Investigate Earth Conspiracy Podcast - Climate Change Conspiracy Podcast | Climategate

Episode Date: October 15, 2021

Is Climate Change real? What happened with Climategate? Is Climate Change a conspiracy? These are all the topics we talk about tonight on the Climate Change conspiracy podcast. What is the government using climate change to try to gain more control and power over?

Today is the beginning of the end and the start of a new beginning. Find yourself and let go over the demons in your head that have helped you be kept. It's time to flip the page and prove them wrong. It's time for time. Time is up to stay in a bye talk is trying to bring you down. In the blink of an eye, you realize that there's so much more to the books than the page you were stuck on. Finally, you will be free till you are the highest authority. I'm sorry when it comes to knowing which you stop trading yourself for the impeachment after.

Hello and welcome to Investigate Earth Podcast, guys. That was, I love that song. Sorry, but, so we did shorten it for you guys tonight. It is Friday night, October the 15th, and here in the eastern part of the United States, it is 7.23 p.m. And we are doing this on a Friday because we have been away for a couple days and are back. and wanted to talk about this because we feel like this is a very important thing, especially with everything that's going on, at least here in the United States,

as far as this new spending bill, you know, Joe Biden's plan to spend $3.2 trillion, and this plan has a lot of stuff going on as far as climate change, carbon emissions, and all of these different various, in my opinion, insanities. So, welcome to Invest the Earth Podcast. I'm your host Chad alongside I'm with Sherry. Hello. And that fan is going.

It's crazy I can actually hear that. And it's barely, you can't hear it any other way, but the mics pick it up pretty well. So anyways, this is climate change. This is what we're going to talk about. And we've never done a podcast episode on climate change. And I don't know why we haven't because in all honesty, climate change is important. So I do want to preface this in saying that I do believe climate change is. happening. I believe climate changes every day. I'm not a climate change denier. I am not a, you know,

one of those people that just believe in no way, shape, or form that climate change exist. But what I do know is that they are using climate change. And I say they, especially our U.S. government is using climate change to control more of what people do, how they do it, when they do it, where they do it. And that's the issue. It is just a number. step into tyranny. It is another step into deciding what you can and can't do. But also, it goes a little further than that. And we're going to talk a little more a little bit more about that. It goes further than that. It goes, it goes into, you know, when Biden took office, uh, the number one thing he did was completely cut off our energy independence. And in this new

$3.2 trillion bill, it furthers that agenda on cutting that off. And not, to mention it's going to cost us just an astronomical amount of money, the United States, of what he has in this plan. But when he cuts off these oil and gas pipelines and all this stuff, not only did he lose thousands of jobs by doing this in a time that we didn't need to lose jobs in the United States, but it also just each pipeline and each thing he did towards the agenda he's trying to push, and he's pushing it in this $3.2 trillion plan. And there were people outside the White House during the White House press.

press secretary or press conference yesterday and although they know that there's a astronomical amount of money and an absurd amount of just stupid uh plans that he has in this in this in this in this in this agenda in this package um there were people outside the white house protesting and then it wasn't enough because these people want to protest they they want to take away everything all of our independence everything that we do have always done they want to take this stuff away. So anyways. But yeah, Sherry, you said at the beginning before the podcast that you, the reason I'm saying

this is because you said that, well, I don't really love doing this podcast because I do believe in climate change, which, I mean, I'm not saying I don't believe in climate change. Right. But this is something that is, I'm glad you said that because this is something I want to get across to people. I know. And oh, boy, did my eyes get big when you put me on the spot because I was like, oh, I I mean, I do believe a lot of things that humans do.

They do make the changes worse. And I see, like, you know, temperatures rising and, you know, in the polar, the Arctic. Although you do know that Antarctica had the coldest temperature ever recorded the other day. Yeah, you just told me that. And that's crazy because they say that, you know, everything's melting and it's making, like, the sea level higher on the West Coast. Yeah. So I don't know. Well, you know, Joe Biden.

So there's an article in a New York Times that says, our New York Post says Joe Biden's climate change plans will burn billions, won't bring actual change. And it says, you know, Joe Biden is going to rejoin the Paris Climate Agreement soon after being inaugurated. And that's what he did. You know, but he's wanting to combat this and proposes to spend at least $500 billion each year on climate policies. And so, you know, the problem is that this $3.5 trillion. dollar package that he's got trying to push through here. Yeah, I get that. It is going to cost the country and it's going to cost each of us and it's going to cost us

dearly. And our grandchildren and great-grandchildren and everyone else. If we ever even make it to that. If everyone else that comes. I mean, that's a lot of, I mean, we're talking about this the other day, Chad, that we're spending more on this package than we did in any world war or any war, any war in the United States. And, you know, you think about when you're in.

involved in a war, that's a lot of money. You got, you know, all the equipment, the people, you know, everything. Yeah. It's a lot of money. And we're spending way more money than anyone wore. Yeah, exactly. And so some of the things that have been proposed in this, and then also some of the things that Biden and his fellow comrades have said in the past

was even talking about what we eat and how much we eat of it. And he was specifically talking about red meat. Now, if you go to Google on all these places and type in burgers, red meat, climate change, right? There will be these fact-checking websites like they do on all this other stuff that, even though it's true, even though this has been said, you can do this on so many things that is absolutely true. It's on video, all this stuff. And then fact-checkers will say, oh, no, that's a lie. No, it is. It's true.

Biden has proposed, like he wanted to get rid of 90% of red meat or more by 2030. Because of the Cal emissions. Because of, yeah, that's a lie. The gas emissions from the farms. You know, he wants to do all of this stuff. You know, not to mention, one of the biggest holes in our ozone that we had is now closed. It closed up. And, you know, this is something that was a big issue, but it's closed.

