Investigate Earth Conspiracy Podcast - Charlie Kirk Assassination: Exploding Microphone Theory, TPUSA AI Video & The Truth Problem

Episode Date: June 22, 2026

The Charlie Kirk assassination case continues to raise major questions, and tonight we are breaking down one of the strangest theories circulating online: the exploding microphone theory. While the official story points to a shot from a distant rooftop, many people are questioning the footage, the audio, the reaction, and whether the public has been given the full truth. We also dive into the growing controversy surrounding TPUSA and an alleged AI-generated video of Charlie Kirk saying something very specific after his death. In a world where voices can be cloned, videos can be manufactured, and emotional moments can be digitally created, how can anyone know what is real anymore? Tonight on Investigate Earth, we look at the timeline, the official case, the suspect, the AI video controversy, and the theories that continue to grow around one of the most shocking political assassinations in modern America.Our Merch Store

Want to be the person that you call up when you're down. Want to be the first who knows all of your deepest secrets. Can I be the one who wakes you up before you missed your ride? Because I want to be close to you. And I want to show you something new. Every day I got your back. Hello and welcome to Investigator's podcast. I'm your host Chad alongside my beautiful wife, Sherry.

Tonight we're diving into one of the strangest theories surrounding the Charlie Kirk assassination, which is the so-called exploding microphone theory. And we're not saying that's what happened, but when a story this big has this many holes, this many unanswered questions, and this many people online slowing the footage down frame by frame, you have to at least ask why so many people are not buying the clean official version. And now Turning Point USA has only added more fuel to the fire. A video has put out showing Charlie saying something very specific, something that seemed to hit right at the heart of the story.

And then it turns out the clip was AI. So now the question becomes bigger than one theory. In a world where a man can be gone, the footage can be debated, the audio can be questioned, and even his own voice can be recreated. How are we supposed to know what is real anymore? Guys, welcome to the show. It is June the 21st, 2026. The name of the song is Flying Colors by Dexton featuring Sturzerzerberg.

And I want to start by saying a very happy Father's Day to all of the fathers out there. We are recording this episode on Father's Day. And Sherry, I know you wanted to say something. as well. Yeah. And first of all, I want to tell you, happy Father's Day, Babe. Happy Father's Day, you are the best stepdad in the world and you are the even better furry dog. Ferry dog, dad. Yeah. Yes. Our puppies and our kitties love you so much. And we are very thankful for you. And I also want to say happy Father's Day to all the great dads out there. Both Chad and I have lost our dads. So we are praying for people today as well because today is hard for people that have lost

their dads and can no longer celebrate with them, but you do have their memories and you will remember them. And I also want to say that I am also praying for the dads that have lost children because that is also a hard day for fathers. But happy Father's Day to everyone. Absolutely. Very happy Father's Day. And you know what, Sherry, it's so funny because we've done this show for what, eight or nine years now. And it seems like we're always, always doing a show on whatever holiday it is, whether it's Mother's Day, Father's Day. It's on Sunday. Not necessarily. Christmas. We usually skip Christmas, but there's so many holidays, it seems like we're doing a show on. But either way, guys, welcome, welcome. We promised you guys where we're going to talk about this on the last episode. We're talking about Charlie Kirk again. For those that do not remember that day for some weird reason, I don't know how you could not possibly remember that day, but it was absolutely very vivid for us because we literally went on the show probably about an hour after it happened. And I remember a witness and it actually happened in real time. We saw it on camera. We saw it on camera. like so many of you have probably seen the actual footage of the assassination and it was horrific and i

remember coming on the show uh probably an hour later and it was one of the toughest shows ever to get through just to talk about what we saw what we witnessed and then also just to realize the magnitude of the man that the world lost which was charlie kirk and you know talking about father's day he was a father himself he was a father of i believe two little girls and uh obviously the they're going to miss their dad for the rest of their life because of whoever it is that killed Charlie Kirk. Now, the official narrative and story is is Tyler Robinson. And we're going to go over briefly kind of the outline of actually what happened because I want this episode to be an episode that you could send to your family or friends or whoever. And we'll kind of recap everything that happened initially.

But then we're also going to talk about some of the theories and all of the conspiracies, not all of them, but the prime ones that have kind of survived. the tell of the tape, I guess you can say, especially over the past two years. It's almost been two years. This happened in 2025. And so let's go ahead and just break down quickly the overview. He was shot and killed on Wednesday, September 10th, 2025, during a turning point USA style campus event at Utah Valley University in Orham, Utah, which is just right outside of Provo.

It was roughly 39 miles south of Salt Lake City. He was 31 years old. The event was held in university's fountain courtyard and where Kirk was seated under a tent taking audience questions. The school surveillance allegedly captured the suspected shooter arriving on campus around 11.51 a.m. Kirk's event began around 12 p.m. and then in approximately 1220 p.m. mountain time while Kirk was answering a question about gun violence, a single shot rang out. Authorities have said that the shot came from a distant roof, which is the official version of the shooting. and at 1223, a UVU police officer radioed that shots had been fired and that Charlie Kirk is down. The public timeline was messy in the first few hours.

UVU issued an alert saying a single shot had been fired and that the suspect was in custody. Then Orm's mayor said the suspect was still at large. FBI director Cash Patel posted that a subject was in custody, but later posted that the person had been released after interrogation, and the investigation was still ongoing. Trump announced Kirk's death at about 240 p.m. and authorities later confirmed Kirk had been taken to Tenepoga's regional hospital where he died. And I know I definitely just butchered that name. Now, when everyone came out and said they had a suspect in custody, it was because of someone in the crowd that was saying, I shot him.

I shot him. And this guy, which seems to be pretty famous in major events, I mean, including 9-11. He was actually there the day of 9-11. he has been at other, I think he has been at one other assassination at either attempt or an actual assassination before. And it seems like he is for whatever reason, always there to run cover or to be an adversion for police to look at him. Now, will that ever come out?

Will the full details of, you know, who he is, who he's connected with? Will that ever be known? We don't know. But what we do know is that he was one of two people that day at UVU campus that when Charlie was either shot or whatever happened to Charlie that day, which we're going to talk about on this show, that they made sure all the attention was on them to the point where that's where all of law enforcement ran to, allegedly to either get the attention on them so that the shooter could then run away or maybe even whatever was going on where Charlie Kirk was for the attention

to be diverted away from that. We don't know. But it also all depends on what the actual narrative of the story is. Now, guys, the official narrative is that Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk from a rooftop with a single gun shot 30 a 6. That is what we heard from the very beginning. And obviously, since then, there has been so many YouTube videos of gun experts and you name it that have tried to disprove that theory, especially considering the fact

that a 30-a-6 round is extremely powerful. It can go through an entire moose, including flesh and bone. It literally shatters and destroys bones. and then usually continues out the other side of a moose. And we're talking about a massive mammal. And I've even seen actual videos showing that they actually had a moose carcass. This was one of the latest videos I saw. And they shot at 30 out six from about the same distance that they're saying Tyler Robinson was at on the roof of this campus.

