Investigate Earth Conspiracy Podcast - Diddy Trial Bombshells | Sex Trafficking, Witness Testimony & Elite Cover-Ups

Episode Date: May 15, 2025

As the trial against Sean “Diddy” Combs unfolds, the courtroom isn’t just revealing disturbing allegations—it’s opening the door to something far bigger. Tonight, we break down the bombshell testimony, the sex trafficking claims, and the elite-level protection that has seemingly shielded Diddy for years. But there’s more. Shocking new connections are emerging—like the ties between Diddy and Maui Police Chief John Pelletier, who was also in charge during the Las Vegas mass shooting. Is it coincidence, or are we looking at a deeper, intelligence-linked network? Many are now comparing Diddy’s alleged operations to those of Jeffrey Epstein—where power, blackmail, and control intersect in the shadows of celebrity culture. From witness statements to elite cover-ups, this case may be just the surface of a much darker reality. Are intelligence agencies involved? Has Diddy been protected like Epstein once was? And will this trial finally expose the hidden structure behind the entertainment industry? We’re connecting the dots—and tonight, we pull no punches.

Welcome to Investigator's podcast. I'm your host, Chad, alongside my beautiful wife, Sherry. On tonight's episode, we're diving into one of the most explosive trials in recent memory. That is the Sean Diddy Combs case. And what started as a string of civil lawsuits has now erupted into a full-blown federal investigation with allegations ranging from sex trafficking and drug distribution to gun possession and criminal conspiracy. This isn't just a celebrity scandal. It's a legal and cultural firestorm with potentially, massive implications. So far, we've seen shocking testimony from key witnesses including Cassie Ventura, who opened the courtroom with raw and emotional details about years of alleged abuse. Other witnesses have begun painting a picture of a hidden world behind the music empire, a world filled with power, control, and darkness. And tonight we break down everything this happened in the courtroom so far, the charges, the testimonies, and what it could all mean for Diddy and the industry that has protected him for decades. We may even get into some of the conspiracy that we've talked about in the past.

Guys, welcome to the show. It is May the 14th of 2025. And for those that are new listening to this episode, you should absolutely go back and listen to our Diddy case, our Diddy episodes where we talk about in detail the conspiracy. We're going to break some of that down tonight. We're also obviously going to cover what has happened in trial so far. But I think that there are so many similarities in the Diddy sex trafficking slash racketeering.

slash racketeering slash all the other things he's charged with. There are a lot of similarities to this and Jeffrey Epstein. We've covered Jeffrey Epstein extensively. Our last episode literally was about whether or not the Trump administration would actually release the Epstein files, the Epstein flight logs, any evidence to actually show who Epstein was trafficking young children to because we had Jisleine Maxwell. We had her in court. There was four Jane Does that came forward.

they testified against, I guess, Gislane Maxwell because Jeffrey Epstein is now dead, although Jeffrey Epstein allegedly killed himself, but most people do not believe that whatsoever either. It was all the perfect storm scenario. Jeffrey Epstein was put into the same, I guess you can say jail in the Southern District of New York that Jeffrey Epstein was. Jeffrey Epstein was under suicide watch. And yet somehow the logs, logging people in and out of this area happened to disappear.

The cameras turned off. It was a perfect storm of murder. And they murdered Jeffrey Epstein because they knew if they had to bring Jeffrey Epstein on trial that he was going to defend himself. He knew that he was against the cabal, the elites, and I think that Jeffrey Epstein 100% is a complete piece of shit, but he is yet another pawn

in the elite power and control structure of human sex trafficking. More specifically, child sex trafficking. And I think it goes way deeper than that. I'm talking CIA is involved. Even in Besad, you know, we talked about that on the podcast two or three nights ago with Epstein that we definitely feel like CIA was involved.

Yeah. But even other countries could be involved in this sex trafficking schemes that blackmail very prominent people in America. Absolutely. And I think it should not surprise anybody that you now have one of the biggest media moguls in the world that is also implicated in something very similar. Sean Diddy Combs, for those that do not know or didn't grow up in the, I guess you can say early 90s, late 90s, early 2000s, Sean Diddy Combs was huge.

I remember it was like every teenager's thing that they did in the 90s that you would go on MTV, you would watch TRL, Total Request Live, you'd watch all these shows, right? When you got home from school, you want to see what the hottest songs were, who were the biggest artist. And for those that do not know a lot about Sean Diddy Combs, P. Diddy or Puff Daddy when he first originally came out was all over these shows. I mean, he had all of his songs in the top 10, the top 15 continuously. And not only that, he always had other artists that was in his videos. He brought in people from everywhere. He made a lot of these people very famous during this process. And it's almost kind of like the whole conspiracy about

the Illuminati. For those that know anything about the Illuminati, there is this belief that the Illuminati, you kind of almost have to sell your soul to the devil, right? You have to say, look, for me to be famous, I have to commit to your commands. I have to do whatever it is that you tell me I am to do. And if I do those things, if I denounce everything I've ever believed in, my morals, my everything, then I can be famous. And that's why they always say selling yourself to the devil because the devil is in the details. The devil is in the system and the devil is in the power structure. And that is what mainstream media does a lot of.

But that's also what mainstream music, mainstream Hollywood does. They have this evil control structure around it. And if you do not comply with that control structure, then you aren't going to be famous. And, you know, you go back to Harvey Weinstein, you know, the director that had so much power and control over Hollywood. for whatever reason, they did go after Harvey Weinstein. And I say for whatever reason, obviously this guy was a piece of shit. Yeah, but he was not the only guy that did the things he did. There was all kinds of producers and directors that did the same thing to women.

You know, they basically had to give up sex to get apart. Yeah, absolutely. And this is what's happening in the music industry. And we look at P. Diddy. And for example, in the 90s, you know, he, when he was really big, he was heavily influenced by Clyde Davis. Yeah, Clive Davis, yeah. Well, Clive Davis was the biggest in the music industry back in the day.

And I think the difference, though, with even Harvey Weinstein, at least from what we understand or know, Harvey Weinstein was one of the biggest, I guess, directors or movie producers in the world. And so so many of the actors, especially actresses that you know today had to go through Harvey Weinstein to become famous. What does that mean? Well, what that means is that he used his power to the benefit and control. of sex. Did Harvey Weinstein have houses that had video cameras set up throughout to blackmail

these celebrities? I don't know. That would be a very good question to know. We have not heard anything about that as of now, but I almost guarantee you that there is some celebrity or some producer, some director, some very high elite in Hollywood. I'm talking about movies and TV that is operating very similarly as Diddy has. There's tons of homes. And I'm talking about the blackmail thing. So for those that don't maybe understand, you might be looking at the Diddy case as, well, he just was a freak. You know, he loved, he loved orgies. He loved the sex parties. It was all for his benefit.

It was just something that, you know, he had to have. He was a sex addict. Maybe you're thinking, you know, he had all this baby oil. But I don't think that's what it was. I think Diddy was a controlled operative. I think he was a controlled operative very similarly to Jeffrey Epstein. And although you do have to, I guess, find someone that has the mindset that would be willing to do the things that Did He

did and Epstein did. And this is what we talked about on our last episode. If you guys want to go back and listen to our Jeffrey Epstein episode, we talked about whether or not Trump and the administration would ever release the files of Jeffrey Epstein. But when you are recruited by the CIA or Mossad or whoever, but I know, especially the CIA, if you're recruited by CIA, one of the things they do, they do various tests. and they do test to check your morality and your manipulation tactics and all of this stuff. They only hire the people that don't have backgrounds in law enforcement or anything that's going to be suspect,

especially if you're in a foreign country like Russia or China. They don't want Russia and China to be able to look you up and say, well, this guy was like FBI four years ago. So we're definitely arresting this guy. We're going to take Joe and Blow off the street. We're going to make him to a CIA operative, a spook. And we're going to do all these tests to determine whether or not he. would be the right fit. I think that they do the exact same thing in cases like P. Diddy.