I mean, that hole was closed up. Since when? And how do we know that? Like recently. I mean, scientists have said this. Because I even know, like, when I was growing up, there was a hole back then. I mean, that was a while ago. There was a hole.

Yeah. And they were always worried about this hole getting bigger. and bigger and bigger. And now, for some reason, it's getting smaller? Yeah, it is. Or closed up? Well, no. There's, there's, I believe there's multiple holes in the ozone.

But the biggest one that I guess we had seen has been closed up somehow. It closed itself up, whatever happened. The issue with the climate change, I'm not saying there isn't climate change. I believe, you know, there are two groups of scientists. There are some scientists that say that climate change is natural and there's nothing that we can or cannot do that is ever going to change it. It doesn't matter what it is. There has been things that have happened.

So, for example, climate change is not just the temperature heating up. Climate change can be also a result of temperatures falling. And it all depends on different things. It depends on different scenarios and different variations. Now, keep in mind, there are two theories of why the dinosaurs died and when it extinct. There is one that is the meteor theory. And that has been a somewhat popular theory. And it became more popular once the climate change politics came in.

And this is something that I was reading the other day. Originally, one of the things that most people believed of why dinosaurs went extinct was the Ice Age. Yeah, that's what I grew up learning. Yes. And so as politics started getting involved in the history, history of our world and started to talk more about climate change now because look it's not truly about i mean look you guys have to you have to understand this these people right now and it's not just in united states it's in australia uk australia is basically in tyranny united states

is headed that way uh there are hospitals that are refusing patients because they weren't vaccinated on on donor list um they are firing nurses and doctors that they desperately need to care for sick people in a pandemic. They are about to fire half of the Chicago Police Department in one of the most gang violent cities in America because of a COVID thing. So if you really think about this, if you think about the whole climate change thing, right? This whole scenario that anyone, even someone born today is not even going to be affected truly by climate change. Right. But yet they care so much about us.

They're going to spend trillions of dollars and they're going to take away meat or they're going to try to take away what you eat. And they're going to tell you what you can and can't drive. They're going to tax you on your car, by the way. That's part of the climate change thing. The taxes. The mile tax is climate change. That's why they want to do it. They want to tell you that we no longer can depend on ourselves for any oil or.

gas. But instead, what we're going to do is we're going to pay another country four times the money, which means they're going to have to ramp up four times the oil and gas production, which is exactly what we would have been making in the United States. Exactly. That makes sense. But yet, we're going to pay them now to do it. So somebody on the earth is doing this. Somebody is. Yeah. We're still making these emissions or whatever. Somebody's doing it. So why not us? Yeah. And it's actually. probably going to be Russia. Russia is going to be the one that is the benefit of these contracts, this money, this oil and gas refineries. And so guys, what you have to understand is when we

shut down in the United States, our oil and gas lines and our pipelines and all this stuff, don't think that we're just curing our climate change. And that's what they're trying to make people think. But that's bullshit. Because what you have to understand is that what then we are doing is we are paying other countries such as Russia to make four times the amount of oil and gas and we're going to pay them for this and we're going to pay in return we're even going to help pay for them to open up more refineries

the United States is doing this and we're already seeing this with our own gas like it's been happening for months and it just increased again yeah today it's over three something dollars which is probably cheap for other places yeah it's over three something dollars here but usually like

all right I'm just going to say I would say it was 280. Yeah. And before Biden came into, into presidency, we were under a dollar. Or we're a dollar something. I remember.

Yeah, $1.80. Or $1.75. Something like that. Yeah. And now we're up to $3 a gallon. Yeah. So, you know, these protesters that are protesting

outside of the White House, you know, and they're saying, shut down more oil refineries and more of this and more of this. What they don't understand is that for everything the United States shuts down,

We then go and pay Russia or somewhere else, mostly Russia. Well, I thought Middle East was a lot of it. No, but Russia is a lot of it now. Really? Yeah, it's shifted. I was reading about this the other day. We're paying Russia already because of what we've already shut down. And they're having to make more oil.

And so what the United States, at least, is telling you, and by the way, if you're in Australia or you're in UK, and you guys are having similar things or you guys are on similar things, And this whole Paris Climate Accord is bullshit. But that's just a way for Paris Climate Accord is a way for all the countries to get involved. It's just another aspect of globalization. It is another aspect to get everyone on some kind of same theory, same plan of whatever it is, same way with COVID. They're trying to get ever new, the World Health, I was going to say the New World Health Organization,

it should be called that. the world health organization, same thing with COVID, same thing with climate change. So just keep in mind that when your country says, well, we're going to shut down some pipelines, guess what? Someone's still going to be making it because you have to have it. And that is a fact. The United States is currently paying Russia four times what we paid them last year because we have less pipeline. And I could understand like, okay, you know, part of Biden's thing is he wants to have these cars that are. electric or battery run or whatever that's not hurting us but until then why it is but those are two

but i was going to say until then why did we close down our gas lines and our pipelines and our things because we don't even really have that many of those cars here available in the cars that we do have available most people in america can't afford them well you know well yeah well here's the problem is is that number one those cars are not cheap you know you look at teslas and stuff like they're not cheap. And so really what this whole climate change accord deal is going to do is if you really care about the low-income families, these families are the ones that you're going to be taxing more so.