Well, this bullet entered the left shoulder of the moose went all the way through the left shoulder, completely shattered his shoulder, all of the bones in there, went through his chest cavity, and then out the other side. of his shoulder also shattering that bone leaving a large gaping impact or not impact but exit wound on the backside and yet they're trying to tell you that this 30 out six round came from the roof went into charlie's neck and then somehow you know shattered inside of charlie's body because the doctor said that charlie had bones of steel like superman yeah that's crazy and they said it didn't exit i've actually seen videos where they have shot the same bullet through cylinder blocks and it demolished the cylinder blocks and came out cylinder you mean like concrete blocks yeah no absolutely um and so the official narrative is just very strange and a lot of people

have said like this just doesn't make a lot of sense and especially when you're trying to tell us that it was a 30 out six and then you also had some videos where there was a reporter that was sitting near the grandfather now the grandfather was allegedly the grandfather that gave Tyler Robinson the gun and this reporter was recording through audio outside of a, I think it was one of Tyler Robinson's hearings. Tyler Robinson's grandfather was sitting outside the courtroom next to the reporter and she starts a conversation with him and in the conversation, he says he does not think that Tyler did this.

He thinks that something was set up or something was not right about the entire situation. And of course, obviously the mainstream media has tried to tell you that Tyler Robinson's family is the one that turned him in. They all knew it was him. you know, he had confessed the whole nine. Now, the suspect, obviously, Tyler James Robinson was 22 at the time on September 11th. The FBI released images of a person of interest and police also released video of someone moving across the roof area from where the authorities say the shot was fired.

And then according to charging documents cited by AP, Robinson's mother recognized him from the released image. His parents confronted him and the family helped persuade him to surrender through a family friend who was a retired sheriff's deputy. At about 8.02 p.m. on September 11th, Washington County Sheriff, Nate Broxby, reportedly received a call saying the family knew the shooter's identity was trying to convince him to come in peacefully. And that's around 9 p.m. Robinson turned himself in with his parents at Washington County Sheriff's Office. Now, the Utah County Attorney's Office charged Robinson with aggravated murder, felony discharge of a firearm, causing serious bodily injury, obstruction of justice, and witness tampering. The charging document says prosecutors believe Robinson intentionally or nobly caused Kirk's death on September.

September 10, 2025. They also alleged Robinson concealed or removed the firearm used in the shooting, removed or destroyed clothing he wore, and told his partner to delete text messages and stay silent if questioned. AP reported the prosecutor said they had hard evidence including an alleged text message confession and note saying they had the opportunity to kill Kirk and was going to take it. And so where the case stands as of right now, as of the latest reporting, Robinson has not yet entered a plea. Prosecutors still intend to seek the death penalty and the case is still in pre-trial proceedings. A major current fight is over courtroom access, media coverage, evidence, and whether the defense can block prosecutors from seeking the death penalty. A key hearing is scheduled to begin July 6, 2026, where prosecutors must show that they have enough evidence for the case to move forward to trial. Now, AP describes that as the most significant evidence presentation so far because much of the case up to this point has been dominated by arguments over media access, courtroom cameras, and pretrial fairness. So it sounds like the July 6th hearing is going to be the evidentiary hearing where they're going to try to present as much evidence as it can to show that Tyler Robinson was the shooter of Charlie Kirk.

So that's just kind of to give you a brief overview for anyone that kind of forgot or just needed to kind of get the timeline in her head again before we cover this. Now, obviously, after all of this and many months later, we have had fighting between Candice Owens and, and basically anyone that is questioned the narrative of the shooting with Turning Point USA. And of course, then there's also the Erica Kirk thing. We all remember, or those that watched the actual, I guess you can say, celebration of life of Charlie Kirk at the huge stadium in Arizona. It was almost more like a MAGA rally or some kind of Republican conservative rally more than it was a celebration of Charlie Kirk's life.

I mean, they had fireworks. They had all of this stuff. and it was just so glamorous. And, you know, you had Erica Kirk coming out. And that's when everybody really looked at Erica Kirk and was like, is this girl real genuine or is she not? Because it just didn't seem, it just didn't seem right. It seemed like she was playing a part. It seemed like she was acting from the crying to the tissue and the way that she would look up and look down and do all these things.

It was so performative. Right. And obviously, she is an actor. She's been in many things. She's been a reality TV show. She's been in CIA videos, not to mention multiple of those for whatever reason. And everything almost that she has done since then has been very, very weird and performative. And there's all these memes and there's all these videos that show Erica Kirk like talking and discussing, especially the people that are questioning anything, especially Candace Owens.

And then when she'll look down and like give you those evil eyes like. Yeah. And even when she was having a like Zoom call with all the. turning point employees. She's like, look, everyone shows their grief differently. Just because I'm not boo-hooing right now doesn't mean we don't have to get to work. You know, and then she went on to talk about how many t-shirt sales they were up because of Charlie's death, you know, and yeah, people do grieve differently, but this grief is like no grief.

Yeah. I don't know because I'm just saying if something happened to you like that, I don't even know if I could be on a Zoom call two or three days later and talk about the T-shirt sales, I would not give a damn about the T-shirt sales at that time. Yeah, and not only that, like the very beginning of that Zoom call, she's like laughing and just living it up. And then someone, you know, some of the people start joining. And then all of a sudden she kind of turns it around like she's sad again, sort of, but not really.

And then she goes into like you said, talking about the business aspect of it, how much money can we make? The T-shirt sales are up. Holy shit. We're doing great. all of these things. And then kind of in light of recent events, it sounds like Turning Point USA is under investigation for various reasons, including fraud.

