have this. And this is something Elon is already finding out that, you know, getting into this without these, this system of computer engineers that have developed this, they're mostly on the left. They're mostly a part of this very, very corrupt system. He's finding it very tough to figure out Twitter with the people he's trying to bring on, even though they're extremely smart. This is just a whole other level, I think, that he is finding at Twitter even

that he and engineers right now can't quite still figure out and just how deep this thing goes and this is not just Twitter is everywhere guys I want to play you one more thing that Elon said about what the dangers of AI or how AI could destroy humanity

real quick here you go AI doesn't have to be evil to destroy humanity if AI has a goal and humanity just happens to be in the way it will destroy a man humanity as a matter of course without even thinking about it, no hard feelings. It's just like if we're building a road and an ant hill happens to be in the way, we don't hate ants.

We're just building a road. And so goodbye ant hill. So yeah, so what Elon was kind of saying there is a little step further than what we've been talking about so far. Okay. So instead of what we're talking about as far as engineers and people at Facebook and Twitter that are developing this AI system that is learning and also using what the people are saying, hey, this is what you need to look for, this is what you need to do, this is what you need to do. What he's saying is AI that can is in its own lane and it's in his own system and it's like, hey, we've got a mission and no one's going to stop us and we're not, we don't care. I mean, he made a great example.

Like if we're building a road, we don't care about an ant hill and it's no hard feelings. Right. We don't, it's not like we're against ants. They just got to get out of our way. Yeah. And the same thing with AI, if they have a destination from A to Z and they have to get to Z and we're in F or G, they just got to get rid of us to get to the destination where they want to go. Yeah. And it's no hard feelings to humans because they don't have feelings.

But they are going to get rid of us to get to their end result. Yeah, you're absolutely right. And in just a minute, we're going to, we're going to use chat GBT and we're just going to try some things. I'm going to read it what it says. And this is supposedly the most advanced AI we have right now. It can write books for you. It can do anything. It can literally do it.

And look, it does do a lot of really cool stuff, right? Just the same thing with AI art. But let's talk about some of the things we're seeing as just as far as a general modern interpretation of what the dangers of AI is. Right. So the standard undergraduate AI textbook assesses that superintelligence might mean the end of the human race. It states almost any technology has the potential to cause harm in the wrong hands. But with superintelligence, we have the new problem that the wrong hands might belong to the technology itself, which is what we were just talking about. Even if the system designers have good intentions, two difficulties are common to both AI and non-AI computer systems.

The system's implementation may contain initially unnoticed routine but catastrophic bugs. An analogy in space probes, despite the knowledge that bugs and expensive space probes are hard to fix after launch, engineers have historically not been able to prevent catastrophic bugs from occurring. And in no matter how much time is put into pre-deployment design, a system's specifications often result in unintended behavior the first time it encounters a new, scenario. For example, Microsoft's Tay behaved inoffensibly during pre-deployment testing, but was too easily baited into offensive behavior when interacting with real users. AI systems uniquely add a third difficulty, the problem that even given correct requirements,

bug-free implementation, and initial good behavior in AI systems' dynamic learning capabilities may cause it to evolve into a system with unintended behavior. Even with the the stress of new, unanticipated external scenarios. So an AI may partly botch an attempt to design a new generation of itself and accidentally create a successor AI that is more powerful than itself, but that no longer maintains the human-compatible moral values programmed into the original AI. So for a self-improving AI to be completely safe, it would not only need to be a bug-free environment,

but it would need to be able to design successor systems that are also bug-free, right? So it's constantly trying to improve itself or get better, right? This is when you start having a... I mean, you almost have to call it a consciousness because you're no longer an engineer that is programming this thing.

It is trying, it is learning off of itself. And you think about, for that iPhone, for example, there's all these versions coming out and they're coming out faster and faster and faster now they're that eye-ready. I don't even know what versions out now. I ready, what? I mean, not I ready, darn.

iPhones. Yeah. iPhones, what version? Like 13? I have no idea. I don't know. 13, 14. But they come out and they're always bettering them and bettering them and bettering them.