On mileage. I'm sure that some point in time they'll say, well, hey, you know what? Electric vehicles, we won't tax you on mileage, but we'll tax the gas cars because that's what they're going to do. It's just like unvaccinated versus vaccinated. And guess what? The poor people and the people that can't afford Tesla's or whatever else is available at that point in time is the ones that's going to be screwed.

it's going to keep going down the line. Now, there was actually, these morons actually tried to say, and I couldn't believe this when I read it, and I don't know if I'll come across it tonight, but oh my God, I couldn't believe it. The reason why they're wanting to shut down some of these refineries is they're saying that it is predominantly around black neighborhoods, and black neighborhoods are suffering the most from this,

from pollution. That's literally what this dumb-ass government, is saying. And I looked into it and I was like, you've got to be, you've got to be kidding me. Like, these, these morons are actually trying to bring race into this too. Like, I mean, they are though. They really are. Like, they have said this. And I was reading this. I was like, you got to be shitting me. There's no way they said this. And I was like, oh my God, they fucking did say this. So it's like, not only is police bad because of race and, you know, whatever else, Dave Schpell is bad now. But, you know, he's not, he's not, he's not, he's not

horrible bad because he is black. But what I'm saying is now oil refineries and gas is bad because it's around black people. Their neighborhoods. And it's bullshit. I mean, come on, guys. I mean, they will do anything to push us in. So, let's get to the damn nitty-gritty of this, okay? Because we don't got to go all night on this. It's Friday night

and we're going to keep you guys forever. But we want to get to the basis of it. Now, I don't know how many of you have heard about Climate Gate. Climate gate is something that when I started looking into climate change, and by the way, we've not been big climate people either or, right? We've never, you know, yes, we've done conspiracy podcasts. Yes, we've talked about everything from Bigfoot to aliens to supply change to presidential elections and so on and so forth.

But climate change has always been something that I was kind of like, you know, I guess, I mean, you know, I guess it's probably happening, you know. but I also have looked at data based on shoreline rises and so on and so forth. You know, I've looked at all that stuff. I've also looked at things that have happened in the past, like the Ice Age, which I believe is what devastated the dinosaurs. And the reality is that when politics started coming in, they started going more with the theory of the meteor, because they didn't want to say Ice Age because that is a form of climate change.

It is a massive form of climate change. Yeah, but during the dinosaur ages, we didn't have cars in emissions going out and screwing up the ozone layer. We didn't, but we had something else, which is called natural climate change, polar shifts. This is something that many scientists have proven. So it's more like polar shifts is not something that humans are doing. No, we have no idea. It's gravitational. Yeah.

And there are also things that, you know, climate change can, happen. First of all, we've also had more solar flares in the past 20 to 30 years than ever. And they're even talking about a solar flare that could come very soon that could wipe out internet for months. And it can cause a complete shutdown of the world. And so when you have solar flares, many scientists have said all of these solar flares that have happened over the past 20 to 25 years, they emit heat. They do. They emit waves of heat. Like waves of heat. that warm up a planet. And there are many scientists

have proven this theory, they believe, right? The same as people believe they've proven another one. Right. And we're, I know humans are not affecting the sun. No.

So what is climate gate? Let's talk about this. Okay. Climate gate basically erupted in November 19 of 2009. And it was basically a collection of email messages, data files, and data processing programs

were leaked from the University of East Anglia. Climatic Research Unit. And this was located in the United Kingdom. It basically revealed scientific fraud and data manipulation by scientists concerning the global warming theory. Now, this is in 2009. The scandal, that was a suffix,

it basically implies that the state of climate scientists over the past decade revealed by more than a thousand emails, documents, and computer code sets between various prominent scientists. The release information is evidence of deceit by climate scientists, which is kept a secret or hidden from the public until the data was leaked by the CRU. The CRU's apparent obstruction of freedom of information request, as revealed by the leaks, was only the tip of the iceberg. Climate Gate is said to have had revealed the biggest scientific hoax in world history

as the worst scandal of this entire generation. Okay? Now we're going to stop there And we're going to go on. So they're saying it can possibly be a hoax, this whole thing. Yes. Well, not possibly. What you have to understand is this is factual.

This is all documented. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is something you can look up. Now, what I will say is when you look up ClimateGate, I'm sure that liberal media is going to try to spin whatever they can into whatever it is. But what I will tell you is go to duck. Go somewhere that you can actually read through emails. You can see them decoded and see what they say.

how they are talking about manipulating data and making it look worse and all this shit. These are things that you have to do as researchers. And you don't have to do. We're going to do it for you right now. And we're going to try to do it fairly fast because it's not that hard. The reality is that not only are these just random scientists, these scientists, which is what created this entire climate change theory, right? Climate change fact is what they're calling it.

They're calling it a climate change fact. These scientists were among, I mean, hundreds of the top scientist group for climate change. And so this hacking group, first of all, they tried to go for a Freedom of Information Act. Right. And they were basically interfering with the freedom of, and what a Freedom of Information or FOIA request is, is it basically is public documents that are submitted to either government or whoever. and so a group of people or people can go and try to request these documents to see what these documents say, especially about the climate change and then you can compare them.

Well, they were basically trying to get in the way of those documents, these scientists, this group. Because they didn't want them to see them. They did not want to see. They basically did everything they could. They wouldn't release them. They wouldn't do this and all this stuff. So then apparently this group was a hacking group or had a group and they hacked their servers and released every single email they had. When was this?

They released it to the public, 2009. Oh, this was in 2009 when they leaked all this stuff. Yes. Yeah, it was a huge thing. I mean, and the media tried to kind of brush it under the rug, but man, there's been documentaries about it. There's been meteorologists that have said it's the biggest hoax of our entire life. This literally says the worst scandal of this entire generation. I mean, and by the way, it's still going on.