I think they do the exact same thing in people like Epstein. Epstein was someone that was afforded so much access and luxury and power and benefit with zero credibility to back it. Yeah, I know. He was into investing people's money and he didn't even have a degree to do that. No, he actually quit college, if I'm not mistaken. I don't even think he was that smart. But he was investing very, very important people's money.

And he was like in the elite. Yeah, structure. Yeah, for sure. And that's what you do. He had the access. The number one thing is like, let's grant access for Epstein and let's control Epstein. And let's promise him all these things. Let's make sure he sells his soul to the devil.

And that's what Epstein, I believe, did. And the devil you can say is, you know, like in the Bible, it talks about the devil not necessarily 100% as a one person. and it is sometimes a system or a or a collaboration of events that that creates or is or does the dirty work of evil. And I think when you talk about evil and you think about Jeffrey Epston, you think about P. Diddy. Now, everything right now at P. Diddy is alleged.

And as I go back to Harvey Weinstein, Harvey Weinstein was someone that had this power control, but I don't think necessarily he had all of the, all of the blackmail structure as Diddy. and Epstein did. But for some reason, they wanted to take him out, which in my opinion, it makes me believe that he was someone that they had to cut ties with if he was connected to this scheme. I don't know that he was. But every time something starts happening or coming out to where it's going to implicate someone that is in higher power or control of this ring, they got to take that ring out.

Well, and I think in this case, it was the civil court case that came out first. when all these people started suing him and saying this is what happened, when they felt comfortable and got away from him from some time and brought out this civil suit, that's when they decided they had to indict him. Yeah. Because they couldn't hide it. And that very well could be the case. And so they started to think, well, shit, we got civil lawsuits everywhere. We're going to have to now step in because we're going to have to control the narrative. Obviously right now, we're not talking about the civil lawsuits necessarily.

we're talking about this federal trial. And so they're going to be able to control the narrative of this trial, especially if Diddy is in any way, shape, or form involved in some type of higher structure of power, manipulation, whatever. But I want to start here. And we're going to also get to in just a little bit connections with even the captain of the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department to where this guy was a captain. and we're talking about John Pellateer. He was a captain during the Las Vegas Harvest 91 shootings, and which was for most people, they believe it was a completely botched investigation.

There was a cover-up conspiracy. There was a lot more that went on with that shooting that killed a lot of people than we can even imagine. So instead of being demoted or just, you know, fired or kicked out of law enforcement forever, he was instead sent to Maui, where he became the Maui police chief. He even took a pay cut to go to Maui,

to be the police chief. Yeah, but three months later, they did give him a pay raise. Yeah, they gave him a pay raise, but he was there just before the Maui fires happen. And for most people that believe anything about the Maui fires, as the Maui fires was intentionally set,

and it was set for land or land control or land grabs. It goes so deep, but just understand this. We're talking about corruption in Las Vegas. We're talking about potential corruption in Maui. And then John Pellateer, this guy we're talking about, that once captain and police chief of Maui is also named in the Diddy suit.

And this Diddy suit, it was named that he literally was like one of Diddy's right-hand man. So how is it that this guy that may have controlled or had some type of hand in the controlled narrative of certain massive events is also just so happened to be connected to Diddy? It's nuts. But what I do want to do is that we had had Ian Carroll on. back in the day. And I say back in a day.

But when I say back in a day, I mean like a year ago. Like last March. Yeah. Yeah. When this thing happened, we had Ian Carroll on. And for those that do not know who Ian Carroll is, Ian Carroll has kind of transcended media. And he does a really good job at explaining things in very short timeframes about what is going on. And he did a video about the Diddy charges, but also the Diddy Empire, everybody that's

connected to Diddy. how all of this means anything. And we had brought Ian Carroll on our show on X. By the way, if you guys want to go follow us over on X, just type and investigate Earth podcast. You'll find us also on Facebook, Instagram, or wherever you do social media. But we had Ian Carroll on our live stream about a year ago when this thing first broke. And Ian Carroll kind of went down and explained a lot of what he's going to say in this video.

But I do want to play this before we get into the trial, before we get into some of the testimony of what's going on. and whether or not Diddy is actually going to be found guilty of this. Because I don't think necessarily the prosecution is doing a great job right now, especially some of these bigger charges that could actually land Diddy in jail for either 25 years to life. They really have to prove this one thing that I don't think they're doing a great job at yet. But let me play the Ian Carroll clip about how all of this kind of started. Listen, the Jeffrey Epstein of the music and entertainment industry.

The new lawsuit that just dropped against Diddy is massive and it has photos, it has videos, it names names. And there's so much here that it's never going to fit into a single video. So I'm going to do a quick overview in this video and then I'm going to do a couple of parts breaking down all the different aspects of what's come out so far. We're talking crime scenes. We're talking photo evidence of celebrities like Cuba Gooding Jr. We're talking record label executives.

We're talking hidden cameras in every room of the house, getting recordings of celebrities, executives, politicians, at parties with celebrities and underage girls, with drinks being spiked, with drugs. This goes all the way back to the murder of Tupac and Biggie. We're talking about the entire rap and hip-hop industry and the whole music industry at large. But to be clear, this is just opinions and speculation. These are not statements of fact. When I show sources in the background like the court case, you should take those for just what they are.

I'm not saying that all of this is necessarily real. So what's happened just now? is that this man, Rodney Jones, who is a music producer, that worked with Sean Combs, who is Diddy, he just filed this lawsuit. And he didn't just file it against Diddy. He filed against the executives at all of the companies associated and against the companies like Universal Music Group. His lawyers claim that he has secured hundreds of hours of footage and audio recordings of Diddy and his staff and his guests engaging in serious illegal activity. It's illegal for lawyers to make these claims if they don't have reasonable belief that this

evidence is legitimate and exists. They could get disbarred for making these claims if they're not true. And some of that evidence is present in this lawsuit, like when Diddy allegedly shot a man. And then the LAPD saw that room in the photo, the bathroom with all that blood, and were on the scene for hours and no arrests were made. They went with the explanation that Diddy told his staff to give, which was it was a drive-by shooting. Diddy made it clear that his head of security, Fahim Muhammad, had the power to make people

and problems disappear. This guy. And all of Diddy's staff were instructed to contact Mr. Muhammad if they were ever pulled over by the police in Miami or California. Diddy often bragged about having law enforcement under control.

Although the deeper you look, the more it looks like people above him and above law enforcement had him under control. And I got to stop here for a second because we're talking about Muhammad. He was the bodyguard of Diddy. Obviously, he has massive connections.

Now, there's one thing. right if you have connections in say a local law enforcement agency whether it's a sheriff's department or police department we've had a couple of episodes on that over the past month where we talk about sparking we talk about um the scott spivey shooting in in ory county south carolina and this is kind of local to us but there is corruption in law enforcement for sure i mean we acknowledge that absolutely and but in this case in particular you had mohammed which was a bodyguard i don't know exactly where Diddy got this guy from. But what we do know is that obviously he had some connections to law enforcement.

And it wasn't just in a local town. It was in both California and Miami. These are two massive places. And I'm thinking Los Angeles, California and then also Miami, Florida. How did he have these connections? Who is this Muhammad guy? And how is he connected to Diddy? But more specific, likely how is he connected to the system that is above Diddy?

Because I guarantee you, they sent someone. as like their archangel if you want to go biblical. They sent someone to protect their boy, which is ditty. They're like, hey, you got to go and be this guy's bodyguard. If he ever gets to any shit with local law enforcement or whatever, you're our guy. You're maybe a spook, CIA guy who knows. But you are on him. That is your job is to protect him.