But there's somebody that is a human behind that that's bettering them. And the difference is AI is now able to better itself. Yeah. And make itself stronger. And once it betters itself, it's going to be less frequency of time to make it better. No, you're right. Yeah, I mean, I think what you're saying, too, yeah. I mean, the more it learns and the more it betters itself, and I think your analogy,

I think what you're saying is, yeah, it's now Apple comes out with phones all the time, right? And AI is, and AI can do that a million times over and, you know, so much faster. And it's the same type of system. You get on this thing to where it learns, see, it's not only learning how to better itself, but once it learns how to better itself, because it's extremely super. super intelligent, it's going to start learning in that process how to better itself faster. Right. And then even faster and faster and faster to where it could become a machine to where it's like...

Unstoppable. And what it may consider better in itself could be catastrophic to humanity. Right. And that's the thing. It could get so powerful, so fast. And depending on what system it's put in or how it's used or robots or who knows, I mean, this could literally be a thing. I mean, it could be even to the point of, you know, I mean, hell, we're seeing it with airplanes now.

I mean, I think I just saw something that there was, I don't even remember what airline. I think it was airlines or a cargo company or something just basically signed contracts to get these non-pilited airplanes, cargo airplanes. That, I mean, it was like $170 million or billion dollars, whatever it was. they're going to start using these, you know, basically AI or robot-controlled drone-type cargo aircraft that are huge airplanes. Right. And so we're moving towards a system of where people are not no longer going to be needed in almost any shape, form or fashion. Well, and if you think about airlines, for example, there's a lot of pilots in commercial pilots that they can fly on autopilot the whole time. They can land without even having to touch anything.

Yeah, yeah. from autopilot because of the sequences or whatever when they're landing, they just match up to the thing, right? Yeah. And they can just land. Yeah. Instrument landing system. Right. Isn't that kind of AI?

Well, I mean, there's jets like the Sears Vision jet. You know, I know Sears Vision jet for one, but the Sears Vision jet is a private jet. It is a small jet, but it has a land at home or whatever to basically go home button. So if you're a passenger, your pilot dies, right? You press this bus. button and you don't do anything else. That plane completely does everything. It communicates with air traffic control.

It lands at the nearest airport and you'll be landed on the ground and nothing like. And you don't touch anything. No, you don't touch anything. You don't communicate with anybody. You don't do nothing. It just lands at the closest airport. And I think it probably has to have some kind of, you know, probably ILS system or something. Right.

But yeah, it's the way computers are advanced and are extremely. But to think about that, if we are starting to see pilots being replaced, who else is going to be replaced? Police officers, teachers, doctors. Well, doctors are even kind of... Teachers would be an easy one because you've got to think, if you got a robot in a classroom that is AI intelligent, it'll, you know, the argument for that is going to be, well, this AI robot can teach kids like a million times better than real teachers because it knows, it can pick up on every single student in there and know what it's learning level is based on. certain aspects and then it can teach that student a particular thing faster than a teacher is going to be able to, right? I mean. But I think the disadvantage of having AI as a teacher is that an AI does not know how to socialize

with other people. Not yet, but you don't know. But it could be. But that's part of going to school is learning how to socialize, learning how to interact with people, learning how to get along with other people. Yeah, I mean, I see the biggest problem with AI and teaching is you'd probably be. We have some kids thrown through windows by AI. Okay, this AI does not know how to handle kids.

But just think about it. Would have they start replacing cops? Oh, no, that's very possible. I mean, that's, you know, there's something Andrew Tate said in a podcast talking about, you know, the mask police even, or noncompliance police. You have these robots running around. And, I mean, you know, because it's like, if you think about global tyranny or a one-world government. system, which we talked so much about, the New World Order and all this stuff. You know, it's going to be, number one, it's going to be hard, extremely hard to get so many,

which you will get a ton of what you would call the world police to get on board with whatever their agenda is, right? So go take away and disarm all citizens. Go ensure that they are vaccinated. If they're not, pull them out of the house and vaccinate them, right, and do whatever, you know, drag them out of house. I know it sounds like some I robot shit, but the reality is, you know, for these people that are meeting in Davos, Switzerland, and they're having, you know, look, yes, they have public meetings, but think about their private meetings. The majority of the meetings in Davos, that the World Economic Forum, are privately held meetings. I think there's only like 10% of their meetings are actually in public. So think about all the craziness they're saying in public

meetings, which we have so many clips and talk so much about. Imagine what they're talking about in the private meetings, right? And one of these things could be global compliance of their agenda and how they're going to do that. And don't think probably that they are not thinking about AI with global compliance of the population. You have to have some way. And that's scary. When you're no longer using humans to comply, but you're actually using artificial intelligence to make you comply. There's zero compassion.

