Investigate Earth Conspiracy Podcast - Classified Documents Leak Conspiracy Podcasts | Was Jack Teixeira A Scapegoat?
Episode Date: April 18, 2023The recent classified documents leak revealed the United States actually has military personnel on the ground in Ukraine, but what is more confusing is how Jack Teixeira even had access to some of the...se documents. Was there a much bigger plan in place behind these leaks? Is this also a play to gain more control over various social platforms on the internet... We discuss this and more on this episode of Classified Documents Leak Conspiracy Podcasts | Was Jack Teixeira A Scapegoat?
Transcript
Discussion (0)
And welcome to Investigate Earth Podcast.
I'm your host, Chad, alongside my beautiful wife, Sherry.
Say hello, Sherry.
Hey, guys.
Hey, gals.
Welcome to the podcast.
We are so thankful that you are here tonight.
We are thankful you guys are here.
It is 7.35 p.m. here on the east coast of the United States of America.
And we welcome you back to another great episode of Investigator Earth Podcast.
That song is called I Won't Stop Now by Nikki G.
Cool song.
It's like an 80s vibe.
It is definitely.
If you want to check that song out, listen to it, guys.
Tonight, we're going to be talking about the classified documents leak that has happened over the past few days.
And what that really means, right, is this guy, this Jack Texera guy, is he a scapegoat for the government to impend more control on the internet, on you?
We're going to talk about that.
But we're also going to talk about what the classified documents actually say, what it means.
And basically, we've been lied to, as usual, by the United States government, you know, the people that,
supposedly care so much about us, which they do not.
So we're going to talk about that, guys.
So welcome to the show.
We are thankful for each and everyone to you, as Sherry said.
From around the world, we thank you all for listening.
Although we do talk about subjects like this,
that is a military classified documents leak from the Pentagon or Pentagon documents.
This does affect everybody because in the event,
we do get to a World War, a World War III.
Obviously, that affects all of us around the world.
and as something I always say
that like, you know,
the countries around the world
have always looked
to the United States
for, I guess you can say
as the beacon of hope,
the beacon of freedom,
the beacon of light.
Yep.
And now countries like Europe,
I mean, or places like Europe
and even Australia
and places around the world
are looking at the United States.
Like, what in the hell happen there?
Like, what is happening?
These guys are going crazy.
The administration is going crazy
in a recent interview.
that Donald Trump did, I believe it was with Tucker Carlson.
You know, one of the things Donald Trump said was, you know, look, we can worry about China and Russia and all these other places.
But our biggest worry we should really be worrying about is from within.
It is for sure.
So, and I think, you know, even with this Jack Texera guy, this National Guardsman that leaked to these classified documents over a Discord server, which, by the way, a Discord server is where gamers go.
usually PC gamers to chat with each other while they're playing
or so if you're playing, I don't know, flight simulator or whatever PC game
you don't think of. Call a duty or anything. Yeah, you go on, yeah, you go on Discord and
there's, there's chats, you know, screens there, you can also voice chat, you can do
tons of stuff. That's where a lot of AI stuff, like AI art is being done as Discord. There's a
ton of, I guess, uses for Discord. But this guy, you know, goes on to Discord, leaks this
to his little gaming community, I guess you can say.
And then come to find out, you know, this apparently Russia and some other countries somehow found this.
They didn't somehow find it.
Basically how they found it was someone in this group shared it to a public forum.
And then that somehow got out there.
And then it just kept kind of unraveling.
Kind of grew and grew and grew.
Yeah.
And then this guy is then at his mom's house and helicopters are circling.
While he's just in the backyard chilling.
Could you just imagine being a 21-year-old that's a National Guard person, 21 and all these like, yeah, soldier guy.
And then all these helicopters and big, like, military trucks are coming for you.
Yeah, the FBI.
Yes, the FBI SWAT basically is who came after him.
And we're going to talk about all that.
I mean, you know, the media and government and all these people are comparing this Jack Texera guy as worse than Snowden.
than Julian Assange that are even comparing
and putting his name with people like Timothy
McVeigh and the Oklahoma City bombings and
David Koresh for the Waco, Texas,
I guess some people will call
a cult, whatever it is.
And, you know, they're putting his name with people
like that. They've even mentioned his name with 9-11
hijackers. Are you kidding?
Yeah. This is just crazy.
So we're going to talk about all that.
It is nuts, but there is
a lot to unravel here, and
we're going to unravel it to make you better
understand what this really means.
Because we can look at it from the outset and say, well, this guy is a traitor.
This guy is someone that leaked classified documents that he had access to.
He had a top secret clearance.
He did work in and around computers and whatnot.
And this guy had access to this and then leaked him.
So, you know, he's a traitor.
He is against our country, whatever.
There's a lot of stuff you could say with this.
But the one thing, as usual, of what a lot of people, aka whistleblowers or whatnot,
typically what happens is, you know, they will make you out to be the worst person on the face of the earth,
especially the worst person in the United States, where you either flee or you get arrested and potentially,
probably life in prison. And even in some cases, they can put you to death for traitor or, you know,
whatever, for being a traitor of the United States. But this Jack guy, I think there's a lot more to this.
And we're going to talk about it. We're going to talk about why there's a lot more to it.
Because I actually think that people inside and,
And deeper down wanted these documents to be released.
I think they used him to do this because they wanted to show what was really going on.
They wanted just to show even deeper on a deeper level that like, look, the administration's lying to you.
The government's continuing to lie to you.
And typically what these people that have to run the rest of their lives or, you know, reside in another country like Snowden did, is they just tell you what the government is doing to you.
I mean, this is, you know, whistleblowers should have protections.
And they typically, you know, they technically do.
But unfortunately, in Snowden's case and that he had, you know, CIA level clearance and obviously top secret clearance.
You have Julian Assange, which ran WikiLeaks that was provided classified or declassified whistleblower type documents.
These people have to run.
You know, Julian Assange is still in custody.
Snowden is in Russia.
and, you know, Snowden's never going to have a normal life in the United States again
because he did tell the American people that, hey, guys, just so you know, the government
is spying on all of you all the time.
And this is against the Constitution.
It's against everything.
It's against everything that the government is supposed to stand for.
But because Snowden said that, he became a traitor of the United States.
But really, is the government that's the traitor of the United States?
Yeah, exactly, because who would not want to know what they're really doing to,
the citizens of America.
Yeah. And he exposed that and
that's what's just crazy. Now he's a traitor. He has to live in Russia
but really it's the government that we should be looking at.
Yeah, absolutely. It's pretty nuts.
But guys, I want to start off by saying that thank you all
for the ones of you going over to our substack and subscribing and
really supporting us over there. You're just supporting free speech. You're
supporting the fact that if we do get censored or banned,
we talk about true and real topics here on Spotify, wherever you're listening, but probably
most of you are listening on Spotify. We are already seeing our numbers go a little lower. We're getting,
I don't know, just behind in some of the search rankings on Spotify, whatnot. And so we're
starting to kind of see that Spotify has changing their viewpoint a little bit as far as, you know,
censorship. I think they're probably getting more pressure from the government, whatever the case may be.