Yeah, this guy. Yeah, this guy was basically in with law enforcement. And in order to get away with things such as murder, you need somebody in place like that. Yeah. Because it is stated or supposedly that Diddy was in charge of maybe even two murders that we know about of very famous people. Yeah. And one of those being Tupac, obviously, you know, Tupac Shakur, which was murdered in Las Vegas. And this was way back in a day.

So I don't know if Muhammad was around during that time, not necessarily. They probably had someone else on the case at that point. But there is someone locked up in jail right now for Tupac's murder. It seems like all of the evidence really points back to Diddy potentially. Yeah. And there was a drive-by shooting in his studio also that involved his son's friend. That was another suspicious murder. And if you even look into his first wife, she died suspiciously as well.

But then you also have J-Lo. I think there was a shooting, I think, in a club at that point as well, that they also got away with. and J-Lo was kind of involved in all that stuff. I mean, it's nuts. It goes really deep. But you don't just get away with all of this shit if you're just some random person. Even if you are a music mogul, even if you are some type of highfaluting music industry executive, because he technically is, I mean, Sean Diddy Combs is a music executive of Bad Boy Records. Exactly.

And, you know, when he started, which Ian's about to talk about here with Clive Davis and Bad Boy Records, there's something to this. What I would love to know is who Muhammad is, because I guarantee he's tied to the government, just like I'm sure Epstein had someone very similar as Muhammad. Yes. We'll go more into these cases in the detailed videos, but now the bigger picture. See, Diddy has been one of the most powerful people in the rap industry ever since the 90s when he founded Bad Boy Record. And he was only 24 when he founded it. He started his career as a non-paid intern at A&R until he was then fired in 1993 when he was 24 and founded his own label, Bad Boy Records, later that year. So how does a 24-year-old found a massive record label on his own?

Well, when you dig further, you realize it wasn't on his own. It was with the help of Clive Davis, his mentor. And the further into it all you dig, you realize that Clive Davis came out as gay later on, and there's a lot of rumors that him and Diddy were in a relationship. throughout this time. This is going to come up over and over and over, just by chance. Clive Davis has been running significant portions of the music industry since our parents were kids listening to music, responsible for artists like Aretha Franklin, Alicia Keys, the Grateful Dead, then later Usher, Outcast Pink.

But back in the 60s and 70s, like Janice Joplin, Santana, Aerosmith, Pink, Floyd, like, come on, read it. And it wasn't just Clive Davis over these people. He was over people, you know, as some of you know, Sherry and I were in music. I was in music. Sherry kind of was a, I guess a manager to me back 14, 13 years ago. But even before that in the 90s, you know, that was one of- But I didn't sleep with anybody just so you guys know.

No, she didn't. Just Chad. That's why I am not a musician now. So you didn't do your job directly. I'm just saying, what the hell? That's why I should have got someone up. But either way, you know, when you're growing up in the 90s, And, you know, these artists like Backstreet Boys, Insink, you name it.

Everybody that was mainstream famous in the 90s, if you looked up who or where they came from, it was typically Clive Davis. Yes. So as an aspiring musician back in the day, I was like, you know, Clive Davis is the guy. He is the man over music. And I always wondered why I didn't make any music, but maybe I just didn't like dudes enough. I don't know. Or you didn't do your damn job.

See, that's what I think it is. One of the two. But it's very interesting with Clyde. Davis because that is how Diddy really got his start was with Clyde. And then Ian says they were in a relationship. I don't think they weren't in a relationship. I think that possibly Diddy was a victim. Very well could be.

Let's listen to some more of this. Specifically claims that they were trying to groom him to do gay stuff, which has long been the talk of the town and the rap industry by people that aren't with it. Diddy allegedly showed him a tape from a secret recording that he just happened. happened to have of Jones' idol having gay sex with some white guy. And then Diddy apparently told Jones that he had engaged in gay sex with this redacted rapper and that redacted rapper and his idol, Stevie J. And apparently he also promised to make sure that Jones would win producer of the year at the Grammys if he did gay stuff on camera. Although, to be clear, he wasn't explicitly

saying on camera, but Mr. Jones discovered that Diddy had hidden cameras in every room of his home. I'm going to guess that Diddy didn't learn how to wire a whole house with cameras on his own. Kanye has accused Diddy of being a Fed many times. Diddy's also been accused of ordering the hit on Tupac many times. And when Diddy was asked about this on a podcast, this was his response. When you start digging into allegations of the CIA, the FBI, the Mossad having tentacles in the music industry, you wind up at total rumors like this. Former CIA agent admits agency created gangster rap to fill private prisons by glamorizing criminality. Claims like famous hip-hop lyrics of the legendary hip-hop outfit NWA were even

scripted by a team of psychologists and war propagandists inside the CIA, according to this former agent. Obviously, these are just totally rumors and conspiracy theories, no truth to this whatsoever. But it leads you to people like Lear Cohen, who might be the most influential person in the last hundred years of music. Because he ran Def Jam and made Jay-Z who he is, including Red Man, Method Man, DMX, J-Rul, Ludacris. But it's... doesn't stop with rap music. We got Bon Jovi, Mariah Carey, Shania Twain, Elvis Costello, Ashanti, nickelback, slit not, some 41, The Killers, Slayer. But then we've also got his protege, Julie Greenwald, that got elevated through this merger that he brokered and managed the Black

Keys, Bruno Marr's, Death Capric Cutie, Jason Marantz, Kid Rock, Lupe Fiasco, Wiz Khalifa. That would be this Julie Greenwald. And then we've got Lucan Grange, the CEO of Universal Music Group. He's the one that is directly implicated and named in this lawsuit. It is alleged that he attended these parties with underage girls and with sex workers and he knew that they were spiking drinks, etc., etc. But when you're talking about Diddy, you've got to also talk about Justin Bieber, who was managed by Scooter Braun, along with Kanye West, Ariana Grande, Demi Lovato,

etc. Scooter Braun is a really big player in the modern music industry. We also got Cy, Carly Ray Morris, Martin Garrick, Kanye West, Black Eyed Peas, David Gretta, Little Dicky. So you might not remember, but back in the 90s, Tupac and Biggie were both coming up, and they were both talking about leaving their records that we've shown the people involved in those records already and starting their own. And Tupac was starting to speak out a little bit maybe about the state, the nature of the industry. Diddy was close in the middle of that and there's a lot of rumors that he ordered the hit on Tupac. Diddy sort of rose to power on the power vacuum of Tupac and Biggie both leaving the scene. And he has been manipulating and running a huge portion of

the industry from the inside ever since. And this court case directly alleges with lots of evidence that he has been running a sexual blackmail scheme that entire time, promoting artists that that would engage in the sexual blackmail scheme and then do their bidding there because there's not just him acting alone and pushing out ostracizing, blacklisting, attacking artists that wouldn't. So maybe you should go back

and listen to some of like Kanye's interviews and see if he sounds quite so crazy after all. So as you heard from this Ian Carroll video is this power and control structure of the music industry. You know, when Biggie and Tupac were starting to think about leaving their labels. Number one, Tupac and Biggie, it was West Coast, East Coast, for those that don't remember. It was a rap battle.

It was a gang war is what they were trying to set up from the East Coast side and the West Coast side. You had Tupac, which was heavily always involved in the West Coast side of things. Snoop Dog was another one over there. Snoop Dog is, I don't even know how old he is, but he's been around for a while. And so he was kind of involved in all that as well. Then you had Biggie Smalls. You had all the East Coast rappers. They were trying to create this kind of gang war between the two sides.