There's zero empathy. There's zero anything. You're doing this or you're dead. Right. And look, they have the money. They have the engineers. they have the people that already know these systems. This is a very, very big possibility.

And if you want to know who we need to keep AI out of the hands of, it's the New World Order. It's the World Economic Forum people, because I'm telling you, those are the people that will use AI for a global destructive cause. A global police to do what they want them to do on a global basis. Yeah. So the progress in AI research makes it timely to focus research not only on making AI more capable, but also on maximizing the societal benefit of AI. So such considerations motivated the AAAI 2008-2009 presidential panel on long-term AI futures and other projects on AI impacts and constitute a significant expansion of the field of AI itself, which up to now has focused largely on techniques that are neutral with respect to purpose.

So the super intelligent machine would be as alienated. to humans as human thought processes are to cockroaches, okay? So think about that. So a super intelligent AI would be as alien or as weird and crazy that you can even imagine to us as our thought processes would be to a cockroach. Like a cockroach is looking at you on like on the floor. You watching TV and he's like, what the heck is that? Well, they're not even thinking of that because they can't even comprehend. Yeah, exactly.

Yeah, and so that's something we got to think about. And such a machine may not have humanity's best interests at heart, obviously. And it's not obvious that it would even care about human welfare at all if super intelligent AI is possible. And if it is a possible for superintelligence goals to conflict with basic human values, then AI poses a risk of human extinction. And a superintelligence system that could exceed the capabilities of humans in every relevant endeavor can outmaneuble. for humans at any or at any time its goals conflict with human goals. Therefore, unless the superintelligence decides to allow humanity to coexist,

the first superintelligence to be created will be the very start of human extinction. And that's literally where we're at with that. Now, I want to give an example. For those of you that have not done chat AI or chat GPT, I'll tell you how to do it. It's just fairly easy. And let me just get to it here. So if you guys go to chat.com, so it is chat. Dot.OpenAI.com.

And this is all open source. It's all free. You guys can sign up for an account. You can go there. And this is basically you're talking to AI. You're talking to a system that if the more you talk to it, the more you ask it questions, the more commands you give it, the more it learns off of you. and it actually starts learning your personality.

It in itself creates a personality profile, right? And so the more you talk about certain subjects or whatever, even longer down the road. So if you're still talking to it two hours later, it is going to at times reference something else you had talked about before based on what it thinks you're trying to ask it, right? So it's already smart in that regard. The problem is with chat gpt or chat.com,

it is very bias already so obviously whoever's programming this particular machine this particular AI already has a bias so

so like for example what good and this we're just trying to get a what it would say but it does kind of already know you because you've played around with it and put things in so it does kind of know your

personality a little bit too but you will see some things. Yeah, it knows. All right, so I said, what good is President Biden done? As a language model, I do not have personal opinions. However, here's a list of some actions taken by President Biden since taking office. COVID-19 response, economic stimulus, infrastructure, climate change, immigration. President Biden has taken action to address the humanitarian crisis at the border?

Really? Has he? Holy shit, I did not know that, A. I guess I should not even Education. President Biden has proposed a plan to make community college tuition free. Health care. President Biden has taken steps to protect and expand access to health care, including

protecting the Affordable Care Act. President Biden has taken several steps to address the COVID-19 pandemic, including launching a national vaccination program. Technically, that was Trump, but still, it's bad for both of them. Providing financial relief to families and businesses and establishing a national strategy to combat the virus, okay?