So that's why we want to get every single one of you there, listen to this podcast,
over to Substack.
All you have to do,
download the app on your phone.
It's very easy.
You can log in, very easy.
You can do it with your Google
or whatever you're typically logged in
on your phone,
and then type in,
Investigate Earth with Chad and Sherry.
You can subscribe over there.
We have a free and premium membership,
a lot of our podcast episodes,
and we're about to start a fireside chat,
which is going to be video,
where it's by a fire,
and it's just Sherry and I with lab mics.
You can hang out with us.
We can talk about stuff.
We can do whatever.
And we're going to try to figure out
some live stuff with that as well
so you can ask questions,
and we can just talk to you guys at the same time.
But please go subscribe to us, either or free,
or if you want to support us, premium,
and you're going to get premium content over there.
So we do want to make sure that we talk about that
and tell you guys,
because that's the most important thing right now
is we have to maintain this message.
We have to continue the message
and get this message out to as many people as possible,
and we have to be censorship-free,
and that is what sub-stack offers us.
It is censorship-free.
It is they want you to be able to tell your story
without hindrance of whatever platform you're on.
And Substack does a really good job at that.
There's so many people supporting it right now.
And really, it's actually a battle right now between Substack and Twitter.
Substack's got a new notes feature, which is like tweets, but they're longer.
But they also got podcasts.
They got video.
They got everything over there.
And I really like it better than any social media platform that's out there.
So I did want to bring that to your attention.
I want you, I'm going to say that every episode, even if it's two minutes long,
but we're working our butts off over there.
And we got great articles over there.
We go into detail about stuff.
And we're going to do our fireside chats.
And one more thing before we start this subject, we just got bombshell news about 9-11.
And so we're going to do a member's only episode over there because we can't really talk about the bombshell news, especially accusing what we're going to say about this, you know, just to everybody.
So we have to do it over there.
So if you guys want to go and subscribe to Substack, we're going to have that episode out very soon.
I don't know if it'll be denied or whatever.
It might be a shorter one, but we're going to have it out.
So that's all I want to say.
So let's get into this.
Jack Texera, the suspect in the leak of Pentagon documents, was charged with unauthorized retention of classified material.
So Jack Texerra, he's a 21-year-old Massachusetts man.
He was arrested for his suspected connection to the disclosure of dozens of secret documents that revealed
sensitive intelligence and defense information.
He has now been charged with unauthorized retention and transmission of national defense information
and unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents.
The airman in the Massachusetts Air National Guard made his first appearance in federal court in Boston
on Friday.
Attorney General Merrick Garland announced Texera's arrest by the FBI on Thursday afternoon,
and an affidavit filed in the court with a criminal complaint states that there is probable
cause to believe that Texera improperly and unlawfully retained and transmitted national
defense information classified at the TSSC level to persons not authorized to receive such
information.
It also alleges that Texera, who held a top security clearance and sensitive compartmental access,
obtained these sensitive government documents that were ultimately reposted on the internet
in February of 2023, according to logs kept by the federal government.
about a day later, according to the charge in documents,
an online user reported that information on the internet.
Federal investigators interviewed the user,
identified the documents only as User 1,
who told the FBI that the information was originally posted
by an individual using Texanera's username.
So according to User 1,
an individual utilizing Texaner's username
initially posted sense of information as paragraphs of text,
the criminal complaint explains.
And around January 2023 began posting documents,
that appeared to contain classified markings.
So charging documents revealed that one of the posted documents
described the status of the Russia-Ukraine conflict,
including troop movements on a particular date.
The government confirmed that the document in question is classified
at the highest level, according to the complaint.
Months later, on April 6th, the day media reports first surfaced
about the leaked documents.
Investigators alleged Texera used his government computer
to search classified intelligence reporting for the word leak.
There is reason to believe that Texera was searching for classified
reporting regarding the U.S. intelligence community's assessment of the identity of the individual
who transmitted classified national defense information to include the government document investigators
alleging court papers. Texero will be represented by a court-appointed attorney. If convicted,
the 21-year-old faces up to 15 years in prison. So maybe I guess this is not necessarily life in
prison, but during his arraignment hearing, Texera responded yes when asked if he understood
his right to remain silent. And as the hearing ended, he was placed in handcuffs. He was
led away by a male family member seated in the court, said, love you, Jack.
So President Joe Biden, who returned to the U.S. from Ireland Friday, said he asked the Defense Department to make sure they get to the root of YTECH.
Sarah had access in the first place.
Well, can I tell you about the route in the first place?
Yeah.
Because honestly, I have listened to news programs.
I have read articles.
Did you know that over 10,000 other people had access to this?
There's tons.
Yeah, they had access to this thing that he put on discourse.
Yeah, 10,000 people.
Discord.
Discord.
Discord.
That is this close.
We should start.
But I'm just saying when you have so many people that have access to the same thing that he did,
and he's like, well, you know, there's 10,000 other people that have access to this.
But this is like stuff that is classified.
Why?
Yeah.
Well, and the thing is, so let's first get into what the, you know,
what these leaks basically said.
Well, number one, it says these leaks basically say that they've lied to the American people.
Instead of it kind of being a proxy war, it is kind of actually a war where our soldiers are on the ground in the United States.
Now, I don't think we have the full extent of the documents in these documents as far as how many are on the ground,
because I believe probably they're not going to put the full extent of what our military force or whatever it is in any documents, period whatsoever,
especially with the amount of access, obviously, that is being held by these top secret documents.
And don't forget, like, before this war even started, we had all kinds of military over in Ukraine training Ukrainian soldiers.
How to use these weapons, supposedly, right?
How to use the weapons, how to do everything.
They're just on the soil training.
Yeah.
Do you really believe that?
Well, so what these documents revealed, though, is that we have soldiers not just the United States, but U.K.,
so many of the NATO members have soldiers, but not just soldiers.
They have special forces units and commandos on the ground in Ukraine.
Now, these guys are, I promise you, not there to train them how to use these weapons.
We also don't know the extent and the numbers exactly on how many soldiers we actually do have on the ground in Ukraine.
And that's, like I said, probably something they would not put in documents at the very least.
because, you know, there's a fine line of if you have a document that could be leaked, especially in today's world, that says, hey, we've got a thousand, two thousand soldiers across or infiltrated into the Ukrainian army, then that would be a very bad thing, especially to leak.
So I don't believe that we put everything in documents.
We just don't do that.
That would be really stupid to even put them in documents.
Yeah, but the way that we explain things sometimes with the way that documents are set forth,
they will mention and name or at least reference certain units or special forces units or whatever
when they're talking about something else.
So that's basically what these documents said.
Part of it anyway was saying that, hey, we have special forces units, along with many other NATO members,
have special forces units on the ground.