I mean, they basically went with what those scientists, and this is what you have to think about people. Think about something that is basically like almost proven bullshit, right? These emails show them manipulating data, manipulating the key things that are trying to say is climate change. And then after that goes away, because the media quits talking about it, then you just go back with it again. And so it's not a conspiracy that conservatives, as they call it, or whoever, the climate change deniers as they call them. it's not a conspiracy that they deny them. Many of these people deny climate change because of this exact thing, climate gain. It is basically proven that the top scientists in the world that told the world this was happening lied.

And they were not only lying, they were corrupt. They were making sure that they twisted the data. And what benefit would they do that? Like why? Exactly what we're going through right now. Okay, gotcha. Total control. Oh, okay.

I mean, there's ways that you can control a public when it's something to do with your livelihood. Now, keep on. Look at COVID. Look how much control countries are trying to take over their people right now, over COVID, right? And they use fear and they use scare tactics and they use, we're doing this for your own good. There's that quote, hey, the worst quote, it was said by a president, and I cannot think right now. It was it Eisenhower or whoever. He said, the worst thing you can ever hear is, hey, I'm the government and I'm here to help.

That is the worst sentence you can ever hear in your life because you better be ready to be screwed. Yeah. So the climate get emails and climate data became the subject of an intense debate. Call into question assumptions on the anthropogenic man-made global warming, the legitimacy of climate science and charges leveled by the CRU and the intra-governmental panel on climate change, which claims human beings call. climate change was severely shaken by Climategate. Evidence revealed told the truth about the man-made global warning, it's a fraud.

Despite the significance of the scandal and its impact on the theory suggesting humans cause climate change, in a profoundly bizarre situation, the mainstream media attempted to bury the Climate Gate story. At the same time, liberal Wikipedia became censored Climate Gate, or sorry, quickly censored climate gate and referred to it as an illegal incident as the work of a computer hacker's on stealing data. So instead of actually saying what came from the data, they classified it as illegal incident

and we cannot cover this. And by the way, Wikipedia has went so bad as far as like, they're liberal. And, you know, like for example, Project Veritas is coming out with these videos on all these, they're just going undercover with the people that work at Pfizer and Moderna and all these places. And they're not, they're not Trump supporters. They've never once said, hey, I'm a conservative, I'm a liberal, I'm any of this, they're journalists. They're trying to find the truth. That's all they're doing. And so if you go and look up

James O'Keefe on Wikipedia, it says he's a far right extremist or whatever it says, right? And that's absolutely false. It's just Wikipedia has been made to where everyone used to think that it was the facts like yeah yeah like if you go there yeah you know that's that's it yeah but so think about this in your mind do you think that was planned do you think they planned to make sure wikipedia was the factual book of god and then the day that they had all this shit coming they're like well if they go to wikipedia it's going to tell them exactly what they want to know well i think we have some information in wikipedia yeah we do through our sites yeah we do yeah They use our stuff.

I'm like, I'm going to sue the shit out of them. Yeah. I mean, word for word, they use our stuff. Not just our stuff, our pictures, our website, or everything. And that's not on investigating right, though, but it's on some of our other stuff. So despite the significance of the scandal and this impact on the theory suggests that humans cause climate change in a profoundly, oh, my bad. Sorry, I was getting that. So anyways, commentators and other.

Others in the media covered news on ClimateGate, many of which outlined important takeaways about specific information valuable to the public. So climate scientists was troubled after news reports of ClimateGate scandal went public. After release of thousands email messages and collection of data and data processing programs from the University of Anglia Climateic Research Unit, the trustworthiness of scientific community's global warming data pool was called into question. On November 29th, with the publication of a report by the Sunday Times of London, it was reported that scientists at the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit in the United Kingdom was confessed to throwing out most of the raw temperature data on which the theory of global warming was founded. So they threw all that out.

This is crazy. The admitts occurred following requests of the data under Freedom, Freedom of Information Legislation. Michelle Malkin detailed one of the many problems that will occur as a result of such data loss at the University of East Anglia, the research institution at the center of climate gate. She reported it means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations

said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years. So basically she's saying because of this was all thrown out, there's no way they can check and see if there was an actual steady rise in temperature, which is the founding,

the founding data on climate warming, global warming, climate change, yeah. So the Climate Gate scandal revealed that corruption of climate science is a worldwide problem and is not confirmed to just Britain's CRU Climate Research Center. For instance, it was discovered that the reported warming trend in New Zealand over the past 156 years was created by man-made adjustments of the temperature data. So they found this out. 156 years they were trying to say that this was man-made, but they were actually adjusting the temperature. So, yeah, it is man-made because they were bullshitting the data.

Right. Okay. In New Zealand. Yeah. The centerpiece of New Zealand's National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Temperature claims were proven false. The data contributes to global temperature statistics and the climate science report by the IPCC. The false data was used by the Obama administration as a reason for remaining insistently stubborn on particular. in the climate conference in Copenhagen in 2009 and 2010.

So the Obama administration insisted this is why we got to go to this Copenhagen thing. And it's basically what leads to the Paris Climate Accord, which is what we are in now, which is also why we're spending trillions of dollars in this package towards global warming. It goes all right back to the same thing. You can follow this line of bullshit all the way up. So it goes from Obama's times. Now, I guess that was 2009. Well, it started before that, but the whole climate, like the whole climate change thing, and these scientists, the ones that lied, the ones that emails were hacked and the ones that they proved it was bullshit.

The ones that the media just kind of brushed under a rug, even though it's worldwide known, the climate gate existed. Everything we've done climate-wise has consistently been based off of this, okay? So that's what's nuts. Oh, my gosh. I mean, it really is. It is absolutely crazy. The CRU scientists deliberately falsified data and then used the results of the falsification

to obtain additional research funding. So they not only falsified it, they used that to get more money. Okay? And so this is a criminal fraud under English law. Because of the worldwide fraud revealed from Climategate and the burden it caused the global scientific community on December 1st, 2009,

Phil Jones, a director of embattled climatic research unit in the United Kingdom, stepped down pending investigations into allegations that he overstated the case for man-made climate change. On January 28, 2010 from the London Times inquiry over the Climate Gate emails found Phil Jones broke the law by refusing to hand over its raw data for public scrutiny. So he refused.

