Investigate Earth Conspiracy Podcast - Dallas ICE Sniper Attack: Left-Wing Extremism Surging Against Christians & Law

Episode Date: September 26, 2025

Tonight we break down the shocking ICE facility shooting in Dallas, where a rooftop sniper killed one detainee and critically wounded two others. This is just the latest example in a disturbing pattern of left-wing political violence sweeping across America. From the assassination of Charlie Kirk, Minnesota Catholic school shooting, and the attempted assassination of President Trump, the violence is escalating at an alarming pace. We’ll also revisit the Nashville transgender school shooter and how these events connect to a growing wave of radicalized attacks targeting conservatives, Christians, and law enforcement. What does this mean for our country’s security, our faith, and our freedom? And why does the media continue to downplay these acts of violence when the narrative doesn’t fit their agenda? Stay tuned as we expose the facts, cut through the spin, and reveal the bigger picture behind this rising tide of political violence.Check out our merchandise storeOur Youtube Channel

welcome to Investigator's podcast. I'm your host Chad alongside my beautiful wife, Sherry. On tonight's episode, we have to confront a dangerous pattern that the media downplays at every turn. That is the rise of politically driven violence from the left. Now, we've seen Thomas Crook's attempt to assassinate President Trump. We've seen Tyler Robinson murder Charlie Kirk in cold blood, allegedly, at a public event. We've seen Robin Westman open fire to Catholic school in Minneapolis, shattering stained glass windows and many lives. And just yesterday in Dallas, a man named Joshua John climbed onto a rooftop. and unleashed gunfire on an ice facility, scrawling anti-ice on his ammunition,

killing one detainee and critically wounding others before taking his own life. These aren't just random outbursts. They are ideologically charged attacks, carried out by individuals radicalized by a culture of hatred, division, and propaganda. Tonight we're going to break down who those shooters were, what drove them, and why the establishment would rather bury these stories than omit the truth. America is facing a wave of left-wing violence and ignoring it puts every one of us at danger. welcome to the show. It is September the 25th, 2025.

We are once again trying out another video platform. So for those audio listeners, we're going to do our very best to where you don't have to watch the videos if you do not want to. This video will be out probably a couple of days after the audio. We will have that on our YouTube. If you guys do not follow our YouTube, I do encourage you to go follow it now. That is, Investigate Earth Podcasts on YouTube. Just go check us out. We recently did an episode with Ashton Forbes, which,

honestly got a ton of backlash. I don't know that we've ever had an episode, Sherry, that got more backlash done the Ashton Forbes episode where we talked about Charlie Kirk. And a lot of people are just kind of talking about Ashton dispelling or trying to debunk any conspiracy that had anything to do with Charlie Kirk. We got a little bit of backlash as well by people saying you didn't push back. You didn't push back hard enough. But as I say before, though, Sherry, this was not our podcast to debate Ashton. That was not what we set that episode up for.

Ian Carroll actually agreed to come on that podcast, the little podcast, as Ian Carroll calls it. And he agreed to debate Ashton Forbes. Yeah. The problem is about, I don't know, an hour before we were supposed to debate, Ian Carroll sent me a message, which kind of went viral once Ashton posted it. And he said, look, you know, I'm not going to debate Ashton because, you know, he's just going crazy on social media, all of this. And I told Ashton a day before and we had had this kind of plan for three or four days. I said, Ashton, I guarantee you Ian's not going to come on the show because he just has too much to lose. You know, regardless of whether he's right or Ashton's right, you know, when you have a platform like Ian does and Ashton has a big platform as well, especially on social media, it's just for, it's probably not an Ian's best benefit to come on and debate really anybody.

And that's why you don't really see him in a lot of debates. Yeah. And Ashton was really fired up. And he is fired up about this whole thing. And, you know, Ashton's not usually in the lane is what they call it of politics. He stays in the science lane. And now he's getting in the politics lane. And boy, he was fired up. So it was hard to even get a word in wise with Ashton. No, it was.

Yeah. Yeah, it was tough. But, you know, like I said, Ashton was kind of fired up to debate Ian. And so instead of, you know, Ian showing up and debating Ashen didn't happen. so Ashton was kind of off the leash or off the chain I guess you can say now as we said in the last episode audio we do not agree with everything that Ashen said obviously in that show we have not agreed necessarily with everything Ashen has ever done but that's not really what we are about we believe that look if you have something to say come on our show we've literally done episodes

of Black Lives Matter to where we had a black guy from Texas that came on our show that had a lot of the same views as most Republican conservatives and then we have had another guy that, you know, after that episode, he said, hey, when y'all want a real dude on y'all's podcast to talk about the inner city stuff, the St. Louis. St. Louis. He was a rapper. We brought him on. An interesting thing was he did obviously have a different perspective, but it was strange because by the end of the episode, we kind of all still agreed, right? Now, the thing about I was hesitant on what we call this episode. And this is going to be about far left violence. And this was something that I believe a lot of people disagree with Ashen Forbes on, especially when it came to Charlie Kirk

because of Tyler Robinson, because we don't necessarily have all the evidence that we need right now, we don't have what the people want. And very similarly to Thomas Crooks, you know, there have been people in the past to where we knew every single thing about their lives within 24 hours. And it just depends on how does it fit the narrative? Does it fit the narrative for the establishment or does it not? If it doesn't fit the narrative or if there is a backhanded behind the scenes operation going on, then you're likely not going to know a lot about it, right? And so when you see stuff like the Tyler Robinson assassination of Charlie Kirk,

allegedly, right, to where this guy supposedly used a 30 out six bullet, which could typically go through large game, you know, elk, moose, whatever, and especially deer. And yet you have this, what appears to be in Charlie Kirk, you have this almost exit wound on the front of Charlie Kirk. And there was no exit wound at all from what we understand on the backside of Charlie Kirk. And if you guys have not heard our last episode with Rashid, which was, he was a federal law enforcement employee. He was also military, I guess, not intelligence, but civil affairs. They tell a lot of this stuff.

And then even before that, he was paramedic. There's a lot of things about the Charlie Kirk assassination, 100 percent, that does not add up. And so I think one of the things that a lot of people did not agree with Ashton about was it's not just the left. We can't just blame everything on the left. But I also understand his point, too, to where it's like, look, if, you know, if they have blamed the right for everything over the past four to eight years to where they censored and silenced people like the sitting president of the United States, for example, Donald Trump, he literally got his Facebook and YouTube and basically every account he was on banned as a sitting president of the United States. and not just Donald Trump. You had Gina Carana. You had, I mean, obviously, Alex Jones, you had Nick Fuentes, you had everybody.

And it wasn't just the higher up big dog names. It was people that were just talking about their opinions, whether it was about COVID-19, whether it was about criticizing Joe Biden or that administration. They were getting silenced and censored. We go back to the Twitter files. Matt Taibi, where when Elon Musk actually bought Twitter slash. Now X. When he bought Twitter, they said, hey, let's just go through like some of the conversations from some of the CEOs and some of the CEOs and some of the higher ups at Twitter.

And let's see what was actually going on. Well, what did we find out from the Twitter files? We found out that the FBI and especially the Department of Justice and the Biden administration was literally paying Twitter to silence conservative, to silence a dissenting voice on Twitter. We know that for a fact because it is literally in black and black. white. It is in text. It is in messages between the government. It is in emails. We have all of that. So, you know, the fact that when Jimmy Kimmel was, quote, unquote, silence or censored for three days, everybody was like, no, we can't have this. We can't have censorship in America because, guys,

they did that to us. Now, I understand the side to where you think, like, yes, they did do this to conservatives, right? They've done this to us for a very long time. And that was Ashton's point. They've already done it to us. So why are we not doing it to them? That was his whole point about censorship. Yeah. And the question, though, lies is like, do you continue to do it, right? Do you continue to do what they did to us? Because that's obviously not the right thing to do. Our Constitution does afford us the First Amendment. It affords us all of our constitutional rights. And so there was always the argument back in a day that says, look, you know, because it is a private platform, because it's Facebook, because it's Instagram, because of all these things, then they have a right because

they are a private company. So technically, if you want to go out there on the courthouse and you want to say whatever you want to say, then yes, that is protected by the First Amendment. But when you are under a company or a social media company, no longer... Or if you have an employer. Yeah, but you no longer have the freedom of speech under that particular environment. But here's where it gets a little stranger is because when you are a social media company and you are afforded certain protections under the federal government of the United States to where you are not held liable for whatever people.

say on your platform. And when originally the social media companies actually went to the government and said, hey, look, we don't want to be liable for what people say because we don't want to censor people, but we also don't want to be sued. So make sure that we have these section 230 or whatever the protections are that they afforded the social media companies. But even after they were afforded all that, which is immunity essentially, for anybody that said anything, they could not be sued because of, just similar, by the way, to the

vaccine companies and pharmaceutical, they still censor people. and, you know, they censor people because they knew the strong arm of the government was going to come down very heavy on them. The Biden and Harris administration. Now, I'm not saying that the same thing obviously cannot happen in this particular case because it absolutely can. You have Trump administration in. You know, we just did acquire TikTok today, which, you know, I guess China is going to still be somewhat involved in that. And there was actually a reporter to the asked Donald Trump today. He said, what kind of content are you going to?

push more so on TikTok now. Like are you going to be pushing more MAGA content? And he's like, well, if I could do MAGA content 100% I would do it every day all day. I would definitely do that. But he did come back and say I will not do that because we have to be fair with everyone and fair to

everyone on every side. Right, right. Yeah. And so I was really like you go Trump for that because I think that's important. Yeah, but he also says, you know, Oracle is working behind the scenes to make sure that, you know, and Oracle apparently has been working with TikTok for quite some time. And it was always interesting to me when they were trying to cancel TikTok and they were saying

China has your data. China is getting all this information from you and they're going to spy on us and they're going to use this for their benefit. Like first of all, that's complete horse crap. Number two is like you also have to understand the Oracle, which is the company that a lot of people believe was actually created by and for the CIA. Larry Ellison was the founder of that company. it's interesting finding out and talking today with Trump, not talking with Trump today, but as Trump announced today, he said, look, you know, Oracle has already had a big part of data storage for TikTok, even before we actually just recently bought it as America or as the USA. In kind of a co-venture, I think it's like 70, I think it's around 70% owned now by American assets or entities.