It also talks about, you know, weapons that South Korea and,
and various other countries, you know, we're going to give the Ukraine.
It also talks about the knowledge of the United States potentially knowing that United Arab Emirates,
which is, you know, a longstanding, I guess you can say ally to the United States,
but we do have definitely some interest in the UAE.
But it also talks about the potential of UAE possibly supporting or maybe even,
even being on the side of Russia.
We don't know, which UAE, you know, adamantly denies based on the leaks.
I'm sorry.
What is UAE?
United Arab Emirates.
That's basically Dubai and kind of that whole, you know, conglomerate over there.
And so that kind of talks about it.
But these documents really do bring into account so many other countries that are involved in this.
It's not just NATO.
It's not just the United States.
There are other countries that it seems like the United States is pressured into.
getting involved in this. And so it's just some, it's huge. I mean, especially in terms of, you know,
when we talk about World War III and so many people say that, you know, look, we think World War
three is actually already happening. Well, it probably is. I mean, it's similar to when people say,
well, when is the one world government going to happen? When is the New World Order going to happen?
It probably already is happening, right? I mean, we have to understand that when we look at the way
things are in the United States during the pandemic, during in in Canada, in Australia, especially
where so many of these leaders are the young leaders of the World Economic Forum and they
attended all this stuff growing up.
You know, this world order has already started.
It's already in place.
We don't fully 100% see it yet because you still see.
Yeah, you still see democracy in the United States.
You still see your government in Australia.
But everything is being influenced.
Everything that's happening is being influenced, especially in the United States right now.
And that is so true.
And it's also kind of like to give you a little bit of, you know, the media is going to tell you a little bit about this and a little about that, that.
So it's not so shocking when it really does happen.
Like Biden was already saying, you know, this, we are in the New World Order.
This is what's going to happen.
But I think when the media is kind of coming out and saying, you know, before 10, 15 years ago, talking about New World Order was a.
like complete conspiracy.
Yeah.
And now our own administration and governments around the world are starting to talk about this.
Yeah.
And they're starting in very small like fractions, I guess, just to give us a little bit of pieces and things.
So we're not shocked or overwhelmed.
Yeah.
But to me, and I'm just predicting on based on everything I know, I think it'll be in full effect 2030.
Yeah.
I think so.
100%.
Yeah, I mean, it's not even a prophecy anymore, or something you would call a, you know, a psychic ability to see 2030.
I mean, we're seeing it happen as we speak.
And it's something I've talked about in the substack a lot and many articles.
We are just flying right towards 2030 very fast and there's a lot of stuff that's got to happen.
But similar to New World Order and the one of what government technically kind of basically already being in place and already working to unravel the governmental systems around the world, which we.
I mean, guys, if you just look around to what's happening.
I mean, look on the news, watch the news, watch Chicago, watch shootings, watch Australia, what happened during the pandemic.
I don't know what's happened to Australia now, but Canada is, you know, they went full authoritarian, especially during the pandemic.
That's all part of the system that's moving forward.
Very similar to World War III because World War III, we don't realize that we're actually in right now, but we are.
Exactly.
Right.
Bombs aren't going off all over the United States and this and this and this, but we are in a World War III system or,
not system, but we're in a World War III environment right now to where I believe it's already
started, how it ends and what happens from now till then, we don't know. That's the most dangerous
part of it, but I do believe we're already in a World War III, but both economically,
militarily, and obviously in some ways according to these documents, there's a lot of stuff that
we are in, and not just that. Culturally, religiously, there are so many wars that are going on,
but it's all part of this system. And I think the New World Order has a part of this.
But let's break down kind of the breakdown, I guess,
between Biden and U.S. intel community behind the Pentagon leaks.
So somebody in the White House or the Pentagon apparently got weary
with Team Biden's Ukraine adventurism and instructed the U.S. mainstream press
to publish the Pentagon leaks, argued former CIA analyst Ray McGovern,
commenting on Cy Hirsch's recent op-ed about a breakdown between Biden and U.S. intelligence community.
Earlier this week, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour
shed light on the U.S. intelligence communities grow in frustration with the Biden administration,
whom the American spooks see as completely incompetent and reckless.
According to the veteran journalist, the Ukraine government headed by Vladimir Zelensky
has been using American taxpayer funds to pay for diesel that is keeping the Ukrainian
Arby on the move in his conflict with Russia.
What's more, Zelensky takes a considerable share of incoming foreign funds for himself,
up to $400 million he's skimming off the top of our taxpayer money
that the United States and others are sent into Ukraine,
but thus irritating his generals something that the Biden administration is well aware of.
So this is quote,
Well, Zelensky, a sleaze, McGovern told Sputnik,
the very telling part of what Cy writes here
is that the CIA director, Bill Burns,
was sent to see Zelensky one-on-one.
And he says, look, you're taking too much of a cut
and the other guys are getting mad, including the generals.
You've got to pare down your own cut.
This is what the CIA guys tell him Zelensky,
because Zelensky is taking $400 plus million from taxpayer money.
And he's like, dude, I'm going to get rich over, like getting all my people killed.
Yeah.
So, and someone who knows told Cy Hirsch that another thing Cy talks about is the advisors,
Jake Sullivan and Tony Blinken and the others, you know.
I call them sophomores, and Cy has promoted them to juniors, calls them juniors now.
But he says, you know, they had no experience, no judgment, no moral integrity.
They just tell lies, make up stories, diplomatic deniability, or something else.
But then they just lie through their teeth.
Well, you know, there's a breakdown and trust between these guys who have been able to do what they want until now
and the intelligence people who see something really bad is coming.
And that really bad thing is the Russian offensive that is likely to start late May, early June,
as soon as the mud is okay to transverse.
And what's going to happen then is going to force decisions on the administration.
most unwelcome decisions.
McGovern also referred to the apparent Pentagon leak,
which appears to see as part of the intelligence community
and Department of Defense's dissent
against Team Biden's unprofessional handling of foreign affairs.
So this is where we're starting to kind of get in these leaks.
It's not just this random 21-year-old dude.
I think he's a scapegoat.
I think they're using him,
but I think that the intelligence department,
especially the dissenting agents or officers,
whether it be CIA Pentagon or otherwise,
are using Texera
to make sure that people know,
and this is brought to people's attention,
that there's a lot of effed up stuff
going on in the Ukraine,
a lot of corruption,
and, you know, American taxpayer money,
for one, is 100% going to all these generals
and all these people.
And this is hardworking money that, you know,
it just pisses me off beyond belief
that Zelensky is getting rich
off of the American workers.
And it's so hard to even talk about
and to say, oh, I don't completely believe in what Zelensky
is doing or I don't 100% agree
because everybody looks at you like,
how could you be like that?
You don't believe in Ukraine.
You know, you believe in Russia instead of Ukraine.
But that's not really the case.
Yeah.
If you know the underlining circumstances
of everything that's going on,
on is eye
opening just like COVID was.