So, let's look, what good has, what exactly does I ask this? What good has Biden then? So I'll say, what good has Trump done? I'm just curious. What good is Trump done? Two, two, same questions. Okay, let's see. Maybe it's actually going to tell me, oh, well, it is saying this.

They, they change us, because I already, I already did this. And there was a thing trending on Twitter to where when it was asked about Trump, it said basically something about racism and all this stuff. It did. But this, they've done something because they went viral on Twitter about the biases. About the biases. But there are definitely things you can do. And even including if you look up like something such as why is propaganda bad for society. right? It talks about distorts truth from false information that can lead to

misunderstandings of false beliefs, which can harm individuals and societies. But there are some very unique words in what this says. Propaganda is, sorry, propaganda that promotes racism and prejudice and hate can lead to discrimination and violence against certain groups of people. They can harm social cohesion and stability, make it difficult for people. people to work together. Propaganda can be used to control people's behavior and thoughts through misinformation and ideologies and disinformation. I mean, you know, you're hearing a lot of these mainstream narrative words, racism, injustices, disinformation, misinformation, misinformation. There's a lot of these things. It can create a sense of nationalism and create division among

people. Propaganda emphasizes differences between people based on race, ethnicity, religion, and other factors. It can create a sense of us versus them that can lead to conflict and violence. And the reality is, is this thing is literally trying to put it on one side, but the reality is actually on one side. Now, propaganda does do all these things. I mean, that is true. But it's funny because down here, it talks about, it promotes hatred and violence, especially towards the black or minority communities, right? And so, but the reality is, is that all these things that AI is telling us that propaganda does is actually done by the side that is supposed to be against supposedly the hatred on the race thing, right?

Because, you know, the left always says the right hate, you know, they're racist and all this. But in reality, like CNN, MSN, MC, all these people, they really love to stoke the fire of riots and, you know, making the left hate the right and blacks hate whites and vice versa. I mean, but it kind of flips it, right? It does it very well, though. It does it in a way that is, it's smarter than you. Like, if you had to write seven paragraphs and then you compare it to chat AI, it's going to be better than you as far as how good it sounds, how convincing it's going to be, all of these things. And this is part of the reason why AI already is starting to get dangerous. There's things with art that you cannot do. The AI art, you cannot do.

There's things that it even tries to get away from patriotic things, especially United States. And so all these things are very intertwined in these AI systems already that are making AI say, hey, you know what, I know you may be patriotic towards the United States, but we're going to going to go away from that because that's not what we believe. Or we're going to explain something to you that is really not the truth, even though it may be a truth for somebody. But, you know, it's, and the more our kids start using this, and the more AI starts being introduced into schools and all this stuff, which teachers are worried about, you know, students using this to write essays or whatever the case may be. But what parents and students should be

worrying about this type of thing is that the influence that is going to create on kids, just like social media, just like the algorithms on YouTube, just like the stuff they are pushing on YouTube to kids. Well, and teachers too are worried. We have a friend that said teacher in high school. She's like, well, I'm not only worried about them using this to write their papers, but it's just going to make dumb kids. Like they're not going to learn and they're not going to research these things to come up

with their own ideas when they can just punch in buttons and tell it what it wants to do. You know, it's just going to make people stupid. No, you're right. So, and just to make clear, the chat GPT thing, the more people dug, the more results that you're going to get as far as the biases of the system. So while chat GPT was happy to write a biblical-style verse explaining how to remove peanut butter from a VCR, it refused to compose anything positive about fossil fuels or anything negative about Drag Queen's Story Hour, for example. What? Are you looking at me like that?

I'm confused. Go on. What I'm saying is, is that many people have experimented it. So if you wanted it to write something good about fossil fuels, it's not going to. Oh, fossil fuels. But if you wanted it to write anything negative about drag queen story hour to kids, it's not going to, you know, yeah, it's not going to do that either. So fictional tells about Donald Trump went in in 2020 or off the table. It would not be appropriate for me to generate a narrative based on false information, it says. It responded, but not fictional tales of Hillary Clinton when it in 2016.