And then you're probably going to have that, you know, 20 to 25, 30% ownership from some either bite dance or whoever the Chinese company is. But Oracle is still going to be behind it, right? So, you know, I never worried about, like, what was China going to find out about me using TikTok, even though I don't really use TikTok a lot. But I'm actually more concerned about Oracle, having all that data and information. But Oracle's had it for a long, long time. Why would you be worried about it? Well, I'm not. I mean, well, I just don't, I don't really like Oracle as a company that much. I don't know 100% everything that Oracle does and doesn't do. What we do know is their connections and ties to the CIA.

We also like Palantir, for example. Palantir is very similar. Palantir has, what they're essentially trying to do is to put all data from every single facet of our lives into one database that then the government can go and utilize. So you can go in a, and use a search term in whatever the database that Palantir creates. And you can find out basically anything that one person is doing in any way, shape, or form. And I'm sure that data is going to be pulled from your phone. your car, your Amazon Alexa, your literal Amazon remote.

I mean, they are going to house and store data for every single thing that we do. And it's going to be much easier for intelligence agencies, for the deep state, for whoever, to be able to then go and find and centralize everything. And you might ask yourself, well, why is that a worry? Because that is when we have complete and utter and total control. one of the biggest problems for the United States has always been their lack of ability and tools to be able to control the people, especially, right? When you have the United States of America that is one of, it is the biggest, you know, gun toting countries in the world as far as their citizens go. You have over 300 million citizens and there's far more guns than citizens.

So they know they can't just go and take away weapons. But they do know that they can utilize data to control us more. and especially in events like COVID-19, mass propaganda, shooting instances, the Charlie Kirk assassination, how information is disseminated, and how is it controlled. So all of that's very important. That's why I'm saying I wasn't too worried about China having access to our data. But before we get into this episode any further, we're about to go into the shooting yesterday at the ICE facility in Dallas.

We're going to talk a little bit about Thomas Crooks. Like we still haven't heard a lot about Thomas Crooks that tried to assassinate Trump. we might even, I guess, touch on Charlie Kirk and that assassination, all the stuff that still doesn't make a lot of sense. We did have, like I said, in our last audio episode for those that are watching on YouTube right now, if you want to go and check out our Spotify, that is where you can find all of our audio episodes for the past seven years. We also have a merchandise, which I think we're trying to change out once a month. So we're going to have limited edition merchandise. It's usually stuff that we talk about. we do have an I am Charlie Kirk shirt on there.

We're going to donate all the proceeds to that to turn the point USA. And then we have stuff like, you know, you name it. We literally have geoengineering shirts on there. We also have some pretty nice hoodies that have our merch. The MK Ultra shirts were really cool. MK Ultra. That sent us pictures that like really, really good. Yeah, they're pretty sweet.

Yeah. So go check out, investigate earthstore.com. That is our store. And obviously, follow us on social media. We are on X. We're Facebook or Instagram or all those things. I would say that we get the most reach on X because it is a free speech platform, but actually we get the least reach on X of any social media platform.

We had started getting a decent amount of reach actually on Instagram. I mean, I think over the past 30 days, we were like at 29 million views. And then when I posted the video of and I didn't even. The guy behind Charlie Clark. Yeah, signaling. You didn't even show like the app. No. The actual like thing.

No, I didn't show that the shooting. I didn't show the graphics. stuff but when i when i posted a video of the sign language or signals behind charlie kirk that that day that's when our account got demonetized which we weren't making money on in anyway i still don't understand how all that works but i think now we're shadow band again so uh we'll see but let me go ahead and share the screen here now like i said we are on a new platform but for those that are audio listeners you're not going to miss anything you're going to be able to hear stuff and i'm going to be able to read this as well but we're going to go ahead and share the screen and we are

going to go to the actual official news article this is as of today um let me see what this looks like yeah see i don't like the way that looks i don't know why it does this but um let me just change this layout real quick of course it's not going to do that there we go let's just do that for now all right so here's the actual article so we have the recent shooting and uh dallas ice shooter Joshua John wanted to cause terror according to handwritten notes. Now, this says the brief. A shooting at a Dallas ice facility left one person dead and two injured. The gunman died from a self-inflicted wound.

The suspected gunman, 29-year-old Joshua John, showed a high degree of pre-attack planning, including scouting facilities and writing threats, security is being increased at ice facilities nationwide, and two surviving victims, one of whom is a Mexican national remain in critical condition. Now, the 29-year-old man who opened fire on Dallas Ice facility left behind handwritten notes at his home in Oklahoma that shared a motive for his attack to terrorize ICE employees. FBI and Department of Homeland Security officials gave an update on what they've learned in the investigation at a news conference held on Thursday afternoon, which we're going to play that in just a moment. But here's what we know. FBI director Cash Patel and Dallas FBI Special Agent in Charge Joseph Rotheluk released new information about the shooting suspect. behind Wednesday morning attack.

And he posts on social media, Director Patel said the FBI has been working around the clock to seize devices, exploit data, and process writings found at Joshua John's home and in his bedroom. According to Patel, John downloaded a document titled Dallas County Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, which contained a list of Department of Homeland Security facilities. He also conducted multiple searches of ballistics and the Charlie Kirk shot video between

September 23rd and September 24th. John allegedly left handwritten notes behind that read in part, hopefully this will give ICE agents real terror to think about. Is there a sniper with AP rounds on the roof? And it also quotes, to include John's own words in his handwritten notes, John specifically intended to kill ice agents. He fired a transport vehicles carrying ice personnel, federal agents, and detainees. He also fired multiple shots into the window of the office building where numerous ICE

employees do their jobs every day. Rothrock said during a news conference. So I want to go ahead while we're here and I want to go ahead and get into the actual video. Let me stop sharing this if I can figure out how to do that. Sorry, guys. We're getting this. I think you're doing great, Chad.

Yeah, we're trying. You are a tech. I'm not. No, no, no. I'm not. It's been pretty tough. So let's go ahead and get into the press conference real quick. I'm going to make sure that we have this poll.

up this particular press conference we warned about the exact scenario months ago APP to follow ICE agents patrons. Paters need to start downloading these apps and spamming them with false reports. So there are apps that are actually being used in this is what they're saying. But let's go ahead and go to this video on X real quick. And let me back this up about here. Here you go. Charles. I am the ICE executive associate director for enforcement. removal operations. The attack on ICE's Dallas field office yesterday was tragic.

And while our hearts and prayers are with the family of the detainees who were shot, the evidence is clear that this was intended as an assault on ICE personnel who come to work every day to do their job. Violent rhetoric has led to over 1,000 percent increase in assaults on ICE officers, and it has to stop. In contrast to those who would de facto, humanize our men and women. Yesterday, our brave officers ran back into danger, along with ATF, our partners, to save the detainees while shots were still being fired. Those ICE officers just showed the

world who they really are. Law enforcement officers who want the best for our country. That's ICE, integrity, courage, excellence. They were willing to put their lives on the line to pull detainees out of the transport van to get them to safety. They are heroes, and I hope the media has the integrity to shine a light on this story. Enough is enough with the harmful lies and violent rhetoric. It has to stop. The shooter used the ice tracking apps. Anyone who creates or distributes these apps that is designed to spot, track, and locate

ice officers are well aware of the dangers that they are exposing to, law enforcement. It's a casting call to invite bad actors to attack law enforcement officers. It's no different than giving a hitman to location of their intended target, and this is exactly what we saw happen in Dallas yesterday. The media has been amplifying these apps, even as we warned them, it would only lead to more attacks on law enforcement. We truly wish we didn't have to say, I told you so, but here we are. ICE continues to prioritize the safety. and security of our personnel, detained aliens, and facilities, we will do everything possible to increase security to counter the increased wave of these lethal attacks. Again, we call on those

who formant violence and vilify our law enforcement officers to cease the dangerous rhetoric. We also call on law-abiding Americans everywhere to report any suspicious activity. The individual that was out there yesterday shooting at our agents and our officers was trying to take the lives of law enforcement people doing their job. Instead, he killed to or killed a detainee and shot two others. That is something that's unacceptable. The rhetoric that's out there on social media, the rhetoric that is being said by some community leaders in other states,

needs to stop. there's been an increase in violence against ice agents not only in in Texas and Dallas, but across the country in violent protests. Again, I ask everybody just stop. Thank you. There you go. So that was the local director there. And obviously, as you heard, these people have this app to where they can track ice agents,

which is a big problem. for obvious reasons. And there's actually a lot of law enforcement agencies now across the country that are trying to hide in some way, shape, or form their scanner feeds because criminals use those. If you can track down, especially if you are doing crimes and you can figure out where law enforcement and what they're doing and how they're doing it, then you're going to have an advantage over them. But in this space and what is going on in this world, in this country, especially right now, where you have this far left rhetoric. And not only do you have the far left rhetoric, guys, this app didn't just come about from out of nowhere, out of thin air. This has been worked on. Obviously, there is some degree of tracking that someone has behind the scenes, probably a deep state operative.