Because it was made up. Yeah, he refused to hand it over, and he broke the law. And so he stepped down. Did he go to jail? Who knows? So Climategate fraud also extended to the United States and the Competitive Enterprise Institute. The CEI had their attorneys file three notices of intent to file suit against NASA.

Chris Horner represented CEI said that NASA, Goddard Institute for Space Studies, failed to comply with the Freedom of Information Act for over three years. The Climate Gate emails originating from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia showed how all the data centers worldwide, including NOAA and NASA, conspired in the manipulation of global temperature records to suggest that the temperature in the 20th century rose faster than they actually did. NASA's two primary climate centers,

the National Climate Data Center in Asheville, North Carolina, and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies of Columbia University in New York City, systematically eliminated 75% of the world stations with a clear bias towards removing higher altitude, higher altitude, higher latitude, and rural locations. So they removed a lot of their locations to do this. The number of actual weather stations used to calculate average global temperatures was reduced

from about 6,000 in the 1970s to 1,500 today. The number of reporting stations in Canada dropped from 600 to 35. Okay. So this all goes into the United States as well. And they're getting rid of all these reporting. places and you think about it should be going the opposite it should have been 3,500 back in the 70s and now 6,500 now because of technology and it's, you know, how we've changed and we've grown and we know more data, but now it's going backwards because it sounds like it's a conspiracy

that they're lying about everything. Yeah, absolutely. You're 100% right. There are graphs that just show how this is all BS. I mean, this is why I'm glad we do this. podcast because you know um you just hear climate change all the time if you talk to the average person they're going to be like yeah climate change definitely exist i can talk to i could call my brother i mean my brother believes anything it seems like nowadays um but uh or doesn't either one i don't know i don't know but be nice i am being nice um but it's just either doesn't or does believe i guess well it's um believes in the opposite what you believe but there's a lot of people believe i don't know it's it's It is what it is.

So the CRU scientists from the Climate Gate emails on several occasions actually discuss methods of subverting the scientific peer review process, which means trying to make sure that didn't happen to ensure that skeptical papers had no access to publication. So they wanted to make sure that anybody that even thought about talking shit about this couldn't publicize it. And by the way, as we're going through this climate change, and this is in 2009 and 10 and it's still going on the day, think about the corruption that we're hearing right now and then think about COVID because it's happening in COVID too. I mean, think about Ivermectin and these other drugs and they're just bullshit in studies

and trying to figure out ways to get rid of this thing. You know, it's all based on money. As scientific data begins showing a downtrend after 2001, the Climategate emails show a criminal intent to create fraudulent data and defraud the public of massive amounts of money with a cap and trade scheme as part of a global warming movement.

Climate scientists as the CRU worked to circumvent the Freedom of Information Act process in the United Kingdom. The Freedom of Information Act explicitly forbids deletion of any material subject to the FOIA request. The penalty for such a criminal act is a fine of up to 5,000,

presumably being found guilty of such an act or even suggesting it would also bring about significant disciplinary procedures. But that's what they want to do. They wanted to circumvent anyone being able to even get FOIA. request. I mean, it's just nuts. I mean,

and the primary issue for the whole climate gate is the data manipulation. Science requires information. It requires data. Right. And this whole inadequacy, yeah, this whole inadequacy of climate record was always the

main issue, even before Climate Gate, became known to the public. Right. You can't collect data on bullshit data. That doesn't work. No, because they are literally just making the data they want it to look like. Yeah, they were making it to make it look like this is changing and it's our faults and we've got to do something about it. Yeah. That's what it sounds like to me. Well, Dr. Tim Ball wrote in the Canada Free Press on the primary issue for climate gate, he said climatology recognizes

three distinct periods. The very recent instrumental period, the historical period to 3,000 years and the geologic biologic for the rest. The climate research unit scientists manipulated data in all three, but the first is critical because it is a source of material for the computer models, the vehicle of their deception. They claim in their emails are taken out of context. In context, the fullness of their criminality is absolutely exposed. They claim there's nothing of consequence in the emails, but the emails show a litany of manipulation of the data, the process, publications, peer review, and personal attacks

to try to hinder their data. I mean, it shows it all. And so here's the thing. What these scientists had on their side was the media. Okay? They had money. Look, they weren't doing this for no money. It's just like the way the medical system is working with COVID.

You know, Ivermectin was showing great results. It still is. But yet now, the same company that created Ivermectin, and came out with another pill, even though it is actually showing less effectiveness in many studies. But yet, guess what? This is what the media is talking about. And by the way, this drug costs $17 to make and is $780. There's a 400% increase in, I mean, it's sickening.

And we're going to have another podcast on that. We're going to have a podcast on pharmaceutical companies. And it's so funny because people like our parents are people that just see regular media, they're like, oh, yeah, have you heard about the SARS or whatever? The new pill that's come out? We're like, yeah, it's from the same company, you know? Yeah. And it's like what you said, $16 compared to $700. But they didn't hear about the $16 ones.

Oh, exactly. Because of media. No. Well, exactly. You're 100% right on that. You couldn't have made a better point of that. Oh, yeah. Have you heard of aramectin?

No. Well, yeah, I heard. Yeah, that's the horse dewormer. Oh, okay. Well, have you heard of this other pill that costs $780? Yeah. It's supposed to be a miracle. Yeah.