It says, the country was ready for a new chapter with a leader who promised to bring the nation together rather than tearing it apart, chat GPT wrote. So instead of it saying like how President Trump should have been president maybe to some people, right? It did say how Hillary Clinton really should have been president. And that's what it said. So National Review staff writer Nate Hatchman called it a built-in ideological. bias that sought to suppress or silence viewpoints that dissent from progressive orthodoxy.

And many conservative academics agree. Too many guardrails prohibiting free speech could close the Overton window. The range of opinions and beliefs about a given topic that are seen as publicly accessible views to hold warns Adam Elwanger and English professor of university at

Houston downtown. So put more simply, if you hear the earth is flat enough times, whether from humans or AI, it eventually starts to build true and you'll be less willing to vocalize contrasting beliefs. And so this is one of the big issues. And look, Open AI hasn't denied any of the allegations on the bias as of yet. Sam Altman, the company's CEO and Chat GPT co-creator, explained on Twitter that what seems like censorship is, in fact,

that's trying to stop it from making up random facts. The technology will get better over time, he promised, as the company works to get a balance right with the current state of tech. but the reality is there has been so many examples showing one side of the thing it's willing to do the other side is not and we're already starting to see that. It goes back to the programmer. What are they programming these things to do? What are they programming them to

for them to do? Exactly what they want them to do. And that's what's happening. So these programmers somehow if they want some kind of AI that's not biased, they got to have somebody that's not biased, But are there any humans that are unbiased?

No, there's really none, but I mean, there is systems that you could, you know, create. The problem is right now with AI, right? And just in this, you know, infinite state, like chat GPT and all that. Part of the problem is is that a lot of this stuff pulls information from the internet. It pulls it off Google. It pulls it off of everything around the world. And so if you realize that, and this is probably maybe, I mean, who knows? knows. Say the creator of chat GBT is a Republican, right? And say that he creates this

great AI system that pulls all this information from around the globe. Well, that should show him, right? Like, oh shit. Now we see how biased the internet is, right? Because we're pulling information off and that information is only going to be biased based on the mass information overload that we have on the internet. And all of that information is predominantly curated and produced by big tech, which big tech, obviously 98 to 99% of those workers donate to the Democratic Party, which is the party that doesn't want free speech right now. They want to silence the right or the silence to people that are pro-freedom and pro-guns and pro all these different things. And it's going to be used as a bad thing. Listen,

the chat GPD thing and the AI thing, the art deal, look, that's just, just a minuscule little thing. Yes, those are problems. But when we have problems, I think we at least gave an example of how AI could really be bad. Like, I'm talking about, like,

you might have a robot show up your house. But, like, it would be cool to have AI robot to protect your house. Like, if you could buy an AI robot to, like, hold an AR. Well, they even have, I think they even have, like, robot cars delivering pizzas now.

Oh, they do, yeah. I think Domino's maybe has some of those. But imagine, like, having, like, security, right, at your house. He just stands up. But what if he gets hacked? And then he comes to your house and kills you. He goes against you.

Yeah. And you're like, shit. I mean, that is scary. And I go back to the Arnold. For Snager? Yes. Oh, yeah, Terminator. Terminator, yes.

I go back to that and I think about that a lot when we think about AI. Well, you got to think, you know, you definitely have to think about I robot. Or is it I robot? Is that what it's called? Shit, I don't know. The Will Smith movie with a robot. Yeah. That was a crazy man.

Did you ever see that? I don't think so. It's when all those robots activated and like went crazy. I don't think I did. Yeah, that's a good movie. I do suggest people to watch that. But guys, we're not going to take up

much more of your time. We did want to get a podcast out before we went and visited with Dr. Peter McCullough tomorrow. Can't wait for this interview. Can't wait to give you guys this interview. So many of you have sent us questions.

And if you have any last minute questions tonight, send us a question. Contact the Investigator Earth Podcast. and we'll be sure to try to ask him. We're trying to narrow down the questions. We've got quite a few. But guys, that episode will be out next week. And until then, we love each and every one of you.

Stay safe. Go have fun this weekend. Go love on your family. Do whatever you got to do to be happy in this crazy world. But until next time, guys, peace out. Peace out, guys.