Absolutely.
You know,
there was a lot of people like,
how dare you even talk about COVID like that?
Yeah.
Right?
Yeah, yeah.
Yeah.
And if you don't get vaccinated,
you're killing your neighbor.
Right.
And you're a piece of shit.
But this is kind of the same thing.
It's like,
how dare you talk bad about this situation
or talk about this situation
where we don't agree with you?
Yeah.
It's just mind-blowing.
Yeah.
Now, yeah, you're right.
100%. Now, the classified documents dumped particularly shedded light on the Ukraine war plans
and the upcoming spring offensive, as well as on the Biden administration's failures to force
its allies and to jumping on its proxy war bandwagon to bleed Russia white. Right? So, you know,
it's becoming harder and harder, according to the leaks for the Biden administration to get
on board a lot of these NATO members. A lot of these NATO countries like, dude, we are not going to
continue this shit. Like we we don't we don't we don't just have endless amounts of money we don't want
to do this to our people in some of these cases. And so it is a this is a very big divide between a lot
of NATO members, which is what some of these documents are showing in the United States.
And also it shows in Francis McCrone himself is kind of now I believe McCrone is definitely a
huge part and a huge I guess supplier or or I don't know what you want to call it to the New
World Order.
McCrone was a part of the young leaders
for World Economic Forum as well
McCrone was at first against the whole
Ukraine thing, then he came on board now he's kind of
going back against it. A lot of these NATO
countries are wanting to
dissent, I guess, off of the
backs of the United States because they don't want to look like
the United States is bullying them,
although they are into this war with the Ukraine.
I mean, the United States in general has
bullied many of these countries into NATO.
So it's not just
the fact that France sees this.
Many other countries do as well.
And once you're kind of a part of NATO,
you are pretty much just another proxy country for the United States.
Yeah, it's under the umbrella.
Yeah.
And not to mention all the money we're spending,
but the money we're spending, is it really there?
Because our dollar means nothing now.
I guess we're not really sending them money.
We're sending them weapons and things that are...
Yeah, that we pay.
We pay these big companies, Raytheon, and all these other ones that make these weapons,
the military industrial complex, which is, you know, they profit heavily.
It's very similar to the biopharmaceutical complex, how they profit in the pandemic.
Well, obviously, the military industrial complex and the companies that supply all these weapons
to the United States and all these other countries make a killing during this time.
It's just like the pandemic.
Now we've moved on from the pandemic to wars because we've got to still make that money,
and don't think the people in this administration, including the Bidens, which were heavily involved in Ukraine, even before the Ukraine war happened, and Hunter Biden, and probably so many other people surrounding him, not just Ukraine, they're heavily involved with China as well. They're getting checks on China, which is why you wonder why we're so influenced. And, I mean, in a lot of ways, already controlled by China is because of our administration is controlled by China with money. We knew this. There's class, there's not classified, but there's things.
leaks that are coming out. They're showing the Biden administration has been taking a lot of money from China.
We already seen this with Hunter Biden in Ukraine and Joe Biden. We've literally have it on video.
And so this is this is just, it's batshit crazy, but it's actually happening. And, you know, I think there's some dissenting people in the government, especially in intelligence agencies. We've talked about this before.
You know, a lot of the people that the Biden administration and this deep state, new world order,
globalist movement are putting into power in these intelligence agencies in the United States
are evil people. They're very woke. They're very globalist. They give two shits about the United
States and their values. But the reality is there are good agents and good officers and good
whoever underneath those leaders. But eventually, there's going to be people to get fed up
and want to expose or risk it all in some cases to make sure that the American people know.
There are going to be truth tellers.
There are going to be people that risk it all for the truth.
We have less of those people nowadays.
Don't get me wrong because everything, so many people have been brainwashed and beaten in the face
until you can't breathe or see anymore with lies and media and propaganda
and threats from the government and threats from the Internet and threats from your social media.
you name it, but there are still good people out there. And I still believe wholeheartedly,
we have a lot of good CIA officers out there. We got a lot of good FBI agents and
good Department of Defense and Pentagon and you name it. And eventually there's going to be
enough of them to get fed up and this is going to continue to happen. And really, their hands are
just tied because they have to go with their orders from above and they can't really do anything
about it. And it's the same thing as this whole thing that we're in right now. There's so many things
we want to do, but our hands are tied.
We're watching all this unfold in front of our eyes,
and there's not really much we can do as a civilization, but watch.
And that's what's so crazy about it.
Yeah.
Well, so this CIA guy, right, and he makes a extremely good point here,
of how he believes, and I believe this as well, 100%.
Like, if you think this Jack Texera guy is the only guy that did this, just randomly,
And there was no other involvement with intelligence agents or otherwise behind the scenes.
Well, let me explain why that is not the case.
Because McGovern also drawn attention to the fact that the latest Pentagon leaks have been largely circulated by the U.S. press.
And it was even done before the White House or whoever said anything or even particularly knew about it.
But in particular, the New York Times and the Washington Post.
Now, what I will tell you about the New York Times and the Washington Post, which we've said many times,
the Washington Post is 100% basically a right hand for the United States government's propaganda wing.
The New York Times is a left hand for the United States government propaganda wing.
So for it to actually come out in this form and the amount of connections,
especially to the intelligence agencies that these two news outlets have,
then there has to be something up with that because the two have long been criticized by alternative media
for being too close with the Democratic administration and intelligence community.
So for comparison's sake,
Cy Hirsch's bombshell has been nearly completely ignored by the U.S. mainstream media.
The supposed Pentagon document has described a gloomy picture of the Ukrainian armed forces,
unpreparedness for a spring offensive,
including a shortage of ammo and manpower.
They also shed light on NATO's special operation forces,
presence on the ground in Ukraine,
and involvement in the bloc's ongoing proxy war against Russia,
something which is fraught with a risk of direct,
clash between major nuclear powers.
They ignore that, but
this is quote, I may have
said this before, but I'll emphasize it. The New York
Times ran with these leaked documents.
So did the Washington Post.
They could have simply submerged them.
They could have ignored them, but they didn't.
Now, the New York Times never does
anything without checking with the White House these days.
That's a fact.
So, okay, so somebody in the White House
or the Pentagon said, yeah, you lay
it all out, let people see it. Yeah, let
people see that Millie, Sullivan, Blinking, Biden, all of these guys have been lying through
their teeth. Let them see that now and maybe more sensible decisions will be made because they're
going to have to be made in the next couple of months, McGovern included. So what they believe
is that this leak, which is the New York Times and the Washington Post, which is the one that
blew this thing up before the White House or anyone even knew about it, there was something,
there was a conspiracy behind this thing to make sure this shit got out before the White House,
or the government could do anything about it.
And this poor 21-year-old kid
He's a scapegoat.
He's going to suffer for all this.
Yeah, he is.