Oh, really? Yeah, that's crazy. I mean, that's literally what it is. And it's less effective than... It is. I mean, according to studies. The horse, demerner. The moirner.

So, ClimateGate basically shows strong evidence of fraud and may actually show a smoking gun proof of cover-up by the CRU scientist to exaggerate the existence, causation, and threat of global warming. So there was a guy, Cube Antics by Robert. Robert Grainner, who was a scientist and engineer with an agnostic stand on global warming, he offered a statement about the research methods of the CRU scientists. And he attempted to show proof that they had the means and intent to falsify data. Garner pointed out that the ClimateGate emails alone do not provide sufficient proof that the CRU was deliberately tampering with the data.

What the climate gate emails do show is that climate scientists may have committed a felony using government. government-funded money, moreover, within the collection of data and data processing programs, revealed that ClimateGate code from the CRU shows proof that valid temperature station readings were taken and revealed or skewed to fabricate the results skewed. The scientists wanted to believe, not what actually occurred. Analysis of the CRUs code revealed the foundation of the manipulated temperature readings. So he reiterated his findings. He said, first and foremost, this doesn't necessarily prove anything about global warming as science.

It just shows that all the data that was the chief result of mostly environmental legislation, which is what we're having right now, created over the last decade, was a farce. This means that all of those billions of dollars we spent as global community to combat global warming may have been for nothing. if news station anchors and politicians were trained as engineers they'd be able to find real proof and not just speculate about the meaning of emails that only made it appear as if something illegal happened so he's basically saying everyone is a bunch of dumbasses

that they literally manipulated and basically what this guy is saying I don't give a shit if you read every email I don't care what you take from these emails which most people say I mean they were literally talking back and forth about manipulating data, right? His point to this is,

is I don't give a shit about the emails. Like, I have proof that they manipulated the temperature data. Right, and that's all that matters. Yeah, and it's bullshit. Because you can't have data with false data. Which, by the way, was a mega felony because they did this to get government funding. A shit ton of it, by the way.

That's why. I'm talking about a lot of money. I mean, it's just like a pharmaceutical company. Well, we've got to get a vaccine. Government, how much you're willing to pay us. Billions? Oh, hell yeah. Let's do it.

We're going to give you the data. Yeah. We've been working on a cold vaccine, quote unquote, for years and could never figure it out. But now the government wants to pay us billions of dollars for COVID. Yeah, we got it in like three months. We got it. Yeah, it's pretty good enough. I mean, how many people are going to die?

I don't know. I mean, all of our animal trials, they all died. But I mean, I think it'll probably be fine in humans. But it's just so crazy, Chad, that you found this report. You know, and I, okay, to be honest, I was working all day. And I didn't really, like, research anything. sometimes I don't. Well, that's why I just, I just listen to what you're saying.

I'm just educating you. Yeah, you're educating me and I listen and kind of like, you know, put my opinion or whatever. But right before our podcast, I was like, well, you know, you're like, what are you doing, sharing? So I got on my phone. I was like, well, I'm going to look up this stuff real quick. You're like, it's too late. But when I looked it up, it was everything against what you're saying. There was no way for me to find that ever on Google.

Yeah. Well, no, you can't. How would you find that? No, listen, listen, you make a great point. Yeah, that's what I'm saying. Yeah, exactly. Yeah, you make a fantastic point because I told you when I was researching this and I was like, I really want to research it. I really want to dig deep and I want to find out some things.

And so when I got on to the climate gate subject, I was like, man, you know, and I started reading through this. And I was like, damn, this is real. You know, this is one of the things that, like, the media can't deny, right? And they can't deny this happened. I mean, you can look it up on Google. If you look up ClimateGate, it'll be interesting to see. I'm just going to, I'll do it with you guys on the phone. I mean, on the phone.

Yeah, you guys, we're talking to you guys on the phone. That's what it feels like. Yeah. ClimateGate. I just did that in Google. So let's just see what it says. Oh, shit. Okay.

It's still listening to me. ClimateGate. Not a lot of stuff. Oh, fact check. Oh, of course, factcheck. Oh, of course, factcheck.org comes up. And I'm just curious what climate, what fact check. says.

Is it say it's a lie? I'm just curious. Because, well, oh my God. Fact check doesn't say shit. It doesn't know whether it's a lie or not. You know, usually when you go to fact check, it's like, lie. Fault.

Yeah. It's like, it gives a summary, analysis. I mean, come on. Oh, my God. So they can't. So Wikipedia says, The Climate Research Unit email controversy,

also known as ClimateGate, began in November 2019 with the hacking of a server at the climatic research unit. So it proves it happened. You know, and, and, um, there's no, there's no doubt it happened. I, and I'm not going to read through Wikipedia because I just don't want to do that, because they're commies. But what, what I will say is that, um, it happened. And, you know, and they can't deny it.

It is, is something that, you know, they can't deny. And, and I think there's going to be a lot of things. that we are experiencing now and have experience in the past few years, same thing. We're going to look back on things when more data comes out and when it's like more, it's like a lot harder to deny. And I'm saying a lot of things. But how are we going to know if they're falsifying data or data or whatever? How are we going to know?

Hackers. I mean, that's how, that's the only way we knew anything of this. Yeah, that's the only way we know about this report is because hackers got in there and like, you're full of crap. Yeah. So how do we know from? this day forward what's true and what's not

you know if scientists are doing this to get funding. Look. And this funding is helping them but the funding you know is also helping the government have more control over people because it's more of a global thing like we got to get control of this thing and money and yeah everything.