And it seemed like as both artists started to figure out how screwed up the music industry actually was, that's when they started to think about leaving their labels because they knew that their labels had a lot of control that they didn't necessarily agree with. Maybe they didn't agree with the stuff that was going on. But this is how the power of the music industry kind of evolves. and this is exactly what happened. I want to get into some of the testimony so far from this case. Cassie Ventura recalled in 2016 a hotel altercation seen on video footage after being shown a clip from the incident during the second day of her testimony. She recounted that Combs was yelling and threw something that heard during the attack.

She said that she told Colms via text message. She had a black eye from the incident and reminded him of a person. premiere she was supposed to attend. And she says, you are sick for thinking it's okay to do what you've done. She wrote in a text of Combs. Please stay far away from me. Now, for those that don't know who Cassie Ventura is, she was professionally known as Cassie, which I remember her actually.

And she was an American singer, model actress and dancer. She rose to fame in the mid-2000s with her debut single, Me and You. That was 2006, which was a hit under Bad Boy Records, obviously under Sean Dedy Combs. She got into a romantic relationship with Diddy. Cassie and Diddy were in a long term on and off again relationship. And that lasted for about a decade from around 2007 to 2018. And then during their time together, Diddy was not only Cassie's romantic partner, but also her mentor and boss, which created a huge power dynamic that has since come under scrutiny,

obviously in this case. So when she goes on to talk more about this, Ventura felt disgusted and humiliated by Freakoffs. Ventura began to cry during her testimony when asked whether she wanted to participate in every freakoff. She said that she didn't and she felt disgusted and humiliated by them, but she also didn't want to disappoint Combs. Then there was a shift in their relationship. Ventura recalled Combs looking out for her when she first met Sean Diddy Combs. They fell in love. She said while spending time together in studio or traveling elsewhere, she quotes, I think I was just enamored by him.

We were just having a good time. It was really fun at this point, she told the court. But as her appearance, transportation, rent, and overall lifestyle came under Calm's control. Ventura said her music career and record deal eventually took a backseat to allege Freakoss, which left her feeling humiliated. She testified that despite recording hundreds of songs and nine albums while she was with Calms, the work was never released because the Freakoss became her job. They took up too much time and energy to leave the room for other pursuits.

Ventura said adding that she would stay up for several days at a time to party, drink, and have sex with strangers. And the freakoffs could last from 36 to 72 hours at a time. And she said with the longest continuing for four days, she recalled them happening almost weekly for years. And so you're talking about like this artist. And this is just one instance of she was up for three to four days. And there were even allegations in this case and or at least in the court documents, especially some of the civil lawsuits where there were men that allegedly were giving drugs like the date rape drug where they would pass out.

Yeah. And they would be raped. They would have stuff forcefully put inside of them. And it wasn't just women. It was men as well. And these were, in some cases, very famous people that had this done to them. Now, we don't know if this was done to Justin Bieber or Usher or whatever, but we do know that a lot of these big time artists that you know or know or heard of were around this situation when it would happen. And she said, control was everything.

Ventura characterized columns as physically and psychologically abusive. throughout the first hours of her testimony. She said control was everything from the way that I looked to what I was working on that day, who I was speaking to. She said control was an all-around thing to a certain point. Colmes allegedly introduced Ventura to freak off drug-fueled events where he is accused of forcing women to reform sex acts with hired sex workers, which were a focus of the indictment outlined in his alleged crimes.

Ventura said Colmes broached the idea of sexual encounters involving voyeurism during the first year of their relationship, and he would hire an escort or dancer with whom he would watch her engage while he directed them. The singer testified she felt confused and nervous, but I also loved him very much and wanted to make him happy. She testified she worried about making Colmes angry because of how much control he had over her life and career and the possibility that he could blackmail her by releasing images of the freakoffs. Prosecutors allege in court documents that the Combs often recorded these performances with or without participants' consent. So we go to the blackmail thing. That's exactly what this was. And then she said violence occurred frequently.

In her initial statements before the court, Ventura now pregnant with her third child and married to personal trainer Alex Fine recalled her and Colm's early interactions and how she started to see a different side of him over time. She said she met Combs when she was a newly signed singer at 19 and their friendship became romantic two years later. She also described her alleged violence throughout their 10 year off and on relationship, recounted. instance where he knocked her over, kicked and dragged her, and stomped on her head, causing black eyes and bruises on her body. And when asked, Ventura said that the abuse she endured happened frequently.

Colmes has seen attacking Ventura in video footage, CNN obtained and published last year, which shows him throwing her to the floor, kicking and dragging her in the hallway of a Los Angeles hotel room. And this is what obviously has kind of been everywhere. This was kind of breaking down the first day of testimony from Cassie Ventura, which then leads us to what has happened since then. Well, and Daniel Phillip, who was a dancer, I guess, I don't know if you want to call him a prostitute, but they hired him to have sex with Ventura.

And he testified to the same thing that there were points where Diddy took Ventura into another room and he could hear him slapping him around or slapping her around and hitting her because she didn't want to participate in some form or another with these freakoffs with him. And then she comes back in the room. And Daniel Phillips. Sex worker. Yeah. He was just like wanting to hold her and say, it's okay.

Get away from this guy. What are you doing? You know, he felt so bad because he was paid to have sex with her. And he couldn't do anything to help her. Yeah. You know, this obviously is setting up this whole thing with Diddy. Like were people forced into sex? Were people forced into certain circumstances?

And we're going to get into Diddy's charges and what it actually carries the potential sentences, all of that. But. Colm's family, including his mother and children, they've all been present with him in the courtroom so far in the trial. On the first day, his daughters briefly left the courtroom during the graphic testimony involving sex acts.

Bensura's husband also left the courtroom many times during a lot of this testimony. It was pretty brutal testimony. And so... Some of the testimony, I'll just go ahead and tell you guys, like literally, Diddy asked the sex performer guy to urinate in her mouth, and it choked her.

Yeah. It is really bad. Yeah, it's nuts. Now, there are dozens of women and men that have filed lawsuits against calm since 23 alleged physical and sexual abuse. So many of those accusers claimed to have been drugged and then abused while incapacitated. Most of these allegations, however, are not part of the criminal case. So in addition to Ventura, there are three other women expected to testify.

And they'll be testifying using pseudonym. So Jane Doe, victim one, whatever, victim two, victim three, very similar to what we saw and the Gislane Maxwell trial. So Cassie returned to the stand Wednesday, which is today. And like Tuesday, she was wearing another turtleneck dress and a blazer. She took the blazer off as she began her testimony. Prior to returning to Ventura, returning to the stand, the judge was addressing a note from a juror and talking about privacy screens for the viewing of some of these videos.

And during this time, that is when Cassie Ventura's husband got up and walked away. And he just could not hear a lot of this stuff about the videos. that the jury was going to see. But then questions return about Shug Knight and weapons. And so prosecutors asked Ventura about her testimony Tuesday regarding Combs' concern about Shug Night. And Ventura explained that guns were taken from a safe and they were put on their bodies. Ventura also said Colms asked her to make sure that the escorts involved in encounters. Ventura testified that she did so by telling them that she wasn't a cop, which is something she said,

Combs told her to say. for those that don't know who Shug Knight is Shug Knight was like the bad boy of the rap industry He was kind of like the equalizer If you guys have ever saw that movie with Denzel Washington This guy was I guess implicated or known as someone That would murder the shit out of you if you kind of stepped out of line I think he was in some ways kind of the

The intimidator with a lot of these people To make sure that whatever they were told to do And I'm talking about combs and all the rest That he made sure they did And he's in prison now, by the way, for murdering someone. Yeah. And at one point, Diddy thought that Cassie was involved with Shugnight and he blew up his car. Yeah.