There's also some type of tax issue because they are a nonprofit and yet they're raking in as much money as they possibly can. They're using it for all these various things. And then it was about two or three weeks ago. That Turning Point USA, after so much heat, after so many people on the internet were saying, like is Erica Kirk qualified to be the actual CEO of turning point USA who put her in charge would Charlie have wanted this all of this stuff and so then they released this video and this is a very quick part of the video that there's it's it's about probably like a i don't know

a 30 second video in total but this is actually the part that had everyone question whether or not this was real and this just listen to exactly what charlie kirk here says I want my wife to run turning point USA if something happens to me. Erica would do a great job. So there you go. He says, I want my wife to run turning point USA if something happens to me. Erica Kirk would do an amazing job is basically what he says. Now, so then when they released this, we had people like Graham Allen and I think Dan Bonino

and so many others that were posting saying, see, and this was actually Graham Allen's post. And Graham Allen actually went to work with the Trump and. administration. He was a political commentator before, just like Dan Bongino, but then he went in to work in the Trump administration. He has been one that is 100% on been on Israel's side of everything. He has been basically against anyone that says anything about the Epstein files or Israel or even questions to Charlie Kirk assassination narrative. He's that guy, just kind of like Dan Bongino. And so it was on June 5th, 2026, when they released this video, Graham Allen, and I believe it was

also Dan Bongino. I think Dan Bongino has since deleted his actual post, but Graham Allen has not. And he says, Dear Candace Owens and all of your demonic cult members, here's your video proof that Charlie appointed Erica to lead turning point USA if something ever happened to him. Choke on that, you demons, is what he says, right? And it was just showing the video of him saying exactly what you just heard. Now, Patrick Bet David. Now, Patrick Bet David has been also kind of one of those people, the Dan Bonino crowd and the Graham Allen's and whoever. And so just the other day, it was hilarious because one of Patrick Bet David's co-host, and I cannot remember his name right now, but either way, he's the guy that's like all MAGA. He's all conservative, all patriot. He actually brought this up to PBD.

And it was like, hey, did you know that video they just released is just complete bullshit? Listen to this. It's about a three-minute clip. But it also highlights that not only did they release this, they had to come out, turning point USA and actually say something about this video. So listen. This is real and you put AI and you're lying on your dead friend's name. Vinny, what is going on with this TPSA story?

In this montage, they play and they purposely put it in there, a fake AI video of Charlie Kirk saying if something happens to me, everything could go to Erica. Can you please play this video? Play this part. Passion, and now his mission is my mission. I appoint my wife to run turning point. Erica would do a great shot.

Okay. Are you guys ready for this? That is AI, and that was fake. And they purposely put that in there. And then, Pat, once it came out and the internet did its thing, and they found out that it was fake, this is Andrew Colvitt. The, was he, is the executive producer of the Charlie Kurt Show? I don't know where he's at in Turning Point USA. This is them getting caught and then having to play defense.

Play this video. We decided over the weekend we were going to troll the trolls. There's this video that has become a source of controversy. Just obsession from bizarre people. Yeah, just absurd. I don't even talk about it because I think the whole thing is so lame. They demand overwhelming proof for the idea that Charlie loved his wife and would want his wife to carry on his mission. Yeah.

Well, it's something he told all of us. We all knew. We didn't talk about it because we thought Charlie's going to be with us for another 50 plus years. But like we all knew. The board knew. This was the plan. Whatever. he said it one time in front of a camera at a private event with donors in Aspen.

So we just thought we figured we troll the trolls. Yeah. And you get a little taste of it here. The most important relationships in your life is the one that you have with your Lord's Jesus Christ. Their passion was my passion. What's AI going? Ready?

Ready? Right there. That's fake. Erica would be a great job. That's AI. How do you know that's AI? They just admitted it. Let me hear it out there.

But then. So we knew that it was going to be like, oh, it's AI or it's fake or whatever this. Because that's what they do. They always move the goalpost here. And that's why it's a sucker's game to even play this. But it was really fun to be able to troll the trolls, she's tough it in their face. They put that in there. That's not real.

When the evidence was shown. I don't know if he said it's AI. He's not saying it's AI. What do you mean? We got caught. Pat, they're saying that they were trolling the trolls. Is that what he's saying? Yes.

that that that that's not so do me favorite go under the tweet and go and check to see if grok says somebody probably would have asked the question i first want to qualify if that was a yes the specifically expert was presented as an ai generated or manipulator video of the organization okay so perfect so then let's go through it so it is it was it is a yes so specifically the part where he's talked about yes and by the way if you watch the video the lips don't match the words you know it's not that hard to do if you watch the video the lips don't match the words you guys lied fake AI, fake voice, fake Charlie, and then you're acting like, no, no, we were trolling. I don't believe them. Yes, there you go. That is insane, right? I mean, the fact that Turning Point USA would put out a video

that they thought they could get away with, right? Because it was just that three second part where Charlie Kirk says, if something happens to me, I want my wife to continue on and basically get in or take my footsteps and continue to run, turning point USA. She would do a great job.

And then they had no choice but to come out and say, oh, we were just trolling the trolls. Yeah, they weren't trolling the trolls. And if they wouldn't have got caught, they would have kept that video up and said, see, here is proof that he wanted Erica to run this organization. And I'll go a step further. I mean, I'm just wondering now, was it AI that Trump put Erica Kirk in charge of veteran affairs, some kind of thing that she's in charge of for the White House? Like, where is her qualifications to even be in these positions? Just like, wasn't she in a position with like a bunch of preachers or something? Oh, I don't know.

Like all, I mean, she gets in all these positions. She does these CIA videos. She is now helping the White House and she's doing something with the veterans. And she's done all these other things. But when you go back and when you listen to Candace Owens going through her accreditations and her school, career and everything. Her resume, basically. Yeah, her resume and everything she's done.

She's not qualified to do any of this. And is she even qualified to run a company of this sorts? Well, I mean, it's kind of like, you know, you think back to old Jeffrey Epstein. He wasn't qualified to do a damn thing either. Yet he was in charge of trillions of, you know, political leaders and also executive and elites money. And it was all because the government, CIA and most likely predominantly Mossad is the one to put him in these positions to pivot him.

him in places that they could use him. Now, very similarly to Erica Kirk. This is what they do. And I'm not necessarily saying that Erica Kirk is CIA or whatever, but we've always heard throughout history, especially if you go and talk to anyone that has been in the CIA or any intelligence agency about honeypots. That is one of the number one things that CIA assets traveling abroad have to be extremely careful with is honeypots.

Because although, yes, you may think that you're in another country and you may think that your cover is not blown or whatever, other countries also have intelligence agencies that are always constantly looking at who potentially is there as a spy. And when they do potentially identify a spy, they'll send their honeypots, these beautiful women that are very provocatively dressed and very smart in most cases to identify whether or not these people are assets or not. Because it's easier for honeypots to identify that than it would be obviously if an intelligence officer, a guy comes up to them and just strictly, you know, simply ask or they start trying to investigate. It's a lot easier to send some very beautiful woman to try to get into that person's

life or to try to figure out what they're doing to use their beauty to do this. It's also a lot easier to manipulate guys, even if they are CIA assets, if you are a very beautiful woman. And that's why they use honey pots. Now, could they have used Erica Kirk? Could someone have used Erica Kirk to get in with Charlie Kirk? And then, of course, you got to say, well, damn, they got two kids. You know, they had a family. They had all this. It obviously doesn't appear. hear that she's a honeypot and you may be right but and she may not be but we also don't know necessarily like at you know what point could she have become a honeypot and like how strong actually was charlie and erika's relationship those are all things we don't really know erika kirk was

always seeking the limelight since you know a very young age she went on reality tv dating shows I believe. She just wanted attention at all possible. And it seems like she did everything in her in her history to do that. And so obviously the question goes with like, is Erica part of a bigger system? We don't know. We've never really covered that or talked about it.