I mean, unfortunately,
and who knows that someone above him,
you know, a higher superior or, you know, whatever,
didn't instruct him to do certain things,
potentially with these doctors.
We don't know.
They'll probably be in trouble too.
Maybe.
Maybe.
It depends on how connected and how this whole system went.
It sounds like somebody wants to,
wanted this leaked and the major right hand and the left hand of government leaked this completely to show what was happening.
Yeah.
Well, now, so yeah, you're right.
So this, from what it sounds like, there is some people in the intelligence community that wanted this information out and they used Jack's Jack Texera as a scapegoat.
Okay, so then we got to think about this.
So, of course, let's take it for that.
Let's say that that happened.
Let's say that that conspiracy unraveled, and that's actually what happened.
Okay, fine.
But let's also talk about another side of it and just kind of try to come to some kind of conclusion with this.
Well, the Pentagon leak, a disinfo operation to expand control of internet and get rid of Biden, says XCI officer.
Okay, so we got two CIA guys.
And talking about this, and it could be both, right?
They could have used this regardless to gain and garner more control.
So let's break it down.
The Pentagon leak could have been deliberately orchestrated to force the removal of U.S. President Joe Biden and or, which is kind of what we're talking about,
and or to expand the power of the U.S. government to regulate anything posted on the Internet.
Larry Johnson retired CIA agent or officer and ex-state department official told Sputnik.
21-year-old, which we talked about, was arrested last Thursday.
And as we talked about, he was charged with unauthorized use and retention of classified documents.
And in an affidavit accompanying, the charges in FBI special agent revealed that Texera had, you know, multiple security clearances, but the highest of which.
And so in a quote, it says, it's not normal, it's not typical.
It's not easy, particularly for a member of the National Guard to gain this level.
of clearance, Larry Johnson, a veteran of the CIA and State Department's Office of Counterterrorism,
who provided training to the U.S. Military Special Operations Task Force for 24 years.
So this is very unusual and strange.
The thing that captures my attention is that the individual is part of the Air Force Unit
that's involved with information warfare.
At that age and at that low rank, the possibilities that he would have unlimited access to highly classified material is just extremely unlikely.
Yeah, that makes me wonder, did somebody leak this to him on purpose?
Well, he did have clearance from what they're saying, but it's just strange.
It is very weird.
It is very strange.
The trove of documents was released on Discord as we talked about.
Now, could this be a deliberate leak?
And here's why.
Johnson believes that it was a controlled leak, even though initially the former CIA analyst
had been inclined to think that the leaked documents were the work of a frustrated whistleblower.
What struck Johnson was a document labeled C.
CIA Operations Center Intelligence Update in the trove.
The one document that did capture my attention, he says, as far as being highly unlikely that
he would ever have access to it, was the report from the CIA Operations Center, Johnson
explained.
The document is prepared for internal use only within the CIA.
It's not the kind of document that's prepared or circulated within other agencies that
are considered part of the intelligence community.
One might ask why the leak was needed.
According to CIA veteran, those he claimed tricked Texera may have
sought to kill several birds with one stone.
To smear MAGA conservatives,
to justify new internet restrictions
and remove Joe Biden from the Oval Office,
thus, Texera was immediately described as a right-winger,
as an anti-Semite, as a racist, a gun lover,
a religious extremist.
He checks all the boxes, routinely smeared by the U.S. mainstream press.
And as Johnson wittily remarked in his blog earlier today,
the only thing Lacken is that the fellow Jack Texera
was not wearing a MAGA cap.
quote, there's current legislation being proposed that would not only ban TikTok,
but would expand the power of the U.S. government to regulate anything posted on the internet.
So this could be an act designed to help create political support for the kind of authoritarian crackdown on information,
a complete violation of the First Amendment.
Now, we already talked about previously on another podcast about the Restrict Act,
which is what they are trying to push through the House and Senate on,
and blame it on TikTok.
You know, this TikTok thing has been going for a while.
This has been circulating in mainstream media.
It's had, you know, people like Joe Rogan and others to really get behind support of this and
say, oh, China is spying on you and they're going to know all your information.
So we got to get rid of this.
Have you read the terms of service?
Have you done this?
Have you done that?
And Joe Rogan really is one of the ones that really got the ball rolling on this.
Now, not saying Joe Rogan might have been come to by somebody to, I don't know.
Well, we don't know.
We really don't know because, I mean, you've got to think if you're the number one media source, which Joe Rogan is, and you don't think someone or something.
I mean, hell, he has CIA agents, which we have too, but I'm saying he has CIA agents on his podcast.
He's friends with him.
He's, you know, he regularly circulates his life around a lot of these people.
Who knows?
Who knows what may have brought that to his attention or why that could have happened?
And I actually need to go back and look in who he.
had on when he first mentioned
the TikTok thing, I don't know.
But I'm pretty sure he's also...
Yeah, that would be really interesting.
But I don't remember...
I know he's talked about it with Mike Baker, which is an ex-CIA
guy that I don't like or trust
Mike Baker whatsoever.
He's always like a
apologist for the CIA and the government.
He's always one of those people. It's always on the side of the
CIA in government. He's like a propagandist that's
sent to Joe Rogan on behalf of the
government's CIA. It's almost like that
wide open. You know, he tries
to downplay things that are so
obvious that there's so much of that shit.
And yet Joe Rogan continually has him back on, I don't know.
But either way.
Well, it just sounds fishy to me because listening to this article, you know, this guy,
this 21-year-old, he had some types of clearance, but he didn't have all the clearance
to get the documents he actually had.
The documents he actually had came directly from the CIA.
Yeah.
And that one document says that it does not go.
outside of the CIA. Right, which means somebody within the CIA leaked those documents to him
or others or just him or like, I don't know, but those documents were leaked through the CIA
to this kid and this kid was probably like, you know, I just think about, I have a daughter
is 22. They're not fully developed adults yet, you know? Yeah, yeah, I know. I don't know.
Who knows? It's just strange.
That was leaked to him.
Yeah, even the story, though, the story the media first came out with and said, you know, hey, this guy, you know, he don't like wars.
And so he wanted to share this with his buddies on Discord to like, it just doesn't make sense.
No.
None of it makes sense, right?
I mean.
No, most guys on Discord are playing some kind of war game.
Yeah, you're right.
You're 100% right.
Another possibility is that the disclosure of these documents is designed to embarrass the Biden administration, ultimately force,
and removal of Joe Biden, the CIA veteran suggested.
But another thing that said Lauren Bell's ringing for Johnson was Bellingcat,
which is characterized by the former State Department official
as an open-source intelligence outfit that has been funded by U.S. and British intelligence.
It was Bellingcat that allegedly managed to trace the leak to a Discord server called Wow Mau,
which seemed to have been sourced from the Thug Shaker Central Channel.
The story about leaked Pentagon files was also picked up by the New York Times and Washington Post,
which are largely criticized that we talked about earlier
for being in cahoots with the U.S. federal government and intelligence agencies.