Did he blew up Shug Knight's car? So that tells me alone that especially considering how most people looked at Shug Nite, such as powerful figure, that Sean Combs felt like he was much more powerful than Shugnight. But Ventura on the aftermath of the hotel incident caught on video, testimony returned to the infamous video of Colmes beating Ventura in a hotel hallway, and Ventura was shown a clip from the incident. Ventura testified Colmes was holding her phone in his hand during the incident. She testified he was yelling at her and threw something at her. She then reviewed text messages he sent after the incident asking her to call him in a text in which he said that he was surrounded,

trying to make her think that he was arrested for what he just did. And Ventura testified that she replied, it should be okay. From time to time, Ventura rubs her pregnant belly on the stand today. And so she's kind of trying to portray this like, hey, I'm pregnant, whatever. And I'm not saying this bad. But what I am saying is, is that at one point in time, prosecution and defense have been talking about showing some of these videos where Cassie was involved in some of this stuff. And some people say maybe it's not good to show the jury her involvement in some of these videos because as she is on the stand as a pregnant woman now, which is a good thing for the prosecution. Right.

to kind of give that, that viewpoint. And I know this sounds bad what I'm saying, but if you show the jury these videos where maybe in some of these videos, she looks like a willing participant. It seems like at least she was drugged in a lot of these cases. She may look willing when you're, you know, when you're completely drugged. But that's kind of been the big debate.

Should we show these videos with Cassie in it, especially since she is going to be likely the star witness? But what's crazy is, the defense. They had an argument on the first day that she took the stand. They didn't want her to take the stand while the jury was in the room. They wanted her behind the seat so they couldn't see that she was pregnant because it could show some type of sympathy that she was pregnant. But that's why there's been the big debate about whether or not you show the videos with Cassie involved in some of this stuff because it may shed a different light on her to the jury.

So there's been a big thing on that. And so here's a quote from today. It says, you are sick for thinking it's okay to do what you've done. Ventura testified she did not know whether or not police responded to the Intercontinental Hotel, where the incident took place as Colmes claimed. She testified she took a selfie after the incident, which showed her with a fat lip and wearing sunglasses. She said she wore the sunglasses to cover a black eye. And Colmes continued to text her claiming police were at the hotel asking for her to call

him immediately. Ventura testified. She testified she responded to him by saying that was, supposed to attend a premiere and now she had a black eye. She says, you are sick for thinking it's okay to do what you've done. Ventura texted, please stay far away from me. Combs then said I'm getting arrested. Combs continued to text Ventura, writing that if she doesn't pick up, she'll never hear his voice again and won't pick up her calls. And she says, I'm getting arrested. He texts. Ventura testified she was unaware of whether or not he was being arrested, but she texts back,

plugging my phone in and going to bed. You should do the same Ventura applied. She also said, I didn't want to hurt him in that way. Ventura arrived back at home. A friend of hers was there and became very upset. She testified. Ventura testified her friend called police who came to her apartment and started question her, but she wouldn't reveal who attacked her. And the quotes, just in that moment, I didn't want to hurt him in that way. Ventura testified, add, and she wasn't ready. And then after the hotel accident, Combs went to her apartment. Ventura testified that Combs showed up at her apartment after the incident at the hotel, yelling again and banging Ventura testified just commotion. She added it was pretty normal. She then went to the house of a member of the security team named D. Rock because she didn't know many people in Los Angeles and D. Rock and his wife were always there for her Ventura testified. Colmes then came to Drock's house and she went with

him back to Colms home to prepare for her premiere. Prosecutors showed a photo from the premier which faintly shows a bruise on her shoulder. Ventura said she used makeup to cover up the bruises on her face and wore a long dress to cover bruises on her legs. Now there's a photo that shows bruises. Pictures were displayed from the after party of the premiere. And in the photo, Ventura is wearing a shorter dress and a bruise could be seen on her right shin. Ventura testified that she had a larger bruise on her thigh that couldn't be seen.

And testimony then to other escorts used during freakoffs as the prosecutor showed additional photos and listed some names. Now, if you guys have saw this video we're talking about in this hotel with Diddy kicking these shit out of Cassie, you'll know that you don't have to try to look for bruises on her body. He is literally dragging her down the hallway. all the way into where the elevators are. And then he kicks her head.

He's kicking her in other areas of her body. This was obviously kind of showing a moment of who did he really is. The weird thing about this is a lot of people have said, well, you know, we want to play this video down the juror's throat. And although, yeah, you probably should do that to try to set up his character, which is what I believe that the prosecution is trying to do here. Very similar to Alec Murdoch and his case down. in South Carolina to where, you know, he killed his wife and son, but what the prosecution didn't have, which was a ironclad case necessarily for sure, that Alec Murdoch committed the murders against his wife and son. But what they did have was all of his corruption and all,

and all the ways that he screwed all the people out of money throughout his career. And so they used that heavily in his murder trial. And although you might think, like, well, How are you going to use that in a murder trial? And so many people were a question, well, is that why he was actually convicted of murder? It wasn't necessarily that the prosecution or the law enforcement had all the evidence that he actually did kill his son and wife. But it was just we wanted to paint a picture of his character to then paint the picture to the jury that as they're thinking through this stuff, they're like, well, we did see that video over and over and over again. And so he's a piece of shit. We should convict him for sure.

And that's what prosecution can do at times. and I'm not saying that he shouldn't be convicted, but I'm just saying that what he is charged with, you have to stick by what he's charged with. Yeah, but during these texts that he texted her when she was in the Uber with the black eye and the fat lip, this is a typical abuser. This is what they do after the fact. They say, oh, my gosh, poor me.

I'm getting arrested. You got to get over here. You got to do this. They change the table and they put it on the victim. And this is what abusers do. And I know for sure he was abusive physically, mentally, every way possible. But that's not what the charges are about. The charges are about racketeering, sex trafficking, drugs, weapons, all that.

Can they use an abusive relationship for these charges? Well, so here's the actual charges, racketeering conspiracy or RICO. Now, the allegation is Combs is accused of orchestrating a criminal enterprise referred to to by prosecutors as the Combs enterprise, which allegedly engaged in patterns of illegal activities such as sex trafficking, forced labor, kidnapping, bribery, and obstructing justice. Now, the potential penalty for this is up to 20 years in federal prison per count. However, if the racketeering acts include crimes like kidnapping or sexual exploitation, the sentence can be significantly higher, potentially up to life in prison.

And then you have sex trafficking by force fraud or coercion. And Combs is charged with coercion women, including underage victims, to participate in sex acts through manipulation threats and drug use. And these acts were allegedly organized during events known as freakoffs, which involved a drug-fueled sexual encounter that was often recorded without consent and used for blackmail. And so this penalty carries a 15-year prison sentence with the possibility of a life sentence if convicted. Transportation for the purpose of prostitution. Now, this allegation is the charge involves the alleged transportation of individuals across state lines to engage in prostitution

under coercive circumstances, and this carries up to 10 years in federal prison. Then you have forced labor. Combs is accused of compelling individuals to perform labor or services through threats, coercion, or abuse of legal processes. This carries up to 20 years in prison with increased penalties if the offense involves aggravated circumstances. And then you have obstruction of justice and bribery. Prosecutors allege that Combs attempted to obstruct justice by bribing law enforcement

officers and intimidating potential witnesses to prevent them from testify. or cooperating with authorities. Each count can carry up to five years in prison with additional fines and penalties depending on the severity and impact of the obstruction. So we have massive charges on Diddy, but they do have to make some of these charges stick and they got to prove it beyond reasonable doubt, and especially when we're talking about the racketeering and also even the sex trafficking by force fraud or coercion. These are going to be the biggest numbers as far as how long he may stay in prison.

because if they cannot get him on the racketeering conspiracy, which is RICO, it's going to be a much different outcome for how long he may actually stay in prison. Yeah, the defense is going to have to prove that these people weren't coerced into having sexual acts with other people and with him. Yeah. They're going to have to prove that. And they do have three other witnesses that I know are going to testify, but one of the witnesses is refusing at this time to even testify.

