Investigate Earth Conspiracy Podcast - Andrew Tate BBC Interview Conspiracy Podcasts | Andrew Tate Exposes Matrix Media

Episode Date: June 6, 2023

Andrew Tate recently had a compelling discussion with the BBC following his unexpected arrest and subsequent imprisonment, although no charges were officially brought against him. The interview lasted for about 40 minutes, but unfortunately, the BBC condensed it to a mere 10 minutes. Regardless of one's personal opinion about Andrew Tate, it is worth acknowledging the BBC'sattempt to influence their listeners on behalf of the "new world order" and the pervasive nature of media propaganda within the matrix. In our conversation, Sheri and I delve into the profound implications of this interview and its significance for our society.

Hello and welcome to Investigate Earth Podcast. I am your host, Chad, alongside my beautiful and gorgeous wife, Sherry. Say hello, Sherry. Hello, guys. Welcome to the podcast this evening. Welcome, welcome, welcome, guys. It is 7.30 p.m. on the East Coast, United States, June 5th. Don't know if you guys will be listening on June 5th.

We may release us tomorrow the next day. But anyways, on this episode, we are going to be talking about the Andrew Tate-B-B-C interview, which basically Andrew Tate destroyed the BBC and all of their credibility. if they had any left. And we're going to be talking about that. We're going to play us some clips in relation to the BBC's version of the interview. We're going to talk about it. But even the bigger picture here is, I think there's some promising things to take from this Andrew Tate Doe, right?

And we're going to talk about those, right? But it seems like people are finally starting to see through the bullshit, right? They're finally awakening to the masses. The masses are awakening to the disinformation, the propaganda, to the media. And to the misinformation. See, I'm using their words against them. And the disinformation. That's what I said.

Yeah. And mal information, right? All non-information. Yeah. So anyways, guys, this is something we felt like we had to talk about because of the fact that this Andrew Tate thing, we actually did cover this probably, I don't know, four months ago or so, where we specifically talked about some of Andrews' accusations as far as rape, human trafficking, or sex trafficking, whatever you want to say. And we did give our

opinions, especially me. I was a little more opinionated on Andrew Tate situation. And that's really just been based on, and that Andrew Tate, by the way, that interview, or not interview, but that podcast episode, you guys are welcome to go back and listen to it. We say whatever we feel. And based on the things and the stuff that I pulled up from Andrews past and the things he said online. I had a pretty outlined viewpoint of Andrew Tate. I wasn't necessarily making up anything. I kind of played you guys what he himself said.

And then, you know, I basically said, well, this is how I made my judgment on kind of what kind of person is Andrew Tate. Now, I'm not an Andrew Tate hater, right? And we can say that, you know, a lot of what Andrew says is taken out of context. And that may very well be true. And there's two sides of this, really. And Sherry, you actually made a good point. What did you say about, regardless of kind of whatever the situation is,

earlier we were talking on the patio. And you had said, like, the fact that they were attacking him in this BBC interview so much. Just for Lucy to come out and attack him like she did, makes him out to be the good guy because she made herself look like the villain. Just by attacking him and trying to catch him on something. Absolutely. She was the one that really turned into an evil biotch because I was like even looking at her, you could even like you were saying, looking at her eyes. She just had that devilish look looking at him like I could kill you right now. I mean, she put herself in a place where she's going to be ridiculed, which she is highly being ridiculed today. Yeah. And Andrew Tate himself warned her and the BBC during his interview. Now, just to give you guys some pretext, for those of you to do not know what's going on, Andrew Tate himself warned her and the BBC during his interview. Now, just to give you guys some pretext, for those of you to do not know what's going on, Andrew Tate, Tate is a, and has been, especially over the past year or two, a very highly influential social

media personality that came on the scene and blew up pretty much overnight, right? And so Andrew Tate, along with many of his followers, he kind of always talked about the men or the pro-male stance of things and viewpoints as far as being a man and being strong and, and, and and whatever. There was a lot of things that he has said that's been very controversial. A lot of people call him a misogynist. A lot of people call him a douchebag. You know, a lot of people don't call him an asshole.

There's a lot of things that can be said about Andrew Tate that is controversial or whatever you want to say about him. But the reality is at the end of day, he garnered multi-millions of views, of followers of people that were both young and especially the younger adults, these guys latched onto this. But you know what the thing about this is? Is that I think a lot of these news organizations want really bad to kind of pin Andrew Tate is like he's a bad guy because he's a misogynist.

He is a piece of shit. He treats women like shit and all these things. And part of that problem was is that I don't know if you ever heard, I guess, the saying of like good girls like bad guys. That's typically some kind of mentality. It really is. So no matter how bad this dude actually may be, really what it does to a lot of women is attract them more to him. And although whatever he's saying at any given time may to a rational human being be like, God, he sounds like such an asshole.

Yeah. There's a lot of women that are for whatever reason attracted to that. And a lot of women, they like that masculinity. They like the guy that's in control. And, you know, is in kind of control. the relationship. When you think about relationships, there is not a lot of relationships that are extremely balanced. There is usually one person that's kind of more dominating than the other. And he was just making a point that he feels like the man, the masculine part of the relationship

should be the one that dominates the relationship, which I get that to an extent. You know, there were parts of his interviews that I didn't care for like he was saying, I can go out and party, but my woman's going to stay home. You know, those kind of things, I'm like, oh, that's not fair, though. You know, it's got to be like a two-way street. But I do get, you know, some of his opinions. And I also get to the fact that he has so,

he does influence so many young men. And he does, in a lot of ways, influence them in a positive way, saying being a hard worker, be a strong man, you know, always make goals, go out and work out, be healthy. You know, he has a lot of positive. things that he brings to the table as well. You know, there's just some things that he does say that is controversial, and it just depends on what kind of context you look at it in.

Yeah, absolutely. Yeah, and by the way, I probably shouldn't mention this. Like, if you have kids that usually listen or stuff, which we've been really trying really hard to not say things or whatever, but, you know, this may not be the episode because there are some things that Andrew Tate and how he describes things and what we may say, you know, he may not want your kids to hear. So I just want you guys to know that now in advance. Yeah, this is the check button, not kidlif friendly.

Yeah. So you're right, Sherry. He does, and he has brought a lot to the man environment, right? The man's society. And at a time that really men needed it more than ever. You know, you have at this time, you know, two years ago, was about when he really blew up, really more so a year ago. He was everywhere on all.

social media platforms. He was very smart about his marketing and social media. He had, he not only allowed, but he encouraged other influencers, other YouTubers to get their start by using his content to build their channels up. So what these content creators would do is they would react to some of his videos or they would post his videos on other channels. And so what this enabled him to do was he could just create these massive long streams or whatever, and then he encouraged these other YouTubers or other whoever it was to take clips or clip it out and just post it all over the internet everywhere possible. And part of what he did was, you know, there's always that saying, and especially in marketing,

there's no, well, except for Bud Light, there's no bad publicity, there's no bad publicity, right? So if you're, if you're, if you have a public, you know, even if it's bad, if you're everywhere, that's not bad, although Budlida believes not in that anymore. But anyway, so he was one of these very influential people. And what you have to understand is shock value, right? There are things that people do that make it primarily because of the shock value in the things they say. I have witnessed this in entertainers.

I have witnessed this in social media influencers. There are so many influencers. And this was huge, especially back when YouTube allowed people to actually be who they were or allowed people to use their actual opinions and thoughts and beliefs for the reason of why their channel got as big as it did. Now YouTube, you're not allowed to do this and this and this and this and this. I mean, there's a whole list of things you're not allowed to do, which is why not crazy long after Andrew blew up around the world.

He was a global name. He was on every social media site, even after they banned him, which they came after Andrew Tate on all platforms, banned him from everything, except for. rumble, which is where he went to Rumble, which really helped Rumble out a lot. But even after that, YouTube, not just YouTube, YouTube, Instagram, Twitter, whoever could not control the amount of people that were continually posting his content. And I'm sure these CEOs and these big tech people were just like, oh my God, we can't get rid of him.

Because as soon as you ban 50 accounts, there's going to be 50 or 100 more accounts that continue to post this stuff. and it was part of them it was a movement right this was a mass movement at a time where masculinity was going down the drain and it was a bad thing according to the propaganda and the government and the media and the new world order that says that oh you know what you're not allowed to be manly because that makes you a piece of shit you're not allowed to be a real man because then if you're a real man you're transphobic if you're a real man you're homophobic you know all of these things so Andrew Tate took this opportunity to

to create this realm and aura around him that is manly, that is the most manly shit he could possibly think of to say and do. And this is a time that men needed it more than ever, especially in social media, because this is the time when everything on social media was being promoted by LGBTQ, all this crazy shit where men were not men anymore. They didn't even know what the hell they wanted to be. And Andrew Tate kind of showed up on the scene and was like, no, you know what? You can be a fucking man.

you can you can be who you want to be. And this is now there's people who are going to argue he took it too far on the manly side as far as especially the misogynistic aspect of it and women are not equal to what some people said is what Andrew Tate kind of seem like he said a lot. By the way, there's a lot of women listening to this podcast. I would be I'd be very curious to hear you guys opinions on Andrew Tate. Not only was he putting the man thing out there, but he was putting a main word in front of the man, which was a white man. And if you remember at the time and it still is kind of going on, you know, the roles have reversed slightly where now there are way more prejudice against white men than any other race. Athenticity. Sorry, female, male, whatever.

And I thought it was really bright of him to put those words together, even though I don't consider him a white man at all. He is, you know, he's of Arab descent. Yeah, yeah, for sure. I wouldn't consider him a white male, but he was, you know, putting it out there. It's kind of weird because it's almost like the way the world describes white men as anyone that is not black, right?