And this is, quote,
that's why I think it is disinformation operation, Johnson said.
Bellingant has been funded by both MI6 and CIA
and has worked really as what they call an open source intelligence operation.
And it has been used as an intelligence entity.
And several of the reporters who were involved,
both the writing for the New York Times,
had previously worked,
with Bellingat.
The timing of this is just very unusual, that all of a sudden is just discovered, and the
documents that are being leaked are very precisely focused on Ukraine, the conflict with
Ukraine and Russia's activities in Ukraine.
So, you know, he's saying that two of the journalists was involved in Operation Bellingat,
which is an intelligence, open source, whatever, whether the CIA utilizes it, whoever.
Well, and they're saying that since Bellingcat, whatever his name is.
Well and Cat is the operation name.
Oh, okay.
But the CIA agent is the one that saying, you know, there were two reporters that were involved in that, that actually were also reporting the story.
Well, and I guess what he was saying is if they smelt it, they dealt it pretty much.
Yeah, probably.
Yeah, you're probably right.
They were probably heavily involved.
They've done this so many times.
I mean, the New York Times and Washington Post all the time publish and release things on behalf of intelligence agencies or government.
that are disinformation campaigns.
That's exactly what they do.
Sciops, propaganda, that is their thing.
So, you know, it's no, you know, there's no, I guess, doubt that they would do this as well.
You know, he is a convenient scapegoat.
And the 21-year-old appears to be more of a convenient scapegoat rather than a hero, according to Johnson.
The former CIA analyst does not rule out that Texera will be punished alone.
Aiken to William Cali in the My Lai Massacre case, which has, which is chain of a command.
will be left off the hook. He said, I don't think he had any clear purpose for what he was doing,
said CIA veteran. And it's not clear why he started doing this. And these things are getting posted
to this Gamer Board. Again, that's the story we're being told. I don't know what to believe
anymore from the U.S. government. The lies that have been told are so extensive and so massive,
I just don't know what to believe. So, and the thing is, the government is violating constitutional
rights wouldn't shock me at all. So he goes on to say that,
the U.S. government agencies are eager to violate constitutional rights of a U.S. citizen to reach their objectives.
Remarkly, the U.S. mainstream media has not raised the question if Texeris should be treated as a whistleblower, which we talked about earlier.
And it goes in the quote, the government violating constitutional rights wouldn't shock me at all, remarked Johnson.
That's why I said he's a convenient scapegoat. They're using him in this way. He was not working for some foreign intelligence agency.
He would not have been able to just on his own to get access to those documents. I know how really difficult it is.
is, even electronically, when you log into these systems to find something of that information,
and then turn it off, then take it out, and then decide to photograph and then post it,
and then he said, the story just doesn't add up. So multiple CIA agents are saying this is
bullshit or ex-CIA officers, not agents. Right. So what is more likely from this, right? I mean,
that's the big question. Obviously, the Biden administration and who is really involved in the
heavy funding of this Ukraine war is not wanting these things to get out.
Right.
They're mad that that got out.
They don't want anything like this leaked or get out because that just makes the intensity
of the war heat up.
Yeah.
And it makes them look stupid.
Yeah, it does because Putin knows all this stuff now.
And he knows from these leaks that we do have people on the ground that are not just
training, that are actually in war.
with Russia and not just Americans, but you were saying other probably countries have the same
thing going on.
Well, the interesting thing to this, though, is that, you know, you have to think about
Texera.
I mean, I mean, say that you look at it from perspective of, you know, officers in the CIA or
FBI or whoever, you know, someone in intelligence agency wanted this to get out.
It was a coordinated effort to get these documents to him, probably obviously a CIA agent or
officer had to do this, at least for that one document, because it is only to be circulated
within the CIA. There's no way Air Force National Guardsmen is going to have access to
information regardless of security clearance. But it just makes you think, like, I mean, would, I mean,
you know, you want to say, oh, they're patriots in this country. They're trying to tell the American
people that this is what's happening. But if they're using a guy, a 21-year-old National Guardsman
to do this as a scapegoat. Right. And then just to F him over, screw him over,
it just none of it really makes sense i mean
and where does the whole topic about 10,000 other people
knew about these classified documents
or have access to them yeah is that what you're talking about yeah had access to them
well i mean the problem is is that i apparently you know there's a lot of people that have
access to top secret documents as we're kind of starting to find out but the thing that i've
been seeing the media push and if i have to just take this from like an outside really
outside perspective just based on everything I'm hearing, reading, and watching on the media
is one thing they're heavily pushing, though, is the, they want this to really, they want to
come down hard on information on the internet. They want to ban things or at least be able to
better surveil things on platforms that they don't right now have, well, they have access
to, but they want to.
they want to go full circle.
They want to fully infiltrate
every single digital platform
that you can possibly think of
probably to include email,
which I'm sure they already have access to that.
I mean, if we just think about how much access,
which, by the way,
Elon is on Tucker Carlson right now
as we are talking.
It's like a huge interview
because he really goes in detail
about a lot of the Twitter files
and just how extensive
the government's involvement
really was with Twitter.
And we already know they were
with Facebook, Instagram.
And imagine how much infiltration
they had because one of the things Elon says on Tucker Carlson in this interview tonight is that, you know, FBI and whoever else was involved with Twitter and the intelligence agencies, they had access not just to what you posted. They had access to your private messages, everything. So imagine if you don't think that Google is giving up every single email you ever send out in your Gmail account, you must be crazy. Exactly. But I think these other type places like the 4-chain or whatever, these other 4-Chene on the end.
or, you know, these encrypted type sources where no one tells their real name or whatever,
I think these places are where government doesn't have access to and they want them.
Because Discord, not many people even know what Discord is.
Yeah.
And this is more of a private type thing.
I guess it's not really over the Internet.
It's not like on social media.
This is just a bunch of a group of guys and gals that are gamers pretty much.
I guess it is social media technically.
I mean, because, you know, you do have a, you know, you have servers to where you have a community and all these things.
Right, right.
You know, but they're going to use this.
Yeah.
Regardless of how this.
Control, even of Discord or the 4chan or whatever other things there are.
Yeah, I mean, so upon discovering the documents had been available online for an extended period because they had.
I mean, before they even knew about it, you know, they had been online for a while.
The president and other officials allegedly considered ways to prevent this from happening.
again in the future. And as a response, the administration may expand the scope of online platforms
that intelligence and law enforcement agencies monitor. This is what NBC reported. And so what they're
wanting to do is, you know, they're wanting to heavily surveil Discord. They basically
already said that. Discord is, you know, all it is is a communications app. You know,
we've talked about it before. But the intelligence community is reportedly wrestling with how
to scan platforms like Discord for relevant content to prevent similar leaks in the future.
The incident has prompted new questions about the management of sensitive intelligence information within the government
and whether access to such data should be further restricted.
What this, though, sounds like is, you know, like from there, the images made their way to 4chan, pro-Russian telegram channels, Twitter, New York Times, blah, blah.