If you think about like the Open Society Foundation of George Soros, I know Trump just recently announced that he's going to be looking into these NGOs, the non-government organizations. we've talked often on this podcast about these about what they call the deep state and what is the deep state how do they operate well i think there is a deep state within our own country i think we've seen it under the biden harris administration i thought i think we saw it with obama we've saw it with bush the deep state has been alive for a very long time on both sides and on top of that you then also have this globalist narrative this globalist push and the globalist push is to basically demoralize our country and not just our country, but you look at the UK. You look at the mass uprising of people in the UK because of mass immigration.

And it's not necessarily because of a particular group of people, although, yes, many of them are Muslim immigrants that have come to the UK. But what you're starting to see shape up is that as anyone criticizes the mass immigration, the open borders in the UK, they are being arrested. if you post something on social media in the United Kingdom and you criticize immigration, illegal immigration of that, then you are going to be visited by law enforcement. Right now in the UK, they have 30 people being arrested per day because of what they're posting on social media.

And just think about the comment. I think he posted even before he got to the UK. And he says something about UK or whatever. But when he landed, they actually arrested him at the air. airport. Yeah, you're talking about a comic. Yeah, there was a comedian there. Yeah, he had said something in one of his, I guess, sets, this was not even in the UK, but as he landed, he was arrested. And so you can do things and say things outside of the UK. And if you return, you will also be arrested. So maybe you wonder, like, what is this all about? Right. And even with these shootings, even with the mass immigration, the open borders, the United States has had for especially the past four years. I mean, I think right now under Trump, although I do criticize Trump, Trump on a lot of things that are going on right now. But we do know, at least from what we're being told, is that there is basically no illegal immigration coming across our southern border at the moment.

They said it was zero. Pretty much zero per day. But what happened under the Biden administration was not by accident. It wasn't because they couldn't control the border. It was because they didn't want to. It was because they wanted to let as many people from foreign nations across our border as possible. They want to completely destroy an up-in sovereignty of the United States of America.

They want to degrade our values. they want to take out the Christian nationalism conversation completely. And although I'm not saying that everyone in the United States has to be Christian, but even just the Christian aspect, the foundational beliefs and values, our Constitution, everything the United States was built on is being destroyed. And it's being destroyed by globalist narratives. And so when we talk about the deep state, we talk about like who could possibly be behind some of these things.

Well, number one, I think if you look back to COVID-19, I think it was a combined effort. You had the deep state inside the United States, which I call them bureaucrats. You know, there are typically far more bureaucrats, non-elected positions in government than there are elected positions by far. You're talking about the CDC, the FDA. You're talking about the FTC. We have a good friend that got sued by the FTC because he had a product, a nasal spray that studies were showing that it actually could possibly prevent you from dying from COVID.

And so they presented studies. What did the FTC do? Well, they decided to sue this company. And they sued this company because of the fact that they did not want any medicine or anything that could possibly help people during whatever their agenda or narrative was during this time. They wanted to sue them. And now that company is now suing the FTC to make sure that never happens again.

But what we have to understand is that when we look at apps that are created to follow ICE agents, you know, is it an app? that was created by intelligence inside of the United States, doubtful. I think these apps are being created by these movements, by the Open Society foundations and by the globalist to make sure that whatever the America right now is trying to do to continue their sovereignty, to continue their nationalism, to bring back and restore America to what it's supposed to be. They're trying to make sure they up in that.

You know, the New World Order, the Great Reset, all these things that we've talked about in so many episodes, the Agenda 2030. all of these things are agendas that they want to accomplish by the year 2030 to where the United States of America will no longer look like or even close to resemble the United States of America that was written and that was afforded by our constitutional founders and our forefathers. They want to completely upend and destroy that. I'm not a huge Nick Fuentes supporter, but he did have a really good point about that. when you're bringing so many immigrants into America, America is no longer going to be America. It's no longer going to be America because they're not assimilating into America into the melting pot. They're coming in with their own religions, their own beliefs, and it's all becoming divided instead of being a melting pot.

And I thought that was a really good explanation of what happens when we have so many immigrants come in. And I think that there has to be a limit. And the way we get a limit is we have to close the borders. Yeah. Well, I mean, the problem is is that melting pot is one thing, right? America has kind of always been a melting pot. But then there's also going to come a time to where there are factions of religions that are going to try to take over. And we're seeing that in the UK.

We are seeing a call for Sharia law inside of the UK, which is a Muslim, you know, it's a Muslim law. It upends all other nationality or national laws. Sharia law is the highest law of all, according to Muslims. And so this is what we're starting to see in the UK. Same thing is probably happening in many places across the country here in the United States or America as well. But we look at, you know, what we're talking about today is the left-wing violence, right? There is obviously a left-wing rhetoric that is taken over the country that says that if you are Christian, you are MAGA, you are a Trump supporter, you're conservative, you liked Charlie Kirk or anything he said. for if you believe in Jesus, if you believe in God, those are all things that make you a target

now in America. And, you know, we've had this problem for a very long time. Now, I'm not saying, you know, if you got, we've probably done five episodes on the Charlie Kirk assassination. One of the things I do disagree with Ashton Forbes on in this note is that I don't necessarily think it just sums up to this is a left-wing radical single shooter in the Charlie Kirk assassination. That's one of the things I don't think, right? I think there's so many things wrong with what we're being told, what we're being shown, all of the evidence that is presenting itself on social media. And I say evidence because we don't have any evidence from the FBI.

We do not have any evidence from the government. And, you know, to some degree, that makes sense because it's going to take some time for them to kind of go through the rabbit holes, go down the pipeline, see who he was communicating with. And then also you don't want to just go out there and throw everything out there to the public when you do have a trial. Tyler Robinson is in custody. Right. But there is a point where I think the FBI can lay down some evidence and give it to the people so conspiracy theories don't happen where they can explain, oh, this is this and this is why this happened.

We've already looked into this. This is, you know, give us something because when you give us nothing, then people are going to go down the rabbit holes and they're going to look. Well, they did give us something. They gave us text messages, which have no timestamps. It appears to be like from the 1800s, so where it seems like a guy that is in his 20s that is not just in his 20s, but according to all mainstream media and the government that he was a far left liberal, a leftist, you know, and this guy saying, my love, my, my old man, my old man, the way he described the gun. There are just so many weird things that those text messages just say that just doesn't make any

sense. And like I've said on other podcasts, there are no, like timestamps. They just read it to us. We don't see the actual. text messages. No. And I think it were actually Discord messages from what we understand, but we don't know for sure. And then the other weird thing about the Charlie Kirk thing was that, you know, Discord did originally come out once they found out that, hey, supposedly Tyler Robinson

was on Discord and he was. But what they said was, we do not see anything through anything we have researched or investigated that shows Tyler Robinson communicating, planning, or doing anything that has to do with this Charlie Kirk's assassination. but then you had the government come out and they're trying to blame discord very heavily right now for like Tyler Robinson planning all this stuff he not only was a part of this one group but he was a part of multiple groups the far left or the like I don't know the globalist groups that were trying to indoctrinate or radicalize him but then you have discord saying no that's not the case and then just tonight on Fox News I was watching and I find it I found it in her I think

it was Jesse Waters that was saying you know discord you know how many of these shooters are using Discord. I said at the very beginning, for some reason, the government right now has it out for Discord. They want rid of Discord. Very similarly to what we have saw with Telegram. They want rid of Telegram as well. Or signal or anything, but they use the same apps. Yeah, they do. But if they're not going to own these apps, then they don't want them to be a part of anything to do with us because there are some encryption that make it harder for some governments to be able to hack. But I want to go ahead and also play another clip. Now, this is another clip from today's press conference.