I mean, that's basically kind of what it is. Even if you're Arab, I mean, you know, look at the media. You can be from India. You can be a Mexican. You can be Middle Eastern and be a white supremacist now. So basically, you are white if you're not black. I mean, that's literally how the media propaganda

bullshit machine looks at people outside of the black community as white. And it's just the easiest way to group an entire group of people against this one thing, which is who they're trying to go after for media purposes, polling, so on. So guys, I don't know if I should read this first or play you the interview. And by the way, the BBC interview, I want to make sure we're clear on this. Now, Andrew Tate was smart enough to where he actually recorded the interview with the BBC, with this reporter named Lucy.

He invited her into his house and, you know, there were no stipulations on the interview whatsoever, but he said, look, you're welcome to come here, but I'm going to say what it is. And whatever. So he invited his, or sorry, he invited the BBC in his house. They brought an entire crew. He recorded the entire interview, which is a very in-depth interview as far as Andrew's side. I mean, it wasn't as much BBC side because all they wanted to do was attack him, attack him, attack him, attack him, attack him. It was obvious that, like, when comment said on YouTube, she was a zombie of the Matrix, and even the screenshot of, like, how they took her picture, she was the most evil, like you said, looking woman ever. It was like she was a zombie. She was in this trance of the propaganda machine to where she was sitting there. She had 100% hatred for Andrew Tate or anyone that represents manly or men values or anything, like you said, white values or just not.

I guess, non-black or whatever to hell the cases. Non-trans, non-gay, non-whatever their crazy agendas, right? And so you could just tell this entire interview, she was nasty. This is one of the nastiest reporters I've seen in a very long time. Even at the end of the actual interview that Andrew Tate filmed, you know, when they were leaving, because she basically, a lot of gamers, if you know gaming terminology, when you get really pissed off in a game. Like it could be war zone. It could be Fortnite, whatever. There's, there's, there's always been this term for rage quitting. And what would be what they mean by that is you get

so pissed off because you're losing so bad. You rage quit. Throw your damn controller. Say I'm done. The people disappear and you never hear from them again. And it's kind of what actually happened to this interview. The actual full length interview eventually BBC said, you know what, F this, we're out. Well, Lucy said, I'm done. I'm out. And took her stuff out. Didn't even see. say, thank you for the interview. She just abruptly stopped it. Yeah. And it was so funny after the interview.

He was even like trying to shake her hand. Thank you so much, Lucy. Thank you, Lucy, for coming in. But there were so many times he's like, I wish you would have just done your research before you came and attacked me. Yeah. Which makes complete sense. Yeah, Andrew said, look, you know, instead of coming here and only asking me about rape and

rape and rape and you're a horrible person, you're misogynic. You know, they were basically saying he was a misogynist because of his sports cards. because of his wealth. And they wanted to down, they really wanted to cast a bad shadow on the fact that he was successful. This is something we are seeing so much nowadays is that if you are a successful white male or other male, I guess whatever the hell you want to call that,

but if you are successful in any shape, form or fashion, then you should, you're a misogynist, you're a white supremacist, you are homophobic, you are transphobic, you're a terrorist. These are all the things that want you to believe.

And why would you think they want to downplay and push down and ridicule people that are successful because successful people are not dependent on the government, which is what basically anti-communism is. Right, and that's what they want. Yes. Us to be dependent on the government, and I think that's a great, another point that you brought up

is he does preach about being against the Matrix, and his matrix is kind of the same definition of what we call New World Order. And he, yeah, and he definitely talks about a New World Order himself. as well all the time. Now, before we get in an interview, I want to read you, it's a brief, but if you look at Andrew Tate in any shape, form or fashion on the internet, you will find articles that basically ridicule him, that call him a rapist, that call him violent.

And so, for example, the Guardian, a huge paper, a huge media organization says, inside the violent, misogynistic world of TikTok's new star, Andrew Tate. Now, this was posted in August of 2022, so this was last year. And so this article says, Andrew Tate says women belong in the home, can't drive and are a man's property. He also thinks rape victims must bear responsibility for their attacks and dates women age 18 and 19 because he can make an imprint on them according to videos posts online. In other clips, the British American kickboxer who poses with fast cars, guns, and betrays himself as a cigar smoking playboy, talks about hitting and choking. women trashing their belongings and stopping or stopping them from going out. Now, all these things, by the way, everything they've said so far is all out of context because

I've seen videos of what they're talking about, which is all bullshit. They took a clip of a role play scenario, which we know for sure. Even the woman came out on Twitter spaces and said, this is bullshit. It was a role play thing that was completely, you know, that was, you know. So this is quote, it's bang. It's bang out the machete, boom in her facing. and grip her by the neck. Shut up, bitch.

That's what she said. Quote, this is what Andrew Tate supposedly said. Now, the reason why he actually said this, by the way, and the BBC actually even ask him about this, if you actually watched the full clip, someone had asked him or whoever he was talking to at the point was, what if a woman has a machete?

And he's going to try to kill you, Andrew, or whatever. And he's like, well, I grab the machete, you know, just dude of face, bang, bitch, whatever. Right, but they took it. They didn't even mention. the part that came before this, right? And that's a huge reason because if someone's saying, well, what if this girl, some girl you meet, whatever, she's crazy as hell, she comes to you a machete because Andrew's a kickboxer. And I think that's kind of how they were talking about.

I was like, well, you could be a badass, but if a girl has a machete, these are a type of conversations that these dudes have. I mean, it's like if you're sitting with your boys, right, and you're drinking your ass off and you're like, well, what if this girl comes in a machete? What are you going to do then? They have these conversations in public, right? And and so unfortunately, though, for someone like Andrew Tate, media can just take that clip to where you're just like, oh, I'll take the machete and slasher or, you know, bang your across the face and that, you know, and that's what they have taken. The BBC even ran with that, knowing full and well, that that was 100% not the context of what

that whole conversation was about. But yet, here this is the Daily Wire, one of the biggest, or sorry, the Daily Mail, or sorry, the Guardian, the Guardian, which is one of the biggest media outlets around the world, using this and trying to make everyone of their listeners believe that this guy is that violent that he would cut up a girl with a machete and kill her and potentially rape her. I mean, this is how bad propaganda media is. So even just the Andrew Tate thing, just imagine what they're doing with politics, right? I mean, you've got to think about this.

So anyways, I want to restate what he said. It's bang out the machete, boom in her face, and grip her by the neck. Shut up, bitch. okay and actually I even think the shut up bitch part was even after I've watched this video in particular and it's like completely taken out of context but he says in one video acting out how he'd attack a woman if she accused him of cheating now see this is how they're and this is not what the video implies now in another he describes throwing a woman's things out the window and a third he calls an ex-girlfriend who accused him of hitting her an allegation he

denies a dumb ho. Tate's views, sorry, I'm sorry, this is, whatever, Tate's views have been described as extreme misogyny by domestic abuse charities, capable of radicalizing men and boys to commit harm offline. But the 35-year-old is not a fringe personality lurking in an obscure corner of the dark web. Instead, he's one of the most famous figures on TikTok, where videos of him have been watched 11.6 billion times. Stiled as a self-seller. self-help guru, offering his mostly male fans a recipe for making money,

pulling girls, and escaping the Matrix. Tate has gone in a matter of months from near obscurity to one of the most talked about people in the world. And in July, there were more Google searches for his name than Donald Trump or Kim Kardashian.

So he was actually, at one point in time, the most searched term, period. On Google, yeah. Yeah. So what you have to understand and listen, I encourage you guys to go back and listen to our first Andrew Tate interview, because, I mean, interview, but podcast.

Because when we talk about Andrew Tate in this, we take what he has said himself. And I was not necessarily nice to Andrew in that. And I'm not necessarily saying I still am. I'm not telling you guys that he is what he is or he isn't what he isn't. Right. I'm just saying that I have taken clips of what he actually. has actually said in full and just said, this is what he said. So what do you think?

And I didn't, in that podcast, I don't believe, I don't believe I say that, you know, I know for sure he raped someone. But, you know, there are clues that can kind of lead to something that if someone's, well, he wasn't even actually officially charged. He was held in prison or a, you know, Romanian jail for 90 plus days with no charge, which is, you know, unhumanitarian. It is un, even though they don't have a constitution over there, apparently. But, you know, in the United States, that would be ridiculous, right? Right. But when we did play the first clips or the first podcast, we, in entirety, listened to all of his interviews in full. Like, we sat there all day and we listened to every interview from start to finish to gather our opinions about him.

And so I didn't like him a lot. Yeah, well, I think that even back then. there were some good points and there was also like the bad points. The only thing I didn't like was, you know, the fact, what I stated before is the whole relationship that, you know, not having the fairness, you know, of men and women. I get one person being superior over the other because that's how most relationships are, if you want to admit it or not. You know, you're not always on the same page.

Now, the pages could change and sometimes you might be more dominant than the other person, just in my opinion. But I think he goes with, you know, the man's. should be the dominant person in relationship. I agree with that. You know, but to the fact, you know, all the other things he was saying that that women are property and things like that, I don't agree with. We're not property if you're not property. Yeah.

No, I agree. And I also have to think about this, too. Apparently when this whole cancel thing started coming to Andrew Tate, he was getting huge on TikTok. I believe that is where he first got really big. Now we have to remember what the government and the United States government has been trying to do to TikTok by blaming China saying that they're taking all of your data. They're doing all this stuff. They're spying on you. They're spying on all these American citizens.