Is that because he's blackmailed them or they're. they're scared or what's going on with that? It could be either, right? I mean, there's something probably happened with that. And will we know what actually happened on that? We don't know. But I do want to play this quick video. TMZ has kind of been all over this, this whole trial.

And he does a very, very good job of what happened in some of the very graphic descriptions of what was talked about in trial just yesterday. And as Cassie Ventura testified on, he also makes some good points on, you know, the prosecution did a pretty good job. But there's definitely things they lack in when we're trying to convict Diddy on these massive charges to where, you know, if you want to cut off the head of the snake, even though he's not the head of the snake, he's just one little certain section of that snake. But what did the prosecution do good? What did they do bad? I think that TMZ does a pretty good job to summing this up. And we're going to break it down. Listen here. Day two of the Diddy trial prosecutors won. They didn't necessarily win for the reasons you might think. I will say. say that I think there was a problem prosecutors had, but we have an update at the end of this video

where something happened in real time that could change everything. There was damning testimony, and I think this is why the prosecutors won today, that Cassie said on the stand that Diddy would threaten to release videos of the freak off with her in it. various freak-off, she said, that's extortion. And what the prosecution needs to prove is force or coercion. And there is no doubt, I think, in any jury's mind, that if you say to somebody, I'm going to release video of you in a freak-off, that's extortion, except what it requires is this, unless you do something or unless you don't do something, she has not closed that loop yet.

She hasn't said he threatened to release video of the freakoffs unless I participated in more of them. If she said that squarely, case over as far as I'm concerned, that's coercion and that's enough, I think, for the jury to convict. She hasn't completed that loop and said the threat to release the freakoff videos was so she would do X. She hasn't said that squarely. But there's certainly an intimation there that he was forcing her to do things. Is that enough? I don't know. But it's certainly something.

And it's important if he's holding something like that over her head. Now, the reason I said that it's not what you think in terms of why the prosecutors won is, I think that statement about threatening to release the videos is really damning. But the other stuff that came out in the case, I don't know. I don't know that the jury is going to find necessarily force or coercion, because it's not just what's in Cassie's head, what she fears. It's what Diddy either communicates or insinuates. I didn't hear that today. So I want to give you a couple of examples of this, okay? So they talked about, I'm going to read this actually from a transcript of the hearing. We have a

transcript. So here's what it says. Prosecutor, do you recall all of the freakoffs, Cassie, That would be impossible. Prosecutor, did you want to stop? She says, yes, I was humiliated. I didn't have those words then. I couldn't talk to anybody about it. Prosecutor, did you tell him you didn't want to? She says, yes.

And then she says, I brought it up gently. I didn't want him to just do it with someone else. Remember, they were boyfriend and girlfriend at the time. Were you able to express your concerns to him? And the defense objects, the prosecutor rephrases the question. Why would you talk to him gently? She says, I didn't want him to be angry. So, yes, she says, I talk to him gently.

What does gently mean? What does that mean? And you know that on cross-examination, the defense is going to raise that issue. What did you mean by saying you brought? it up gently because again, it's not what's in her head. It is what he either says or insinuates to cause coercion or create force. I want to stop for a second because obviously the defense is going to tear this up. They're going to say, okay, well, are you a victim or are you not? They're going to try to paint her as a maybe even a co-conspirator or a willing participant.

that is what the defense wants to do here obviously diddy and cassie were boyfriend and girlfriend this time and even when she said i didn't want him to do this with someone else so she was like i'm volunteering to do this because i don't want you do this to someone else i'm going to be a part of this i'm going to volunteer for this is kind of how this sounds and if you're the defense you're going to go on that and you're going to harp on that and you're going to tear that down you're going to say well you know you were a willing participant you had an opportunity at this time to stop what was going on. And what you said was, well, I didn't want him to do it with someone else. That's like saying that, well, I had sex with my wife. And the reason I had sex of my wife, even though she was

forcing me to have sex in my wife or vice versa, husband, the same thing. I didn't want him to have sex with someone else. Right. I mean, there are people that literally have sex with their spouses because they don't want them to go out and cheat, but they don't want them to go out and have sex with other people. So at what point during this line of questioning, uh, Is Cassie really portraying herself as a victim, as a sex trafficked woman? Because or by force or coercion when one of the main things here is you're saying, I didn't want him to do it with someone else. Well, I think the two words, or three words, are four words or whatever it is.

I didn't want him to get it mad. What does that mean? I didn't want him to get mad. I didn't want him to beat my ass. I didn't want him to give me a black eye. I didn't want him to kick me in the chest. I didn't want him to physically hurt me. I didn't want him to drug me.

Like, they have to get into that testimony more. Yeah. Why have they not is the question? Yeah. Why have they not? Why, as a prosecutor, would you not then go through the line of question? And I'm not an attorney. But, you know, on the basis of that, if I'm a prosecutor and I'm asking these questions and she's answering them in this way, I would have then went on and said, well, why would you be worried about whether he was mad or not?

Why were you fearful of that? What was going to happen if you didn't comply? Yeah, what were you fearful of? What do you think would have happened? Has there ever been anything else happened that led you to the fear that if you did not cooperate during this particular event, that it would have led to maybe something that's happened in a past, even though it's kind of leading statements. But what I'm saying is you've got to ask those questions as far as let's break this down because you can't just leave it open by her saying, well, I didn't want him to do it with someone else. That just looks a little suspicious. And for a jury, they may say, well, look, I know she's pregnant right now.

She's rubbed her belly on the stand. But that's also been the fear of the prosecution why they don't necessarily know if they want to share the video of Cassie in these videos because it will potentially shed light on her in a different way from the differential of her appearance in court as a pregnant lady with a boyfriend and someone that, you know, know, is completely out of that world now, at least from what we understand and know. And listen, I'm saying this, too. I'm not on either side. I definitely think Cassie is a victim. And I think sometimes you can become a victim without realization of you being a victim to where you feel like maybe this is just the way it is.

It's a normal thing. And you don't realize until long later. That she came into this dating P. Ditty, who is this famous rap artist that had this record label and he was, you know, very high and tight with everyone. Like he was a big name. And a lot of people are like, oh, my gosh, I'm starstruck. And I'm in love with this guy. And I'm going to do anything I can to make him happy.

And she's an aspiring musician, keep in mind. And Cassie was someone. I actually remember Cassie being an artist back in the day. So she was an aspiring musician. She wanted to become famous. And what was her pathway to fame? It was Diddy. She was right in his house.

she is it's like it's like people i mean this sounds this is a really bad example i should not even say this but it's like people aspiring to be a christian aspiring to know what the truth is about jesus and then you know uh five months later you somehow wind up in jesus's house right and you're like i know that's a horrible example but what i'm saying is it's like this is someone that you felt like was so far out of reach that you just you know you would never ever get to this level of notoriety maybe or just in the company of someone like Diddy. And this was Cassie. She was aspiring.

She wanted all these things. She wanted all these things. And then all of a sudden she somehow connected to Diddy, got into this world. And so these people are willing sometimes to do any and everything to get famous. And that sounds nuts. It may even apply to Justin Bieber. It may even apply to Usher. It may even apply to all these other artists.

But at some point in time, you know, you have to understand that fame is not worth your morality. Fame is not worth the lifelong, uh, just scar in your soul in your mind of what you had to go through to get fame. And I think that there's, that's why it's so many people in the, in Hollywood, in fame, they kill themselves or they get, uh, you know, addicted to drugs is because of sometimes what they had to do to get to the point of fame. Yeah, what they have to endure. And it's not necessarily something they want to do. They feel like they have to do it. But I think she felt like she had to do it not only because she felt like she was in love with him, but maybe to enhance her career as well.