And so as U.S. Attorney Larson confirms that the ICE Dallas shooter was a left-wing terrorist who was targeting ICE agents. So let me go ahead and play this real quick. We will share the screen. And you will also be able to hear it if you're on audio. So don't worry. You don't have to see this. Initially, I want to commend the cooperation of the Dallas Police Department, the Dallas

County Sheriff's Office, the FBI, the ATF, ICE, and HSI for their swift and decisive response to this crime. Members of these agencies quickly secured the scene and the evidence and were tirelessly to determine any continuing threat. Due to their efforts, it did not take long to ascertain the identity of the shooter, who was deceased by a self-inflicted gunshot wound, and that he very likely acted alone. His name is Joshua Jan, 29 of Fairview, Texas. Let me just review a very brief summary of the timeline of yesterday's attack. We believe at some point around three o'clock in the morning that the suspect was seen driving on footage with a large ladder on his car. And we believe that that is what he used to position himself on top of the building. The shooting itself started at approximately 6.30 a.m.

After the shooting started, Dallas Police Department arrived on Moss, secured the scene. Law enforcement officers found the sniper dead. They found bullets on the rooftop, one of which was labeled with the words anti-ice. That morning, gunshots sprayed the length of the building, the windows, and law enforcement vans that were in the Salliport area. Detainees were struck by these bullets. One was killed, two were wounded, and both of them are undergoing treatment. Shortly thereafter, the FBI began its meticulous work at the crime scene. At the same time, we obtained and executed multiple search warrants yesterday for devices and locations associated with the sniper. FBI agents executed a search warrant at the sniper's residence yesterday, and there found a collection of notes.

First, I want to point out that one of these notes or papers, the sniper explicitly states, yes, it was just me. That statement appears to be correct at this point in the investigation. Notably, these loose notes included a game plan of the attack and target areas at the facility. He called the ICE employees people showing up to collect a dirty paycheck. check. He wrote that he intended to maximize lethality against ICE personnel and to maximize property damage at the facility. He hoped to minimize any collateral damage or injury to the detainees and any other innocent people. It seems that he did not intend to kill the detainees or harm them. It's clear from these notes that he was targeting ICE agents and ICE personnel.

The tragic irony for his evil plot here is that it was a detainee who was killed and two other detainees that were injured when he fired into the Sallieport. He also hoped his actions would give ICE agents real terror of being gunned down, and he did this to induce constant stress in their lives. He hoped his actions would terrorize ICE employees and interfere with their work, which he called human trafficking. And this, what he did, is the very definition of terrorism. Again, his notes reveal, yes, it was just me and my brain. And he said, good luck with the digital footprint. And of course, we take this to mean that he deleted evidence from his devices. His words were definitively anti-ice.

That said, we did not find evidence of membership in any specific group or entity, nor did he mention any specific government agency other than ICE. Among his papers, though, was a handwritten note in which, crude words, he expressed his hatred for the federal government. Finally, I want to address the heroism of our federal agents yesterday. While under fire, ICE agents and ATF agents who were also present in the facility Salliport area, work together to remove detainees from the vans and get them to safety while the bullets were flying.

These agents were heroic, clearly willing to lay down their lives to save the lives of the detainees in their custody. And that's an extremely important point to make at this point in time. I want to express my deepest appreciation for the bravery of these law enforcement officers yesterday and every single day that they go out there to keep us safe. I'll now turn it over to FBI FBI Special Agent in charge of the Dallas Field Office Joe Rothrock. Thank you. All right. So there you go. So that was

you know, the, I think she's the Attorney General. Is that correct? I believe so. Yes. I think that's what it was. Either way, we're going to have to start banning ladders, I think. We've got to have ladder control in this country. Because if we do not have a ladder control we're going to keep getting these lone gunmen that are carrying ladders on their in their backpacks on their pre-us or yeah in their backpacks yeah it's like they had a 12-foot ladder but he had in his backpack and you can see it right here in a grainy video you see that ladder that was it so here here's the thing too about all this and i want to say like what is is this guy a

lone shooter do we know everything about this well we know more about this guy so far at least than we knew about or know about Tala Robinson, absolutely more than we know about Thomas Crooks. He made sure to mention, yes, it was just me. So saying there's no other accomplices. I didn't work with anyone else, which is kind of also interesting to me because it's like, if you're going to knowingly go and kill yourself, which, you know, he did. And there's some pretty graphic images actually out there on social media of him after he killed himself on the roof.

But if you're going to go do this, you know, I would be, it was just weird. I'm surprised he didn't implicate somebody, right? You know, just try to say that he was working with this group or organization or something. But he didn't. He said, no, it's just me. Don't worry, guys. And I'm only after ICE, although I think this guy literally has killed more immigrants than the government has at this point.

So, you know, good job. You're a shitty-ass shooter. And, you know, this is also maybe the difference in. you know, people that are on the left, not saying that they're not necessarily, you know, good shooters, but we also have to understand that people on the left for years has been calling for gun control because guns are dangerous. Guns are dangerous. We cannot have guns.

There's no way we can have guns. They're just too dangerous. We hate guns. We despise guns, which is why likely he killed a detainee instead of an ICE agent, right? Because he's a shitty shooter. He somehow got access to a weapon, which was legally bought. did not steal the weapon or anything else in august of 2025 august of 2025 he shot in not i think he shot into vehicles also the windows of the actual ice facility which is where i believe he did

actually kill one of the detainees no i thought they were in the van well that he shot into the van but i think where he killed them was in the window but i could be wrong about that you know and then so his accuracy versus tyler robinson just think about this for a second you know tyler robinson according to what we know so far is that this guy took a 30 all six mouser rifle an old one from his grandfather that had what he mentioned in text matches to be a probably two thousand dollar scope and he somehow what it seems like disassembled reassembled disassembled disassembled reassembled threw it in a woods hey i got to reassemble this before i throw it in the woods so people can find it a lot of sense yes like why would

would you not keep it disassembled and why would you not throw all those multiple pieces around everywhere you can possibly find like if you're going to disassemble a rifle after you shoot someone it is to hide it better like after the fact not to hide it in your bag or whatever obviously yes that would be a good reason but i'm saying why would you ever reassemble the rifle and then throw it in the woods but then there's also so much there's also so much that this doesn't make sense either because as a screwdriver on the roof it didn't make sense either because a lot of people say you're you can't even desist you don't need a screwdriver to disassemble a weapon like that well it just depends because there are certain 30 all six rifles that you need two tools uh which are not usually even

screwdrivers number one and number two uh you know this screwdriver if he left it on the roof but then reassembled the rifle after he got off the roof then did he bring two screwdrivers is that we're supposed to believe because he just pre-plan this so well you know there's a lot that doesn't make sense but what we do know is that whoever shot charlie kirk was a very good shot. Whatever happened in that scenario did not miss. It was not multiple shots fired. It was one shot,

one kill. It was, even if it was at 200 yards, which is what they're saying, which we don't know for sure the exact distances from the top of that building to where Charlie Kirk's tent was. But what we do know is that 200 yards

on a 30 out 6 is not a very far distance. That's almost like a pop shot. But regardless of all of that, you have one Tyler Robinson taking this shot. clean allegedly Tyler Robinson, even though he supposedly admitted to all this in text message. He admitted this to his boyfriend slash girlfriend, whatever. And he talked like he was from the 1800s.

And then on top of all that, he then is now not cooperating with law enforcement. He's saying that, look, I didn't do this. I didn't kill anyone. I didn't shoot anybody. And so how long is it going to be until Tyler Robinson is dead in his prison cell? That's what I want to know is when is he going to be suicided? And it's just crazy too because there's so many videos out there that are now saying that the wound we saw was the exit wound. It was not actually the entrance.

And people are saying it came from behind him or to the right of him. And it didn't come from the building. And there's even people have done like audio tests of the shot, the sound of itself. And then we're saying, yeah, the echo. and all that echo and it could have been to the building to the left that it was definitely not the building where he was at where Robinson was at. There's so many different conspiracies, I guess, out there. But I think there are is because it doesn't make sense of what we're seeing on video. Yeah.

And then you also have, which I'll share the screen here, you also have what Joshua Juan or Hahn, whatever the hell they're saying his last name is. I don't know. don't don't really care jean jean but they're saying that this is the bullets that he left behind so for those that are in audio you cannot see this but um it shows a um let me go full screen on this there we go it shows anti ice on these on these on these rounds so you know a lot of people are saying conspiracy they're saying oh my god yeah he wrote it looks like in ballpoint pin anti ice on it's not carved in or anything it's just no it doesn't look like it is.

And so a lot of people are saying this is a conspiracy? Like, is this like trying to kind of push the narrative towards the left? Right. And I've seen a lot of conspiracies out there saying ever since Cash Patel became FBI director is when we're starting to see all these bullets that are carved or have. These sayings or whatever. And they're almost blaming the FBI saying the FBI is doing this saying it's these shooters.

Now, I also want to show you something out. So this is Joshua's sister. So Joshua's sister is a known criminal. She's very much a criminal, actually. This is her. And I don't know. She said, I think it's K.I. Jean, I passed my written state board exam.

She's going to be a barber. She or he, whatever that is. This is Kyoko Jean is the name. It looks very interesting. She, I guess is a she, I guess I can say, has been in jail multiple times. Right here, some of her mugshots from back in 2022, 28, 19, or that's 2019, 19, 19, 19, she's been booked on so many different charges. So she's a criminal as well.