But I'm just saying that she does seem, it just seems, she just don't seem genuine to me. Right. And almost anything she ever says. And it's crazy because even our FBI director, Cash Patel, his girlfriend was accused of being a honeypot.

as well. And it seems like people with influence, that's who they direct these honeypots too. And it was really crazy because last night I watched this whole series. It was so great. It was called The Beast in Me. Yeah. But anyways, long story short, the main object of the movie towards the end, and I think this girl was a honeypot. And she ended up marrying this murderer and getting pregnant.

So I think that is possible that honeypots do end up in a like a. like a situation for years sometimes and build families based on something that's false. Yeah. But you also have to understand. And I don't think most people do understand this about how big Charlie Kirk's reach was. Like how big Charlie Kirk's influence was. And he was changing an entire generation. I mean, he was in large part.

And the reason, one of the main driving reasons that Trump was elected in 20, 24. Obviously, you had the podcast society that also helped prop up Trump in his run to 2024, but Charlie Kirk and Turning Point USA was a massive reason. And we have to obviously also talk about the fact that, yes, Charlie was absolutely changing his views on Israel leading up to his death. He had said that multiple times, not just in text messages, in group text messages, but he was also saying this on various podcasts from Megan Kelly to other shows that he had been on. And so there's obviously the conspiracy that maybe it was Israel that had Charlie Kirk assassinated. And we don't know whether that's true or not.

We do know, though, however, that Charlie Kirk had said multiple times that his security staff were Israelis. Most of his team that was around Charlie Kirk that day and also leading up to his assassination was either ex-Massad or ex-IDF soldiers that were part of this security force that Charlie didn't pick himself, by the way. someone said, hey, this is the best guys you could possibly have on the planet. You need these guys. And that's who he went with, right?

But the question is, is was Charlie Kirk killed with a 30 out six or not? And one of the leading theories outside of the 30 out six and a firearm is the exploding microphone. Why the exploding microphone? Well, there's a guy, which I'd actually reached out to. It was just way too late. We were planning on doing this tonight. And hopefully we can get him on in the next few days.

And if we can, we will. but this guy has broke down and analyzed literally everything and his job is kind of in that whole realm explosives and all this stuff and as he slows down everything and starts seeing like the energy dispersion and all this stuff and the way explosives work versus bullets all of that yeah you can see it seems like at least from the analytical part of it where all the videos are slowed down the energy dispersion once he's actually hit all of that it absolutely does not appear appear to be a gunshot. It,

um, you know, it shows his shirt coming up and, that was one of the first things I ever noticed was his shirt started rattling around. And I was like, is it because of the gunshot to his neck? Well, I don't know.

I mean, it's very unlikely considering the fact that they're saying that this gunshot came from a roof top building, which was a downward angle where it would have hit his neck coming from up top down. But yet his shirt is moving from down. to up, which means the energy was coming from the shirt area and moving upwards. It was not coming from down below. You would have saw the shirt shrink down or at least shoot down, but likely a bullet

and the velocity would not have caused that shirt to move all the way down, his necklace to go above his head and then snap. It didn't break, by the way, that Charlie's necklace did not break at the clasp, which is the most obvious way the necklace would break off someone's neck. This particular chain, they know what kind of chain it is. This guy even analyzed this. This chain was a very durable chain. He found what exact chain it was because he had asked some people that knew Charlie.

Charlie always wore this one particular chain. He found the chain. He saw that the strength it would have taken for this necklace to break, especially where the chain itself connects to each other, right? Chain, chain, link, the chain links. The amount of energy would have been that you would have had to really pull on that chain hard. Now, if you pulled on the chain, it would break from the class. It would not break from the actual necklace itself.

Obviously, if any of you have ever broken necklace, that's usually where your necklace is breaking is from the clasp. But his necklace actually broke like towards up above where the microphone actually was, right? That's where his necklace broke apart. As it was coming up. Yeah. So as the energy from the microphone area was coming up, that's where the necklace actually broke.

It actually broke and went above his head and over his shoulder. They want you to believe that a gunshot that hits, his neck would have broke the necklace went above his head the shirt would have came from down to up none of that seems logical and if you look at the actual facts and look at everything that everyone's done to analyze that and especially people that know explosives it just doesn't make a lot of sense so what i want to do is i want to play this video and uh canis owens had broke this down about the exploding microphone the reason why exploding microphone can make some sense here and especially knowing that his entire security team for the most part was Israelis is because you get to think back to the pager

incident with israel and the sod where they intercepted that pager shipment to humas and they basically put they planted very small amounts of explosives in these pagers most of the pagers didn't even kill any of these people they just maimed them or or blew their balls off but the fact that someone could do that and get away with it it tells you number one that's possible but number two it's actually been done many times before and it's not that hard to do it. There's a new explosive out there that is very easily installed in electrical devices that can then trigger from signals or whatever it is. And so that's why maybe his microphone is actually what exploded that then shot something

up in his neck that killed him. Yeah. And isn't it just crazy that after the pager incident, Bibi sends a golden pager to Trump as like, a trophy maybe or is it something else? And I wonder if somebody does something like that with pagers, then could they do that with microphones? Yeah, they can. So let's go ahead and get into this Candace Owen's clip. Listen. A gunshot. This is N.I.J. 4 rated glass from a 30 out six. It's about the same clip I am there. It's about the same as a gunshot from a 30 a six. buckle up, ladies and gentlemen, because we are going on a journey, which actually begins on

August 23, 2022. There was a man named Mark A. Leaty, and he died in a rather bizarre accident. The initial story is that he was in his backyard messing around with his burn barrel when something suddenly exploded. And they don't know what exactly it is that exploded in that burn barrel, but something did and caused a piece of shrapnel to hit his neck and end his life. Mark Leedy was just 48 years young. Take a listen to local news coverage of the event. It's being called a freak accident, a healthy, active 48-year-old killed when something inside the burn barrel he was using ignited, causing an explosion, sending shrapnel flying through the air. It's heartbreaking. It's heartbreaking.

Chris Leedy is still trying to process the death of his younger brother, Mark. He was burning papers or whatever. This was the story that I got, and something was in there. Something exploded and a piece had come up and, you know, that was it. I'm still in shock. At some point, I will try to put my arms around it, but at this point now, I can't. The Leidy family still doesn't know what ignited inside the barrel that caused that explosion. How curious. Okay. His neck hit with a piece of shrapnel from an explosive.