And then as we found out more about this TikTok bill as they started introducing the TikTok bill, then it was like an a aha moment or an aha moment, which was they made people believe that TikTok was a Chinese back company, which it is. Don't get me wrong. And they were using all of Americans' data and probably Australia and probably UK and probably Canada, whatever. But they tried to make you believe, oh, this is some, you know, this is a platform by the Chinese Communist Party. And they are taking all of our data and they're going to use that to do what? To infiltrate us. What are they going to do? They're already buying our farmland.

Exactly. They already control the basically world economy. I mean, we have a president and his son and all. all these other ones that have made deals with China and made apparently multi-millions of dollars off of Chinese connections, including Ukraine and all these other ones. But yet now all of a sudden we're so worried about China having your data. What are they going to do with your data? And number two, do you understand that, and people don't get this.

Facebook, Instagram, well, I don't know about Twitter, but I'm, I don't know. I hope I have more faith in Elon, even though I've had some issues lately. this is not the podcast for that but Facebook and Instagram and all the other social media, Snapchat, whatever, they all have subsidiaries of their companies in other countries in many other

countries and do not think that you, I mean if you think that they're not given your data to potentially China or Russia or whoever, we have no clue. And they can get around the rules very easy with these companies in their country because they can say

oh, as a company in America, we are not allowed to do this, blah, blah, blah, blah. But all they do is have their company from another country come get your information and give it to them. There's always loopholes through all this stuff. So whatever you agreed or allow on your phone or your computer, they have that information. So hopefully you're not fooled by that. Oh, they absolutely do. So I think the only thing to do right now, guys, is I want you to, and listen, and I will say this, We're going to do a couple things here.

We are going to play the actual BBC interview. It is 12 minutes long. If you guys have seen the interview or heard it, fast forward 12 minutes. We're not going to interrupt the interview. Hopefully there's not an ad, but if there is, we'll pause and skip it, whatever. But this interview is 12 minutes and 17 seconds long. I think you guys should listen to it because if you haven't heard the BBC's cut, they basically cut it from 40 minutes, which is what Andrew Tate and his film crew filmed,

on the sidelines, just the show. And Andrew Tate did elaborate and break down and do a lot of things and the questions, even though they continued to ask the same questions, it was a 40-minute-long interview, at which point the BBC rage quitted. It was like, F this. I'm done with this, dude. Refused to shake his hand, refuse to acknowledge that it was a good interview, refused all these things, even though she was the complete bitch. Anyways, so they cut that 40-minute interview down to 10 minutes.

Okay. And so what you're going to hear here is a 10 minute interview. And they're going to, although if you have not heard, which we're not going to play the full 38 minute interview, you guys can go check it out. And I will tell you after this interview, the YouTube channel, you can actually watch the interview. But the full interview. But just understand when you're listening to this, there's going to be cuts. You're probably not going to understand the cuts. It's going to make him look like he's.

either refusing or not answering the question or trying to move forward. But the reality is that in the 38-minute interview, he breaks down and goes deep into most of these questions and explains how they're wrong and lying and how they're propagandist and they're, you know, whatever. So understand that when you hear this. But I want you guys to hear this. And if you've already heard it or whatever, is this just fast-forward 12 minutes from this point.

So here you go. Here is the 12-minute, really 10-minute, but 12-minute interview from the BBC. and Andrew Tate, check it out. The BBC has questioned the controversial social media influencer Andrew Tate at his home in the Romanian capital of Bucharest. Tate is under house arrest and being investigated by Romanian prosecutors for accusations including rape, human trafficking and exploiting women, which he denies. The BBC challenged him on whether his views about women broadcast to his millions of online followers

harmed young people as many teachers and police officers claim. Well, the interview which had no set conditions was Tate's first since being released into house arrest from police custody last month. Lucy Williamson reports now from Bucharest. We are doing an interview with you because you're facing some very serious allegations. Correct. Rape, human trafficking. Yep. And also because there's a great deal of concern about the things you say and the impact that they have.

on young people, on women? I don't think the concerns about the things I say. I think the concern is for the level of influence I have and the reach I have. Let's start with the allegations. Have you raped anybody? Absolutely not. Have you trafficked anybody? Absolutely not.

Exploited any women for money? Absolutely not. But you have admitted using emotional manipulation to get women to work in the webcam industry for you. No. We have an open criminal investigation. I am absolutely not really sure I'll be found innocent. I know the case better than you. I know it intimately and you don't.

I have seen all the criminal files and the evidence against me and you haven't. I know the truth of what happens and you don't. And I'm telling you absolutely not really. I've never hurt anybody that the case that's been put against me is completely not really fabricated. And I'm never going to be found guilty of anything. And it's very difficult for me to answer your in-depth questions because we're sitting here inside of the territory of Romania. I am beholden to the Romanian legal system and I'm not going to incriminate myself.

Let me read you then what you have said about what you have done. Sure. you have said my job was to meet a girl, go on a few dates, sleep with her, get her to fall in love with me to the point where she'd do anything I say and then get her on webcam so we could become rich together. I don't think that's what I personally said. That's exactly what you said on your website. No, I've never said that. That's something that you found on the internet. Doesn't mean I've said it.

And again, once again, if any female on the planet has a problem with me, I strongly recommend her to go to the police and try and pursue me for criminal charges. I'm actually such a nice person that I've never had to you and come back. The BBC has spoken to somebody since your arrest who says exactly those things. That with you, it's all manipulation. There's an ulterior motive to everything you do. Oh, Sophie. The fake name, no face. I was so intent on wanting to please him and wanting him to be happy that I was just kind of, yeah.

I have to pause this because I just heard something that. Sorry. Okay. Sorry. I don't know what that. I don't know what I did. I have to pause this for a second. So for the people, fast forward and whatever.

When they ask him about this person or whatever, right? And then he says, is this Sophie? Is this Sophie? Pretty sure they're the ones that brought up the name and the people and all this stuff. And they tried to make him look like he knew who this person was and this was like a thing out there. I just want to say that was another very effed up tactic of what they did in this edit. But they've done it already so far. And you can also hear the cuts.

If you just really listen, especially it just cuts off and then she comes right in with another question. Yeah, you're right. Here's the rest of it, guys. Do whatever you want. And what is she accused me of a crime, this imaginary Sophie? She's making the point that there is a- Has she accused me of a crime? Emotional or psychological manipulation.

I've asked you a question and I've allowed you into my house. I'm asking you a question. Correct, but you're not the boss here because I've allowed you into my house. I'm asking you the questions. Correctly, and I'm telling you. You get to decide the answers. No, we're equal here. I've allowed you into my house.

You don't come here with a position of authority. I'm doing you the favor as legacy media giving you relevance by speaking to you. And I'm telling you now, this Sophie, which the BBC is invented, which there's no face of, nobody knows who she is. The BBC did not invent her. Of course not. Because you never invent anything. And she's not filed criminal charges against me. What are we talking about here?

What is she saying? We're talking about emotional manipulation into the sex industry for your financial gain. Absolute garbage. I'm describing women who are going to court to accuse you of rape and human trafficking. Sophie isn't going to court. And I'm describing women who have spoken to the BBC at length and other media organizations about what they say is emotional manipulation and coercion. And I'm quoting back to you your own words where you describe coercion and emotional manipulation.

The words you found on the internet and Sophie doesn't exist. On your website. In your voice. Move on to the next subject. No, I think I'll stick on this one for a minute. So there's other places in that same website where you say you get girls to fall in love with you and they do it because they love you because they want to do what you say.

Convincing women to take part in some kind of business arrangement doesn't work long term because they're emotional. You've got to get them to fall in love with you. That's coercion. That's emotional manipulation. That's abuse. What you've found are clips from the internet, some text from the internet,

and you're going to sit here and tell me that that's the reason I should be... Your website, your words. It's not my website. Yes, it is. No, it's not. Check my website. Next. It's the website you've taken down,

I wonder why those comments have been taken down. No website's been taken down. My website is the same and it's been the same for a very long time. You are accusing me, I'm guessing. What you're trying to say is you're accusing me and you're trying to say that I'm guilty of the things I'm accused of and that I'm emotionally manipulating people. I'm saying that you have said you emotionally manipulated people here

for your own financial gain. No, absolutely not. It's not only about the criminal allegations. It's a much bigger issue. You've got children's organizations in the UK. You've got rape organizations in the UK. You've got the police naming you by you. name as someone who has a harmful influence on children and on women in the UK and elsewhere,

because of the things you say, because of the way you present gender relations, the way you say men should treat women? That's very upsetting. And the reason that's very upsetting is because I know that's not true. I'm genuinely a good person. I believe my impact on the world is positive. The reason we're asking you about these comments is because we've got the chief executive of rape crisis naming you individually as people.

a dangerous ideology of misogynistic rape culture. Absolutely. It's the comments you make that are leading people to say things like this. Absolute garbage. National organizations who are saying that are blaming you for increasing levels of misogy, schools that are saying they are having increased incidents of girls being attacked, of female teachers being harassed by pupils because of you and your teaching and your influence. That's absolute garbage.

I have never ever encouraged a student to attack a teacher. male or female ever. I preach hard work, discipline. I'm an athlete. I preach anti-drug. I preach religion. I preach no alcohol. I preach no knife crime. Every single problem with modern society, I'm against. I'm teaching young men to be disciplined, to be diligent, to listen, to train, to work hard, to be exactly like me. And I'm saying that if men grew up like me, which are hardworking and diligent and emotional control and stoic, we're going to have a better society, not a worse society. To sit here and say that schools in England, England, which is a failing nation, which has knife crime going through the roof,

violence going through the roof, men's mental health going through the roof, and they're going to all blame me because I appeared on the internet one year ago. You sell an image of success. It's disingenuous. It's disingenuous. You sell an image of financial success with a Bugatti and a cigar, but it comes with a side order of misogyny.