So, yeah, the leak documents made their way kind of across the board.
but there's no question that the government is going to use this thing, this incident,
regardless of what the initial cause of it was, to gain more control over every single aspect of social media.
And, you know, right now we have this restrict act that is waiting in the wings to be passed,
you know, whether it be by Congress or however it will be passed, they need support on the, you know,
Republican side. Democrats will probably pass it no problem. And to be honest, there's a lot of support
on the right. There's a lot of support from Republicans because of TikTok. It is like it is the most
superficial bill ever in the history of anything because the Restrict Act really doesn't even
talk too much about TikTok. It rather says that we are going to have full and unlimited access,
100% across the board to everything that you possibly can do on the internet. And we're going to
surveil you like you can't even imagine.
Right. And they're just using TikTok as the
upfront kind of guy because
China has all of our information.
But guess what? China already
has our information. It's already out there.
And even if they didn't have TikTok, guess
what? They got your iPhone and they got your
Android and they got everything else.
They have all your information
already. So that's
not going to work.
No, it isn't.
But they're going to use it. Right.
And, you know, I mean,
And what you have to understand is, like, people say, well, I don't give a damn thing to surveil me.
But you have to understand that everything that you do is on your phone.
I mean, your phone is with you and connected to you and is a huge part of most people's lives.
I mean, and that includes text messages and emails and everything.
That includes what you do think, Phil.
Are they going to also surveil, which they already, I mean, there's already been reports, you know, about, you know, Echo, Amazon Echo.
and I'm sure Siri and I'm sure Google, whatever the hell you say to Google, hey Google, or whatever, those are all being recorded, monitored.
They have algorithms.
If you don't think Twitter and Google and all of them have algorithms and the government doesn't for Siri or whoever to be able to listen and once they hear keywords or key sentences or key phrases that it automatically connects and goes straight to FBI or whoever it is, then you're crazy because they do 100%.
And like you were saying, people are like, well, I don't give a doubt.
damn at the FBI are listening.
I'm not doing anything wrong.
But that is not the point.
The point is they're infringing, fringing on your rights.
Yeah, absolutely.
And not only are they infringing,
but there is a opportunity that they can turn things around on you
and take just parts of what you said, you know, recorded parts,
and turn it around on you and say, oh, by the way, you're a criminal now because you said this.
And they only take a part of what they recorded of what you said.
Yeah. I mean, and yeah, you're right. You're 100%. And to that, to what you're saying on that, is, you know, they could literally, and we've talked before on the other podcast about how IBM helped and contributed to the Nazi Germany to figure out a way to account for every Jew in the country so that they could then and go kill them and assassinate and murdered them.
So imagine how easy it is, though, now for the government, especially with full reins and full access to.
cameras and to microphones and to everything that you possibly have.
Now, we have to understand and remember that, you know, when we sign up for Facebook or
Instagram or Twitter or whatever, and it says, hey, we need access to your camera and
microphone.
Do you allow this?
Yes.
And you have to because if you don't, you can't access the app or you can't use it.
So then thinking about the Twitter files and the government's involvement there, well, they
had full reins and access to Twitter and Facebook and Instagram.
So they basically have full access to everything that you allow.
these social media companies to use, which is everything, which means they can hear you right now.
They can hear us right now.
Yes. And that means not only Americans. That means people in Europe, Canada, Australia, anybody that
uses Twitter or anyone that uses Facebook. Our government, America, is listening to you too.
By the way, Europe and Canada and Australia and China and whoever, well, I don't think China has Facebook,
but all of those countries ever, you guys should ban Facebook and Instagram because the United States
is probably worse than China when it comes to spying on your data.
Exactly.
I mean, think about that.
We should worry about that more than TikTok.
Yeah, we know for a fact the U.S. government is 100% involved in our social media companies.
But yet we're questioning China and TikTok?
Like, come on, bro.
Seriously?
Come on, bro.
I mean, that's ridiculous.
It's absolutely absurd.
Because just think about that.
Our government, America, we really, our government knows everything about
everyone else in different countries.
They do, because we own all the major platforms.
Yeah, a huge part of me
I've thought about this often is like,
I truly believe that like, you know,
I don't know.
I guess you could think back on social media companies
and think that they were all just created organically,
you know, that there was these smart people
that came along like Zuckerberg and,
and who was the guy?
Well, MySpace was Tom.
I remember that dude.
He was like, if you, as soon as you signed up for MySpace,
You had one friend.
And it was that dude.
It was that dude in a white shirt and he was looking back on the computer.
And his name was Tom.
I guess he was a creator of Myspace or whatever.
Well, Myspace was like lit before Facebook or any of that shit was.
That was like the first social media platform that, you know, you were on.
I don't know what it is now.
But, you know, parts of me think, and this could be a whole other conspiracy theory.
But I don't know if there's a theory or not.
But it is a theory to think about.
It's like, were these social media companies,
created organically just by smart people all of a sudden that had these ideas for this?
Or was the government actually behind all of these things being created to then better
surveil, access people around the world and get all of their information?
I don't know because to me, when people have access to everything around the world
and have access to media, I don't know, though, because they only show us the media they want
us to see.
Yeah.
So that doesn't work either.
So maybe you're right.
I don't know.
because, I mean, look how involved they've been with the government ever since. I mean, really. I mean, and especially now,
especially in Operation Warp Speed of Global Government, they are heavily utilized in these social media companies.
And I just don't, it doesn't make sense to me how this exactly happened because, you know, it just so happens that all of these social media companies are very far left.
All of their, all of their money is funded towards Democrats. And the Democratic Party are the ones that go for globalist agendas, period.
And there's a lot of Republicans that would go for it too.
There's a lot of piece of shit Republicans as well.
I'm not saying it's just Democrats.
But what I am saying is that the administration and the government we have right now are heavily behind the New World Order, Agenda 2030, all this green bullshit, which is, you know, honestly, I think it's, you know, do we have climate change?
Well, go back and listen to our climate change episode.
Just scroll back, find it.
We do.
But, you know, it's not necessarily.
It's not going to take over our earth and destroy our earth.
It's not going to happen.
Yeah.
At least not anywhere close to our lifetime.
No.
When the earth is destroyed, it'll be from something else.
Not because of the pollution on Earth.
I'm sorry.
That's not going to happen.
Yeah, I mean, we do contribute, but not in a way.
Like 1%.
Yeah, I mean, if you look at a, like, when a volcano erupts,
the amount of carbon and it puts an atmosphere is like quadruple,
whatever the world population does in so long. I mean, it's ridiculous stat, right? But also with our, you know,
with our climate change episode, we read through documents and actual documents that showed that
even back in the day when this whole thing started was climate scientists were lying. They were
literally lying about numbers. It was very similar to how, you know, systems and hospital systems
or whoever lied about COVID and numbers there. I mean, very simple.