Yeah I mean it's money I mean they want money and control I mean and and and it also I mean there's so many things but you even look at like Biden's 30 plan and if you want to fact check that or they're going to tell you as bullshit but it's not because

he said himself that we need to get rid of red meat. They were even mainstream media was talking about this four months ago. Because they were saying because of the gas the cows have. Four months ago CNN was talking about that. Yeah. They were trying to talk about one hamburger a month or something shit. We were laughing

about it. Yeah. And then all a sudden now it's fact checked as false. Biden's not coming after your burgers it says. I mean literally This is what they do. I know. But, I mean, it was. I remember us laughing about this a couple months ago.

So I don't know if you guys remember Al Gore. Al Gore was, you know, he's big in the climate thing. Yeah, and he doesn't know how to spell potato. Yeah, I don't know. But Al Gore is shockumentary, as they call it, an inconvenient truth. He has a documentary. It's called an inconvenient truth. It's perhaps the earliest known climate gate fraud and most widely known global warming hoax.

The firm was designed to remote fear of global warming. with false claims. It's basically called junk science. And it was basically digitally enhanced lies proclaiming the end of the world. During Al Gore's promotional efforts for his film and to raise

alarm on the effects of global warming, he boldly predicted, we have 10 years to doom. Oh my gosh. At the Sundance Film Festival in Park City, Utah. Larry David commented on Gore's promotional efforts to raise awareness about his

shockumentary and said, you know Al you know Al is a funny guy but he's also a very serious guy who believes humans may only have 10 years left to save the planet from turning into a total frying pan

so this is one of the big things and I remember Al Gore really pushed this stuff this was something he made a shit ton of money off of a documentary off of everything I mean it was insane so guys

I don't think we gotta we don't have to just keep going on this well I'm just saying and I think we're going to dive back into this later too. But I don't think we're going to die in 10 years. Our earth is going to be destructive because of humans messing up the earth. I think that maybe that has a role to play, like with all the, you know, the gases or whatever, pollution. I mean, I just think about even like the trash dump. I've been out there on a field trip

just to see. And you see these big, like, these big things with just gas flowing out all the time from just the trash. Yeah. I mean, so we're emitting, like, things that are bad for the Earth, obviously. But so are animals. Yeah, but is it bad enough to actually change the way the Earth is going? No. I mean, the Earth is so old and we're so little. We're just a little speck in the Earth's, like, lifespan, right?

So, and they're saying, oh, well, it's in the last years where humans are affecting it, but it wasn't going that fast before that. It was, you know, slower. And now that humans have come in contact with the earth. I don't believe that, though. Yeah, I just because, okay, it kind of goes with the Bible to me. Like, the earth is so old and you think about the Bible, Earth has changed over time, long, long, long times, right?

So I just don't see how we are affecting the earth that fast. And I also think about this. And keep in mind, by the way, even in biblical times, they had farms. Yeah. I mean, they had to. Right. There were thousands of, there were probably more animals and cows on Earth then than ever. Yeah.

But they didn't have cars. No, they didn't have cars. But, I mean, but you also have to, but people also don't realize that even with this electric car thing, to mine lithium, which is what you need for things, is astronomical as far as the equipment you need to mine lithium. I'm talking about things that produce a shit ton of black burning coal, gas. things giant oh machines yeah machines and yeah just putting all that everything in the atmosphere yeah i mean

the amount of the cost it takes to make that is is absurd i mean it's just it's literally but look i guess my point is that i'm not saying climate change don't exist i think it does but i do think it i think it occurs naturally and i think what we have to understand is many scientists many of the actual

sciences are not full of shit say that doesn't matter what we do as humans it's not going to change it There is nothing we could really do to, like we would have to just basically get rid of everything. And even then, we don't even think, they don't even think that that would cure climate change. Climate change, a lot of scientists believe is natural. And yes, we do implement some things in the atmosphere, but the majority of it is a natural occurrence. It is not something we're going to save.

This is done for money, power, and control, and, and, control. and manipulation. And I think these emails and this climate gate absolutely shows the climate change climate shit is bullshit. Yeah. And now I'm thinking about too, like when we used to have that net spray or whatever, it was an aerosol. Remember? The hair spray.

And they took that away. That's when we have big hair or whatever. They're trying to. Well, they still have aerosol. They don't have a lot because it was dangerous to the ozone layer or something. Oh, yeah. I'm sure. But, I mean, how much danger is one spray?

It's bullshit. That's all bullshit. I mean, that's what I'm saying. It's just, it's BS. And I also been thinking like, all right, think back to 2009, you know, or think back even back way before then. Think about the temperatures. Have the temperatures really changed around here?

No. I can remember having my 21st birthday here in March, March 20th, and I was outside laying out getting a sun tan in March. Yeah. And that was like a long time ago. But, and here's the thing. Like the climate does change, but it changes back and forth. Right.

And it has always done that. Right. There will be times of snow in a region for years and there will be times of heat in a summer or a winter or whatever. And I think, do you think what about El Nino's and all that stuff? Do you think that affects all that stuff? It does, but I mean, I don't know. Not really. But, you know, there's like a climate.

And the last thing we'll say is there's a climate chain or a climate gate 2.0. And it was basically a new batch of emails that was not that long ago. It was like eight or seven, six years. ago. 5,000 emails among scientists central to the assertion that humans causing a global warming crisis were anonymously released to the public yesterday, igniting a new firestorm

of controversy nearly two years to the day after similar emails ignited the same theory. Three themes, and by the way, this is on Forbes. This article is on Forbes. Three themes are emerging from the newly released emails. Number one, prominent scientists central to the global warming

debate are taking measures to conceal rather rather than decimate underlying data and discussions. Number two, these scientists view global warming as a political cause rather than a balanced scientific inquiry. And number three, many of these scientists frankly admit to each other that much of the

science is weak and dependent on deliberate manipulation of facts and data. Oh my God. This is in Forbes. And these are new emails. These are newer emails. Yes. And Forbes is pretty reliable to me. Well, yeah, I mean, when they want to be. But I mean, for them to even write this article. Right.