How does having a Bugatti and a cigar come with a misogyny? I am asking you about things that you have said that have caused major national organizations, including the police, to worry about you by name. That's what I'm asking you about. I say. It's about what you have said that has caused such concern in the UK, and I want to put it to

you that you don't really care about the harm it causes because making controversial statements like this online has made you a lot of money. Okay, so first thing, I genuinely am a force for good in the world. You may not understand that yet, but you will eventually.

And I genuinely believe I'm acting under the instruction of God to do good things, and I want to make the world a better place. I genuinely believe my legacy is a good legacy, and I believe that eventually, when the legacy media catches up, they're going to understand I'm a good positive influence. I'm not interested in damaging the world for money, because if I was interested in damaging the world for money, I could have sold drugs, or I could make rap music and encourage everyone to stab each other like all the drill artists do.

Or you could make controversial statements online that attract a lot of followers who you then direct to your website where they pay to learn how to be like you. I mean, I could make jokes online. I could make jokes online. I mean, I could make a joke online. Are you saying that all the controversial things you said are jokes? No, I'm saying that these organizations and the BBC who are going to sit here and pretend that I am the face of damaging the youth is absolutely garbage. It's completely disingenuous. It makes you money. In fact, I've seen thousands and thousands of comments and have endless emails from women praising the fact, praising the fact, praising the fact that their sons are listening to me. Does it not worry you? The things I'm saying,

does it not worry you? Are you not concerned about your influence? It would worry me if I was genuinely damaging the world. But for you to sit here and say, Andrew, you become the most Googled man in the world, you have billions of views and one woman, one is now saying that her husband is, not the same man she wants to be. When thousands and thousands of people are saying the opposite, well, then I would say that that's... I've presented you with case after case after case, with quote after quote after quote,

of people who are genuinely concerned about the impact you're having, and you brush it off as if it's nothing. No, what you have done is come here with an agenda. You've come here with loaded questions. You've come here with things taken out of context. You come here with things that you don't understand her satirical. And then you're going to also sit and say that one woman said that her boyfriend changed when he watched one of your videos.

And then I don't know what you expect me to say to that. Caterical, sarcastic and jokes. That's how you explain the comments you make. Would you like to apologize for any of them? For you to sit down, for you to sit down, it's fine, no, it's fine, it's easy. For you to sit down and say that one woman said

that her boyfriend watched an Andrew Tate video and now he won't do the dishes. Schools. Or whatever your argument is. I'm somehow the worst, most dangerous man in the world because I have a car, is just disingenuous. If you actually watch the things I say, if you actually watch my comments about women,

I've done long podcasts for hours long about females, talking about protecting for them, providing for them, how I believe a woman should be treated in a relationship. I've done all of this. Andrew Tate, talking there to Lucy Williamson. Well, let's go straight to the newsroom, go straight to our education editor, Branham.

Education editor. And Bramon, I know that over the last recent while, you've been talking to so many teachers about Andrew Tate. How concerned are they about the stuff he pumps out? Matthew Teachers have spoken very vividly. of how they are deeply worried about how the language, the attitudes, the behaviors that Andrew Tate models in his content are having a far-reaching influence on boys as young as 10-11

and certainly older teenagers. That, they say, is translating into a culture where casual sexism is normalized in UK schools. All right, so anyways, I guess 10-and-11-year-old boys are given web, cam businesses going of their 10-11-year-old counterparts. I have to say, though, Chad, when you were 10 or 11, you were, we didn't have webcams, but you were calling the 1-800 numbers. If we did have webcams, I'd be on it at 10 or 11 probably.

Because you did pretend to be your dad and call those numbers and charged thousands of dollars on your mom's phone bill. Okay. Well, you didn't have to say all that. Anyways. Long story short, yes, she is wrong. Right. But that was also because, you know, back then you had these infomercials, right? And it was just like, you know, it was like, this was like, I was probably 11, right? So it was like right at the time. And I was like, okay, let's see these numbers. I got a phone. I got, I used to have the, well, here's the even more screwed up thing, right? This is the more scared of thing about like this is growing up in the 80s, right? Or not 80s. I guess it was early 90s. But, you know, so our house was decently small, right? But so my bedroom. was right across the hall from my mom and dad's bedroom.

And my mom and dad always went to bed late, right? I mean, they were bed 12 o'clock. They were not going to bed at like 10 o'clock, like older people, you know, whatever. So I would go to my bedroom like nine or eight or whatever time it was. And we had like a phone where you dial the, you know, the little... The rotary phone. Rotary phone. And it just so happens that mom and dad's rotary phone, because the only phone in the house at that point,

Well, there was a phone in the kitchen, and there was a phone in my mom and dad's room. And so I figured out that the phone in my mom and dad's room was long enough, the cord, to get across the hall into my room. So I would dial the number in. And then I put clothes over the cord so that they could not see the phone. This is so bad. I sound like Andrew Tate was talking to me back then. But anyway, so yeah. I used, I did, it was dumb.

It was like, you know, 11, 12 years old. And then it always said, the number was always like, caller, please state your name. And I was always like, because my dad was named John. I was like, John. I would be as low voice I could. And honestly, like that point, I didn't really know that it cost money until the phone bill came.

But I guess that's really bad. I'm sorry. But my point is, boys that age, are, you know, that's what they do. They look at Playboy. Absolutely. They sneak around and do things like that because that's what boys do. It's not because Andrew Tate's making them that way.

No. You know, all boys are like that or most boys are like that. Yeah. Which, I mean, you know, and look, the thing about this interview, and I think I figured out kind of during, as we were listening this, you know, I don't, yes, Andrew Tate went into detail in the 40-minute-long interview about many of the reasons why he, said that the BBC and the reports and all this stuff was wrong. And I got to be honest, we watched a whole interview, the 40-minute long, uncut interview. And a lot of the stuff he said, and if you go research and fact-check and kind of cross-reference all of that, you know, he's not wrong, I don't think, and at least criminally, from what I've seen. Although I do not agree with a lot of what he

says about the woman, man role. But I think it's one of these things, right? In 2023, you have men that are taking the roles of women almost. And sometimes in society, you have the woman that still just wants to be a woman, right? I mean, and yes, there are women out there. And there are so many of you probably listen to right now that are like, look, you know, I do a long career. I want to be strong and independent.

And I can be that. But that doesn't mean to your man. should take on the woman role either, right? I mean, let's be honest. Like, you know, the man still needs to be a man. And, but the thing is, the man being a beta male nowadays and a beta, aka more womanized version of a man is being normalized. It is being a normal thing.

And the government and propaganda media want to push this beta male, anti-alphal male thing. imagine this. Think about this for a second, and I'm playing devil's advocate as far as the BBC goes, right? And I can definitely talk about the devil's advocate for Andrew Tate's side as well. But let's take the devil's advocate side of the male version of whatever we have now. Imagine going to Africa, for example. You go to Sahara Africa, and you start influencing lions, these massive beastly lions that that have to these lions in Africa have to not only protect

their prides they got to dominate other lions because you either dominate or you die it's very similar nowadays especially the as we get in in 20203 and the violence and the crime and all this crazy shit that's going on you're either alpha or your beta but there are betas that can still cause massive damage we saw this in the national shooting we've we've we've we've We're seeing this with trans armies they're trying to put together, which is crazy. Although they're still very beta and very just piece of shit, these people. But they still believe they want to compete with alpha males, right? But imagine going to these lion tribes and trying to influence them with some bullshit that we're seeing today about being trans or not knowing if you're male or female or you should wear makeup and you should wear nail polish.

You should not worry about guns or meat or working out or being successful. Those are all very lying things to do. And you should not be a lion anymore. You know what I'm saying? Because at some point in time, when you start making those lions in the Sahara not be lions anymore, guess what? There's going to be a new predator that comes in town, and they're going to dominate that lion population, and that new predator that comes to town is going to be the government.

And that's going to be the authoritarianism. That's going to be the tyrannical people that are finally able to come in when you start reducing the population of alpha males, and which is exactly what they want to do. They want to reduce the military style mentality men, which is, you know, a lot of people always say the reason why China or Russia or some of these countries have not invaded us even still because of how inept our government is. look at our president. He falls every day. We got a vice president. It's complete, just dumbass. We have an administration that is just a shit show. But the reason why China hasn't just invaded us, like Russia has Ukraine or whatever the case may be, is because unless they want to use a nuclear warhead on the United States, which they know is going to be at all out nuclear war. But if China wanted to come and invade the United States right now, we have twice as many or three times as many weapons in this country as we do people. And we have,

And we have at least probably 40 to 50% of gun-owning Americans that will F you up and are just waiting on China or Russia to come and invade our country. Because, yes, we have our military, but we also have 50% of our population and are ready to fight and we'll F you up. And most of those people that we're talking about are alpha males that are still trying to be alpha males and are still protecting their families. They're still badasses out there. And this is something that Andrew Tate went a little extreme on in some of his teachings. his philosophies and his beliefs, but you've got to understand that the other side is going extreme on that you shouldn't be a male at all. Right.

And it's a bad thing. Exactly. And there are so many women like me that want that man to be masculine and to protect me and to know that I am safe, you know, with my husband. I want that safety net. You know, and you were talking about, you know, some women want to have their own careers and blah, blah, blah, blah. Absolutely.

But there are also some women that still. want to be home and raise their kids. Yeah, for sure. And I think, too, if you really think about when society changed, it changed when women started working. Because no longer did we have parents at home raising kids. Yeah, for sure. And I think that really ruined the foundation of what a family was supposed to be, you know, a mother and a father. And then you're going to have the kids.