And I'm not saying that we shouldn't take care of the earth.
Of course we should take care of the earth.
But I think that overall, what population is doing on the earth is 1% of what I can't say the word right now.
Darn it.
Because strathies.
Catastrophe.
Thank you.
Catastrophe.
Yeah.
Anything can happen beside what we're doing to the earth.
Solar flares or, you know, anything.
Look at Armagedon.
Armaged, got...
Damn, man.
Oh, my God.
Armageddon?
Armageddon?
Armageddon.
Yes, Armageddon.
That's it.
Thank you.
I'm going to shut up.
No, it's all good.
No, I mean, yeah, but you're right.
I mean, there's so many things that can destroy this Earth.
But, you know, right now, the biggest threat to Earth is our government and the
bullshit that we're getting ourselves into with the nuclear, powerful countries around the world.
Right.
Not just Russia, China, you name it.
Like, everybody hates the United States.
except for the people that we give a lot of money to, right, and have control over.
You know, we, that's the thing with these NATO countries are saying, well, the United States are bullies,
and we don't want to appear to be bullied by the United States.
And so there are some NATO members that are starting to kind of like, be like kind of dissent against the United States.
And, you know, how far will that go?
It depends on how far the Ukraine war is going to go.
But what we do know, this is not a Russia-Ukraine thing, podcast, but, you know, Russia is waiting.
You know, we've not heard a lot about Russia-Ukraine war right now because it is dead of winter there.
It is really cold.
But the summer months are upon us.
Even in Ukraine, they're going to start warming up over there.
And you're going to see a massive offensive, it seems like, from Russia.
And who knows what's going to be the result of that?
But, you know, I was listening to the other day.
You know, we think about nuclear missiles, right?
We think about nuclear warheads.
And I can't even remember the Jack Ryan show or whatever on YouTube.
But there's this guy that used to be a nuclear weapons officer.
and he was also a CIA officer,
which I do think he's a propagandist.
I think he's one of the,
I think he's just another dude
that goes to these podcasts
and, you know,
is told or has an agenda
to portray to this massive audience
of patriots, right?
And it's funny,
because if you read comments
on the Jack Run show
in this particular guy's episode,
there's so many people like,
yeah, that's a great propagandist
they sent to your show
to, like, tell us all that bullshit
because we don't believe it.
But, you know,
it was interesting, too, though,
he was thinking about, well, you know, if Russia didn't just set off a nuclear warhead, right,
or sorry, if they didn't, if we didn't get into a nuclear war with Russia, right, what they may do,
and, you know, I don't know if you know this, but you can actually take a nuclear weapon in a briefcase.
You can, you can, they can, someone can go through Belarus or wherever, have it, have a nuclear
warhead in a briefcase, take it into Ukraine, say Kiev, right?
Mm-hmm.
And detonate it just on a, in a briefcase.
case and is a nuclear warhead.
Wow.
And then it's gone.
I guess that person would be like a kamikaze person.
Well, no.
I mean, they can detonate it without even being near it.
But the point is, is that, you know, it would also be a lot harder to figure out who did it.
Because then it's not, you know, when you have missiles launching from Russia or wherever their places are, that's easy because you can see them on satellite and all this.
But if you have someone smuggle a nuclear warhead or whatever in a briefcase and you just go right.
in the middle of the city of Kiev
detonate it.
Russian can deny it.
Whoever can deny it.
I mean, who knows?
And then there's just this whole conspiracy.
Then people could say,
well, the United States might have done this shit.
Like, who knows?
Or NATO, you know,
it could be positive deniability.
Well, it could depend on to the amount of surveillance
that Ukraine has in their country.
You know, like here.
I don't think it would matter after nuclear war.
And I'm just thinking about the Boston Marathon,
those guys that had.
those big pressure cookers that bombed the, you know,
they eventually got caught because of surveillance cameras.
Yeah, but they didn't have a nuclear warhead in a briefcase
because there ain't going to be no damn surveillance left when that thing goes off.
That shit will just be gone.
I don't know.
I mean, maybe surveillance records to a cloud somewhere, I guess.
Maybe that's possible.
I don't know.
I don't know.
But you could just be random.
If you have a briefcase or suitcase with a nuclear warhead,
you better not do that.
because there is a chance you can get caught.
Okay.
Well, there's your advice for a day not to go use a new board.
Don't do it.
Guys, I was going to play another song at the end of this,
but I think we might go over to Substack right now.
We're either going to do it tonight or tomorrow to talk about this bombshell new thing about 9-11.
And it's nuts, but it also doesn't surprise me.
And it kind of goes somewhat off the back of what sort of we talked about tonight,
but it's just nuts, right?
So if you want to hear that, please go to our...
our substack. It'll either be released tonight or we'll do it tomorrow night. One of the two,
I don't know if we'll do it tonight or not. But also, we are, we've been working in a yard too.
Like, we've kind of, we've done so much podcast getting a substack ready and everything.
We haven't had time to do anything else really, right, between working and doing everything
else. And so, but once we get all that done, which we're going to try to do a fireside chat this
week, record it, edit it, put it up on our substack. It's going to be cool. We're going to have a fire.
It's going to be a camera.
and we'll have microphones.
We're going to sit down.
And we're just going to talk about just cool shit.
Like we're going to talk about, I think the first thing we're going to talk about is Skinwalker Ranch and some UFO stuff.
Because all of our fireside chats are going to be at night.
So it would be cool.
Right.
And I can't wait for you guys to see our backyard.
It's not big or anything.
But we have put a lot of work into it.
And every year during spring is so hard to get it back to where it needs to be.
Because the winter.
Yeah.
That's where we are right now.
So in trying to do that and keep up with our podcast.
and everything.
You know, it's just a, we are constantly working.
Yeah, it's a ton of work.
But we do appreciate each and every single one of you guys.
And by the way, if you guys can give us a good review,
wherever you're listening to a set,
give us a five-star review if you think we're a five-star on Spotify,
especially iTunes.
People hate us over there.
I don't know why.
But anyways, go give us a good review over there.
Do whatever you can to help us out.
We really appreciate it.
We do work really hard for you guys.
And your support means everything to us.
and we want you to understand that.
And so when we get messages or you,
we see new subscription on the substack
or whatever the case is,
it means everything to us.
That means more than anything.
And it makes us know that each and every single subscription
or thing or whatever we see from you guys,
it just makes us know what we're doing is worth it.
And so that's what we do this for.
We don't do it for ourselves.
We don't do it to see her and talk.
We do it for you guys.
We do it for us.
And we hope that you guys stay with us.
And we do not get censored or banned,
which is exactly why we're on substack.
Go check out our substack.
Guys, we love you.
We're going to have a 9-11 bombshell episode on our substack.
And then we're going to have fireside chat also coming this week.
So we're going to really be releasing a lot of good premium content.
And we release tons of free content as well there.
But anyways, go check us out.
And until then.
Peace out.
Peace out, guys.