But now we have to get to the Thomas Crook stuff because we get to talk a little bit about this. Thomas Crooks. We still don't know a lot about Thomas Crooks. right we we know that he was allowed to get off multiple shots towards Donald Trump but we still just don't know a lot what is interesting though as i shared the screen and i will show you guys and i'll explain what i'm saying here for those that are audio listeners you know for example right here you have newly acquired cell phone data this was back in 2024 that revealed that an individual who frequented or frequently visited Thomas Crook's home and work address also

visited a Washington, D.C. building near an FBI office in June of 2023. So here's the actual image. This was a cell phone data log that shows that the same person that was going to Thomas Crook's house was also regularly visiting the FBI office right before and before, I think it was six months up until the, the Donald Trump. attempted assassination. So that leaves you with questions. But then you also have interviews with some of Thomas Crooks people or yeah, Thomas Matthew

Crook's people that kind of knew him. And one of them said, hey, look, you know, he actually wasn't very good actually at shooting. To be honest. He doesn't really look like he would be a good shooter, to be honest. No, but let's play this for a quick. I'm going to play this and we'll take ourselves off the screen. Here you go. I mean, he would sit alone at lunch.

I mean, he was just a outcast, and you know how kids are nowadays, so they're going to see someone like that, and they're going to target him because they think it's funny or whatever. So it's the best way I can describe it. And it's honestly kind of sad. Like, I don't want to say this is what provoked it, but you never know. You said it was a loner?

Yeah. I want to say he was a loner more because he was just, he was quiet, but like he was just bullied. Like, he was bullied so. So much. So much. How? High school.

Yeah. What did they still remember at all what they said to him or called him? No. He was just made fun of, I guess, for the way he dressed or his appearance. I mean, he would sit at lunch. I mean, he was just a house. There you go. I'm going to stop sharing that now.

So he'll see someone like that. And they're going to be in mind that Thomas Crooks was kicked off of his rifle team. because he sucked. He wasn't good. He wasn't a good shot. He was on a rifle team, but he literally sucked. And he got kicked off his rifle team. Now,

that might explain why he had to take so many shots, right? But it also doesn't explain why the Secret Service allowed him to get off so many shots. Right. You know, we have Corey Comparatory, which was killed. He was a firefighter that was there. He was a Trump supporter that was at this rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. He is, unfortunately, a casualty because of time. Thomas Crooks and Donald Trump was very near a casualty during this assassination attempt.

But the interesting thing, too, is like, why was Thomas Crook's house scrubbed? Now, from what reports show is that Thomas Crooks, after the fact, after when people in law enforcement, like regular law enforcement went to this house, they said that this house appeared to be like a model home. and so there were many videos in the aftermath of the assassination attempt that showed media would find Thomas Crook's father that would be walking through, you know, parking lots or whatever. They would try to interview him. He would never talk to anybody. And just to be honest, he kind of looked like a slob.

You know, he kind of looked like a slob. He looked like. And normally when you look like a slob, you kind of live like a slob. Exactly. Normally. But even in his house, they said they didn't, I don't, did they even have silverware? No, no, they had no silverware. had no nothing they it was like the house was professionally scrubbed completely and that leads to

this picture which i think have this picture shown right here oh no it's actually not a picture of the video but so right after not long after thomas crooks actually tried to assassinate trump this is there was someone that showed up kind of near where he lived and i'll explain the video after the fact but for the video listeners it's a very short video but here is what it shows Excuse me. What's going on? I have no idea. What?

I can't get down the road? Nope. Why not? Because I was told to close it. What's that? Because I was told to close it. Okay. Are you secret service?

No, I'm not. You're not. Well, I'm allowed to, sir. Well, you can move on, too. I can, but I'm allowed to photograph. You can get out of the way. I got traffic coming. You can go.

I'll go. Now. All right. All right. Have a good one. So there you go. So that was a guy that kind of showed up near where Thomas Crooks lived. They had the entire road closed off.

This was right before when some of the other law enforcement came in and said, look like this house was professionally scrubbed. There was no silverware in the drawers. It was like you could eat off the floors. And like I say, like Sherry kind of said too, like when you look at his father and kind of look at that, it's like he did not look like he would live like he was in a model home. This was something very strange. And not only that, I mean, it was just a simple fact that you have someone that regularly visited the FBI office.

Why are they going to his house, a teenager's house? No. You know, and when we dove all into all the stuff, why would a teenager have off-shore accounts with a lot of money in them? It just doesn't. None of it makes sense. No, it doesn't. No, so he had a lot of offshore accounts and not just offshore accounts. He had accounts worth millions and millions of dollars. right so someone was funding him we don't know could this had been from maybe the same people that might

have been funding this operation of charlie kirk because you know you think about charlie kirk right you had trump which was not president yet he was campaigning to be president of the united states in butler pennsylvania um this was the summer july leading up to the election and which is in my opinion also one of the reasons why trump just kind of superseded everybody in the election was partly because of most people thought he almost just got assassinated by the left. That's what many people believed. So that really did help his cause. That's why there's also conspiracies out there about the assassination.

There's conspiracies with everything. He didn't get shot. Yeah. Well, he didn't get shot or maybe it was set up or maybe it was some type of whatever. I don't know how you would set up something just brazing your ear, though. That's kind of scary. It's almost like Alec Murdoch, you know, when he had his friend try to shoot him. but I think he wanted to shoot him to kill him and it just brazed his head.

Yeah, I don't know. Maybe, I mean, maybe that's possible. But I think with Alec Murdoch thing, which no one's going to know anything about that probably on this episode. But yeah, this disgrace lawyer in South Carolina. Yeah, he had someone try to set him up or try to, I guess, kill him. But I don't necessarily think he was intending to be killed. I don't know. But either way, getting off of that, what I'm saying is that Thomas Crooks, you know,

I don't think it was necessarily set up that a round was. shot through someone else. There were six other rounds. Like not far from where Trump passed where Trump was. Some of those rounds hit hydraulics on tractors where they were holding up the flag. And you could see the hydraulics just kind of basically exploding in this. And so I don't think it was a conspiracy. I don't think it was set up.

I do think that they automatically, once they knew Trump was okay, used it as a photo op. Although the main goal of Secret Service is like get the- To cover the- Get the guy out of there. Right. Period. In the story. There is no like, hey, I'm going to stand up.

and do this thing, fight, fight, fight, and let me get my shoes. I understand where people saw that, but I don't necessarily think it's a conspiracy on the Trump side. I absolutely think it's a conspiracy on the other side. Who was Thomas Crooks? Who did he interact with? Why was there FBI informants or agents or whoever that was visiting in his house? Why was he also going to gun ranges that were gun ranges that the Department of Homeland Security

actually also trained at? But I want to play this clip as well. we're getting to all of this because this is talking about kind of the house cleaning this is in congress this is a congressional hearing guys so let me share this and this is the congressional hearing which i thought was pretty groundbreaking check it out have you been getting those messages from people like i have i have not sir you haven't well there's a lot of people in this room that have been getting the same messages why do you think that is why do you think that a lot of americans are like this doesn't add up. This doesn't make sense, guys. How could this many things have gone wrong?

Like the things I pointed out, a 20-year-old kid, got 150 yards of the president of the United States with an AR-15, flew a drone to conduct site surveillance, was spotted with a rangefinder, ranging targets, then lost, had advanced explosive devices on him with no military training. Nobody was placed in the most obvious spot to conduct counter sniper operations. I was the sniper in the SEAL teams colonel. As soon as I got out of the SUV and I saw that sniper, that water tower. I was like, that's exactly where I'd be, but me right there. So obvious. After partisan attempts to bankrupt him, imprison him for 750 years and countless depictions as a modern day Hitler, are you surprised, sir, that a lot of Americans are like, maybe there's more to this story? I wouldn't begin to speculate.

about what the American people think, sir. Colonel, did your team make entry and conduct investigation at the suspect's home prior to this shooting? Excuse me, sir? I've asked that the question. Did your team make entry and conduct any investigation at the suspect's home? I believe we had people that participated in that securing of it. There were bomb assets that we provided. Mr. Chairman, can I have 30 more seconds?

Yeah, yeah, I'm letting everybody come. Okay. on the night of since then. Did you get any reports from any of your agents of anything fishy at the home? I was briefed on. Was there any silverware found in the home or trash? I have nothing in the briefing that I was given. Was it extremely clean, almost like a medical lab?

Were you given any of those reports? I wasn't giving any of them. Okay. That's what I'm here. Interesting. So, so yeah. I mean,

you know, he, uh, he kind of took that guy to school because, there's a lot of stuff that doesn't make sense. And the very interesting thing about this congressman and what he asked this general was, did your team go to Thomas Crook's house before? He said prior to the shooting.