The dad goes and works. The mom is taking care of and raising the children and teaching them how to be, a proper man or a proper woman, you know, and all that's out the door now because everyone has to work in order to survive. Yeah, and yeah, to your point, you're 100% correct. And then, you know, you start thinking about like, what is the problem in America? What is the problem with our youth? Well, if you look at the black community, for example, this is just, it's not an opinion. It's a fact. The black community has a huge problem with men not being in the household. Their fathers not being in the household. Their fathers are leaving the household. They're

part of gangs, some of them, and especially the inner cities or whatever the case is. And they're not leaving going to work. They're not present for the children. No, absolutely not. No, they're not, which is then not having an authoritarian figure, not a family environment, not a figure of a normal household. Plus, they're in a gang related or gang area to where they just want to be accepted, and especially by a male, which also the gang stuff comes into play. And keeps them safe. Yeah, yeah, it keeps them safe, which is what the man's supposed to do. all these authoritarian alpha type things. This is how these younger people, especially in Chicago and these inner cities, you know,

younger males want alpha males to raise them. I mean, it's very similarly to, you know, Saharan Africa, to where these lions, you know, the female is always there. It's like the caregiver. Lionesses are, you know, they're also strong and can kill you as well. Right. But at the same time, the alpha male, when this, when this, when this, is looking at that lion of a dad and that just going out there and just just just

ravaging something because you know whatever the case is this little cub is like I want to be this way like I got to be like my dad I got to be the line I got to be the alpha of my tribe but this is what I have to try to be so imagine taking that away from even the Saharan Africa imagine your cub is no longer seeing this he's only seeing the female side of things and and which is and I mean In some cases, not even seeing the mom, but their grandmothers are raising them. Yes, and I don't want to say this, and I don't want to upset any women when I say this, but we've got to be real as far as just biology goes.

But even if you took away the lions from this tribe, and so this little cub, this little male cub is growing up. And yes, although that mother, if the mother no longer has that alpha around or whatever, is going to probably be stronger than if she did have the alpha around, but it's still not going to be the same level of the alpha lion that is around. It can be stronger, but it's not going to be the alpha lion that's there. And so that cub and the generations following is going to keep growing up to be weaker. There's so many things in that. And I do truly believe there are roles in society. There are roles in biology. And it's not just human beings. It is in so many

aspects of life, period. It is. And even like you talking about that, it reminds me of our dog, our beagle. Chad is the alpha with the beagle. The beagle wants to be the alpha. He ain't. But Chad is the alpha. And I'm like, oh, I'm just closing my eyes. Like, don't spake him or, you know, I'm just the caregiver of the poor puppy where

Chad is going to be the one saying, no, you are not going to party in the house or whatever. Now, we'll say this. And I don't, I don't usually get personal on podcasts, especially here on substack. We do more so. But, you know, my thing is I am an alpha. And Sherry's an alpha as well. I'm a female alpha.

Yeah, she's a female alpha. But, you know, but I also know, like, if Sherry and I ever get in a shit, she's going to have my back. And even though I don't want her to have my, like, there was a situation we got into, which I'm not going to go into details about it, whatever. But it was, you know, a few weeks ago, we got in a situation where these other apparent alphas, which were in a little pack as they, you know, they wanted. The pack of alphas. Yeah, because they wanted to try to start shit with me. you know, over whatever reason. And I've noticed this, I've noticed this,

and I've thought about this before. It's like, especially people you don't know. I'm not going to be a beta, a beta in front of you because you have your boys or whatever. And I'm not an asshole. I'm never an asshole, but I'm not ever going to be a beta. I'm not ever going to be submissive or whatever. That doesn't mean I'm an asshole at all because I'm not.

I really try to get along with everybody. but also sometimes, you know, with other guys like that, I don't necessarily always click with them, even though I think that we're having a good conversation. But to them, it just seems like is something that clicks in their mind that it's like it pisses. I don't know if it pisses them off, but it's like a threat to them. You know, and I don't even know what it is, but it's like, and I don't want to say this the wrong way. But do you understand what I'm saying? And like, I've had this encounter situation many times.

And I've always wondered as like, I don't understand quite what the deal is. But I'm going to be myself no matter what. And, you know, and you have to understand that. But there are not many guys like that anymore. And I think there need to be guys like that. I mean, I think that you, for the guys that are listening, the 40% of you that are listening. And by the way, I talk to many of you guys out there. you reach out a lot.

And a lot of you are cops, a lot of you are law enforcement, or sorry, military. I mean, literally, so many of the people that reach out to us is military, police, whatever. So I know you guys are outfits, and I know you kind of have to be. But what I'm saying, it is weird. And actually in law enforcement, for those to be law enforcement guys that are listening, you should know in law enforcement is a huge problem in law enforcement as far as people getting in along, the structure of, you know, someone wants to be a badass because they're this or this, and not even ranking goes.

I mean, you could just not be ranked at all, and you could have an officer here, an officer here, and they just have very alpha personalities, which many police officers do because they are police officers because of that. They feel they're, they feel they're strong enough to be that. They feel they are alpha enough to be that. And so, therefore, when you have these personalities that clash sometimes, and, you know, And not all departments are like this, but many are. It becomes an issue.

But also in society, I think that society wants cops, male and females, to be betas. They don't want them to be alphas. They want them to serve and protect the community without being an alpha. And that's really a very hard position to be in. Yeah, but look, here's the thing, especially law enforcement. You can be an alpha and not be a piece of shit. Right. And that's the reality.

There are cops out there that are pieces of shit. You can be an alpha, but here's the problem. I don't think the alpha guys, the real guys that are alpha are not the piece of shit. Many of them. Some of them have some kind of something they're missing or lacking. Maybe they want to be alpha so they lash out to try to make themselves feel alpha, especially to weaker things or people, especially when they have the authority, to where they feel like they're behind a protection barrier, to where they can be more authoritarian,

but those same people, if you get them in a one-on-one situation with a random big dude and in the middle of a field, they're not going to be so authoritarian anymore because they don't have the power of the law enforcement behind them. Those are the guys you run into problems with. But the guys are very secure in their alfiness or their alpha male thing.

They don't have that need or urge to always want to. And those are the cool, I think. But getting back to your story, you did not even finish the story about being a female alpha. No, you are. No, 100%. No, I mean. What happened that night when they were starting crap? And I know that Chag can handle his own. And I know that. But me being a female alpha, I'm right behind him standing up. Like, uh, no, sir. You're not going to do that. You know, and no, Sherry is what she's saying is she's one of the girls that were going to get you in a fight as a dude. even if you don't want to be.

Well, no, I was telling them, I was going to fight them. But for those of you don't know, like, Shere and I used to spar, which we still do. I mean, we still, we do active drills in our house. We do a situation where someone breaks in. Well, situational awareness situations is what we do. Yeah, but we do scenarios. You know, we do home invasion scenarios where someone breaks in,

someone comes in, she knows her role, I know my role. We know what we're doing. It would be, it would be a bad thing if someone breaks in our house because they're going to die. I mean, period. They're not in their environment. And they're going to lose. I mean, period. Plain and simple.

That's like, that's like taking someone in a, that's like, for example, guys or girls, or especially guys, take your wife and put her in a call a duty match that she's never played call a duty before. She has or even take someone who has played games before, but never play call duty. I know the controls, but they don't know the map. They don't know the layout of anything. And then you put them against someone that does this shit all the time and understands it, knows the guns, knows everything. That's what you're doing if someone breaks in your house. That's the way it should be, by the way. And I want to encourage each and every one of you to make sure that you understand and know your map, which is your house, on a daily basis.

And I know we're getting a little off topic. But look, the whole point here is let's read some comments as far as this is what we need to. Yeah, that's what we need to do. Let's get back to the interview because this was really funny. Because we were sitting on our patio talking about it. I'm like, Chad, we really should do this. So then he was reading the comments to me. I'm like, we've got to read some of these comments because the top comments,

well, Chad's going to read them. And you're like, oh, my gosh, this is exactly why she should not have been like this. Because this is on BBC's website. Now, Andrew Tate, for example, he did say in the 40-minute uncut interview, which he recorded himself, he said multiple times to the BBC's, interviewer, you just wait until you release this and you go read your comments and see if people are on your side or on my side because they're not going to be on your side. They're going to see right through your bullshit and that is 100% fact. Now look, let's read the top

comments on BBC, which I'm actually surprised they even have comments on this. But this was 46,000 likes comment. 46,000. I've never got to comment that many likes. I have commented on YouTube videos. I got a lot of likes, but not that. The fact that, Andrew recorded this with his own camera to stop BBC from misreporting him is just genius. Another comment, I was a fan of Andrew. Now I'm a mega fan of him. He wiped the floor with this unprepared reporter. Another comment. Y'all didn't even give Andrew a chance, felt more like an interrogation than an interview. Another comment. She did an amazing job showing how the media usually predetermines a narrative and have little use for facts. Another comment. Honestly,

even the editors couldn't make Andrew Tate look bad. in post-production. Another comment. I just watched a 38-minute-long interview and was curious what the BBC uploaded, so I watched this one, and I'm impressed by how the interview was cut from 38 minutes to 10 minutes

in order to betray Tate as a horrible human being. This just goes to prove how the media cannot be trusted since they are not truthful and only want to create their own version of reality. The longer version interview shows how the interviewer was not prepared to have a conversation, but instead planned to just attack his zone. image and accuse him of being a bad influence on society.

Another comment, she did an amazing job by convincing thousands of people that Andrew is genuinely a good person. Another comment, as a teenage boy, I can confirm Tate's speech was a turning point of my life from a crybaby to a real man. Someone else says, I've come here from watching the full interview. It's incredible how the BBC has taken the 38-minute interview and cut it down. all of his answers to make it sound like he is to dismissing their questions and not keeping in the parts where he went in depth answering their questions, trying to make him look bad, of course. The BBC is losing all credibility, another comment says, absolutely disgusting conduct on their part.