You can obviously tell that his brother has questions about that narrative. And he wasn't the only one, by the way. Mark Ledy's best friends had questions as well. One of his friends in particular, who he had known since high school did not fully accept the burn barrel narrative. The first reason was due to what Mark Ledy did for a living. Mark Ledy, not mentioned, he, here in that news clip was a supervisor for a company called SureFire Wireline LLC. That is in Kittening, Pennsylvania. Sure Fire Wireline works with oil and gas companies and they specialize in what's known as pump down perforating for oil and gas wells.

Don't worry, I'll explain it to you. You don't need to know much. Essentially, what it means is that they punch holes so that oil and gas can flow through horizontally. Okay. Now, why am I telling you that? Why do we need to know about that? Because that technique requires the use of a very specific explosive known as P-E-T-N.

Think back to when you used to watch like Bugs Bunny, the Roadrunner. They always had the TNT explosive. Well, things have been updated since. And now the favorite explosive that is used is P-E-T-N. Okay. So Mark Leady's high school friend, one of his best friends, did not believe that he had died because he just burned some random stuff in a barrel, because he knew that Mark had access to very dangerous explosives.

And also that Mark knew how to deal with them, right? He was particularly careful with those explosives. He knew how to handle them, rather. And then there's this. Allegedly, Mark A. Leady had confessed to his longtime high school friend just a week before he died that he had illegally taken some explosives from his job. The ATF was apparently investigating for this, investigating him for this. At least that's what was told to what Courtney Feefe, who was a former ATF agent, confided to

somebody that he had this confession a week before he died. By the way, just as a general question, why would any person want to steal explosives from work, right? To be clear, just a tiny bit, a couple of grams of PETN causes a massive explosion. I'm going to demonstrate for that for you guys in a little bit. So it begs the question, what could a person do with larger amounts of it? Is there like a black market for those types of explosive? Otherwise, why risk blowing yourself up, taking it from work, getting into trouble, being

investigated by the feds? Was there somebody on the outside that was seeking to buy it in larger quantities on the side? The answer is I don't know. What I do know is what happened on July 13th, 2020. just 30 minutes away from kiddening Pennsylvania. And this happened in Butler, Pennsylvania. Trump survived an assassination attempt while on stage at his rally. The sad part is that Mark Leedy's longtime high school friend who didn't exactly buy the narrative of the barrel,

he did not survive. Mark Lee's friend's name was Corey Comparator. Yes, it was Corey Comparator who Mark Leedy had confided his secret to that he had done something that he wasn't supposed to. But again, I'll ask the question to what end. Did he tell Corey more about what he was doing with those explosives? Sadly, neither man is alive today. As we know, Corey and his family had quite an odd evening the night of Pennsylvania, of the Butler rally in Pennsylvania because they weren't supposed to be in the front of the audience

to see President Trump speak. In fact, Corey had grabbed regular tickets for he and his family. They were amongst the crowd. So they were quite surprised when while waiting in a large crowd, an unknown woman asked them if they'd like to be escorted to the very front. Who was this woman? Surely with so many cameras reporting live from the rally, someone must have captured this moment. Who was it that had the authority to make such a move happen? And I want to stop for a second because, you know, we've never talked about the Trump assassination attempt anymore since we've done episodes.

on it post butler but this is you know what canis owens is saying is absolutely true core cori comparatory and his family was asked if they wanted to move to the front by some random lady this has been widely reported although mainstream media doesn't want to really talk about it too much but yes they had regular tickets they were then moved to the front by some random lady that said hey you guys want to come up here and sit here and it just so happens that on this day is when cori comparatory was killed And so then to think that this guy, Levy, it was like his best friend. That's crazy.

And this guy has like, wow. This is, is this like killing two birds with one stone or what's going on here? So, and here's the thing. I don't exactly 100% know how that exactly ties. But what we can at least say without saying that the Trump assassination temp was all fake and set up. And there's definitely people out there that are saying that. Obviously, the Democrats right after it happened was thinking. and maybe that was the case.

Because obviously, when Trump was grazed by the bullet in his ear or on his ear, he was then taken to the ground eventually, I guess you can say, by Secret Service. And then they allow him to stand back up while all the people around the entire stage with cameras were ready for him to come up and put his hand in the air, which is now to this day probably one of the most iconic images of any president ever. Yeah, and if you notice during that time, those photographers were not worried about anything going and taking those photos and getting those best photos, no matter if it would cost their life or not. Well, and that's probably just them because they probably are willing to risk their life to get that photo or to get photos of Trump potentially assassinated. I mean, that's like one of those moments, you know, like JFK moment or whatever. So, you know, there's been allegations that maybe the media was particularly set up in a place.

to get the right shot because actually right before Trump was grazed by the bullet, you see a bunch of media start moving to the front. And this was before a shot ever rang out. So there was, you know, obviously conspiracies surrounding that. But then you think about this Levy, you know, Corey Comparatory story is strange. But nonetheless, it does lead into more of the Charlie Kirk microphone explosion potential. That's a big authority, right? Corey Comparator then is shot in the head.

It's worth noting that Mark A. Leady is also friends with various members of the Crooks family on Facebook. That, of course, could just be a small town coincidence. We can't really extrapolate anything from that. I'm just mentioning it as a fact because it is one. Anyway, let's hit fast forward again. Just two months after the Butler shooting, Corey Comparator loses his life. And then a never-before-seen terror attack is executed with precision, which involves P-E-T-N explosives. On September 17th and on September 18th of 2024, there was a massive series of pager explosions across Lebanon and Syria,

wounding more than 3,000 people and killing 12 people, including two children. I'm going to allow you to listen to these survivor stories of people. who were not the intended targets. Take a listen. On a normal day in September 2024, Hussein Taney was playing at home in southern Lebanon when an unfamiliar noise rang out from his dad's pager. But this run was very horrible,

and when I got him, I'm sorry to have me given me a word and a sarm. I said, if I could press okay, I'm fashned. In another home in southern Lebanon, Sarah Jafal had no time to respond after picking up a family member's pager. She has undergone 45 surgeries in nine months with additional procedures to come, including reconstructive surgery on her face and fingers.