But what it sounds like, her career went nowhere. Instead of being a musician, she was on these freakoffs every week. Yeah. Yeah, they utilized her for the freakoffs. Even though I think she did, like I said, I think she had probably two or three songs released. I think she was featured with Diddy in a couple songs. I remember that name back in the day. But like I said, and like the court documents say, I think they utilized her.

more for the freak-offs than they did her actually becoming famous or a musician. And when you talk about they did, there is a lot of other people behind the they did besides just diddy. I'm talking about his whole staff. They arranged all these freak-offs. Even when they went to hotels, they made sure they had extra bed linens. They made sure they had the body oil. They made sure they had everything in place ready to go.

And then after these freak-off that lasted two to four days, they left. these rooms a mess. There was body oil all over the place. There was blood. It was disgusting. They would have to pay thousands of dollars to have these hotel rooms redone. Yeah, it's nuts. Let's listen to some more of TMZ's report on this. Okay. That's one example. Here's another one. And this gets a little bit graphic. Okay. Prosecutor, did you want to be urinated on? You know, it came out with the sex worker who testified earlier. that he would urinate at Ditty's direction on Cassie. So during the freakoffs.

So, prosecutor, did you want to be urinated on? Defense, objection. And they get into the objection. The judge overrules it. And she says, no, I did not want it. Prosecutor, how did it feel? Cassie, it was disgusting. It was too much.

I choked. No one could think I wanted it. Prosecutor, why were you choking? Cassie, too much urine in my mouth. Prosecutor, who else urinated on you? Cassie, Sean. So it wasn't just the sex worker. It was Sean, according to Cassie.

Did you want Sean to urinate on you? Cassie, I didn't want anyone to urinate on me. Prosecutor, how often did it happen? Answer, often enough. And then, prosecutor. Why didn't you say no? And this is what the defense is going to seize on. Cassie, it was obvious I didn't want to be on the ground being urinated on by two men.

And then she says she never explicitly consented. Well, here's the thing about that. She says she didn't explicitly consent. The real issue is, did she explicitly consent? object. And that again is what the defense is going to seize on in this case. That to convict Diddy, you have to show he did this against her will. He forced her to do it. He coerced her into doing it. And I don't feel like that loop has been closed yet. Now, it may be because she's still on the stand and maybe they will close it, but I don't know. You would think that when they go down that

line of questioning, they would have closed that loop then, and they didn't. So a lot of this is insinuation. And what is in Cassie's head. Now, look, I am not saying that, oh, well, she should have said, I don't want to be urinated on because most people don't want to be urinated on. And that's pretty obvious. And you take her at her word that she didn't want to. And I guess, I guess, get it. To convict him, he has to somehow overtake her free will. Did she express that free will enough for him to have objected either directly or by insinuation? I don't know. This jury may just say, this is on its face disgusting. Nobody wants it. He knew it. He made her do it again. He degraded her. That's enough. Guilty. They may say that. But what if a juror in that

deliberation room raises an issue and says, wait a minute, if you look at the jury instruction, it says you got to see force or coercion or duress. Where is the force, coercion, or duress? Then they start getting into, well, Cassie said she didn't like it. And then some other juror says, well, did she say it? And did he say you're doing it anyway? That would be the most direct thing. And so far, not seeing that. Maybe they think because of the power dynamic, it's obvious enough. I'm not advocating one side or another here. I'm just trying to give you, based on a lot of experience I've had in court and covering cases, that this is what juries do. They could go either way on it. I just thought that this testimony specifically, based on the U.S. attorney coming out in this

news conference, really strong, making, at least made me think, wow, they've got evidence that he forced her, that he said it. And that's what I took away from that news conference with the U.S. attorney. And it's kind of what I got from the indictment. I thought she was going to close that loop, and I didn't hear it. Now, again, that doesn't mean a jury wouldn't convict him, because there are all sorts of reasons that a jury would say, it's obvious. I mean, this is a powerful, powerful guy. She is under his thumb, so they could go that way.

I'm just surprised that it didn't go as far as. as I thought it was going to go. All right. I want to pause here because, you know, when you're hearing this, the urinating on Cassie, that is a humiliation thing. It is a thing that shows that I have the power, I have the control. We also think about this with R. Kelly. That's why R. Kelly's in jail.

He was urinating on people, too. I don't know what it is about rappers and urinating on women or people, whoever, but they have a thing about it. And also, I mean, if you want to get into this, like some of the deep dark depths of just freaky weird shit there are people that are into that as well and so we don't know for 100% sure whether or not that some of these people that participated whether willingly or unwillingly may have been you know okay with this at a time and then in hindsight thinking back with everything and then a prosecutor or a district attorney

or whoever comes to them and says hey we understand that you're a part of this ditty thing what what can you tell us and then they encourage these women to say, well, yeah, then come to trial for us. Tell us about your experiences. And I think in some ways maybe, I'm just speculating, but maybe that's why Cassie is a little bit standoffish as far as she's not dominating in a way that she's accusing him that he was forcing her to do this rather than that's why she won't go all the way there. I kind of disagree with what he was saying just because that's why they showed what happened

in the hotel when he dragged her by. her hair. He kicked her. They showed about her black eye and her fat lip in the Uber. They're showing a consistency of him battering her, beating her up if she does not do what he asked her to do. Yeah. I 100% agree with that. And to the latter part of this clip we're listening to, you know, we're not on trial for domestic violence. But to what your point is, Sherry, it does show a pattern. It shows the control structure. It shows how powerful he was over her. It shows that even in that particular video to where she had her ass me and drugged down a hallway when she had a premiere to go to.

The next morning, yeah. Yeah. And she still didn't call the police. And even the night where this Phillips guy, he was testifying, he said when Cassie was not performing the way that did he wanted to, he took her in another room and he could hear him slapping her. and then they came back in the room to have sex some more. Yeah. That is coercion. Yeah, absolutely.

I 100% agree with that. And like I said, it does absolutely show how much control he had over her. There's no question. I want to get to the last part of this clip. And then we're going to get into a little bit of the conspiracy with John Pelliter and how he may be involved with Diddy. And the fact that the guy that was at the Las Vegas shootings and the Maui fires also shows up in the Diddy. case, insane. Domestic violence. There is a lot of domestic violence in this case. And it is clear

that Sean Combs used domestic violence as a tool in his toolbox. That's pretty obvious. And Cassie testified that there were times when she would have to hide in a hotel room for a week so the bruises on her face would heal. So there is absolutely no doubt. doubt. Well, I mean, there's no doubt just based on the Cassie video that Diddy was brutal. Thing is, the defense is admitting that. They admitted it to the jury in opening statements. And, you know, the thing is that domestic violence is a state crime. And this is not a domestic violence charge that he faces. You know, this involves sex workers and interstate consequences. commerce and all of that. So, you know, his position is, look, this was mutual domestic violence.