That woman should be ashamed of herself. She has brought shame to her family. I wonder if she reads these comments. Lucy girl. Lucy's family is going to be pissed. Lucy's family is going to disown her. Because I knew it when we were watching the interview yesterday. I was like, oh my God.

The comment she's going to get is going to be incredible. Yeah. So this says, Andrew was polite, courteous, yet strong and tactful in this interview. This one says, I have literally never heard or seen Andrew Tate saying anything about rape or human trafficking. Literally everything I've seen from him has been positive and good. He is a good person for society. Now, I don't necessarily agree with that. I do think some of his viewpoints are kind of weird and effed up.

but this is my viewpoint and like I said I think Andrew Tate does go a little far right or not right but a little far on the other side extreme yes of what I guess the same way that they're trying to convince you to transvest sites are women and they should be in women's sports it's similar not me not even maybe quite that far but possibly maybe that far on the other side

I mean you have extremes on both sides imagine cutting out the part where she rage quit the interview that's that's another one Another one says, Andrew Tate is an absolute legend changed a lot of male's lives for the better, a true inspiration. Another one says, you know,

you can physically bring the studies and articles to him and show him the kids in schools are doing bad stuff because of they watch or follow Andrew Tate. The fact that she only says, children are misogynistic because of you, and we are supposed to believe it at face value, is ridiculous. If you watch the full interview multiple times and write down all the questions she asked,

you would be surprised how ill intent the interview was. So anyways, we have went through hundreds and hundreds of these comments and every single one of them were not bad, which is crazy to me. And there are women even on there. The women chime in. Look, it is a very complex thing. Well, and there were several comments on there saying that Andrew Tate really changed my life. I was in such depression now for the last 10 months. I'm going to the gym.

I have a new outlook on life. You know, I'm being positive. So there were some comments like that as well. Yeah, absolutely. And, you know, anytime somebody can get someone out of depression or some kind of mental health issue is, you know, I have to applaud that. You know, if you're helping someone to better themselves, that's a good thing. It is. I mean, but I also do see the potential downfall of, I don't know,

You guys, and I encourage you. Go listen to our first entertainer interview. I don't, I don't know. I have mixed opinions. I think that we do need guys that are strong and alpha and whatever to teach the men of today to be alpha. You have to have people like this. I do think at times Andrews, some of his comments or whatever the case may be was too strong. And when she said this came out of your words, yeah, well, some of it did.

Some of it did. Absolutely. I believe that. Yeah. It did because I watched the interviews myself. Yeah. So the funny thing is, so there was a BBC parody account that was created on Twitter, right? And so a parody is basically just a funny version of the actual account. There was another account by AOC that was a parody account. It was called AOC press release or whatever. And then at the end it said parity because Elon Musk made a very strong statement that said, you cannot imitate other people unless you have parity in your name. So then someone created a OC. and at least whatever whatever the hell her name is.

And so the funny thing is AOC was really pissed off about this parody account because they did it. They're doing an amazing job by just basically calling out how ridiculous she is.

So there's a BBC parody account. It only has 18 tweets which Andrew Tate and the Tate brothers have all went and liked all of their tweets since this parody account. has been created. But there's a tweet that says, the BBC is not happy with the documentary featuring Lucy Parody,

which is the name of the interviewer and Cobra Tate. So we are looking for some new bullshit to spread on his name. Maybe we should make another fake Sophie. Another one says, after a long discussion, the BBC had decided to fire Lucy Parity as she felled the mission and is a miserable person. We are looking for another dork in her place.

So what I found really funny, and guys, I got to play this and Sherry didn't understand I was saying. So remember the actual comment on the BBC parody said after a long discussion, the BBC has decided to fire Lucy parody which is this evil little bitch girl

or you know, sorry that sounds bad, but she kind of is. If you actually look at the whole interview. That's why you say be it should not bitch. Sorry. But it says as she felt the mission and is a miserable person, we were looking for another dork in her place. Now

there's a guy that commented on here Apparently this was some Nigerian interview, and I want to set this up correctly. It's only 20 seconds, but it's hilarious, especially understanding this. There's this Nigerian reporter. He looks like he's interviewing maybe someone from the Middle East. He's in a white suit, the Middle East guy, the Nigerian reporter's in a suit. This is like an official news broadcast somewhere. I don't know if it's Africa or wherever it's a Nigerian reporter.

but it's just what this Nigerian reporter is saying and it's how he's interviewing this person It's hilarious And they were saying that he should be the new reporter He should be the new replacement for Lucy Right And we're going to send him in to interview Andrew Tate So check this out here you go

All right here I'm going to restart to play Good morning Why are you gay? Who says I'm gay? You are gay. You are a transgender. What shows that I'm gay? You are a transgender and you are gay rights activists and unoutspoken lesbian, homosexual.

How can I describe you? You are gay. Good morning. No, he just said, sorry, he says, how am I gay? He's like, you are gay. And you are lesbian. You are a rapist. How am I rapist?

You're a rapist. You are a rapist. Oh my God. But the fact that someone was like, you know what? This is her new replacement. This is this dude. Anyways, guys, let's wrap this up. Well, we didn't get to the Elon's thing.

So maybe we should get to that. No, no, no, no. We got to do that. Yeah. So I do want to do it. I'm glad you reminded me of this. So Elon Musk went on a BBC interview as well. And Elon Musk kind of fends Andrew

Tate in this interview. And, you know, it basically is, and it's only a seven-minute clip, but I want you guys to hear it because Elon Musk went on BBC and BBC was, with this reporter, was doing very similar things that old Lucy was doing Andrew Tate. And what we have to understand is there's this narrative. There's this push, there's this agenda by the mainstream global media. And BBC is a global media company. There's no question, no doubt about it. If anyone is involved in propaganda, BBC is one of the, them, including CNN, including MSNBC, all of these news outlets you're seeing, we are finally awakening to the fact that these news outlets are controlled and influenced and infiltrated by the government 100%. They are the right-hand arm of the government. They are telling you what you

should and should not believe, period, plain and simple. If you look at what happened to Fox with the firing of Tucker, with a firing of Ingraham, I believe, and the firing of Dan Bongino, all these pro-America, pro-free speech, pro-patriotism, pro-democracy, all these people that are pro-any of that, they're firing these people. And they're using lawsuits. They're using all these things to do this. And listen, when I said that we were up against this massive machine, they are smarter than you think.

I mean, I know it sounds like a big conspiracy theory that someone would sue like Dominion for this to put in part of the deal with a Dominion voting thing. Tucker and probably Dan Von Gino and all these people are going to be fired to destroy Fox News. If you think that's a conspiracy theory, think about it. We've been talking about the show. We've been talking about the fact that I can't believe Fox News has been around as long as they have. I can't believe they've been not infiltrated over the past three years. And yet they finally are.

Fox News is dead. Any form of communication outside of what the propaganda wants you believe is dead, except for Twitter at the moment, even though it's not the greatest form, you got Rumble, you've got Sussbaum, you've got substack you've got some of these things but we really got to push everybody towards these platforms and we are on substack and we post our on substack and we are going to do the videos and the what is it called the fire side shots we just had a lot going on we're trying to figure we're trying to get that done but I promise you guys we're going to have that very soon and once we get once we get established we're there we're there and we really want to

establish a Twitter thing as well and someone actually mentioned I want to bring this shit up. Someone mentioned, it was like, oh, yeah, yeah, you talk about Twitter. Oh, and then, and then you talk about whatever. No, we talk about whatever is relevant to free speech. That is what we push, and that is what we're going to go to. So if it's Twitter, if it's substack, which we are on, we're on Twitter as well. Which Rumble.

It was just really hard for us to do. Well, it is, but I do want to start incorporating Rumble. We're going to start thinking about that as well. but we have to push the platforms that are free speech. Yeah, exactly. And so it's not like we're just trying to push all these other platforms. We're trying to make sure that we get all the platforms that really, truly are for the people. Rumble is a huge platform and a huge thing that is really relevant to us in the event we get banned.

But also, we really want to start incorporating. We've been working with Substack to get the video better, the video side of things, before we do the fireside chat. It's not necessarily on our side at all. It's just when we released the last video, a lot of people had issues, so we've been working with them to get that done. So I just want you guys to understand that is what we're working on,

and we're going to have that fixed and on there very soon. So just know that. But here's the Elon Musk interview with BBC. It's seven minutes, but he kind of defends Andrew Tate here and just listen to how they try to pin him down on the free speech saying. Trying to manipulate.

Yeah, all the same BS they use. used on Andrew Tate and and pretty much anyone else that comes on that is pro free speech or pro humanitarian rights here you go he were brought back do you think you prioritize freedom of speech over misinformation and hate speech who's to say that something something is misinformation who's the auditor of that well you said you've seen more hateful content but you can't name a single example not even one then i say so that you don't know what you're talking about really yes because you can't be a single example. Free speech is meaningless unless you allow people you don't like to say things you don't like.

Otherwise, it's irrelevant. And at the point of which you lose free speech, it doesn't come back. I think the issue some people have is that a lot of people were brought back. I mean, some people who were previously banned for spreading things like Q and non-conspiracies. You have people like Andrew Tate, who were brought back, who were previously. ban for things like hate speech. Do you think you prioritize freedom of speech over misinformation and hate speech? Well, you know, who's to say that something is misinformation? Um, who is the arbiter of that? Is it the BBC? You literally asking me. Yes. Well, no,

you be you are the arbiter on Twitter because you own Twitter. Yes, I'm saying, who is to say that one person's misinformation is another person's information. The point of which you said that this is misinformation, like, who is going to design that? But you accept that misinformation can be dangerous, that it can cause real world harms, that it can potentially cause...