And he's like, wait, what? What did you just say? And he had no idea what he was about to say or what he should say because he's like, wait, wait, what the hell did he just say? Because he had some intel, this congressman, that apparently, a team from our government went to Thomas Crook's house before and prior to the shooting. So what were they doing at this house prior to the shooting? But then you also think about with the reports that we had saw about the people that were

showing up at Thomas Crook's house that had also ties to where the same cell phones were going to FBI buildings in Washington, D.C. Was this what they were referring to? And when you asked him, it was pretty obvious that he's, you know, when he asked him, it was pretty obvious that he did not know what to say at all. Yeah, it's just crazy that all these shootings that are happening lately, you know, everyone's looking towards the FBI. And when you think about that, if the FBI had anything to do with this,

they're the ones investigating all these things. And that is the problem with all of this is I almost feel like, you know, even like with this shooting at ice, this ice facility in Texas, the FBI is, is investigating. Yeah. It's not local police. It's not these other people. It's the FBI.

And I think a lot of people are beginning to feel like they don't trust the FBI. And when they're investigating their own cases, who do you believe? Yeah, I mean, the FBI, I mean, thinking about Cash Patel, I've said this a million times. You know, Cash Patel went on all of these podcasts leading up to his nomination as the FBI director. You know, he went on him for a year and a half, two years. You know, I had said this on our telegram, by the way. follow our telegram go out there and check out our telegram and as an investigative podcast you can find us go there we do live streams or or live audio chats

usually like every other night so we're talking with you guys we're getting theories we're we're kind of uh bouncing stuff off of you because so much of what we do on this podcast for so long has been based on your opinions we're a team here so it's not just us right but um but one of the things was like cash betel you know he went on podcast for two years and he made everybody think that, you know, if I was ever this and if I was ever FBI director, if I was ever in a position of power, that I will do all of these things to make sure that we have answers on day one. But yet he is FBI director.

What is he said about the Epstein files? Well, he said recently in a congressional hearing, yeah, not only that, he said, we know based on evidence, that's what he said, that Jeffrey Epstein didn't traffic anybody to anyone. So what you're basically saying is all the witnesses that we know for sure of are liars. Because we did at least have in the Gislaen Maxwell trial at least four or five witnesses. You have Virginia Jewfrey, which supposedly died after a bus accident, which no one said was, you know, all the witnesses said was like a fender bender. There's no way that she was injured whatsoever. Oh, but then she was sick and dialysis with her kidney.

and her kidneys were failing. There was all these crazy stories going on around her. And she was a young chick, like in her 40s. Yeah. And she had, you know, she had posted an Instagram picture of black eyes and bruised and all this stuff. And, you know, she died. And she died because she has so much information.

I think that if, if like how Cash Patel and Pam Bondi and all these people are saying that Epstein wasn't nobody, don't worry about Epstein. you know, he is, he didn't traffic anybody, anybody. The only thing we found on the laptop is child P. Well, I wasn't going to say that word because it's YouTube. But anyways, yeah, child P. It's the only thing we found, guys. And so we don't have to look at this anymore.

And every time that the media asked Trump and Pambani and all of them about, you know, what is the, what's the, you know, are you going to release the files? And they're like, quit asking us about the files. They get pissed off, frankly. about the files. And then Trump said it's a hoax. It is a left-wing hoax. That is what we're seeing, guys. It's a left-wing hoax. We need to quit looking at this. Like, why do we care about someone this dead is what Trump said? So whereas I, for sure, leading up to the 2024 election, you know, I was like, look, we got to get Trump in because there's no way in hell I'm voting for,

you know, for Joe Biden or Kamala Harris. Or the Bahamas or whoever. They all go together. They're all tied together. Yes, but also at the same time, that doesn't mean we should not hold who is in office now accountable. And I think that that's very important. Now, I did want to also, because I know this is talking a lot about Thomas Crooks at this point, and we'll get in some other stuff. But here's a good video I found. And this was not long after the assassination attempt, but I wanted to at least play this because I thought it was pretty good. So here we go.

So this is an ex-account, and he talks about we still don't know anything about Thomas Crooks. Donald Trump's Butler-Pensylvania rally will go down as one of the most historically significant political rallies in presidential history. But the act that made it so significant is already the most forgotten. It's now been five months, almost six months since Thomas Matthew Crooks tried to assassinate Donald Trump at that Pennsylvania rally and killed an innocent and father and husband in the process, we've been following this investigation since it happened, trying to ask questions, and we still know very, very little. What was Crook's motive for the shooting? How did the Secret Service even let this guy get eight shots off?

Why was his house professionally scrubbed? What did the FBI find when they finally broke into his phone? How did a 20-year-old come to possess two improvised explosive devices that they found in the trunk of his car. And what was he planning on using them for? None of these questions, do we have the answers for? It's been almost six months. Ask yourself, do we know anything more about this guy than we did the day after this happened? And the answer is no, absolutely, no, we don't. The last official update we got was on August 28th, in which the FBI told us they don't have a definitive motive and they haven't uncovered any credible evidence for co-conspirators. That's. That's a

That's it. Three and a half months since the last update. Well, yesterday, Republicans in Congress tried to find some of these answers by holding a hearing with the acting Secret Service Director. Watch this. Congressman, what you're not seeing is the sack of the detail off, out of the picture's view. And that is the day where we remember the more than 3,000 people that have died on 9-11. I actually responded to ground zero. I was there going through the ashes of the World Trade Center. I was there at Fresh Kills. I'm not asking you that.

I'm asking you. You were there. I was there to show respect for a secret service member that died on 9-11. You were trying to be. Do not invoke 9-11 for political purposes. Oh, that I'm not. I'm invoking this. You are, sir.

Gentlemen, I would like to ask him a quick, please. You are out of line. Order. Don't try to fully me. Order. I'm elected member of Congress, and I'm asking you a serious. question and you are playing public servant who has served this nation and you won't answer the question on our day on our country's darkest day so instead of answering their questions serious questions from our

elected representatives this guy lashes out provide zero information no new information all he says is we don't want to rush to judgment the DOJ withheld requested info from congress about this shooter they're not telling us what was on his phone, even though they know what's on it. They're withholding information that Congress is demanding. The whole thing just reeks, reeks like a cover-up. This is as high profile of crime as you get someone shooting Donald Trump in the head, and we get nothing, absolutely nothing. January 20th can't come soon enough.

We need Cash Patel in that job, in the FBI director's spot, who, by the way, Cash plans on setting up a 24-7 declassification office, which would be awesome. All right. So there you go. And that was what he said. Yeah, Cash Patel is doing all this crazy stuff he was about to do. And this was before, obviously, Donald Trump got in. Cash Patel.

He was going to have a declassification office. On day one, we're going to do all this stuff. We haven't saw shit from you, Cash Patel or Pam Bondi, really at all. It's all been lies. Yeah, but they do say, oh, we released all the files. We released the JFK files, the M.O. K files, the alien files. We even...

We even released the Epstein files. We've given you file after file after file and there is nothing near to see on all the files. You know, you also got to remember Thomas Crooks, he did make an appearance in a 23 Black Rock video that was filmed at his high school in Bethel, Pennsylvania. And, you know, very interesting because not necessarily putting everything on Black Rock, but there is connections, right? Black Rock owns most of everything. America and not just America, a lot of the world.

And so if you think about like, what does Black Rock really mean? How does that even play into any of this? Well, it's, you know, even with the Charlie Kirk thing. And I go back to this. And so many people still have so many questions. And we do as well. I mean, there's a ton of evidence out there that just, or not evidence. I guess you can say videos.

There's a lot of crazy conspiracy. I mean, there's some theories that are coming out now that are just crazy. they really are and and look I understand like when you don't really give a lot of information when a lot of stuff is not adding up about the Charlie Kirk assassination there's going to be more conspiracies and more conspiracies come out even about Erica Kirk even about like some of her involvement and what she's been involved in in the past and who she was connected with and the fact that she was I guess somewhat of an actor or I guess actress at one point in time and then you know even people are saying you know her appearance as

the Charlie Kirk Memorial seemed kind of weird, right? You know, she, I understand that she lost her husband, but it was like the way they presented her on stage and the way that she, you know, would be on the microphone, she would look up and it was like almost kind of like fake tears. It was like a photo op moment, right? And it was something that they really wanted to highlight. That was one thing that they really wanted to highlight.

Let's make sure that when Erica Kirk does this or whatever, we get this, we get this thing. We get the shot, right? Well, the other. The thing I don't understand about the whole, I guess, memorial slash revival of Charlie Kirk is it was more like a revival and slash political event. It was not really geared towards the loss of her husband. And I don't know. It was just so weird to me.

It was like a Trump rally. Yeah. Really is what it became. I mean, let's just be honest. And guys, like I said, I mean, we're not. We're not anti-Trump and especially Sherry. No, I'm definitely a Trump. Yeah.

But there's still just a lot that doesn't make sense about the Charlie Kirk session. Now, I don't even know if I want to go into this. Let me just see if there's anything relevant that we should be talking about, I guess, as far as Charlie Kirk. I mean, there's tons of stuff. We've done a lot of episodes on this. You guys, there are so many conspiracies. I'm sure you've dove through the conspiracies as well.

but even to the point where like when Erica Kirk did the photo op with her husband in the casket and his hands are laying just like this and she's got her rings on top of his ring on top of his hands and number one people are like his hands don't even look real and well people dispel that saying well it's because they're dead hands or whatever for sure and then another thing is people have zeroed in on the rings and the rings have some kind of symbolization of like freemasons. Yeah. And why are they wearing them?