And, you know, he will point to what he says were abuses by Cassie. Again, I don't know that that airplane flies because when you look at his size versus hers, you know, I don't know that's going to work. But, you know, they brought up that they want to, they want to introduce into evidence, evidence of a bar fight cast he was in where she wanted to kill somebody when she was high on drugs. So they're going to try to bring that in to show this kind of mutual domestic violence. Again, I don't know if that's going to work, but ultimately, this is not a domestic violence case. And I think that's one of the things. Now, I want to raise one other point. And then I'll stop, I promise. The other point I want to raise,

is the freak-off videos. A prosecution said they want to admit it into evidence, at least one of them. And the defense started objecting, saying they didn't want the media to see it. They haven't done that yet, and it's unclear whether the judge will clear the courtroom, whether the judge will let the jury see it away from the media, whether they sit there with, you know, some kind of a screen where the people in the courtroom can't see it other than the jurors. I don't know whether they do that or not. I don't know what the freakoff video shows. Does it show Combs in any way coercing or forcing her? It's going to be really relevant. The thing that I thought about was that Cassie is coming to court very, very pregnant. And that is hard for the jury to reconcile

with these stories about freakoffs with Cassie involved in all. If they, you know, And that's the image of Cassie they see. If they see that video, I'm just thinking, as a prosecutor, what do you do? Because now all of a sudden, the jury says, oh, yeah, that was her back in the day, you know, when she was involved in this. And she's a very different person from we see now. Do you want to create that dichotomy? In a way, in a weird way, that might be a risk for the prosecution. I saw this on law and crime, I think it was.

It's like if you want to introduce videos of freakoffs, where it shows and betrays Cassie in this environment. Now, the interesting thing is the defense objected to this. They did not want the jury to see these freakoffs. What does that mean to me? It means that it may paint Diddy in a more sinister light than it paints Cassie. Because if obviously Diddy, with the amount of money that he has to hire the defense team that he has, they would be thinking through all of the things that we've been talking about.

And the one thing I'm sure they have come to the conclusion of is that likely it's going to hurt Diddy showing these freakoff videos more than it's going to hurt Cassie. And in the event of that, it doesn't make a shit whether she's pregnant right now in a courtroom. And then they also see her being abused as a woman in a freak off party. And if you guys have saw the video of Diddy just abusing the shit of her in this hotel room, look, there are women that are feisty. Sherry's feisty. There's a lot of women that are feisty that can hold their own.

But you're still a man. And especially Diddy. Diddy's a big dude. He's like 6-1, 62 decently muscular. I'm not going to say he's like crazy muscular, but he's decently muscular, stronger than Cassie is. And it just goes back to it's probably not going to go well for Diddy showing these videos about. this masculine media mogul that has power and control over some young aspiring artist in a situation that has been depicted not only in in trial but also in court documents it's not

going to go well for ditty and people are going to look at this and look at him like a piece of shit and they're going to look past whether or not she was an active or willing participant or not doesn't matter it's going to look very bad want to get into this as a well because this is some of the conspiracy stuff around this. Obviously, the trial is going to continue on throughout this week. And I think the biggest testimony you have heard, we, with the clip we just played, the urination, the alleged allegations from Cassie as far as how did he controlled her and maybe why she didn't want to participate, but she couldn't say that she didn't want to participate. Maybe it was the power of control and she was scared of him. You've heard the biggest

part of what's happened so far in trial. And there are other witnesses that are going to get on the stand and they're going to talk about their involvement. But I also want to bring up John Pellateer. This is the law enforcement officer, the captain in Las Vegas metropolitan police department during the time of the Las Vegas shootings. As we said, he went over to Maui during the time of the Maui fires. And then he was also involved in the Diddy case.

And I'm going to explain exactly how he was involved in the Diddy case. but just to kind of recap and refresh your memory of who John Pellantir is and his lineage, I want you to listen this clip, and then I'll break down how he's involved in Ditty case. County Mayor Richard Bisson is calling for the police chief John Pellitier to be on leave after he was named in a lawsuit, tying him to Hollywood celebrity Sean Diddy Combs. But wait a second. Isn't that guy also the same guy that was in? My name is John Pellateer. I'm a captain with the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department.

But wait, there's more. Yeah, and this article says John Belator led response to 2017 Vegas Mass. No, no, there's still more. That is possible. That's what we're sharing here internally. That is possible that there will be many children. So this article says, as Maui students return to school, many children among 850 missing. after deadly fires.

Missing kids again. Weird. You can't make this up, man. I oversee the major violator and narcotics bureau. Former Metro Police Captain is refuting claims that he was involved in a cover-up related to Sean Diddy Combs. In a criminal complaint, it alleges that current Maui Police Chief John Pellotier was hired to provide security for Combs back in 2018. It claims Pellatee posed as a sheriff's deputy in California to respond to an alleged gang rape involving Combs. The complaint also claims all defendants directly committed violations of aiding, abetting, and inducing the sex trafficking venture and sex trafficking of plaintiffs in this suit.

We got Jim. Look back at his history here with the department shows that he was actually praised for his dedication to sexual assault prevention, which may be some. surprising for some, a given the allegations of this lawsuit. So let me see if I got this straight. The same guy that was the commanding officer at the time of the 2017 Las Vegas shooting, which to this day is extremely hard to explain and doesn't make any sense at all for a mountain of reasons that I can't go into because it would make the video way too long. Clearly seems to be a very manufactured event. That same commander is also,

the guy who was in charge when Maui gets hit with the biggest wildfire in history and tons of kids go missing randomly. And then coincidentally, he now gets named in the Diddy case as somebody who while he was in Vegas was over the major violator and narcotics bureau in Las Vegas and that he was there for more than 22 years and is being named in the case with Diddy? So as you just heard, this is John Pellateer. And I'm calling him Pellateur, not Pellatea, whatever the hell he wants his name to be. It's Pellateer. And this is the Maui Police Chief that has been named as a co-defendant in a civil lawsuit

filed in March of 2025 alleging his involvement in covering up a 2018 gang rape incident in Arenda, California. Now, the lawsuit filed by Ashley Parham and two other plaintiffs claimed that Pellateer, then a Las Vegas police captain, posed as a Contra Costa County Sheriff Deputy in response to Parham's 911 call reporting the alleged assault. Now, Parham alleges that Pellateer instructed her to go home without offering assistance or medical care and handed an envelope believed to contain cash to a neighbor. Additionally, the suit accuses Pellateer of forcefully taken to other individuals from Las Vegas to California, restraining them, and then preventing them from conducting legal counsel. Now, the lawsuit also named Sean Diddy Combs, NFL player Odell Buckham Jr., and comedian Drusky, as defendants allege in their direct involvement in the assault. Now, Chief Pellantir has categorically denied the allegations labeling them as completely false and baseless. He provided evidence, including debit card transactions and affidavits from Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department colleagues to demonstrate that he was in Las Vegas on the date of the alleged incident where he kidnapped these people that were tied to the Ditty case, making it improbable for him to have been in California.

Now, Belis here also challenged the identification of a photograph presented in the lawsuit, which purportedly shows him at a 2018 Super Bowl event with Sean Diddy Combs. He asserts that he has never attended a Super Bowl or has been in Minnesota where the event took place. And so in response to the lawsuit, Maui County Mayor Richard Bisson recommended that Maui Police Commissioner Place Pellantor on administrative leave pin in further investigation. And so if you guys have not dove into the Las Vegas shooting conspiracy and the cover up, please go and listen to our series on the Las Vegas Route 91 shootings. please go listen to that. Also go listen to our John Pellateer episode about the Maui fires and the connections with Diddy. We also have an episode on that. Go listen to all of those because this all kind of ties into the Diddy trial and the Diddy case.

How are all of these things connected? We do not for sure know, but we know they are connected. We always say there is no such thing as coincidences. But guys, that's going to do it for this episode. Make sure you continue to follow our podcast for the latest on the Sean Diddy Combs trial. And as we said in the last episode, we are going to do the book of Enoch series with the Giants and the Nephlam and the Watchers. I'm just not quite ready. I think that will be our next episode.

So just make sure that you keep your eye out for that. And until next time, we love each interview all very much. The name of this song is L.A. made you crazy because I think L.A. makes a lot of people crazy, including Diddy and all the other psychos. I feel a little crazy right now, too. There you go. Until next time, guys, we love you. Peace out. There's no way I can beat it because I got no chance, no chance when it comes to her.