Yeah, so the point of trying to make is the BBC itself has, at times, published things that are false. Do you agree that that has occurred? I'm quite sure the BBC have said things before that turn out to not be true. Right. And it's whatever it is,

100-year history. question. Yes. Even if you aspire to be accurate, there are times when you will not be. We've spoken to people very recently who were involved in moderation, and they just say, there's not enough people to police this stuff, particularly around hate speech in the company. What hate speech are you talking about? I mean, you use Twitter. Right. Do you see a rise in hate speech? I mean, just a personal anecdote. Like, what do you? I don't. Personally, my, for you, I would see I I get more of that kind of content, yeah, personally. But I'm not going to talk to the rest of, for the rest of Twitter.

You see more hate speech personally? I would say I would see more hateful content in that. Content you don't like or hateful? What do you mean to describe a hateful thing? Yeah, I mean, you know, just content that will solicit a reaction, something that may include something that is slightly racist or slightly sexist, those kinds of things. So you think if something is slightly sexist, it should be banned?

Is that what you're saying? I'm not saying anything. I'm just curious. I'm trying to say what you mean by hateful content. I'm asking for specific examples. And you just said that if something is slightly sexist, that's hateful content. Does that mean that it should be banned? Well, you've asked me whether my feed, whether it's got less or more.

I'd say it's got slightly more. That's why I'm asking for examples. Can you name one example? I honestly don't you... You can't name a single example? You can't name a single example. I'll tell you why, because I don't actually use that for you feed anymore, because I just don't particularly like it. And actually, a lot of people are quite similar.

I only, I only look at my following. You said you've seen more hateful content, but you can't name a single example, not even one. I'm not sure I've used that feed for the last three or four weeks. Well, then how did you see that hateful content? Because I've been using Twitter since you've taken it over for the last six months. Okay, so then you must have at some point seen that you've for you hateful content. I'm asking for one example. Right.

You can't give a single one. And I'm saying, Then I say so that you don't know what you're talking about. Really? Yes, because you can't be a single example of hateful content, not even one tweet, and yet you claimed that the hateful content was high. Well, that's false. No, what I claim is.

No, what I claim was there are many organizations that say that that kind of information is on the rise. Now, whether it has on my feed or not. I mean, right. Literally can't even one. And like the strategic dialogue in the UK, they will say that. Look, people will say all sorts of nonsense. I'm literally asking for a single example, and you can't name one. Right.

And as I've already said, I don't use that feed. But then how would you know that? I don't think this is getting anywhere. You literally said you experienced more hateful content and then couldn't name a single example. Right. And as I said, I haven't actually looked at that feed. Then how would you know this hateful content? Because I'm saying that's what I saw a few weeks ago.

I can't give you an exact example. Let's move on. We only have a certain amount of time. Wow. COVID misinformation. You've changed the COVID misinformation. Has BBC changes COVID misinformation? The BBC does not set the rules on Twitter, so I'm asking you. No, I'm talking about the BBC's misinformation about COVID.

I'm literally asking you about you change the labels, the COVID misinformation labels. There used to be a policy and then disappeared. Why do that? COVID is no longer an issue. Does the BBC hold itself at all responsible for misinformation regarding masking and side effects of vaccinations and not reporting on that at all?

And what about the fact that the BBC was put under pressure by the British government to change its editorial policy? Are you aware of that? This is not an interview about the BBC. Oh, you thought it wasn't? And I see now why you've done Twitter spaces. I am not a representative of the BBC's editorial policy.

I want to make that clear. Let's talk about something else. We want to talk about the BBC. Expenses went from 4.5 to 6, creating a $3 billion negative cash flow situation and Twitter having a billion dollars. All right, guys, we got a break in here because, listen, you know, he, this BBC reporter,

did the exact same thing that old Lucy did. You remember when Andrew was asking her questions because we're like, oh, let's ask what the BBC does here. And then Lucy's like, well, this is not, you are not allowed to ask me questions. I'm asking you questions. And Andrew, say, oh, wait, actually, and I want to play this. And I hope that this is the video, because guys, you've got to hear this, because I want

you to hear how propagandist, how the system, this, the systematic, if you want to talk about systematic anything, not racism, because there's no such thing as that anymore, but if you want to talk about systematic, let's talk about what actually is systematic. systematic about... Is this it? I think this is it. I hope this is when she says, this is not about me,

but I know Andrew Tate says, I invited you here, blah, blah. Let's hear what he says. It's short. Or not. I guess I got to unmute what I'm trying to play to you guys because I'm...

Because you have no time to actually watch my come to that way and understand what I'm saying. You have small pieces of paper, small clips on a piece of paper. You're trying to pretend I've said people think. And then you're going to say

I'm the most dangerous man in the world, which is truly laughing. Do you believe him the most dangerous man in the world, Lucy? No question. Well, then we need to change the dynamic of this interview because, and I'll make this click. I allow you into my own. I'm doing your favor.

I'm doing the person. You don't come here in a position of authority. You're not going to police. I don't respect it to see it. I don't know you. Okay, sorry. That's got some music, weird stuff in the background. Yeah, it's got weird stuff.

But anyways, so at one point in time he said, well, let me ask you a question, Lucy. Do you believe I'm the most dangerous man in the world? Blah, because she had mentioned this, she brought this up. And then she said, well, this is not an interview about the BBC. This is an interview of you. You're not asking me questions here. That's what she said. And he said, no, let's make this clear.

I invited you in my home. You were not the arbitrator of truth. You are not the whatever. You're not the tyrannical alpha, yeah, in this environment. You were in my home, and we're going to have a conversation, which is what we agreed to. And so anyways. But to Elon's point here, he couldn't name one example. He 100% was there on yet another hit piece by the BBC.

this is what the media does. And the BBC is a, it's probably one of the bigger international broadcast networks, even though it's mostly British and European and all that. But, you know, it's probably as big as, if not, well, I would probably say BBC is bigger than CNN and some of these others. Well, and guess what? Elon handed it to him. He handed it to him. That guy was like, he just wanted to say this interview is not going to.

the way I wanted it to. No. And the thing is, is that, you know, as Elon said, well, do you classify slightly sexist or slightly whatever, you classify it as hate speech? And that should be banned. You could not answer that, right? He only wanted, and this is what the media does. They only want to push the narrative.

It's much like headlines, guys. And this is why when you read headlines, any news organization can push a headline out there. And especially for older people or the most. mass amount of people. So I don't know what the actual numbers are as far as the population of, you know, I don't know. I would say 45 plus versus 45 and under, right? But if you just think about this, 45 plus, a lot of them will see a headline. They will, they will see a news flash or whatever. And it'll say Elon Musk pushes hateful conduct and hate speech on Twitter. Or

Elon Musk stops COVID or sorry. No, no, no. He silences fact checks on COVID misinformation. All of these things is a narrative. And by the way, there's a lot of new things coming out right now about nudges. And these nudges are minute things. It's almost like it's almost like subliminal advertising. And this is what they're trying to do now more so than ever.

and instead of just outright being and saying these things like, you know, vaccine is completely good still. Now they're doing what is called nudges. So they want to nudge you towards the narrative, right? They just have to get this much leverage towards you believe more than the vaccine than you'd not believe a vaccine. So you're going to go in this route. That's all they really have to do anymore.

At one point in time, they wanted to just go all out because there was no proof. there was no, none of this, so they could do this. As the proof's rolling out, they're going to still nudge you towards vaccines good. This is good. All these things are good, but the reality is, guys, is that I hope that we proved, and look, we did this on behalf of Andrew Tate, but it's just another huge example. Now, that does not mean that our belief on Andrew Tate is that he is the perfect male figure for males.

I don't know, right? I don't know. I think there are a lot of things that Andrew Tate needs to be saying and needs to be talking about to the mass male population, but I also think there are things that could be detrimental to the males,

but also if you think about this way, I mean, I don't know, do I want the things that Andrew is pushing that could be detrimental to males? Would I rather have maybe that? And I'm not talking about rape because that's bullshit. He's never promoted rape or whatever.

He has promoted like the alpha male, like the man's role, woman's role thing. But would I rather have that or would rather have my son listen to transvestites and drag shows and trying to figure out whether you're a male or female to where eventually maybe they kill themselves because they're so unhappy with themselves? They don't even know what the F they are anymore. You know, I don't know. But it's definitely going to be more on the Andrew Tate side than the transvestite side. and the and the beta male side and the never being manly and putting nail polish on and doing all this weird shit.

And the reality is, is like, I do, I do believe, I mean, I think I believe this, that there are people born gay. There are people born that like men and they're men or like women, they're women. Right, right. Absolutely, there are. But many of these gay people are not even into this whole movement. No, you're right. They're not with this movement. They could care less about this movement, and they don't even want to be included in the movement.

They were born gay, but they are born as gay men. Even though I think a lot of these gays, these lesbians or gays or lesbian, whatever, I think a lot of them are trying to be sucked into this movement, although this movement is far beyond what gay or lesbian is. And I do think there is a line here. And I mean, we can talk about the religion side of whatever and whatever, but I do think there are people born gay. But I also think there's a line, though, where people are not necessarily born gay, but they have some kind of mental thing or get wrapped up in a mental thing as far as a transvestite thing. And they don't understand what the hell they want and this and this and this. That can be from trauma. That can be from a lot of things.

but I don't think kids are born transvestites. I don't think. I mean, maybe some. There are hermaphrodites, but that is like the most minute case in biology and science of anything. And I'm not an expert in any of this shit, but I'm just telling you. And there could be like that Jade, the Jade girl that first came out as a transsexual. Not Jade. Jazz.