She has lost four fingers in the attack, two of which are now fused together and is waiting to receive a prosthetic right eye. While Hezbollah has admitted that most of the dead and wounded were its fighters or staff, the explosions also seriously injured many civilians. Okay. So you should know that the pagers were rigged, as I told you with P, E, T, and explosive. The intended target were Hezbollah operatives. But what I want to draw your attention

to is just the trajectory of their injuries, right? So these people, they heard the pageer go off, whether it was their dad's pager or their uncle's pager, they went to go grab the pager, they held it in their hands, and to get it to go off, you had to hit the okay button. get the okay button and it subsequently exploded. This is why it took off their fingers. In one case, it took off a person's nose because it means its trajectory is going from here to here. In many cases, it took out their eye because they were looking at it. Okay. P-E-T-N, exploding, shrapnel, and of course, because of the shrapnel, they have cuts all over their faces. So we know who did this, obviously, because they were very proud that they did this. It was Israel.

how did they do it? Well, they interrupted the supply chain of pagers by creating a bunch of fake shell companies and selling the rigged pagers to people who were affiliated with Hezbollah. Admittedly, by the way, kind of genius, the thought of how they infiltrated was, well, pagers are a very dated technology. And there are only so many people who are mass buying pagers, right? Not many people are bulk purchasing them, so to speak. But the exact details of where they interrupted the supply chain, how they manufactured these pagers, how they amassed the P.E.10 or where they amassed the P.E.T.N.

exclusive from where that assembly took place of the rig tech, all that information remains unknown. What is known is how proud the Mossad was and is of their ability to infiltrate specifically companies and organizations. And I'm just going to let you listen to. one of the Mossad agents applauding their abilities to do just that following the pager attack of how they did it. Take a listen. We have an incredible array of possibilities of creating foreign companies that have no way being traced back to Israel, shell companies over shell companies who

affect the supply chain to our favor. We create a pretend world. We are a global production company. We write the screenplay. We're the directors, we're the producers, we're the main actors. The world is our stage. So the company in Taiwan, Gold Apollo, did they know that they were working with people from Assad?

Gold Apollo had zero clue that they are working with the Mossad. And neither did Hezbollah. When they are buying from us, they have zero clue that they are buying from the Mossad. We make like Truman Show. Everything is controlled by us behind the scene. In their experience, everything is normal.

Everything was 100% kosher, including businessman, marketing, engineers, showroom, everything. So as you can hear there, that's on 60 minutes. This is the Mossad assets or agents or whatever you want to call them that went on 60 minutes, said how they do things, which is like, hey, the world is our playground. We can do whatever the hell we want to and get away with it. We set up shell companies. We set up LLCs, whatever. It'll never be traced back to Israel.

and we can do whatever to hell we want to basically. I mean, they're admitting this, but yet everyone says, oh, there's no way Israel could have killed Charlie Kirk. I know, but it's crazy because they did this with the pagers, but now they're coming out. Well, I think they admitted it right away. Yeah. Obviously, they don't want to admit that they would do something to Charlie Kirk. Yeah. And like I said, we still don't officially know, obviously, that Mossad or Israel had anything to do with Charlie Kirk's assassination.

but if it ever comes out that the pager was used as the way to kill Charlie Kirk, will we ever know that? We don't know. But, you know, and that's one thing that a lot of people say. It's like, look, just wait till the trial, Tyler Robinson, they're going to prove everything. And yes, they may very well be able to prove everything. You know, there is a battle right now going on, you know, in this court that they don't want to allow cameras.

And it's actually weird that it's the defense they say is the one that don't want cameras in. but I also don't think the prosecutors necessarily want cameras in there either, even though you have Erica Kirk and others that are coming out and saying, no, we want cameras and we want cameras in. That could all be a show potentially. We don't know. But either way, there is this huge battle that is going on right now in the courtroom of whether or not they're going to allow cameras in this trial. And for obvious reasons, you should definitely want cameras in this trial.

This is probably one of the most talked about assassinations ever beyond JFK or someone else. Right. This is a thing that happened in our lifetime that has more public interest and I can freaking think of anything else. But maybe you don't want cameras in the courtroom to make your own judgments. And I think that's potentially what they don't want to happen. Now, for me, the defense, like there's no way that from the defense perspective that you wouldn't want cameras in the courtroom because it seems like the conspiracies would go wild

and it would help your case. Exactly. And I wonder, are they going to bring up all these conspiracies? But talking about the microphone conspiracy, I just have a. question about it because it's just weird to me because when the pagers went off you said when his ball up you know when they had the pager they had to our candis actually said it they had to push the okay button for it to detonate so in the case of charlie kirk he was already talking on the microphone so what button would he have had to push or did somebody else push it would not have had to

have pushed a button if you know how these and they're what they are is road wireless pro microphones. They operate off this very specific frequency. They have transmitters and then they have a base. And this specific road technology is a very new technology, number one. And so I have actually watching many videos on this that you could interrupt that signal or you could send the signal to this actual microphone to get that explosive to actually react rather than these older pagers, which I'm sure, you know, Hamas actually ordered that probably likely didn't have that type of capability. So So they had to kind of push a button to get it to actually activate. Because like Candace said, Pagers are old technology.

The road wireless pro microphones are very new technology with different frequencies they operate off of. And so the ability to be able to get those things to detonate without the person that actually has the microphone on them to have to do anything would be much easier. And so I've saw videos on this. There's actually a video on YouTube that breaks it down in its entirety. It's like a 40 minute video kind of showing like how this technology actually works, how it can be. intercepted or hijacked. And especially if the person or even the security team had no idea that there was explosives in it, there could have been someone outside that had never even touched that

to potentially be able to hack it to get it to explode. Are they saying the shrapnel is what kind of went in his neck and caused all the bleeding or what, what are they saying? Yes, they're saying that it exploded upwards. And, you know, and keeping also in mind, it doesn't necessarily have to be shrapnel from the actual microphone that kills you. they can also implant something in the actual microphone just above the explosive, depending on how they actually put it in the microphone.

They could have put a razor. They could have put some type of even small round, almost like it would be shot from a bullet, just above the explosive to where when that explosive does shoot upwards, that piece, whatever is above that actual explosive, the PETN in this case, would go upwards, which would have been right at his neck, right? Well, it's just interesting because most people were,

arguing and debating when he was shot in the neck that most people said that when you have an entry wound, you don't have a lot of blood coming out that wound, but it's more blood coming out of the exit wound. If this is the case with the microphone and the shrapnel went into his neck and then all this blood gushes out, would that make sense to you? Well, the argument there is that an entry wound is smaller than the exit wound. And it doesn't necessarily mean that the entry wound is not capable. will produce in a large amount of blood.

And so obviously Charlie did not even have an exit wound, but better yet, this, whatever it was, whether it was a bullet or shrapnel, it actually hit his juggler vein, it seems, and that's why the profuse bleeding was seen on video when he was hit. It's just like if you get stabbed in the neck, which is obviously one of the worst places you can possibly get stabbed, you're going to bleed out most of the time well before any EMS can show up to save your life. And so it appears that this wound that was in Charlie's neck was. from the juggler.