But I've looked at other photos of Erica Kirk and, you know, other photo ops and she always wears the same rings and so does he. So I'm not sure if it has anything to do with freemasons or not, but a lot of people are speculating that. Yeah, absolutely. Like I said, there's so many, so many conspiracies. There's so many. Number one, you know, if you look at like the bullet, for example, with Charlie Kirk, 30 out six

round, which is one of the largest rounds besides a 50 cow. And then obviously, if you get into the military grade, military great stuff, that is very telling. I mean, it's huge. And this is a round that is made to go through elk and moose and deer and anything you can possibly think of. And not only, hold on. I'm sorry.

Not only do we have to understand that this round is created for hunting, for taking down big game, you know, when you shoot. this through a elk or a moose and you got to think about the mass of these creatures, the mass of these animals. You're talking about probably three feet in diameter or wide. And sometimes those rounds will also go through the bone. They'll go through the bone and shoot out the other side still. And there'll be a gaping hole on the out on the other side of where you actually shot the moose or elk or whatever. And so what you're telling us as the official narrative, is that he was shot with a 30 out six a mauser rifle with a according to tax message is a two thousand

dollar scope and yet it hit him in the throat and somehow there's no exit wound there's no blood splatter behind him and the tent um hardly anyone around him didn't really have blood whatsoever on them i mean i guess there was some reports that say yes there was some blood on some of the people that tried to help him obviously that would be you know that would make sense but you know if if he's getting shot by a 30 out 6 even from a downward angle coming down the throat and back behind him. You had, you had the, what is it, his producer that came out with that text message that say he was made of bones of steel. That's what the, that's the only thing the surgeon can say is that Charlie Kirk was

made of bones of still. Obviously, we don't believe this shit. I mean, this, this is, this is an obvious lie. This is obviously something they're trying to make us believe that is not true. and the problem with all this is like what is true and who is really behind it is it the far left and i understand people that are saying let's not get into conspiracies about israel let's not get into conspiracies about you know benjamin netting yahoo and they you know charlie kirk was kind of going this more anti-israel thing or he was criticized in israel we can't

make it about that because if we do um we're we're basically taking the blame off the left They have this ideology that they want to kill people on the right. So we can't we can't just start creating all of these conspiracies to kind of take the blame and take the focus off of the people that are really involved. And I understand that, right? You have to understand that. But there's still, even if it is the left, it's not just the left, guys. I mean, it's not just Democrats that have some type of crazy group coordination. You know, I don't know what you would almost even call them.

Maybe, why am I blanking right now? But like a shit. Anyways. Yes. I don't know what you're saying, but I know what you're saying, you know, as far as the left, there's so many people out there that are taking their violence to guns. And it's just weird to me that they are even doing that because the left is anti-gun. But they're using guns to kill people on the right.

I don't think, you know, necessarily that when you look at all these shootings that have occurred lately, they have not blamed Israel for any other shootings except for Charlie Kirk. That's the conspiracy that's out there now. So I don't. And by the way, you know the reason for that though. Yeah. And I don't think that. It's the religious aspect. Yeah.

I don't think they're doing that just because it's Charlie Kirk. I mean, if that were the case, if they hated Israel and they wanted to go after Israel, they would use Israel. they would use Israel for every mass shooting to Catholic churches. You know, you think about all that. They have not used Israel. So it's just interesting that they are using Israel for this one. Yeah. And so, well, we got to ask why.

Because regardless of whatever he want to say, I mean, Charlie Kirk was very critical of Israel over the past six months or a year. Yeah, but before that, he was not. I know. Well, of course. I mean, yes, he has been a staunch supporter of Israel. for a very long time. Right. But it doesn't matter about what you did 10 years ago or five years ago or three years ago.

What it matters is is that if you're over the past six months or a year and you have been very critical of Israel, literally including calling out the fact that he believed that Israel knew about the October 7th attacks before they happened. He said that on, I mean, there's videos out there. You can go watch. He also talked about the fact that how much pressure he was under and how they were trying to completely destroy his moral character. how they were trying to destroy his lineage, his everything that he has ever worked for

because he pushed back a little bit on Israel. So when people do say that, hey, could this be Israel? I think it's, I think it's crazy to say that we shouldn't even ask that question. I mean, you know, that that's like saying that we can't ask the question, is it the left because of whatever? It's the same shit. I mean, and, you know, the unfortunate problem is, yes, there are absolutely. people out there that have been hardcore anti-Israel or against Israel and pretty much everything,

and especially since October 7th. Since October 7th happened. And it wasn't even really October 7th. No one was really against Israel on October 7th. Israel actually, they had a lot of people for Israel because they were like, look, Hamas attacked them and that's very bad. And so most people were at the least on the side of Israel. They had more of the public sentiment going for their failure. than they didn't.

It was when Israel went into Gaza and started to basically annihilate everything in Gaza, which actually, if you look at the previous videos and pictures of Gaza, very, very pretty place, actually. I mean, they were on the sea. They had pretty buildings, pretty beaches. Looked like

a pretty decent life or place to live, to be honest, outside of the, you know, missile barrages back and forth between Israel and Palestine for so many years. But I think it was, where Israel lost all, I guess you can say, not all, but a lot of respect or a lot of support was their response to Gaza, to where when we were getting reports of 50, 60, 70, 80, 100,000

civilians killed. And we don't even for sure know the real numbers. Could it be less than that? I doubt it. But I think could it be more than that? Very likely. And, you know, and then also hearing about the blockades from where. IDF was blocking food and aid coming into Gaza.

We know that for a fact. That is a fact that's been reported. That's not a conspiracy theory. They were blocking aid going into Gaza. We also know that when people are showing up to aid sites, they were getting bombed. We also know that like even when people are showing up to aid sites that were getting shot at, including kids, this is stuff that did happen. And that's when, you know, if you want to radicalize the people, if you want to get those people that are waving Hamas flags and all this shit, it in the streets of America, that's the best way to do it.

That is the best way to do it. And then it just completely, it literally completely goes against what actually happened to begin with. Even beyond the idea that Israel may have known about October 7th before it happened. I mean, you've got to think Mossad is literally one of the most advanced intelligence agencies in the entire world. And if you go back and listen to our last episode with Rob, Rashid that has worked with federal law enforcement and military to where he's worked with

Mossad before. And then you talk to other people that know that you can't go anywhere, including Charlie Kirk himself, said you cannot go anywhere in Israel without someone being in the IDF. You know, like you don't just have a music festival to where six and seven, eight hours later people are live streaming them killing Jews in the streets and no military to be found. That's just, that just doesn't happen in Israel. And you can ask anybody that ever worked in Israel, military contractor, military, federal agent, officer, whatever, they'll all tell you that just doesn't happen. You are surveilled in anywhere you go in Israel at any, at all times.

And especially if you are the enemy. If you are right across the border, there's no way that is there's no way you just didn't know that that that was happening for six hours. And then better yet, Jerusalem Post, where they posted, they had whistleblowers that were telling them that Israel knew, about the attack at least a year before October 7th. And they knew the exact date and hour and time that this was going to happen. But they stood down. They allowed it to happen. Why?

Well, because they want Palestine. They want to finally take over that land. You know, the same shit that people are saying about Russia. You know, Russia wants Ukraine. They want to go back to the USSR. But yet everyone believes that narrative. But for some reason, there's a big fight between the narrative of Israel wanting back. Well, Russia has come out.

and said they want Ukraine. They've come out exactly and said, but they said, I don't think Hamas attacked Israel for Israel to take over Palestine. I don't think that's what happened. No, but listen. But you know what? I'm not going to, we're not going to debate and argue about it. I told you I'm not going to say anything. So I'm going to remain silent, but I'm just going to say that our feelings disagree on this one.

Yeah, for sure. Well, that's fine. But either way. So you, but do you disagree? I think Hamas has killed Hamas's people. Well, I'm sure they have because they're a piece of shit. And I think that they're continuing to be killed. By the way, I'm still not even released the hostages.

I'm not pro. I know. But Sherry, I'm not pro-Hamas, but what I am, what I'm not going to do. I'm not going to, I'm not going to debate you on this. And we're not going to, I told you I was going to let you have per se. So either way. My point is, is that there is a lot to be said about Israel.

So what I'm saying is, can we just discard Israel from the conversation about Charlie Kirk? No, we can't. Do I think it was Israel? probably not i would say i mean like if i had to give my honest opinion do i think that tyler robinson acted alone no i don't i don't think tyler robinson at all acted alone do i think that he was acting in coordination with massad probably not that's just that's just my opinion and thoughts and the main reason for that is because it just doesn't make a lot of sense like there is a lot of other people that massad would go after that has influence other than charlie kirk

and then beyond that, like, it would have not happened that way because if Massad would have done it, you know, number one. We wouldn't have known and it would have been way easier. Well, number one. Done, it would be a done deal. You know, it's just like when we had Jason Hansen on that was a CIA guy, he said if we would have come in and done this, nobody even knew we were there. And that's the same way. Massad is the same way. I think they're more intelligent than the CIA.