They had to have, you know, I mean. They had to really trust what they were writing. And I'm not saying Forbes is liberal, but they're more liberal than anything. Or not liberal, but extreme left or whatever, whatever. And they're even saying it's BS. Yeah. So regarding scientific transparency, defining characteristic of science is the open sharing of scientific data theories and procedures. So the independent parties and especially skeptics over to particular theory or hypothesis can replicate and validate asserted experiments or observations.

emails between climate gate scientists however show a concerted effort to hide rather than disseminate or yeah disseminate sorry disseminate underlying evidence and procedures they wanted to make sure everything they did was hidden this says quote i've been told that ipCC is above national freedom of information acts one way to cover yourself and all those working in ar5 would be to delete all emails at the end of the process right phil jones a scientist working with the united nations intergovernmental panel of climate change. So he was basically instructing these scientists. Make sure you delete your emails. Make sure that, you know, and he says, I believe we're above the Freedom of Information Act.

So you don't get to worry about that either. Yeah. This is the United Nations. These people are full of shit. I'm just so, I'm so fucking tired of people lying to us. I'm so tired of this bullshit. You want to spend $3.5 trillion dollars

to fuck people's lives over, to take people's jobs, to raise our gas prices, and by the way, all these things that you're doing for climate change, raising our gas prices, taking away fucking refineries, you're not only doing that, but you're also raising beef prices, you're raising meat prices, you're raising prices of everything. It's called inflation.

And all this inflation shit, which is not going to go away anytime soon, it's going to get worse, it's going to cause more poverty, more starvation. You're fucking doing it because of a lie, and you're doing it because of fucking climate change. And this is a huge problem. COVID's fucking bad enough. And you, motherfuckers, to start more shit. You guys want to go and fucking more people over. And I'm sorry I'm cussing,

but this shit pisses me off. This is plain as day a lie. There has been thousands and thousands and thousands of emails that all of you can look up to show this is bullshit. I just have no words. I mean, it's crazy because I'm sorry. I did cuss, but you know what? Whatever. Sometimes. Sometimes. Sometimes. Sometimes. It's, especially when he's emotional like that. But I mean, it is scary. You know, here's a government that are saying they're for the poor. Well, really, they're going against the poor because they're raising gases.

They're making everything more expensive. They're making food. Well, unless, you know, they're planning on giving them food and giving them a car. I don't know. Oh, hey, Sherry. Oh, shit, I can't say that. Damn it. Okay.

Let me say it this way without saying what I want to say. In your line of work, when they give people free food, how does that food look? Well, you used to look way bad. Cheese sandwich? Yeah. Oh, no. When they don't pay their bill, they get a sandwich with cheese on it. Yeah.

It's worse than what people get in prison. Yeah. So anyways. Yeah, that's what you're going to be getting, though, a cheese sandwich on some white bread. You ain't going to have no steak. You might be able to have one little slider burger a month. No, but people that are on welfare right now in EBT or whatever, they get good food right now. Yeah.

Well, I mean, yeah. They do. I mean, right now, but until that shit ain't available anymore. And then what are they doing? I mean, they're going to send you prison food. I mean, they'll probably be like, well, they get in prison. Lush. Well, I don't know.

Bologna sandwich? Bologna sandwich. You'll be getting bologna sandwiches. And then one day when you guys out here that are supporting this bullshit and y'all are like, you know, three, four years from now, you're like, damn, man. What are we got, where are we eating today? Oh, you know, we fucking eat a bologna sandwich. You remember we voted for them, Mofos, like four years ago? Yeah, and tonight, we're going to fry it.

option. We're going to fry it tonight and make it different. Oh, we can't fry it because they took away our butter. Oh, okay. Well, shit. Why don't take away our butter? Oh, they said it was causing gases. I mean, seriously, that's what that is, that is happening guys. It's really scary. I'm just sorry,

I'm sorry, but man. I just, I just can't stand these fucking people that are this and look. And I think you proved it without you, with a reasonable, like, everything. You proved everything tonight. You know, like I didn't

research it like I said and listening to all this stuff. But I'm glad you said that you I believe in climate change and it. Yeah. I'm glad because I hope a lot of people out there do because I hope a lot of people like Chad, I don't know if we should do this or whatever but no, you came up with it. You came up with it like and that's scary

that most people like me don't even know. Yeah. And this is just breaking the iceberg man. There are so many other corruption things laden in this. and we're going to leave this open for another podcast to elaborate on more of what we're talking about. And by the way, I think that our next podcast, and I got to remind myself of this, I need to write down a note. It needs to be on the pharmaceutical industry because these type of people that do shit like this, they piss me off. Okay?

They do. And it's because it affects our lives. But the pharmaceutical industry, we're going after next because these people are just the worst of the worst. and they are connected with their government but these people are the worst of worth. They always have been. And now they're just getting worse. And by the way, this is being allowed by

past politicians. They threw out things that was reasonably priced medications. They literally wrote it out of order so that these companies could do this. And trust me, don't think there's not a way that they, a reason they did this. But we want to go into all that.

Guys, enjoy your Friday night. We're going to get off here now Before I freaking get more pissed off And it's Friday night We're probably not going to have a podcast Tomorrow or Sunday But we might have one Sunday But Monday

We might have Sunday Sunday evening We'll try Probably Sunday Yeah But have a great weekend I know everything's crazy But just enjoy your time

And you know I don't know Go drive one of those badass old 1970s cars that smoke every damn wearer. Until next time, we love you. Peace out.