That's why he bled out so fast. But yeah, the entry and exit wound only matters because entry wounds are typically smaller, a smaller hole. An exit wound usually blows out, especially if it's like coming out in the back or the back in the neck. You know, like you actually saw this in the JFK assassination where half of his head was blown off. And so, yeah, that argument about the entry versus exit wound, it doesn't really matter

considering the fact that there was only one entry wound on Charlie Kirk. And that's where he lost all of the blood. And it's like most people say he was probably dead. within a few seconds of him actually being hit because it was obviously a big enough hole that produced a massive amount of blood to leave the body in a very short time frame. So, yeah, the whole entry versus exit wound thing, I don't think it matters in this case because of where Charlie was hit. But either way, let's listen to some more of the video.

It's just amazing. We create a Truman show. We are the directors, the actors, the performers, everything in your life will be fake. and we will be pressing a play. It's just incredible that what I say it, it sounds like an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory. But they say it's just like, you know, we're taking credit for what we do.

We're the best at this and we're sophisticated. And we'd like to tell you here on 60 minutes. Anyway, I want to also show you a graphic, which demonstrates exactly how they were able to rig the pagers with the explosive. This graphic was provided by Reuters who estimated that they used just six grams of P.E.T. N explosive to accomplish this far-reaching attack. Just six grams put inside of a functional pager. That's important, too, because they actually had to make sure that they didn't put enough

so as to render the pager ineffective. They had to just put enough that it would explode. Here you go. On that left-hand side, you can see where it's pointing to the detonation material. Tiny, tiny, you got the battery cell and the detonation material right there on the bottom, the P-E-T-N explosive. It's a very, very thin amount. It's incredible, six grams.

Why am I telling you that? Now, assuming that Reuters is accurate, we can then reasonably assert that six grams of PETN is not enough to confidently kill someone, right? They only killed 12 out of 3,000 people. You can also confidently assess that they would have to use more if they wanted to guarantee more fatalities, right? I mean, in that regard, I would say the operation was kind of a failure. because it demonstrated without question their precision and it was psychologically damaging,

no doubt, but in terms of real world consequences, you don't want to just take off the fingers of your enemies. That's only going to strengthen their resolve against you while they are still very much alive. Anyway, it got me wondering if six grams could take out fingers and eyes, how much P.E.T. and explosive would you need to guarantee a fatality? What would that look like? What would the size of that injury look like on a person? And so at a sense, I decided to research and see if there were maybe some random YouTube channels that were dedicated to demonstrating, doubling that amount, maybe tripling that amount, and seeing what would happen. And ladies and gentlemen, I am not kidding you when I say that this was the very first video that I stumbled across on YouTube, just typing in PETN explosive. and it was just guys that were using 20 grams of PETN explosive within a tiny capsule.

And they were using it against bulletproof glass to see what would happen. And I want you to pay very close attention to what this person says because I could not believe my ears. I was freaking out. Take a listen. 20 gram booster PETM charge. We're going to use it against the transaction window to see what the results are. This is the first one that went the way I expected it to go. I didn't expect a half-pounder to make a, make like a laser beam through the guy's head.

It's about the same as a gunshot. This is NIH 4 rated glass. Yeah, from a 30-od6. It's about the same foot diameter. It's about the same as a gunshot from a 30-a-6. If you shot it against that bulletproof, you heard him correctly. I promise you. I just, that was the first one I hit.

He decided, and he, like, same results as a 30-od-6. 20 grams of P.E.T.N. mimics the punch of a 30-od-6 bullet. Unbelievable. I want to be clear, this video was not posted to prove or debunk any conspiracy theories. In fact, it was published back in May of 2025. Charlie was very much alive. That's a full four months before Charlie was murdered. This was merely just par for the course on a channel that focuses on testing explosives and guns.

there's no aim for them. They're just, this is what they do. This is how they have fun. So it is fascinating that they are saying it mimics the diameter of a 30-0-6 bullet, especially given the persistent conspiracy theory that Charlie's road mic was rigged with P-E-T-N explosive. I haven't much spoken about that because I wasn't a P-E-T-N expert until this Butler situation, speaking with people close to situation, telling me about this strange

set of circumstances and the possibility of some exploit. I went, wait, what? What are we talking about? Anyway, enough of conspiracy. Let's return to the facts. We fast forward now to February 4, 2025, just a few weeks after Trump's inauguration into his second presidential term, Bebe Netanyahu enters the White House and presents President Trump with a gift, a golden pager, a nod to the Mossad's pager operation. I'm sorry, but why? Why? Why? What is the context of that? Is that like an inside joke? Is it a threat? Because Donald Trump was not president when the pager operation took place. President Biden was. So why would he gift this to Donald Trump? American troops are not involved so far as we know. Why would he gift this to Donald Trump? What is this significance of this? This is not a traditional gift. This does not make sense in a traditional sense. Okay. Like they give you something. something, a samurai sword from Japan. I think they gave them a samurai helmet, actually.

It was the last gifts that came from Japan. Saudi Arabia, gifts like jewelry and crowns. Switzerland gifted very appropriately a Swiss watch. What's up with the golden pager, BB? Frankly, it was crass and it was off-putting. Children were murdered in this operation. And I'd like to think that America had nothing to do with it, but, you know, I know better. We are, after all, supplying Israel with white phosphorus, the chemical to burn Lebanese civilians alive.

Did we know more about the pager attack than we let on? Did we assist somehow in this invisible supply chain that was happening? Anyway, suffice it to say that Butler now fascinates me. Most of all, Dan Bongino's strange reaction to it, Trump's reaction to it, he's satisfied, he wants it shut down. That's not how a man would act if it was an assassination attempt to. against him. Was it an assassination attempt or wasn't an assassination success? Was it an assassination complete? I mean, perhaps the only good portion of this story is that I have it on authority. The widow of Corey Comparatore and the family of Corey Comparator is not like

Trump. They are not satisfied with the investigation. They are not happy with the fact that secret service agents never lost their jobs. They are not satisfied with the answers that they are receiving about how Corey Comparator was killed. Imagine that. Imagine a widow who has questions. And last I was informed, that particular widow didn't take over her husband's career in the blink of an eye. So like I said, imagine that. There you go. So I wanted to play all that because obviously very compelling stuff. And when you're talking about PETN, you're talking about the conspiracy around the Charlie Kirk assassination when it comes to Israel, and especially the explosives, the PETN, everything is involved with that.

You have Israel that is literally going on 60 minutes in the United States, Mossad, and they are bragging about how they control the world, essentially, and the world is their playground. No one will know if we do something or don't do something. You know, if we were involved in an assassination, say, you'll never know. You'll never know how we got access to that road microphone. or how we installed that or whatever the case may be. I mean, they literally brag about this.