And for them to screw up that bad, I just don't think it's Israel. Do I think there's other influences that could be, you know, with this? Possibly. But I still, I mean, I think there's a lot of weird stuff going on. And I think it's because people are jumping through all these rabbit holes and looking at this and looking at that and saying, oh, his ring fell off. Like, what happened? How did his ring fall off?

Is this a fake video? Is this AI? There's so many questions. And I think it goes back to the questions are not being answered by FBI for people to jump through the rabbit holes. And that's what Chad and I do. This is what our podcast is. is we jump in rabbit holes and we try to figure out the truth.

Yeah. Unless it's about Israel and then we got to quit talking about it. No, I like you talk. Anyways, but no. So, but that's what I'm saying. It's, we don't know. But I guess the kind of consensus of this episode is, is this far left wing violence only? I think number one is that there's no government entity that is ever going to let tragedy go to waste.

And they're always going to try to blame it on the. other side, no matter what. And I think, number one, if Tyler Robinson or this guy that is anti-ice, apparently, you know, if, or otherwise, we're always going to try to blame whoever best benefits us as a political party or an administration. That's just what's going to happen. And we're also going to not blame people that support and help and make sure that we are supported or have influence in us and whatever. So the problem is, is that trying to decipher and trying to figure out what the truth is is very hard today. It is one of the hardest things that we have as people is to try to figure out what

the actual truth is. What we are going to look for with Tyler Robinson's case with Charlie Kirk is are we going to start actually seeing some real evidence? Like let's get ballistics. Let's get autopsies. Let's get all of this stuff because you're going to have to explain it. You're going to have to explain how a 30 out six round did not go through Charlie Kirk. without an exit wound.

You're going to have to explain that. And an autopsy is a very easy way to do this unless some reason they didn't do an autopsy, which I do find it interesting that they quickly had his funeral. You know, I mean, from the time he died to the time Erica Kirk was over his casket was very fast. So did they do the autopsy? Have we heard anything about an autopsy that has been performed? Because obviously, even if you think that is a politically motivated assassination, the number one thing that is most important is an autopsy

to where you can so where you can see the entry and action wounds so you can see the ballistics you can see all of that because the number one most important thing right now is I hate to say it besides Erica Kirk finding out what really truly happened like what was the round used what was the weapon who actually did it was he involved with other people the other biggest thing is like the American people the American people need to know and people might want to say

well, why does the American people really need to know all that? Well, they do because like shit like this can lead to war. It can lead to war in our own country. It can lead to more assassins. It can lead to more people that want to go out and start violence on the other side. There's a reason why we want to be told the truth and we want to know that justice is actually being done. And not that Tyler Robinson was a patsy, right? Because that's very possible.

I mean, you look at Lee Harvey Oswald. He was a patsy. And I just see a lot of similarities. between the two. Oh, absolutely. We for sure do. And I just realized,

by the way, I did not turn on the blue, I did not turn on the blue light in our background. Oh, so you're going to do it now? Yeah, absolutely.

We're at the end. Let's see, let's see what happens, guys. Blue light. Oh, my goodness. Why is this not working? Oh,

you know what? It's because I didn't plug it up. Oh, my gosh. You know what I think? I actually brought the light in, and then I think I did the little remote and then it just didn't come on. Oh.

Because it, guess what? it's not plugged up okay so anyways um but i think that's going to be it for this there there's just so much there's so much going on right now everybody and i'll be honest you know what i did all day today is i read the bible and is interesting because i mean i used to read the bible back in a day um i read it quite a few times i was like kind of growing up and then i kind got away from the bible and god and all that stuff and then so i started reading the bible today you know, and it kind of made me feel a little better about stuff, you know, just, I started Romans, by the way. So if anybody wants to start reading the Bible, start Romans.

And tell them why you started Romans. Well, I started in Romans, actually, it's interesting because I have this Bible. I have the actual Bible on my tablet and I open this Bible and I go to the chapter. It's like, you know, there's tons of chapters and 66 books of the Bible, to be exact. And so I was like, where would I even start? I know the Old Testament very well. you know, we basically went through all of the Old Testament. We know the Old Testament very well. But as a Christian, as someone that believes in Jesus, I was like, where do I even start? And for some reason, I remember what Charlie Kirk said.

You know, there was a clip of him two weeks ago. He said, you know, I believe that because someone asked him and said, what is your favorite chapter? And he said, Romans. You know, it was Paul's letter to the Romans. And someone asked him, he said, why do you say it's Romans? And he said, because I think that's the Constitution for Christians. And I think there's so much that you can love. learn just based on Romans, you know, if you have, if you have questions about so many different

things. And so I started Romans today again. I've got through quite a bit actually just today. And I can't tell you, you know, some of the questions I've had, some of the things I've had as far as just that were kind of eating at me, whether it be the Israel, America thing and Christianity and Jewish or whatever, it kind of, the Bible really does answer a lot of questions if you're ready to read it and actually take it in and i think guys that in today's world we're going to look for answers in so many different places um you may look for answers in in other places i've been looking for answers in all kinds of other places whether it be you know the internet which is probably one of the worst places maybe you get answers from

uh reading other books of other people's opinions right um about whether cia or or or even Palestine and Israel and, you know, there's always some type of narrative to that. But I feel like that the most based place that you can go for guidance is the Bible. And I know that a lot of people are like, the Bible's boring. Well, I don't think it is if you really truly have in your mind you understand the time we're living in right now. And if you are listening to podcasts like ours to where, we are so lost we feel like as a civilization we're so lost as people we're so lost as you know

we're literally fighting each other in this country right now left versus right uh country skin color versus skin color illegal versus non illegal literally every faction of everybody is fighting i mean seriously it's like just name something that divides us and people are fighting over it and so the only way and the only place i think that we have to go right now at least in my opinion to get any kind of answers to be foundational or based to where maybe that that's the only place I'm trying to go right now. So like, you know, God, you got to give me answers now. I can't go look for answers for for any from any other human or any other man.

I have to look for answers that has been given to us for thousands of years now. And I think that that is what is starting to make me feel a little bit less freaked out about the place we live and the world we live in because although we do look around and we see the world that we live in this crazy and scary and tumultuous and evil. This is not new. This has happened to people throughout history. And there's a reason why there is guidance out there. And I think it's the Bible, but it may not be for you.

And by the way, we're not very religious people at all. It's just something I've been doing. And so I'm going to actually start trying to read the Bible. I was like, hey, maybe you should read the Bible. How many people said that? I don't know. Just like people that say I'm praying. How many times if I said I'm praying?

I'll pray. Do I ever pray? No, never. See, I do. See, that's bad. I know. I know. But it's like if you say to someone, I'll pray.

Yeah. Like if they lost a love love one or something. Yeah, for sure. I do pray. But guys, that's going to be it for us on this episode of Investigators podcast. If you are new to this, if you're watching us on YouTube, make sure you go to our Spotify or wherever you listen to podcast. Look up Investigator's Conspiracy podcast.

You'll find us. We've had episodes. So it's for what, seven and a half years now. I would encourage you to listen in the past year at least because I think we've gotten a little better in the past year than over six years ago. Yeah, but this is a little learning experience today with all this. Yeah, the video stuff. So bear with us.

It's tough. It's just a whole new format. It's a whole new thing. We're usually just used to like, you know, if you want to be in pajamas, doing audio, you can do it. But it's also, I don't really, I'll be honest, like Riverside, where are you at, bro? Like, there's so many things that are not working on this. And then Streamyard is the other thing. It's like video there.

kind of a pain in the ass also. It's just weird, but we'll figure it all out. Bear with us. We love you guys. We're leading into October, which is scary season. We've had a lot of kind of hard stuff that we've been talking about the past week or week and a half. And I know that a lot of you like to listen to conspiracy and the ghostly stuff and aliens. Lighthearted stuff, if that is.

Yeah, the fun. Yeah, the fun stuff. I don't know if it's lighthearted, but it's fun. It is. I mean, it's the fun stuff. And it's been pretty tough on all of us over the past. couple weeks. So yeah, we all need a little break.

We do. So we will have a lot of that for you guys in October. We got a lot of great episodes coming. And like I said, if you are listening, go subscribe to us on YouTube. And we also have a Rumble. That's Investigator's Conspiracy Podcast. And if you are watching us on YouTube or Rumble, go and check us out on Spotify or app or wherever you listen to podcast.

And are you supposed to say click the button or something and click the bell? No, subscribe. Of course subscribe. Yeah, of course subscribe. But also, guys, I do want to say this. If you do follow us on social media, especially X and place like that, make sure you click the bell on those platforms. Yeah, the bell.

Yeah, but make sure you click those because then you'll be notified when we post. We don't post a lot. But the problem is that we're shadow band on most platforms. So even if you log in, you're never going to see our post. The only way you'll see them is if you click the bell to make sure you're notified when we post. Same way goes with YouTube or Rumble or wherever else. So till next time, guys, we love you. Peace out.

Peace out, guys.