Jazz, yeah. But now she's regretting it. But now Jazz regrets doing all of that. and wants to go back as a boy. Yeah, it's because it was all for show. It was all for show. And also, Jazz was too young to make his mind up at the time, but because parents are letting children make their own decisions in.

And parents are pushing decisions on children to do things that they could regret the rest of their lives. It's messing up a lot of lives. Also, with media and propaganda, it's really cool to be trans now. It's in elementary school because you stand out. You're different than everybody else. You're cool. You know, it's a thing that right now kids think it's cool to be something they're not. You know, and if you think about in history, past history, the cool people, I think, were always the ones that kind of stand out, the ones that are not completely like everyone else.

But I just, I think a lot of it is based on parents wanting their children to stand out, children wanting to stand out. but in my opinion, no matter what you want to do, what you want to do, or not want to do, don't do these operations that change and permanently change these kids until they have adult minds of themselves. Yeah. You know, and you're not technically, you don't have an adult mind until you're at least 18 years old. And I don't even think you have an adult mind then. I think that it takes time to fully develop yourself as an adult. You're impressionable.

Yes. And at that time, if you still feel like that, then, go for it. Be my guest. You know, I have no, I don't care what you are. I don't care what anyone is, but I don't like the fact when there's a push to change

children's identities. Yeah, imagine this, to your point. And you said a push, right? We talked earlier about gang-related stuff, fathers not being in a household, kids adapting or latching on to male figures

or influences, like like, for example, in Chicago, well, there's no difference in this trans movement. And especially when the parents are the ones doing it. And when the parents are the ones that are also mentally effed up in the mind as far as what they have been taught, manipulated, and brainwashed into believing. You've got to think about, you know, it started in high schools. I know high schools are doing this. I know high schools are really big and awoke ideology.

Middle schools are starting to get into it. Elementary is not as much, but there are some elementary. schools around the country, they're also being part of this involved. And they're trying to go as low as possible to brainwash the society into this woke movement. And the higher up you go, the worse it gets. High school is now very woke. There are very many high schools that are going woke. And then you think about colleges nowadays. Most colleges are liberal colleges. They are crazy. If you think about any of these conservative pundits that go to these colleges to where they have to be escorted out, they're being attacked, they're being hit, they're being abused, they're being

assaulted through being all this stuff because of they're just there to promote American ideology straight or whatever that ideology is right like basic American values and in common sense you're seeing people being attacked so imagine when we talk about these black youth and not just black there are whites that are wrapped up in the gang life as well in Chicago and stuff these are these are young kids impressionable kids which are looking to latch on to a thing, to something that makes them feel important because they don't feel important, because they're from a broken household.

And I hate to say this, but a lot of the people, I mean, there's a lot of broken households in the people that bring up and want to inspire and encourage and brainwashed our kids into this trans movement. They come from a broken household, which in a lot of cases is why they become in this realm. They don't understand that they are. They want to really stand out. They want to get attention.

They want to do all this stuff because they're desperate. And so it's no different. But in this case, you have parents influencing your young impressionable, these young impressionable kids to be trans, to not understand what the hell they even are anymore. And so it's very similar to the gang life of where these young kids latch on to these gang members. Now these young kids are latching on their parents' ideology or their teacher's ideology of trans is good and straight is bad. White is bad. This is bad. This is bad. This is bad. It's brainwash, brainwash.

And then you wonder why these trans have one of the highest suicide rates in the country because they are taught and brainwashed this shit. And it's going against their biology. It's going against what they were actually born to believe and think and feel. Which is why you don't see a ton of actual people that are gay and born gay that are killing themselves. Because that is who they are. But there are also people that are brainwashed and to believe in this is who they are that then at some point in time figure out, Holy shit.

Right. This is not who I am. And the people that are brainwashing are a lot of, like you said, education. You go to college nowadays. I don't think there is any colleges that are not liberal-based anymore. And you wonder about companies like Bud Light is because all these kids coming out of college are coming out of college with these woke ideologies. And they're campaigning towards these woke ideologies.

And that's why places like Bud Light are getting these kids coming. coming out of college and doing these massive platforms of like, we're going to make money with this. Well, guess what's happening? It's destroying their companies. It's destroying their companies now because they're coming from woke colleges. Yeah, there was a BlackRock CEO, which for those of who BlackRock is, they own a shit ton of land in the United States. They are going to be a big part of the New World Order's movement to basically put all of people into urban and very close-knit quarters to where they rent everything. They don't own anything.

they take away their land. BlackRock is one of those huge companies that are buying up a massive swaths of land across the United States, along with China, and they are building these massive complexes of high-rise apartment buildings, which is what they're going to utilize eventually for moving everyone into these urban centers. And these, the CEO just recently said, we have to force this ideology onto people. We have to force this into, in particular, companies. And regardless of what we do, we are going to force this. This CEO just said this. And it is, is destroying these companies. These people are lost, they have completely lost touch with the reality of what people actually even think anymore. And guys, this is exactly why we do this podcast and we're not going to stop our fight.

Well, and also too, and you think about that Andrew Tate interview and you go back and you look at all the comments and all the comments are based on the fact that they are more on Andrew Tate's side than BBC. And I think also too, and we were talking about this earlier, Chad, is because people are finally waking up and seeing what is going on. And they're no longer letting government think for them.

And government's having a really hard time because they're knowing that they can't just think for us and make us believe what we want to believe anymore. So they're going to have to infiltrate in another way. Yeah. And, you know, and this is what I go back to. there's a lot of people out there that could believe Andrew Tate's a piece of shit. But I think these people are having to decide between Andrew Tate piece of shit or the Matrix piece of shit. And people were deciding, fuck the Matrix, fuck the propaganda. We are not going to be tyrannized.

I'd rather go with this dude, which could be a complete dickhead. But I'm going to go with this guy because you guys are worse. I mean, that is literally how bad shit has got. Right. And people are seeing this finally. Yes. And I think it has to do with more platforms that are becoming freedom of speech, in part, his Twitter is letting these things. And where was his interview anyways?

What do you mean? Well, I guess it was on YouTube. Yeah, I was sorry. Yeah, I was supposed to mention that. So, yeah, his full interview is on, I think it's, the Andrew Tate full interview. You guys can probably look it up. Andrew Tate, BBC, uncut. Let's see.

I'll find it. I know it. I'll see. Andrew Tate, full uncut. It's not that. It's not that. It was like BB. It was also like something, BSN, BSN network or something.

I think it's called B.SN. Yeah, BSN. If you guys go to BSN, Andrew Tate, BBC, you guys will find the full 40-minute interview. It is a, I don't know what BSN is, but it's just one of these other channels that promote Andrew Tate,

just like millions of other ones do still. But, you know, his channel has gotten almost a million followers now because, you know, he's just another one that promotes it. But guys, look, all this means is we're not condoning everything Andrew Tate says. I don't know that everything Andrew Tate says is taken out of context or not. We don't know. What we did want to expose is the propaganda and the Matrix, as Andrew Tate calls it the Matrix, which it really kind of is.

It is a mass sci-up operation of the New World. world order in the one world system to him to push their narrative and their agenda to the world whereas you are supposed to disregard and ignore all of common sense and reality and they're literally trying to push it so hard through mass media although mass media is dying because of it so the big question here is going to be how is mass media and how is this new world order and how is the matrix actually going to respond because what they're attack was, has failed, and yet there is actually a more sinister attack towards them, which is almost like a death blow to their massive machine of information.

And so what will be their attack? Will it be a nuclear option, which means full totalitarian, full authoritarianism to the point where they, look, I'm not even going to say it on here because I don't want someone to say, you're spreading all this crazy shit. But just think about it. If they cannot control information anymore and they are desperate on their goal, what is their next step?

What is their next step? You might want to think about that because it could be a lot worse. Right. That's all I'm saying. That's all I'm going to go into. You guys can probably pick up on that. By the way, I think I'm going to release

this episode first. And then I think tomorrow or the next day, we have a great UFO episode. We're going to be talking about the lights over Camp Pendleton. in California. This episode will release first. So guys, please make sure you check out that Camp Pendleton episode.

Please go check out us on Twitter. Look, guys, we're still on social media. We're on Facebook. But if you're going to follow us, follow us on Twitter, because Twitter is, I guess, at this time, mostly free speech, even though I think we're still censored and Saddle Band on there, which is crazy. I really do. And I'm not sure what the deal is that.

But anyways, and if we could possibly get Andrew Tate on this podcast, which I will reach out to him. I have not tried or whatever. I will reach out to him to see if he would be willing to come on this podcast and talk about it. We've done two episodes on it. I would like to ask Andrew the questions that we want to ask. And we're not against him. I want to ask him the questions that other people probably have, even if they believe in what he says. I would like to ask him those questions. You guys could help if you want to see or hear Andrew Tate on this podcast. Go to Twitter probably is one of the best ways. Go comment on his statuses. say, hey, you should go on the investigator's podcast.

They did a podcast on you tonight. You should go check it out. Whatever. If you want to hear him on this podcast for us to ask the questions that you probably want to hear, go do that. Yeah. Hey, you guys, you spread this podcast like he tells you to spread his stuff. Absolutely. Yeah, for sure.

And we would love to have Andrew on to ask him the questions. And you guys can even send us questions to ask him. And the best way to do that is on Twitter or send us a message or wherever. Wherever you find this, just type us in, send us the message. And we'll do that. But guys, that's going to be it for this. particular episode of Investigator's podcast. What in the hell?

It did this. It did this again. What happened last time this happened? I forgot. I think you just played the intro. Oh, look. See, it just wants to do what it wants to do. All right, guys. There you go.

Until next time, we love you. Peace out. And we'll talk to you in the next couple days. Yes, absolutely. Peace out, guys. See you later.