And am I saying that positively this is the way that Charlie Kirk was killed? No. But what I can tell you is, and if we can get this guy John on the show soon, which hopefully we can, he has done amazing research into all of this. And I'm telling you, if you follow his research and you follow everything that he has broke down, it's pretty compelling that the microphone is what can. killed Charlie. I mean, he breaks it down from every single camera angle. He shows the velocity. He shows the the damage. He also shows how everything moves. There's almost no way possible that Charlie's shirt

did what it did from a gunshot coming from a roof angled downward. And also, I want to point this out as well inside of charlie's shirt now if you know how a microphone works obviously you have a backside and a front side and the mic was you know positioned right there on a shirt you see once this shirt movement goes up there's something inside of the shirt that is moving up right yeah it's a something square that is moving up and then you can see it kind of get caught as it's coming back down in the shirt after the actual velocity of the energy goes up and then that box type thing starts falling, it gets caught in the shirt, and then you can see it fall all the way down into the bottom of the shirt.

So whatever the energy was that made not only the shirt go up, but it also made whatever was inside of a shirt, whether it was the backside or the backing of the mic, something, whatever was in his shirt, it also made that move completely up and then fall down in the bottom of the shirt. it just doesn't look at all like a gunshot wound from a 30 out six period i mean you know you get hit in the neck right and when you get hit in the neck with a 30 out six and it's not even that far of a distance what was it 150 yards or so something like that it's not that crazy of a distance it's going to hit yeah it's going to have some percussion to it especially on the neck but the biggest

thing is 100 it should have an exit wound and that exit wound should look very graphic it could literally probably blow off his freaking head almost with that velocity of a round. And yet he had bones of steel, according to the medical doctor that saw Charlie Kirk. And, you know, it was just a miracle, I guess, that the bullet didn't go through his neck and kill someone else behind him and all of this BS theory. And yet also, even with the way the reporting around the gun and the gun was moved and it was taken apart and reassembled and it was here and it wasn't here. and there's just a lot of stuff that just doesn't make a lot of sense.

And there's never really been a clear, clear, clear picture since the beginning. No, it really hasn't. And if you think about the only people that are fighting for transparency and truth is Corey's wife. It's not Trump. He's not asked to investigate anything further. Yeah, and you're talking about Butler. Yeah, talking about Butler. And then Erica is not asking for any extra investigating.

She just wants to put Tyler. on the stand and let's let's go at it and let's you know do what we need to do there is no extra investigations going on and no asking of investigations from trump or erika but then cori's wife is not satisfied yeah i mean do you not think that's just a little bit weird yeah i mean well the strange thing is that whole day the whole butler day didn't make a lot of sense you know the secret service they saw thomas crooks on the roof they saw everything go down as it was happening. And yet they let him take a shot allegedly or supposedly.

They let him take the shot. Then they go to Thomas Crook's house. They see that it basically looks like a demo house. Like if you go into a new neighborhood where you want to go check out what the houses look like in a neighborhood and you go in and everything's perfectly clean, you open drawers. Well, there might be some silverware holders, but there's no silverware in them or whatever the case is.

Well, when they went to the house, this house was completely scrubbed. It looks spotless. It looked completely clean. no one lived there. This Thomas Crooks guy had also been training at a firearms facility that also trained Department of Homeland Security, which he had made some trips to go to this place multiple times. He also had made trips overseas.

He had overseas bank accounts worth millions of dollars. Who was funding him the money? Or why was he, why did he have accounts that had potentially a million plus dollars in them, some dorky kid Thomas Crooks? And I've never put two and two together until right now. You know, I always thought, well, maybe it's somebody that, you know, he was like a patsy for somebody to put him up to this. But what if it was our own government trying to, trying to make Trump look like he's a true hero? You know, all these Democrats were like, oh, yeah, he got grazed by ear.

We don't believe all their shit. I'm like, no, you can see the bullet in the picture. You see it going in the air. Yeah. Yeah, I mean, and that's my thing. I just don't, you know, number one, I don't. don't think the government would have grazed Trump's ear to make it look like, you know, Trump's the guy.

We got to go with him. He survived the assassination attempt. Obviously, that's just way too risky. You would never want to do that. You know, do I buy the story that the Thomas Crook's butler assassination attempt was all set up to make Trump look good? I don't really buy it. I mean, you would have to give me some crazy evidence to even make me think that is a possibility,

honestly. And I know there's a lot of people out there probably listening right now that don't buy the official story of Butler. What I can tell you at the very least is that the whole Thomas Crook's backstory doesn't make any sense, as we were just talking about. But do I think that it was all set up to try to make Trump like the candidate we have to have, he survived an assassination attempt, make him look good, make him look like the leader that was courageous enough to stand up after being shot and raise his arm with the American

flag draped in the background? I just, I don't really buy that. But what if they used P.E. T.N in the Butler's circumstance and said it was a bullet, but it was really like a firecracker. Yeah, but how would you do that on someone like Corey Comparatory? I mean, unless he was wearing something. I don't think that's the case. I think it was a gunshot.

I think Thomas Crooks took the shot. I think he likely did hit Corey Comparatory instead of Trump. And but, you know, like I said, I don't know. It is very strange the connection between the guy that died from the burn barrel that also worked with PETN that I guess was being investigated by the ATF. and then just so happens to be friends with Corey Comparatory. And he tells him about what he had stolen from their company. Yeah. But also I want to also want to bring up this.

There was a factory in Tennessee. And it was in, I think it was like somewhere near Nashville. But that factory blew up like two or three weeks after Charlie Kirk was assassinated. Now, why does that matter? Well, this factory actually produced explosives, number one. And I think a large amount of the explosives they actually. actually manufactured was PETN. And not only that, this company worked with the government and I also believe intelligence

agencies to install explosives from what we are hearing in devices. And yet this place blew all to hell, killed everyone that was working there. And this was two or three weeks after Charlie was assassinated. And as a matter, when all that happened in Butler, Pennsylvania and Thomas Crooks tried to kill Trump, when they were searching for like other things. And remember people are looking at the back towers and they thought there were somebody on the back towers. Well, right around those back towers, they found a white van. And that white van traced back to somebody, I think in Arizona, as a matter of fact.

And he owned or was part of that explosion company that you're just talking about. Yeah, that was the theory, right? And I never really looked deep into that. I did hear that theory or at least people reporting that that van potentially belong to an explosives. company we don't know for sure i would have to look more into that but guys we just wanted to uh release this episode today just a touch on this i mean these are two pretty weird and wild things obviously the a i video is weird the exploding pager theory i think is one of the most credible if you're going conspiracy theory with this and especially once you start watching the videos in real time

slowed down especially when you're looking at the energy dispersion and and and like i said if we can get john on over the next few days then you'll hear him here I definitely want to talk to him. He can break it all down with precision. But guys, until next time, we love you guys. We hope that all of the fathers out there have an amazing day. And until next time, we love you. Peace out.

Peace out.